HomeMy WebLinkAboutAttachment 4 Reso for CC to rev
higher in elevation than the parking on Gleason. The goal of the landscape treatment surrounding the building is to
reinforce and support the architectural elements. The layout and species selection of the trees and foundation
plantings is formal and avoids providing hiding places or roof access.
The proposed development is not to our knowledge on a hazardous waste and substances site pursuant to the
Govemment Code Section 65962.5.
Page 3 of3
July 7, 2003
RESOLUTION NO. 04 - 06
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CERTIFY THAT IT REVIEWED AND
CONSIDERED THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTIENVIRONMENT AL IMPACT
STATEMENT (EIR/EIS) FOR THE JUVENILE JUSTICE FACILITY AND EAST COUNTY HALL
OF JUSTICE DATED APRIL 2003
P A 02-030
WHEREAS, Jim Kachick, on behalf of the Alameda County General Services Agency, has requested
approval of a Site Development Review application to construct a 208,408 square foot building comprised of
courtrooms, offices, and associated facilities on 21.77 acres located on the north side of Gleason Drive
between Madigan and Arnold Drives; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant has submitted a complete application and project plans for Site
Development Review PA 02-030 dated received June 1,2004, submitted by Sandis-Humber-Jones (16 Sheets),
PGA Design, Inc. (5 sheets), and Muller and Caulfield (7 Sheets), stamped approved, and on file in the Planning
Department (hereinafter referred to as the "Project Plans"). Included in these plans is the color and material
board dated April 19, 2004, and other plans, text, and diagrams relating to this Site Development Review, and
WHEREAS, The County of Alameda prepared a joint Environmental Impact Report and Environmental
Impact Statement (EIR/EIS), dated April 2003, to determine the potential environmental impacts occurring as a
result of the East County Hall of Justice project. The Final EIR/EIS concluded that the preferred alternative for
the location of the East County Hall of Justice was in Dublin at the subject site. The EIR/EIS identified
mitigation measures to address the environmental impacts identified and the Final EIR/EIS and accompanying
mitigation measures were adopted the Alameda County Board of Supervisors on May 6, 2003; and
WHEREAS, Alameda County is the lead agency for this project, and the City is a responsible agency
under CEQA. As a responsible agency, the City's role is very limited. Rather than certify Lead Agency's
document as adequate, the decision-making body of a responsible agency is required only to certify that it
reviewed and considered the information contained in the EIR/EIS prepared by the Lead Agency according to
CEQA Guidelines, § 15050, subd. (b).); and
WHEREAS, the City of Dublin did review and consider the information contained in the EIR/EIS in
relation to the project as proposed; and
WHEREAS, Staff has concluded that the proposed Site Development Review application falls within
the analysis completed as part of the EIR/EIS and that no additional impacts have been identified; and
WHEREAS, Pursuant to Sections 15162 and 15164 of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) Guidelines, no subsequent EIR/EIS shall be prepared for this project, as no substantial changes have
been proposed to the project which require revisions of the previous EIR/EIS. No new significant
environmental impacts have been identified and no substantial increase in the severity of previously identified
impacts have been discovered; and
ATTACHMENT 4