Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 6.1 Donlan Canyon Annexation AGENDA STATEMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 25, 1990 SUBJECT: PA 89-125 Donlan Canyon Planned Development Prezoning, Tentative Map and Annexation for 196+ acres REPORT PREPARED BY: Maureen O'Halloran, Senior Planner EXHIBITS ATTACHED: Exhibit A: Tentative Map, Site Plan, Floor Plans, Landscape Plans, Building Envelope Exhibit B: Resolution regarding Negative Declaration Exhibit C: Resolution regarding Planned Development Prezoning Exhibit D: Resolution regarding Tentative Map Exhibit E: Resolution regarding Annexation No. 9 Exhibit F: Resolution of Exchange of Property Tax Revenue Exhibit G: Draft Ordinance for PD Prezoning Background Attachments: Attachment 1: Applicant' s letter dated received January 17, 1990 Attachment 2: Applicant' s Project Description Attachment 3: Section III of Initial Study Attachment 4: Negative Declaration RECOMMENDATION: 1) Open public hearing and hear Staff presentation. 2) Take testimony from Applicant and the public. 3) Question Staff, Applicant and the public. V5)4) Close public hearing and deliberate. Staff recommends the City Council adopt resolutions: Exhibit B approving Negative Declaration; � L Exhibit C approving Planned Development Prezoning; Exhibit D approving Tentative Map; Exhibit E making application for Annexation to LAFCO; and -------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------- COPIES TO: Applicant/Owner ITEM N0. e PA 89-125 Project Planner Agenda File Exhibit F approving exchange of property tax revenue; and introduce the Ordinance Exhibit G approving the Planned Development Prezoning and continue to the July 9, 1990, 1990 City Council meeting for second reading and adoption of Ordinance. FINANCIAL STATEMENT: None GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed PD Prezoning, Tentative Map and Annexation request includes the following general features: 1. Project Area - 196+ acres 2. Single family custom lots - 17 lots on 10+ acres 3. Condominium/apartment units - 300 units on 16+ acres 4. Open Space/Parkland - 170+ acres 5. Single family lot size - range 15,000+ square feet to 34,800+ square . feet 6. Emergency access road 7. Detention basis 8. Off-site improvements A. Construction of 5 foot wide sidewalk along north side of Dublin Boulevard from project to Silvergate Drive B. Contribution of projects percent share of Valley Christian Center Road C. Contribution of projects percent share of improvements to widen Dublin Boulevard between Silvergate Drive and Hansen Drive D. Contribution of projects percent share of improvement of additional right turn land west leg of eastbound Dublin Boulevard/San Ramon Road intersection E. Contribution of projects percent share of improvement of the redesign of the Dublin Boulevard and Silvergate Drive intersection BACKGROUND: The City Council adopted a General Plan Amendment and a Final Environmental Impact Report as complete and adequate for the Donlan Canyon site on August 14, 1989. The General Plan Amendment 1) designated the entire site as part of the City' s primary planning area, 2) designated 13+ acres as low density single- family residential ( .5 to 3.8 DU/AC) , 19.1 acres medium-high density residential (14.1 to 25 DU/AC) and 164.9 acres as open space/stream corridor. The Applicant subsequently submitted an application request for PA 89- 125 Planned Development Prezoning, Tentative Map and Annexation for 17 single family custom lots, 300 multi-family condominium/apartments and 170+ acres open space/parkland. 2 - On June 4, 1990, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the application and adopted resolutions recommending City Council approval of 1) the Negative Declaration, 2) PD Prezoning, 3) Tentative Map, and 4) Annexation. Environmental Review: Initial Study/Negative Declaration In compliance with State law (CEQA) requirements, an Initial Study for the project (PA 89-125) was completed referencing the prior EIR certified by the City Council on August 14, 1989. The Initial Study found that there would not be any significant effect on the environment. The initial Study for PA 89-125 Donlan Canyon Planned Development Prezoning, Tentative Map and Annexation incorporates by reference the earlier EIR prepared for PA 87-012 Donlan Canyon General Plan Amendment (SCH No. 88100406) and certified by the City Council, pursuant to Section 15153(c) and 15183 of the CEQA Guidelines. The mitigation monitoring program approved by the City Council established mitigation which is incorporated into the project. Staff and the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of the Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance. Planned Development Prezoning: The proposed Planned Development allows for development of 17 single family custom homes, and 300 multi-family residential units, and zones 170+ acres for open space/parkland use. The proposed PD District establishes provisions and regulations for the single family portion of the project similar to the City's existing R-1 regulations. The provisions proposed for the multi-family portion are similar to previously approved multi-family Planned Development Districts in the City. Significant provisions of the multi-family development and the single family development include: Single Family 1. 10 foot front yard setback for garages with entrances facing the side property line rather than the 20 foot standard R-1 front yard setback. A similar provision was approved for the Hansen Hill project. 2. Building height restrictions for garages with 10 foot front yard setbacks. The PD District would require the height not to exceed one foot in height for each one foot the building is set back from the back of sidewalk. The PD does allow an exception for architectural features and elements and for gable roof elements. The maximum building height permitted in the R-1 District is 25 feet. A similar provision was approved for Hansen Hill. 3. Maximum building height of 35 foot. The PD establishes that the height measurement is taken at the perimeter of the building from the finished grade to the top of the structure. 25 feet is the maximum building height in the R-1 District and height is taken from an average of the high and low point of the lot. (However, in practice Staff utilizes the building perimeter method for measuring building height) . The method for building height measurement is similar to the provision established for Hansen Hill. 3 - Lots 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 maximum height must generally conform to the building envelopes established for those lots in the visual analysis (see Exhibit A) . 4. 15 foot minimum clear and level provision for rear yards and 5 foot minimum clear and level for sideyards. The existing R-1 District does not include a requirement for clear and level. However, the requirement for clear and level areas is a standard provision included in most single-family residential Planned Development Districts in the City, either specifically in the PD regulations for the District or in the Site Development Review Conditions of Approval. A similar provision was required for Hansen Hill. 5. Requirement for decks when clear and level areas can not be provided due to either the topography or vegetation constraints on the site. A similar provision was included in the Hansen Hill Planned Development. 6. 10 foot rear yard setback for shade structures attached to the unit provided the shade structure is not enclosed. This PD District provision defines "enclosed" as having more than one vertical wall. The Zoning . Ordinance currently does not permit structures attached to the main unit to encroach within the required 20 foot rear yard setback unless the property has compensating yards. A similar provision was required on Hansen Hill. 7 . A tree preservation study establishing setbacks, drainage, irrigation and on-going maintenance is required on lots 11, 12 and 13 due to the significant oak woodlands located on these lots. This is in compliance with the mitigation monitoring program adopted for the General Plan Amendment. 8. Minimum 2 covered parking spaces per unit is required. The R-1 regulations require 2 parking spaces per dwelling unit, however the Zoning Ordinance does not specify that the spaces must be covered. A similar provision was required on the Hansen Hill Planned Development. 9. A minimum lot depth of 100 feet, minimum lot size of 15,000 square feet and minimum lot width of 40 feet of street frontage and median lot width of 100 foot are proposed. Multi Family 1. 20 foot minimum front yard setback is required. This is typical front yard setback required in all residential areas in the City. 2. 10 foot minimum setback between building wall and parking area, drive aisle/roadways is required. This is similar to setback requirements for the villages. 3. 40 foot maximum building height with 2-5 foot exception permitted for architectural and gable elements. 4. 35 foot maximum building height is established for the recreational building with a 15 foot exception for architectural features. 4 - 5. The visual bulk and massing of buildings 1 and 2 shall be reduced through design modifications subject to Site Development Review approval. 6. Recycling collection containment areas are required subject to Site Development Review approval. The PD Prezoning request is generally consistent with the General Plan land use designations and policies. Staff and the Planning Commission recommend the City Council approve the Planned Development Prezoning. TENTATIVE MAP The Tentative Map provides specific detailed information concerning the physical layout of the project. Issues which are addressed at the Tentative Map stage of the planning process include the location, dimension and number of lots on the site, grading, easements, off-site and on-site improvements, street dedication, width, and location, open space, landscaping, park land dedication, water and utilities, CC&R's and miscellaneous construction activity limitations. In particular, the conditions of approval for the Tentative Map include requirements 1) for an all weather surface access road to the existing ranch road located northwest of the multi-family project site, 2) for curb, gutter and 5 foot wide sidewalk on Dublin Boulevard from Silvergate Drive to the western end of Dublin Boulevard, and 3) allowing phased final map provided the Valley Christian Center road contribution occurs with the single family phase and any offers of open space dedication and all other off-site improvements occur with the first phase regardless of whether the first phase is the single family or multi family portion of the project. The required Parkland dedication for the Donlan Canyon project is 2.887 acres (based upon .011 acres per unit per single family portion of the site and .009 for the multi-family portion of the site) . In-lieu fees may be paid instead of Parkland dedication or a combination of both may be provided based upon current market value of the developable acreage of the subdivided area. The developer is required to comply with the City's Parkland dedication requirements prior to issuance of building permits or final map approval which ever occurs first. The 170+ acres of open space if offered for dedication would not qualify for Parkland dedication in that it is not an active recreation area such as a playing field or basketball court, and -is not designated in the General Plan or Master Plan of Parks as Parkland. As a condition of approval for the Planned Development Prezoning and Tentative Map, the open space area is required to be maintained and owned by the City (if offered and accepted) , or another agency/Land Trust acceptable to the City. Currently, a one acre parcel of land situated south of the project site between the improved portion of Dublin Boulevard and the Applicant' s property line, is owned by Alameda County as unimproved right-of-way. Once this area is annexed to the City of Dublin the City will own the one acre area. 5 - The Applicant is proposing a land trade in order to utilize this one acre parcel within the multi-family portion of the project. The Applicant proposes to trade land adjacent to (west of) the terminus of Dublin Boulevard, which the City could then use or sell for the future extension of Dublin Boulevard to the west or any other use the City deems appropriate. Conditions are included in the draft resolution of approval for the Tentative Map, requiring the Applicant and Staff to work together to facilitate the Applicant' s acquisition of all or part of the one acre parcel. Staff and the Planning Commission recommend the City Council approve the Tentative Map for Donlan Canyon. Annexation The project site is currently within the unincorporated portion of Alameda County. In order for the site to come under the jurisdiction of the City of Dublin, the site must be prezoned and annexation approved. The final ._ approval for an annexation comes from the Alameda County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) . The City Council must adopt a "Resolution of Application" and a "Resolution Relating to Exchange of Property Tax Revenue" , which will be included as part of the City's application to LAFCO. The final approval for an annexation comes from LAFCO. The existing property tax rate for residential areas is approximately 28%. It is anticipated that a similar property tax rate would be applied to the Donlan Canyon property. Annexation is appropriate for this site as it is contiguous to the existing City limits and would allow the City to provide the necessary level of urban services to the site. The annexation proposal has been reviewed by the applicable public services and utilities who have indicated services can be provided to the area at a level commensurate to the level of service provided within the adjacent City limits. A plan for providing services is attached to Exhibit E. The site also requires annexation into Dublin San Ramon Services District. As with the Hansen Hill LAFCO application, the Dublin San Ramon Services District annexation request for Donlan Canyon can be processed concurrently with the City's application. Staff and the Planning Commission recommend the City Council adopt the Draft Resolution of Application to LAFCO and the Draft Resolution relating to the Exchange of Property Tax Revenue. 6 - June 25, 1990 City Council Meeting Staff Report Summary Sheet PA 89-125 Donlan Canyon Planned Development .Prezoning, Tentative Map & Annexation NOTE TO PUBLIC: AT THIS PUBLIC HEARING, MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WILL HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO FULLY COMMENT ON EACH NUMBERED ISSUE LISTED BELOW. TO MAINTAIN THE FOCUS ON EACH ISSUE, .PERSONS DESIRING TO COMMENT SHOULD LIMIT THEIR COMMENTS TO THE ISSUES ON THE FLOOR. IF YOUR COMMENTS ARE SIMILAR TO THOSE MADE BY OTHER SPEAKERS, PLEASE MAKE YOUR STATEMENT, BUT TRY TO AVOID NEEDLESS REPETITION. .PRIOR TO SPEAKING, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS AND GENERAL SUBJECT OF YOUR COMMENTS. THANK YOU. THE FOLLOWING FORMAT WILL BE FOLLOWED FOR EACH NUMBERED ISSUE: 1. Staff presentation 2. Applicant presentation 3. Public comments 4. Staff/Applicant response 5. City Council discussion/direction it :MEETING FORMAT: it The Mayor opens .Public Hearing and leads discussion regarding: - Project Description by Staff and Applicant ISSUE #1. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: INITIAL STUDY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION The Initial Study incorporates by reference the earlier EIR certified by the City Council on August 14, 1989. and mitigation monitoring program prepared for the General Plan Amendment and found that there would not be any significant effects on the environment. A. REQUIRED ACTION: Adopt Negative Declaration resolution or give direction and continue. B. STAFF AND PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: -Adopt resolution approving Negative Declaration ISSUE #2. PREZONING: The proposed PD Prezoning is for 17 single family custom lots, 300 condominium/apartment units and 170+ acres for open space/parkland use. The proposed .PD District regulations are similar to the R-1 District and to existing multi-family PD Districts in the City. The Prezoning is appropriate for the site in that the proposed provisions are consistent with the City's General .Plan land use designations and policies. A. REQUIRED ACTION: Adopt .PD Prezoning resolution and introduce ordinance or give direction and continue. B. STAFF AND .PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution approving .PD Prezoning general provisions, introduce ordinance approving PD Prezoning and continue to July 9, 1990 for second reading. ISSUE #3. TENTATIVE MAP: The Applicant proposes a subdivision of the 196+ acre site to include approximately 10+ acres for 17 single family custom lots, 16+ acres for 1 multi- family lot (for 300 condominium/apartment units) and 170+ for open space/parkland (balance of the site) . The required parkland dedication is 2.887 acres or in-lieu fees or a combination may be provided instead. Dedication of the 170+ acres of open space, would not qualify for parkland dedication. The area is not considered an active recreation area (basketball courts, playing fields), is not designated as parkland on the General .Plan or the Master .Plan of .Parks. The proposed subdivision is appropriate for the site in that the proposal is consistent with the General Plan. A. REQUIRED ACTION: Adopt Tentative Map resolution or give direction and continue. B. SRAFF AND PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution approving Tentative Map. ISSUE #4. ANNEXATION: The project site is located outside the City limits. In order for the site to be under the City's jurisdiction LAFCO must approve the annexation. Annexation of the area is appropriate in that the site is contiguous to existing City limits and the City could provide the necessary level of urban services to the site. The site also requires annexation to Dublin San Ramon Services District. A. REQUIRED ACTION: Adopt resolution relating to annexation and property tax change or give ' direction and continue. B. STAFF AND .PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution of annexation application and approving property tax exchange. LEGENtl iT? ,irl .� L1 ❑ c.a ceaCEG!C CX V�iL�A�L slrE: , -! t, PL—ER] Q c�t{- t W3 2� l�s!JOglut' CIVIL ER1 9URVl .� VtYOR lOR] mc.i.✓.rar O n+...G `coo /,��u.K m+rt..t .u¢v Scvwf a.rl[neV _.- ._�_.y L1M DA0 CA EIVO _ na, I L•� �; ALA MO,G 4507 w.co .",\ on mMvIK PROJECT i---_/1 +` 1. I;.r` (111)W-11++ j'1�•c'rrn.n v 'Z-f �=1 Cctw'ruv I I �J 1 ��1.'I'• I"�}+' FAX(ne)w-1111 _LZ_ a,.ccnnv a-ea.c I /I 1 �I=•.._, .ict� rYrlcAL .C610 J&-r7a/ \ °°°m"••°•••°,�•"ALL \ �• r` .V77— VICINITY MAP ,are �,� cwr•..r«rnf �Irt t na ,/ i O+r.... •u wt.uiU v'•nonnro J~ 11 11c t, 9 rYr7GC .ruo !CC M3 .u..u.0..v 7J .. f a u.oa.n,.rnmrn <.w,rt oua c...+ o ,.o.r,..>a ,w .•:::�. -_ ov.m,un n r.�.w.r.n>H ) w aur..ci•w tiI s , FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND Nr•••r•••r•wµ•u''• TENTATIVE MAP. ^�'� nu�,.,.uuM„a• M�, DONLAN CANYON `J SUBDIVISION 5962 nm�ru.u,•r (LOT 1 IS FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES) [ollr++CO2 TA cou.rr,c•inonw,+ !r � oerofen.lf.f u.Kannc vnw.Im n.>rr,w.0 Pnv •r ALIQUOT ASSOCIATES •,.car uw•,•••vr.wtc nn., 1+99 DAHViLLE BLVD. ALAMO.CA 9+196(4 15)916-11++ ' Lp ; ECE MAY °� 1990 I LI � 4 a a LANNING r DUBLIN P • TENTATIVE MAP TRACT N0. 5926 r -n•o' r�.. sr «e•.�.. '.r.v ... . . .. nK�j� LOT 1 IS FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES) \ DONLAN CANYON •• %w ( DONLAN CANYON ASSOCIATES h,r. .• l '""•" �� � PAR e. I % �. SINGLE FAMILY ALIQUOT EXPLANATION EROSION.SOIL CREEP •Q '� !:, kC _ ..�1"� PAR D �6. ?�.3 — \ EARTHFLOW OR DEBRIS FLOW: �, - 1y�. �--�•"` _ •u; a '�, r WITH ARROW SHOWING DIRECTION OF MOVEMENT •- :_� I �'-+�_. � �,°" •..•.. ��\ � Wit\ '�_ l') VERY OLD LANDSLIDE PARCEL A. •``I�f MULTI FAMILY COLLUVIUM � 4a,4J fD GRADING BALANCE®040,000 CY 49 nlT. - E I V F f) rw"•.mu..iw u�ro,u...at pnl.v..w ru pul.v.un SHEET 2 OF T SHEETS DUBLIN PLANNING. 690 \�-- 590 AL P-1 Vii• a4 r�\` i � _ �'a 5 _ / \ � d.i`.� �_ I Q s�. ( -- I__• I - r.•((J� �'�,.-..`` .\ �_--__x'..\\� \,na ~ `! .40T I 111 C r ( —1 !.:, _ y � \ I I w, , \ �•� yy W O W r I• I II t n\ \W �._�i—_--.� W ° 8\\ 4 I Y ,• / �_��-� e ..1.. � II�}�; _ � �I`f1(I �\ ''i--.� � ��- 1O a-� t � uu �i� ff �•=.=_ ° � I \ �. ��� - -,�p 8 �v� � \ �1 c I. .'1�`��— � \ _���_ `_�-n_` mil-_ a - - ��+�� s.• -. \ _- -i.' ... - 1 '.:.__ Irl r.'in»Yr � SBOt rr .� 1 \�� _ _ • \ >p _ - 'fir'• � - - : ' .-- -�,:.��--.._ �_'--------r:;_ - TO BE DEDICATED FOR OPEN SPACE •I 600 \. \ ? \ PARCEL A a1 AV A[-IQCJOT PLANNERB aG„a:/'•10• `—_—_-- CIVIL ENDINEERB BURVETOfl4 ta:CCl I)bl PRELIMINARY AND FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN NDY DANVILLE BLVD oe slGx: AND ALAMO•CA W507 r TENTATIVE MAP (415j SM-5554 DOULAN CANYON FAX(41S)638-5551 4 us 7 s 4 SUBDIVIS011 5962 MAY 3 -1 1991 f I-�5`i- gas J)UBLIN PLANNING i A OPEN SPACE o / TO DE DEDIC TFD FOR PARCEL A' — < Y _ - •ref � -� � •.° - -- - "� �. / __ S / /� i / 'rCMP� IIYP.f /.�fsy �_�1 .ate' W1/,�(�— V♦ __ L �.I51 LfE 1',� \ - •/G. /�1.! '—� f � / 1 I L y �� '/ JLfyt�/ �% i- yP,I" -♦1�1. 1 _ -1.J ►AO LE 1 ' / y6 \ ,Is. 0•r:I 1 1c ""� �l cll 1 PAD EL 1` � p1 '� I I Jj ••'�a�� � `� — 1 61 / 1 n— Fe, _ '{ ` D EV s A. •! `. — yt , !.E. P z o \ 11'x' E>� _�\\\\�\ eP°'�� � ����- � .Y /�,, :?'_ •""A..�•A• -- FOR OPEN SPACE T /_- O D E pEDICATED PARCEL A .,L O- ��•<6/ �/ ;/ '�xPOnl w,fn.�•El OSr•nr' .. � � ` `\ , � j ` I�,/' ./ 1.•• TYPICAL CARPORT SECTION I I jtf/f%i Er SECTION A-A' s 1 � ALIQUOT � LN awry./'O CIVIL PLANNERS ENGINEERS DC iAE.A SURVEYORS KW r r, PRELIMINARY AIID IAI DEVELOPMENT PLAN .11 UA-11 IE OLVD r '..n..-....�.r r^.r.r. �.J U FIIA UU D[ 1 AlAMO.CA 1.50] rC .i t r ul ne.ss.. 5 7Et1I Al A7110 MAP 5 ..____.----_..—___._/ - - - .• � Ot1LANCANYON ♦ � SI/UDIVIS011�J62 1 1 MAY [� �li c 1 990 iYl eft--EC7 - /1,12-15 DUBLIN PLANNING \ \ �\ \.\ •� \�\ �_���� 660 /i i IT S- D 14A P.• PACE' n P 6 00 `// RS f I - A P_ EtIRY ACD —CO VELM . ll P CIMI A ._M�INDL A ENN N OLILNCErEA LV j D �• .---, / TEN7A7 Eh1AP -- utio. 9am7 t 1 6 DONLAN CANYON FAX(115)e3s-3337 / SU6DIVISot1 5962 ,!-.,-L, � A Z / ®A r� TO BE DEDICATED FOR OPEN SPACE. / ALIQUOT CIVIL/STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS /I �' /• t6 PLANNERS \\0 1\ 1 ✓ l+� /• •tip„/ 1� — SURVEYORS STS/ PADLI\ 1�1 \\\\.per 'tn /tZY \?�//�y '•%• ,�, ,\ `\`�`•:.��/� •fy I5v l I\\\\\\` \ � •�� ,/�� ���: (�� ���� lam, �/�/, \5 ^\ \ \A.t1JOO fF ,�Y” \�� �_ --- -- --—_� � �°"[. (� � ,,�^ �✓� ;10. \� �fro � I � ;� / _ /__� a ��/ / �._—__ / � � /6•[ 11 / / / � Os°� /ice' \\.\ � to / � O T. .- _ _ // �,/!..d .p� ./t•' .Mllr. �^^` — _ ____ �. off\ - � .� � ---- � -! S.I– ,;��i'`'�;%-�=,,/i� •. WA- ., _ t.� ��t _---- A•.11,MO Sr •// fI �.1 Y,' � VI ����♦ _ �! t• / :``✓/ `bp' L1�� '"'j. \ A• {/tom/p / /: t'./%./ /!/ w 14.1M 51 i'°f /7L•' �.3y�/ _/ //� / 'lI',i/ f 0 4 I �II � / � t/ ��� � ^( A.q,00 Jr /: :"�'•,/,.� / GtC IJ c ICI_ IJOT55 w d p la ♦ Q J 'B.Gt.� ` I .1{. 3 O J=> Uo 1 As 2) lJnunc, r Car— T-ro ro+ eN F c. zaa z> ' \ t L t ,�,.. '. • m�2 W �... PtJ /' ' /../_ %� I'''IbJEGT / LL ~ J O vl cG v/f!ex.i '" ,00° / 1` f�_ o�I �� / �•, c) m zm cc )• o- 'tom///•f: '_ 1 t �J ! / •u7 f y/ � � a 'rp // t' \\'. :I• For' A.[L.0^/SF ',I.I S,ON J/ / Il/ � / ��•� r✓ / • __ a •\ 600 I,111 / ` I 4 _..__ _ —�— 2 cc \i -. \\ �\ � \ m,.[ 315 /� � � / ,nrn A.:.�z.t-.: I t�:/•ten 'urn::zraa a 1 \ / � TIP/C.f L S7,CEET SE�TiC.V __ I \\\,,•\ V I I I i I t I tcu u _ _ 7 a 7 [r<tn RECEIVED Y 31 1990 c L —1 DUBLIN PLANNING 1 J 1 'q. �T/l?'-r' ��"' ,�y �, ' ,� m4 u I ��,�p�j�a� ,� '� ..• ,�a� `J Ire ��,��� ,o,.� •`�°?��' o OWN WWI �,, �6►+ ► � l� n6 �� i + (�0{p ' 1".: =j 'fir" ,VAR ♦ "�iA 1 • ..1 ►.� •.fi g' �� j �, •O-� ( �$If.� ^ I II �'Il �:��. ••/i, ate �lJ�w. t ..`� I�T I �'C�T �i► •;��' .�"�q � Ell AM u r 1►f� f MIF alm"Or Dim ��f�'�'4t �,�'�� �f� �•3 � � � � �"r'� � :. �� dal. , • r RECEIVED NOV 171989 - 44� QLIN PLANNINGIZ 'IT . m am Wu �\ YT►•�� _ " )NNT � ��,f -ten^„ems �J - M t V ��- = NATIVE PLANT MATERIAL WITHIN HABITAT AREA ORNAMENTAL PLANT MATERIAL c - _ \ a • i J .._TREES —7RCE5 m Q QU(RL.US MJIf O(IA COAST NVE OAK AX:A RURLIM Ali) ART O LL 0 �. Lj(f RC11S IORAIA ­11Y OAK H:IR rAI AIAIUM IArAN S M f AI'IE (r.I RCUS WILIIIN NI I0.XM IN(OAK ARBUI11S Il{IlU SIRAWMRRY IRI( Q I UCAI)'r I US"Cl 1O11 f WRILTV-lEMW P(PMRMNI SAL IX tASI R IMS R RROIC'TV I1 / UII%TASK%frl$ ARRVIO WIIOW IRA%NIS O.RAY WO(NY 0.AYN[]Of]AVI ■p \ �-•\ I UMBELLLA ARIA CALF ORNCA CALIORNA BAY CA IUIISIA 1.'SIIM%MASUR' SIIAU(MASTtR IIUAIEY LOCUST • • - LK7LA AMh1R S.TRIO AUU' SW(I ICl/M { 51IRURS r")%I TAU rtNSls At rro P" PMTS PNEA SIT"r" / ARCr0STAr1IYIOS UINSTUORA %CW,1O 1A AIANZANIA rRINUS CIRASIIRA]L.V,' "I [.ILA[MUM \, lid ,'/ • • , A UR BR(WLRI BRLWIR'S SALT BIVSII PYRIS C.*ARISTOCRAT ARISTOCRAT PEAR ART NARIA CAI N%RLA CA SAMriVORi PYRVS KAWAKAAY [VIR(%LI[N r[AR •`I\ `i - •• BACCIIARIS PIUARIS'CONSACA"A' C(1NIF BRUSII CEA'IIIKIS'CONCIIA' CONCIIA C[ANU11R/5 CIANUIIF]S CL"AIIIS BIK:KnRU.%Il 51iRU05 ' - CIA II flTSf LORLS a11R BRU511 AUArANll us At' rF IS --- / llTf{IS SI'ICIS lU'f1 AlAl1A =UR NItUS('()aIIM ALA ALIMIA ITS(;U I TM US M(KV:IY II(riV1R CUT ULLMA AI%)1'URVM RA I'I inmrs(S AT IA—%CAI ITOA"CA CAI F(A"A CUIUBIRRY IRICA NAI{MIA IRN:I%IUSM.MUM / • Rfl1S CAI/URNR_IIAL (:OOSI nI RRY IlCAIIONA NPR IM %Y(USMA •' 'NH CAI RIILA 11UNN(IIRRy 1[RNS NIUINA / VIIIS CAIXORNCA W11 CRArt RUBUS VIIIFOIus CALIFORNA UACKBNRY � //�I� �•••1 SITE PLAN (vnan,u) � NuRw o no 1./13169 MASTER SITE PLAN CAMP&CAiV1P CAM l'&[7,1 1 7. — ``` lidRge A.dylOn __1 _ R )[I]TOUR 11v1 B.fUR 111191Mf1 CFllC G%)%MI )11(:11 4 RECE;.IYIED NOV LARGE RECREATION AREA SCALE:1'=1(Y /' //. t /-. l '�.'!� PI u ` Al- V' \ _ + \ (� •oC' j E �` Rai EN RANCE AIO MCNF ,At '.�J ,, 1 J!�` :� '�. ,}�,. 1, �C•DA`, N z �FOUN7Aq�=(ETS�J.�� A:• N -.�. �A• 1 ►;, IMW ♦ c- - VA ll Y14" �y � ♦ r. ; -�e^ /q�,�ry .�A. C > >,? /rl \� �. ' �/ e- ``YES 3• .:q+�(.� Q^ � SPECIALTY PAVEMENT. --•y� '4 - RECEIVED NOV 171989 011 DUBLIN PLANNING CL a a � z .�fkjt,;,'xrh:1'jr(',;(,�1''f.),k;.?;,�1°��'sff: •: '- ��: s y '' o 1'8'i i,4;�1'r f'i''1 fit - 'o• p ' - ,•t �° �.1;�'rYj!}�\ifi� `'Sri f,'.'� C�jaj fifffl' a + ,1;};`i,' „�'tEt1'i�:F��`:�\,'11 >-o � ,S;'151j�''V\11Y'y.1 _ T,t;)f;'}'.}jj (i7f.., :\'i";. `t�,,,;h•\�;:;\'i, `y. Qo 0 Nll?1i 1, ,, ,\rt,ti1,\1� _ z o o ••2.;:�1„ '`1,,,\•., :.,\.,;. „\\,,;\1, ,. �. ___�� ',! ,�� ,�{t •��t;�,\\\ ply, ..a';•,\`1, t�,t\,. \,�jl: 0 P SPA O o1 1 ! 1 \ - T \\10..%4`i};„15.x`\, W 13/a9 utu SMALL RECREATION AREA SCALE:1'=1(Y �L-4 r "�:rL�tJ ff�- j .. ■■JJfl �t^�:y�. ,.4,. .f„,,i��,r 1, Ci. �y4��,��■■-'iio-^C��i�!i��a',�,�,�.+?yam� hg � D[7s�„�+,i�'��'. .` .• � rt'""���!��'i��.rJ�a�'i1C • 1�- S�r., �. .i,�• I�� r ti r GC����!T�• t, t ��� r , �,F,9;'i ri tt•. - 1 �. •�,yr�� + 1. � � � `r���I������ �,�,��;�����, ��i RECEIVED W. td OV 2 DUBLIN;PLANNING` ; Cn w 4 . _ __ i o _ 40 north� 0" 40' 80• Map Drawing Index Iu1 Project Data wr,i n. ""„ M _._____..._...__.1. _..ii iir• w'r__. �� 1 � �A2 9 E PLAN PAR TIAI) PLAN E1E A ON SITE PLAN tti ,n ail\!1 \SI� I �`�\� A9 i. . Ii; ii; r YJ t � lri iiSS Location CI S i. �1? 1 1 li p . 1 !?�i. AJ 'VNIT PWIS. DUA 6 (PARTIAL) 1: :? 1' A Fib t A4 VNIT PUNS Alo v-VD Es >Niw ': AS BUILDING TYPE 1 �f-V n ' ._/i PINT k ELEVATION END ELEVATIONS t w WWW��"'''""``` _ rm. r ....• t 1, k..urr. ,i ni 1tn. - - �}, -BLDCS 2 k S .. ..A11 'REOIEATION u `ii i wiw Iv. y. >•� �'r Af BUILDING TYPE I� FLOOR —... t LJTY iv,.a tr.n ....• nn w; _ v PLAN 4 ELEVATION FLOOR PINTS .. _ _ _.._.. __—_ -- I BLOCS 1.J.{.k 7. AtI. RECREATION vn __._. t.. ' „•. - A7 BUtDINO TYPE III FACILITY .,NN. wn nrt {i_.M.q!__� ._...... _v ��"" PLAN k ELEVATION -. -ELEVATIONS rtw oti; w ��} ............__.._....... ` „ -----------._____.............___._.._._._....___... I r� ` OLDC 6 'A13 CABANA :,n,r. rls. "• .i.µ i, !�:'G ,o„'� p1 jrI ( �•4` _ Ae BUILDING TYPE IV AI.. CARPORTS . ......—_-_.__ w isilw.fa r r .i bivliri. .� . -----------------------------'----- PLAN k ELEVATION:� .. a»tmE xo..c, <wnMnw `; '+rl.. 11 11 li _ =•`: -.` '� BLOCS 9 k ID '.M Norlh •,M 1_J RECEIVED Y: l )� . DUBUN. ::3 e ay cour_c,� d.� y ' WVTITW `. ZM Z .Q 00 0 \ J°� 9lr PLM " ✓ (Pmnr<) A2 RECEIVED V9 �g fi t NG � - O O - _.oA ° d>_2 O O If1alT7 i W�i (j_ q < ttosai pATH� NITCHlN BATH KI7CMlN DINING BATH I pr; DINING KRCftH L I U O -- - - - rAIR•1 L HALL ' ((( *A"— HALL ` \ - LOaaT - \ L WITO"• gOLIIID m noa ow BEDROOM LIVING BEDROOM 1 BEDROOM 2 LIVING Q LIVING Y BEDROOM Z - Fileo.7 �C-onmLnrc BALCONY BALCONY $TOR. $TOR. — BALCONY I -- - -all 7 I- a —I IJ_-5___—_-._ .-.__.-_9- ______.4__!_._�---_!S.-"—__.__..__,� x_____.____19-�—___— _ IJ•-6• 1 UNIT Alf 2 UNIT A2 3 UNIT Bi a J7_--q_ _Wrvoo".r rro __s'-o-- -------?'•-'--- Z a 0 __----_ —___—_- - } noon am -'{ O Q I I = LL -- - _-+ --4 00 O O 9 O z� BATH I BATH 2 MOW ♦AMIT7 � I Q Q. .J DINING KITCHEN BEDROOM 1 J 2 m -' - Z p L _ _ _ _....... L I 0 L p IT FWAM- $TOR. L aaT HALL` �I I -- BATH 2 ILOVniaM1Y L _.. HALL < LIVING BALCONY I LIVING =_, rAU•$I ' BEDROOM 1 BEDROOM 2 I D CLO$aT . lNrar BEDROOM 2 DINING UMT PLANS "•u Lnl[•t STOR. i ! KITCHEN m —_.._. o"O1ry1°ftOC" BALCONY •n m I�'-1' iJ'-R- T WrvDU"•t IOI• f NOTE: SEE BUILDING PLANS 4 UNIT B2 5 UNIT B3 FOR PATIO CONDITIONS A3 o' x• r B' Is• RECE`Il%Ep N-0-M-1989 -- --. D16LI p a5: -- - fi- - PLANNING, _— — o O. � (-1 D-0 �. ruMTr MATH Im. KITCHEN DINING MATH O tm• Kt7cIaN DINING 0 MATH p — - - - I a'I O rANITr t - HALL m HALL - _ L _ _ Q ' Y Q - BEDROOM 1 BEDROOM 2 LIVING [BEDROOM 1 BEDROOM 2 LIVING Z u F 'tta u I i not MTOR. .TOR. u.Ux[wl fn+ou�o i+•oon t• wwrm now I BALCONY _ BALCONY n— UNIT B4 2 UNIT 85 �'o 1 Z°C z Q W -K I U 0 cc K eo TLwL O I •ATN t cc �O DINING KITCHEN" oTIL• Z a ca I MATN t O IRL KITCHEN DINING _-■ATM f O a p __ MATN a _ --- i _- _ _ —- pALeoNr a 0 fALR•M - I •.-.�.• aALCONr f stony L / \ L HALL CLOaaT L LIVING BEDROOM 1 BEDROOM 2 LIVING BEDROOM 1 BEDROOM 2 —v/�LLIUR AI UNIT PLANS w .ro rlalx ooN' 00. STOR. 87 wanro now BALCONY 1 —I BALCONY 1O" -- I oo.L.A— O 1] 6 I 11•-6, I 1•-0 71•-10 l�i_— �..� �� UNIT B6 NOTE: SEE BUILDING PLANS 3 UNIT B5 - END CONDITION 4 FOR PATIO coNOITIO+s A4 0 7. 4• M•' 6 w RECEIVED - N OT-2-0-1989- DUBLIN PLANNING - - _ U O 1 BUILDING TYPE I - END ELEVATION 2 BUILDING TYPE I - ELEVATION (©uauu+cs 2 ar�o s) (uuauD+cs 2 auu s) _ Z O� t Z Q i - ¢ isa I-_1 i v B3 A2 » A2 B3 Q z i Cf =0 O 0 Am --— Y d - - i J c B3 A2 A2 B3 I 1 V44 i 1=-i 1--_; - I' - - - - --- - yr � -_� BVRDWG 7YPE I PLAN k CLC VATON DlDCS 2 t S rn.r.m 3 BUILDING TYPE I - 1ST AND 2ND FLOOR PLANS 0' r 6' 16' 32' A5 RECE7IVED NOV 2: 0 lqAq DUBUN PLANNING a ".•;: - CL � _ O 3. I co 1 BUILDING TYPE 11 - ELEVATION (BUILDINGS 1, 3. �. AND 7) r, • Z _ — - -- a o t z CC LL L- _ 30 zcc " Bi A2 ii Al` Al 1 A2 B2 r a tea. z OD " / 0 U, - O- - - / , o - - - Q dLQ o - 3 , b Bl \ A2 Al Al A2 62 BUILDINC TYPE 0 PLAN t CLEVAM4 2 BUILDING TYPE II - 1ST AND 2ND FLOOR PLANS , (BUILDIUGS 1, 3, D• i E• 16• J7' ^_ A6 e RECEfvED' NOV 2: 0 1989 DUBLIN p. L4NN/N Mal BUILDING TYPE III - ELEVATION (DUILDItJG fi) •- • -,_..._.. a O= >-o c z z GG B5 B4 B4 B5 Q a J • m 1 --- --- --- --- / z a t o - - Ef - CS -- _ _ I .Y•__ _ 5.2.. SL.. — I Y_-- _ �\ I S =---- B5 B4 --- --- B4 B5 —i _. d ---- - I' -----J ----- ---- -�J _ -.� 9UILENJG i E 16 7 PLAN k ELEVAPON BLDG 6 2 BUILDING TYPE III - 1ST AND 2ND FLOOR PLANS (DUILDItJG 6) 0' P 6' 16• 32' _- A7 s, aaaa - i81 .es !� I _, �eaea �eaee ; 1111 11� :r;ar :: t iii:.. na iaaaa _Qea1J see a- �� jai � , •.?ryr sw, �- _� a(..a:::l rill 011Q ' f- - � _ -(: r r! ^1111 _ :� :iii �4{.,'�Ra�. 's.3��' ,... � �-� •, _ _ ::11 aaaa = ml I . �,;.s..i. i - el. W.i�'�t � +� '<�<;vs::±'•:•#j1nn1iIkti.�.� �.c�.. � w, .i•�.. e�s<s w�` oii, �.'•'S.dca � �. �CS i III � ....... i pMtx i; r.•�1�� �.y�. rr�,f �r �� I!a. L9Qa -r. -.�-: „• NNimillilla ) !i '11 r`— - ::i 3 •.sl ■ O • In : II - .. --.� -�� pia � p - a� • iI�• . a -- - :I r�� � �• � - IIII EEMME oil I , � Big � t f� U p_ 1..:• _ ��� IJ 4 _ c:l I _ • _ b ?'s a :aas is oss - / k�.YU.�%ss ✓%ti- ��+�''� _ I{Iltl 11111 i r i QQaI��,^Ilaa� •,_ I P ... __ _ i / eai d z s �r`aT' .'3 ��� t ,�t,�.•: •: !....!� ::, o• ( �_ :. !s :::1- _ ;:. �::�a a�;ii,• itt�<:• II4._ __ a' r9c - eic C • � �Cfft t1+- �_0�, ..—Lam...,:!:Q ---_ _ _ -,...,- r° .- •e ® �1 ....'�: -•'� I, �'!1 i ; a DUBLIN Z3 ...m 1 BUILDING TYPE II 2- END ELEVATION BUILDING TYPE III & V - END ELEVATION (DUILDING$ 1, S, 4, dt 7) (BUILDING$ 6 k 8) Z 0 C a )-o'. _ Z¢ CC Q= ILL Ua Z< o G = J° m rc O o c U. BUILDU+D ttPCS CND ELEVAPONS 3 BUILDING TYPE IV - END ELEVATION (BUUOD+cs o' 4' e' 1s• 32• -...AlO A RECEIVED NOV 2 0 1989 DUBLIN PLANNINGa CL _ �2 N — 7. Y EAST ELEVATION o a Z� o Q= W 00 t Z¢ U Q = J° m Z o 0 r =:._::. oa. Muff p _ _ g } •[rnunor+ FACUTY ELEVATIONS 2 SOUTH ELEVATION . o• : e• 16' 32' Al2 R C E.(.V E D ., Nor r4�•jQ s • NV I.plJ4 I. N NNI GEaL Ss .. .Q: 3�•ask � 1 troll. _ _ I'. - I � � � , 3�i`e•�4;I 1 71 j S 1 L f 1 I JYI Q' • I PORCH I - Ytlt)WOM1OVNOL H- W BAR cm �R I�J= I TV LOOM IIP ruq "EAT ROOM _ Z Q CL ,i < LTLAM A�� tAUNA I z �-{{I Z LL Z U 00 CC_ 1¢N WOY[N I - Q I P-— I s wOMCMt O Mt N•. p--b LOCKtR■ LOCKER! CLOtMO .. . LEASING LEASING 2ND FLOOR PLAN Y■■—^�►■� .RIGHT ROOM V MANAGER ' ONIPLAY RECEPTION ACcrO K1T I ti TEL RECREATION FACILITY FLOOR PLANS. 1 1ST FLOOR PLAN - 0• r e• 16• u• A11 RECEIVED NOV 2 -1989 DUBLIN PLANNING Q� d s (n � 1 WEST ELELVATION — 4 SOUTH ELEVATION 00 cc POOL EQUIPMENT I V O J WORK ROOM Q ` r CC _._..__.............._._._ __....__._.___.._.._._..._........._._.___._... O z CC LL o WOMEN — MEN o 2 NORTH ELEVATION q I I `'omme I L=JL=J Vg < – — I I I _------_— NON. CABAIIA -- CABANA PLAN /� 3 EAST ELEVATION .r B. Z. s. . 6 __ A13 - r RECEIVE. - - 15=0-- NOV 2 0 19898 DUBLIN PLANNING ------------ -----, o a m II � I � I co Y - J Q 4 CAR CARPORT PLAN ~" 2 CARPORT 3 4 CAR CARPORT FRONT ELEVATION Z E�VATION _ a = o . — ----- --—---- — ---- --} U o u. — ----- ---- -- —————o'—___ , Zi U �- - - I a� Z J a m Z a j I I pLL 0 I it - - ----- o------ -----n------ i r - 'y' 4 4 CAR CARPORT W/ TRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN CARPIXi7S 5 TRASH ENCLOSURE 6 4 CAR CARPORT W/ TRASH ENCLOSURE FRONT ELEVATION • ELEVATION o• 2 4' a is rA14 CCADP 6215 Florio Street Oakland, CA 94618 (415) 420-6960 Q--40 80 120 240 SCALE IN FEET 1:120 RECEIVED DUBLIN PLANNING &N\ 1� L' v i� u � iSui4 4P lei I �I l �l�i� �l l� l � ExNIBIT % ` " RESOLUTION NO. - 90 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE FOR PA 89-125 DONLAN CANYON WHEREAS, the Paragon Group has requested approval of a Planned Development Prezoning, Tentative Map and Annexation of 196+ acres to allow 17 single family lots on approximately 10 acres, and 300 multi-family units on 16+ acres, approximately 170+ acres of open space, in unincorporated Alameda County, west of Silvergate Drive, north of the western terminus of Dublin Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) , together with the State guidelines and City environmental regulations, require that certain projects be reviewed for environmental impact and that environmental documents be prepared; and WHEREAS, an Initial Study was prepared pursuant to Section 15153(c) and 15183 of the CEQA Guidelines finding that the project, as proposed, would not have a significant effect on the environment and that the earlier EIR prepared for the Donlan Canyon General Plan Amendment, an earlier project, PA 87-012 (SCH No. 88100406) , was used to document that finding; and WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration has been prepared for this application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did review and consider the Negative Declaration at a public hearing on June 4, 1990; and WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given in all respects as required by law; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and Staff recommended City Council approval of the Negative Declaration; and WHEREAS, the City Council did review and consider the Negative Declaration at a public hearing on June 25, 1990. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin City Council does hereby find: 1. That the PD Prezoning, Tentative Map and Annexation for the Donlan Canyon project PA 89-125 will not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared and processed in accordance with State and local environmental laws and guideline regulations. 3. That the Negative Declaration is complete and adequate. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin City Council does hereby approve the Negative Declaration for PA 89-125 Donlan Canyon Planned Development Prezoning, Tentative Map and Annexation. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of June, 1990. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk -2- i•, RESOLUTION NO. - 90 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ APPROVING AND ESTABLISHING FINDINGS AND GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) PREZONING CONCERNING PA 89-125 DONLAN CANYON WHEREAS, the Paragon Group has requested approval of a Planned Development Prezoning, Tentative Map, and Annexation of 196+ acres to allow 17 single-family lots on approximately 10 acres and 300 multi-family units on 16+ acres with approximately 170+ acres of open space in unincorporated Alameda County, west of Silvergate Drive, north of the western terminus of Dublin .. Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held public hearings to consider the request on June 4, 1990; and WHEREAS, proper public notice of this request was given in all respects as required by law for the Planning Commission hearings; and WHEREAS, the Staff Report was submitted recommending the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Planned Development Prezoning subject to conditions prepared by Staff; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission heard and considered all said reports, recommendations and written and oral testimony submitted at the public hearing as herein above set forth; and WHEREAS, pursuant to State law (CEQA) and regulations, a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance has been prepared; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing to consider this request on June 25, 1990; and WHEREAS, proper public notice of this request was given in all respects as required by law for the City Council hearings; and WHEREAS, the Staff Report was submitted recommending the City Council approve the Planned Development Prezoning subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the City Council heard and considered all said reports, recommendations and written and oral testimony submitted at the public hearing as herein above setforth. *' NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE City Council does hereby find: 1. The proposed prezoning, as conditioned, is consistent with the City General Plan and Policies; and 2. The proposed prezoning will not have a significant environmental impact; and 3. The prezoning, as conditioned, is appropriate for the subject property in terms of being compatible to existing land uses in the area, and will not overburden public services; and 4. The prezoning will not have substantial adverse effects on health or safety, or be substantially detrimental to the public welfare, or be injurious to property or public improvements. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby approves PA 89-125 Donlan Canyon Planned Development Prezoning subject to the general provisions __ listed below: GENERAL PROVISIONS A. Provisions Applicable to Single Family and Multi-Family Development 1. Intent: This approval is for Planned Development Prezoning PA 89-125 Donlan Canyon. This PD District is e.9tablished to provide for and regulate the development of multi-family dwelling units and custom single-family dwelling units. This approval prezones 10+ acres for PD low-density single family custom lots 17 units, 16+ acres for multi- family condo/apartments 300 units, and 170+ acres open space/parkland. Development shall be generally consistent with the following submittals labeled Exhibit A on file with the Dublin Planning Department: a. Site Plan, Floor Plans and Elevation Plans prepared by Tanakatsubo Group consisting of 14 sheets dated received May 31, 1990. b. Preliminary Landscape Plans prepared by Camp and Camp Associates consisting of 5 sheets dated received May 31, 1990. C. Tentative Map prepared by Aliquot consisting of 7 sheets dated received May 24, 1990. d. Building envelopes prepared by CADP dated received April 25, 1990. 2. Site Development Review: All structures shall be subject to the Site Development Review procedures established in the City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance unless a Site Development Review waiver is approved by the Planning Director and a zoning approval is granted upon the determination that the construction constitutes a minor project and building permit plans are in accord with the intent and objectives of the Site Development Review procedures. - 2 - 3. Except as specifically modified by the provisions of this PD District, all applicable and general requirements of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance shall be applied to development within this PD District. 4. The design, location and material of all fencing and retaining walls shall be subject to approval of Site Development Review unless Site Development Review requirement is waived by the Planning Director. 5. All graded cut and fill slope areas shall be revegetated with native trees, shrubs and grasses subject to review and approval of the Planning Director and Public Works Director and Site Development Review approval. 6. All landscape areas within open space and common areas shall be subject to approval of Site Development Review. 7. Appropriate all weather surface vehicular access to open space (to existing ranch road north of multi-family project) shall be provided and maintained on a continuous basis, to the satisfaction of the Fire Chief, Public Works Director and Planning Director. 8. All signs established for identification of this project shall be subject to approval of Site Development Review in regards to location, copy and design. 9. Except as may be specifically provided for within these General Provisions for PA 89-125, development'shall comply with City of Dublin Site Development Review Standard Conditions (Attachment 1) . 10. Except as may be specifically provided for within this PD, development shall comply with City of Dublin Residential Security Requirements (Attachment 2) . 11. CC&R's shall be subject to review and approval of the Planning Director prior to recordation of the Final Subdivision Map. 12. The Applicant shall submit an Open Space/Landscape Management Plan subject to review and approval of the Public Works Director and Planning Director in conjunction with Site Development Review. 13. A master trail system plan for the open space area shall be submitted and shall be subject to approval of Site Development Review. 14. Fire buffer zone between development area and open space area shall be provided and maintained by property owners on a continuous basis to the satisfaction of the Dougherty Regional Fire Authority Fire Chief. 15. The fire buffer zone including a list of acceptable plant materials shall be subject to Site Development Review approval. - 3 - 16. Required parking shall not be located within required setback areas. 17. The developer shall confer with local postal authorities to determine the type of centralized mail receptacles necessary and provide a letter from the Postal Service stating their satisfaction at the time the Site Development Review submittal is made. Specific locations for such units shall be to the satisfaction of the Postal Service and the Dublin Planning Department. If centralized mail units are not required, the developer shall provide written documentation from the Postmaster stating the exemption. 18. Minor modifications in the design, but not the use, may be approved by Staff. Any other change will require Planning Commission approval through the Conditional Use Permit review process or, depending on the magnitude of the modification, submittal of a new Planned Development Rezoning submittal. 19. Proposed water tanks shall be sited and appropriately screened to diminish visual impacts. Site specific visual studies shall be reviewed during the Site Development Review application stages. B. Provisions Applicable to Single Family Residential 1. Yards (setbacks) : The minimum requirement for yards shall be as follows: a. Depth of Front Yard (setback) : 20 foot minimum Exception: 1) 10 foot minimum for units with side vehicular entrance garages (also see Building height exceptions) and 2) Lots 11, 12 and 13 may deviate from the 20 foot minimum setback subject to approval of Site Development Review finding that either the topographic or vegetative constraints (based upon approved Tree Preservation Study) of the site prevent the development from complying with the 20 foot minimum setback. In no event shall the front yard setback for Lots 11, 12 and 13 be less than 5 feet from the garage. b. Rear Yard (setback) : 20 foot minimum, 15 foot minimum clear and level zone Exception: 1) Section 8.26.6.1 Alternate Provisions of Rear Yard (compensating yards) of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance shall apply to building additions; 2) 10-foot minimum for shade structures attached to the unit provided the shade structure is not enclosed (enclosed means more than one vertical wall) ; 3) Lots 11, 12, and 13 required setbacks will be determined by the approved Tree Preservation Study (see provisions # B6, 7, 8, 9 and 10) ; and 4) deviation or deck alternative to 15 foot minimum clear and level requirement subject to Site Development Review approval if demonstrated that grading will be minimized. In no case shall the required clear and level area be less than 5 feet. 4 - C. Side Yard (setbacks) : 5 foot minimum with 25 foot total aggregate side yard setback required. 5 foot wide minimum clear and level zone each side yard. Exception: 1) 15 foot minimum side yard setback for street side yard of corner lot; 2) Lots 11, 12 and 13 setbacks subject to Tree Preservation Study (see Provision # B6, 7, 8, 9 and 10) ; and 3) decks may be provided when 5 foot wide minimum clear and level is not possible due to topography or vegetation subject to Site Development Review approval. d. General Development Provisions: i. Fireplaces, chimneys and air conditioning units shall not encroach within the required clear and level zone. Other encroachments shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval. ii. Roof eaves, pop-outs, bays, architectural projections and columns may project 3 feet into required yards subject to compliance with building code requirements. iii. Accessory structures located in required yards shall be subject to the provisions of Section 8-60.20 through 8- 60.32, 8-60.59 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. Exception: 1) accessory structures shall maintain 3 foot minimum required setback; and 2) accessory structures located on Lots 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 shall maintain rear yard setback in compliance with site specific visual analysis prepared during Site Development Review. 2. Building Height: 35 foot maximum or two and one half (2-1/2) stories at any one point. Building height shall be measured from the finished grade at the perimeter of the building to the top of the structure. Exception: 1) building height for units with garage 10 foot front yard setbacks, shall not exceed one (1) foot for each one (1) foot the building is setback from the back of sidewalk. However, architectural features and elements may exceed this provision by a 2 foot maximum, and a gable element may exceed this provision by 5 foot maximum; 2) maximum building height on Lots 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 shall generally conform to the building envelopes established in Exhibit A. Specific height limits for these lots shall be subject to Site Development Review approval; and 3) Lots 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 may deviate from the established building envelope, subject to approval of Site Development Review and additional site specific visual analysis. 3. Lot Depth: 100 foot minimum. .4: Lot size: 15,000 square foot minimum. 5. Lot width: 40 foot minimum (street frontage) , median lot width: 100 foot minimum. 5 - 6. Principle structures shall be prohibited within the dripline of the existing woodlands area located on Lots 11, 12 and 13 of the Tentative Map unless tree preservation study approved by the Planning Director determines that principle structures located within the dripline will not adversely impact the woodland area. 7. Prior to issuance of grading permits and/or Site Development Review approval for Lots 11, 12 and 13 a detailed tree survey, horticultural report and tree preservation study shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. 8. The tree preservation study shall identify everything necessary to preserve the existing trees on site including setbacks, drainage, irrigation, construction activity, and on going maintenance. 9. Landscape features (such as decks, trellis, benches, spas) shall be permitted within the dripline of the woodland area on Lots 11, 12 and 13 subject to approval of tree preservation study. 10. The on-going maintenance of the trees in conformance with approved tree preservation study (see Provision B7 and 8) with the existing woodland area on Lots 11, 12 and 13 shall be the responsibility of the individual property owners of the lots in which the trees are located. Requirement for maintenance of said trees shall be incorporated into the CC&Rs. 11. Parking: minimum 2 covered parking spaces per dwelling unit required. 12. Except as specifically modified by the provisions of this PD (PA 89-125) District, the lots developed in the single family residential portion of this PD District shall be subject to the regulations of the R-1 District regarding land use and minimum/maximum development criteria. C. Provisions Applicable to Multi-Family Residential Setbacks - Multi-Family 1. A 20 foot minimum front yard setback is required. The setback is measured from the property line to the closest point of the building structure. Upon the developer's/applicant's acquisition of all or part of Parcel C, as shown on the tentative map, the setback shall be measured from the new property line created as a result of said acquision. 2. Landscape features such as ponds, fountains, trellises, benches and pedestrian walkways or soundwall (as may be required by an acoustical study) may be permitted within said front yard setback subject to Site Development Review approval. 3. A 10 foot minimum setback between building wall (the exterior side of building walls containing heated space) and parking areas/drive aisle/roadways shall be required. 6 - Building Height - Multi-Family 4. The maximum permitted building height for residential buildings is 40 feet. Exception: Architectural features and elements may exceed this provision by a maximum of 2 feet. Gable elements may exceed this provision by 5 feet maximim. 5. The maximum permitted building height for the recreation building is 35 feet. Exception: Architectural features and elements may exceed this provision to a maximum of 15 feet subject to Site Development Review approval. 6. The perceived visual bulk and massing of buildings 1 and 2 shall be reduced through design modification to roof facade blending with background. Design, material, and colors are subject to Site Development Review approval. 7. Accessory structures located within private open space areas (patio and deck areas assigned to individual units) shall maintain 3 foot minimum - rearyard and sideyard setbacks. 8. The maximum building height for accessory structures within private open space areas shall not exceed 15 feet. 9. Accessory structures shall be subject to zoning approval, regardless of whether building permits are required: 10. Accessory structures within common open space areas shall be subject to Site Development Review and approval. 11. Master Plan for accessory structures identifying acceptable type/size, designs, colors and materials of accessory structures shall be submitted for review subject to Site Development Review approval. Parking - Multi-family 12.' A minimum of 2 parking spaces per unit is required. 13. A minimum of 1 parking space per unit shall be covered and assigned to a specific unit. 14. A minimum 15% of the overall number of parking spaces provided shall be reserved and designated on pavement for guest parking only. 15. 35% of uncovered parking spaces may be compact parking spaces. 16. All parking spaces shall be double striped. 17. Required minimum parking dimensions: - 7 - A) Covered 9' x 20' B) Standard uncovered 9' x 18' C) Compact uncovered 8' x 17' Length reduction exception: A 2 foot overhang is permitted for covered car-port type, standard and compact uncovered parking spaces 18. Private vehicular accessways shall comply with the City of Dublin Preliminary Residential Condominium Development Guidelines (Attachment 3) , with the exception that accessways with carport type covered parking may comply with Attachment 4, subject to Site Developement approval. Private Useable Open Space- Multi-Family 19. Private and common open space shall comply with the City of Dublin Preliminary Residential Condominium Development Guidelines. 20. At-grade patios for the multiple family residential units shall be individually fenced and shall be supplied with soil preparation to accommodate future planting. Individual hose bibs for each ground level unit patio area shall be provided by the developer. The layout of the enclosed patio areas (as regards size and placement of concrete patio pads and the design of the enclosing fencing and retaining walls) shall be subject to review and approval as part of the respective Site Development Review submittal. Storage - Multi-Family 21. Separate individual lockable and waterproof storage space shall be assigned to each unit. Said storage space shall contain a minimum of 120 cubic feet with a minimum dimension of 4 feet. The location is subject to Site Development Review approval. Refuse Collection/Recycling Collection - Multi-Family 22. Refuse collection areas shall be provided within enclosed areas of solid and substantial materials. The design shall be compatible with the architecture of the project and the height shall exceed the refuse container. The size, design, location and number of refuse collection areas shall be subject to Site Development approval. 23. Recycling collection containment areas shall be provided throughout the project. The specific size, location, design and number of containment areas shall be subject to Site Development Review approval. Energy - Multi-Family 24: All multi-family units shall be provided with separately metered gas for hot water. All meters shall be screened from view within an enclosure that is compatible in design, location and materials to that of the building to which it is to be installed. 8 - 25. Exterior lighting fixtures in multi-family areas shall be energy efficient, fluorescent or metal vapor lighting. 26. Landscape design shall incorporate use of solar shading for south and west facing walls in multi-family housing areas. 27. Recreation area pools in the multi-family project shall incorporate solar heaters. The developer shall submit documentation that the number, size, location and design of the solar collector panels will suffice to provide adequate pool heating for a reasonable length of time in each calendar year. Heating of the pools may be supplemented by gas heaters. Miscellaneous Multi-family 28. Should the units be initially occupied as apartment units, all appliances shall either be replaced with new units or the initial buyers provided with a one-year' s parts and warranty guarantee on all appliances. 29. A pedestrian circulation plan shall be submitted as part of the Site Development Review materials. The plan shall include section details of the pathway system and a detailed pedestrian walkway lighting plan. 30. Light standards (freestanding, pedestrian and/or wall mounted) utilized in this project shall be of a design which shields the light sources from view from off-site while providing for adequate security and safety illumination. Light standards shall be subject to review and approval as part of the Site Development Review submittal in regards to design, location, number and illumination intensity. 31. Handicapped ramps and access as required by Title 24, State of California, shall be provided (parking and walkways serving on-site recreational facilities) . Handicapped parking stalls, appropriately signed, shall be provided evenly throughout the project with their location and design as part of the Site Development Review submittal and approval. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of June, 1990. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk 9 - RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING TENTATIVE MAP 5962 CONCERNING PA 89-125 DONLAN CANYON WHEREAS, the Paragon Group has requested approval of a Planned Development Prezoning, Tentative Map, and Annexation of 196+ acres to allow 17 single family lots on approximately 10 acres and 300 multi family units on 16± acres , approximately 10± acres of open space, in unincorporated Alameda County, west of Silvergate Drive, north of the western terminus of Dublin Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the State of California Subdivision Map Act and the adopted City of Dublin Subdivision Regulations require that no real property may be divided into two or more parcels for purpose of sale, lease or financing unless a tentative map is acted upon, and a final map is approved consistent with the Subdivision Map Act and City of. - Dublin subdivision regulations; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held public hearings to consider the request on June 4 , 1990; and WHEREAS, proper public notice of this request was given in all respects as required by law for the Planning Commission hearings; and WHEREAS, the Staff Report was submitted recommending the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Tentative Map subject to conditions prepared by Staff; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission heard and considered all said reports , recommendations and written and oral testimony submitted at the public hearing and recommended City Council approval of the Tentative Map; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a noticed Public Hearing to consider the request on June 25, 1990; and WHEREAS, pursuant to State law (CEQA) and regulations, a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance has been prepared; and WHEREAS, the Staff Report was submitted recommending City Council approval of the Tentative Map; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. approving the Negative Declaration for PA 89-125; and " WHEREAS, the City Council heard and considered all said reports, recommendations, written and oral testimony submitted at the public hearing as hereinabove set forth. n MAP NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE City Council does hereby find that: 1 . Tentative Map 5962 , as modified, is consistent with the intent of applicable subdivision regulations and City zoning and related ordinances . 2 . Tentative Map 5962 , as modified, is consistent with the City' s General Plan as they apply to the subject property. 3 . Tentative Map 5962 will not result in the creation of significant environmental impacts . 4 . Tentative Map 5962 will not have substantial adverse effects on health or safety or be substantially detrimental to the public welfare, or be injurious to property or public improvements . 5 . The site is physically suitable for the proposed development in that the site is indicated to be geologically satisfactory for the type of development proposed in locations as shown, provided the geological consultant ' s recommendations are followed; and the site is in a good location regarding public services and facilities . 6 . The request is appropriate for the subject property in terms of being compatible to existing land uses in the area, will not overburden public services , and will facilitate the provision of housing of a type and cost that is desired, in the City of Dublin. 7 . General site considerations, including unit layout, open space, topography, orientation and the location of future buildings, vehicular access, circulation and parking, setbacks and similar elements have been designated to provide a desirable environment for the development. 8 . This project will not cause serious public health problems in that all necessary utilities are, or will be, required to be available and Zoning, Building and Subdivision Ordinances control the type of development and the operation of the uses to prevent health problems after development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE City Council hereby approves Tentative Map 5962 - PA89-125 Donlan Canyon - subject to the conditions listed below: -2- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Unless otherwise specified, the following conditions shall be complied with prior to the recordation of the Final Map. Each item is subject to review and approval by the Planning Department and Public Works Department unless otherwise specified. GENERAL PROVISIONS 1 . This approval is for Tentative Map 5962 , PA 89-125 Donlan Canyon. The Final Map shall generally conform to the Tentative Map prepared by Aliquot dated received May 24 , 1990 labeled Exhibit A on file with the Dublin Planning Department. 2 . Approval of Tentative Map is subject to the subdivider/developer securing final approval from the Dublin City Council for the Planned Development (PD) Prezoning request covering the subject property. Any modifications to the project design approved by the Planned Development (PD) Prezoning action shall supersede the.. . - design on the Tentative Map and shall be considered as an approved modification on the Tentative Map. Site Development Review approval for the project shall be secured prior to the recordation of the Final Map. Site Development Review and Final Map recordation may occur in phases . 3 . Comply with the "Typical Public Works Conditions of Approval for Subdivisions" (see Attachment 1 ) . 4 . The Developer shall comply with applicable Fire Department, Flood Control District, and Public Works requirements . Written statements from each such agency or department approving the plans over which it has jurisdiction shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to issuance of building permits on lots of the subdivision or the installation of any improvements related to this project. 5 . Should the developer wish to file a master Tract Map separating or phasing the project, all off-site work shall be guaranteed and constructed as part of the agreement for this tract. In addition, all streets necessary to keep from landlocking any parcel shall be offered for dedication and the construction guaranteed by the Subdivision Agreement . All off-site improvements and contributions to off-site improvements and offer of dedication of open space shall occur in conjunction with phase 1 . Except that contribution to improvements of Valley Christian Center Road shall occur in conjunction with the single family phase. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS 6 . Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R' s) shall be established for this development. The CC&R' s shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to the recordation of the Final Map. -3- 7 . The CC&R' s shall be reviewed and approved by the City to assure that: a. There is adequate provision for at least the maintenance, in good repair, of all commonly owned facilities , property and landscaping, including but not limited to open space areas, lighting, recreation facilities, landscape and irrigation facilities , fencing, and drainage and erosion control improvements . b. Payment of dues and assessments shall be both a lien against the assessed land and a personal obligation of each property owner. An estimate of these costs shall be provided to each buyer prior to the time of purchase. C . The Association shall keep the City Planning Department informed of the current name, address and phone number of the Association ' s official representative . d. Payment of the water and street lighting bills (maintenance and energy) and maintenance and repair of storm drain lines, are the obligations of the Homeowner' s Association, unless paid for through a Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Assessment District. e. Each buyer is to sign an acknowledgement that he has read the Constitution and Bylaws of'the Homeowner' s Association and the Conditions , Covenants and Restrictions applying to the development . f . The Homeowner' s Association shall contract with, or be advised (as in handling maintenance operations ) by, a professional management firm. g. The CC&R' s shall include a statement outlining the obligations of the property owner to be responsible for public liability in case of injury in connection with public utility easements, and for maintenance of private vehicle access ways and utility trenches in public utility easements . h. The CC&R' s shall contain a list of plant materials acceptable for landscaping subject to review and approval of the Planning Director and Fire Department . GRADING AND DRAINAGE 8 . Landslides and erosive areas as outlined in the Geotechnical Investigation Report for Donlan Canyon Ranch project shall be shown on the Grading and Improvement Plans . Proposed repairs shall be outlined on these same plans . 9 . Long term maintenance of these landslide repairs landslides within the developed area shall be the responsibility of the -4- Homeowner' s Association/property owner and incorporated in the CC&R' s . 10 . Prior to approval of grading plans, Applicant shall conform to the recommendations outlined in the Geotechnical Investigation Report for Donlan Canyon project as a minimum. Stricter controls , particularly on landslide repairs , retaining structures, subdrains, and surface drainage, may be imposed by the Public Works Director. 11 . Prior to issuance of grading permits, the City shall contract for a third party soils engineer to review and provide recommendation of the Applicant ' s submitted Geotechnical Investigation Report as related to landslide repair. The Applicant/Developer shall pay the City the cost of the third party review. 12 . All concentrated storm drain flow shall be discharged into the established drainage channels, not onto the slopes . 13 . All inlets and outlets of storm drain flow from or into natural drainage channels shall be constructed with rock slope protection to eliminate erosion and undercutting. 14 . A registered civil engineer shall design all retaining walls over three feet in height (or over two feet in height with a surcharge) and a building permit shall be required for their construction. A maintenance/ inspection program shall be implemented by the developer/homeowners ' association for the periodic inspection and maintenance of all retaining walls that could possibly affect the public right-of-way. All wood in contact with soil shall be pressure treated. 15 . Each lot that drains to the street shall be provided with two 3" drains through the curbs and the roof leaders shall be tied into them. 16 . No drainage shall be directed over a slope . 17 . All cut and fill slopes shall be contoured to appear natural and blend with the existing natural contours . 18 . The soils report for the project shall include recommendations 1) for foundations , decks, and other miscellaneous structures, 2 ) for design of swimming pools, and 3) for setbacks for structures from top or toes of slopes . Additionally, the soils report shall include a professional opinion as to safety of the site from the hazards of land slippage, erosion, settlement and seismic activity. 19 . A .declaration by the soils engineer that she/he has supervised grading and that such conformance has occurred shall be submitted to the Public Works Director. 20 . Prior to final preparation of the subgrade and placement of base materials , all underground utilities shall be installed and -5- service connections stubbed out behind the sidewalk. Public utilities, Cable TV, sanitary sewers, and water lines will be installed in a manner which will not disturb the street pavement, curb, gutter and sidewalk when future service connections or extensions are made . 21. Grading shall be completed in compliance with the construction grading plans and recommendations of the project ' s soils engineer and/or engineering geologist, and the approved erosion and sedimentation control plan, and shall be done under the supervision of the project ' s soils engineer and/or engineering geologist, who shall, upon its completion, submit a declaration to the Public Works Director that all work was done in accordance with the recommendations contained in the soils and geologic investigation reports and the approved plans and specifications . Inspections that will satisfy grading plan requirements shall be arranged with the Public Works Director. 22 . Any grading on adjacent properties will require written approval, of those property owners affected. 23 . Where soil or geologic conditions encountered in grading operations are different from that anticipated in the soil and geologic investigation report, or where such conditions warrant changes to the recommendations contained in the original soil investigation, a revised soil or geologic report shall be submitted for review by the Public forks Director. It shall be accompanied by an engineering and geological opinion as to the safety of the site from hazards of land slippage, erosion, settlement and seismic activity. 24 . All cut and fill slopes shall be revegetated with native shrubs , trees and grasses subject to review and approval of the Planning Director and Public Works Director. 25 . Prior to Tentative Map approval, the Applicant shall submit a drainage plan/hydrology report. This report shall prove adequacy and/or propose necessary improvements to the downstream drainage facilities . These facilities shall be adequate to convey the 100 year storm flow. 26 . Landslides and erosive areas as outlined in the Geotechnical Investigation Report for Donlan Canyon shall be shown on the Improvement/Grading Plans . Proposed repairs shall be the responsibility of the Homeowners ' Association and incorporated in the CC&R' s . 27 . The grading shall meet the requirements set forth in the preliminary geotechnical exploration, and ultimately, the final geotechnical exploration. Including all required subdrains, buttress fills, over-excavation and recompaction, keyed and benched engineering fills, and all other specifications . 28 . In the past, grading of other hills in this area has activated natural springs . These springs can contain numerous chemicals , -6- including H2S, which discharges a displeasing odor. Moreover, this spring water has been found to leave a hard residue that may plug up subdrains and the storm drain system, rendering them ineffective. It is likely that the proposed grading of this site will cause additional springs to surface. The Applicant shall submit a detailed study of this problem for review and approval of the Public Works Director to determine how these springs should be handled in order to prevent any damage to the environment, as well as to public and private facilities . 29 . Show typical lot drainage on the subdivision grading plans . 30 . The Applicant shall submit an erosion control plan that conforms to the "ABAG Control and Sedimentation Handbook" as a minimum. 31 . The improvement plans shall include construction details for all drainage inlets and manholes that are not Alameda County Standard. 32 . No retention basin will be permitted. Detention basin with 100- year spillway tied into underground drain is required subject to Public Works Director approval . All through underground storm drain systems will be adequately constructed to collect and convey the 100 year storm flow. 33 . Grading plans shall state the quantity of fill that must be on or off hauled. If fill is to be on or off hauled the Applicant shall submit details as to how it will be done and routes of travel for the Public Works Director' s approval . 34 . The two drainage inlets at the west end of Donlan Canyon shall be constructed with at least two sets of trash racks each. The Applicant shall provide details of the trash racks on the Improvement Plans . 35 . The Applicant shall provide trash racks and all weather access where picking up natural drainage meets improved storm drain system, to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director. 36 . All storm drain pipes that drain public property or the open space shall be contained within storm drain easements and shall be constructed of reinforced concrete pipe. 37 . All slopes 10 feet in height or higher will have a concrete "v' ditch installed at the toe of the slope. These ditches shall discharge into natural drainage channels or adequate storm drain systems . 38 . The old undocumented fill in Donlan Canyon shall be removed and . recompacted in a controlled and monitored manner. All unsuitable material found in this fill shall be removed and not reused in the fill subject to the Building Official and Public Works Director approval . -7- 39 . Subdrains shall be installed in all existing water channels that the Applicant is proposing to fill . Including the existing creek, and swales . In addition a subdrain will be installed along both sides of Donlan Canyon at the existing toe of bank. All subdrains will be 6" minimum in diameter and will have cleanouts at a minimum of every 300 linear feet. No single angles shall exist in the subdrain or cleanout riser grater than 22 . 5 degrees subject to Public Works Director review and approval . 40 . The Developer shall provide an all weather surface access to the existing ranch road located northwest of the multi-family project site subject to Site Development Review and Public Works Director approval . STREETS 41 . All public streets shall drain into storm drain systems before being discharged into established drainage channels . 42 . An encroachment permit shall be secured from the Public Works.. Director for any work done within the public right-of-way where this work is not covered under the improvement plans . 43 . Street names shall be submitted and processed through the Planning Department and shall be indicated on the Final Map and Improvement Plans . 44 . The Developer shall furnish and install street name signs, in accordance with the standards of the City of Dublin, bearing such names as are approved by the Planning Director. The subdivider shall, furnish and install traffic safety signs in accordance with the standards of the City of Dublin. 45 . The entrance road through Parcel "C" shall have no more than a 6% slope for the first 100 feet to allow for the possible future widening on Dublin Boulevard in this area. 46 . Maximum longitudinal slope on any streets shall not exceed 12% . 47 . Maximum longitudinal slopes through intersections shall not exceed 6% . 48 . Driveway slopes shall not exceed 20% . 49 . All concentrated surface flow shall be contained within a improved ditch to eliminate soil erosion. 50 . All public streets and cul-de-sacs shall conform to Alameda County Standards . 51 . The Applicant shall coordinate with the Applicant of the Hansen Hills project to insure that "A" Street conforms to both projects and the City of Dublin standards . -8- OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS 52 . Prior to approval of the improvement plans and Final Map the developer shall submit documents satisfactory to the City of Dublin presenting proof of public access on the proposed road across Parcel "C" . 53 . Construct 35 foot radius cul-de-sac at the end of Dublin Boulevard. The new curb and gutter shall not be constructed any closer to Interstate 580 than the existing curb. 54 . Provide a 2" AC overlay on Dublin Boulevard in front of the Donlan Canyon project. The overlay shall include placing paving fabric between the existing pavement and the overlay. 55 . Remove the existing AC berm on the north side of Dublin Boulevard from the proposed turnaround to Silvergate Drive and replace with Alameda County Standard Curb, Gutter and 5 foot wide sidewalk. 56 . The Applicant shall obtain Caltrans approval for any work performed within their right-of-way, or affecting their facilities ( i .e. , tying into their cross-culvert, etc. ) . 57 . Prior to release of occupancy of any units , the developer shall be responsible for contribution towards cost of the design, construction and inspection of an additional right-turn lane including right-of-way and related signal modification in the west leg of eastbound Dublin Boulevard at the San Ramon Road intersection. This cost shall be split between this development and the development of the Hansen Hills property immediately to the east, on a pro rata basis based on the amount of traffic generated by each development. 58 . Prior to release of occupancy of any units , the developer shall be responsible for contribution towards cost of the design, construction and inspection of the widening of the existing roadway of Dublin Boulevard approximately 15 feet, all on the south side, between Silvergate Drive and Hansen Drive, to accommodate four 12-foot traffic lanes , and two five-foot bike lanes , and a five-foot sidewalk, as generally shown on the proposed widening plans prepared by TJKM and dated received August of 1988 and described in the study prepared by TJKM in memo dated September 27 , 1989 . This work shall also involve reconstructing the intersection of Dublin Boulevard and Silvergate Drive to form a "T" intersection, with Dublin Boulevard being the through road. This cost shall be split between this development and the development of the Hansen Hills property immediately to the east on a pro rata basis based on the . amount of traffic generated by each development. 59 . The developer shall be responsible for paying his fair share towards the cost of the design, construction and inspection of the off-site street improvements through the Valley Christian Center based on proportionate traffic generation on that street. -9- 60 . Prior to release of building permits, the Applicant shall remove all downed wood and debris the on-site creeks to keep this material from entering the water courses . This pruning and removal shall be done in the area lying between the creeks and 50 feet uphill of the flow line. 61 . A 10-foot public utility easement shall be shown on the Final Map along all street frontages, in addition to all other easements required by the utility companies or governmental agencies . 62 . All common area landscaping, and landscaped medians , shall be maintained by the homeowners ' association/or property owners of the multi-family project. 63 . All open space shall be owned and maintained by the City of Dublin, if offered for dedication and accepted by the City, or another agency/land trust acceptable to the City of Dublin Planning Director and Public Works Director, if offered for dedication and accepted by such agency. 64 . The Developer shall submit to the Public Works Department for review and approval, a street signing and striping plan. 65 . The Developer shall submit an acoustic analysis for the project. The study shall determine Interstate 580 affects on the proposed development and whether sound walls'or other sound attenuations are necessary. If the study determines the sound walls are necessary, the Applicant shall submit plans and details subject to Site Development Review approval and construct them as part of their improvements . 66 . If the Applicant is planning on selling the multi-family units as condominiums , the Tentative Map must say "For Condominium Purposes" . UTILITIES 67 . Electrical, gas , telephone, and Cable TV services , shall be provided underground to each lot or building in accordance with the City policies and existing ordinances . All utilities shall be located and provided within public utility easements, sized to meet utility company standards, or in public streets . 68 . Prior to filing of the grading and improvement plans, the developer shall furnish the Public Works Director with a letter from Dublin San Ramon Services District (DSRSD) stating that DSRSD has agreed to furnish water and sewer service to the development. 69 . Secure DSRSD agreement to maintain the on-site sanitary sewer collection system excluding individual laterals . The system shall be designed as acceptable to DSRSD. -10- 70 . All utilities along the projects Dublin Boulevard frontage and within the project shall be undergrounded. WATER 71 . Water facilities must be connected to the DSRSD system, and must be installed at the expense of the developer, in accordance with District standards and specifications . All material and workmanship for water mains, and appurtenances thereto, must conform with all of the requirements of the officially adopted Water Code of the District, and will be subject to field inspection by the District. 72 . Any water well, cathodic protection well, or exploratory boring shown on the map, that is known to exist, is proposed or is located during the course of field operations , must be properly destroyed, backfilled, or maintained in accordance with applicable groundwater protection ordinances . Zone 7 should be contacted for additional information. 73 . The Developer/Applicant shall comply with all applicable DSRSD and City of Dublin Public Works requirements, particularly regarding: a. The elevation of the storm drain relative to the sewer lines . b. The location of the sewer man-holes . They shall be in parking or street areas accessible by DSRSD' s equipment . C . Dedication of sewer lines . d. Location and design of the water system valves . 74 . The Applicant/Developer shall submit plans for all DSRSD facilities within the project to DSRSD for review and approval . 75 . The Applicant/Developer shall submit a water system analysis showing pressures and elevations throughout the development, subject to DSRSD review and approval . 76 . Prior to issuance of grading permits, the Applicant/ Developer shall submit to the City of Dublin Planning Director proof that DSRSD requirements have been met . IMPROVEMENT PLANS, AGREEMENTS AND SECURITY 77 . The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Dublin and its agents, officers, and employees, from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Dublin or its agents, officers, or employees, to attack, set aside, void, or annul, an approval of the City of Dublin or its advisory agency, appeal board, or legislative body concerning a subdivision, which action is brought within the time period provided for in Section 66499 . 37 of the Government Code of the State of California. The -11- City of Dublin shall promptly notify the subdivider of any claim, action, or proceedings and shall cooperate fully in the defense. DEDICATIONS 78 . Park land shall be dedicated or in-lieu fees shall be paid, or a combination of both shall be provided prior to issuance of building permits or prior to recordation of the Final Map, whichever occurs first, in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance. The park land dedication required is approximately 2 . 887 acres ( . 011 acres per dwelling unit for single family portion of the site and . 009 acres per dwelling unit for multi- family) . OPEN SPACE/COMMON AREAS/LANDSCAPING 79 . Maintenance of common areas including ornamental landscaping, graded slopes , erosion control plantings and drainage, erosion and sediment control improvements, retaining walls, and landslide repair improvements shall be the responsibility of the developer during construction stages, and until final improvements are accepted by the City, and the performance guarantee required is released; thereafter, maintenance shall be the responsibility of a Homeowner' s Association, which automatically collects maintenance assessments from each owner and makes the assessments a personal obligation of each owner and a lien against the assessed property. 80 . ' Street trees, of at least a 15-gallon size, shall be planted along the street frontages . Trees shall be planted in accordance with a planting plan, including tree varieties and locations, approved by the Planning Director. Trees planted within, or adjacent to, sidewalks or curbs shall be provided with root shields . 81 . Prior to issuance of grading permit visually important trees shall be tagged in the field for protection and preservation and appropriately fenced subject to approval of the Public Works Director. DEBRIS/DUST 82 . Measures shall be taken to contain all trash, construction debris, and materials on-site until disposal off-site can be arranged. The developer shall be responsible for corrective measures at no expense to the City of Dublin: 83 . The developer shall keep adjoining public streets and driveways free and clean of project dirt, mud, materials and debris , and clean-up shall be made during the construction period, as determined by the Public Works Director. 84 . Areas undergoing grading and all other construction activities shall be watered or other dust-palliative measures used to prevent dust, as conditions warrant. -12- ARCHAEOLOGY 85 . If, during construction, archaeological remains are encountered, construction in the vicinity shall be halted, an archaeologist consulted, and the City Planning Department notified. If, in the opinion of the archaeologist, the remains are significant, measures, as may be required by the Planning Director, shall be taken to protect them. FIRE 86 . All materials and workmanship for fire hydrants, gated connections, and appurtenances thereto, necessary to provide water supply for fire protection, must be installed by the developer and conform to all requirements of the applicable provisions specified by the Dougherty Regional Fire Authority (DRFA) . All such work will be subject to the joint field inspection of the Public Works Director and DRFA. 87 . The developer shall comply with all applicable requirements of DRFA including, but not limited to, those related to the following: a. Fire Trail Access, b. Fire Buffer Zone, C . Weed Abatement, + d. Fire Sprinklers in Structures outside the 1-1/2 mile distance from the nearest fire station, e. Street Grades , f . Fire Impact Fee, g. Fire Hydrants, and h. Roads MISCELLANEOUS 88 . Any relocation of improvements or public facilities shall be accomplished at no expense to the City. 89 . Copies of the project plans, indicating all lots, streets and drainage facilities , shall also be submitted at 1" = 400 ' scale, and 1" = 200 ' scale for City mapping purposes . 90 . This property shall be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. 83-1 . 91 . All construction traffic may be subject to specific routing as determined by the Public Works Director. 92 . , The Developer shall provide unit address information to the satisfaction of DRFA, U. S . Postal Services, and City of Dublin Planning Department. 93 . All construction/grading activity at the site shall be restricted to the hours between 7 : 30 a .m. and 5 : 30 p.m. , Monday through -13- Friday, except as may be 'approved in advance in writing by the Public Works Director. 94 . In submitting subsequent plans for review and approval, each set of plans shall have attached an annotated copy of these conditions of approval . The notations shall clearly indicate how all conditions of approval will be complied with. Construction plans will not be accepted without the annotated conditions attached to each set of plans . The Applicant will be responsible for obtaining the approvals of all participating non-City agencies prior to the issuance of building permits . 95 . The Applicant/Developer shall work with the Applicant/Developer of the adjacent property Hansen Hill/Bren Co. project site Tentative Map 5962 to provide adequate access and utility connections, to the satisfaction of Public Works Director. 96 . Prior to issuance of grading plan the Applicant shall submit for review and approval a site safety plan for protection of construction worker. The Safety Plan shall establish action levels for personal protection identified through on-site air monitoring in compliance with Alameda County Environmental Health Services requirements . 97 . Any materials escavated during construction and grading of the site which contain chemical compounds shall not be reused on-site unless acceptable remediation measures are complied with subject to Public Works Director approval . 98 . Temporary fencing shall be provided during construction for those areas of riparian or oak/bay woodland habitat not intended to be included in the construction or grading zones . 99 . For any removed trees with a trunk diameter greater than 6 inches at a height of 54 inches above ground, replacement trees should be planted on-site and be of a similar native species on a 3 to 1 basis . 100 . Replacement trees shall be at least a five gallon container stock size . The large trees which will be removed shall be replaced with bay trees at a size of at least ten gallon containers . A maintenance program shall be established for the replacement trees as necessary to provide fertilizer, pruning and protection from browsing by deer and rabbits . 101 . The creation of the new habitat corridor on Lot 1 as approved by the California Department of Fish and Game shall be undertaken prior to or at least concurrently with the project construction, and shall consist of the minimum habitat widths and vegetation . types as preliminarily proposed. A contingency plan for replanting of the corridor shall be developed in case the original attempt fails . The new habitat corridor shall be inspected on an annual - basis to determine if the original plantings are surviving and providing adequate wildlife habitat. -14- If necessary, new plantings shall be installed and maintained in a manner consistent with the original plans . 102 . Prior to undertaking any fill activities within the channel of Donlan Canyon Creek or in adjacent wetlands, all necessary permits shall be obtained from the California Department of Fish and Game, and the US Army Corps of Engineers . All conditions of these permits shall be implemented including those attached to the Corps permit by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board through its issuance of State water quality certification. The Applicant shall submit verification that necessary permits have been obtained to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director. 103 . The Applicant shall work with City Staff in the acquisition of all or part of the one arce Parcel C. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE City Council directs Staff to work with the Applicant to facilitate, for the City' s best interest, the Applicant ' s acquisition of all or part of the one acre Parcel C..- PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of June, 1990 . AYES : NOES : ABSENT: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk -15- RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN RESOLUTION OF ANNEXATION APPLICATION (PA 89-125 DONLAN CANYON REORGANIZATION) ANNEXATION NO. 9 Recitals 1. Pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Government Reorganization Act of 1985 (the "Act") (Government Code Section 56000 et seq. ) an affected city, as therein defined, may by resolution adopted by its legislative body make a proposal for a "reorganization" , as defined in Section 56073 and request initiation of proceedings thereon; 2. The City of Dublin is an affected city for a reorganization proposal which contains territory proposed to be annexed to said city. 3. The reorganization proposal would detach the territory described in Attachment A from the Alameda County Structural Fire District. The territory described in Attachment A would then be annexed to the City of Dublin and the Dublin San Ramon Services District. 4. The territory described in Attachment A is uninhabited territory within the meaning of Government Code Section 56046. 5. The exterior boundaries of the territory described in Attachment A are as shown on Attachment B hereto. 6. This reorganization is proposed at the request of the landowner within the territory to be annexed. 7. It is proposed that the proposed reorganization would be conditional upon detachment of the territory described in Attachment A from the district listed in paragraph 3. 8. The plan for services for the territory to be annexed is set forth in Attachment C. 9. This proposal is consistent with the City of Dublin's sphere of influence. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Dublin does RESOLVE as follows: The City Council of the City of Dublin, as the legislative body for an affected city, does hereby adopt the foregoing recitals and makes a proposal for a reorganization, as described herein, pursuant to the Act and does hereby request that proceedings be taken pursuant to said Act. F.. AnnexA't,'o M 3 ' TA S9. M5 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall file a certified copy of this resolution with the Executive Officer of the Alameda County Local Agency Formation Commission. PASSED, ADOPTED, AND APPROVED this 25th day of June, 1990, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk ATTACHMENT A PA 89-125 DONLAN CANYON LEGMM PTION REAL PROPERTY SITUATE IN THE UNINCORPORATED AREA, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE 1/4 SECTION CORNER OF THE LINE DIVIDING SECTIONS 3 AND 4, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN; AND RUNNING THENCE ALONG THE LINE DIVIDING NORTHWEST AND SOUTHWEST QUARTERS OF SAID SECTION 3 SOUTH 89 045' EAST 2614.26 FEET TO THE 1/4 CORNER IN CENTER OF SAID SECTION 3; THENCE SOUTH 0°30' WEST 993.00 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE NORTHERN LINE OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA BY DEED RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF ALAMEDA COUNTY OCTOBER 17, 1951, BOOK 6562, PAGE 267, OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE, EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERN LINE AND ALONG THE NORTHERN LINE OF THOSE CERTAIN PARCELS OF LAND_CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA BY DEEDS RECORDED IN SAID OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER JUNE 17, 1976, REEL 4407, IMAGE 191, OFFICIAL RECORDS, AND NOVEMBER 7, 1968, REEL 2282, IMAGE 959, OFFICIAL RECORDS, THE FOLLOWING 11 (ELEVEN) COURSES: 1) NORTH 76°50'47" EAST 141.84 FEET, 2) SOUTH 34 014'51" EAST 221.02 FEET, 3) NORTH 79 018'27" EAST 36.60 FEET, 4) NORTH 24 046'42" EAST 231.25 FEET, 5) SOUTH 50 038'13" EAST 282.54 FEET, 6) SOUTH 85 001'13" EAST 128.05 FEET, 7) NORTH 52 046'20" WEST 75.55 FEET, 8) NORTH 55 013'36" EAST 49.45 FEET, 9) NORTH 71 032'36" EAST 164.81 FEET, 10) SOUTH 76 017'59" EAST 122.81 FEET, AND 11) NORTH 88 038'10" WEST 194.17 FEET TO THE COMMON PROPERTY LINE, NOW OR FORMERLY, OF WILLIAM A. EATON AND ROBERT L. WATKINS, ET AL; THENCE, LEAVING SAID NORTHERN LINE OF SAID STATE OF CALIFORNIA PARCELS NORTH 0 030' EAST 1,155.56 FEET MORE OR LESS TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY LINE OF LOT LETTERED "V" ON THE LINE DIVIDING THE SAN RAMON AND SANTA RITA RANCHES, ALSO CITY OF DUBLIN BOUNDARY CORNER, ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF DUBLIN BY DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL ON 6-21-1990 ORDINANCE 89-020764, RESOLUTION LAFCO RECEIVED JUN 0 .990 DUBLIN PLANNING RUNNING THENCE ALONG THE SAID SOUTHERN BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID LOT LETTERED "V", AS SAID LOT IS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN MAP ENTITLED, "MAP OF THE PROPERTY OF THE ESTATE OF ELIZABETH A. DOUGHERTY" FILED IN SAID OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER MAY 11, 1891; NORTH 89°30' WEST 407.88 FEET; NORTH 56°30' WEST 1075.80 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT LETTERED "V"; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERN BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID LOT LETTERED "V" NORTH 0°15' EAST 1841.40 FEET TO A POINT IN THE CENTER OF THE CREEK AT THE SOUTHEASTERN CORNER OF THE 7.92 ACRE TRACT OF LAND HERETOFORE CONVEYED BY T.F. DONLON, ET AL., TO E.J. CRONIN, BY DEED DATED APRIL 25, 1911, RECORDED IN BOOK 1938 OF DEEDS, PAGE 104, ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS; THENCE UP SAID CREEK ON THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID 7.92 ACRES, SOUTH 36°45' WEST 33.66 FEET; SOUTH 64° WEST 90.42 FEET; SOUTH 46 010' WEST 138.60 FEET; SOUTH 82° WEST 151.80 FEET; SOUTH 86 045' WEST 277.86 FEET; NORTH 83° WEST 122.76 FEET; NORTH 87 045' WEST 181.50 FEET; NORTH 63 015' WEST 130.68 FEET; NORTH 880 WEST 139.26 FEET; NORTH 73 015' WEST 65.34 FEET; THENCE NORTH 680 15' WEST 115.50 FEET; NORTH 61°15' WEST 99.00 FEET; NORTH 69°15' WEST 130.68 FEET; NORTH 43 030' WEST 72.60 FEET TO THE MOST EASTERN CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN 3.227 ACRE TRACT OF LAND HERETOFORE CONVEYED BY E.J. CRONIN TO T.F. DONLON ET AL, BY DEED DATED APRIL 25, 1911, RECORDED IN BOOK 1938 OF DEEDS, PAGE 105, ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS, THENCE CONTINUING UP AFORESAID CREEK, ALONG THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID 3.227 ACRE TRACT NORTH 52 045' WEST 69.30 FEET; WEST 31.68 FEET; NORTH 73 030' WEST 216.48 FEET; NORTH 76 015' WEST 200.64 FEET; NORTH 800 WEST 242.22 FEET; SOUTH 88°30' WEST 166.98 FEET; NORTH 760 WEST 127.38 FEET TO A POINT ON THE LINE DIVIDING SECTIONS 33 AND 34, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN, DISTANT THEREON NORTH 219.78 FEET FROM THE SECTION CORNER COMMON TO SECTIONS 3, 4 IN TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST AND SECTIONS 33 AND 34, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST; AND THENCE ALONG THE LINE DIVIDING SAID SECTIONS 33 AND 34 AND RECEIVED J J i`l 1990 �'vuLlfJ PLANNING THE SAID SECTIONS 3 AND 4 SOUTH 0°15' EAST 2871.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. BEING PORTIONS OF SAID SECTIONS 3 AND SECTION 34 AFORESAID, AND ALSO A PORTION OF THE RANCHO SAN RAMON. A.P.No. 941-18-3 941-18-4 86079.1 OVERALL DESCRIPTION 6/5 /90 - pECEIVED jUt,; ; ;gin 5- �l✓aLiiv ?LANNiNG 6 6) z PROPOSED ANNEXATION — 01 ON I BLAYLOCK, GLEASON, 0 i FL ETCHER : z (80 - 29140) 0 . 54 A C. . Ln m AR EA 196 N w 00 .......... Jr P.O. �./33 31 30, (31 ra Attachment C PA 89-125 DONLAN CANYON Annexation No. 9 -Plan For Providing Services 1 . Indicated below are the agencies which currently provide public services within the proposal area and which will provide these services if annexation of the site is approved by LAFCO: Services Current Agency Proposed Agency Police protection Alameda County Sheriff ' s City of Dublin Department Police Dept Fire protection Alameda County Sheriff ' s Dougherty Department: County Fire Regional Fire Patrol Authority (DRFA) Water distribution N/A Dublin San Ramon Services District (DSRSD) Sewage collection DSRSD and Treatment N/A Refuse collection Livermore Dublin Disposal Same as current Service Street lighting N/A City of Dublin Street maintenance City of Dublin and sweeping N/A Flood Control Alameda County Flood Control Same as current Parks & Recreation N/A City of Dublin Library Services Alameda County Alameda County Electricity N/A PG&E Cable television N/A Viacom Cable- vision Transit N/A LAVTA/BART 2 . The proposed services will be provided at the same level of service applied to other properties within the applicable agency service areas and will be 'extended upon annexation and development requiring the services . '.3 . The proposed project will require the widening and upgrading of existing streets , the construction of new streets, sewer and other structures which will be financed by the developer. 4 . Revenue sources used in the support of services to the site will include property and sales tax. RESOLUTION NO. _ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN RELATING TO EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUE FOR PA 89-125 DONLAN CANYON REORGANIZATION ANNEXATION NO. 9 Recitals 1. Section 99 of the Revenue and Taxation Code (AB 8) provides, among other things, that no local agency jurisdictional change can be completed without the agencies affected by such change first having agreed upon an exchange of property tax revenue between and among the affected agencies: and 2. The County of Alameda Board of Supervisors (Resolution No. 186574) have previously agreed to a method for equitably distributing the property , taxes; and 3. There is presently pending an application for a reorganization by the City of Dublin entitled PA 89-125 Donlan Canyon PD Prezoning, Tentative Map and Annexation to annex territory to the City of Dublin; and 4. Specific agreement is required for each reorganization proposal agreeing to the exchange of property tax revenues for the reorganization to be completed and filed with the State. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Dublin does RESOLVE as follows: Section 1. That for the said annexation by the City of Dublin, the Auditor-Controller of the County of Alameda shall be directed to cause an exchange of property tax revenues pursuant to the following provisions of paragraph numbers 1 and 3 of Exhibit "A" of the property tax revenues redistribution method developed by the Alameda County Board of Supervisors (Resolution No. 186574) . 1) In all annexations involving developed or developing residential territory, as well as mixed residential/commercial areas and vacant or underdeveloped industrially-zoned areas, the City would automatically be entitled to receive an allocation of the County's general fund computed property tax revenue from that area, equal to the City/County' s existing allocation percentage ratio within its corporate limits; 2) In the event that a City assumes full responsibility for a service or services presently provided by a separate County taxing agency or special district within a territory proposed to be annexed, pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 99(b) , the County will endeavor to transfer to the City the entire computed property tax revenue presently allocated to such County agency or district from said area. Section 2. The City certifies that there is no significant commercial and/or industrial development in the area proposed to be annexed. 6XchAAJe c-' a M8'9-I�tS Section 3. That the property tax proceeds allocated to Alameda County Structural Fire District shall be transferred to the City of Dublin by virtue of the fact that the City of Dublin will assume full responsibility for the services presently provided in the subject area by the above district. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Dublin City Council does hereby agree to the property tax revenues redistribution method stated in Section 1 and 3. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of June, 1990. AYES: NOES: ABSNET: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 90 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO PERMIT THE PREZONING OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF THE WESTERN TERMINUS OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- The City Council of the City of Dublin does ordain as follows: Section 1. Chapter 2 of Title 8 of the Dublin Ordinance Code is hereby amended in the following manner: Approximately 196+ acres consisting of lands fronting along the north side of Dublin Boulevard, more specifically described as Assessor's Parcel Number 941-18-3 and 941-18-4, is prezoned to a PD Planned Development District, PA 89-125 Donlan Canyon, as shown on Exhibit B (Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance), Exhibit C (Approval, Findings and General Provisions of the PD, Planned Development Prezoning), and Exhibit D (Tentative Map Approval) on file with the City of Dublin Planning Department, are hereby adopted as regulations for the future use, improvement, and maintenance of the property within this District. A map depicting the prezoning area is outlined below: DUBLIN �a. a� PROJECT SITE s> V VE;Gar_ x._30 1 Section 2. This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days from and after its passage. Before the expiration of fifteen (15) days after its passage, it shall be published once, with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the same, in a local newspaper published in Alameda County and available in the City of Dublin. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY the City Council of the City of Dublin, on this day of July, 1990. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Mayor .a ATTEST: City Clerk 0 IF)SeIrC'EL January 17, 1990 Maureen O'Halloran Senior Planner City of Dublin 6500 Dublin Blvd. P.O. Box 2340 Dublin, CA 94568 RE: PA 89-125 Donlan Canyon Dear Maureen, Donlan Canyon Ranch, Ltd, a California Limited Partnership, as owner of that certain property- consisting of +197 acres known as Donlan Canyon fronting on the 580 freeway located in Alameda County, hereby authorizes the City of Dublin to prezone and annex said property into the City of Dublin. Sincerely, n2CE 'a VED .1 Pi 1 9 1999 DUBLIN PLANNING CZ! V E D By: ichae . /Gleason General Partner CU3L J PLANNING s f}pplicAnlf's le er L., ,,T'IAU'..HM'tNT did VI 7/9. 89- RECEIVED Do\TI.AN CANYON p pT 1 3 1989 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DUBLIN PLANNING Donlan Canyon Ranch is 197 +/- acres adjacent to the City of Dublin at its western boundary, and consisting of two large Oak/Bay woodlands, Donlan Creek and portions of two dominant ridgelines. Based on our site assessment, feasibility and market conditions, we are requesting Prezoning Annexation and approval of a tentative map. It is our intent to dedicate 170 +/- acres to the City, East Bay Regional Park District or to both. This acreage includes both woodland areas and ridgelines that make up two of the most prominent ridgelines in Dublin's sphere. It is our request that if our proposal is acceptable to the City and subsequently approved that we exchange some of our 170 acres for approximately 1 acre adjacent to the frontage road (Parcel Q. To produce a natural appearing hillside project which is integrated into existing slopes, the grading will be limited where possible to a 3:1 slope. This gentle slope will increase the area which is graded, however the end result will be a rounded, flowing, rural setting. Benching will be avoided where possible. Geologic restoration will be required for portions of the site that are prone to landslides. Grading to gentler slopes and the use of fill from the graded areas for buttressing the slopes are some means of restoration that will be employed. The illustrative development plan generally depicts filling of the previously disturbed canyon floor to a point where the natural creek conditions exist approximately 2000 feet from the frontage road. Grading on the saddle for the single family lots will allow for generous side and rear yard setbacks that will reduce the visibility of the homes from off site. As another visual consideration the hillside homes will be custom designed to maximize their fitting the site. Revegetation of graded areas will give a more naturalistic e appearance to the landscape. ATTACO e c� 4' i �r z The typical landscape character of the region is that of rounded, grassy hills weaving through scattered oaks and woodlands massing at the draws and ravines where water or seasonal run off is available. Native grasses and flora of the Oak woodland and Riparian environment will be reintroduced following the natural pattern of the area. Measures . have been established in coordination with the State Department of Fish and Game to mitigate development impacts on the riparian environment. A more intense native riparian planting will be established along this zone with trees being replaced at a ratio of three to one. A natural spring at the head of the draw . will be preserved and opened up to provide water to the riparian environment. Access to the project will be made form Dublin Boulevard for the apartments and the Hansen project for the single family. The majority of roads on the site will be at a gradual grade and run nearly parallel to the topographic contours or be integrated into a natural land form. Visual and erosion control measures such as hydroseeding & selective landscaping will be utilized. The loop access road has been provided to maintain good emergency accessibility. In general, utilities will have to be made available to the project. The development proposes the construction of two water tanks and the requisite facilities. Negotiations are on-going with the Dublin San Ramon Service District as to their requirements for this site. The developers have made a request to extend the Districts' upper zone boundary; this will have no effect on the adequacy of service. Sewer disposal will be provided by DSRSD it is our understanding that capacity is available. All other utilities and services are standard and available. e PA 89-125 DONLAN. CANYON PD PREZONING, TENTATIVE MAP AND ANNEXATION INITIAL STUDY III . Discussion of Environmental Evaluation Pursuant to Section 15153 (c) and 15183 of the CEQA Guidelines , the earlier EIR prepared for Donlan Canyon General Plan Amendment, an Earlier project PA 87-012 ( SCH No. 88100406 ) was used to document the finding that the project as proposed would not have a significant effect on the environment . - The earlier EIR prepared for PA 87-012 Donlan Canyon General Plan Amendment addressed the issues and impacts related to earth, air, water, plant life, animal life, noise, light/glare, land use, natural- resources , risk of upset, population, transportation/circulation, public services, energy, utilities , health, aesthetics , recreation and cultural resources . The EIR required specific mitigation measures which are incorporated into the project (see attached mitigation summary and mitigation monitoring program for earlier EIR for PA 87- 012 Donlan Canyon General Plan Amendment) . The EIR determined that with incorporation of the mitigation measures, the impacts are not significant . ATTACHMOEmHl' S�eef�o�! ILL PA89- /a.45 NEGATIVE DECLARATION (To be prepared pursuant to City of Dublin Environmental Guidelines , Section 1 . 7 (c) , 5 . 5) Description of Project: PA 89-125 Donlan Canyon PD Prezoning, Tentative Map, and Annexation of 197+ acres Project Location: Western terminus of Dublin Boulevard, Alameda County Name of Proponent: George Thomas , Paragon Group, 523 West 6th Street, Suite 515 , Los Angeles , CA 90014 I hereby find that the above project will not have a significant effect on the environment . Attached is a copy of the Initial Study ( "Environmental Information Form" and Environmental Checklist" ) documenting the reasons to support the above finding . Pursuant to Section 15153 ( c) and 15183 of the CEQA Guidelines , the earlier EIR prepared for PA 87-012 Donlan Canyon General Plan Amendment, an earlier project, was used to document the finding . The following mitigation measures are included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects on the environment . ( If no mitigation measures are included, indicate "not applicable" . If mitigation measures are included, a Monitoring/Reporting Plan must be attached) : Not Applicable . The earlier EIR Monitoring/Reporting Plan (attached) for PA 87-012 Donlan Canyon General Plan Amendment ( SCH No . 88100406 ) designed to ensure that the mitigation measures are carried out during the project ' s implementation is hereby incorporated and fully made part of this Negative Declaration. Signature Laurence L. Tong Printed Name Planning Director Title May 31 , 1990 Date > ffe HM'HT T I AC t �ectAR�'��o�r Pff89- 1�.5 Attachments Date Published: Date Posted: Date Notice Mailed: Considered by: on: Action on Negative Declaration: Approved Disapproved Notice of Determination filed: Council Resolution No.