Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5.1 St Patrick Way Residential Project-SDR & VTM 10809 (PLPA 2017-00061)Page 1 of 17 STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: March 27, 2018 TO: Planning Commission SUBJECT: St. Patrick Way Residential Project - Site Development Review and Vesting Tentative Map 10809 (PLPA-2017-00061) Prepared by:Amy Million, Prinicpal Planner EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Bayview Development Group/The Morley Bros. is seeking to develop a ± 8.53 acre site located at 6700 Golden Gate Drive within the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan Transit- Oriented District. The proposal includes the demolition of the existing largely vacant 204,624 square foot warehouse building, construction of the final extension of St. Patrick Way and construction of a five-story, 499-unit residential building and related site improvements. The project includes a request for a Vesting Tentative Map for condominium purposes. RECOMMENDATION: Disclose ex-parte contacts, conduct the public hearing, deliberate and adopt a Resolution approving a Site Development Review Permit and Vesting Tentative Map 10809 for the St. Patrick Way Project at 6700 Golden Gate Drive in Downtown Dublin. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project site, commonly referred to as the Prologis site, is located at 6700 Golden Gate Drive. The ±8.53-acre site is located north of I-580 and south of the future extension of St. Patrick Way, as shown in Figure 1 below. Adjacent to the west boundary of the property are two restaurants (Outback Steakhouse and a vacant restaurant space) as well as a retail/office building on the adjacent 1.3 acre site. To the east of the site is a 309-unit residential development, Connelly Station. The site currently includes a largely vacant 204,624 square foot warehouse/industrial building, surface parking lot, and outdoor storage area for an existing tenant. Industrial uses are not permitted in the DDSP which results in the building’s existing industrial use being legal-nonconforming. The existing warehouse building presents challenges to repurposing it with conforming commercial uses. Such challenges include parking and building code compliance. Page 2 of 17 The subject property is located within the Transit-Oriented District of the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan (DDSP). This land use designation allows a variety of uses, including residential, retail and office uses. The DDSP identified a pool of 1,900 residential units that may be constructed in the Transit Oriented District. As part of the proposed project, the applicant is required to enter into a Community Benefit Agreement in exchange for using units from the pool. The Community Benefit Agreement is subject to review and approval by the City Council. Since the establishment of the pool, 688 units have been constructed. There are 1,212 units remaining in this pool as shown in Table 1 below. Table 1. Transit Oriented District Residential Development Pool Transit Oriented District (1,900 Residential Units) Project Address Units Status Connelly Station 7550 St Patrick Way 309 Approved 2012 - complete Aster (Bay West) 7544 Dublin Blvd. 313 Approved 2013 - complete Valor Crossing (Eden) 6707 Golden Gate Dr. 66 Approved 2013 - complete Total Developed Units 688 Remaining Units 1,212 St. Patrick Way 6700 Golden Gate Dr. 499 Proposed Project Remaining Units with Proposed Project 713 On November 21, 2017, City Council held a study session for and provided input on the proposed project and the negotiated deal points of the proposed Community Benefit Agreement, which included the following: Page 3 of 17 • Dedication of a 1.3-acre site just west of the subject property for the purposes of developing affordable housing • Enhanced streetscape along St. Patrick Way to allow for its use for special events and Downtown activation. • Supporting the City’s economic development effort through providing a collaborative work space within the project for local residents, entrepreneurs and emerging businesses. City Council directed Staff to proceed with processing the project entitlements for consideration by the Planning Commission and prepare a Community Benefit Agreement for the City Council to consider. Current Request Bayview Development Group/The Morley Bros. proposes to demolish the existing industrial warehouse building, construct the ultimate extension of St. Patrick Way and construct a five-story, 499-unit residential community with related amenities including a club house, pool, roof top terrace, passive courtyards, collaborative work space, leasing office and structured parking. The entitlements for the project that are being presented to the Planning Commission for consideration are a Site Development Review Permit and Tentative Parcel Map for condominium purposes. The Community Benefit Agreement, which allocates the units, will be considered separately by the City Council. ANALYSIS: Site Development Review The DDSP contains allowed uses, development standards, and design guidelines for all projects within its boundaries. The development standards contained in the DDSP are purposefully permissive to allow flexibility in project design and implementation. The proposed building meets all the development standards of the Transit-Oriented District (DDSP Section 4.2). An overview of those standards is provided in Table 2 below. Table 2. Overview of DDSP Development Regulations Development Regulation Standard Proposed Density Range 30 to 85 units per net acre 65.66 units per net acre Building Height 8 floors / 90 feet 5 floors / 57 feet Setbacks: St. Patrick Way Interior I-580 Freeway 5 feet to 15 feet maximum 5 feet minimum 10 feet minimum Varies. 6.4 feet minimum Varies. 12 feet minimum Varies. 54 feet minimum Required Frontage A building facade shall be Approximately 83% of Page 4 of 17 constructed within 10 ft of the minimum street setback line along at least 80% of the property’s total street frontage the building façade is constructed within this area. Private Outdoor Space 100 square feet per unit or 49,900 square feet 50,000 square feet Residential Parking 1.5 spaces per unit / 749 spaces 749 spaces Guest Parking Up to 15% of required parking / 0 to 112 spaces 2.1% / 16 spaces Work Space Parking 1 space per 250 square feet / 6 spaces 6 spaces In addition to defining uses, development standards, and design guidelines, the DDSP also includes a set of guiding principles to help prioritize the direction and developm ent strategy for Downtown Dublin as a whole (DDSP Section 3.3). The purpose of the guiding principles is to define a framework for future land uses, development standards and design guidelines. For details on the project’s consistency with those guiding principles see the “Consistency with the General Plan, Specific Plans, and Zoning Ordinance” section below. Overall Site Plan and Circulation The proposed building includes 499 market rate apartments and a 1,500 square foot collaborate work space along the extension of St. Patrick Way. The 499-units will be distributed through five floors which wrap around three internal courtyards and a five - story parking structure. The 1,500 square foot collaborative work space is located on the ground floor at northeast corner of the building facing St. Patrick Way. Vehicular access to the site is provided by a single driveway off St. Patrick Way. The driveway provides access to the parking garage as well as guest parking spaces along the driveway. A second vehicle access, for emergency vehicles only, is provided off West Street, a private road along the eastern property line, which is shared with the adjacent residential community, Connelly Station. This access road is restricted with a gate at the entry (located at the property line) that wraps around the building to the south, providing a buffer between the proposed building and I -580. Pedestrian access to the site is provided from St. Patrick Way, West Street and the project drive. A plaza feature has been designed in front of the leasing office centrally located along the St. Patrick Way street frontage. The plaza and leasing office create a focal point for the front façade with enhanced pavement in the plaza leading to the leasing office, which is designed as an open two-story interior space. A small second lobby is located on the east side of the building near the emergency vehicle access road off West Street. This lobby provides a direct pedestrian connection to South Street which leads to Golden Gate Drive and the West Dublin/Pleasanton BART station. A Page 5 of 17 pedestrian gate next to the emergency vehicle gate will provide secure access for the residents using this lobby. A third lobby is located on the west side of the building off the project drive adjacent to the guest parking spaces. As outlined in Table 2 above, there are a total of 771 parking spaces on -site, both at- grade and in the parking garage. The parking requirement for residential uses in the DDSP area is 1.5 spaces per residential unit and up to 15% add itional spaces for guest parking. Consistent with the DDSP, the applicant is proposing to provide 1.5 spaces per unit (749 spaces) and a limited amount of guest parking of 2.1% (16 spaces) that the applicant feels will adequately serve the needs of the building. For commercial uses, the DDSP refers to the parking standards in the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. The collaborative work space, located on the ground -floor facing St. Patrick Way is designed to be open to the public, so that it can be used by both resi dents of the project and non-residents. As such, a parking requirement of 1 space per 250 square feet for a total of 6 spaces is required for this work space and will be provided on -site. The DDSP requires private outdoor spaces for all residential development projects at a ratio of 100 square feet per residential unit. This space may be provided in a series of spaces which are common to all residents such as courtyards or roof gardens or private to individual residences such as individual balconies and patios. A total of 49,990 square feet of open space is required for the proposed 499 units and 50,000 square feet is provided. The layout of the building provides for individual balconies as well as three large internal courtyards designed for both active and passive uses including a pool, spa, BBQ, fountains, seating, and a fireplace. Additional detail on the courtyard spaces is provided in the Landscape Design section below. A site plan highlighting access locations and project features is provided in Figure 2 below and included as Attachment 2, Sheet A0.4. Page 6 of 17 As part of the review, the City engaged the services of Kittelson & Associates to complete a project-level analysis of the transportation effects, which included a review of the site circulation and access. The proposed project was determined to have adequate site circulation and access for all users including residents, emergency vehicles and service vehicles such as garage trucks. St. Patrick Way Extension The project includes the extension of St. Patrick Way from West Street to Regional Street, completing the planned connection. The street incorporates the Complete Streets standards of the General Plan (Section 5.4) with infrastructure for all modes of transportation including vehicles, pedestrians and bicyclists. The applicant is proposing to further enhance St. Patrick Way along this segment of the street. The proposal includes creating plaza type improvements such as seat walls, enhanced paving, poles for decorative string lights, temporary bollards, etc., in an effort to make St. Patrick Way a destination street for events and activities. As proposed, the street could periodically be closed for use as a place to hold Farmers’ Markets, in addition to other street fairs and food truck events hosted by the City. Figures 3 and 4 below show completion of St. Patrick Way and a detail of some of the proposed enhancements. Page 7 of 17 The proposed street enhancements implement with the guiding principles identified in the DDSP for the downtown such as: • Enhance the visual quality of Downtown Dublin, including public streetscape improvements, entryways, on‐site landscaping and the appearance of individual buildings. • Create a pedestrian‐friendly downtown that minimizes potential conflicts between vehicles, pedestrians and bicyclists. • Enhance the multi‐modal circulation network to better accommodate alternative transportation choices including BART, bus, bicycle, and pedestrian transportation. • Encourage development that will create a vibrant and dynamic downtown that is considered an attractive and distinctive amenity to the Tri‐Valley Region. • Work with property owners and business to achieve the goals and objectives of the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan. • The cost of infrastructure should be paid for by development. The conceptual streetscape improvements are included in the project plans for reference (Attachment 2, Sheets L1.2 and L5.1). The details on the streetscape improvements will be included in the Community Benefit Agreement as previously discussed. Page 8 of 17 Building Architecture and Materials The architectural concept for the development is a contemporary building designed to front along the future extension of St. Patrick Way. The north half of the building which is primarily visible from St. Patrick Way and West Street focuses on the pedestrian experience using smaller architectural details, materials and entry features. The southern half of the building which is primarily visible from I -580 focuses on experiencing the development from a vehicle on I -580 through its larger design features and color palette. The two halves of the building relate through the building’s consistent architectural theme and materials and differentiate through the changes in articulation and details. The building’s contemporary look and geometry follows the St. Patrick Way street frontage with articulation and architectural features in key locations. The ground level along St. Patrick Way is highlighted with an entry plaza with a change in paving materials leading to a two-story interior leasing office. Entry stoops for the ground -floor units provide pedestrian scale and create a direct connection to St. Patrick Way. At the corner of St. Patrick Way and West Street is a two -story cooperative working space at the ground level that also activates the corner. A partially open terrace is also provided on the 5th floor above the leasing and amenity space along the St. Patrick Way frontage. Figure 5. Partial North Elevation – St. Patrick Way Page 9 of 17 Figure 6. Detail view of Work Space and Front Entries on St. Patrick Way The parking structure is located on the southern half of the building and is wrapped on the three of the four sides, leaving the southern façade exposed to I -580. The building’s architecture screens the parking structure which is accented by colorful metal screens that are placed along the 5th floor of the parking structure and continued down the east side of the south facade to the ground floor to add further interest. Figure 7. South Elevation – I-580 The exterior materials throughout the building are a variety of contemporary building materials including, wood composite lap siding, cementitious panels, stucco, glass and metal awnings. The building’s façade is articulated through the use of two a nd three story architectural elements, grouped windows and varying window patterns that create visual interest at different levels. Balconies and awnings are used throughout the buildings along with varying vertical parapet heights. Page 10 of 17 Figure 8. Awning and Balcony Details The roofline has a traditional contemporary form that rises and falls with the various architectural projections. The open amenity space on the 5th floor directly above the ground floor leasing office and amenity space off ers additional visual relief to the building’s five-story mass. The building is further accented with balconies with wood railings, glass panels along the 5th floor amenity space, and metal awnings over selected windows and doors. These perspectives and elevations are included as Attachment 2, Sheets A1.0-A2.3. Landscape Design The landscaping is designed to enhance the building’s architecture while complementing the already established landscaping in the surrounding developments and on the street. The landscape is also functionally designed to buffer the proposed building in key locations such as along 1 -580 and the vacant property to the east adjacent to BART. The DDSP encourages the use of landscaping on all sides of buildings, along streets, walkways, driveways and private outdoor spaces. A combination of trees, shrubs and groundcovers are also encouraged which may be provided in planters, pots or in the ground. The DDSP supports the inclusion of shade trees along walkways and near buildings. These encouraged features are included in the proposed design. The design concept for the interior courtyard continues the contemporary design theme. The furnishings and plant palate are clean and contemporary. The three courtyard spaces provide different functions with both active and passive uses. The most active courtyard is the largest of the three and located directly behind the leasing and amenity space. This area includes the pool and spa. The second courtyard is directly connected to the first and is designed with a variety of seating, a fireplace and BBQs. The third courtyard provides a passive setting for the units on the southern half of the building closest to I-580. Due to its location, this space is designed to function less as an active space and more as a passive open space for the residents. Page 11 of 17 The plants selected will provide year-round seasonal interest, with a mix of evergreen and deciduous plantings. The plantings will be drought tolerant with water management features that will allow the site to use a minimum amount of water while creating an attractive and thriving environment. The conceptual landscape plan is included as Attachment 2, Sheet L1.1, which details on Sheets L3.0 and L5.2. Public Art The applicant intends to satisfy the City’s public art requirement through the inclusion of public art. The preliminary location of the art is shown along St. Patrick Way at the east and west corners of the building. Condition of Approval No. 20 confirms the public art requirement. Vesting Tentative Map 10809 The Applicant has indicated that the proposed development will be rental housing; however, a request to subdivide the ± 8.53 acre property for condominium purposes has been included to allow flexibility in the future to convert the project to ownership units. The vesting tentative map will allow up to the proposed 499 -units. No condominium conversion may take place in the City without the owner first obtaining a Condominium Conversion Permit pursuant to Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 8.54 from the Planning Commission. The Vesting Tentative Map is included in the Project Plans as Sheet C1.0. The Resolution approving Vesting Tentative Map 10809 is included as Attachment 1 to this Staff Report. CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN, SPECIFIC PLANS, AND ZONING ORDINANCE The project is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Downtown Dublin – Transit-Oriented District and the DDSP. The DDSP was written as a comprehensive plan for future development in the Downtown area. The Specific P lan contains the allowed uses, development standards, and design guidelines with which all projects within the boundaries must be in compliance. The proposed project, with the allocation of residential units from the Development Pool as described above, i s consistent with the DDSP and the City’s Zoning Ordinance. The proposed facility has been designed to be compatible with surrounding residential and commercial properties, while encouraging the appropriate integration to activate this key area of Downtow n Dublin. In addition, the proposed project will contribute to the implementation of the vision of the DDSP and the housing opportunities offered in the DDSP area. Downtown Dublin Specific Plan Guiding Principles A set of guiding principles are included to help prioritize the direction and development strategy for Downtown Dublin as a whole (DDSP Section 3.3). The purpose of the guiding principles is to define a framework for future land uses, development standards and design guidelines. In addition, guiding principles for Downtown Dublin as a whole, guiding principles have been identified for the Transit‐Oriented District (DDSP Section 3.3.3). Those that apply to the proposed project are as follows: • Promote transit‐oriented development to create a distinctive and active district; Page 12 of 17 • Identify opportunity sites for future development that incorporate mixed ‐use and provide public and/or private plazas and outdoor gathering areas at strategic locations; and • Encourage underground and/or above ground parking stru ctures. Downtown Dublin Specific Plan Vision The established vision of the DDSP is to make Downtown Dublin “a vibrant and dynamic commercial and mixed-use center that provides a wide array of opportunities for shopping, services, dining, working, living a nd entertainment in a pedestrian-friendly and aesthetically pleasing setting that attracts both local and regional residents.” The redevelopment of the subject property is an important incremental improvement to advance this vision. The proposed project also supports the narrower vision for the Transit-Oriented District which is “to encourage the development of the area with land uses that support and complement transit uses, particularly the West Dublin BART Station. These uses include high-density multi-family residential and those that are generally more urban that the surrounding area”. In addition, a pedestrian-scale, walkable environment is encouraged through the development of plazas and connectively within the District and areas outside the District. The proposed project with its completion of St. Patrick Way and site design will further the vision of the Transit-Oriented District. Downtown Dublin Specific Plan Design Guidelines The DDSP establishes design guidelines for development within the pl an area (DDSP Section 4.4). The proposed project meets the key design guidelines of the DDSP (DDSP Section 4.4), including: • Using high-quality building materials and treating all building facades that are visible from the public realm with similar archite ctural elements, materials, and colors; • Incorporating treatments into the building design to ensure articulation and visual interest by utilizing techniques such as changing direction of the wall or façade, altering the height of the rooflines, providing p rojecting elements such as canopies, balconies, trellises, and breaking up large surfaces with logical changes in materials, texture, or colors; • Use of bold colors as accent features only and maximizing the use of muted or soft colors; • For residential uses, porches, balconies, and courtyards and providing ground- floor access to both individual and common building entrances; and • Finishing materials and color used on all building facades should be complementary to cone another and appropriate for the architec tural style and character of the building. AFFORDABLE HOUSING/INCLUSIONARY ZONING The inclusionary requirement for a 499 -unit residential project is 62 units. The applicant is proposing to satisfy the affordable housing requirement through the dedicati on of a 1.3-acre site just west of the subject property for the purposes of developing affordable housing. As proposed, the applicant would sell the property to the City or an affordable housing developer for a nominal fee. As was the case for units create d for the Valor Page 13 of 17 Crossing Veteran’s Housing Project, the City will hold any excess credits of affordable units and can sell these credits to other projects in the community as a means of satisfying their affordable requirements. REVIEW BY APPLICABLE DEPARTMENT AND AGENCIES: The Building Division, Fire Prevention Bureau, Public Works Department, and Dublin San Ramon Services District reviewed the project and provided Conditions of Approval where appropriate to ensure that the Project is established in comp liance with all local Ordinances and Regulations. Conditions of Approval from these departments and agencies have been included in the attached Resolution (Attachment 1). ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The project which includes demolition of the existing wareho use building, construction of the ultimate extension of St. Patrick Way, and construction of a 5 story, 499 unit apartment community with related amenities including a club house, pool, roof top terrace, passive courtyards, leasing office and structured parking, is located within the Transit-Oriented District of the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan (DDSP), which was the subject of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), State Clearinghouse number 20100022005. The DDSP Final EIR was certified by City Council Res olution No. 08-11 on February 1, 2011. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) the proposed residential development is (1) exempt from further environmental review under Government Code Section 65457 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 a nd under (2) CEQA Guidelines Section 15168 this residential project is in conformity with the DDSP and within the scope of the project analyzed in the DDSP EIR; therefore, no further CEQA review or document is required. Government Code sec. 65457 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 - Exemption Pursuant to Government Code sec. 65457 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15182(a) (Residential Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan) of the CEQA Guidelines which states: "Exemption. Where a public agency has prepared an EIR on a specific plan after January 1, 1980, no EIR or negative declaration need be prepared for a residential project undertaken pursuant to and in conformity to that specific plan if the project meets the requirements of this section including” an event as described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. As identified in CEQA Section 15162 and briefly describes as follows, supplemental environmental review is required only when there are new or substantially more severe significant environmental impacts which require major revisions to the EIR due to project changes, substantial changes with respect to circumstances under which the project is undertaken or new information of substantial importance, or other standards under CEQA section 15162 are met. On February 1, 2011, the Dublin City Council adopted Resolution 09 -11 adopting the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan (DDSP). At the meeting, the City Council adopted Resolution 08-11 certifying an EIR for the DDSP. The purpose of the adopted DDSP was to guide development and design for the approximately 284 acres located in Downtown Dublin. The DDSP consists of a comprehensive set of incentives, standards, and requirements that implements the vision for the future development of downtown Dublin. The DDSP defines the physical envelope for Downtown Dublin’s future growth using height limits, setbacks, density, and design standards. Page 14 of 17 On May 6, 2014, the City Council adopted Resolution 49-14 adopting an Addendum to the DDSP EIR for changes to the DDSP. The changes included increasing the number of residential units permitted in the DDSP area by 1,200 units and decreasing the amount of commercial square footage permitted by 773,000 square feet, creating minimum density thresholds for the Transit-Oriented and Retails Districts, and restricting residential development on the west side of San Ramon Road in the Retail District. DDSP EIR and the subsequent addendum analyzed the construction of approximately 2.2 million square feet of non-residential development and 2,500 residential dwelling units, included in the DDSP. Of the 2,500 residential dwelling units, 1,900 unit were allocated to the Transit-Oriented District. As shown in Table 1 above, the proposed project’s 499-units is within the already contemplated residential development activity in the Transit-Oriented District. The proposed project meets the development standards established in the DDSP as shown in Table 2 above. The project is consistent with DDSP. Approval of the proposed 499 -unit residential project would be within the development threshold of the 1,900 residential dwelling units allocated for the Transit-Oriented District. In addition, the proposed project conforms with the development regulations and design guidelines established in the specific plan in which is located. As provided in Government Code sec. 21166 and Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, when an EIR has been prepared for a project (DDSP EIR), no new environmental document shall be prepared for the proposed project, unless the Planning Commission makes one of the following determinations under Section 15162(a): 1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; 2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or 3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the EIR was adopted, shows any of the following: a. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR; b. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measures or alternative; or c. Mitigation measures which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on Page 15 of 17 the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure. The City conducted a review to determine if the proposed project met any of the standards requiring the preparation of supplemental environmental review under CEQA. Based on a review of the project, the environmental analysis in the DDSP EIR and all the information in the Project record as a whole, the City has determined that there is no substantial evidence that any of the standards are met. As part of this determination, the City had an analysis of traffic and noise impacts prepared for the Project to ensure that potential impacts in those areas did not present new or substantially more s evere significant impacts than presented in the DDSP EIR. Therefore, pursuant to Government Code sec. 65457 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15182, the project is exempt from CEQA and no further environmental review is required for this project. Section 15168 – WITHIN SCOPE OF CERTIFIED DDSP PROGRAM EIR. The DDSP was prepared as a Program EIR under CEQA Guidelines Section 15168 to be used as the CEQA review for future implementing projects. Section 15168(a) defines a “program EIR” as one prepared on a series of actions that can be characterized as one large project and are related geographically and by other shared characteristics. Section 15168(c) states that subsequent activities in the program EIR must be examined in the light of the program EIR to determin e whether an additional environmental document must be prepared. If the agency finds that pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(c)(2), no new effects could occur or no new mitigation measures would be required, the agency can approve the activity as be ing within the scope of the project covered by the program EIR and no new environmental document would be required. Operation Traffic Analysis The City engaged the services of Kittelson & Associates to complete a project -level analysis of the transportation effects. The analysis included trip generation, trip distribution, traffic operation, site circulation and access. Using the same methodology established in the DDSP DEIR which includes an analysis of both the Base FAR and Maximum FAR, the project was found to be within the impacts analyzed and mitigated in the DDSP EIR and no new or substantially more severe significant traffic impacts are presented for the project. As stated, the DDSP EIR assessed the transportation impacts of the DDSP by identifying large areas for development. Since the EIR did not assign development densities to individual parcels, general assumptions were required. Therefore, included in the evaluation of the proposed project was the intersection of Golden Gate Drive and St. Patrick Way. The study found that a traffic signal was not warranted by the project alone; however, it did note that in the future (before 2040) with additional projects, the signal will be required. This finding is consistent with the DDSP EIR Mitigation Measu re 3.9-1. This mitigation measure requires the City to collect impact fees from developers in the Specific Plan Area for the Tri-Valley Transportation Development Fee as well as the Western Dublin Traffic Impact Fee programs prior to issuance of Building P ermits. This will fund local and regional transportation improvements. The signal at Golden Gate Drive and St. Patrick Way has already been identified in the Western Dublin TIF program and the payment of the required TIF fees addresses this previously iden tified impact. Page 16 of 17 Noise Impacts The DEIR for the DDSP identified the impact pertaining to the increase of noise levels in the area from mobile sources (vehicular traffic) at existing and future uses. To mitigate this impact the City adopted Mitigation Measure 3.7-3. This mitigation measure requires that future development within the DDSP project area located adjacent to Highway 580 prepare a site-specific acoustical analysis subject to review and approval by the City of Dublin. The mitigation required that the acoustical analysis evaluate resultant noise impacts in comparison to the City’s noise criteria for Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Environments. Feasible project specific mitigation measures are required as part of the project design to reduce noise impacts at future noise sensitive land uses, including but not limited to the following: 1) site design, 2) operational restrictions, 3) barriers, 4) setbacks, and 5) insulation. An acoustical assessment dated March 2018, was prepared by Kimley Horn on behalf of the applicant. The assessment evaluated future uses at the project site and potential noise levels they would be exposed to. The assessment includes an evaluation of the existing conditions and concluded that the primary noise source was traffic on I-580. As required by Mitigation Measure 3.7-3, the assessment made project specific design recommendations to address noise levels. The recommendations are as follows: 1) Sound wall. A 7-foot noise barrier is needed to ensure that ground-floor exterior noise levels in Courtyard C (closest to I-580) 2) Upgraded windows. Units along the western, southern and eastern property line require thicker glass windows (minimum Sound Transmission Class of 36) 3) Balcony treatments. The first row of units that façade the western, southern and eastern site perimeter require incorporation of a noise attenuating balcony or patio treatment (42” minimum height) With implementation of the above recommendations, the interior noise levels at the project would not exceed the 45dBA interior threshold required by the California Building Code and the Dublin General Plan. They would also keep exterior noise levels from exceeding 60 dBA which is identified as a “normally acceptable” level for residential uses in the Dublin General Plan. Based on the Project record as a whole, the proposed project is within the scope of the project covered by the DDSP EIR and subsequent Addendum. The circumstances under which the Project is to be undertaken have not substantially change d since the DDSP EIR and subsequent Addendum were prepared and will not substantially change with the approval of the Project. As supported by the operational traffic analysis and noise study, the EIR adequately describes the impacts of the Project for the purposes of CEQA, no mitigation measures or new alternatives are required by the Project other than those previously disclosed and analyzed in the DDSP EIR and subsequent Addendum. Approval of the project will not create any site‐specific operations giving rise to environmental effects different from those examined by the EIR or requiring the preparation of an Initial Study. The proposed project is subject to the DDSP Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Consequently, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Page 17 of 17 Section 15182, the Project impacts are covered by the DDSP EIR and its Addendum and no further environmental review is required for this project. PUBLIC NOTICING: In accordance with State law, a public notice was mailed to all property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the proposed project to advertise the project and the upcoming public hearing. A public notice also was published in the East Bay Times and posted at several locations throughout the City. A Planning Application sign was posted on the project site and the project was also included on the City’s development projects webpage. A copy of this Staff Report has been provided to the Applicant. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution Approving the Site Development Review Permit and Vesting Tentative Map 2. Exhibit A Project Plans RESOLUTION NO. 18-XX A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING A SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PERMIT AND VESTING TENTATIVE MAP 10809 FOR THE ST. PATRICK WAY PROJECT AT 6700 GOLDEN GATE DRIVE IN DOWNTOWN DUBLIN APN:941-1500-047-07 PLPA-2017-00069 WHEREAS, the Applicant, Bayview Development Group/The Morley Bros. is seeking to develop an 8.53 acre site located at 6700 Golden Gate Drive within the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan. The proposal includes the demolition of the existing partially vacant 204,624 square foot warehouse building, construction of the ultimate extension of S t. Patrick Way and construction a 5 story, 499-unit apartment community and related site improvements. The St. Patrick Way Residential Project includes a request for a Vesting Tentative Map for condominium purposes; and WHEREAS, the project site is located in Downtown Dublin, within the Transit Oriented District of the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, the 499 total residential dwelling units and 1,500 square feet of office (collaborative work space) in the collective project are permitted in the Transit Oriented District of the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, the project site is currently occupied by a partially vacant 204,624 square foot warehouse building, surface parking lot, and outdoor storage area for an existing tenant ; and WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), together with State Guidelines and City Environmental Regulations require that certain projects be reviewed for environmental impacts and that environmental documents be prepared; and WHEREAS, the project is located within the Transit-Oriented District of the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan (DDSP), which was the subject of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), State Clearinghouse number 20100022005. The DDSP Final EIR was certified by City Council Resolution No. 08-11 on February 1, 2011. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed residential development is exempt from fu rther environmental review under Government Code Section 65457 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15182. In addition, under CEQA Guidelines Section 15168 this residential project is in conformity with the DDSP and within the scope of the project analyzed in the D DSP EIR; therefore, no further CEQA review or document is required; and WHEREAS, a Staff Report, dated March 27, 2018 and incorporated herein by reference, described and analyzed the proposed St. Patrick Way Residential Project, including the Site Development Review application and Vesting Tentative Map application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a properly noticed public hearing on the St. Patrick Way Residential Project on March 27, 2018, at which time all interested parties had the opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hear and use independent judgment and considered all said reports, recommendations, and testimony hereinabove set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the foregoing recitals are true and correct and made a part of this resolution. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE City of Dublin Planning Commission does hereby make the following finding regarding the St. Patrick Way Project: A. The project which includes demolition of the existing warehouse building, construction the ultimate extension of Saint Patrick Way, and construct ion of a 5 story, 499 unit apartment community with related amenities including a club house, pool, roof top terrace, passive courtyards, leasing office and structured parking, is located within the Transit-Oriented District of the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan (DDSP), which was the subject of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), State Clearinghouse number 20100022005. The DDSP Final EIR was certified by City Council Resolution No. 08-11 on February 1, 2011. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA ) the proposed residential development is exempt from further environmental review under Government Code Section 65457 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15182. In addition, under CEQA Guidelines Section 15168 this residential project is in conformity with the DDSP and within the scope of the project analyzed in the DDSP EIR; therefore, no further CEQA review or document is required. Government Code sec. 65457 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 - Exemption Pursuant to Government Code sec. 65457 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15182(a) (Residential Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan) of the CEQA Guidelines which states: "Exemption. Where a public agency has prepared an EIR on a spe cific plan after January 1, 1980, no EIR or negative declaration need be prepared for a residential project undertaken pursuant to and in conformity to that specific plan if the project meets the requirements of this section” including an event as described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. As identified in CEQA Section 15162 and briefly describes as follows, supplemental environmental review is required only when there are new or substantially more severe significant environmental impacts which require major revisions to the EIR due to project changes, substantial changes with respect to circumstances under which the project is undertaken or new information of substantial importance, or other standards under CEQA section 15162 are met. On February 1, 2011, the Dublin City Council adopted Resolution 09-11 adopting the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan (DDSP). At the meeting, the City Council adopted Resolution 08-11 certifying an EIR for the DDSP. The purpose of the adopted DDSP was to guide development and design for the approximately 284 acres located in downtown Dublin. The DDSP consists of a comprehensive set of incentives, standards, and requirements that implements the vision for the future development of downtown Dublin. The DDSP defines the physical envelope for downtown Dublin’s future growth using height limits, setbacks, density, and design standards. On May 6, 2014, the City Council adopted Resolution 49-14 adopting an Addendum to the DDSP EIR for changes to the DDSP. The changes included increasing the number of residential units permitted in the DDSP area by 1,200 units and decreasing the amount of commercial square footage permitted by 773,000 square feet, creating minimum density thresholds for the Transit-Oriented and Retails Districts, and restricting residential development on the west side of San Ramon Road in the Retail District. DDSP EIR and the subsequent addendum analyzed the construction of approximately 2.2 million square feet of non-residential development and 2,500 residential dwelling units, included in the DDSP. Of the 2,500 residential dwelling units, 1,900 unit were allocated to the Transit-Oriented District. As shown in Table 1 below, the proposed project’s 499-units is within the already contemplated residential development ac tivity in the Transit-Oriented District. Table 1. Transit Oriented District Residential Development Transit Oriented District (1,900 Residential Units) Project Address Units Status Connelly Station 7550 St Patrick Way 309 Approved 2012 - complete Aster (Bay West) 7544 Dublin Blvd. 313 Approved 2013 - complete Valor Crossing (Eden) 6707 Golden Gate Dr. 66 Approved 2013 - complete Total Developed Units 688 St. Patrick Way 6700 Golden Gate Dr. 499 Proposed Project Remaining Units with Proposed Project 713 The proposed project meets the development standards established in the DDSP as shown in Table 2 below. Table 2. Overview of DDSP Development Regulations Development Regulation Standard Proposed Density Range 30 to 85 units per net acre 65.66 units per net acre Building Height 8 floors / 90 feet 5 floors / 57 feet Setbacks: St. Patrick Way Interior I-580 Freeway 5 feet to 15 feet maximum 5 feet minimum 10 feet minimum Varies. 6.4 feet minimum Varies. 12 feet minimum Varies. 54 feet minimum Required Frontage Buildout A building facade shall be constructed within 10 ft of the minimum street setback line along at least 80% of the property’s total street frontage Approximately 83% of the building façade is constructed with in this area. Private Outdoor Space 100 square feet per unit or 49,900 square feet 50,000 square feet Residential Parking 1.5 spaces per unit / 749 spaces 771 spaces Guest Parking Up to 15% of required parking / 0 to 112 spaces 2.1% / 16 spaces Work Space Parking 1 space per 250 square feet / 6 spaces 6 spaces The project is consistent with DDSP. Approval of the proposed 499 -unit residential project would be within the development threshold of the 1,900 residential dwelling units allocated for the Transit-Oriented District. In addition, the proposed project conforms with the development regulations and design guidelines established in the specific plan in which is located. As provided in Government Code sec. 21166 and Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, when an EIR has been prepared for a project (DDSP EIR), no new environmental document shall be prepared for the proposed project, unless the Planning Commission makes one of the following determinations under Section 15162(a): 1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; 2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or 3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the EIR was adopted, shows any of the following: a. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR; b. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measures or alternative; or c. Mitigation measures which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure. The City conducted a review to determine if the proposed project met any of the standards requiring the preparation of supplemental environmental review under CEQA. Based on a review of the project, the environmental analysis in the DDSP EIR and all the information in the Project record as a whole, the City has determined that there is no substantial evidence that any of the standards are met. As part of this determination, the City had an analysis of traffic and noise impacts prepared for the Project to ensure that potential impacts in those areas did not present new or substantially more severe significant impacts than presented in the DDSP EIR. Therefore, pursuant to Government Code sec. 65457 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15182, the project is exempt from CEQA and no further environmental review is required for this project. Section 15168 – WITHIN SCOPE OF CERTIFIED DDSP PROGRAM EIR. The DDSP was prepared as a Program EIR under CEQA Guidelines Section 15168 to be used as the CEQA review for future implementing projects. Section 15168(a) defines a “program EIR” as one prepared on a series of actions that can be characterized as one large project and are related geo graphically and by other shared characteristics. Section 15168(c) states that subsequent activities in the program EIR must be examined in the light of the program EIR to determine whether an additional environmental document must be prepared. If the agenc y finds that pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(c)(2), no new effects could occur or no new mitigation measures would be required, the agency can approve the activity as being within the scope of the project covered by the program EIR and no new environmental document would be required. Operation Traffic Analysis The City engaged the services of Kittelson & Associates to complete a project -level analysis of the transportation effects. The analysis included trip generation, trip distribution, traffic operation, site circulation and access. Using the same methodology established in the DDSP DEIR which includes an analysis of both the Base FAR and Maximum FAR, the project was found to be within the impacts analyzed and mitigated in the DDSP EIR and no new or substantially more severe significant traffic impacts are presented for the project. As stated, the DDSP EIR assessed the transportation impacts of the DDSP by identifying large areas for development. Since the EIR did not assign development densities to individual parcels, general assumptions were required. Therefore, included in the evaluation of the proposed project was the intersection of Golden Gate Drive and St. Patrick Way. The study found that a traffic signal was not warranted by the project alone; however, it did note that in the future (before 2040) with additional projects, the signal will be required. This finding is consistent with the DDSP EIR Mitigation Measure 3.9-1. This mitigation measure requires the City to collect impact fees from developers in the Specific Plan Area for the Tri-Valley Transportation Development Fee as well as the Downtown TIF programs prior to issuance of Building Permits. This will fund local and regional transportation improvements. The signal at Golden Gate Drive and St. Patrick Way has already been identified in the Downtown TIF program and the payment of the required TIF fees addresses this previously identified impact. Noise Impacts The DEIR for the DDSP identified the impact pertaining to the increase of noise levels in the area from mobile sources (vehicular traffic) at existing and future uses. To mitigate this impact the City adopted Mitigation Measure 3.7 -3. This mitigation measure requires that future development within the DDSP project area located adjacent to Highway 580 prepare a site -specific acoustical analysis subject to review and approval by the City of Dublin. The mitigation required that the acoustical analysis evaluate resultant noise impacts in comparison to the City’s noise criteria for Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Environments. Feasible project specific mitigation measures are required as part of the project design to reduce noise impacts at future noise sensitive land uses, including but not limited to the following: 1) site design, 2) operational restrictions, 3) barriers, 4) setbacks, and 5) insulation. An acoustical assessment dated March 2018, was prepared by Kimley Horn on behalf of the applicant. The assessment evaluated future uses at the project site a nd potential noise levels they would be exposed to. The assessment includes an evaluation of the existing conditions and concluded that the primary noise source was traffic on I-580. As required by Mitigation Measure 3.7-3, the assessment made project specific design recommendations to address noise levels. The recommendations are as follows: 1) Sound wall. A 7-foot noise barrier is needed to ensure that ground -floor exterior noise levels in Courtyard C (closest to I-580) 2) Upgraded windows. Units along the western, southern and eastern property line require thicker glass windows (minimum Sound Transmission Class of 36) 3) Balcony treatments. The first row of units that façade the western, southern and eastern site perimeter require incorporation of a noise attenuating balcony or patio treatment (42” minimum height) With implementation of the above recommendations, the interior noise levels at the project would not exceed the 45dBA interior threshold required by the California Building Code and the Dublin General Plan. They would also keep exterior noise levels from exceeding 60 dBA which is identified as a “normally acceptable” level for residential uses in the Dublin General Plan. Based on the Project record as a whole, the proposed project is within the scop e of the project covered by the DDSP EIR and subsequent Addendum. The circumstances under which the Project is to be undertaken have not substantially changed since the DDSP EIR and subsequent Addendum were prepared and will not substantially change with the approval of the Project. As supported by the operational traffic analysis and noise study, the EIR adequately describes the impacts of the Project for the purposes of CEQA, no mitigation measures or new alternatives are required by the Project other than those previously disclosed and analyzed in the DDSP EIR and subsequent Addendum. Approval of the project will not create any site ‐specific operations giving rise to environmental effects different from those examined by the EIR or requiring the preparation of an Initial Study. The proposed project is subject to the DDSP Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Consequently, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15182, the Project impacts are covered by the DDSP EIR and its Addendum and no further environmental review is required for this project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE City of Dublin Planning Commission does hereby make the following findings and determinations regarding the Site Development Review Permit: A. The proposal is consistent with the purposes of Chapter 8.104 of the Zoning Ordinance, with the General Plan and any applicable Specific Plans and design guidelines because: 1) The project is compatible with the architectural character and scale of development in the immediate area in which the proposed project is to be located; 2) the project is utilizing traditional building forms with contemporary, high - quality materials and finishes in compliance with the design guidelines of the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan; 3) the project will provide unique, varied, and distinct housing opportunities in an area where the City of Dublin has made efforts to incentivize higher-density housing; 4) the proposed project also supports the more specific vision for the Transit-Oriented District to encourage the development of the area with land uses that support and complement transit uses, particularly the West Dublin BART Station; 5) the project will help to provide affordable housing through the dedication of the 1.3 acre site; 6), the project will complete the planned extension of St. Patrick Way completing this roadway network; and 7) the project is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Downtown Dublin Specific Plan – Transit- Oriented District. B. The proposal is consistent with the provisions of Title 8, Zoning Ordinance because: 1) the project contributes to the orderly, attractive, and harmonious site and architectural development that is compatible with the architectural style, intensity of development – either in place or permitted in the future, and context of surrounding and adjacent properties; and 2) the project complies with the development standards of the Downtown Dublin Zoning District, as outlined in the DDSP. C. The design of the project is appropriate to the City, the vicinity, su rrounding properties, and the lot in which the project is proposed because: 1) the project is consistent with the DDSP in that it provides additional housing opportunities in close proximity to the West Dublin/Pleasanton BART station; 2) the size and mass of the proposed buildings are consistent with other residential development in the immediate vicinity and in compliance with the minimum and maximum development density/intensity permitted; 3) the redevelopment of the subject property is an important incre mental change to advance the vision of the DDSP to make Downtown Dublin a vibrant and dynamic mixed-use center; and 4) the proposed building in conjunction with the completion of St. Patrick Way will provide a more complete street scene. D. The subject site is suitable for the type and intensity of the approved development because: 1) the Project provides residential development in an area that can support residential uses; 2) the Project is consistent with the Downtown Dublin Zoning District in which it is located; 3) the project site will be fully served by a network of existing and planned infrastructure of public roadways, services, and facilities and 4) he proposed project meets all of the development standards established to regulate development in the DDSP Transit-Oriented District and are consistent and compatible with other residential development projects in the immediate vicinity. E. Impacts to existing slopes and topographic features are addressed because: 1) the project site is generally flat; and 2) landscaping along St. Patrick Way and throughout the project will be complete. F. Architectural considerations including the character, scale and quality of the design, site layout, the architectural relationship with the site and other buildings, scree ning of unsightly uses, lighting, building materials and colors and similar elements result in a project that is harmonious with its surroundings and compatible with other developments in the vicinity because: 1) the Project provides a high degree of design and landscaping to provide a unique, urban, contemporary-themed housing opportunity in the DDSP; 2) the structures reflect the architectural styles and development standards for other higher-density residential projects within the DDSP; 3) the materials proposed will be high-quality and long-lasting; and 4) the color and materials proposed are appropriate to the contemporary architectural design proposed for the project and complementary to other commercial buildings in the project vicinit y; 4) the architectural style and materials will be consistent and compatible with the contemporary architectural style, colors, and materials being utilized on other multi -family projects in the immediate vicinity; 5) the project is utilizing traditional building forms with contemporary, high-quality materials and finishes in compliance with the design guidelines of the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan; and 6) the size and scale of the development will be similar to multi-family project already being constructed in the immediate project vicinity. G. Landscape considerations, including the location, type, size, color, texture and coverage of plant materials, and similar elements have been incorporated into the project to ensure visual relief, adequate screening and an attractive environment for the public because: 1) all perimeter landscaping, streetscape enhancements, fences, and hardscape are proposed for construction in accordance with the DDSP; and 2) the project perimeter and interior landscaping is consistent with other developments currently under construction in the vicinity and 3) the project will conform to the requirements of the City’s Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. H. The site has been adequately designed to ensure the proper circulation for bicyclist, pedestrians, and automobiles because: 1) all infrastructure including streets, sidewalks, and street lighting are proposed for construction in accordance with the project plans and have been reviewed for safety and adequate circulation; and 2) development of this project will include completion of the planned extension of St. Patrick way to Regional Street to City Standards including Complete Streets so that all modes of transportation are supported and ensuring the safe use of these facilities. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Dublin hereby makes the following findings and determinations regarding Vesting Tentative Map 10809: A. The proposed subdivision map together with the provisions for its design and improvement is consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific plan because: 1) the proposed Vesting Tentative Map 10809 together with the provisions for its design and improvements complies with the development standards of the DDSP and the Transit-Oriented District as well as the overall vision of the DDSP to provide a vibrant mixed-use center which includes high-density residential development. B. The subdivision site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development because: 1) the project site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development (65.66 units per acre) is consistent with the DDSP Transit Oriented District’s density range of 30 to 885 units per acre; 2) the proposed 5- story development is consistent with the scale of other residential developments in the immediate vicinity; and 3) the project site is located on approximately 8.53 acres of relatively flat topography, and so therefore is physically suitable for the type and density of development that is proposed. C. The tentative tract map is consistent with the intent of applicable subdivision design or improvements of the tentative tract map are consistent with the city’s general plan and any applicable specific plan because: 1) the proposed Vesting Tentative Map 10809 for no more than 499 residential condominium units is consistent with the development densities allowed in the DDSP and well with the overall vision of the DDSP to provide a vibrant mixed-use center which includes high-density residential development. D. The subdivision design and proposed improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat because: 1) the proposed Vesting Tentative Map is for the redevelopment of an already fully developed site with improvements and therefore already an urbanized site will not result in environmental damage or substantially injure fish or wildlife or their habitat or cause public health concerns; 2) in addition, the City conducted a review to determine if the proposed project met any of the standards requiring the preparation of supplemental environmental review under CEQA. Based on a review of the project and the environmental analysis in the DDSP EIR, the City has determined that there is no substantial evidence that any of the standards are met. Therefore, it has been determined that the project is exempt from CEQA and no further environmental review is required for this project. E. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements will not cause serious public health concerns because: 1) the design of the subdivision or type of improvements will not cause serious public health concerns as it has been conditioned to comply with all building codes and ordinances in effect at the ti me of permit issuance; 2) in addition, the City conducted a review to determine if the proposed project met any of the standards requiring the preparation of supplemental environmental review under CEQA. Based on a review of the project and the environmen tal analysis in the DDSP EIR, the City has determined that there is no substantial evidence that any of the standards are met. As part of this determination, the City had an analysis of traffic and noise impacts prepared for the Project to ensure that potential impacts in those areas did not present new or substantially more severe significant impacts than presented in the DDSP EIR. Therefore, it has been determined that the project is exempt from CEQA and no further environmental review is required for this project. F. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision; or alternate easements are provided pursuant to Government Code Section 66474(g) because: 1) the City Engineer has reviewed the Vesting Tentative Map and title report and has determined that the future proposed buildings will not conflict with existing or new easements nor with future property line s. G. The design or improvements of the tentative map are consistent with the city’s general plan and any applicable specific plan because: 1) the proposed Vesting Tentative Map 10809 together with the provisions for its design and improvements complies w ith the development standards of the DDSP and the Transit -Oriented District as well as the overall vision of the DDSP to provide a vibrant mixed-use center which includes high- density residential development. H. The subdivision is designed to provide for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities because: 1) the proposed design and orientation of the building is designed to limit the number of residential units from southern exposure ; 2) the limited number of units which have southern exposure are located on a single-loaded corridor limiting direct sun exposure; 3) the parking structure, which is an non-habitable space, is specifically located to align with the southern exposure and designed with openings to naturally vent; 4) awnings are included in the design of some of the window to provide some protection; and 5) along the southern property line, a dense canopy of evergreen trees are proposed to provide shade year round. I. The tentative tract map, including design and improvement, shall comply with all the applicable provisions and requirements of the zoning ordinance, the latest municipal stormwater permit issued to the city by the Regional Water Quality Control Board, this title, any other ordinance of the city, and the Subdivision Map Act because: 1) the project is compliant with the California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit ; 2) the project is located within a quarter mile of a BART Station, is characterized as a non -auto-related use, meets the minimum gross density requirements, and therefore is eligible for LID treatment reduction credit as a special project under Provision C.3 of the MRP; 3) the project would include bioretention areas and stormwater treatment vaul ts to ensure consistency with regional C.3 stormwater treatment; 4) the project meets hydromodification exempt requirements; and 5) the project would include full trash capture devices to ensure consistency with regional C.10 stormwater treatment requirements. J. The vesting tentative map complies with the associated site development review application. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Dublin hereby approves the Site Development Review Permit for the St. Patrick Way Residential Project, subject to the conditions included below, and in accordance with the Project Plans, incorporated herein by reference and attached as Exhibit A to this Resolution. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Dublin hereby approves the Vesting Tentative Map for the St. Patrick Way Residential Project, subject to the conditions included below, and in accordance with the Project Plans, incorporated herein by reference and attached as Exhibit A to this Resolution. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Unless stated otherwise, all Conditions of Approval shall be complied with prior to the issuance of building permits or establishment of use and shall be subject to Planning Department review and approval. The following codes represent those departments/agencies responsible for monitoring compliance of the conditions of approval. [PL.] Planning, [B] Building, [PO] Police, [PW] Public Works [P&CS] Parks & Community Services, [ADM] Administration/City Attorney, [FIN] Finance, [F] Alameda County Fire Department, [DSR] Dublin San Ramon Services District, [CO] Alameda County Department of Environmental Health, [Z7] Zone 7. CONDITION TEXT RESPON. AGENCY WHEN REQ’D Prior to: 1. Approval. This Site Development Review and Tentative Map 10809 approval is for the St. Patrick Way Residential Project (PLPA-2017-00069). This approval shall be as generally depicted and indicated on the project plans prepared by KTGY and CBG dated received March 16, 2018, attached as Exhibit A, and other plans, text, and diagrams relating to this Site Development Review, unless modified by the Conditions of Approval contained herein. PL On-going 2. Permit Expiration – Site Development Review. Construction or use shall commence within one (1) year of the effective date of this Permit or the Site Development Review shall lapse and become null and void. If there is a PL One year after Effective Date CONDITION TEXT RESPON. AGENCY WHEN REQ’D Prior to: dispute as to whether the Permit has expired, the City may hold a noticed public hearing to determine the matter. Such a determination may be processed concurrently with revocation proceedings in appropriate circumstances. If a Permit expires, a new application must be made and processed according to the requirements of this Ordinance. 3. Permit Expiration – Tentative Map. Approval of the Tentative Map shall be valid for 36 months from the effective date as set forth in Section 9.08.130.A of the Dublin Municipal Code. PW 36 months after Effective Date 4. Time Extension. The original approving decision-maker may, upon the Applicant’s written request for an extension of approval prior to expiration, upon the determination that all Conditions of Approval remain adequate and all applicable findings of approval will continue to be met, grant an extension of the approval for a period not to exceed six (6) months. All time extension requests shall be noticed and a public hearing shall be held before the original hearing body. PL One Year Following Expiration Date 5. Compliance. Developer shall comply with the Subdivision Map Act, the City of Dublin Subdivision and Zoning Ordinances, City of Dublin Title 7 Public Works Ordinance, which includes the Grading Ordinance, the City of Dublin Public Works Standards and Policies, the most current requirements of the State Code Title 24 and the Americans with Disabilities Act with regard to accessibility, and all building and fire codes and ordinances in effect at the time of building permit issuance. All public improvements constructed by Developer and to be dedicated to the City are hereby identified as “public works” under Labor Code section 1771. Accordingly, Developer, in constructing such improvements, shall comply with the Prevailing Wage Law (Labor Code. Sects. 1720 and following). PL, PW On-going 6. Effective Date. This Site Development Review approval becomes effective after the Community Benefit Agreement associated with the project is approved by the City Council. If the Community Benefit Agreement is not approved, the Site Development Review and Vesting Tentative Map approvals shall become null and void. PL Ongoing 7. Revocation of Permit. The Site Development Review approval shall be revocable for cause in accordance with Section 8.96.020.I of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. Any violation of the terms or conditions of this permit shall be subject to citation. PL On-going 8. Requirements and Standard Conditions. The Applicant/ Developer shall comply with applicable City of Dublin Fire Prevention Bureau, Dublin Public Works Department, Dublin Building Department, Dublin Police Services, Alameda County Flood Control District Zone 7, Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority, Alameda County Public and Environmental Health, Dublin San Ramon Services District and the California Department of Health Services requirements and standard conditions. Prior to issuance of building permits or the installation of any improvements Various Building Permit Issuance CONDITION TEXT RESPON. AGENCY WHEN REQ’D Prior to: related to this project, the Applicant/Developer shall supply written statements from each such agency or department to the Planning Department, indicating that all applicable conditions required have been or will be met. 9. Required Permits. The Applicant/Developer shall obtain all permits required by other agencies which may include, but are not limited to Alameda County Environmental Health, Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (Zone 7), California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Army Corps of Engineers, Regional Water Quality Control Board, Caltrans, or other regional/state agencies as required by law, as applicable. Copies of the permits shall be provided to the Public Works Department. PW Building Permit Issuance 10. Fees. The Applicant/Developer shall pay all applicable fees and receive all applicable fee credits in effect at the time of building permit issuance, grading permit issuance and final map approval, including, but not limited to, Planning fees, Building fees, Traffic Impact Fees, TVTC fees, Dublin San Ramon Services District fees, Public Facilities fees, Dublin Unified School District School Impact fees, Fire Facilities Impact fees, Alameda County Flood and Water Conservation District (Zone 7) Drainage and Water Connection fees; or any other fee or credit that may be adopted and applicable, as provided by the Development Agreement, if any. The Developer shall be eligible for credits as stated in the Western Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update: Final Report (WDTIF), dated August 2016, for public right-of-way dedicated and improvements constructed at St. Patrick Way. Amounts of credit shall be consistent with areas dedicated and improvements constructed, not to exceed the amount set forth in the WDTIF. Various Final Map Approval, Grading Permit, and Building Permit Issuance 11. Indemnification. The Applicant/Developer shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Dublin and its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Dublin or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City of Dublin or its advisory agency, appeal board, Planning Commission, City Council, Community Development Director, Zoning Administrator, or any other department, committee, or agency of the City to the extent such actions are brought within the time period required by Government Code Section 66499.37 or other applicable law; provided, however, that the Applicant’s/Developer's duty to so defend, indemnify, and hold harmless shall be subject to the City's promptly notifying the Applicant/Developer of any said claim, action, or proceeding and the City's full cooperation in the defense of such actions or proceedings. ADM On-going 12. Clarification of Conditions. In the event that there needs to be clarification to the Conditions of Approval, the Director of Community Development and the City Engineer have the authority to clarify the intent of these Conditions of Approval to the Developer without going to a public hearing. The PL/PW On-going CONDITION TEXT RESPON. AGENCY WHEN REQ’D Prior to: Director of Community Development and the City Engineer also have the authority to make minor modifications to these conditions without going to a public hearing in order for the Applicant/Developer to fulfill needed improvements or mitigations resulting from impacts of this project. 13. Clean-up. The Applicant/Developer shall be responsible for clean-up and disposal of project related trash to maintain a safe, clean, and litter-free site. PL On-going 14. Modifications. Modifications or changes to this Site Development Review approval may be considered by the Community Development Director in compliance with Chapter 8.104 of the Zoning Ordinance. PL On-going 15. Controlling Activities. The Applicant/Developer shall control all activities on the project site so as not to create a nuisance to the existing or surrounding businesses and residences. PL On-going 16. Accessory Structures. The use of any accessory structures, such as storage sheds or trailer/container units used for storage or for any other purpose during construction, shall not be allowed on the site at any time unless a Temporary Use Permit is applied for and approved. PL Establishment of the temporary use PLANNING DIVISION - PROJECT SPECIFIC CONDITIONS 17. Equipment Screening. All electrical, fire risers and/or mechanical equipment shall be screened from public view. Any roof-mounted equipment shall be completely screened from view by materials architecturally compatible with the building and to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. The Building Permit plans shall show the location of all equipment and screening for review and approval by the Director of Community Development. PL Building Permit Issuance And On-going 18. Sound Attenuation. The project shall comply with the sound attenuation measures recommended in the Acoustical Assessment dated March 2018 prepared by Kimley Horn and generally outlined as follows: 1) Sound wall. A 7-foot noise barrier is needed to ensure that ground-floor exterior noise levels in Courtyard C (closest to I-580) 2) Upgraded windows. Units along the western, southern and eastern property line require thicker glass windows (minimum Sound Transmission Class of 36) 3) Balcony treatments. The first row of units that façade the western, southern and eastern site perimeter require incorporation of a noise attenuating balcony or patio treatment (42” minimum height) Refer to Acoustical Assessment for further details. PL Building Permit Issuance 19. Mitigation Monitoring Program. The Applicant/ Developer shall comply with the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) certified by City Council Resolution 08-11, including all mitigation measures, action programs, and implementation measures contained therein. The EIR is on file with the Community Development Department. PL Building Permit Issuance CONDITION TEXT RESPON. AGENCY WHEN REQ’D Prior to: 20. Public Art. The project is required to comply with Sections 8.58.05A and 8.58.05D of Chapter 8.58 (Public Art Program) of the Dublin Municipal Code. PL Building Permit Issuance 21. Final building and site development plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department staff prior to the issuance of a building permit. All such plans shall insure: a. That standard residential security requirements as established by the Dublin Police Department are provided. b. That ramps, special parking spaces, signing, and other appropriate physical features for the disabled, are provided throughout the site for all publicly used facilities. c. That exterior lighting of the building and site is not directed onto adjacent properties and the light source is shielded from direct offsite viewing. d. That all mechanical equipment, including air conditioning condensers, electrical and gas meters, are architecturally screened from view, and that electrical transformers are either underground or architecturally screened. e. That all vents, gutters, downspouts, flashings, etc., are painted to match the color of adjacent surface. f. That all materials and colors are to be as approved by the Dublin Community Development Department. Once constructed or installed, all improvements are to be maintained in accordance with the approved plans. Any changes, which affect the exterior character, shall be resubmitted to the Dublin Community Development Department for approval. g. That all exterior architectural elements not detailed on the plans be finished in a style and in materials in harmony with the exterior of the building. All materials shall wrap to the inside corners and terminate at a perpendicular wall plane. h. That all other public agencies that require review of the project are supplied with copies of the final building and site plans and that compliance is obtained with at least their minimum Code requirements. PL Building Permit Issuance LANDSCAPING 22. Final Landscape and Irrigation Plans. Final landscape plans, irrigation system plans, tree preservation techniques, and guarantees, shall be reviewed and approved by the Dublin Planning Division prior to the issuance of the building permit. All such submittals shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and the Community Development Director. Plans shall be generally consistent with the Preliminary Landscape drawings included in the Project Plan Set prepared by Fletcher Studio received by PL Landscape plan approval and installation CONDITION TEXT RESPON. AGENCY WHEN REQ’D Prior to: the Planning Division on February 9, 2018, except as modified by the Conditions listed below or as required by the Community Development Director to address specific site constraints or conditions. The Final Landscape Plans shall insure: a. That plant material is utilized which will be capable of healthy growth within the given range of soil and climate. b. That proposed landscape screening is of a height and density so that it provides a positive visual impact within three years from the time of planting. c. That unless unusual circumstances prevail, all trees on the site shall be a minimum of 15 gallons in size. All trees that are on the exterior building perimeter shall be 24” box minimum, with at least 30% at 36” box or greater. All shrubs shall be 5 gallon minimum. d. That a plan for an automatic irrigation system be provided which assures that all plants get adequate water. In unusual circumstances, and if approved by Staff, a manual or quick coupler system may be used. e. That concrete curbing is to be used at the edges of all planters and paving surfaces where applicable. f. That all cut and fill slopes conform to the conditions detailed in the Site Development Review packet. g. That a guarantee from the owners or contractors shall be required guaranteeing all shrubs and ground cover, all trees, and the irrigation system for one year. h. That a permanent maintenance agreement on all landscaping will be required from the owner insuring regular irrigation, fertilization and weed abatement, if applicable. 23. Landscaping at Street/Drive Aisle Intersections. Landscaping shall not obstruct the sight distance of motorists, pedestrians or bicyclists. Except for trees, landscaping (and/or landscape structures such as walls) at drive aisle intersections shall not be taller than 30 inches above the curb. Landscaping shall be kept at a minimum height and fullness giving patrol officers and the general public surveillance capabilities of the area. PL Ongoing 24. Plant Clearances. All trees planted shall meet the following clearances: a. 6’ from the face of building walls or roof eaves. b. 7’ from fire hydrants, storm drains, sanitary sewers and/or gas lines. c. 5’ from top of wing of driveways, mailboxes, water, telephone and/or electrical mains d. 15’ from stop signs, street or curb sign returns. e. 15’ from either side of street lights. PL Landscape plan approval and installation CONDITION TEXT RESPON. AGENCY WHEN REQ’D Prior to: 25. Landscaping. Applicant/Developer shall construct all landscaping within the site and along the project frontage. PL, PW Landscape plan approval and installation 26. Backflow Prevention Devices. The Landscape Plan shall show the location of all backflow prevention devises. The location and screening of the backflow prevention devices shall be reviewed and approved by City staff. PL, PW, F Landscape plan approval and installation 27. Root Barriers and Tree Staking. The landscape plans shall provide details showing root barriers and tree staking will be installed which meet current City specifications. PL, PW Landscape plan approval and installation 28. Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance. The Applicant/ Developer shall submit written documentation to the Public Works Department (in the form of a Landscape Documentation Package and other required documents) that the development conforms to the City’s Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance. PL Landscape plan approval and installation BUILDING & SAFETY DIVISION 29. Building Codes and Ordinances. All project construction shall conform to all building codes and ordinances in effect at the time of building permit. B Through Completion 30. Building Permits. To apply for building permits, Applicant/Developer shall submit electronic plans and specs and the number of hard copies as determined by the Building Official for plan check. Each set of plans shall have attached an annotated copy of these Conditions of Approval. The notations shall clearly indicate how all Conditions of Approval will be or have been complied with. Construction plans will not be accepted without the annotated resolutions attached to each set of plans. Applicant/Developer will be responsible for obtaining the approvals of all participating non-City agencies prior to the issuance of building permits. B Building Permit Issuance 31. Construction Drawings. Construction plans shall be fully dimensioned (including building elevations) accurately drawn (depicting all existing and proposed conditions on site), and prepared and signed by a California licensed Architect or Engineer. All structural calculations shall be prepared and signed by a California licensed Architect or Engineer. The site plan, landscape plan and details shall be consistent with each other. B Building Permit Issuance 32. Foundation. Geotechnical Engineer for the soils report shall review and approve the foundation design. A letter shall be submitted to the Building Division on the approval. A soils report is required. B Building Permit Issuance 33. Engineer Observation. The Engineer of record shall be retained to provide observation services for all components of the lateral and vertical design of the building, including nailing, hold-downs, straps, shear, roof diaphragm and structural frame of building. A written report shall be submitted to the City Inspector prior to scheduling the final frame inspection. B Scheduling the Final Frame Inspection 34. Phased Occupancy Plan. If occupancy is requested to occur in phases, then all physical improvements within each phase shall be required to be completed prior to occupancy B Occupancy of any affected building CONDITION TEXT RESPON. AGENCY WHEN REQ’D Prior to: of any unit within that phase except for items specifically excluded in an approved Phased Occupancy Plan, or minor handwork items, approved by the Department of Community Development. The Phased Occupancy Plan shall be submitted to the Directors of Community Development and Public Works for review and approval a minimum of 60 days prior to the request for any occupancy the building. No individual space shall be occupied until the adjoining area is finished, safe, accessible, and provided with all reasonable expected services and amenities, and separated from remaining additional construction activity. Subject to approval of the Director of Community Development, the completion of landscaping may be deferred due to inclement weather with the posting of a bond for the value of the deferred landscaping and associated improvements. 35. Air Conditioning Units. Air conditioning units and ventilation ducts shall be screened from public view with materials compatible to the main building. Units shall be permanently installed on concrete pads or other non- movable materials approved by the Chief Building Official and Director of Community Development. Air conditioning units shall be located in accordance with the PD text. B Occupancy of Unit 36. CAL Green Building Standards Code. The project shall incorporate the requirements of the CAL Green Building Standards Code. The project shall be provided with: a) short term bicycle parking, and b) conduit installed from the electrical supply panel to the roof for the installation of future PV. The Green Building Plan shall be submitted to the Chief Building Official for review. B Permitting 37. Solar Zone – CA Energy Code. Show the location of the Solar Zone on the site plan. Detail the orientation of the Solar Zone. This information shall be shown in the master plan check on the overall site plan. This condition of approval will be waived if the project meets the exceptions provided in the CA Energy Code. B Through Completion 38. Accessible units under CBC 11A Project type requires a minimum of 10% of the units shall meet the requirements of chapter 11A of the CBC. The ten percent (10%) accessible units shall be constructed concurrently with the project. Certificate of Occupancies may be withheld by the Chief Building Official’s determination at any time that the 10% requirements are not being met. B Building Permit/ Occupancy 39. Accessible Parking. The required number of parking stalls, the design and location of the accessible parking stalls shall be as required by the CA Building Code. B Through Completion 40. Addressing (a) Address signage shall be provided as per the Dublin Commercial Security Code, Section 7.32.280 as applicable to multifamily buildings and parking structures. (Prior to Occupancy of any Unit) (b) Exterior address numbers shall be backlight and be posted in such a way that they may be seen from the street. B Prior to Occupancy CONDITION TEXT RESPON. AGENCY WHEN REQ’D Prior to: (Prior to permit issuance, and through completion) (c) Address will be required on all doors leading to the exterior of the building. Addresses shall be illuminated and be able to be seen from the street, 4 inches in height minimum. 41. Accessory Structures. Separate building permits are required for all associated exterior amenities/structures and some of those are required to meet the accessibility and building codes. Examples of amenities include: swimming pools/spas, shade structures, fire pits, retaining walls, water features, exterior fixed seating, BBQs, etc. Provide a list of these structures requiring separate permits on the cover sheet of plans. B Building Permit 42. Temporary Fencing. Temporary Construction fencing shall be installed along the perimeter of all work under construction. B Through Completion 43. Copies of Approved Plans. Applicant shall provide City with 2 reduced (1/2 size) copies of the City of Dublin stamped approved plan. B 30 days after permit & each revision issuance FIRE DEPARTMENT 44. No fire service lines shall pass beneath buildings. F Approval of Improvement Plans 45. New Fire Sprinkler System & Monitoring Requirements In accordance with The Dublin Fire Code, fire sprinklers shall be installed in the building. The system shall be in accordance with the NFPA 13, the CA Fire Code and CA Building Code. Plans and specifications showing detailed mechanical design, cut sheets, listing sheets and hydraulic calculations shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval and permit prior to installation. This may be a deferred submittal. a) Sprinkler Plans. (Deferred Submittal Item). Submit detailed mechanical drawings of all sprinkler modifications, including cut sheets, listing sheets and calculations to the Fire Department for approval and permit prior to installation. b) All sprinkler system components shall remain in compliance with the applicable N.F.P.A. 13 Standard, the CA Fire Code and the CA Building Code. c) Underground Plans. (Deferred Submittal Item). Submit detailed shop drawings for the fire water supply system, including cut sheets, listing sheets and calculations to the Fire Department for approval and permit prior to installation. All underground and fire water supply system components shall be in compliance with the applicable N.F.P.A. 13, 24, 20, 22 Standards, the CA Fire Code and the CA Building Code. The system shall be hydrostatically tested and inspected prior to being covered. Prior to the system being connected to any fire protection system, a system flush shall be witnessed by the Fire Department. d) Central Station Monitoring. Automatic fire extinguishing systems installed within buildings shall F Building Permit Issuance CONDITION TEXT RESPON. AGENCY WHEN REQ’D Prior to: have all control valves and flow devices electrically supervised and maintained by an approved central alarm station. Zoning and annunciation of central station alarm signals shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval. e) Fire Protection Equipment shall be identified with approved signs constructed of durable materials, permanently installed and readily visible. 46. b Fire Access During Construction. a) Fire Access. Access roads, turnaround, pullouts, and fire operation areas are fire lanes and shall be maintained clear and free of obstructions, including the parking of vehicles. b) Entrances. Entrances to job sites shall not be blocked, including after hours, other than by approved gates/barriers that provide for emergency access. c) Site Utilities. Site utilities that would require the access road to be dug up or made impassible shall be installed prior to construction commencing. d) Entrance flare, angle of departure, width, turning radii, grades, turnaround, vertical clearances, road surface, bridges/crossings, gates/key-switch, within a 150-foot distance to Fire Lane shall be maintained. e) Personnel Access. Route width, slope, surface and obstructions must be considered for the approved route to furthermost portion of the exterior wall. f) All-weather access. Fire access is required to be all- weather access. Show on the plans the location of the all-weather access and a description of the construction. Access roads must be designed to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus. F During Construction 47. Fire Alarm (detection) System Required A Fire Alarm-Detection System shall be installed throughout the building so as to provide full property protection, including combustible concealed spaces, as required by NFPA 72. The system shall be installed in accordance with NFPA 72, CA Fire, Building, Electrical, and Mechanical Codes. If the system is intended to serve as an evacuation system, compliance with the horn/strobe requirements for the entire building must also be met. All automatic fire extinguishing systems shall be interconnected to the fire alarm system so as to activate an alarm if activated and to monitor control valves. Delayed egress locks shall meet requirements of C.F.C. a) Fire Alarm Plans. (Deferred Submittal Item). Submit detailed drawings of the fire alarm system, including floor plan showing all rooms, device locations, ceiling height and construction, cut sheets, listing sheets and battery and voltage drop calculations to the Fire Department for review and permit prior to the installation. Where employee work area’s have audible F Occupancy CONDITION TEXT RESPON. AGENCY WHEN REQ’D Prior to: alarm coverage, circuits shall be initially designed with a minimum 20% spare capacity for adding appliances to accommodate hearing impaired employee’s. b) Central Station Monitored Account. Automatic fire alarm systems shall be monitored by an approved central alarm station. Zoning and annunciation of central station alarm signals shall be approved by the Fire Department. c) Qualified Personnel. The system shall be installed, inspected, tested, and maintained in accordance with the provisions of NFPA 72. Only qualified and experienced persons shall perform this work. Examples of qualified individuals are those who have been factory trained and certified or are NICET Fire Alarm Certified. d) Inspection & Testing Documentation. Performance testing of all initiating & notification devices in the presence of the Fire Inspector shall occur prior to final of the system. Upon this inspection, proof that the specific account is UL Certificated must be provided to the Fire Inspector. 48. Fire Extinguishers. Extinguishers shall be visible and unobstructed. Signage shall be provided to indicate fire extinguisher locations. The number and location of extinguishers shall be shown on the plans. Additional fire extinguishers maybe required by the fire inspector. Fire extinguisher shall meet a minimum classification of 2A 10BC. Extinguishers weighing 40 pounds or less shall be mounted no higher than 5 feet above the floor measured to the top of the extinguisher. Extinguishers shall be inspected monthly and serviced by a licensed concern annually. F Occupancy 49. FD Building Key Box. Building Access. A Fire Department Key Box shall be installed at the main entrance to the Building. Note these locations on the plans. The key box should be installed approximately 5 1/2 feet above grade. The box shall be sized to hold the master key to the facility as well as keys for rooms not accessible by the master key. Specialty keys, such as the fire alarm control box key and elevator control keys shall also be installed in the box. The key box door and necessary keys are to be provided to the fire inspector upon the final inspection. The inspector will then lock the keys into the box. F Occupancy 50. Means of Egress. Exit signs shall be visible and illuminated with emergency lighting when building is occupied. F Occupancy 51. Main Entrance Hardware Exception. It is recommended that all doors be provided with exit hardware that allows exiting from the egress side even when the door is in the locked condition. However, an exception for A-3, B, F, M, S occupancies and all churches F Occupancy CONDITION TEXT RESPON. AGENCY WHEN REQ’D Prior to: does allow key-locking hardware (no thumb-turns) on the main exit when the main exit consists of a single door or pair of doors. When unlocked the single door or both leaves of a pair of doors must be free to swing without operation of any latching device. A readily visible, durable sign on or just above the door stating “This door to remain unlocked whenever the building is occupied” shall be provided. The sign shall be in letters not less than 1 inch high on a contrasting background. This use of this exception may be revoked for cause. 52. Maximum Occupant Load. Posting of room capacity is required for any occupant load of 50 or more persons. Submittal of a seating plan on 8.5” x 11” paper is required prior to final occupancy. F Occupancy 53. Interior Finish. Wall and ceiling interior finish material shall meet the requirements of Chapter 8 of the California Fire Code. Interior finishes will be field verified upon final inspection. If the product is not field marked and the marking visible for inspection, maintain the products cut- sheets and packaging that show proof of the products flammability and flame-spread ratings. Decorative materials shall be fire retardant. F Occupancy 54. General Inspection. Upon inspection of the work for which this submittal was provided, a general inspection of the business and site will be conducted. F Occupancy 55. Addressing. Addressing shall be illuminated or in an illuminated area. The address characters shall be contrasting to their background. If address is placed on glass, the numbers shall be on the exterior of the glass and a contrasting background placed behind the numbers. Building Address. The building shall be provided with all addresses or the assigned address range so as to be clearly visible from either direction of travel on the street the address references. The address characters shall not be less than 5 inches in height by 1-inch stroke. Larger sizes may be necessary depending on the setbacks and visibility. Multi-Tenants. Where a building has multiple tenants, address shall also be provided near the main entrance door of each tenant space. The address shall be high enough on the building to be clearly visible from the driveway, street or parking area it faces even when vehicles are parked in front of the tenant space. The address shall not be less than 5- inches in height with a ½-inch stroke. F Occupancy of any building 56. FIRE SAFETY DURING CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION a) Clearance to combustibles from temporary heating devices shall be maintained. Devices shall be fixed in place and protected from damage, dislodgement or overturning in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. b) Smoking shall be prohibited except in approved areas. Signs shall be posted “NO SMOKING” in a conspicuous location in each structure or location in which smoking is prohibited. F Ongoing during construction and demolition CONDITION TEXT RESPON. AGENCY WHEN REQ’D Prior to: c) Combustible debris, rubbish and waste material shall be removed from buildings at the end of each shift of work. Flammable and combustible liquid storage areas shall be maintained clear of combustible vegetation and waste materials. 57. An Emergency Responder Radio Coverage system shall be installed. The system shall comply with all City, Fire and Building Codes. The system must be compliant with the radio systems used by Dublin Police and Fire services. F Occupancy 58. An Emergency Vehicle Access Easement shall be deeded between the Connolly Station private street and the proposed emergency vehicle access for this project. F Approval of improvement plans. 59. The project will be required to comply with all Building and Fire Code requirements in effect at time of permit application F Building Permit issuance. 60. Fire access road designs and gates shall meet fire code requirements F Approval of Improvement Plans 61. Additional fire hydrants shall be installed to ensure compliance with fire code requirements. F Approval of Utility Plans DUBLIN SAN RAMOM SERVICES DISTRICT 62. d Complete improvement plans shall be submitted to DSRSD that conform to the requirements of the Dublin San Ramon Services District Code, the DSRSD “Standard Procedures, Specifications and Drawings for Design and Installation of Water and Wastewater Facilities”, all applicable DSRSD Master Plans and all DSRSD policies. DSRSD Issuance of Building Permits 63. Planning and review fees, inspection fees, and fees associated with a wastewater discharge permit shall be paid to DSRSD in accordance with the rates and schedules and at time of payment as established in the DSRSD Code. Planning and review fees are due after the 1st submittal of plans. Construction Permit and Inspection Fees are due prior to the issuance of a Construction Permit. Capacity Reserve Fees are due before the water meter can be set or the connection to the sewer system. DSRSD Issuance of Building Permit or Improvement Plans 64. For Construction of DSRSD Facilities: Prior to, all improvement plans for DSRSD facilities shall be signed by the District Engineer. Each drawing of improvement plans for DSRSD facilities shall contain a signature block for the District Engineer indicating approval of the sanitary sewer and/or water facilities shown. Prior to approval by the District Engineer, the applicant shall pay all required DSRSD fees, and provide an engineer's estimate of construction costs for the sewer and water systems, a faithful performance bond, and a comprehensive general liability insurance policy in the amounts and forms that are acceptable to DSRSD. The applicant shall allow at least 15 working days for final improvement drawing review by DSRSD before signature by the District Engineer. DSRSD Issuance of any building permit by the City; or any Building Permit or Construction Permit by the DSRSD 65. All easement dedications for DSRSD facilities shall be by separate instrument irrevocably offered to DSRSD or by offer of dedication on the Final Map. Prior to approval by the City for Recordation, the Final Map shall be submitted DSRSD Approval of Final Map CONDITION TEXT RESPON. AGENCY WHEN REQ’D Prior to: to and approved by DSRSD for easement locations, widths, and restrictions. 66. The Developer will be required to enter into a Planning Services Agreement with DSRSD to conduct a Water and Sewer Services Analysis to adequately size the water and sewer facilities for the project. DSRSD Approval of Improvement Plans 67. Where the narrow width of a proposed alley or cul-de-sac is so restrictive that the standard separation requirements for water mains and sewer mains cannot be maintained, the water and sewer mains shall be installed within main thoroughfares, outside of alleyways or cui-de-sacs. Water and sewer mains may not be installed within courtyards. Water meters shall be installed around the outer perimeter of buildings. Installation of water lines from the meter to each unit shall be documented and submitted to the District. DSRSD Issuance of Improvement Plans 68. All mains shall be sized to provide sufficient capacity to accommodate future flow demands in addition to each development project’s demand. Layout and sizing of mains shall be in conformance with DSRSD utility master planning. DSRSD Issuance of Improvement Plans 69. The locations and widths of all proposed easement dedications for water and sewer lines shall be submitted to and approved by DSRSD. DSRSD Issuance of Improvement Plans 70. Water and sewer mains shall be located in public streets rather than in offstreet locations to the fullest extent possible. If unavoidable, then sewer or water easements must be established over the alignment of each sewer or water main in an off-street or private street location to provide access for future maintenance and/or replacement. DSRSD Issuance of Improvement Plans 71. Domestic and fire protection waterline systems for Tracts or Commercial Developments shall be designed to be looped or interconnected to avoid dead end sections in accordance with requirements of the DSRSD Standard Specifications and sound engineering practice. DSRSD Issuance of Improvement Plans 72. Sewers shall be designed to operate by gravity flow to DSRSD’s existing sanitary sewer system. Pumping of sewage is discouraged and may only be allowed under extreme circumstances following a case by case review with DSRSD staff. Any pumping station will require specific review and approval by DSRSD of preliminary design reports, design criteria, and final plans and specifications. The DSRSD reserves the right to require payment of present worth 20 year maintenance costs as well as other conditions within a separate agreement with the applicant for any project that requires a pumping station. DSRSD Issuance of Improvement Plans 73. This project includes mixed use and/or multi-family residential units and is subject to the requirement of SB 7 (2016, Walk) as a condition of water service. Each individual residential unit shall be metered or submetered to measure water used by each unit. Water meters for each unit shall be shown on improvement plans. Exemptions may be made only for exempted uses listed in the legislation. If submetering is proposed in lieu or individual meters, plans reflecting the submeters and associated Issuance of Improvement Plans CONDITION TEXT RESPON. AGENCY WHEN REQ’D Prior to: residential unit shall be submitted. DSRSD may not approve applications and issue construction permits without this submittal. 74. The District employs Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI), a fixed water meter reading system. The system uses radio communication between the individual water meter boxes or vaults and Tower Gateway Base Stations (TGBs) to transmit data on water consumption and meter readings. Due to the high density and tall profile of the buildings in this project, the buildings themselves may hinder effective communication between the individual meter boxes and the TGBs. Applicant shall fund an AMI Propagation Study provided by the District to determine if supplementary AMI communication equipment is required. If required, the supplementary equipment will be provided by the developer, and the location and appearance of the equipment must be approved by both the City of Dublin and the District. DSRSD Approval of Improvement Plans 75. This project will be analyzed by DSRSD to determine if it represents additional water and/or sewer capacity demands on the District. Applicant will be required to pay all incremental capacity reserve fees for water and sewer services as required by the project demands. All capacity reserve fees must be paid prior to installation of a water meter for water. If a water meter is not required, the capacity reserve fee shall be paid prior to issuance of a building permit. The District may not approve the building permit until capacity reserve fees are paid. DSRSD Issuance of Building Permit 76. No sewer line or waterline construction shall be permitted unless the proper utility construction permit has been issued by DSRSD. A construction permit will only be issued after all of the items in the condition immediately above have been satisfied. DSRSD Any construction permit 77. Above ground backflow prevention devices/double detector check valves shall be installed on fire protection systems connected to the DSRSD water main. The applicant shall collaborate with the Fire Department and with DSRSD to size and configure its fire system. DSRSD Issuance of Improvement Plans 78. Development plans will not be approved until landscape plans are submitted and approved. DSRSD Approval of Landscape Plans 79. During construction of the sewer main in the entry drive easement applicant shall ensure uninterrupted service of the wastewater collection systems of the occupied parcels: Libby Parcel 2, PM 1920, Chin Parcel A 101 PM 47, Chin Parcel B 101 PM 47 and Green Bear, LP Parcel 2, 286 PM 5 to the west of the site. Applicant shall coordinate maintenance of service with District staff. DSRSD Issuance of Improvement Plans 80. Prior to issuance of a District Facilities Construction Permit, Applicant shall provide easement(s) from BART that meet the District requirements and connect seamlessly to (1) the easement for the water main in West Street; and (2) the DSRSD Issuance of Improvement Plans CONDITION TEXT RESPON. AGENCY WHEN REQ’D Prior to: easement for the sewer main in South Street, to provide for the connection to the existing water and sewer mains. 81. Applicant must ensure that installation of new sanitary sewer mains does not adversely affect the operation of existing sanitary sewer mains and manholes in the vicinity of the project; particularly the existing sanitary sewer main north of the project site. DSRSD Issuance of Improvement Plans PUBLIC WORKS GENERAL CONDITIONS 82. Conditions of Approval. Developer shall comply with the City of Dublin Public Works Standard Conditions of Approval contained below (“Standard Condition”) unless specifically modified by Project Specific Conditions of Approval below. PW On-going 83. Compliance. Developer shall comply with the Subdivision Map Act, the City of Dublin Subdivision and Zoning Ordinances, City of Dublin Title 7 Public Works Ordinance, which includes the Grading Ordinance, the City of Dublin Public Works Standards and Policies, the most current requirements of the State Code Title 24 and the Americans with Disabilities Act with regard to accessibility, and all building and fire codes and ordinances in effect at the time of building permit. All public improvements constructed by Developer and to be dedicated to the City are hereby identified as “public works” under Labor Code section 1771. Accordingly, Developer, in constructing such improvements, shall comply with the Prevailing Wage Law (Labor Code. Sects. 1720 and following). PW On-going 84. Clarifications and Changes to the Conditions. In the event that there needs to be clarification to these Conditions of Approval, the City Engineer has the authority to clarify the intent of these Conditions of Approval to the Developer without going to a public hearing. The City Engineer also has the authority to make minor modifications to these conditions without going to a public hearing in order for the Developer to fulfill needed improvements or mitigations resulting from impacts of this project. PW On-going 85. Zone 7 Impervious Surface Fees. The Applicant shall complete a “Zone 7 Impervious Surface Fee Application” and submit an accompanying exhibit for review by the Public Works Department. Fees generated by this application will be due at issuance of Building Permit. PW Grading Permit or Building Permit Issuance PUBLIC WORKS – AGREEMENTS AND BONDS 86. Tract Improvement Agreement. Developer shall enter into an Improvement Agreement with the City for all public improvements including any required offsite storm drainage or roadway improvements that are needed to serve the development, as determined by the City Engineer. PW Final Map Approval or Grading Permit Issuance 87. Security. Developer shall provide faithful performance security to guarantee the improvements, as determined by the City Engineer (Note: The performance security shall remain in effect until one year after final inspection). PW Final Map Approval or Grading Permit Issuance 88. Storm Water Treatment Measures Maintenance Agreement. Developer shall enter into an Agreement with the City of Dublin that guarantees the property owner’s PW Final Map Approval CONDITION TEXT RESPON. AGENCY WHEN REQ’D Prior to: perpetual maintenance obligation for all stormwater treatment measures installed as part of the project, including those on-site and within the public Right of Way along St. Patrick Way. Said Agreement is required pursuant to Provision C.3 of the Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit, Order No. R2-2009-0074. Said permit requires the City to provide verification and assurance that all treatment devices will be properly operated and maintained. The Agreement shall be recorded against the property and shall run with the land. PUBLIC WORKS – PERMITS 89. Encroachment Permit. Developer shall obtain an Encroachment Permit from the Public Works Department for all construction activity within the public right-of-way of any street where the City has accepted the street right of way. The encroachment permit may require surety for slurry seal and restriping. At the discretion of the City Engineer an encroachment permit for work specifically included in an Improvement Agreement may not be required. PW Start of Work 90. Grading Permit. Developer shall obtain a Grading Permit from the Public Works Department for all grading. PW Start of Work PUBLIC WORKS - SUBMITTALS 91. All submittals of plans shall comply with the requirements of the “City of Dublin Public Works Department Improvement Plan Submittal Requirements”, the “City of Dublin Improvement Plan Review Check List,” and current Public Works and industry standards. A complete submittal of improvement plans shall include all civil improvements, joint trench, street lighting and on-site safety lighting, landscape plans, and all associated documents as required. The Developer shall not piecemeal the submittal by submitting various components separately. PW Improvement Plan Approval 92. Developer will be responsible for submittals and reviews to obtain the approvals of all participating non-City agencies. The Alameda County Fire Department and the Dublin San Ramon Services District shall approve and sign the Improvement Plans. PW Improvement Plan Approval 93. Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs). A Homeowners Association shall be formed by recordation of a declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions to govern use and maintenance of the landscape features, decorative pavement and other features within the public right of way contained in the Agreement for Long Term Encroachments; all open space and common area landscaping; and all stormwater treatment measures. Said declaration shall set forth the Association name, bylaws, rules and regulations. The CC&Rs shall also contain a provision that prohibits the amendment of those provisions of the CC&Rs requested by City without the City’s approval. The CC&Rs shall ensure that there is adequate provision for the maintenance, in good repair and on a regular basis, of all private streets, landscaping & irrigation; decorative pavements; fences/gates; walls; drainage and stormwater treatment facilities; lighting; signs and other related PL, PW Final Map Approval CONDITION TEXT RESPON. AGENCY WHEN REQ’D Prior to: improvements. The CC&Rs shall also contain all other items required by these conditions. The Developer shall submit a copy of the CC&Rs document to the City for review. 94. Composite Exhibit. Construction plan set shall include a Composite Exhibit showing all site improvements, utilities, landscaping improvements and trees, etc. to be constructed to ensure that there are no conflicts among the proposed and existing improvements. PW Improvement Plan Approval 95. Geotechnical Report. Developer shall submit a Design Level Geotechnical Report, which includes street pavement sections and grading recommendations. PW Approval of Improvement Plans, and Grading Plans 96. Ownership and Maintenance of Improvements. Applicant shall submit an Ownership and Maintenance Exhibit for review and approval by Planning Division and Public Works Department. Maintenance shall include but not be limited to, street cleaning of parking areas within Campbell Lane along project frontage. Terms of maintenance are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. PL, PW Final Map Approval or Grading Permit Issuance 97. Building Pads, Slopes and Walls. Developer shall provide the Public Works Department with a letter from a registered civil engineer or surveyor stating that the building pads have been graded to within 0.1 feet of the grades shown on the approved Grading Plans, and that the top & toe of banks and retaining walls are at the locations shown on the approved Grading Plans. PW Acceptance of Improvements 98. Approved Plan Files. Developer shall provide the Public Works Department a PDF format file of approved site plans, including grading, improvement, landscaping & irrigation, joint trench and lighting. PW Improvement Plan Approval 99. Master Files. Developer shall provide the Public Works Department a digital vectorized file of the “master” files for the project, in a format acceptable to the City Engineer. Digital raster copies are not acceptable. The digital vectorized files shall be in AutoCAD 14 or higher drawing format. All objects and entities in layers shall be colored by layer and named in English. All submitted drawings shall use the Global Coordinate System of USA, California, NAD 83 California State Plane, Zone III, and U.S. foot. PW Acceptance of Improvements PUBLIC WORKS - EASEMENTS AND ACCESS RIGHTS 100. Abandonment of Easements. Developer shall obtain abandonment from all applicable public agencies of existing easements and rights of way within the development that will no longer be used. PW Final Map or Improvement Plan Approval 101. Acquisition of Easements. Developer shall acquire easements, and/or obtain rights-of-entry from the adjacent property owners for any improvements not located on their property. The easements and/or rights-of-entry shall be in writing and copies furnished to the Public Works Department. PW Final Map or Improvement Plan Approval 102. Private Street Easements. Public Utility Easements (PUE), Sanitary Sewer Easements (SSE) and Water Line Easements (WLE) shall be established over all private PW Final Map and Improvement Plan Approval CONDITION TEXT RESPON. AGENCY WHEN REQ’D Prior to: streets within the subdivision. The PUE, SSE and WLE dedication statements on the Final Map are to recite that the easements are available for, but not limited to, the installation, access and maintenance of sanitary and storm sewers, water, electrical and communication facilities. Project entry monument signs and walls shall not be located within these easements. 103. Emergency Vehicle Access Easements. The Developer shall dedicate Emergency Vehicle Access Easements (EVAE) over the clear pavement width of all private streets. Easement geometry shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer and Fire Marshall. PW Final Map PUBLIC WORKS - GRADING 104. Grading Plan. The Grading Plan shall be in conformance with the recommendation of the Geotechnical Report, the approved Tentative Map and Site Development Review, and the City design standards & ordinances. In case of conflict between the soil engineer’s recommendation and the City ordinances, the City Engineer shall determine which shall apply. PW Approval of Grading Plans 105. Erosion Control Plan. A detailed Erosion and Sediment Control Plan shall be included with the Grading Plan submittal. The plan shall include detailed design, location, and maintenance criteria of all erosion and sedimentation control measures. PW Grading Plan Approval 106. Retaining Walls. Tiebacks or structural fabric for retaining walls shall not cross property lines, or shall be located a minimum of 2’ below the finished grade of the upper lot. PW Grading Plan Approval PUBLIC WORKS - IMPROVEMENTS 107. Public Improvements. The public improvements shall be constructed generally as shown on the Vesting Tentative Map and Site Development Review. However, the approval of the Tentative Map and Site Development Review is not an approval of the specific design of the drainage, sanitary sewer, water, traffic circulation, parking, stormwater treatment, sidewalks and street improvements. PW Improvement Plan Approval 108. Public Improvement Conformance. All public improvements shall conform to the City of Dublin Standard Plans, current practices, and design requirements and as approved by the City Engineer. PW Improvement Plan Approval 109. Public Street Slopes. Public streets shall be a minimum 1% slope with minimum gutter flow of 0.7% around bumpouts. Private streets and alleys shall be a minimum 0.5% slope. PW Improvement Plan Approval 110. Curb Returns. Curb Returns on arterial and collector streets shall be 40-foot radius, all internal public streets curb returns shall be minimum 30-foot radius (36-foot with bump outs) and private streets/alleys shall be a minimum 20-foot radius, or as approved by the City Engineer. Curb ramp locations and design shall conform to the most current Title 24 and Americans with Disabilities Act requirements and as approved by the Public Works Traffic Engineer. PW Improvement Plan Approval 111. Decorative Pavement. Any decorative pavers/paving installed within City right-of -way shall be done to the PW Improvement Plan Approval CONDITION TEXT RESPON. AGENCY WHEN REQ’D Prior to: satisfaction of the City Engineer. Where decorative paving is installed at signalized intersections, pre-formed traffic signal loops shall be put under the decorative pavement. Decorative pavements shall not interfere with the placement of traffic control devices, including pavement markings. All turn lane stripes, stop bars and crosswalks shall be delineated with concrete bands or color pavers to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Maintenance costs of the decorative paving shall be the responsibility of the developer or future property owner. 112. Private Streets. The Developer shall establish private street access rights and install complete street improvements for the proposed private streets and alley ways within the development as shown on the Vesting Tentative Map. PW Improvement Plan Approval 113. Monuments. Final Maps shall include private street monuments to be set in all private streets. Private street monuments shall be set at all intersections and as determined by the City Engineer. PW Final Map 114. Private street and common area subdivision improvements. Common area improvements, private streets, private alleys and all other subdivision improvements owned or maintained by the homeowners’ owners association/property manager are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to Final Map approval and shall be included in the Tract Improvement Agreement. Such improvements include, but are not limited to: curb & gutter, pavement areas, sidewalks, access ramps, driveways, parking and circulation in and at structures; enhanced street paving; parking spaces; street lights (wired underground) and appurtenances; drainage facilities; utilities; landscape and irrigation facilities; open space landscaping; stormwater treatment facilities; striping and signage; and fire hydrants. PW Improvement Plan Approval 115. Traffic Signing and Striping. Developer shall install all traffic signage, striping, and pavement markings as required by the Public Works Department. PW Certificate of Occupancy or Acceptance of Improvements 116. Street Lighting. Street light standards and luminaries shall be designed and installed or relocated as determined by the City Engineer. The maximum voltage drop for streetlights is 5%. PW Certificate of Occupancy or Acceptance of Improvements 117. Water and Sewer Facilities. Developer shall construct all potable and recycled water and sanitary sewer facilities required to serve the project in accordance with DSRSD master plans, standards, specifications and requirements. PW Certificate of Occupancy or Acceptance of Improvements 118. Fire Hydrants. Fire hydrant locations shall be approved by the Alameda County Fire Department. A raised reflector blue traffic marker shall be installed in the street opposite each hydrant. PW Certificate of Occupancy or Acceptance of Improvements 119. Storm Drain Inlet Markers. All on-site storm drain inlets must be marked with storm drain markers that read: “No dumping, drains to creek.” The stencils may be purchased from the Public Work Department. PW Certificate of Occupancy or Acceptance of Improvements CONDITION TEXT RESPON. AGENCY WHEN REQ’D Prior to: 120. Utilities. Developer shall construct gas, electric, telephone, cable TV, and communication improvements within the fronting streets and as necessary to serve the project and the future adjacent parcels as approved by the City Engineer and the various Public Utility agencies. PW Certificate of Occupancy or Acceptance of Improvements 121. Utility Locations. All electric, telephone, cable TV, and communications utilities, shall be placed underground in accordance with the City policies and ordinances. All utilities shall be located and provided within public utility easements or public services easements and sized to meet utility company standards. PW Certificate of Occupancy or Acceptance of Improvements 122. Utility Vaults and Boxes. All utility vaults, boxes, and structures, unless specifically approved otherwise by the City Engineer, shall be underground and placed in landscaped areas and screened from public view. Prior to Joint Trench Plan approval, landscape drawings shall be submitted to the City showing the location of all utility vaults, boxes, and structures and adjacent landscape features and plantings. The Joint Trench Plans shall be signed by the City Engineer prior to construction of the joint trench improvements. PW Certificate of Occupancy or Acceptance of Improvements 123. Street Signs. Developer shall furnish and install street name signs, traffic signs and markings for the project as required by the City Engineer. PW Certificate of Occupancy or Acceptance of Improvements PUBLIC WORKS - CONSTRUCTION 124. Erosion Control Implementation. The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan shall be implemented between October 1st and April 30th unless otherwise allowed in writing by the City Engineer. The Developer will be responsible for maintaining erosion and sediment control measures for one year following the City’s acceptance of the improvements. PW On-going as needed 125. Archaeological Finds. If archaeological materials are encountered during construction, construction within 100 feet of these materials shall be halted until a professional Archaeologist who is certified by the Society of California Archaeology (SCA) or the Society of Professional Archaeology (SOPA) has had an opportunity to evaluate the significance of the find and suggest appropriate mitigation measures. PW On-going as needed 126. Construction Activities. Construction activities, including the idling, maintenance, and warming up of equipment, shall be limited to Monday through Friday, and non-City holidays, between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. except as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Extended hours or Saturday work will be considered by the City Engineer on a case-by-case basis. Note that the construction hours of operation within the public right of way are more restrictive. PW On-going as needed 127. Temporary Fencing. Temporary Construction fencing shall be installed along the perimeter of all work under construction to separate the construction operation from the public. All construction activities shall be confined within the PW Start of Construction and On-going CONDITION TEXT RESPON. AGENCY WHEN REQ’D Prior to: fenced area. Construction materials and/or equipment shall not be operated or stored outside of the fenced area or within the public right-of-way unless approved in advance by the City Engineer. 128. Construction Noise Management Plan. Developer shall prepare a construction noise management plan that identifies measures to be taken to minimize construction noise on surrounding developed properties. The plan shall include hours of construction operation, use of mufflers on construction equipment, speed limit for construction traffic, haul routes and identify a noise monitor. Specific noise management measures shall be provided prior to project construction. PW Start of Construction Implementation, and On-going as needed 129. Traffic Control Plan. Closing of any existing pedestrian pathway and/or sidewalk during construction shall be implemented through a City approved Traffic Control Plan and shall be done with the goal of minimizing the impact on pedestrian circulation. PW Start of Construction and On-going as needed 130. Construction Traffic Interface Plan. Developer shall prepare a plan for construction traffic interface with public traffic on any existing public street. Construction traffic and parking may be subject to specific requirements by the City Engineer. PW Start of Construction; Implementation, and On-going as needed 131. Pest Control. Developer shall be responsible for controlling any rodent, mosquito, or other pest problem due to construction activities. PW On-going 132. Dust Control Measures. Developer shall be responsible for watering or other dust-palliative measures to control dust as conditions warrant or as directed by the City Engineer. PW Start of Construction; Implementation On-going as needed 133. Construction Traffic and Parking. All construction related parking shall be off street in an area provided by the Developer. Construction traffic and parking shall be provided in a manner approved by the City Engineer to minimize impact on BART patrons. PW On-going PUBLIC WORKS - NPDES 134. Stormwater Treatment. The project qualifies as a Category C Special Project – Transit-Oriented Development as defined in the NPDES Municipal Regional Permit (MRP). Planting within all bioretention areas or similar LID landscape-based stormwater treatment measures shall adhere to the guidelines summarized in the most current version of Appendix B to the C.3 Stormwater Technical Guidance Handbook published by the Alameda County Clean Water Program. PW Building Permit Issuance and Grading Permit Issuance 135. Media Filters. All media filters used for stormwater treatment shall have been certified under the Washington State Department of Ecology Technical Assessment Protocol – Ecology (TAPE) General Use Level Designation (GULD) for Basic Treatment. All media f ilters shall be hydraulically sized based on the criteria specified in the Municipal Regional Permit Provision C.3.d and the design operation rate for which the product received TAPE GULD PW Building Permit Issuance and Grading Permit Issuance CONDITION TEXT RESPON. AGENCY WHEN REQ’D Prior to: certification for Basic Treatment. 136. NOI and SWPPP. Prior to any clearing or grading, Developer shall provide the City evidence that a Notice of Intent (NOI) has been sent to the California State Water Resources Control Board per the requirements of the NPDES. A copy of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be provided to the Public Works Department and be kept at the construction site. PW Start of Any Construction Activities 137. SWPPP. The Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall identify the Best Management Practices (BMPs) appropriate to the project construction activities. The SWPPP shall include the erosion and sediment control measures in accordance with the regulations outlined in the most current version of the ABAG Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook or State Construction Best Management Practices Handbook. The Developer is responsible for ensuring that all contractors implement all storm water pollution prevention measures in the SWPPP. PW SWPPP to be Prepared Prior to Approval of Improvement Plans; Implementation Prior to Start of Construction and On-going as needed 138. Stormwater Management Plan. Construction Plans shall include a Stormwater Management Plan subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. PW Approval of Improvement Plans and Building Permit Issuance 139. Trash Capture. Specific information is required on the construction plan set demonstrating how MRP Provision C.10 (trash capture) requirements are met. Trash capture devices to be used shall be listed and details shown on plans. PW Approval of Improvement Plans and Building Permit Issuance PUBLIC WORKS - SPECIAL CONDITIONS 140. Approval. The Vesting Tentative Map approval for Tract 8460, for Condominium Purposes, PLPA 2017-00069, establishes the design concepts and expectations for the Vesting Tentative Tract Map. The Vesting Tentative Tract Map shall generally conform to the SDR and Tentative Map plans submitted by CB&G Engineers, submitted March 5, 2018, on file with the Community Development Department, and other plans, text, and diagrams relating to this Tentative Tract Map, unless modified by the Conditions of Approval contained herein. PL, PW On-going 141. Final Map Recordation. Tract Map 8460 shall record prior to the issuance of a building permit. PW Building Permit Issuance 142. Wells or Exploratory Boring. Any water well, cathodic protection well, or exploratory boring on the project property must be properly abandoned, backfilled, or maintained in accordance with applicable groundwater protection ordinances. For additional information contact Alameda County Flood Control, Zone 7. PW Through Completion 143. Landscape Features within Public Right of Way. • The Developer shall enter into an “Agreement for Long Term Encroachments” with the City to allow the Homeowner’s Association/Property Manager to maintain the sidewalk, landscape and decorative features within public Right of Way including frontage landscaping and special features (i.e., PW Final Map Approval CONDITION TEXT RESPON. AGENCY WHEN REQ’D Prior to: walls, portals, benches, stormwater treatment facilities, etc.) as generally shown on the Site Development Review/Vesting Tentative Map package. The Agreement shall identify the ownership of the special features and maintenance responsibilities. • If property owners adjacent to public Right of Way along St. Patrick Way constructed with this project enter into an “Agreement for Long Term Encroachments” with the City to allow the Homeowner’s Association/Property Managers to maintain the portion of sidewalk, landscape and decorative features within the public Right of Way including frontage landscaping and special features (i.e. walls, portals, benches, stormwater treatment facilities, etc.) along their respective property frontages, the Developer shall be released of the maintenance responsibility of these specific areas, but will remain responsible for these features within the public Right of Way along their property frontage. 144. Parking Structure. • Parking Structure shall be landscaped per DMC Section 8.76.070.A.18. • Parking stall dimensions shall have a clear width of 9-feet to edge of columns. • Parking stalls shall be a minimum of 9’ x 18’ • Parking structure access and gate shall be such to provide a turnaround area for guests not able to access the garage, and be designed to allow residents to access the parking garage independently from a guest waiting for access. PW Grading Permit or Building Permit Issuance 145. Utility Services to Adjacent Property to the West. Existing utility main lines within “Entry Drive” are shown to be removed and new main lines installed. The adjacent site to the west is serviced off those main lines. The Developer shall notify and coordinate with the adjacent property owner(s) regarding any interruption in utility services. The Developer shall submit to the City copies of notifications. PW Approval of Improvement Plans and Ongoing 146. Landscaping on Adjacent Properties. The Developer shall obtain written authorization to enter and construct improvements on the adjacent properties as shown on the SDR/VTM package. The Developer shall submit a copy of the written authorization to the City. • Landscaping on adjacent properties shall blend with existing features/landscaping on those properties. PW Final Map and Improvement Plan Approval 147. Concrete Step-Out. There shall be an additional 6” wide concrete step-out at landscaped areas adjacent to driver side and passenger side of parking stalls on construction plan set. PW Improvement Plan Approval 148. Decorative Pavement. Decorative pavement within the public right-of-way is subject to the approval of the City Engineer. PW Improvement Plans Approval 149. Storm Drain Access Easement. The Developer shall PW Final Map CONDITION TEXT RESPON. AGENCY WHEN REQ’D Prior to: dedicate a storm drain access easement over the proposed EVAE at the east side of the project to allow the City to access the existing storm drain facility located off-site to the east of the project for maintenance purposes. 150. Easements. The Developer shall be responsible for obtaining all dedications of easements on-site and off-site. The applicant shall be responsible for preparation of all required documentation for dedication of all easements on- site and off-site. PW Improvement Plan Approval 151. Construction on Adjacent Properties. The Developer shall be responsible for obtaining written authorization for right of entry and construction of improvements on adjacent property sites. The Developer shall submit a copy of the written authorization to the City PW Final Map or Improvement Plan Approval 152. St. Patrick Way. • The Developer shall irrevocably dedicate public right-of-way, subject to the terms of a Community Benefit Agreement between the Developer and the City, for the construction of St. Patrick Way public right-of-way consistent with the alignment shown on Sheet C3.0 of the Vesting Tentative Map. • The Developer shall be responsible for and provide all required documentation for the irrevocable dedication of this public right-of-way both on-site and off-site. • Developer shall construct all improvements at St. Patrick Way as shown on the Vesting Tentative Map and in accordance with current Public Works standards, which may include, but are not limited to: installation of asphalt pavement, new or replacement of existing concrete curb, gutter, and sidewalk; planting of new street trees and any appurtenant irrigation; relocation of existing utilities; placement of all new utilities underground; installation of new street lights; installation of new or modification of existing storm drainage facilities and stormwater treatment facilities. The lane configuration striping shall be as generally shown on the Vesting Tentative Map. Modifications shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer. • Drainage behind proposed walls along the northerly sidewalk at St. Patrick Way shall be collected and conveyed underground to the storm drain system. Wall Scuppers shall not be allowed. • St. Patrick Way shall be constructed with a Traffic Index (TI) of 11. • Applicant/Developer shall provide all necessary documentation, including, but not limited to noticing for public hearings, legal descriptions and plat maps, and right of way maps, to effectuate the acceptance of St. Patrick Way right of way as a public street and to rescind the previously established right of way line, as necessary and subject to the determination of the City Engineer, in accordance with Chapter PW Final Map or Improvement Plan Approval and Acceptance of Improvements CONDITION TEXT RESPON. AGENCY WHEN REQ’D Prior to: 7.68 of the DMC. 153. St. Patrick Way Landscape Improvements. • Design of the irrigation system within the public right-of-way at St. Patrick Way shall be such the applicant will be responsible for irrigation and maintenance of the proposed landscaped areas along adjacent property frontages and within the public Right of Way at St. Patrick Way. • Irrigation shall be designed to allow for the possibility of irrigation to landscape areas within the public right-of-way along adjacent property frontages to be connected to and maintained by those adjacent property owners in the future. • Landscaping and trees along St. Patrick Way shall be consistent with the City’s Streetscape Master Plan and blend with the existing landscaping and street trees along St. Patrick Way to the east extending to Golden Gate Drive. This shall also include any proposed street furniture (i.e. benches, trash receptacles, etc.). PW Final Map or Improvement Plan Approval 154. String Lighting. String Lighting at St. Patrick Way is subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer and Fire Marshall. PW Improvement Plan Approval 155. Community Benefit Agreement. Improvements set forth in the Community Benefit Agreement between the City of Dublin and the Developer shall be shown on the Improvement Plans. PW Final Map and Improvement Plan Approval 156. Western Dublin Traffic Impact Fee. Applicant shall pay the Western Dublin Traffic Impact Fee to fulfill Fair Share obligation for the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of St. Patrick Way and Golden Gate Drive. PW Final Map 157. Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Credits. The Developer shall be eligible for credits as stated in the Western Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update: Final Report (WDTIF), dated August 2016, for public right-of-way dedicated and improvements constructed at St. Patrick Way. Amounts of credit shall be consistent with areas dedicated and improvements constructed, not to exceed the amount set forth in the WDTIF. PW Final Map 158. Private Access Easement (PAE). • The Developer shall provide an accessible pedestrian path from the westerly property line to the easterly within the PAE. • An additional pedestrian access location shall be added near the curved section of the EVA road (southeast corner) with a gate to allow access through the BART property. This will be in addition to the access location shown to the north at the EVA entrance location from West Street PW Final Map and Improvement Plan Approval 159. Public Service Easements (PSE). A 5’ Public Service Easement(s) shall be dedicated along the project’s St. Patrick Way to allow for the proper placement of public utility vaults, boxes, appurtenances or similar items behind the back-of-sidewalk. Private improvements such as fences, PW Final Map CONDITION TEXT RESPON. AGENCY WHEN REQ’D Prior to: gates or trellises shall not be located within the public service easements. 160. Stormwater Management. The provided Stormwater Management Plan, Sheet C6.0 of the Vesting Tentative Map, prepared by Carlson, Barbee & Gibson, Inc. dated 3/5/2018 is approved in concept only, except as noted below. The final Stormwater Management Plan is subject to City Engineer approval prior to approval of the Improvement Plans. Approval is subject to the developer providing the necessary plans, details, and calculations that demonstrate the plan complies with the standards issued by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board. • LID treatment reduction credit shall conform to C.3 Stormwater Technical Guidance, and is subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. Infeasibility of LID treatment must be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. • Use of Interceptor Trees for stormwater treatment credit shall conform to the c.3 Stormwater Technical Guidance Handbook, and is subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. PW Final Map and Improvement Plan Approval 161. Trash Room Chute Plan. Trash room/chute plan shall be adjusted to accommodate the use of 4-yard non-compacted trash bins and recycle bins as an alternative to 2-yard compacted trash. This could be achieved by lowering the floor of the trash rooms by 2 feet. Alternatively, the location of where the chute meets the ground floor trash room could be adjusted to allow space for 2-yard bins to catch material disposed of on the first floor and 4-yard bins for material coming from the 2nd-5th floors. The building shall be built to accommodate non-compacted collection should that be desired for use in the future. PW Issuance of Building Permit PASSED AND ADOPTED BY the Planning Commission of the City of Dublin, on this 27th day of March 2018 by the following votes: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: Assistant Community Development Director Architecture + Planning1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400Oakland, CA 94612510.272.2910ktgy.com DU B L I N , C A # 2 0 1 7 - 0 4 8 6 ST . P A T R I C K W A Y SC H E M A T I C D E S I G N : S U B M I T T A L # 3 MA R C H 1 6 , 2 0 1 8 A0 . 0 CO V E R Ar c h i t e c t u r a l A0 . 0 Co v e r A0 . 1 Sh e e t I n d e x A0 . 2 Pr o j e c t D a t a A0 . 3 Su r r o u n d i n g C o n t e x t M a p A0 . 4 Co n c e p t u a l S i t e P l a n A0 . 5 La n g u a g e E x h i b i t : A + B A0 . 6 La n g u a g e E x h i b i t : A A0 . 7 Co n c e p t u a l B u i l d i n g D e t a i l s : L a n g u a g e A A0 . 8 La n g u a g e E x h i b i t : B A0 . 9 Co n c e p t u a l B u i l d i n g D e t a i l s : L a n g u a g e B A1 . 0 Bu i l d i n g P e r s p e c t i v e s A1 . 1 Bu i l d i n g P e r s p e c t i v e s A1 . 2 Bu i l d i n g P e r s p e c t i v e s A1 . 3 Bu i l d i n g P e r s p e c t i v e s A1 . 4 Bu i l d i n g P e r s p e c t i v e s A1 . 5 Bu i l d i n g P e r s p e c t i v e s A2 . 0 Bu i l d i n g E l e v a t i o n : N o r t h ( S t P a t r i c k ) A2 . 1 Bu i l d i n g E l e v a t i o n s : E a s t A2 . 2 Bu i l d i n g E l e v a t i o n s : S o u t h ( 5 8 0 ) A2 . 3 Bu i l d i n g E l e v a t i o n s : W e s t A3 . 0 Bu i l d i n g F l o o r P l a n - L e v e l 1 A3 . 1 Bu i l d i n g F l o o r P l a n - L e v e l 2 A3 . 2 Bu i l d i n g F l o o r P l a n - L e v e l 3 / 4 A3 . 3 Bu i l d i n g F l o o r P l a n - L e v e l 5 A3 . 4 Bu i l d i n g R o o f P l a n A4 . 0 Co n c e p t u a l L i g h t i n g D e t a i l s : L i g h t i n g * A5 . 0 Ma t e r i a l & C o l o r B o a r d : L a n g u a g e A A5 . 1 Ma t e r i a l & C o l o r B o a r d : L a n g u a g e B A6 . 0 Co n c e p t u a l F i r e A c c e s s D i a g r a m A6 . 1 Al l o w a b l e A r e a s A6 . 2 Ex i t i n g D i a g r a m A7 . 0 Gr e e n P o i n t R a t e d C h e c k l i s t La n d s c a p e L1 . 1 Co n c e p t u a l L a n d s c a p e P l a n L1 . 2 Co n c e p t u a l S t r e e t s c a p e P l a n L2 . 0 Co n c e p t u a l L i g h t i n g P l a n L3 . 0 Co n c e p t u a l P l a n t i n g P l a n L4 . 0 Co n c e p t u a l I r r i g a t i o n Z o n i n g D i a g r a m L5 . 1 Co n c e p t u a l L a n d s c a p e I m a g e r y - S t r e e t s c a p e L5 . 2 Co n c e p t u a l L a n d s c a p e I m a g e r y - R e s i d e n t i a l Ci v i l C1 . 0 Ve s t i n g T e n t a t i v e M a p C2 . 0 Bo u n d a r y & E x i s t i n g C o n d i t i o n s C2 . 1 Ex i s t i n g U t i l i t i e s & E a s e m e n t s C3 . 0 Si t e P l a n C4 . 0 Pr e l i m i n a r y U t i l i t y P l a n C5 . 0 Pr e l i m i n a r y G r a d i n g & D r a i n a g e P l a n C6 . 0 Pr e l i m i n a r y S t o r m w a t e r C o n t r o l P l a n C7 . 0 Pr e l i m i n a r y E r o s i o n C o n t r o l P l a n C8 . 0 Fi r e A c c e s s & S e r v i c e P l a n Architecture + Planning1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400Oakland, CA 94612510.272.2910ktgy.com DU B L I N , C A # 2 0 1 7 - 0 4 8 6 ST . P A T R I C K W A Y SC H E M A T I C D E S I G N : S U B M I T T A L # 3 MA R C H 1 3 , 2 0 1 8 A0 . 1 SH E E T I N D E X MA R C H 1 6 , 2 0 1 8 Architecture + Planning1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400Oakland, CA 94612510.272.2910ktgy.com DU B L I N , C A # 2 0 1 7 - 0 4 8 6 ST . P A T R I C K W A Y SC H E M A T I C D E S I G N : S U B M I T T A L # 3 MA R C H 1 6 , 2 0 1 8 A0 . 2 PR O J E C T D A T A Architecture + Planning1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400Oakland, CA 94612510.272.2910ktgy.com DU B L I N , C A # 2 0 1 7 - 0 4 8 6 ST . P A T R I C K W A Y SC H E M A T I C D E S I G N : S U B M I T T A L # 3 MA R C H 1 6 , 2 0 1 8 A0 . 3 SU R R O U N D I N G C O N T E X T M A P 1 2 3 123 A0.4 A0 . 4 BU I L D I N G L A N G U A G E : A & B 0 30 60 15 Architecture + Planning1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400Oakland, CA 94612510.272.2910ktgy.com DU B L I N , C A # 2 0 1 7 - 0 4 8 6 ST . P A T R I C K W A Y SC H E M A T I C D E S I G N : S U B M I T T A L # 3 MA R C H 1 6 , 2 0 1 8 Bu i l d i n g L a n g u a g e : A St . P a t r i c k : P e d e s t r i a n E x p e r i e n c e Mi c r o G e s t u r e Pa u s e In t e r a c t Co n n e c t i o n 0. 6 M P H Bu i l d i n g L a n g u a g e : B 58 0 : V e h i c u l a r E x p e r i e n c e Ma c r o G e s t u r e Mo t i o n Ob s e r v e Ed g e 65 M P H A0 . 5 A0 . 5 BU I L D I N G L A N G U A G E : A Architecture + Planning1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400Oakland, CA 94612510.272.2910ktgy.com DU B L I N , C A # 2 0 1 7 - 0 4 8 6 ST . P A T R I C K W A Y SC H E M A T I C D E S I G N : S U B M I T T A L # 3 MA R C H 1 6 , 2 0 1 8 Bu i l d i n g La n g u a g e A 1 2 3 No d e 2 : E n t r y S t o o p Node 1: Co l l a b o r a t i v e W o r k S p a c e No d e 3 : L o b b y / L e a s i n g O f f i c e A0 . 6 S t . P a t r i c k W a y Entry Drive A B C Architecture + Planning1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400Oakland, CA 94612510.272.2910ktgy.com DU B L I N , C A # 2 0 1 7 - 0 4 8 6 ST . P A T R I C K W A Y SC H E M A T I C D E S I G N : S U B M I T T A L # 3 MA R C H 1 6 , 2 0 1 8 A0 . 6 BU I L D I N G L A N G U A G E : A DE T A I L S 0 8 16 32 1. K e y F r o n t E l e v a t i o n n . t . s . 1 Ke y M a p n . t . s . 1 St . P a t r i c k E n t r y L o b b y 3 De c k a t H o r i z o n t a l M a s s i n g Stucco Co m p o s i t e Ra i l i n g w / M e t a l Fr a m e 1 4 Me t a l A w n i n g St o r e f r o n t De c o r a t i v e Li g h t F i x t u r e CompositePanelCementitiousLap Siding De c k E d g e Si g n a g e Metal AwningMetal RailingDeck Edge St u c c o 3 2 2 Me t a l A w n i n g + W i n d o w D e t a i l St u c c o Me t a l A w n i n g St u c c o Co m p o s i t e Pa n e l 4 Vertical Massing A0 . 8 A0 . 7 A0 . 7 BU I L D I N G L A N G U A G E : B Architecture + Planning1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400Oakland, CA 94612510.272.2910ktgy.com DU B L I N , C A # 2 0 1 7 - 0 4 8 6 ST . P A T R I C K W A Y SC H E M A T I C D E S I G N : S U B M I T T A L # 3 MA R C H 1 6 , 2 0 1 8 Bu i l d i n g La n g u a g e B 2 3 1 Ar e a 1 : P a r k i n g G a r a g e Area 3: Residential Corner Ar e a 2 : U n i t s a t S i n g l e L o a d e d C o r r i d o r A0 . 7 A0 . 8 S t . P a t r i c k W a y Entry Drive A B C Architecture + Planning1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400Oakland, CA 94612510.272.2910ktgy.com DU B L I N , C A # 2 0 1 7 - 0 4 8 6 ST . P A T R I C K W A Y SC H E M A T I C D E S I G N : S U B M I T T A L # 3 MA R C H 1 6 , 2 0 1 8 A0 . 8 BU I L D I N G L A N G U A G E : B DE T A I L S 0 8 16 32 1. K e y R e a r E l e v a t i o n n . t . s . Ke y M a p n . t . s . 1 W i n d o w s a t R e a r 2 Op e n i n g s a t G a r a g e R e a r E l e v a t i o n St u c c o 1 1 Me t a l A w n i n g St u c c o Me t a l R a i l i n g St u c c o 2 Me t a l R a i l i n g Me t a l A w n i n g Me t a l S l a t S c r e e n St u c c o St u c c o Co m p o s i t e Pa n e l 2. K e y E a s t E l e v a t i o n n . t . s . 3 St u c c o Me t a l P a n e l a t Ba l c o n y 3 De c k a t E a s t & W e s t E l e v a t i o n s 4 Parapet at East & West Elevations StuccoStuccoMetal Awning 4 2 Composite Panel A0 . 9 Architecture + Planning1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400Oakland, CA 94612510.272.2910ktgy.com DU B L I N , C A # 2 0 1 7 - 0 4 8 6 ST . P A T R I C K W A Y SC H E M A T I C D E S I G N : S U B M I T T A L # 3 MA R C H 1 6 , 2 0 1 8 A6 . 0 BU I L D I N G P E R S P E C T I V E S ST . P A T R I C K W A Y M A I N E N T R Y 1 Ke y M a p n . t . s . 1. B u i l d i n g P e r s p e c t i v e o f S t . P a t r i c k W a y M a i n E n t r y S t . P a t r i c k W a y Entry Drive A B C A6 . 0 1 S t . P a t r i c k W a y Entry Drive A B C Architecture + Planning1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400Oakland, CA 94612510.272.2910ktgy.com DU B L I N , C A # 2 0 1 7 - 0 4 8 6 ST . P A T R I C K W A Y SC H E M A T I C D E S I G N : S U B M I T T A L # 3 MA R C H 1 6 , 2 0 1 8 A6 . 1 BU I L D I N G P E R S P E C T I V E S ST . P A T R I C K W A Y L O O K I N G E A S T 1 Ke y M a p n . t . s . 1. B u i l d i n g P e r s p e c t i v e f r o m I n t e r s e c t i o n o f S t . P a t r i c k W a y a n d E n t r y D r i v e A6 .1 Architecture + Planning1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400Oakland, CA 94612510.272.2910ktgy.com DU B L I N , C A # 2 0 1 7 - 0 4 8 6 ST . P A T R I C K W A Y SC H E M A T I C D E S I G N : S U B M I T T A L # 3 MA R C H 1 6 , 2 0 1 8 A6 . 2 BU I L D I N G P E R S P E C T I V E S ST . P A T R I C K W A Y E N T R Y 1 Ke y M a p n . t . s . 1. B u i l d i n g P e r s p e c t i v e f r o m S t . P a t r i c k W a y l o o k i n g W e s t S t . P a t r i c k W a y Entry Drive A B C A6 .1 S t . P a t r i c k W a y Entry Drive A B C Architecture + Planning1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400Oakland, CA 94612510.272.2910ktgy.com DU B L I N , C A # 2 0 1 7 - 0 4 8 6 ST . P A T R I C K W A Y SC H E M A T I C D E S I G N : S U B M I T T A L # 3 MA R C H 1 6 , 2 0 1 8 A6 . 3 BU I L D I N G P E R S P E C T I V E S ST . P A T R I C K W A Y L O O K I N G W E S T 1 Ke y M a p n . t . s . 1. B u i l d i n g P e r s p e c t i v e f r o m S t . P a t r i c k W a y l o o k i n g W e s t A6 .1 S t . P a t r i c k W a y Entry Drive A B C Architecture + Planning1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400Oakland, CA 94612510.272.2910ktgy.com DU B L I N , C A # 2 0 1 7 - 0 4 8 6 ST . P A T R I C K W A Y SC H E M A T I C D E S I G N : S U B M I T T A L # 3 MA R C H 1 6 , 2 0 1 8 A6 . 4 BU I L D I N G P E R S P E C T I V E S VI E W F R O M I - 5 8 0 1 Ke y M a p n . t . s . 1. B u i l d i n g P e r s p e c t i v e f r o m I - 5 8 0 l o o k i n g W e s t A6 .1 S t . P a t r i c k W a y Entry Drive A B C Architecture + Planning1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400Oakland, CA 94612510.272.2910ktgy.com DU B L I N , C A # 2 0 1 7 - 0 4 8 6 ST . P A T R I C K W A Y SC H E M A T I C D E S I G N : S U B M I T T A L # 3 MA R C H 1 6 , 2 0 1 8 A6 . 5 BU I L D I N G P E R P S E C T I V E S VI E W F R O M I - 5 8 0 1 Ke y M a p n . t . s . 1. B u i l d i n g P e r s p e c t i v e f r o m I - 5 8 0 l o o k i n g E a s t A6 .1 ±63'-6" 10'-3"10'-3"10'-3"10'-3"10'-3" S t . P a t r i c k W a y Entry Drive A B C Architecture + Planning1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400Oakland, CA 94612510.272.2910ktgy.com DU B L I N , C A # 2 0 1 7 - 0 4 8 6 ST . P A T R I C K W A Y SC H E M A T I C D E S I G N : S U B M I T T A L # 3 MA R C H 1 6 , 2 0 1 8 A2 . 0 BU I L D I N G E L E V A T I O N S ST . P A T R I C K W A Y - B U I L D I N G L A N G U A G E A 1. F r o n t E l e v a t i o n : S t . P a t r i c k W a y 1 1 1 3 1 6 10 10 Ma t e r i a l L e g e n d : 1. St u c c o 2. Ce m e n t i t i o u s P a n e l 3. Ce m e n t i t i o u s L a p S i d i n g 4. Me t a l P a n e l R a i l i n g 5. Co m p o s i t e R a i l i n g 6. Me t a l A w n i n g I 7. Me t a l A w n i n g I I 8. Me t a l R a i l i n g 9. Vi n y l W i n d o w 10 . St o r e f r o n t 11 . Me t a l S c r e e n 12 . Co m p o s i t e P a n e l Ke y M a p n . t . s . 2 12 9 8 5 3 1 1 10 0 8 16 32 ±61'-1"10'-3"10'-3"10'-3"10'-3"10'-3" ±58'-9" 12'-3"10'-3"10'-3"10'-3"10'-3" S t . P a t r i c k W a y Entry Drive A B C Architecture + Planning1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400Oakland, CA 94612510.272.2910ktgy.com DU B L I N , C A # 2 0 1 7 - 0 4 8 6 ST . P A T R I C K W A Y SC H E M A T I C D E S I G N : S U B M I T T A L # 3 MA R C H 1 6 , 2 0 1 8 A2 . 1 BU I L D I N G E L E V A T I O N S EA S T E L E V A T I O N 0 8 16 32 1 Ma t e r i a l L e g e n d : 1. St u c c o 2. Ce m e n t i t i o u s P a n e l 3. Ce m e n t i t i o u s L a p S i d i n g 4. Me t a l P a n e l R a i l i n g 5. Co m p o s i t e R a i l i n g 6. Me t a l A w n i n g I 7. Me t a l A w n i n g I I 8. Me t a l R a i l i n g 9. Vi n y l W i n d o w 10 . St o r e f r o n t 11 . Me t a l S c r e e n 12 . Co m p o s i t e P a n e l 1 1 1 1 12 4 8 9 1 12 5 1 1 9 1 2 3 2 1. P a r t i a l E a s t E l e v a t i o n 2. P a r t i a l E a s t E l e v a t i o n 1 2 Ke y M a p n . t . s . Bu i l d i n g L a n g u a g e A Building Langu a g e B ±63'-0" 10'-3"10'-3"10'-3"10'-3"10'-3" S t . P a t r i c k W a y Entry Drive A B C Architecture + Planning1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400Oakland, CA 94612510.272.2910ktgy.com DU B L I N , C A # 2 0 1 7 - 0 4 8 6 ST . P A T R I C K W A Y SC H E M A T I C D E S I G N : S U B M I T T A L # 3 MA R C H 1 6 , 2 0 1 8 A2 . 2 BU I L D I N G E L E V A T I O N S 58 0 H I G H W A Y - B U I L D I N G L A N G U A G E B 1 1. R e a r E l e v a t i o n : V i e w f r o m I n t e r s t a t e 5 8 0 1 1 9 1 8 8 11 1 Ma t e r i a l L e g e n d : 1. St u c c o 2. Ce m e n t i t i o u s P a n e l 3. Ce m e n t i t i o u s L a p S i d i n g 4. Me t a l P a n e l R a i l i n g 5. Co m p o s i t e R a i l i n g 6. Me t a l A w n i n g I 7. Me t a l A w n i n g I I 8. Me t a l R a i l i n g 9. Vi n y l W i n d o w 10 . St o r e f r o n t 11 . Me t a l S c r e e n 12 . Co m p o s i t e P a n e l Ke y M a p n . t . s . 1 1 12 8 12 0 8 16 32 7 ±61'-0" 10'-3"10'-3"10'-3"10'-3"10'-3" ±63'-0"10'-3"10'-3"10'-3"10'-3"10'-3" S t . P a t r i c k W a y Entry Drive A B C Architecture + Planning1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400Oakland, CA 94612510.272.2910ktgy.com DU B L I N , C A # 2 0 1 7 - 0 4 8 6 ST . P A T R I C K W A Y SC H E M A T I C D E S I G N : S U B M I T T A L # 3 MA R C H 1 6 , 2 0 1 8 A2 . 3 BU I L D I N G E L E V A T I O N S WE S T E L E V A T I O N 1. P a r t i a l W e s t E l e v a t i o n 2. P a r t i a l W e s t E l e v a t i o n 1 2 1 Ke y M a p n . t . s . Ma t e r i a l L e g e n d : 1. St u c c o 2. Ce m e n t i t i o u s P a n e l 3. Ce m e n t i t i o u s L a p S i d i n g 4. Me t a l P a n e l R a i l i n g 5. Co m p o s i t e R a i l i n g 6. Me t a l A w n i n g I 7. Me t a l A w n i n g I I 8. Me t a l R a i l i n g 9. Vi n y l W i n d o w 10 . St o r e f r o n t 11 . Me t a l S c r e e n 12 . Co m p o s i t e P a n e l 3 1 5 1 1 8 1 2 12 8 1 1 1 3 4 0 8 16 32 2 Bu i l d i n g L a n g u a g e B Buildin g L a n g u a g e A UP Re s i d e n t i a l P a r k i n g ±8 6 S t a n d a r d ±2 A c c e s s i b l e Tr a s h Ut i l i t y Tr a s h EV R EV R EV R Gu e s t P a r k i n g ±2 1 S t a n d a r d ±2 A c c e s s i b l e Bi c y c l e S t o r a g e GuestGuestGuest Guest Guest GuestGuestGuest GuestGuestGuestGuestGuestGuestGuestGuestGuestGuestGuestGuest Guest EVR Guest Guest Co m p P1 - 0 P2 - 1 P0 - 2 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P0 - 1 P1 - 3 P1 - 2 P1 - 0 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P0 - 1 P2 - 0 P0 - 3 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 (P 2 - 0 A b o v e ) P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 1 P1 - 0 P0 - 1 P1 - 0 P0 - 1 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P0 - 1 P0 - 1 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P0 - 1 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P0 - 1 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 El e c t r i c a l (P 1 - 0 A b o v e ) Co u r t y a r d A Co u r t y a r d B En t r y Ga t e Ma i n t e n a n c e / Ut i l i t y El e c t r i c a l El e c t r i c a l (P 1 - 0 A b o v e ) Lo b b y 3 Am e n i t y ±1 , 7 7 0 S F (D o u b l e He i g h t ) Lo b b y 2 Ut i l i t y Fi r e P u m p Rm . ( a s r e q u i r e d ) El e c t r i c a l Co l l a b o r a t i v e Wo r k ±1 , 5 0 0 S F (D o u b l e H e i g h t ) Am e n i t y ±1 , 7 7 0 S F (D o u b l e He i g h t ) Po o l Eq u i p t . Lo b b y 1 Le a s i n g ±2 , 1 0 0 S F (D o u b l e H e i g h t ) Am e n i t y ±2 , 3 0 0 S F (D o u b l e H e i g h t ) Lo b b y 1 P2 - 0 Co u r t y a r d C P2 - 0 288'-9" 38 6 ' - 0 " 23 5 ' - 1 0 " 28 4 ' - 9 " 52 0 ' - 6 " 625'-7" 336'-11" 127'-6"297'-0"101'-8"526'-2" 17 0 ' - 1 " 24 ' - 0 " 9'-0" TYP. 280'-0" 19 7 ' - 1 0 " 18 ' - 0 " TY P . 5'-0" 35'-0" 18'-0" TYP. 9' - 0 " TY P . 41 ' - 0 " 24 ' - 0 " 41 ' - 0 " 24 ' - 0 " 18 ' - 0 " 18 ' - 0 " 1'-6" TYP. 5'-6" 6'-0" 9'-3"6'-0" 6' - 6 " 10 ' - 2 " 10 8 ' - 1 0 " 161'-3" 173'-4" 62 ' - 1 1 " 70'-0" 17 4 ' - 0 " 33'-10" 5' - 0 " 10'-6" 24'-0" 5'-0"5'-0" 6' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 17'-0" 5'-0"9'-6"5'-0" Architecture + Planning1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400Oakland, CA 94612510.272.2910ktgy.com DU B L I N , C A # 2 0 1 7 - 0 4 8 6 ST . P A T R I C K W A Y SC H E M A T I C D E S I G N : S U B M I T T A L # 3 MA R C H 1 6 , 2 0 1 8 A3 . 0 BU I L D I N G F L O O R P L A N LE V E L 1 0 16 32 64 P1 - 0 P2 - 1 Le a s i n g Be l o w Am e n i t y Be l o w P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P0 - 1 P1 - 3 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 Lo b b y P0 - 3 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 UP DN DN Tr .Ut i l i t y EV R Tr . EV R EV R Re s i d e n t i a l P a r k i n g ±1 3 9 S t a n d a r d ±3 A c c e s s i b l e EV R Ut . EV R Co m p P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P2 - 0 P2 - 1 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 Am e n i t y Be l o w Lo b b y 2 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P0 - 1 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P0 - 1 P1 - 0 P0 - 1 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P0 - 1 P0 - 1 Co l l a b o r a t i v e Wo r k Be l o w P0 - 2 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P0 - 1 P2 - 0 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 Am e n i t y Be l o w P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 L.L. P2 - 0 288'-9" 38 6 ' - 0 " 23 5 ' - 1 0 " 28 4 ' - 9 " 52 0 ' - 6 " 625'-7" 336'-11" 127'-6"297'-0"101'-8"526'-2" 17 0 ' - 1 " 279'-10" 19 7 ' - 1 0 " 15'-0" 6' - 6 " 15 ' - 8 " 9'-0" TYP. 18 ' - 0 " TY P . 5'-0" 35'-0" 18'-0" TYP. 9' - 0 " TY P . 24 ' - 0 " 41 ' - 0 " 24 ' - 0 " 18 ' - 0 " 1'-6" TYP. 5'-6" 6'-0" 9'-3" 6' - 6 " 5' - 0 " 24'-0" 5'-0"5'-0" 6' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 17'-0" Architecture + Planning1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400Oakland, CA 94612510.272.2910ktgy.com DU B L I N , C A # 2 0 1 7 - 0 4 8 6 ST . P A T R I C K W A Y SC H E M A T I C D E S I G N : S U B M I T T A L # 3 MA R C H 1 6 , 2 0 1 8 A3 . 1 BU I L D I N G F L O O R P L A N LE V E L 2 0 16 32 64 UP Ut i l i t y EV R Tr . DN DN EV R EV R Re s i d e n t i a l P a r k i n g ±1 3 9 S t a n d a r d ±3 A c c e s s i b l e EV R Tr . Ut . EV R EV R EV R Co m p P1 - 0 P2 - 1 L. P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P0 - 1 P1 - 3 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 Lo b b y P0 - 3 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P2 - 0 P2 - 1 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 Lo b b y 2 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P0 - 1 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P0 - 1 P1 - 0 P0 - 1 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P0 - 1 P0 - 1 P0 - 2 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P0 - 1 P2 - 0 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 L. P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P0 - 1 P0 - 1 P2 - 2 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 288'-9" 38 6 ' - 0 " 23 5 ' - 9 " 28 4 ' - 9 " 52 0 ' - 6 " 625'-7" 336'-11" 127'-6"297'-0"101'-8"526'-2" 17 0 ' - 1 " 279'-10" 19 7 ' - 1 0 " 6' - 6 " 15 ' - 8 " 9'-0" TYP. 18 ' - 0 " TY P . 5'-0" 35'-0" 18'-0" TYP. 9' - 0 " TY P . 24 ' - 0 " 41 ' - 0 " 24 ' - 0 " 18 ' - 0 " 1'-6" TYP. 5'-6" 6'-0" 9'-3" 6' - 6 " 5' - 0 " 24'-0" 5'-0"5'-0" 6' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 17'-0" Architecture + Planning1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400Oakland, CA 94612510.272.2910ktgy.com DU B L I N , C A # 2 0 1 7 - 0 4 8 6 ST . P A T R I C K W A Y SC H E M A T I C D E S I G N : S U B M I T T A L # 3 MA R C H 1 6 , 2 0 1 8 A3 . 2 BU I L D I N G F L O O R P L A N LE V E L 3 & 4 0 16 32 64 UP Ut i l i t y EV R Tr . DN DN EV R EV R Re s i d e n t i a l P a r k i n g ±1 3 8 S t a n d a r d ±4 A c c e s s i b l e EV R EVR EV R EV R Tr . Ut . EVR Co m p P1 - 0 P2 - 1 L. P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P0 - 1 P1 - 3 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 Lo b b y P0 - 3 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P2 - 0 P2 - 1 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 Lo b b y 2 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P0 - 1 P1 - 0 P0 - 2 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P0 - 1 P2 - 0 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 L. P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 2 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P0 - 1 P1 - 0 P0 - 1 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P0 - 1 P0 - 1 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P0 - 1 P0 - 1 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P1 - 2 P1 - 2 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 Am e n i t y ±7 4 5 S F P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 P2 - 0 P1 - 0 P2 - 0 Am e n i t y ±7 4 5 S F P2 - 0 288'-9" 38 6 ' - 0 " 23 5 ' - 9 " 28 4 ' - 9 " 52 0 ' - 6 " 625'-7" 336'-11" 127'-6"297'-0"101'-8"526'-2" 17 0 ' - 1 " 279'-10" 19 7 ' - 1 0 " 6' - 6 " 15 ' - 8 " 6' - 6 " 15 ' - 8 " 9'-0" TYP. 18 ' - 0 " TY P . 5'-0" 35'-0" 18'-0" TYP. 9' - 0 " TY P . 24 ' - 0 " 41 ' - 0 " 24 ' - 0 " 18 ' - 0 " 1'-6" TYP. 5'-6" 6'-0" 9'-3" 6' - 6 " 5' - 0 " 24'-0" 5'-0"5'-0" 6' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 17'-0" Architecture + Planning1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400Oakland, CA 94612510.272.2910ktgy.com DU B L I N , C A # 2 0 1 7 - 0 4 8 6 ST . P A T R I C K W A Y SC H E M A T I C D E S I G N : S U B M I T T A L # 3 MA R C H 1 6 , 2 0 1 8 A3 . 3 BU I L D I N G F L O O R P L A N LE V E L 5 0 16 32 64 DN Re s i d e n t i a l P a r k i n g ±9 2 S t a n d a r d Ut i l i t y Op e n t o S k y Op e n t o B e l o w Ut . Ut . Co m p Sc r e e n e d M e c h a n i c a l U n i t s , T y p . 288'-9" 38 6 ' - 5 " 23 5 ' - 1 0 " 28 4 ' - 1 " 51 9 ' - 1 0 " 615'-5" 326'-9" 128'-7"298'-0"100'-7"527'-2" 16 9 ' - 1 " 278'-0" 19 6 ' - 0 " So l a r R e a d y Z o n e , T y p . 15 ' - 8 " 24 ' - 0 " 9'-0" TYP. 18 ' - 0 " TY P . 35'-0" 41 ' - 0 " 24 ' - 0 " 18 ' - 0 " 1'-6" TYP. 5'-6" 6'-0"5' - 0 " 24'-0" 5'-0"5'-0" 5'-0" 8' - 0 " 5' - 0 " 13 ' - 6 " 17'-0" 10 ' - 2 " 17 ' - 6 " 18 ' - 0 " TY P . Architecture + Planning1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400Oakland, CA 94612510.272.2910ktgy.com DU B L I N , C A # 2 0 1 7 - 0 4 8 6 ST . P A T R I C K W A Y SC H E M A T I C D E S I G N : S U B M I T T A L # 3 MA R C H 1 6 , 2 0 1 8 A3 . 4 BU I L D I N G R O O F P L A N 0 16 32 64 Le g e n d So l a r R e a d y Z o n e , c a l c u l a t e d p e r 1 5 % r o o f a r e a Lo c a t i o n s s u b j e c t t o b e r e f i n e d a s b u i l d i n g p r o g r e s s e s Pr o j e c t m a y o p t f o r E x c e p t i o n 4 t o S e c t i o n 1 1 0 . 1 0 ( b ) 1 B Sc r e e n e d M e c h a n i c a l U n i t s S t . P a t r i c k W a y Entry Drive A B C Architecture + Planning1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400Oakland, CA 94612510.272.2910ktgy.com DU B L I N , C A # 2 0 1 7 - 0 4 8 6 ST . P A T R I C K W A Y SC H E M A T I C D E S I G N : S U B M I T T A L # 3 MA R C H 1 6 , 2 0 1 8 A7 . 0 CO N C E P T U A L L I G H T I N G D E T A I L S 0 8 16 32 1 Wa l l S c o n c e : L o b b y + L e a s i n g 2 Re c e s s e d C a n L i g h t : B a l c o n y 3 Li n e a r F i x t u r e : G a r a g e * Lighting to be refined as project progresses. Ca l c u l i t e C F L Re c e s s e d O p e n Do w n l i g h t ( o r s i m . ) Or i o n S a b e r Li n e a r L i g h t Fi x t u r e ( o r s i m . ) We s l e y 2 L E D Al u m i n u m W a l l Sc o n c e ( o r s i m . ) 1 Ke y M a p n . t . s . 3 2 A7 . 0 A4 . 0 St. Patrick Way En t r y D r i v e A B C Architecture + Planning 1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400 Oakland, CA 94612 510.272.2910 ktgy.com DUBLIN, CA # 2017-0486 ST. PATRICK WAY SCHEMATIC DESIGN: SUBMITTAL #3 MARCH 13, 2018 A8.0MATERIAL AND COLOR BOARD ST. PATRICK WAY - BUILDING LANGUAGE ANTS 1. Front Elevation: St. Patrick Way 1 Key Map n.t.s. STUCCO 2STUCCO 1 S2S1 CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING 1CL1CEMENTITIOUS PANEL 1CP1 METAL AWNING 1MW1 VINYL WINDOW 1W1 STUCCO 3S3 COMPOSITE BOARD 2CB2COMPOSITE BOARD 1CB1 STUCCO 4S4 CL1 CP1 S1 S5CB1 S4CB2S2S3MW1W1 STUCCO 5S5 A8.1A8.A5. St. Patrick Way En t r y D r i v e A B C Architecture + Planning 1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400 Oakland, CA 94612 510.272.2910 ktgy.com DUBLIN, CA # 2017-0486 ST. PATRICK WAY SCHEMATIC DESIGN: SUBMITTAL #3 MARCH 13, 2018 A8.1MATERIAL AND COLOR BOARD 580 HIGHWAY - BUILDING LANGUAGE BNTS 1. Rear Elevation: View from Interstate 580 1Key Map n.t.s. 2. East Elevation 2 St. Patrick Way En t r y D r i v e A B C Architecture + Planning 1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400 Oakland, CA 94612 510.272.2910 ktgy.com DUBLIN, CA # 2017-0486 ST. PATRICK WAY SCHEMATIC DESIGN: SUBMITTAL #3 MARCH 13, 2018 A8.1MATERIAL AND COLOR BOARD 580 HIGHWAY - BUILDING LANGUAGE BNTS 1. Rear Elevation: View from Interstate 580 1Key Map n.t.s. 2. East Elevation 2 St. Patrick Way En t r y D r i v e A B C Architecture + Planning 1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400 Oakland, CA 94612 510.272.2910 ktgy.com DUBLIN, CA # 2017-0486 ST. PATRICK WAY SCHEMATIC DESIGN: SUBMITTAL #3 MARCH 13, 2018 A8.1MATERIAL AND COLOR BOARD 580 HIGHWAY - BUILDING LANGUAGE BNTS 1. Rear Elevation: View from Interstate 580 1Key Map n.t.s. 2. East Elevation 2 S3S4CB1M4S2CB1 CB1 M4 M3 S3 S3 S3 S5 S4 S5 S5 S4 S1 S1S4S3 S1 M2M1 CB1 M4 STUCCO 5S5STUCCO 2S2 COMPOSITE BOARD 1CB1METAL 1M1 METAL 2M2 METAL 3M3 STUCCO 3 STUCCO 4S3S4STUCCO 1S1 METAL 4M4 VINYL WINDOW 1W1 A8.A5.MARCH 16, 2018 5 F T S E T B A C K 5FT SETBACK 5FT SETBACK 5FT SETBACK 5FT SETBACK 10 F T S E T B A C K UP Re s i d e n t i a l P a r k i n g ±8 6 S t a n d a r d ±2 A c c e s s i b l e Tr a s h Ut i l i t y Tr a s h EV R EV R EV R Gu e s t P a r k i n g ±2 1 S t a n d a r d ±2 A c c e s s i b l e Bi c y c l e S t o r a g e GuestGuestGuest Guest Guest GuestGuestGuest GuestGuestGuestGuestGuestGuestGuestGuestGuestGuestGuestGuest Guest EVR Guest Guest Co m p 15 0 ' H O S E M A X P U L L W / F I R E TR U C K LE G E N D 15 - 3 0 F T A E R I A L F I R E AP P A R A T U S A C C E S S R O A D S ST A N D P I P E I N S T A I R E N C L O S U R E 15 0 ' H O S E M A X P U L L F R O M ST A N D P I P E 11 1 ' - 9 " 161'-4" 205'-6" 60 ' - 0 " 70'-0" 17 4 ' - 0 " 26 ' - 0 " 26 ' - 0 " 26'-0" CO N N E L Y S T A T I O N A P A R T M E N T S So u t h S t r e e t ( P r i v a t e ) West Street (Private- Easement Provided) S t . P a t r i c k W a y ( E x t e n s i o n ) Pr o j e c t En t r y Entry Drive/ Co u r t y a r d C AERIAL FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS Fi r e A p p a r a t u s A c c e s s R o a d Regional Street 26 ' - 0 " ±1 6 ' - 0 " ±2 3 ' - 0 " AERIAL FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS 21'-8" Ga r a g e 1 B U I L D I N G / 1 R O O F 5 L e v e l s (A C C E S S T O B E P R O V I D E D F O R E L E V A T I O N CH A N G E S ) Se e C i v i l A 8 . 0 f o r a e r i a l fi r e d e p a r t m e n t a c c e s s ro a d d i m e n s i o n s Fire Apparatus Access Road Co u r t y a r d A + B in t e r c o n n e c t e d w i t h br e e z e w a y a b o v e El e c t r i c a l (P 1 - 0 A b o v e ) Co u r t y a r d A Co u r t y a r d B Ga t e Ut i l i t y El e c t r i c a l El e c t r i c a l (P 1 - 0 A b o v e ) Lo b b y 3 Lo b b y 2 Fi r e P u m p Rm . ( a s r e q u i r e d ) El e c t r i c a l Co l l a b o r a t i v e Wo r k ±1 , 5 0 0 S F (D o u b l e H e i g h t ) Am e n i t y ±1 , 7 7 0 S F (D o u b l e He i g h t ) Po o l Eq u i p t . Lo b b y 1 Am e n i t y ±2 , 3 0 0 S F (D o u b l e H e i g h t ) Lo b b y 1 Le a s i n g ±2 , 1 0 0 S F (D o u b l e H e i g h t ) 38 6 ' - 0 " 52 0 ' - 6 " 625'-7" 526'-2" 17 0 ' - 1 " A1 . 1 CO N C E P T U A L F I R E A C C E S S D I A G R A M LE V E L 1 0 30 60 15 Architecture + Planning1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400Oakland, CA 94612510.272.2910ktgy.com DU B L I N , C A # 2 0 1 7 - 0 4 8 6 ST . P A T R I C K W A Y SC H E M A T I C D E S I G N : S U B M I T T A L # 3 MA R C H 1 6 , 2 0 1 8 A1 . 1 A6 . 0 A1 . 1 A6 . 0 UP Ut i l i t y EV R Tr . DN DN EV R EV R Re s i d e n t i a l P a r k i n g ±1 3 9 S t a n d a r d ±3 A c c e s s i b l e EV R Tr . Ut . EV R EV R EV R Co m p BLDG 15:7,130 SF x 5 Stories =±35,650 SF Total(48,000 SF Allowable)BLDG 14:4,750 SF x 5 Stories =±23,750 SF Total(48,000 SF Allowable)BLDG 13:7,540 SF x 5 Stories =±37,700 SF Total(48,000 SF Allowable)BLDG 9:9,280 SF x 5 Stories =±46,400 SF Total(48,000 SF Allowable)BLDG 8:7,710 SF x 5 Stories =±38,550 SF Total(48,000 SF Allowable)BLDG 11:7,620 SF x 5 Stories =±38,100 SF Total(48,000 SF Allowable)BLDG 12:6,280 SF x 5 Stories =±31,400 SF Total(48,000 SF Allowable) BL D G 7 : 8, 8 3 0 S F x 5 S t o r i e s = ±4 4 , 1 5 0 S F T o t a l (4 8 , 0 0 0 S F A l l o w a b l e ) BL D G 6 : 6, 4 5 0 S F x 5 S t o r i e s = ±3 2 , 2 5 0 S F T o t a l (4 8 , 0 0 0 S F A l l o w a b l e ) BL D G 5 : 6, 5 3 0 S F x 5 S t o r i e s = ±3 2 , 6 5 0 S F T o t a l (4 8 , 0 0 0 S F A l l o w a b l e ) BL D G 4 : 5, 4 6 0 S F x 5 S t o r i e s = ±2 7 , 3 0 0 S F T o t a l (4 8 , 0 0 0 S F A l l o w a b l e ) BL D G 1 7 : 8, 2 7 0 S F x 5 St o r i e s = ±4 1 , 3 5 0 S F To t a l (4 8 , 0 0 0 S F Al l o w a b l e ) BLDG 1:7,850 SF x 5 Stories = ±39,250 SF Total(48,000 SF Allowabl e ) BL D G 2 : 7, 6 2 0 S F x 5 S t o r i e s = ±3 8 , 1 0 0 S F T o t a l (4 8 , 0 0 0 S F A l l o w a b l e ) BL D G 3 : 9, 4 3 0 S F x 5 S t o r i e s = ±4 7 , 1 5 0 S F T o t a l (4 8 , 0 0 0 S F A l l o w a b l e ) BL D G 1 6 : 7, 2 1 0 S F x 5 S t o r i e s = ±3 6 , 0 5 0 S F T o t a l (4 8 , 0 0 0 S F A l l o w a b l e ) BLDG 10:4,720 SF x 5 Stories =±23,600 SF Total(48,000 SF Allowable) H. E . H. E . H. E . F. W . F.W . F.W. F. W . F. W . F. W . F. W . F. W . F. W . F.W. F.W. F.W. F. W . F.W. F. W . Architecture + Planning1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400Oakland, CA 94612510.272.2910ktgy.com DU B L I N , C A # 2 0 1 7 - 0 4 8 6 ST . P A T R I C K W A Y SC H E M A T I C D E S I G N : S U B M I T T A L # 3 MA R C H 1 6 , 2 0 1 8 A1 . 2 AL L O W A B L E A R E A LE V E L 3 ( T Y P I C A L ) 0 16 32 64 Co n s t r u c t i o n T y p e : T y p e I I I A Al l o w a b l e B u i l d i n g H e i g h t ( C B C T a b l e 5 0 4 . 3 ) Al l o w a b l e b u i l d i n g h e i g h t s : T y p e I I I A R - 2 = 6 5 f e e t , 4 S t o r i e s Al l o w a b l e b u i l d i n g h e i g h t s w i t h S p r i n k l e r I n c r e a s e : T y p e I I I A R - 2 = 8 5 f e e t , 5 S t o r i e s Al l o w a b l e B u i l d i n g A r e a ( C B C S e c t i o n 5 0 6 . 2 . 3 ) Aa = [ A t + ( N S x I f )] x S a Aa = A l l o w a b l e a r e a ( s q u a r e f e e t ) At = T a b u l a r a l l o w a b l e a r e a f a c t o r p e r T a b l e 5 0 6 . 2 NS = T a b u l a r a l l o w a b l e a r e a f a c t o r p e r T a b l e 5 0 6 . 2 f o r a n o n s p r i n k l e r e d b u i l d i n g If = F r o n t a g e I n c r e a s e ( n o t t a k e n ) Sa = N u m b e r o f b u i l d i n g s t o r i e s a b o v e g r a d e p l a n e , n o t t o e x c e e d 2 CB C 5 0 6 . 3 . 3 F r o n t a g e I n c r e a s e : If = [ F / P - 0 . 2 5 ] W / 3 0 = 0 ( Fr o n t a g e I n c r e a s e n o t t a k e n ) Aa = [ A t + ( N S x I f )] x S a Aa = [ 2 4 , 0 0 0 + ( 2 4 , 0 0 0 x 0 ) ] x 2 Aa = 4 8 , 0 0 0 S F Al l o w a b l e b u i l d i n g a r e a = 4 8 , 0 0 0 S F p e r b u i l d i n g Fi r e - R e s i s t a n c e R a t i n g R e q u i r e m e n t s i n T y p e I I I A C o n s t r u c t i o n Ex t e r i o r B e a r i n g W a l l s : 2 H o u r ( C B C T a b l e 6 0 1 ) Ex t e r i o r N o n b e a r i n g W a l l s : 1 H o u r ( C B C T a b l e 6 0 2 ) Fi r e W a l l s : 3 H o u r ( C B C T a b l e 7 0 6 . 4 ) St a i r E n c l o s u r e : 2 H o u r ( C B C S e c t i o n 7 1 3 . 4 ) H. E . Ho r i z o n t a l E x i t Fi r e W a l l Le g e n d F. W . A1 . 2 A6 . 1 UP Ut i l i t y EV R Tr . DN DN EV R EV R Re s i d e n t i a l P a r k i n g ±1 3 9 S t a n d a r d ±3 A c c e s s i b l e EV R Tr . Ut . EV R EV R EV R Co m p H. E . ±2 3 9 ' - 4 " T r a v e l D i s t a n c e (2 5 0 ' M a x . T r a v e l D i s t a n c e ) H. E . ±242'-3" Travel Distance (250' Max. Travel Distance) H. E . ±171'-1" Travel Distance(250' Max. Travel Distance)±165'-0" Travel Distance (250' Max. Travel Distance) ± 7 2 2 ' D i a g o n a l (± 2 4 0 ' - 8 " M i n . D i s t . B / t E x i t s ±470'-6" B/t Exits ±155'-8" Travel Distance(250' Max. Travel Distance)±123'-4" Travel Distance(250' Max. Travel Distance) ±3 7 0 ' D i a g o n a l (± 1 2 3 ' - 4 " M i n . D i s t . B / t E x i t s ) ±174'-1" B/t Exits±277' Diagonal(±92'-4" Min. Dist. B/t Exits ±209'-6" B/t Exits ±332 ' D i a g o n a l (±11 0 ' - 8 " M i n . D i s t . B / t E x i t s ) ±249'-3" B/t Exits ±2 6 1 ' - 5 " T r a v e l D i s t a n c e (4 0 0 ' M a x . T r a v e l D i s t a n c e ) ±2 7 6 ' - 4 " T r a v e l D i s t a n c e (4 0 0 ' M a x . T r a v e l D i s t a n c e ) Architecture + Planning1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400Oakland, CA 94612510.272.2910ktgy.com DU B L I N , C A # 2 0 1 7 - 0 4 8 6 ST . P A T R I C K W A Y SC H E M A T I C D E S I G N : S U B M I T T A L # 3 MA R C H 1 6 , 2 0 1 8 A1 . 3 EX I T I N G D I A G R A M LE V E L 3 ( T Y P I C A L ) 0 16 32 64 H. E . Ex i t A c c e s s T r a v e l D i s t a n c e Mo s t R e m o t e P o i n t Ho r i z o n t a l E x i t Ma x i m u m E x i t A c c e s s T r a v e l D i s t a n c e ( C B C T a b l e 1 0 1 7 . 2 ) R O c c u p a n c y w i t h S p r i n k l e r S y s t e m : 2 5 0 ' M a x i m u m S- 2 O c c u p a n c y w i t h S p r i n k l e r S y s t e m : 4 0 0 ' M a x i m u m Le g e n d A1 . 3 A6 . 2 Architecture + Planning1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400Oakland, CA 94612510.272.2910ktgy.com DU B L I N , C A # 2 0 1 7 - 0 4 8 6 ST . P A T R I C K W A Y SC H E M A T I C D E S I G N : S U B M I T T A L # 3 MA R C H 1 6 , 2 0 1 8 A9 . 0 GR E E N P O I N T R A T E D C H E C K L I S T A9 . 0 A7 . 0 MARCH 16, 2018 MARCH 16, 2018 MARCH 16, 2018 March 27, 2018 SB 343 Senate Bill 343 mandates supplemental materials that have been received by the Community Development Department that relate to an agenda item after the agenda packets have been distributed to the Planning Commission be available to the public. This document is also available in the Community Development Department and the City’s Website. The attached document was received in the Community Development Department after distribution of the March 27, 2018 Planning Commission meeting agenda packet. March 27, 2018 Item # 5.1 FILENAME: H:\22\22412 - ST. PATRICK WAY DUBLIN\REPORT\DRAFT\22412_STPATRICKWAYTECHMEMO_20180221.DOCX TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM St. Patrick Way Housing Development Date: February 21, 2018 Project #: 22412 To: Obaid Khan City of Dublin From: Aaron Elias, PE and Mark Heisinger Project: St. Patrick Way Housing Development Subject: Transportation Impact Study The St. Patrick Way Housing Project (Project) proposes the development of a 499-unit apartment complex west of the Connolly Station Apartment Homes near the West Dublin BART Station. The Project will be accessed via an entry driveway on an extension of St. Patrick Way and is located in the Transit-Oriented District of the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan (DDSP). This memorandum presents Kittelson and Associates, Inc’s (Kittelson) analysis of the transportation effects of this Project. The following assessments were completed to document the Project and documented in this technical memorandum: Trip Generation Trip Distribution Traffic Operations Site Circulation and Access TRIP GENERATION Trip generation estimates for the Project were developed using the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition. The specific land-use used for the analysis is Mid- Rise Multifamily Housing (ITE Code 221). Trip generation was estimated for weekday AM and PM peak hour periods using the fitted curve equations. The trip generation estimates for the development are shown in Table 1. This table also includes a 25% trip reduction taken by the DDSP to account for the proximity to BART, bus route coverage available in the DDSP area, the proposed mix of uses of the DDSP, and the proximity to freeways and arterials from which pass-by trips can be drawn. The DDSP and accompanying Environmental Impact Report (EIR) were completed in 2010 and studied trip generation for two different Floor Area Ratios (FAR) in order to provide a trip generation envelope for the DDSP plan area. The DDSP plan area was also divided into three districts for the EIR including the Retail, Village Parkway, and Transit-Oriented districts. The proposed Project is in the Transit- St. Patrick Way Housing Development Project #: 22412 February 21, 2018 Page 2 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California Oriented district. Table 2 shows the trip generation envelope studied as part of the EIR for the Base and Maximum FAR in the Transit-Oriented District and the entire DDSP plan area. Table 1: Project Trip Generation Estimates Land Use ITE Code Units Daily Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Total In Out Total In Out Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise) 221 499 2,718 165 43 122 207 126 81 Transit/Pass-By Reduction (25%) -679 -41 -11 -31 -52 -32 -20 Total Net New Trips 2,038 124 32 92 155 95 61 Table 2: Trip Generation Rates Studied in the DDSP EIR District Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Total In Out Total In Out Transit Oriented District Base FAR 228 125 103 759 372 387 Transit Oriented District Maximum FAR 1,443 806 637 4,820 2,352 2,468 DDSP Base FAR 581 318 263 1917 937 980 DDSP Maximum FAR 2,131 1,184 947 7,078 3,455 3,623 Since the completion of the EIR, project specific developments have been approved under the DDSP and EIR. The trip generation for these developments counts toward the total number of trips approved as part of the EIR reducing the number remaining for future developments. To determine how many vehicle trips remain after the approved project trips are accounted for, Kittelson estimated the approved project trip generation using the ITE Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition. The findings of this analysis are shown in Table 3. St. Patrick Way Housing Development Project #: 22412 February 21, 2018 Page 3 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California Table 3: List of Project Approved Under the DDSP EIR Project Land-Use ITE Code Units Daily Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Total In Out Total In Out Transit Oriented District Connelly Station Multi-Family Housing (Mid-Rise) 221 309 1,682 103 27 77 131 80 51 Bay West Multi-Family Housing (Mid-Rise) 221 313 1,704 105 27 77 132 81 52 Eden Housing Multi-Family Housing (Mid-Rise) 221 66 358 23 6 17 30 18 12 Transit/Pass-By Reduction (25%) -936 -58 -15 -43 -73 -45 -29 Transit Oriented District Net New Trips 2,808 173 45 128 220 134 86 Village Parkway & Retail Districts Avesta Development Continuing Care Community 255 80 362 32 21 11 70 28 42 Trumark Homes (The Perch) Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise) 220 60 413 29 7 22 37 23 14 Transit/Pass-By Reduction (25%) -194 -15 -7 -8 -27 -13 -14 Village Parkway and Retail Districts Net New Trips 581 46 21 25 80 38 42 Combined Trips Total Net New Trips 3,389 219 66 153 300 172 127 Using the estimated trip generation of the Project (Table 1) and the three approved projects in the Transit-Oriented District (Table 3), Table 4 provides a comparison on the number of trips remaining within the approved amount for the Transit-Oriented District. As shown in this table, the Base FAR trip generation is exceeded for the AM peak hour but the PM peak hour and Max FAR trip generation are not. Table 4: Transit Oriented District Trip Generation Comparison Scenario Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Total In Out Total In Out Approved Projects 173 45 128 220 134 86 St. Patrick Project 124 32 92 155 95 61 Sum of All Projects 297 77 220 375 229 146 Remaining Base FAR Trips -69 48 -117 384 143 241 Remaining Max FAR Trips 1,146 729 417 4,445 2,123 2,322 St. Patrick Way Housing Development Project #: 22412 February 21, 2018 Page 4 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California Table 5 provides a comparison of the remaining trips for the entire DDSP plan area once the Project and approved projects are accounted for. As shown, the Project and previously approved projects account for about 15% and 6% of the AM and PM peak hour trip generation approved under the DDSP EIR, respectively. Table 5: DDSP Trip Generation Comparison Scenario Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Total In Out Total In Out Approved Projects 219 66 153 300 172 127 St. Patrick Project 124 32 92 155 95 61 Sum of All Projects 343 98 245 455 267 188 Remaining Base FAR Trips 238 220 18 1,462 670 792 Remaining Max FAR Trips 1,788 1,086 702 6,623 3,188 3,435 TRIP DISTRIBUTION Trip distribution for the Project was estimated based on existing traffic volumes collected on October 19, 2017 for the nearby intersections of: Amador Plaza Road and I-680 SB Ramps, Amador Plaza Road and Dublin Boulevard, and Golden Gate Drive and Dublin Boulevard. Three origin-destinations were assumed for Project trips including Dublin Boulevard west of Golden Gate Drive, Dublin Boulevard east of Amador Plaza Road, and the I-680 Ramps at Amador Plaza Road. Based on the existing traffic patterns, the percentage of trips traveling between these three origin- destinations are shown in Table 6. Table 6 Trip Distribution Estimates Origin/Destination Percentage of Generated Trips (Inbound & Outbound) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour West of Dublin Boulevard/Golden Gate Drive 34% 39% East of Dublin Boulevard/Amador Plaza Road 42% 46% East of Amador Plaza Road/I-680 Ramps 24% 14% TRAFFIC OPERATION FINDINGS The DDSP EIR assessed the transportation impacts of the entire specific plan that the Project is apart of. However, it did not cover the more localized impacts to intersections immediately adjacent to the St. Patrick Way Housing Development Project #: 22412 February 21, 2018 Page 5 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California Project. Therefore, this section assesses the Project’s impacts to the intersection of Golden Gate Drive and St. Patrick Way based on existing traffic volumes collected on October 19, 2017 from 7:00 to 9:00 AM and 4:00 to 6:00 PM. Kittelson assessed the traffic operations at the Golden Gate Drive and St. Patrick Way intersection using Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 6th Edition methodologies implemented by the Vistro version 5.00-05 software analysis tool. The following scenarios were analyzed for the AM and PM peak hours: Existing Existing Plus Project 2040 2040 Plus Project In addition to determining the delay, V/C ratio, and LOS for these scenarios, Kittelson also conducted a peak hour signal warrant analysis. Based on the existing traffic volumes and the estimated trip generation, distribution, and assignment of the Project trips, Table 7 shows a summary of the findings for existing conditions. The Golden Gate Drive and St. Patrick Way intersection, currently an All-way Stop Controlled (AWSC) intersection, operates at LOS B under all four existing scenarios. The intersection analysis and LOS worksheets are shown in Appendix A while the traffic volumes generated by the Project are shown in Appendix B and the total traffic volumes for existing scenarios are shown in Appendix C. As expected with LOS B operations, the peak hour signal warrant was not met under any of the existing scenarios. Signal warrant analysis sheets for all scenarios are shown in Appendix E. Table 7 Existing and Existing Plus Project Traffic Operations at Golden Gate Drive and St. Patrick Way Scenario LOS V/C Delay (s) Signal Warranted? Existing AM B 0.32 10.4 No Existing AM Plus Project B 0.39 11.2 No Existing PM B 0.45 11.3 No Existing PM Plus Project B 0.61 13.5 No The Dublin Citywide Travel Demand Model was used to grow the existing 2017 volumes to the year 2040 for both the AM and PM peak hours using the Furness Method as described by National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 255. The resulting 2040 peak hour volumes for the Golden Gate Drive and St. Patrick Way intersection are shown in Appendix D. Using the peak hour volumes derived from the travel demand model along with the trip generation for the Project, Table 8 provides the operations findings in 2040 with and without the Project. As shown, the intersection is anticipated to operate at LOS C during the AM peak hour with and without the St. Patrick Way Housing Development Project #: 22412 February 21, 2018 Page 6 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California Project. However, the PM peak hour shows the intersection operating at LOS F while meeting the peak hour signal warrant with and without the Project. Table 8 2040 and 2040 Plus Project Traffic Operations at Golden Gate Drive and St. Patrick Way Scenario LOS V/C Delay (s) Signal Warranted? 2040 AM C 0.70 19.0 No 2040 AM Plus Project C 0.81 23.5 No 2040 PM F 1.10 52.8 Yes 2040 PM Plus Project F 1.12 70.1 Yes SITE CIRCULATION AND ACCESS Kittelson reviewed the Project’s site plans to assess the site access and circulation for the proposed Project. This review included an evaluation of pedestrian and bicycle site access, large vehicle site access, and vehicle circulation within the site. The pedestrian site access evaluation revealed a potential conflict between the off-street parking and sidewalk widths on the eastern side of the entry driveway. Chapter 8.76.070 of the City of Dublin Municipal Code requires full-sized parking spaces to be a minimum of 9’ x 20’, however the length of parking spaces may be reduced two feet if the vehicle parked in them will overhang the adjacent landscaping or sidewalk such that the sidewalk is not reduced to an unencumbered width of less than four feet. The parking spaces on the eastern side of the entry drive are 18’ long, two feet less than the full-sized parking space standard. While there is a sidewalk, it is only five feet wide and immediately adjacent to the parking spaces. Most vehicles have an overhang greater than one foot which would reduce the unencumbered width to less than four feet. The automobile parking summary presented in the Project’s site plan state that there will be 793 parking stalls provided, including 15 residential ADA stalls and 13 guest ADA stalls. This does not meet the standards set forth in Chapter 8.76.080 of the City of Dublin Municipal Code which requires 2 parking spaces per dwelling (1 for residents, 1 for guests). However, it does meet the parking requirements of the DDSP which requires 1.5 spaces per unit. The Project’s site plan does not indicate the amount of bicycle parking on the site. The City of Dublin Municipal Code conforms to the California Green Building Standards (CGBS) for short-term and long- term bicycle parking requirements. CGBS requires the number of short-term bicycle parking spaces to equal 5 percent of the number of provided motorized vehicle parking spaces and requires they be placed within 200 feet of the visitors’ entrance. Long-term bicycle spaces are required at the same rate. Based on the vehicle parking provided in their site plan, this project would require 40 short-term bicycle parking spaces and 40 long-term bicycle spaces. St. Patrick Way Housing Development Project #: 22412 February 21, 2018 Page 7 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California Large vehicle site access was evaluated by Kittelson using turning-templates from AutoTURN on CAD drawings supplied by the City. Turning movements were evaluated using the garbage truck, fire engine, and single unit truck (SU-30) templates at the entry drive and emergency vehicle access points. Turning movements were also evaluated within the garage with a passenger vehicle template. Based on our analysis, the Project site plan provides adequate circulation for the various uses. The turning movements for the fire engine and passenger vehicle templates are shown in Appendix F. The single unit truck and garbage truck templates were excluded from the appendix as they are both better-case scenarios than the fire engine template, in terms of vehicle length and turning radius. RECOMMENDATIONS Based on our analysis, Kittelson recommends the following: The intersection of Golden Gate Drive and St. Patrick Way should be signalized by the year 2040 to handle expected traffic growth during the PM peak hour. Based on a linear interpolation of intersection delay between 2017 and 2040, this intersection is anticipated to operate in the PM peak hour at LOS E in 2026 and LOS F in 2032. Using the existing lane configurations, Kittelson implemented an actuated uncoordinated signal at this location running permitted left turn phasing with 2040 traffic volumes. The findings of this analysis are shown in Table 9. As shown, the intersection would improve to LOS C or better once a signal is installed for the 2040 PM scenarios. The Project is anticipated to contribute about 8.4% of the total traffic volume using this intersection under the 2040 + Project PM peak hour scenario. Table 9 Traffic Operations with Recommended Improvements Scenario LOS V/C Delay (s) 2040 PM F 1.10 52.8 2040 PM Plus Project F 1.12 70.1 2040 PM w/ Signal B 0.76 13.8 2040 PM Plus Project w/ Signal C 0.84 21.7 Based on the potential for overhanging vehicles to reduce the unencumbered width of the sidewalk to less than four feet along the east side of the entry drive to the Project’s garage, Kittelson recommends the sidewalk be widened or relocated to provide additional separation between the 18-foot parking stalls and the sidewalk. The final site plan should be checked to verify that the Project will provide 40 short-term and 40 long-term bicycle parking spaces and that it will be located within 200 feet of the Project’s visitor entrance. St. Patrick Way Housing Development Project #: 22412 February 21, 2018 Page 8 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California SUMMARY This technical memorandum evaluated the potential effect that the St. Patrick Way Project would have on the Golden Gate Drive and St. Patrick Way intersection and reviewed potential issues relating to site circulation and access. Key findings of this evaluation and review include: The study intersection operates at LOS C or better with and without the Project for all scenarios except the 2040 PM conditions when the intersection operates at LOS F with and without the Project. The peak hour signal warrant is only met in 2040 for the PM peak hour with and without the Project. If a traffic signal is installed at this location, the intersection would operate at LOS C or better in the 2040 AM and PM peak hours. On-site vehicle circulation is sufficient to accommodate most vehicles including fire trucks, garbage trucks, and single-unit trucks. Vehicle parking supply meets the parking requirements of the DDSP with more than 1.5 spaces per unit. It does not meet the City of Dublin’s municipal code requirements of two spaces per unit. There is a potential for cars parked on the eastern side of the entry drive to overhang onto the sidewalk reducing the unencumbered width to less than four feet. Kittelson recommends widening the sidewalk or moving it to provide more separation between the parking curb and sidewalk. Bicycle parking areas were not defined in the plan and should be checked during the next site plan submittal to verify 40 short-term and 40 long-term spaces have been provided. Appendix A Intersection Analysis & LOS Worksheets Existing AM Existing AM Plus Project Existing PM Existing PM Plus Project 2040 AM 2040 AM Plus Project 2040 PM 2040 PM Plus Project 2040 PM With Signal 2040 PM Plus Project With Signal Appendix B Net New Trips AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Appendix C Existing Traffic Volumes Existing AM Existing AM Plus Project Existing PM Existing PM Plus Project Appendix D Future Traffic Volumes 2040 AM 2040 AM Plus Project 2040 PM 2040 PM Plus Project 2040 AM Plus Project Appendix E Signal Warrant Worksheets Existing AM Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet MUTCD Warrant 3: Peak Hour Scenario: Existing AM Intersection: St Patrick Way & Golden Gate Drive PART A or PART B SATISFIED YES NO PART A SATISFIED YES NO (All parts 1, 2, and 3 below must be satisfied) 1. The total delay experienced for traffic on one minor street approach controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one- lane approach and five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; AND (0.58 hours ; two lane) YES NO 2. The volume on the same minor street approach equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes; AND (202 vph ; two lane) YES NO 3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches. (618 vph ; 4 approach) YES NO PART B SATISFIED YES NO APPROACH LANES Lanes VPH Both Approaches – Major Street 1 380 Highest Approaches – Minor Street 2 226 The plotted points for vehicles per hour on major streets (both approaches) and the corresponding per hour higher volume minor street approach (one direction only) for one hour (any consecutive 15 minute period) fall above the applicable curves in MUTCD Figure 4C-3. Figure 4C-3.Warrant 3, Peak Hour (340, 219) (380, 226) Existing AM Plus Project Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet MUTCD Warrant 3: Peak Hour Scenario: Existing AM Plus Project Intersection: St Patrick Way & Golden Gate Drive PART A or PART B SATISFIED YES NO PART A SATISFIED YES NO (All parts 1, 2, and 3 below must be satisfied) 1. The total delay experienced for traffic on one minor street approach controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one- lane approach and five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; AND (0.68 hours ; 2 lane) YES NO 2. The volume on the same minor street approach equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes; AND (210 vph ; 2 lane) YES NO 3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches. (742 vph ; 4 approach) YES NO PART B SATISFIED YES NO APPROACH LANES Lanes VPH Both Approaches – Major Street 1 407 Highest Approaches – Minor Street 2 235 The plotted points for vehicles per hour on major streets (both approaches) and the corresponding per hour higher volume minor street approach (one direction only) for one hour (any consecutive 15 minute period) fall above the applicable curves in MUTCD Figure 4C-3. Figure 4C-3.Warrant 3, Peak Hour (407, 235) Existing PM Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet MUTCD Warrant 3: Peak Hour Scenario: Existing PM Intersection: St Patrick Way & Golden Gate Drive PART A or PART B SATISFIED YES NO PART A SATISFIED YES NO (All parts 1, 2, and 3 below must be satisfied) 1. The total delay experienced for traffic on one minor street approach controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one- lane approach and five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; AND (0.48 hours ; 2 lane) YES NO 2. The volume on the same minor street approach equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes; AND (172 vph ; 2 lane) YES NO 3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches. (791 vph ; 4 approach) YES NO PART B SATISFIED YES NO APPROACH LANES Lanes VPH Both Approaches – Major Street 1 588 Highest Approaches – Minor Street 2 186 The plotted points for vehicles per hour on major streets (both approaches) and the corresponding per hour higher volume minor street approach (one direction only) for one hour (any consecutive 15 minute period) fall above the applicable curves in MUTCD Figure 4C-3. Figure 4C-3.Warrant 3, Peak Hour (588, 186) Existing PM Plus Project Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet MUTCD Warrant 3: Peak Hour Scenario: Existing PM Plus Project Intersection: St Patrick Way & Golden Gate Drive PART A or PART B SATISFIED YES NO PART A SATISFIED YES NO (All parts 1, 2, and 3 below must be satisfied) 1. The total delay experienced for traffic on one minor street approach controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one- lane approach and five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; AND (0.57 hours ; 2 lane) YES NO 2. The volume on the same minor street approach equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes; AND (185 vph ; 2 lane) YES NO 3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches. (946 vph ; 4 approach) YES NO PART B SATISFIED YES NO APPROACH LANES Lanes VPH Both Approaches – Major Street 1 675 Highest Approaches – Minor Street 2 200 The plotted points for vehicles per hour on major streets (both approaches) and the corresponding per hour higher volume minor street approach (one direction only) for one hour (any consecutive 15 minute period) fall above the applicable curves in MUTCD Figure 4C-3. Figure 4C-3.Warrant 3, Peak Hour (675, 200) 2040 AM Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet MUTCD Warrant 3: Peak Hour Scenario: 2040 AM Intersection: St Patrick Way & Golden Gate Drive PART A or PART B SATISFIED YES NO PART A SATISFIED YES NO (All parts 1, 2, and 3 below must be satisfied) 1. The total delay experienced for traffic on one minor street approach controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one- lane approach and five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; AND (1.65 hours ; 2 lane) YES NO 2. The volume on the same minor street approach equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes; AND (312 vph ; 2 lane) YES NO 3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches. (1068 vph ; 4 approach) YES NO PART B SATISFIED YES NO APPROACH LANES Lanes VPH Both Approaches – Major Street 1 684 Highest Approaches – Minor Street 2 349 The plotted points for vehicles per hour on major streets (both approaches) and the corresponding per hour higher volume minor street approach (one direction only) for one hour (any consecutive 15 minute period) fall above the applicable curves in MUTCD Figure 4C-3. Figure 4C-3.Warrant 3, Peak Hour (684, 349) 2040 AM Plus Project Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet MUTCD Warrant 3: Peak Hour Scenario: 2040 AM Plus Project Intersection: St Patrick Way & Golden Gate Drive PART A or PART B SATISFIED YES NO PART A SATISFIED YES NO (All parts 1, 2, and 3 below must be satisfied) 1. The total delay experienced for traffic on one minor street approach controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one- lane approach and five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; AND (1.93 hours ; 2 lane) YES NO 2. The volume on the same minor street approach equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes; AND (320 vph ; 2 lane) YES NO 3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches. (1192 vph ; 4 approach) YES NO PART B SATISFIED YES NO APPROACH LANES Lanes VPH Both Approaches – Major Street 1 711 Highest Approaches – Minor Street 2 360 The plotted points for vehicles per hour on major streets (both approaches) and the corresponding per hour higher volume minor street approach (one direction only) for one hour (any consecutive 15 minute period) fall above the applicable curves in MUTCD Figure 4C-3. Figure 4C-3.Warrant 3, Peak Hour (711, 360) 2040 PM Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet MUTCD Warrant 3: Peak Hour Scenario: 2040 PM Intersection: St Patrick Way & Golden Gate Drive PART A or PART B SATISFIED YES NO PART A SATISFIED YES NO (All parts 1, 2, and 3 below must be satisfied) 1. The total delay experienced for traffic on one minor street approach controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one- lane approach and five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; AND (12.5 hours ; 2 lane) YES NO 2. The volume on the same minor street approach equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes; AND (557 vph ; 2 lane) YES NO 3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches. (1698 vph ; 4 approach) YES NO PART B SATISFIED YES NO APPROACH LANES Lanes VPH Both Approaches – Major Street 1 1113 Highest Approaches – Minor Street 2 600 The plotted points for vehicles per hour on major streets (both approaches) and the corresponding per hour higher volume minor street approach (one direction only) for one hour (any consecutive 15 minute period) fall above the applicable curves in MUTCD Figure 4C-3. Figure 4C-3.Warrant 3, Peak Hour (1113, 600) 2040 PM Plus Project Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet MUTCD Warrant 3: Peak Hour Scenario: 2040 PM Plus Project Intersection: St Patrick Way & Golden Gate Drive PART A or PART B SATISFIED YES NO PART A SATISFIED YES NO (All parts 1, 2, and 3 below must be satisfied) 1. The total delay experienced for traffic on one minor street approach controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one- lane approach and five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; AND (13.92 hours ; 2 lane) YES NO 2. The volume on the same minor street approach equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes; AND (575 vph ; 2 lane) YES NO 3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches. (1903 vph ; 4 approach) YES NO PART B SATISFIED YES NO APPROACH LANES Lanes VPH Both Approaches – Major Street 1 1140 Highest Approaches – Minor Street 2 620 The plotted points for vehicles per hour on major streets (both approaches) and the corresponding per hour higher volume minor street approach (one direction only) for one hour (any consecutive 15 minute period) fall above the applicable curves in MUTCD Figure 4C-3. Figure 4C-3.Warrant 3, Peak Hour (1140, 620) Appendix F Large Vehicle Site Access Evaluation Architecture + Planning 1814 Franklin St., Ste. 400 Oakland, CA 94612 510.272.2910 ktgy.com DUBLIN, CA # 2017-0486 ST. PATRICK WAY SCHEMATIC DESIGN JANUARY 31, 2017 A0.0COVER Acoustical Assessment for ST. PATRICK WAY RESIDENTIAL Acoustical Assessment for the proposed St. Patrick Way Residential in the City of Dublin, California Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 765 The City Drive, Suite 200 Orange, California 92868 Contact: Mr. Ace Malisos 714.939.1030 March 2018 St. Patrick Way Residential Acoustical Assessment | Page ii March 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................. 1 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Location ......................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Project Description .................................................................................................................... 2 2 FUNDAMENTALS OF SOUND AND ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE Fundamentals of Sound and Environmental Noise ................................................................... 6 3 REGULATORY SETTING 3.1 State of California .................................................................................................................... 11 3.2 City of Dublin ........................................................................................................................... 11 4 METHODOLOGY AND EXISTING CONDITIONS 4.1 Methodology ........................................................................................................................... 13 4.2 Existing Conditions .................................................................................................................. 14 5 ACOUSTICAL IMPACTS 5.1 Predicted Traffic Noise Levels ................................................................................................. 16 5.2 Architectural Mitigation Techniques ....................................................................................... 19 6 RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendations .................................................................................................................. 23 7 REFERENCES References ............................................................................................................................... 24 TABLES Table 1 Typical Noise Levels ................................................................................................................... 6 Table 2 Definitions of Acoustical Terms ................................................................................................. 7 Table 3 City of Dublin Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Environments .......................... 12 Table 4 Noise Measurements .............................................................................................................. 14 Table 5 Exterior and Interior Traffic Noise Levels ................................................................................ 18 Table 6 Sound Transmission Class for Windows .................................................................................. 20 EXHIBITS Exhibit 1 Regional Vicinity ........................................................................................................................ 3 Exhibit 2 Site Vicinity ................................................................................................................................ 4 Exhibit 3 Site Plan ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Exhibit 4 Noise Measurement Locations ................................................................................................ 15 Exhibit 5 Modeled Receiver Locations ................................................................................................... 17 APPENDICES Appendix A: Existing Ambient Noise Measurements Appendix B: Traffic Noise Model Output Files St. Patrick Way Residential Acoustical Assessment | Page iii March 2018 LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS ADT Average Daily Traffic ANSI American National Standards Institute CNEL Community Noise Equivalent Level dB decibel dBA A-weighted decibel DNL day-night average EPA Environmental Protection Agency FHWA Federal Highway Administration HVAC heating, ventilation, and air conditioning Hz hertz Ldn day-night average sound level Leq Equivalent Sound Level Lmax maximum A-weighted sound level Lmin minimum A-weighted sound level Ldn day-night average sound level Leq Equivalent Sound Level mm millimeter mph miles per hour STC sound transmission class TNM 2.5 Traffic Noise Model, Version 2.5 St. Patrick Way Residential Acoustical Assessment | Page 1 March 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This acoustical analysis assesses potential impacts for noise-sensitive areas within the proposed St. Patrick Way Residential (the project), located in the City of Dublin, California. The project site is in the City of Dublin, California within the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan area, approximately 200 feet west of the West Dublin/Pleasanton Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) Station and the current terminus of St. Patrick Way. The project proposes a five story, 499-dwelling unit apartment building, wrapped around a five- story parking structure. The buildings would be approximately 56 feet in height with staircase enclosure at approximately 63 feet at limited locations on the roof. The plan includes a mixture of studio, one, and two-bedroom apartments and include several amenities including a clubhouse, pool, a co-work space, and active and passive courtyards. The Federal Highway Administration’s Traffic Noise Model, Version 2.5 (TNM 2.5) was utilized to calculate the forecast noise levels. Based on the results of the TNM 2.5 modeling, receivers along the western, southern, and eastern property line would be exposed to future traffic noise levels along Interstate 580 in exceedance of the City’s exterior standard of 60 dBA Ldn and interior standard of 45 dBA Ldn. Based on the results of the traffic noise evaluation, future uses at the project site would be exposed to exterior noise levels of up 78 dBA without mitigation. As such, recommendations for a sound wall, upgraded windows, and balcony treatments have been identified. With implementation of the recommendations, interior noise levels experienced at the project site would not exceed the 45 dBA interior threshold required by City policy and the California Building Code. In addition, the recommendation would keep exterior noise levels experienced at the project site from exceeding the 60 dBA exterior standard listed as normally acceptable in the City’s General Plan. St. Patrick Way Residential Acoustical Assessment | Page 2 March 2018 1 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this Acoustical Assessment is to evaluate potential impacts for noise-sensitive areas that would be affected by the proposed St. Patrick Way Residential Project (project), located in the City of Dublin, California. 1.1 PROJECT LOCATION The project site is in the City of Dublin, California within the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan area; refer to Exhibit 1. Specifically, the project is located approximately 200 feet west of the West Dublin/Pleasanton Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) Station and the current terminus of St. Patrick Way; refer to Exhibit 2. 1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The St. Patrick Way Residential project includes the construction of a new 499-unit apartment complex on an 8.53-acresite; refer to Exhibit 3. The project requires the demolition of an existing 200,000 square foot warehouse building. The apartments would be five stories, wrapped around a five-story parking structure. The buildings would be approximately 56 feet in height with staircase enclosure at approximately 63 feet at limited locations on the roof. The project may be construc ted as two buildings, two construction types or two phases based on final design. The plan includes a mixture of studio, one, and two-bedroom apartments and include several amenities including a clubhouse, pool, a co-work space, and active and passive courtyards. The project is consistent with the City of Dublin General Plan, the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan, and the Zoning Code. Not to scale Exhibit 1: Regional Vicinity St Patrick Way Noise Study 580 680 580 680 680 880 80 80 80 880 280 280 92 4 101 101 101 101 San Francisco San Rafael Berkeley Pleasanton San Jose Palo Alto Livermore San Ramon PROJECT SITE Fairfield Vacaville Sacramento Vallejo Dublin Not to scale Exhibit 2: Site Vicinity St Patrick Way Noise Study Dublin B l v d St Patric k W a y R e g i o n a l S t S a n R a m o n R d G o l d e n G a t e D r A m a d o r P l a z a R d Project Site 580 680 Source: Google Earth 2018 Not to scale Exhibit 3: Site Plan St Patrick Way Noise Study Source: KTGY, February 1, 2018 St. Patrick Way Residential Acoustical Assessment | Page 6 March 2018 2 FUNDAMENTALS OF SOUND AND ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE Acoustics is the science of sound. Sound can be described as the mechanical energy of a vibrating object transmitted by pressure waves through a medium (e.g., air) to human (or animal) ear. If the pressure variations occur frequently enough (at least 20 times per second), they can be heard and are called sound. The number of pressure variations per second is called the frequency of sound and is expressed as cycles per second, or hertz (Hz). Noise is defined as loud, unexpected, or annoying sound. In acoustics, the fundamental model consists of a sound (or noise) source, a receptor, and the propagation path between the two. The loudness of the noise source and obstructions or atmospheric factors affecting the propagation path to the receptor determine the sound level and characteristics of the noise perceived by the receptor. Acoustics deals primarily with the propagation and control of sound. A typical noise environment consists of a base of steady background noise that is the sum of many distant and indistinguishable noise sources. Superimposed on this background noise is the sound from individual local sources. These sources can vary from an occasional aircraft or train passing by to virtually continuous noise from, for example, traffic on a major highway. Perceptions of sound and noise are highly subjective from person to person. Measuring sound directly in terms of pressure would require a large and awkward range of numbers. To avoid this, the decibel scale was devised. The decibel scale uses the hearing threshold (20 micropascals) as a point of reference, defined as 0 dB. Other sound pressures are then compared to this reference pressure, and the logarithm is taken to keep the numbers in a practical range. The decibel scale allows a million-fold increase in pressure to be expressed as 120 dB, and changes in levels (dB) correspond closely to human perception of relative loudness. Table 1 provides typical noise levels associated with common activities. Table 1: Typical Noise Levels Common Outdoor Activities Noise Level (dBA) Common Indoor Activities – 110 – Rock Band Jet fly-over at 1,000 feet – 100 – Gas lawnmower at 3 feet – 90 – Diesel truck at 50 feet at 50 mph Food blender at 3 feet – 80 – Garbage disposal at 3 feet Noisy urban area, daytime Gas lawnmower, 100 feet – 70 – Vacuum cleaner at 10 feet Commercial area Normal Speech at 3 feet Heavy traffic at 300 feet – 60 – Large business office Quiet urban daytime – 50 – Dishwasher in next room Quiet urban nighttime – 40 – Theater, large conference room (background) Quiet suburban nighttime – 30 – Library Quiet rural nighttime Bedroom at night, concert hall (background) – 20 – Broadcast/recording studio – 10 – Lowest threshold of human hearing – 0 – Lowest threshold of human hearing dBA = A-weighted decibels; mph = miles per hour Source: California Department of Transportation, Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol, September 2013. St. Patrick Way Residential Acoustical Assessment | Page 7 March 2018 Noise Descriptors The decibel scale alone does not adequately characterize how humans perceive noise. The dominant frequencies of a sound have a substantial effect on the human response to that sound. Several rating scales have been developed to analyze the adverse effect of community noise on people. Because environmental noise fluctuates over time, these scales consider that the effect of noise on people is largely dependent on the total acoustical energy content of the noise, as well as the time of day when the noise occurs. The equivalent noise level (Leq) is a measure of ambient noise, while the day-night noise level (Ldn) and Community Equivalent Noise Level (CNEL) are measures of community noise. Each is applicable to this analysis and defined in Table 2. Table 2: Definitions of Acoustical Terms Term Definitions Decibel, dB A unit describing the amplitude of sound, equal to 20 times the logarithm to the base 10 of the ratio of the pressure of the sound measured to the reference pressure. The reference pressure for air is 20. Sound Pressure Level Sound pressure is the sound force per unit area, usually expressed in micropascals (or 20 micronewtons per square meter), where 1 pascal is the pressure resulting from a force of 1 newton exerted over an area of 1 square meter. The sound pressure level is expressed in decibels as 20 times the logarithm to the base 10 of the ratio between the pressures exerted by the sound to a reference sound pressure (e.g., 20 micropascals). Sound pressure level is the quantity that is directly measured by a sound level meter. Frequency, Hz The number of complete pressure fluctuations per second above and below atmospheric pressure. Normal human hearing is between 20 Hz and 20,000 Hz. Infrasonic sound are below 20 Hz and ultrasonic sounds are above 20,000 Hz. A-Weighted Sound Level, dBA The sound pressure level in decibels as measured on a sound level meter using the A-weighting filter network. The A-weighting filter de-emphasizes the very low and very high frequency components of the sound in a manner similar to the frequency response of the human ear and correlates well with subjective reactions to noise. Equivalent Noise Level, Leq The average acoustic energy content of noise for a stated period of time. Thus, the Leq of a time-varying noise and that of a steady noise are the same if they deliver the same acoustic energy to the ear during exposure. For evaluating community impacts, this rating scale does not vary, regardless of whether the noise occurs during the day or the night. Lmax, Lmin The maximum and minimum A-weighted noise level during the measurement period. L01, L10, L50, L90 The A-weighted noise levels that are exceeded 1%, 10%, 50%, and 90% of the time during the measurement period. Day/Night Noise Level, Ldn or DNL A 24-hour average Leq with a 10 dBA “weighting” added to noise during the hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. to account for noise sensitivity in the nighttime. The logarithmic effect of these additions is that a 60 dBA 24-hour Leq would result in a measurement of 66.4 dBA Ldn. Community Noise Equivalent Level, CNEL A 24-hour average Leq with a 5 dBA “weighting” during the hours of 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. and a 10 dBA “weighting” added to noise during the hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. to account for noise sensitivity in the evening and nighttime, respectively. The logarithmic effect of these additions is that a 60 dBA 24-hour Leq would result in a measurement of 66.7 dBA CNEL. Ambient Noise Level The composite of noise from all sources near and far. The normal or existing level of environmental noise at a given location. Intrusive That noise which intrudes over and above the existing ambient noise at a given location. The relative intrusiveness of a sound depends on its amplitude, duration, frequency, and time of occurrence and tonal or informational content as well as the prevailing ambient noise level. The A-weighted decibel sound level scale gives greater weight to the frequencies of sound to which the human ear is most sensitive. Because sound levels can vary markedly over a short period of time, a method St. Patrick Way Residential Acoustical Assessment | Page 8 March 2018 for describing either the average character of the sound or the statistical behavior of the variations must be utilized. Most commonly, environmental sounds are described in terms of an average level that has the same acoustical energy as the summation of all the time-varying events. The scientific instrument used to measure noise is the sound level meter. Sound level meters can accurately measure environmental noise levels to within about plus or minus 1 dBA. Various computer models are used to predict environmental noise levels from sources, such as roadways and airports. The accuracy of the predicted models depends on the distance between the receptor and the noise source. Close to the noise source, the models are accurate to within about plus or minus 1 to 2 dBA. A-Weighted Decibels The perceived loudness of sounds is dependent on many factors, including sound pressure level and frequency content. However, within the usual range of environmental noise levels, perception of loudness is relatively predictable and can be approximated by A-weighted sound levels. There is a strong correlation between A-weighted sound levels (expressed as dBA) and the way the human ear perceives sound. For this reason, the A-weighted sound level has become the standard tool of environmental noise assessment. All noise levels reported in this section are in terms of A-weighted levels, but are expressed as dB, unless otherwise noted. Addition of Decibels The decibel scale is logarithmic, not linear, and therefore sound levels cannot be added or subtracted through ordinary arithmetic. Two sound levels 10 dB apart differ in acoustic energy by a factor of 10. When the standard logarithmic decibel is A-weighted, an increase of 10 dBA is generally perceived as a doubling in loudness. For example, a 70 dBA sound is half as loud as an 80 dBA sound and twice as loud as a 60 dBA sound. When two identical sources are each producing sound of the same loudness, the resulting sound level at a given distance would be 3 dB higher than one source under the same conditions. Under the decibel scale, three sources of equal loudness together would produce an increase of 5 dB. Sound Propagation and Attenuation Sound spreads (propagates) uniformly outward in a spherical pattern, and the sound level decreases (attenuates) at a rate of approximately 6 dB for each doubling of distance from a stationary or point source. Sound from a line source, such as a highway, propagates outward in a cylindrical pattern, often referred to as cylindrical spreading. Sound levels attenuate at a rate of approximately 3 dB for each doubling of distance from a line source, such as a roadway, depending on ground surface characteristics. No excess attenuation is assumed for hard surfaces like a parking lot or a body of water. Soft surfaces, such as soft dirt or grass, can absorb sound, so an excess ground-attenuation value of 1.5 dB per doubling of distance is normally assumed. For line sources, an overall attenuation rate of 3 dB per doubling of distance is assumed. Noise levels may also be reduced by intervening structures; generally, a single row of buildings between the receptor and the noise source reduces the noise level by about 5 dBA, while a solid wall or berm reduces noise levels by 5 to 10 dBA. The manner in which older homes in California were constructed generally provides a reduction of exterior-to-interior noise levels of about 20 to 25 dBA with closed windows. The exterior-to-interior reduction of newer residential units is generally 30 dBA or more. St. Patrick Way Residential Acoustical Assessment | Page 9 March 2018 Human Response to Noise The human response to environmental noise is subjective and varies considerably from individual to individual. Noise in the community has often been cited as a health problem, not in terms of actual physiological damage, such as hearing impairment, but in terms of inhibiting general well-being and contributing to undue stress and annoyance. The health effects of noise in the community arise from interference with human activities, including sleep, speech, recreation, and tasks that demand concentration or coordination. Hearing loss can occur at the highest noise intensity levels. Noise environments and consequences of human activities are usually well represented by median noise levels during the day or night or over a 24-hour period. Environmental noise levels are generally considered low when the CNEL is below 60 dBA, moderate in the 60 to 70 dBA range, and high above 70 dBA. Examples of low daytime levels are isolated, natural settings with noise levels as low as 20 dBA and quiet, suburban, residential streets with noise levels around 40 dBA. Noise levels above 45 dBA at night can disrupt sleep. Examples of moderate-level noise environments are urban residential or semi- commercial areas (typically 55 to 60 dBA) and commercial locations (typically 60 dBA). People may consider louder environments adverse, but most will accept the higher levels associated with noisier urban residential or residential-commercial areas (60 to 75 dBA) or dense urban or industrial areas (65 to 80 dBA). Regarding increases in A-weighted noise levels (dBA), the following relationships should be noted: • Except in carefully controlled laboratory experiments, a change of 1 dBA cannot be perceived by humans. • Outside of the laboratory, a 3 dBA change is considered a just-perceivable difference. • A change in level of at least 5 dBA is required before any noticeable change in community response would be expected. An increase of 5 dBA is typically considered substantial. • A 10 dBA change is subjectively heard as an approximate doubling in loudness and would almost certainly cause an adverse change in community response. Effects of Noise on People Hearing Loss While physical damage to the ear from an intense noise impulse is rare, a degradation of auditory acuity can occur even within a community noise environment. Hearing loss occurs mainly due to chronic exposure to excessive noise, but may be due to a single event such as an explosion. Natural hearing loss associated with aging may also be accelerated from chronic exposure to loud noise. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has a noise exposure standard that is set at the noise threshold where hearing loss may occur from long-term exposures. The maximum allowable level is 90 dBA averaged over 8 hours. If the noise is above 90 dBA, the allowable exposure time is correspondingly shorter. St. Patrick Way Residential Acoustical Assessment | Page 10 March 2018 Annoyance Attitude surveys are used for measuring the annoyance felt in a community for noises intruding into homes or affecting outdoor activity areas. In these surveys, it was determined that causes for annoyance include interference with speech, radio and television, house vibrations, and interference with sleep and rest. The Ldn as a measure of noise has been found to provide a valid correlation of noise level and the percentage of people annoyed. People have been asked to judge the annoyance caused by aircraft noise and ground transportation noise. There continues to be disagreement about the relative annoyance of these different sources. For ground vehicles, a noise level of about 55 dBA L dn is the threshold at which a substantial percentage of people begin to report annoyance. St. Patrick Way Residential Acoustical Assessment | Page 11 March 2018 3 REGULATORY SETTING To limit population exposure to physically and/or psychologically damaging as well as intrusive noise levels, the federal government, the state of California, various county governments, and most municipalities in the state have established standards and ordinances to control noise. 3.1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA California Government Code California Government Code Section 65302 (f) mandates that the legislative body of each county and city adopt a noise element as part of its comprehensive general plan. The local noise element must recognize the land use compatibility guidelines established by the State Department of Health Services. The guidelines rank noise land use compatibility in terms of “normally acceptable”, “conditionally acceptable”, “normally unacceptable”, and “clearly unacceptable” noise levels for various land use types. Single-family homes are “normally acceptable” in exterior noise environments up to 60 CNEL and “conditionally acceptable” up to 70 CNEL. Multiple-family residential uses are “normally acceptable” up to 65 CNEL and “conditionally acceptable” up to 70 CNEL. Schools, libraries, and churches are “normally acceptable” up to 70 CNEL, as are office buildings and business, commercial, and professional uses. Title 24 – Building Code The state’s noise insulation standards are codified in the California Code of Regulations, Title 24: Part 1, Building Standards Administrative Code, and Part 2, California Building Code. These noise standards are applied to new construction in California for the purpose of interior noise compatibility from exterior noise sources. The regulations specify that acoustical studies must be prepared when noise-sensitive structures, such as residential buildings, schools, or hospitals, are located near major transportation noise sources, and where such noise sources create an exterior noise level of 65 dBA CNEL or higher. Acoustical studies that accompany building plans must demonstrate that the structure has been designed to limit interior noise in habitable rooms to acceptable noise levels. For new residential buildings, schools, and hospitals, the acceptable interior noise limit for new construction is 45 dBA CNEL. 3.2 CITY OF DUBLIN City of Dublin General Plan The Noise Element of the City of Dublin General Plan establishes residential, commercial, and industrial land use compatibility standards for noise measured at the property line of the receiving land use. The land use compatibility noise criteria provide the basis for decisions on location of land uses in relation to noise sources and for determining noise mitigation requirements. Table 3 shows the noise standards for the City. As indicated, the normally acceptable exterior noise level for the City of Dublin is 60 dBA or less for noise-sensitive residential land uses and parks, and 70 dBA or less for retail, commercial, office, and industrial land uses. Noise levels up to 70 dBA are considered conditionally acceptable for most noise sensitive land uses. St. Patrick Way Residential Acoustical Assessment | Page 12 March 2018 Table 3: City of Dublin Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Environments Land Use Category Community Noise Exposure (Ldn or CNEL, dBA) Normally Acceptable Conditionally Acceptable Normally Unacceptable Clearly Unacceptable Residential 60 or less 61-70 71-75 Over 75 Motels, Hotels 60 or less 61-70 71-80 Over 80 Schools, Churches, Nursing Homes 60 or less 61-70 71-80 Over 80 Neighborhood Parks 60 or less 61-65 66-70 Over 70 Office, Retail, Commercial 70 or less 71-75 76-80 Over 80 Industrial 70 or less 71-75 Over 75 -- Ldn = Day night average; NA = not applicable. Notes: • Conditionally acceptable exposure requires noise insulation features in building design. Conventional construction, but with closed windows and fresh air supply systems or air conditioning will normally suffice. Source: City of Dublin, City of Dublin General Plan, adopted February 11, 1985, updated January 19, 2010. The following policies in the City of Dublin General Plan are applicable to noise in the project vicinity: • Guiding Policy A. Where feasible, mitigate traffic noise to levels indicated by Table 3. o Implementing Policy F. Noise impacts related to all new development shall be analyzed by a certified acoustic consultant. o Implementing Policy H. Review all multi-family development proposals within the projected 60 CNEL contour for compliance with noise standards (45 CNEL in any habitable room) as required by State law. Consistent with the Noise Element of the City of Dublin General Plan, the normally acceptable outdoor noise exposure standard for residential sites is 60 dBA or less. Noise levels between 61 to 70 dBA are considered conditionally acceptable and noise Insulation features must be included in the design. Conditionally acceptable exposure requires noise insulation features in building design. Conventional construction, but with closed windows and fresh air supply systems or air conditioning will normally suffice. Noise levels between 71 to 75 dBA are considered normally unacceptable and anything over 75 dBA is clearly unacceptable. Project designers may use one or more of four available categories of mitigation measures: site planning, architectural layout (bedrooms away from noise source, for example), noise barriers, or construction modifications. City of Dublin Municipal Code The City’s Municipal Code includes standards pertaining to noise control within the City. Municipal Code Section 5.28.020 prohibits any person within the City to make any loud, or disturbing, or unnecessary, or unusual or habitual noise or any noise which annoys or disturbs or injures or endangers the health, repose, peace or safety of any reasonable person of normal sensitivity present in the area. The Municipal Code regulates stationary source noise and does not establish standards for mobile source noise levels at residential areas. St. Patrick Way Residential Acoustical Assessment | Page 13 March 2018 4 METHODOLOGY AND EXISTING CONDITIONS 4.1 METHODOLOGY Traffic Noise Model In March 1998, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) released the Traffic Noise Model, Version 1.0 (FHWA TNM). It was developed as a means for aiding compliance with policies and procedures under FHWA regulations. Since its release in March 1998, Version 1.0a was released in March 1999, Version 1.0b in August 1999, Version 1.1 in September 2000, Version 2.0 in June 2002, Version 2.1 in March 2003 and the current version, Version 2.5 in April 2004. TNM 2.5 was utilized to determine the noise resulting from vehicular activity along the surrounding roadways. TNM is a state-of-the-art computer program used for predicting noise impacts in the vicinity of highways. It uses advances in personal computer hardware and software to improve upon the accuracy and ease of modeling highway noise, including the design of effective, cost-efficient noise barriers. TNM contains the following components: • Modeling of five standard vehicle types, including automobiles, medium trucks, heavy trucks, buses, and motorcycles, as well as user-defined vehicles; • Modeling of both constant-flow and interrupted-flow traffic using a 1994/1995 field-measured data base; • Modeling of the effects of different pavement types, as well as the effects of graded roadways; • Sound level computations based on a one-third octave-band data base and algorithms; • Graphically-interactive noise barrier design and optimization; • Attenuation over/through rows of buildings and dense vegetation; • Multiple diffraction analysis; • Parallel barrier analysis; and • Contour analysis, including sound level contours, barrier insertion loss contours, and sound-level difference contours. The TNM 2.5 database is made up of over 6,000 individual pass-by events measured at forty sites across the county. It is the primary building block around which the acoustic algorithms are structured. The model has been tested for accuracy with modeled and actual measured noise. In cooperation with the FHWA, the Volpe Center Acoustics Facility (Volpe) has conducted multiple-phase studies to assess the accuracy and make recommendations of the use of the TNM 2.5 model. The study, TNM version 2.5 Addendum to Validation of FHWA’s Traffic Noise Model: Phase I (dated July 2004), included 100 hours of traffic noise data were collected at seventeen highway sites around the country. The sites had characteristics of those most commonly modeled by TNM users. TNM 2.5 was used to model and compare the predicted noise over the measured noise. The study determined that the model includes a 0.5 standard deviation of measured noise to modeled noise. TNM 2.5 is also much more user friendly compared to its predecessor Sound 2000. TNM 2.5 allows the user to import CADD files to determine more precise locations of the noise at surrounding sensitive receptors. This acoustical analysis was able to utilize TNM 2.5 to determine the noise levels at proposed residential units throughout the project site. St. Patrick Way Residential Acoustical Assessment | Page 14 March 2018 4.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS Noise Measurements To determine ambient noise levels in the project area, three 10-minute noise measurements were taken using an American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Type I integrating sound level meter between 10:25 a.m. and 11:15 a.m. on February 21, 2018; refer to Appendix A for noise measurement data and Exhibit 4. Noise Measurement 1 was taken to represent the ambient noise level at the northwest portion of the project site; Noise Measurement 2 was taken to represent the ambient noise level at the southwest portion of the project site closest to I-580; and Noise Measurement 3 was taken to represent the ambient noise level in the eastern portion of the project site. The primary noise source during all three measurements was traffic on I-580. Table 4 provides the ambient noise levels measured at these locations. Table 4: Noise Measurements Site No. Location Leq (dBA) Lmin (dBA) Lmax (dBA) Time 1 Northwest portion of the project site, approximately 300 feet east of Regional Street 59.8 56.4 63.3 10:25 a.m. 2 Southwest portion of the project site, approximately 100 feet north of I- 580 71.6 68.6 74.3 10:42 a.m. 3 East portion of the project site, approximately 400 feet west of Golden Gate Drive 75.3 67.5 77.0 11:01 a.m. Source: Noise measurements taken by Kimley-Horn on February 21, 2018. Not to scale Exhibit 4: Noise Measurement Locations St Patrick Way Noise Study Dublin B l v d St Patric k W a y R e g i o n a l S t S a n R a m o n R d G o l d e n G a t e D r A m a d o r P l a z a R d Project Site 580 680 Source: Google Earth 2018 1 2 3 Noise Measurement Locations1 St. Patrick Way Residential Project Acoustical Assessment  | Page 16   March 2018  5 ACOUSTICAL IMPACTS    A noise impact analysis has been completed to determine the noise exposure levels that would result  from off‐site transportation noise sources, and to identify potential noise reduction measures that would  achieve acceptable project exterior and interior noise levels. The primary source of traffic noise affecting  the project site is from I‐580. The project would also be exposed to nominal traffic noise from the project’s  adjacent local streets. However, due to the relatively low traffic volume/speed, traffic noise from these  roads would not substantially contribution to ambient noise conditions. This analysis addresses on‐site  exterior and interior noise levels at proposed residential receptors/receivers.    5.1 PREDICTED TRAFFIC NOISE LEVELS    The traffic volumes along I‐580 were obtained from the Caltrans Traffic Census Program.1  Average daily  traffic (ADT) volumes were increased by 10 percent to reflect future long‐range traffic conditions  necessary to evaluate the worst‐case future traffic noise levels at the project site. Truck ADT and fleet mix  data was also obtained from Caltrans Traffic Census. Roadways and receivers were digitized in TNM 2.5  based on the project site plan layout.  The model also accounted for the differences in elevation between  the roadway and each receptor. Noise levels were calculated at the exterior receptor locations (for each  of the proposed five stories.     Table 5 provides the results of the modeling and Exhibit 5 depicts the location of the modeled noise  receivers.  As shown in Table 5, noise levels would range from 34.4 dBA to a maximum of 78.2 dBA.  Noise  levels would be lower at the receivers further away from I‐580.  Additionally, noise levels at internal  receivers (i.e., Courtyards A and B as well as balconies facing Courtyards A and B) would be attenuated by  the proposed building and parking structure.  Proposed Courtyard C is located along the southern portion  of the project site, facing I‐580.  Courtyard C is not fully enclosed by the proposed building and would be  exposed to traffic noise from I‐580.  Noise levels at this location would be 64.8 dBA.      The City’s General Plan sets a normally acceptable exterior noise standard of 60 dBA for residential uses.   Noise modeling was conducted to determine noise perceived at the residential units along the perimeter  of the proposed building that would be exposed to traffic noise along I‐580.  Based on the modeling  results, 26 dwelling units on the first floor, 31 dwelling units on the second floor, 41 dwelling units on the  third floor, 41 dwelling units on the fourth floor; and 41 dwelling units on the fifth floor would be exposed  to exterior traffic noise levels above 60 dBA.  Additionally, as noted above, noise levels at Courtyard C  would also exceed City standards; refer to Table 5.    A noise barrier (e.g., sound wall or solid gate) along the southern edge of Courtyard C (the portion that is  open to I‐580) was modeled at one‐foot increments to determine the height necessary to attenuate  exterior noise levels at Courtyard C.  The model results indicate that a 7‐foot barrier is needed to ensure  that ground‐floor exterior receivers at Courtyard C meet City standards; refer to Exhibit 5.  Due to the  height of the proposed building, perimeter noise barriers would not be effective for balcony or upper  story receivers. As indicated above a total of 180 units would have exterior noise levels above the standard  of 60 dBA; refer to Exhibit 5 for unit locations of buildings requiring further mitigation.                                                                    1 California Department of Transportation, Traffic Census Program, http://www.dot.ca.gov/trafficops/census/, accessed  February 12, 2018.    Not to scale Exhibit 5: Modeled Receiver Locations St Patrick Way Noise Study Source: KTGY, February 1, 2018 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 23 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 353637383940 41424344 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 53 52 54 55 Units Requiring Architectural Mitigation 7-Foot High Noise Barrier St. Patrick Way Residential Acoustical Assessment | Page 18 March 2018 Table 5: Exterior and Interior Traffic Noise Levels Receiver No. Exterior Noise Levels (dBA Ldn) 1 Interior Noise Levels (dBA Ldn) 2 First Floor Second Floor Third Floor Fourth Floor Fifth Floor First Floor Second Floor Third Floor Fourth Floor Fifth Floor 1 69.9 71.2 73.4 73.8 74.1 45.9 47.2 49.4 49.8 50.1 2 70.9 72.4 73.8 74.2 74.5 46.9 48.4 49.8 50.2 50.5 3 71.9 73.3 74.3 74.6 75.0 47.9 49.3 50.3 50.6 51.0 4 73.2 74.5 75.0 75.4 75.8 49.2 50.5 51.0 51.4 51.8 5 70.4 73.3 74.0 74.4 74.8 46.4 49.3 50.0 50.4 50.8 6 66.6 70.6 71.4 71.8 72.0 42.6 46.6 47.4 47.8 48.0 7 64.1 68.5 69.5 70.0 70.3 40.1 44.5 45.5 46.0 46.3 8 65.0 68.8 69.9 70.4 70.7 41.0 44.8 45.9 46.4 46.7 9 65.8 67.7 69.1 69.5 69.9 41.8 43.7 45.1 45.5 45.9 10 65.0 65.6 67.0 67.4 67.8 41.0 41.6 43.0 43.4 43.8 11 61.9 62.3 63.6 64.1 64.6 37.9 38.3 39.6 40.1 40.6 12 59.2 59.7 60.9 61.5 62.1 35.2 35.7 36.9 37.5 38.1 13 50.7 51.7 52.7 53.7 55.4 26.7 27.7 28.7 29.7 31.4 14 43.9 44.7 45.9 48.1 51.5 19.9 20.7 21.9 24.1 27.5 15 74.7 76.9 77.4 77.8 78.2 50.7 52.9 53.4 53.8 54.2 16 74.6 76.8 77.4 77.7 78.1 50.6 52.8 53.4 53.7 54.1 17 74.4 76.7 77.2 77.6 77.9 50.4 52.7 53.2 53.6 53.9 18 73.8 75.9 76.4 76.7 77.1 49.8 51.9 52.4 52.7 53.1 19 70.9 73.9 74.8 75.2 75.6 46.9 49.9 50.8 51.2 51.6 20 68.1 72.0 73.1 73.6 73.9 44.1 48.0 49.1 49.6 49.9 21 66.8 71.5 72.6 73.1 73.5 42.8 47.5 48.6 49.1 49.5 22 65.8 70.6 71.8 72.4 72.8 41.8 46.6 47.8 48.4 48.8 23 65.1 69.9 71.2 71.9 72.3 41.1 45.9 47.2 47.9 48.3 24 64.4 69.0 70.6 71.3 71.8 40.4 45.0 46.6 47.3 47.8 25 63.6 68.4 69.9 70.7 71.2 39.6 44.4 45.9 46.7 47.2 26 63.1 67.9 69.4 70.3 70.8 39.1 43.9 45.4 46.3 46.8 27 62.5 67.3 68.8 69.7 70.3 38.5 43.3 44.8 45.7 46.3 28 61.1 66.1 67.5 68.4 69.1 37.1 42.1 43.5 44.4 45.1 29 60.1 65.2 66.5 67.5 68.1 36.1 41.2 42.5 43.5 44.1 30 58.9 64.2 65.3 66.2 66.7 34.9 40.2 41.3 42.2 42.7 31 58.0 63.3 64.2 65.1 65.7 34.0 39.3 40.2 41.1 41.7 32 56.9 62.3 63.1 64.0 64.6 32.9 38.3 39.1 40.0 40.6 33 55.7 61.2 61.9 62.7 63.3 31.7 37.2 37.9 38.7 39.3 34 54.9 60.2 61.0 61.8 62.5 30.9 36.2 37.0 37.8 38.5 35 52.1 57.4 58.3 58.9 59.7 28.1 33.4 34.3 34.9 35.7 36 35.7 38.0 38.9 40.9 43.7 11.7 14.0 14.9 16.9 19.7 37 45.0 41.6 39.7 40.8 43.6 21.0 17.6 15.7 16.8 19.6 38 47.1 44.8 43.0 52.2 55.7 23.1 20.8 19.0 28.2 31.7 39 47.0 44.7 42.9 41.1 43.2 23.0 20.7 18.9 17.1 19.2 40 43.0 40.5 39.2 40.7 43.3 19.0 16.5 15.2 16.7 19.3 41 34.4 38.7 39.2 41.2 44.0 10.4 14.7 15.2 17.2 20.0 42 40.7 39.0 39.7 41.5 44.2 16.7 15.0 15.7 17.5 20.2 43 46.6 44.6 43.5 43.3 49.5 22.6 20.6 19.5 19.3 25.5 44 57.5 58.9 64.2 65.8 66.9 33.5 34.9 40.2 41.8 42.9 45 57.6 59.0 64.6 66.2 67.1 33.6 35.0 40.6 42.2 43.1 46 57.6 59.0 64.8 66.4 67.2 33.6 35.0 40.8 42.4 43.2 47 57.6 59.0 64.9 66.6 67.3 33.6 35.0 40.9 42.6 43.3 48 57.4 59.1 64.8 66.6 67.2 33.4 35.1 40.8 42.6 43.2 49 57.0 58.9 64.7 66.6 67.3 33.0 34.9 40.7 42.6 43.3 50 54.8 57.1 64.3 66.5 67.0 30.8 33.1 40.3 42.5 43.0 St. Patrick Way Residential Acoustical Assessment | Page 19 March 2018 Table 5: Exterior and Interior Traffic Noise Levels (Continued) Receiver No. Exterior Noise Levels (dBA Ldn) 1 Interior Noise Levels (dBA Ldn) 2 First Floor Second Floor Third Floor Fourth Floor Fifth Floor First Floor Second Floor Third Floor Fourth Floor Fifth Floor 51 56.7 57.9 62.8 64.2 64.7 32.7 33.9 38.8 40.2 40.7 52 55.6 56.7 61.4 62.5 63.0 31.6 32.7 37.4 38.5 39.0 53 41.2 41.3 42.5 44.3 47.2 17.2 17.3 18.5 20.3 23.2 54 43.7 44.5 47.0 48.7 51.5 19.7 20.5 23.0 24.7 27.5 55 (Courtyard C)3 64.8/59.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Notes: 1. Refer to Exhibit 5 for modeled receiver locations. Units in Bold text require mitigation. TNM 2.5 input/output files are provided in Appendix B. 2. A 24 dBA noise attenuation rate was utilized to determine the interior noise standards. Each of the receivers in the table would be required to use mechanical ventilation to ensure a “closed window” condition is satisfied. 3. Receptor 55 depicts the unmitigated (without sound wall) and mitigated (with sound wall) noise levels at Courtyard C; refer to Recommendation 6-1 in Section 6. The project would also be subject to the State Building Code and City Implementing Policy H, which require interior noise levels not to exceed 45 dBA. Typical building construction can reduce noise levels by 24 dBA with the windows closed.2 Therefore, a 24 dBA noise attenuation rate was utilized to determine the interior noise levels in Table 5. As indicated in Table 5, receivers 1-9 and 15-28 would be exposed to interior noise levels above 45 dBA. 5.2 ARCHITECTURAL MITIGATION TECHNIQUES Based on the TNM 2.5 modeling results 180 units would require additional recommendations to ensure exterior (balcony) noise levels and interior noise levels would be below 60 and 45 dBA, respectively. Recommendations would include the use of balcony treatments and upgraded windows. Although sound insulation varies with frequency and is very different for various types of partitions, it is convenient to compare the effectiveness of two partitions using a method of rating insulation that can be represented by a single number. In North America, the most commonly used single number rating is the Sound Transmission Class (STC). An STC rating of 0 indicates that a partition provides no airborne sound insulation. Balcony Treatments As discussed above, exterior noise levels experienced at receivers 1-12, 15-34, and 44-52 would be above the City’s 60 dBA exterior standard; refer to Table 5 for the exterior sound levels specific to units on each story. Based on the site plans, the first-row dwelling could have balconies that face the western, southern, and eastern site perimeter that would be exposed to freeway traffic noise (dwelling units facing the northern site perimeter would not exceed City standards). Therefore, it is recommended that balconies directly facing the western, southern, and eastern site perimeter incorporate noise attenuating balcony or patio treatments, including a barrier that is at least 42 inches high as measured from the floor. Acceptable materials for the construction of the barrier should have a minimum weight of 2.5 pounds per square foot of surface area. The barrier may be composed of the following: masonry block, stucco veneer over wood framing (or foam core), glass, Plexiglass or Lexan (1/4 inch think) and may be constructed out of a combination of the above listed materials. 2 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Protective Noise Levels (EPA 550/9-79-100), November 1979. St. Patrick Way Residential Acoustical Assessment | Page 20 March 2018 Window Treatments Typical values of sound insulation ratings provided by various types of window constructions are presented in Table 6. For high sound insulation, the purchase of commercially available windows that have been rated by a recognized testing laboratory provides better performance for a given cost than individually designed units. To obtain a sound transmission class rating above 45, it is necessary to select acoustical windows with specially designed frames, and glass mounting is recommended. Table 6: Sound Transmission Class for Windows STC1 Single Glazed Glass Thickness Dual Glazed Glass (Airspace Between Glass) Inches (mm) Sealed Window Operable Window Inches (mm) Both 1/8-inch (3-mm) Glass Both ¼-inch (6-mm) Glass ¼-inch (6-mm) and laminated 9/32-inch (7-mm) Glass 30 27 1/8 (3), 5/32 (4) ¼ (6) NA NA 32 29 ¼ (6) 3/8 (10) NA NA 34 31 ¼ (6) L2 ¾ (20) 5/16 (8) NA 36 32 ½ (12) 1 ¼ (30) ½ (13) NA 38 34 ½ (12) L2 2 (50) ¾ (20) 3/8 (10) 40 36 NA 2 ¾ (70) 1 ¼ (30) 5/8 (16) 42 37 NA 4 (100) 2 (50) 1 (25) 44 39 NA 6 (150) 3 ¼ (80) 1 ½ (40) 46 41 NA NA 4 ¾ (120) 2 7/8 (60) 48 43 NA NA NA 4 (100) mm = millimeter; NA = Not Applicable Notes: 1. STC ratings assume that windows have effective weather stripping. 2. L denotes laminated glass. For example ¼ (6) L is 1-4-inch (6 mm) thick laminated glass. Source: Cyril M. Harris, Noise Control in Buildings – A Practical Guide for Architects and Engineers, 1994. Transmission of sound through a hollow window-frame can significantly reduce the sound insulation, especially for windows with very high STC. This reduction can be minimized by drilling one or more holes in the hollow frame and pumping a mastic material to fill the hollow frame. The following is a listing of various window types that are utilized on typical residential structures: • Single Glazing (Unlaminated). The sound insulation provided by single glazing improves with increasing glass thickness. However, the increase is limited in the mid-frequency range by the stiffness of the glass. As indicated in Table 6, a single, unlaminated layer of solid glass usually does not provide an STC rating above 32 for a sealed window and 29 for an operable window. • Laminated Glass. Laminated glass is two or more layers of glass bonded together by think plastic interlayers. It can provide higher values of sound transmission class than solid glass of equal thickness. This is because the sound insulation versus thickness of single sheets of glass exhibits a dip at a frequency determined by the stiffness of the glass. The improvement in sound insulation is primarily due to damping by the plastic interlayers that reduce the magnitude of the dip. • Dual Glazing. Dual glazing is two panes of glass with airspace between them. Dual glazing provides greater sound insulation at high frequencies than single glazed laminated glass. St. Patrick Way Residential Acoustical Assessment | Page 21 March 2018 Table 6 compares typical vales of STC for sealed windows, with corresponding values for operable windows, and for single-glazed windows of various thicknesses. These STC values increase with the increasing thickness of glass. For glass of a given thickness, sealed windows provide greater sound insulation than operable windows. The overall improvement provided by dual glazing depends on the separation of the layers and glass thickness. For each doubling of the airspace, there is an increase in STC rating of about 3. There is some advantage in using two panes of laminated glass, especially for glass thicker than ¼ inch (6 mm). Based on TNM2.5 traffic noise modeling for future receptors at the project site, modeled receivers along the western, southern, and eastern property line would be exposed to traffic noise levels of up to 78 dBA; refer to Table 5. Noise levels at these receivers could exceed the City’s interior requirement by 9 dBA. Therefore, these receivers should include windows with a minimum STC of 36 to ensure interior noise levels are below the City’s 45 dBA interior requirement. Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning In a Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) system, the components that generate the most sound power are the supply fan (in the air supply system) and the return fan (in the return air system). By definition, a fan is a device for moving air, which utilizes a power-driven rotating impeller. A fan has at least one inlet opening and at least one outlet opening. The opening may or may not be provided with connections to ductwork. If an HVAC system does not have good aerodynamic design and efficient operation of the various components, the noise level of fan noise sources may increase in level. The airflow at the entrance and exit of a fan should be as smooth as possible to minimize the generation of turbulence; turbulence results in the generation of noise and an increased static pressure drop in the system. It is recommended that the following measures would be implemented to reduce noise levels associated with HVAC equipment: • Fittings (such as elbows and transitions) should not be placed closer than 3 to 6 duct diameters downstream from a fan; • For an HVAC system having a constant volume of airflow, operate the fans generally close to their maximum efficiency; • For a variable-volume system, a variable-speed drive should be considered to maintain operating efficiency for low volume; • Avoid any obstruction close to the fan inlet or fan outlet; • Provide a minimum space of 1.5 duct diameters at the fan inlet or fan outlet; • Consider the installation of bell-shaped inlet to provide better airflow conditions at the fan; and • Avoid offsets, abrupt or nonsymmetrical transitions, or offset flexible duct connectors in ductwork since they will be source of turbulence and therefore noise sources. Conclusion A site plan and architectural drawings site have been prepared for the proposed project. Based on TNM 2.5 traffic noise modeling for future receivers at the project site, residential uses at receivers along the St. Patrick Way Residential Acoustical Assessment | Page 22 March 2018 western, southern, and eastern property line should include windows with a minimum STC of 36 to ensure interior noise levels are below the 45 dBA interior standard. As part of construction documentation, the project engineer should ensure that the building construction specifications include an STC rating of 36 for windows and entry doors and that any balconies facing the western, southern, and eastern building perimeter include treatments described above. The 36 STC rating and balcony treatments for the project should be specified upon final site design, and submitted to and approved by the City of Dublin prior to issuance of building permits. St. Patrick Way Residential Acoustical Assessment | Page 23 March 2018 6 RECOMMENDATIONS 6-1 Construction of a 7‐foot high wall (or operable gate) along the southern edge of Courtyard C (the portion that is open to I-580) between modeled receivers 5 and 15 (refer to Exhibit 5) would sufficiently attenuate Courtyard C exterior noise levels to less than 60 dBA. Acceptable materials for the construction of the barrier should have a minimum density of 3.5 pounds per square foot of surface area and may be composed of the following: masonry block, stucco veneer over wood framing (or foam core), glass, Plexiglass, Lexan 9 ¼ inch thick), or metal. The barrier may also be constructed out of a combination of the above listed materials. The barrier should be solid with overlapping edges. 6-2 Outdoor activity areas (i.e., balconies) that face the western, southern, and eastern site perimeter shall incorporate noise attenuating treatments. These outdoor activity areas shall include a barrier that is at least 42 inches high as measured from the floor. Acceptable materials for the construction of the barrier should have a minimum weight of 2.5 pounds per square foot of surface area. The barrier may be composed of the following: masonry block, stucco veneer over wood framing (or foam core), glass, Plexiglass or Lexan (1/4 inch think) and may be constructed out of a combination of the above listed materials. 6-3 Sound‐rated windows and entry doors with a minimum STC rating of 36 shall be installed on the residential facades facing the western, southern, and eastern perimeter. After the plot plans and architectural drawings have been developed, and prior to the issuance of building permits, the plans specifying the 36 STC rating shall be submitted to and approved by the City of Dublin Community Development Director (or designee). 6-4 The final site design should implement centralized heating/ventilation/air-conditioning units (HVAC) on all of the affected units to ensure noise levels will be below 45 dBA with the windows and doors closed. Additionally, the mechanical ventilation units shall be designed to supply a minimum of two air changes per hour for each habitable room, with a minimum of 15 cubic feet per minute of outside air per occupant. The fresh air inlet duct should be of sound attenuating construction and consist of ten feet of straight or curved ducts plus one sharp 90-degree bend. 6-5 The project Applicant shall include the following recommendations in the design of the HVAC equipment: • Fittings (such as elbows and transitions) should not be placed closer than 3 to 6 duct diameters downstream from a fan; • For an HVAC system having a constant volume of airflow, operate the fans generally close to their maximum efficiency; • For a variable-volume system, a variable-speed drive should be considered to maintain operating efficiency for low volume; • Avoid any obstruction close to the fan inlet or fan outlet; • Provide a minimum space of 1.5 duct diameters at the fan inlet or fan outlet; • Consider the installation of bell-shaped inlet to provide better airflow conditions at the fan; and • Avoid offsets, abrupt or nonsymmetrical transitions, or offset flexible duct connectors in ductwork since they will be source of turbulence and therefore noise sources. St. Patrick Way Residential Acoustical Assessment | Page 24 March 2018 7 REFERENCES 1. California Department of Transportation, Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol, September 2013. 2. California Department of Transportation, Traffic Census Program, http://www.dot.ca.gov/trafficops/census/, accessed February 12, 2018. 3. City of Dublin, City of Dublin General Plan, adopted February 11, 1985, updated January 19, 2010. 4. City of Dublin, Dublin Municipal Code, December 2017. 5. Cyril Harris, Handbook of Noise Control, Second Edition, 1979. 6. Cyril M. Harris, Noise Control in Buildings – A Practical Guide for Architects and Engineers, 1994. 7. Solutia, Inc., Saflex Acoustical Glazing Design Guide, accessed at https://www.scribd.com/document/330271291/Saflex-Acoustical-Guide-pdf on February 12, 2018. 8. U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, TNM Version 2.5 Addendum to Validation of FHWA’s Traffic Noise Model TNM: Phase I, July 2004. 9. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, The Noise Guidebook, March 2009. 10. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Protective Noise Levels (EPA 550/9-79-100), November 1979.   Appendix A  Existing Ambient Noise Measurements         Noise Measurement Field Data  Project:  Site No.: Analyst: Location:  Noise Sources:  Comments: Leq:59.8 Lmin:56.4 Lmax:63.3 Peak:90.5 Photo:  Meas. Duration:  Microphone Height: 55 < 5, calm Partly Cloudy 30.23 in Humidity:42%  Weighting, Resp.: Sky:  Bar. Pressure: 5 feet 10 min A, fast 197133001 2/21/2017 10:25 AM  Calibrator:  Sound Level Meter: WeatherEquipment  Temp. (degrees F):  Wind (mph): Traffic from I‐580 freeway CEL 260 CEL 490  Results (dBA): Noemi Wyss Northwest portion of the project site, approximately 300 feet east of Regional St.   Time: St. Patrick Residences 1   Job Number:   Date: Noise Measurement Field Data  Project:  Site No.: Analyst: Location:  Noise Sources:  Comments: Leq:71.6 Lmin:68.6 Lmax:74.3 Peak:95.7 Photo:  Meas. Duration:10 min  Bar. Pressure:30.23 in  Microphone Height:5 feet Humidity:42%  Calibrator:CEL 260  Wind (mph):< 5, calm  Weighting, Resp.:A, fast  Sky:Clear  Results (dBA): EquipmentWeather  Sound Level Meter:CEL 490  Temp. (degrees F):55 St. Patrick Residences   Job Number:197133001 2   Date:2/21/2017 Noemi Wyss   Time:10:42 AM Southwest portion of the project site, approximately 100 feet north of I‐580 I‐580 freeway Noise Measurement Field Data  Project:  Site No.: Analyst: Location:  Noise Sources:  Comments: Leq:75.3 Lmin:67.5 Lmax:77.0 Peak:95.8 Photo:  Meas. Duration:10 min  Bar. Pressure:30.23 in  Microphone Height:5 feet Humidity:42%  Calibrator:CEL 260  Wind (mph):< 5, calm  Weighting, Resp.:A, fast  Sky:Partly Cloudy  Results (dBA): EquipmentWeather  Sound Level Meter:CEL 490  Temp. (degrees F):55 St. Patrick Residences   Job Number:197133001 3   Date:2/21/2017 Noemi Wyss   Time:11:01 AM East portion of the project site, approximately 400 feet west of Golden Gate Drive I‐580 freeway, occassional cars driving past, landscaping crew   Appendix B  Traffic Noise Model Output Files  IN P U T : R O A D W A Y S St P a t r i c k W a y Ki m l e y - H o r n 27 F e b r u a r y 2 0 1 8 Ma l i s o s TN M 2 . 5 IN P U T : R O A D W A Y S Av e r a g e p a v e m e n t t y p e s h a l l b e u s e d u n l e s s PR O J E C T / C O N T R A C T : St P a t r i c k W a y a S t a t e h i g h w a y a g e n c y s u b s t a n t i a t e s t h e u s e RU N : I- 5 8 0 T r a f f i c N o i s e - 1 s t F l o o r of a d i f f e r e n t t y p e w i t h t h e a p p r o v a l o f F H W A Ro a d w a y Po i n t s Na m e Wi d t h Na m e No . Co o r d i n a t e s ( p a v e m e n t ) Fl o w C o n t r o l Segment X Y Z Co n t r o l Sp e e d PercentPvmtOn De v i c e Co n s t r a i n t VehiclesTypeStruct?Affected ft f t f t f t m p h % I - 5 8 0 E B 1 12 . 0 p o i n t 1 1 7 0 2 , 8 2 5 . 3 2 0 2 , 1 6 6 . 5 3 7 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 2 2 7 0 3 , 6 4 7 . 2 2 0 2 , 1 0 3 . 9 3 6 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 3 3 7 0 4 , 5 3 5 . 6 2 0 2 , 0 1 9 . 1 3 5 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 4 4 7 0 5 , 4 6 0 . 8 2 0 1 , 9 1 6 . 0 3 5 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 5 5 7 0 6 , 4 5 6 . 2 2 0 1 , 8 1 2 . 9 3 4 0 . 0 0 I - 5 8 0 W B 1 12 . 0 p o i n t 6 6 7 0 6 , 4 5 0 . 4 2 0 1 , 8 9 1 . 4 3 4 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 7 7 7 0 5 , 4 5 5 . 1 2 0 1 , 9 9 4 . 6 3 5 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 8 8 7 0 4 , 5 2 9 . 6 2 0 2 , 0 9 7 . 7 3 5 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 9 9 7 0 3 , 6 4 1 . 2 2 0 2 , 1 8 2 . 4 3 6 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 1 0 1 0 7 0 2 , 8 1 9 . 1 2 0 2 , 2 4 5 . 1 3 7 0 . 0 0 I - 5 8 0 W B 2 12 . 0 p o i n t 1 1 1 1 7 0 6 , 4 4 6 . 9 2 0 1 , 8 7 9 . 7 3 4 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 1 2 1 2 7 0 5 , 4 5 1 . 6 2 0 1 , 9 8 2 . 9 3 5 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 1 3 1 3 7 0 4 , 5 2 6 . 2 2 0 2 , 0 8 6 . 0 3 5 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 1 4 1 4 7 0 3 , 6 3 7 . 8 2 0 2 , 1 7 0 . 7 3 6 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 1 5 1 5 7 0 2 , 8 1 5 . 7 2 0 2 , 2 3 3 . 4 3 7 0 . 0 0 I - 5 8 0 W B 3 12 . 0 p o i n t 1 6 1 6 7 0 6 , 4 4 9 . 1 2 0 1 , 8 6 7 . 9 3 4 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 1 7 1 7 7 0 5 , 4 5 3 . 8 2 0 1 , 9 7 1 . 1 3 5 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 1 8 1 8 7 0 4 , 5 2 8 . 3 2 0 2 , 0 7 4 . 2 3 5 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 1 9 1 9 7 0 3 , 6 3 9 . 9 2 0 2 , 1 5 8 . 9 3 6 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 2 0 2 0 7 0 2 , 8 1 7 . 8 2 0 2 , 2 2 1 . 6 3 7 0 . 0 0 I - 5 8 0 W B 4 12 . 0 p o i n t 2 1 2 1 7 0 6 , 4 4 7 . 4 2 0 1 , 8 5 6 . 5 3 4 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 2 2 2 2 7 0 5 , 4 5 2 . 1 2 0 1 , 9 5 9 . 7 3 5 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 2 3 2 3 7 0 4 , 5 2 6 . 6 2 0 2 , 0 6 2 . 8 3 5 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 2 4 2 4 7 0 3 , 6 3 8 . 2 2 0 2 , 1 4 7 . 5 3 6 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 2 5 2 5 7 0 2 , 8 1 6 . 1 2 0 2 , 2 1 0 . 2 3 7 0 . 0 0 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P r o g r a m \ S t P a t r i c k \ 1 s t F l o o r 1 27 February 2018 IN P U T : R O A D W A Y S St P a t r i c k W a y I - 5 8 0 W B 5 12 . 0 p o i n t 2 6 2 6 7 0 6 , 4 4 8 . 9 2 0 1 , 9 0 1 . 3 3 4 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 2 7 2 7 7 0 5 , 4 5 3 . 6 2 0 2 , 0 0 4 . 5 3 5 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 2 8 2 8 7 0 4 , 5 2 8 . 2 2 0 2 , 1 0 7 . 6 3 5 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 2 9 2 9 7 0 3 , 6 3 9 . 8 2 0 2 , 1 9 2 . 3 3 6 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 3 0 3 0 7 0 2 , 8 1 6 . 8 2 0 2 , 2 5 4 . 1 3 7 0 . 0 0 M e d i a n W B 30 . 0 p o i n t 3 1 3 1 7 0 6 , 4 4 9 . 1 2 0 1 , 8 4 2 . 0 3 4 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 3 2 3 2 7 0 5 , 4 5 3 . 8 2 0 1 , 9 4 5 . 2 3 5 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 3 3 3 3 7 0 4 , 5 2 8 . 4 2 0 2 , 0 4 8 . 3 3 5 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 3 4 3 4 7 0 3 , 6 4 0 . 0 2 0 2 , 1 3 3 . 0 3 6 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 3 5 3 5 7 0 2 , 8 1 7 . 9 2 0 2 , 1 9 5 . 8 3 7 0 . 0 0 M e d i a n E B 30 . 0 p o i n t 3 6 3 6 7 0 2 , 8 2 4 . 8 2 0 2 , 1 7 7 . 8 3 7 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 3 7 3 7 7 0 3 , 6 4 6 . 7 2 0 2 , 1 1 5 . 2 3 6 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 3 8 3 8 7 0 4 , 5 3 5 . 1 2 0 2 , 0 3 0 . 4 3 5 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 3 9 3 9 7 0 5 , 4 6 0 . 2 2 0 1 , 9 2 7 . 3 3 5 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 4 1 4 1 7 0 6 , 4 5 5 . 7 2 0 1 , 8 2 4 . 2 3 4 0 . 0 0 I - 5 8 0 E B 2 12 . 0 p o i n t 4 3 4 3 7 0 2 , 8 2 2 . 5 2 0 2 , 1 5 3 . 1 3 7 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 4 4 4 4 7 0 3 , 6 4 4 . 4 2 0 2 , 0 9 0 . 5 3 6 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 4 5 4 5 7 0 4 , 5 3 2 . 8 2 0 2 , 0 0 5 . 7 3 5 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 4 6 4 6 7 0 5 , 4 5 8 . 0 2 0 1 , 9 0 2 . 6 3 5 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 4 7 4 7 7 0 6 , 4 5 3 . 4 2 0 1 , 7 9 9 . 5 3 4 0 . 0 0 I - 5 8 0 E B 3 12 . 0 p o i n t 4 8 4 8 7 0 2 , 8 2 4 . 5 2 0 2 , 1 4 2 . 6 3 7 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 4 9 4 9 7 0 3 , 6 4 6 . 4 2 0 2 , 0 8 0 . 0 3 6 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 5 0 5 0 7 0 4 , 5 3 4 . 8 2 0 1 , 9 9 5 . 2 3 5 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 5 1 5 1 7 0 5 , 4 6 0 . 0 2 0 1 , 8 9 2 . 1 3 5 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 5 2 5 2 7 0 6 , 4 5 5 . 4 2 0 1 , 7 8 9 . 0 3 4 0 . 0 0 I - 5 8 0 E B 4 12 . 0 p o i n t 5 3 5 3 7 0 2 , 8 2 0 . 3 2 0 2 , 1 3 3 . 2 3 7 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 5 4 5 4 7 0 3 , 6 4 2 . 2 2 0 2 , 0 7 0 . 6 3 6 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 5 5 5 5 7 0 4 , 5 3 0 . 6 2 0 1 , 9 8 5 . 8 3 5 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 5 6 5 6 7 0 5 , 4 5 5 . 8 2 0 1 , 8 8 2 . 7 3 5 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 5 7 5 7 7 0 6 , 4 5 1 . 2 2 0 1 , 7 7 9 . 6 3 4 0 . 0 0 I - 5 8 0 E B 5 12 . 0 p o i n t 5 8 5 8 7 0 2 , 8 1 9 . 4 2 0 2 , 1 2 4 . 1 3 7 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 5 9 5 9 7 0 3 , 6 4 1 . 4 2 0 2 , 0 6 1 . 5 3 6 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 6 0 6 0 7 0 4 , 5 2 9 . 6 2 0 1 , 9 7 6 . 7 3 5 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 6 1 6 1 7 0 5 , 4 5 4 . 9 2 0 1 , 8 7 3 . 6 3 5 0 . 0 0 Average p o i n t 6 2 6 2 7 0 6 , 4 5 0 . 4 2 0 1 , 7 7 0 . 5 3 4 0 . 0 0 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P r o g r a m \ S t P a t r i c k \ 1 s t F l o o r 2 27 February 2018 IN P U T : T R A F F I C F O R L d e n St P a t r i c k W a y Ki m l e y - H o r n 27 F e b r u a r y 2 0 1 8 Ma l i s o s TN M 2 . 5 IN P U T : T R A F F I C F O R L d e n PR O J E C T / C O N T R A C T : St P a t r i c k W a y RU N : I- 5 8 0 T r a f f i c N o i s e - 1 s t F l o o r Ro a d w a y Po i n t s Na m e Na m e No . Se g m e n t AD T Aut o s MT r u c k s HT r u c k s Bu s e s Motorcycles %D % E % N S % D % E % N S % D % E % N S % D % E % N S % D % E % N S ve h / 2 4 h r s % % % m p h % % % m p h % % % m p h % % % m p h % % % m p h I - 5 8 0 E B 1 p o i n t 1 1 2 2 2 2 0 9 1 9 1 9 1 6 5 3 3 3 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 9 1 9 1 9 1 6 5 3 3 3 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 2 2 2 2 0 9 1 9 1 9 1 6 5 3 3 3 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 4 4 2 2 2 2 0 9 1 9 1 9 1 6 5 3 3 3 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 5 5 I - 5 8 0 W B 1 p o i n t 6 6 2 2 2 2 0 9 1 9 1 9 1 6 5 3 3 3 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 7 7 2 2 2 2 0 9 1 9 1 9 1 6 5 3 3 3 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 8 8 2 2 2 2 0 9 1 9 1 9 1 6 5 3 3 3 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 9 9 2 2 2 2 0 9 1 9 1 9 1 6 5 3 3 3 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 0 1 0 I - 5 8 0 W B 2 p o i n t 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 0 9 1 9 1 9 1 6 5 3 3 3 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 0 9 1 9 1 9 1 6 5 3 3 3 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 3 1 3 2 2 2 2 0 9 1 9 1 9 1 6 5 3 3 3 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 4 1 4 2 2 2 2 0 9 1 9 1 9 1 6 5 3 3 3 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 5 1 5 I - 5 8 0 W B 3 p o i n t 1 6 1 6 2 2 2 2 0 9 1 9 1 9 1 6 5 3 3 3 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 1 7 2 2 2 2 0 9 1 9 1 9 1 6 5 3 3 3 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 1 8 2 2 2 2 0 9 1 9 1 9 1 6 5 3 3 3 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 1 9 2 2 2 2 0 9 1 9 1 9 1 6 5 3 3 3 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 0 2 0 I - 5 8 0 W B 4 p o i n t 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 0 9 1 9 1 9 1 6 5 3 3 3 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 9 1 9 1 9 1 6 5 3 3 3 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 2 0 9 1 9 1 9 1 6 5 3 3 3 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 2 4 2 2 2 2 0 9 1 9 1 9 1 6 5 3 3 3 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 2 5 I - 5 8 0 W B 5 p o i n t 2 6 2 6 2 2 2 2 0 9 1 9 1 9 1 6 5 3 3 3 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 2 7 2 2 2 2 0 9 1 9 1 9 1 6 5 3 3 3 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 8 2 8 2 2 2 2 0 9 1 9 1 9 1 6 5 3 3 3 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 2 9 2 2 2 2 0 9 1 9 1 9 1 6 5 3 3 3 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 0 3 0 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P r o g r a m \ S t P a t r i c k \ 1 s t F l o o r 1 27 February 2018 IN P U T : T R A F F I C F O R L d e n St P a t r i c k W a y M e d i a n W B p o i n t 3 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 4 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 3 5 M e d i a n E B p o i n t 3 6 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 7 3 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 8 3 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 9 3 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 4 1 4 1 I - 5 8 0 E B 2 p o i n t 4 3 4 3 2 2 2 2 0 9 1 9 1 9 1 6 5 3 3 3 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 4 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 0 9 1 9 1 9 1 6 5 3 3 3 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 4 5 4 5 2 2 2 2 0 9 1 9 1 9 1 6 5 3 3 3 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 4 6 4 6 2 2 2 2 0 9 1 9 1 9 1 6 5 3 3 3 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 4 7 4 7 I - 5 8 0 E B 3 p o i n t 4 8 4 8 2 2 2 2 0 9 1 9 1 9 1 6 5 3 3 3 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 4 9 4 9 2 2 2 2 0 9 1 9 1 9 1 6 5 3 3 3 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 5 0 5 0 2 2 2 2 0 9 1 9 1 9 1 6 5 3 3 3 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 5 1 5 1 2 2 2 2 0 9 1 9 1 9 1 6 5 3 3 3 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 5 2 5 2 I - 5 8 0 E B 4 p o i n t 5 3 5 3 2 2 2 2 0 9 1 9 1 9 1 6 5 3 3 3 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 5 4 5 4 2 2 2 2 0 9 1 9 1 9 1 6 5 3 3 3 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 5 5 5 5 2 2 2 2 0 9 1 9 1 9 1 6 5 3 3 3 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 5 6 5 6 2 2 2 2 0 9 1 9 1 9 1 6 5 3 3 3 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 5 7 5 7 I - 5 8 0 E B 5 p o i n t 5 8 5 8 2 2 2 2 0 9 1 9 1 9 1 6 5 3 3 3 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 5 9 5 9 2 2 2 2 0 9 1 9 1 9 1 6 5 3 3 3 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 6 0 6 0 2 2 2 2 0 9 1 9 1 9 1 6 5 3 3 3 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 6 1 6 1 2 2 2 2 0 9 1 9 1 9 1 6 5 3 3 3 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 6 2 6 2 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P r o g r a m \ S t P a t r i c k \ 1 s t F l o o r 2 27 February 2018 IN P U T : R E C E I V E R S St P a t r i c k W a y Ki m l e y - H o r n 27 F e b r u a r y 2 0 1 8 Ma l i s o s TN M 2 . 5 IN P U T : R E C E I V E R S PR O J E C T / C O N T R A C T : St P a t r i c k W a y RU N : I- 5 8 0 T r a f f i c N o i s e - 1 s t F l o o r Re c e i v e r Na m e No . #D U s Co o r d i n a t e s ( g r o u n d ) He i g h t In p u t S o u n d L e v e l s a n d C r i t e r i a A c t i v e X Y Z ab o v e Ex i s t i n g Im p a c t C r i t e r i a N R in Gr o u n d Ld e n Ld e n Sub'lGoalCalc. ft ft ft ft d B A d B A d B d B 1 1 1 7 0 4 , 5 3 9 . 9 2 0 2 , 5 2 2 . 8 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 2 2 1 7 0 4 , 5 4 0 . 1 2 0 2 , 4 9 7 . 2 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 3 3 1 7 0 4 , 5 4 0 . 0 2 0 2 , 4 7 0 . 9 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 4 4 1 7 0 4 , 5 3 9 . 8 2 0 2 , 4 3 4 . 9 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 5 5 1 7 0 4 , 6 1 1 . 3 2 0 2 , 4 3 6 . 7 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 6 6 1 7 0 4 , 6 1 2 . 1 2 0 2 , 4 8 0 . 2 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 7 7 1 7 0 4 , 6 1 3 . 1 2 0 2 , 5 1 3 . 0 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 8 8 1 7 0 4 , 6 4 1 . 6 2 0 2 , 5 1 3 . 4 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 9 10 1 7 0 4 , 6 7 5 . 8 2 0 2 , 5 1 5 . 0 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 1 0 11 1 7 0 4 , 7 0 1 . 5 2 0 2 , 5 1 3 . 3 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 1 1 12 1 7 0 4 , 7 3 3 . 4 2 0 2 , 5 1 4 . 0 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 1 2 13 1 7 0 4 , 7 5 6 . 6 2 0 2 , 5 1 4 . 0 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 1 3 14 1 7 0 4 , 7 7 8 . 6 2 0 2 , 4 9 9 . 1 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 1 4 15 1 7 0 4 , 7 8 0 . 0 2 0 2 , 4 6 4 . 8 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 1 5 16 1 7 0 4 , 6 8 9 . 2 2 0 2 , 4 1 1 . 8 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 1 6 17 1 7 0 4 , 7 1 9 . 2 2 0 2 , 4 1 0 . 8 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 1 7 18 1 7 0 4 , 7 5 5 . 2 2 0 2 , 4 1 0 . 4 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 1 8 19 1 7 0 4 , 7 9 2 . 9 2 0 2 , 4 1 1 . 7 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 1 9 20 1 7 0 5 , 0 6 1 . 9 2 0 2 , 3 8 7 . 9 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 2 0 21 1 7 0 5 , 0 6 2 . 6 2 0 2 , 4 2 5 . 2 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 2 1 22 1 7 0 5 , 0 6 3 . 2 2 0 2 , 4 4 6 . 7 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 2 2 23 1 7 0 5 , 0 6 2 . 0 2 0 2 , 4 7 9 . 7 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P r o g r a m \ S t P a t r i c k \ 1 s t F l o o r 1 27 February IN P U T : R E C E I V E R S St P a t r i c k W a y 2 3 24 1 7 0 5 , 0 6 2 . 9 2 0 2 , 5 0 9 . 8 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 2 4 25 1 7 0 5 , 0 6 2 . 7 2 0 2 , 5 4 0 . 6 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 2 5 26 1 7 0 5 , 0 6 3 . 7 2 0 2 , 5 7 7 . 5 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 2 6 27 1 7 0 5 , 0 6 1 . 3 2 0 2 , 6 0 2 . 4 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 2 7 28 1 7 0 5 , 0 6 4 . 2 2 0 2 , 6 3 7 . 9 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 2 8 29 1 7 0 5 , 0 9 3 . 2 2 0 2 , 7 2 9 . 7 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 2 9 30 1 7 0 5 , 0 9 4 . 2 2 0 2 , 7 6 1 . 0 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 3 0 31 1 7 0 5 , 0 9 4 . 0 2 0 2 , 7 9 5 . 4 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 3 1 32 1 7 0 5 , 0 9 4 . 2 2 0 2 , 8 2 4 . 2 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 3 2 33 1 7 0 5 , 0 9 5 . 0 2 0 2 , 8 5 8 . 0 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 3 3 34 1 7 0 5 , 0 9 4 . 0 2 0 2 , 9 0 0 . 8 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 3 4 35 1 7 0 5 , 0 9 5 . 1 2 0 2 , 9 3 3 . 7 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 3 5 36 1 7 0 5 , 0 9 3 . 9 2 0 2 , 9 9 3 . 2 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 3 6 37 1 7 0 5 , 0 5 0 . 2 2 0 2 , 9 9 5 . 9 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 3 7 38 1 7 0 5 , 0 0 0 . 8 2 0 2 , 9 8 9 . 3 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 3 8 39 1 7 0 4 , 9 6 7 . 7 2 0 2 , 9 8 4 . 3 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 3 9 40 1 7 0 4 , 9 3 5 . 0 2 0 2 , 9 8 1 . 0 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 4 0 41 1 7 0 4 , 9 0 3 . 7 2 0 2 , 9 7 8 . 3 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 4 1 42 1 7 0 4 , 8 5 6 . 5 2 0 2 , 9 5 6 . 8 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 4 2 43 1 7 0 4 , 8 0 7 . 2 2 0 2 , 9 5 5 . 9 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 4 3 44 1 7 0 4 , 7 5 8 . 1 2 0 2 , 9 5 4 . 2 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 4 4 45 1 7 0 4 , 7 0 9 . 2 2 0 2 , 9 5 0 . 7 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 4 5 46 1 7 0 4 , 7 0 8 . 6 2 0 2 , 9 0 2 . 1 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 4 6 47 1 7 0 4 , 7 0 8 . 8 2 0 2 , 8 6 5 . 8 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 4 7 48 1 7 0 4 , 7 0 7 . 2 2 0 2 , 8 3 0 . 3 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 4 8 50 1 7 0 4 , 7 0 6 . 6 2 0 2 , 7 9 4 . 4 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 4 9 51 1 7 0 4 , 7 0 7 . 3 2 0 2 , 7 7 1 . 7 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 5 0 52 1 7 0 4 , 7 0 6 . 1 2 0 2 , 7 2 2 . 9 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 5 1 53 1 7 0 4 , 7 0 5 . 8 2 0 2 , 6 5 2 . 8 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 5 2 54 1 7 0 4 , 7 4 3 . 8 2 0 2 , 6 5 1 . 4 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 5 3 55 1 7 0 4 , 7 4 7 . 4 2 0 2 , 5 8 7 . 2 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 5 4 56 1 7 0 4 , 7 0 5 . 3 2 0 2 , 5 8 4 . 5 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 N - 2 59 1 7 0 4 , 5 1 3 . 4 2 0 2 , 4 0 4 . 1 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 C o u r t y a r d C 62 1 7 0 4 , 6 9 9 . 7 2 0 2 , 4 8 6 . 3 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P r o g r a m \ S t P a t r i c k \ 1 s t F l o o r 2 27 February IN P U T : B A R R I E R S St P a t r i c k W a y Ki m l e y - H o r n 5 M a r c h 2 0 1 8 Ma l i s o s TN M 2 . 5 IN P U T : B A R R I E R S PR O J E C T / C O N T R A C T : St P a t r i c k W a y RU N : I- 5 8 0 T r a f f i c N o i s e - 1 s t F l o o r Ba r r i e r Po i n t s Na m e Ty p e He i g h t I f W a l l If B e r m Ad d ' t n l Na m e No . Co o r d i n a t e s ( b o t t o m ) He i g h t Segment Mi n Ma x $ p e r $ p e r To p Ru n : R i s e $ p e r X Y Z at Seg Ht PerturbsOnImportant Un i t Un i t Wi d t h Un i t Po i n t Incre-#Up#DnStruct?Reflec- Ar e a V o l . Le n g t h menttions? ft f t $ / s q f t $ / c u y d f t f t : f t $ / f t ft ft ft f t f t B u i l d i n g 1 W 0. 0 0 9 9 . 9 9 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 1 1 7 0 5 , 1 7 2 . 8 2 0 3 , 0 2 3 . 1 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 7 0 5 , 1 7 4 . 4 2 0 2 , 6 7 4 . 2 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 7 0 5 , 5 5 4 . 1 2 0 2 , 6 7 5 . 9 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 4 4 7 0 5 , 5 5 5 . 8 2 0 3 , 0 1 6 . 3 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 5 5 7 0 5 , 1 7 4 . 4 2 0 3 , 0 2 1 . 4 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 B u i l d i n g 2 W 0. 0 0 9 9 . 9 9 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 6 6 7 0 5 , 7 2 5 . 0 2 0 2 , 8 7 1 . 1 3 5 0 . 0 0 1 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 7 7 7 0 5 , 8 0 0 . 7 2 0 2 , 8 7 0 . 3 3 5 0 . 0 0 1 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 8 8 7 0 5 , 7 9 9 . 9 2 0 2 , 8 4 3 . 0 3 5 0 . 0 0 1 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 9 9 7 0 6 , 0 1 6 . 8 2 0 2 , 8 4 0 . 1 3 5 0 . 0 0 1 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 0 1 0 7 0 6 , 0 1 6 . 0 2 0 2 , 7 4 1 . 5 3 5 0 . 0 0 1 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 1 1 1 7 0 5 , 8 0 0 . 7 2 0 2 , 7 4 3 . 7 3 5 0 . 0 0 1 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 2 1 2 7 0 5 , 7 9 9 . 9 2 0 2 , 7 0 8 . 4 3 5 0 . 0 0 1 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 3 1 3 7 0 5 , 7 6 8 . 9 2 0 2 , 6 8 9 . 7 3 5 0 . 0 0 1 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 4 1 4 7 0 5 , 7 2 3 . 6 2 0 2 , 6 9 0 . 4 3 5 0 . 0 0 1 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 5 1 5 7 0 5 , 7 2 4 . 3 2 0 2 , 8 7 1 . 1 3 5 0 . 0 0 1 5 . 0 0 B u i l d i n g 3 W 0. 0 0 9 9 . 9 9 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 1 6 1 6 7 0 5 , 6 7 2 . 2 2 0 2 , 6 3 2 . 2 3 5 0 . 0 0 1 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 1 7 7 0 6 , 0 1 2 . 0 2 0 2 , 6 3 2 . 2 3 5 0 . 0 0 1 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 1 8 7 0 6 , 0 1 4 . 3 2 0 2 , 5 2 5 . 0 3 5 0 . 0 0 1 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 1 9 7 0 5 , 6 7 1 . 0 2 0 2 , 5 3 0 . 6 3 5 0 . 0 0 1 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 0 2 0 7 0 5 , 6 7 2 . 2 2 0 2 , 6 3 2 . 2 3 5 0 . 0 0 1 5 . 0 0 B u i l d i n g 4 W 0. 0 0 9 9 . 9 9 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 2 1 7 0 5 , 6 2 8 . 8 2 0 2 , 4 6 1 . 2 3 5 0 . 0 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 2 2 7 0 5 , 9 8 5 . 7 2 0 2 , 4 4 5 . 2 3 5 0 . 0 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 3 2 3 7 0 5 , 9 7 5 . 8 2 0 2 , 3 2 1 . 8 3 5 0 . 0 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 2 4 7 0 5 , 6 2 1 . 8 2 0 2 , 3 4 0 . 5 3 5 0 . 0 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 2 5 7 0 5 , 6 2 9 . 1 2 0 2 , 4 6 0 . 2 3 5 0 . 0 0 4 0 . 0 0 B u i l d i n g 5 W 0. 0 0 9 9 . 9 9 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 6 2 6 7 0 4 , 2 8 2 . 0 2 0 2 , 5 0 8 . 4 3 5 5 . 0 0 1 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 2 7 7 0 4 , 2 8 2 . 5 2 0 2 , 4 2 5 . 3 3 5 5 . 0 0 1 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 8 2 8 7 0 4 , 4 0 3 . 3 2 0 2 , 4 2 5 . 1 3 5 5 . 0 0 1 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 2 9 7 0 4 , 4 0 3 . 1 2 0 2 , 5 0 9 . 7 3 5 5 . 0 0 1 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 0 3 0 7 0 4 , 2 8 2 . 0 2 0 2 , 5 0 8 . 7 3 5 5 . 0 0 1 5 . 0 0 B u i l d i n g 6 W 0. 0 0 9 9 . 9 9 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 1 3 1 7 0 4 , 3 6 1 . 2 2 0 2 , 7 1 4 . 8 3 5 5 . 0 0 1 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 3 2 7 0 4 , 3 5 6 . 1 2 0 2 , 6 0 9 . 9 3 5 5 . 0 0 1 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 3 3 7 0 4 , 5 0 1 . 9 2 0 2 , 6 0 2 . 9 3 5 5 . 0 0 1 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 4 3 4 7 0 4 , 5 0 8 . 9 2 0 2 , 7 1 2 . 2 3 5 5 . 0 0 1 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 3 5 7 0 4 , 3 6 1 . 8 2 0 2 , 7 1 5 . 4 3 5 5 . 0 0 1 5 . 0 0 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P r o g r a m \ S t P a t r i c k \ 1 s t F l o o r _ r e v 1 5 M a r c h 2 0 1 8 IN P U T : B A R R I E R S St P a t r i c k W a y B u i l d i n g 7 W 0. 0 0 9 9 . 9 9 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 6 3 6 7 0 4 , 3 6 1 . 0 2 0 2 , 8 8 4 . 6 3 5 5 . 0 0 1 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 7 3 7 7 0 4 , 4 7 3 . 4 2 0 2 , 8 1 5 . 3 3 5 5 . 0 0 1 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 8 3 8 7 0 4 , 4 7 6 . 7 2 0 2 , 8 3 5 . 5 3 5 5 . 0 0 1 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 9 3 9 7 0 4 , 5 9 0 . 8 2 0 2 , 8 3 3 . 9 3 5 5 . 0 0 1 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 4 0 4 0 7 0 4 , 5 9 0 . 8 2 0 2 , 7 5 6 . 4 3 5 5 . 0 0 1 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 4 1 4 1 7 0 4 , 4 5 9 . 9 2 0 2 , 7 5 5 . 8 3 5 5 . 0 0 1 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 4 2 4 2 7 0 4 , 3 3 5 . 3 2 0 2 , 8 4 2 . 0 3 5 5 . 0 0 1 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 4 3 4 3 7 0 4 , 3 6 1 . 0 2 0 2 , 8 8 3 . 0 3 5 5 . 0 0 1 5 . 0 0 P r o p o s e d B u i l d i n g W 0. 0 0 9 9 . 9 9 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 4 4 4 4 7 0 4 , 5 4 1 . 4 2 0 2 , 5 5 1 . 1 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 4 5 4 5 7 0 4 , 5 4 0 . 6 2 0 2 , 4 2 0 . 2 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 4 6 4 6 7 0 4 , 6 0 9 . 7 2 0 2 , 4 2 0 . 1 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 4 7 4 7 7 0 4 , 6 1 0 . 1 2 0 2 , 5 1 5 . 5 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 4 8 4 8 7 0 4 , 7 8 5 . 3 2 0 2 , 5 1 5 . 4 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 4 9 4 9 7 0 4 , 7 8 5 . 2 2 0 2 , 4 4 5 . 5 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 5 0 5 0 7 0 4 , 6 6 8 . 4 2 0 2 , 4 4 6 . 5 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 5 1 5 1 7 0 4 , 6 6 8 . 6 2 0 2 , 4 1 4 . 8 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 5 2 5 2 7 0 4 , 8 1 7 . 0 2 0 2 , 4 1 4 . 0 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 5 3 5 3 7 0 4 , 8 1 7 . 0 2 0 2 , 3 8 1 . 1 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 5 4 5 4 7 0 5 , 0 5 9 . 6 2 0 2 , 3 8 1 . 0 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 5 5 5 5 7 0 5 , 0 5 9 . 5 2 0 2 , 7 0 7 . 7 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 5 6 5 6 7 0 5 , 0 9 1 . 8 2 0 2 , 7 0 8 . 4 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 5 7 5 7 7 0 5 , 0 9 1 . 3 2 0 2 , 9 5 8 . 4 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 5 8 5 8 7 0 5 , 0 9 6 . 4 2 0 2 , 9 5 9 . 1 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 5 9 5 9 7 0 5 , 0 9 0 . 3 2 0 2 , 9 9 7 . 8 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 6 0 6 0 7 0 4 , 8 7 3 . 8 2 0 2 , 9 7 2 . 8 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 6 1 6 1 7 0 4 , 8 7 3 . 8 2 0 2 , 9 5 4 . 6 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 6 2 6 2 7 0 4 , 7 1 0 . 6 2 0 2 , 9 5 2 . 9 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 6 5 6 5 7 0 4 , 7 0 8 . 8 2 0 2 , 6 5 4 . 5 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 6 8 6 8 7 0 4 , 7 8 2 . 9 2 0 2 , 6 5 4 . 5 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 6 6 6 6 7 0 4 , 7 8 3 . 2 2 0 2 , 5 8 2 . 2 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 6 7 6 7 7 0 4 , 7 0 5 . 4 2 0 2 , 5 8 2 . 3 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 6 3 6 3 7 0 4 , 7 0 5 . 4 2 0 2 , 5 5 2 . 8 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 6 4 6 4 7 0 4 , 5 4 0 . 6 2 0 2 , 5 5 2 . 8 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 f w y b a r r i e r W 0. 0 0 9 9 . 9 9 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 6 9 6 9 7 0 6 , 4 7 2 . 2 2 0 1 , 9 4 9 . 8 3 5 0 . 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 7 0 7 0 7 0 5 , 4 5 7 . 1 2 0 2 , 0 6 3 . 4 3 5 0 . 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 7 1 7 1 7 0 4 , 5 3 8 . 2 2 0 2 , 1 6 2 . 2 3 5 0 . 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 7 2 7 2 7 0 3 , 6 4 1 . 7 2 0 2 , 2 4 6 . 2 3 5 0 . 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 7 3 7 3 7 0 2 , 8 1 4 . 2 2 0 2 , 3 1 2 . 9 3 5 0 . 0 0 2 . 0 0 W a l l - g a t e W 0. 0 0 9 9 . 9 9 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 7 9 7 9 7 0 4 , 6 6 7 . 8 2 0 2 , 4 4 5 . 6 3 5 0 . 0 0 6 . 0 0 1 . 0 0 4 1 p o i n t 8 0 8 0 7 0 4 , 6 1 0 . 9 2 0 2 , 4 4 5 . 6 3 5 0 . 0 0 6 . 0 0 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P r o g r a m \ S t P a t r i c k \ 1 s t F l o o r _ r e v 2 5 M a r c h 2 0 1 8 RESULTS: SOUND LEVELS St Patrick Way Kimley‐Horn 5‐Mar‐18 Malisos TNM 2.5                                          Calculated with TNM 2.5                                      RESULTS: SOUND LEVELS PROJECT/CONTRACT:St Patrick Way                                               RUN: I‐580 Traffic Noise ‐ 1st Floor                              BARRIER DESIGN:all rec                                                     Average pavement type shall be used unless  a State highway agency substantiates the use  ATMOSPHERICS: 68 deg F, 50% RH                                           of a different type with approval of FHWA. Receiver Name No.#DUsExistingNo Barrier With Barrier LdenLden                          Increase over existingTypeCalculatedNoise Reduction CalculatedCrit'nCalculatedCrit'nImpactLdenCalculatedGoalCalculated Sub'l Inc minus Goal dBAdBA dBAdB dB dBAdB dBdB 1 110 69.966 69.9 10Snd Lvl 69.9 08 ‐8 2 210 70.966 70.9 10Snd Lvl 70.9 08 ‐8 3 310 71.966 71.9 10Snd Lvl 71.9 08 ‐8 4 410 73.266 73.2 10Snd Lvl 73.2 08 ‐8 5 510 70.466 70.4 10Snd Lvl 70.4 08 ‐8 6 610 66.666 66.6 10Snd Lvl 66.6 08 ‐8 7 710 64.166 64.1 10‐‐‐‐64.1 08 ‐8 8 810 65.066 65.0 10‐‐‐‐65.0 08 ‐8 9 1010 65.866 65.8 10‐‐‐‐65.8 08 ‐8 10 1110 65.066 65.0 10‐‐‐‐65.0 08 ‐8 11 1210 61.966 61.9 10‐‐‐‐61.9 08 ‐8 12 1310 59.266 59.2 10‐‐‐‐59.2 08 ‐8 13 1410 50.766 50.7 10‐‐‐‐50.7 08 ‐8 14 1510 43.966 43.9 10‐‐‐‐43.9 08 ‐8 15 1610 74.766 74.7 10Snd Lvl 74.7 08 ‐8 16 1710 74.666 74.6 10Snd Lvl 74.6 08 ‐8 17 1810 74.466 74.4 10Snd Lvl 74.4 08 ‐8 18 1910 73.866 73.8 10Snd Lvl 73.8 08 ‐8 19 2010 70.966 70.9 10Snd Lvl 70.9 08 ‐8 20 2110 68.166 68.1 10Snd Lvl 68.1 08 ‐8 21 2210 66.866 66.8 10Snd Lvl 66.8 08 ‐8 22 2310 65.866 65.8 10‐‐‐‐65.8 08 ‐8 23 2410 65.166 65.1 10‐‐‐‐65.1 08 ‐8 24 2510 64.466 64.4 10‐‐‐‐64.4 08 ‐8 25 2610 63.666 63.6 10‐‐‐‐63.6 08 ‐8 26 2710 63.166 63.1 10‐‐‐‐63.1 08 ‐8 27 2810 62.566 62.5 10‐‐‐‐62.5 08 ‐8 28 2910 61.166 61.1 10‐‐‐‐61.1 08 ‐8 29 3010 60.166 60.1 10‐‐‐‐60.1 08 ‐8 30 3110 58.966 58.9 10‐‐‐‐58.9 08 ‐8 31 3210 58.066 58.0 10‐‐‐‐58.0 08 ‐8 32 3310 56.966 56.9 10‐‐‐‐56.9 08 ‐8 33 3410 55.766 55.7 10‐‐‐‐55.7 08 ‐8 34 3510 54.966 54.9 10‐‐‐‐54.9 08 ‐8 35 3610 52.166 52.1 10‐‐‐‐52.1 08 ‐8 36 3710 35.766 35.7 10‐‐‐‐35.7 08 ‐8 37 3810 45.066 45.0 10‐‐‐‐45.0 08 ‐8 38 3910 47.166 47.1 10‐‐‐‐47.1 08 ‐8 39 4010 47.066 47.0 10‐‐‐‐47.0 08 ‐8 40 4110 43.066 43.0 10‐‐‐‐43.0 08 ‐8 41 4210 34.466 34.4 10‐‐‐‐34.4 08 ‐8 42 4310 40.766 40.7 10‐‐‐‐40.7 08 ‐8 43 4410 46.666 46.6 10‐‐‐‐46.6 08 ‐8 44 4510 57.566 57.5 10‐‐‐‐57.5 08 ‐8 45 4610 57.666 57.6 10‐‐‐‐57.6 08 ‐8 46 4710 57.666 57.6 10‐‐‐‐57.6 08 ‐8 47 4810 57.666 57.6 10‐‐‐‐57.6 08 ‐8 48 5010 57.466 57.4 10‐‐‐‐57.4 08 ‐8 49 5110 57.066 57.0 10‐‐‐‐57.0 08 ‐8 50 5210 54.866 54.8 10‐‐‐‐54.8 08 ‐8 51 5310 56.766 56.7 10‐‐‐‐56.7 08 ‐8 52 5410 55.666 55.6 10‐‐‐‐55.6 08 ‐8 53 5510 41.266 41.2 10‐‐‐‐41.2 08 ‐8 54 5610 43.766 43.7 10‐‐‐‐43.7 08 ‐8  N‐2 5910 75.866 75.8 10Snd Lvl 75.8 2.58 ‐5.5  Courtyard C 6210 64.866 64.8 10‐‐‐‐64.8 5.58 ‐2.5  Dwelling Units  # DUs Noise Reduction  Min Avg  Max  dB dB  dB  All Selected 560 00  All Impacted 140 00  All that meet NR Goal 00 00 RESULTS: SOUND LEVELS St Patrick Way Kimley‐Horn 5‐Mar‐18 Malisos TNM 2.5                                          Calculated with TNM 2.5                                      RESULTS: SOUND LEVELS PROJECT/CONTRACT:St Patrick Way                                               RUN: I‐580 Traffic Noise ‐ 1st Floor                              BARRIER DESIGN:wall‐gate Average pavement type shall be used unless  a State highway agency substantiates the use  ATMOSPHERICS: 68 deg F, 50% RH                                           of a different type with approval of FHWA. Receiver Name No.#DUsExistingNo Barrier With Barrier LdenLden                          Increase over existingTypeCalculatedNoise Reduction CalculatedCrit'nCalculatedCrit'nImpactLdenCalculatedGoalCalculated Sub'l Inc minus Goal dBAdBA dBAdB dB dBAdB dBdB  Courtyard C 6210 64.866 64.8 10‐‐‐‐59.3 5.58 ‐2.5  Dwelling Units  # DUs Noise Reduction  Min Avg  Max  dB dB  dB  All Selected 15.5 5.55.5  All Impacted 00 00  All that meet NR Goal 00 00 RESULTS: SOUND LEVELS St Patrick Way Kimley‐Horn 5‐Mar‐18 Malisos TNM 2.5                                          Calculated with TNM 2.5                                      RESULTS: SOUND LEVELS PROJECT/CONTRACT:St Patrick Way                                               RUN: I‐580 Traffic Noise ‐ 2nd Floor                              BARRIER DESIGN:all rec                                                     Average pavement type shall be used unless  a State highway agency substantiates the use  ATMOSPHERICS: 68 deg F, 50% RH                                           of a different type with approval of FHWA. Receiver Name No.#DUsExistingNo Barrier With Barrier LdenLden                          Increase over existingTypeCalculatedNoise Reduction CalculatedCrit'nCalculatedCrit'nImpactLdenCalculatedGoalCalculated Sub'l Inc minus Goal dBAdBA dBAdB dB dBAdB dBdB 1 110 71.266 71.2 10Snd Lvl 71.2 08 ‐8 2 210 72.466 72.4 10Snd Lvl 72.4 08 ‐8 3 310 73.366 73.3 10Snd Lvl 73.3 08 ‐8 4 410 74.566 74.5 10Snd Lvl 74.5 08 ‐8 5 510 73.366 73.3 10Snd Lvl 73.3 08 ‐8 6 610 70.666 70.6 10Snd Lvl 70.6 08 ‐8 7 710 68.566 68.5 10Snd Lvl 68.5 08 ‐8 8 810 68.866 68.8 10Snd Lvl 68.8 08 ‐8 9 1010 67.766 67.7 10Snd Lvl 67.7 08 ‐8 10 1110 65.666 65.6 10‐‐‐‐65.6 08 ‐8 11 1210 62.366 62.3 10‐‐‐‐62.3 08 ‐8 12 1310 59.766 59.7 10‐‐‐‐59.7 08 ‐8 13 1410 51.766 51.7 10‐‐‐‐51.7 08 ‐8 14 1510 44.766 44.7 10‐‐‐‐44.7 08 ‐8 15 1610 76.966 76.9 10Snd Lvl 76.9 08 ‐8 16 1710 76.866 76.8 10Snd Lvl 76.8 08 ‐8 17 1810 76.766 76.7 10Snd Lvl 76.7 08 ‐8 18 1910 75.966 75.9 10Snd Lvl 75.9 08 ‐8 19 2010 73.966 73.9 10Snd Lvl 73.9 08 ‐8 20 2110 72.066 72.0 10Snd Lvl 72.0 08 ‐8 21 2210 71.566 71.5 10Snd Lvl 71.5 08 ‐8 22 2310 70.666 70.6 10Snd Lvl 70.6 08 ‐8 23 2410 69.966 69.9 10Snd Lvl 69.9 08 ‐8 24 2510 69.066 69.0 10Snd Lvl 69.0 08 ‐8 25 2610 68.466 68.4 10Snd Lvl 68.4 08 ‐8 26 2710 67.966 67.9 10Snd Lvl 67.9 08 ‐8 27 2810 67.366 67.3 10Snd Lvl 67.3 08 ‐8 28 2910 66.166 66.1 10Snd Lvl 66.1 08 ‐8 29 3010 65.266 65.2 10‐‐‐‐65.2 08 ‐8 30 3110 64.266 64.2 10‐‐‐‐64.2 08 ‐8 31 3210 63.366 63.3 10‐‐‐‐63.3 08 ‐8 32 3310 62.366 62.3 10‐‐‐‐62.3 08 ‐8 33 3410 61.266 61.2 10‐‐‐‐61.2 08 ‐8 34 3510 60.266 60.2 10‐‐‐‐60.2 08 ‐8 35 3610 57.466 57.4 10‐‐‐‐57.4 08 ‐8 36 3710 38.066 38.0 10‐‐‐‐38.0 08 ‐8 37 3810 41.666 41.6 10‐‐‐‐41.6 08 ‐8 38 3910 44.866 44.8 10‐‐‐‐44.8 08 ‐8 39 4010 44.766 44.7 10‐‐‐‐44.7 08 ‐8 40 4110 40.566 40.5 10‐‐‐‐40.5 08 ‐8 41 4210 38.766 38.7 10‐‐‐‐38.7 08 ‐8 42 4310 39.066 39.0 10‐‐‐‐39.0 08 ‐8 43 4410 44.666 44.6 10‐‐‐‐44.6 08 ‐8 44 4510 58.966 58.9 10‐‐‐‐58.9 08 ‐8 45 4610 59.066 59.0 10‐‐‐‐59.0 08 ‐8 46 4710 59.066 59.0 10‐‐‐‐59.0 08 ‐8 47 4810 59.066 59.0 10‐‐‐‐59.0 08 ‐8 48 5010 59.166 59.1 10‐‐‐‐59.1 08 ‐8 49 5110 58.966 58.9 10‐‐‐‐58.9 08 ‐8 50 5210 57.166 57.1 10‐‐‐‐57.1 08 ‐8 51 5310 57.966 57.9 10‐‐‐‐57.9 08 ‐8 52 5410 56.766 56.7 10‐‐‐‐56.7 08 ‐8 53 5510 41.366 41.3 10‐‐‐‐41.3 08 ‐8 54 5610 44.566 44.5 10‐‐‐‐44.5 08 ‐8  N‐2 5910 75.866 75.8 10Snd Lvl 75.8 2.58 ‐5.5  Courtyard C 6210 64.866 64.8 10‐‐‐‐59.3 5.58 ‐2.5  Dwelling Units  # DUs Noise Reduction  Min Avg  Max  dB dB  dB  All Selected 560 00  All Impacted 240 00  All that meet NR Goal 00 00 RESULTS: SOUND LEVELS St Patrick Way Kimley‐Horn 5‐Mar‐18 Malisos TNM 2.5                                          Calculated with TNM 2.5                                      RESULTS: SOUND LEVELS PROJECT/CONTRACT:St Patrick Way                                               RUN: I‐580 Traffic Noise ‐ 3rd Floor                              BARRIER DESIGN:all rec                                                     Average pavement type shall be used unless  a State highway agency substantiates the use  ATMOSPHERICS: 68 deg F, 50% RH                                           of a different type with approval of FHWA. Receiver Name No.#DUsExistingNo Barrier With Barrier LdenLden                          Increase over existingTypeCalculatedNoise Reduction CalculatedCrit'nCalculatedCrit'nImpactLdenCalculatedGoalCalculated Sub'l Inc minus Goal dBAdBA dBAdB dB dBAdB dBdB 1 110 73.466 73.4 10Snd Lvl 73.4 08 ‐8 2 210 73.866 73.8 10Snd Lvl 73.8 08 ‐8 3 310 74.366 74.3 10Snd Lvl 74.3 08 ‐8 4 410 75.066 75.0 10Snd Lvl 75.0 08 ‐8 5 510 74.066 74.0 10Snd Lvl 74.0 08 ‐8 6 610 71.466 71.4 10Snd Lvl 71.4 08 ‐8 7 710 69.566 69.5 10Snd Lvl 69.5 08 ‐8 8 810 69.966 69.9 10Snd Lvl 69.9 08 ‐8 9 1010 69.166 69.1 10Snd Lvl 69.1 08 ‐8 10 1110 67.066 67.0 10Snd Lvl 67.0 08 ‐8 11 1210 63.666 63.6 10‐‐‐‐63.6 08 ‐8 12 1310 60.966 60.9 10‐‐‐‐60.9 08 ‐8 13 1410 52.766 52.7 10‐‐‐‐52.7 08 ‐8 14 1510 45.966 45.9 10‐‐‐‐45.9 08 ‐8 15 1610 77.466 77.4 10Snd Lvl 77.4 08 ‐8 16 1710 77.466 77.4 10Snd Lvl 77.4 08 ‐8 17 1810 77.266 77.2 10Snd Lvl 77.2 08 ‐8 18 1910 76.466 76.4 10Snd Lvl 76.4 08 ‐8 19 2010 74.866 74.8 10Snd Lvl 74.8 08 ‐8 20 2110 73.166 73.1 10Snd Lvl 73.1 08 ‐8 21 2210 72.666 72.6 10Snd Lvl 72.6 08 ‐8 22 2310 71.866 71.8 10Snd Lvl 71.8 08 ‐8 23 2410 71.266 71.2 10Snd Lvl 71.2 08 ‐8 24 2510 70.666 70.6 10Snd Lvl 70.6 08 ‐8 25 2610 69.966 69.9 10Snd Lvl 69.9 08 ‐8 26 2710 69.466 69.4 10Snd Lvl 69.4 08 ‐8 27 2810 68.866 68.8 10Snd Lvl 68.8 08 ‐8 28 2910 67.566 67.5 10Snd Lvl 67.5 08 ‐8 29 3010 66.566 66.5 10Snd Lvl 66.5 08 ‐8 30 3110 65.366 65.3 10‐‐‐‐65.3 08 ‐8 31 3210 64.266 64.2 10‐‐‐‐64.2 08 ‐8 32 3310 63.166 63.1 10‐‐‐‐63.1 08 ‐8 33 3410 61.966 61.9 10‐‐‐‐61.9 08 ‐8 34 3510 61.066 61.0 10‐‐‐‐61.0 08 ‐8 35 3610 58.366 58.3 10‐‐‐‐58.3 08 ‐8 36 3710 38.966 38.9 10‐‐‐‐38.9 08 ‐8 37 3810 39.766 39.7 10‐‐‐‐39.7 08 ‐8 38 3910 43.066 43.0 10‐‐‐‐43.0 08 ‐8 39 4010 42.966 42.9 10‐‐‐‐42.9 08 ‐8 40 4110 39.266 39.2 10‐‐‐‐39.2 08 ‐8 41 4210 39.266 39.2 10‐‐‐‐39.2 08 ‐8 42 4310 39.766 39.7 10‐‐‐‐39.7 08 ‐8 43 4410 43.566 43.5 10‐‐‐‐43.5 08 ‐8 44 4510 64.266 64.2 10‐‐‐‐64.2 08 ‐8 45 4610 64.666 64.6 10‐‐‐‐64.6 08 ‐8 46 4710 64.866 64.8 10‐‐‐‐64.8 08 ‐8 47 4810 64.966 64.9 10‐‐‐‐64.9 08 ‐8 48 5010 64.866 64.8 10‐‐‐‐64.8 08 ‐8 49 5110 64.766 64.7 10‐‐‐‐64.7 08 ‐8 50 5210 64.366 64.3 10‐‐‐‐64.3 08 ‐8 51 5310 62.866 62.8 10‐‐‐‐62.8 08 ‐8 52 5410 61.466 61.4 10‐‐‐‐61.4 08 ‐8 53 5510 42.566 42.5 10‐‐‐‐42.5 08 ‐8 54 5610 47.066 47.0 10‐‐‐‐47.0 08 ‐8  N‐2 5910 75.866 75.8 10Snd Lvl 73.3 2.58 ‐5.5  Courtyard C 6210 64.866 64.8 10‐‐‐‐59.3 5.58 ‐2.5  Dwelling Units  # DUs Noise Reduction  Min Avg  Max  dB dB  dB  All Selected 560 00  All Impacted 260 00  All that meet NR Goal 00 00 RESULTS: SOUND LEVELS St Patrick Way Kimley‐Horn 5‐Mar‐18 Malisos TNM 2.5                                          Calculated with TNM 2.5                                      RESULTS: SOUND LEVELS PROJECT/CONTRACT:St Patrick Way                                               RUN: I‐580 Traffic Noise ‐ 4th Floor                              BARRIER DESIGN:all rec                                                     Average pavement type shall be used unless  a State highway agency substantiates the use  ATMOSPHERICS: 68 deg F, 50% RH                                           of a different type with approval of FHWA. Receiver Name No.#DUsExistingNo Barrier With Barrier LdenLden                          Increase over existingTypeCalculatedNoise Reduction CalculatedCrit'nCalculatedCrit'nImpactLdenCalculatedGoalCalculated Sub'l Inc minus Goal dBAdBA dBAdB dB dBAdB dBdB 1 110 73.866 73.8 10Snd Lvl 73.8 08 ‐8 2 210 74.266 74.2 10Snd Lvl 74.2 08 ‐8 3 310 74.666 74.6 10Snd Lvl 74.6 08 ‐8 4 410 75.466 75.4 10Snd Lvl 75.4 08 ‐8 5 510 74.466 74.4 10Snd Lvl 74.4 08 ‐8 6 610 71.866 71.8 10Snd Lvl 71.8 08 ‐8 7 710 70.066 70.0 10Snd Lvl 70.0 08 ‐8 8 810 70.466 70.4 10Snd Lvl 70.4 08 ‐8 9 1010 69.566 69.5 10Snd Lvl 69.5 08 ‐8 10 1110 67.466 67.4 10Snd Lvl 67.4 08 ‐8 11 1210 64.166 64.1 10‐‐‐‐64.1 08 ‐8 12 1310 61.566 61.5 10‐‐‐‐61.5 08 ‐8 13 1410 53.766 53.7 10‐‐‐‐53.7 08 ‐8 14 1510 48.166 48.1 10‐‐‐‐48.1 08 ‐8 15 1610 77.866 77.8 10Snd Lvl 77.8 08 ‐8 16 1710 77.766 77.7 10Snd Lvl 77.7 08 ‐8 17 1810 77.666 77.6 10Snd Lvl 77.6 08 ‐8 18 1910 76.766 76.7 10Snd Lvl 76.7 08 ‐8 19 2010 75.266 75.2 10Snd Lvl 75.2 08 ‐8 20 2110 73.666 73.6 10Snd Lvl 73.6 08 ‐8 21 2210 73.166 73.1 10Snd Lvl 73.1 08 ‐8 22 2310 72.466 72.4 10Snd Lvl 72.4 08 ‐8 23 2410 71.966 71.9 10Snd Lvl 71.9 08 ‐8 24 2510 71.366 71.3 10Snd Lvl 71.3 08 ‐8 25 2610 70.766 70.7 10Snd Lvl 70.7 08 ‐8 26 2710 70.366 70.3 10Snd Lvl 70.3 08 ‐8 27 2810 69.766 69.7 10Snd Lvl 69.7 08 ‐8 28 2910 68.466 68.4 10Snd Lvl 68.4 08 ‐8 29 3010 67.566 67.5 10Snd Lvl 67.5 08 ‐8 30 3110 66.266 66.2 10Snd Lvl 66.2 08 ‐8 31 3210 65.166 65.1 10‐‐‐‐65.1 08 ‐8 32 3310 64.066 64.0 10‐‐‐‐64.0 08 ‐8 33 3410 62.766 62.7 10‐‐‐‐62.7 08 ‐8 34 3510 61.866 61.8 10‐‐‐‐61.8 08 ‐8 35 3610 58.966 58.9 10‐‐‐‐58.9 08 ‐8 36 3710 40.966 40.9 10‐‐‐‐40.9 08 ‐8 37 3810 40.866 40.8 10‐‐‐‐40.8 08 ‐8 38 3910 52.266 52.2 10‐‐‐‐52.2 08 ‐8 39 4010 41.166 41.1 10‐‐‐‐41.1 08 ‐8 40 4110 40.766 40.7 10‐‐‐‐40.7 08 ‐8 41 4210 41.266 41.2 10‐‐‐‐41.2 08 ‐8 42 4310 41.566 41.5 10‐‐‐‐41.5 08 ‐8 43 4410 43.366 43.3 10‐‐‐‐43.3 08 ‐8 44 4510 65.866 65.8 10‐‐‐‐65.8 08 ‐8 45 4610 66.266 66.2 10Snd Lvl 66.2 08 ‐8 46 4710 66.466 66.4 10Snd Lvl 66.4 08 ‐8 47 4810 66.666 66.6 10Snd Lvl 66.6 08 ‐8 48 5010 66.666 66.6 10Snd Lvl 66.6 08 ‐8 49 5110 66.666 66.6 10Snd Lvl 66.6 08 ‐8 50 5210 66.566 66.5 10Snd Lvl 66.5 08 ‐8 51 5310 64.266 64.2 10‐‐‐‐64.2 08 ‐8 52 5410 62.566 62.5 10‐‐‐‐62.5 08 ‐8 53 5510 44.366 44.3 10‐‐‐‐44.3 08 ‐8 54 5610 48.766 48.7 10‐‐‐‐48.7 08 ‐8  N‐2 5910 75.866 75.8 10Snd Lvl 73.3 2.58 ‐5.5  Courtyard C 6210 64.866 64.8 10‐‐‐‐59.3 5.58 ‐2.5  Dwelling Units  # DUs Noise Reduction  Min Avg  Max  dB dB  dB  All Selected 560 00  All Impacted 330 00  All that meet NR Goal 00 00 RESULTS: SOUND LEVELS St Patrick Way Kimley‐Horn 5‐Mar‐18 Malisos TNM 2.5                                          Calculated with TNM 2.5                                      RESULTS: SOUND LEVELS PROJECT/CONTRACT:St Patrick Way                                               RUN: I‐580 Traffic Noise ‐ 5th Floor                              BARRIER DESIGN:all rec                                                     Average pavement type shall be used unless  a State highway agency substantiates the use  ATMOSPHERICS: 68 deg F, 50% RH                                           of a different type with approval of FHWA. Receiver Name No.#DUsExistingNo Barrier With Barrier LdenLden                          Increase over existingTypeCalculatedNoise Reduction CalculatedCrit'nCalculatedCrit'nImpactLdenCalculatedGoalCalculated Sub'l Inc minus Goal dBAdBA dBAdB dB dBAdB dBdB 1 110 74.166 74.1 10Snd Lvl 74.1 08 ‐8 2 210 74.566 74.5 10Snd Lvl 74.5 08 ‐8 3 310 75.066 75.0 10Snd Lvl 75.0 08 ‐8 4 410 75.866 75.8 10Snd Lvl 75.8 08 ‐8 5 510 74.866 74.8 10Snd Lvl 74.8 08 ‐8 6 610 72.066 72.0 10Snd Lvl 72.0 08 ‐8 7 710 70.366 70.3 10Snd Lvl 70.3 08 ‐8 8 810 70.766 70.7 10Snd Lvl 70.7 08 ‐8 9 1010 69.966 69.9 10Snd Lvl 69.9 08 ‐8 10 1110 67.866 67.8 10Snd Lvl 67.8 08 ‐8 11 1210 64.666 64.6 10‐‐‐‐64.6 08 ‐8 12 1310 62.166 62.1 10‐‐‐‐62.1 08 ‐8 13 1410 55.466 55.4 10‐‐‐‐55.4 08 ‐8 14 1510 51.566 51.5 10‐‐‐‐51.5 08 ‐8 15 1610 78.266 78.2 10Snd Lvl 78.2 08 ‐8 16 1710 78.166 78.1 10Snd Lvl 78.1 08 ‐8 17 1810 77.966 77.9 10Snd Lvl 77.9 08 ‐8 18 1910 77.166 77.1 10Snd Lvl 77.1 08 ‐8 19 2010 75.666 75.6 10Snd Lvl 75.6 08 ‐8 20 2110 73.966 73.9 10Snd Lvl 73.9 08 ‐8 21 2210 73.566 73.5 10Snd Lvl 73.5 08 ‐8 22 2310 72.866 72.8 10Snd Lvl 72.8 08 ‐8 23 2410 72.366 72.3 10Snd Lvl 72.3 08 ‐8 24 2510 71.866 71.8 10Snd Lvl 71.8 08 ‐8 25 2610 71.266 71.2 10Snd Lvl 71.2 08 ‐8 26 2710 70.866 70.8 10Snd Lvl 70.8 08 ‐8 27 2810 70.366 70.3 10Snd Lvl 70.3 08 ‐8 28 2910 69.166 69.1 10Snd Lvl 69.1 08 ‐8 29 3010 68.166 68.1 10Snd Lvl 68.1 08 ‐8 30 3110 66.766 66.7 10Snd Lvl 66.7 08 ‐8 31 3210 65.766 65.7 10‐‐‐‐65.7 08 ‐8 32 3310 64.666 64.6 10‐‐‐‐64.6 08 ‐8 33 3410 63.366 63.3 10‐‐‐‐63.3 08 ‐8 34 3510 62.566 62.5 10‐‐‐‐62.5 08 ‐8 35 3610 59.766 59.7 10‐‐‐‐59.7 08 ‐8 36 3710 43.766 43.7 10‐‐‐‐43.7 08 ‐8 37 3810 43.666 43.6 10‐‐‐‐43.6 08 ‐8 38 3910 55.766 55.7 10‐‐‐‐55.7 08 ‐8 39 4010 43.266 43.2 10‐‐‐‐43.2 08 ‐8 40 4110 43.366 43.3 10‐‐‐‐43.3 08 ‐8 41 4210 44.066 44.0 10‐‐‐‐44.0 08 ‐8 42 4310 44.266 44.2 10‐‐‐‐44.2 08 ‐8 43 4410 49.566 49.5 10‐‐‐‐49.5 08 ‐8 44 4510 66.966 66.9 10Snd Lvl 66.9 08 ‐8 45 4610 67.166 67.1 10Snd Lvl 67.1 08 ‐8 46 4710 67.266 67.2 10Snd Lvl 67.2 08 ‐8 47 4810 67.366 67.3 10Snd Lvl 67.3 08 ‐8 48 5010 67.266 67.2 10Snd Lvl 67.2 08 ‐8 49 5110 67.366 67.3 10Snd Lvl 67.3 08 ‐8 50 5210 67.066 67.0 10Snd Lvl 67.0 08 ‐8 51 5310 64.766 64.7 10‐‐‐‐64.7 08 ‐8 52 5410 63.066 63.0 10‐‐‐‐63.0 08 ‐8 53 5510 47.266 47.2 10‐‐‐‐47.2 08 ‐8 54 5610 51.566 51.5 10‐‐‐‐51.5 08 ‐8  N‐2 5910 75.866 75.8 10Snd Lvl 73.3 2.58 ‐5.5  Courtyard C 6210 64.866 64.8 10‐‐‐‐59.3 5.58 ‐2.5  Dwelling Units  # DUs Noise Reduction  Min Avg  Max  dB dB  dB  All Selected 560 00  All Impacted 340 00  All that meet NR Goal 00 00