Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 8.2 Budget Modification 2005-2006 CITY CLERK File # DcaJ[3]~-[Z]~ AGENDA STATEMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 13, 2006 SUBJECT 2005-2006 Budget Modification with Regard to ArtIcle XTTl B ofthc State Conshtuhon Prepared hv Fred Marsh, Finance Manager and Lisa Hisatomi, 4dminislralive Analvst II ATTACHMENTS Nonc RECOMMENDATION ~ A.uthoTIze as appropriations to Reserves any revcnucs in excess of budgeted expenditures as of Junc 30, 2006, as outlined below FINANCIAL STATEMENT This action will provide appropriations to Reserves m the amount of any revenues receIved that are in cxcess of expemhtures_ This action will not change the amounts authorized for expenditure. Actual amounts appropriated to Reserves in each Fund will be ident1 fied after the books are closed and all accruals recorded. DESCRIPTION This action requests authorization to "appropnate" all revenucs received in the current hscal Year 2005-2000 that are in excess of expenditures_ The actual amounts involved will be detenlllned following the close of Fiscal Year 2005-200(\ Each year the City Council takes this action to protect the ability to utilize these reserves 111 future years, WIthout the risk of exceeding the State mandated Appropriations Limit. The State Constitution establishes a limit on the amount of annual appropriations that can legally be made from "Proceeds of Taxes." Although the City is currently well below the maxImum Appropriations LimIt, thIS action will protect filture expenditures from Reserves. Under State Law eertam funds can he excluded from the ealculatHln of the total "appropriations" which wlll he suhJect to the Limit. The law specifically excludes funds that have been "appropriated" to Reserves in a prior fiscal year When the Reserve Funds arc eventually used, they arc not subject to the Appropriations LImit 111 the year ulihzed, since they were prevlOusly "appropriated" under the Limit authoTIzed in a prior ycar In other words, if the City Council appropriated $500,000 to Reserves in Fiscal Year 2005-2006 and the funds were used on a capital project in Fiscal Year 2006-2007, this expendIture would not be subject to the Limit. As part of the development of the Fiscal Year 2006-2007 Prehmmary Budget, Staff has rev1sed the revenue and expenditure estimatcs for Fiscal Year 2005-2000. Those rcvised estImates project that the -----------------------------~~.~--------------------------------------~---------------------------~-~------ COPIES TO; 1 01'2 11:\nudi:ftl.Alrndo Stlltemfnts\FYfl6-f1"7\Apprllprilllwll '0 ~t9~..~t.I1fI(. ITEM NO. ~. 2- City's 2005-2006 year-end surplus to be approximately $3.8 million. Excluding the cany-over of $822,744 in CapItal hnproveffient ProJects the rcmaining General Fund surplus is projected at $2,812,064 Stall recommends that the City Council authonze the appropriation of all excess revenues to Rcserves in eonfonnallce with tl1lS report. 2 of 2