HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 020-89 HansenHillMonitorRESOLUTION NO. 020 - 89
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
(HANSEN HILL RANCH)
WHEREAS, Public Resources Code 21081.6 requires the City to adopt a
reporting or monitoring program for changes in a project or conditions imposed
to mitigate or avoid significant environmental effects in order to ensure
compliance during project implementation; and
WHEREAS, on February 27, 1989 the City Council adopted Resolution No.
019-89 making findings certifying the Hansen Hill Ranch EIR and Addendum as
complete and adequate;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED TItAT THE Dublin City Council does hereby
adopt the "Hansen Hill Ranch Mitigation Monitoring Matrix" attached hereto as
Attachment B-1 as the monitoring program required by Public Resources Code
21081.6.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 27th day of February, 1989.
AYES:
Councilmembers Hegarty, Jeffery, Snyder, Vonheeder, and Mayor
Moffatt
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST .'
PA 87-045 HANSEN HILL lt~NOH MITIGATION
MONITOKING PROGRAM MATRIX
FEBRUARY 17, 1989
The Applicant shall be responsible for any and all costs incurred in
monitoring mitigation. measures.
For detailed information on impacts and mitigation measures refer to
Hansen Hill Ranch Environmental Impact Report.
RESOURCE IMPACTS
MONITORING!7ACTION
VERIFICATION
Vegetation Oak/Bay Woodland 1.
due to roadway
construction
through open space
Prior to issuance of
grading permits, the
developer submits arborist
horticultura!ist report.
Grading permits will not
be issued unless plans
reflect recommendation in
arborist/horticuituralists
report
1. Public Works
Dept (PWD) with
Planning Dept
input
2a. The Developer shall
identify significant
trees and tree clusters
on T.Map and grading
plans.
2a. Planning with
P~ input
2b. Prior tO issuance of
grading permit, signi-
ficant trees and tree
clusters shall be tagged
in the field for
protection.
2b. Pb~ with
Planning input
Prior to issuance of
grading permits, the
developer shall submit
a revegetation landscape
and irrigation plan for
disturbed areas.
Planning with
input from E~'D
CA Dept of Fish
and Game and
other appro-
priate agency
as needed.
[Monitor Matrix 2/27]
-1-
RESOURCE IMPACTS
MONITORING ACtiON VERIFICATION
Vegetation Riparian/stream 1. Prior to issuance of 1. (a)
corridor due to grading permits the (b)
roadway grading developer shall (a)
construction submit verification of
through open Fish and Game permit
space areas (b) submit grading plan
minimizing cut and fill slopes
within riparian corridor (c)
submit revegetation landscape
plan (see 3 above)
(c)
Planning
PWD with
Planning
input
Planning
with Fish
and Game
input
Wildlife Isolation of 1. 1. PWDwith
large mammals Planning input
due to roadway
construction
The Developer shall'
submit grading and
improvement plans prior
issuance of grading
permit. Grading permit
will not be issued unless
the plans incorporate
mitigation measures
addressed in the EIR
requiring box culvert under
roadway at confluence of
two canyons in northwestern
portion of site.
Grading/
Topography
Excessive Cut 1. The developer submits 1.
and Fill grading plans incon-
junction with T.Map
Planning Application
Planning Dept
with PWD input
Traffic Potential 1.
decrease in.
levelof service
Dublin Blvd./San
San Ramon Road
Prior to issuance of
building or grading
permits, the developer
pays to the City a
Traffic Mitigation Fee
as compensation for
project's fair share of
cost of improvements
required to mitigate
traffic inpacts, or
developer constructs
~mprovements
1. PWD with input
from City Traf-
fic Consultant
[Monitor Matrix 2/27]
RESOURCE IMPACTS MONITORING ACTION
VERIFICATION
Traffic' 2. City acquires 2. PWD
right-o~-way at
cost to the developer
Geology/ Reactivation of 1. Prior to grading, 1. PWD
Soil landslide, soil developer submits revised
shrink-swell : soils report/geotechnical
report and erosion
control/maintenance plan
with improvement plans.
Grading permits will not
be issued unless plans
reflect recommendation of
soils ~eport/geotechnical
report, erosion control
and maintenance plan.
Hydrology Increased flow/ 1. Developer submits 1. PWD
velocities of revised drainage plans/
Martin Canyon hydrology report, grading
Creek permits will not be issued
unless plans reflect
recommendation in hydro-'
logy report.
Visual Site Change 1. 2. Planning Dept
Quality from rural
to suburban
Developer submits
Planning Application
for Planned Development,
Tentative Map, including
zoning regulations
(setbacks, building
heights, etc.), lot
design and l~yout for
City Council review and
approval.
[Monitor Matrix 2/27]
-3-