Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.1 Hansen Hill Ranch Annexation AGENDA STATEMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 21, 1989 SUBJECT: PA 89-062 Hansen Hill Ranch/Bren Co. Annexation REPORT PREPARED BY: Maureen O'Halloran, Senior Planner EXHIBITS ATTACHED: Exhibit A: Resolution of Annexation Application Exhibit B: Resolution of Exchange of Property Tax Revenue Background Attachments : Attachment 1 : Letter from Bren Co. dated received December 14, 1989 RECOMMENDATIONS : 1) Open public hearing and hear Staff presentation 2) Take testimony from Applicant and k the public 3) Question Staff, Applicant and the public U�) Close public hearing and deliberate 5) Staff recommends the City Council adopt the draft resolutions Exhibit A relating to the Annexation Application and Exhibit B relating to the Exchange of Property Tax Revenue FINANCIAL STATEMENT: None DESCRIPTION: At the November 27 , 1989 City Council meeting, the Council approved the Hansen Hill Ranch/Bren Co. Tentative Map, Planned Development Prezoning General Provisions and related environmental review (Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program) . At the December 11, 1989 Council meeting, the City Council adopted an Ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance to prezone the project site "Planned Development" allowing single-family residential lots and open space. The annexation was continued in order to incorporate the City Attorney' s resolution revisions and to provide the required 15-day public notice. The 147 acre project site . is currently within the unincorporated portion of Alameda County. In order for the site to come under ----------------------------------------------------------------- COPIES TO:.; Applicant/Owner ITEM NO. -- File PA 89-062 [89062SR] Project Planner General File the jurisdiction of the City of Dublin, the site must be prezoned. Additionally, the City Council must also adopt a "Resolution of Application" and a "Resolution Relating to Exchange of Property Tax Revenue" , which will be included as part of the City' s application to Alameda County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) . The final approval for an annexation comes from the LAFCO. The existing property tax rate for residential areas is approximately 28% . It is anticipated that a similar property tax rate would be applied to the Hansen Hill Ranch property. The annexation proposal has been reviewed by the applicable public agencies and utilities who have indicated services can be provided to the area at a level commensurate to the level of service provided within the adjacent City limits and a plan for providing services is attached to Exhibit A. Staff and the Planning Commission recommend the City Council adopt the Draft Resolution of Application to LAFCO and the Draft Resolution relating to the exchange of property tax revenue. - 2 - RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN RESOLUTION OF ANNEXATION APPLICATION (PA 89-062 HANSEN HILL RANCH/BREN CO. REORGANIZATION) Recitals 1 . Pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Government Reorganization Act of 1985 (the "Act" ) (Government Code Section 56000 et seq. ) an affected city, as therein defined, may by resolution adopted by its legislative body make a proposal for a "reorganization" , as defined in Section 56073 and request initiation of proceedings thereon; 2-. The City of Dublin is an affected city for a reorganization proposal which contains territory proposed to be annexed to said city. 3 . The reorganization proposal would detach the territory described in Attachment A -from the Alameda County Structural Fire District. The territory described in Attachment A would then be annexed to the City of Dublin and the Dublin San Ramon Services District. 4 . The territory described in Attachment A is uninhabited territory within the meaning of Government Code Section 56046 . 5 . The exterior boundaries of the territory described in Attachment A are as shown on Attachment B hereto. 6 . This reorganization is proposed at the request of the landowner within the territory to be annexed. 7 . It is proposed that the proposed reorganization would be conditional upon detachment of the territory described in Attachment A from the district listed in paragraph 3 . 8 . The plan for services for the territory to be annexed is set forth in Attachment C. 9 . This proposal is consistent with the City of Dublin' s sphere of influence. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Dublin does RESOLVE as follows : The City Council of the City of Dublin, as the legislative body for an affected city, does hereby adopt the foregoing recitals and makes a proposal for a reorganization, as described r VM 89062RE1] PAGE. OF q herein, pursuant to the Act and does hereby request that proceedings be taken pursuant to said Act. Be it further resolved that the City Clerk shall file a certified copy of this resolution with the Executive Officer of the Alameda County Local Agency Formation Commission. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of December, 1989, by the following vote: AYES : NOES: ABSENT: Mayor Y ATTEST: City Clerk [89062RE1] - 2 - PAGE-'Z- OF Q RECE�� E� pEC 1519x9 p0151019 PINING ATTACHMENT A DESCRIPTION - AREA 1 DEC kum HANSEN HILL RANCH ALL THAT LAND SITUATE IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA$ , MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A CONCRETE MONUMENT AS SHOWN ON THE MAP OF TRACT 4859, FILED IN MAP BOOK 147, PAGE 56, ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS, SAID MONUMENT BEARING NORTH 3° 22` 00" EAST, 215.36 FEET FROM THhT CERTAIN CONCRETE MONUMENT BEING THE INTERSECTION OF THE MONUMENTED LINES OF SILVERGATE DRIVE AND HANSEN DRIVE AS SHOWN ON THE MAP OF TRACT 2405, FILED AUGUST 9, 1863 IN MAP BOOK 46, PAGE 73 TO 76, INCLUSIVE, ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS; THENCE ALONG THE MONUMENT LINE OF SILVERGATE DRIVE AS SHOWN ON THE AFOREMENTIONED MAP OF TRACT 4859 NORTH 12' 44' 36" WEST, 554.50 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID MONUMENT LINE SOUTH 779 15' 24" WEST, 34.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID POINT BEING ON WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SILVERGATE DRIVE AND ALSO BEING THE MOST SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF PARCEL 'B' AS SHOWN ON THE MAP OF TRACT 5410 IN MAP . BOOK 163 AT PAGES 32 THROUGH 42, INCLUSIVE, ALAMEDA COUNTY - RECORDS; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL 'B' OF TRACT $410 SOUTH 81" 34' 52" WEST, 307.14 FEET; THENCE NORTH 640 39' 05" WEST 474.40 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 'B' , SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF PAGE 3.OF TRACT 4943, FILED IN MAP BOOK, 148, PAGE 1 TO 4, INCLUSIVE, ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS; THENCE ALONG THE GENERALLY SOUTHWESTERN BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT 4943 NORTH 64' 39'05" WEST, 493.20 FEET; THENCE NORTH 48' 18' 50" WEST, 251 .80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 57' 33' 04" WEST, 228.11 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28' -35' 14" WEST, 73,99 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF TRACT 4943; THENCE LEAVING SAID TRACT 4943 NORTH 81' 43' 41" 'WEST, 214.01 FEET; THENCE NORTH 57' 24' 05" WEST, 421.08 FEET; THENCE NORTH 76' 39' 05", WEST, 224.40 FEET; THENCE S0UTu 89' 50' 515" WEST, 53.46 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70' 09' 05" WEST, 245.52 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 64' 50' 55" WEST, 151.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 57' 09' 05" TEST, 778.14 FEET; THENCE NORTH 58' 24' 05" WEST, 264.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 37' 54' 05" WEST, 426.36 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01' 55' 55" WEST, 1174.80 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01' 05' 55" WEST, 1356.30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 55' 49' 05" EAST, 1075.80 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88' 39' 05" EAST, 407.88 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01' 20' 55" EAST, 537.24 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88' 54' 05" EAST, 1328.58 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01' 05' 55" EAST, 131.32 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL 'A' AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP 1168, AS FILED IN MAP BOOK -80, PAGE 21, ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL 'A' SOUTH 81' 08' 00" EAST, 164.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF TRACT 4988, FILED IN MAP BOOK 139, PAGE 69, ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT 4988 SOUTH 81' 08' 00" EAST, 181 .07; THENCE NORTH 88' 23' 00" EAST, 58.75 FEET; THENCE NORTH 77' 57' 00" EAST, 68.63 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF TRACT 2534, AS FILED IN BOOK 49, PAGES 6 TO 9, INCLUSIVE, ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY PAGE of BOUNDARY OF TRACT 2534 NORTH 67. 27' 00" EAST. 58.63 FEET; THENCE NORTH 62. 12' 00" EAST, 427.06 FEET; THENCE NORTH 71. 08' 30" EAST, 87.40 FEET; THENCE NORTH 77- 29' 30" EAST; 87.40 FEET; THENCE NORTH 83- 29' 40" EAST, 158.17 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 80. 58' 00" EAST, 260.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 74° 29' 12" EAST, 1.18 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID TRACT 2534 SAID CORNER BEING ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SILVERGATE DRIVE; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE OF SILVERGATE DRIVE 159.74 FEET ALONG A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 110 26' 26" A RADIUS OF 800.00 FEET, THE RADIUS POINT FOR WHICH BEARS NORTH 88' 41' 50" EAST; THENCE NORTH 12- 44' 36" WEST, 454.48 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 146.840 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. DESCRIPTION - AREA 2 The area bounded on the east by the existing City limits at the intersection of Dublin Boulevard/Silvergate Drive, on the north by the existing City limit line, on the west generally by the terminus of the existing Dublin Boulevard, and on the south by the I-580 right-of-way boundary as generally shown on Attachment B. PAGE 5 OF ASSESSORS MAP 941 Code Area Not.72-001 72-009 ATTACHMENT B seck.i,-300' (DO MAP OF A%JEDV.0 PLOT A CF THE DO"ERTY RANCH(P0R.PtDT69)(8k.15Pg.17) 2 NOTICE 112 T ,off I E LAND THIS MAP MAY OR MAY N17 BE A SU--,V[Y CF T.-* A V'P :kNY PiCTED HEREON. IT !S NOT TO FE RELIED U�-�: u PURPOSE OTHER T.'.AN S:'L' tZ 1-3 1 G-EINEV1 -r.CCAT!0% !-'F rP.-. PA":CEL 0:' r 4.3--S T q Los FIRST AMERICAN TiTLE COMPANY ASSUNI:S lin� LIt.S;!-;Tf F'.-R LOSS OR DAM.ACE RESULT�,:G FROM RIL"ANCEE TF.EREON. 27,72 k 117 22 rz� 100 ja AW 4.0 jkCM 47 A*A� PACE OF • ATTAt-RENT B r� ti Vii•• AV O 1 O v • ~• , 1 ti I r •ice. ws�' •: • •�.t�r t� •� ' ~may , •�•hi ' vri W31MV A 110•�V!A•lOtil A NCea'� •' . PAGE .'OF ATTACHMENT C PA 89-062 HANSEN HILL RANCH/BREN CO. ANNEXATION NO. 7 Plan For Providing Services 1 . Indicated below are the agencies which currently provide public services within the proposal area and which will provide these services if annexation of the site is approved by LAFCO: Services Current Agency Proposed Agency Police protection Alameda County Sheriff ' s City of Dublin Department Police Dept Fire protection Alameda County Sheriff ' s Dougherty Department: County Fire Regional Fire Patrol Authority (DRFA) Water distribution N/A Dublin San Ramon Services District (DSRSD) Sewage collection and Treatment N/A DSRSD Refuse collection Livermore Dublin Disposal Same as current Service Street lighting N/A City of Dublin Street maintenance and sweeping N/A City of Dublin Flood Control Alameda County Flood Control Same as current Parks & Recreation N/A City of Dublin Library Services Alameda County Alameda County Electricity N/A PG&E Cable television N/A Viacom Cable- vision Transit N/A LAVTA/BART [89062 ) - 1 - PAGE OF 2 . The proposed services will be provided at the same level of service applied to other properties within the applicable agency service areas and will be extended upon annexation and development requiring the services . 3 . The proposed project will require the widening and upgrading of existing streets, the construction of new streets, sewer and other structures which will be financed by the developer. 4 . Revenue sources used in the support of services to the site will include property and sales tax. [89062 ] _ 2 _ PAGE,OF q RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN RELATING TO EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUE FOR PA 89-062 HANSEN HILL RANCH/BREN CO. REORGANIZATION Recitals 1 . Section 99 of the Revenue and Taxation Code (AB 8) provides, among other things, that no local agency jurisdictional change can be completed without the agencies affected by such change first having agreed upon an exchange of property tax revenue between and among the affected agencies; and 2 . The County of Alameda Board of Supervisors (Resolution No. 186574 ) have previously agreed to a method for equitably distributing the property taxes; and 3 . There is presently pending an application for a reorganization by the City of Dublin entitled PA 89-062 Hansen Hill Ranch/Bren Co. PD Prezoning, Tentative Map and Annexation to annex territory to the City of Dublin; and 4 . Specific agreement is required for each reorganization proposal agreeing to the exchange of property tax revenues for the reorganization to be completed and filed with the State. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Dublin does RESOLVE as follows : Section 1 . That for the said annexation by the City of Dublin, the -Auditor-Controller of the County of Alameda shall be directed to cause an exchange of property tax revenues pursuant to the following provisions of paragraph numbers 1 and 3 of Exhibit "A" of the property tax revenues redistribution method developed by the Alameda County Board of Supervisors (Resolution No. 186574) . 1) In all annexations involving developed or developing residential territory, as well as mixed residential/ commercial areas and vacant or underdeveloped industrially- zoned areas, the City would automatically be entitled to receive an allocation of the County' s general fund computed property tax revenue from that area, equal to the City/ County' s existing allocation percentage ratio within its corporate limits; 3) In the event that a City assumes full responsibility for a service or services presently provided by a separate County taxing agency or special district within a territory ( 89062RE2 ] crop proposed to be annexed, pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 99 (b) , the County will endeavor to transfer to the City the entire computed property tax revenue presently allocated to such County agency or district from said area. Section 2 . The City certifies that there is no significant commercial and/or industrial development in the area proposed to be annexed. Section 3 . That the property tax proceeds allocated to Alameda County Structural Fire District shall be transferred to the City of Dublin by virtue of the fact that the City of Dublin will assume full responsibility for the services presently provided in the subject area by the above district. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Dublin City Council does hereby agree to the property tax revenues redistribution method stated in Section 1 and 3 . PASSED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of December, 1989 , by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk [89062RE2 ] - 2 - c ...^7y^� 5 �".�f` �A �g WW2.Ya �:Bre1 . Yx a � xf a �i� A. , December 14, 1989 Mr. Laurence L. Tong Director Planning Department City of Dublin 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568 Dear Mr. Tong: The Bren Company, a California Corporation, as the owner of that certain property, Assessor's Parcel numbers 941-110-1-9 and 941-110-2 located in Alameda County, hereby authorizes the City of Dublin to prezone and annex said property into the City of Dublin. Sincerely, DONALD L. BREN COMPANY, a California Corporation By: , Martha W. Buxton Director, Land Acquisition RECEIVED 0EC141989 DUBLIN PLANNING , AG K&-R- AM 0 Big EMER I a Northern Califo:�: R"T,_ A HT, 6601 Owens Drive, Suite 250, Pleasant. L-oca. Z