HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 7.1 DublinTransitCtrSiteB
CITY CLERK
File # n[~][:1J[lj1~~[O]
e
AGENDA STATEMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 21, 2005
SUBJECT:
P A 03-058 Dublin Transit Center Site B Village Green Alternatives
Report Prepared by Mamie R. Nuccio, Associate Planner D{e:..---
ATTACHMENTS:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Dublin Transit Center Site Map
City Council Meeting Minutes of January 4, 2005
Stage I Planned Development Zoning Village Green concept
Avalon Bay Communities initial Village Green concept
Village Green Schematic Landscape Plan, Option I
Village Green Schematic Landscape Plan, Option 2
Village Green Schematic Landscape Plan, Option 3
RECOMMENDATION: _ rV'" Consider the three alternative designs for the Village Green and
~ direct Staff to return to the City Council with a Site Development
\ Review application for the preferred alternative for review approval.
FINANCIAL STATEMENT:
e
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
No financial impact.
Backl!round
In December 2002, the City Council adopted Resolution 216-02 approving a General Plan/Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan Amendment; Ordinance 21-02 approving a Stage I Planned Development Zoning; and,
Resolution 02-40 approving Tentative Parcel Map 7892, for the Dublin Transit Center, located generally
between the Iron Horse Trail to the west, Dublin Boulevard to the north, Arnold Road to the east, and the
Dublin/Pleasanton Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) Station to the south. A Master Development
Agreement for the Dublin Transit Center was adopted by Ordinance 5-03. in May 2003 and together with
the. approved General PlarilEastem Dublin Specific Plan Amendment, Stage 1 Planned Development
Zonmg, and Vesting Tentative Tract Map, established the land use approvals for the future development
of the site.
The Dublin Transit Center project area includes the future development of 1,500 residential units on Sites
A, B and C; two-million square feet of cam.pus office on Sites D and E, with an option for an additional
300 residential units; and 70,000 square feet of ancillary retail uses to be dispersed between Sites B"E.
Open space will be provided by a 12.20 gross acre park, located on Site F and a I-acre Village Green
located between Sites B and C. The Transit Center project area also includes 8.65 gross acres of
-------------...--------.....-----...--...--------...-----------...---...---
.
copms TO: PatCashman,ACSPA
Nathan Hong, Avalon Bay Communities
Dean Mills, DR Horton
l~~ ITEMNO.--I.1
public/semi-public uses including the future BART parking garage, PG & E substation, and surface
BART parking (Attachment I).
On January 4, 2005, Staff brought before the City Council an application for a Stage 2 Planned
Development Rezoning, Site Development Review and Development Agreement for the development of .
Site B with a 305 unit apartment community to be constructed by Avalon Bay Communities and a 257- .
unit condominium community to be constructed by DR Horton. The project also included the I-acre
Village Green, located to the south of Site B. However, this component of the project was not approved at
that time. The City Council expressed concern over the design of the Village Green and directed Staff to
work with the Applicant to further define how the Village Green would be used and by whom
(Attachment 2). Specifically, the City Council was concerned that the design of the Village Green did not
clearly convey whether it was a private or public space and felt there would be conflicts between residents
and non-residents using the park. The City Council emphasized the need to design the park in such a
fashion that it would attract the intended users. Lastly, the City Council expressed their vision for the
Village Green being a public gathering space due to its close proximity to public transit.
VlIlal!"e Green Concept IUld DesÎlm
The approved Stage I Planned Development Zoning established the concept for the Village Green as a
central open space approximately I acre in size (Attachment 3). As stated in the Stage I Development
Plan, the Village Green was intended to be, "a gathering spot and peacefUl refUge for the surrounding
residential development by providing an open grassy area on which local residents could enjoy passive
recreational activities. One-way private streets on either side of the Village Green could provide access
to the adjacent [residential] buildings which in turn would enclose and shelter the space from freeway
noise and pervasive westerly· winds. A pedestrian corridor through Site C would physically and visually
connect the Village Green to the BART station entrance to the south allowing easy public access to this
privately maintained open space area ".
The Village Green was further defined in the Stage 1 Development Plan as a linear park with unfenced .
public access. The space included a central plaza of residential scale and character with a grid of canopy
trees over seating. The central focal point of the plaza could include public art or a water feature. Open
grassy areas on either side of the plaza would provide multi-purpose green space for active uses. A tree
lined edge would provide privacy and enclose the space as well as provide shade for seating beneath.
Entry plazas on the east (Iron Horse Parkway) and west (Demarcus Boulevard) ends of the Village Green
also included focal points such as public art or special landscape treatment and decorative paving. The
Village Green was intended to be the heart of the residential neighborhood.
At the January 4& City Council meeting, Staff presented Avalon Bay Communities proposed design of the
. Village Green, which included a central plaza area with trellised seating surrounding the plaza to provide
a shaded seating area. The water feature chosen as the focal point of the central plaza was a splash pad
play surface with aquatic playground equipment. On either side of the central plaza area were two tot lots.
Combined with the splash pad, the design was intended to provide formal recreational opportunities for
children. As approved, the Avalon Bay Communities and DR Horton projects do not include play
equipment within their respective developments. Open grassy areas and a tree lined edge were also
incorporated into the design as planned for in $e Stage 1 Development Plan (Attachment 4).
In response to the City Council's direction, Staffhas been working with the Applicant tQ develop several
alternative site designs which are included as Attachments 5-7 and described below.
Analvsis of Alternatives
.
Schematic Landscape Plan - Option One:
Rose gardens, symmetry and a grand central plaza define this option for the Village Green. The central
plaza area is retained in the center of the Village Green with a large specimen tree as the fQcal point: The
2Ob~
plaza is surrounded by decorative paving; trellised seating, and flowering accent trees. On either side of
the central plaza are large rose gardens with multiple opportunities identified for public art. Pedestrian
pathways extend out fi'om the central plaza to the east and west leading towards two smaller plaza areas.
Circular seat walls create casual seating areas with additional opportunities for the placement of public am.
. From. the smaller plaza areas, diagon. al pedestrian pathways extend out t.OWardS the edge of the Village
Green. Open grassy areas between the interlocking pathways provide multi-purpose green spaces with
enough room for recreational play and picnics. Pilasters flank each end of the park framing the view into
the Village Green (Attaclunent 5).
The most significant differences between'the initial Village Green design and Option One is the
replacement of the two tot lots that flanked the central plaza area with rose gardens and multiple
opportunities for public art; replacing the water feature within the central plaza with a speciInen tree; and
introducing a more elaboraie system of pedestrian walkways throughout the open grassy areas. This
design is geared more towards future residents of the Dublin Transit Center by providing opportunities for
passive recreation and picnics.
Schematic Landscape Plan - Option Two:
In option two, the central plaza area is shi.fted to the eastern edge of the Village Green (at Iron Horse
Parkway). The plaza is a large, open and un-programmed space with trellised seating, flowering trees and
.seat walls lining the outer edge of the plaza. A specimen tree and mounded garden is located in the center
of the plaza. A large paved area within the plaza could accommodate outdoor seating or events as well as
public art. A linear pedestrian pathway connects the large plaza with a strong central promenade in the
center of the Village Green. This promenade is rectangular in shape and large enough to accommodate an
outdoor market or other large gatherings. Low seat walls and rose gardens line both sides of the plaza.
Opportunities for multiple art pieces are identified within the central promenade.
. The linear pedestrian pathway continues west leading to a smaller plaza area with raised seating
platforms. At the western most end of the Village Green a sma11 scale plaza mimic's the central plaza on
the east end. A stainless steel play dome is located in the center of the plaza and serves as both a
sculptural element as well as a place for kids to play. Trellised seating, flowering accent trees and
decorative paving are also part of the plaza's design. Open grassy areas between the linear pathways
provide multi-purpose green spaces with enough room for recreational play, farmers markets or picnics
(Attachment 6).
The most significant differences between the initial Village Green design and Option Two are the
relocation of the central plaza area from the center of the Village Green to the eastern most edge (near
IrOn Horse Parkway); a strong central promenade in the center of the Village Green; additional pedestrian
walkways throughout the open grassy areas; and, a play apparatus on the western edge. Option Two
provides amenities for both future residents of the Dublin Transit Center and the general public. For
residents, there are open grassy areas for recreation and an area for child's play. This latter area is
strategically placed farther from the more active public spaces located on the eastern edge of the Vil1age
Green. The large central promenade is designed as a quasi-public space and could accommodate large
public gatherings for an outdoor market or art show. The large plaza on the east end is oriented towards
future retail and office uses and is geared towards the general public with opportunities for outdoor
seating and other outdoor events.
Schematic Landscape Plan - Option Three:
This design is dramatically different than any other Village Green concept. Two large sweeping curves
a gracefully lead pedestrians on a path from one end of the park to the other, converging in the center to
., create a centralized meeting space. Along the pathways are specimen trees in raised planters, curved
trellises and shaded seating areas. Circular raised planters throughout .the park provide opportunities for
public art. Mounded lawns provide a grassy area ·for recreation and/or relaxing. Specimen trees at each
3DQl.f
end of the Village Green greet pedestrians ehteringthe park and evergreen trees lining the curved
walkways reinforce the flow of the paths throughout the year (Attachment 7).
Option Three introduces an entirely new concept to the Village Green by providing more hardscape areas
emphasizing pedestrian paths of travel and providing more opportunities for open markets, art shows and _
similar pedestrian oriented uses and deemphasizing open grassy areas for recreation. This option is _ '
geared towards more public use of the Village Green rather than it being a recreational amenity for the
, residents.
CONCLUSION
In response to the City Council's concern over the design of the Village Green as presented on January 4'"
with the Avalon Bay Communities residential project, three alternate design concepts for the Village
Green have been presented which further define how the Village Green could be used and who the users
would be. The alternate designs are in keeping with the general concept for· the Village Green as
approved in the Stage I Development Plan with slight deviations to better define the space within the park
as well as provide multiple opportunities for the placement of public art.
RECOMMENDATION
.,,!,
Staff recommends that the City Council consider the three alternative designs for the Vi11age Green and
direct Staff to return to the City Council with a Site Development Review application for the preferred
alternative for review and approval.
....:.'.......
."
.
4""b~
IJU U U U U U U U U U IJ U IJ V U t:J (;I 'U ... U tI U U U U U CI U U 'U ."
.. . .
f!:~) ¡¡r
.~¡', ¡~
~ij i l~.
~ g i
'1'
!
~
~2~'i ~¡¡:J
"Hi õ~
*~Q~ ]
-'!.'! .
I:'
c:
t¡
t""'
-
z
...¡
'"
V>
'0
~
::;;
i',
-0
íi>"
:Ja
--
"
..:>:J
">
.
x;'~
"'0-
!.!¡r
"''''
~:J
,,0-
íi>c::
:Jf/¡
:Þ",
3
t"D
::;¡
...¡O-
3
t"D
::;¡
...
,.,
Z
.
-'"
"
.-
"
n
tT1
z
--i
>-
..
.
i!.
.
"
¡¡
,.
\I i
~(I')æI
"'" .
rp
Hl~
ao g II> ð
""311
po JI' . Iii:
t"':I:Z;>CI
nu
:Þ!Ô'~
;:I!,>
:a;.t I'"
g';I-~.t
!!Ø,._:), r ~
.........~~
-~:'¡ ~"
." ·iq,.~
:Z:~î~~l I
..... ,,= "~ 0
_.,1 k"
" .....
~-"
"
m
'"
~
:J:
~
^
·
o
0-
·
'"
o
·
:i'
·
·
·
"
·
"
.-
------~.
õ'
.,.
q.
'"
<>
I
-10-
"~"
~~g
100008
T
Z
C
..c.::::'
/...~
-,~
"",
"'-n
"",
~;:!.
:J,"
",,,,
-n
"0
;;:"
",;:¡
II "I
" II
¡ \\ \i 1'1
III II l
'II II '
~i\ \i I' ¡
'"IIIU
. II II I
III II I'..'
, II II I
'II II
J:: "I
111 ::'-
" II ~
iiii Ii I.'.'
111111
111111
Iltll:
, ,
""':Þ,-.... \,
-, / -
I',_~
a
o
:J:
o
~
~
t
.1!
'"
~
C\ 0 "'Q ~ n
g3g:;¡~
~~~i;
~~~i~
~ ~ <!' ;: .
/11 ~. f7' I/>
[ ~ ~ ~
o
co
!!C
>-
,
,¡¡
'"
if
>-
~tl-
I
)I 'M~II:CUŠ. 80I,lL~""All.D
,,\',i'l:r:~t,,>
/",,1'1'
::\{'~;i:,,\
¡';i¡i;ì:I/
,:::I:.~\.:: '?I.
',\,\ ':.::1,
'"
jj'
'"
n
"'
3
"
~
;
"
o
S!:
;;
~
.
'"~
grt
s.¡;>
~,=-
~~
"
:'"
, 00
o
."
:u
'"
'"
~
!(
~
ii
'"
i
"
;.,
'"
;.,
~---~ - ~9
. '".. '''''''".._,,~. n_ .". ".... ...-. -. --"-,., ,'" --ij. (_.__.~..'_o....-..'._D_",:._-.~_D..:~~_'_:~_._-.,--.:,.:-.. ~..-...,..,.~'-. ...-::. .c".;.,{.......¡'1
.. - - - - - ~,,~,:,¡:::::....._ ::---:::,-=\:..::-:~.,.,....=:~~:: -::::-:===1. ""..
--- ---'" ,I'
! II I: 'I :1 I"
,II III II II
III ,,' " "
"I II "
II III II II
: II III II II
\11 I] II II
ii~:!: : t,::
,",II I 11.'''1;;11
," ;¡ '1'1""'"
III:.:¡II 1.-11'11
i"I.·.·.·.'..'.·~."..111:-: ~ 1.1.'::%::
J"~Ti tl- ;1-- t ;" "I, ~',i, ~
. 11""1 '.'. I -111.' e" ~I
III II I ,\11""'11 l'
,I: :1 I I "~" IF
11::'::1: ::~:: fl':!
III II I 11'='11 ij
," II " II ï
I1'I II : :1 ¡:
:: :: I:: I] I :: :: ~I~·
II" II I "I
.::: ", ' ¡i~:: I'
II" Ii' . " II I
,I: "I I II II
III III I II II
....\.:::...... II II' ' II II
----___-----_-~---~~-__- "rlfc--,~- ---It'll' '1'- - --~
-- ----=- ~:;::_~=---=- ~,~r~~-=--;"" -'~ - ~o- - =_ "~"'~H Ä tiE N D ¡: ~ ~ {V-E- -= - =-1 -_ j / _ iti:'" ;::..~-=--- --
_,___~~",,_' _J C-- __ - _=::J - -=1- , b.::
· ¡ffi' -- '\\ ~¡r~rc::~L ~ ~~yC:"C'-~=;~k (~=---=
.
--::....::~--=-~- ----~,..¡']~~
I, I
: I I
V'I II I
jj' :: !
II ~ I
I : ~ I
i I ~: I
[' "I
I !I
I \ ~I
iJr
'-tÆ:lif!
" I I
I, I
I I
/ I f
II I
! /
I,
IE'::..'
I I'!
I I'
) I'I
~:'~:~-~~~~\ --J~C~;
-------'IT'¡r r~ -----..
_'1,;,,:- _::--_-==~_-_--
) ~~'
,d,
i~
If¡
~;
~
I~
II
."
..
;..
..---...--...
-'.
!:::1
r;
\ I
~ \
,
,
,~
,\\
>\\.
;¡:
"'
\,
!£
<T
~
!¡'
I
,;-
o
¡
'>.
z...,tJb~
· RE6UI.AR. MEETING - JANUARY' 4.. 1005
gpSm..£ESS10N
A closed sessiort was he1d at 6:30 p.m., regarding:
Conference with Le;gal Counsel
1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED urrGA nON Government Code
Section 5ü5U, subdlvilion c (tour potential aasesJ
A resula.r meetirlS of the Dublin City Council was held on Tuesday, January 4, Z005, in
the Council Chambers of the Dublin Civic Center. The meeting was called to order at
7:12 p.m., by Mayor Lockhart
·
ROlL CALL
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers Hildenbrand, McCormick, Oravetz, Zika
and Mayor Lockhart. -
None.
·
·
fl.ED~QF ALLEGIANCI;
The pledge of allegiance to theflag was recited by the Council, Staff and those present.
·
moRT ON CJ,¡Q,çW SESSION ACTION
Mayor Lockhart anttOunced that there was no action talœn.
·
"CCEPT~ pF GRANT.1.B.OM ALTAMONT CllUISEKS CAR C{.tJB OF UVERMORE
7:13 p.m.5.t (150~70)
Polìœ Chief Gary Thunun advised that the Altamont CruiS(':!:"S has donated $1,000 to
Dublin Police Services for purchase of two digital cameras with printer to be used by
students that attend the annual Potice Youth AcademY·
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
VOLUME 24
REGULAR MEETING
Janua ry 4, ZOO~
PAGE 1
AlTACHMENT 2-
·
n of.
.; d/)'t.\
The Council thanked the Altamont Cruisers C8.t' Club for their continued support of
Dublin Police Services.
e
On motion of Vm. Zika, seconded Þy Cm. Oravetz and by unanimous vote, the City
Councì1 accepted the grant from the Altamont Croisers Car CIµb; approved the Budget
Change in the amount of $1,000; and directed Staff to prepare formal acknowledgement
to the donor.
.
PROC1.AMATlON D~LARING JANUARY Z005 AS VOLI1N'œEIUILOOD DONQi
MONIH
7:15 p.m. 3.2 (610~50)
Mayor Lockhart read. a proclamation dec1aringJanuary Z005 as "Volunteer Blood Donor
Month," and urged all citizens to pay tribute to th05~ among use who donate for others
in need.
Carmel o'Connor Jones, Blood Services Community Relations Director for the Northern
CalifomÍB. Region of the Ameriœn Red Cross, accepted the proc1a.manon and thanked tÞe
Council for helping create puÞlic awareness regarding the enormous need for healthy
blood donations. She also encouraged the public to donate toward disaster relief to
victims of the Southeast Asia. tsunami.
.
.
CONSENTC~
7:19 p.m. Item:; 4. J through 4.5
On motion of Vm. Zika, seconded by Cm. McCormick, and by un.a.nimous vote, the
Council took the following actions:
Approved (4.1) the minutes of the Regular Meeting of December 21, 2004;
Adopted (4.2 3~O~20)
RESOLUTION NO. 01 - 05
MAKING FINDINGS REGARDING UNEXPECTED DOWNTOWN TltAFFIC MITIGATION
CONTRIBUTIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 200g~2004
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
VOLUME 24
REGULAR MEETING
January 4, 2005
PAGE 2
.
I.fè'b "2-[
e Accepted (4.3 330-50) Financial Reports for the Month of November 2004;
Accepted (4.4 600-35) improvements under Contract No. 04-09, Central
Parkway/per,§imrnon Drive Safety Improvements; and authorized release of retent10n
after 35 days if there are no subcontractor claims;
Awroved (4.5 300-40) the WarrantRegîster in tþe amount of $1,447,274.08.
.
PUB1JC HEARING - AV AWN BAY COMMUNITIES
DEVELOPMENr V~7í)NING, SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
.mJ21O ~J'MENT AGBUM.:ENT (DA}YA OS-OS8
7:20 p.m. 6.1 (410-30/600-60)
Mayor Lockhart opened the public hearing.
Marníe Nuccio, Assistant Planner, presented the Staff Report and advised that Avalon Bay
Communities is proposing to construct Ii multi-family residential apartment community
of 305 units and approximately 12,750 square feet of ground floor retail on
approximately 3_57 net acres of IlIl1d within the Dublin Transit Center project. TIle
. Duþlin Transit Center is located ,generally between the Iron Ho~e Trail to the west,
Dublin Boulevard to the north. Arnold Road to the east and the DubHn/Pleasanton BART
Station to the south.
Mayor Lockhart asked if the proposed Village Green would be public or private.
Ms. Nuccio advised that the one-acre park-like setting would be private.
Mayor Loc:khart asked. why it would not be fenced.
Ms. Nuccio advised that the Stage 1 Development Agreement did not identify a fenced
area and the open area. would connect the Village Green to the adjacent residential
communities. Although it might attract user~ from future office or retail uses, the intent
was to provide recre.atioriBl am~t1ity for the residential communities.
Mayor Lockhart expressed COfIcern about the publicy includîng those coming from 'l:he
BART statiOtl, using a private park, and stated that it should be fenced. If it wu unfenced
and open to the public, how would the residents react? 1t should be clear as to whom the
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
VOLUME 24
REGULAR MEETING
January 4, 2005
PAGEJ
.
S-(Q 1-1
park was intended. She expressed çoncern about children playing in an unfenced area in
such close proximity to tÌle BART station. .
City MAnager Richard Ambrose advised that, as part of the Transit Center approval, the
public park area. identified. was across Dublin Boulevard. The Village Green was
proposed as part of the County's master pla.n. Avalon Bay would own it, but an HOA
would maintain it. It was set up as a common amenity between Sites B~ 1 8; B- 2.
'The Council discussed the possibility of the public, especially those with young children,
using the private park, and agreed. that it could cause a problem between residents and
l10n ~residentia) users.
Cm. Hildenbrand expressed the need to maintain the flow of non --resident's using the
park and questioned how the police would monitor the private park. The area could
become a 1w1gout for people walking to and from the jail, as well as people coming from
the BART station.
City Manager Ambrose advised that the Applicant could be asked to modify the design
thoo\lgh the Site Development Review process so as to not to a.ttract children. The Police
would have adequate access to patrol the area.
.Mayor Lockhart stated that the park should not create mixed messages; everyone should
be aware of the intended use of the open space and it should be set up to attract the .
intended. users.
The Councì! and Staff discussed the VilIage Green concept and the need for everyone to
be clear on the intended use of the park, which could be defined by what was put in it.
Planning Consultant Mike Porio expla.ined the background of the project and advised
that the Village Green area sits over a stann drain 80 it was not possible to develop
buildings over it. The Village Green area. was originally intended to be a public
gathering space for residents and campus office employees. Avalotl Ba.y WBJ required to
bu.ild and mäÎntAin the Villa.ge Green, but it was meant as an ameníty for all the people
using the Transit Center. Public uses for the Vi11age Green could include a farmers'
market or art shows, etc.
City Manll8er Ambrose asked if Staff had looked into the possibility of moving tot lots into
the complex courtyards.
ÇITY COUNCIL MINUTES
VOLUME 24
REGULAR MEETING
January 4, 2005
PAGE 4
.
Lt."Ò ~,
Ms. Nuccio advised that rough measurements had been taken to see if both tot lots could
. be relocated onto the Avalon Bay Site. It may be too small to accommodAte "fall zone"
safety regulations; however, Staff could shidy its feasibility.
City Manager Ambrose advilied that tonight would be the time fOf CounC!il to articulate
concerns about the site design, and that it would be helpful fOf the Council to provide
Staff with an idea as to what would be acceptable.
Mayor Lockhart stated that more time should be spent on the Village Green. It does not
meet the needs of families or the community and hasn't been clearly defined. More
examples of other Village Greens would be helpful since this is Dublin's first attempt.
She was not comfortable with putting two tot lots and a water feature in front ofthe
BART Station. It does not make sense and does not fit the Council's vision of the
community. The right atmosphere needs to œ created for that area. More time should
be sperlt to understand what could be accomplished there and bring the whole Village
Green issue back before the Council. A public gatherit1g space next to public transit
made sense to her.
City Manager Ambrose su:;gested that the Council, during deliberation, give direction to
Staff for alternative studies for design..
. Vm. Zika expressed concern about protecting the pla.nned two~hout' parking on Iron
Horse Parkway from BART riders, and asked. if Avalon Bay would pay for extra Police
patrol. The plan would set up a war zone between retailers and BART parkers.
Police Chief Gary Thuman advised that "no parking" between 7 a.m. - 9 a.m. would be
feasible íf there were no retail uses that would be open that early, such a.s a coffee shop.
There would have to be sufficient deterrent, such as higher fines or towing, for motorists
to modify their behavior. "No parking" would be Police Staff intensive.
The Council and staff discussed various parking options, including "no parking" :zones
or metering..
City Manager Ambrose advised that this was a unique project and the City does need to
provide some services. There would be some additional costs depending on how the
CounciJ wanted to approach it.
The Council and Staff engaged in a question and answer session regarding parking
options, as well a.s discussed various options to accommodate future uses.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
VOLUME 24
REGULAR MEETING
January 4, 2005
PAGE 5
.
..., øt '2-1
Pat Cashman, Alameda County Surplus Property Authority, advised tMt the Village Green
would '?e privately built and maintained, ~t be a passive space ?pett I? the public. It is .
approXlmately 800 feet from the BART SahOt!, and peOple walking to It would be
primarily residents. The conœtnS about the tot tot might be valid. Hopefully, the Village
Green can continue to go forward and not hold up the approval process. The
programming of the Vil1.age Green can be determined later. Retail was defined in the
plan approval as auxilía.Iy retail, which required no parkirl$. The Developer recognized,
however, that there would be some pragmatic level of parlciJlg. The real support for the
retAH will be the residents, office users and BART users. This will be a dense
neighborhood where you might have to drive around looking for parking. Hopefully,
that will be part of its charm.
Nathan Hong, Senior Development Director with Avalon Bay, reviewed the background
of the project and advised tha.t they would be willing to reconsider placin.g tot lots in the
village Green. With respect to retail, future uses are hard to predict; however, it would
generally be neighÞorhood-serving retail, such as dryc1eaner, daycare service or coffee
shop_ There would probably be 2 or 3 smaller separate users, as opposed to one larger
uSêf.
Mayor Lockha.rt reiterated the need to define the users of the Village Green.
Vm. Zika asked how the 2-hour parki1181imit would be e11forced.
Mr _. Hong advised tha.t a Master Association between the four sites (B-1, B- 2, C-l and c-
2) would be set up to maintain :roads, the Village Green, and parking enforcement, etc.
The specifics Mve not been defined yet, but tbe cars would be red-tagged. They
committed to the 2-hour regula.tion as part of this approvaJ and would work to thaL
Mayor Lockhart asked about private security.
Mr. Hong advised that they generally do not have private security services, and did not
foresee that for the master association. Garages and wildings would have technological
security devices.
Vm. Zika. noted that the HOA cannot issue parking tickets, and BART riders would just
scrape off any red tags. Although he liked the project, he could not support it until the
parking issues; were resolved.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
VOLUME 24
REGULAR MEETING
Jao1lQ.ry 4, 2005
PAGE 6
.
.
't; T1Q~'
.Mr. Hans concum:c1 with Police Chief Thuman regardirtg having a sufficient deterrent,
such as higher fines or towing, and stated they would work closely with the Police
Departm~nt to effectuate the proper procedures.
Mayor Lockhart stated that every parking issue could not be resolved. The peopJe will
have to foJlow the rules; if they do not, they win,get ticketß.
Cm. Orø.vetz noted that the future BART parking garage, as well as the future West
Dublin BART Station might alleviate some of the problems in time.
City Manager Ambrose asked the Applicant about the feasibilíty of relocating the tot lot
within the complex.
Mr. Hong adviaed that they would take 11 look, but did not foresee enough demographics
to build intenmlly. It wou.ld be more beneficial to open it to the public for maximum
use.
Zoyd Luce, Dublin resident and new BART Board Representative, expreß3ed concern
about the current parking situation at BART and stated that the Council must address
parking now. If enough parking was not provided, it would continue to create hostile
BART riders. He offered his services to remedy the situation.
eMayor Lockhart stated the City of Dublin could not take care of BAlrI"s parking
problems. .
Mayor Lockhart dosed the public hearing.
Cm. McCormick referred to the Green auilding Guíde1înes and asked for clarification to
the statement "to the extent practical, the Applicant shall incorporate green building
measures."
.Ms. Nu.ccio advised that Dublin did not have an adopted Green Building Ordinance, 80
currently the Building Official works with the Developer to incorporate cost effective
measures to incorporate green building into their projects.
Building Official Gregory Shreeve advised that the City utilizes the Alameda County's
Waste Management Multi-Family AffordAble HousÍ1lg Program for Green Buildi~.
"Extent practical" means accomplísl1ing items that are practical or structurally feasible
in their project;
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
VOLUME 24
REGULAR MEETING
January 4, 2005
PAGE 7
.
CìÐ'(?Z.¡
Cm. Oravetz made A motion that the Council waive the reading IUld introduce an
Ordinance approving Stage Z Planned Development Zoning with the Development PIAn .
attached as Exhibit A; adopt the Resolution for Site Development Review with Project Plan
attached JiS Exhibit A; waive the reading And introduce Ordinance adOptiflS the
Development Agreement; and direct Staff to work with the Developer to provide the
Council with alternative layouts for the Village Green Open Space.
Cm. Hildenbrand seconded the motion.
City Manager Ambrose recommended that the Council not provide a Site Development
Review approval for the Village Green portion of the prqjoct. 'The City Attorney had
advised that the Council could pull it out at this time7 and the Site Development Review
for the Village Green could be brought back to the Councillaìer. The balance Qf the Site
Development Review could be approved7 if the Council so chose.
Mayor Lockhart clarified that this would allow the Applicant to move forward with
everything else. .
City Manager Ambrose agreed.
Cm. Oravetz rescinded his initial motion.
Cm. Hilden brand rescinded her second of the initial motion.
.
Assistant City Attorney John Bakker recommended that the motion approve the Site
Development Review, excepting the Village Green.
On motion of Cm. Oravetz, seconded by Crn. Hildenbrand and Þy 11U1jOrity vote (Vm.
Zika opposed), the Council waived the first reading and INfRODUCED an Ordinance
ø.pproving a Stage 2 Planned Development Zoning; adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 02 - 05
APPROVING SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FOR PA 03-058 DUBIJN TRANSIT CENTER
(EXCLUDING THE VILLAGE GREEN) SITE B-2 (AVALON BAY COMMUNITI£S)
LOCATED AT TIlE SOUI'HWEST COKNE1l OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD.AND
IRON HORSE PARKWAY (APN 986-0001-01 1~OO)
And waived the fit'8t reading and INTRODUCED an Ordinance adopting a Development
Agreement.
.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
VOLUME 24
REGULAR MEETING
January 4, ZOO!;
. PAGES
.
1D"b ').. \
PUBLIC HEARING
.DUBLIN TIUNSIT CENTER SITE B-1, D.L HORTON, INC"7 STAGE Z PLANNED
~LOPMENI REZONING ANJ2.II11PEVEL.OlMtiJlll'REVIEW. PA OS-OM
8:31 p,m, 6.2 (410~30/450-30)
Mayor Lockhart opened the public hearing.
)
Mike Porlor Planning Consulta.ntr presented the Staff Report and advised that D.R. Horton,
IrIc., is proposing to construct It multi ~family residential condominium community of
257 units on approximately 3.13+ net acres of land within the Dublin Transit Center
project on a portion of Site B (referred to as Site B~ 1). The Dublin Tt'ansit Center is
located generally between the Iron Horse Trail to the west, Dublin Boulevard to the
north, Arnold Road to the east and the DubHn/Plea:>anton BART StKnon to the south. The
Horton portion of the Transit Center project is within the overal1 confines of the purchase
that Avalon made of the entire site.
Mayor Lockhart asked if the glass element would be blue tinted as shown in pictures.
Mr. Porto advised that the tint would have It blue-green cast, and indicated that the
Architect would speak on that later.
. Vm. Zika noted that the area had a water table problem and asked how that would affect
the subterranean parking.
Mr. Porto advised that the Applica.ntwas working with the Building Official on this issue.
There is a hei,ght limit situation relative to the type of building they are trying to
construct, and it will be worked out during: the building: plan check process.
Vrn. Zika commended the Applíca.nt for providing more than adequate parking.
Dean Mi11s¡ representing D.R. Horlon, advised that they were aware of the water t4ble
issue, and have already brought on a waterproofing consultant to determine how to dealCwith the situation during construction and on along-term basis. They are vcry conscious
of the issue because these are for-sale units.
Vm. ZÏka expressed concern aboµt the Applicant returnÎ11g to the Council at a later date
asking for an exemption because they did not deal with the issue.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
VOLUME 24
REGULAR MEETING
January 4, 2005
PAGE 9
.
(lÐb ~\
Mr. Mil1s advised that they have met with the Building Official and are aware that an
exemption is nman option. .
Glen Tamida, Project Architect, advised that they had ejected to go with cool coJors to
dîstinguish themselves from the Avalon project, so there wou.ld be tinted glass. The
windows would be 8-feet high and part of the inside furnishings would be shades.
The Council and the Architect disçussed the proposed elevations.
Mr. Porto explained that, when looking at high density urban environments and looking
at scale and mas$, there needed to be a way to blend different architecture types so there
was no shock value as the buildings changed from one land use to another. The
proposed elevations helped the transition from residential to campus office.
Mary Beth Acuff, Dublin resident, expressed concern about only stairway access for
seniors.
Mayor Lockhart advised that the plan inc1uded elevato!'s.
Mayor Lockhart closed the public hearing.
On motion of Oravetz, seconded by Cm. McCormick and by unanimous vote, the Council
wa.ived the firstread.ing and INTRODUCED an Ordúw1.ce approving a Stage 2 Planned .
Development Zoning; and adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 03 - 05
APPROVING SITE DEVELOPMHNT REVIEW FOR. FA 03~58 DUBUN TRANSIT CENTER
SITE B-1 (D.Il HORTON, INC.) LOCATED AT THE SOUI'HEAST CORNER OF DUBUN
BOULEV AKD AND DEMARCUS BOULEV AIlD
(Am 986-0001-011-00)
.
IlU»YN TRANSIT CENTER. A1l~
8:50 p.m. 7.1 (600-60)
Parks & Community Services Director Diane Lowart presented the Staff Report and
advised that, as part of the Dub1in Transit Center Development Agreement, the Alameda-
County Su.rplus Property Authority is required to contribute $250,000 for Public Art.
The City considered three arti~ submittals for the first phase of the project (vii. Green
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
VOLUME 24
REGULAR MEETING
January 4, 2005
PAGE 10
.
12Øå.¿'\
Center)- The Art Selection Committee recommends artist Bryan Tedrick and the Heritage
_nd. Cultural Arts. CommillSion rerommends artist Yoshio Ta.ylor be commiBsioned for the
proJect.
Ms. Lowart advised that Staff was requesting that the Council consider the
recommendations of the selection Committee and Heritage & Cultural Arts Commission,
and select the artist to create artwork for the Village Green ot' provide Staff with alternate
direction
Pat Cashman, Alameda County Surplus Property Authority and speaking on behalf of the
Selection Committee, advised that the Selection Committee wanted to go on record as
beil1$ unanimous and enthusiastic about the dragon sculpture. It was unique. and win
become a focus point. The Selection Committee felt stronglya.bout its choice, and he was
surprised that the recommendation of the Heritage & Cultural Arts Commission was
presented to the City Council.
Mary Beth Acuff, Heritage &; Cultural Arts Commissioner and Selection Committee
member, explained the seeming conflict between H&CA Commission and the Selection
Committee by stating the H&CA Commission did not interview the artists. The H&CA
Commission was ßÍven to understand, as reflected in their meeting minutes, that its
position was just to look at the maquettes and give an idea to the Selection Committe¢
.what it liked. She did not have a concept that the H&CA Cornmission recommendation
would come to the City Council sa a conflict position with the. Selection Committee. Also,
when the H&CA ComttÚ$sion considered tve artwork, she did not have as well-developed
ideas as to what the Village Green would be like, as the Selection Committee had.
,
Mayor Lockhart sta.ted she was not concerned about :maintenance of the fountain, if the
Developer was willing to accept it. The real issue was trying to force art into the Village
Green before its future users had been defined. The City has learned in the past to get
resident participation in art selection. She suggested that, if there wns no rea30n to rnaJt:e
a decision tonight, the issue should wait to get resident input.
Ms. Lowart explained the artist selection process, and advised. that it was sometimes more
cost effective to have the. art installed while the infrastructure was being built. A
fountain would require quite. a bit of infrastructure and timing was an issue.
Mr. Forto advised that construction staging was a problem in terms of location, and the
Developer would like to use the Village Green area to stage to construction of the
residential units, and put in the Village Green toward the end of the construction project.
CITY COlJNCIL MINUTES
VOLUME 24
REGULAR MEETING
January 4, 2005
PAGE 11
.
I ~1fJ1A
There is a condition that the Vi11a,ge Green has to be operational prior to a certain
number' of units being occupied in the building. .
Mayor Locldmrl suggested deferring the selection for resident input since they would be
the ones to take ownership and pay for the maintenance of it.
The Council discussed the suggested artwork and its maintenance, as wel1/1S the
possibility of deferring the sel~tion for resident input and a,yeed that, although· the
Committee selection was to be re:;pected, the future residents should be allowed to
provide input into the artwork selection. Because the Vi11age Green design has yet to be
defined~ and in light of the area. being needed as a construction staging area, it might be
appropriate to defer art selection at this time and involve resident inp1At.
City lYIAnager Ambrose asked, with respect to the Site Development Review of the Village
Green, if the Council would like to see some alterna.tive designs prior to residential
occupancy, or should that þe deferred 8S well for resident input.
Mayor Lockhart stated that the ~ign and programming of the Village Green was the
Council's responsibility~ including identii'ying art placement; however, the artwork
should be selected by the residents.
Ms. Lowart advised that designs for neighborhood parks usually include public input
through public meetings at the Parks & Community Services Corrunission and City .
Council meetings. Neighborhood involvement is encouraged.
Pat Cashmart advised that it would be fme to defer the artwork selection until occupancy,
but that may be 3 years in the furore. However, there were two issues with the current
Development Agreement. First, the Development A,greement required them to do the art
in conjunction with the building. Also, it is anticipated that the other half of the money
will be spent in conjunction with the BART garage and BART plaza. Does the Council
want them to wait for the whole neighborhood toÞein place before they do that?
Mayor Lockhart advised no, thAt would be at the BART station, not in the neighborhood.
Mr. Cashma.n stated the Vi11age Green needed to be landscaped and programmed by the
time the buildings open.
Mayor Lockhart agreed, stating that the Council would work through that issue, and the
residents can deal with the art issue.
CITY COUNCIL MINlJTES
VOLUME 24
REGULAR MEETING
January 41 2005
PAGE 12
.
1~"b'V!
.City Manager Ambrose clarified the terms of the COUnty's Development Agreement as it
related to public art, advising that the Development Ag;reernent says that the County will
give the City cash to purchase public art. Tonight's discussion i9 different because the
Village Green is private property and there would need to be some sort of arrangement or
modification to that agreement to accommodate the pubJic art on this privately owned
location.
Mr. Cashman advist:d that he and the City Manager could work out how to modify the
agreement, if necessary.
The Couilcil agreed.
The Council, Staff and the Developer discussed the timing of the project. A$ the condition
was writte.n, the :requirement was to have the Village Green constructed and completed
prior to first occupancy.
Ms. Lowart suggested tluit Staff regroup, meet with the Developers, look at the public art
opportunities that have been identified in the initial plan, and look at how both the
Village Green art and the BART art could be phø.ged in. She believed that the public art
opportunities for the BART Station were on BART property, so it may be that BART may
need to be brought into this discussion earlier, 90 that Staff could explain to the Council
a how it WOl,¡ld recommend phasing in these pieces of art. Staff would also work with the
_ County to address any Development .Agreement issues.
Mayor Lockhart stated that it was good suggestion.
City Ma~r Ambrose c1arif:ted that Avalon Bay was responsible for building the Vi11age
Green, but the condition applied to the entire Site B. SO whoever builds first would have
to get the Village Green up ./U1d running.
Mr. Porto confirmed that the Developers would be able to stage construction on the
Vi1Iage Green for quite awhUe. As they got closer to occupancy, they would have to
move the construction trailers elsewhere.
11m Council and Staff further discusged the timing of the project, as well as the
infrastructure needed for the selected art. If the art was not selected now, art
infrastructure nt£Iy need to be imtalled after the Village Green was completed.
Nathan HOt1$, Senior Development Director with Avalon Bay advised that the
programming of the Village Green design would need to come first. Wherever the art
CITY COUNC[L MINUTES
VOLUME 24
REGULAR MEETING
January 4, 2005
PAGE 13
.
I ~'It> ¡\-I
piece goes or whatever infrastructure was needed to support it would be mînor and
could come later. When they come back with the desÎ8I1 of the Village Green, that would -
be one component to complete. They would work with the Art Selection Committee to ..
allot a. space for the art that would be flexible enough to support whatever design was
selected.
Cm. McCormick asked if the three original ørl pieces would be submitted for
consideration if the ørl selection was deferred for ~ident input.
Ms. Lowart stated it would depend on the artist.
Bryan Tedrick, Artist, stated that in 3 years time, his piece might not be available for the
same price. Although he wanted the residents to be happy, you cannot please everyone.
His piece has no real maintenance issue. Regarding the location, the landscape architect
had advised that the County had approved the meridian strip as a location in the center
of the VîHage Green, and seemed reluctant to go beyond the original site specifications.
The Council discussed the issue and agreed that, although art work prices might go up, it
was important to solicit resident input in the selection process.
City Manager Ambroæ asked if the Council wanted to wait until the entire buiJd out of
the project to get resident input or at wother point.
The Council discussed the issue and agreed that the issue should be brought back a.t 25%
of occupancy of the first two projects, Site B-1 & B-2.
City Manager Ambrose advised that Staff would work with the Developer to provide
alternative opportunity zones for art.
e
Mr. Porto discussed phasing and advised that it would be approximately two years before
occupancy starts.
Cm. McCormick asked if the timing would change anythÌt1g with the artists.
Ms. Lowart advised that Staff would discuss the issue with the artists.
.
CITY COUNCIL MINlJTES
VOLUME 24
REGULAR MEETING
JaDuary 4, 2.0$
PAGF. 14
.
f (,,1ib1-\
.~
9:40 p.m.
City Manager Ambrose advised that a joint Dublin School Board/City CoUncil meeting
had been tentatively scheduled for March 8,2005, at 5:80 p.m. Tho date and time
would be confirmed in the near future,
MAyor Lockhart advised that there had been some 1'Cq1le::;ts for the City to make a
donation to south Asia Tsut11Un.Ì relief fund, as the City did for 9/11, and asked that the
item be placed on the January 18th Council agenda. She requested tha.t Staff look to see if
we could offer .Ii way for residents to work with us on collecting money in order to ma.1œ
one donation from the community. Many residents are looking for a donation outlet.
Vm. Zika suggested matching dollar for dollar.
Mayor Lockhart agreed, and suggested that the donation Þe delivered through the
American Red Cross, as we did for 9/11.
.
&JO~N'!'
-11.1
There being no further business to come before the Council, the meeting was adjourned
at 9:45 p,m.
Minutes taken I1l1d prepared Þy Fawn Holman, Deputy City Clerk.
A TIEST:
.~
.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
VOLUME 24
REGULAR MEETING
January 4, 2005
PAGE 15
i "'"
.,
!
¡)
.....g
NÆ
2
Ö '""I
~~ ,
a. EB! r-
~ '!!~,¡
~ oJ.
~ ~J ¡d't
(;j 11 ~ oil
::.:: l. <- L
"" P .
u , · 3 ..
"Æ. '"
'"
VI C
z e~
w
a.
0
-'
~
I- t'6~ II
Z ä"¡: ;:"¡
"" "t,sC!
u .. III 8 \"III
f~"V
· £. "t
h~!
· ~.,
,g . '"
t>;S
ìiii ë-~
· ...
~~ ~
· ;!\
u "
'"
·
·
· ¡::r:;
u
1
· I.I.1
"
I-
{~
~'.5 v Z
~" ~
2~ Vi
'" ~ "~
.'!i æ h I.I.1
Vi
., I
"'
ö-
~i' u
H
3^'~O VON31)VH-- EB·
I: 01
It:
~
LI.
....I
;:)
~ >-
z ~
;:¡ ¡¡¡
ø:I LI.
'~".,-".-,.:,..~;:) '.. .. ""~"T".'~C ,It:
'0 l"~
. '..1'1:11 '!;. ,'!~
. . . I:,',! i'~"'-'~~\'>';~.;it
'\'{,:""'~'~'¡;¡:I_,!!~,JI""
'\:.,~I~~~.;.'.;.··...;;'·'.·I·~~.:¡.'....'.....'.<..:N.\.'.'~......r.~~. S 'ii
'¡':I',.. ':~¡¡··.).":I.'...:i1"'.'
11,"1""'''' I~'f """,.w. .-
II·:'!"','" "",,/' ,.;:yt-" ,,' .~,
-~"~'f~"'.:;0r.t'r-';" ..J
~ '; I '
I
,
"I
"';!
l··
-"~¡'
/,:' :.~
>,-0
",QJ
l~....,
¡,::.c '"
_ .rtJ'"
0= 0.,.c:::3
K:ffilllgf.!!!
'C III ~ 0 a.
QJ.';::; o......~
",'-'I£i:I:::
~ :e~d5
t~-Q)QJ
(1J>"'C::...c:
c.. c.....J+-'
c:~ ",.~ 0
0"0...... ......
uCIJ"'.c>,
rtJ a. CIJ...., rtJ
-o~ ~ ~~
§~~~~
o rtJ ...... a.o.
'->c:
rtJ O.~ ItI (I)
"OCIJ-c::':~
1lI.c~"OO
N"'" 'U c: I
'2 III [;.!!! c:
"'..0:5..:.:: 0
e.n~ 0 u-=
o .~ ca E-c
(lI ",..oc:
..c"t)::I-6rd
~ 8 ~.~"t)
'ë.c~E:a
:O.....""'rd>
"8 .8 ~ 0I1~
0-&055
..c:...... ~-ca
5 (I)(lI"'",
..oC:U=::I
-§¡~ ~ e :=
.,.....¡...J &ñ ..., co
(lIc: "'::e
c: (lI.!:! rd CIJ
~ -c ~..o -......
rd .- c: .....
.~ K::::J CIJ-
1;;.....0.1110
", V) ~ i.,., .
-è(ll:¡:;l;)ClJE
'''''£..¡..J c: L..
'" (1).....0
~-o..:.:: 0110_
c:rdu......
'-+-J==II¡ca
()J..... -- '10".......
....,,,,=>.!:Q.
c: Q).,.... .¡...i s=
(I).c~~"""o
U It, VI µ ca..::;
~ '4-'~ ~ nJ
._.c~ E rd......
"'~rdON'"
c: ~""'rd
'" .(I)I.i...~(lI
ÞK:-c 0.£
c:U"¡:¡;"';Q)\t-
:::;1tI",,,,~0
..0 Q.::I res 0......
~ :::J '" 0 WI 0
.... CI.!:! ~ (I) _ 0
c: ....Jw.J:::i-'+-
QI W..o!i:;......OCIJ
U ,.c::::J.... c:~..c:
~ Q....,.~t ....,
E
QI
1;:
;::
1'3
III
fill"
If ,,.
"
It
JIlt
"
lit
"
f
~2
~l
L
á .~
._~1J.
f¡:¡'~
,]it;
l..
'"
J'I
'"
-----
r
J -t1i
I~~ J '-
;1
I
ã
.. " "P ~J~l
~ ., ~
.'!i ~ ~.~
Vi . ~D~
] .
.
...
"
..
" "
"
..
..
..
..
..
..
-
~!
~'"~
F~l:
- ~.,
fo]
H
~~
:lõ:¡i
l-
.
~.
-
.
f/)~
7. .
u
<.
It! ø.:'"
~ .
~
:> "
¡-.
z
~
-1
u
li c:)
::J
Æ~ CI
¡j
j1!
d .
Æ
J li
0
J
--
¡
. j,
U~ l
I ~HI!!
::d J.!:!:
-~ij
-
....
-
r ' "
j MÍ<
". ~m
m':; ~]~~
I
..~----_.-
~
(¡4
._.---".~'-"'---"
JIB
~ffi ~ J~ii
-~~ I h~
j!' <!>... l ìi!j ~ ~
IIi
'"
§~
WZ
~w'"
po",
z .~- ....J
ij ~ä~
i' ~~ ~
¡;;:.
~
.
.. .. L
m"~ .
§ ~~~
iP"i
IL~~~
if. ,,-....
\~-_:__.)
'-::.....--
I'
_.<,,-.J .,
'"
z
;;;
~
~
"
- "
m
X
w
.-
i_15 J
I ð",
o ð I
I ...J g I
. ,---~ iJ'
u 3
. In.., ~ III
~ ~
- ~
]jJ
I ___
---
,. \
I", ) --
Hg)
. ,,0 ~
I ou
ì:;:~ -
( :,\", ~
__ 31"
_z
~~ )
(,--~ '
----;J!
: ... .(/~-\
.- ~
i-.~L
( g~
L. .. § i; \
-1.-.., ~ f
, -- )
, --
~--,.' )-"
-".,.",,,_.,,.._.._~--,_:'.,....,\
-----------.--.
._L_.
,
.--~)
In-.
""-,...-...-.
Co
:;:
"
~
~¡:
~¡;
co'
;;.~ ill
~!!' r;
¡;" .
fIJ d ~ ~
~H;¡
~"-'
L
~~
z
w
w
a::
(!)
w"
..., r;:
::s :.
....J ,jj
;;¡
> i,(
---
CI
a::
~
::¡
o
u
CI
>
-'
QJ
"
~ ::; ~'
~.. .'''-J1l ~ ~
, "iCl~
.-- I
Ii!
Id
~ sUI
<1<1 -1<1 i §
iL ~ffi
~U ~,·I "'"~
ill ~ ~ U~ g
. ~ ; Hh N
" i .....
u ~
i
'"
H
~ ~
o 0
~ f
"
~o ~_
81\1 ~
~I
._. .,~b.:
l""J-
~ .A.
,
-., --.--.-
:...;;:.-
,,,,I,....,,
---I
. ---¡-J ,.,
.-..... :'--....... I i
......~~.....-..::'-~.~.
.............. ..~~.......
.._______J t
§~ 11 )
mu 0 )
:¡ )
"-...'
--~-
É
~0 ;(
/)1
,. ) I'
",
--.
-'---
".
.--.....
~1
......~_.'
CI
a::
g
::¡
o
u ~
"
...J :.
g ~
/l.. ~
~~~
CI
a::
«
~
;:¡
o
U
I ¡,
"
~
@ ~
~-'.....-~)'É
__no Q
Z
"..
~"'J___~~"~'.'~'~'
i )
l
o
~ i ;: ~
ª~, '.'
~..¡,
.~:;;I::i ~ '~.
h:;,... ~.
.!
" ,"..
;b!1
-I
0,
~I
-,
("';' :2
........! '"
~.
81 w w
E
, w '" «
, , :> Z
:= : a:;
'" :;; '"
E: I..'J ::¡ 0
....
V: 0 ~
w u
'" >- ",'
u I..'J «
'" co :¡
""d , <x: z '"
<= 0 ::>
'" --' C>
-1 -"'
«
u --' >
~ <!
~ >
0)
~
ü
{fl
"II
Ii
¡I"J'!;;;
'i
, .
I "
'I'"
i'.~
.L,,'
i
,
U,
t-
:z
L&.I
::æ
':'r
,",
,..,.
1...1
v'
j
)
r
.,
! ~ì
,
,
,
;'~
..
,
.....
I-
Z
LI.
:æ
~~.-
~..~~,..'~~~--~~~-
'I
,
,
,(
L,
o~ ,
~~,
Ñ~ ~
.~~¡
.'t9",
.¡
,
I",¡
,
It.!
',/,1
I:
</:1
o !
~' !
¡......
I
~ '
51 2:
._ I '"
~, LJ. w
E
LJ. :z <f.
a: ~ ~
::?i '"
l.9 ::; 0
li.
8 '"
LJ. ..
'" >- v
u! l.9 « ::i
.tJ co ::¡
« :z '"
¡:; 0 =>
'" --' "
...J --'
w --' :;
'¡:J ..
~ >
B
~I
"
"
i ~
,.
";:'
',,;
,h
.,
.
.
.
~"'",'~
,
~>
c·.J
..".....------'-'.~"
'I,
'.'L.
I'
.
':1·
{~ I;',
@~¡ 1"':'
"~~¡ I-
I. I
'ì I.
.\ ,
"
~-~~.~-~~~.._~~'~-_..~'-"---~,.~~.
~~--~"",.,.,..-
.,~--_.,-~,.,"_._--_.~
···;,,··'".I.J'·
I
J'
C
I
.
z '"
u.J ,"
F
u.J Z q;
0:: ::> 2
::;; '"
¡;¡ :> 0
~
0 ~
w u
:;;: v
l'J ";:!.~
'" :¡
<t '" '"
'"
-I ~ {O
-I >
'" q;
,~ >
'"
E
'"
..0::
v
V1,
~ ~
'.:
j;:
.'i/,'"
^
.-
~v_·_~~~
.