HomeMy WebLinkAbout Park&RecPlanWorkshop
M\e ~ q'lO"'~
Park and Recreation
Facility Planning
Workshop
Special City Council
Meeting
p e ~
Presentation Outline
L Workshop Objectives
II. Overview of Possible Projects
III. Projected Funding Sources
IV. Options for Addressing Funding Shortfall
V. Tax Revenue Options
VI. Potential Facility Phasing Options
VII. Facility General Fund Annual Operational
Subsidy
VIII. Potential Next Steps
1. Workshop Objectives
Identify Actions Required To Complete
Planning Process For:
1. Emerald Glen Park Recreation/Aquatic
Center
2. Historic Park
2
II. Overview of Possible Projects
Project Cost Estimates
Historic Park Possible Expansion
Preferred Option $25.4 m+
Green Store
Assessed Value $.6 m
Market Value Unknown
Recreation/Aquatic Center
Preferred Option
Alternative #1
$39.1 ill
$33.5 ill
*Total
$58.9 - $64.5 m+,
+Total does not include all potentialco!'il<; aS~(lciated with land ~cquisition
2
Overview of Possible Projects
Preferred Option for Recreation & Aquatic Complex
Gymnasium (Olll: full~length court and two shorter courts)
Fitness Center
BabysittilJglTot Activity Room. Designed especially for toddler c1assesand birthday
partH:s.
Group Exercise Room with wood floors, mirrors, and sound system for aerobics.
spinning, yoga, tai chi~ martial arts, etc.
Dance Studio with wood floors, ballet bars. mirrors & sound system.
Game Room with three to four attractions for use on a drop.in basis.
Indoor six-lane pool for year-round lessons, ael'Obics~ warm water therapy & arthritis
classes, events and rentals.
QUtd()(JT Leisure Pf.)ol with play strucl.1lT1::s and slide mountain, Has "zero-dopth" beach
entry. and a small lap swimming and lesson area.
Outdoor Lazy River, liB-mile long, 12-fe:=el wide. Can he used for wall:<!" walking and
resistance training,
Outdoor Competitive Pool. 25~yardsx25-l1leters.
Casual Activities Lounge off of the lobby.
Special Events Room for birthday parties and private rentals. 4
Overview of Possible Projects
Alternative 1 for Recreation! Aquatics Center
Reduccs building sizc fmm 62.815sfto 54.820sf
Reduces the water surface area from 25,800sfto 18,500sf
Reduces t'ot'a! project' co,t' from $39,072,000 to $33,491.450
Reduce, e"imated funding shortfall from $21,964,755 to $16,383,805
The Casual Activitiel1 Lounge is reduced (rom I ,4006ftO 800sf.
The Locker Rooms were reduced from 1 ,500sfto 1 ,250sf each_
The number of Family Changing Rooms was reduced from 4 to 3.
Reduced thtJ size of the gymnasium from 12,O()Osfto] 1,240sf.
Oeleted the Dance Studio_
The Leisure Pool, which features water play structures and slides. would be reduced
from 8,000,fto 6,000,f.
The Lazy River would be reduced from Jl8-mile 10 1/] 6-mile in length. The width
of the river was reduced from 12-fee! to 8-feet.
Rt:duced the number of concession sti:U1ds serving the outdoor pool area from two to
onc. 5
3
. ,'I".
Recreation Facility Financing Workshop
Overview of Possible Projects
Shortfall
Historic Park
$25.4 m +
Recreation/Aquatic Center $33.5 - 39,1 m
Less Planned Public Facility Fee Contribution
($17.1 ill)
Subtotal $16.4 - $22 m +
Shortfall Grand Total
$41.8- $47.4 m +.
Ill. Projected Funding Sources
. Grants
. Development Agreements
. Public Facility Fees from lnfill Projects
. Lin Community Park Land Donation
. General Fund Projected Net Surplus
. Summary of Restticted Uses on Available Funds
. Funding Shortfall Summary
'1
4
Recreation Facility Financing Workshop
..1, ...".1"
Projected Funding Sources
Grants
MTC Grant
$750,000
Can be nsed for Historic Park streets cape construction
,
Projected Funding Sources
Development Agreements
Braddock & Logan DA
$2m
Funding will be received Over 5-10 year period d"Pendent upon boild-out
Braddock & Logan Affordable Housing $1 m
Timing of paymenllo be delennined
,
5
Projected Funding Sources
Public Facility Fees From Infill Projects
Community Park Land
Community Park Improvements
Community Buildings
Quimby Act
Total
$4.1 m
$2.4 m
$1.6 m
$1.0 m
$9.1 m
10
Projected Funding Sources
Fees available from Lin Community
Park Land donation
$2 million
11
6
Projected Funding Sources
General Fund Projected Net Surplus
FY 2004-05 FY 2005.06 FY 2006.07
Aetual Adjusted Budget Projected
:1':lii;.ji';:,i,:'illlilii';:.lII!i:..'::il':.i":I'ii)llil(1'ir\lllll!lli~llijjlJlX):I:~1JII;Jj)f,'ii'$/liW,jlm~lW:llll:ll''I'q~~mttm0\ililllillllf-'il)',II':III\':i11
$43.588.156 $46,200,478 $47,187,768
42.396.366 47,895,390 49,689,898
$1,191,800 ($1,694,912) ($2,502,130)
Revenue
Expenditures
Differenee
Adjustments
To/From Reserve
Net Year End
Available
(334.211)
1,694,912
2,502.130
.:::I::,lm ...'.~~~~I~tI:I!L!I:mll:I::!IlIIII:llmll&iil:lmI.:lilmlii1ll~ii:l:li:li~~lm
Does not illclude partial repaymellt of Fire Impact Fee Loan
]2
Projected Funding Sources
Summary of Restricted Uses
Historic Park only
Recreation/Aquatic Center only
Either Project
Total
Issues:
Dependent upon development occurring through bulld-out.
. Other Public Facility Fcc funded pl'Ojeets could be delayed.
$10.2 m
$0,0
$5.5 ill
$15.7 m
13
7
Recreation Facility Financing Workshop
Projected Funding Sources
Projects that could be delayed as a result of using
available Public Facility Fee funds:
Fallon Sports Park
Library Phase II
14
Projected Funding Sources
Comparison of Park Acreage per Population
Adopted Standard - 5 acres/1 ,000
FY 0;;-06
FY 06-07
FY 07-0S
FY OS-09
"'Park Acres
164.74
166.74
171.74
171.74
PopulatIon
36.887
38,936
40,849
43,162
Standard
4.47 "c,e,1l 000
4.28 aeresllOOO
4.20 acresllOOO
3.98 acre,/IOOO
"'Includes school parks
15
8
Projected Funding Sources
Funding Shortfall Summary
Total Facility Costs
Less Planned Public Facility Fees
Less Projected Funding Sources
. Net Shortfall
$58.9 - $64,5 m +
($17.1 m)
{$15,7 m)
$26,1- $31.7 m +
"
\. \.,' ,
IV. Options For Addressing Funding
Shortfall
. Debt Financing
. Use City General Fund Reserves
. Defer/Eliminate Capital Projects
. Available Grant Funds
. Camp Parks Development Agreement
. Additional Options
]7
9
W',"""I,:."'.
,:1 "",<,
Recreation Facility Financing Workshop
Options For Addressing Funding Shortfall
Debt Financing
Project Costs (Jess public facility funds) $41.8 -$47.4 m +
* Annual Debt Service Estimate $2,8-$3.2 m +
Project Costs (Jess PFF and projected funding sources)
$26. I - $31.7 ill +
* Annual Debt Service Estimate
$1.8 - $2.2 m +
*30 year bond at 5.39% interest, ratc
"
,,'\,,/.., ,',' \ ,\,\ I
",~~Cr-:~tion FacmtyFinanC:ng WorkshOP.~
Options For Addressing Funding Shortfall
Historical General Fund Net Surplus
1982/1983
1983/1984
1984/1985
1985/1986
1986/1987
$1.9 ill
$2.3 m
$3.5 ill
$4.5 ill
$2.0m
1988 Dublin Civie Center Annual Debt Service S1.7 m
19
10
Recreation Facility Financing Works
Options For Addressing Funding Shortfall
General Fund Projected Net Surplus
Revenue
Expenditures
Difference
Adjustments
To/From Reserve
Net Year End
Available
FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
Actual Adjusted Budget Projected
j!':':~:'."I:i<<,ltl~(~i:':ill:,IIII,:I:I:,:IJ;II:j:.:,,.:j.:!!,lli:WI:0:~.llIIII~~:~,I:!:1:lil:i:IIIIIrr:.'5o/i:m:1 ')')II',:<\II::',::lillllli':i;;:'. ,~, '::",::,,:':i:I;11
$43,588.156 $46.200,478 $47,187,768
42,396,356 47,895,390 49,689.898
$1.191.800 ($1.694,912) ($2,502,130)
(334,211)
1,694,912
2,502,130
"III'I"I'IIII'n;!j~;c;'tJiil!i!ffilll,"lim~W!'UlIIf,,"'r"r"'T"""',l,n",'II,1 1".'.Ili. .......
~ All: I ,hh~~,MW!~mfii':,If:,1 :.1IJ(, Aiml ,~H If:HWid!iUilli,m9JiUil!il::'<:d::!i::::.,":ii::'::! ;:'::,\~g~i
* Does not include partial repayment ofFirc Impact Fee Loan
20
Options For Addressing Funding Shortfall
Use City General Fund Reserves
6/3012005 Undesignated Reserves
Less amount used for Shannon
Net Available Undesignated Reserves
$33.4 ill
($2.2 ill)
$31.2 m
6/30/2005 Designated Reserves:
Economic Uncertainty
Downtown/Open Space
Affordahle Housing
Net Available Designated Reserves
$3.0m
$1.9m
$1.0m
$5,9 m
21
II
il"
,.,,',.,1'.<
Recreation Facility Financing Workshop
Options For Addressing Funding Shortfall
Implications of Using Reserves
FY 2006/2007 projected General Fund intercst
revenue: $1.7 m
FY 2006/2007 year end surplus ifundesignated
reserves are depleted: ($1.3 m)
22
Recreation Facility Financing Workshop
Options For Addressing Funding Shortfall
Dcfer/Eliminate Capital Projects
CIP Description
Council Chamber Voting System
Sidewalk Safety Repair Program
Dou!;l'hsrty HillS Park - Oog Park
Summer Concert Series Sanners
Subtotal - Fiscal Year 2005-2006
Amount Fiscal Year
8,000 2005-06
66,200 2005.06
44,288 2005-06
17,335 200(;-06
$135,823
26,305 2006-07
40,000 :2006-07
65,720 2006-07
30,500 2006-07
542,554 2006.07
50,625 2006-07
3:2,630 2006-07
$78Bj234
"
$924,057
Civic Center Generator
GeographiC Informa.tion System
Sidewalk Safety Repair Program
BU5 Shelters
Oougherty Hills Park - Dog Park
$ta!;l'eoo:;:Jch P13rk AS5essment District Water Meter
Dublin aOulevard - Raise CJ;ltCh 6S5in Gr~te5
Subtotal. Fiscal Year 2006-2007
Total
12
Options For Addressing Funding Shortfall
Historical General Fund CIPS
_ 6.00
'"
g ~,oo
:E 4.00
g 3.00
-
g 2.00
o
E 1.00
-0:
Q...... ~').. ~~ ~tIo h ..so
#' "'" "" ,g; r? <!I'
'V ,.<:r ,.<:r f' ,." f'
Fiscal Year
24
Options For Addressing Funding Shortfall
Apply for another Workforce Housing Grant
Maximum Available $277,000
2S
13
Options For Addressing Funding Shortfall
Pursue Additional Funds Through Long Term
Development Agrccments
Example: Camp Parks
Require Conveyance to City of 4_2 acres of land f!'Om the Camp Parks
development as part of a development agreement. Sell the 4.2 acres and
use the proceed, for the possible projects.
Issues:
Timing
Dependent upon Anny proceeding
"
Options For Addressing Funding Shortfall
Additional Options
Amount
Revise Public Facility Fee Standards
for Aquatics
Unknown
"
14
v. Tax Revenue Options
· Property Tax Override - General Obligation
(GO) Bond
. Parcel (Excise) Tax - Certificates of
Participation (COP)
· Transactions and Use Tax
· Hotel Occupancy Tax
· Election Related Timing and Costs
28
Tax Revenue Options
Special Tax:
Requircs funds bc dedicated to a spccific purpose.
Supermajority (2/3) voter approval required.
General Tax:
Cannot be earmarked for any partieular use, Howcver, a
general tax can be accompanied by a non-binding advisory
measure that directs how the proceeds from the tax should be
spent. Simple Majority voter approval required.
"
15
Tax Revenue Options
Property Tax Override-General Obligation Bond
- Addition to the 1 % ad valorem property tax
- Assessed value of parcel would determine amount
paid by property owner.
- This would be a special tax requiring
supermajority (2/3) voter approval.
- Ternl of bond could be reduced over time based on
growth and assessed valuation
30
Tax Revenue Options
Property Tax Override - GO Bond
Pl'Oject Costs (less public facility funds)
Histonc Park
Recreation/Aauatic Center
Total Shortfall
$25,4 rn
$16,4 $22 m
$41.8 - $47.4 m
Annual Debt Service Estimate:
$2.8 - $3.2 m
Tax amount required for debt service:
.047% - ,053% A V
Examples:
ill,.,iclYaJue
$200,000
$(.00,000
$ 1 ,000,000
Annual Tax Amount
...._.___.._AIUtl '?refeTTf:d Ontioll
59) $106
$280 $31R
$407 $530
"
16
Recreation Facility Financing Workshop
I'. 'I'
Tax Revenue Options
Property Tax Override - GO Bond
Project Costs (less public facility funds and projected funding sources)
Combined Facility Cost Shortfall: $26.1 - $31.7 m
Annual Dcbt Service Estimate: $ 1.8 - $2,2 m
Tax amount required for debt service:
.029% - ,035% A V
Examples:
A!;sessc=:d Value
$200,000
$600,000
$1,000,000
Tax Amount
Alt #1 Pn::ferred Option
$58 $71
$184 $223
$292 $354
n
Tax Revenue Options
Parcel (Excise) Tax - Certificates of Participation
- Flat tax per parcel based on potcntial use of City services or
facilities
- Rates would vary based on type of use, Recommend
following model established in Publie Facility Fee Study
distributing costs of eommunity parks among single family,
multifamily, retail, office, industrial pareels aeeording to
county use codes,
- Could be proposed as gcneral or special tax.
3l
17
(\; , i., ~,':: I '
Recreation Facility Financing Workshop
H ""
':';
Tax Revenue Options
Pared (Exeise) Tax - COP
Pl'Oject Costs (less public fadllty funds)
His toric Park
Recreation! Aauatic Centcr
Total Shortfall
$25.4 m +
$16.4 - $22 m
$41.8 - $47.4 m +
Annual Debt SCl'Viee Estimate:
$2.8 m - $3,2 m
Tax amount required for debt scrvice:
Residential (per unit)
Sing,le Family: $196-$222 Multi-family: $12;1-$139
Commcrcia! (per 1,000 'q. ft.)
}{etai1 $28.$32 OffiCe $54-$61 Ind\15tri~] $24-$27
)4
Tax Revenue Options
Parcel (Exeise) Tax - COP
Project Costs (less public facility fund, and prC\iected funding source,)
. Combined Facility Cost Shortfall: $26.1 - $31,7 m ->
Annual Debt Service Estimate: $ 1.8 - $2.2 m
Tax amount required for debt service:
Residential (per unit)
Sin,gl~ Family: $123.$149 Multi-Family: $77-$93
Commercial (per 11000 ::;q, 11.,)
l-t!:tail $18-$21 Office $34-$41 flloustrial SI5.$IB
"
18
Tax Revenue Options
Transactions and Use Tax (General or Special Tax)
Increase sales tax by ,25% from 8,75% to 9.00%
(must be jncrea.~(?d in .25% increments)
Annual Revenue Generated
Estimare 2006-2007: $3,7 m
Atmual Debt Sel'Vice Estimate (Includes use ofplal'l'ned public facllity
Fees): $2,8 - $3.2 m
Exccss annual revenue", $900,000 - $500,000
Potential reduced sales volume resultingfrom higher sales tax rate has not
been included in revenue estimate
"
Tax Revenue Options
Hotel Transient Occupancy Tax (General or Special Tax)
Increase TOT from 8% to 12%
Estimated Additional Annual Revenue
$350,000
This would nol he suJJidenl10 CQver th~ debt service for any a/the scenarios,
however the revenue (:{)uld be Il_<;ed to cover the debt service associated with a
$5.4 bOlid iSS'Iamce and fund Q portion of improvements for e.ither possible project.
)7
19
Tax Revenue Options
Election Related Timing and Costs:
All four tax options would requlre voter approval
Voter Opinion Research
." This could be llsed to ascertain what tax nlcasurc the community would ~UppOTt.
Appl'Oximately 90 days to conduct V()t(:"T survey hy phone.
- Cost: $15,000-$10,000
General Election
Genel'al tax OJ' special tax rnCOlS\JfCS.
- Next General El~ction: Nnv. 7,2006.
- La!it date for COUTlcillu huld public hel.lrillg and call election fot' ballot measure: August
1,2006
- Cost: 110,000-$12,000
Special Election
Speci<ll tllX measures only
- Next l-'!:a~ible Special ElectiDn: June 6. 2006
Llst date [0[' Council to hold public heMing and call election tor ballot meaSure: March
10,2006
- CO!;lt: $17,000 ,111
VI. Potential Facility Phasing Options
· Recreation/Aquatic Center
. Historic Park
. Development Timeline
'"
20
Potential Facility Phasing Options
Phase I Recreation & Aquatic Center
78.300 sf Recreation Qept'ir
- Fitness Center
- Group Exercise Room
- Babysitting/Tot Activity Room
- Lobby~ Casual Activities Lounge, Reception
- Pool Concession
- Administrative Offices
- Reslrooms and Locker Rooms
Aquatic Center
- LeiSUTe Pool, Play Structures, Slides and Lazy River
Estimated Cost: $19.5 m
.0
Potential Facility Phasing Options
Phase II Recreation & Aquatic Center
22,200 sfReereation Center Addition
- Gymnasium
- Donee Srndio
- Game Room
- Special Events Room
- Juice Bar / Deli
Estimated Cost: $11 m
4]
21
Recreation Facility Financing Workshop
,."!,,;,,, !\ '\!"'^,'i'"'j''' "".\
Potential Facility Phasing Options
Phase III Recreation & Aquatic Center
ACiuatie Center Addition
- Natatorinm and Six-Lane Indoor Fitness Pool
- Competitive Outdoor Pool
Estimated Cost: $8.6 m
42
Potential Facility Phasing Options
Phase I
Historic Park
AcquisitionITUl'f/lrrigationlStreet Improvements
MTC Grant -. Street Improvements
Total
Cost
$8,1 m+
($.75 m)
$7,35 ml
4.'
22
Recreation Facility Financing Workshop
Potential Facility Phasing Options
Phase II
Historic Park
Cultural Arts Center, uutdoor stage) picnic scating, Alarnilla Spring
interactive wa~eT feature, ranch playground area, orchard lawn and
reception areaj Amador Hotd pergola/entrance plaza and cemetery
Total Phase II Cost
$18.05m
44
Recreation Facility Financing Workshop
','
Potential Facility Phasing Option Summary
Phase I Recreation/Aquatic Center $19.5 m
Less Planned Public Facility Fees ($17.1 m)
Net Shortfall $2.4 m
Phase T Historic Park
Less MTC Grant
Net Shortfall
*Total Net Shortfall Phase T
$8,1 m +
($,75 m)
$7.35 m
$9.75 m +
"'Shortfall could be satisfied through long~tcnn funding options previously identified
sllch as Jnfill Public Facility Fees and 2004/2005 year end surplus
45
23
Potential Facility Phasing Option Timeline
Phase I Recreation/Aquatic Center
January 2006 InItIate Project
June 2006 Completion of Parks & Reo Master Plan Update
Completion of IlG Park Master Plan Update
Complerion of Design/Plans & Specs
Completion ofP'hase T Improvements
June 2008
June 2010
Phase I Historic Park
March 2006 Completion of Historic Park Master Plan
CompletIon of SP for Donlon Way
June 2006 Completion ofGPA (including CIlQA)
Completion of Parks & Rec Master Plan Updak
June 2007 Completion of Property Acquisition
46
June 2008
Completion of Phase Ilmprovements
":,,
Recreation Facility Financing Workshop
VII. Facility General Fund Annual Operational
Subsidy
Preferred Option Recreation! Aquatic
Center estimate
$600,000
Historic Park
TBD
"
24
Facility General Fund Annual Operational Subsidy
Operational Deficit Funding
Shift Project Management Costs from General Fund to Public Facility Fee Fund
Annual ~avings to OF: $211,000
Eliminate PIQ Position
Artnual Savings lD GF:
$135.000
Eliminate TVCVB Contribution
AllnU<ll Savings to GF:
$56,000
Total Annual Savings to OF:
$402,000
""Net General Fund Subsidy:
$198,000
*Approximately the ~a111C as Cllm~nt General Fund subsidy for the Dublin Swim Center
4'
VIII. Potential Next Steps
Rccrcation/Aquatic Center Options
Proceed With Planning for:
1. Preferred Option
.Shortfall
$39,1 m
$22m
OR
2_ Altel'l1ative I
'Shortfall
$33,5 m
$16,4 m
*Does not include projected funding sources
49
25
~~ ,:':(,' .,' " '..' d " " "\ ' :. " " 'i.' , " ,\
Rec:rl!!.lItlon Facility FlnllnclngworkshoP,~~r'
Potential Next Steps
Recreation/Aquatic Center
Possible Future FinancingIPlanning Options
1, Proceed with phased approach -shortfall $2.4 m
a. Revise EG Park Master Plan and Park and Rec Master
Plan
b, Use lnfill development Public Facility Fees
c, FundIng SOUl'ces of ftllllre phases 10 be identified al a
later date
d, Phase II and III would be constructed based on
availability of futUl'e funding
so
Potential Next Steps
Recreation/Aquatic Center
Possible Future FinancingIPlanning Options
2. Proceed with constructing entire facility
a. Revise EO Park and Park & Rec Master Plans
b, Would requIre raising laxes
1. Hire Opinion Research/financial Consultant
2. Detennine type of lax
3. Condllel election
4. b,oe Bond 01' COPs
c. Commence Design
51
26
Potential Next Steps
Historic Park Options
1. Proceed with Historic Park full site scheme as part
of GP & SP Study
OR
2. Proceed with (1) above and add Green Store
parcel to the Specific Plan Study
"
Potential Next Steps
Historic Park
Possible Future Financing/Planning Options
1. Proceed with planning process (GP, SP, Park &
Rec Master Plan, Historic Park Master Plan).
Timing of acquisition of property and park
improvements will depend on availability of
revenues.
53
27
,I.."...,
Recreation Facility Financing Worksho
Potential Next Steps
Historic Park
Possible Future Financing/Planning Options (cant)
2, A Phased approach to development is possible:
Cost $8,1111 I
Lcss MTC Grant ($,75 m)
Shortfall $7.35 m +
a, Utilize Impact Pees from infill developmcnt ($6.49 Ill) and
2004/2005 ($.86 m) year end surplus to fund shorlfalL
b. Future funding sources would need to be ldenlified to complele
improvements shown in Draft Master Plan_
54
Recreation Facility Financing Wo
Potential Next Steps
Historic Park
Possible Future Financing/PJanning Options (cont)
3. Development of the entire sitc in accordance with Draft
Master Plan
a. Would require raising taxes including same steps identified for
Recreation! Aquatic Center,
b. Design would commence Once planning process was complete
and funding somces seemed,
55
28
Recreation Facility Financing Workshop
\' r ~' "
Questions?
Other Options?
"
29