HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 7.1 VillagePkwyLewisDesign CITY CLERK #820-20
AGENDA STATEMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 3, 2002
SUBJECT: Conceptual Design for Intersection Improvements at Village
Parkway and Lewis Avenue (Downtown Streetscape Improvement
Implementation Plan)
Report Prepared by: Janet Harbin, Senior Planner ~
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Conceptual Design for Intersection Improvements
2. Cost Estimate for Improvements
3. City Council Agenda Statement dated July 2, 2002
RECOMMENDATION: 1. Receive Staff report
2. Approve Conceptual Design for Intersection Improvements
(Attachment 1)
3. Authorize preparation of construction/bid documents for
improvement plans
FINANCIAL STATEMENT: The funding for the improvement project and the related consultant
services is included in existing funds alloCated in Capital
Improvement Program Project #94060 for FY 2002-2003 (for
detailed information on funding, see section of report addressing this
issue below).
DESCRIPTION:
In November 1999, the City Council directed staff to prepare three Specific Plans for various portions of
the downtown area of Dublin to guide the development and revitalization of the West Dublin BART,
Downtown Core and Village Parkway areas. The Specific Plans were adopted by the City Council on
December 19, 2000. As part of the implementation of the three downtown Specific Plans adopted by the
City Council, streetscape improvements are necessary in the West Dublin BART, Downtown Core and
Village Parkway Specific Plan areas to provide continuity and unifying elements to establish a positive
image in the downtown area. Prior to construction o£these improvements, the basic designs for the
streetscapes, plazas, monuments, gateways, and street furnishings associated with the downtown planning
area were to be determined, cost estimates obtained, and a phasing plan with priorities developed based on
direction from the City Council.
The City's consultant for this project, Dave Evans of Singer Fukushima Evans, Inc. presented this
'information to the City Council at its meeting on May 1, 2001. The City Council determined that the
COPIES TO: In-House Distribution
Singer Fukushima Evans
G:\Downtown Streetscape Imp\CC-sr2 ConcptVP&Lewislnterlmprv.doc / ~ ~d
initial priorities for improvement of the streetscape in the downtown area should be focused on
establishing a gateway monument at the northwest comer of Village Parkway and Dublin Boulevard
which is an entryway to the downtown, a gateway arch at St. Patrick Way and Amador Plaza Road, and
intersection imProvements at Village Parkway and Lewis Avenue.
Previous City Council Action: At the City Council meeting on July 2, 2002, consideration of the d~sign
of the intersection improvements at Village Parkway and Lewis Avenue was continued by the City
Council until the consultant and Staff resolved some issues related to the improvements' design. The
major issue to be resolved in the design of the intersection improvements was to maintain the ability for
vehicles to make U-tums at the intersection. There was a concern that the design of the concrete bulb-outs
at the pedestrian crossings would eliminate the U-turn movement. The City Council wanted to insure that
motorists could easily reach all businesses located on Village Parkway. The City Council also directed
Staff to notify business and property owners in the Village Parkway area of the planned improvements.
This report addresses the modified conceptual design for the intersection improvements at Village
Parkway and Lewis Avenue. Staff is requesting that the City Council approve the conceptual design of
the improvement project so that Staff can begin the preparation of construction and bid documents.
Modified Conceptual Design: Since the July 2nd City Council meeting, the Community Development
and Public Works Department Staff and the consultant, Dave Evans of Singer Fukushima Evans, Inc.,
have developed a conceptual design for the intersection improvements which allows U-turns at the
intersection of Village Parkway and Lewis Avenue (see Attachment 1, Conceptual Design for
Imp?ovements), and also includes the addition of certain features to promote pedestrian activity on Village
Parkway such as bulb-outs, bollards, a small plaza with landscaping and paving, and better defined
crosswalks. Additionally, businesses and property owners on Village Parkway and Lewis Avenue in the
Village Parkway Specific Plan area were sent courtesy notices of this City Council meeting to consider
the conceptual design of the intersection improvements.
Over the past several months, the consultant has been working with the Community Development and
Public Works Department Staff to develop alternative designs for the intersection improvements at Lewis
Avenue at Village Parkway. A description and details of previously reviewed alternative designs are
included in Attachment 3, Agenda Statement dated July 2, 2002, The Conceptual Design that has been
developed consists of bulb-outs for a modified pedestrian crossing, new sidewalk, curbs and gutters, a
new easier to identify pedestrian crosswalk, a plaza on the northeasterly comer of the intersection with
paving, seating, and landscaping, and other related minor improvements. Although other conceptual
design alternatives were developed and considered during the design process (see Attachment 3), the
design in Attachment 1 provided the most comprehensive design solution for the intersection
improvements by providing a reasonable amount of amenities such as landscaping and lighting within the
constraints of the project budget, and also allows vehicular turning movements to continue without
physical restrictions.
The estimated cost for construction of the conceptual improvements is included in Attachment 2, and is
estimated at $241,482 by the consultant, The consultant will make a short presentation of the proposed
design for the intersection improvements at the City Council meeting.
Implementation of Village Parkway Specific Plan: The Village Parkway Specific Plan includes goals
and objectives for the Village Parkway plalming area to provide direction for private and public
development to implement the overall vision for this portion of the downtown. The intent of the
streetscape improvement project for the intersection at Village Parkway and Lewis Avenue is to
implement the following goals and objectives of the Specific Plan by constructing physical improvements
such as bulb-outs or bump-outs, a raised crosswalk, and a plaza that create a more accessible and
pedestrian-friendly commercial environment:
Goal 4: Create Public spaces within the Specific Plan area for people to enjoy while using area
shops and services.
Objective 4. !: A village square and/or plaza should be developed within the Specific Plan
area.
Goal 6: Traffic volumes and vehicular speed on Village Parkway shall be controlled to allow for
improved access to individual businesses and to encourage a friendlier environment.
Objective 6.2: Develop and implement measures to decrease vehicular speed using Village
Parkway. Appropriate traffic calming measures to be incorporated into the design of
Village Parkway include bump-outs and raised crossings.
Goal 7: Create a more pedestrian-friendly environment for Village Parkway to attract shoppers.
Objective 7. 4: Improved pedestrian connections should be considered between uses on
Village Parkway, including new pedestrian crosswalks along Village Parkway between
Dublin Boulevard and Amador Valley Boulevard, improved signs warning motorists of
pedestrian activity and improved sidewalks.
Budget/Capital Improvement Program Funding: The funding for the improvements and plaza at the
intersection of Village Parkway and Lewis Avenue is allocated in the fiscal year 2002-2003 Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) budget for the Downtown Streetscape Improvement Implementation Plan,
CIP Project #94060. The CIP contains $170,500 for the bulb-outs and pedestrian crossing improvements,
and $114,875 for the plaza improvements, including the necessary land acquisition at the northeast comer
of Village Parkway and Lewis Avenue. The total funding allocated in the CIP for this portion of the
Downtown project is $285,375. This amount also includes monies for completion of the design and
construction documents.
Other CIP Projects for Village Parkway: The CIP contains other projects to be implemented along
Village Parkway which will be coordinated with and complement the improvements proposed for the
intersection project. The following projects are included in the CIP budget and will be constructed within
this fiscal year (FY 2002-2003):
· An improved left-turn lane at the Village Pkwy./Lewis Ave. intersection
· A monument at the intersection of Village Pkwy./Dublin Blvd. (a design will be
recommended to the City Council by the Task Force in October 2002)
· Enhancement of the Village Parkway Median landscaping
· Traffic Signal upgrade at Village Pkwy./Amador Valley Blvd.
Additionally, two studies, a Pedestrian Bridge Feasibility Study for Dublin Boulevard at Golden Gate
Drive and an arborist's assessment of the trees on Village Parkway, are included in the CIP budget for the
Downtown Streetscape Implementation Plan and will be presented to the City Council in early October
2002. Staff has reviewed the draft studies and submitted comments to the consultant for incorporation in
the final documents.
CONCLUSION:
Of the design alternatives considered by the consultant and Staff, the proposed plan for the intersection
improvements at Lewis Avenue and Village Parkway shown in Attachment 1 is the most comprehensive
and most cost effective design, providing both pedestrian crossing improvements and plaza design
elements, including textured paving, landscaping and irrigation. This Conceptual Design will meet the
goals of the Village Parkway Specific Plan relative to creation of a more pedestrian-friendly environment
and a public space/plaza at the intersection. As the CIP budget for FY 2002-2003 contains a total
allocation of $285,375 for both aspects of this particular project, the Conceptual Design is within the
budget allocated for the land acquisition and construction of the planned improvements at approximately
$241,482.
Based on the comprehensiveness of the design of the proposed improvements and the cost allocated for
the project in the CIP budget for the Downtown Streetscape Improvement Implementation Plan, Staff
recommends that the City Council approve the basic design for the Village Parkway/Lewis Avenue
intersection improvements as shown in Attach2rnent 1. Following Council direction on the project, the
consultant could then be directed to go forward with completion of the construction and bid documents at
this time. These documents would be brought back to the City Council in a few months for authorization
to commence the bid process.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council receive Staff report, approve the Conceptual Design for the
Intersection Improvements as shown in Attachment 1, and direct Staff to authorize the consultant to
prepare construction and bid documents.
G:\Downtown Streetscape Implem\CC-sr2 ConcptVP&Lewislnterlmprv.doc
PROPOSED SHADE TREE, NEW 8' BENCH,
PROPOSED -- <~' ~
RELOCA'IE [XISTiNG
CITY STANDARD CONCRETE
CURB INLET. ~'~,.~,'~.~ LO?
r~'~, ~--- - ,-,.PROPOSED CONCRETE
EXISTING SIGNAL PAVEMENT
TO REMAIN,
EXIS3ING CURB
TO REMAIN. TYP. EXIS'I1NG SIGNAL-.~
'r~ .. / ,.' TO REMAIN, TYP.
NEW CI1Y STANDARD CURB INLET.
CATCE BASIN.
\
PAVEMENT
.... ~,, Ii AW^CN .Ew ~.O~ED CO~CR~E
DUBLIN PLANNING
urben design
I a n d s c a p e VILLAGE PARK'~AY AT LEWIS AVENUE
a~chlt sot-re INTERSECTION IlvIPROVEMENTS
~' ~ ~ ~' '~ ~ "~' ~ ~ ~ CONCEPTU~ DESIGN FOR ~NTERSECT]ON ]~RO~NTS
Mobilization 1 Allow $5,054.60 $5~054.60
Land Acquisition 425 SF $35.00 $14,875.00
Remove Existing Concrete Curb & Gutter 162' LF $10.00 $1,620.00
Remove Existing Asphalt Pavement 1450 SF $4.00 $5,800.00
Remove Existing Concrete Sidewalk 897 SF $8.00 $7,176.00
Re-Grade Street & Sidewalk 1977 SF $2.50 $4,942.50
Adjust Existing Utility Box to Grade 9 EA $225.00 $2,025.00
Relocate Existing Business Sign 1 EA $7,500.00 $7,500.00
Temporary Construction Area Signs 1 Allow $1,500.00 $1,500.00
Temporary Traffic Mitigation & Control 1 Allow $3,165.00 $3,165.00
New Crosswalk Signal 1 EA $4,000.00 $4,000.00
New Catch Basin & Pipe 1 EA $7,000.00 $7,000.00
New Curb Inlet & Pipe 3 EA' $6,500.00 $19,500.00
New Concrete Curb & Gutter 205 LF $18.00 $3,690.00
.New Asphalt Pavement w/AB (Patch Work) 500 SF $3.00 $1,500.00
New Concrete Pvmt. w/AB 2297 SF $9.00 $20,673.00
Curb Ramp 6 EA $2,200.00 $13,200.00
New Metal Bollard 7 EA $950.00 $6,650.00
New Metal Bollards w/Lights 8 EA $1,200.00 $9,600.00
8' Bench 2 EA $1,500.00 $3,000.00
New Thermoplastic Crosswalks 187 LF $30.00 $5,610.00
New Shade Tree (36" Box) 4 EA $1,200.00 $4,800.00
New Groundcover 264 SF $2.50 $660.00
Irrigation System 1 Allow $20,000.00 $20,000.00
Subtotal $173,541.10
General Conditions (15%) $26,031.16.
Subtotal $199,572.26
Contractor Overhead & Profit (10%) $19,957.23
$219,529.49
Construction Contingency (10%) $21,952.95
Total Construction Cost $241,482.43
ATTACHMENT
AGENDA STATEMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July'2, 2002
SUBJECT: Conceptual Alternatives for Intersection Improvements at Village
Parkway and Lewis Avenue (Downtown Streetscape Improvement
Implementation Plan)
Report Prepared by: Janet Harbin, Senior Planner ~r/
ATTACHMENTS: '1. Conceptual Alternative A with attached Cost Estimate
2. Conceptual Alternative B with attached Cost Estimate
3. Conceptual Alternative C (Preferred Alternative) with
attached Cost Estimate
RECOM1VIENDATION: 1. Receive Staff report
. Direct Staff on selected Conceptual Alternative (Preferred
Conceptual Alternative C in Attachment 3)
3. Authorize preparation of construction/bid documents for
improvement plans
FINANCIAL STATEMENT: The funding for the improvement project and the related consultant
services is included in existing funds allocated in Capital
Improvement Program Project #94060 for FY 2002-2003 (for
detailed.information on funding, see section of report addressing this
issue below).
DESCRIPTION:
In November 1999, the City Council directed staffto prepare three Specific Plans for various portions of
the downtown area of Dublin to guide the development and revitalization of the West Dublin BART,
Downtown Core and Village Parkway areas. The Specific Plans 'were adopted by the City Council on
December 19, 2000. As a part of the implementation of the three downtown Specific Plans adopted by the
City CoUncil on December 19, 2000, streetscape improvements.are necessary in the West Dublin BART,
Downtown Core and Village Parkway Specific Plan areas to provide continuity and' unifying elements to
establish a positive image in the downtown area. Prior to construction of these improvements, the basic
designs for the streetscapes, plazas, monuments, gateways, and street furnishings associated with the
downtown planning area were to be determined, cost estimates obtained, and a phasing plan with
priorities developed based on direction from the City CoUncil.
~~~O.~i--H6~e Di~b-gtion
Singer Fukushima Evans
ITEM NO.
G:Wowntown Streetseape Imp\CC-st ConcptVP&Lewislntersection .doc A r~ICS~~ ~
The City's consultant for this project, Dave Evans of Singer Fukushima Evans, Inc. presented this ,
information to the City Councit at its meeting on May I, 2001. The City Council determined that the
initial priorities· for improvement of the streetscape in the.downtown area should be focused on ~
establishing a gateway monument at the northwest comer of Village Parkway and Dublin Boulevard
which is an entryway to the downtown, a. gateway arch at St. Patrick Way and Amador Plaza Road, and
intersection improvements at Village Parkway and Lewis Avenue.
This report addresses the conceptual design alternatives for the intersection improvements at Village
Parkway and Lewis Avenue. Staff is requesting direction from the City Council on.the preferred
ConcepV~a! Alternative for the improvement project to begin preparation of construction and bid
documents.
Implementation of Village Parkway Specific Plan: The Village Parkway Specific Plan includes goals
and objectives for the Village Parkway planning.area.to provide direction for private and public
development to. implement the overall vision f°r this portion of the downtown. The intent of the
streetscape improvement project, for the intersection at Village Parkway and Lewis Avenue is to
implement the following goals and objectives Of the Specific Plan by constructing physical improvements
such as bulb-outs or bump-outs, a raised crosswalk, .and a plaza that createa more accessible and
pedestrian-friendly commercial environment:
Goal 4: Create ·Public spaces within the Specific Plan area for people to enjoy while using area
shops and services.
Objective 4.1: A village square and/or plaza should be developed within the Specific Plan
Goal 6: Traffic volumes and vehicular speed on. Village Parkway shall be controlled to allow for
improved access to individual businesses and,to encourage a friendlier environment.
Objective 6. 2: Develop and implement measures to decrease vehicular speed using Village
Parkway. Appropriate traffic calming measures to be incorporated into the design of
Village Parkway include bump-outs and raised crossings.
Goal 7: Create a more pedestrian-friendly environment for Village Parkway to attract shoppers.
Objective 7. 4: Improved pedestrian connections should be considered between uses on
Village Parkway, including new pedestrian crosswalks along Village Parkway between
Dublin Boulevard and Amador Valley Boulevard, improved signs warning motorists of
pedestrian activity and improved sidewalks.
Budget/Capital Improvement Program Funding: The funding for the improvements and plaza at the
intersection of Village Parkway and Lewis Avenue is allocated in the fiscal year 2002-2003 Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) budget for the Downtown Streetscape Improvement Implementation Plan,
CIP Project #94060. The CIP contains $170,500 for the bulb-outs and pedestrian crossing improvements,
and $114,875 for the plaza improvements, including the necessary land acquisition at the northeast comer
of Village Parkway and Lewis Avenue. The total funding allocated in the CIP for this portion of the
Downtown project is $285,375. This amount also includes monies for completion of the design and
construction documents.
Concept. Alternatives for Intersection lmpro~ement Design: .Over the past several months, Dave
Evans of Singer Fukushima Evans, Inc. has been working with the Community Development and Public
Works Staff to develop three alternative designs for the intersection improvements at Lewis Avenue at
Village Parkway. Each alternative consists of bulb-outs for a modified pedestrian crossing, new sidewalk,
.curbs and gutters, a new easier to identify pedestrian'~i)~'~aik, a plaza~ on the northeasterly comer of the ~'~/~--
mtersectgon with paving and seating, and other related minor improvements. The concept alternatives that
.hive been developed vary in the extent of the proposed improvements to be constructed and other
amenities such as the mount of landscaping and lighting. Additionally, with the varying degree of
improvements, the estimated cost of each concept changes. The consultant will make a short presentation
of the design alternatives for the intersection improvements at the City Council meeting.
Summarized below are the differences between the three alternatives; Concept Alternatives A, B and C.
Concept Alternative A has the highest estimated cost of approximately $310,000 and would provide the
most physical amenities and features of all the alternatives, whereas Concept Alternative B is the lowest in
estimated cost at approximately $132,000 but provides the least mount of amenities and features (such as
no landscaping, irrigation and a smaller seatwall). The estimated cost of Concept Alternative C is
$204,000 which is at the midpoint of the cost range for all the design alternatives.
COMP~SON OF ALTERNATIVES FOR INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
VITJ,AGE PARKWAY & LEWIS AVENUE
Alternative Amenities Land Acquisition Estimated Cost (Approx.)
CONCEPTUAL · New concrete paving & sidewalk Requires acquisition $310,000
ALTERNATIVE A (4011 sq.f0 of 425 sq.ft, of
· New catch basins -'4 private property
· New bench
· New plaza w/concrete seatwall
(45 linear ft.)
· New arbor w/vines & shrubs
· New irrigation system
· Relocation of Waffic signals &
business signage ·
CONCEPTUAL · New concrete paving & sidewalk No acquisition $132,000
ALTERNATIVE B (1975 sq.ft.) required
· New catch basins -2
· New plaza w/concrete seatwall
(20 linear ft.),
CONCEPTUAL · New concrete paving & sidewalk Requires acquisition $204,000
ALTERNATIVE C (1975 sq. ft.) of 425 sq.ft. Of
· New catch basins - 2 private property
· New plaza w/concrete seatwall
(60 linear ft.)
· New shade tree, groundcover,
flowers
· New irrigation system
· Relocation of traffic signals &
business signage
Preferred Concept Alternative C: Of the three Concept Altematives developed by the consultant, the
...................... pr~e£erre~._t!I_~._for the..intersection-'an:provements atLewis Avenue..andVillage Parkway is Concept
Alternative C. The plan for this alternative is the most comprehensive in design and the most cost
effective alternative, providing both pedestrian crossing improvements and plaza design elements with
landscaping and irrigation. The conceptual design of this altemative will meet the goals of the Village
Parkway Specific P1an relative to creation of a more pedestrian-friendly environment and a public ~ ~
spaCe/plaza at the intersection. As the CIP bUdget for FY 2002-2003 contains a total allocation of-
$285,3 75 for both aspects of this particular project, ConCept Alternative C is within the budget allocated
for the land acquisition and the planned improvements at approximately $204,000.
CONCLUSION:
Based on the comprehensiveness oft he design of the proposed improvements and the cost allocated for
the project in the CIP budget for the Downtown Streetscape Improvement Implementation Plan, Staff
recommends that the City, council select the Preferred Alternative, Concept Alternative C, for the basic
design for the' Village Parkway/Lewis Avenue intersection improvements. Following Council direction
on the' project, the consultant could then-be directed to go forward with completion of the construction and
bid documents at this time. These documents would be brought back to the City Council in September for
authorization to commence the bid process.
RECOMMENDATION: "
Staff recommends that the City Council receive Staff report, select the Preferred Concept Alternative C,
and direct Staff to authorize the consultant to prepare construction and bid documents.
A~bor *Exist. Catch Basin
w/Seating
~ ~ ~ist. Flagter
Exist. Catch Basin .
Relocate ~is~ ~c Signal
~ Disabled Ramp (Typ.) . .
. " Concept A
~or~'. 1 Altow ' $3,093'.00 $3,093.00
Land Acquisition' 425 SF $35.00 $14,875.00
Remove ExiSting Concrete Curb & Gutter' 169 LF $t0.00 $1~690.00
¥,. Existing Asphalt 'Pavement 2395 SF $4.00 $9,340'.00
Remove Existing Concrete Sidewalk 825.. SF $8.00 $6,600,00
Re-Grade Street & SideWalk' 4011 · SF $2.50 . $10,027.50
Adjust Existing Utility Box to Grade. 1.1 EA · $225.00 . $2,475.00 .
Relocate Existing Business Sign I FA, $4,500.00 $4,500.00
Temporary construction Area Signs I Allow $500.00
Temporary Traffic Mitigation & Control 1 Allow $3,165.00. $3,1.65.00.
Relocate Existing Traffic Signals 3 EA . $4,000.00 $,12,000.00
Relocate Existing Mast-Arm Traffic Signals I EA $10,000.00 $10,000.00
New Catch Basins.& Pipe 4 EA $5,000.00 $20,.000.00
New COncrete Curb & Gutte~' 260 -.' LF $18.00 $4,680.00
New Asphalt' Pavement w/AB .. 500 SF $3.00 $1.500.00
New Concrete Print. w/AB 40I'1. SF $9.00 $36,099.00
Concrete Seatwafl 45 LF $200.00' $9,000.00
New Arbor . 450 SF $30.00 $13,500.00
New Concrete Disabled Ramp 8 EA $2,500.00 $15,000.00
New Trash Receptacle 1 EA $1,200.00 $1,200.00
New Metal Bollard 20 EA $950.00 $19,000.00
New Bench 3' EA $2,000.00 .$6,000.00
New Thermoplastic Crosswalks 155 LF $30.00. $4,650.00
New Vines & Shrubs 30 5 Gal. $45.00 $1.350.00
New Irri ~g~. titan System 1 Allow $12,500.00 $12,500.00
Subtotal $222,744.50
Contractor General Conditions (18%) $:$3,411.68.
Subtotal $256,1~J6.'i 8
Contractor Overhead & Profit (10%) $25,6t5.82
Subtotal -$28-t-,T7%79-
Construction Contingency (10%) $28,177.18
Total COnstruction Cost $309,948.97.
proposed Oatch Basin . L Catch BaSin
~ Proposed Catch Basin
~ ~. Village Parkway .
Concept B
MobiliZation I Atiow $1,422.00 $1,422.00
Existing Con.crate: Curb & Gutter 73 LF $10.00 1. $730.00
Remove
E~isting A~phalt Pavement 1665 SI= $4.00 $~6(~0.00
Remove Existing Concrete Sidewalk 490 SF $8.00 $3,920.00
Re-Grade Straet & Sidewalk 1975 SF $2.50 $4,.813.00
ust Existing Utility Box to Grade 8 EA $225.00 $1,800.00
Temporary Construction Area Signs 1 Allow $500.00 $50t~.00
Temporary Traffic MitigatiOn & Control 1 Allow $3,165.00 $3,185.00
Catch Basins & Pipe 2 EA $5,000.00 $10,000.00
10 INew Concrete Curb & Gutter 145 LF $18.00 $2;810.00
11 iNew Asphalt Pavement 'w/AB 500 SF $3.00 $1,500.00
12 New Concrete Print. w/AB 1975 SF $9.00 $17,775.00
13 New Pedestrian Grate .. 35 LF $45.00 $l,575.00
14 ~iew Concrete Seatwail 20 LF $200.00 $4,000;00
. 1'5 'New Concrete Disabled Ramp 6 EA $2,500.00 $15.000.00
16 NewMetal Bollard t4 EA $950.00 $13,300.00
17 New Trash Receptacle 1 EA $1,200.00 $I,200.00
18' New Thermoplastic Crosswalks 155 ' LF $30.00 $4,850.00
Subtotal $94,620.00 ·
' $14,193.00
Contractor General Conditions ('15%)
t Subtotal $108,813.00
Contractor Overhead & Profit (10%) $I 0,881.30
Subtotal $11.9,694.30
Construction Contingency (t 0%) $t 1,969.43 ·
Total Construction Cost $'131,663.73
:'.. . . .%~'~1~!~
"' - ~isflng Catch Basin ~
' ~p~st Conor~te Mn~er ~)
' ~ ' ~ ~' Flush ~ndition ~ E~e of Bulb-cut
~ ·
..
...
·
..
......
..'~.~" ~ ~= ~ .. ' ' ~'~ ~llage Pa~y ~ Lewis Avenue
.... · o ' pt
· . ,~ .. ~ . .
~-~ .~ . ~- ~ ~- ,,
~ ~: of ~wis Avenue Apdi 29~ 2002
Mobilization I Allow $2,742.00 $2,742.00
Land. Acquisition 425 SF $35.00' $14,875.00
Remove.Existing Concrete Curb & Gutter 73 LF $10.00 $730.00
Remove Existing Asphalt Pavement 1665 SF $4.00 $6,660.00
Remove Existing Concrete Sidewalk 490 SF $8.00 $3,920.00
Re-Grade Street & SideWalk 1975 SF $2.50 $4,813.00
Adjust Existing Utility Box to. Grade 8 EA $225.00 $1,800,00
Relocate Existing Business Sign 1 EA $4,500.00 $4,500.00
Relocate Existing Traffic Signal I EA $4,000.00 $4~000.00
Temporary Construction. Area Signs I Allow $500.00 $500.00
Temporary Traffic Mitigation & Control 1' Allow $3,165.00 $3,165.00
New Catch Basins & Pipe 2 EA $4,000.00 $8,000.00
New Concrete Gutter Band 145 LF $15.00 $2,175.00
!New Asphalt Pavement w/AB 500 'SF $3.00 $t,500.00
,New Concrete Print. w/AB 2425 SF $9.00 $21,825.00
New Pedestrian Grate 35 LF ~ $45.00 $1,575.00
New Concrete Seatwati 35 LF $200.00 $7,000.00
New Metal Boilard 10 EA $950.00 $9~500.00
New Precast Concrete Markers 8 EA . $2,500,00 $20,000.00'
.New 8' Bench 2 EA $t,500..00. $3,000.00
New Thermoplastic Crosswalks 155 LF . $20.00 $3,100.00
New Shade Tree (36"' Box) 4 EA $1,200.00 $4,800.00
New Groundcover 264 SF $2.50 $660.00
New Perennial Flowers 95 SF $2.50 $240.00
New ~rdgation System I At,ow $15;000.00 $1.5,000.00
Subtotal $146,080.00
Contractor General Conditions (15%) $21,912.00
$~67,992.00
Contractor Overhead & Profit (10%) $16,799.20
Construction Contingency (t0%) $18,479.t2
Total ConstruCtion Cost $203~270.32