HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 8.1 - 3186 CDBG Program Review (2)
Page 1 of 6
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: April 21, 2020
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Linda Smith, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program Review
Prepared by: Jim Bergdoll, Senior Planner
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will consider its options to become an Entitlement City and receive
funding directly from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
starting in 2021. The City currently receives CDBG funding through the Urb an County
program administered by Alameda County. The City must notify HUD and the County of
its decision by May 15, 2020 and begin to implement that decision.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Direct Staff to either remain in the Urban County program or seek Entitl ement City
status and notify HUD and Alameda County HCD of that decision.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
If the City remains part of the Urban County program, there would not be a change in
financial impact. Becoming an Entitlement City would cost approximately $30,000 in
consultant time to plan the program in FY 2020-21 and would also include a provision of
staff time. Program administration costs, including staffing, would begin in FY 2021-22
and the cost could be partially offset by the CDBG program which allows 20 percent of
the annual funding allocation to pay for program administration.
DESCRIPTION:
Background
The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program provides annual grants to
states, cities, and counties to develop viable urban communities by provid ing decent
housing and a suitable living environment, and by expanding economic opportunities,
principally for low- and moderate-income persons. The program is authorized under
Title 1 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 and is administere d by
HUD. CDBG funds are allocated to local jurisdictions by HUD using a calculation based
on relative levels of pre-1940 housing, poverty, overcrowding, population, and regional
Page 2 of 6
growth lag.
The City currently receives CDBG funds through the Urban County program
administered by the Alameda County Department of Housing and Community
Development (HCD). The Urban County program is a way for cities with a population of
less than 50,000 to receive CDBG funds (cities over 50,000 may also choose to receive
their CDBG allocation through the Urban County program). Dublin participates in the
Urban County program through a Cooperative Agreement with the unincorporated
Alameda County and the cities of Newark, Emeryville, Albany, and Piedmont.
Dublin’s participation provides approximately $244,000 in CDBG funds to the Urban
County program. A portion of those funds are allocated specifically for Public Service
Grants to fund programs in Dublin, a portion is allocated to countywide service
programs, and a portion is placed into a pool of funds for Capital Grants that are
available to the Urban County jurisdictions on a competitive basis to fund capital
improvements.
Alameda County handles most of the required program administration, including
preparation of the Consolidated Plan, Annual Action Plan, and Citizen Participation
Plan. The Consolidated Plan must be prepared every five years, and include a needs
assessment, market analysis, anti-poverty strategy, goals, and projections. The Annual
Action Plan is prepared by the County prior to the start of each fiscal year and identifies
the goals, projections, and budget for the year. HUD also requires extensive reporting
and program monitoring which is handled by the County. This includes year end and
quarterly reporting of data on people served, demographics, etc., administration of
financial disbursements to grantees, periodic monitoring of every grantee, and financial
reporting on expenditures and balances.
Alameda County HCD administers certain CDBG-funded programs that benefit all the
Urban County jurisdictions. This includes administering a contract with ECHO Housing
to provide tenant/landlord and fair housing services. The County also funds the Minor
Home Repair Program administered by Healthy Homes, and a Rental Housing
Rehabilitation program that is available to Urban County jurisdictions.
Dublin’s share of discretionary CDBG funds are distributed through Public Service
Grants and Capital Grants. Public Service Grants are awarded through the City’s
Human Services Grants Program to local non-profit organizations serving Dublin in
conformance with program guidelines. These grants are awarded annually by the
Dublin City Council after reviewing recommendations made by the Dublin Human
Services Commission. Public Service Grants are limited to 15 percent of the total
annual CDBG funding allocation. Historically, Dublin has received more than its share of
the 15 percent Public Service Grant allocation by utilizing funds that have gone unused
by the other Urban County jurisdictions. This year, Dublin will award approximately
$85,000 in public services grants.
The Capital Grant program is administered by Alameda County to provide funding for
capital improvements. Organizations apply to the County with the City taking the lead on
Page 3 of 6
the application submittal. Approximately $630,000 is available annually to share
amongst the Urban County jurisdictions. This includes a $330,000+/- “capital pool”
which is available for projects through an RFP program, and at least $300,000 in
previously programmed categories like Rental Housing Rehabilitation and Preservation,
and Minor Home Repair. It should be noted that the funds in the “capital pool” are
shared amongst the Urban County jurisdictions and awarded to projects on a
competitive basis. The amount of money available to projects in Dublin can vary from
year to year. Open Heart Kitchen successfully applied for a $330,000 Capital Grant this
fiscal year to build out their new facility in Livermore which will serve the greater Tri -
Valley.
Current Consideration
Every three years, the City has the option to stay in the Urban County program or
become an Entitlement City. The City first became eligible to participate as an
Entitlement City in 2014 when the population reached 50,000. The City Council decided
in 2014 and again in 2017, to remain in the Urban County program. The City must once
again decide whether to remain in the Urban County program and enter into a new
three-year Cooperative Agreement or become an Entitlement City and begin the
process to establish that program. The City must inform HUD and Alameda County
HCD of its decision by May 15, 2020.
ANALYSIS:
The City of Dublin has the option to become an Entitlement City and receive CDBG
funds directly from HUD and take over program administration beginning in 2021 or
remain part of the Urban County program. Table 1 below provides a comparison of the
CDBG components for Dublin under the current Urban County program and as an
Entitlement City. All dollar amounts are provided on an a nnual basis with Urban County
program figures based on the current fiscal year, and Entitlement City figures estimated
based on information provided by HUD.
Table 1. Urban County & Entitlement City Program Matrix
Program Component Urban County Program (FY 2019/20) Entitlement City (Estimated)
CDBG Annual Allocation
(Allocated to programs noted
below)
$244,000 (estimated portion of Urban
County funds attributable to Dublin’s
participation in the program. These
funds are not the exclusive use of
Dublin nor are they a cap on annual
funding available to Dublin based
programs and services)
$250,000 +/- (estimated total amount
that would be available to Dublin in
year 1 of the program)
Public Service Grants (To
non-profit service providers
and limited to 15% max. of
annual allocation)
$36,600 (Note: Can utilize unused
Urban County funds to increase this
amount. For example, Dublin awarded
$85,000 in FY 2019/20 by accessing
unused funds from other Urban County
jurisdictions.
$37,500 (estimated total amount based
on the above number)
Capital Grants (To non-
profit organizations for
capital improvements)
Portion of $630,000 Urban County pool
awarded by County (Recent examples
include: Axis Health $16K loan
$160,000 total to be allocated by
Dublin through RFP (Unused funds
can be carried over into future years
Page 4 of 6
Program Component Urban County Program (FY 2019/20) Entitlement City (Estimated)
payments annually, $30K capital
improvements FY16 and $25K FY17;
CRIL roof replacement $5K FY16)
with certain limitations)
Economic Development
(Job creation for small, low
income owned or operated
businesses)
Amount varies per year and
determined by program administration
and funded from the annual CDBG
allocation based on program priorities
Amount varies per year and
determined by program administration
and funded from the annual CDBG
allocation based on program priorities
Tenant-Based Rental
Assistance (Emergency
housing funds available
partly from CDBG program,
and partly HOME)
Not available CDBG can be used for related support
services outside of 15% services cap.
HOME funds are used to provide
financial assistance
HOME Funds (rental
assistance, down payment
assistance, homebuyer
counseling, affordable
housing production)
Share of $585,000 pool awarded on
competitive basis to organizations
serving Urban County jurisdictions
$75,000 (program administered by
City, but funds continue to be
administered by HCD)
HUD 108 Loans (For Capital
Projects or Programs as 20-
year, low interest loan)
Available only in partnership with an
Entitlement City (example: Axis Health)
Up to 5x CDBG allocation (total
cumulative balance of all outstanding
108 loans cannot exceed this amount)
Program Administration
(20% max. of annual
allocation to cover program
administration, and
preparation of Consolidated
Plan, Annual Action Plan,
Citizen Participation Plan)
$6,600 to Dublin; and $42,200 to
Alameda County
$50,000 to Dublin
Consolidated Plan Prepared every 5 years by County with
staff input (costs offset by Program
Administration funds)
Prepared every 5 years by the City
(estimated cost: $30,000)
Annual Action Plan and
Citizen Participation Plan
Prepared annually by County with staff
input (costs offset by Program
Administration funds)
Prepared annually by City (costs offset
by Program Administration funds)
Monitoring and Reporting
to HUD
Prepared annually by the County Prepared annually by the City
Comparable/Nearby Entitlement Cities
Table 2 below provides the CDBG allocation for FY 2020 - 21 for comparable and
nearby Entitlement Cities.
Table 2. Comparable Entitlement City Annual Allocations
City Population
1/1/2019 (DOF)
CDBG Allocation
FY 2020/21*
Santee (San Diego County) 58,408 $276,000
San Clemente (Orange County) 65,405 $356,000
Walnut Creek (Contra Costa County) 70,212 $342,000
Pleasanton (Alameda County) 80,492 $342,000
Livermore (Alameda County) 91,039 $437,000
Dublin (Alameda County) 64,577 $250,000*
*Entitlement City figures for Dublin estimated based on information provided by
HUD.
Page 5 of 6
The cities of San Ramon (population 72,073) and Brentwood (population 51,335) are
examples of cities which are similar in size and demographics to Dublin that are not
Entitlement Cities, and do not plan to change that status.
As an example of how CDBG funds can be spent by category, Table 3 below shows
how the cities of Livermore and Pleasanton proposed spending their a nnual CDBG
allocations as Entitlement Cities in FY 2019-20.
Table 3. Livermore and Pleasanton CDBG Allocation by Category FY 2019 -20
Program Component Livermore Pleasanton
Capital Grants
Homeowner Housing Rehabilitation $160,000 --
Tri-Valley REACH Home Maintenance & Repairs $12,000
Community Facilities Rehabilitation -- $183,000
Axis Clinic Loan Repayment -- $23,000
Public Service Grants
Misc. Community Services $72,000 $48,000
Other
Tenant-based Based Rental Assistance/
Emergency Rehousing
$108,000 --
Administration $88,000 $64,000
Total $440,000 $318,000
Urban County Program
Historically, Dublin’s CDBG program efforts have primarily focused on Public Service
Grants. If Dublin were to remain in the Urban County program, there appear to be
opportunities for the City to expand its CDBG program to further utilize available
funding, particularly in the Capital Grant and Economic Development categories. These
efforts would require coordination with Alameda County HCD and allocation of
additional staff resources to the CDBG program. These funds would be drawn from the
Urban County pool of funds ($630,000+/-) for Capital Grants. Potential uses of Capital
funds include:
• Single-Family Home Rehabilitation or Weatherization Grants.
• Incentivize the creation of Junior Accessory Dwelling Units.
• Community Facility Rehabilitation and Preservation - Expand facilities such as
Tri-Valley Haven.
• Assist non-profit organizations to acquire, rehabilitate and/or preserve
apartments for low-income households.
• Land Acquisition for New Affordable Housing.
• Public Works projects that improve ADA accessibility.
Page 6 of 6
The City could also potentially utilize CDBG Economic Development funds for job
creation/retention activities including establishment, stabilization and expansion of small
businesses if they are either owned by low income people or employ low income
workers.
If the City Council elects to remain in the Urban County program, but desires to expand
the programs funded through CDBG, they cou ld direct Staff to pursue such
opportunities.
Entitlement City
Becoming an Entitlement City would provide the City with greater control over the
CDBG program administration and certainty regarding annual Capital Grant funding. But
it could also reduce the maximum amount of potential Capital Grant and Public Service
Grant funding available each year because we could no longer utilize unused funds in
the Urban County pool (Please refer to the discussion immediately above for examples
of potential programs that could use capital funds). With that control would also come
additional work to administer the program. In addition to the upfront consultant time and
cost to plan the program, Staff believes additional staff time would be necessary to
manage the CDBG start up and ongoing program. This would either come in the form
of a redeployed staff resource or a staff augmentation through a consultant.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
This information report is not subject to the requirements of the California Environment al
Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 as it does not meet
CEQA’s definition of a project and will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in
the environment.
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:
None.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
None.