Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 8.5 ALUC Action Livermore Airport Protection CITY OF DUBLIN AGENDA STATEMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 14, 1992 SUBJECT: Upcoming ALUC action on the Livermore Airport Protection Area REPORT PREPARED BY: Dennis Carrington, Senior Planner EXHIBITS ATTACHED: Exhibit A: Draft letter to the Airport Land Use Commission. Exhibit B: Airport Protection Area map. Exhibit C: Draft Eastern Dublin Specific Plan map with Airport Protection Area shown. Exhibit D: Letter to Adolph Martinelli, dated August 7 , 1991 . RECOMMENDATION: 4- Authorize the Mayor to sign the attached letter (Exhibit A) to the Airport Land Use Commission FINANCIAL STATEMENT: None DESCRIPTION: The City of Livermore has established an Airport Protection Area (APA) (Exhibit B) which prohibits new residential uses within its boundaries in the City of Livermore. Livermore has asked the County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) to include the APA in the Airport Land Use Policy Plan and has supported that request with a report on the APA prepared by McClintock, Becker and Associates . The boundary of the APA would extend into the proposed Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area and would adversely impact approximately 1, 000 dwelling units in that plan (Exhibit C) . The APA is intended to protect the airport from complaints of residents of dwellings that could potentially be built within its boundaries . The protection area generally follows the dimensions of the existing flight pattern for the airport. The flight pattern directs aircraft take-off paths over the location of the proposed Eastern Dublin Specific Plan in order to avoid complaints from residents of Pleasanton. The APA is a way for the airport to maintain the existing take-off paths and flight pattern rather than revising the airport master plan (which expires in 1995) to equitably share the burden of take-off noise and overflights, as has been proposed by Staff . On November 17 , 1992 the Airport Land Use Commission met to receive public testimony on the proposed APA and Draft Negative --------------------------------------------------------------------- ITEM NO. COPIES TO: ALUC File Planning Director Senior Planner Agenda File/General File ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COPIES TO: ITEM NO. CITY CLERK FILE E 6 0 0 Declaration. Mayor Peter W. Snyder made a presentation on the APA and Dublin Staff reviewed the concerns of the City with the APA. Several individuals from Livermore and the Pilots to Protect the Airport recommended that the APA be approved by the ALUC in order to protect the airport. Representatives of several landowners in the vicinity of the airport recommended that the APA not be approved because it is unnecessary, arbitrary and would cause opposition to the airport. The ALUC heard a Staff report on the proposed APA and the Negative Declaration, discussed the matter and continued the hearing until January 13, 1993 . Staff has several concerns which are included in the Draft letter: 1 . The APA would allow for the expansion of the flight operations at the Livermore Municipal Airport beyond that authorized by the Livermore Airport Master Plan and its environmental impact report. The Negative Declaration for the APA prepared by ALUC Staff does not address the environmental impacts of the increase in flight operations beyond that analyzed in the previous EIR and is therefore inadequate. An EIR for the APA should be prepared. 2 . There is no factual justification in the McClintock, Becker report for an APA or its extent based on accident distribution, noise complaints, noise contours from overflights and individual overflights . 3 . Flights are intentionally routed over the location of the proposed Eastern Dublin Specific Plan in order to minimize complaints from already developed areas rather than distributed equitably. Development in Eastern Dublin should not be restricted in order to maintain the existing arbitrary flight pattern. Staff proposes that a committee be established made up of elected officials and staff of the cities of Dublin, Livermore and Pleasanton and the County of Alameda to cooperatively update the Airport Master Plan. Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the Mayor to sign the attached Draft letter (Exhibit A) to the Airport Land Use Commission to express its concerns with the proposed APA and proposing an alternative course of action. -2- r. `,� 01" D�l���� CITY OF DUBLIN P.O. Box 2340, Dublin, California 94568 City Offices, 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin, California 94568 December 9, 1992 Members of the Airport Land Use Commission 224 W. Winton Avenue Hayward, California 94544 SUBJECT: Comments on the proposed Livermore Airport Protection Area and Negative Declaration Dear Members of the Commission: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed Airport Protection Area (APA) and Negative Declaration and for the cooperation of your Staff . The purpose of this letter is to express the concerns of the City of Dublin with the proposed APA and Negative Declaration. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The APA would allow and facilitate the expansion of the number of flight operations of the Livermore Airport resulting in potentially significant environmental impacts on the Cities of Livermore and Pleasanton. The McClintock, Becker report states that the number of daily operations at the airport is projected to increase from 232,930 at present to 420,700 by the year 2011 . The Livermore Airport Master Plan which expires in 1995 envisioned a cap of 340,000 flight operations . The Negative Declaration prepared by your staff for the proposed APA states that there is sufficient airfield capacity to accommodate the forecasted demand at the airport through the year 2011, and no amendment to the 1975 Master Plan would be required for the forecasted growth to be realized. The City of Dublin contests this assertion. The environmental review for the Livermore Airport Master Plan only addressed the impacts of a maximum of 340, 000 flight operations . Yet, the Negative Declaration asserts that 420,700 flight operations could be accommodated without amending the Livermore Airport Master' Plan, and we presume, additional environmental review. Such an increase would have potentially significant noise and safety impacts on existing housing units in the cities of Livermore and Pleasanton. These impacts should be analyzed in an Environmental Impact Report. Adrninist ration (415) 833-6650 • City Council (415) 833.6605 • Finance (415) 833-6640 • Building Inspection (415) 833-6620 Code Enforcement (415) 833-6620 • Engineering (415) 833-6630 • Planning (415) 833-6610 Police (415) 833-6670 • Public Works (415) 833-6630 • Recreation (415) 833-6645 AIRPORT PROTECTION AREA 1 . There is no factual justification in the McClintock, Becker report for an APA or for the extent of the proposed APA: A. Accident distribution statistics in the report show a concentration of accidents near the runway and not in Eastern Dublin, north of I-580 . B. Noise complaints are concentrated near the airport runway. An analysis of Exhibit IV-3 of the report shows that 93% of the complaints occurred in a band 3, 600 feet north and south of the runway. No residential land uses are proposed in Eastern Dublin within 3, 600 feet of the runway so it is very unlikely a significant amount of noise complaints would arise from residences which would all be located further away from the runway. C. The 65dB CNEL contour recognized by the State Department of Transportation as the threshold of compatibility for residences and schools lies well south of I-580 in the year 2011 and will not impact any residential land uses in Eastern Dublin. The proposed use of the much more restrictive 60dB contour would be arbitrary and exceed the State standard. 2 . Exposure to single event overflights by corporate jets will occur over a far greater area than the proposed APA. Occasional irritation and isolated complaints are not justifications for an APA. 3 . Flights are intentionally routed over Eastern Dublin to minimize complaints from already developed areas rather than distributed equitably over the Dublin, Livermore and Pleasanton area. Development in Eastern Dublin should not be restricted in order to simply maintain the existing arbitrary flight pattern. ALTERNATIVE TO THE APA The proposed APA is not the appropriate method to address noise and safety impacts and complaints regarding aircraft operations . Instead, the Livermore Airport Master Plan (which is due to expire in 1995) and the Airport Land Use Policy Plan should be updated to address these potential concerns . This should be done in cooperation with the cities of Dublin and Pleasanton and Alameda County as opposed to Livermore seeking to unilaterally apply an APA. i i A Regional Airport Advisory Committee was established in ;1988 by the cities of Livermore and Pleasanton in order to foster inter-city cooperation. The Advisory Committee could be used as a model for a new Committee made up of the cities of Livermore, Pleasanton and Dublin and the County of Alameda. The committee could cooperatively update the Airport Master Plan to include: 1 . A revised flight pattern which equitably distributes the burden of overflights and uses airspaces over highways and commercial and industrial areas for take-off and landing flight tracks. 2 . Avigation easements purchased from landowners most severely impacted by the airport. 3 . Placing limitations on the hours of operation of certain types of noisy aircraft. 4 . Construction standards which attenuate noise. The Dublin City Council appreciates your consideration of these comments . We request that the Airport Land Use Commission deny the request of the City of Livermore to include the proposed Airport Protection Area in the Airport Land Use Policy Plan. The proposed APA is unneccesary, without factual support and arbitrary. Furthermore, we request that you recommend the establishment of a committee to revise the Livermore Airport Master Plan in a manner which is acceptable to all parties . If you have any further questions, please call Laurence L. Tong, Planning Director, at 833-6610 . Sincerely yours, Peter W. Snyder Mayor PWS/DHC cc: Richard Ambrose, City Manager Laurence Tong, Planning Director Elizabeth Silver, City Attorney Dennis Carrington, Senior Planner Ben Tarver, Mayor, City of Pleasanton Cathie Brown, Mayor, City of Livermore /LIVAPT4 ---• �»al»tm� D®i teem!3�1®f E'S(lam[R�®!1®1�� 1�� lea[IAar�•� `s 1 w Z I Ck 1LOC srlrty toaa 2 OL ....-thirwn Clt, Ll■lti r. a 4p F 8 rr pl®- llfyoct hottctla lru I r•, � _^580 � —� 1 ' (`/�`1 - _ -- ��r','y/ + _ _` u�r—_ �- �_ mar.. — v,�`�l •K,� i" , ` — r xj {',� r 111. _ �..... i �•..i?:`�r:.'7�,fi���--�1';'r r —-y •• t ��jl-�L_ P� It ,� y �+ '.g1.[;7JC���%+�•''.�'a)fr' �. —. _ ltt 1 t �a - '^�,}`=".1 i l i 7`'i1-� 4ai�lr ..Ifl _. _ t i� '� ••�f i'r'1: Ir'w— r - — LIA N 7i' ..- �— t• 4 n c't ,�•.', \ -ti==p=— ��T 1:� I i��; r • . � �' "+ �� �' 1 + J� •�) r Y, ;�irir'i!�i� o l'LLIlf.. �}� �f•S}��•��i rl'�. 7 �,�-'' / Le� ��...• ST' \ I : L pl � (c ` f .t x.. �!1':�'•'.•.,'. r`I to � Yl'!-�i;��: �'9 i"�•�• �' r � / ,> >'� _— t 1 H3 3 :'1 E :�'IL�i:'�e:.�.•.) C/vCR1f011R/f11N101AL A/Af011T 1�.r,5.iy�t-` 'r -S 1•,I'�� � 1.� . ""�4�"kGM�/�"- Y0�1•, L3 i 1 Tel '`\i�S�`II. ..� �1."� an•7.< P.S ) , i .r- u .`J• ( ,1,i<Q Zt{��'�E# ,Y` i ; ,t!r,,,.,o. •t i.,• �' ;._.1 � 1 li , . . ,, it Lo / • .l( �'� , u �L'••!•,�� ; �:• _I.,1w1 � � it l,l -� �,� �r ,,.n Mn7�i � ��. I O i L ■ ; '` r- .run,. � , i t �.f [rt n w r ■...rr Mr _ _ _ ._r• s'�-f � � tiµ; I �1 � � � .. �:.'4�. t ' yin` '..�rrw� •-�- � ) � � � �4 � • 1� --_.� ors- --•.,,_ `• � �� , t ° �p�✓ * L „1 • Y-y'i i - 4u AM AIRPORT PROTECTION AREA r IJ 1 3S fl� �Of Rovl uorl 2/20/70 /. y RR 1 RR r�'.••i DRAFT MH ++ It MH 1 f '.•��.��'-jj'A•r••i.'�i ■r■■fir■ 111■w■rte■ �ii a■�!� �.;� '••'�•_f ■� LJ� r H .. :ice'� %:�•')`'' r'.•.y, :� G)• ,�.' � .: ��•_�:�`)��i: :; � I ., J:r•%1 .' `�;�y�`�'r� � r )•.) "�:�"•;j"r.f,'���-�.i."7)".':� •' '^J'•^.i �r;)�J:•rtI;,r�. ,/' -i��'i'_ � '.•fr t,�;.'�• 'µ` •.r.•�•',s•.`. M �,��CL `Ct k•�•�• �).i�''•" 'r '!'' _'� 't,..•;l, •' •�_ r •(;._Y rte••• r.:'iv, +1 'l•r • •J.-'(:'Y r .ice _ �,^,,r••���' �.;,,'� .7„ ,� ��)' :'`)'F:- � •.C;•�::• .JtJ .� V'y%i�`ti•;. IT ��+{) :��.i' (,). `' it Fy.;�••�) r..C��:., ±J•�r „r.:, :�j;J: �•� ,�� Ir /� �•r ^iJ'.l'�,*• +••�.1� f,.mil. 1 \ .'. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I. . . . . . . . . .....•.'.'. .'. .'. . .'.'.'. .'. . . . ' .' .' .' .' ... is-:`. . . . . : . 3m am EXHIB. s CITY OF DUBLIN —�\, •••�/l�� a City Offices. t00 Civic plaza. Dublin. California^-5E8 P.O. Be,( 23 0. Dublin, California 9,15E8 August 7 ,.-. 1991 Mr. Adolph Martinelli Administrative Officer Airport Land Use Commission of Alameda County 224 W. Winton Avenue 94544 Hayward, California SUBJECT: Addition of City Livermore's of Live airport protection y arz= to the County Airport Land Use Policy Plan Dear Mr. Martinelli : f this letter is to formally express The purpose o 1ehCity of concerns of the City�rof Dublin about e Area" to l the portion of Livermore to add an Airport P the Airport Land Use Policy Plan addressing; the Livermore airport. The proposal would restrict residential and perhaps other of land uses within an area 5o0�feet of of the m that thew5�,000 the Livermore airport. The Y foot dimension to the north of the and not based on fact or any studies or economic studies , risk studies , flight op erations osed change to the studies have been performed to support the prop plan. of Any restriction on land uses northrocess tfor� would East Dublin have negative impacts on the planning p lues within the Specific Plan, have a chilling impact on land va Airport Protection Area and have a negative impact on the value of all lands in the specific plan area. Areas designated single family residential, medium density reenanaeleinentarylschoolh density residential on the specific plan, and a junior high school (all of which are at least 3 ,600 feet north of the runway) would be impacted. Residential and school uses would have to be redistributed to other areas 4nd industrial Lit I pdrrinls;r„t:on (�15) 833-66=0 • city Courc:l (J15) 833.6c05 • Finance (415)833 060 • building ! Code Enforcement ity ur.c:l 20 Enc:neenng (sty) 833.6630 • Planning (41 Police W15) 833-6670 Public WO( (etS)933.6630 • Rec:eaucn (SUS)83: , business park or regional commercial useanw�dverseve to be park placed in this area . The end result would e jobs/housing situation in the East Dublin area. During recent history, the City of Livermposedaairport approving residential llaidcuses withinh heapciny which has It protection area. recently allowed residential uses ilnt"i'sareionomoresdestant prohibit such uses in another city from the airport. the Again, I would like to the express the oppositosal by f the City of Dublin to the arbitrary anddctio�uo ded apaouses within the City of Livermore to place City of Dublin by means of adding the Airport Protection Area to ,the Airport Land Use Policy Plan. If you have any questions please call Dennis Carrington, Senior Planner, at 833-6610 . Sincer y yours, Peter W. Snyder Mayor DHC Attachments cc: Airport Land Use Plan file Cathie Brown, liayor, City of Livermore Richard C . Ambrose, City Manager Laurence Tong, Planning Director Elizabeth Silver, City Attorney Dennis Carrington, Senior Planner James Walsh, Planner II I /ALUPLET