Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4.05 AlamoCrkPrkDevAgrmntCITY OF DUBLIN AGENDA STATEMENT City Council Meeting Date: September 8, 1986 SUBJECT: Park Development Agreement for Villages at Alamo Creek (Tract 5511) EXHIBITS ATTACHED: 1) Resolution 2) Agreement and Exhibits A and B-1 3) Excerpt from Resolution No. 32-86 Approving Tentative Map 5511. / RECOMMENDATION: ~~AdoptAgreementResolution Authorizing Mayor to Execute FINANCIAL STATEMENT: This agreement provides for the dedication of 5.6 acres to the City for park purposes and construction of Phase I Park Improvements at East Dougherty Hills Park (not to exceed $686,875) by the developer. DESCRIPTION: The Tentative Map and Site Development Review Conditions of Approval for Tract 5511, the Villages at Alamo Creek, were approved by the City Council at its meeting of March 24, 1986. The Condition pertaining to Park Dedication references a memorandum from-the City Manager to the City Council dated March 20, 1986 (copy attached for your reference). The proposal states that the developer's park dedication requirement will be satisfied by a combination of dedicated parkland (East Dougherty Hills Park) and certain improvements to that parkland, which are detailed in the referenced memorandum. The P~tk Development Agreement is a contract between the developer, Rafanelli and Nahas, and the City of Dublin, which confirms the items outlined in the March 20th memorandum. The developer will be securin9 construction of those Phase I Park Improvements in the Certificate of Approval for the Final Map for Tract 5511. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved this document. Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution approving the agreement and authorize the Mayor to execute said agreement. ITEM NO. ~*.~ COPIES TO: Rafanelli & Nahas 20638 Patio Drive Castro Valley CA 94546 RESOLUTION NO. -86 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING PARK DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR EAST DOUGHERTY HIL;kq PARK AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF SAID AGREfl~ENT WT{EREAS, the developer of the Villages at Alamo Creek is required to dedicate parkland to the City of Dublin; and WHEREAS, an Agreement has been drafted which allows the developer acreage credit in return for providing certain improvements to the dedicated parkland; and WHEREAS, this Agreement benefits the City of Dublin by providing park improvements for which there is no other funding; and WHEREAS, the City Council, by its Resolution No. 32-86, approved the terms of said agreement in conjunction with the Tract Tentative Map Approval; NON, THEREfXRRE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin approves this Park Development Agreement and authorizes the Mayor of the City of Dublin to execute same. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 8th day of September, 1986. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Mayor A%~EST: City Clerk PARK DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into this day of September, 1986, by and between the City of Dublin, a municipal corporation ("City") and Rafanelli and Nahas, a California general partnership ("Developer"). RECITALS A. Developer is the owner of certain real property shown on Exhibit A attached hereto, consisting of approximately 145 acres (the "Project Site"). Developer intends to develop the Project Site as a planned residential development (the "Project"). B. The City approved Planned Development PA85-041-1 and Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5511 (the "Tentative Subdi~%sion Map") for the Project Site on March 24, 1986. The recordation of a final subdivision map for the Project Site (the "Master Map") will create the park parcel as shown on Exhibit A, consisting of approximately 5.6 acres and commonly known as East Dougherty Hills Park (the "Park"). C. California law permits a city, by ordinance, to require the dedication of land or payment of fees for park and recreational purposes as a condition to its approval of a final subdivision map. The City has adopted a park dedication ordinance (the "Park Dedication Ordinance"). 1 D. This Agreement sets forth the manner in which City and Developer have agreed that Developer shall satisfy its obligations under the City's Park Dedication Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Park Land Dedication. Upon recordation of the Master Map, Developer shall offer for dedication to the City fee title to the Park and City shall accept such offer of dedication. 2. Park Improvements. (a) Phase I Improvements. City and Developer acknowledge that the proposed improvements to the Park shall be developed in phases. Developer shall, at its cost and in accordance with final design plans and specifications provided by the City, cause to be constructed in a good and workmanlike manner the improvements to the Park which are described in Exhibit B-1 and shown on the preliminary master plan for the Phase-~'Park Improvements by Singer & Hodges, Inc., modified and approved by the Dublin City Council on April 28, 1986. (b) Grading. The Developer shall cause to be prepared, at Developer's cost, the as-built grading plan for the Park (the "Grading Plan"). The Grading Plan will be given to the City of Dublin for the preparation of landscape architectural plans by Singer & Hodges, Inc. Developer, at its cost, shall cause the Park to be graded in a good and workmanlike manner and in accordance with the Grading Plan. (c) Desiqn Plans and Specifications. City shall, at Developer's cost, cause the design plans and specifications and working drawings for the Phase I Improvements (collectively the "Design Plans") to be prepared by Singer and Hodges (the "Park Consultant"). (i) At least fourteen (14) days prior to submitting the Design Plans to either the City's Park and Recreation Commission or the City Council, the City shall submit one set of the Design Plans to Developer. In the event Developer has an objection to the Design Plans, it may appeal to the City Council. City shall submit to Developer, and Developer shall have the right to review any and all modifications to the Design Plans, which materially affect the cost or nature of the Phase I Improvements. In the event Developer has an objection to a modification to the Design Plans, it may appeal to the City Council. · ~ (ii) City shall deliver to Developer the Design Plans, approved by the City Council and the City's Park and Recreation Commission, on or before December 31, 1986. (iii) The City agrees that the Design Plans will provide that drinking fountains installed in the Park shall be located adjacent to pressurized water mains and that Developer shall not be required to extend pressurized pipes for the purpose of installing drinking fountains in the Park. (d) Completion of Phase I Improvements. Developer shall, subject to force majeure (defined below) cause the Phase I Improvements to be substantially completed on or before December 31, 1988. For purposes hereof "force majeure" shall mean hostilities, insurrection, strikes, walk-outs, riots, floods, earthquakes, fires, casualties, acts of God, governmental restrictions imposed or mandated by other governmental entities, enactment of conflicting state or federal laws or regulations, judicial decision, new or supplementary environmental regulations or any cause, whether of the same or different nature, which is beyond the reasonable control and without the fault or negligence of Developer. (e) As set forth in the Owner's Certificate of the Master Map, the dedication of the Park shall satisfy the Developer's obligations under the Park Dedication Ordinance with respect to Parcels 1-145, 147 and 149 of the Master Map. Prior to the further subdivision of or issuance of building permits for Parcels 146, 148 and 150 of the Master Map, Developer covenants that it shall have completed the Phase I Improvements or posted security guarantees for completion satisfactory to the City's Civil Engineer, which covenant shall run with the land and bind Parcels 146, 148 and 150 of the Master Map. (f) Inspection and Survey Costs. Any reasonable costs City incurs in surveying the Park in connection with the preparation of the Design Plans and in inspecting the Park during the construction of the Phase I Improvements shall be paid by Developer. 4 (g) Costs of Phase I Improvements. The itemized cost breakdown for the development costs of the Phase I Improvements attached hereto as Exhibit B-1 is for informational purposes only. In the event the actual cost of the Phase I Improvements exceeds the cost breakdown attached hereto, Developer shall be solely responsible for such increase and, alternatively, in the event the cost of the Phase I Improvements is less than the itemized cost breakdown, Developer shall be entitled to any such savings. 3. Chanqes in Phase I Improvements. City agrees that the Developer's dedication of the Park and construction of the Phase I Improvements shall constitute Developer's full satisfaction of its obligations to the City under the City's Park Dedication Ordinance. City agrees that any changes in the design or nature of the Phase I Improvements to be constructed by Developer shall not increase Developer's obligations to the City u~der the Park Dedication Ordinance. In the event the City requires a change in the design or improvement of the Park which will result in an increase of Developer's cost of construction, the Park Consultant shall determine the cost of such change and determine the manner in which such increased cost will be offset against Developer's obligation to construct the Phase I Improvements. (a) Method of Valuation. If Developer disagrees with the Park Consultant's valuation of the changes to the Phase I Improvements or if Developer disagrees with the manner in which the Park Consultant intends to offset such costs against Developer's obligation to construct the Phase I Improvements, Developer may, within fourteen (14) days of written notice of such proposed change or offset, submit to the City bids for such changes or offset by two (2) independent licensed contractors. In the event the City and Developer are unable to agree upon the valuation of the changes to the Phase I Improvements or the manner in which the cost of such changes shall offset Developer's obligation to construct the Phase I Improvements, the dispute shall be submitted to arbitration in accordance with the provisions of Section 6. (b) Construction of Bridqe. Developer acknowledges that the City wilI require that the Phase I Improvements include°the construction by Developer, at its cost, of a bridge from Village III (as shown on Exhibit A) to the Park. The Park Consultant shall promptly value the cost of such wc~rk and determine the manner in which such costs shall be offset against Developer's obligations to construct the Phase I Improvements. In the event Developer disagrees with the Park Consultant's valuations, Developer and City shall foliow the procedures set forth in Paragraph 3(a) above for resolution of disagreements concerning valuations of work. 4. Fence Desiqn. The City agrees that Developer shall be entitled to design the masonary and tubular steel fence along that portion of Dougherty Road which fronts the Project Site in a manner consistent with the Developer's design plan for the entry from Dougherty Road to the Project Site; provided, however, that Developer shall obtain design review approval from the City for such fence design. 5. Indemnification. (a) Developer hereby agrees to, and shall defend, save and hold City and its elected and appointed boards, commissions, officers, agents and employees harmless from, any and all claims, costs (including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs of suit), liability or damages which (i) arise out of or result from Developer's or Developer's contractors', subcontractors' or employees' construction of the Phase I Improvements and, (ii) arise out of or result from Developer's failure to construct the Phase I Improvements in accordance with the Grading Plan and the Design Plans. (b) City hereby agrees to, and shall defend, save and hold Developer harmless from, any and all claims, costs (~ncluding reasonable attorneys' fees and costs of suit), liability or damages which may be imposed upon, incurred or paid by, or asserted against Developer, the Project Site or the Park arising from, or in connection with the ownership and operation of the Park and any improvements thereon. 6. Arbitration. Any action, controversy, claim or dispute arising out of or relating to the Park Consultant's valuation of the changes to the Phase I Improvements proposed by the City or the manner in which the cost of such changes shall offset Developer's obligation to construct the Phase I Improvements as provided in Section 3, shall, on the written request of either party served on the other, be submitted to arbitration. Such arbitration shall comply with and be governed by the rules and regulations of the American Arbitration Association ("Association"). If the parties cannot agree on one arbitrator to resolve the matter within fifteen (15) days, then an arbitrator shall be promptly appointed by the Association. Any such arbitration shall be held and conducted in Dublin, California. The arbitrator selected must have significant experience in arbitrating matters relating to construction disputes. The arbitration shall commence not less than ten (10) days nor more than thirty (30) days after the arbitrator has been designated. The arbitration shall be concluded as soon as'reasonably possible, and' the arbitrator shall make a written determination of the dispute within fifteen (15) days after the completion of the arbitration hearing% The provisions of Title 9 of Part 3 of California Code of Civil Procedure, including Section 1283.05 thereof, as same may be amended from time to time, permitting expanded discovery proceedings shall be applicable to all disputes which are arbitrated hereunder. The prevailing party in any such arbitration shall be awarded reasonable attorneys' fees, expert and non-expert witness costs and expenses and other costs and expenses incurred in connection with such arbitration, unless the arbitrator for good cause determines otherwise. Costs and fees of the arbitrator shall be borne by the non-prevailing party, unless the arbitrator determines otherwise. The arbitrator's adjudication shall be final and fully binding and enforceable in any court having jurisdiction thereof. 7. No Joint Venture Or Partnership. City and Developer hereby renounce the existence of any form of joint venture or partnership between them, and agree that nothing contained herein or in any document executed in connection herewith shall be construed as making City and Developer joint venturers or partners. 8. Notice. All notices and demands shall be given in writing by certified mail, postage prepaid and return receipt requested. Notice shall be considered received by the addressee three (3) days after deposited in the United States Mail. Unless either party gives notice of a change of address in the manner provided in this Paragraph 8, notices, if to the Developer shall be addressed to: Rafanelli & Nahas 20638 Patio Drive Castro Valley, CA 94546 Attention: Ronald C. Nahas and, if to the City, shall be addressed to: City of Dublin P. O. Box 2340 Dublin, CA 94568 Attention: Richard Ambrose 9. Miscellaneous. (a) Severability. If any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement is held to be invalid or otherwise unenforceable, the rest of the Agreement shall 9 remain in full force and effect and in no way shall be affected, impaired or invalidated. (b) Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts and all so executed shall constitute one agreement, binding on all of the parties hereto. (c) Governinq Law. This Agreement and the rights and duties of the parties hereunder shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. (d) Entire Agreement; Amendment. This instrument contains the final and complete agreement of the parties with respect to the rights granted and obligations assumed herein and supersedes any prior agreement, written or oral. This Agreement may be amended at any time and from time to time, but only by°a writing signed by the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Developer and City have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. ATTEST: By: Its: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY: CITY OF DUBLIN, a municipal corporation. By: Its: City Attorney (Signatures continued on next page) 10 DEVELOPER: RAFANELLI California & NAHAS, general partnership JLA:lj/6 0379A/9.03.6 71679.05 By: Its: 11 M E M O R A N D U M• 4 TO: City Council FROM: a ty Manager • SUBJECT: Villages Development Park Dedication Proposal DATE: March 20 , 1986 • General Background Information - • By law developers are required to dedicate land, pay park fees in-lieu of dedication of park land, or provide a combination of land dedication and park fees in-lieu at the time of City approval of the developers residential final subdivision map. The law also provides that the City may at its discretion give a developer credit for private active recreation areas . The City' s ordinance provides that the park dedication requirement for a similar planned development is calculated based on the following formula : Park Dedication ( in acres ) = . 009 acre per dwelling unit x number of units If the City is desirous of receiving park in-lieu fees , the fee would be based upon the park dedication calculated above, times the fair market value at the time that the final map is approved. A piece of raw land is more valuable when the final map is approved. Staff typically calculates the fair market value of land for park dedication based on comparable land = sales and approvals . If a developer questions the value established by • Staff, the City obtains an appraisal and the appraised value is utilized to establish the fair market value of the land and thus , the amount of park in-lieu fee owed the City by the developer . To date , residential developers have accepted the -fair market value of park dedication established by Engineering Staff and the appraisal process has not been utilized. The Villages Park Requirement Based upon the-City' s Park Dedication Ordinance, the park land dedication requirement for The Villages Development is calculated at 10 . 485 acres if 1165 dwelling units are approved; and 9 . 774 acres , if 1086 dwelling units are approved, as recommended by the City Planning Commission. As part of a previous parcel map consideration, the City Council agreed to give the developer 5 acres credit for the dedication of parkland presently known as East Dougherty Hills Park. The actual park land to be dedicated to the City is approximately 5 . 6 acres in area,. excluding Alamo Creek which traverses the park. The remaining park land dedication requirement is 5 . 485 acres or 4 . 774 acres depending upon the density of the project approved by the City Council . If the City were to give no further credit to the developer for private recreation areas provided in the project, the park in-lieu fee payable to the City would be as shown below, depending on the established land valuation: Park In-Lieu Fees - Range Based on Various Appraised Land Valuation Rates Assuming 1165 Assuming 1086 Land Value -- Dwelling Units Dwelling Units $ 2 . 00/sq ft $ 477 , 853 $ 415, 911 $ 2 . 50/sq ft $ 597 , 317 $ 519 , 889 $ 3 . 00/sq ft . $ 716, 780 $ 623 , 866 $ 3 . 50/sq ft $ 836, 243 - $ 727, 844 • $ 4 . 00/sq ft $ 955, 706 $ 831, 822 E ' ,e. - 1 .: ...... w; ..: ~'? .. - - ' '-'..-f,-L'. i .- '-' ..7~L-~ - ' ' '...' '. ' The folloWing land values were used in the establishment of park in-lieu .~.:,fees-,:fo.rn'other- ~.planned.::de-ve topment~s'," which ~:th~,, City.,-has -iapproved. ~::--:These .~-.: land values calculated times the park land dedication requirement resulted in the payment of park in-lieu fees shown below: In-Lieu Fee Equivalent · Land'Value Per Dwelling Unit Amador Lakes Arbor Creek Morrison Homes $2.37/sq ft $4.50/sq ft $4.50/sq ft $647 $1,590 $1,917 As part of the review of The Villages Planned Development, Staff has contehded.that the land value for the project at the time of final map approval will be in the neighborhood of $3.50-$4.00/sq ft. The developer believes the value of the land to be much less. The developer has also indicated his desire to have the East Dougher~y Hills Park built in conjunction with the construction of his residential units. East Dougherty Hills Park Development Cost Although the design of the East Dougherty Hills Park has not been completed, and that design has not been reviewed by the Park & Recreation Commission~or the City Council, Staff has requested Singer & Hodges to develop a preliminary cost estimate for development of the park based on one of the simpler preliminary park designs. An itemized breakdown of the. development costs is shown below: Basic Park Development 1. Site work and landscaping a. Site preparation and clearing b. Grading c. Drainage pipes and inlets d. Lawn e. Irrigation f. Trees $ 8,400 60,000 25,000 57,600 67,200 21,250 Total $239~,450 Walks, Parking, Lighting, Furniture a. Walks b. Parking Lot (24 spaces) c. Lighting (20 lights) do Park Furniture (1) Drinking Fountains (two) (2) Benches (eight) (3) Trash Receptacles (five) (4) Park Sign e- Water connection & drainage fees $100,000 38,300 64,000 1,600 3,600 2,000 2,5.00 20,600 Total $232,600 Fencing Open rail fence (1,000 linear feet) 6' Vinyl clad chain link fence (1,250 linear feet) Total $ 40,000 11,875 $ 51,875 4. Design/Inspection/Survey Cost (14%) 5. 15% Contingency Total Estimated Basic Park Development Cost $ 73,350 $ 89,600 $686,875 Enhanced Park ImproVements 1- Group picnic~ &~individual picnic areas 2. Bridge (across creek to provide southerly access to park) ~ 3. Children's play area 4. Restroom 5- Lighted Tennis courts (two) 6. Improvements to creek to improve access 7. Design & Inspection (12%) 8. 15% Contingency Total Enhanced Park Improvements 21,800 50,000 40,000 79,800 88,000 unknown 33,600 47,000 $360,200 TOTAL PARK DEvELoPMENT COST * $1,047,075 * Does not include improvements to the creek. As shown above, the cost for completion of this park's development is estimated to be in excess of $1 million. If the City were to phase the development of the park so that the basic improvements were installed first, the cost is estimated at $686,875 for the first phase. If the land was valued at $4.00/sq ft, the park in-lieu fees would fund the basic park improvement and many of the enhanced park improvements. Compromise Park Proposal As stated previously, the developer has indicated a desire to see construction of the East Dougherty Hills Park occur in conjunction with his residential development. Initially, he is interested in only those ~ improvements identified in the Basic Park Development identified above. Staff has indicated that there are insufficient park in-lieu fees generated by other residential developments to fund any portion of the East Dougherty Hills Park without impacting the City's ability to improve other parks, including Kolb, Dolan, Shannon ~nd Mape Parks. In recognition of this fact, as well as the fact that Staff and developer disagree as to the land valuation, Staff and the developer have conceptually agreed to a compromise which Staff recommends the City Council support. The compromise i~ as .follows: Developer Commitment 1. The Developer would construct only the basic park improvements identified above. 2. The Developer would build the park to City design and specifications. City Commitment The City would not require appraisal of property and permit the development of the East Dougherty Hills Park to proceed with development of The Villages. The City would withdraw its condition that a swimming facility for the single family development be constructed- This would result in a cost savings to the developer as well as maintain two single family lots. The City will utilize a Request' for Proposal process to select a firm to provide the working drawings and assist with inspection of the park. The City agrees t° invite David Gates & Associates to submit a Request for Proposal as well as other consultants. The City will endeavor to supply grading plans of the park to the developer in order that the grading of the park can be accomplished within the developer's overall grading t~me frame. 5. The City agrees that drinking fountains installed in the park shall be located adjacent to pressurized mains-Within the irrigation system. Pressurized pipes'will not'specifically,be'extended for the purpose of installing drinking fountains. No sewer hookups are required for the drinking fountains. '/~ '~. i ~ii!i~?~!/i..iJi~i~ii~i.ii~' 6. The City agrees to permit.the developer ~to-design the masonry and tubular steel fence along Dougherty~Road.consistent with the development sound wall and entry design,'subject to City's Site Development Review .... ~.~ i '~---~i-~' ~::~' ' 7. The City agrees to allow the'developer to have input into the park design process in order to.effect cost.savings. The.developer's input 'will not be at the expense of proper, specifications, but will be~ intended to avoid the inefficient expenditure of funds. Under this proposal the developer would not be given credit for private recreation areas. If the City Council were to support this compromise park proposal the developer's park contribution per dwelling unit including land and improvements is estimated to range from $1,337 - $1,~35/unit depending on the approved density. This assumes that the 5 acres dedicated to the City is worth $4.00/sq ft. If a lower land value is given as the developer suggested, the contribution per unit would be.even less. If the City Council requested a contribution for the net acreage toward in lieu fees based upon $4.00/sq ft, the developers contribution would be $1,568 per unit irrespective of the approved density. The developer has submitted a letter dated March 19, 1986 which requests concessions from the City related to other issues involving other aspects of the project. Some of these concessions Staff cannot support because the . ld~nt~_c committments are too vague and broad, specifically items 3 and ~ ' o ;~;=' on page two of the Rafanelli and Nahas letter dated March 19, 1986. Staff recommends support of a compromise park proposal as identified in the Staff report. 25. The subdivider shall enter into an Improvement Agreement with the City for all public improvements. Complete improvement plans, specificatio~s~. and calculatiohs shall beS~bmitted to~'and''r~vieW~d by, 'the City Engineer and other affected agencies having jurisdiction over public improvements prior to execution of the Improvement Agreement. Improvement plans shall show the existing and proposed improvements along adjacent public street(s) and property that relate to the proposed improvements. All required securities, in an amount equal to 100% of the approved estimates of construction costs of improvements, and a labor and material security, equal to 50% of the construction costs, shall be submitted to, and approved by, the City and affected agencies having jurisdiction over public improvements, prior to execution of the Improvement Agreement. PARK DEDICATION 26. Parkland shall be dedicated or in-lieu fees shall be paid, or a combination of both shall be provided prior to issuance of Building Permits or prior to recordation of the Final Map, whichever occurs first, in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance. The parkland dedication required is approximately 10.485 acres (0.009 acres/dwelling units x number of dwelling units). The subdivider/developer shall receive 5.0 acres of credit for the parkland dedication. .The subdivider/developer shall provide certain improvements to the dedicated parkland. The dedicated parkland and associated improvements shall satisfy the developer's total park dedication requirement. The improvements shall be installed to the City's satisfaction within 30 months of the recordation of the Final Map or issuance of Building Permits. The items to be provided shall be as specified in the Compromise Park Proposal portion of the Memorandum from the City Manager to the City Council regarding Villages Development Park Dedication Proposal dated March 20, 1986, as revised and adopted by the City Council. STREETS 27. The minimum uniform gradient of streets shall be 0.5%-and 1% on parking areas, and 2% on soil drainage. The street surfacing shall be asphalt concrete .paving. The City Engineer shall review the project's Soils EngineD~'s structural design. The subdivider shall, at his sole expense, make tests of the soil over which the surfacing and base is to be constructed and furnish the test reoorts to the City Engineer. The subdivider's Soils Engineer shall determine a preliminary structural design of the road bed. After rough grading has been completed, the developer shall have soil tests performed to determine the final design of the road bed and parking areas. 28. An encroachment permit shall be secured from the City Engineer for any work done within the public right-of-way of Amador Valley Boulevard and Dougherty Road where this work is not covered under the improvement plans. UTIL!TImS 29° Electrical, gas, telephone, and Cable TV services, shall be provided underground to each lot or building in accordance with the City policies and existing ordinances. All utilities shall be located and provided within public utility easements, sized to meet utility company standards, or in public streets. 30. Prior to filing of the grading and improvement plans, the developer shall furnish the City Engineer with a letter from Dublin San Ramon Services District (DSRSD) stating that the District has agreed to furnish water and sewer service to the-development. 31. Secure DSRSD agreement to maintain the on-site sanitary sewer collection system excluding individual laterals. Th6 system shall bedesigned as acceptable to DSRSD.