Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 8.1 CampParksLandUse CITY CLERK File # D~[]ø-~lQ] AGENDA STATEMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: February 15, 2005 SUBJECT: ATTACHMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: ~ FINANCIAL STATEMENT: None PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Review of Alternative Land Use Plans for future private development at Camp Parks Report Prepared by: Kristi Bascom, Senior Planner <¥-' I. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Land Use Plan Alternative I Land Use Plan Alternative 2 Land Use Plan Alternative 3 Land Use Plan Alternative 4 Land Use Plan Alternative 5 Overview of future improvements at Camp Parks Alternative analysis worksheets for Alternatives 3, 4, and 5 I. 2. Receive Staff Report. Staff recommends that the City Council review the Top 3 Alternative Land Use Plans and provide comments on the positive and negative aspects of each plan, using the worksheets provided (Attachment 7) On June 1,2004, the City Council approved a consultant contract for RTKL Associates, Inc. to guide the City through a Strategic Visioning Process for possible tuturc private development on 182 acres at Camp Parks. The end result of the visioning process was intended to be several master plan alternatives for City Council review and discussion. City goals for future development at Camp Parks: On July 20, 2004, the City Council approved the following list of goals for private development at Camp Parks to guide the City through the Strategic Visioning Process: 1. Plan should have a net positi ve físcal impact on the City. 2. Plan should provide a strong connection between the eastern and western parts of the City while also evaluating a "village" concept. 3. Plan should link to the Transit Center and BART. 4. Plan should provide a unique feature - either publicly or privately funded - which strengthens the image of the City and further increases the quality of life for residents and/or strengthens Dublin's position as a destination. 5. Plan should accommodate some unmct pubJic agency/public facìJity needs (i.e. school facility, maintenance facility, park or community facility, etc.) COPIES TO: In-House Distribution Property Owners! Applicants -B1- t/ G;\P A#\2003 \03 -0 15 Camp Pw-ks GP A \ VisiùíJ.ing Program\CC Staff Report Rt::vi~w Alts vcrs Jll.doc ltJb? ITEM NO. 6. Analysis of the land use plan should look at the property itself as well as the impact of developing the property on other parts on the City in rclation to traffic, market demands, fiscal impacts, and schools. 7. Plan should consider a new route between Dougherty and Arnold Roads to accommodate ncw development. 8. Plan should provide an attractive transition between the Camp Parks RFTA and private development. Strategic Visioning Proce~·s: The main components of the Strategic Visioning Process were three community meetings. The first and second meetings were a Planning and Design Charrette with community leaders to solicit, discuss, analyze, and evaluate design alternatives for the property. These meetings took place on Friday August 6, 2004 and Saturday August 7, 2004. The charrette was attended by the invitees as well as a number of guests and interested citizens. At the charrette, participants were presented with background information about the property as well as an economic market analysis of the region. After much discussion, several conceptual alternatives for the property were developed by small groups and presented to the entire group. At the end of the two-day event, the consultants left with several concepts and ideas for the site that were to be studied further. The consultants refined the concepts and developed five different land use alternatives that illustrated a variety of land use densities, configurations, and public amenities. The consultants conducted a brief analysis of the five alternatives and examined their feasibility from economic, traffic, and land use viability perspectives. The consultants then returned to the original eharrettc participant group on Monday October 4, 2004 and presented the five alternatives and the results of their analysis for the group's consideration, discussion, and eventual recommendation. (See Attachments 1-5) The workshop group examined the pros and cons of the five alternatives, and at the end of the evening, voted for their first, second, and third preferences. The results of the intormal voting were as follows: 1" choice 2"d choice 3'" choice Total votes Rank Alternative I 0 5 8 13 Fourth Alternative 2 0 1 4 5 Fifth Alternative 3 2 4 7 13 Third Alternative 4 6 12 6 24 Second Alternative 5 J8 4 I 23 Fir.~t Relation of alternative land u~·e plan.~ to the Camp Parks Military Base Master Plan: In conjunction with the Army's plans to tum 182 acres of the base over to private development, Camp Parks is also beginning to implement 31). aggressive Base Master Plan, which will replace outdated facilities on the base and add new capacity to their training areas. Although the City does not review or approve any of the on-base facilities, it is important to understand what buildings and uses will be located in the future on thc southern border of the base, adjacent to the project site so that the City can determinc which alternative has the best "fit". Immediately inside thc base, 5th and 6th Streets run east-west and will serve as a buffer between the buildings on the base and the project site. North of 5th and 6th Streets, on thc western-most portion of the base and currcntly under construction, are 114 single-family homes for military personnel. Several new parking lots will line the southern perimeter of the base, and the other new buildings near the perimeter will includc a reserve forces training center consisting of classrooms, meeting spaces, and assembly rooms, as well as new storage facilitics and the ncw Armory. Therc are no hazardous uses that will be located in the immediatc southern portion of the base near the project site. (See Attachment 6) Page 2 of3 Last step~· of the Strategic Vi~·ioning Proce.\w: Following the results of thc workshop voting as described above, the Army bcgan internal discussions to determine which, if any, of the five alternatives would be financially feasible from their perspective and worth pursuing. The Anny indicated its willingness to move forward in the process with the alternatives developed, and the last step in the Strategic Visioning Process is for the City Council to examine the "Top 3" alternatives in more detail and determine which alternative the City Council would like to see the Anny bring torward as their formal project application. In order for Staff to prepare a complete analysis of thc Top 3 alternatives for the City Council's review and discussion, Staff first wanted to have a discussion with the City Council about the positive and negative aspects of each land plan. Although the informal voting that took place at the October 4th workshop indieated that a majority of thc participants favored Alternative 5, Staff is interested in hearing from the City Council specificallv what it is about each of the alternatives that the City Council prefers and doesn't prefer. Staff will then takc thc information received at the February 15tl' meeting and prepare a more detailed, technical analysis of each plan, highlighting how the plan should be modified to reflect the City Council's concerns as well as issues raised by Staff through the analysis process. Staff's analysis will bc prcscnted to the City Council at the March 15, 2005 meeting and the City Council's discussion and eventual conclusions from that mccting will be provided to the Anny for usc in preparing their official developmcut application. The Army is currently preparing a Request for Proposals that will be distributed to the development community, soliciting applications for a Master Developer for the site. Once a Master Developer is selected by thc Anny, they will work together to crcatc a planning application to submit to the City. CONCLUSION: The Top 3 alternative land plans each have a variety of strcngths and weaknesses, and each plan accomplishes the City's goals for the project to varying degrees. The final step in this Strategic Visioning Process is for the City Council to review the alternative land plans, identify any issues of concern, and providc direction to the Army on which aspects of the plans have the most merit from the City's perspective. This is the first of two meetings where this discussion will take placc. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recollnnends that the City Council review the Top 3 Alternative Land Use Plans and provide eomments on the positive and negative aspects of each plan, using the worksheets provided (Attachment 7) Page 3 on , ., " e f. 0 :_··.t:;i.. ," .,. . ",. '¡ .', ·'1 :,_ ;"':"tir"!t'". ." "'-"-"'_0 '" I:::: ~:-:'I: ~11~¡::1:' µ.:: :''',:'/:':'<¡.;'', Q ,,; ~.,\",' ~. :i:,~}t,., J :¡~,~~ I',:~~:;.f,~':" 1/1 Q o . ',..<,.,..., ~.". IDb 1 000000 I-!::!:: 0000 -:zz Ww ~;:);:) a: a: ..w oou..u..u..uu ;:)g;¡(I)~IJ'JIJ'JIJ'J<t« 0<r"d' :W::II::II:'-O ~WWW....C.lIII.Ot.- :;¡:a:a:a:1ll1I01D .-~~~..; "'g¡.. ;t ~<ii:>i II! -LU- _ ~::¡;~~..J_ ..JU.O;t;t~!:i~ :::!;w:I:,I'IOu.'!( !za~!S-'¡§II!~ð W'Z>::>=U' zo 0- F! ::¡; .:<t ü: \;l w :I: _ '8. I ¡¡; 00 I-' u. ~ "- U l-15~Ob ~ ATTACHMENT ). , ' Lr .,r 11'\1 , . 'i' '. '" "" :¡ .. o ~, ~""7"""':--~~~'" ~ '6fJ 1 cnV>U) f-!:::!::: U)U) Z2Z Ww "':::>:::>:::> a: a: :...., oou.u.u.uu« ~COQIXIU)U)U)« a:;;:",'<t:.::.::.:CDO !!wwW,",OO.,'" W'-a:a:lØO(ll ::ÛUUII""!!.fII ¡P;~ a:: ~~ ~ ;;.: .. >... (II :.JtI)r, . ......w::::...-_ ~::¡;::¡;a:..J;;: ..J«u.o~~~~~ -w::t:,_o 'Í f- Z¡::;'·:~(IIQ;..J zc53::..J-w-'-U)Q WZO:::>:::!UuZQ g¡j)F::i¡!¡¡;5~[¡ U) wu.-OU) w a::ou a: ATTACHMENT t. ffi \;.:~~~ _~"r ,. ~ ¡. .li<.f" :.....J ~ \ ~'-r___ « ~. ....:1. ..e.' (t " " , ~ 0 ~~~ :1- , 1 , 'I"':;, .!..,';,::~,.;~}' i¡;:.~~-7iij¡~'1II~i"iI¡¡':j;/; ":f ·j'y::';;}'.1 ,.",,,"~':~'1iit1'M~""",,T1 ~ t ""'J.t,I, 'f\ 1t'"n""!'I,'!\ .'/''''., ~. ' " " ""!ff'ii;'.~., 'I 'I ~:¡,"""", "--.u:'i--···,;- (f)(f)<n I-!::!:: (f)(f) ZZz UJUJ "':):):) a:: a:: ~NOO"'''''''(f)'::;!'::;! C_W('I. (fJU) -.-. M\t)Il)::.:::.:::.:...O I:IUJUJUJOO....I'JIII... 1'Ja:: a:: a:: CII III... "'UUCJ:"''I'''''P ~~~ Œ :>;..... I'J :.J(I):::j . ~~~a:::;_ ...J«o««UJa::UJ ....... ......1-«(..) ::::UJJ:'IIIOu..'!I: !zŒZ~!S-';:¡;I'!~ð UJz :):::!~uzo ¡¡j¡;¡ ::¡¡¡$B::E~a ~ ATTÅCHMENT ~ f. C ',.""" 'I e '/_;,i:I I ,::,1 -'it"I'r". - I.'~,I ~..!\."~ '" -- "- :3 '" ¡: ~f:J 0', '" Q '.";, -, '.':'~':" ;y,"::~:>;: C '" ::>: "I " Yt>~ <1)<1)<1) I-!:::!::: <1)<1) zZZ LLILLI "'~::;¡::;¡ a: a: -- u.uu ~~gg¡:;¡:;<I)<<C O....."'ã,!I!!I!!I!OI'ao :!tLLlLLlLLlUltllC'1..... ;;;a:a:a:I7IUI" "uU~""C'1 ~H¡;:., iE NãS ~ ;>;....... UI :..IU'¡..-¡ . -w- _ ~:¡;:¡¡iE....._ :;¡!~o~~~~~ -"LLI:I:'UlOLL~ !zaz~5~ffil'!<I)5 LLlZ :>-uuzo QVj ~~¡¡;-LLl:I: ~ a::T~KcHMENT "I , .: ' . \1 . '. e f. C _',""'~-r-. 5~4 V)rJ)V) I-I-!::: V)rJ) zzZ UJUJ ~~~ a: a: ~ 0 u..uu ·"'<DOou..u..V)«« ~~<O<DrJ)V)...oco eN::: ~~;:::Ift !2UJUJl!!cø~.. èSia:a:uØl.... "~~~"iE 06",¡¡; ~ ;>-:.."" III :;...JU)::::::¡ ~ -w__ :t:i:::¡;~;:¡jê2UJ -'u..O~U;b~~ ~~~¡::II!~~~B z~:;::;..¡-'~_ 0 ~a::;Ó~:«¡¡:~¡¡:¡::r -v)I-~u..>,,-u ~ ·AT~ÅCHMENT? 11:>'1 Camp Parks Alternative Analysis Worksheet Please review the StaffRcport and note your opinions about Alternatives 3-5 in the table below. We will discuss these items at the City Council meeting on February 15th. Altern ative 3 Positive elements Thinl!s that should be chanl!ed Location and types of housing Location and sizcs of parks Location and number of east-west connections Location of office and mixed use development Overall mix ofland uses Connection to future Transit Center development Othcr ATTACHMENT 7 ~ ifJ or Alternative 4 Positive elements Thinl!s that should be changed Location and types of hOllsing Location and sior.es of parks Location and nllmber of east-west connections Location of office and mixed use development Overall mix of land uses Connection to future Transit Center development Other C[ ~{I Alternative 5 Positive elements Thines that should be cbaneed Location and typcs of housing Location and sizes of parks Location and number of east- west connections Location of officc and mixed use development Overall mix ofland uses Connection (0 future Transit Center development Other ...I. 3 , 00 « I'DI'D» 3'rt l'D<rt =' ...I"ØJ rtl'Dn (/):E::r ØJ03 rt -n I'D =' n -nrt ØJS::cn 3rt.. "'Os:: , "'tI1'D ØJ , '" (/)