HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 6.2 Amendment to Business Registration Ord. r
CITY OF DUBLIN
AGENDA STATEMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 26, 1991
SUBJECT: Public Hearing: Amendments to Business Registration
Ordinance
(Prepared by: Philip S. Molina, Finance Director)
EXHIBITS ATTACHED: ■ Agenda Statement from City Council meeting of
August 12, 1991
■ Proposed Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: 1 . Open Public Hearing
2. Receive Staff Report
3. Receive Public Testimony
4. Close Public Hearing
5. Deliberate
6. Waive reading and Adopt Ordinance
FINANCIAL STATEMENT: A change in revenue may result from the proposed
changes in the Ordinance, however, it is not
anticipated to impact the 1991-92 Budget.
DESCRIPTION: At the City Council meeting on August 12, 1991 , the
City Council conducted a public hearing on proposed modifications to the
Business Registration Ordinance. The City Council introduced the Ordinance
after conducting the Public Hearing.
The attached agenda statement from the previous City Council meeting
describes the proposed amendments.
Staff recommends that the City Council conduct a Public Hearing and adopt
the Ordinance.
i
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COPIES TO:
ITEM NO. + CITY CLERK
FILE L71,319 0 D
CITY OF DUBLIN
AGENDA STATEMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 12, 1991
SUBJECT: Amendments to Business Registration Ordinance
EXHIBITS ATTACHED: 1) Proposed Ordinance Amendment
2) Current Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: , j Open Public Hearing
i 2) Receive Staff Report
3) Receive Public Testimony
4) Close Public Hearing
5) Deliberate
6) Waive Reading and Introduce Ordinance
FINANCIAL STATEMENT: The loss of revenue as a result of modifying
Section 20 is not known, but may be significant depending upon the number
of multiple rentals. The loss of revenue as a result of modifying the
other sections of the Ordinance is minimal. These modifications should not
impact the 1991-92 Budget, because neither the expense nor revenue
associated with enforcing Section 20 of the current Ordinance were included
in the Budget.
DESCRIPTION: Dublin's Business Registration Ordinance became
effective on October 1, 1990.
During the first year of administration, the Staff has identified certain
sections of the current Business Registration Ordinance that should be
revised to 1) ease administration of the Ordinance, 2) lower certain fees
in accordance with the cost of performing certain functions related to the
Ordinance, and 3) bring the Ordinance into conformance with recent changes
in the law.
The proposed revisions to the Ordinance are discussed below in more detail.
1. Section 8 of the current Ordinance presently exempts the profession of
"attorney-at-law." The intent of the current Ordinance is to exempt
attorneys who practice law in the State of California from the local
licensing requirements for the legal services that they provide. The
current language has been interpreted to mean that all business
activities conducted by an attorney is exempt from the licens.e. The
proposed change would exempt an attorney from paying a city
registration fee only for legal services rendered; any other business .
that an attorney conducts within the City will require a business
license and the payment of a registration fee.
2 . The current language in Section 20 of the Ordinance requires a
separate fee payment from each landlord for each separate location
that he/she rents in Dublin. The proposed language would require the
payment of only one registration fee for renting and/or leasing any
number of properties in Dublin. The impact of the change, for
example, would allow a landlord to rent 10 separate buildings in
Dublin and only pay one registration fee to do so. The Fee Collector
still has the authority to request other necessary information
(Section 22 (a) (6) ) , and as such the Fee Collector will require that
each landlord provide a list of the addresses, business names, and
phone numbers of all the business tenants at each location, if this
change is approved by the City Council.
3. Section 26 of the Ordinance allows for the prorating of the
registration fee to a new business starting out in Dublin. However,
Section 28 provides that when an existing business transfers its
license to a different location, the Ordinance requires the full
payment of $50. 00 regardless of when the transfer takes place. Since
a transfer of business location is analogous to starting a new
business, it would seem appropriate to allow for the prorating of the
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
COPIES TO.
ITEM NO.
fee when a license will be modified to reflect a change in the
business location.
4. Section 28 of the Ordinance also addresses transfer of the business to
a different owner. In those cases where there is no change in
business type or location, this kind of a transfer would require
minimal Staff time except to duplicate in the computer the existing
data onto a new license number within the data base. It seems more
equitable, therefore, that the charge for issuing a new license for a
transfer of ownership should be lowered to $5. 00 rather than the
current amount of $25. 00 to more closely reflect the cost of producing
the duplicate license.
S. The Fee Collector is responsible for enforcing the Registration
Ordinance and from time-to-time may need to enter business premises to
conduct, a Business License Inspection (Section 34b) . In accordance
with the changes made to other City ordinances to more properly
reflect currently case law, the City Attorney has recommended that
this Ordinance be revised to require that the Fee Collector obtain
judicial authorization before entering the premises for the purpose of
a Licensing Inspection when the consent of the business is not given.
6. Section 32 of the Ordinance - currently requires the Fee Collector to
charge a penalty on any business that is delinquent in paying its
license fee. From time-to-time it may be necessary to either waive or
reduce the penalty for a specified period of time when, for example,
it is clear that the delay in the payment is not the fault of the
business. The new language would provide the Fee Collector with the
authority to waive or reduce the penalty.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the changes
in the Business License Ordinance, waive the reading and introduce the
Amendments to the Business License Ordinance.
Y
a:L812BReg.doc.agenda#5
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
COPIES TO:
ITEM NO.
ORDINANCE NO. - 91
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
AMENDING THE BUSINESS REGISTRATION ORDINANCE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN DOES ORDAIN as
follows:
Section 1. Section 8 of Ordinance No. 10-90 is deleted and a new
Section 8 is added to read as follows:
"Section 8 . Exemptions -- Attorneys
The provisions of this Ordinance shall not apply to any
natural person licensed to practice law in the State of
California when such person is practicing law. "
Section 2 . Section 20 of Ordinance No. 10-90 is deleted and a
new section 20 is added to read as follows:
"Section 20. Branch Establishments--Separate
Licenses.
A separate license must be obtained for each branch
establishment or location of the business transacted and carried
on, and for each separate type of business at the same location,
and each license shall authorize the licensee to transact and
carry on only the business licensed thereby at the location or in
the manner designated in such license; provided, that warehouses
and distributing plants used in connection with and incidental to
a business licensed under the provisions of this Ordinance shall
not be deemed to be separate places of business or branch
establishments, and provided further that only one license is
required for the rental or lease of real property within the City
regardless of the number of locations or units of real property
being rented or leased. "
Section 3. Section 28 of Ordinance No. 10-90 is amended by �.
deleting the words "a fee of $50. 00" and adding in their place
the following words:
"a prorated fee in the manner calculated pursuant to
section 26. "
and by deleting the number 11$25. 00" and adding in its place the
following: 11$5. 0011 .
114\ord\bus-reg3.ehs 1
Section 4 . Section 29 of Ordinance No. 10-90 is amended by
deleting the number 11$25. 00" and adding in its place the
following: 11$5. 00. "
Section 5. Subsection (b) of Section 34 of Ordinance No. 10-90
is deleted and a new subsection (b) is added to read as follows:
"The Collector, in the exercise of the duties imposed
upon him or her hereunder, and acting through his or
her deputies or duly authorized assistants, shall
examine or cause to be examined all places of business
in the City to ascertain whether the provisions of this
Ordinance have been complied with. Absent consent to
enter the premises, the Collector shall request the
City Attorney to obtain the necessary judicial
authority for entry and inspection. "
Section 6. Section 32 of Ordinance No. 10-90 is deleted and a
new section 32 is added to read as follows:
"Section 32 . Business Registration Fee--Penalty.
A penalty in the amount of 7% compounded monthly of any
delinquent business registration fee shall accrue on the 30th day
following the due date of any business registration fee, up to a
maximum penalty equal to the amount of the business registration
fee. The amount of any business registration fee and penalty
imposed by the provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed a
debt to the City but may be reduced or waived, in the discretion
of the Collector or on appeal, where appropriate. An action may
be commenced in the name of the City in any court of competent
jurisdiction for collection of such amounts. "
Section 7 . Effective Date & Posting.
This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30)
days from and after the date of its passage. The City Clerk of
the City of Dublin shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in at
least three (3) public places in the City of Dublin in accordance
with Section 36933 of the Government Code of the State of
California.
114\ord\J=-reg3.ehs 2
i
i.
. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of
1991, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
114\ord\bus-reg3.ehs 3