HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 4.12 DevImpactFeeDepositCITY CLERK FILE # 300-20
AGENDA STATEMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 16, 2001
SUBJECT:
Annual Report of Developer Impact Fee Funds Deposits:
Pursuant to Government Code Sections 66001, 66006 and 66008
(AB 1600)
Report Prepared by: Carole A Perry, Administrative Services
Director and Fred Marsh, Finance Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Annual Report of Developer Impact Fee Funds.Deposits
2. Resolution Making Findings Regarding Unexpended
Developer Deposits For Public Improvements
/~Accept the reports and adopt the Resolution
FINANCIAL STATEMENT:
All Developer Deposits are anticipated to be utilized for the purpose
for which they were originally collected.
DESCRIPTION: A City is authorized under State Law to require development applicants to
contribute fees toward off-site improvements, which are needed as a result of the new development. The
report in Attachment 1 provides information related to the status of these funds from July 1, 1999 through
June 30, 2000.
Requirements of Law
The law requires the City to review on an annual basis the status of development mitigation fees collected.
Staff previously made available to the public a draft copy of this report on December 29, 2000. In the
event that any fees remain unexpended for more than five years, the City Council must adopt a Resolution
making certain findings. In the event that findings are not made to support the retention of the funds, the
unexpended fees must be returned to the current owners of the subject property.
Maior Components of Rel~ort
Liability accounts have been established for each of the City's impact fees and Downtown Traffic
Mitigation Contributions. The information presented in the attachments to this report identify the' status
of developer contributions. The ending impact fee balances shown in this report match the amounts
shown on the City Financial Records and reported in the City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
for Fiscal Year 1999-2000.
Section #1 of Attachment 1 contains an outline of the various disclosure requirements relating to impact
fees and shows which attachments contain the required information.
Section #2 of Attachment 1 identifies those contributions which have remained unexpended for more than
five years, discussed and summarized by project below:
COPIES TO:
GAImpact Fees'~Ab 1600 - Impact FeesXFY 9900x, AGENDA.DOC
ITEM NO.
Project Name
St. Patrick Way - Regional to Golden Gate
Dougherty Road - Noah of
Amador Valley Boulevard
Village Parkway Traffic Signals
Unexpended Developer
Deposit Balances
as of June 30, 2000
$73,258
$8,245
$34,142
Section #3 of Attachment 1 contains a breakdown of the accounts as of June 30, 2000. In 1999-2000,
interest was allocated to the impact fee funds based upon the average month end cash balances in each
fund.
Section #4 of Attachment 1 was prepared in order to meet the disclosure requirements under section
66006 of the California Government Code. This section of the law requires that the report shows the
percentage of the costs of each public improvement that will be funded by impact fees as compared to
other funding sources.
Pronosed Resolution Makinff Necessary. Findings
In order to retain funds longer than five years certain findings must be made by the City Council. Staff
has identified the findings necessary as part of the attached Resolution (Attachment 2). Adoption of the
Resolution allows the City to continue to retain the fees discussed earlier in the report, to fund the projects
for which they were collected.
Staff would recommend that the City Council accept the attached reports and adopt the attached
Resolution (Attachment 2).
City of Dublin
Annual Report of Developer Impact Fee Funds Deposits
For the Year Ended June 30, 2000
ATTACHMENT 1
IMPACT FEE DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS
Government Code
Section
66006 (b) (A)
66006 (b) (B)
66006 (b) (C)
66006 (b) (D)
66006 (b) (E)
66006 (b) (G)
66006 (b) (H)
Requirement
Provide the following:
1. A brief description of each of the City's impact fees.
2. The amount charged for the City's impact fees.
3. The beginning and ending balance for the City's
impact fee accounts.
4. The amount of fees collected and interest earned.
An identification of each public improvement on
which fees were expended and the amount of the
expenditures on each improvement, including the
total percentage of the cost of the public
improvement that was funded with fees.
A description of each interfund transfer or loan
made from the account or fund, including the public
improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees
will be expended, and, in the case of an interfund'
loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid, and
the rate of interest that the account or fired will
receive on the loan.
The amount of refunds made pursuant to
subdivision (e) of Section 66001 and any allocations
pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 66001.
At the time the local agency imposes a fee for
public improvements on a specific development
project, it shall identify the public improvement that
the fee will be used to finance.
A determination that there is a reasonable
relationship between the fees' use and the type of
development project on which the fee is imposed.
10. A determination that there is a reasonable
relationship between the need for the public facility
and the type of.project on which the fee is imposed.
See Disclosure At
Section 2, Part A
Section 2, Part B
Section 3
Section 3
Sections 3 and 4
Section 2, Part C
Section 3
Section 2, Part B
Section 2, Part B
Section 2, Part B
G:Xlmpact VeesXAb1600 - Impact VeesXFY 9900\OUTLINE.DOC ATTACHMENT 1, SECTION 1
IMPACT FEE DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS
Government Code
Section
66001 (d) (1)
66001 (d) (2) b.
66001 (d) (3) c.
66001 (d) (4) d.
66006 (b) (1) (V) e.
Requirement
11. For the fifth year following the first deposit into the
account or fund, and every five years thereafter, the
City shall make all of the following findings with
respect. to those portions of the impact fee
remaining unexpended, whether committed or
uncommitted.
a. Identify the purpose to which the fee is to be used
for.
Demonstrate a reasonable relationship between
the fee and the purpose for which it is to be
charged.
Identify all sources and amounts of funding
anticipated to complete financing' in incomplete
improvements.
Designate the approximate dates on which the
funding referred to in item c above is expected to
be deposited into the appropriate account or fund.
When sufficient funds have been collected, the
agency shall identify, within 180 days of the
determination that sufficient ~mds have been
collected, an approximate date by which the
construction of the public improvements will
commence.
See Disclosure At
Section 2, Part D and
attached Resolution for
items a-e below.
G:\Impact FeesXAbl600- Impact VeesWY 9900\OUTLINE.DOC ATTACHMENT 1, SECTION 1
DISCLOSURES RELATING TO THE CITY'S IMPACT FEES
A. DESCRIPTION OF THE CITY'S IMPACT FEES
The City of Dublin has established the following Impact Fees and Traffic Mitigation Contributions:
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fees
Downtown Traffic Mitigation Contributions
Public Facilities Impact Fees
Park Dedication Fees
Fire Impact Fees
Tri Valley Transportation Development Fees
Freeway Interchange Fees
Noise Mitigation Fees
Dublin - Contra Costa Traffic Impact Mitigation Fees.
These impact fees were established to pay for the design, development and construction of projects for
streets, public facilities, parks, fire capital expansion projects and noise mitigation.
B. AMOUNTS CHARGED BY THE CITY FOR IMPACT FEES AND PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FUNDED BY THESE FEES
The amounts charged for the impact fees noted above are dependent upon the type and size of a particular
development and were based upon related studies, conducted prior to the adoption of the fees. City
Council has adopted and imposed the subject fees through the passage of the following resolutions:
Impact Fee
Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fees
Public Facility Impact Fees
Park Dedication Fees
Fire Impact Fees
Tri Valley Transportation Development Fees
Pleasanton Interchange Fees
Noise Mitigation Fees
Dublin - Contra
Mitigation Fees.
Costa Traffic Impact
Resolution / Ordinance
Resolution 225-99
Resolution 60-99
Chapter 9.28 Dublin
Municipal Code
Resolution 37-97 amended
by Resolution 208-00
Resolution 89-98 amended
by Resolution 85-99
Resolution 11-96 amended
by Resolution 155-98
Resolution 33-96
Resolution 74-00 and
Contra Costa County
Ordinance No. 2000-24
G:XImpact FeesXAbl600 - Impact FeesXFY 9900\disclosures on impact fees. DOC ATTACHMENT 1 SECTION 2
The studies adopted as part of the resolutions noted above identify the public improvements that those
fees will be used to finance. These studies also show that there is a reasonable relationship a.) between
the fees' use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed and b.) between the need
for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.
C. INTERFUND LOANS AND TRANSFERS OF IMPACT FEES
No interfund loans or transfers of impact fees are outstanding and none were made during Fiscal Year
1999-2000.
D. ANALYSIS OF FEES LEVIED AGAINST DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH SEC. 66001 OF THE (CGC) AND UNSPENT AFTER 5 YEARS
The purpose of the review was to identify monies that had been collected and held for a period of more
than five years and to make appropriate disclosures. The City of Dublin has analyzed the balance of
monies held in its impact fee funds and has determined that there are three projects involving the use of
Downtown Traffic Mitigation Contributions which continue to hold funds for more than five years. The
Projects are accounted for in the adopted City of Dublin Five Year Capital Improvement Program 2000 -
2005. In accordance with State Law the City Council has previously adopted Resolution #232-99 on
12/21/99 declaring the need to continue to maintain the funds related to Projects 96560, 96850 and 96870
in order to complete the intended projects.
Details related to the three projects and fimds held for more than five years are identified below:
PROJECT 96560 - TRAFFIC SIGNALS - VILLAGE PARKWAY
AT BRIGHTON DRIVE, TAMARACK DRIVE AND DAVONA DRIVE
Amount Collected in Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995 subject to 5 Year Limitation: $34,142
Project Cost As Identified In CIP:
$446,213
Description of Project
This project would provide for the installation of three traffic signals at the intersections of Village
Parkway with Brighton Drive, Tamarack Drive and Davona Drive. These signals would be interconnected
to the other existing traffic signals on Village Parkway south of this project.
A traffic study conducted during Fiscal Year 1983-1984 found that these signals were wan'anted. The
warrants were reviewed again this year by the City's traffic engineering consultant and were found to still
be justified. To properly coordinate traffic flow, the consultant is recommending that all three signals be
installed at the same time.
Source of Fundin~
General Fund, Federal ISTEA Grant, Local Measure B monies
Contributions.
and Downtown Traffic Mitigation
Approximate Project Completion Dates
This project is scheduled to be completed in Fiscal Year 2000-2001.
PROJECT 96850 DOUGHERTY RD NORTH OF AMADOR VALLEY BLVD. TO
NORTH OF HOUSTON PLACE
Amount Collected in Fiscal Year 1990 Subject to 5 Year Limitation:
Project Cost As Identified lh CIP:
$8,245
$4,449,583
Description of Project
This project consists of two phases. The first phase widened the travel lanes by removing existing dirt
medians on Dougherty Road and replacing them with new pavement. This completed the ultimate
pavement improvements for southbound traffic for this segment of Dougherty Road. A second phase of
this project will widen Dougherty Road from four to six lanes and will include landscaped medians.
The first phase of this project allowed the two southbound lanes to move away from the westerly curb,
thus improving intersection sight distance and providing an area along the curb for bus stops, emergency
parking and on-street bicyclists. The City also overlayed this segment of Dougherty Road, including a
portion of DoUgherty Road north of Amador Valley Boulevard.
Source of Funding
Federal ISTEA Grant, Local Measure B monies, State Gas Taxes, State SB 300 Grant, and Downtown
Traffic Mitigation Contributions.
Approximate Project Completion Dates
It is estimated that the timing of the complete contributions will be beyond Fiscal Year 2004/2005. It is
possible that phases based upon available funding could begin at an earlier date.
3. ST. PATRICK WAY - REGIONAL STREET TO GOLDEN GATE DRIVE 96870
Amount Collected in Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995 Subject to 5 Year Limitation: $73,258
Project Cost As Identified In CIP:
$4,384,055
Description of Project
This project will construct a 2-lane roadway between Golden Gate Drive and Regional Street south of and
parallel to Dublin Boulevard., The need for a connector road for three long commercial cul-de-sacs was
identified in the City's Downtown Study. This need will become more apparent as this portion of the
Central Business District develops further and the proposed BART parking lot is constructed along
Golden Gate Drive. The section of Saint Patrick Way between Amador Plaza Road and Golden Gate
Drive was constructed by the Alameda County Transportation Authority (ACTA) as part of the 1-580/I-
680 Interchange Improvements.
Source of Funding
Downtown Traffic Mitigation Contributions, BART mitigation ~mds, and developer mitigation
improvements
Approximate Project Completion Dates
It is estimated that the timing of the complete contributions will be beyond Fiscal Year 2004/2005. It is
possible that phases based upon available funding could begin at an earlier date.
E. REFUNDS
No refunds have been made pursuant to Section 66001(e), nor have allocations been made pursuant to
section 66001(f). See Attachment 1, Section 3 for additional details.
CITY OF DUBLIN CAPITAL IMPACT FEE REPORT 199912000
Prepared December 2000 and Detailing Activity From July 1, 1999 - June 30, 2000
EASTERN
DUBLIN PUBLIC PARK
TRAFFIC FACILITIES DEDICATION
IMPACT FEES IMPACT FEES FEES
Subobjects 23-25, 30-31,40,43 Object No. '331 Object 331 & 432
Balance Available 7/1/99
Fees Collected: 7/1/99-6/30/00
Interest 7/1/99 - 6/30/00
Less 1999/00 Expenditures
Civic Center Library (93450)
Civic Center Modification Phase I (93910)
Emerald Glen Park- Phase 1 (95600)
Heritage Center Improvements (95540)
Emerald Park Fire Station (93510)
Traffic Improvements (Various Project Nos)
Refunds Per CGC 66001 (e)/(f)
Ending Balance 6/30/00
$2,257,217.33 $4,460,649.14 $2,083,533.80
9,292,425.65 3,934,352.96 323,817.40
360,448.04 122,757.15 80,669.44
(1,933,279.00)
$9,976,812.02
(338, 147.92)
(1,49e,599.49)
(3,825,240.33)
$2,855,771.51
(2,066,400.00)
(1,079.04)
$420,541.60
FIRE
IMPACT FEES
Object No. 331-028
$831,987.22
330,617.63
53,048.76
(22,893.26)
$1,192,760.35
Balance Available 7/1/99
Fees Collected: 711199-6130/00
Interest 7/1/99 - 6/30/00
Less 1999/00 Expenditures
Regional Traffic Improvements
Freeway Interchange Reimbursements
Refunds Per CGC 66001 (e)/(f)
Ending Balance 6/30/00
TRI VALLEY
TRANSPORTATION
DEVELOPMENT
FEES
Object 331-0032
$582,798.72
1,863,636.72
27,126.96
(1,540,679.06)
$932,883.34
FREEWAY
INTERCHANGE
FEES
Object 331-0022
$24,378.56
622,569.94
(637,454.82)
$9,493.68
NOISE
MITIGATION
FEES
Object 331-0026
$74.95
8,904.96
335.63
$9,315~54
DUBLIN -
CONTRA COSTA
TRAFFIC IMPACT
MITIGATION FEES
O~ect331-0044
104,560.25
~.3,131.64
$107,691.89
Date Printed: 12/21/00 3:36 PM Filename: g:\impactfee\ab1600~annual activity report.xls
ATTACHMENT 1 SECTION 3
_J
CITY OF DUBLIN CAPITAL IMPACT FEE REPORT 1999/2000
DETAIL OF DOWNTOWN TRAFFIC MITIGATION CONTRIBUTIONS
Prepared December 2000 and Detailing Activity From July 1, 1999 - June 30, 2000
CIP PROJECT #
Balance Available 7/1/99
Fees Collected: 7/1/99-6/30/00
Interest 7/1/99 - 6/30/00
Less 1999/00 Expenditures
Refunds Per CGC 66001 (e)/(f)
Ending Balance 6/30/00 (a)
CIP PROJECT #
Balance Available 7/1/99
Fees Collected: 7/1/99-6/30/00
Interest 7/1/99 - 6/30/00
Less 1999/00 Expenditures
Refunds Per CGC 66001(e)/(f)
Ending Balance 6/30/00 (a)
DOWNTOWN TRAFFIC MITIGATION CONTRIBUTIONS
331-0005 331-0006 331-0007 3~1-0008 331-0010 331-0011
Doughedy Rd Scarlett Extension Parallel Rd Dougherty Rd Village Pkwy Dublin Blvd
improvements Dc~ugherty/Dublin Blvd St. Patrick Way n/o AVB Signals Sierra-Clark
96550 96860 96870 96850 96560 96920
521,894.65 204,545.47 200,531.39 215, 128.63 101,065.19 85,840.45
2,74.1.68 49,209.15 5,090.08 1,617.20 2,920.35
15,712.53 2,871.80 7,479.69 6,595.54 2,871.80 912.38
(108,662.72) (6,800.00) (58,295.03)
540,348.86 98,754.55 257,220.23 226,814.25 98,754.19 31,378.15
DOWNTOWN TRAFFIC MITIGATION CONTRIBUTIONS
331-00'j 3 331-001,~ 331-0027 331-0029
Dougherty Dublin/Silvergate Dublin Blvd. AVB Bike Lane
Houston Place Impvts Sierra Dghty Stagecoach
96850 96010 96930 96070
6,469.50 578,780.59 77,598.88 25,928.40
7,066.23 8,650.69 17,222.48 529.24
405..35 1,030.01 2,839.94 792.23
(553,040.95)
13,941.08
35,420.34 97,661.30 27~249.87
331-0012
Downtown
TIF Study
96850
0.00
1,106.79
33,29
1,140.08
P~inted: 12./21/0012:01 PM Filename: g:~mpactfee\ebl6OO\ennual ectivffy report, xfs
ATTACHMENT 1 SECTION 3
Fire Impact Fee Fuml
Emerald Park Fire Station
Expense Developer Fees
Exp~nse Other Funds
Total for Project
SCHEDULE OF FUNDING FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
FIRE, PARK DEDICATION AND PUBLIC FACILITIES IMPACT FEES
LISTING OF ACCOUNTS WITH ACTIVITY IN FISCAL YEAR 1999/2000
Prior Years Current Year % Developer
Project Expenditures Project Expenditures Fee Funded
All Funds All Funds Project to Date
Thru 6/30/99 Fiscal Year 1999/00 TOTAL Expenditures
Budgeted CIP/Operating
Project Expenditures
All Funds
7/1/2000 - 6/30/2005*
Grand
Projected
Total per
5 Year CIP
$0.00 $22,893.26 $22,893.26 100%
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $22,893.26 $22,893.26 100%
$3,265,609.00
$0.00
$3,265,609.00
$3,288,502.26
$0.00
$3,288,502.26
% Developer
Fee Funded for
Projected Total
Expenditures
100%
100%
Public Facilities Impact Fee Fund
Civic Center Modification Design Services & Construction
Expense Developer Fe~s
Expense Other Funds
Total for Project
Civic Center Library
Expense Developer Fees
Expense Other Funds
Total for Project
Emerald Glen Park Phase 1
Expense Developer Fees
Expense Other Funds
Total for Project
$135,149.33
$0.00
$135,149.33
$1,498,599.49 $1,633,748.82 81%
$375,603.00 $375,603.00
$1,874,202.49 $2,009,351.82 81%
$0.00 $338,147.92 $338,147.92 100%
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $338,147.92 $338,147.92 100%
$1,024,532.90
$0.00
$1,024,532.90
$3,825,240.33 $4,849,773.23 100%
$8,988.00 $8,988.00
$3,834,228.33 $4,858,761.23 100%
$1,705,795.00
$41,846.00
$1,747,641.00
$3,339,543.82
$417,449.00
$3,756,992.82
$11,045,953.00
$2,936,578.00
$13,982,531.00
$11,384,100.92
$2,936,578.00
$14,320,678.92
$9,658,312.00
$9,658,312.00
$14,508,085.23
$8,988.00
$14,517,073.23
89%
11%
100%
79%
21%
100%
100%
100%
Park Dedication Impact Fee Fund
Heritage Center Improvements
Expense Developer Fees
Expense Other Funds
Total for Project
$157,112.33
$o.o6
$157,112.33
$1,079.04 $158,191.37 100%
$0.00 $0.00
$1,079.04 $158,191.37 100%
Emerald Glen Park Phase 1
Expense Developer Fees $0.00
Expense Other Funds $0.00
Total for Project $0.00
$2,066,400.00 $2,066,400.00 100%
$0.00 $0.00
$2,066,400.00 $2,066,400.00 100%
* Includes projected future costs that are not anticipated to be funded within the next five Fiscal Years.
$158,191.37
$0.00
$0.00 $158,191.37
100%
0%
100%
$6,487,010.00
$0.00
$6,487,610.00
$8,553,410.00
$0.00
$8,553,410.00
100%
100%
ATTACHMENT 1 SECTION 4
SCHEDULE OF FUNDING FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES AND DOWNTOWN TRAFFIC MITIGATION CONTRIBUTIONS
LISTING OF ACCOUNTS WITH ACTIVITY IN FISCAL YEAR 1999/2000
Dept No Project Name
East Dublin Traffic Imoact Fees Project Costs
96380
96400
96410
96420
96430
96890
96650
95600
I580 / San Ramon Rd Interchange
E. Dublin Arterial Improvements
I580 / Hacienda Interchange
I580 / Tassajara Road Interchange
I580 / Fallon Road Interchange
Dublin Blvd - Dougherty/Scarlett
Eastern Dublin Street ROW Acquisition
Emerald Glen Park Street ROW
Total Expense Developer Fees
Prior Years Current Year % Developer Budgeted CIP
Project Expenditures Project Expenditures Fee Funded Project Expenditures
All Funds All Funds Project to Date All Funds
Thru 6/30/99 Fiscal Year 1999/00 TOTAL Expenditur~ 7/1/2000 - 6/30/2005*
$51,001.62 $51,001.62 $77,050,806.00
$48,834.35 $48,834.35 $1,299,416.00
$143,416.49 $917,037.01 $1,060,453.50 $10,691,542.00
$210,632.35 $571,105.18 $781,737.53 $13,057,091.00
$112,197.09 $112,197.09 $2,169,863.00
$9,390.56 $69,128.75 $78,519.31 $4,470,058.00
$164;465.00 $164,465.00
$363,439.40 $1,933,769.00 $2,297,208.40 100% $108,738,776.00
$363,439.40 $1,933,769.00 $2,297,208.40 100% $108,738,776.00
Total for Projects
Downtown Traffic Mitigation Project Costs
96010 Dublin / Silvergate Improvements
96560 Traffic Signals - Village Parkway
96850 Dougherty Rd Improvements N/O AVB
96920 Dublin Blvd- Village Parkway to Sierra Court
Total Expense Developer Fees
$178,205.89 $553,040.95 $731,246.84 $1,450,000.00
$129.69 $6,800.00 $6,929.69 $106,000.00
$14,005.89 $14,005.89 $3,875,217.00
'$0.00 $112,197.09 $112,197.09 $47,300.00
$192,341.47 $672,038.04 $864,379.51 60% $5,478,517.00
96560
96850
96920
Traffic Signals - Village Parkway
Dougherty Rd Improvements N/O AVB
Dublin Blvd- Village Parkway to Sierra Court
Total Expense Other Funds
Total for Projects
$9,083.00 $32,538.52 $41,621.52 $305,000.00
$524,996.73 $524,996.73 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00 $2,417,114.00
$534,079.73 $32,538.52 $566,618.25 40% $2,722,114.00
$726,421.20 $704,576.56 $1,430,997.76 t00% $8,200,631.00
T-ri Valley Transportation Fees Project Costs
Regional Transportation Projects
Expense Developer Fees
Expense Other Funds
Total for Project
$518,253.55 $1,540,679.06- $2,058,932.61 100% $18,741,067.00
$0:00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $1,540,679.06 $2,058,932.61 100% $18,741,067.00
1580 / San Ramon Rd Interchange
Expense Developer Fees
Expense Other Funds
Total for Project
$0.00
$46,405.53 $46,405.53 55% $1,545,700.00
$37,595.94 $37,595.94 45% $71,450.00
$84,001.47 ~84,001.47 55% $1,617,150.00
* Includes projected future costs that are not anticipated to be funded within the next five Fiscal Years.
Grand
Projected
Total per
5 Year CIP
% Developer
Fee Funded for
Projected Total
Expenditures
$77,101,807.62
$1,348,250.35
$11,751,995.50
$13,838,828.53
$2,282,060.09
$4,548,577.31
$164,465.00
$111,035,984.40
$111,035,984.40
100%
100%:
$2,181,246.84
$112,929.69
$3,889,222.89
$159,497.09
$6,342,876.51
$346,621.52
$524,996.73
$2,417,114.00
$3,288,732.25
$9,631,628.76
66%
34%
100%
$20,799,999.61
$0.00
$20,799,999.61
100%
100%
$1,592,105.53
$109,045.94
$1,701,151.47
94%
6%
100%
ATTACHMENT 1 SECTION 4
RESOLUTION NO. -01
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
MAKING FINDINGS REGARDING UNEXPENDED
DOWNTOWN TRAFFIC MITIGATION CONTRIBUTIONS
FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000
Recital
The City has collected contributions for off-site traffic improvements needed as a result of new
development, which will not be expended within five years after deposit. The improvements are
described in the 2000-2005 Capital Improvement Program and include the improvements described
below:
Project Name
St. Patrick Way - Regional to Golden Gate
Dougherty Road - North of
Amador Valley Boulevard
Village Parkway Traffic Signals
Unexpended Developer
Deposit Balances
as of June 30, 2000
$73,258
$8,245
$34,142
2. The three projects described in the recital above are referred to as the "Three Traffic Improvements."
Findings
The Council finds,' on the basis of the foregoing Recitals, that:
The contributions which have been collected for the Three Traffic Improvements will remain
unexpended in Fiscal Year 1999-2000;
The contributions which have been collected for the Three Traffic Improvements will remain committed
for construction of the improvements identified in the adopted Capital Improvement Program;
The purpose for which the contributions will be used is construction of the Three Traffic Improvements,
as described above and in the 2000 - 2005 Capital Improvement Program;
The contributions were collected to make the Three Traffic Improvements, which improvements will
mitigate traffic impacts .caused by the new development projects which paid the contributions; and
The contributions which have been collected for the Three Traffic Improvements are needed for
construction of the Three Traffic Improvements.
ATTACHMENT 2
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 16th day of January 2001:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
City Clerk
G:XImpact FeesXAbl600 - Impact FeesXFY 9900Xresolution version 2.doe
Mayor