Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 8.2 Dublin Blvd Extension CITY OF DUBLIN AGENDA STATEMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 23, 1991 SUBJECT: Dublin Boulevard Extension Assessment District 91-1 Report by Public Works Director Lee Thompson EXHIBITS ATTACHED: 1) Signed petitions for subject Assessment District 2) Certificate re petition 3) Resolution accepting petitions 4) Boundary Map 5) Resolution approving Boundary Map 6) Resolution approving agreement for consulting engineering services 7) Consulting engineering services agreement with John Heindel as Engineer of Work 8) Resolution of Intention to Order Improvement in Dublin Boulevard Extension Assessment District 91-1 RECOMMENDATION: 1) Adopt resolution accepting petition and direct City Clerk to file petition and certificate. 2) Adopt resolution approving Boundary Map and direct City Clerk to file Boundary Map with the County Recorder. 3) Adopt resolution appointing John Heindel as Engineer of Work. 4) Adopt Resolution of Intention FINANCIAL STATEMENT: The assessment district will allow properties that will benefit from the improvements to be assessed a portion of the costs based on the benefit to those parcels. Miscellaneous costs such as legal, engineering, and bond discounts will be included in the assessments. The costs that are not directly benefiting properties in the District will be contributed by the City of Dublin through a loan from BART, with the expectation that these costs will be recovered through offsite fees and/or future assessment districts which include properties that benefit from the improvements. There are monies budgeted in the present Capital Improvement Program to pay for the City's contribution to the District. DESCRIPTION: The Dublin Boulevard Extension project which the City Council approved in its 1991-92 Capital Improvement Program will extend from Dougherty Road easterly to the Southern Pacific Railroad Right-of-Way. The assessment district portion of the funding was anticipated to come from the parcels within Tract 5900 (John Moore) . It was also anticipated that the City would be purchasing all of the Curtiss Dodge (Nohr) parcel and that the property at the northeast corner of Dublin Boulevard and Dougherty Road would be developed by Chevron and that Chevron would dedicate the necessary right-of-way and install improvements. CITY CLERK FILE 6 0 Q ITEM N0. COPIES TO: Bob Brunsell; John Heindel; John Moore; Michael Nohr; Kanaris Vangelatos, et. al. ; Michael Nave At this point in time, Mr. Nohr has opted to keep the southern portion of his property, and since that portion of his property will benefit from having its frontage on a new arterial street, Staff recommends that this parcel be included in the proposed benefit district. Chevron has decided to hold off development of its corner site. To complete the Dublin Boulevard improvements, Staff recommends that the Chevron parcel be included in the District and that the Capital Improvement Project construct the frontage improvements that were originally to have been constructed under Chevron's use permit. Staff has received signed petitions from the owners of Assessor's Parcels 941-550-39 through 44 and 941-550-36. These parcels represent more than 60% of the proposed district land area. Petitions were sent to the owners of Parcels 941-550-13 and -15 (Chevron parcel) and to the owner of 941-550-12-7 (Nohr) , with no response. The City will own Parcel 941-550-10-11 (Valley Boat House) , and no petition is necessary for that parcel. Engineer of Work: Staff recommends that an outside consultant determine the assessment cost spread because of the proposed new parcels in the District. John Heindel specializes in assessment district engineering and has previously performed a study for the City regarding the cost spread for Dublin Boulevard costs as well as the I-580 interchange costs. Mr. Heindel's charges are proposed to be on a time and material basis, not to exceed $10,000. These costs will be charged against the assessment district. The various resolutions and documents have been prepared by Mr. Robert Brunsell, who has been appointed Assessment District Counsel. Mr. Brunsell will attend the meeting to explain the details of the process. The next step will be for the City Council to receive the Engineer's Report for the district, which will include the proposed method of assessment spread, and to authorize Staff to advertise for construction bids and set a public hearing for protests to the District. Staff recommends that the City Council receive the report from Staff and Mr. Brunsell and take action as listed under the "Recommendation" section of this report. a: (dbx)\ad\agstpeti - 2 - CERTIFICATE RE PETITION DUBLIN BOULEVARD EXTENSION ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 91-1 CITY OF DUBLIN I, the undersigned, certify: I have examined a "Petition for Special Assessment Proceedings" signed by owners of land shown on the map entitled "Proposed Boundary of Dublin Boulevard Extension Assessment . District 91-1, City of Dublin, Alameda County, California. " I have compared the names on the petition with the names of owners of land as shown on the records of the County Assessor. I find the petition to have been signed by owners of more than sixty percent (60%) in area of the land subject to assessment within the boundaries shown on the above-entitled map. I calculate that the owners of % of the described land have signed the petition. DATED: , 1991 LEE THOMPSON, City Engineer By c- I Mm December 11, 1991 Mr. Richard Ambrose Mr.Lee Thompson Mr.Larry Tong CITY OF DUBLIN 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568 RE: Formation of Assessment District for Dublin Blvd.Extension Dear Messers Ambrose,Thompson, and Tong: Enclosed, please find an original Petition for Special Assessment Proceedings executed by two property owners in the effected area, BJ Dublin Commercial, a California Limited Partnership and Dublin Commercial II, a California Limited Partnership. These Petitions are being submitted under the following express understandings between the owners and the City. 1. The maximum amount of the lien that may attach to BJ Dublin Commercial property shall be equal to the cost of Dougherty/Dublin road improvement conditions described in Tentative Map 5900 and our proportional assessment district soft costs. No other cost or future assessment connected to the proposed right of way acquisition and improvements may be liened against our property. 2. The maximum amount of the lien that may attach to Dublin Commercial II property shall be the cost of installing Chabot Road improvements on the west side of the channel along our property frontage (Chabot improvement along U-Haul's adjacent property are expressly excluded) and our proportional assessment district soft costs. No other cost or future assessment connected to the proposed right of way acquisition and improvements may be liened against our property. 3. In the event that the City acquires the uneconomic remnant parcels abutting the BJ Dublin Commercial property from the Nohr and Boatworks properties, and if the City surpluses ses it d remnant parcels, and if no ether governmental agency acquires the surplused remnants, understood the BJ Dublin Commercial shall have an pportunity to purchase said remnarlL parcels from the City at terms to be agreed upon y parties. Sincerely, J. PATRICK LAND COMPANY General Partner for BJ Dublin Commercial,Dublin Commercial II Jo n P. Moore President JPM/cm 7901 STONERIDGE DRIVE, SUITE 403, PLEASANTON, CA 94566 (415) 463-1688 FAX (415) 463-0528 RECORDING REOLIESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: �) SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE c � 41 r til �t1 Ott 111t. mfflrr of I lamb fong �u brrrrlary of$tatr SACRAMENTO 11 MARCH FONG EU, Secretary of State of the State of California, hereby certify: 4 That the annexed transcript of page(s) was prepared by t 1 and in this office from the record on file, of which it purports to be a copy,and that it is f ull, true and correct. l SEPE °F raF 1/\'I[7T?�'ESS WHEREOF,1 execute �I I 1 .•'co.e.. -•. sr this certificate and affix the Great ;. Seal of the State of California this i SEC/STATE Form lV 212A (Re, 9/87) 87 46299 O / Secretary of State I' NUMBER OF PAGES ATTACHED.I ' 1W 'JY 5. IT IS HEREBY DECLARED THAT I AM fWE ARE) THE PERSO .'►rl•1o��(�CU� THIS AMENDMENT TO THE IDENTIFIED CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP. WHICH EXECUTION IS MY (OUR) ACT INSTRUCTIONS) J. Patrick Land Comnanv 6. T)-vs sPACE FOR FILING OFFICER VSE SIGP.ATURE OF GENERAL P T ARNER DATE SIGNATVRE OF GENERAL PARTNER DATE rDAT[ OF FILING) o $� -1lgooZ9 2�z � SK.N� AIRy OF GENERAL PARTNER DATE SIGNATURE OF GENERAL PARTNER DATE S' . ohn P. Moore, President SIGNATURE OF OTHER TMAN GENERAL PARTNER TrrL.E OR OCSIGNATION DATE F i LE D is#d 0""*1 dA%"*or,a*ft 61#4 sr.»w CAN-6. 7. RETURN ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO: 0 CTl 1.1989 NAME I l ,A _ �i ADORESS J. Patrick Land Comoan_v yrl�"6�I�(,�1 �'M� Cm 7901 Stoneri dge Drive, Suite 403 MARCH FONG EU STATE Pleasanton, CA 014566 II SECRETARY OF STATE Dl CODE L J FOAM LP-2—FILING FEE S15 Appr...d 6T rho Sensory Of State 'AMENDMENT ERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNER —FORM LP-2 IMPORTANT.—Ad instructions on back before compWg this form This Amendment is presented for filing pursuont to Chapter 3,Article 2,Section 15622,Colifomio Corporations Code. 1. SECP.'--TARY OF STATE FILE NO. JORIGINAL CIRTIFICATn 2. SECRETARY OF STATE FILE DATE )ORIGINAL CERTIFICATE) 8311800029 April 25, 1988 3. NAME OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 8J Dublin Commercial , a California Limited Partnership 4. THE CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP IS AMENDED AS FOLLOWS:ICOMPUM APPROPMATIE SUWSECnON(31 A. THE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP NAME IS CHANGED TO: a California Limited Partnership B. THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICE ADDRESS ❑ OR THE OFFICE ADDRESS IN CALIFORNIA. IF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICE IS LOCATED OUTSIDE CALIFORNIA ❑ IS CHANGED TO: IC77TI WATV MFI (srmzirn C. THE ADDRESS OF THE FOLLOWING GENERAL PARTNERISI IS CHANGED TO-. ,CONTINUE ON SEPARATE PAGE IF NECEssARn twme n 1c.-+-n tsr.tn a1P1 D. THE FOLLOWING GENERAL PARTNERIS) HAS (HAVE) WITHDRAWN: tCO,rnNUE ON SEPARATE PAGE IF NECE-sARn H&M Investments, Inc. , 7901 Stoneridge Drive, Suite 403, Pleasanton, CA 94566 V"-0 aT*cm rcrm tsrATO (ZIP) E. THE FOLLOWING GENERAL PARTISIMS) HAS (HAVE) BEEN ADDED: 1CONnNUIE oN SEPARATE PAGE IF NECESSARn J. Patrick Land Comoany, 7901 Stoneridge Drive, Suite 403, Pleasanton, CA 94566 V"-w trntsim ISTATO ai pj F. THE ADDRESS OF THE CURRENT AGENT FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS IS CHANGED TO: (STA,fl (ZIP) G. THE AGENT FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS HAS BEEN CHANGED TO: John P. Moore, 7901 Stoneridge Drive, Suite 403, Pleasanton, CA 94566 P"a0 ISTW91 r) fcrm (7TATO Q,PI H. THE TERM FOR WHICH THE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP IS TO EXIST HAS BEEN CHANGED TO: I. OTHER MATTERS INCLUDED IN THE CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ARE AMENDED AS INDICATED ON THE ATTACHED PAGE(S). NUMBER OF PAGES ATTACHES �_ W 5. IT IS HEREBY DECLARED THAT I AM (WE ARE) THE PERSO #V(404- (ECLorZ THIS AMENDMENT TO THE IDENTIFIED CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP. WHICH EXECUTION IS MY (OUR) ACT ,cFlu IJSE INSTRUCTIONS) J. Patrick Land Comr)an,! 6. THIS SPACE FOR FIUNG OFFICER USE SIGNATURE OF GENERAL PARTNER OATS SIGNATURE OF GENERAL PARTNER DATE {OATH OF FIUNO _ C. -��. $S Ilgoo0Z9 S-GNATUR OF GENERAL PARTNER DATI! SIGNATURE OF GENERAL PARTNER DATE B�John P. Moore, President SIGNATURE OF OTHER TI,AN GENERAL PARTNER TITLE OR DESIGNATION DATE FILED M/f MfiN al!�sm"al y a!w N"Wo d CdAw-.r• 7. RETURN ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO: OCT11.1959 EU NAME 7 ADDRESS J. Patrick Land Comaanv arr 7901 Stoneridge Drive, Suite 403 SECRETARY HFONG STATE STATE Pleasanton, CA 14566 Dl CODE L FORM LP-2—FILING FEE SIS Appr+.+d by the SPa ry.►o &I Stol• PETITI ,i FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENT P�. ,EEDINGS TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN: 1. We, the undersigned, are the owners of land shown on the map attached as Exhibit A and made a part of this document. 2 . We petition you to undertake special assessment proceedings for the public improvement as described in Exhibit B attached hereto. 3 . We understand: (a) THAT the cost of the project will be charged to the land which benefits from the project, including our land, except that the City of Dublin is to make a contribution from funds of the City to pay the cost of a certin portion of the improvements; (b) THAT a report will be prepared on the project including plans and specifications, a detailed cost estimate, and a division of the costs among the benefited parcels of land, and that you will conduct a public hearing on the- report; (c) THAT the cost of engineering, legal and other incidental and financing costs will be included in the project cost; (d) THAT each property owner may pay his assessment either in cash without interest or in installments with interest over a period of years. (e) THAT if we sign this petition and do not file a written protest prior to the public hearing, it will be assumed at that time that we still favor the project. (f) THAT if this petition is signed by the owners of at least sixty percent (60%) of the land area proposed to be assessed, the City Council, at the close of the public hearing, may overrule a majority protest by a four-fifths vote of its members. (g) THAT protests to the proceedings will be counted solely upon the land area of the property proposed to be assessed.. 4 . The present best estimate of the total cost of the project to be financed by the proposed assessment district, including incidental and financing costs in connection therewith, is $2 .9 million. 5. We waive investigation proceedings and all other provisions of Division 4 , Streets and Highways Code, as provided in Section 2804 of that code. NAME AND ADDRESS DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY DATE 8.3 Dublin (61KK -C%k1, qyl - 550-3lo 11 n Q Nlii h L•Mit r �t o ' �l b ,6• at'ri >t Lard Co 4 _ - 4 I - 5 0 -4 Y11pD�IC, G5 • ?QDI S�'QNCYic1t�G�Y��� i -#��3 �It�n�.aKfiovl , r. q4 588 biAIt Vt f„ALIrVR(`IIA AMENDMENT CERTIFICATE OF UMITED PARTNE" `iIP—FORM LP-2 IMPORTAP 'ead instructions on back before v •ling this form This Amendment is present, filing pvrsvont to Chopter 3,Article 2,Section Colifornio Corporotions Code. 1. SECRETARY OF STATE FILE NO. IORIaNAL CERTIFICATE) 2. SECRETARY OF STATE FILE DATE (ORIGINAL CERnFICATE) 2.922400028 AuCust 11, 1958 3. NAME OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Dublin Commercial II , a California Limited Partnership 4. THE CERTIFICATE OP LIMITED PARTNERSHIP IS AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: (COMPLETE APPROPRIATE SuWSECTIONCA A. THE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP NAME IS CHANGED TO•. ,a California Limited Partnersl S. THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICE ADORESS ❑ OR THE OFFICE ADDRESS IN CALIFORNIA. IF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICE 13 LOCATED OUTSIDE CALIFORNIA ❑ 13 CHANGED TO: MTRQT7 IDrrn (ETATD MP) C. THE ADDRESS OF THE FOLLOWING GENERAL PARTNERS) IS CHANGED TO: (CONTINUE ON SEPARATE PAGE IF NECESSARY) INAAW tETRE1n ICrTn IETATM alp) D. THE FOLLOWING GENERAL PARTNERS) HAS (HAVE) WITHDRAWN: ICoNnNUE ON SEPARATE PAGE IF NECESSARY) H°•^' Investments, Inc. , 790: Stoneridne Drive, Suite 4C3, Pleasanton, CA 94566 MAaO erTREET) ICITYI HTATD 61p) E. THE FOLLOWING GENERAL PARTNERS) HA3 (HAVE) SEEN ADDED. = nNuE oN saMATE PAGE V NECESSARn J. Patrick Land Comoanv, 7901 Stoneri&e Drive, Suite 4 103, Pleasanton, CA -94566 MArO OETRQT7 1Crm WTATW aIP) F. THE ADDRESS OF THE CURRENT AGENT FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS IS CHANGED TO: uT7rQT7 SCITn WTATD alp: G. THE AGENT FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS HAS BEEN CHANGED TO-. John P. !'oore, 7991 Stoneridne Drive, Suite 403, Pleasanton, CA 9 4 566 ►AAaE1 WT*Krn Icrm W A TD (ZIP; H. THE TERM FOR WHICH THE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP IS TO EXIST HAS BEEN CHANGED TO. I. OTHER MATTERS INCLUDED IN THE CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ARE AMENDED AS INDICATED ON THE ATTACHED PAGE(S). NUMBER OF PAGES ATTACHED S. IT IS HEREBY DECLARED THAT 1 AM (WE ARE) THE PERSONIS, WHO EXECUTED THIS AMENDMENT TO THE IDENTIFIED CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP. WHICH EXECUTION 13 MY (OVRI ACT AND DEED. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS) 0. Patrick Land Com�an�� • Q. THIS fPAC! /OR FILING O=0l10ER usf s1GNAT'URE Or GENERAL PARTNER DATE MATURE OP GENERAL PARTNER DATE (DATt OF FILINQ �- C. SIGNATURE / NERAL PARTNER DATII SIGNATURE OF GENERAL PARTNER DAT's B%-: Llohn P. Moore, President SIGNATURE OI OTHER THAN GENERAL PARTNER TITLE DR DEliGNArlok GATE 7. RETURN ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO: NAME ESS �J. Patrick Land Compan- H A 7901 Stoneridne Drive, Suite 493 Pleasanton, CA 94566 STATE V CODE L FORM LP-2—FILING FEE 215 App•..PA boy d.F S.o.Pery •I SIO/F ASSIGNmr-NT OF MANAGEMENT RIGHTS A..,l DUTIES (Dublin Commercial II Project) This agreement is entered into by and between H&M Investments, a California corporation, hereinafter "Transferor", and J. Patrick Land Company, a California corporation, hereinafter "Transferee." PROVISIONS 1. Transferor is a party to that certain Limited Partnership Agreement, dated August 26, 1988, by and between transferor as General Partner and John P. Moore, Arthur D. Bridges, Leisure Sports, Inc., and James W. McKeehan as Limited Partners. The Limited Partnership owns and intends to develop for investment purposes certain real property located in the City of Dublin, Alameda County which it purchased from U- Haul. The Partnership's property is hereinafter described as "the Project." 2. Pursuant to paragraph 7.1 of the Limited Partnership Agreement, Transferor was assigned general management responsibility for the Project, including the right to assign the rights and obligations of Transferor to an entity owned at least 50% by John P. Moore. 3. Transferor hereby transfers to Transferee all the rights and obligations of "General Partner" under paragraphs 7.1 and 7.2 of said Limited Partnership Agreement. This specifically includes the right to receive the Payments to General Partner described in paragraph 7.2 of the Limited Partnership Agreement. 4. Transferee hereby accepts the rights and agrees that it will perform all of the Project Management obligations of "General Partner" under paragraph 7.1 of said Limited Partnership Agreement. In witness whereof, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date set forth below: Transferor: Transferee: H&M Investment, Inc. J. Patrick Land Company a California corporation a California corporation By: �. By: G- Its: tL4ident Its: sident Dated: April 3, 1989 Dated: April 3, 1989 PETITION FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PRu,EEDINGS TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN: 1. We, the undersigned, are the owners of land shown on the map attached as Exhibit A and made a part of this document. 2 . We petition -you to undertake special assessment proceedings for the public improvement as described in Exhibit B attached hereto. 3 . We understand: (a) THAT the cost of the project will be charged to the land which benefits from the project, including our land, except that the City of Dublin is to make a contribution from funds of the City to pay the cost of a certin portion of the improvements; (b) THAT a report will be prepared on the project including plans and specifications, . a detailed cost estimate, and a division of the costs among the benefited parcels of land, and that you will conduct a public hearing on the report; (c) THAT the cost of engineering, legal and other incidental and financing costs will be included in the project cost; (d) THAT each property owner may pay his assessment either in cash without interest or in installments with interest over a period of years. (e) THAT if we sign this petition and do not file a written protest prior to the public hearing, it will be assumed at that time that we still favor the project. (f) THAT if this petition is signed by the owners of at least sixty percent (60%) of the land area proposed to be assessed, the City Council, at the close of the public hearing, may overrule a majority protest by a four-fifths vote of its members. (g) THAT protests to the proceedings will be counted solely upon the land area of the property proposed to be assessed. 4 . The present best estimate of the total cost of the project to be financed by the proposed assessment district, including incidental and financing costs in connection therewith, is $2 . 9 million. 5. We waive investigation proceedings and all other provisions of Division 4 , Streets and Highways Code, as provided in Section 2804 of that code. NAME AND ADDRESS DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY DATE ttibli -, C mryes66_1 IC Art ers�i rrtove—, �40� 5+orie.r�,dSCA y6SS ,P1e46AK__1'oh , EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK THE SCOPE OF WORK INCLUDED WITHIN THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT INCLUDES: 1. All those proposed public improvements within Tract 4978 and the proposed Tract 5900. These include curbs, gutters, sidewalk, pavement, street monuments, drainage, street lights, street trees, signs, striping, irrigation, and related miscellaneous improvements on Dougherty Road and Dublin Boulevard extended. 2 . The construction of the westerly one-half of the road which is to be on either side of the Chabot Channel. The limits of these improvements are from the end of the existing cul-de- sac north to the improvements of Dublin Boulevard extended, the reconfiguration of the cul-de-sac bulb to a through street, and changing of the driveway entrance at Scarlett Court to street curb returns. 3 . The construction of the Extension of Dublin Boulevard from Dougherty Road to Tract 4978 , together with the necessary right-of-way to construct these public improvements. 4 . The five-foot widening on the east side of Dougherty Road from Dublin Boulevard extended north to Tract 4978 . 5. The acquisition of right-of-way for the above improvements in Items 1 and 2 . 6. The miscellaneous costs involved in the engineering, legal process, and financing. RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PETITION DUBLIN BOULEVARD EXTENSION ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 91-1 CITY OF DUBLIN The City Council of the City of Dublin resolves: Certain owners of real property have filed with the Clerk of this body a petition, signed by them, requesting the public . improvements described in the petition, the cost to be specially assessed against land benefiting from the improvements. The petition contains an express waiver of statutory proceedings under the Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931, as provided in Section. 2804 of the Streets and Highways Code. The City Council finds that all of the owners of more than sixty percent (60%) in area of the land subject to assessment for the proposed improvements have signed the petition. Accordingly, the City Council accepts the petition and directs that special assessment proceedings shall be undertaken by the terms of the petition, and without further compliance with the Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931. This action is final within the meaning of Section 3012 of the Streets and Highways Code. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 23rd day of December, 1991, by the following vote: - AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MAYOR ATTEST: City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING BOUNDARY MAP DUBLIN BOULEVARD EXTENSION ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 91-1 CITY OF DUBLIN The City Council of the City of Dublin resolves: A map entitled "Proposed Boundary of Dublin Boulevard Extension Assessment District 91-1, City of Dublin, Alameda County, California" has been filed with the City Clerk. This City Council approves the map and adopts the boundaries shown on the map as describing the extent of the territory included in a proposed assessment district to be known as Dublin Boulevard Extension Assessment District 91-1, City of Dublin, Alameda County, California. This City Council finds that the map is in the form and contains the matters prescribed by Section 3110 of the California Streets and Highways Code. This City Council directs the City Clerk to certify the adoption of this resolution on the face of the map, and to file a copy of the map with the County Recorder for placement in the Book of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 23rd day of December, 1991, by the following vote: _ AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MAYOR ATTEST: City Clerk $16, But L -5 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES DUBLIN BOULEVARD EXTENSION ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 91-1 CITY OF DUBLIN The City Council of the City of Dublin resolves: This City Council approves that certain agreement between the CITY OF DUBLIN and JOHN H. HEINDEL, for services as Engineer of Work for Dublin Boulevard Extension Assessment District 91-1, City of Dublin, Alameda County, California, dated the 23rd day of December, 1991, and attached to this resolution. The Mayor is authorized to sign the agreement and the City Clerk is authorized to attest its execution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 23rd day of December, 1991, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MAYOR ATTEST: City Clerk }� ' STANDARD CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made at Dublin, California, as of , 1991, by and between the CITY OF DUBLIN, a municipal corporation ( "City" ) , and John H. Heindel, ( "Consultant" ) , who agree as follows : 1 . SERVICES. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, Consultant shall provide to City the services described in Exhibit A. Consultant shall provide said services at the time, place, and in the manner specified in Exhibit A. 2 . PAYMENT. City shall pay Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement at the time and in the manner set forth in Exhibit B. The payments specified in Exhibit B shall be the only payments to be made to Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall submit all billings for said services to City in the manner specified in Exhibit B; or, if no manner be specified in Exhibit B, then according to the usual and customary procedures and practices which Consultant uses for billing clients similar to City. 3 . FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT. Except as set forth in Exhibit C, Consultant shall , at its sole cost and expense, furnish all. facilities and equipment which may be required for furnishing services pursuant to this Agreement. City shall furnish to Consultant only the facilities and equipment listed in �2.�M�r �[TH Joy r� i-Ei a� Exhibit C according to the terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit C. 4 . GENERAL PROVISIONS . The general provisions set forth in Exhibit D are part of this Agreement . In the event of any inconsistency between said general provisions and any other terms or conditions of this Agreement, the other term or condition shall control insofar as it is inconsistent with the general provisions . 5 . EXHIBITS . All exhibits referred to herein are attached hereto and are by this reference incorporated herein. 6 . SUBCONTRACTING. The Consultant shall perform the work contemplated with resources available within its own organization and no portion of the work pertinent to this contract shall be subcontracted without written authorization by the City, except that which is expressly identified in the Consultant ' s proposal . 7 . CHANGES . City may from time to time require changes in the scope of the services by Consultant to be performed under this Agreement . Such changes , including any change in the amount of Consultant ' s compensation which are mutually agreed upon by City and Consultant, shall be effective as amendments to this Agreement only when in writing. g . RESPONSIBLE CHARGE . Consultant shall assign a project manager( s ) to the project for the duration of the project . There shall be no change in the Project Manager or members of the project team without prior written approval by the City. The Project Manager for Consultant shall be Mr. Jack Young. 9 . CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. This Agreement shall be administered by LEE S . THOMPSON ( "Administrator" ) . All correspondence shall be directed to or through the Administrator or his designee . 10 . NOTICES . Any written notice to Consultant shall be sent to: John H. Heindel p . 0. Box 3452 Saratoga, CA 95070 (408) 741-0159 Any written notice to City shall be sent to: Lee S . Thompson Director of Public Works/City Engineer p. 0. Box 2340 Dublin, CA 94568 Executed as of the day first above stated: CITY OF DUBLIN, a municipal corporation By "City" Attest : _ City Clerk By "Co sultant" Approved as to form: City Attorney EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES AND SCHEDULE Provide assessment engineering services relative to the formation of a proposed assessment district in the City of Dublin, to extend Dublin Boulevard from Dougherty Road easterly to the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way, herein called the Project, specifically: 1) Prepare the rules for spreading the costs to the various parcels within the Project, subject to approval by City' s bond counsel and City staff . 2 ) Prepare one or more- spreads of Project costs, bsed upon cost. information provided by City and/or others . 3) Respread costs if required by changes ordered by the City Council at the public hearing for the project. ity at any informal meetings with property owners g ) Represent C and/or their representatives , which may be held at various stages an an to explain the rules of spread, to answer of the proceedings , questions on matters relative to Consultant' s duties , and to receive input . 5) Testify at all public meetings at which the Project is to be considered, including the public hearing and any continuances thereof , as to benefits and other matters relative to Consultant' s duties . 6 ) Consult and city' s staff , and others q relative to Consultant ' s duties . 7 ) Prepare the Engineer' s Report, exclusive of plans, specifications , and assessment diagram, including revisions thereto ordered at, or prior to, the public hearing, and execute said report as Engineer of Work. g) Perform services in addition to those described above, as requested by City. Exhibit A Page 1 of 1 12/4/91 EXHIBIT B PAYMENT SCHEDULE City shall pay Consultant an amount not to exceed the total sum of TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ( $10 , 000) for services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall submit invoices during the term of this Agreement based on the cost for services performed in accordance with the following schedule: $100 . 00 per hour expended by Consultant, plus 115% of the actual cost of any outside services and expenses incurred by Consultant, to be billed and paid monthly as the work progresses , but not more often than once a month; and provided further, in no event shall City pay Consultant a sum exceeding 20% of the total sum due for services pursuant to this Agreement within forty-five ( 45) days after completion of the services and submittal to City, if all services due pursuant to this Agreement have been satisfactorily performed. The total sum stated above shall be the total which City shall pay for the services to be rendered by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement. City shall not pay any additional sum for any expense or cost whatsoever incurred by Consultant in rendering services pursuant to this Agreement. City shall make no payment for any extra, further or additional service pursuant to this Agreement unless such extra service and the price therefor is agreed to in writing executed by the City Manager or other designated official of City authorized to obligate City thereto prior to the time such extra Exhibit B Page 1 of 2 12/4/91 service is rendered. If the cost for additional services is over 25% of the original contract amount, City Council approval is required. The services to be provided under this Agreement may be terminated without cause at any point in time in the sole and exclusive discretion of City. If the Agreement is terminated by City, Consultant shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any satisfactory work completed on such documents and other materials to the effective date of such termination. In that event, all finished and unfinished documents and other materials shall, at the option of the City, become City' s sole and exclusive property. Consultant hereby expressly waives any and all claims for damages or compensation arising under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate logs and timesheets in order to verify costs incurred to date . The Consultant is not authorized to perform any services or incur any costs whatsoever under the terms of this Agreement until receipt of a fully executed Purchase Order from the Finance Department of the City of Dublin. Exhibit B Page 2 of 2 12/4/91 EXHIBIT C City shall furnish physical facilities such as desks , filing cabinets , and conference space, as may be reasonably nece- ssary for Contractor' s use while consulting with City employees and reviewing records and the information in possession of City. The location, quantity, and time of furnishing said physical facilities shall be' in the sole discretion of City. In no event shall City be obligated to furnish any facility which may involve incurring any direct expense, including, but not limiting the generality of this exclusion, long-distance telephone or other communication charges , vehicles , and reproduction facilities . Exhibit C Page 1 of 1 12/4/91 EXHIBIT D GENERAL PROVISIONS 1 . INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall be an independent contractor and shall not be an employee of City. City shall have the right to control Consultant only insofar as the results of Consultant ' s engineering services rendered pursuant to this Agreement; however, City shall not have the right to control the means by which Consultant accomplishes services rendered pursuant to this Agreement . 2 . LICENSES; PERMITS, ETC . Consultant represents and warrants to City that he has all licenses , permits , qualifications and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required for Consultant to practice his profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at his sole cost and expense, keep in effect at all times during the term of this Agreement any licenses , permits , and approvals which are legally required for Consultant to practice his profession. 3 . TIME . Consultant shall devote such time to the performance of services pursuant to this Agreement as may be reasonably necessary for satisfactory performance of Consultant ' s obligations pursuant to this Agreement. 4 . INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS . Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, his agents, representatives , employees or subcon- tractors . The cost of such insurance shall be included in the Consultant ' s bid. A. Minimum Scope of Insurance . Coverage shall be at least as broad as : ( 1) Insurance Services Office form number GL 0002 (Ed . 1/73 ) covering comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services Office form number GL 0404 cover- ing Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability; or Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage ( "occurrence" form CG 0001) . ( 2 ) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/78) covering Automobile Liability, code 1 "any auto" and endorsement CA 0025 . Exhibit D Page 1 of 5 12/4/91 ( 3) Worker ' s Compensation insurance as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers Liability Insurance. B. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: ( 1) General Liability: $500, 000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. ( 2 ) Automobile Liability: $500, 000 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and $100, 000 for property damage . ( 3) Workers Compensation and Employers Liability: Workers Compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers Liability limits of $1 , 000 , 000 per accident. C. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions . Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers , officials and employees ; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guarantee- ing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses . D. Other Insurance Provisions . The policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions : ( 1 ) General Liability and Automobile Liability Coverages . (a) The City, its officers, officials , employees and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects : liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the Consultant, premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant, or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of the protection afforded to the City, its officers , officials, employees or volunteers . Exhibit D Page 2 of 5 12/4/91 (b) The Consultant' s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers , officials , employees and volunteers . Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers , officials , employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant ' s insurance and shall not contribute with it . (c) Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers . (d) The Consultant' s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is' brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer' s liability. ( 2 ) Worker' s Compensation and Employers Liability Coverage . The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its officers , officials , employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by the Consultant for the City. ( 3 ) Professional Liability. 2$O,ODO Consultant shall carry professional is ility insurance in an amount of City to ro te ct the City against liability caused by negligent acts , errors or omissions on the part of the Consultant in the course of performance of the services specified in this Agreement . ( 4 ) All Coverages . Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty ( 30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. E . Acceptability of Insurers . Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a Bests ' rating of no less than A:VIII . F. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish City with certificates of insurance and with original endorse- ments effecting coverage required by this clause. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf . The certificates and endorsements Exhibit D Page 3 of 5 12/4/91 are to be received and approved by the City before work commences . The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies , at any time . H. The Risk Manager of City may approve a variation of those insurance requirements upon a determination that the coverages . scope, limits and forms of such insurance are either not commercially available or that the City' s interests are otherwise fully protected. 5 . CONSULTANT NO AGENT. Except as City may specify in writing, Consultant shall have no authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of City in any capacity whatsoever as an agent . Consultant shall have no authority, express or implied, pursuant to this Agreement. to bind City to any obligation whatsoever. 6 . ASSIGNMENT PROHIBITED. No party to this Agreement may assign any right or obligation pursuant to this Agreement . Any attempted or purported assignment of any right or obligation pursuant to this Agreement shall be void and of no effect. 7 . PERSONNEL. Consultant shall assign only competent personnel to perform services pursuant to this Agreement. In the event that City, in its sole discretion, at any time during the term of this Agreement, desires the removal of any such persons , Consultant shall , immediately upon receiving notice from City of such desire of City, cause the removal of such person or persons . 8 . STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE . Consultant shall perform all services required pursuant to this Agreement in the manner and according to the standards observed by a competent practitioner of the profession in which Consultant is engaged in the geographical area in which Consultant practices his profession. All instruments of service of whatsoever nature which Consultant delivers to City pursuant to this Agreement shall be prepared in a substantial , first class and workmanlike manner and conform to the standards of quality normally observed by a person practicing in Consultant ' s profession. 9 . MOLD HARMLESS AND RESPONSIBILITY OF CONSULTANTS . Consultant shall take all responsibility for the work, shall bear all losses and damages directly or indirectly resulting to him, to any sub- consultant, to the City, to City officers and employees , or to parties designated by the City, on account of the negligent performance or character of the work, unforeseen difficulties , accidents, occurrences or other causes predicated on active or passive negligence of the Consultant or of his subconsultant . Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers , officials , directors , employees and agents from and against any or all loss, liability, expense, claim, costs ( including costs of defense) , suits, and damages of every kind, Exhibit D Page 4 of 5 12/4/91 nature and description directly or indirectly arising from the Consultant ' s negligent performance of the work. This paragraph shall not be construed to exempt the City, its employees and officers from its own fraud, willful injury or violation of law whether willful or negligent. For purposes of Section 2782 of the Civil Code the parties hereto recognize and agree that this Agreement is not a construction contract. By execution of this Agreement Consultant acknowledges and agrees that he has read and understands the provisions hereof and that this paragraph is a material element of consideration. Approval of the insurance contracts does not relieve the Consultant or subconsultants from liability under this paragraph. 10 . GOVERNMENTAL REGULATIONS . To the extent that this Agreement may be funded by fiscal assistance from another governmental entity, Consultant shall comply with all applicable rules and regulations to which City is bound by the terms of such fiscal assistance program. 11 . DOCUMENTS . All reports, data, maps , models , charts , designs , plans , studies , surveys , photographs, memoranda or other written documents or materials prepared by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall become the property of City upon completion of the work to be performed hereunder or upon termination of the Agreement . No such materials or properties produced in whole or in part under this Agreement shall be subject to private use, copyrights , or patent rights by Consultant in the United States or in any other country without the express written consent of City. City shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose (as may be limited by the provisions of the California Public Records Act) , distribute, and otherwise use, copyright or patent, in whole or in part, any such reports , studies , data, statistics , forms or other materials or properties produced under this Agreement. a : (dbx) \corres\heindel Exhibit D Page 5 of 5 12/4/91 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ORDER IMPROVEMENT IN DUBLIN BOULEVARD EXTENSION ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 91-1 CITY OF DUBLIN The City Council of the City of Dublin resolves: This City Council intends to order the following improvement under the authority of the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 : 1) All those proposed public improvements within the proposed Tract 5900. These include curbs, gutters, sidewalk, pavement, street monuments, drainage, street lights, street trees, signs, striping, irrigation, and related miscellaneous improvements on Dougherty Road and Dublin Boulevard extended. 2) The construction' of the westerly one-half of the road which is to be on either side of the Chabot Channel. The limits of these improvements are from the end of the existing cul-de-sac north to the improvements of Dublin Boulevard extended, the reconfiguration of the cul-de-sac bulb to a through street, and changing of the driveway entrance at Scarlett Court to street curb returns. 3) The acquisition of right-of-way for the above improvements in 1) and 2) . 4) The miscellaneous costs involved in the engineering, legal process, and financing. This City Council finds that the land specially benefited by the improvement is shown within the boundaries of the map entitled, "Proposed Boundary of Dublin Boulevard Extension Assessment District 91-1, City of Dublin, Alameda County, California. " This map has been approved by the City Council and is now on file with the City Clerk. The land within the exterior boundaries shown on the map shall be designated Dublin Boulevard Extension Assessment District 91-1, City of Dublin, Alameda County, California. This City Council intends to levy a special assessment upon the land within the described district in accordance with the special benefit to be received by each parcel of land, respectively, from the improvement. There shall be omitted from special assessment all public streets, alleys and places and all land belonging to the United States, the State of California, . the County of Alameda and this City now in use in the performance of a public function. �i � Where any disparity occurs in level or size between the improvement and private property, this City Council determines that it is in the public interest and more economical to eliminate the disparity by doing work on the private property instead of adjusting the work on public property. Accordingly, work may be done on private property for this purpose with the written consent of the landowner. Annual administrative costs of the City shall be charged against income from investment of the Special Reserve Fund. Annual administration costs include without limitation the annual charges of the City's fiscal agent and the cost of calculating arbitrage rebate, if any. The balance of investment income from the Special Reserve Fund shall be deposited in the Redemption Fund for the bonds. This City Council orders that a portion of the cost of the improvement, to be determined, shall be paid by the City of Dublin and that the balance of the cost shall be specially assessed. Bonds representing unpaid assessments, and bearing interest at a rate not to exceed twelve percent (12%) per annum, will be issued in the manner provided by the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 (Division 10, Streets and Highways Code) , and the last installment of the bonds shall mature not to exceed twenty-four (24) years from the second day of September next succeeding twelve (12) months from their date. The procedure for the collection of assessments and advance retirement of bonds under the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 shall be as .provided in Part 11. 1, Division 10, of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. The City Council will not obligate itself to advance _ available funds from the City treasury to cure any deficiency which may occur in the bond redemption fund. A determination not to obligate itself shall not prevent the City from, in its sole discretion, so advancing funds. This City Council finds that the Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931 (commencing with .Section 2800, Streets and Highways Code) does not apply to these proceedings. This City Council appoints JOHN H. HEINDEL as Engineer of Work for this project, and directs the preparation of the report required by Section 10204 of the Streets and Highways Code. 2 In the opinion of this City Council, the public interest will not be served by allowing owners of assessable lands to enter into a contract for the work of improvement as otherwise permitted in Section 20485 of the Public Contract Code. The amount of any surplus remaining in the improvement fund after completion of the improvement and payment of all claims shall be distributed in accordance with the provisions of Section 10427 of the Streets and Highways Code. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 23rd day of December, 1991, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Mayor _ ATTEST: City Clerk - 3. 0 � Ip, p° a 3/ 00' � � -• -_ i' SIERRA /07 9¢' ° LANE / \ Q v' r 24.90 I m I R = 750.07' N A= /5°/&`5311 ' O /I 58" rr u r - N88 °4ro'5B'W-,� _ .5/8' \ ,/ /R= 7¢y' , - N43°29'35'IE G.00,-* \ 49 027'39 "W 6.00'o / 1 (y34004,00,15 6.00" - \� l "- � •. L °70.5&1)- - - --�� r \\ � \� 41L / CA = 85 °59'22 i V C** 3 �o Oo JyfG 0 FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN, COUNTY \� OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIS DAY OF 19 _ \� KAY KECK, CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN, \ COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. 735.00' I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS APPROVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AT A REGULAR MEETING THEREOF, HELD ON THE DAY OF , 19 _, BY ITS RESOLUTION NO. KAY KECK, CITY CLERK AND CLERK OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. NOTE: THIS BOUNDARY MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR PROPERTY SURVEY, THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE MAPS WAS COMPILED FROM AVAILABLE ASSESSORS AND RECORD OF SURVEY MAPS, DIVISION OF HIGHWAY RIGHT OF WAY AND COUNTY PRECISE PT-AN AND TO BE USED FOR ASSESSMENT BOUNDARY ONLY. PROPOSED BOUNDARY OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD EXTENSION ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 91 -1 CITY OF DUBLIN, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SCALE : 111= 1001 i,NGINrrac�LY &I, SERVICES �ES DECEMBER 1991 IYA•lic I.np.nnnuanm • LuW • Tmn.pmmoinn 'Lour�D� M+�P �� Z..'. SHEET 1 OF 1 o o W O fj c o � U N 88 ° 42'58 "!^/ OM U✓�' �J (/V 89 ° 30' W ✓�✓ )v 89 ° /'W� N N N N i LEGEND W 0/'57'9- /cT 30uNOA/ZY W O lS1 ^/0°/3'02'E 3100, 5OUAIPAeY4VAIe1VG,-'D 15TANCE nl o en 0 j1=90M T94 C T 4978, MAP at;iJfC 1-3(5 O PAGE 3 A2N�OR PARCEL MAP 28/7 83, t}Lr4MEG34 /8�� Z 2 �' N mU woK (N 89 ° 30'W 28731 ') e= /28.0/' BOUNGS4Ky SEAp.,Al STANCE tl = 85 °59'22" FkOM t3tieCEL• /slA� /043, MAP W6e BO s1 LrSMEl�A RPE4GGOE20 FILED THIS DAY OF AT THE HOUR OF O'CLOCK M. IN BOOK (N,99°30'W 713.87) AOUNOARY8S40e/A/e7vdO/57AA/CE OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT FACILITIES DISTRICTS AT PAGE AND COMMUNITY IN THE OFFICE OF THE FROM ALAME0.9 CDUNTYA��O,R5 1�f4P AnaC 9¢/ /i46,45 5oi9 COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. K O FouNO 5L4e vEY /- ONUh1EA/TS RENE DAVIDSON, COUNTY RECORDER (N ¢3 °29'35 "E ,a 00 OF THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. OEEd (7 &- /72070) 9,560WE9 06TO94R 395, ALAMEDhACOUNTY BY: PZECORDS. DEPUTY COUNTY RECORDER NOTE: THIS BOUNDARY MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR PROPERTY SURVEY, THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE MAPS WAS COMPILED FROM AVAILABLE ASSESSORS AND RECORD OF SURVEY MAPS, DIVISION OF HIGHWAY RIGHT OF WAY AND COUNTY PRECISE PT-AN AND TO BE USED FOR ASSESSMENT BOUNDARY ONLY. PROPOSED BOUNDARY OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD EXTENSION ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 91 -1 CITY OF DUBLIN, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SCALE : 111= 1001 i,NGINrrac�LY &I, SERVICES �ES DECEMBER 1991 IYA•lic I.np.nnnuanm • LuW • Tmn.pmmoinn 'Lour�D� M+�P �� Z..'.