HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 4.01 Draft CC 11-6-07 Min
][)) RAFT
]JllNlIJn:5 oor l1HHK rcIlTIf C01lJNCXn..
OW l1HHE: em ow IDJ1IJfffilI.JN
U(fii~R IMHKlK']['][N6 - N<OlW'mlBHKlR. (5p 2CC1
CLOSlED SlESSION
A closed seSSIOn was held at 6 38 pm, regardmg
I CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION
Government Code sectIOn 549569, subdivIsIOn a
City of Dub 1m v Ralph Gt!, et aI, Alameda SuperIOr Court No VG05241773
II CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION
Government Code section 549569, subdiViSIOn a
Name of case Arroyo Vista Tenants AssocmtlOn, Rhenea Keyes, Andres
Arroyo, Darlene Brown, Elise Veal v City of Dublin, Dublm Housmg
AuthoTlty, Housing AuthoTlty of Alameda County, and Does 1 through 20,
inclUSiVe, Alameda County SuperlOr Court RG 07351015
--<>
A regular meetmg of the Dublm City CouncIl was held on Tuesday, November 6,2007, m
the Council Chambers of the Dublm CiViC Center The meetmg was called to order at
7 04 P m by Mayor Lockhart
<>-
ROLL CALL
PRESENT Councllmembers Hildenbrand, Oravetz, Sbrantt and Scholz, and Mayor
Lockhart
ABSENT None
-0
DUBL][N C][TY COUNC][L MJINUTlES
VOLUMlE 26
RJEGULAR MJEE'HNG
NOVIEMBER 6, 2007
PAGE 4138
if, \
][)) lRA18"f
PLEDGE OF ALLEGJIANClE
The pledge of allegiance to the flag was recited by the Council, Staff and those present
<>
RlEPORT ON CLOSED SIESSJION ACTJION
Mayor Lockhart advised that no reportable actiOn had been taken
-<).
ORAL COMMlUNICA TJIONS
Introduce New lEmplovees
705 pm 3 1 (700-10)
Commumty Development Director Jen Ram mtroduced new Code Enforcement Officer
Anthony Romero
Parks & Commulllty ServIces DIrector Diane Lowart mtroduced new Recreatton
Techmcian, Angela H Gamez
The Council welcomed Mr Romero and Ms Gamez to the City of Dub 1m Staff
<>-
Apponntments to Clhzerns/OIl"2:annzatlOD of the Year Ad! ]floc Committee
709pm 32 (61030)
Deputy City Clerk Carohne Soto presented the Staff Report and adVised that each year the
City of Dublm recogmzed a Citizen, young citizen and organIzation of the year at Its
Volunteer RecogmtlOn Event As part of thiS process, an Ad Hoc Committee compnsed
of two DublIn CouncIlmembers was needed to perform dutIes mcludmg arrangmg for
impartial Judgmg and selectIOn of wmners The City CouncIl would consider the
appomtment of two Councllmembers to the Ad Hoc Committee
DUBL][N CJITY COUNCJIL MINUTES
VOLUME 26
RlEGULAR MElETING
NOVlEMBER 6, 2007
PAGE 4139
][))lRAJF'JI'
Vm Hildenbrand asked when the nommatlOn penod would begm
Deputy City Clerk Soto responded the nommatIOn penod would begm at the end of
November and close January 31,2008
On motion of Vm HIldenbrand, seconded by em Oravetz and by unanimous vote, the
Councll appoInted Mayor Janet Lockhart and Councilmember Sbrantl to the Ad Hoc
Committee
- <>
PublIc Comments
7l1pm 33
John Zukoskl, Dubhn reSIdent, commented on the future extenslOn of DublIn Boulevard
and asked if there would be any measures to mitIgate traffic flow durmg commute hours
or proVIde trees or some type of coverage
Pubhc Works Director Mehssa Morton commented there was a landscapmg plan that
would Incorporate street trees along Dubhn Boulevard
-<>
CONSENT CALlENDAR
7 14 P m Items 4 1 through 4 13
Mayor Lockhart pulled Item 4 3 for discussIOn at the request of a member of the pubhc
On motIOn of Vm Hlldenbrand, seconded by Cm Oravetz and by unammous vote the
Counctl took the followmg actIOns
Approved (4 1) Mmutes of Regular Meetmg of October 2, 2007, SpeCIal Meetmg of
October 3, 2007, and Regular Meetmg of October 16,2007,
Approved (4 2 330-40) the Budget Changes,
DUBL][N C][TY COUNCIL MINUflES
VOLUME 26
lREGULAR MlEE TING
NOVlEMBER 6. 2007
PAGE 440
IDRAlF1I'
Authonzed (4 4 600-35) Staff to SOhCit bids for Contract No 07-10, Village Parkway
Soundwall Pamtmg
Adopted (4 5 360-20)
RESOLUTION NO 1941- 07
ORDER][NG 1'JHLE ANNEXATJION OF FALLON VILLAGE (TRACT 7586)
1'0 TJHIE DUBLIN RANCJHI STRlEJE1' LJIGHTIING MA][N1'JENANCE
ASSESSMENT DJISTRICT 99-1
Approved (4 6 600 30) Change Order #2 for Callander ASSOCiates Landscape
ArchItecture, Jnc m the amount of$5,727
Adopted (4 7 600 60)
RJESOLU1'JION NO 195 - 07
APPROV][NG TRACT IMPROVlEMEN1' AGRlEEMENT WI1'JHI
LENNAR 1EI0MlES OF CALJIFORNIA, JINC , FOR TRACT 7282, AND
ACCEP1'JING IMPROVEMENTS AND APPROVING REGULA TORY
TRAFFJIC CONTROL DEVJIClES FOR BRANNJIGAN STREET
ReceIved (4 8 320-20) City Treasurer's Investment Report for l,t Quarter 2007-2008
Received (4 9 330-50) Fmancial Reports for the months of July, August, and September
2007
Adopted (4 10 360-60)
RESOLUTION NO 196 - 07
SlE1'TING A lPlUBLJIC JHIEARlING ON 1'JHIE FORMATION OF THE lFALLON
VILLAGE GJEOLOGIC JHIAZARD ABATEMENT DISTRIlCT
DOOLIN CllTY COUNCIL MJINU1'ES
VOLUME 26
REGULAR MlEETING
NOVlEMBJER 6, 2007
PAGE 441
]J)lRAJF'f
Adopted (4 11 600-30)
l
RlESOLU110N NO 197 - 07
APPROVING A CONSULTING SIERVIClES AGREEMlEN1'
WITH R3 CONSULTING GROUP
Adopted (4 12600-30)
]RESOLU1'JION NO 198 - 07
APPROVING SALE AGREEMENT WITH
OHLONlE PRlESlERVE CONSlERV A 'nON BANK FOR
PURCIHIASE OF CONSERVATION CREDrJI'S FOR THE
][-580IlFALLON ROAD ][NTERCHANGE ][MPROVlEMlENT PROJECT
and authonzed Mayor Lockhart to Sign the agreement
Approved (4 13 300-40) the Warrant Register In the amount of $4076,84292
Mayor Lockhart pulled Item 4 3 (450-30) Emerald Place Retail Center for dlSCUSSlOn at
the request of MIChael Lutz, Dublin reSident
Michael Lutz Dublin reSident stated In relatzon to Item 43 he was In Opposltzon to
vertIcal creep or anything hIgher than what the City currently had as far as blaldlng
height
DOOLIN Crn{ COUNC][L M][NUTlES
VOLUMlE 26
REGULAR MlEET][NG
NOVEMBER 6, 2007
PAGE 4412
][))lRAlF'f
On motIOn of em Sbrantl seconded by em Scholz and by unammous vote, the CouncIl
adopted (4 3 450-30)
ORDINANCE NO 22 - 07
APPROVING AMENDING THE ZONING MAP TO REZONE PROPERTY
TO THE PD- PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT AND APPROVING
A RELATED STAGE 1 DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE EMERALD PLACE
RETAIL CENTER PROJECT, PA 07-019
<>
WRITflEN COMMUNICATIlONS - None
<>
PUBLU:: H:EARJINGS
MItIgated! NegatIve DeclaratIOn, West Dublm BART Specnfic Plan
Amendment, Stage :n. Development PRaIll Amendment and Stage 2 Planned
Development Rezone for a 309-Umt Resullenbal CommunIty. PA 06-009 Wmdstar
7 18 P m 6 1 (400-20/410-55/450-30)
Mayor Lockhart read aloud a request by the applicant, Wmdstar Commumtles, to contmue
thiS item to the November 20, 2007, City CounCIl meetmg
On motlon of Cm Sbrantl, seconded by Vm Hildenbrand and by unanImous vote, the
CouncIl approved the request by the apphcant, Wmdstar CommumtIes, to contmue the
Item to the November 20, 2007, CIty Council meetmg
<>
DUBLJIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
VOLUME 26
RlEGULAR MlEET][NG
NOVEMBER 6,2007
PAGIE 443
][))RAlF'f
PubBlc Hearnng
An Ordmalllce Repealmg and Adoptmg
New Chapters 5 08, "lFlIl'e Code," and 7 32, "Bmldmg Code," allld Ameilldmg
Chapters 7 28, "Bunldl1llg ReguBatDon AdlmDDlstratIOn," 7 36, "lElectrIcal Code,"
7 410, "Plumbml!: Code," and 7 44, "MechaDlcal Code," of the Dublm MUDRcIIDal Code
7 19 p m 62 (610-20)
Mayor Lockhart opened the publIc hearmg
Semor Buddmg OfficIal Gregory Shreeve presented the Staff Report and adVised that the
CIty CouncIl would reView an Ordmance repealmg and adoptmg new chapters to the
Dublm MUfilcIpal Code Because of a clencal error, the second resolutiOn on the Staff
Report would be brought back to the CIty CounCil for consideratlOn of adoptIOn at the
November 20 2007, City CouncIl meetmg
Chns Dado, Dublm reSIdent, asked If any modificatIOn of a home reqUIred a new code
upgrade for smoke detectors
Semor Plannmg OffiCIal Gregory Shreeve replIed yes, the upgrade would be m regard to
battery-operated smoke alarms
Mayor Lockhart closed the public hearmg
On motIon of Cm Oravetz, seconded by Vm HIldenbrand and by unammous vote, the
CounCIl adopted
RESOLUf][ON NO 199 - 07
APPROVING lFINDJINGS REGARDING TlHllE NEED FOR AMENDMENTS TO
PROV.D.SIONS JIN TIHlE CALmFORNIA BU][LDING STANIDARDS CODlE AS
ADOPTlED BY THE STATE OlF CALIFORNIA, JIN 1'HIE CALJIFORNIA CODE OF
lRJEGULAl'IONS, TITLE 241, TO BE ADOPTED BY REFIERlENCIE JlN 1'HIE
DUBL][N MUNJICIPAL CODlE
DUB!LIN C][TY COUNCIL MIN1Ul'lES
VOLUME 26
REGULAR MJEE'f][NG
NOVlEMBIER 6, 2007
PAGE 44141
][))RAlFT
and waived first readmg and INTRODUCED Ordmance Repeahng Chapters 508, "FIre
Code,' and 7 32, "BuIldmg Code," Addmg Chapters 5 08, "Fire Code," and 7 32,
"BUlldmg Code," and Amendmg Chapters 728, 'Bmldmg RegulatIOn AdmmistratIOn,"
7 36, "Electncal Code," 7 40 "Plumbmg Code," and 7 44, "Mechamcal Code," of the
Dublm MunIcIpal Code m Order to Adopt by Reference and Amend the PrOViSIOns of the
2007 EditIon of the CahfornIa BUIldmg Standards Code TItle 24, CalIfornIa Code of
RegulatlOns
<>
PublIc lHIeall"lng
Amendment of DllIbBm MllIDnCIpal Code Chapter 240
ReBatmg to UnclaImed ProlPerty and AddItIon of DefinntIOn
folf' the Term "County" to DunbBnn MUDlcmal Code SectIon 1 04 020
7 26 p m 6 3 (610 20)
Mayor Lockhart opened the pubhc heanng
AdmmIstratlve Services DIrector Paul Rankm presented the Staff Report and adVised that
as part of a comprehenSive update to the Dublm MUlllcipal Code, the CIty Council
consIdered an ordmance regardmg a proposed amendment to Chapter 2 40 Relatmg to
Unclaimed Property at Its June 5, 2007, CIty CounCil meetmg At that meetmg, the
Council directed Staff to reVise the ordmance to establIsh a "lost and found" for property
turned mto the CIty and to proVIde for notIficatIOn of found items On the CIty's website
No testImony was receIved by any member ofthe pubhc relatIve to thIS issue
Mayor Lockhart closed the publIc hearIng
On motlon of em Oravetz, seconded by Cm Sbrantl and by unammous vote, the Council
Waived the first readmg and INTRODUCED Ordmance Amendmg Chapter 2 40 of the
Dublm MumcIpal Code relatmg to UnclaImed Property and Addmg a DefimtlOn to
Sectlon 1 04020 of the Dublm Municipal Code
<>
DUBL][N CITY COUNCIL MllNUl'ES
VOLUME 26
RJEGULAR MlEETJING
NOVlEMBER 6, 2007
PAGE 41415
IDlRAlF'f
PunbRnc Hearmg
11'0 ConSider AdoptIon of III Resolutnon of NeceSSity to Condemn Interest m R.eal
Property at 11837 Dublm Boulevard for CapItal Improvement Program (elF)
ProJect No 95556 - DublIn }ll"Istorlc Park ACqUisItion (JH[entaee Center JExlPanslOn)
7 34 p m 64 (295-30)
Mayor Lockhart opened the pubhc heanng
CIty Manager Rlchard Ambrose presented the Staff Report and advised that m order to
move ahead wIth the Hentage Center ExpansiOn, the City must acqUlre mterest m real
property at 11837 Dubhn Boulevard
No testImony was received by any member of the pubhc relatIve to thIS issue
Mayor Lockhart closed the pubhc heanng
Cm SbrantI stated that the findmgs In the Staff Report were well laid out and m order
On motlon of Vm Hildenbrand, seconded by em Scholz and by unammous vote, the
CouncIl adopted
RJESOLU1'ION NO 200 - 07
DlETIERMINJ[NG TlHIA1' THlE PUBlL][C INTlERlES1' AND NIECESS][TY REQU][RE
THE ACQUISI1'JION OIP' CERTAIN PROPlER.TY ][NTERlESTS AND DIREC'fING
1'B]E lFILING OlF lEM][NJENT DOMAJlN PR.OClEEDINGS lFOR THIE CAPITAL
JIMPROVEMENl' PROGRAM (CJI!P) PROJECT NO 95556 - DUBLJIN HJISTORJIC
PARK PROJECT (HER][1'AGJE CENTER EXPANSJlON)
0-
UNlFJINJISJH[lED BUSJINESS - None
<>-
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIl. MJINUTJES
VOl.UMlE 26
RlEGULAR MlEJE'f][NG
NOVJEMBER 6,2007
PAGlE 4416
][))lRAIP''f
NEW BUSJINIESS
AddntIOn of Crossmg Guard and
Safety Improvements at Tassanara Road/GReason Dnve IntersectIOn
7 39 p m 8 1 (590-40/590-50)
Traffic Engmeer JaImee BourgeOls presented the Staff Report and adVised that the City
CounCIl would consIder placement of a crossmg guard and safety improvements at the
mtersectIon of TassaJara Road/Gleason Dnve for improved pedestnan access safety
to/from Eleanor Murray Fallon School
em Oravetz asked how long It would take to Implement these improvements If the
CouncIl approved the request tomght
Traffic Engmeer BourgeOls stated the first step, implementmg SIgnal timmg changes
would have to be done by the County but that could be done withm the next couple of
days A crossmg guard was ready to start work Signs and markmgs could be done
shortly, so improvements could be completed withm the next week
Dr Stephen Hanke, Supermtendent of Dub 1m Umfied School Distnct, stated he wanted to
stress the importance of safety to the School DiStrict He urged the CouncIl to support
Staff s recommendatlOn and also thanked Council for conSIderatIon of the item
Vm HIldenbrand stated she drove thIS mtersectIon every day and wOITled about students
at thIS mtersectlOn She was glad that Citizens had brought thIS concern to Staff s
attentIOn
Cm Scholz thanked the parents that brought thiS item to the City'S attentlOn
On motIon of em Scholz seconded by Cm Sbranti and by unammous vote, the City
CounCIl approved the additlOn of a crossmg guard and other safety improvements at the
mtersectlOn of TassaJara Road/Gleason Dnve to improve pedestnan access safety at
Eleanor Murray Fallon School, and approved a budget change to the Crossmg Guards
operatmg budget m the amount of$7,769 for Fiscal Year 2007-2008
DUBLIN CITY COUNCJIL MINUflES
VOLUME 26
RJEGULAR MEE1'][NG
NOVlEMBlER 6, 2007
PAGlE 447
lD>lRAlF'f
<>
JInntnatlOn of a GeneraR Plan allRd
JEastern Dublm SpecIfic Plan Amenndment Study of a PortIon of Property
Known as Area JH[ of DublIn Ranch, or Commonlv Known as the Grafton Plaza SIte
7 51 pm 82
(410-55/420-30)
Planmng Consultant Mike Porto presented the Staff Report and adVised that the City
Councll would deCide if the City should undertake a General Plan Amendment/Eastern
Dubhn SpeCific Plan Study for a portIOn of property known as Area H of DublIn Ranch,
or commonly known as the Grafton Plaza Site
John Zukoskt, Dublm reSIdent, spoke of what he referred to as posItive pomts of the
Grafton Plaza project, wIth the exceptlOn of the resIdentml flats The towers themselves
would be an eyesore and obstruct the View, and could pOSSibly be a hazard m regard to the
Livermore auport He mentlOned office/condos as a pOSSIble optlOn at the project He
requested the City Council take the reSidential portlOn of the project off the table
Al Albarran, Dubhn reSident, spoke agamst bmldmg of the Grafton Plaza project
Chns Didato, DublIn reSident, stated the Grafton Plaza project was not the best project for
Dublm There would need to be addItlonal pohcmg and he belIeved the traffic survey for
the project was flawed Zonmg m the City should stay as it was currently He was also
concerned about available parkmg m the area He dId not beheve a high nse tower fit mto
the area
George Zika, Dubhn reSIdent, spoke of the mappropnateness of puttmg resIdenhal
development m thIS area He asked that the CouncIl look at thiS project m relatIOn to a
Jobslhousmg balance, and also the CIty s fiscal mfrastructure The City needed busmess-
to-busmess sales taxes to keep servIces gomg The City should take a look at the fiscal
impact thiS project would have on the CIty
RIch Guarienti, DublIn reSident, stated the City did not need a big study There did not
need to be any residentlal m thiS project The commercial retml that could support the
DUBLIN C][TY COUNCIL MIN1U1'ES
VOLlUMlE 26
RlEGULAR MlElE1'][NG
NOVJEMBlER 6, 2007
PAGE 448
DRAlFT
campuslretail was appropnate There might need to be adjustments to what was
campus/retall The Cay mIght desIgnate a height or story lImIt He urged the CouncIl to
deny the proposal
Ramoncito Firmeza, Dublm reSIdent, stated hiS opposition to further reSIdentIal projects m
the City There was a Delta water cnSIS that was a statewide issue Metro water agencies
were predictmg water ratIOmng He asked the CouncIl to help control mventory of new
homes and development
BIll Schaub, Plannmg CommISSlOner Chmr and Dublm reSident, suggested the Council
conSider height lImIts m relatlOn to where people lIved, what their view would be, lookmg
out towards the proJ ect
Ron Boggs, DublIn reSident, stated the City had the VISion and leadershIp to take on thiS
project
Jeff Keihl, Dublm reSident, stated that before the study was done, he would lIke to see
directlOn from the City CouncIl regardmg heIght IImItatlOns
Mayor Lockhart read comments from Roxanne Johannes, Dublm reSident Key items Ms
Johannes noted were commumty, fiscal responsibllIty and scalabIhty
Dave Chadbourne, Land Plan ASSOCIates, Pnncipal Planner for the Grafton Plaza ProJect,
stated he was avmlable to answer questIOns, If necessary
<>
RECESS
8 32 p m
Mayor Lockhart called for a bnef recess
Councilmembers present at 8 43 p m
The meetmg reconvened With all
<>
DUBLIN C][TY COUNC][L MINUTES
VOLUMlE 26
RlEGULAR MlElE1'ING
NOVIEMBlER 6,2007
P AGlE 449
][)) RAlFT
Mayor Lockhart explamed that City Manager Ambrose would go through a senes of
questIOns With the Council, to dISCUSS issues, take a straw poll and garner directIOn, m
aSsociatIOn WIth the project ThIS was not to approve a bUlldmg or project, but to start a
process to' look at what project the Counell would be considenng
CIty Manager Ambrose stated the questIOns were desIgned to try to provide an envelope
for WhICh the apphcant could design a project whlCh would meet the Council's
expectatIOns
City Manager Ambrose asked m regard to Commerclal/Retail, QuestIOn # 1 Are the uses
(not necessanly anCillary to a Campus Office land use) that are proposed by the ApplIcant
appropnate for the Site If so, which are appropnate a) Hotel b) Spa, c) Sports club?
Cm Scholz stated she was not mterested m seemg any ofthe three uses
Cm Oravetz stated he supported all three uses
Cm Sbranti asked the apphcant If the boutique hotel proposed m thiS project would be m
addItion to the one at the Promenade or would It replace the hotel proposed at the
Promenade
Jim Tong, Charter Properties, explamed the hotel at the Promenade was approved about
seven years ago The land for the hotel at the Promenade would probably be for a use
other than the prevlOusly proposed hotel Current mformatlOn led the developer to beheve
they could not support two hotels at the same tIme
em Sbrantl asked what would become the underlymg zomng for the land that was
prevIOusly planned for the hotel at the Promenade
Planlllng Consultant Porto stated the land at the Promenade was deSIgnated
vlllage/ commercIal
Cm SbrantI asked If the hotel and spa would be one development Had the apphcant done
market research to determme If there was a need for such busmesses m Dublm or the Tn-
Valley?
Dl[ffiLIN CITY COUNCIL M][NUTlES
VOLUMlE 26
REGlULAR MlElE1'ING
NOVJEMBlER 6, 2007
PAGE 450
DRAFT
Mr Tong stated It would be a full service spa, not a health club It would be run m
conJunctlOn With the hotel It would also cater to the residents of the condommmills
They were m the process of seekmg boutique hotel consultants
Cm SbrantI stated he supported all three uses
Vm Hildenbrand stated she supported all three uses It would allow for a sports club, not
that It would defimtely be bmlt In lookmg at the Staff Report, she did not beheve the
resIdents m the area, were necessanly lookmg for a convemence store
Mayor Lockhart stated she also supported all three uses They were amemtles for the
entIre commumty She had received a call from John Chen CEO of Sybase, and he was
very pOSit1ve about these uses and stated employees of hIS company could use these
facIhties
City Manager Ambrose asked, m relatIOn to CommercmllRetatl, the project proposed
181 000 square feet of office space, QuestIOn #2, Is the amount of Campus/Office square
footage appropnate?
Vm Hlldenbrand asked m regard to office space, were they referrmg to traditIonal Class
A office space, not the shopkeeper or lIve/work umts? Because a hve/work umt could be
a professlOnal office, would that be counted separately?
City Manager Ambrose stated that issue would be addressed separately
Vm Hildenbrand asked if all three types of uses were added, would it come close to that
amount?
Planmng Consultant Porto explamed that there were approximately 181 000 square feet
proposed by the apphcant It was approximately 16,000 square feet for shopkeeper
desIgnatlOn, 15,000 for lIve/work, and 19,000 square feet for other lIve/work Ulllts and
the other 55,000 square feet was for the retml portiOn at the hotel and spa
Vm Hildenbrand asked what was the ongmal campus/office designatlOn for the area?
Planmng Consultant Porto rephed that It was 475,469 square feet
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
VOLlUME 26
RJEGUJLAR MEE1'][NG
NOVEMBlER 6, 2007
P AGJE 45Jl
IDlRAlF1r
City Manager Ambrose reiterated that the questIOn was did the Council feel comfortable
with the amount proposed? DId they thmk there should be less or more?
Cm Scholz asked if thiS would mean changmg the General Plan, If they went With the
other uses smce It was now deSignated office space
City Manager Ambrose rephed it -would not It was deSignated campus/office for the
entlre SIte and they would have to change it only if they went With other uses Other uses
were permItted by the General Plan, WhiCh mdicated there could be ancillary uses, retail
uses for campus/office, and up to 50% reSIdential may be perrmtted With certam findmgs
Cm Scholz asked agam if the General Plan would be changed
City Manager Ambrose stated It might be changed dependmg on what the City Council
decided
Mayor Lockhart stated that what they were trymg to do was nail down uses and
approXimate Size so that Staff could study It and determme If it would reqmre a General
Plan amendment or not Staff could not tell them tomght Just by the baSiC blocks the
Council was now pIckmg out
Cm Scholz stated that her understandmg of the General Plan was that thIS area was
deSIgnated as office If the Council did go forward WIth the proJect, a change would have
to be made to the General Plan
Mayor Lockhart stated that even With an office deSignatiOn, there were other uses that
could fit m there It did not necessanly mean 11 was Just an office bmldmg In fact, m the
Stage I PD that they already had, It stated that if studies proved that other uses worked
then they could have them m it So dependmg on what the Council ended up WIth, it mIght
not reqmre a General Plan amendment
em Scholz asked if they were then gomg to talk about the 749 residences
Cm Sbranti stated he would hke to see more office square footage to the extent that it was
feaSible He agreed With the other uses, but he felt the pnmary square footage should be
DUBLllN CJITY COUNCJIL MINU1'lES
VOILUMJE 26
REGULAR MlEETING
NOVEMBER 6, 2007
PAGE 452
][))lRAlF'f
devoted to professIOnal office WIth 231,000 square feet, if you counted hve/work and
office, he would hke to see more than half office because it was the pnmary designatIOn
Vm Hildenbrand agreed With Cm Sbranti s comments The City had a good miX of uses
Condo Ulllts had sold and people were lookmg to change the way they did busmess and
where they worked People who bought the umts were commltted to work m the
commumty where they hved The Council had made a commitment to mcrease office
space m the commumty
Mayor Lockhart and Cm Oravetz stated they also agreed with em Sbranti's and
Vm Hildenbrand's comments
Cm Scholz stated she was unsure of the prevIOUS questiOn
City Manager Ambrose clar1:fied that when the Council discussed half of the Site, they
were speakmg of half of all bmldmg constructlOn, all square footage that was bmlt on the
Site, more than half of that would be office, not Just developed area, but half of all
bUlldmg constructIOn
Cm Sbranti stated they were speakmg of half of the 479,000 square feet
City Manager Ambrose asked Question #3, Are there other uses that have not been
proposed by the Apphcant that should be mcluded as a part of the proJect?
Cm Sbranti stated that although gas statlOns, convemence stores and fast food restaurants
were perrmtted uses withm the campus/office deSignatIOn, It might upset the character of
the area The CounCIl might want to stay away from those uses
City Manager Ambrose stated that was a good example, a reason to amend the General
Plan If that use was a perrmtted use today, the Councll mIght want to conSider deletmg it
Vm HIldenbrand stated she would be wllhng to do that A small market would be more
m keepmg With the village concept versus a convelllence store
DOOLIN C][TY COUNCIL MJINUIES
VOLlUMJE 26
RlEGUILAR MJEET][NG
NOVEMBER 6, 2007
P AGlE 453
IDlRAJFl'
CIty Manager Ambrose clanfied that the Council could not desIgnate a particular retaller,
but they would have to look at the uses Did the CouncIl agree that they did not want to
see a gas statIOn m the proJect?
Vm Hlldenbrand stated she did not believe the residents would want to have a gas statton
there
CIty Manager Ambrose moved on to ResIdentlal related QuestlOn # 1, Are residentlal umts
appropnate on the Site? If so, WhICh types of umts were appropnate? a) Shopkeeper
unitS, b) Live/work umts, c) Luxury condos, d) Tower flats, or e) Podmm flats
Vm Hlldenbrand asked for clanficatIOn between a tower flat versus a podmm flat
Plannmg Consultant Porto stated a flat was basically a flat The developer was proposmg
to hide the parkmg structure with a nng of umts that were called podmm flats It would
mclude a combmatlOn of hve/work umts, shopkeeper umts, and Just straight flat
condommmms Then you had the tower UllltS themselves whICh were the flats that were
m the towers, 4, 5, 6 and 8 to a floor, that went up m a vertlcal manner, where as the
others would rmg the parkmg structures They were SimIlar m floor plans, if not identical
The dIstmctlOn was how they were placed on the Site
Cm Sbrantl asked what was a luxury condo? How would it be descnbed?
Mr Tong stated there would be only 20 luxury condos and the mImmum square footage
would be 2,500 square feet They would cater to these reSIdents by offenng hotel
servICes, room servIce, and cleanmg The hotel employees would prOVIde these serVices
The cost of mamtammg the condos would be higher These services allow the hotel to
generate more revenue
Cm Sbrantl stated he was opposed to the tower flats He could support the other four
optIOns, potentlally He also wanted to dISCUSS a cap on the number of resIdenllal umts
Some of those concepts could be Innovallve
Vm HIldenbrand stated she would prefer to deCIde the bmldmg height Issue first ThIS
would dictate how much residentlal could be put m the bmldmg
DUBJLIN C][TY COUNC][L MINUTES
VOJLlUMlE 26
RlEGULAR MlElET][NG
NOVlEMBlER 6, 2007
PAGE 4541
])) lRAlF'f
Mayor Lockhart asked the CouncIl if they would agree to address the height Issue first
Cm Oravetz supported all the reSidential Ulllts
Cm Scholz stated she did not support the reSidential due to the Impact it would have on
schools They were already maxed
Mayor Lockhart stated that was why the Council wanted to talk about the height issue
first
Cm Scholz stated that the comments she had receIved from reSIdents mdicated that the
height was ndiculous, absurd
VfQ Hildenbrand stated that was why she suggested lookmg at the height lssue first That
was where the reSIdential pIece came m Unul the Council answered the questlOn of
height they did not know if there would be reSidentIal umts
Cm Scholz reIterated that from the comments she receIved, no one would support the
heIght and dId not understand how the CouncIl could make a declSlon as the developer
had not presented any plans
Mayor Lockhart stated the Idea was to give the developer some gmdehnes so that they
could come back WIth a plan
em Scholz stated she was gomg to deny the request
Mayor Lockhart stated the CouncIl would now take on the height issue
Cm Sbrantl stated he would hke to look at the height issue and then QuestlOn #2,
regardmg office square footage percentage Although he supported some of the uses, he
did not support all the uses
Vm HIldenbrand stated she thought the project was very mtngumg and she had read all
the emaIls received, both good and bad She had been a reSIdent III the commulllty that
had supported and opposed proJects, so she understood the process and deSIres people had
for their commumty She did not want to see 21 stones The City was on the forefront of
DlUBL][N CITY COUNCIL MINUTIES
VOLUME 26
REGULAR MlEETING
NOVlEMBJER 6, 2007
PAGlE 4155
][)) RAF'f
green bmldmgs, VIllages, and transit centers The CIty had an opportumty to do
somethmg dIfferent She would not hke to see anythmg higher than 10 stones She did
not know how much residential that would allow
Mayor Lockhart stated she hked Mr Schaub's comment regardmg relatiVity to where
homes were located and theIr VIews There was opportumty to prOVide a streetscape that
was excitmg for people If you had somethmg to work with, not just four story square
bmldmgs She wanted to gIve the developer the flexibihty to bUIld somethmg that was
creatIve and special, she could hve With 10 stones maXimum
Cm SbrantI stated at the last meetmg With the Plannmg ComrmSSlOn somethmg was
brought up about SIX stones bemg the height lImIt m the eastern Dubhn area He would
hke to stay wIthm the confines of the Eastern Dublm SpeCIfic Plan It was the gmde that
the Council had been usmg withm the eastern Dublm area He would hke to see the
project hmlted to SIX stones and at that height, the applicant could stIll be creative
Mayor Lockhart stated she would hke the apphcant to come back WIth some optlOns so
the commumty could VIew At that pomt, if 10 stones did not make sense, then the
CouncIl could say that The Council would be approvmg the footpnnt for some ideas and
she dId not want to hmit It nght now, she would hke to see the dIfference between SiX and
ten stones What dId It look lIke on paper? She had seen the emails also that stated some
reSidents dId not want 21 stones, but she wanted to see more before the Council saId yes
or no
Cm Scholz asked why not deny thIS plan and request the appbcant return With a new
project plan, mcludmg plans to ensure schools were not overcrowded? What about the
park issue? Did the applIcant not have to proVide a certam amount of park for that
development?
Vm Hildenbrand stated that was why they were dIscussmg a study If the study was
completed, then the apphcant could answer those questIOns
Cm Scholz stated the Council was, m a way, bargammg for what they wanted and did not
want, ahead of the game and the appbcant had not given the Council anythmg speCl:fic
DUBLIN CITY COUNC][L MINUfJES
VOLUMJE 26
REGULAR MlEJE1'ING
NOVEMBJER 6, 2007
JP AGlE 4156
lI}RAJFl'
Vm Hildenbrand stated the apphcant had presented the ongmal plan at the August 14,
2007, workshop and the Council told them they dId not hke the plan and wanted them to
return
Cm Scholz stated that 95% of the people that emalled or called had Informed the CouncIl
that they did not want the project
Vm Hildenbrand asked 95% of how many residents?
Cm Sbranti stated there was not a plan, but what the CIty was currently dOIng was part of
a process The CounCil had an InItial study seSSlOn and what had come before them was
mappropnate, so now the apphcant had come back askmg for dlrectlOn from the Council
Staff would work with the appl1cant on a plan that the CouncIl could approve or deny
ThIS was all part of the process
em Oravetz stated they should give the appl1cant an opportumty to come up With a plan,
wIth dIrectIOn from the Council
Cm Scholz asked about gettmg more mput from the commumty and askmg what they
wanted
Vm HIldenbrand stated the pubhc would have an Opportunity dunng the publIc hearmg
process to speak RIght now the Councll was glvmg the apphcant dlrectlOn about what
they would hke to see The CouncIl still had the Opportunity to say that after all the work,
they did not agree with the project
Cm SbrantI stated there had been much pubhc mput They had heard from reSidents
through several venues There would be more meetmgs and study seSSIOns for pubhc mput
and the City had done a goodJob ofmvolvmg itS reSidents
Cm Scholz reiterated there were other areas that needed to be explored and evaluated
such as parks and schools
The Council agreed that thiS would be studIed
DUBJLJIN C][TY COUNC][L MJINUTJES
VOLUMlE 26
REGULAR MlElET][NG
NOVlEMBlER 6, 2007
lP' AGlE 457
DlRAJF'f
Vm Hildenbrand stated the publIc may not lIke some of the components of the project but
all of thiS allowed for conversatlOn and they dId hke some of the amemtIes
Cm Sbrantl reiterated he dId not want to see anythmg hIgher than SIX stones but with the
square footage allowed, he did not thlllk they could do that He dId not want to see
anythmg over 10 stones
Mayor Lockhart stated the issue regardmg square footage was complIcated, it was not cut
and dry It was an item that needed to be revIewed by Staff and the applIcant, and some
agreement reached The Council wanted to gIVe the apphcant some dlrectlOn so they
could return With a project the Councll could support
Vm Hildenbrand stated she would not lIke to see the project higher than 10 stones and
see what the applicant would bnng back
Cm Oravetz stated he could support 10-12 stones
Mayor Lockhart stated there were three Councllmembers that agreed to a height hmlt of
10 stones or less
em Sbrantl asked Plannmg Consultant Porto how 479,000 square feet, m regard to Floor
Area RatlO (FAR), was calculated
Plannmg Consultant Porto stated that FAR was a fairly comphcated issue The Eastern
Dubllll SpeCific Plan and the General Plan referenced a 45 FAR, baslCally 45% of the
Site You took the square footage area of the Site, m thiS case it was 24 46 acres,
multIphed it by an acre, WhiCh was 43,560 square feet and then multIply that by 45
Assummg the CIty had the correct parcel Size, It would give you a relahve square footage
area of 475,465 square feet of developable area on the SIte That was under the eXlstmg
Stage 1 PO and it was under the eXIstlllg General Plan and the eXlstmg Specific Plan
Mayor Lockhart asked if thiS same method was used at the Waterford development
Plannmg Consultant Porto stated no Waterford was done on a densIty baSiS He
explamed that the Sybase property, prevlOusly referred to as SIte 15A, was set up for
resldentml development and the CIty moved 390 umts off of the Sybase property to
DUBJLIN C][TY COUNC][L MINU1'JES
VOLUMlE 26
REGULAR MElETING
NOVlEMBlER 6, 2007
PAGE 4158
][JJ lRAF'f
Waterford If you looked m the General Plan and Eastern Dublm SpecIfic Plan and read
commerCial development, It spoke of the abilIty to put residential there as long as It was
not the majonty use on the property So m the case of Waterford, the Waterford
apartments were a smaller use, approximately five acres, where the commercIal use was
approxImately seven acres The density of Waterford was 47 umts to the acre The CIty
dId not have a mixed use land use designatiOn at the time Waterford was completed, so
there was nothmg to whlCh the City could refer The mixed use land use desIgnatlOn came
from the west side of town through Tralee and the project at San Ramon Road and Alcosta
Boulevard In the east, the mixed use desIgnatIOn came to the City WIth Fallon VIllage
and the commerCial core That was where the City had picked up the mixed use land use
desIgnatIOn, which better defined the use than Waterford
The Mayor stated the City had done it different ways
City Manager Ambrose stated there was another difference, also The County requested
the City transfer density from one part of its property, residentlal densIty, to another So it
was dIfferent The result was a mIxed use project, but the way It happened was different
than the General Plan, and the way resldentlal was allowed on campus/office
Mayor Lockhart asked if the City had transferred reSidential denSity from the water
qualIty ponds
Planmng Consultant Porto stated that the water quahty ponds had always had a
deslgnatlon of campus/office
Cm Sbranti stated the FAR formula was a good formula to follow The CIty was gomg
off the FAR, 45 to 60 ThIS Site m partIcular was umque due to the fact that half the SIte
was not developable because of the water quahty basm So, 45 or 60 FAR was really 9
or 1 2 because you were only developmg half of the Site He did not want to go over
479,000 square feet m terms of developable land The CounCil had estabhshed that it
wanted to see more than half of that as office It was important to stay wIthm the denSitIes
that were allowed m terms ofF AR WIth the Emerald Place development approved earher
In the meetmg you were lookmg at 305,000 square feet on 27 acres, and here the CounCil
was lookmg at 479,000 square feet on 12 acres There was gomg to be denSity even III the
form of 479,000 square feet and he did not want to go over that That was an appropnate
FAR for thIS SIte
DUBLJlN CJlTY COUNCJlL MJINU1'ES
VOLUME 26
REGULAR MEETING
NOVJEMBER 6, 2007
PAGIE 459
IDlRAlF1f'
City Manager Ambrose asked, regardmg the tOpiC of ResidentIal, QuestIOn #5, Should the
bUlldmg square footage of residential development be considered as part of the maximum
floor area ratIo?
Mayor Lockhart stated she dId not know She needed to see what the dIfference would be
and what it did to the density
Cm SbrantI stated he belIeved it should be and they needed to keep m mmd that parkmg
was not part of the FAR, so you were already gomg to have structures on the Site because
parkmg was part of that The 479,000 square feet was not countmg any parkIng that was
mcluded If you counted the parkmg, the Council should count the reSIdentIal towards
that as well as the office or the sports club The applIcant did have the OppOrtulllty, m
terms of the hotel, to move It back to the Promenade whIch might free up some of the
square footage for some of the other thmgs they wanted to do UltImately on the 12 acre
footpnnt, the Council should count the residentIal square footage towards the FAR
Cm Oravetz stated he was not clear on thIS questIOn
Cm Scholz asked If there would be four acres of park out of that, somewhere
em Sbrantl stated the amount of park area reqUlred would depend on the number of
reSidentIal umts, if there was reSIdential, then the City would apply itS standard park ratIO
to that number
Mayor Lockhart stated she would hke to see what that looked lIke, exactly what Cm
SbrantI Just Said, uSlllg the FAR for the housmg But she would also hke to see the flip
Side of it, if you were not mcludmg the housmg, and stIll stay under the cap
CIty Manager Ambrose stated that one issue was the height but the other issue was if you
did go With only SIX stones, you dId not want a sol1d City block With Just bUlldmg on it
That was the other aspect of the massmg issue
Mayor Lockhart asked if the Councll could have an example of what that would look hke
Vm Hlldenbrand stated that it was hard to VisualIze how it would look
DUBlLIN CiTY COUNC][L M][NUTlES
VOLUMIE 26
RJEGULAR MEE1'JING
NOVlEMBlER 6, 2007
P AGlE 460
llJllRAlF1r
em Sbrantl stated the last thmg he would want would be 12 acres of a solId block He
dId not beheve that would happen, but that was worth takmg a look
Vm Hlldenbrand stated if the Councll put the appllcant m a box or under certam
condltlons, then that might be wIth what they returned She would lIke to give them
flexIbihty
CIty Manager Ambrose clanfied that three of the Councilmembers were saymg, have the
apphcant come back with two optlOns One would be to put a hard cap of 479,000 square
feet WhICh apphed to all uses, WIth the exceptlon of the garages Another option would be
the resldentlal not count agamst that square footage and wlthm the heIght lImIt of ten
stones
Mayor Lockhart stated that they would go back to the dlscusslOn of what types of umts to
mclude m the project Did Cm Sbranti still want to get nd of the tower flats?
em Sbrantl stated he dId not want to see a SiX story resIdential development He wanted
to mamtam the office component With some of the uses that were conducive to office,
whether it was the spa, sports club, or boutique hotel He thought luxury condos played
mto that Shopkeeper, lIve/work UnIts also played mto that He was not partIcularly
mterested In podmm or tower flats as the CIty already had many Of the five optlOns, he
preferred shopkeeper, hve/work and luxury condos He was not m favor of tower flats
He mIght conSider podlUm flats
Mayor Lockhart stated there were people that hked podlUm flats, to have the entlre UnIt on
one floor
Vm HIldenbrand asked for clarlficatlOn on floor placement of tower flats She asked If
the podlUm flats were hke Waterford and the tower flat were SImilar to the Elan
development
Plannmg Consultant Porto stated Waterford was what was called a wrap The podmm was
generally lIke Elan, one or two levels of parkmg WIth structures pIled on top, and then
structure wrappmg around the base That was what Elan did If you looked on Hamlet,
you had umts facmg Dubhn Boulevard and DeMarcus, but they are screenIng the top floor
DlOBLIN CJI1'Y COUNCIL MINUTES
VOLUMIE 26
REGULAR MJEE1'JING
NOVIEMBIER 6, 2007
PAGE 4161
][))RAF'f
of the parkmg structure Those were podlUm flats Whereas m the case of Waterford and
Avalon, there was parkmg structure m the middle wIth umts around it What thIS project
was proposmg was havmg parkmg and maybe some office on top of it and then maybe
some reSIdentIal on top of that What forced it mto a tower was when it came down and
started gomg vertIcal But generally it was a layered project
Cm Oravetz stated he would hke give the apphcant dIrectIOn to use the five types of
residential umts and see with what they returned He dId not want to tIe theIr hands
Cm SbrantI stated that he was most opposed to havmg Just a resIdentIal bmldmg or
condos, town homes or apartments completely separate But if the apphcant were to
propose havmg Class A Office, then on the top floor have some condos or if you had a
boutlque hotel and you had 20 condos as part of that, then it would not Just be a
residential development There would be other uses In the bulldmg - mixed use
Plannmg Consultant Porto clanfied that the CounCil dId not want to see a residentIal
bUlldmg They wanted to see everythmg mcorporated m It, mixed use
City Manager Ambrose asked for clanficatIOn from the Council m terms of mixed use
DId they mean mixed use m the confines of the same bUlldmg, not hke the City had at San
Ramon VIllage where there was commerCial In one place and resldentlal m another
The CouncIl replIed that was correct, the mIxed uses m the confines of the same bmldmg
Cm Sbrantl asked if regardmg ResIdential, had QuestlOn #6 been answered? What
percentage ofthe total bulldmg square footage on the Site should be residential?
City Manager Ambrose stated that the dlrectlOn was more than half, 50% plus one would
be campus/office
Mayor Lockhart added that the rest would be a mIX of other uses
Cm Sbrantl stated that the resldentlal should be the smaller portlOn to help enhance the
project
DOOLIN CITY COUNCIL M][NUTES
VOLUME 26
RlEGULAR MJEIETIING
NOVEMBlER. 6, 2007
PAGlE 462
][)) RAF'f
City Manager Ambrose recapped that what the CIty dId hke, m regard to Commercial
RetaIl, was the hotel, spa and sports club Cm Scholz voted no, but the other four
mdICated yes WIth respect to office square footage there was a consensus that the City
would hke to see at least more than one half of that be profeSSiOnal office space There
were some concerns about gas statIOn use bemg permItted as well as lookmg at the Issue
of convelllence stores and how they fit m WIth zomng The CouncIl preferred not to have
convemence type stores WIth respect to the residential, there was a consensus to penmt
some resIdential on the Site That It be mixed-use There was some support for lookmg at
all five types Identified m the Staff Report whICh mcluded shopkeeper units, hve/work
umts, luxury condos, tower flats, and podIUm flats WIth respect to heIght, the consensus
was ten stones or less
CIty Manager Ambrose clanfied, m regard to professIOnal office, the Council was
referrmg to offices uses The CouncIl was not lImltmg It to doctors, etc The dlstmctlOn
was made not to mcorporate the shopkeeper or hve/work umts as part of the office square
footage Was that the consensus?
The Council stated no
City Manager Ambrose stated those were m additIOn to half of the SIte bemg
campus/office
Mayor Lockhart asked if Cm Sbranti wanted more than half of it to be office, plus add m
the hve/work umts
Cm Sbrantl stated that when they spoke of hve/work or shopkeeper, what type of office
was that
Vm Hildenbrand stated it could be a photography studiO, counselor, or msurance There
were all kmds of professlOnal people that could use those umts
CIty Manager Ambrose asked PlannIng Consultant Porto If the square footage that was
shown mcIuded the reSidential portIOn of that umt, as well as the office or retaIl portlOil
when you looked at the square footage the apphcant mcluded
DOOLIN CiTY COUNCIL MiNUTES
VOLUME 26
RlEGULAR MlEET][NG
NOVEMBJER 6, 2007
PAGIE 463
][)) lRAFT
Planmng Consultant Porto stated that if you looked at the chart on Page 4 of the Staff
Report, you could see the dIfferentlatlOn
City Manager Ambrose asked that where it stated Shopkeeper umt square footage at
16,000 square feet, dId that mclude the entIre space?
Plannmg Consultant Porto replIed that no, that would be Just the portIOn that was their
workmg part of the bUildmg
City Manager Ambrose asked then if it would be 50,000 square feet m additIon to the
181,000 square feet?
Cm Sbrantl stated that one way to reach it was saymg 200,000 square feet of the Class A
office, and then you could count the rest of the Shopkeeper, Live/work to get you over
240,000 square feet because the CounCIl was saymg they wanted over half to be office So
If one of the scenanos had a cap at 479,000 square feet, lfthere was 200,000+ of the Class
A Office and you counted the rest, WhiCh would get the amount over That would stlll
mcrease the Class A Office He would lIke to see was 250,000 square feet total, at least
Vm Hlldenbrand added, but without mcreasmg the shopkeeper, lIve/work Ulllt, makmg up
that additIOnal wIth extra office
Cm SbrantI stated he thought 181 000 square feet was too low for Class A, but there were
a lot of dIfferent thmgs they could look at so he dId not want to be overly restrictive
without a plan But If the CIty were to get a mmimum of 250,000 square feet, then 50,000
was hve/work, that would be a mmImum of200,000 square feet of Class A Office
CIty Manager Ambrose asked em SbrantI If he was baSically addmg 19,000 square feet
of Campus/Office?
Cm Sbranti replIed, yes, at a mlmmum
The maJonty of the CounCil agreed
Cm Scholz stated she did not want it to appear she dId not want good thmgs for Dublm,
but there were many concerns Many people felt the City had plenty of apartments,
DOOLIN C][TY COUNCIL MINUTES
VOLUME 26
R1EGlU lLAR MlElE'nNG
NOVlEMBJER 6, 2007
PAGlE 464
]lJ)lRAF'f
condos and houses Some of her questIOns that remamed were was the Councll gomg to
change the General Plan? How were they gomg to handle the school sItuatIon relatIve to
number of students? Was the City gomg to bUlld another high school? What about parks
and recreatIOn and play areas If you were gomg to bUlld thiS big of a project? Those
issues had not been reviewed Did the City want to add more denslty m terms of people m
the residentIal unitS? What about parkmg? It seemed some of the basic questIOns she
heard from the pubhc needed to be looked at more carefully The City needed more
opportumhes for pubhc mput Was thiS what they really wanted?
Cm Oravetz stated he agreed With much of what Cm Scholz stated, but he would hke to
see the City contmue With the prOject He hked a lot of the amemties and what it would
bnng to Dublm The Councll had gIVen the apphcant good feedback He was m
agreement with the resolutIOn m Ophon 1 of the Staff Report recommendatIOn
Cm SbrantI stated the CounCil was movmg forward m the process They were
mamtammg the mtegnty of the plan They were stlll Iookmg predommately at
campus/office They wanted to have over half of it be more professlOnally onented to
proVIde jobs for the reSidents of Dubhn Ranch and eastern Dublm By movmg forward,
they were Iookmg at amemtles and a httle resldential, makmg It a lesser use There was
creatIvity that brought dIstmctlOn to the plan The CIty should senously look at the cap m
terms of square footage Just because It was pushed onto the once 12 acre parcel They
should shck wIth the current FAR, 479,000 square feet developable, was Important Staff
would work With the apphcant to address all of Cm Scholz's concerns as the process
contmued
Vm Hildenbrand stated she loved how the commumty would come together on all
different issues She hked to work With the pubhc and was sure the pubhc would stay
mvolved The CIty would work WIth the School DIstnct to ensure that there was enough
space at the schools The parks issue would have to be figured out It was an OppOrtulllty
to bUlld a project that was dIfferent ThiS was an opportumty to spur mterest m the
Promenade ThIS would be one step closer to gettmg it bUilt She would hke to see the
project come back and study It ThiS was an opportumty to gIVe directIOn and mput on
what the CounCIl was lookmg for, ahead of tIme
Cm Sbrantl added that he appreciated the apphcant's willmgness to work With Staff and
the Commulllty on the project
DOOLIN Cny COlUNC][L MINUTES
VOLUME 26
REGULAR MJElE'nNG
NOVJEMBIEIR 6, 2007
PAGIE 4165
]lJ)RAlF'f
Mayor Lockhart stated thiS project would be a catalyst for the Promenade It would
mcrease the value of the mvestment m the community She appreciated the fact that the
applIcant was hstelllng to the commumty and CouncIl She hoped there would be
productive work study seSSlOns between the CouncIl and the Planmng CommissIOn so
they could all stay on track and the community could be m attendance She understood
the concerns about what was gomg to happen to the commumty, but the City'S General
Plan needed to be able to adapt to the needs of the commumty The schools m the east
would have room With two new ones commg on lIne and there would not be a lot of kids
commg out of the luxury condos It was Important to hear the facts, see what was gomg to
happen and then make a declSlon She did not want the City to mISS somethmg because
they were not wllhng to look
On motion of Cm Sbrantl, seconded by Vm Hlldenbrand and by majorIty vote (Cm
Scholz votmg no), the City Council adopted
RESOLU1'JION NO 201 - 07
ADOPT RJESOLUTJION APPROVING THlE IN][1lA1'JION OF A GENERAL lPLAN
AMENDMJEN1' AND JEAS1'lERN DUBLIN SlPEC][lF][C PLAN AMlENDMJENT
STUDY WITH DIRJECTJION lFOR MODIlFJICA TIONS 1'0 1'HlE PROJECT 1'0 BE
STUDIED lFOR THE PROPJERTY COMMONlL Y KNOWN AS GRAFTON PLAZA,
A PORTION OF DUBLIN RANCH AREA IE[
wlthm the parameters detmled m the ResolutlOn, under the headmgs of
CommerclallRetml, Residential and BuIldmg HelghtlMassmg
-- <>
lFallon Sports Park Phase I - Landscape Archltec1turaR Services
10 11 P m 8 3 ( 600- 30)
DIrector of Parks and Commumty ServIces DIane Lowart presented the Staff Report and
advised that as approved In the 2006-2011 CapItal Improvement Program, deSign of
Fallon Sports Park Phase I would begm m Fiscal Year 2007-2008 Staffwas seekmg City
DUBLJIN C][TY COUNCIL MJINU1'JES
VOLUMlE 26
REGULAR MEJETING
NOVlEMBJER 6, 2007
PAGE 466
][)) lRAF'f
Council authonzatlOn to contract wIth CarducCi and Associates, Incorporated to complete
the commumty design process through constructIOn documents and blddmg
Vm Hildenbrand asked If Staff would be lookmg at the feasIbIhty of turf grass
Parks and Commulllty Services Director Lowart stated one of the goals of the City was to
look at the feasIbIlity of turf grass, but they needed to complete a study to show the pros
and cons of such surfacmg
On motIOn ofVm Hildenbrand, seconded by Cm Scholz and by unanimous vote, the City
Council adopted
RlESOJLlU1':llON NO 202-07
APPROVING AN AGRlEEMENT WJI1'H
CARIDUCCJI AND ASSOC][ATES, ][NCORPORA1'ED
FOR FALLON SPORTS P AR.K PHASlE I
<>
])esl2nahorn bv Cnty CouDlcIl of an Ad Hoc AudIt ReView CommIttee
10 14 P m 8 4 (110- 30)
City Manager Ambrose presented the Staff Report and adVised that mdependent audItors
from the firm of CapOrlCCl and Larson would soon complete the Comprehensive Annual
FmancIal Report (CAFR) for the year endmg June 30, 2007 City CouncIl would establIsh
a Ad Hoc Committee to review the report With the Auditors
On motlOn of Mayor Lockhart, seconded by Cm Oravetz and by unammous vote, the CIty
Council deSIgnated Cm Sbrantl and Vrn HIldenbrand to reView and dISCUSS the audIt
reports for the penod endmg June 30,2007
<>
DUBLJIN CITY COUNCJIL MJINlUTES
VOLUMJE 26
lRlEGULAR MlEETING
NOVlEMBIER 6, 2007
PAGE 467
IDRAJF'f
MedlatImn In Appeals Before City Conned
10 15 p m 85 (610-25)
CIty Attorney Ehzabeth Silver presented the Staff Report and advised that at the
October 17, 2006 City Councll meetmg, the CouncIl asked whether requmng parties to
mediate would save City bme by resolvmg disputes early m the admlll1stratIve process
ThIS report completed by Staff and the City Attorney s Office, detatled further analySiS on
the subject
City Manager Ambrose explamed that there had been an item the Council had approved at
a CIty Council meetmg regardmg hmlted parkmg, then the parties resolved the issue that
dId not reqUIre the approved lImited parkmg, and they had to come back and rescmd the
Council's decisIOn
Cm Sbranb stated he was m favor of medmtlon With no expense to the CIty If someone
did not want to partIcipate, they did not have to
The Council stated they were all m agreement With medIatiOn
City Attorney Sllver asked Council how they would hke to see the cost of mediatlOn
dlVlded
Mayor Lockhart asked If there was a cost to an appeal The cost for mediatlOn should be
picked up by the person who was appeahng a declSIon
City Attorney Silver stated Staff would return With a proposed Ordmance at the first
meetmg m December regardmg thiS issue
<>
DUBL][N CJI1'Y COUNCIL M][NUTIES
VOLUMIE 26
REGULAR MlElETING
NOVlEMBER 6, 2007
PAGIE 468
][)) lRAFT
OTHER BUS][NlESS Bnef INFORMATION ONLY reports from CouncIl and/or Staff, mcludmg
Committee Reports and Reports by Council related to meehngs attended at CIty expense (AB 1234)
1024 P m
City Manager Ambrose stated Staff had been workmg With the Army at Camp Parks to
develop an Industry Day In whIch they could make presentatiOns to the development
commumty and the City and the local government partners They had not firmed up a date
yet
Cm Scholz stated she had attended the FIre StatIOn Open House at StatIOn 16 and the
firefighters had made it a fun event for the kids
Cm Oravetz stated he and the Mayor had attended the LA VT A meetmg and worked on
the BR T bus deSign
Cm SbrantI stated he had attended the Chamber Real Estate Tour and Lunch It was a
great event between the Chamber and the City to help hIghhght econOmIC development
opportumtles wlthm the City He attended the East Bay DlVIsIOn DInner where they
discussed SucceSSIOn Plannmg In City government The City was gomg to have a career
day WIth the schools ASSIstant CIty Manager JOlll PattIllo had approached the
Supermtendent With such a plan and receIved pOSitive receptlOn from the parents to work
on an event for the SprIng The parents were mterested m attendmg Career Day, also
Vm Hlldenbrand stated she also attended the East Bay DIVISion DInner The next East
Bay DlVIsIOn bocce ball tournament would be In the Spnng Green Elementary School
had ItS offiCial grand openmg There were many elected offiCIals at the event It was well
attended by the community She also attended a City LIaIson meetmg WIth DUSD
Mayor Lockhart stated there were a few parents m attendance at the DUSD which was
mce The next Alameda County Mayors Conference would be hosted by DublIn on
November 14, highlightIng the Dublm Hentage Center The Dublm High Drum Ime
would also be performmg She had attended the US Conference of Mayors Chmate
ProtectlOn Workshop In Seattle Speakers mcluded MlChael Bloomberg, Mayor of New
York City, PreSident Chnton, and Al Gore She had some Ideas on developmg a Green
DUBL][N CIITY COUNCIL MINUTJES
VOLUMlE 26
REGULAR MElE1'ING
NOVEMBlER 6, 2007
IP AGlE 469
][))lRAlF'f
Valley and would diSCUSS with Staff She would speak to offiCials at the Livermore Lab
on how they mIght work together on proJ ects
<>
ADJlOlURNMIENT
101
There bemg no further busmess to come before the Councll, the meetmg was adjourned at
1035 pm
Mmutes prepared by Carolme Soto, Deputy CIty Clerk.
Mayor
ATTEST
Deputy City Clerk
~
DUBLIN CITY COUNCJIlL MJINU1'lES
VOLlUMlE 26
REGUJLAR MlEJE'fJING
NOVEMBER 6,2007
PAGlE 470