HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 8.5 VoluntaryTripReducePgm CITY CLERK
File #590-80
AGENDA STATEMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: April 2, 2002
SUBJECT:
Report on Voluntary Trip Reduction Programs
Report Prepared by: Lee S. Thompson, Public Works Director
ATTACHMENTS:
RECOMMENDATION:
1) City of Pleasanton TSM Ordinance No. 1708
2) City of San Ramon TSM Ordinanc'e No. 301
'~Q~Receive Report and provide direction to Staff
FINANCIAL STATEMENT:
If the City decides to implement a voluntary trip reduction program
in a manner similar to the Cities of Pleasanton and San Ramon, a
new full-time position would likely be needed to administer the
program.
DESCRIPTION: As part of the Goals and Objectives process, the City Council
requested that Staff investigate the process of developing a Trip Reduction Program. Staff recently
surveyed adjacent Bay Area cities regarding voluntary trip reduction programs in an effort to explore
the possibility of developing such a program in Dublin. The cities included in the survey were Danville,
Livermore, Pleasanton, San Ramon and Walnut Creek. Only Pleasanton and San Ramon were found to
have voluntary trip reduction programs.
In the early 1990's, many public agencies in Califomia participated in mandatory trip reduction programs
that were imposed on businesses employing over a certain number of people (e.g., over 100 employees) to
encourage the employees to use alterriate transportation to the single-occupant vehicle (SOV) to get to and
from work. In 1992, the City of Dublin established a Trip Reduction Ordinance (TRO) as a requirement
for receiving grant monies through the Alameda County Congestion Management Agency (ACCMA).
This requirement was a result of Proposition 111, which was approved in 1990 and mandated by the
Alameda County-Wide Congestion Management Program.
At that time, Dublin was required to contact and work with businesses in the City that employed over
100 people to encourage alternative modes of transportation to the SOV. In September 1994, the City
transferred this responsibility to the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD), as Dublin
did not have adequate Staff or funds to continue administering this program.
COPIES TO:
ITEM NO. 4~5
G:\TRAFFIC\agst_trip reduction program.doc
In October 1995, the California Legislature adopted SB 437, which prohibited any public agency from
imposing an employee trip reduction program on an employer unless federal law expressly required the
program, and which elimination of the program would result in the imposition of federal sanctions,.
including, but not limited to, the loss of federal funds for transportation purposes. As such, TRO
requirements administered by local or regional public agencies in California were rescinded pursuant
to SB 437.
Some cities in the Bay Area continued to operate trip reduction programs on a voluntary basis and staffed
the programs with full-time employees. For example, in March 1997, the City of Pleasanton adopted
Transportation Systems Management (TSM) Ordinance No. 1708 to create a voluntary, rather than
mandatory, employer trip reductiOn program (Attachment 1). Under this ordinance, every existing or
furore employer with 75 or more employees wishing to enroll in the TSM program entered into a
Participation Agreement with the City of Pleasanton to develop an employer trip reduction program
and conduct a bi-annual employee transportation survey to monitor and improve the effectiveness of
the program. Such an employer program had the ability to include alternative/flexible work hours,
carpooling, vanpooling, a compressed workweek, and/or telecommuting. The employer covers the cost
to implement the voluntary trip reduction program.
At the present time, there are 24 employers participating in trip reduction programs under Pleasanton's
voluntary TSM ordinance. Pleasanton has a full-time employee to administer the ordinance and provide
support, guidance and assistance to employers who enroll in the TSM program. The last employee
transportation survey was conducted in year 2000 and had a response rate of only 15%. According to this
survey, the drive-alone rate was measured at 80%, which showed an improvement of approximately 3%
over 1998. Only 2% of survey respondents work a compressed schedule; with most working a regular
5-day-a-week full-time schedule.
In June 1998, the City of San Ramon adopted Ordinance No. 301 (Attachment 2), establishing a
Voluntary Transportation System Management (TSM) Program. This program was designed to promote
and encourage use of transit, ridesharing, bicycling, walking, flexible work hours and telecommuting as
alternatives to solo driving. These objectives are incorporated, as appropriate, into San Ramon's land use
review and planning process. A TSM Advisory Committee was established as part of this program and is
composed of one representative of the Transportation Committee of the San Ramori City Council, a San
Ramon Transportation Analyst, and five members appointed by the City Council, each representing an
employer or complex. The TSM Advisory Committee develops and recommends incentive trip reduction
programs for commuters by coordinating efforts with employers and complexes within San Ramon.
For the most part, the San Ramon TSM program seeks out employers with 50 or more employees at a
work site. There are currently 260 employers participating in the program, with the majority of these
employers (approximately 70%) being located within Bishop Ranch, which employs 21,000 employees.
An employee-based survey is conducted every other year to measure the effectiveness of the TSM
program. According to preliminary results from the latest survey (which has not yet been published),
there has been a 5% increase in BART and transit use, which is attributed in part to the Express County
Connection bus service between the BART station in Dublin and Bishop Ranch. The City of San Ramon
has one employee administering the TSM program on a full-time basis. This employee also serves as the
Transportation Analyst on the TSM Advisory Committee.
The City of Dublin does not currently have a voluntary trip reduction program in place. However, City
Staff has encouraged developers in Eastern Dublin through the land use review process to coordinate with
the Livermore-Amador Valley Transit Authority (LAVTA) by joining bus pass incentive programs for
2
their employees. Development projeCts in Eastern Dublin, such as Hacienda Crossings, Emerald Point,
Micro-Dental, and Sybase each have a cooperative agreement with LAVTA to use the "Flashpass"
incentive program. For example, Sybase will receive 667 bus rides per month for $500 under the LAVTA
Flashpass program. These bus rides will be offered to Sybase employees free of charge, and will include
rides to and from the Dublin BART station. Based on recent discussions between LAVTA and City Staff,
LAVTA is fully satisfied with the positive results from the Flashpass program and its contribution to
rising transit ridership within the Tri-Valley area.
Another program currently in place in Alameda County to help promote ridesharing is the "Guaranteed
Ride Home Program." Under this program, any employee who participates in ridesharing, such as
carpooling or vanpooling, is guaranteed a free ride home in case of an emergency, illness or other
circumstances that may arise. The employee can use this service up to six times a year, and has a choice
of using an ACCMA designated taxicab company or renting a vehicle from Enterprise Rent-A-Car.
The Guaranteed Ride Home Program is sponsored by the Alameda County Congestion Management
Agency (ACCMA) and is funded through the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD)
Transportation Fund for Clean Air (TFCA) program. The ACCMA has allocated $171,000 in TFCA
funds for the current two-year cycle of the Countywide Guaranteed Ride Home Program, ending in June
2002. This program will be renewed for the next two-year cycle starting July 1, 2002, and the ACCMA
has allocated $171,000 in TFCA funds for the next cycle. Employers with 100 employees or more that
are located within Alameda County may participate in this program.
The LAVTA Flashpass incentive program and the ACCMA Guaranteed Ride Home Program are cost-
effective for the City of Dublin in that both programs come at no cost to the City and require no additional
City staffing. On the other hand, a voluntary trip reduction program in Dublin would likely require the
addition of one full-time position to administer the program, based on Pleasanton's and San Ramon's
experiences with such programs. Furthermore, due to the voluntary nature of the program, the success
of any voluntary trip reduction program is typically not guaranteed.
· Staff recommends that Council receive this Report and provide direction to Staff.
TriE CITY OF
PL£AS&NTON
Transportation Systems Mangement
Ordinance No. 1708
March 18, 1997
P. O. Box 520, Pleasanton, CA 94566-0802
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF pr.~_ASANTON
ALA1M~DA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE NO. 170g
AN OILDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON
REPEALING ORDINANCE 1625 AND CHAI~TER 17.24 OF
THE PLEASANTON MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADDING A
REVISED CHAPTER 17.24 TO THE I~LEASANTON
MUNICIPAL CODE CONCE~G A TRANSPORTATION
SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF PLmASA1NTOI~ DOES OP. DAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Sec~ti0n 1:
Ordinance 1625 and Chapter 17..24 of the Pleasanton Municipal
Code are hereby repealed.
SectiOn 2:
Chapter 17,24 is hereby added to the Pleasanton Municipal Code to
read as follows:
"CHAPTE~ 17.24 Transportation Systems Management
17.24.010 Purpps~. The City has adopted General Plan policies to reduce the
tot'al number of average daily waffle (AD'F) trips and to evenly distribute the ADT trips
throughout the non-peak hours. The purpose of this Chapter is to implement these
policies by creating a voluntary, rather than mandatory, employer trip reduction program.
City finds as follows:
Although recent legislation (SB 437) [Health and Safety Code §40929] that
prohibits public agencies from imposing mandated employer trip reduction
programs, the City believes that a voluntary program can accomplish the same
objectives as the mandatory program.
Transportation planning studies done for the City of Pleasanton and the Tri-Valiey
have all indicated the need to manage the transportation system and conserve
capacity. The I995 Tri-Vail~y Transportation Plan/Action Plan for B, outes of
ll.¢gional SiEni~cance indicates the gateways - 1-680, 1-580, Hwy 84 and Vasco
l~,oad - will have more demand than capacity. Traffic studies of Pleasanton's
buildout of land use also indicate that many of the critical intersections in
Pleasanton will be opcrat/n§ near capacity, The impact of any significant cut
through traffic would further aggravate these traffic conditions. Transportation
Page 1
.F.
planning in Pleasanton relies on continued traffic management strategies to
maintain acceptable levels of service,
The/3choral. Plan mandates an uncongcsted traffic circulation system, energy
conservation, and maintenance of'noise and air quality levels within established
standards.
The General Plan also mandates reducing the total number of average daily
Uaffic (Al)T) trips and minirni~_ng the number of employees travelling to and
from work during the peak commute hours through promoting transit, ddesharing,
bicycling, walking, telecommuting programs and alternative work hours program.
Reductions in traffic trips, both absolutely and within peak hour periods, are
beneficial in terms of reducing traffic congestion, vehicle emissions, energy
consumption, and noise levels. The improved traffic levels of service, air quality,
and ambient noise levels contribute to making the City an attractive and
convenient place to live, work, vi,sit, and do business.
l~fmimizing inconvenience in conunute trips and retaining an attractive
environment will enable employers W: (1) be easily accessible to clients;
(2) assure the delivery of§oods and services: and (3) effectively recruit and
retain quzli/ied personnel.
Voluntary participation by public and private employers is critical to the success
of a Transportation Systems Management (TSM) Program.
17.24.020 Definitions. For purposes of this chapter, the following words or
phrases shall have meanings as provided in this section:
Alternative Work Hours Pr0~arn: Any system for shifting the work-day of an
employee so that the work day starts and/or ends outside of the peak periods.
Such programs include, but are not limited to: (1) compressed work weeks; (2)
staggered work hours involving a shift in the set work hours o£ all employees at
the workplace; and (3) flexible work hours involving individually determined
work hours within guidelines established by the employer.
Bo
Caroool: A vehicle occupied by two (2) to six (6) people traveling together
between their residences and their work sites or destination for the majority of the
total trip distance. Employees who work for different employers, as well as
non-emPloyed people, are included within this definition as long as they are in the
vehicle for the majority of the total trip distance.
"Commute Trip: The trip made by an employee from home-to-work or work-to-
home. The commute trip may include stops between home and the work site.
Page 2
Comoressed Work Week: A regular full-time work schedule which climinates at'
least one round-trip commute trip (both home-to-work and work-to-home) at least
once every ~vo (2) weeks. Examples include, but are not limited to, working
three twelve-hour days (3/36), four ten-hour days (4/40) within a one week
period, or eight nine-hour days and one eight-hour day (9./80) wkhin a two week
period.
.C. owanute Alternatives: Carpooling, vanpooling, transit, bi~-ycling, walking, and
tclecommufing.
Employee: Any person working for an employer for either wages or
salary, including part-time, seasonal and limited term employees. The term
excludes independent contractors.
EmPlOy_e_r: Any public or privatc cmploycr, including thc City, with a permanent
place of business in the City.
Employer Trip Reduction Progr~rn: A program developed and implemented by
the employer to provide information, assistance, incentives or other measures for
employees to increase commute alternat'rve use, increase the number o£ employees
using Alternative Work Hours Program and decrease the number of trips made
inside the peak period.
Flexible-WorkHours: A system for shifting the workday of an employee so that
the workday starts and/or ends outside oft. he peak periods.
Level of'Service: A measure of the percentage o£ capacity of a roadway or
intersection being used during the peak hour, as determined by the City Engineer,
and in accordance with the definition contained in the Highway Capacity Manual,
I-IR.B Special Report 87.
Peak Hour Periods. Peak Hour. and_P_~ak Periods: The hours from 7:30 a.m. to
8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. during work days for calculating peak hour
vehicle reduction.
Single-Occupancy Vehicle: A motor vehicle occupied by one (1) person.
Survey: A form designed to ascertain employee commute information in order
calculate peak hour vehicle reduction, for the work site.
Telecommutlng: A system of working at home or at an off-site, non-home
tcl¢commut¢ facility for the full work day on a regular basis for at least one day
per week.
Page 3
Trans_o_clCcation Coordinator: A management employee who is responsible For the
implementation of the TSM Program and for fulfilling the conditions of the
City/Employer Participation Agreement. The Transportation Coordinator is also
a member of the Transportation Committee.
T.r_ansportation Committee: Thc Transportation Committee shall consist of'
Transportation Coordinators from each employer enrolled in the TtM Program
and the City TtM Coordinator, a representative from each of the following may
participate: any transit authority serving Plcasanton, Business Parks, Pleasanton
Chamber of Commerce, and the Pleasanton Downtown Association. The
Transportation Committee shall participate in any and all programs necessary to
coordinate and implement citywide TSM efforts.
Qo
!¢'am~ool: A vehicle occupied by seven (7) to fifteen (15) cmployees including thc
driver who commute together To work for the majority of their individual
commute trip distance. Employees who work for different employers are included
within this definition as long as they are in the vehicle for the majority of'their
individual trip distance.
~: Any place o£employment, base of operation or predominant location
of the employer including multiple buildings or facilities occupied by thc same
employer within the City. A temporary building construction site is excluded
from this definition:
17.24.030 Particip_a_tion_ Agreement. Every existing or'future employer with 75
or more employees wishing to enroll in the TSM program shall enter into a Participation
Agreement with the City of Pleasanton to do the following:
Develop an employer trip reduction program plan designed to achieve the purpose
of this Ordinance. Develop cooperatively with the City reasonable and ambitious
trip 'reduction goals with thc goals to be based on a variety of criteria, which may
include employee commute patterns and times and the corporate environment. A
copy of the plan shalt be filed with the City of Plcasanton.
· Every other year each employer shall ~ during the month of May, conduct an
employee transportation survey at the work site. This survey will provide the
employer with monitoring, planning and marketing information to help develop
an effective trip reduction program. The aggregate results of the employer survey
as well as progress toward the employer's goal shall be shared with the City.
Within 30 days following enrollment in the TSM Program, the employer
shall appoint a management level employee as the Transportation
Coordinator.
Page 4
The Transportation Coordinator shall represent the employer as a member o£the
Transportation Committee.
17.24.040 City's Participa_t-ipn. The City is committed to providing support,
guidance and assistance to employers who enroll in the TSM Program. City shall:
Appoint a City TSM Coordinator who will coordinate and staff the
Transportation Committee, provide direct support to employers and
citywide TSM program.
manage the
B. Develop and provide marketing materials.
Form and support the Transportation Committee that will provide
networking opportunities, information sharing, help in designing TSM programs,
and participation in applying for grants.
D. Offer training for the Transportation Coordinator.
Coordinate and/or conduct on-site events.
F. Conduct one to two major membemtfip-wide events per year.
Sponsor employer recognition through awards, TSM newsletter and local
newspaper articles.
D~,elo p TSM program guides (e.g. preferential parking, telecommuting,
alternative work hours, etc.)
L Operate a Guaranteed Ride Home program for participating employers,
17.24.050 Transportation Committee - The Transportation Committee shall be
formed and shall participate in any and all programs necessary to coordinate and
implement citywide TSM efforts in order to achieve as congestion-free circulation system
as feasible. The Transportation Committee shall hold its first meeting within 60 days
following thc effective date of this ordinance, and shall continue to meet on a regularly
scheduled basis, as determined by the Transportation Committee."
Section 3:
The ordinance shall be published once within fifteen (15) days after ks adoption in
"¥alley Times," a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of
Pleasanton, and the complete Ordinance shall be posted for fifteen (15) days in the
City Clerk's office within fifteen (15) days after its adoption.
Section 4:
This Ordinance ghall be effective thirty 00) days after its passage and adoption.
Page 5
INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council o£ the City oi'Pleasanton on March 4,
1997.
ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the CityCouncil of the City of Pleasanton on March 18, 1997.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Councilmembers - Ayala, Dennis, Michelotti, and Mayor Tarver
None
Councilmember Pico
None
Michael H. Roush, City Attorney
Page 6
ORDINANCE NO. 301
ORDINANCE OF TIlE CITY OF SAN RAMON
REPEALING CHAPTER VII, TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT OF
DIVISION B-8, OF TI-IE MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADDING CHAPTER VI TO
DIVISION B-8 ESTABLISHING A VOLUNTARY TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
/.5
· THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAMON DOES ORDAIN as follows:
Section 1. The City Council finds that:
(a)
There continues to be an increase in new employment and housing opportunities
in San Ramon and the San Ramon Valley;
(b)
Transportation System Management (TSM) Programs have the potential to
reduce vehicle trips and vehicle emissions more efficiently and cost-effectively
than major roadway improvements;
(c)
For many years prior to the passage of Measure C, local jurisdictions developed
and implemented a variety of projects and programs, e.g., operation of transit
systems, construction of bicycle facilities, land use policy coordination and
related improvements;
(d)
Since 1992, the Contra Costa Transportation Authority has committed both
Measure C and Transportation Fund for Clean Air (TFCA) funds to four
Subarea programs, for the implementation of Measure C and Clean Air Plan
goals;
(e)
The Countywide Comprehensive Transportation Plan iI~c0rpora[e~ egc..h_
Regional Committee's Action Plan for Routes of Regional Significance, which
support specific TSM goals and objectives;
(f)
Over the past four years, the subarea, TSM.,programs havebeen successful in
reducing vehicle' trips and emissions at' the employment sites specified in-the
TSM ordinance, as well as in school and residential~aeeas where programs~ have
been implemented;
Ordinance No. 301
(g)
In adopting this Ordinance cooperation and coordination with other local
jurisdictions and regions in TSM are acknowledged as having the potential to
enhance the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of its efforts; accordingly the
Council directs staff to take steps to implement TSM in accordance with the
policies, goals and objectives set forth herein.
SectiOn 2. Chapter VII comprising Sections B8-101 through B8-120 of Division B-8
of the Municipal Code is repealed.
- Section 3. Chapter VI comprising Sections B8-101 and B8-102 are added to
Division B-8 of the Municipal Code to read:
Chapter VI
Transportation System Management
Section B8-101. Purpose, Goals and Objectives
In light of'state law prohibiting mandatory employer-based trip reduction requirements, the
following purposes, goals and objectives are adopted.
A. Purpose:
1. To promote maximum efficiency in the existing transportation system and to further the
transportation goals of the Measure C Growth Management Program, Contra Costa's
Congestion Management Program and the Bay Area Clean Air Plan by:
(a)
Promoting and encouraging the use of transit, ridesharing, bicycling, walking,
flexible work hours and telecommuting as alternatives to solo driving;
-2-
Ordinance No. 301
(c)
(d)
(e)
(fl
(g)
(h)
Incorporating these goals and objectives into the land use review and planning
process;
Developing proactive programs and/or projects either alone or in conjunction
with other jurisdictions, aimed at achieving these goals;
Considering the incorporation of appropriate technology designed to facilitate
traffic flow, provide transit and highway information, provide trip generation
alternatives, and related technology into the transportation system;
Educating San Ramon employees, employers, residents and students regarding
the benefits and availability of commute alternatives;
Working with the transit authorities to better serve San Ramon;
Encouraging the most cost-effective broad based and wide range of
transportation improvement projects aimed at achieving congestion relief;
Cooperating with other jurisdictions, the private sector, and transit operators in
planning and implementing transportation programs.
To reflect an ongoing commitment to expand TSM efforts beyond employer-based trip
reduction programs, in order to achieve traffic congestion management and air quality
goals.
To comply with applicable state and federal laws as well as with Measure C Growth
Management Program requirements pertaining to TSM.
-3-
Ordinance No. 301
B. Goals: The goal of this ordinance is to ensure the continuation of a proactive, but
voluntary, TSM program effort aimed at reducing vehicle trips, vehicle emissions and traffic
congestion in the most cost effective maimer.
Ce
Objective: The objective of this section is to establish the following policies:
1. To participate, in conjunction with other jurisdictions, in a proactive effort to
support and develop projects which will achieve the Measure C TSM goals as
described in the San Ramon'Action Plan, the Countywide Comprehensive
Transportation Plan, the Measure C Strategic Plan, the Congestion Management
Plan and/or the Bay Area Clean Air Plan. Such participation may include, but
need not be limited to:
(a) Promotion and encouragement of the use of transit, ridesharing,
bicycling, walking, flexible work hours, telecommuting or other
alternatives to solo driving;
(b) Project incorporation appropriate technology designed to facilitate traffic
flow, provide transit highway information and related technology.
To incorporate these objectives, as appropriate, into the City land use review
and planning process.
-4-
Ordinance No. 301
Section B8-102 TSM AdviSory Committee. The San Ramon TSM Advisory Committee is
established to provide a unique opportunity for the private/public sector to work together toward
reducing traffic congestion and achieving cleaner air for its business community, residents and
schools.
(a)
Composition. The TSM Advisory Committee shall be composed of the following:
1. One (1) representative of the Transportation Committee of the City Council
(non-voting member);
2. The San Ramon Transportation Analyst;
3. Five members appointed by the City Council, each representing an employer or
complex.
Co)
(c)
Term and Termination of Office. The term of office for each member shall be two
(2) calendar years, or portion thereof, ending on December 31 of the second year.
Members may be reappointed for consecutive terms. Termination of office shall be
according to by-laws developed by the TSM Advisory Committee and approved by the
City Council.
Meetings. As a part of its by-laws, the TSM Advisory Committee shall establish
regularly scheduled dates and times for its meeting, and shall promulgate rules for the
conduct of this meeting including attendance requirements.
-5-
Ordinance No. 301
(d)
Function, The TSM Advisory Committee may develop and recommend programs to
coordinate and implement the City-wide Voluntary Employer Based Trip Reduction
effort.
(1) The TDM Advisory Committee shall develop programs'and make
recommendations to:
a. Coordinate TSM efforts of all employers and complexes in the City of
San Ramon;
b. Coordinate TSM efforts with local and regional agencies as designated
by the City;
c. Seek the cooperation and assistance of neighboring communities in
achieving TSM goals.
(2)
The TDM Advisory Committee may make recommendations on other activities
which may include, but not limited to, the following:
a. Encourage and promote ali transit services betWeen the complexes,
downtown and the transit stops;
b. Compile, distribute and annually update Ridesharing materials;
c. Plan any TSM Program element; and,
d. Improvements in City services and facilities to assist employers in meeting
the goals of this voluntary TSM Ordinance.
-6-
Ordinance No. 301
/5
Section 4. If any subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any
reason held by a court of competent jurisdiction to- be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it
would have passed this section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase hereof irrespective of the
fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases are held invalid.
Section 5. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days from the date of its
passage. Before the expiration of fifteen (15) days after its passage, this Ordinance shall be
posted in three public places within the City of San Ramon along with the names of the
members of the City Council voting for and against same.
-7-
Ordinance No. 301
The foregoing Ordinance was introduced at the meeting of the City Council on June 9,
1998 and after public hearing was adopted at the meeting of the City Council of the City of San
Ramon on June 23, 1998 by the following vote:
AYES:
Councilmembers Athan, Hudson, Kinney, Raab and Mayor Welm
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Hermann Welm, Mayor
ATTEST:
g\transp/res/tsmord.rev
-8-