Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 6.2 Dublin Place Commercial Building ~~~~1I'DU~l CITY CLERK !/I N File # 19~ ~8'l C,lLI~~,Zy1~ AGENDA STATEMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 6, 2006 SUSJF.,CT: PiJ$i.iC HF.ARiNC: PA OS-35 Duhlin Place Commercial 13uildin~ - Planned Development Re7rnre with Stage 2 Development Plan and Srle Development Review fora 17,500 square foot comr~iercral huilding located at 7000 Amador Plaza Road. Report Prepared by Jeff Baker, Associate Planner ATTACHMENTS: 1 Ordinance approving a PD - Planned Development Rczonc with Stage 2 Development Plan for 7000 Amador Plaza Road (PA OS-035) 2. Resolution approving Site Developtnerrt Review Permil to construct a 17,500 square foot cnrntnercial huildmg and related unprovemenls at 7000 P.tnador Ylaza Road (PA US-1135 j. 3 City Council Staff Report dated May ~G, 2000 4 Dralt Minutes ol'thc City Council meeting on May 1G, 2006 5 Project Plans 6 Color Elevatron RF:CUMMRNDATiUN: 1 Open the puhhc heanng; 2. Receive Staffpresenlation; 3 Receive presentation from the Apphcanl, ~ 4 Receive Public Testimony; -:.ti 5 Close the Public Hearutg; b. Dclihcratc; and 7 Take the lollowing actions: a. Waive the Reading and Introduce Ordinance (Attachment 1) approvmg a PD -Planned Development Rezone with Singe 2 Development Plan for 7000 Amador Plaza Road (PA 05-035) h Adopt the ResnluUon (Attachment 2) approvmg Sile Development Review for the pad huildmg located at 7000 Amador Plaza Road. YRUJEC"1' DESC'KlY'1'lUN: The project site is located at 7000 Amador Plaza Road within the Dublin Place Shopping Center 1'he Dublin Place Shopping Center is located at the northwest corner of Duhlin Boulevard and Amador Plaza Road and is wrthm the Downtown Core Specific Plan. The project is located on the undeveloped portion COPIES TO: Applicant Property Owner Page 1 of 5 ITEM NO. G.\PAN\2DUSW5-075 Mav~eld Gentry keully 4Jvisurs~C'C\ursr ti.Uti.Oti.duc of a parcel that includes the Expo Design Cenier This undeveloped site is the former location of the Dublin (Jcneral Cinemas which was approved by Alameda County in 1e79 The theater has since closed and the building was demolished in 2UU2. The Apphcant currently requests approval of a Planned Development Rezone with a Stage 2 Development Plan, and a Site Development Review Penml to construct a ] 7,500 square foot commercial building and related nnprnvenrents including a plaza, fountain, landscaping and parking. Tenants have not been identified for the building but the tenant mix is anhcapaled to include 40% retail and 6U°/~ restaurant uses. RACKCRpL1ND: i On April 25, 2000, the Planning Conunission held a Public Heanng to review the proposed project. However, the Applicant was inadvertently unable to attend this meeting. The Planning Commssion rased a number of concerns with the project hui felt it was problematic to discuss these issues without the Apphcant henag present to address them. The Applicant's representative requested that the Planning Commiss~nn forward the project to the Oily Council rather than continue the project to a firture Planning Commission meeting. 'T'herefore, the Planning Coinnnss~oners agreed that the Commissioners would state their conecrns with the project for the record and refer hearinglunschctxon to the City Council. F.ach Plam~ing Commissioner identified tlrcir individual concerns but the Ylaiming Comnnss~on did not attempt to achieve consensus on the overall concerns with the project. Plcasc refer to the Planning Commission Minutes (Attachment 3) for mfonnaUon regarding the issues and conecrns raised by the Planning Commission. On May 16, 2UU6, the City Council held a Public 1-learing to review the proposed project. The City Council raised a number of concerns with the design of the proposed building elevatums and plaza area. The City Council members voted unanimously to continue the item in order for the Apphcant to address their concerns (Attachment 41. The following is a list of the concerns raised by the City Council. So[ten the overall appcarxncc of the building and include design elements similar to the Angel's Crossing Shopping Cenier; Y Provue a vanety of roof forms, including lower elements and gabled roof forms; r Replace the split-face block with stacked stone; r Provide a warm color palate; and r Create an inviting plaza design that incorporates a water element. ANAi.YSiS: Site Development Keview Bteilding Desigx The Applicant has revised the building elevations to address the concerns raised by the City Council. 'fhe revised building maintains the same basic building form but incorporates architectural elements, enhanced materials, and revised colors that add visual interest to the proposed building (Attaclunents .5 and G). The building continues to he divided into three distinct building forms that arc distinguished by setback, height, roof form, and massing. The following is a discussion of the key modilicahons to the proposed elevations. Roof Form -The revised building elevations include a variety of roof Forms that include pyramid, shed, and flat roofs (Attachments 5 and 6). A tower element with a pyramid roof has been included on the left sttle of the west elevation (adjacent to the fountain/plaza). This tower provides a vertical clement that will function as a focal point for the building and a~ entry feature for the adjacent tenant space. Shed roofs have been incorporated over the four individualized storefronts in the center portion of the huilduig. A pyramid style roof has been incorporated over the largest building form which is located nn the right side of the west ele~atum. 5~milar arch~ieciural textures and building articulation have been included on the Page 2 of S east elevation which fa.ecs Amador Pl.~tza Road. The north clcvation faces the plaza and includes shed roofs snnilar to the east and west elevations. Storefronts - All window glazing and storefinnts will he recessed into the pnmary wall place approximately 18 meees. The recessed windows will provide additional shade and shadow that will soften the overall appearance of the bu~ldtug. The Applicant has accentuated the four individualized storefronts m the center of the building by creating a storefront element that protn~des approximately tluee (3) feet from the primary wall plant. Similar storefront clements arc included on the north clcvation and will provide an archileeturally interesting backdrop to the playa. The northern tenant space will have colorful awnings nn the north, east, and west elevations. These awnings will provide additional shade and shacinw to the building and further individualize this tenant space. Materials. and Colors The Applicant has revised the building elevations to include additional enhanced materials and colors similar to those found on surrounding buildings including the Senior Center and the recently approved Elephant 13ar located north of the project stte (Attachment Thts ancludes the use of a paroled metal standing seam roof on the tower elements and shed roofs. This roof material has been used on the Senior Center and the approved plans for the Elephant Bar The revised elevations also include stacked ledger stone at the bast of the building and on the verUcul tower type clements. The stone base will enhance the weight and appearance of the building and will feature a cap io provide a finished appearance. The proposed stone will match the stone approved for the Elephant Bar A wooden trellis will be incorporated over each of the four individualized storefronts in the center of the east and west elevations. The proposed color palette matches the color palate 1'or the recently approved Elephant Bar and includes warm earth tones. This palette was designed to complement the surrounding buildings wilhtn the shopping center A colored elevation has been included as Attachment 6 to this Staff Report.. Site Plan Pedestrian Plaza -The p1.3za area has been redesigned to create a space that is inviting for both pedestrians and restaurant patrons to linger (Attachment 5). This plaza design includes a central ('ouniain that functions as the local point of the plaza and provides the basis of the radial design of the space. Knee walls, approximately eighteen (18) inches in height have been incorporated around the fountain and surrounding raised planters. These knee walls have been designed to function as seating areas. Space has also been provided for outdoor restaurant seating; although tables have not yet been identified for this space. The Stage 2 Planned Development Plan (PD) (Attachment 1) requires the Applicant to obtain a. Srie Development Revtew Waiver m order to have outdoor restaurant seating at this location. The SDA Water wtll allow Staff to review the furniture arrangement for consistency with the Planned Development Plan and to ensure that the plaza meets accessibility requirements. The landscaping will include shrubs and shade frees that will protect the plaza from the afternoon sun. The plaza will he accented with pots that contain annuals for visual interest. Porttnns of tlae plaza will he ftmshed with mlerlockang bock pavers which will complement the stone used on the buildings. Landscape Plan -The landscape Plan has been revtsed to reflect the modtfied plaza destgn as discussed above. Thts includes shade trees, shrubs, and pots with atmuals within the plaza area. Puhhe Arl -The City Council directed the Applicant to incorporate a fountain into the plaza design. 1'he Crty Council also discussed public art as a part of the fountain/plaza. However, it was not clear if it was the City Council's intention that the fountain be in place of public art or if the City Council would consider adding public art to the plaza at a later date. [lndcr the City's Public Art Master Plan, a lountain Page 3 0l'S would not cnnsntute puhhc art unless desrgned by a professional artist or a desigrr team that includes a professional artrst. Therefore, Condition 15 (Attachment 2) requires the Applicarrt to pay a fee in-lieu of pruviding public art. This fee; is based on the requirements contained in the Public An Master Plan. A location within the plaza has been identified as a potential art location. Condition 1G (Attachment 2) requires the Applicant to dedicate a public art casement to the City at this location. 'T'his easement will permit the City to come back at a later date and place art within the plaza should the City Council decide to do so. if the City Council chooses to accept the fountain in-lieu of a public art requirement, Conditions l5 and 1G contained in the Site Development Review permit Resolution should be removed. Planned Development Rezone with Stage 2 Development Plan As previously discussed m the Staff Report, dated April 16, 2D06 (Attachment 3), the project site rs located wrihm a Planned Development (PD) Zoning Drstnet that encompasses the Downtown Cnre Spectfic Plan area. This YD distnct requires a Stage 2 Development Ylan atui Sate Development Review petnlit for all new development within the Specific Ylan area. 'Therefore, the Applicant is requesting approval of a PD Rezone with a Stage 2 Development Ylan. 'The proposed Stage 2 Development Plan (Attachment 1) has been modified to incorporate the revised project plans. The followuig rs a drscussurn of the secUnns of the proposed Development Plan that have heen modified In incorporate the revrsed protect plans. Stage 2 Site Ylan: "1'he Stage 2 Site Ylan depicts the building location, landscaping and plaza location, circulation system, and parking areas. Architectural Stattdards_ The architectural design standards for the Stage 2 Development Plan aro established by the revised architectural drawings prepared by Michael Willis Architects, dated May 3U, mots. Development Re~ulaGvns: The proposed Development Plan and development standards for the PI7 ronmg drslnct are as estabhsheci m the Downtown Core Spectfic Plan anti included m the Stage 2 Development Ylatt. Preliminary Landscape Ylan: The Preliminary Landscape Ylan includes the conceptual landscape design for the project. The Conditions of Approval for the Site Development Review Yetntit require the suhmittal of a Final Landscape and Irrigation Plans. General Plan Consistency The prv~ect site has a General Plan land use designation of Ketail/Office. The revisions to the proposed project do not result in changes in the proposed use or size of the building. 'T'herefore the proposed project is consistent with the Ueneral Plan land use designation as stated in the City Council Staff Report dated May 1G, 2000 (Attachment 3). Specific Plan Consistency '1'hc revised building design is consistent with the politics and design guidelines contained in the Downtown ('ore Specific Plan because it creates a design which focuses attractive: architectural elements to the street as well as all four srdes of the building, and is compatible wtth surrounding huildmgs, and creates a pedestrian plaza area in a location consistent with one of the general plaza locations identified in the Downtown Corc SpcciGc Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The Cahfarnra F.nvrromneulal Quality Act (CEQA), together with the State guidelines and City envrronmental regulatrrnts require that certain projects be reviewed for environmental impacts and that Page 4 0l' S environmental documents he prepared. On December 19, 2000, the Dublin City Council adopted the Downtown Core Specific Plan and campamon Inrttal Study/Negative Declaration. The current project at 7000 Antador Ylaza Koad has been found to be consistent with the Initial Study/Negattve Declaration prepared for the Downtown Core Specific Plan in December 2(100; therefore no further environmental review is necessary CONCLUSION: This application has been reviewed by the applicable City departments and agencies, and their comments have been incorporated into the Conditions of Approval for the project. As discussed in this Staff' Report and the Staff Repotrt, dated May 1G, 2UUti (Attachment 3), the proposed protect is conststent wtth the Dublin Gcncral Plan, the Downtown Core Specific Plan, and the Planned Dcvclopmcnt Zoning District in which the protect site is located and represeatts an appropnale project for the sale. The project plan mciudes a plaza area with a fountain, seating, and landscaping including shade trees. These elements will help to create an attractive and inviting environment for pedestrians and restaurant patrons to linger The building architecture has been revised to include design elements that create a pedestriazi scale and create an attractive appearance. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council. 1) Opcn the Public hearing; 2) Keceive Staff presentation; 3) Receive presentation from the Applicant; 4) Receive Public testimony; 5) Close the Public Hearing; 6) Deliberate; and 7) Take the following actions. a) Waive the Reading and Introduce Ordinance (Attachment 1) approving a PD Planned Development Rezone with Stage 2 Dcvclopmcnt Plan fur 7000 Amador Plain Road (PA OS-035); and h) Adopt the Resolution (Attachment 2) approving Site Development Review for the pad builclmg located at 7000 Amador Plara Road. Page 5 of 5 (n~ I C~`r~ ORDINANCE NO. XX - 06 ' AN ORDINANCE OF TIIE CITY COIINCIL OI+' "1'HE Cl'1'Y OF llUBLIN *******+~***~~******~*******,r**,r********* APPROVING A Yll - YLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONE WITH STAGE 2 DFVELOYMEN'I' PLAN I+'ORTHE COMMERCIAL BUILDING: LOCATED AT 7000 AMADOR PLAZA ROAD Pn OS-n35 WHEREAS, the Applicant, PFRS Dubltn Corporation, has requested approval of a PD - Platmed Development rezone wtth Stage 2 Development Plan (PA US-035) to construct a 17,500 square loot conunercial building and related site improvements including a plaza, landscaping and parking, located within the existing Dublin Place Shopping Center on an undeveloped silo that is the location of the former Dublin General Cinemas and located at 7000 Amador Plaza Road (APN 941-0305-040); and WHEREAS, the Applicant has submitted a complete application which is available and on file in the Planning I7+vtston for a Planned Development Rezone and Stage 2 Development Plan (PD), and Sitc Developtent Review (SDR) for the construction of a single story 17,500 square foot retail building and related improvements (PA US-035); and WHEREAS, the Applicant has suhmitled protect plans m contunchon with the requested plamring action dated received May 30, 2006, and a Slage 2 Development Plan; and WHF.RF.AS, the protect stte is located within the Downtown Core Specific Plan area which has Planned Development ?oning. "T'he Ordinance (Ordinance U3-U2) approving this Platuted Development Zoning Distnct requires a Ylamied Development rezone and Stage 2 Development Plan, and Sitc Development keview prior to new development within the plan area; attd WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Acl (CEQA), together wilh the State CEQA Guidelines roquire that certain prgjects he reviewed for environmental impacts and that environmental documents be prcparcd, and WHERF,AS, on Decenaher 19, 2000, the Dublin City Council adopted the Downtown Core Specific Plan and companion Tnrtial Study/Negative Declaration. The current project at 7000 Amador Plaza Road has been found to be consistent with the hritial Study/Negative Declaration prcparcd far the Downtown Core Specific Ylan in December 2000; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a properly noticed public heanng on said application on April 25, 2006, and referred heanngtur+sd~ct~on of the request to adopt an Ordinance to establish a Planned Development (PD) Rezone with Stage 2 Development Plan for the Conunercial Protect, PA OS-035, to the City Council; and WHF,RFAS, the City Council dtd hold public hearings on said application on May 16, 2UU6, Junc 6, 2006, and June 2U, 2UU6, and WIIEREAS, proper notices of said hearings were given in all respects as required by law; and WIIEREAS, a Staff Report was submitted to the Dublin City Council, dated May 16 2006, Tune 6, 2UU6, and June 2U, 2UU6, rccommcnding adoption ol'an Ordinance to approve the Planned Development District Rezoning for the Commercial Protect PA OS-035, and / ATTACHE~~T_~ _o~ a~ ~ WHEREAS, the City Council did hear and use its independent judgment and considered all said reports, rccommcndations and testimony hercinahovc set forth, and NOW, THF.RF.FORF., the City Council aF'lhe City of Dublin does ordain as follows: SF..CTJON 1; Findings. A. Pursuant to Section 832.070 of the Dublin Municipal Code, the City Council finds as follows. 1 The Planned Development Rezone and related Stage 2 Development Plan meets the intent and purpose of Chapter 8.32 of the Loving Ordinance hecause they provide efficient use of the project sift pursuant to Ueneral Plan a~td Downtown Core Specific Plan polictes that include development with a pedestrian scale, including plazas and landscaping, and establish permitted, conditionally permitted and temporary uses and other standards which will ensure that the project will he compatible with commercial and public ttses in the immediate vicinity 2. Development under the Planned Developtent zoning and Stage 2 Development Plan will he harmonious and compatible with existing and future development ua the surrounding area m that the proposed uses and development standards are consistent with the adopted Stagel Development Plan. Compliance with the Stage 1 Dcvclopment Plan ensures that the Developer's project will be harmonious and compatible with other existing and future development in the area. Through compliance with the adopted Stage 1 Devclopmcnt Plan, the Stage 2 Development Plan for the proposed commercial building will create a pedeslnan oriented development wtth a pedestrian scale. B Pursuant to Sections 8.120 0.5U of the Dublin Municipal Code, the City Council finds as follows. 1 Devclopmcnt under the Plamted Dcvclopment zoning and Stage 2 Development Pl.~tn will be harmonious and compatible with existing and future dcvclopment in the surrounding area in that the proposed uses and dcvclopment standards are consistent with the adopted Stagel Development Plan. Compliance with the Stage 1 Devclopmcnt Plan ensures that the Developer's protect will he harniomous and compatible with other existing and Puncre development in the area. Through compliance wrih the adopted Stage ]Development Plan, the Stage 2 Development Plan for the proposed cocmnerccal hwldmg will create a pedestnan oriented development with a pedestrian scale. 2. The project site is physically suitable for type and intensity of this project in that it is intended to conform with City politics related to comprehensive planning in the Downtown Core Specific Plan area. The project is designed to minimally affect the existing topography and terrain of the site, has adequate access, anti complements existing and proposed development in surrounding areas. 3. The proposed Planned Development Rezoning and Stage 2 Devclopmcnt Plan will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons restding or working m the vzcmily, nr he detrimental io the public health, safety or welfare because the Stage 2 Development Plan has been designed in accordance with the City cf Dublin General Plan, Downtown Corc Specific Plan, and all applicable development regulattons. 4 The pn>posed Planned Development Rezoning and Stage 2 Development Plan for the project arc consistent wuh all elements and policies of the Duhhn General Plan and the Downtown Core Specific Plan, as proposed. The Stage 2 Development Plan conforms to tttc elements and politics 3r~ i~~ oi' those plans through the provision uf• a pedestrian scale with varied setbacks, roof heights, building massing, pedestrian plaza with lountain and larrdscaphrg, and roadways consistent with the Circulatiun Element, adequate public facilities, and safe desi,gtr as required by the Seismic Safety and Safety Element. C Pursuant io the California Environmental Quality Act, the City Council adopted an Initial Sludy!Negat7ve DeclaraUvn fvr the Downtown Core Specific Plan on December 19, 2UU(1, incorporated herein by reference. SF.CTiON 2. Pursuant to Chapter 8.32, Title 8 of the City of Dublin Municipal Code the City of Dublin 7,onrng Map rs amended tv rezone the follvwmg properly ("the Property") to a Planned Development Zoning District: Approximately 0.40 acres, generally located west of Amador Ylaza Road, north of the existing PetSmart Building, on the western portion of the parcel shared with the existing llome >;xpo (AYN 941-0305-040). A location map of the rezoning area is shown below ~ NANK>H VNJFr 11C%1lEVPAO 1 R r..•C- - ~ ` ~ - ~y,0 ~Pl ~ - _ , i ~ L._ ~ , w ~ - vow , _ i _ ~-..flan. • ignMN AWN 1 ~ _ w~i I ` ~ - ` .gyp) 1 } 6W1 I~.J• (C[M1 A7 1 i I, ! ~w lLVMO__,_..._. _ .~r~.~...:..~r:: 1 SECTION 3. The regulations for tlrc use, dcvclopmcnt, improvement, and maintenance of the Property arc set forth in the following Stage Z Development Plan for the Project area which is hereby approved. Any amendments to the Stage 2 Development Plan shall be in accordance with section 8.32.080 of the Dublin Municipal Code ur its successors. STAGF. 2 DFVF.i..OPMF.NT PLAN I"his is a Stage 2 Development Ylan pursuant to Chapter 8.32 of the Dublin 7.,onmg Ordinance for the property located at 7000 Amador Ylaza Road (APN J41-0305-U40) and rs adopted as a romng amendment pursuant to seciinn 8.32.030.B ofthe Dublin Zoning Ordinance. 1) Compatibility with Stage 1 Development Plan. The Stage 2 Development Plan is consistent wilh the site plan, uses, densities and other dcvclopmcnt standards and provisions of the Stage 1 Development Plan adopted by the City Council in Resolution 229-U0, on December 19, 2000 ~o~ 2) Statement of Proposed Uses Permitted uses: Retail uses, including, but not limited to a) Ucncral Merchandise Store b) Discount Rctai] Store c) ClolhmgJFashcon Store d) Shoe Store e) Home Furnishing Store f) Office Supply Store g) Home Appliance/Electronics Store h) Homc Improvement/Hardware Store i) Music Store J) Hobby/Specialty Interest Store k) Gifts/Specialty Store 1) Jcwclry and Cosmetic Store m) Drug 5lore nl Aula Parts Store n) Tny Store p) Book Store q) Pct Supplies Store r) Sporting Goods Store (without the salt of firearms) s) Grocery/food Store t) Vi[ieo Rentals u) Other similar and related uses as determined by the Community Development Director Service establishments, including, but not limned to a) HairBeauly Salon b) Cleaner and Dryer e) Shoe Repair d) Kcy Stop el 'T'ailor t) Formal Wcar/Rental g) Other similar and related uses as determined by the Cominuntty Development Director j ~I~S Ealing and dnnkmg estahhshmenls including, but nut limited to. l~ al Restaurant - no drive through b) Delicatessen c) Specialty Food (e.g. bagel shop) d) Bakery e) Cafes/Coffee House I) ice Cream Shop g) Sandwich Shop h) Other similar and related lists as determined by the Community Development Director Conditional Uses: a) Wine and Liquor bar with on-sale liquor license b) Micro-Brcwcry c) Video Arcade d) 5porlmg Goods Store (with sale of firearms) e) Recreational facility -indoor 1) Other similar and related uses as determined by the Commwiity Development Director Temporary Uses: a) Please refer to Zoning Ordinance Chapter 8.108 for a list of permitted temporary uses and pernrit procedures. 3) Stage 2 Site Plan. Please refer to Exhibit A. 4) Site Area and Proposed Densities. Please refer to Exhibit A. 5) Development Regulations. a) Parking. All uses for the site shall comply with Chapter 8.76 Off-Street Parking and i.nacling Regulations of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. h) Signage: The project and all signs wrthm the project shall he subject to the Dublin Town Center Master Sign Program/Site Develnpme~it Review c) Outdoor restaurant stating associated with an approved restaurant use located m the northern most tenant space shall be suh~ecf to a 5~1e Development Rcvicw Waiver to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director 6) Architectural Standards. Plcasc refer to Exhibit B. 7) Preliminary Landscaping Plan. Please refer to Exhibit A. SF.CTiQN 4. The use, development, improvement, and maintenance of the project area shall be governed by the provisions of the Dublin Zoning Ordnance except as provided in the Stage 2 Development Plan. ~~d SECTION 5. "Phis Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (3U) days following tts adoption. The City Clerk of the City of Dublin shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in at least tluee (3) public places m the Crty of Dublin m accordance with Sectzon 36933 of the Government Code ol'the Sfaie of Califonria. YASSEll ANll ADOP'1'Ell BY die City Council of the City of Duhhn, nn thts 201h day of June, 2UU6, by the following votes: AYES: NOES: AssENT: ABSTAIN: Janct Locklrart, Mayor ATTEST: Fawn llolman, City Clerk G:\PAit\20n5\U5.035 Mayfield Gentry Realty AdvisunK'C\CC Ord Stage 2 Pn.dnc SLR ~ 7i7 ~~•a~ ai~~~ 6~~~ vm+n via nvoivr ooo~ A~~~n~ ~ ~ !g~i! 6¢ Iiejaa w~qn? 3 e~ ~ r K~ ~y J e e W ~'Y~ e F ~ ? 5 e ~l y C F nL fi c # 6 ~ a~ ~ eo x g F m . E 3 ~ - l ° ~ ~ p tl o 5 e 5 ~J p 9 ~ V 5 ' N min F ° ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ ¢ c x P,~ay,4 H: r: 5a 3 n" ' N ~ W ~ .,vim w r 3 r t ~n ~ ~ 3x ~ M ~ p u;a' ~ti R i^~,~ ~ f 5 Z [ C U n 'k t' i~'~ F ~ ~ ~ F Ge!'63 c~ CF ~ n ~9R _ ~ ~ Q ~ ass ~ F .v ~ ® I ~ ~~ae i~ ro • 4 O m ~ ~ a a x 1 ~~-•_-1 ~ _ ~ I'~ ~ ~ \ .iii • i i~ • 1, ~ o 11, ~ a ~ rr ~ ( ~ g ( 1 . _ - --1 . ~ ti ^ . - S' t-. t W ~ SS.U {x=1CKJXXY.~.v:'1 •.CJ.•A•[-Xl aJ~ I ' ~ r•a:d~J ~Ji_Gr.,_p.a•,.~:~j ~&'r Trb . _ ~.Li a r~:r _ ~ ~ ' ' ~11. o a r ~ cc ~ ~ ~4 4 a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ y ~ z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ >,ar,. ~ Z Q o ~ ~H ~ ~ ~$yS J ~ 3 5 °yq4 5 ~t ag i'~tl F ~ H ~ ~ d ~ ~ L 1'' W + z ~ ~ w E ~ ~8 ~~qyE - ~ ~ a ~ ~ g~ ~ a ~R~~~- ~ ' ~ :xr_r_, ~cxa:~rxxxzsSa _ r ~ 11 a ge ~ ~ w , _y..^ - u ~ =_.ry , w ( ^J ~ ~ W~ t~ ~G f a ~b. W J SS , c t ~ ~ ( 1 QJ ~ ~ ~ m~ ~ ~ ~ ~gg~~ J $~~~s i' ~T BIGSTORE SIGSTORE ..,y ! eStoTe Clothes ~9°~n ~ i ~ ~ i~ ~ I ~ WEST ELEVATION FAGNG PRRKING i _ ~ ~ arm. u., r.,~- - i _ _ _ .i .T i~ T i i v.~.. T - ~ I; : ~ 1 ~ ~ IuGSroRE 1 91GSiORE m.,i.n c.+D,c.. ~ astae i i~..mn i - i T ~ ~ " s EAST ELEVATION FACING AAIAOOft PLAZA ROAD _ _ - _ i ~ p gyp` ~ e`p` ' I I a I ~ o ~ a i ? ? ? ? CJ I ~ ~ I I NORTH ELEVATION FACING PLAZA it .a 2 SOLTH ELEVATION FACING PETSNART - srue +.r • ra rr u-r-v m ~e 4F~`cnicr pµ2.,]YYG w~.. EIY MAY 3 4 21jfl6 L~+nnows OUBLiiv r ~D.~gg+oViVIFV(a "~A' ~:~i d i 9i ~ 'fSG.~ Yf~T LAD 1`f W 6TDI IPiY W fCMrtm acomaMa.mvrema'r¢u ~4-YYO ]U~ RESOLUTION NO, -U6 A RESOLUTION OF THE Cl'I'Y COUNCIL OF THF, CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING A SiTF. DF.VF,i.OPMENT REVIEW PERMIT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A 17,500 SQUARE FOOT COMMF,RCiAL BUILDING ANll RELATED IMPROVF,MENTS i.OC'ATED A'I' 7000 AMADOR PLA7A ROAD (APN 941-0305-U4U) PA OS-U35 WHF.RF.AS, the Applicant, PFRS Dublin Corporattom, has requested approval of a 5~te Development Review Permit to construct a 17,500 square fool commerctal building and related site umprovements including a plaza, landscaping, parking, and service area at 7000 Anrador Plaza Road (APN 941-0305-04U); and WHEREAS, the Cahfomta Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), together with the State guidelines and City environmental regulations require that certain projects be reviewed fur environmental impact and that env~ronanental documents be prepared; and WHEREAS, the prv)ect has been found to he consistent with the Initial Study/Negative Declaration prepared for the Downtown Core Specific Plan and adopted by the City Council on December 19, 2000 (Resolution 226-UU); and WIIEREAS, the Planning Commisswn held a properly noticed Public Heanng on saui application on April 25, 2006; and WIIEREAS, following the Public Heanng, the Plamring Commission re('erred heannl; jurisdiction to the City Council, and WHEREAS, the City Council did hold a properly nnhced public hearing on said application on May 1.6, 2UU6 and continued the matter tv the City Council meeting on .Tune 6, 2006, and WHEREAS, the City Council held a properly noticed public hearing on said application on Tune 6, 2006, and WHEREAS, a Stafflieport was submitted to the City Council, dated June 6, 2UU6, recommending adoption of a Resolution conditionally approving the Site Development Review Permit; and WHEREAS, the Cily Council did hear and consider all said reports, recommendations and testimony herein above set forth and used its independent judgment to evaluate the project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Duhlm does hereby find that. A. The proposed Project, as conditioned is consistent with khe purpose and intent of Chapter 8.104, Site Development Review, of the Zoning Ordinance because: 1) the proposed building, as conditioned, will be attractive and will be compatible with similar improvements in the vicinity as required by Section 8.104 U2U.A of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance; 2) the building has been ATTACHMENT rot desrgned to complement new buildings and recent fapade remodels ur the shopping center m order to incorporate certain design elements which are prevalent in the shopping center; 3) the new pedestrian plaza and outdoor dining patio will complement the desrgn of the building and wtll be compatible wtth the potential future restaurant use; 4) as conditioned, the applicant will be required to replace dead or dying landscaping to improve the property; and 5) the building, once complete, will he compatible wrth the existing buildings in the vicinity and the buildings in the Downtown. B. The proposed Project, as conditroned, wtll be compatible with the surrounding area and complies with the politics of the Gcncral Plan, with the development regulations and performance standards establrshed for the Zoning District in which it is located and with all other requirements of the Zoning Ordinance because; 1) the proposed commercial building and improvements, as conditioned, meets the intent of the Duhltn General Plan whtch discourages projects which do not relate well to the surrounding buildings and as conditumed, the proposed butldmg is compatible with the exrstmg buildings in the area; and 2) as conditioned, the project will be consistent wrth the Downtown ('ore Specific Plan. C The proposed Prn~ecl, as conditioned, will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity, or he detrimental to the puhltc lrealth, safety and welfare because: 1) the design of the buildings and improvements, as conditioned, are compatible with the desrgn of the buildings and improvements in the vicinity; 2) the proposed commercral building will comply wilh all City of Dublin regulations; and 3) the pedestrian plaza arcs is compatible wilh the 1:)owntown Specific Plan which encourages plazas and crvrc gathering spaces. D The approved site development, including srte layout, structures, vehrcular access, crrculation and parking, setbacks, herght, walls, public safety and similar elements, has been designed to provide a desirable cnvironmcnt for the development because: 1) the proposed pedestrian plaza with Fountain complements the building and provides a public gathering space; 2) the pedestrian plaza is situated to such a manner as to promote a pedestrian friendly cnvironmcnt by locating the patio where ii rs vrsihle and accessible from the street and entrance to the shopping center; 3) the commercial building has been designed to promote a pedestrian friendly and attractive desigrt by creating individual storefronts, varying wall heights, windows facing the street and walkway, and creating a design which is attractive on all four sides of the building; and 4) as conditioned, the building will meet current requirements of the Municipal Code, with respect to safety E. The subject site is physically suitable for the type, density, and intensity ol'the proposed Project and related structures because: 11 the project site is relatively level, Z) the site has existing utilities, services, parkuig, and access to the local roadway network; 3) the scale of the proposed improvements are compatible wilh similar nmprovenrents and extsttng buildings m the vicinity; and 4) the proposed pedestrian plaza is compatible with the anticipated retail and restaurant uses and fits in with the exrstmg shopping center uses and uses in the Downtown. F Impacts to views arc addressed because: 1) the layout of the building will generally remain the same as the previous movie theater building at this site and won't further impact views; and 2) the pedestrian plaza will be located in such a manner to allow visibility to surrounding uses wttlun the center 2 Ili ion 'There arc nu impacts to slopes or topographic features becausc: the site is relatively flat and nn major lnpngraplric changes are proposed to the site other than leveling the existing pad for the proposed building and nnprovements. H The character, scale, quality and design of the protect [s compatible wtth the existing attd approved projects m the area and with arrticipaled fitture development m the area because: 1) the building will include varying building heights whtch will promote visual interest of the building and will break up the massing of the building; 2) the project plans show a conuce to match the cornices on the remodeled and new buildings in the shopping center so that the building will he compatible with the design of the buildings m the center; 31 the building will have stucco, stacked ledger stone and tnetal roof materials which arc compatible with the materials m the shopping center and in the downtown area, acrd 4) the building has been designed to focus pedestrian elements towards the street, as required by the Downtown Core Specific Plan, which include a plaza area with a fountain, windows, varying builchng heaght, articulated building form, and a mix ol'matenals. I. The landscaping, tncludmg the location, type size, color and texture and coverage of plant materials, provisions and similar elements have been considered to ensure visual relief and an attractive envirotment for the public becausc: 1) new plant materials will be added to the site; and 2) as conditioned, the Applicant as reyutred to replant all plant materials damaged in con)unction wtth the remodel project. .l The approval of the Site Development Review Permit is consistent with fhe Duhhn General Plan and the Downtown Core Specific Plans because: 1) the construction of the proposed building will enhance the sales tax base of the downtown area by creating additional retail and restaurant space as stated in Goa12 ol'thc Downtown Core Specific Plan; 2) the pedestriatt plaza provides a unique clement in the Downtown area and creates a pedestrian friendly environment for the Downtown as stated in Goal 7 and Objective 7 1 of the Spectfic Plan which encourages outdoor spaces and eating spaces; 3) the proposed building and pedestrian plaza will create a more pedestrian friendly envrrvnment by including pedestrian oriented features as stated m Goal 11 and Ob)ective 13.3 of the Specific Plan; 4) the existing and proposed landscaping will enhance the appearance of the site with platrt materials that conform to the established Plant matrix of the Specific Plan as stated in Objective 13 a, 5) the proposed protect will enhance the appearance of the vacant pro)ect site, and create a more pedestrian friendly environment m this area which meets the intent of the Downtown Core Specific Plan; and 6) the proposed Project is located on a vacant site designated for commercial development within the Downtown and will meet the design and use requirements of the adapted Specific Plan and therefore the Project will he consistent with 5echon 2.2.1 of flit Dublin General Plrui. 13E 1T FURTHER RF.SOLVF.I) that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby conditionally approve YA US-U35, a Site Development Review Penmt application to construct a 17,SOU square foot commercial building and related improvements, as generally depicted by the Srte/Landscape Plan, Utility Plan, Floor Plan, and Elevattons dated received May 30, 2006, stamped approved anti nn file with the City of Dublin Community Development Department, subject to the conditions below and to Attachment A to this Resolution. 3 iz~ lfl~ CONDiTiONS OF APPROV.~i. Unless stated otherwise, all Conditions of Approval shall he complied with prior to the issuance of building permits or establishment of use, and shall be subject to Planning Department review and approval. The following codes represent those departments/agencies responsible for monitoring compliance of the conditions of approval [PL] Planning, jB] Buildtng, [PO] Police, [PW] Puhhc Works, [ADNI] Administration/City Attorney, [F}N] Finance, [PCS] Parks and Community Services, ~ F] Alameda County Fire Department, [DSRSI)] Dublin San Ramon Services District, [AVI] Atnador Valley Industries, [CO] Alameda County Department of Environmental Health, [Zone 7] Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation Distncl lone 7, [LAVTA~ Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority, [CHS] California Department of health Services. CONDITION TRXT 12ESPON. WHEN SOiJRCE A[:ENCY REQ'D PRIOR TO G F.NF.RAL . _w. _ 1. Approval. This Site Development Rcvicw approval is for PI Ongoing Planning the 17,500 square foot building located at 7000 Amador Plaza Ruatt, PA U5-U35 The pru)cot shall generally conform to the project plans submitted by Michael Willis Architects received May 3(1, 2006, on file in the Community Development Department, and other plans, text, and dia~~ams relating to this Sric Development Keview, unless nwdificd by the Conditions of Approval contained herein. 2. Permit F,xpiration. Construction shall commence within 1'L Dne year DMC one (1) year of Pcrmri approval or the Permri shall lapse trom pemnt 8.96.U20.D and became null and vocal. Commencement of construction approval means the actual ennstructiun pursuant to the Permit approval or demonstrating substantial progress toward commencing such construction. If there is a dispute as to whether the Permit has expired, the City may hold a noticed public hearing to determine the matter Such a determination may be processed cuncun•ently with revocattun proceedings in appropriate circumstances. If' a Permit expires, a new applioat~un must he made and processed according to the requtrcmcnts of this Ordinance. _ 3. Time Extension. '11te original approving decision-maker P}., Dne year DMC' may, upon rho Applicant's written toques[ for an extension from perntit R9(r.020.E of approval prior to expiration, and upon the determination approval that any Conditions of Approval remain adequate to assure that applicable findings of approval will continue to he met, grant a time extension of approval for a period not to exceed six (G) months. All [tine extension requests shall be noticed and a public hearing or puhl is meeting shall be held as required by the particular Permit. 4. Permit Validity. This Site Development Rcwcw approval PL Ongoing llMC shall he valid fur the remaining life of the approved 8.9G.U20.P stmcture so lung as the operators of the subject property comply with the project's conditions of approval. 4 I rag CONDITION TRXT 12ESPON. WHEN SOLIRCE AGEN'C'Y 12Ef1'D PRIOR TO 5. Revncatiou of permit. The Site Development Review 1'L Ongoing DMC' permit approval shall be revocable for cause in acern'dance 8.96.020.I with Section 8.96 D2D.1 of the Dublin Toning, Ordinance. Any violation of the terms or conditions of this permit shall he sub'cct to citation. _ _ 6. Requirements and Standard Conditions. The Applicant/ Various Building Standard Developer shall comply with applicable City of Duhlin Fire Permit Prevention Bureau, Dublin Public Works Department, issuance Duhlin Building Department, Duhlin Police Services, Alameda County Flood Control District 7.nne 7, Livermore Amador Valley "Transit Authority, Alameda County Public and Environmental Health, Dublin Satt Ramon Services District and the California Department of Health Services requirements and standard conditions. Prior to tssuanco of building permits nr the installation of any improvements related to this project, the Developer shall supply written statements from each such agency nr department to the Planning Department, indicating that all applicable condittons rec wired have been or will he met. 7. Required Ycrmih. An encroachment permit from the PW Building Standard Public Works Department may he required fur any work Pcnnit done within the public right-ot~way Developer shall obtain Issuance all pennris required by other agencies including, but not limited to Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation Distnet Zunc 7, California Department of Fish and Game, Army Corps of Engineers, Kegional Water Quality Control Board, Caltrans and provide copies of the emtits to the Public Works De artmenl. 8. Fees. Applicant/Developer shall pav all applicable fees in Variuus Building Various effect at the time of buildtng perntit issuance, including, but Permit not limited tn, Plamm~g fees, Building fees, Traffic Impact Issuance Fees, TVTC fees, Duhlin San Ramon Scrvtccs L)istrict fees, Public Facilities fees, Duhlin LJnificd School District School Impact fees, Fire Facilities Tmpacl fees, Noise Mittgation fees, lnclusionary Ilnusing Tn-Lieu fees', Alameda County Flood and Water Conservation District (Zunc 7) Drainage and Water Comtectinn tees; nr any other lee that may be ado rted and a ~licahle. _ 9. Indemnification. The Developer shall defend, indemnify, ADM Ongoing Administrat and hold harmless the City of Dublin and its agents, ion/ City officers, and employees from any claim, action, or Attorney proceeding against the City of Dublin or its agcmts, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City of Dublin or tts advisory agency, appeal board, Planning Convtvsaton, City Council, Community Developm~mt Director, Loning Administrator, or any other department, committee, or agency of the C'tty related to this project to the extent such actions are brought within the time eriod required b Govcmmcnt Code Section 5 I'{-~~ los CONl]1T1ON TEXT ItESPON. W13EN SOURCF. AGENCY REQ'D _PRIOR TO 66499.37 or other applicable law; provided, however, that the Developer's duty to so defend, indemnity, and hold harmless shall be subject to the Citys promptly notifying the Developer of any said claim, action, nr proceeding and the C'ity's full cooperation in the defense of such actions or roceedings. 10. Clean-up. The Applicant/17evclopcr shall be responsible PL Ongoing Planning for clean-up and disposal of pro)cct related trash to maintain a safe, clean, and httcrfrce site. 11. Modifications (SI)R). Modifications or changes to this PL Ongoing DMC Site Development Review approval may be considered by 8.104 100 the Community T)cvdopmcm Director if the modifications nr changes proposed comply wrih Section 8.1U4 l0U of the Gonin~ Ordinance. 12. Controlling Activities. The Applwant/Developer shall PL Ongoing Ylannin~; control all activities on the pro3cd sric so as not to create a nuisance to existin •/surroundin • businesses and residences. 13. Soft Fnam Ruilding Materials. Sofl. Fo.un (i.c. ofis type PL Building I']anning material) may he installed nn closer than 6 fed. from the Pcrmtt earth nr paved areas. _ _ Issuance 14. Accessory/Temporary Structures. The uac of any PL Ongoing llMC accessory or temporary structures, such as storage sheds or 8.108 trailer/ container waits used for storage nr for any other purposes, shall be subject to review and approval by the C.ommunit llcvelo ment llire_ctor_ _ _ PROJRCT SPECIFIC 15. Public Art. The Applicant/owttcr shall pay a fcc equal to PL Issuance of Planning forty-five one-hundredths percent (U 45"b) of the Building Building Valuation (exclusive of land) to finance an art project. Permit Phis money shall he used at the City C'ouncil's discretion for Public Art at a location identified h the Cit Council. _ 16. Pnblic Art Easement. The Applicant/owner shall dedicate PT Issuance of Planning a public art easement to the City of Dublin. This casement Building shall be at the approximate location of the landscape area. Permit identified on the Site Plan as a . ntential uhlic art locahon. _ 17. Equipment Screening. All electrical and/or mechanical Pi. Ruilding Planning cyuipment shall be screened from public view Any roof- Permit mounted equipment shall he completely screened from Tssuanec new by materials architecturally compatible with the Through building and to the satisfaction of the Community Complctton/ Development Director The Ruilding Permri plans shall Ongoing show the location of all cyutpment and screening for review and approval by the Community Development Director 18. Property Maintenance. The Applicant shall maintain the PT Ongoing Planning property and all building materials in good condition and shall keep the site clear of trash, debris and I,•raffiti vandalism nn a re ular and continuous basis. 6 15 a'b c og _ CONUITIUN TEXT RESPON. WHEN SOURCE AGENCY REQ'D PRIOR TO 19. Awning Maintenance. The Applicant shall maintain the Pi Ongoing Planning awnings and keep them clean and in good rcpalr, which includes keeping them free fmm fading nr other weather related dalna e. 20. Project Signage. The stgms 'shown on the project plans are PL Occupancy Planning for conceptual purposes and have nut been approved in conjunction with this review All slkmagc requires an amendment to the Dublin Town Center Master Sign Pro am. 21. Muster Sign Program. Prior to Occupancy, the Applicant P} Occupancy Planning or Developer shall apply for an amendment RI the Dublin Town Center Master Sign Program as necessary to allow si a e for the ro osed huildin , 22. Signs. All signagc shall wnfonn to Chapter 8.7G of the PL Ongoing Chapter Dublin 7.nning Ordinance at all limes. Window signs shall 8.7G be limited to 25`%, of the window area. All temporary slbins and banners require a 7.oning Clearance from Che Planning Division rinr to installation. 23. Colors. The exterior paint colors of the bulldmgs are 1'L Occupancy Planning subject to City review and approval. The Applicant shall paint a portion of the building the proposed colors for review and approval by the Comnnmity llevelopment Director rinr to ainfln the buildm •s. 24. Fire Sprinklers. The Site Plan and Elevations submitted in PL, F Issuance of Planning conjunction with the Auilding Permit plans shall show the Building location of the tare sprinkler risers. To the extent possible, Permits these sprinklers shall be screened from public view and shall not he visible from the Public Right-of--Way subject to the review and approval of the Community DcvclopmcnC Director and the Alameda Count Pire De artmcnt. _ 25. 1'rush and Waste Accumulation. The applicant or any PL Ongoing Planning future owner shall provide and conduct regular maintenance of the site in order to eliminate and control the accumulation of trash, excess/waste materials and debris. 26. Landscape Repair The Applicant shall add plants to any PI (]ccupancy Planning sparse areas in the existing landscaping along the project frontage and replace any existin}; landscaping that Is damaged during the course of construction, to the satisfaction of the Communi Develn meet Director _ LANDSCAI'IN[: .,J 27. Final Landscape and Irrigation Plans. final Landscape I'L Fuilding DMC and Imgation flans prepared and stamped by a State Permit R.72.030 licensed landscape architect nr registered engineer shall be Issuance submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer and the Comntunriy Developm~mt Director 'these plans shall he coordinated with on-site civil, streetlights, and utility improvement plans. The final plans shall be approved and si ned b the Communit Develo meet Director and the 7 I ~gb lo$ COND1T10N TEXT RF.SPON. WI1F.N SOIiRCE AGENCY REQ'D PR1012 TO City Engineer Plans shall be generally consistent with the preliminary landscape plan prepared by Michael Willis Archriwts, received March 17, 2000, except as modified by the Conditions listed below and as required by the Cammuni Develn ment Director 28. Plant Species. Plant species shall he selected according to PT Building Planning use, sunshade location and space availahiliry The Permit landscape plan should include plant species that are not Issuance salt-sensitive. Street trees shall he high-branching and reduce minimal litter 29. Slopes. 1'he landscape plan shall address slopes within the PL Building Planning property including erosion, rnaintenance and irrigation Permit issues. All slopes shall have a one-Pout level arcs at wp Issuance and hottem of the s'lo e tier maintenance. _ 30. Landscaping at Street/Drive AIsle Intersections. PL Building Planning Landscaping shall not obstnrct the sight distance of Permit motorists, pedestrians or bicyclists. Landscaping, and/or issuance landscape structures such as walls, at drive-aisle intcrscctrons shall not be taller than 3U inches above the curb, except for trees. Landscaping shall he kept at a minimum height and fullness, giving patrol ofticers and the eneral yublic surveillance ca abilities of the area. 31. Lighting. l he Applicant/Developer shall prepare a PL, PW, PO Building Planning photometric plan to the satisfaction of the City P.ngineer, Permit Community Development llirector and Dublin Police Issuance Services. Extcnor lighting shall be provided within the parking tut and on the building, and shall be of a design and placement so as not to cause glare onto adjoining properties, businesses er Rr vehicular traffic. Lighting used after daylight hours shall be adequate to provide for security needs. The plan shall show measurements for the parking structure, connecting paths, outdoor parking area and resulcntral areas. 32. Street Lights and Trees. Maintain approximately 15 feet PL, YO Building Planning clearance betwecrrt streetlights and street trees. Where such Permit clearance is nut practical for design considerations, trees Issuance shall he increased to 3F inch box mmrmum W reduce the conflict between the li htin and folia •c. _ g 6 33. Standard Plant Material Irri anon and Maintennnce PL Buildm • DMC Agreement. The Applrcant/Developer shall complete and Permit 1i.72A5U.B subnut to the Dublin Planning Department the Standard Issuance Plant Material, Irri atien and Maintenance Agreement. 34. Plant Standards. All trees shall be 24 inch box minimum, 1'L Occupancy Plamting wrih at least 30% at 36 inch box er greater; all shrubs shall be 5 all_on mininmm. 35. llcviccs. The Landscape Plan shall show the location of all PT., PW, P Building Planning hackflew prevention devices, detector cheek valves, utility P~rntlt boxes and fire s nnkl~r nsc-rs. The location and screenin Issuance ii l~Jl~ 10~ CUNll1T1UN TEXT RESPON. WFIEN SOURCF. A(;<ENCI' 1tE(1'll 1'1t1U12'1"U of these dcvtces shall be reviewed/a roved b C'r1 staff. 36. Root Barriers and Tree Staking. 1'he landscape plans PI„ PW $uilding Planning shall provtdc details showing root 6amers and tree staking Permit installation, which meet cutn'nt Cit s ccifications. issuance 37. Water Eff[cient Landscaping Ordinance. The; PI. Building DMC 8.88 Apphcanl/ Developer shall submit written documentation Permit Co the Public Works Department (in the form of a Issuance Landscape Doeumentalton Package and other required documents) that the development conforms to the C'ity's Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance.- BU1L1)1NG 38. $uilding Codes and Ordinances. All project constriction $ Through $uilding shall conform W all buildmg codes and ordinances in effect Completion at the lime of buildin ermtt. _ 39, $uilding Permits. To apply for building perntits, $ Issuance of $uilding Apphcanl/I)cvcloper shall submit eight (8) sets of Building construction plans to the Building Division fur plan cheek. Permits Each set of clans shall have attached an annotated couv of these Conditions of Approval. 'Elie notations shall clearly indicate how all Conditions of Approval will or have been complied with. Construction plans will not he accepted without the annotated Conditions of Approval attached to each set of plans. ApphcanUDcvclopcr will he responsible F'ur obtaining the approvals of all participating non-City agencies prior to the issuance of buildin ermits. 40. Construction llrawings. Constriction plans shall he fully $ Issuance of Building dimensioned (including building elevations) accurately $uilding drawn (depicting all existing and proposed conditions nn Permits site), and prepared and signed by a California licensed Architect or Engineer All structural calculations shall be prepared and signed by a California licensed Architect or Engineer The; site plan, landscape plan and details shall he consistent with each other _ 41. Addressing. Addnaacs will be roquired on all doors B Occupancy $uilding leading to the exterior of the building. Addresses shall be illuminated and be able to be seen from the street, 5 inches in hei ht minimum. _ _ _ 42. Tem orar Fencm 1'em ora Constriction fen ~ p y g. p ry cing $ Through Building shall be installed along the perimeter of all work under C'omplct~on constmction, commencing at the grading stages and be in of Exterior lace and safe through the completion of the ro ect. Work 43. Engineer Observation. 'Che Engineer of record shall he B N'inal Nrame Building retained to provide observation services for all components Inspection of the lateral and vcritual design of thn buildmg, including nailing, hold-downs, straps, shear roof diaphragm and structural frame of building. A written report shall be submitted to the Cit Ins )ector riur to schedulin the 9 ~ $t>~ o~, CONDITION TEXT 12ESPON. WHEN SOURCE. AGENCY RE(2'll PRIOR TO_......._._ final frame ins ection. 44. Foundation. C3eotechnical Engineer 1'or fbe soils report B Issuance of Building shat] review and approve the foundation design. A letter Building shall he submitted to the Buildin Division on the a ritual. 1'ernrit 45. Green Building Cruidelines. Tn the extent practical the B 'T'hrough Building applicant shall incorporate Green Building Measures. Completion Green Building plan shall he submitted to the Building f )ftlcial for review 46. Cool Roofs. All new rooling or reroofing installed shall R Through Building use matcnals and installahon standards approved under Completion Title 24 cncr ~ re uucmcnts. 47. Electronic File. The ApplicantJDcvclopcr shall submit all B Issuance of Building building drawings and spcc~fications for llus prolcct m an Building electronic format to the satisfaction of the Building Official Permits prior to the issuance of building pemuts. Additionally, all revisions made to the building plans dunng the prolcct shall he incorporated into an "As Built" clccirontc file and submriled our to the issuance of final Deco anc _ 48. Site Survey. The foundation pad must be certifiai fur R Scheduling Builchng vertical and horizontal location by a licensed surveyor A Foundation written report shall he submitted to the City inspector prior to Inspection schedulin athundatinnins.ecti~n. 49. Fire Sprinklers. The structure will require the installation B Occupancy Building of a NFPAl3 sprinkler system due to proposed square footage, intended use, and type of constnictinn. (17 Sf10 s uare feet, B rn• M nccu anc , and T e V construction . 5U. Location to Property ).inc. The south wall of the proposed B Issuance of Building stmcture will he required to he constructed as a 1 hour wall Building due to the fact that it appears to be located 15 feet off the Pemrit ad acent ro crt line. 51. Restroums. Itestrooms shall be provided with the B Issuance of $uildmg appropnatc number of fixtures as prescribed by the Building Cahfomia Plumbing Code in effect at thn time of building Permit Tenant Ian rcvtcw Im rovements 52. Finished Flour Elevation Certification. Fl~MA B Issuance of Building certification of the finished floor elevation shall be provided Building b the A licant. Pcmtris FIItE 53. Fire Flow. The fire flow for the sric shall wmply with F Issuance of Fire appendix III-A of the CFC Prowde a ]cater from DSRSD Building stating what the available fire flow is at the site. A copy of Permits the letter shall be submitted to our office. _ 54. Construction. The allowable area of the building shall F Issuance of Fire comply with chapter 5 of the CRC Building Permits 55. Fire Hydrants. Provide an additional fire hydrant within F 1'riorto Fire SU feet of the FDC on Amadnr Plaza Rnad. Occupancy 111 1~1~~0~' COND1T10N TEXT RESPON. WREN SOi1RCF. AGENCY 12EQ'D PRIOR TO 56. Fire Sprinklers. Automatic sprinklers shall he provided F' Prior to Fire tluoughout the buildings as required by the Dublin Fire Uccupancy Code. if there are over 100 sprinklers, the system shall he monitored by l1L listed central station. 57. Access. Fire apparatus roadways shall have a minimum N Through Fire unobstructed width of 20 feet and an unobstructed vertical Completion clearance of noC less than 13 feet 6 inches. Roadways under 36 feet wide shall he posted with silms or shall have red curbs painted with labels nn one side; roadways under 2R feet wide shall be posted with siyms ar shall have red curbs painted with labels on tenth sides of the street as follows: "NO STOPPING FIRR i.ANE - CVC 22500 1" (CF(' 199R, Section 1998). 58. Knox Box. A I{nox box is rcyuircd at the roam clcctncal F Prior to Fire room for access to the fin; alarm panel. The Knox box shall Occupancy contain a key tltat prov~dcs access to the tenant space. Order thnns for the Knox box are available at the fire prcv~mtion nftice at the address above. The key can he placed in the box Burin the Pire De a~tment ins ection. ._..---._.-----1? 59. Addressing. Approved numbers or addresses shall be N Yrior to Fire placed on alt new and existing buildings. 1'he address shall Occupancy be positioned as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fraiting the property Said numbers shall contrast with their background (CPC, 1998, Section 901 4 4). 6D. Codes. The project shall canply with lJniform I3uilding and N 'through Fire Fire Codes as ado fed b the Cit of Dublin. Coro Iction _ _ 61. Slgnage. If key locking hardware is used on one main door, F Occupancy C'RC' provide a sigm above the door stating, "THIS DOOR TO 1003.3 I.R REMAIN Li1Vl.OCKED DC1RiNG E3USINESS HOURS Otherwise the exit doors shall be openable from the inside without special knowledge or elTurt and have lever or panic hardware. P_OLI_CR 62. Residential and Non-Residential Security Ordinance. 1'U Ongoing Police The Apphcant/Developer shall comply with all applicable City of Dublin Non-Residential Security Ordinance rc uircmcnls. 63. Lighting. The City of Dublin Security Ordinance requires PO Ongoing PohccT specific foot candles of light be provided at ground level. '17tese requirements will he enforced when reviewing and approving the lighting plan for this project. The applicant shall submit a final lighting plan I'or approval by the Dublin Police. Pxterior lighting is required over all doors. To ensure that the doorways retain the rcyuircd lighting levels, regardless of the landscaping lighting, it is requested that doorways be lighted with fixtures designed for that express purpose. 11 I~g CONDITION TEXT RF,SPON. WHEN SOURCE AGENCY REQ'D 1'1ZIUK TO Security lighting shall he provided in parking lot areas. I 0 candle lights at ground level in parking lot areas v i.i htin ~ lixtures shall be of a vandal restatant t c _ 64. Landscaping Mainkenance. Landscaping shall be kept at PO Ongoing Pnlicc a minimal height and fullness giving patrol ol7icers and the eneral ublic surveillance ca abilittcs of the area. 6S. Skateboarding. Landscaping features and outdoor PO Ongoing Police amenritcs shall be dcst~mcd to reduce thctr attracttvcncss to skateboarders and vandals. _ 66. Addressing. Addressing and building numbers shall be PO Ongoing Pohcc wsiblc from the approaches to the building. Addressing for mdrvidual suites/businesses within the project shall also have tlrc address on the rear door of the business. _ 67. Doors. Employee exit doors and doors to the rear of tenant PO Ongoing Pohcc spaces shall be equipped wrih 180-degree viewers if there is not a burglary resistant window panel in the door from which W scan the exterior _ _ 68. Parking Signage. All entrances to the parking areas shall PO Ongoing Police he posted with appropnatc sums per Sec. 226.581x) of the California Vchtclc Code and City of Dublin Mumctpxl Ordinance Section 6.04.200, to assist in removing vchtclcs _ at the . ro . ert owner's/mans er's re uest. G9. GralTti. The Applicant and Tenant shall keep the site clear PO Ongoing Police of ratflti vandalism on a continuous basis at all times. 70. Theft Prevention and Security Program. The Applicant I'U Ongoing Police or Manager shall wrn•k with the Dublin Police on an ongoing basis to establish an effective theft prevention and securi ro ram. _ tT P.. 8._........----.......... 71. Construction Phase Srcurity. During the ennst,tiiction 1'U 'Through Police phase the Applicant and Developer shall conform to the Occupancy following security requirements: 1. The site shall have a security fence around the perimeter of all work under construction. 2. The site shall have lighting and the fence shall be locked when workers are not present. 3. A temporary address stgn shill be posted of sufficient stze and color contrast to be seen from the street during hours of darkness. 4. The Applicant shall file a Dublin Pnlicc "Business Site iimergency Response Card" prior to any phase of construction, which will provide 24-hour telephone contact numbers of pcvsons responsible for the constructton sttc. 5. Ciood security practices shall he followed with respect m storage of building materials and storage of tools at the constructton situ. 12 ~~~c~ CONDITION TEXT RESPON. WHEN SOURCE AGENCY REQ'D 1'RlOli TD PilI3LIC WORKS - GENERAi. 72. Glorifications and Changes to the Conditions. In the PW Improvement Public event that there needs to be clarification to these Plans Works Conditions of Approval, the Directors of Conununity llevelopment and Public Works have the authority to clarity the intent of these Conditions of Approval to the Applicant/Developer by a written document signed by the Directors of Community Development and Puhlic Works and placed in the project tile. The Directors also have the authority to make minor modifications to these conditions without going to a public hearing in order for the Developer to fultill needed improvements or mitigations resulting from im acts of this rnject. 73. Standard Public Works Conditions oT Approval. 1'W Improvement 1'tiblic Applicant/Developer shall comply with all applicable City flans Works of Dublin Puhlic Works Standard Conditions of Approval. In the event of a conflict between the Puhlic Works Standard Conditions of Approval and these Conditions, these Conditions shall revail. 74. Hold Harmless/lndemnificution. The lleveluper shall PW Completion Puhlic defend, mdenmify, and hold harmess the Caty of Dublin of Works and ria agents, officers, and employees from any claim, improvements action, ur proceeding against the Ctty of Uublin or its and agents, officers, or employees to attack, scC aside, void, nr Occupancy annul an approval of the City of Uublin ur its advisory agcnuv, appeal board, I'lamm~g Commission, City Cuuneil, Conmiunity llevelopment llirector, Loning Administrator, nr any other department, cummtttcc, or agency of the City to the extent such actions are brought within the time period required by Government ('ode Section h6499.37 or other applicable law; provided, however, that The Developer's duty to so defend, indemnify, and hold harmless shall be subject to the City's promptly notifying Developer of any said claim, action, or proceeding and the City's full cooperation in the defense of such actions or roceedin •s. _ 75. (:onditinns nF Approval. A copy of the Conditions of YW Improvement Public Approval which has been annotated how each condition is Plans Works satisfied shall he included with the submittals to the Public Works Department for the review of the Parcel Map and improvements plans. The notations shall clearly indicate how al] Conditions ul'Approval will be complied with, and where they arc located un the plans. Submrilals will nut be _ accepted without the annotated conditions. 7(~. Title Report. A current preliminary title report (prepared PW Impruvcmcm Public within the last six months) together with copies of all Plans Works recorded easements and other encumbrances and copies of Final Maps for adjoining properties and ntt-site easements shall be submitted for reference as deemed necessa b the 13 _ ie~ CONDITION 'I"1N;XT RF,SPON" WNEN SOURCE AGENCX REQ'D PRIOR TO Ci Fn rinser/Director of Public Works. 77. Improvements within Existing Easements. The PW Imprrwcmcnt Public Applicant/Develnper shall ohtain written pcrntissiun from Plans Works the heneticiaries of all existing casements encumbering Chc site before cnnstruchng improvements within the casement areas it the proposed improvements arc mconsiatcm with purpose for which the cascmcm was created. Said permission shall be forwarded to the City as evidence of the Apphcant/L)eveloper's right to construct said im rovcmcnta. 78. improvement Agreement and Security. Pursuant to PW Issuance of Public ~71G,620 of the Municipal Code, the Applicant shall Grading/ Works ohtain aGrading/Sricwork Pcnnit from the Public Works Sitcwork Department that gove-rtis the installation of required site Permit improvements. As a condition of issuance of said permit, Lnprunemerst Security shall be posted to guarantee the faithful pcrlurmancc of the permitted work. Such security shall be m the Porn of cash, a certified or cashier's check, a letter of crcdil, or a pernrit bond executed by the applicant and a corporate surety authorized to do business in California. The amount of the security will be based on the estimated cost of the site work (excluding the building). The applicant shall provide an estimate of these cults fur Ci review with the_tlrst Aan suhrnittal. 79. Improvement and Grading Plans. All improvement, PW Issuance of Public drainage, utility and grading plans submitted to the Public Grading/ Works Works Department for review/approval shall be prepared in Sitework accordance with the approved SDR, these Conditions of Permit Approval, and the City of Dublin Municipal C;udc mcluchng Chapter 71G (Grading Ordinance). When submitting plans for review/approval, the Apphcanl/Dcvcloper shall also fill-out and submit a City of Dublin Iniproverr:erat Plan Review Checklist (three 8-1/2" x II" pages). Said checklist includes necessary design criteria and other pertinent information to assure that plans arc submitted in accordance with established City standards. T'he plans shall also reference the current City u/ Dublin ~S'trnarlrn•rl P/aras• (booklet), and shall include applicable City of Dublin bnprovenaent !'tan Cenerad Notes (three 8-1/2" x 11" pages). Nor nn-site improvements, the Applicant/lleveloper shall adhere to the City's On-silt Checklist (eight 8-1/2" x 1 I" pages)- All nfthese reference documents are available from the Public Works Department (call telephone 925-833-6630 for more mfonnafion). The Grading flan shall he in conformance with the recommendations of the Ceotechnical Report, the approved SDR, and the City design standards & ordinances. in case of conflict between the soil en ineer's recommendations 14 i o~ CONDiTiON TEXT R.ESPON. WHEN SOUitCE AGENCY REQ'D PIZiOR TO and City ordinances, the City Engineer shall determine which shall apply A detailed rrnsion Control Plan shall be mcludcd with the Grading Plan. The plan shall mcludc detailed desilm, location, and mamtcnancc cntcna of all erosion and sedimcntahon control measures. Detailed Engineer's Tstimatc of improvement costa shall be submitted with the fans. 80. Grading/Sitework Permit. All improvement work must PW Issuance of Public be performed per a Grading/Sitework 1'ennit issued by the Grading/ Works Puhhc Works Department. Said permit will be based on Sitcwork the final set of civil plans to be approved once all of the Perrmt plan check comments have been resolved. Please refer to the handout titled Grurling/Site Inihr•nverraent perrrait .9pplicratlun Lrstrarctiun and attached application (three 8- 1/2" x 11" pages) for more information. 'fhe Applicant/Developer must fill in and return the applicant mforniation contained on pages 2 and 3 The current cost ol• the pcmiit is $l0.UU due at the time of permit issuance, although the Applieant/Developcr will be responsible for _ _ any_adn ted increases to the fee amount. 8i. Erosion Control during Cnnstructlon. PW issuance of Public Applicant/lleveloper shall include an Gmsinn and Gradingi Works Sediment Control flan with the Grading and Improvement Sitewnrk plans for review and approval by the City Hngineer and/or Permit Public Works Director Said plan shall he designed, implemented, and continually maintained pursuant to the City's Nl'll1;5 permit between October t" and April I S"' or beyond these dates if dictated by rainy weather, or as otherwise directed by the City Engineer and/or Public Works D~rcctor A1] bRading, construction, and development activities within the City of Dublin must comply with the provisions of the Clean Water Act. Proper erosion control measures must be installed at development sites within the City during construction, and all activities shall adhere to Best Mana cmcnt Practices. _ _ 82. Water Quality/Best Management Practices. Pursuant to PW Issuance of Public the Alameda Comrtywide National Pollution Discharges Grading/ Works 1?limination Permit (NPDES) Nn CA50U29831 with the Sitework California Regional Water Quality Control Board Permit (RWQCBI, the applicant shall desibm and operate the snc in a manner conaistemt wrih the Start at the Source publication, and according to Best Management Practices to minimize storm water pollution. All trash dumpsters and compactors which are not sealed shall have roots to prevent contaminants from washin~nto the storm drain sstem- IS CONDiTTON TEXT RESPON. WIZEN SOIIRCE AGENCY RF.Q'D PRIOR TO All storm drain inlets serving vehicle parking areas shall he fitted with Filter Devices to remove Hydrocarbons and other enntamittants, attd all storm dram inlets shall be stenciled "No 17umpmg Drama to Bay" using an approved stencil available from the Alameda Countywrdc Clean Water Pro zam 83, Storm Drain Improvements. Apphcant/Devuloper shall PW Issuance of Public construct all rcyutrcd Sturm dram tmprovemettts in Gtadmy Works accordance with a srtc-spcctfic hydrology/hydraulic Sitework analysrs and/or as apectficd by the Public Works Director Pcmiit Plans subtmttcd for the stone drain improvements shall include full drama e attcm for the entire arkin lot. 84, Storm Water Treatment Measures Maintenance PW Occupancy Public Agreement. Apphcant/Dcvcloper shall enter into an Works agreement wrih the City of Dublin that guarantees the property owner's perpetual maintenance obligation for all storm water treatment measures installed as part of the project. Saul agRCememt is required pursuant to Provision C.3.e.ii of RWQCB Order R2-2U03-U021 for the reissuance nf• the Alameda C ountywulc NPDES municipal storm water permit. Said pcnmt regains the City to provide veritication and assurance that all trcalmcnt dcvtccs will 6c roperly operated and maintained. 85. 'Lone 7 Drainage Fee. The applicant will be required to PW Issuance of Puhlic pay 'Lone 7's SDA 7-I irnpeivious Surface Area fees for all Building Works new hardsca a areas. Permits p--... 86. Koof Drainage. Roof drainage shall drain across hie- 1'W lnrprovement Puhlic swales or into bin-filters prior to entering the stnrrn drain Plans Works system. The landscaping and drainage improvements in the bio-Swale and bio-filters shall he appropriate for water quality treatment. The City ingineer may exempt specitic roof leaders from thra reyurrement if space limitations prevent adequate water treament without creating hazards, nursancc or structural concerns. Concentrated flows will not be allowed to drarn across ublic sidewalks. 87. Geotechnlcal Report and Recommendations. 1'he PW Issuance of Public Applicant/Developer shall incorporate the Grading/ Works recommendations of the project (ieotechnical Sitework Investigations report or as may be amended by subsequent permit and report, and additional mitigation measures required by the during C'aty Engineer, into the project design. The Gentechnical constmction Engineer shall certify that the project design conforms to the report recommendations prior to issuance of a Grading/Sitework Permrt. All report recommendations shall be followed clunng the course of grading and construction. _ 88. Parking Lot Lights. The Applicant/1)evelnper shall PW Occupancy Puhlic provide photometric calculation for the existing parking tut Works and around the buildin that demonstrates a minimum toot- 1G ~s~~n~ CONDI"I'lON TEXT KESI'UN. WHEN SUURCE AGENCY REQ'D PRIOR TO candle lighting level of not less than LO at the ground surface fur the ad)aucnt parking area, if this cannot be verified rowdc additional h •htm • where ne;ccssar _ 89" Disabled Parking. All disabled parking stalls shall meet PW Issuance of Public State'l'itle 24 requirements, including p~nviding curb ramps Building Works at each loading zone Curh ramps cannot encroach within Permits and the loading/unloading areas. Disabled stalls shall he Occupancy conveniently located and grouped near the primary entrances to each building. Van accessible stalls shall also be rovided and shall meet State_Title 24 re uq irements 90. Disabled Access Ramps. The Applicant/Developer shall YW Occupancy Public install disabled access ramps, and where necessary replace Works all existing handicapped ramps at driveway intersectiats to meet current State Title 24 re uirements. 91. Vehicle Parking. Applicant shall repair any distressed 1'W Occupancy Public areas of pavement within the existing parking Held of the Works project site and the north/south drive-aisle immediately north of the project site, then seal and re-stripe the entire parking field within the project site. Al] parking spaces shall be double striped using 4 inch white lines set approxm~atcly 2 feet apart according to Figure 76-3 and §8.76.070 IA) 17 of the Dublin Municipal Code. All compact-aizcd parking spaces shall have the word '`COMPAC'T" stenciled on the pavement within each space. l2 inch-wide concrete slop-oul curbs shall 6c constructed of each parking space where one or both sides abut a landscaped area or planter Whccl stops as necessary shall _ he provided at the arkin stalls. 92. Bicycle Racks. Bicycle racks shall he installed near the PW, PL Issuance of Public entrances to retail buildings at a ratio of I rack per 40 Building Works vehicle parking spaces. Bicycle racks shall he designed to Permit Plans accommodate a minimum of four bicycles per rack, and so and that each bicycle can be secured to the rack, The location Occupancy of the bicycle racks shall not enemach into any adjacent/adjoining sidewalks in a manner that would reduce the unencumbered width of the sidewalk to less than 4 feet. Bicycle racks shall be placed in locations where they will have adequate lighting and can be surveilled by the building occupants. the Site flan shall show the location of the pro osed hie cle racks. 93. Sidewalk. The Applicant/Dcvclopcr shall repair any PW Occupancy Public damaged sidewalk along the s~tc frontage on Amador Plaza Works Road. Pedestrian walkway connecting the back door exits/entrances to the public sidewalk shall also be installed. Pcr Section 1114B.1.2 of the California Building Code, an accessible and direct route travel shall he provided between the building and the public sidewalk nn Amador Plaza Koad. - 17 a~~ CONllI'1'lON'1'EXT RESl'ON. WIZEN SOURCE AGENCY 1tEQ'll PRIOR TO 94. Pedestrian Crossing Signs and Striping. The YW Occupancy 1'u»lic Applicant/Developer shall install crosswalks, pedestrian Works crossing warning signs, and pedestrian crossing pavement legends per Calnans and City standards at the proposed crosswalk locations. 9S. Signs and Pavement Markings. The Applicant/Developer 1'W Occupancy Puhlic shall be responsible fur the 1'ulluwing on-site traffic s~lms Works and pavenrenC markings: r. A stop control (including Caltrans R1 "Stop" sir, step pavement Icgend, 12 inch-wide white stop bar stripe) shall he installed at the driveway exit. ii. 17irectinnal pavement arrows in the drive aisles. iii. R2fiF "No Stopping -Fire Lane" sigms shall be posted on-site along all curbs that are longer than 2U feet and that parallel the dove aisles as required by the Firc Marshall. r~ R1UUI3 (disc»led parking regulations sign) shall 6e installed of each of the driveway entrance to the site with amended text to read " .may he reclaimed at DiJBi.TN POLICI; ur »y telephoning R33-fifi70" v Handicapped parking signs and legends per State Title 24 requirements. vi. The word "Compact" shall he stenciled ar the pavement surface within each compact parking space. vii. "Nn Dumping - Drains to Bay" stenciled in thermoplastic at storm drain inlets. viii. Any other signs and markings deemed reasnna»ly necessary by the City 1;ngineer and/or Public Works Director Burin final desi and/or construction. 96. Landscape and lrrigatiun Ylans. The PW issuance of Public Applicant/Developer shall submit Landscape and Irrigation improvement Works Plans ibr review and approval by Planning and Public flans and Works Dcparimcnta. Thcac plans shall be coordinated with Building on-site civil, streetlights, and utility improvement plans. Permits The final plans shall be signed Community Development Director and the Cit hn ineer 97. Landscaping at Intersections. Landscaping at PW Occupancy Pu»lic intersections shall be such that sight distance is nut Works obstructed for dnvcrs. Except fur trees, landscaping shall not be hi ~hcr than 30 inches above the curb m these areas. 98. Relocation of Existing Improvements/ IItilities. Any PW Occupancy Public necessary relocation of existing improvements nr Works util ides shall he accom lished at no ex ense to the Cit 99, Temporary Fencing. Temporary Construction fencing PW During Puhlic shall be installed along pcnmctcr of all work under Construction Works cnnstruchon to separate the constructron operation from the public. All constructron achnhcs shall be confined to Occupancy within the fenced area. Construction materials and/or c ui mcnt shall not be o crated or stored outside of the 18 a~~ rig C(7NDiTiON TEXT RESPON. WiIFN SOURCE AGENCY REQ'I7 PRIOR TO fenced area or within the public right-of--way unless a roved in advance 6 the Public Works llirector 100. Cnnstruction Hours. C.onslruction and grading operations PW During Public shall be hmitcd to weekdays (Monday through Friday) and Crnistniction Works nun-C.riy hohdxys between the hours of 7.30 a.m. and .5.30 p.nr. The Apphcant/Devclopur may request permission to wank on Saturdays and/or holidays between the hours of 8.30 am and S:DO pm by submitting a request form to the City Engineer nn later than 5•UO pm the prior Wednesday Overtime inspection rates will apply for all Saturday and/or _ holiday work. _ 101. Cons traction Noise Management Program/ PW Dunng Public Construction Impact Rcdnction flan. Cons'tructton Works Apphcant/Dcvcloper shall conform to the following C'onstructton Noise Management Prol,Tam/C'onstructton Impact Rcductton Plan. The following measures shall be taken to reduce construction Impacts: a. Off-site tntck traffic shall he routed as directly as practical to and from the freeway ([-580) to the job site. An Oversized Load Permit shall be obtained from the City prior to hauling of any oversized loads on City streets. b. "1'he constniction site shall he watered at regular intervals during all grading activities. The frequency of watering should increase if wind speeds exceed 15 miles per hour Watering should include all excavated and graded areas and material to he transported nff- site. Use recycled or other non-potable water resources where feasible. c. Construction equipment shall not be left idling while not in use. d. Cnnstruction equipment shall he fitted with noise muffling devices. e. Mud and dust carried onto street surfaces by construction vehicles shall be cleaned-up on a daily basis. f. Excavation haul trucks shall use tarpaulins or other effective covers. g. [Ipnn completion of construction, measures shall he taken to reduce wind erosion. Replanting and repaving should he completed as soon as possible. h. After grading is completed, fugitive dust on exposed soil surfaces shall he controlled using the following methods: following methods: 1. Inactive portions of the construction site shall he seeded and watered until grass growth is evident. 2. The construction site shall be seeded and watered until grass brrowth is evident. 3. All unions of the site shall be sufficicrntl 19 a~~ CONDITION TEXT RESPON. WHEN SOURCE AGENCY REQ'll I'121OK TO watered to prevent dust. 4. On-sttc vchtulc speed shall be linntcd to 15 mph. 5. Use of petroleum-based palliatives shall meet the road oil requirements of the Air Quality District. Non-petroleum based tackifiers may be required by the l.ity Engineer i. The Department ul' Pubhc Works shall handle all dust complaints. The City Engineer may rcyuirc the services of an air yuality consultant to advtse the City on the severity of the dust problem and addittonal ways [u mthgatc impact un restdcnts, including temporarily halting project cunstruchun. Dust uonccrns m adjoining wmmunnies as well as the City of Dublin shall be addressed. Control measures shall be related to wind condttiuns. Air yuality munttonng of PM levels shall be pruvadcd as nyutrcd by the City rngtnccr J. Constructtun interference with regional non-project traffic shall 6c minimized by 1 Scheduling receipt of construction materials to non-peak travel periods. 2. Routing construction traffic through areas of least impact sensitivity 3 Routing construction traffic to mm~mtzc construction interference with regional non-pru~cct traffic movement. 4. Limiting lane closures and detours to off-peak travel periods. 5 Providing ride-share incentives for contractor and suhcontractnrpersnnnel. k. Emissions enntml of nn-site equipment shall he minimized tlu•ough a routine mandatory program of low-emissions tune-ups. 102: llamage/Repairs. 'l he Applicant/Developer shall he PW Occupancy Public responsible for the repair of any damaged pavement, curb Works & gutter, sidewalk, or other public street facility resulting from construction activities associated with the development of the~>rnject. 103. Fire Hydrants. "fhe Applicant/Developer shall cnnstiuct I'W Occupancy Public all new fire hydrants in accordance with the ACFD and Works City of Dublin requirements. Final location of fire hydrants shall he approved by the ACED in accordance with current standards. Raised blue reflectorized trai'lic markers shall be oxicd to the center of the street u usttc each h drant. _ 104. Grafl"iti. The Applicant/Developer and/or building PW Ongoing Pubhc tenant(s) shall keep the site clear of graffiti vandalism on a Works regular and continuous basis. Graffiti resistant paint for the structures and tilm for windows or glass shall be used whe_n_ever possible. 20 ~q~ ~ o~ CUNDITIUN TEXT RESPUN. WHEN SOURCF. AGENCY 1tEQ'll PRIOR TO 105. Occupancy Permit Requirements. Prior to issuance of an 1'W Occupancy Public Occupancy Permit, the physical condition of the project site Works shall meet minimum health and safety standards including, but not limited to the following; a. The walkways providing access to the building shall be complete, as determined by the City Engineer, to allow for safe, unobstructed pedestrian and vehicle access to and from the site. h. All traffic control devices providing access to the site shall be in place and fully functional. c. All address numbers for streets providing access to the buildings shall be in place and visible. d. Lighting far the site shall be adeyuate for safety and security Exterior lighting shall be provided for building entrances/exits and pedestrian walkways. Security lighting shall 6e provided as required by Dublin Yohce. c. All constriction equipment, materials, or ongoing work shall be separated from the public by use of fencing, bamcadcs, caution ribbon, or other means approved by the City Engineer f. All fire hydrants shall be operable and easily accessible to City and ACPD personnel. g. All site features desitmed to serve the disabled h.e. H/C parking stalls, accessible walkways, signage) shall he _ installed and full fimetional. 106. Trash Enclosure/(:arhage Area. The doors must he 1'W Issuance of Public designed with self-closing gates that can be locked closed Building Works and can also be held open with pin locks during loading. Permit All trash bins used for this site shall be maintained within the trash bin enclosure at all times. An area drain shall he installed within the trash bin area with a connection to the sanitary sewer system. [n addition, a hose hih shall he rovided for convenient wash-down of the trash enclosure. 107. Refuse Collection. 1'he Applicant/ lleveloper shall provide PW Issuance of Public desilmated refuse collection areas for the project, subject to Building Works approval by the appropnatc solid waste collection company Permits prior to approval of improvemcm plans. All refuse cullcctiun areas shall be screened from public new and shall have roofs to protect against rainwater intrusion and floor drains connected to the sanitary sewer system to collect runoff from periodic wash down. The refuse collection service provider shall be consulted to ensure that adeyuate space is pruwdcd to accommodate collechon and sorting of putrescible solid waste as well as suurco-separated recyclable materials generated by this project. 21 3~~ ~0`~ CONDITION TEXT RESPON. WIIEN SOURCE AGENCY REQ'D PR1UR TU 1118. Geographic Information System. The PW Occupancy Puhlic ApplicanUDcvelupcr shall provide a drgrlal vccWrizcd file Works of the "master" files un floppy or CD of the Improvement Plans to the Public Works Department. and DSRSD Digital raster coptes arc not acceptable. The digrtal vectorized files shall be in AutoCAll 14 or higher drawing format rn• ESR[ Shapetile format. Drawing units shall he decimal with the precision of 0 00 All objects and entities in layers shall he colrn•ed by layer and named in English, although abbreviations are acceptable. All submitted drawings shall use the Global Coordinate Svstem of USA, Cahfomia, NAD 83 California State Plane, Zone III, and U.S. foot. Said submittal shall be acceptable W the City's GIS Coordinator 109. Public improvements. Al] public improvements PW Occupancy Public constructed by Developer and to be dedicated to the City Works are hereby identified as "public works" under Labor Code swtron 1771 unless the Public Works Director specifically dctcrnunes otherwise in writing. Accordingly, Developer, in constructing such improvements, shall comply with the Prevailing Wage Law (Labor C.udc. Stets. 1720 and followin 110. 'Che Applicant/Developer shall comply with Public Works PW hnprovement Puhlic Standard Conditions of A ~ royal (Attachment A.) Plans Works DUBLIN SAN RAMON SF,RViCF,S DiSTRiCT DSRSD 111. Prior to issuance of any building permit, complete DSRSD issuance of DSRSD improvement plans shall be submitted to DSRSD that Building conform to the requirements of the Dublin San Ramon Permits Services District Cade, the DSRSD "Standard Procedures, Spccifiuations and Drawings far Design and installation of Water and Wastewater Facilities", all applicable DSRSll _ _ Master flans and all USIZSll ~nlicies. _ 112. Domestic and fire protection waterline systems for 'tracts llSRSll Improvement llS1ZSD or Commercial llevelopments shall be designed to be Plans luopctl or mtcrcunnectcd to avoid dead end sections in accordance with reyurrcmcnts of the DSRSD Standard S ecitications and sound cn ~inccrin * rachcc. i13. llS1ZSll policy requires public water and sewer lines to be DSRSD Improvement DSRSD located in public streets rather than in off-street locations to Plans the fullest extent possible. if unavoidable, then public sewer water easements must be established over the aliymmcnt of each public sewer or water line in an off-street or private street location to provide access for future maintenance and/ar re lacement. 11Q. Prior to issuance by the City of any Building Permit or DSRSD Issuance of DSRSD C:onstructron Permit by the Dublin San Ramon Services Improvcmertt Drstrtct, whrchcver comes first, all utility connection fees Permits including DSRSD and Gone 7, plan checking fees, ms ection fees, connection fees, and fees associated with a --22- - 3i~ ion CONllIT10N'PEXT RESPON. WHEN SOURCF. AGENCY RRQ'D _ _...W PRIOR TO . . wastewater discharge penrut shall be paid to DSRSD in accordance with the rates and schedules established in the _ llSRSU Cnde. 115. Prior to issuance by the City of any Building 1'ennit or USRSU Issuance of USRSU Constn~ction 1'ennit 6y the llublin San 1Zamon Services Improvement Distnct, whichever comes first, all improvement plans for flans llSKSll facilities shall 6e signed by the District Engineer Each drawing of improvement plans shall contain a sibmaturc block for the Dtstnet Engineer mdtcahng approval of the 5anilary sewer or water facilities shown. Prior to approval by the District Engineer, the applicant shall pay all required DSRSD tees, and provide an engineer's estimate of construction costs for the sweer and water systems, a performance bond, a one-year maintenance bond, and a comprehensive general liability insurance policy in the amounts and forms that are acceptable to DSRSD The applicant shall allow at least 1S working days for final improvement drawing rcv~cw by DSRSD heF'ore si ature b the Dislncl En pincer I76. No sewer line or waterline construction shall be permitted DSIZSU linprovenrent DSRSD unless the proper utility construction permit has been flans tssucd by USRSU A construction pernrit will only be issued after all of the items m Condition No. 113 have been satistied. 1.17. The applicant shall hold DSRSD, its F3oard of Directors, DSRSD issuance of DSRSD commissions, employees, and agents of DSRSD harmless Building and indemnity and defend the same from any litigation, Permits claims, nr tines resulting from the construction and coin letion of the roject. 118. No permanent structures arc pcrnntted over the 15' wtcfc Zonc 7 Ongoing Zonc 7 storm dram casement. 119. The Applicant/Prnperty Uwner shall provide a structural 7.nne 7 Issuance of 7.nne 7 and geotechnical analysis of possible impacts to the ~lnnd Building Control facilities located within the IS' wide storm drain Permits easement resulting from any foundation nr trenching work in the vicinity of this easement necessary to construct the _ _ Proposed building, foundation, nr related im rnvements. 120. The Applicant/Property Owner shall provide a strnctural Lone 7 Issuance of Gone 7 and geotechnical analysis of possible impacts to the $uilding foundation of the proposed building that may result from 1'ennits any trenching or other maintenance/repairs performed on the Flood Control facilities located within the within the 15' wide storm drain easement. 121. The Applicant/Property Owner shall survey and stake the Zone 7 Issuance of Zonc 7 15' wtdc storm drain easement and proposed building Building foundation for review by Zwre 7 The proposed foundation Permits and building shall not encroach within thts stoma drain easement. The survey shall be performed by a licensed serve or 23 a~ i~,`~ PASSED, APPROVED AND ADQPTF.D tMs 6[h day of Tune, 2006, by the following vale: Al'FS: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 7anet Lockhart, Mayor ATTEST: Fawn Halman, City Clerk ci.1P4#\21105\05-1135 May}icld (icntry Rcalty Advisors\CC'\CC' Resa SaR,DaC' 24 3~~~~ UI rll '?i CIZ`Y QF ~ITSLIN Pu61ic Wprk5 ~ '\\\1 Department , l~^*4 ~ Clly pfFlcaS, 100 Clvlc Place, Dublin California 94568 I,,irrr: ' Attachment A PUBLIC WORKS STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL GENERAL. 1 The Developer shall comply with the Subdivisien Map Act, the City of Dublin Subdivision, Zoning, and Grading Ordinances, the City of Dublin Public Works Standards and Policies, and all building and fire codes and ordinances in effect at the time of building permit. 2. In the event that there needs to be clarification to the Conditions of Approval, the Director of Community Development and the City Engineer have the authority tp clarify the intent of these Conditions of Approval to the Developer without going to a public hearing. The Director of Community Development and the City Engineer also have the authority to make minor modifications to these conditions without going to a public hearing in order for the Developer to fulfill needed improvements or mitigations resulting from impacts to this project. 3. The Developer shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Dublin and its agents, officers, and employees From any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Dublin or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City of Dublin or its advisory agency, appeal board, Planning Commission, City Council, Community Development Director, Zoning Administrator, or any other department, committee, or agency of the City to the extent such actions are brought within the time period required by Government Cade Section 66499.37 or other applicable law; provided, however, that The Developer's duty to so defend, indemnify, and hold harmless shall be subject to the City's promptly notifying The Developer of any said claim, action, or proceeding and the City's full cooperation in the defense of such actions or proceedings. 4 Any water well, cathodic protection well, yr exploratory boring qn the project prpperty must be properly abandoned, backfilled, or maintained in accordance with applicable groundwater protection ordinances. For additional information contact Alameda County Flood Control, Zone 7 AGREEMENT AND 80ND5: 5. The Developer shall enter into a Tract Improvement Agreement with the City for all tract improvements. fi. The Developer shall provide performance (100%), and labor & material (10D%) securities to guarantee the tract improvements, approved by the City Engineer, prior to execution of the Tract Improvement Agreement and approval of the Final Map (Note. Upon acceptance of the improvements, the performance security may be replaced with a maintenance bond that is 25% of the value of the performance security ) FEES. 7 The Developer shall pay all applicable fees in effect at the time of building permit issuance including, but not limited to, Planning fees, Building fees, Dublin San Ramon Services District fees, Public Facilities fees, Dublin Unified School District School Impact fees, Public Works Traffic Impact fees, Alameda County Fire Services fees; Noise Mitigation fees, Inclusivnary Housing In-Lieu fees; Alameda Gvunty Flood and Water CI\~u°uti10n15 and SeLLinga\jeffb\Lucal SeLLings\'fempurary Internet files\(1LK19\NW Standard Conditions of AppruvaLJuc 3~~ Conservation District (Zone 7) Drainage and Water Connectien fees; and any other fees as noted in the Development Agreement. $ Parkland shall be dedicated and / or in-lieu fee paid, prior to approval of the Final Map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, in accordance with the City's Subdivision Ordinance. PERMITS. 9. An encroachment permit from the Public Works Department may be required far any work done within the public right-of-way even if covered under an Improvement Agreement. 1D Developer shall obtain all permits required by other agencies including, but not limited to Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Zone 7, California Department of Fish and Game, Army Corps of Engineers, Regional Water Quality Control Board, CalTrans and provide copies of the permits to the Public Works Department. SUBMITTALS. 17 All submittals of plans and Final Maps shall comply with the requirements of the "City of Dublin Public Works Department Improvement Plan Submittal Requirements", and the "City of Dublin Improvement Plan Review Check List" 12. The Developer will be responsible for submittals and reviews to obtain the approvals of all participating non- City agencies. The Alameda Ceunty Fire Department and the Dublin San Ramon Services District shall approve and sign the Improvement Plans. 13. Developer shall submit a Geotechnical Report, which includes street pavement sections and grading recommendations. 14 Developer shall provide the Public Works Department a digital vectorized file of the "master" files fpr the project when the Final Map has been approved. Digital raster copies are not acceptable. The digital vectorized files shall be in AutoCAD 14 or higher drawing format. Drawing units shall 6e decimal with the precision of the Final Map All objects and entities in layers shall be colored by layer and named in English. All submitted drawings shall use the Global Coordinate System of USA, California, NAD $3 California State Plane, Zone III, and U.S. foot. FINAL MAP' 15. The Final Map shall be substantially in accordance with the Tentative Map approved with this application, unless otherwise modified by these conditions. 16. All rights-of-way and easement dedications required by the Tentative Map including the Public Service Easement shall be shown on the Final Map 17 Street names shall be processed for approval through the Planning Department. The approved street names shall be indicated on the Final Map. EASEMENTS. 18. The Developer shall grant to the City of Dublin easements for traffic signal detectors, boxes conduit, etc. at all private streets and driveways entrances that will 6e signalized. 19 The Developer shall obtain abandonment from all applicable public agencies of existing easements and right of ways that will nc longer be used. C:U)ncumcnts and Sc[[ings~jcffh~Lucal Sertings\Tenlpurary Internet I'ilea\GLK19\PW Standunl l'.undiliun5 ul 4ppruvaLduc ~ ~ [off 20. The Developer shall acquire easements, and/or obtain rights-of-entry from the adjacent property owners far any improvements on their property The easements and/or rights-of-entry shall be in writing and copies furnished to the Gity Engineer 21 All public sidewalks must be within City right-of-way or in a pedestrian access easement unless approved 6y the City Engineer GRADING PLANS. 22. Tha Grading Plan shall be in conformance with the recommendations of the Geotechnical Report, the approved Tentative Map, and the City design standards & ordinances. In case of conflict between the soil engineer's recommendations and City ordinances, the City Engineer shall determine which shall apply 23. A detailed Erosion Control Plan shall 6e included with the Grading Plan approval. The plan shall include detailed design, location, and maintenance criteria of all erosien and sedimentation control measures. IMPROVEMENTS 24 The public improvements shall be constructed generally as shown on the Tentative Map However, the approval of the Tentative Map is not an approval of the specific design of the drainage, sanitary sewer, water, traffic circulation, and street improvements. 25 All public improvements shall conform to the City of Dublin Standard Plans and design requirements and as approved by the City Engineer 26. Developer shall construct all potable and recycled water and sanitary sewer facilities required to serve the project in accordance with DSRSD master plans, standards, specifications and requirements. 27 Fire hydrant locations shall be approved by the Alameda County Fire Department. A raised reflector 61ue traffic marker shall be installed in the street opposite each hydrant. 28 Street light standards and luminaries shall be designed and installed per approval of the City Engineer The maximum voltage drop for streetlights is 5°/0. 29 All new traffic signals shall be interconnected with other new signals within the development and to the existing City traffic signal system by hard wire. 30. Two empty 3" conduits with pull ropes, to accommodate future extension of the traffic intercgnnect system and for School District uses, shall be installed along any project arterial street Frontage. The extent of this work to be determined by the City Engineer 31 The Developer shall construct bus stops and shelters at the locations designated and approved by the l_AVTA and the City Engineer The Developer shall pay the cost of procuring and installing these improvements. 32. The Developer shall furnish and install street name signs, and traffic signs & marking for the project as required by the City Engineer 33. Street trees, of at least a 15-gallon size, shall ba planted along the street frontages. The varieties and locations of the trees to be approved by the Community Development Director and City Engineer 34 Any decorative pavement installed within City right-of-way requires approval of the City Engineer Where decorative paving is installed in public streets, pre-formed traffic signal loops and sleeves to accommodate future utilities shall put under the decorative pavement. Maintenance casts of the decorative paving shall be included in a landscape and lighting maintenance assessment district or other Funding mechanism acceptable to the City Engineer C:LL)ncuments unJ ticttings\jePfb~l Heal Sctlings~T°mpnrary Internet Fi1e5\r)LK I9\PW S(alldalYl C°nAitinng n{ppprnaal.dnc J~ ~ I t:'~ 35. To the maximum extent possible, reof drainage shall drain across bio-swales or into bio-filters prior to entering the storm drain system. The landscaping and drainage improvements in the bio-swale and bio-filters shall be appropriate for water quality treatment. The City Engineer may exempt specific roof leaders from this requirement if space limitations prevent adequate water treatment without creating hazards, nuisance or structural concerns. Concentrated flows will not be allowed to drain across public sidewalks. 36. Developer shall construct gas, electric, cable TV and communication improvements within the fronting streets and as necessary to serve the project and the future adjacent parcels as approved by the City Engineer and the various Public Utility agencies. 37 All electrical, gas, telephone, and Cable TV utilities, shall 6e underground in accordance with the City policies and ordinances. All utilities shall be located and provided within public utility easements and sized to meet utility company standards. 38. To the maximum extent practicable, all utility vaults, boxes and structures shall be underground and placed in landscape areas and screened from public view All utility vaults, boxes and structures shall be shown on landscape plans and approved by the City Engineer and Community Development Director prior to construction. CONSTRUCTION: 39 The Erosion Control Plan shall be implemented between October 15th and April 15th unless otherwise allowed in writing by the Gity Engineer The Developer will be responsible for maintaining erosion and sediment control measures for one year fallowing the City's acceptance of the subdivisien improvements. 40. If archaeological materials era encountered during constructicn, construction within 1D0 feet of these materials shall be halted until a professional Archaeologist who is certified by the Society of California Archaeelogy (SCA) or the Society of Professional Archaeolpgy (SQPA) has had an opportunity to evaluate the significance of the find and suggest appropriate mitigation measures. 41 Construction activities, including the maintenance and warming of equipment, shall 6e limited to Monday through Friday, and non-City holidays, between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. except as otherwise approved 6y the City Engineer 42. Developer shall prepare a Construction Noise Management Plan, to be approved by the City Engineer and Community Development Director, that identifies measures to be taken to minimize construction noise on surrounding developed properties. The Plan shall include hours of construction operation, use of mufflers on construction equipment, speed limit for construction traffic, haul routes and identify a noise monitor Specific noise management measures shall 6e included in the project plans and specifications 43 Developer shall prepare a plan for construction traffic interface with public traffic on any existing public street. constructicn traffic and parking may be subject to specific requirements by the Gity Engineer 44 The Developer shall be responsible for controlling any rodent, mosquito, or other pest problem due to construction activities. 45. The Developer shall be responsible for watering or other dust-palliative measures to control dust as conditions warrant or as directed by the City Engineer NPDES: 46. Prior to any clearing or grading, the Developer shall provide the City evidence that a Notice of Intent (NOI) has been sent to the California State Water Resources Control Board per the requirements of the NPDES A copy of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall 6e provided to the Public Works Department and be kept at the construction site. C;\Uucumem5 anJ Settings\jeffb',Lucul Setings\'I'emporary Internet Files\OLK17\PW S[andurel Conditions of 4~rnvutduc 3~°ti 10~ 47 The Storm Water Pollution Prevention Prggram (SWPPP) for the operation and maintenance of the project shall identify the Bast Management Practices (BMPs) appropriate to the project construction activities. The SWPPP shall include the erosion control measures in accordance with the regulations outlined in the mast current version of the ABAG Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook or State Construction Best Management Practices Handbook. 48. The l]eveloper is responsible for ensuring that all contractors implement all storm water pollution prevention measures in the SWPPP ('~.~Documcnts and ScitinSs'jcRb~Lncal Settings~Tcmpurary Internet Files~OLK19V'W Standard Conditions of Apprnval.dnc G~~,~~FDp~~y CITY C1 ~91I~I~ 8z 3 G~ID~ • ~ IFOR~~ AGENDA STATEMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: May 16, 2006 SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: PA 05-35 Dublin Place Commercial Building Planned Development Rezone with Stage 2 Development Plan and 5rte Development Review fora 17,500 square foot commercial building located at 7000 Amador Plaza Road. Report Prepared by Jeff Baker, Associate Planner A,TTACIIMENTS: 1 Ordinance appmvmg a PD -Planned Development Rezone with Stage 2 Development Plan for 7000 Amador Plaza Road (PA D5-035) 2. Resolution approving Site Development Review Permit to construct a 17,500 square foot commercial building and related improvements at 7000 Amador Plaza Road (PA 05-035). 3 Vicinity Map. 4 Project Plans. 5 Calor Elevation. • 6. Downtown Core Specific Plan Exhibit 9 (December 19, 2000) 7 Downtown Core Specific Plan Exhibit 9 (January 1, 2006) 8. Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting on Apri125, 2006. RECOMMENDATION: 1 Open the public hearing; 2. Receive Staff presentation; rY' 3 Receive presentation from the Applicant; 4 Receive Public Testimony; 5 Close the Public Hearing; 6. Deliberate; and 9, Take the following actions: a. Waive the Reading and Introduce Ordinance (Attachment 1) approving a PD -Planned Development Rezone with Stage 2 Development Plan for 7000 Amador Plaza Road (PA OS-035) b. Adopt Resolution (Attachment 2) approving Site Development Review for the pad building located at 7000 Amador Plaza Road. . COPIES TO: Applicant Property Owner Page 1 of 9 I C:1PA#~200SA5A35 Mayfield Grntry Realty Advisore~CCkcsr 5.16.06.doc ATTACHMENT 3G~(j 1UfS PROJECT DIJSCT2IPTION: The project site is located at 7000 Arnador Plaza Road within the Dublin Place Shopping Center The Dublin Place Shopping Center is located at the northwest comer of Dublin Boulevard and Amador Plaza . Road and is within the Downtown Core Specific Plan (Attachment 3). The project is located on the undeveloped portion of a parcel that includes Expo Design Center This undeveloped site is the former location of the Dublin General Cinemas which had been approved for construction by Alameda County in 1979 The theater has since closed and the building was demolished in 2002. The Applicant currently requests approval of a Planned Development Rezone with a Stage 2 Development Plan, and a Site Development Review Permit to construct a 17,500 square foot commercial building and related improvements including a plaza, landscaping and parking. Tenants have not been identified for the building but the tenant mix as anticipated to include 40% retail and 60% restaurant uses. ANALYSTS. Planned Development Rezone with Stage 2 Development Plan Chapter 8.32 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance establiskies the intent, purpose and requirements of the Planiaed Development District. The intent of the Planned Development Zoning Distnci is to create a more desirable use of the land, amore coherent and coordinated development, and a better physical environment than would otherwise be possible under a single zoning district or combination of zoning distracts. The Planned Development district requires that a Stage 1 and Stage 2 Development Plan be adopted to establish regulations for the use, development, improvement, and maintenance of the property within the requested Planned Development Zoning Distract. On April 1.6, 2002, the City Council approved a PD Planned Development Rezone for the Downtown Core Specific Plan area (Ordinance 03-021- This PD district requires a Stage 2 Development Plan and . Site Development Review permit for all new development within the Specific Plan area. Therefore, the Applicant is requesting approval of a PD Rezone with a Stage 2 Developzent Plan as discussed below and included in Attachment 1. Statement of Froposed__Uses_ The Stage 2 Development Plan includes a statement of permitted, conditionally permitted, and temporary uses. Stage 2 Site Plan: The Stage 2 Site Plan depicts the building location, landscaping and plaza location, circulation system, and parking areas. Phasin PP ]an: The emtire project is anticipated to Ue constructed in a single phase. CompatibilitY_ with Stake 1 _Development Plan: The proposed Stage 2 Development Plan is generally consistent with the Stage 1 Development Plan included in the Downtown Care Specific Plan. Architectural Standards: The architectural design standards For the Stage 2 Development Plan are established by the architectural drawings prepared by Michael Willis Architects. Develo ment Re lotions: The proposed Development Plan and development standards for the PD zoning district are as established in the Downtown Core Specific Plan and included in the Stage 2 Development Plan. • Page 2 of 9 Preltminar Landsca e Plan: The Preliminary Landscape Plan includes the conceptual landscape desi~ for the project. The Conditions of Approval For the Site Development Review Perurit require the submittal of a Final Landscaping and Trrigarion Plan. • Site Development Review The Downtown Core Specific Plan includes Design Guidelines which provide a framework for an overall character and destgn consistency throughout the Specific Plan area. Their purpose is to ensure htgh quality site planning and. architecture, and to promote a pedestrian oriented focus throughout the Specific Plan area. Staff worked with the Appltcant to implement these Design Gmdelines. However, the Applicant has identified constraints which they believe limit their ability to fully implement the Design Guidelines as discussed below Site Plan Euildin¢ Orientation: The Downtown Core Specific Plan Stte Planning Destgn Guidelines guide the orientation and placement of structures to ensure an appropriate interface of structures to public places and parking areas. These guidelines encourage buildings to be oriented toward the street wath a zero setback along sidewalks in order to promote pedestrian activrty. The design guidelines encourage parking, service, and utilities to be located away from the street whenever possible in ordex to reduce their visual impact. The proposed building is set back a minimum of 10 feet from The back of sidewalk along Amador Plaza Road (Attachment 4). This location puts the building adjacent to the sidewalk to create a pedestrian edge along the street. A pedestrian plaza will be located to the north of the building as discussed below Parking is located to the west of the building away from Amador Plaza Road and will be screened from view by the building consistent with the design guidelines. The front of the building is oriented to the west and north and will face the parking and plaza areas. The northern most tenant space will front on to . this plaza and be visible from the street. The Applicant stated that it is necessary For the building to face the parking area in order to have a financially viable protect. A site design that pushes the building back from the street and places parking adjacent to Amador Plaza Road would allow the building to face the street and parking. However, this layout would not be consistent with the intent of the Design Guidelines which encourage buildings to be located at the back of sidewalk. Also, rt is not feasible for the Applicant to push the building back from the street to accommodate parking because of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) for the Dublin Place Shopping Center. The CC&Rs restrict the location of the proposed building to the footprint of the former movie theater Therefore, there is not enough space between the street and the building footprint to accommodate parking. Pedestrian Plaza. One of the organizing principles of the Downtown Core Specific Plan is the Dublin Green. This element is intended to be a central landscaped plaza to accommodate public gatherings. However, the Specific Plan uses the terms "Dublin Green" and "plaza" interchangeably Exhibit 9 of the Downtown Core Specific Plan identifies two potential plaza locations both of which are adjacent to the major access ways into the central downtown area. These locations are intended to be refined as the area develops. The Downtown Core Specific Plan was recently reprinted to include amendments through January 1, 2006. The stars representing the potential plaza locations appear in slightly different locations on the revised Exhibit 9 because of the exact locations have not been determined (Attachments 6 and 7). One of these potential plaza locarions is shown slightly to the north of the project site. . The Design Guidelines also encourage smaller pedestrian plazas to emphasize building entries and promote pedestrian activities. These plazas are also encouraged outside of restaurants to improve the pedestrian orientation and promote increased pedestrian activity This project includes the outdoor seating element as well as the plaza area identified in the Specific Plan. Page 3 of 9 ~Ila~io8 The plaza area north of the proposed building provides a civic gathering place as well as provide a pedestrian focal point that connects the building to Amador Plaza Road. The location of the plaza will allow motorists and pedestrians to view patrons in the plaza. Plaza amenities will include a freestandnag tower element, landscaping and benches, as well as space for outdoor dining in the event that a restaurant . occupies the adjacent tenant space. The tower is made from Green Screen (green metal lattice] to accommodate vines and provide a focal point for the plaza. The proposed plaza will be a unique feature that does not currently exist in the downtown area. It will address the need for a Dublin Green, or civic gathering plaza, as generally described in the Downtown Core Specific Plan. The location will also help implement the pedestrian oriented focus of the Specific Plan. Pedestrian Connection. The Downtown Core Specific Plan encourages mid-block pedestrian connections between rear parking lots and the sidewalk. The Specifit Plan further encourages these connections to be paved, lighted and landscaped. The Applicant has provided amid-block pedestrian connection between the proposed building and thy; existing PetSmart building. Dublin Police Services requested a connection at this location to facilitate patrol of the area between the two buildings. This walkway will connect the sidewalk and the parking area to the west pf the building thereby reinforcing the connection between the shopping center anal Amador Plaza Road. This connection will include lighting and landscaping to make a comfortable pedestrian experience during the day or evening. Service Area: A paved service area has been incorporated into the southeast corner of the Site Plan. This service area will serve the project site and the adjacent PetSmart building located immediately to the south. As previously stated, the Design Guidelines encourage such service areas to be located behind the • building and away from the street. However, the PetSmart building has an existing loading dock that faces Amador Flaza Road. The owner of the PetSmart building holds an access easement over the project site to gam access to this loading dock. Therefore, the Applicant is required to provide a paved area in accordance with the easement. The project site will also utilize this service area to take off-street deliveries through the rear of the building. Access and Circulation: Primary access to the site will he from an existing driveway north of the project site on Amador Plaza Road. Additional access points will be provided from driveways that serve the puhlin Place Shopping Center along Amador Plaza Road, Amador Valley Boulevard and Dublin Boulevard. There is an existing private ingress/egress and parking easement across the entire shopping center to allow use of these driveways. ParkinE^ Analysis: The project site is located within the existing Dublin Place Shopping Center. The shopping center has a reciprocal parking easement wkiich means that all of the buildings share the parking spaces within the shopping center. The Applicant anticipates the tenant mix for the proposed building to include 40% retail and 60% restaurant uses. The proposed tenant mix would require 128 parking spaces (1 stall per 3D0 s.f. of retail space and 1 stall per 100 s.f. of restaurant space). The following cable illustrates the number of required parking stalls for the center. • Page 4 of 9 Table 2 -Parking Requirements for the Aubllu Place Shopping Center L.~ ~y~ Building (Address) Size (sq. ft.) Parking Requirement 1Vumber of Stalls Re uired . Anderson's TV (7590 75,300 1 stall/400 sq. ft. 38.25 Amador Plaza Rd. Bank of the West (7533 7,300 1 stall/150 sq. ft. 48.7 Dublin Blvd. Bassett (7575 Dublin 17,850 1sta1U400 sq. ft. 44.63 ~ Blvd. Burlington and Toys R 121,040 1 stalU300 sq. ft. 403.5 Us (6850 and 6900 Amador Plaza Road Carrows (7505 bublin S,D00 1 stall/100 sq. ft. 50 Blvd.) Admimstranve Offices 16,700 1 stall/250 sq. ft. 66.8 (7300 Amador Plaza Rd. Elephant Bar (7202 8,356 1 stall/l0U sq. ft. 83.56 Amador Flaza Rd.) Expo Design Ctr. (7050 93,311 1 stall/300 sq. ft. 311 04 Amador Plaza Rd.) Lighthouse, Cramestop 10,678 1 stall/30D sq. ft. 35.6 and Metro PCS (7172- 7196 Amador Plaza Rd. PetSmart (6960 Amador 25,025 1 stall/300 sq. ft. 83 42 • Plaza Rd. Target (7200 Amador 124,249 1 stall/300 sq. ft. 414.2 Plaza Rd. Video Only (6920 10,250 1 sta1U400 sq ft. 25 6 Amador Plaza Rd.) Proposed Commercial 17,500 (10,500 sq. ft. I sta1U100 sq. ft. 128.3 Building restaurant and 7,000 (restaurant) retail) 1 $ta1U300 sq ft. (retail Total 3X7,243 s . ft. 1 733.6 As shown on the above table, a total of 1,734 parking stalls are required to support the existing shopping center, including the proposed commercial building. A total of 1,935 parking stalls exist today which results in a surplus of 201 parking stalls vn-site. Landscape Plan The Prelumnary Landscape Plan includes new landscaping around the building, enhanced parking lot ]andscaping, and minor modifications to the existing landscaping surrounding the stye (Attachment 4). The Applicant is required to submit a P'inal Landscape Plan for review and approval by the Community Development Department (Condition 26) prior to commencing work. There are certain areas along Amador Plaza Road where the existing landscaping has become sparse and needs to be supplemented. in addition, it is possible that some of the existing landscaping will be damaged during project construction. . Therefore, Condition 25 has been included which requires the Applicant to supplement any sparse or damaged landscaping to the sarisfaction of the Community Development birector. Page S of 9 Building Architecture '-f East Elevation. The cast elevation faces Amador Plaza Road and ~s one of the most important elevations when reviewing compatibility of the building with the shopping center and with the Downtown Gore Specific Plan Design Guidelines. The east elevation has been designed to look like the front of the building because rt faces Amador Plaza Road. However, this elevation will actually function as the back of the building. The doors on this elevation will be used as a service and employee entrance. This elevation has been divided into three district building forms with varied roof heights, cornrces, and setbacks which promotes visual interest and reduces the overall building mass. The varying height and setback also creates a more pedestrian friendly environment by creating changes in the form and hetght. The right side of this elevation is located approximately 10 feet from the back of sidewalk. Store front wandows face the sidewalk and strengthen the pedestrian connection as encouraged by the Design Guidelines. The wall is finished with split face block warnscoting and a cornice treatment that is consistent, with respect to design, with the com~ces located on the adjacent Artderson's, Target, and Expo Design Center buildings located in this shopping center. Colorful striped awnings will add visual interest and pedestrian scale to this elevation. The center portion of this elevation is setback 15 feet io 25 feet from the building forms on either side to break up the massing and provide articulation. The four service entrances have been designed to look like individual storefronts. Each storefront protrudes approximately 6 inches from the wall plane to provide articulation. Windows, glass doors, and colorful awnings have a pedestrian scale and provide visual interest along the street. A vertical trellis (Green Screen) will allow vines to grow and soften the appearance of this elevation. The left side of thts elevation has the tallest roof height and largest buildrng mass of the three building . forms on this elevation. Split face block is the primary material on this section of the elevation. The upper portion of the wall. ~s paanted stucco, and finished with a cornce typical of other buildings within the shopping center. Double glass doors and awnings have been used to further the appearance of storefronts. Electrical equipment and refuse containers are internalized into the elevation. Solid double doors will provide access to these areas. The paved service area in the southeast corner of the site will provide access to the service and refuse area. West Elevation: The west elevation faces Target and Expo Destgn Center and will functton as the front of the building. Like the east elevation, this elevation has been divided into three distinct building forms with varied roof heights, cornices, and setbacks to promote visual interest and breakup the massing of the buildrng. The left side of this elevation includes large storefront windows, split face block wainscoting and a comroe treatment. Colorful striped awnings ate proposed tv add visual interest and differentiate this building mass. The entrance to this tenant space will be on the north elevation facing the plaza. The center portion of this elevation is setback 5 feet from the building forms on either side to break up the massing and provide anc~ulahon. Four individualized storefronts have been incorporated into the design for this section of the building. These stprefronts protrude approxtmately 6 inches from the wall plane, and include window glazing, burgundy colored awnings and a cornice treatment that add a vertical element to the elevation. A vertical metal trellis is featured in two locattons. This trellis will allow vines to grow and soften the appearance of the building. • The right side of this elevation is the dominant building form with the tallest parapet and the largest mass. Split-face block is the predominant material and covers the lower ~/3s of the wall plan. The massing of this Page 6 of 9 elevation is broken up by large storefront windows and doors. This glazing will be shaded by Kelly Grectii awnings that add color and a pedesman scale to this building form. North l?]evatron. The north elevat~an will Face the proposed plaza and will be vtsible from Amador Plaza . Road. The Plaza will accentuate the two entries on this elevation and strengthen the connection between the building and the street. This elevation will feature painted stucco walls and a cornice treatment consistent with the other elevations. to order to break up the building massing, the Applicant has incorporated a split face block wainscoting and a significant number of wtndows. Striped Awnings are included over the windows to provide additional color and visual interest. Condition 18 has been included in the draft resolutton of approval for the 5DR (Attachment 2) which requires the property owner to kcep all awnings clean and in good repatr. South Elevation. The south elevation faces Pet$mart and the mid-block pedestrian connection between the two buildings. Although this elevation will not be visible from the street, the Applicant has incorporated materials and elements that are consistent with the rest of the building. The predominant element is split face block on the lower 2/3s of the wall. The upper portion of the wall will be finished with stucco and a cornice treatment. A series of windows will allow surveillance of the adjacent walkway by employees and customers. Building Colors.; The building will be panted with a mixture of earth tones. The primary building color is a light tan (Tiffany Tan) and the cornice is a dark tan (Camel Tan). These colors will be complemented by three different colors of split-face block (Oak, Pottery, and Taupe). Distinct awning colors (Burgundy, Kelly Green, and Plum, Yellow and Green stripes) which accent the building and provide visual interest. Overall, the colors provide a warns and attractive appearance for the building. The colors are compatible with each other and with the design of the building. The colors are also consistent with the colors in the Downtown which include amixture ofoff-white, browns, reds and other warm colors. • Compatibility wtth Vicinity: The proposed building will be consistent with the design of other buildings in the shopping center as well as the Downtown. The building will include a variety of roof heights, wall planes and cornices which will be compatible with the buildings in the vicinity. The new building will have a mix of warm colors which are compatible with the extsttng shopping center colors which include tan, brown, white and various accent colors. The mix of windows on the building will promote interest and will be compatible with the buildings in the Downtown which have a mix of window forms. Signage The Dublin Town Center lvlaster Sign Program was previously approved for the Dublin Place Shopping Center. The proposed project is subject to this existing master sign program. The signs shown on the plans are for conceptual purposes only and not part of this application. The Applicant will need to submit a permit for signs which will be reviewed against this master sign program. General Plan Consistency The City of Dublin General Plan includes land use designations and development densities. The General Plan Land Use designation For the project site is RetaiUOffice. The RetaiUOffice land use designation permits a range of uses that include retail stores and restaurants. The proposed Stage 2 Development Plan includes a list of perrmtted, conditionally permitted, and temporary uses (Attachment 1) which are consistent with this land use designation. The Genera] Plan permits a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 0.25 to 0 80 The 7 78-acre project site includes the proposed retail pad building and the existing Expo Design Center. The two buildings have a . combined FAR of 0.32, which is conststent with the density range established for this land use. Page 7 of 9 Ana Specific Plan Consistency The )7owntown Core Specific Plan land use designation for the site is Commercial A, which is anticipated to include larger retail centers, service, and restaurant uses. The project site is located within the larger . Dublin Place Shopping Center The proposed retail and restaurant uses are consistent with the intent of the Specific Plan and are also consrstent with the sun•ounding uses. The design of the proposed building meets the requirement in Section G.0 of the Downtown Core Specific ,Plan because it creates a design which focuses attractive archrtectural elements to the stxeet as well as all four sides of the building, and is compatible with surrounding buildings, and creates a pedestrian plaza area to a location consistent witlt the general potential plaza locations identified in the Downtown Core Specific Plan. Noticing Requirements: A public hearing notice for this project was sent to all property owners and residents/tenants within 300 feet of the subject property as required by state law The public notice was also published m the Valley Times in accordance and posted at several locations throughout the City Review by City Departments: The Public Works Department, Building Division, Alameda County Pire lepartment, Police Services, Dublin San Ramon Services District, and the Alameda County flood Conrrol District have all reviewed the proposed project. Conditions of approval from these agencies are included in the proposed Resolution {,4ttachment 2). PLANNING CQM11'IISSTaN HEARING: The Planning Commission has the authority to review the draft Ordinance approving the Planned . Development Rezone and make recommendations to the City Council. The Planning Commission also has the authority to adopt a Resolution approving the Site Development Review Permit. On April 25, 2006, the Planning Commission held a Public Hearing to review the proposed project. However, the Applicant was inadvertently unable to attend this meeting. The Planning Commission raised a number of concerns with the project but felt it was problematic to discuss these issues without the Applicant being present to address them.. Tkte Applicant's representative requested the Planning Commission forward the project to the City Council rather than continue the project to a future Planning Conmiissign meeting. Therefore, Plaiming Commission agreed that the Commission would state their concerns with the protect fqr the record and refer heannglurisdiction to the City Council. Each Planning Commissioner identified their individual concerns but the Planning Commission did not attempt to achieve a consensus on the overall concerns with the project. Please refer to the Planning Commission Minutes (Attachment 8) for information regarding the issues and concerns raised by the Planning Commission. ENVIRONIVIENTAL REVIEW: The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), together with the State guidelines and City environmental regulations require that certain projects be reviewed for environmental impacts and that environmental documents be prepared. On December 19, 2000, the Dublin City Council adopted the Downtown Core Specific Plan and companion Initial Study/Negative Declaration. The current project at 7000 Amadgr Plaza Road has been found to be consistent with the hirtial Sriidy/Negative Declaration . prepared for the Downtown Cgre Specific Plan in December 2000 Page 8 of 9 4(~ ~j r a E~ CONCI,USTdN: This application has been reviewed by the applicable City deparknents and agencies, anal thear comments . have been incorporated into the Conditions of Approval for the project. The proposed project, as conditioned, is consistent with the Dublin Crenera] Plan, the Downtown Core Specific Plan, and the Planned Ievelopment Zoning Drstract in which the project site is located and represents an appropriate project for the site. ItEC0117MENDATIDN. Staff recommends that the City Council. 1) Open the Public Ilearing; 2) Receive Staff presentation; 3) Receive presentation from the Applicant; 4) Recewe Public testimony; S) Close the Public hearing; 6) Deliberate; and 7) Take the following actions: a) Warve the Reading and Introduce Ordinance (Attachment 1) approving a PD -Planned Development Rezone wrth Stage 2 Development Plan for 7000 Amador Plaza Road (PA OS-03S); and b) Adopt Resolution (Attachment 2) approving Site Development Review for the pad building located at 7000 Amador Plaza Road. • Page 9 of 9 ORDINANCE NO. JCX - 06 . AN ORDINANCE bF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN w*www*w~twv.wwaww+hwwwwvewnxww+wwww*wwwwwwww* APPROVING A PD -PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONE WITH STAGE 2 DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CdM1VIERCIAL BUILAING LUCATED AT 7000 AMADOR PLAZA ROAD PA 05-035 WHEREAS, the Applicant, PFRS Dublin Corporation, has requested approval of a PD -Planned Development rezone with Stage 2 Development Plan (PA 05-035) to construct a 17,500 square foot commercial building and related site improvements including a plaza, landscaping and parking, located within the existing Dublin Place Shopping Center on an undeveloped site that is the location of the former Dublin General Cinemas and located at 7000 Amador Plaza Road; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has submitted a complete application which is available and on file in the Planning Division for a PD -Planned Development Rezone and Stage 2 Development Plan, and Site Development Review for the construction of a single story 17,500 square foot retail building and related improvements; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has submitted project plans in conjunction with the requested planning action dated received Apri16, 2006 and a Stage 2 Development Plan; and WHEREAS, the project site is located within the Downtown Core Specific Plan area which has Planned Development zoning. The Ordinance (prdinance 03-02) approving this Planned Development Zoning Distnct requires a Planned Development rezone and Stage 2 Deve]opment Plan, and Site Development Review prior to new development within the plan area; and WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), together with the State CEQA Guidelines require that certain projects be reviewed for environmental impacts and that environmental documents be prepared; and WHEREAS, on 1ecember 19, 2000, the Dublin City Council adopted the Downtown Core Specific Plan and companion Initial Study/Negative Declaration. The current project at 7000 Amador Plaza Road has been found to be consistent with the Initial Study/Negative Declaration prepared for the Downtown Care Specific Plan in December 2000; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a properly noticed public hearing on said application on Apri125, 2006, and referred hearing~urisdiction ofthe request to adopt an Ordinance to establish a Planned Development (PD) Rezone with Stage 2 Development Plan for the Commercial Project, PA OS-035, to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council did hold public hearings on said application on May 16, 2006, and June 6, 2006, and . WHEREAS, proper notices of said hearings were given in all respects as required bylaw; and WHEREAS, a Staff Report was submitted to the Dublin City Council, dated May 16 2006, recommending adoption of an Ordinance to approve the Planned Development District Rezoning for the Commercial Project PA OS-035, and _ W1=IEREAS, the City Council did hear and use its independent judgment and considered all said reports, recommendations and testimony hereinabove set forth; and NPW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Dublin does ordain as follows: SECTION I: Findings. A. Pursuant to Section 8.32.070 of the Dublin Municipal Code, the City Council finds as follows. 1. The Planned Development Rezone and related Stage 2 Development Plan meets the intent and purpose of Chapter 8.32 of the Zoning Qrdinance because they provide efficient use of the project site pursuant to General Plan and Downtown Core Specific Plan policies that include development with a pedestrian scale, including plazas and landscaping, and establish permitted, conditionally permitted and temporary uses and other standards which will ensure that the project will be compatible with commercial and public uses in the immediate vicinity 2. Development under the Planned Development zoning and Stage 2 Development Plan will be harmonious and compatible with existing and future development in the surrounding area in that the proposed uses and development standards are consistent with the adapted Stagel Development Plan. Compliance with the Stage 1 Development Plan ensures that the Developer's project will be harmonious and compatible with other existing and future development in the area. Through compliance with the adopted Stage 1 Development Plan, the Stage 2 Development Plan for the proposed commercial building will create a pedestrian oriented development with a pedestrian scale. . B. Pursuant to Sections 8.120 050 of the Dublin Municipal Code, the City Council finds as follows. 1 Development under the Planned Development zoning and Stage 2 Development Plan will be harmonious and compatible with existing and future development in the surrounding area rn that the proposed uses and development standards are consistent with the adopted Stage] Development Plan. Compliance with the Stage 1 Development Plan ensures that the Developer's project will be harmonious and compatible with other existing and future development rn the area. Through compliance with the adopted Stage 1 Development Plan, the Stage 2 Development Plan for the proposed commercial building will create a pedestrian oriented development with a pedestrian scale. 2. The project site is physically suitable for type and intensity of this project in that it is intended io conform with City policies related to comprehensive planning in the Downtown Core Specific Plan area. The project is designed to murimally affect the existing topography and terrain of the site, has adequate access, and complements existing and proposed development in surrounding areas. 3 The proposed Planned Development Rezoning and Stage 2 Development Plan will not adversely affect the health ar safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity, or be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare because the Stage 2 Development Plan has been designed m accordance with the City of Dublin General Plan, Downtown Care Specific Plan„ and all applicable . development regulations. 4 The proposed Planned Development Rezoning and Stage 2 Development Plan for the project are consistent with all elements and policies of the Dublin General Plan and the Downtown Core ~(~7~ 10~ Specific Plan, as prgposed. The Stage 2 Development Plan confvm~s to the elements and pglicies of those plans through the provision of a pedestrian scale with varied setbacks, roof heights, . building massing, pedestrian plaza and landscaping, and roadways consistent with the Circulation Element, adequate public facilities, and safe design as requited by the Seismic Safety and Safety Element. C. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the City Counci] adapted an Initial Study/Negafrve Declaration for the Downtown Cvre Specific Plan on December 19, 2000, incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 2. Pursuant to Chapter 8.32, Title 8 of the City of Dublin Municipal Code the City of Dublin Zoning Map is amended to rezone the followmg property ("the Properiy'~ to a Planned Development Zoning Drstrict: Approximately 0.40 acres generally located west of Amador Plaza Road, north of the existing PetSmart Building, on the western portion of the parcel shared with the existing Home Expo (APN 941-0305-040). A location map of the rezoning area is shown below: r ~ ~ s ~ ,s~` • ~ p,~r, '~1\0.~1 N': F+ ~ YI ~ (WMN~ ~1\ 1 1 ~ `~N ,;pyRl 1 FdMN INN `1 ti ~ ~1 ~ ~ ~1 \1~ N A - 1. I. 'ICOMN " ~ ~ ~ SECTION 3. The regulations for the use, development, improvement, and maintenance of the Property are set forth in the following Stage 2 Development Plan for the Project area which is hereby approved. Any amendments to the Stage 2 Development Plan shall be in accordance with section 8.32.080 of the Dublin Municipal Code or its successors. STAGE 2 DEVELOPIVIENT PLAN This is a Stage 2 Development Plan pursuant to Chapter 8.32 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance for the property located at 7000 Arnador Plaza Rvad (APN 941-0305-040) and is adopted as a zoning amendment . pursuant to section 8.32.030.B of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. 1) Compatibility with Stage 1 Development Plan. The Stage 2 Development Plan is consistent with the site plan, uses, densities and other development standards and provisions of the Stage 1 Development Plan adopted by the City Council in. Resolution 229-D0, on Decemher 19, 2000. ~~~,,F Ifj~ 2) Statement of Proposed Uses Permitted ases: • Retail uses, including, but not limited to. a) General Merchandise Store b) Discount Retail Store c) Ciothing/Fashion Store d) Shoe Store e) Home Furnishing Store f) Office Supply Store g) Home Appliance/Electronics Store h) Home Improvement/Flardware Store i) Music Store j) Hobby/Specialty Interest5tore k) Gifts/Specialty Store 1) Jewelry and Cosmetic Store m) Drug Store n) Auto Parts Store • a) Toy Store p) Hook Store c~ Pet Supplies Store r) Sporting Goods Store {without the sale of firearms) s) Grocery/food Store t) Video Rentals u) Other similar and related uses as determined by tlae Community Development Director Service establishments, inc]uding, but not limited to: a) Hair/Beauty Salon b) Cleaner and Dryer c) Shoe Repair d} Key Shop e) Tailor f) Formal Wear/Rental • g) Other similar and related uses as deterrnined by the Community Development Director Eatrng anal drinking establishments including, but not limited to: ~ Ip ry a) Restaurant-no drive through b) Delicatessen c) Specialty Food (e.g. bagel shop) d) Bakery e) Cafes/CaFFee House f) Ice Cream Shop g) Sandwich Shop h) Other similar and related uses as determined by the Community Development Director Conditional Uses: a) Wine and Liquor bar with on-sale liquor license b) Micro-Brewery c) Video Arcade d) Sporting Goods Store (with sale of firearms) e) Recreat;onal Facility -indoor ~ Other similar and related uses as determined by the Community Development Director Temporary Uses; a) Please refer to Zoning Ordinance Chapter 8.108 for a list of permitted temporary uses and permit procedures. 3) Stage Z Site Plan. Please refer to Exhibit A. 4) Site Area and Proposed Densities. Please refer to Exhibit A. 5) Development Regulations. a) Parking: All uses fnr the site shall comply with Chaptcr 8.'76 Off Street Parking and Loading Regulations of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. h) Signage: The project and all signs within the project shall be subject to the Dublin Town Center Master Sign Program/Site Development Review c) Outdoor seating associated with an approved restaurant use located in the northern most tenant space shall be subject to a $ite Development Review Waiver to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 6) Architectural Standards. Please refer to Exhibit E. 7) Preliminary Landscaping Plan. Please refer to Exhibit C • SECTION 4. The use, development, improvement, and maintenance of the project area shall be governed by the provisions of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance except as provided in the Stagc 2 Development Plan. ~z~ i~~ SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days following its adoption. The City Clerk of the City of Dublin. shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in at least three (3) public places in the City of Dublin in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code of the State of . California. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY the City Council of the City of Dublin, on this 6th day of June, 2006, by the following votes: AxES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Janet Lockhart, Mayer ATTEST: Fawn Holman, City Clerk G:~PA#~200,5~f15-035 Mavfeld Gentry Realty Ad~isurslCC~CC Ord Stnge 2 PD.dnc o ~ f ' py~1+~d+oowryYxA f ~ l r- y ~~i~ ~ l i H ~ Y r I 7 1 11 ~ ~ ~ ~ - _ 11 ~ j - /N _ - - 11 8 W [~I \ 1 ~ ~ _ . ~k 11 ~ ~ ~ 1 r~ I ~u~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Yi ?~r~i?E~99~~?~5~ 11p,~ 1 ~ 1 + 1 1 ~ 1~ ~ _ ~ s a k~ - 1 1 ~ F 1y 11~ s _ 1 ~ ~ ~ l I 11 ~ I'i 1 I T~ fl 1 l1 l ~F ~ r_. ~ - - f 11 ~g ~ ~ t ~ 1 1 1 ~ ~ a a 1 t-~ _ i ~ ~I~ O ~ 1 w s p a 1d 4 1 1 r I ~ a ~i 1~ - - 1 - ~ r~ 11 ~ V 1 1 Q ~ r4 ffi _ `~q ' I ~ 11 1 Y M W ~ F L m qg 1 I ~ ~ ~ ro a W ~1 \1 04. p ~ f ~ ~ 11 1 v 1 $ ~ 0. ~ 11 ~ s ~~N 1 11 i ~ a ~f ~f 1, 11 1 _ p ~ Y Iti..- y 1 1~~~~ 1 ~f ~ ~ ~ ~y 111 L 11 l~wo lH~ - 1 1 - 05 W 81Z 94L9 WJ t? 1;1 1 1 a Z ~~~adrJ 1 11 11 _ 1 l 1 ~ 11 l1 s I' x ~~A ~ ~ , 1 1 i I ~ i ~ i L....~ I ~ ! I f b ~r L ~ ~ 11~ ~ ~ ~ - W. .w-__-~.~ 111 . ~ -~~r~~ I Q ¢ ~e[irNr~~ I AAenmlu,x rMarmua,uadew ' IAenarsv,®,a ,,R.anm,s,..- ~ ~ ~---Rwea1°~`. r r. w~nu~ae,~.m.; ~a ~eA~ IpRgtA6M. YMW 1 rte= EVC,Y[LCm. ~ m..!•I.>L>s. ~ arlma~~1 ~ ey~gliPAAA~LTIT. I ~ ryr~.m AAICNNQIRLM 8R@RWI®~ p .IOIAYl1BW0.AYe ~ ~ r~Ia.r .e ms~c-ls- ~ ~ ~ t i j 4 1lA~SVII1 Bi~STORE &IGSTORE ~ • HA! ~ eStore C1flShes~ ~ lCicchm flhuz ; ~ 4 I I II :11,1llEFmtYL 4M. lpitYE2m. I NANS rR,1 01Y I 1 ,w~rxeeanrn pA~tlmA,rar$ ~ ~ asaneolAr YYEST H.EVA7FGN FACMGPApgNG I I ' $ .....,r•rr i '0 T fAlCxlrtamnim~ T ~ oVAM1AAeAAm ~ A[1i1161N r0~ j ~ [~namlrLram 1 I { NMPL®BIfAM&61YT Ioalnue.m.~ nETE1N16M.~ S ~~RAA]BIA.m. 11Y,®HBIfTIaIR~Y~£' RR`1,IWE ~ ~ 1I I ~-ucmnam xrmusoime~ ea~ee maLn MABa®61feYd1AlM1 AIYnIW1® ~ ~ MfMY,OI® I p7leC{,m. M1M141maoK,eu®I umia~m*. ante , ip. ' I+ s ~B{.,'1 SCORE ~ ~ BIuSTORE m.lxa ~ e$tOeB 1 wui I ~ ' -1Y9[I ®IAIC.M. 11111@ICIR! NAraAmeleeam~ NAZIS YE1.m. i1BNSAIDYeiL~ ~I SAMk IBYImlE IF?LEUeRAR wNOk maAlAaY: stflll!IOAmrG64a WItmlMfolas! l I ~ EAST ELEYA?l7N (ACING FM4?~1 PIA2A ROPO ove Le• a rr Q ~ . ,~_~.Aa~ 4 .~ellmesertnureu$ralo ~ 1 ~ pIpSIWF rni®menn~ron¢m. wznclc~sla~. 1o~s1~ 1 r i e~llmmert er,caim.-~~ wn®®rartwsacx Imrmr 1+.. I w~AM~ j~erAmeaeA$+a~ ~1 } cuwxm' I l racrac~l.m~ ~ wAlmuEm. 1 J ti ~ ~ I I~'i r y f m m.1 y i i:ox• , ~ EY s r { y >,A ~y{; I I 1 s ~ I i 4 a ~ E ~ NAfYE6Si\'EM ~ rAreraACSS. ~ ~ L-ra~mmn no.M . +-wan.snxa~m. °1R1E~'~~ ~ I ~ SGl1TH EtEVASIGN FACNG PE[SWLRT NDi{'fH EIEVATIbN FACING PCA2A _ ' eec yr.rr r y IY~W.iR Ball ar.¢. r.a>a...... sde l~ e I ua.' Awu.. ix r i .Au I ac uo+~ M~~ Yl1 Fba EXiERIO'n { 0._V~.TlONS haw s ~ A~.~ e r e Nut w a ~o 1~1 4t ~ rE ~ •~Ba°IIq°~ A 1 ! ~ i it i~ i 1 i i ~ 1 1 { i ~ ~ it e ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :n.,.s. 1 1 l l ` ~ / ` iJ 1 ~F¢Y 8 S _ a - __-1 _ ` ~ ~ q ~ - - -z 1 a ~ w d 3 dB @@PFA s~~A ~ ~ ~ - ~ e A &c u a ge 6 ~ ~ ~ 6~ ~i~~:il3~~i tiE ~ ~~~Y ~ ~i sr i~ r Eu I R ~~~jip s ~ ~ a _ _ - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ P N + - ~ ~ i ~ w~ ~ ~~i~ si~~~~i~p ~pi~ ~J ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ % ,r y~i .Y ` © ~ ~55 ~ ~ 555 y~ ~yg~3~5~ C ` O ~9 7 ~ N ~B f~~ i ~ , n gy e~k & _ _ i ~ ~ ~ pq~ gge ~g gY I~ i 7i ~I l\ LG ~ 77 Y ~ i ~ ~ ~g$& ~ ~ ~ a .:A .,4E e~~k~ u • • RESOLUTION NO. ~ 06 SCt t9b 1n&~ • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING A SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PERMIT TO ALLOW CQNSTRUCTION OF A 17,500 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED AT 7000 AMADOR PLAZA ROAD (APN 94]-0305-040) PA 05-035 WHEREAS, the Applicant, PFRS Dublin Corporation, has requested approval of a Site Development Review Permit to construct a 17,500 square foot commercial building and related site improvements including a plaza, landscaping, parking, and service area at 7D00 Amador Plaza Road; and WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), together with the State guidelines and City environmental regulations require that certain projects be reviewed for environmental impact and that environmental documents be prepared; and WHEREAS, the project has been found to be consistent with the Initial Study/Negative Declaration prepared for the Downtown Core Specific Plan and adopted by the City Council on December 19, 2000 (Resolution 226-00); and WHERZJA5, the Planning Commission held a properly noticed Public Hearing on said application • on Apri125, 2006; and WHEREAS, following the Public Hearing, the Planning Commission referred hearing jurisdiction to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council did hold public hearing on said application on May ] 6, 2006; and WFIEREAS, proper notice of said hearing was given in all respects as required by law; and WHEREAS, a Staff Report was submitted to the City Council, dated May 16, 2006, recommending adoption of a Resolution conditionally approving the Site Development Review Permit; and WHEREAS, the City Council did hear and consider al] said reports, recommendations and testimony herein above set forth and used its independent judgment to evaluate the project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RE5QLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby find that: A. The proposed Project, as conditioned is consistent with the purpose and intent of Chapter 8.104, Site Development Review, of the Zoning Ordinance hecause: 1) the proposed building, as conditioned, will be attractive and will be compatible with similar improvements m the vicinity as required by Section 8.104 D20.A of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance; 2) the building has been designed to complement new buildings and recent fagade remodels in the shopping center in order ~ to incorporate certain design elements which are prevalent in the shopping center; 3) the new pedestrian plaza and outdoor dining patio will complement the design of the building and will be compatible with the potential future restaurant use; 4) as conditioned, the applicant will be required to replace dead or dying landscaping to improve the property; and 5) the building, once • complete, will be compatible with the existing buildings in the vicinity and the buildings in the Downtown. S, The proposed Project, as conditioned, will be compatible with the surrounding area and complies with the policies of the General Plan, with the development regulations and perfonnance standards established for the Zoning District in which it is located and with all other requirements of the Zoning prdinance because 1) the proposed commercial building and improvements, as conditioned, meets the intent of the Dublin General Alan which discourages projects which do not relate well to the surrounding buildings and as conditioned, the proposed building is compatible with the existing buildings in the area, and 2) as conditioned, the project will be consistent with the Downtown Core Specific flan. C. The proposed Project, as conditioned, will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity, or be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare because: 1) the design of the buildings and improvements, as conditioned, are compatible with the design of the buildings and improvements in the vicinity; 2) the proposed commercial building will comply with all City of Dublin regulations; and 3) the pedestrian plaza area is compatible with the Downtown Specific Plan which encourages plazas and civic gathering spaces. D. The approved site development, including site layout, structures, vehiculaz access, circulation and parking, setbacks, height, walls, public safety and similar elements, has been designed to provide a . desirable environment for the development because: 1) the proposed pedestrian plaza complements the building and provides a public gathering space; 2) the pedestrian plaza is situated m such a manner as to promote a pedestrian friendly environment by locating the patio where it is visible from the street and entrance to the shopping center; 3) the commercial building has been designed to promote a pedestrian friendly and attractive design by creating individual storefronts, varying wall heights, windows facing the street and walkway, and creating .a design which is attractive on all four sides of the building; and 4) as conditioned, the building will meet current requirements of the Municipal Code with respect to safety E. The subject site is physically suitable for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed Project and related structures because: 1) the project site is relatively level, 2) the site has existing utilities, services, parking, and access to the local roadway network; 3) the scale of the proposed improvements are compatible with similar improvements and existing buildings in the vicinity; and 4) the proposed pedestrian plaza is compatible with the anticipated retail and restaurant uses and fits in with the existing shopping center uses and uses in the Downtown. F. impacts to views are addressed because: 1) the layout of the building will generally remain the same as the previous movie theater building at this site and won't further impact views; and 2) the pedestrian plaza will be located in such a manner to allow visibility to surrounding uses within the center. G. There are no impacts to slopes or topographic features because: the site is relatively flat and no major topographic changes are proposed to the site other than leveling the existing pad for the proposed building and improvements. 2 H. The character, scale, quality and design of the project is compatible with the exisfing and approved . projects in the area and with anticipated future development in the area because: 1) the building will include varying building heights which will promote visual interest of the building and will break up the massing of the building; 21 the project plans show a cornice to match the cornices on the remodeled and new buildings in the shopping center so that the building will be compatible with the design of the buildings in the center; 3) the building will have stucco and split-face block materials which are compatible with the materials in the shopping center and in the downtown area which have a mix of stucce and block/stone accents; and 4) the building has been designed to focus pedestrian elements towards the street, as required by the Downtown Core Specific Plan, which include a plaza area, windows, varying building height, articulated building form, and a mix of materials. T. T'he landscaping, including the location, type size, color and texture and coverage of plant materials, provisions and similar elements have been considered to ensure visual relief and an attractive environment for the public because: 1) new plant materials will be added to the site; and 2) as conditioned, the Applicant is required to replant all plant materials damaged in conjunction with the remodel project. J. The approval of the Site Development Review Permit is consistent with the Dublin General Plan and the Downtown Core Specific Plans because: 1) the construction of the proposed building will enhance the sales tax base of the downtown area by creating additional retail and restaurant space as stated in Goa12 of the Downtown Core Specific Plan; 2) the pedestrian plaza provides a unique element in the Downtown area and creates a pedestrian friendly environment for the Downtown as . stated in Goal 7 and Objective 7.1 of the Specific Plan which encourages outdoor spaces and eating spaces; 3) the proposed building and pedestrian plaza will create a more pedestrian friendly environment by including pedestrian oriented Features as stated in Goal 1 I and Objective 13.3 of the Specific Plan; 4) the existing and proposed landscaping will enhance the appearance of the site with plant materials that conform to the established Plant matrix of the Specific Plan as stated in Objective 13 4; 5) the proposed project will enhance the appearance ofthe vacant project site, and create a more pedestrian friendly environment in this area which meets the intent of the Downtown Core Specific Plan; and 6) the proposed Project is located on a vacant site designated for commercial development within the downtown and will meet the design and use requirements of the adopted Specific Plan and therefore the Project will be consistent with Section 2.2.1 of the Dublin General Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOhVFA that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby conditionally approve PA 05-035, a Site Development Review Fermit application to construct a 17,500 square foot commercial building and related improvements, as generally depicted by the Site Plan, Curb and Paving Layout, Utility Plan, Plaza Layout Plan, Planting Plan, Planting Construction Details, Elevations, and Floor Plan dated received April b, 2006, stamped approved and on file with the City of Dublin Planning Department, subject to the conditions below and m Attachment A to this Resolution. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Unless stated otherwise, all Conditions of Approval shall be complied with prior to the issuance of building permits or establishment of use, and shall be subject to Planning Department review and 3 ~ r+ ` A W,~ 1 D V approval. The following codes represent those deparpnents/agencies responsible far monitoring compliance of the conditions of approval: [PL] Plaxming, [B] Building, [PO] Police, [PW] Public Works, [ADM] Administratioxx/City Attorney, [PIN] Finance, [PCS] Parks and Community Services, [F] Alameda. . County Fire Department, [DSRSD] Dublin San Ramon Services District, [AV7] Amador Valley Industries, [CO] Alameda County Department of Environmental Health, [Zone 7] Alameda County Plood Control and Water Conservation District Zane 7, [LAVTA] Livermore Amador Valley Tratxsit Authority, [CH5] California Department of Health. Services. n y ! 1 ~ ~ rti ~ i X~ ~ fi i"~A`'t~ h f "i~ y l 1. Approval. This Site Development Review approval is for Pl, Ongoing Planning the 17,SOD square foot building located at 7000 Amador Plaza Road, PA 05-035 The project shall generally conform to the project plans submitted by Michael Willis Architects received Apri16, 2006, on file in the Community Development 1epartment, and other plans, text, and diagrams relating tc this Site Development Review, unless modified b the Conditions of A royal contained herein. 2. Permit Expiration. Construction shall commence within PL One year DMC one (1) year of Permit approval or the Peranit shall lapse from permit 8.96.020.D and become null and void. Commencement of construction approval means the actual construction pursixant to the Pemvt approval or demonstrating substantial progress toward commencing such construction. If there is a dispute as to . whether the Permit has expired, the City may hold a noticed public hearing to determine the matter. Such a determination may be processed concurrently with revocation proceedings in appropriate circumstances. If a Permit expires, anew application must be made and rocessed accordin to the re uizements of this Ordinance. 3. Time lExtensian. The original approving decision-maker PL One year DMC may, upon the Applicant's written request For an extension from permit 8.96.020.1= of approval prior to expiration, and upon the determination approval that any Conditions of Approval remain adequate to assure that applicable findings of approval will continue to be met, grant a time extension of approval Far a period not to exceed six (61 months. All time extension requests shall be noticed and a public hearing or public meeting shall be held as re uired b the articular Permit. q, Permit Validity. This Site Development Review approval PL Ongoing DMC shall be valid for the remaining life of the approved 8.9G.020.P structure so long as the operators of the subject property comply with the project's conditions of approval. 5. Revocation of permit. The Site Development Review PL Ongoing I7MC permit approval shall be revocable for cause in accordance 8.96.020.1 with Section 8.96.020.I of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. Any violation of the terms or conditions of this permit shall be subject to citation. 4 4 , is ~,E. ~~1i11v~~ ~ ~ 6. ~ Requirements and Stsudard Conditions. The Applicant/y Various Building Standard Developer shall comply with applicable City of Dublin Fire Permit Prevention Bureau, Dublin Public Works Deparhment, Issuance Dublin Building Department, Dublin Police Services, Alameda County Flood Control District Zone 7, Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority, Alameda County Public and Environmental Health, Dublin San Ramon Services District and the California Department of Health Services requirements and standard conditions. Prior to issuance of building permits or the installation of any improvements related to this project, the Developer shall supply written statements from each such agency or department to the Planning Department, indicating that all applicable conditions re aired have been or will be met. 7. Required Permits. An encroachment permit from the PW Building Standard Public Works Department may be required fox any work Permit done within the public right-of--way Developer shall obtain Issuance all permits required by other agencies including, but not limited to Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Zone 7, California Department of Fish and Creme, Army Corps of Engineers, Regional Water Quality Control Board, Caltrans and provide copies of the ermits to the Public Works D arttrtent. . 8. Fees. Applicant/Developer shall pay all applicable fees in Various Building Various effect at the time of building permit issuance, including, but Permit not limited to, Planning fees, Building fees, Traffic Impact Issuance Fees, TVTC fees, Dublin San ILamon Services District fees, Public Facilities fees, Dublin Unified Schoo] District Schoo] Impact fees, Fire Facilities Impact fees, Noise Mitigation fees, Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu fees, Alameda County Flood and Water Conservation District (Zone 7) Drainage and Water Connection fees; or any other fee that ma be ado ted and a licable. M 5 ~nr f~ ~~U ~(„p1~lD~~ , ~#I~`lr'~r"~~ ~,'~'x1 9. Indemnification. The Developer shall defend, indemnify, ADM ~Ongoing~ Administrat . and hold harmless the City of Dublin and its agents, icn/ City officers, and employees from any claim, action, or Attamey proceeding against the City of Dublin or its agents, officers, ar employees to attack, set aside, veld, or annul an approval of the City of Dublin or its advisory agency, appeal board, Planning Commission, City Council, Community Development Director, Zoning Administrator, or any other department, committee, or agency of the City related to this project to the extent such actions are brought within the time period required by Government Code Section 66499.37 or other applicable law; provided, however, that the Developer's duty to so defend, indemnify, and hold harmless shall be subject to the City's promptly notifying the Developer of any said claim, action, or proceeding and the City's full cooperation in the defense of such actions or proceedings. 10. Clean-up. The Applicant/Developer shall be responsible PL Ongoing Planning for clean-up and disposal of project related trash to maintain a safe clean and litter-free site. Il. Modifications (SDR). Modifications nr changes to this PL Ongoing DMC Site Development Review approval may be considered by 8.104.100 the Community Development Director if the modificatinns or changes proposed comply with Section 8,104.100 of the Zonin •Ordinance. 12. Contralling Activities. The Applicant/Developer shall PL Chtgoing Planning control all activities on the project site so as not to create a nuisance to the existing or surrounding businesses and residences. 13. Soft Foam Building Materials. Soft Foam (i.e. efts type PL Building Planning material) may be installed no closer than 6 feet from the Permit earth or aved areas. Issuance 14, Accesaory/Temporary Structures. The use of any PL Ongoing DMC accessory or temporary structures, such as storage sheds or 8.108. trailer/ container units used for storage or for any other purposes, shall be subject to review and approval by the Communit Devel ment Director t dual storefronts PL Issuance of Plannin 1.5. Building Artteulatton. The four ind vi g located in the center of the west and east elevations of the Building building shall protrude approximately 6inches from the Permit primary wall plain in order to provide further building shade, shadow, and articulation. Articulation of the storefront shall include the glass storefront, and the parapet and cement plaster cornice above the glass storefront element which creates the appearance of individual tenant spaces. 6 ~ ~ , N~1!1D ; ' , N ~ 1 191p1fil:Xt~E i P~1 iQ*~f , . ld. ' E ui merit Screemn . All electri al anrllor mechanical PL ~ Buildin Planni q P g c. g rig equipment shall be screened from public view Any roof- Permit mounted equipment shall be completely screened from Issuance view by materials architecturally compatible with the building and to the satisfaction of the Community Through Development Director. The Building Permit plans shall Completion/ show the location of all equipment and screening for Ongoing review and approval by the Community Development Director. 17. Property Maintenance. The Applicant shall maintain the PL Ongoing Planning properly and all building materials in good condition and shall keep the site clear of trash, debris and graffiti vandalism on a re ular and continuous basis. 18. Awning Maintenance. The Applicant shall maintain the PL Ongoing Planning awnings and keep them clean and in good repair, which includes keeping them free from fading or other weather related dame e. 19. Protect Signage. The signs shown on the project plans are PL Occupancy Planning for conceptual purposes and have not been approved in conjunction with this review All signage requires an amendment to the Dublin Town Center Master Sign Pro am. • 20. Master Sign Program. Prior to Occupancy, the Applicant PL Occupancy Planning or Developer shall apply for an amendment to the Dublin Town Center Master Sign Program as necessary to allow si a e for the ro osed buildin . 21. Slgns. All signage shall conform to Chapter 8.76 of the PL Ongoing Chapter Dublin Zoning Ordinance at all times. Window signs shall 8.76 be limited to 25% of the window area. All temporary signs and banners require a .Zoning Clearance from the Planning Division riar to installation. 22. Golors. The exterior paint colors of the buildings are PL Occupancy Planning subject to Gity review and approval. The Applicant shall paint a portion of the building the proposed colors for review and approve] by the Community Development Director 'or to aintin the buildin s. 13. Fire Sprinklers. The Site Plan and Elevations submitted in PL, P Issuance of Planning conjunction with the Building Permit plans shall show the Building location of the fire sprinkler risers. To the extent possible, Permits these sprinklers shall be screened from public view and shall not be visible from the Public Right-of--Way subject to the review and approve] of the Community Development Director and the Alameda Coun Fire D artment. 24. Trash and Waste Accumulation.. The Applicant or any PL Ongoing Planning future owner shall provide and conduct regular maintenance of the site in order to eliminate and control the accumulation of trash, excess/waste materials and debris. 7 ~ ~lr~o» . ~ ~ ~ ~r, 25. Candace a Re arr. The A licant shall add lams to an PL Oec~ oy~ Planni P P ~ PP P Y ng . sparse areas in the existing landscaping along the project frontage and replace any existing landscaping that is damaged during the course of construction, to the satisfaction of the Communi Develo ment Director. C !I nal Landscape and Irri atlon Plans. Final Landscape PL Buil 26. ail n Plans repg and stem ed b a, State Pe dmg DMC d hY~gatio p ared p y rtmt 8.72.030 licensed landscape architect or registered engineer shall be Issuance submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer and the Community Development Director These plans shall be ceordinated with on-site civil, streetlights, and utility improvement plans. The final plans shall be approved and signed by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. Plans shall be generally consistent with the preliminary landscape plan prepared by Michael Willis Architects, received March 17, 2006, except as modified by the Conditions listed below and as required by the Communi Develo went Director. 27. Plant Species. Plant species shall be selected according to PL Building Planning use, sunshade location and space availability The Permit landscape plan should include plant species that are not Issuance salt-sensitive. Street flees shall be high-branching and roduce minimal liner. 28. Slopes. The landscape plan shall address slopes within the PL Building Planning property, including erosion, maintenance and irrigation Permit issues. All slopes shall have acne-foot level area at top Issuance and bottom of the slo e for maintenance. 29. Landscaping at Street/Drive Aisle Intersections. PL Building Planning Landscaping shall not obstruct the sight distance of Permit motorists, pedestrians or bicyclists. Landscaping, and/or Issuance landscape structures such as walls, at drive-aisle intersections shall not be taller than 30 inches above the curb, except for trees. Landscaping shall be kept at a minimum height and fullness, giving patrol officers and the eneral ublic surveillance ca abilities of the area. 30. Lighting. The ApplicanUDeveloper shall prepare a PL, PW, P4 Building Planning photometric plan to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, Permit Community Development Director and Dublin Police Issuance Services. Exterior Iighting shall be provided within the parking lot and on the building, and shall be of a design and placement so as not to cause glare onto adjoining properties, businesses or to vehicular ffaffic. Lighting used after daylight hours shall be adequate to provide for security needs. The plan shall show measurements fvr the i parking structure, connecting paths, outdoor parking area and residential areas. g , 31. ,Street Lights and Trees. Maintain approximately 15 feet PL, PO ~B • wilding Platning clearance between streetlights and street trees. Where such Permit clearance is not practical for design considerations, trees Issuance shall be increased to 36 inch box minimum to reduce the cotLflict between the li htin and folia e. 32. Standard Plant Material, Irrigation and Maintenance PL Building DMC Agreement. The Applicant/Developer shall complete and Permit 8.72.OSO.B submit to the Dublin Planning Department the Standard Issuance Plant Material, Irri ation and Maintenance A ement. 33. Flant Standards. All trees shall be 24 inch box minimum, PL Occupancy Planning with at least 30% at 36 inch box or greater; all shmbs shall be 5 allon minimum. 34. Devices. The Landscape Plan shall show the location of all PL, PW, F Building Planning baclrflow prevention devices, detector check valves, utility Fermit boxes and fire sprinkler risers. The location and screening Issuance of these devices shall be reviewed and approved by City staff. 35. Root Barriers and Tree Staking. The landscape plans PL, PW Building Planning shall pmvide details showing root bamers and tree staking Permit installation which meet current Ci s ecifications. Issuance 3fi. Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance. The PL Building DMC 8.88 Applicant/ Developer shall submit written documentation Permit . to the Public Works Department (in the form of a Issuance Landscape Documentation Package and other required documents) that the development conforms to the City's Water Efficient Landsca in Ordinance. ~ I ~ ~ 'Ga v1 rvlr~ i.':. ~VJi ~ n ~J~ 2 an I':. I 37. Building Codes and Ordinances. All project construction B Through Building shall conform to all building codes and ordinances in effect Completion at the time of buildin ermit. 36. Building Permits. To apply for building permits, B Issuance of Building Applicant/Developer shall submit eight (8) sets of Building construction plans to the Building Division for plan check. Permits Ea_ch_set_of nians shall have attached an annotated conv of these Conditions of A royal. The notations shall clearly indicate how all Conditions of Approval will or have been complied with. Construction plans will not be accepted without the annotated Conditions of A.pprovai attached to each set of plans. Applicant/Developer will be responsible for obtaining the approvals of all participating non-City agencies prior to the issuance of buildin ermits. 39. Construction Drawings. Construction plans shall be fully B Issuance of Building dimensioned (including building elevations) accurately Building drawn (depicting all existing and prapnsed conditions on Permits site), and prepared and signed by a California licensed M Architect or Engineer. All structural calculations shall be re ared and si ed b a California. licensed Architect or ~ 9 ~ 4~] ' i ~ ~ L~y.~ryyt , , ~ ACr,~1~1Y ~ l ~ C I~i~'1~ En near The site p p shall be consrstent with each Ian landsca a Ian and details ~ . other. 40. Addressing. Addresses will be required on all doors B Occupancy Building leading to the exterior of the building. Addresses shall be illuminated and be able to be seen from the street, 5 inches in hei ht minimum. 41. Temporary Fencing. Temporary Construction Fencing B Through Buildirrg shall be installed along the perimeter of all work under Completion construction, commencing at the grading stages and be in of Exterior lace and safe throw h the com lotion of the ro'ect. Work 42. )Engineer Observation. The Engineer of record shall be B Final Frame Building retained tv provide observation services for all components Inspection of the lateral and vertical design of the building, including nailing, hold_downs, straps, shear, roof diaphragm and structural frame of building. A written report shall be submitted to the City Inspector prior to scheduling the final frame ins action. 43. Fouudation. Geotechnical Engineer for the soils report B Issuance of Building shall review and approve the foundation design. A letter Building shall be submitted to the Buildin Division on the a val. Permit 44. Green 1#uiiding Guidelines. To the extent practical the B Through Building applicant shall incorporate Green Building Measures. Completion Green Building plan. shall be submitted to the Building Official for review. 45. Cool Roofs. All new roofmg or reroofmg installed shall B Through Building use materials and installation standards approved under Completion Title 24 ener re uirements. 46. Electronic File. The Applicant/Developer shall submit all l3 Issuance of Building building drawings and specifications for this project in an Building electronic format to the satisfaction of the Building Official Permits prior to the issuance of building permits. Additionally, all revisions made to the building plans during the project shall be incorporated into an "As Built" electronic file and submitted 'or to the issuance of final accu anc 47. Site Survey. The foundation pad must be certified far B Scheduling Building vertical and horizontal location by a licensed surveyor. A Foundation written report shall be submitted to the City Inspector prior to Inspection schedu]in a foundation in action. 48. Fire Sprinklers. The structure will require the installation B Occupancy Building of a NFPA13 sprinkler system due to proposed square footage, intended use, and type of eonstmction. (17,500 s care feet l3 or M occu anc and T e V construction . 49. Location to Property Line. The south wall of the proposed B Issuance of Building structure will be required to be constructed as a 1 hour wall Building due to the fact that it appears to be located 15 feet off the Permit ad'acent ro line. SD. Restrooms. Restrooms shall be provided with the B Issuance of Building a ro riate number of fixtures as rescribed b the Bui]din to iOl~T ~ ~ , 1s~J~RC~E k g . ~ ,California Plumbin Code in effect at the nme of ~ , ~~"i. wilding Permit Tenant Ian review Im rovements 51. Finished Floor Elevation Certification. FEMA B Issuance of Building certification of the finished floor elevation shall be provided Building the licant. Permits „ , v ;5; W 52. Fire Flow. The fire flow for the site shall comply with F Issuance of Fire appendix III-A of the CFC. Provide a letter from DSRSD Building stating what the available fire flow is at the site. A copy of Permits the letter shall be submitted to our office. 53. Construction. The allowable area of the building shall F Issuance of Fire comply with chapter S of the CBC, Building Permits 54. Fire Hydrants. Provide an additional fire hydrant within F Prior to Firc 50 feet of the FDC on Amador Plaza Road. Dccu anc 55. Fire Sprinklers. Automatic sprinklers shall be provided P Prior to Fire throughout the buildings as required by the Dublin fire Occupancy Cade. If there are aver 100 sprinklers, the system shall be monitored b UL listed central station. 56. Access. Fire apparatus roadways shall have a minimum F Though Fire unobstructed width of 20 feet and an unobstructed vertical Completion clearance of not less than 13 feet G inches. Roadways under 36 feet wide shall be posted with signs or shall have ii red curbs painted with labels on one side; roadways under 28 feet wide shall be posted with signs nr shall have red curbs painted with labels on both sides of the street as Follows: "NO STOPPING FIRE LANE - CVC 22500.1" CFC 1996, Section 1998. 57. Knox Box. A Knox box is required at the main electrical F Prior to Fire room for access to the fire alarm panel. The Knox box shall Occupancy contain a key that provides access to the tenant space. Order forms far the Knox box are available at the fire prevention office at the address above. 'The key can be placed in the box durin the Fire D artment ins ection. 58. Addressing. Approved numbers or addresses shall be F Prior to Pire placed on all new and existing buildings. The address shall Occupancy be positioned as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property Said numbers shall contrast with their background (CFC, 1998, Section 90144. 59. Codes. The project shall comply with Uniform Building and F Threugh Fire Fire Godes as ad ted b the Cit of Dublin. Co letion _ 60. Signage. If key looking hardware is used on one main door, F Occupancy CBC provide a sign above the door stating, "THIS DOOR TO 1003.3 1.8 REMAIN UNLOCKED DURING BUSINESS HOURS Otherwise the exit doors shall be openable from the inside without special knowledge or effort and have lever or panic hardware. 11 [r- 7 ~ t DS ~ ~ and Non-Residential Security Ordinance. PO Ongoing Police 61. Residential , The Applicant/1]eveloper shall comply with all applicable City of Dublin Non-Residential Security Ordinance uiremcnts. 62. Lighting. The City of Dubin Security Ordinance requires PO Ongoing Police specific foot candles of light be provided at ground level. These requirements will be enforced when reviewing and approving the lighting plan for this project. The applicant shall submit a final lighting plan for approval by the T~ublin Police. Exterior lighting is required over all doors, To ensure that the doorways retain the required lighting levels, regardless of the landscaping lighting, it is requested that doorways be lighted with fixtures designed for that express purpose. ~ Security lighting shall be provided in parking lot areas. v 1.0 candle lights at ground level in parking lot areas v Li htin fixtures shall be of a vandal resistant e 63. Landscaping Maintenance. Landscaping shall be kept at PO Ongoing Police a minimal height and fullness giving patrol officers and the eneral ublic surveillance ca abilities o£the area. 64. Skateboarding. Landscaping Features and outdoor PO Ongoing Police amenities shall be designed to reduce their attractiveness to skateboarders and vandals. 65. Addressing. Addressing and building numbers shall be PO Ongoing Police visible from the approaches to the building, Addressing for individual suites businesses within the project shall also have the address on the rear door of the business. 66. Doors. Employee exit doors and doors to the rear of tenant PO Ongoing Police spaces shall be equipped with 180-degree viewers if there is not a burglary resistant window panel in the door from which to scan the exterior 67. Parking Signage. All entrances to the parking areas shall PO Ongoing Police be posted with appropriate signs per Sec. 22658(a) of the Cali£omia Vehicle Code and City of Dublin Municipal Ordinance Section 6.04.200, to assist in removing vehicles at the o owner's/mane er's re uest. 68. Graffiti. The Applicant and Tenant shall keep the site clear PO Ongoing Police o£ affiti vandalism on a continuous basis at all times. 69. Theft Prevention and Security Program. The Applicant PO Ongoing Police or Manager shall work with the Dublin Police on an ongoing basis to establish an effective theft prevention and securi ro am. 70. Construction Phase Security. During the construction PO Through Police phase the Applicant and Developer shall conform to the Occupancy following security requirements: 1. The site shall have a security fence around the erimeter of all work under construction. 12 ~v" ~~a . 2. The site shall have lighting and the fence shall be ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 locked when workers are not present. 3. A temporary address sign shall be posted of sufficient size and color contrast to be seen from the street during hours of darkness. 4. The Applicant shall file a Dublin Police "Business Site !~mergency Response Card" prior to any phase of construction, which will provide 24-hour telephone contact numbers of persons responsible for the construction site. 5. Good security practices shall be followed with. respect to storage of building materials and storage of tools at the construction site. 71. Clarifications and Changes to the Conditlons. In the PW Improvement Public event that there needs to be clarification to these Plans Works Conditions of Approval, the Directors of Community Development and Public Works have the authority to clarify the intent of these Conditions of Approval to the Applicant/Developer by a written document signed by the Directors of Community Development and Public Works and placed in the project file. The Directors also have the • authority to make minor modifications to these conditions without going to a public hearing in order for the Developer to fulfill needed improvements or mitigations resulting from im acts of this act. 72. Standard Public Works Conditions of Approval. PW Improvement Public ApplicanUDeveloper shall comply with all applicable City Plans Works ~ of Dublin Public Works Standard Conditions of Approval. In the event of a conflict between the Public Works Standard Conditions of Approval and these Conditions, these Conditions shall revail. 73. Hold Harmless/Indemnifcation. The Developer shall PW Completion Public defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Dublin of Works and its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, Improvements action, or proceeding against the City of Dublin or its and agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or Occupancy annul an approval of the City of Dublin or its advisory agency, appeal board, Planning Commission, City Council, Community Development Director, Zoning Administrator, or any other department, committee, or agency of the City to the extent such actions are brought within the time period required by Government Code Section 66499.37 or other applicable law; provided, however, that The Developer's duty to so defend, indemnify, and hold harmless shall be subject to the City's promptly notifying Developer of any said claim, action, or proceeding and the City's full cooperation in the defense of such actions or roceedin s. 13 o~ b1 r 1 i, .Yia „~Vr r'Y ! dMr,~'q ~Yrl.,~b! e r V i *{Y hl q PI e r h v y q "N V f1 ! ~v y qr ,k~~„,Rr f~if l ii >..~~r i ,,d Y1J~ f~ ± ~r'~+ qNM~^f~Vr ~'~~i f~"~'S~ ~ Y~ 1 a Sri ~5! ii* pu `M1 r}glu~~~ ^ '':rC r~*~'~^~h g 'VV 'drrfi VG d9a V~~ V ti, ~',v..d VAd rVr ,!pr 7.r9~',.. ~a ]~s4 f~~{1N 74 M `Conditions 'of Approv ;,r~+", qW f ^ , r . ,.;;;rr, ern ,v, ~;rr, • ar. A copy of the Conditions of PW Improvement Public Approval which has been annotated how each condition is Plans Works satisfied shall be included with the submittals to the Public Works Aepartment for the review of the Parcel Map and improvements plans. The notations shall clearly indicate how all Conditions of Approval will he complied with, and where they are located on the plans. Submittals will not be acce ted without the annotated conditions. 7S. 7title Report. A current preliminary title report (prepared PW Improvement Public within the last six months) together with copies of all Plans Works recorded easements and other encumbrances and copies of Final Maps for adjoining properties and off-site easements shall. be submitted for reference as deemed necessaryby the Ci En veer/Director•ofPublic Works. 76. Improvements within Existing Basements. The PW Improvement Public Applicant/Developer shall obtain written permission from Plans Works the beneficiaries of all existing easements encumbering the site before constructing improvements within the easement areas if the proposed improvements are inconsistent with purpose for which the easement was created. Said permission shall be forwarded to the City as evidence of the Applicant/Developer's right to construct said im rovements. • 77. Improvement Agreement and Security. Pursuant to PW issuance of Public §716.62Q of the Municipal Code, the Applicant shall Grading/ Works obtain aGrading/Sitework Permit from the Public Works Sitework pepartment that governs the installation of required site Permit improvements. As a condition of issuance of said permit, Improvement Security shall be posted to guarantee the faithful performance of the permitted work. Such security shall be in the form of cash, a certified or cashier's check, a letter of credit, ar a permit bond executed by the applicant and a corporate surety authorized to do business in California. The amount of the security will be based on the estimated cost of the site work (excluding the building). The applicant shall provide an estimate of these costs for Ci review with the first lan submittal. 78. Improvement and Grading Plans. All improvement, PW Issuance of Public drainage, utility and grading plans submitted to the Public Grading/ Works Works Aepartment for review/approval shall be prepared in Sitework accordance with the approved SDR, these Conditions of Pertttit Approval, and the City of Dublin Municipal Code including Chapter 716 (Grading Ordinance). When submining plans for review/approval, the Applicant/1]eveloper shall also fill-out and submit a City of Duhdin Improvement Plan Review Checklist (three 8-1/2" x 11" pages). Said checklist includes necessary design criteria and other pertinent information m assure that pans are submitted in accordance with established Ci _a 14 ~ - - P , The tans shall a prefer ent Caty of standards. is ence the curt \ Dublin Standard Plans (booklet), and shall include applicable City of Dublin Improvement Plan General Notes (three 8-1/2" x 11" pages). Pot on-site improvements, the Applicant/Developer shall adhere to the City's On-site Checklist (eight 8-1/2" x 11"pages). All of these reference documents are available from the Public Works Department (call telephone 925-833-fi630 For more information). The Grading Plan shall be in confortnance with the recommendations of the Geotechnical Report, the approved SDR, and the City design standards & ordinances. In case of conflict between the soil engineer's recommendations and City ordinances, the City Engineer shall detetxnine which shall apply A detailed Erosion Control Plan shall be included with the Grading Plan. The plan shall include detailed design, location, and maintenance criteria of all erosion and sedimentation control measures. Detailed Engineer's Estimate of improvement coats shall be submitted with the tans. . 79. Grading/Sitework Permit. All improvement work must PW Issuance of Public be performed per aGrading/Sitework Permit issued by the Grading/ Works Public Works Department. Said pem~it will be based on Sitework the fmal set of civil plans to be approved once all of the Permit plan check comments have been resolved. Please refer to the handout titled Grading/Site Improvement Permit Application Instructions and attached application (three 8- 1/2" x 11" pages) for more information. 'The Applicant/Developer must fill in and return the applicant information contained on pages 2 and 3 The current cost of the permit is $10.00 due at the time of permit issuance, although the Applicant/Develaper will be responsible for an ado ted increases to the fee amount. 80. Erosion Control during Construction. PW Issuance of Pubiic Applicant/Developer shall include an Erasion and Grading/ Works Sediment Control Plan with the Grading and Improvement Sitework plans for review and approval by the City Engineer and/or Permit Public Works Director Said. plan shall be designed, rmplemented, and continually maintained pursuant to the City's NPDES permit between October ls` and April 15'h or beyond these dates if dictated by rainy weather, or as otherwise directed by the City Engineer and/or Public Works Director. All grading, construction, and development activities withm the City of Dublin must comply with the provisions of the Clean Water Act. Proper erosion control measures mm 15 must be evelo m. p ent sites within the City ~ tnstalled at d during construction, and all activities shall adhere to Best ~ Management Practices. 81. Water QnalltyBest Management Practices. Pursuant to PW Issuance of Public the Alameda Countywide National Pollution Discharges Grading/ Works Elimination Permit (NPDES) No. CAS0029831 with the Sitework California Regional Water Quality Control Board Permit (RWQCI3), the applicant shall design and operate the site in a manner consistent with the Start at the Source publication, and according to Best Management Practices to minimize storm water pollution. All trash dumpsters and compactors which are not sealed shall have roofs to prevent contaminants from washing into the storm drain system. All storm drain inlets serving vehicle parking areas shall be fitted with Filter Devices to remove Hydrocarbons and other contaminants, and all storm drain inlets shall be stenciled "No Dumping -Drains to Bay" using an approved stencil available from the Alameda Countywide Clean Water Pro 82. Storm Drain Improvements. Applicant/Developer shall PW Issuance of Public construct all required storm drain improvements in Grading/ Works accordance with a site-specific hydrology/hydraulic Sitework analysis and/or as specified by the Public Works Director Permit . Plans submitted for the storm drain improvements shall include full drama a attern for the entire arkin lot. 83. Storm Water Treatment Measures Maintenance PW Occupancy Public Agreement. ApplicantJDeveloper shall enter into an Works agreement with the City of Dublin that guarantees the property owner's perpetual maintenance obligation for all storm water treatment measures installed as part of the project. Said agreement is required pursuant to Provision C.3.e.ii of RWQCB Order R2-2003-0021 for the reissuance of the Alameda Countywide NPDES municipal storm water permit. Said permit requires the City to provide verification and assurance that all treatment devices will be r erl o erated and maintained. 84. Zone 7 lrainage Fee. The applicant will be required to PW Issuance of Public pay Zone Ts SDA 7-1 Impervious Surface Area fees for all Building Works new hardsca a areas. Permits 89. Roof Drainage. Roof drainage shall drain across bio- PW Improvement Public swales or into bio-filters prior to entering the storm drain Plans Works system. The landscaping and drainage improvements in the bio-swale and bio-filters shall be appropriate for water quality treatment. The City Engineer may exempt specific roof leaders from this requirement if space limitations prevent adequate water treatment without creating hazards, nuisance or structural concerns. Concentrated flows will not be allowed to drain across ublic sidewalks. 1G , °I ,c ~ yh pp al Re art and. m'p p Recommendation uance of Public • 8b. Geotechnic orates The PW . Iss ~ A licant/Aeveloper ` ` shall me the Grading/ Works recommendations of the project Geotechnica] Sitework Investigations report or as may be amended by subsequent permit and report, and additional mitigation measures required by the during City Engineer, into the project design. The Geotechnical construction Engineer shall certify that the pmject design conforms to the report recommendations prior to issuance of a Grading/5itework Pemmt. All report recommendations shall be followed during the course of grading and construction. 87. Parking Lot Lights. The Applicant/Developer shall PW Occupancy Public provide photometric calculation far the existing parking lot Works and around the building that demonstrates a minimum foot- candle lighting level of not less than 1.0 at the ground surface for the adjacent parking area; if this cannot be verified rovide additional li tin where necessa 88. Aisabled Parking. All disabled parking stalls shall meet PW Issuance of Public State Title 2A requirements, including providing curb ramps. Building Works at each loading zone. Curb ramps cannot encroach within Permits and the loading/unloading areas. Disabled stalls shall be Occupancy conveniently located and grouped near the primary • entrances to each building. Van accessible stalls shall also be ovided and shall meet State Title 24 re uirements. 89. Disabled Access Ramps. The Applicant/Developer shall PW Occupancy Public install disabled access ramps, and where necessary replace Works all existing handicapped ramps at driveway intersections to meet current State "Title 24 rc uircments. 90- Vehicle Parking. Applicant shall repair any distressed PW Occupancy Public areas of pavement within the existing parking field of the Works project site and. the north/south drive-aisle immediately north of the project site, then seal and re-stripe the entire parking field within the project site. All parking spaces shall be double striped using A inch white lines set approximately 2 feet apart according to Figure 76-3 and §8.76.070 (A) 17 of the Dublin Municipal Code, All compact-sized parking spaces shall have the word "COMPACT" stenciled on the pavement within each space. 12 inch-mde concrete step-out curbs shall be constructed at each parking space where one or both sides abut a landscaped area or planter Wheel stops as necessary shall be rovided at the arkin stalls. 91. Bicycle Racks. Bicycle racks shall be installed near the PW, PL Issuance of Public entrances to retail buildings at a ratio of 1 rack per 40 Building Works vehicle parking spaces. Bicycle racks shall be designed to Permit Plans accommodate a minimum of four bicycles per rack, and so and that each bicycle can be secured to the rack. The location Occupancy of the bicycle racks shall not encroach into any j ad acent/ad'oinin sidewalks in a manner that would reduce J 17 - 7 lc, ~a~lx~ ~ Olin , ~ ~ ~ ~ CE ~ ~ k to less than 4 feet. 'the unencumbered width of the sidewal 'i, , Bicycle racks shall be placed in locations where they will have adequate lighting and can be surveilled by the building occupants. The Site Plan shall show the location of the ro osed bic cle racks. 92. Sidewalk. The Applicant/Developer shall repair any PW Occupancy Public damaged sidewalk along the site frontage on Amador Plaza Wm'ks Road. Pedestrian walkway connecting the back door exits/entrances to the public sidewalk shall also be installed. Per Section 1114E 1.2 of the California Building Code, an accessible and direct route travel shall be provided between the building and the public sidewalk on Amador Plaza Road. 93. Pedestrian Crpssing Signs and Striping. The PW Occupancy Public Applicant/Developer shall install crosswalks, pedestrian Works crossing warning signs, and pedestrian crossing pavement legends per Caltrans and City standards at the proposed crosswalk locations. 94. Signs and Pavement Markings. The Applicant/Developer PW Occupancy Public shall be responsible for the following on-site traffic signs Works and pavement markings: i. A stop control (including Caltrans Rl "Stop" sign, stop pavement legend, 12 inch-wide white stop bar . stripe) shall be installed at the driveway exit. ii. Directional pavement arrows in the drive aisles. iii., R2fiF "No Stopping -Fire Lane" signs shall be posted on-site along all curbs that are longer than 20 feet and that parallel the drive aisles as required by the Fire Marshall. iv R100B (disabled parking regulatitms sign) shall be installed at each of the driveway entrance to the site with amended text to read " .may be reclaimed at DUBLIN POLIC>~ or by telephoning &33-6670" v Handicapped parking signs and legends per State Title 24 requirements. vi. 'The word "Compact" shall be stenciled on the pavement surface within each compact parking space. vii, "No Dumping - Arains to Bay" stenciled in thermoplastic at storm drain inlets. viii. Away other signs and markings deemed reasonably necessary by the City Engineer and/or Public Works Director Burin final desi andior construction. 95. Landscape and Irrigation Plans. The PW Issuance of Public Applicant/Developer shall submit Landscape and Irrigation Improvement Works Plans far review and approval by Planning and Public Plans and Works Departments. These plans shall be coordinated with Building on-site civil, streetlights, and utility improvement plans. Permits The final plans shall be signed Community Development Director and the Ci En 'neer. 18 `1 ~ ~U ~ o~ li, ~ f1 yk~ FY $ i::iA ~ .l:S 96. Landscaping at Imersections. Landscaping at PW Occupancy Public intersections shall be such that sight distance is not Works obstructed for drivers. Except for trees, landscaping shall not be hi her than 30 inches above the curb in these areas. 97. Relocation of Existing Improvements/ Utilities. Any PW Occupancy Public necessary relocation of existing improvements or Works utilities shall be accom lisped at no ex ense to the Ci 9$. Temporary Fencing. Temporary Construction fencing FW Duriz<g Public shall be installed along perimeter of all work under Construction Works construction to separate the constructian operation from the public. All construction activities shall be eonfined .to Occupancy within the fenced area. Construction materials and/or equipment shall net be operated or stored outside of the fenced area or within the public right-of--way unless a roved in advance 'the Public Works Director. 99. Construction Hours. Construction and grading operations PW During Public shall be limited to weekdays (Monday through Friday) and Construction Works non-City holidays between the hours of 7.30 a.m. and 5.30 p.m. The Applicant/Developer may request permission to work on Saturdays and/or holidays between the: hours of 8:30 am and 5.00 pm by submitting a request form to the City Engineer no later than 5:00 pm the prior Wednesday. . Overtime inspection rates will apply for all Saturday and/or holida work. 100. Construction Noise Management Program/': FW During Public Construction Impact Reduction flan: Construction Works Applicant/Developer shall conform to the following Construction Noise Management Program/Constructian impact Reduction Plan. The following measures shall be taken to reduce construction impacts: a. Off-site truck traffic shall be routed as directly as practical to and from the freeway (T-580) to the job site. An Oversized Load Permit shall be obtained from the City prior to hauling of any oversized loads on City streets, b. The construction site shall be watered at regular intervals during all grading activities. The frequency of watering should increase if wind speeds exceed 15 miles per hour Watering should include all excavated and graded areas and material to be transported vff- site. Use recycled or other nun-potable water resources where feasible. c. Construction equipment shall not be left idling while not m use. d. Construction equipment shall be fitted with noise muffling devices. e. Mud and dust carried onto street surfaces by construction vehicles shall be cleaned-up on a daily basis. 19 :E C4~~TA~JC Ct1 AGr~'1*1 PRx~ y rp 'ns or other f.M Excavation haul trucks shall use to auh ~ effective covers. g. Upon completion of construction, measures shall be taken to reduce wind erosion, Replanting and repaving should be completed as soon as passible. h. After grading is completed, fugitive dust on exposed soil surfaces shall be controlled using the following methods: following methods: 1. Inactive portions of the construction site shall be seeded and watered until grass growth is evident. 2. The construction site shall be seeded and watered until grass growth is evident. 3. All portions of the site shall be sufficiently watered to prevent dust. 4. On-site vehicle speed shall be limited to I S mph. 5. Use of petroleum-based palliatives shall meet the road oil requirements of the Air Quality District. Non-petroleum based tackifiers may be required by the City Engineer i. The Department of Public Works shall handle all dust complaints. The City F-ngineer may require the services of an air quality consultant to advise the City un the severity of the dust problem and additional ways to mitigate impact on residents, including temporarily halting project construction. Dust concerns in adjoining communities as well as the City of Dublin shall be addressed. Control measures shall he related to wind conditions. Air quality monitoring of PM levels shall be prcvided as required by the City Engincar j. Construction interference with regional non_project traffic shall be minimized by 1. Scheduling receipt of construction materials to non-peak travel periods. 2. Routing construction traffic through areas of ]east impact sensitivity 3 Routing construction traffic to minimize consruction interference with regional non-project traffic movement. 4 Limiting lane closures and detours to off-peak travel periods, 5 Providing ride-share incentives for contractor and subcontractor personnel. k. Emissions control of on-site equipment shall be minimized through a routine mandatory program of low-emissions tune-u s. 101. Aamage/Repairs. The Applicant117eveloper shall be PW Occupancy Public responsible for the repair of any damaged pavement, curb Works & tier, sidewalk ar other ublic street facili resultin 20 `7 l~ ? JS i ~ FJ a 3 wt~l: ~r h~ ' E , i, structton a from con activities associated with the develo ment of the o'ect. 102. Fire Hydrants. The ApplicanUl7eveloper shall construct PW Occupancy Public al] new fire hydrants in accordance with the ACFT1 and Works City of Dublin requirements. Final location of fire hydrants shall be approved by the ACFD in accordance with current standards. Raised blue reflectorized trafftc markers shall be e oxied to the center of the street o osite each h drant. 103. Graffiti. The Applicant/Developer and/or building PW Ongoing Public tenant(s) shall keep the site clear of graffiti vandalism on a Works regular and continuous basis. Graffiti resistant paint for the structures and film for windows or glass shall be used whenever ossible. 104. Ocenpaucy Permit Regniremeuts. Prior to issuance of an PW Occupancy Public Occupancy Permit, the physical condition of the project site Works shall meet minimum health and safety standards including, but not limited to the following: ~ a. The walkways providing access to the building shall be complete, as determined by the City Engineer, to allow for safe, unobstructed pedestrian and vehicle access to and from the site. b. All traffic control devices providing access to the site shall be in place and fully functional. c. All address numbers for streets providing access to the buildings shall be in place and visible. d. Lighting for the site shall be adequate for safety and security Exterior lighting shall be provided for building entrances/exits and pedestrian walkways. Security lighting shall be provided as required by Dublin Police. e. All construction equipment, materials, or ongoing work shall be separated from the public by use of fencing, barricades, caution ribbon, or other means approved by the City Engineer f. All fire hydrants shall be operable and easily accessible to City and ACFD personnel. g. All site features designed to serve the disabled (i.e. kl/G parking stalls, accessible walkways, signage) shall be installed and full functional. 105. Tras4 EnclasurelGarbage Area. The doors must be PW Issuance of Public designed with self-closing gates that can be locked closed Building Works and can also be held open with pin locks during loading. Permit All trash bins used for this site shall be maintained within I the trash bin enclosure at all times. An area drain shall be installed within the trash bin area with a connection to the sanitary sewer system. In addition., a hose bib shall be M rovided for convenient wash-down of the trash enclosure. 21 s . ~ 106. designatedllefuse ca lectionpareas far thelpper shall p'ovide PW Issuancegf Public . ro'ect, sub ect to Butldin Works approval by the appropriate solid waste collection company Permits prior to approval of improvement plans. All refuse collection areas shall be screened from public view and shall have roofs to protect against rainwater intrusion and floor drains connected to the sanitary sewer system to collect runoff from periodic wash dawn. The refuse collection service provider shall be consulted to ensure that adequate space is provided to accommodate collection and sorting of putrescible solid waste as well as source_separated recyclable materials generated by this ra'ect. 1U7. Geagraphlc Information System. The PW Occupancy Public ApplicantlDcveloper shall provide a digital vectorized file Worms of the "master" files on floppy or CA of the Improvement Plans to the Public Works Deparnnent and DSRSD Digital raster copies are not acceptable. The digital vectorized files shall be in AutaCAD lA or higher drawing format or ESRI Shapefilc format. Drawing units shall be decimal with the precision of OAO, All objects and entities in layers shall be colored by layer and named in Bnglrsh, although abbreviations are acceptable. All submitted drawings shall use the Global Coordinate System of USA, California, NAD 83 Califomia State Plane, Zone III, and U.S. foot. Said submittal shall be acceptable to the City's GIS Coordinator 108. Pnblic Improvements. All public improvements PW Occupancy Public constructed by Developer and to be dedicated to the City Works are hereby identified as "`public works" under Labor Code section 1771 unless the Public Works Director specifically determines otherwise in writing. Accordingly, Developer, in constructing such improvements, shall comply with the Prevailing Wage Law (Labor Code. Sects. 1720 and followin 109. The Applicant/Developer shall comply with Public Works PW Improvement Public Standard Conditions of Approval included as Attachment Plans Works ^ A.•. ~ , • . ~ a ' 110. Prior to issuance of any building permit, complete ASRSD Issuance of DSRSD improvement plans shall be submitted to DSRSD that Iuilding conform to the requirements of the Dublin San Ramon Permits Services District Code, the DSRSD "Standard Procedures, Specifications and Drawings for Design and Installation of Water and Wastewater Facilities", all applicable DSRSD Master Plans and all DSRSD olicies. 111. Domestic and fire protection waterline systems for Tracts DSRSD Improvement DSRSD or Coramercia] Develo menu shall be desi ed to be Plans zz _ , ,;r' ~4 '',It;,dl^ . looped or interconnected to avord dead end sect J rl ions in accordance with requirements of the DSRSD Standard S ecifications and sound en neerin ractice. 112. DSRSD policy requires public water and sewer lines to be DSRSD Improvement D5RSD located in publie streets rather than in off street locations to Plans the fullest extent possible. 1f unavoidable, then public sewer water easements must be established over the alignment of each public sewer or water line in anoff-street or private street location to provide access for future maintenance and/or re lacement. 113. Prior to issuance by the City of any Building Permit or D5RSD Issuance of DSRSD Construction Permit by the Dublin San Ramon Services Improvement District, whichever tames first, all utility connection fees Permits including DSRSD and Zone 7, plan checking fees, inspection fees, connection fees, and fees associated with a wastewater discharge permit shall be paid to DSRSD in accordance with the rates and schedules established in the DSRSD Code. 114. Prior to issuance by the Gity of any Building Permit or DSRSD Issuance of DSRSD Construction Permit by the Dublin San Ramon Services Improvement District, whichever comes first, all improvement plans for Plans DSRSD facilities shall be signed by the District Engineer . Each drawing of improvement plans shall contain a signature block for the District Engineer indicating approval of the sanitary sewer or water facilities shown. Prior to approval by the District Engineer, the applicant shall pay all required DSRSD fees, and provide an engineer's estimate of construction costs far the sweer and water systems, a performance band, a one-year maintenance bond, and a comprehensive general liability insurance policy in the amounts and forms that are acceptable to DSRSD The applicant shall allow at least 15 working days far final improvement drawing review by DSRSD before si afore b the District En 'Weer. 115. No sewer line or waterline constnuction shall be permitted DSRSD Improvement DSRSD unless the proper utility construction permit has been Plans issued by DSRSD A construction permit will. only be issued after all of the items in Condition No. 113 have been satisfied. 116. The applicant shall hold DSRSD, its Board of Directors, DSRSD Issuance of DSRSD commissions, employees, and agents of DSRSD harmless Building and indemnify and defend the same from any litigation, Permits claims, or fines resulting from the construction and completion of the project. 117. Nc permanent structures are permitted over the 15' wide Zone 7 Ongoing Zone 7 storm drain easement. 118. The Applicant/Property Owner shall provide a structural Zone 7 Issuance of Zone 7 and eotechnical anal sis of ossible i acts to the Flood Buildin 23 -war ~ r~'~ ' ~1~ E r ontrvl f P ~ acilities located within the 15' wide storm drain Pet'n"+itig easement resulting from any feundation or trenching work in the vicinity of this easement necessary to construct the ro osed buildin foundation, or related im vements. 119. The AppIicant/Property Owner shall provide a structural Zone 7 Issuance of .Zone 7 and geotechnical analysis of possible impacts to the Building foundation of the proposed building that may result from Permits any trenching or other maintenance/repairs performed on the Plvcd Control facilities located within the within the 15' wide storm drain easement. 120. The ApplicantlProperty Owner shall survey and stake the Zone 7 Issuance of Zone 7 15' wide storm drain easement and proposed building Building foundation for review by Zone 7. The proposed foundation Permits I and building shall not encroach within this storm drain easement. The survey shall be performed by a licensed serve or. PASSF,D, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 16°i day of May, 2006, by the following vote: APES: NOES: ABSENT: • ,ABSTAIN: 7anet Lockhart, Mayor ATTEST: Pawn Holman, City Clerk GdPA#\2flt)5\OS-035 Ma~eld Genvy Realty Adviaore\CC1CC Reso SDR.DGC 24 v i P .w.w. 3 - +s ~ J"! ,.emu' . i . , ~ 1 i , r e .r, fV F~ I d r .,,J U-,(y... yi'~~ x rXe Tt.. r y' ~ ,..y ~ J;le~~'1 X ~ ~ ,u :t I. ~ ~ ~ ,,.r; ~"s 4`'iM. ~ fir. 1 W K y~ w '.nW+ll p.3" ~ i. ir~ ,",'i~'~ y I,. ,..r.w-+_~+.nry .L 'x~°'.,;~'µ~ L ~1 ~I ~16 '1 ~'~.%,~l a' ~ ~ ~ ~ 1.' J i. r ~ 7 /gyp 6 l ~p~' a a~~ ~ ~ x 1 I y I.' Y i ~:.._..._~60~ !N.?~., I. ~Btir,;6~~E'.~ ~~i~,~ 5f7}1SAO.I. u ti. II h ' ~ 1. V n I a' m . g. ~r Y ~ ,~yf~~erNEtr ~~r h°~, Ab~11]'o'~1V0] I O '4""~C~ + ~ ~ lirflli.W~W4 rW.4.1; p"L' ~ "r b,:, r,n ,.-~aYt'GS5 ~ u c ti ~ ~ k „~u~ t ~ r,~~,P"a ;4,tC~'~k~ I~r ~ i I~ , ~ m; r } 1~ a 41 ~e dF ri a ;7%~ u: N. r Mme. "FxW I ~ i pal { II 'r ~F +rv~wf. r y 1 ~ as (!?7 '~k 4~ B J ~ wee t ~ Q' ~ . ~M ,~-:v~ ~ ,Vr C ~ r ~ ~,Lnv~~~. ji: 1 {1 II W ' e '!"1, ~1 ~~'kk . y ~ ;R +a w~. ~ , 3 s . , r r hih a V k ~ ~ _ + ~ ~ I rV r C~~~~C ~ i d 4 , ~ ! ~ µ , ~a. ~ ire, ~ ` ~"'d,."'',~S'~'~k'I~M1~k~+a9~o. " "r 1 i~' v ea't` /~,r~4~'c~dPd' r.~ " " r~,. is '~'Cy~~ ?M _ v ~"a ~ { V~` ' ~ r'~' ~,f~ d~"~ ~ { yy. r ~ ~ ~ V y~,. ~F'1! k 1~'» M rx` r cy.Y;Tt'4w idC~'~K p ~i I' ; f ~d y 1. ~ w 'Y f'~.Sil 7 a1a»~' •µS a~ ~ 4 f L ~ ,14~ (yllb0113~ ~ ~ M,;,,' ~ h w, ~ mar ;w * k... I 'r Irt V FF~ ! rrr d S, ~ .y "3 r~~,~ 1 ' 4.57„'}.~ rev ti y~ ,rl' w r w f ~ ~ , V, " ',I r i " y ~W,k4~ ~R~r~'y`' ~~M>,,'a~~~~- y 'a '..yq ~"'~yl'C ni! 9 ~ I r, `~d J J 1 r ,d r i.. C .r ~ r, f r ~~yr u+ .n ~1.~~~ a ~ h ~r ! I C',r~~l l)i ia.1 w, ; in `t ~ai~i~,>b'e`~`y~q' !'ql "F ~ ~ y'T. r "w,~ r.,r Y S + ± ~ ~k`~lY~i 3r C i ~i r .r..... ~++',..r `W' p y~' ~fi M 'y5• ~ 1 t'yNr^~r ''~1 I~ I ~ ~ [?1 ~ flr A~~. `~P! ~ ~I n:, 6. ~Vyi. 1 ~ .+a, h ' Ir ~n^. ' ~ ~ SNPS113ONV ' 1'~'~& *`7~ ~~y ~ ~ n ~u~ ~Ay ^R ~ ~~'1',,,,''I,,I'' , ~ #~IRi i ~ ~ J 1 A M r r 7 J,.•1, . . MF~I ~ ~~"A ~ r ~~~f~V d r.. V.y,m' ` r*,:~:`1Me rr'r' ~~5 yr.. ~\~1 ,4,. ' G~~ Y 1 i. ..r ' n n wrk - .;r1.'T w 'X~ JF I . a..l j a. jr9 I wlr f drw. / a+aes ~ ~ ~ jay `1. \ ~ ~c ge9v+mfP • F f I r / r ~ I ~ oass+6 P,ueora ~ / w~~n. D . ~ i i J '..J ~ 1 LSL LS+G~_ ^:l ~ -~J~ ~LSC , / ~ ~ ~~LJ C....L~!-~~ Y Y~ SCF SIGH, sTCP ilp! I~ ~ msntnonrvt ~ I I s _ ~y I^ I l } 1 } I s s s ~ s n ~ s e +o +t t u ee to a su :3 ~ ea n ee n ra v ra » k I ~ _ I a~ c f I I e y ~ ~ k I JJf fle C Pi1WiRlG t ssenw~ ~s+., ib G a is a as a ~ n» n l et Ha n I 14 c I ~ tte c ~ ~ tte a c .s w es ae m s r ss es r n ~ a I Jm ~ y v~ PuuvH6 ^ y ~ m e ,kEtrfniwwe~ i~.[ N w t8f C ~ rs _ i Q' w a i mmu. I Se 1- 1r6 C i f i '2 ~ d Q 'm ° , a ~ ~ ~ +as c r s s ~ BOOR ELEVATEQN 337.QC TU50 Amador Plaza Road "u" • tT50U Square Feet r~ ~ ~a~'~ ' ~ L1~ ~ ~ fl~ ~ ` _ ~ ~ ~ L~ I r ~o n , ~ J f Lr Y i i, k } 'y, ~.y ~T.a tPA4•,~F4.ps ~ `Al.e~iY V~wl N4iE: +II ~euo.u.a e~. ' I I >~+W+~sm sE 41E' C2.C FOR cuea } sl~'_V!A'Jt LA1'Olfl 1s9r41~ sCc sF'£ET t.3A FOR J11UF1' IAGATILY{5 k SE~wNOhTa MEW WSRiLA%:. cM[Ni WNCREiE ~ NNo`RTy IL-J' 11E110iE8 ~pPRO%IYATE LIHRS * 1 y` ~F s>FE .oeE ~.r. I i - c~.o NOT FOf1 OQNSrRUCTh7N 4 j moH•wv.u+vw ~•~g~•~! ~ ~ ~ 1 Q N ~y 1 _ _ _ _ i, " ~ d ~ OVA ~ - 4A ~4O (]a A (J ~ Y ~ -jam e h _ • o -iy` ~ ' g ~ Cg ~ v+~~ ~ 8 4~T PN ~ ~ ~ x_ ) poi ~ 1 _ ~~~~~~~as s~ ~ _ Y ) 6 ~ ~ r" y3 is c ~ ~ o~ ~ ~ ~ 1 a S~ ~ g~o ) 1 P ~ ~$LS ~ ~ a _._Y- .:CSa~iAa~~m~~ ~ III! ~ - - ~ ~ - - 1 ~ R i o ~ , o x ~ r a ~ ~a ~ c~ a g ~ z a S ) r . n m o ~ w~ ~ - ~ _ Gal ° ° 1 4 ~ 1 ~ i _ ee w~ yy 1 - o~ w sta sacs wd gg 1 i 7 l3~Hdd ~p~ L~ ~ 9 t - T{ t.._.._... ~ ` y 11 ~ ~ ` sqi j m~ • Q Ma m i ' ~qpk~~~ ii p M ry ~ ~ ~ ~ IIBla21 WI9rva 1 1k~ ~ 1 i ~ 0 ~ ~ U ~ cp P ~ N w W a 5 L - tib ~ 1 - 'tea ~L /Y'Z9{ i .SI~Y^ 1~ ne ~ SYy L11 L v~ ~ ~ ' 'a $ ~ ~ _ ` i ~ 1 - • 'v ?pp~~ ~-~p . w ® 1 - v V - - 4 ~ • % 4 Oy ~ E l ~ _ - ~ ~ r ~J ~gg g ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ \ _ a - ~ ~ ~ . ~ , ~ n 1 Y _ ' ~b v'' i a _ _ b A. Cf p ~ ~ 1 ~ - _@ - - 1 ~ i ~ ~ t R ~ m ~ ~ - - _ ti ~ o ~ 'ttA ~ ~ ~ ~i , ~ - r _ ~ ~1 @ i ~ ~ T y 11 ~J i . _ ~ ~ - - ~ oe w stz ed[s rva o Z 13:721Vd n 'e i f _ ~ • • p:: me rwNa vwre j ~ p 1 a~ ~p ~ A L~ © aT^ Q N M 0. ~ ~ ~ c ~ - - _ - _ - ~ y ` - _ _ - o yy y , ° ~I 'm ? ~8 a ~ ER ~ ~ ~ ~Ra I ~ q ~ 1 ~ yg~~~~°~~Rpp~ ~ ~ ~ ~p ~6 i ~ ~ ~ ~j P . ~ ~ _ _ w Bg ~a ~ qq ~ - ~ s- - ~ n A a Y Inky @ ~ I~~'~ { ~ ~~e~~ ~ ~ I i ~6i~n ~d 14 F~~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ C~~~ BIB, I~' N~~~ I ~ 3~ ~ g694 Ya .r kt ~ ~y9ppIl ~B ~IRi~R~ ~ ~ G~ F~ ~ r 4 ~ ~y~~6~ ~e~~g~~ ~I ~I~ _ ~ ~ B Gp ggy pgg y$ y @ Q ~ a A + i ' r ~ 0 1 as lp,~ f ll mFre •i••ana wno g ~i~~ r e tltl ~ ~ ~ ~ 6 ~ { ~ ~1 9 el~i. o ~ ~ ~ ! t i j ' iii ! 1! 9 ~ ~ ~ ¢ g ~ g ~ o iE# t f i f 3 f ~ I~~~1~~?~' ~i ~ ~ A ~i~ 1 ~ ~ ~ e a S _ t _5 _ _ R -1 _ ~ - - - ¦ Y _ ~ ~ b _ ~ ~ ti - ~~b~~~~~l~~~ e ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ qq~1g~t~~6Q ~p~y~~~~~§ n • ~ • . _ _ Eae C s ~ ag ~ i. Ilgleaull9~~ i E &l~~ ~ ~ x fa 8 ~ ~ ~ o ~r N ~ O [p ~ dw 74,i m d ~ G91 pp q2q6 •agg{6 1~ p p§ pCSy9~ 1 6 ~ tl ~ 3~2~yg9999~ ~ 4-__ - 16 ~ ~ R ~ ! , 0 ' 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~~g A~ 9 ~ ~ r :fir ~ ~ ~I~ ~K ~RF tltl ~a .C ~ _ 9 ~p ~ ~ a~~asa'i'aia - - ~ ~ ~ ~ &F4FFipFp! B 9~ - e ' ® ~ i~Rlaz§q?= ~p ~ ~ ~9~9~~999~ ~ e aR s~ ~ y 6~ ¦p ~ky~Y99~~~99 ~ ~p ~ ~ pk~ F~3 ~ i,.,.yb,a.~khk ~~g g~ a ~t~yy ~ - ~~W ~ ~ l~tt~ ~ ~ ~ 55~~~ ~ I E ~s~~ ~~~4 - ~ ~ g~~4~~~~~ ~~6 ~ ~ i ~ gg , a~ y~~ ~F~ ~ ~ OB~~ ~ ~~p p~~~~P -T- ~p ~E a ~ ~ tl! a~ b 5 y ~e ~ n 19~. ~ 3~~1e18~ I~~,F4~~Ftl~P~~~A3~6 ~kg~~ _~~.~...'.:.~a- ~ a d h ] c ~~~~pp is ~ $ ~ dg~~g6~ ~~~sk9 - m E ~ i- b R „ ,ili"a~ NNN ~ • ' , _ , ~,c•. ''t'om a..-s.'fiis!,n _ _ - ~ - f ~a.v..a~ ` i I ~ e~60WL eMO®tHI~MMlSYl0 ~1 weree>wsumra ~w~.amrnrn.- r-.-aaaesuaes. -,~rmuem. ~r-wu..4 w.m¢w amiaawer.n.~~ P4E#•B6YarLa'. 'eewrar°"'sa~ i iwiaonttw. wcarmRrj~. vwtacam~uav.a ~ j 1 naeewiR~waa~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ Il {wm~sevaat .y . H.~ it - ~ m~e4~rrwlia I m mev,in. I 4 r ~;uw~~i~.x". T l l ; 61~ TORE + .BIGSTORE I ~ 11AIRCi1~ BStoie Clothes K hen Mart 1~ ~ 1 ' ams I I 4 . ~Rwur, ~iocmnx rerienma mct~ ~ avrrr~~usrsm. our WYw[MLOYRBp[ Z ~ & WEST ELEVATOY FACliG PARWNG iVlf K~PC bID'i1g1ElBYM ~ f11L'OfL @l111me~ ~ ~ O ®ailliRaLM.T O D I am>xawu,ara ~ ~ I ~„<,r.r,e,~ I r~ WII®®BefiLAIR6T W0 ' IrTNC11FIR.`~ 111Ef1F11da~M.+~ ',I(J r'al1~a1R1LlR. 9M®@~If11TR6W6_~I! YIF411Yf I ~ ~ nenmsem iuasam~ •rrrmvax xWrawD 1 ^['uae+v~a.m. ~ ~nmwaAaart rre,w.rmaum. nLr - vlaaa®em. a.lIlalTavl. I , 1 ~ mu¢lm. r~ lI ~ m. m. _ ~ 7 i e~iruau~m am ~ ~ m. i 3 ~ ~GSfORE C ~ n 61G57DAE xu~.r.,. ~ e5'lore r >~ma ~ a ~ arm i ~I y I eaa.e i ~ ~ -.1~ Is wy II-IDwr~1VLM. ~IMII@~p~w iRR+CWk~LM~ Ws,CEa63w[2M. WMIGa[aY31.M. EIWIfl6Na Ma~tl aaeeoRna. WWIeW,eel,C[aia aVI1eF~rmSW 'j Y8a1EYIfT6G . f • ~ EAST ELEVATgN FACING A7AADOR PLAZA ROAD erxe,e..ro T w~rtamerrrva;amc_m. ~ iaa wESara~ I a~mw i"~ n' i w®meuuwma-wc I aaomwaa I wrrm®rre.aretm. wrtrmxem.-rase arerm. i`r II 1~ I aoeuweama Lm.-~ ~-imrtlmrEm. aaaM.- 1 ~ 1MI®mniT/~~ { I ~ cmcm.~ .~.s~niac ~ I tm • ~ I ~ i ~ eimra. l ~ I y ~ { I ¢ ( ~ I ~ ~ f ~ f ~ ~ ~ II (f •I r £ ` tl I~ o- 1d I t a~ , I 1 rtmm ewraosuaav.m. i aurtmaaec.m. I ~ ranmmma rvserm. ~i awra aua~eEV,r. ®ewurwrtaeaam ~ NORT}! ELEVATON FACING PLAZA SOIST[i ELEVATION FACNG PETSMAJiT ~1 e,...,. us.ra ~J tr•ra• r f • I nma i mne•ru awr. res.... Wap 4~o4 v71y b. 6~u p~C a n...pw+s*e _ _ 1 ~~1 Y LL our.wiw+s • ' Il wn ~ . ELE> ~ A2.1 e. ~.e`..m®~. ~..r. MOT POR COIptTRVOTIOR 0 it ~ gg qi y5i 6 ~ ~ gg d l ~ i nw a wiq a ~ aG1~ ~ ~ ~ i I $ ~ ¢ xy ~ I~ f ,I ~ I• u~ i ~I I, - ~ , i III x(- - 1 a Y - . , ~ , I ~ i - _ _ _ I ~ Y • ~ - ` ` 1,x,,1 ~ ~I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ , ~ , m ' C~-~ - - -LI i r.-. i : , , k I' , L_ ~ ~ ~ ' F - 1.. , II ~ ~ ~Q-- . =t- ----r~4 - - 1--...----- -----q - _al ~ F-- - -----------i s , O ~ , I 1 i • l; ~j L.. ~ - ~ - _ - - - I , ~ ~ L--_l _ ~ , ~ ,r.. ~ - ~ ; s bra i e ' - _ ii ;'i , _ ; ~I~ ; ~ ~ ~ - - - li I ~ I a3 _ _ - r - , r - - ~ I I • • ~~y 6 3jI y •a~sa~.w' ~ .may 3fli~40 ~S J PflmO~ S r* ~~~1YI081411' j-` i. aY1bYw - J.S w,rx ~~y~.'^- ~ 111-- ~ ~ T ~ .awlu F/G~ ~lrl~®rtARIR1A ~ ~ i _ ~L1N0®®6~IlGVl91E~IyN®~my~llC. lR _ na~t#{ estars Clots KIM . BI STORE BIGSI'ORE I~ _ : )I f" J I \ mRls{PF~iRICm \ t1R1itHMfTNIBD]IIW WNYL90RmY'ICE~m_- WSREI SSNip~J YIFST aEVRTtON FACdlG PERKING ti®ecwnwm,~ aae>•rKnx FfHI1LiRlPNQ~ - ~'m/RRMT MLYZIPJB411B 4. 'x 1: elaiagrwo uwutmrt~~ir s ~ r--•w.raenacgm pnmf3RRlnptGPrm astm7lME "m wamfaert > ~~ifu®»$+wie~+w .w~irebrm a, s,m~. - - ' W ~ _ IA i r.. ` I &6FORE BInwTORf it ! ~ _ _ Y_ - - = 1 ~,F~~ i EASTELNATIDN FRCING AMRDdi PLAYA NORO I~ scuc vr•M ~ mac ~RVIE0.1ir _ ia]rtfRNSm- { - r.wnwma~,m. aeourt,m.- , I ~wa*wlet ~ I ~~.-x, - ~ 1 - _ w.ara,nn~a ~ ~ amuasm~Aalr. ~ .I m s ii I ~ ~ ~ i - j f o ~ ~ 1 wwsa~wM ` awrv~sc.m. f-~i *+sam w+aem slw.artwnw~m NDRiH Fi NATON FACING PLAZA 14 SON7N E`-EYATW FkC6Y0 PEL~.fRRT 13 x.:E o<.r> v srH¢ rr•ra I it ~s »~n II nre_eam srr e~fwm ema.e w.~ew+ erpm~re ~ ueaminx~ ~~(a!CIIlCT'4 ~NAFKXS ~Af? ~ 7 ~no6 - . F~Vt3L•:+yi YLnLUr~as~'s A2.1 ~ a a NDT FOR EON8iRlIClgN i I' ~i I ,~~~yy' f~\\ ,,,``,\1~ ~~o~ ro~ ~ ' W ~ , ~I `-.-r-~ ~ h I `a~ h ~ w ) ~i `,~I\~ y l-~a I;~ ~ + ~R VAI-LEY _ ,rN `1~' STARVJA~D DR 1 y ~ ' ~ COMA) (O) 1? \ ' ~ ~ 5 y * ~ , ~1 ~ ~ 4 5 ~ v ~I 'i ~ (COMA) ¢ ~ 1` \ ~ 1 ~ 1 wl~ I~ ~1 ~Ij ~ : `i ~t 5', t~ ` \ 1 ~ ~ + ( X01 ~1~~} ~ ' I , ~ ~ pUBUN BOULEVARD r--~ ) ~ .`i i t j , l ? `l ~ENp ~ ~ I I. ~i i f ~ 11 - SPECIFIC PLAN BOUNpARY (MU) MIXED USE ~ ~ ~ USE A6 NOTED (R/A) RETPJUAIfTO --~~~11~,. U ~ 1,~j~1, POTENTIAL PLAZA LOCATION (COM gl COMMERCIAL B ~ ~ ~ pPPOFRl1NTIY3T1'E (O) OFFICE ~~1 RETWL/OFFlCE (COMP) COMMERGALA i, ~ ~I n, I~ .:LAND USE PLAN N.r.s. OECEh18ER 2D00 ~ ~ oowNrowN coR~ spECl~lc PLAN CITY Q F DUBLIN I' EXHIBIT" 9 ~ ~ ~ - Exhibit 9 ~ - _ - - ~ , • - - ~ Downtown Core ~l = x Specific Plan F _ s _ MI%ED USE \ ~ ; , ~ ~ Specific Plan z l Land Use ~ ~ ~ _ - cow A ` ~ ~ ck ~~u F1C ~ 1 5 z- W r _ ` ~ ....r.*'*'` z - ` ~ X17 N HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ~ CON B ti ` ~ ~ 'l _ (25A + ou1At} ~FU~ ~ ` 1 -Freeway ?s> _ ~ _ - Streets 9n RETAIL! ~ ° - DuWln Lots ` \ ~ ~ ®8pactfic Pin Area fl W~ ~ ~ t ~y~ La!>Id Use tZ 4~ l ~tammercia[A ~ t ~ `i E , ~ Commercial 8 ' ? ~ Cc>ht _ y , ~ ; V kiigh Detssitf' Residential [25.0 + dWac) ~ ° hto[ed Use y ETAILlOFFiCE V j ~ ' s i ~ ~ CIffiCe i>< ' ~ \ ~ RefalllAutnrrwtive ~ ETA€LIOFFICE _r. - ! . ~ ~ i, ~$etalklOiSce > - .a ~ ~ Poieetial Plaza Location ~ ~4 ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ _ ~alxirtu~,irjr site ~ March 2006 - HL1TE: STtlelntemal s~rstem of ~ ~ , ~ `~x=' `-r ,y ~ ~ - ~ • ~ ~ a kcal dtreeSs ahovm in thls figure ~ a ~w ~ ~ ~ \ "islM~iratNe orgy. 1~..~ _ ~-:s~. - x ' _ ~ DRAFT~IZo log OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN b RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE • DECLARATION FOR THE FALCON CROSSING PROJECT PA 04-016 RESOLUTION N0.06-12 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PREZONE WITH STAGE 1 Dk'VELOFMENT PLAN FOR FALCON CROSSING PA 04.016 RESOLUTION NO.06-13 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN RECOMMENDING TFIAT THE CITY COUNCIL DIRECT STAFF . TO FILE AN APPLICATION WITH THE ALAMEDA COUNTY LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCo) TO ANNEX THE MISSION PEAI~ALLON CROSSINGS AND FREDRICH PROPERTIES TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 73.97 ACRES TO TFIE CITY OF DUBLIN AND THE DUBLIN SAN IiAMON SERVICES DISTRICT (DSRSD) PA 04-016 Chair Schaub requested a Live minute recess at 7:55 p.m. Chair Schaub called the meeting back in session. 8.3 PA 05-035 Dublin Place Commercial Building -Planned Development Rezone with Stage 2 Development Plan and Site Development Review fora 17,500 square foot commercial building. Chair Schaub asked for the staff report. Mr ]eff Baker, /associate Planner, presented the specifics of the project as outlined an the staff . report. f-ie stated that the Applicant was not present for the hearinf;. Chair Schaub asked if the plaza axea would. be available to the public or restaurant patrons only Mr Baker stated that the plaza would be available to both the public and restaurant patrons. G,i'anning i,mm~Giesimr 45 ~a..,;r'-rc ~,nrr.. `~eBuGu !Mrtting DRAFTS 3 db ic6 Vice Chair Wehrenberg asked if the planters would provide seating. Mr Baker stated that the planters would be low and would have benches alongside them for seating • Cm. King stated that he thought the orientation of the project was pexfectly aligned with the Downtown 5peci£ic Plan. He asked why the staff repoxt seemed to have an almost apologetic tone for having the front of the building £ace the inside instead of fronting the street. Mr Baker stated that the interpretation of the design guidelines of the Downtown Specific Plan is to encourage the tenant's entries along the sidewalk to promote activity Cm. Fasulkey stated that he agreed with that interpretation. He fixrther stated that he did not understvld how the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC6sRs) on the property could restrict constructing the building in accordance with the design guidelines of the Downtown Specific Plan. Chair Schaub asked for an explanation of the CCBrRs £or this project. Mr John Bakker, Assistant City Attorney, stated that the CC&Rs do not supersede the City's policies in any way; however, they are a development constraint for the Applicant. He stated that the Applicant would have difficulty negotiating changes in the CC&Rs. This would leave Staff in a position with few design and development options for the project. He stated that the City could strictly implement the Downtown Specl£ic Plan and deny the project. Mr Chris Foss, Acting Planning Manager, stated that when the Downtown Specific Plan. was adopted in 2000, notices were sent to the property owner's in the area. The property owner's xepresentative at that time did not make it clear that there wexe CC&Rs on the property that would not allow the Downtown Specific Plan to take shape as the City had envisioned it. • Cm. Biddle stated that although the Applicant created a decent project, more could have been done if the restrictions were not present. He asked what the Planning Commission s options wore. Mr Bakker stated that if the Planning Commission wanted to implement the Downtown Specific Plan, the options would be to make changes in the project or deny the project. Chair Schaub stated that he felt it problematic to continue the hearing without being able to question the Applicant directly Cm. Fasulkey asked if the doors that face the street could be required to remain open for business during normal business hours. Chair Schaub stated that there are two issues that shoixld be pointed nut:1) The City does not have a Design Element, and 2) The City has not combined the three Specific Plans into one 5peci£ic Plan. Mr Foss pointed out, for the record, that the City Council has not formally adopted the Design Element goal fox the 2006-7 budget. Chair Schaub stated that this project i5 tno important to discuss withoixt having the Applicant present. Czn. Kuig asked about the desired location of a "Dublin Green' area as described in the • Downtown 5peci£ic Plan. Mr Foss stated that when the Downtown Specific Plan was originally adopted, the plaza was generally located in the middle of the Target parking lot; however, G'Ginnury ~.ammivaiox ~}6 Rmi1.~.,5 ;E(lUn ;~I:gvelar Mrxei~Fg DRAM l ~1~{s~(c~ Target decided not tv develop a plaza. Staff has attempted to address the issue of a "Dublin Green" plaza area by incorporating it into this project. • Cm. Fasulkey stated that the Downtown Specific Plan is very specific about having buildings front the street for the purpose of attracting pedestrians. Mr. Foss stated that he believes the Downtown Specific Plan allows for that condition "where feasible." He stated that the property owner could claim infeasibility based on the developmental restrictions of the property. Cm. Fasulkey asked if the Planning Commission could overlook the CCdsRs, and Mr Bakker said yes. Cm. Fasulkey stated that feasibility should be based upon the stores being unable to sustain business. Mr Foss stated that claims for financial infeasibility could probably be supported by an unviable layout of the project and the CC&Rs. Chair Schaub stated that he would like the Planning Commission to defer making a decision on this project. Mr Baker stated that the Applicant indicated a preference for a denial of the project rather than a continuance. Mr Baker stated that the Planning Commission had four decision-making options far this project: 7) approve the project, 2) deny the project, 3) continue the hearing, or 4) refer decision making authority to the City Council. Chair Schaub requested a five minute recess at 8.34 p.m. . Chair Schaub called the meeting back in session. Chair Schaub stated that he would like to place a priority on combining the three Specific Plans and ensure that the issue of CC&Rs is discussed. Chair Schaub proposed that the Planning Cornrnissivn refer this project to the City Council after each Plaruting Commissioner opines on what the City Council should consider in making a decision on the project. Mr Bakker stated that the Planning Commission would be referring jurisdiction over the project from the Planning Commission to the City Council. He stated that the Planning Commissioners should make sure their comments are in the record before making the decision to refer jurisdiction. Chair Schaub opened the public hearing. Mr Charles Leony, Architect, spoke on behalf of the Applicant. He discussed, in detail, the architectural plans for the project. Cm. Fasulkey asked if would be difficult tv find restaurant tenants. IVIr Leony said no, and further stated that it is anticipated that the project would be 60 percent restaurant space. Cm. Fasulkey asked what was being done to make the south wall interesting. Mr Leony stated that they would be treating the wall as a fully visible wall and would be similar to the other . walls of the building. Chair Schaub asked if PefSmaxt's loading dock area would be shared with the project, and Mr Leony said yes. (hYan»iny ('orn+nresicm ~}7 dpiil ?.5",l(N~n ~FY•Rukr Afrxting DRAFT °~~0~ Cm. Pasulkey asked about the easement between the two buildings. Mr Leony stated that it is an existing sewer line that can not be built over He turther stated that the intention is to create a landscaped walkway on the easement. Cm. Biddle stated that he visited the site. He asked about the width o£ the easement and Mr. Leony stated that the easement is 75 feet wide and is shared between the property owner and PetSmart. Cm. Pasulkey asked if the Applicant would solely improve both sides of the easement or share the improvements with PetSmaxt. Mr Leony stated that at this time, it is not part of the agxeement to landscape both sides of the easement. Cm. Pasulkey stated that the discussion with Mr Leony was helpful. Vice Chair Wehrenberg stated that Mx Leony gave a very good overview of the project. Bearing no furthex comments, Chaix Schaub closed the public hearing. Chaix Schaub stated that the architecture and design of this building, while compatible with some of the surrounding buildings, is not consistent with the intent of the Downtown Specific Plan or our future Downtown Dublin. Using PetSmart, Anderson's, and such buildings as the set of common design elements for the our Downtown Coxe is not the design direction he believes that is called for in the Overall Design Guidelines section of the Downtown Specific Plan. Chair 5cl~aub referred to diagrams and verbiage in the Downtown Specific Plan (pg. 38- 45) as his vision for a downtown center and how a pedestrian court area could, if not should, . look. Specifically, Chair Schaub stated that split cinderblock is the building material used for his home retaining wall and the snack shack at the Pleasanton's Spoxts. In his opinion, this is nothing close to "premium building matexial." Chair Schaub stated that covering architectural shortcomings with "green walls" that are watered with potable water is not ecological sound policy l°Te stated that upon visiting the site, he found that none of the green walls in this area have been maintained, including those at Target that appear to be abandoned as nothing is growing on some of them. He stated that he could find no examples around town that demonstrate that these metal grids with proposed vines will ever come close to looking like the architectural drawings that come before the Planning Commission. 1-le stated that he is speaking only of the architecture, structure, and visual appearance of the project and does not have a problem with the pxoposed circulation, safety, ox land use of the project. In summary, Chair Schaub declared that he could not make the required findings far (1) structures consistent with zoning district intent and Specific Plan; (2) views, architectural and landscape considerations; and (3) conservation of water Cm. King stated that he may have misunderstood what the drafters of the Downtown Specific Plan had in mind. He stated that when he initially looked at the Downtown Specific Plan, he approved of it and thought it to be an ambitious vision. He stated that the overall project area does not depict the vision of the Downtown Specific Plan. He stated that he does not understand why the front of the project considered fronting the street. Amador Plaza Road • should not compete with Village Parkway, which is supposed to be a pedestrian fxicndly axea. The back of this project is appropriately facing Amador Plaza Road because Amador Plaza Road is not a plaza, it is a street. He appreciates that the back wall of the project is designed to ~PlanmrgJ CAmmRrsGm 48 9'.priC2.5', ruin, ~~•yuCar ;l2erti~rzh, DRAt' i~ilo aFir~ look like the front. He stated that until he is clear on what the Downtown area is supposed to ]oak like, he is not sure he can vote for any projects in the Downtown area. He stated that this is an important project in an important part of the City and the property owners should not be allowed to dictate how the site is developed. He stated that he utiHaIly thought that the layout of the project fit into the Downtown Specific Plan; however, the architectural design is bland and boring. Cm. King stated that the City should consider eminent domain to develop the area according to the plan; however, he acknowledged that this might not be practical at the present time. The project's architecture should be original or have some kind of identity, such as the "mission' style, the "art-deco" style, "Irish-Urban," style or historical. It can be anything, but it has to be distinctive and creative, not bland and ordinary He stated that before any other projects are approved in. the Downtown area, the Downtown Specific Plan should be clarified. He mentioned Walnut Creek's design of a "public living room" as an example of an appropriate downtown area. Crn. Biddle expressed concerns about the CC&Rs and the land use. He stated that if CC&Rs are allowed to remain so restrictive, then the Downtown area is basically fixed foxever, He stated that he encourages the City to look for means to mitigate the CC&Rs and eliminate similar types of restrictions. These types of restrictions do not seem to benefit the City, Applicant, property owner, or tenants. He stated that without the CCBrI?s, there could have been many options for the layout of the project to better represent the vision of the Downtown Specific Plan. Vice Chair Wehrenberg stated that she likes the project, and it is consistent with other stores on the site. She stated that over all, the layout of the project is good and fits well into the area. . She stated that she is concerned about the landscaping and would like to ensure that the plants are maintained. She stated that she would like to see a larger plaza area. She mentioned the plaza that is across the street from the Nordstrom in Walnut Creek as an example of an appropriate downtown plaza. She stated that eating establishments are needed in the Downtown area. She stated that the Architect did a good job with the design, however, the Planning Commission is not clear on the vision of the Downtown Specific Plan. Regarding safety, the Dublin Place site planning is good for public access. Vice Chair Wehrenberg is concerned about duplicating the entrance to the Expo Design Center There are insufficient crosswalks and sidewalks to access the Expo Design Centex from the parking lot area. Patrons walk through the landscaped area in front of the Expo Design Center to get into the store. Cm. Pasulkey complimented the Architect on the project's design. T-Ie stated that the CCBrRs have put an artificial constraint upon the design flexibility of the project. He stated that he is troubled about putting so much effort into creating the Downtown Specific Plan only to find out that the most creative pieces of the project are constrained. He stated that if the City is stuck with the layout of the project, then architectural detail needs to be added to the south wall. He stated that the project should not aim to match the style of PetSmart because PetSmart may not be there forever He stated that there should be architectural cohesiveness in the area. He stated that Staff is highly constrained in terms of what they have been able to articulate to the Applicant due to the ambiguity within the Downtown Specific Plan. He stated that regardless . of where the project fronts, the Applicant should not be given an opportunity to seal off the street side of the project. There should be a condition that requires the street side of the project to exhibit not only a false front, but a working front; otherwise the Downtown Specific Plan would be disregarded. Street facing doors should be required to be open during business ~anRi>I~ (.amrrriasim.: 49 a1rti6~l.S ZiNln 7~~ular hzeeirng DRAFTq~ o~=ie~ hours; and inviting, pedestrian friendly landscaping and walkways should lead to the front of the building. There should be a required coordinated effort between the Applicant and PetSmart to improve the easement that is shared between them. He stated that there is an opportunity to create a nice esplanade on the easement. Chair Schaub pointed out the importance of having aforms-based code that would contain visualizations of specific plans, rather than having to create a vision from sixty pages of written description. Mr Foss stated that those comments would be relevant to combining the three Specific Plans that may be the focus of the 2006-0'7 Goals & Objectives. Mr. Poss suggested sending each Planning Commissioner their individual comments to ensure that their comments on this item are captured appxapriately Mr Bakker stated that this is fine as long as each Caznmissioner does not reply-to-all with their comments, but replies directly to staff Chair Schaub suggested that this item be discussed in a study session. Mr Baker stated that at this point, the Applicant prefers that the Planning Commission make a formal decision on the project tonight. On a motion by Chair Schaub, seconded by Cm. Wehrenbexg, and by a vote o£ 5-0-0 the Planning Commission unanimously decided to• REFER DECISION-MAKING AUTHORITX ON THIS ITEM TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH THE COMMENTS 4F EACH PLANNING COMMISSIONER AS CONTAINED IN THESE MINUTES. NEW OR UNFTNTST-TED BUSINESS -1VONE Mr Foss stated that the May 9, 2006 Planning Commission meeting is tentatively canceled. OTHER BUSINESS 10.1 Brief INFORMATION ONLY reports from the Planning Commission and/or Staff, including Committee Reports and Reports by the Planning Commission related to meetings attended at City Expense (AB 1234). The Planning Commission did not have any items to repoxt. ADTOURNMENT -The meeting was adjourned at 9:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, . Planning Commission Chair 2'furtnirr~t.amrnicnnn SO 'd/rrfl,~.SlUfl¢: 9P~gnWr nnn~~r~~ 4~~ar r~~~ On motion of Cm, Hildenbrand, seconded by Cm. Zika and by unammnus vote, the Council adopted RFSOLIJTION NO. 7 } - Oh AL701"I"ING A MITIt:,ATED NEGA'I"IVF DF,~'I,ARA'I"ION, STATF,MENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS AND MI"TIGATION MONI'C'ORING FLAN FOR'1"1-lE FAI,LON CROSSING F'Rt71ECT PA 174-OI ki RESOLUTION NO, 72 - 06 ALITHORIGING INITIATION OF APFLICA"PION TO ANNEX 'C'IIF, MISSION PEAI:I FAI.LON CROSSING AND FREDRIC'H PRC7YERTIT,S TO THE CI"I"Y OF DLiBLIN AND C?SRSD ANION NO ] 6 I ]:ESO~ION NO. 73 - 06 AP}'ROILING THE P}2E-ANNC~ATCON AC~REE:M~EN"i" BETWEEN 'I'IiE l ITl' OF DC iBLIN AND STANDARD PACIFII HOMES ANNEXA'1"CC~N NO. 1 Ei PA t74-0'1.6 and waived the reading and INTRODUCED an Ordinance prezomng the Fallon Crossing project site to the Planned Development District with a related Stage 1 Development Plan. Public Hearing Dublin Flare Commercial Building -Planned Development ith 3 2 Devel m nt PI nand Site eve ment li;cview FA d -35 7:50 p.m. 6.2 (410-30) Mayor Lockhart opened the public hearing. Associate Planner Jeff Baker presented the Staff Report and advised that the Applicant, PFRS Dublin Corporation, requested approval of a PD Planned Development rezone with Stage 2 Development Plan and Site Development Review to construct a 17,500 square foot commercial building and related site improvements inclixding a plaza, landscaping and parking, located within the existrng Dublin Place Shopping Center on an undeveloped site that was the location of the former General Cinemas located at 7000 I~[ Ili C~I+P'I"I'k 4. f.DI1Ne'!I, ~'lI'~!p'.I'[''w VUL.I IME 2S REGLiL,AR M EE'C'ING May l6, 20U6 ATTA'~'~~' T l' 4 d_~ i~' tl t»(~ IU'NWI~Ill11J'LNI,l1 lad Amador Plaza Road. Although the Planning Commission had autharrty to review the draft Ordinance approving the Planned Development Rezone and make recommendations to the City Council, as well as adopt a Resolution approving the Site Development Review, the Applicant was inadvertently unable to attend the Planning Commissron's Public l~earrng. The Planning Commission raised. a number of concerns; however, felt it was problematic to discuss these issues without the Applicant being present. The Applicant's representative requested that the Planning Commission forward the project to the Council rather than continue the project to a future Planning Commission meeting. The Commission freed that it would state its concerns with the project far the record and refer hearing jurisdiction to the City Council. Mayor Lockhart stated that it was unusual for the Applicant to bypass the Planning Commission process, and indicated that it was very important that the Planning Commission hear issues and discuss them before they were presented to the Council.. The Planning Commission's comments should be heard in tonight's discussion because they worked very hard and d1d their homework, and had valid comments. The Council concurred. Planning Commission Chair Bill Schaub expressed concern about the proposed store front, as well as the proposed green screen tower element. The green screen was too tall, and plants do not grow well on therm. The sp11t cinderblock was not appropriate for the area, and there were several alternatives. The plans for the proposed. plaza were unclear and needed more explanation. Planning Commission Chair Schaub expressed concern regarding architecture and consistency with the Downtown Care Specific Plan T7esign Guidelines, and showed slides with examples of buildrrtg architecture and plaza elements which he felt were more appropriate For this location. Planning Commissioner Morgan King advised, that many of the proposed elements were not m accordance with the Downtown Specific Plan and expressed his concern with the proposed size and placement of the Village Green plaza, the parking situation, the lack of pedestrian opportunity, the direction of the existing store fronts, and the mediacriry of the proposed building design and architecture. The inflexibility of the property owner's CC&>Z's was a concern, as well. In his opinion, the Village Green plaza plan needed to be mare clearly defined, and a design standard implemented. A lot of work went into the Downtown Specific Plan, and rt should be Considered when this project was contemplated. l~l ltl.l!'; ('i 8'~, i.`4.tE'~'( 11 ~vll"~l'T'L'."~+ VOLI.~ME Za REGULAR 1Vl~:F",TiNG , May 1G, 2nnU 1*:.~?~.'1'. Gdrrt «'°i~ ro~ Planning Commissioner Robert Fasulkey agreed that the Planning Cnmmission put a lot of effort into the crafting of the Specific Plan, and the Applicant might oat fully understand what the Specific Plan was requesting and the vision of the area. He urged the Council to vote against this project tonight unless there was a lot of flexibility to came before them. Planning Commission Doreen Wehrenberg expressed the same concerns. Overall, it was a nice project, but extra design help was needed. Mayor Lockhart thanked the Planning Commission far expressing its concerns before the Council. It was unfortunate that the Commission was not allowed to do its job, She asked the Applicant to address several items of concern to the Planning Cnmmission, including: flat roof vs. gables, green tower, stacked rack vs. cinder Moak, the plaza area, and outdoor dining space. Mayor Lockhart asked Staff if, with other development happening in the area, there were other opportunities far the green space or a plaza area. Could this development meet its responsibility and still look for other plaza space in that vicinity? She was not convinced that the Target parking lot would be the appropriate place for a plaza. Community Development Director ,ieri Ram advised that there were changes occurring along Amador Plaza Road, and it was possible, as part of the new Downtown Plan being worked an, that additional area for plazas or a Dublin green could be identified. Alicia Diaz, Vice President of Mayfield Gentry Realty Advisors, extended a formal apology to the Planning Commission and explained that the principal of the company did have all intention to attend the Planning Commission meeting; however, he was delayed due to traffic. Every effort had been made to meet the City's expectations of the project. Unfortunately, there was very little flexibility in the CC&R's, which were negotiated between several property owners. There have been problems with green screens and watering of vegetation including trees in the overall property area, which would be addressed by enlarged budgets and capital improvements in the landscaping plans. From the beginning, the Applicant had taken a very collaborative approach with Staff regarding the design of the building. The Applicant was willing to work wrth Staff regarding the issue of split cinderblock vs. stacked rock, and looking at additional arohitectural interest with respect to the fascia of the building. There would be concern about the degree of further footprint articulation that may be requested and its impact on the interior footprints. The plaza area was intended to be a combination of restaurant space and public access. l.?l l~l..l"~ a I'1,~' ~"m,ll ~~dQ lI_ ~~lli~t "1'"i. ~ VOLi~ME 25 REGULAR MEETING May 16, 2006 ~ ~ 1U1~ Mr. Leom, Project Architect, advised that the proposed flat roof was a response to the surrounding facilities and tv provide unity to the rest of the shopping center. Landscaping was a very important element, and the green screen provided a signature element to the facility. The cinderblock was included to provide articulation to the building farm, but could be easily changed to another material. There was an effort design the building to face every direction. The Council, Staff and the Applicant entered into a drscussian regarding the challenges such as landscaping, the direction of the stare fronts, softening the store fronts, possibly adding a water element, and defining the plaza area. Ms. Diaz advised that fiscally they could not start from scratch on the project, but they would. be wilting to work with Staff to address fhe Council's concerns. Mayan Lockhart closed the public hearing. Mr. Baker indicated that the Council could continue the item tv the next Council meeting in order to address the Council's concerns, or include conditions in the Site Development Review tv address their concerns. The Council discussed the different alternatives and agreed to continue this item the next Council meeting and directed Staff to address the fallowing issues in the Staff Report: i.) the stare fronts should have a softer appearance; Z) use stacked rock instead of cinderblock; 3) include an art fountain or water element m lieu. of the green screen tower; 4) consider any alternatives to make plan less boxy without interfering with net square footage; 9) and provide different heights in roof elements without the tower element an the building. Nlr. Baker asked if the Council would like the fountain element, which would typically be included m part of the design review and an element of the project, to be included in the design of the plaza that was brought back before the Council at the June 6rh meeting. City Manager Ambrose advised that, if the art was going to be part of the water feature, the amount would need to be negotiated. In order not to hold up the pra~ect, the water element design could be pulled out of the Planned Development and included it in the Site Development P.eview. The Planned Development could be heard an June 6th, and the Site Development Review could be heard at the June 13t}~ Adjourned Regular Meeting, along wzth the second reading of the PD Ordinance. The Council concurred with the option. l:l@. 1St_.,1~~ ¢ ,t.1.'t f'tDR.'~g. S1_ ~,11"4t. l f.,'~ VOLUME 25 - RF.GiTLAR MEETIN[:. May l G, 2006 14 i' ~.~:It 14i~~3 On motion of Cm. Zika, seconded by Vm. Oravetz and by unanimous vote, the Council continued the Planned Development portion to the meeting of June 6, 2006, and the Site Development Review portion to the June l3~ Adjourned Regular meeting, and directed Staff to remove the water feature from the Planned Development and include it in the Site Development Review, as well as address the other concerns as determined. by Council. R>R ~C~SS 9:48 p.m. Mayor Lockhart called for a short recess. At 9:5$ p.m., the meeting reconvened with all Council Members present. 1?ublic HearnsC Heritage and Cultural Arts Program 1"ees and Cha~ge~ 9:5$ p.m. 6.3 (295-10/950-20) Mayor Lockhart opened the public hearing. Heritage and Cultural Arts Supervisor John Hartnett presented the Staff Report and advised that the City Council would consider adopting fees far school and group tours far the Heritage Center's new exhibit. Addrtianally, the Council considered a resolution and authorized the Parks & Community Services Director, with the approval of the Heritage 8c Cultural Arts Commission, future fees for Heritage and Culturai Arts Programs. No testimony was entered by any member of the public relative to this issue. Mayor Lockhart closed the public hearing. The Council entered into a brief discussion regarding fees and scheduling schnnls to ensure that Dublin. students received priority, and agreed that the warding should be changed as follows: "within Dublin School District" to "within the City of Dublin" and $2.Op fee for all school groups with priority to Dublin Schools. ~BP..'~tll l~n C i"1"s ~'t~l nk€` P.1. ~'11,~+4''9 d°,;~ ~'()I.LiME 25 ` REGUi.,AR MEETING: Mgqay lGg¢, 2Q06 .y 9Y '~1 ~ t. C fi ~~i 9 v 7:.•W -~r lS ~S~ •r7/eI ~j~I ~ FnnH...l.~~nn.~uv niiui EYc'~°'% a ,5 IY 4'~ ~j1id !!elan uIIG~O ~ °:5 y~~5 ~ ~ ~ M dill ~ ~ i a ~ a~ k ~ : e ~Na _.J 3 . x ~ $ i = ~ E e ~ ~ t^ y 6 5 ~ a ~ ~ ~ y L'.1 r~+ z i r ~ ? 5 s ~ `~3~A~''ar QF fi { 2 ~ ~ 1AJ ~ ~ ~ 3 s a 5 S~ C u S.e 5= ak o n F S e 5 2 {L s - 4 s F F ~Y d s ` 1 ' - 1 \ ' ~ j _ ~ z t- ~ . Ike 1 ~ ~ - 1 -a~ ' 11 ~r ry~ u ~ - ~ ~1~-_- _ - a m L ~ ~ zA _ _ i ,.r ~ w x • • _an~ j•A•J.•x•Tx~xxS•YJ •S•7.~ATX~A.l ~X~~y ' N r1 1_ Y 1~ ~ a 1'I W e' tj< ~ ~ n. 1~4 Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e w ~ ~ • \ _ ~ via J ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ @~ o Fi_K , a O ~ ~ ~ aE ~ $S ~ 3 ~n C7 4 r• ~ it i.:' w z ~ ~ ~ a a ~g a ~ 1-1 ~ r ~ ~ i ~fY ~ ~ ~ ~ ~e 73YY •xxa~~y jxxx~xxx~Axax~) w ~ ~g[£ na ~ n~ / 5 Al +ti ~ ~ ~y {y! 'F' Y~~::~ aYi ll 24 2 gdA NSr- 6 A = s n° * i w~ z ~~e r w ~ a a _ # ~a 0 f 1 pctl my~<pury WPf J`R~9 ~ ~ b rJ . ~~I ~ 9 IlWe21 u!Igna ~ 1hR~9li ~ g ` ~ ~ ~ Y ~ W ° ~ ~ o ~ g -J -0-~ ..e~sn, y~~oa.eos - q. U y ~ n ed ayL W~ ~ ~ 7 °Q --x ~ a a 4 ` i '4 ~ z d~ 'N ' 1~ ~ y ) r •y _ ~d - \ yb u~ _ 8~$ d 0 -l - ~ - - _ w _ ~ _ _ _ tl ~ ,Y ~ - ' u 1 Ua _ A ~ r r ~ - - - ®emt. ~ Y 9 ' G , p . ~ _ A .9y9 A 1 l 1 ~ .}T _ ~ _ tl 6wc c, ~ - ~ - - r 1 _ r~ ~ _ ,1 p p _ a. - } i yk'' ~ - ' ~ ay bn ~ 1 9S _ _ p 1 _ ~ _ p ~ 1 _ e~ ` {1 _ _ - r-- - - V•, 1 -p ~j ~ 1 ~A y 1 r Y -x 1 _ _ . Q _ ~ Y a y a>~~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ , A~i ~ 11 ~ ~ _ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ 1~ r ~ 1 _ R4F ri _ 4 1 ky °b _ ~ _ .a- _ _ ~ _ TAY. -~~WP ~Sy ~ - s _ - U9 W JlZ B~L9 Wd yyp p ~ ~a- ~ ~ J I G I]J2JVd do+ n ~°o~l t~~ {la e ~ °a d it y~ A • • • ~ -1- IOn je I 6 ~f (jf 1 `JJ R~ 1 1 /1Y1l ~tluolltl~4Fro ~ s tl ~ ~ 1 J~ 13~ ~ w.~rwwWvome k 66~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ I!B1et1 ~llgn0 1 ! ~ ~ i ~ Isla ~ ~ Q '~wtl~i &I poi si ul Imp - r I T x i 1, yl 1 I ' p ~ ~ ~ ii _ei ,I I x ~ O - g I I I Y ~I I I - I - i I I S I ~ I I I I I ~ I ~-a ' i I ~ I Y ~ I I I _a1 I nl ~ I ~ m~ x I I I ! I $ ~ II III - I i~, it ~1 i _ I I ~ ~ 4 " ~ _ 1 I ' ' "Jxi fs4 11 a ` I I I ~ Imo, I I % i III _ I I 'I I I ~I m) _ Y I + ~ mi T -1-_-_-_-"-__._. I Y(-l-, II Y I ~'1 ~ l a I I I I I I~ I I I I I ~ I I, I I "I I i II I III I I I b ~ t ~ ! -I I I I I II ~-3,1 I I ~ i i i II I I i i i I I III I I - 4r I ` - Y~" y ~ -j-+- - - i i I I I~ i rl 4 1 ~ I I ~ I i i ~ i ` I i ~ i_ _I ~ b _ • ~ . n ~ ; - - b------- elan ~1 s x ` - I 0 I I I 1 ~ I I i I I I I d ~ I I I I ~ I I i n II 1 - I ~ I I .a t I~I; I I i ~ , ~ ~ - , 4 "FYI II II II U I - ~ ~ - ~ - ~ 2 L _ _ ! ~ - i Ca i n~s ea ~ 3 3 3 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ II II - ~5,. I ba i nn :n ~ ~ I ~ 1 I 1. u '~wo$i BSI of ,vl (ml ;tl t ~xo c~ f fl~ p i I I u.~ I °'F^~' I -~~~m I l I i I I I I I I I I I I I F l l i l l l k l l l l l l l l N'f 17n,~~ ~ I ~r ~ I I f ro ~ 1 - i i si~srvRE B~csra~ ~ M i ~ ~ estore ~ ctosnes tags I _N i I i j I i ~ ° I _I I _ I I ®~°e i i i i ~ ihE4f ELEVATIGN FACNG PARIfING I I I I i i I I ~ j I I I I i - I i - I' I - ~ - I y - - - J ei[51'ORE ~ BK57GRE oe,..w.l L7orhaa i e3mre i .auao.r I I I i I- I I ~ I I I i i i i i 6 EAST ELEVATION FACING Nb1WRPLA2A RQ\? _ _ .~,r.,•a ~ _ r• r. ~ T r ~ I° € f~ 3 I ~ i ~ ~ i ~ ! ~ F I i i I i i I----- . - I I I I - I I NORiH ELEVATION FACMlO HAZA I I I I I • rxe ,r-rr ,2 ~ 901f7H EIEVATION FACNG PET9NARf soue u. rc .r ~y v•r.r w m ~~c~~veo MAY 3 0 2006 EVATIONS DUBLIN PLANKING A2.1 i,rnr~~®..®~:,~~:=m wtw ~IVnmrrriu _ _ a U' - - - N a .,~c° _ r ~ ' ~ - I~ ;t' ~01f~~~~ , . ~ ~ F 'N h _ , ~ ~ ~ . F , . ' , Y, i~ , - ~ ~f w ' ~ r ,a , . ~ . ~ ~ ~ _ ' 1{ I i ~ H. { t g f, S, r ~ w . ~ SHED ROOF a ~ FOUNTAIN, PAVING, BENCH n F . _ . , ~:a . ~ 4 ~ _ _ . d' t R ~ S! 1 } ~ ~ f ~ _ M _ ~ y~ _ T ~ , _ ~Jr ..a~ ~ - r ~ ~ ~ - . I - - . ti - - k C lei Y r h i _ t ? s. l nth, BENJAMIN MOORE BENJAMIN MOORE CULTURED STONE u,~~' ~e s ~ ~ - ~ ~ DARK MUSTARD WOODSTOCK TAN SOUTHERN LEDGERSTONE: a , , WALNUT - - 1 __.a _ _ _ BENJAMIN MOORE BENJAMIN MOORE BENJAMIN MOORE RAMADA ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SANDING SEAM ROOF CHESTERTOWN BUFF GREEN GROVE HODLEY RED a. - f~ r ~y~..~..~ ~l ~ A ' ~ I` - i fJ ~ _ _ ~ . ~ - 1 . I ~ ~ . ~ h ~ i '~3 _ BIKE RACK TRASH RECEPTICLES BENCHES TI I C I I C I~I~_`C ~ ~ ~ t v~ v v~ v iivvV - _.._...u.. U,~ ~ . ..lVE~ D t1 B r N Michael t ~ Wilhs , , fl MAY ~ 200b . _ Architects 1~~~~ 1 ~ ~ w~ •~uut~rc _ ,r r ~ sua«.a I 7 7 7 7 7 ~ 7 7 n II ~ ~,n«wr«.~,~~ ~ ~ ~ aertnx~ri ~ ~ sumo I -T p1A ara IaL tu~pst-nw i mt Pis)3s~~17ea i rav 1 " IGST~ ~ i BI T $ R GS CARE ~ _ ~ - --rarrw R eStore Clothes cche Mart .F J ~ W I I - _ ~ ~ p o _ _ I _ I ' , - ~ ~ - ~ - I I ' I' 1~ i c_ aI r - ~F -c _ „s. z _ ~ ti'4. tuce~In~eiYiB4'ar0(pYpr w~r.rrr - rrr~wr~ I - - O1M~?INEVEIO111BN~IdINEpWYf ~}w~i..~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ rcap~¢ow I I I ~ I I I I I 7 WEST ELEVATION FACING PARKING scuF tnt• • r~ 4 7 7 7 T 7 7 7 I ~ar~n I i I I I I I I r I i I I I I I I - - ~ a . ~ r.r ~ww.. I - _ _ _ i _ iunbn m s~,~-g a . _ t31GST4RE ~ ~ ~ ~:~ST©R~ KIr~ Mpt Clothes eStore 161C(.1,7 ~ ~ _ k. L G ~ ~ - - _ ~ - I ~ ~ ~ _ M1r _ ~ - - - - _ _ _ 0 h:.. i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I 6 EAST ELEVATION FACING AMADOR PLAZA ROAD s~ ,re~-,~a I Q Q ° Q Q Q i I i ~~~I I i iurtimufn iertFxt~n m _ ~ ~ ~ _ _ ~ ~ , - - U i.~- i ~ [ i _ i f ~ - ~ a - ~ o ~ o i - j i • 6 1 e e i - ; ~I I o o _ _ ~t ~ . - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ I I I I NORTH ELEVATION FACING PLAZA ! I ~ srrvF ue~•r~ SOUTH ELEVATION FACING PETSMART ~ scu e: t~•. r~ oeosn 'd' it ~ I rm. 0142 FY2.DWG II OM2 r•ap Mlchnel LEVATIONS ~„IVE~ DUBLIN PFRS war: p 7050 AMADOR PLAZA ROAD Architects H _03 ~1~ 3 o zoos PA 0 5 5 A + ~ l~t m n+ ~ A2.1 '~1 A Y F I F l D L7L~1;~11111~116 V a ~ N PLANPl1NG r:oap au~ wtro6puwraeaw c0oextt~s~awu tap-raotue Y/1T Y/1D f•RYQTDII/•TIAN