HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 4.06 Dub Blvd Wid MK CentSUBJECT:
CITY CLERK
File # 0600-30
AGENDA STATEMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JULY 18, 2000
Amend Contract Agreement with MK Centennial for Preliminary
Engineering & Environmental Services and Expand Services for the
Preparation of Plans, Specifications and Estimates for the Widening
of Dublin Boulevard (Village Parkway to Sierra Court)
- Report Prepared by: Lee S. Thompson, Public Works Director
ATTACHMENTS:
RECOMMENDATION:
1)
2)
3)
4)
Resolution
Caltrans Audits and Investigations Risk Assessment Letter
Amended Consultant Agreement
Budget Change Form
Adopt Resolution ApproviI~g Amended Consultant Agreement
FINANCIAL STATEMENT: This amended agreement will not change the original amOunt of the
/"agreement for Preliminary Engineering & Environmental Services
_~ (PEES). The cOst of the.proposed exPansiOn of serVices for
/~)~: preparation of Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) is
$267,000 With the total aggregate contract c°st of $411,000 fOr
both services. FUnds from the State Transportation Improvement
Program (STIP) in the amount of $411,000 have been allocated and
approved for PEES and PS&E. It was anticipated that $194,000 in
STIP funds would be eXpended in FY 99-00 and $217,000 in FY 00-
01. Due to scheduling changes, only $144,000 WoUld be expended
in FY 99-00 and $267,000 will be spent in FY 00-01, requiring a
budget change in the amount of $50,000.
DESCRIPTION: On November 16, 1999, the City Council approved an agreement
with MK Centennial to perform preliminary engineering and environmental services .on a time and
material to a maximum basis fOr widening Dublin Boulevard from Village Parkway to Sierra Court. The
City Council also authorized the Public Works Director to sign the agreement When the Consultant met
certain conditions required by the State.
Caltrans, as stated in the Audits and Investigations Risk Assessment letter, has recommended amending
the agreement in line with standard State procedure. It was further recommended to add sections to the
agreement that meet Code of Federal Regulations and the California Code Regulations (CCR) for access
to consultant's documents for the project. In addition, the project has reached the stage when PS&E
documents can be prepared, and thus the amended agreement will expand the scope of services for the
COPIES TO: Erv Koenig, MKCentennial
g:\engr\mk 100\agstmk 100 phase I amended
preparation of PS&E for $267,000. The amended agreement will provide for the PEES and PS&E
services on an actual cost plus fixed fee not to exceed $411,000. This will be paid under a grant from
the State Transportation Improvement Program.
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution approving the amended agreement and
approve the budget change.
Page 2.
RESOLUTION NO. - 00
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
APPROVING AMENDED AGREEMENT WITH MK CENTENNIAL
FOR CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE WIDENING OF
DUBLIN BOULEVARD FROM VILLAGE PARKWAY TO SIERRA COURT / CIVIC PLAZA
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Dublin approved an agreement for Preliminary
Engineering and Environmental Services with MK Centennial for the Dublin Boulevard project from
Village Parkway to Sierra Court, on November 16, 1999; and
WHEREAS, said agreement is required to be modified for compliance with California State
Department of Transportation Audits and Investigations Unit; and
WHEREAS, the amended agreement also expands the scope of services to include the preparation
of Plans, Specifications and Estimates documents for the said pr~)ject with an additional compensation in
the amount of $267,000 for a total aggregate amount of $4 i 1,000; and
WHEREAS, the amended agreement supersedes the agreement approved on November 16, 1999;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin hereby
approves the amended agreement with MK Centennial for consulting services.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor is authorized to execute the amended agreement.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of July 2000.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
Mayor
City Clerk
~ g.'~engrlmklOOIr~somklOOphase I amended
S. TATE C F CALIFORNIA-BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY
GRAY D. AVIS, Governor
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
&UDITS AND INVESTIGATIONS
~-.--1227 O STREET, SUITE 402
,O. BOX 942874
&ACRAMENTO, CA 94274-0001
TDD: (916) 654-3847
FAX: (916) 653-3235
PUB: (916) 653-9400
April 14, 2000
RE~c~tV~D
Floyd Davis
Project Resident Engineer
City of Dublin
P. O. Box 2340
Dublin, CA 94568
Dear Mr. Davis:
Per your request, we performed .a.n.sk.....asse~'~.,of the draft Local Assistance
Agreement between the City of-'Db.b'ii~?~nd":M~'i:'i~'~ntennial. Based on this risk
assessment, we determined that a preaward audit is not required. However, our
review indicated the following deficiencies in the draft agreement:
The draft agreement does not clearly state the method of payment (cost
plus fixed fee, lump sum, or firm fixed hourly rates). The City of Dublin
should determine the appropriate method of payment and state it
specifically in the agreement.
The draft agreement does not contain a record retention clause, nor
does it state'that representatives e,f.;.~e City, State, and FHWA have
access to review the
The draft agreement doe~" not inclU;d~'"required references to 48 CFR
and 49 CFR. The following clause should be included in the
agreement:
The Contractor agrees that the Contract Cost Principles and
Procedures, 48 CFR, Federal Acquisition Regulations System, Chapter
1, Part 31 et seq., shall be used to determine the allowability of
individual items of cost.
The Contractor also agre'es:,.to comt21y with Federal procedures in
accordance with #9 Crl~,;..~a~.~i.8..,~,~[~i~.".m.Administrative Requirements
for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local
Governments.
Any costs for which payment has been made to Contractor that are
determined by subsequent audit to be unallowable under 48 CFR,
Floyd Davis
April 14, 2000
Page2
Federal Acquisition Regulations System, Chapter 1, Part 31 et seq., or
49 CFR, Part 18, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and
Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments are subject
to repayment by Contractor to City.
Any subcontract entered into as a result of this contract shall contain afl
of the provisions of this article.
Please send us a copy of the executed agreement for our audit files. If you have
any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (916) 653-9189.
Audit Manager
AMENDED STANDARD
CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT
TI-~S AMENDED AGREEMENT supercedes and replaces in its entirety an existing
agreement, between said parties, that was made on the 16~ of November 1999. (City Council Resolution
213-99.)
THIS A_MENDED AGREEMENT is made at Dublin, California, as of July 18, 2000, by
and between the C}TY OF DUBLIN, a murdcipal corporation ("City"), and MK CentenniaI
("Consultant"), who agree as follows:
1. SERVICES. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement,
Consultant shall provide to City the services described in Exhibit A Phase I and Phase II. Consultant shall
provide said services at the time, place, and in the raazmer specified in Exhibit A Phases I and II.
2. PAYMENT. City shall pay Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this
Agreement at the time and in the manner set forth in Exhibit B. The payments specified in Exh/bit B shall
be the only payments to be.~de to C..~._~ sultant for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement.
Consultant shall submit all billings for Said services to City in the manner specified in Exhibit B; or, if no
mariner be specified in Exhibit B, then according to the usual md customary procedures and practices
which Consultant uses for billing clients similar to City.
3. FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT. Except as set forth in Exhibit C, Consultant shall, at
its sole cost and expense, furnish alt facilities and equipment which may be required for furnishing
services pursuant to this Agreement. City shall furnish to Consultant only the facilities and equipment
listed in Exh/bit C according to the terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit C.
4. GENERAL PROVISIONS. The general provisions set forth in Exhibit D are part of
this Ageement. In the event of any inconsistency between said general provisions and any other terms or
conditions of this Agreement, the other term or condition shall control insofar as it is inconsistent with the
general provisions.
5..EXHIBITS. Alt exhibits referred to herein are attached hereto and are by this reference
incorporated herein.
6. SUBCONTRACTING. The Consukant shall perform the work contemplated w/th
resources available within its own organization and no portion of the work pertinent, to this contract shall
be subcontracted w/thout ~Mtten authorization by the City, except that.which is expressly identified in the
Consultant's proposal.
7. CHANGES. City'may from time to time require changes in the scope of the services by
Consultant to be performed under this Agreement.. Such changes, including any change in the mount of
Consultant's compensation which are mutually agreed upon by City and Consultant, shall be effective as
amendments to this Agreement only when in writing.
Agreement
Page 1 of 2
07/10/00
8. RESPONSIBLE CHARGE. Consultant shall assign a project manager(s) to the project
for the duration of the project. There shall be no change in the Project Manager or members of the project
team without prior written approval by the City. The Project Manager for Consultant shall be Etty
Mercurio.
9. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. This Agreement shall be administered by LEE S.
THOMPSON ("Administrator"). All correspondence shall be directed to or through the Administrator or
kis or designee.
10..NOTICES. Any written notice to Consukant shall be sent to:
Err Koenig, Vice President
MI{ Centennial
5000 Hopyard Road, Suite 100
Pleasanton, CA 94588
Any written notice to City shall be sent to:
Lee S. Tho.mpson
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
P. O. Box 2340
Dublin, CA 94568
Executed as of the day first above stated:
CITY OF DUBLIN,
a municipal corporation
By
"City"
Attest:
City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Agreement
Page 2 of 2
07/10/00
City Attorney
EXWIBIT A
SCOPE OF SERVICES AND SCI::[EDULE
PER ADMENDED PROPOSAL DATED July 6, 2000 (Phase I) and June 28, 2000 (Phase II)
FROM MK Centennial (ATTACHED)
Exhibit A
Page 1 of 1
07/10/00
EXHIBIT
A Professional Services Agreement Between
CITY OF DUBLIN
(C~TY)
and
MK CENTENNIAL
(CONSULTANT)
for the
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT
SCOPE OF SERVICES
PHASE I
INDEX
DESCRIPTION PAGE
100
110
120
130
]40
150
160
200
210
220
230
300
310
320
330
3'40
400
410
420
430
440
450
500
510
520
540
6OO
610
62O
GENERAL ........................................................... 3
Location .............................................................. 3
Description 3
Length of Services ...................................................... 3
Project Scheduling ...................................................... 3
Project Progress Meetings and Monthly Progress Reporting ..................... 4
Design Monitoring and Subconsukant Management ............................ 4
DESIGN REFERENCES ............................................... 4
Caltrans Publications .................................................... 4
AASHTO Publications .................................................. 4
Publications From Other Sources .......................................... 5
DESIGN WORK PERFORMED BY' CONSULTANT ....................... 5
Coordination with the CITY and Other Parties ................................ 5
Data Collection and Field Reviews ......................................... 5
Site Mapping and Supplemental Field Surveys ................................ 5
Rigl~t-of-way Engineering ................................................ 6
Environmental Document ................................................ 6
Environmental Program Management ....................................... 6
Confirm Environmental Review Process'. .................................... 6
CEQA Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration .......................... 6
Traffic Data and Safety Analysis ........................................... 7
Location Hydraulic Study ................................................ 8
Preliminary Engineering ................................................. 8
Structure General Plan .................................................... 8
Project Submittals ...................................................... 8
Design Reviews ........................................................ 9
MATERIALS FLrRNISHED BY The CITY ................................ 9
Record Documents ...................................................... 9
Base and Miscellaneous Information ........................................ 9
J:k2262L~.dmin\Contra¢~kSCO?E~$COPEI a.W'PD 1
DUBI_I~V BOULEVARD W/DENflVG PROJECT
Scope of Services
July 6, 2000
Page 2
700
710
720
73O
740
750
760
770
780
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION ....................................... 9
The CITY ............................................................. 9
CONSULTANT ........................................................ 9
Project Control ........................................................ 10
Subcontract Services ................................................... 10
Quality Control ....................................................... 10
CONSULTANT Personnel .............................................. 10
Acceptability of the Work ............................................... 10
Design Documentation ................................................. 11
J:~2262~,Admin\Contr-acts\SCOPE\SCOPE I a. WPD 2
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT
Scope of Services
July 6, 2000
Page 3
100
110
120
130
140
GENERAL
Location
The project is located in Dublin, California. The City of Dublin is proposing to widen
Dublin Boulevard between Village Parkway and Sierra Lane from a four-lane facility to a
six-lane facility. The existing street has been improved to a six-lane facility from Village
Parkway westerly to San Ramon Road. Current City's Capital Improvement Project will
provide for Dublin Boulevard to be six lanes from Dougherty Road to Tassajara Road by
the end of next year's Construction Season. The proposed project will extend the six-lane
facility to just east of the Sierra Court intersection. The widening of Dublin Boulevard is to
both sides of the street to obtain additional roadway width. This will require both demolition
and reconstruction of existing imwovements on both sides of the street including widening
of an existing bridge and repair of the creek slopes below the bridge. During the
reconstruction, existing overhead utilities will be placed underground.
Description
The CONSULTANT will prepare an Environmental Document, preliminary engineering
plans, surveys and right-of-way engineering maps. The design of the project elements
described herein, will be in accordance with the CITY, and Caltrans Standards in effect at
the time this agreement is executed. The documents will be produced in dual units
(metric/imperial).
The contract work will consist of the following basic features:
· Conduct an environmental field review
· · Prepare environmental technical studies
· Prepare an Environmental Document
· Attend project status meetings and City. Council meetings
· Conduct field reviews, research and data collection ~ :.
· Prepare topographic mapping and conduct supplemental surveys
· Prepare preliminary engineering plans in support of the environmental document
· Prepare right-of-way engineering maps
Len~h of Services
The project will be initiated with a notice to proceed from the CITY. The environmental
and preliminary engineering work would then proceed without delay for 8 months. A four-
week review period is scheduled for each review of the draft and final environmental
document packages.
The CITY may wish to amend the scope of services to be provided by CONSULTANT.
When this occurs the CITY and the CONSULTANT will agree on a revised scope and any
adjustments to the project schedule and/or compensation due the CONSULTANT.
Project Scheduling
The project schedule will include all project activities and milestones. The schedule will
identify all milestones, tasks and sub tasks, review periods, and coordination activities
associated with engineering and design. Attachment A, "Design Schedule," shows the time
phased tasks to be performed for the required work.
~':k2262kAdmin\C ontraet~kSCOPEXSCOPE I a. WPD 3
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT
Scope of Services
July 6, 2000
Page 4
150
160
200
210
220
Project Progress Meetings and Monthly Progress Reporting
Monthly progress reports will be submitted to the CITY with each invoice for payment for
engineering services. The report will indicate the tasks that were completed during the
preceding period, work planned for the next period, identification of design issues or
problems being encountered, and a comparison of planned and actual progress. The updated
schedule will accompany this report. Monthly reports will be submitted throughout the
project duration assumed above. Reports will not be submitted for any period where no work
was performed.
The CONSULTANT Project Manager will meet with the appointed CITY representatives
on a monthly basis to discuss the status of the project design work. These meetings will
focus on resolution of any design issues requiring the CITY involvement, the design
progress, potential problems, and to address any particular detail of the work previously
identified for resolution.
Design Monitoring and Subconsultant Management
The CONSULTANT Project Manager and each subconsultant principal will monitor the
work Underway to assure it complies with the criteria and standards established for the work,
and to ensure that the design work is being accomplished in the most efficient manner
possible.
The CONSULTANT will establish 'effective and efficient project procedures to direct and
monitor the subconsultants' work. Regular scheduled reviews of the subconsultant design
will be performed to ensure compliance with the quality standards established, coordination
among team members, and that design operations are being conducted in a timely and
efficient manner.
DESIGN REFERENCES
Caltrans Publications
211 Standard Drawings
Bridge Standard Details (Current Edition - Metric)
Standard Plans (1999 Edition - Metric)
212 Specifications
Standard Specifications (1999 Edition - Metric)
213 Manuals
Highway Design Manual, 4th edition (English)
Bridge Design Specifications (Current Edition - Metric)
Bridge Design Practice (Current Edition)
Bridge Memo to Designers (Current Edition)
Bridge Design Aids (Current Edition)
Bridge Design Details (Current Edition)
AASI-ITO Publications
A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 1994 ("Green Book")
Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, with interim revisions through 1997
Manual on Foundation Investigations, 1978
J:X2262~Admin\ContractsxSCOPEX$C OPE I a. WPD 4
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT
Scope of Services
July 6, 2000
Page 5
230
300
310
320
330
Guide for Design of Pavement strUctures, 1993
Guide for Specifications and Standards
Standard Specifications for Structural Supports for Highway Signs, Luminaries and Traffic
Signals, Edition of 1985 and Interim Specifications through 1991
Roadside Design Guide, 1996
An Information Guide for Roadway Lighting, 1984
AASHTO Drainage Guidelines, 1992
Publications From Other Sources
City of Dublin Standard Plans
Alameda County- Standards
Alameda County Flood Control & Water Conservation
Zone 7 Standards & Hydrology & Hydroceed Design Criteria
Dublin San Ramon Service District (DSRSD) Standards
DESIGN WORK PERFORMED BY CONSULTANT
Coordination with the CITY and Other Parties
Design team members will attend the scheduled meetings. The coordination will be
conducted during design review submittals, monthly meetings, and at such other times as
specific issues need resolution. It will be necessary for the CONSULTANT to meet with
representatives of the local agencies and The CITY for the purpose of discussing d~sign
details. The number of meetings budgeted for this work are as follows:
Description Number of Meetings
Monthly progress meetings 4
City Council Public Meetings 2
Zone 7 Meeting 1
Underground Utility 2
Coordination Meeting
(Trench design by others)
The agency contacts anticipated are with Alameda County FC & WCD, Zone 7 and the
CITY.
Data Collection and Field Reviews
The CONSULTANT will meet with the CITY and the local agencies to collect available
information pertinent to the project. A review of available information and an on-site
investigation will be conducted to further define site conditions and determine the need for
additional investigation and data. The design team members and representatives o£the CITY
along with any interested parties will field review the work site two times.
Site Mapping and Supplemental Field Surveys
The CONSULTANT will prepare topographic base mapping at 1:500 with 0.5-meter
continuous intervals based on 1983 NAD (horizontal control) and 1929 NGVD (vertical
control). Mapping standards will be checked by the CONSULTANT and will conform to
J:~2262kAd min\Cona'acts\SCOPEX$COPE 1 a. WPD 5
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT
Scope of Services
July 6, 2000
Page 6
340
400
410
420
43O
the CITY's survey/mapping standards, as required .for this project. The CONSULTANT will
conduct field surveys. Work will include conform areas, pavement Spot elevations, storm
drainage inlets/outlets, selected utilities and potholed utilities. Potholing is not included in
this scope of services.
Right-of-Way Engineering
The CONSULTANT will order title reports (15 total), prepare right-of-way plats and legal
descriptions, and conduct right-of-way surveys.
Environmental Document
The project will require environmental review under both the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), as well as, the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). NEPA
review is required because federal funds will be used to construct the project. When federal
funds from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) are used for project construction,
Cattrans acts as the reviewing agency of all environmental documents on behalf of the
FHWA to ensure that the documents and process comply with NEPA. As a result, the
environmental review process outlined below assumes coordination with Caltrans
environmental staff throughout the project.
Environmental Program Management
The CONSULTANT will oversee and coordinate all aspects of the environmental process
as described below:
Technical Studies
Oversee the preparation of all technical studies
Coordinate with technical subconsultants as required
· Coordinate with The CITY during all phases of the environmental pro~ess
Agency Coordination
Conduct early consultation to explain the project and identify any agency concerns.
· Conduct consultation with agencies to facilitate processing of environmental
permits if required.
Coordination with Engineering Effort
Provide inlgut to preliminary engineering based on the technical reports
~ Analyze design alternatives proposed in terms of environmental constraints and
potential impacts.
Agencies to be consulted will be the CITY, Alameda Cc;unty FC & WCD, Zone 7, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and/or California Department of
Fish & Game.
Confirm Environmental Review Process
The CONSULTANT will conduct a field review meeting with City Staff and Caltrans
Project Development and Environmental staff to review the proposed improvements to
Dublin Boulevard, environmental technical studies that will need to be completed, and the
appropriate environmental document(s) for the project.
CEQA Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
The CONSULTANT will distribute and notice for a proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration/Initial Study including preparation ofa~Notice of Intent, mailing of notices to
local property owners, interested parties and agencies, and delivery of copies of the
Proposed Negative Declaration to the State Clearinghouse.
l:~262~Admin\Contraem[SCOPE~SCOPE I a. WPD 6
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT
Scope of Services
July 6, 2000
Page 7
440
' The CONSULTANT will atteridone Public Information meeting and City Council hearing
and meet with City staff as needed throughout the process.
The CONSULTANT will file a Notice of Completion with the Alameda County Clerk, State
Clearinghouse and payment of California Department of Fish and Game Filing Fees.
Natural Environment Study
The CONSULTANT will prepare a Natural Environment Study pursuant to Caltrans
Environmental guidelines and comments from Caltrans Office of Local Assistance
environmental staff. It will include a wetland delineation and field verification with the US
Army Corps of Engineers.
Categorical Exclusion under NEPA
This includes submittal of technical information to Caltrans in support of a determination
that the project qualifies for a Categorical Exclusion under NEPA. The following technical
studies will be provided to Caltrans:
N~itural Environment Study
Location Hydraulic Study
Traffic memorandum
Sonoma State Cultural Resources Literature Search
Area of Potential Effect Map
Coordination with City and Caltrans as needed regarding Caltrans review of the above
technical information and processing of a Categorical Exclusion through the Federal
Highway Administration.
Traffic Data and Safety Analysis
The CONSULTANT will prepare the transportation element for the environmental
document. The impact analys!s will be completed with and without the Dublin Boulevard
Widening project under both construction year and cumulative year conditions for each
transportation mode including automobiles, bicycle, and pedestrian travel. The
CONSULTANT will collect 24-hour traffic count data on Dublin Boulevard at one location
within the project limits. The CONSUL. TANT will collect morning and evening peak period
traffic counts at the Dublin Boulevard/Sierra Court and Dublin Boulevard/Clark Avenue
intersections. The CONSULTANT will also obtain available accident data from Alameda
County and the City within the project limits. The CONSULTANT will summarize the
setting information including peak hour capacity analyses of the study section of Dublin
Boulevard and the Sierra Court and Clark Avenue intersections.
Available morning and evening peak hour traffic forecasts will be obtained for the study
segment of Dublin Boulevard and the Sierra Court and Clark Avenue intersections under
each scenario. Peak hour operations analyses will be conducted for each facility to establish
a baseline of traffic operations for the corridor. Impacts to bicycle and pedestrian travel will
be qualitatively evaluated based on a review of the project's consistency with established
policies and standards of adopted documents (i.e., General Plans, Specific Plans, design
standards, etc.). Mitigation measures will be identified for significant adverse impacts. The
CONSULTANT will prepare the administrative draft transportation section of the
environmental document. The CONSULTANT has budgeted a total of $ hours to respond
I:k2262~,Admin\ContractsXSCOPE~SCOPE I a. WPD 7
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT
Scope of Services
Page 8
45O
500
510
520
to comments on the administrative draft and draft sections. The CONSULTANT anticipates
attendance at up to one meeting during this effort.
Location Hydraulic Study
The CONSULTANT shall prepare a location hydraulic study in accordance with Caltrans
procedures. The CONSULTANT will coordinate with Zone 7 to obtain relevant current
hydraulic information for the Alamo Canal. The CONSULTANT will prepare a backwater
analysis to supplement the location hydraulic study and will submit copies to Caltrans, the
City and Zone 7 for review.
Preliminary Engineering
The design objective is to provide plans and construction cost estimates in support of the
environmental document. CADD digital drawings will be prepared in Microstation format
and a format acceptable to the City. The documents will be produced in metric units and
annotated Imperial units.
Structure General Plan
The CONSULTANT will prepare a structure general plan to show structural type and
preliminary cost estimates.
Project Submittals
The design objective is to provide an environmental document and obtain the environmental
clearance for the construction of the project. The following environmental documents, if
required, will be submitted to the CITY:
~ A maximum of six copies of each Environmental Technical Studies for the CITY
and Caltrans review:
Natural Environment Study
Location Hydraulic Study
Traffic memorandum
Sonoma State Cultural Resources Literature Search
Area of Potential Effect Map
,- A maximum of six copies of each Environmental Technical Studies for the CITY,
Caltrans and FHWA files:
Natural Environment Study
Location Hydraulic Study
Traffic memorandum
Sonoma State Cultural Resources Literature Search
Area of Potential Effect Map
In conjunction with the environmental document, the CONSULTANT will prepare
preliminary engineering documents for the project. CADD digital drawings will be prepared
in Microstation format, or a format acceptable to the CITY in accordance with the CITY
procedures. Drawings will be in metric, and annotated Imperial units as established by the
CITY. The CONSULTANT will submit a maximum of 10 copies of the preliminary
engineering plans consisting of:
· Strip maps with right-of-way and geometrics defined
· Preliminary Bridge general plan
J:k2262~4.dmin\Contracts'~SCOPl~SCOPE 1 a. WPD ~
DUBLIN BOULEVARD VV~DENING PROJECT
Scope of Services
July 6, 2000
Page 9
540
600
610
620
700
710
720
Design Reviews
At milestone points, the CONSULTANT will submit materials to the CITY and
participating local agencies for review and comment. Review periods will be four weeks
for all milestones. Each reviewing agency will submit a single set of coordinated review
comments to the CONSULTANT. The CONSULTANT will compile review comments
from the reviewing agencies and schedule a meeting with the CITY and the other reviewing
agencies to discuss any conflicting comments and to reach a consensus on resolution of any
conflicts. Minutes of the resolution meeting will be distributed within five working days
of the meeting. The CONSULTANT will incorporate agreed upon resolutions into the
reviewed documents. Should future reviews generate comments which require changes to
previously agreed upon elements of the documents and such changes result in additional
work on the part of the CONSULTANT, such changes will be performed as Additional
Services.
MATERIALS FURNISHED BY The CITY
Record Documents
The CITY will provide the following items:
· Current standard Drawings, Manuals, Guides, and Procedures that pertain to the
project
· Available CITY "as-built" plans and specifications of existing conditions including
roadways, utilities, dra~hage improvements, and structures
Available CITY right-of-way plans
Surveying and mapping information including existing monument locations
Sample plans and reports to be used as guidelines for format, organization and
content
Access to all records available at the CITY
Base and Miscellaneous Informhtion
· Entry permission on private parcels
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
The CITY
The CITY will:
· Conduct ongoing reviews of the CONSULTANT's progress in performing the work
and furnish technical comments in a timely manner on ail submissions
· Review and approve the CONSULTANT's billings in a timely manner
· Review, evaluate and may approve CONSULTANT's requests for extension of time
and amendments to the agreement
· Attend all progress meetings with the CONSULTANT
· Attend meetings with the CONSULTANT and others as requested
· Conduct public outreach and public relations tasks
CONSULTANT
The CONSULTANT will:
· Establish, furnish and maintain suitable office facilities to serve as the project office
for the duration of the project
· Maintain an adequate staff of qualified support personnel to perform the work
l :kZ262kAd min\Contr ac.~SCOPE~S COPE 1 a. WPD 9
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT
Scope of Services
July 6, 2000
Page 10
730
740
750
760
770
necessary to complete the project
Establish internal accounting methods and procedures for documenting and
monitoring project costs acceptable to Caltrans Standards
Establish and maintain contract administration procedures which will include
amendments, time extensions and subcontracts
Maintain a project workbook with all the pertinent information relating to the
project to be given to the CITY at the close of the project
Attend meetings with other agencies as requested by the CITY. However, if number
of meetings exceed those indicated in this scope of services, then those meetings
wilt be performed as Additional Services
The CONSULTANT is responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the contract
documents and related desig-n prepared under this project and prior to submittals will check
all material accordingly. The plans will be reviewed by the CITY for conformity with the
CITY procedures and the terms of the contract.
Project Control
The CONSULTANT will provide and maintain a Management Information System to
monitor costs and manpower and to report progress with the following:
· Identify progress against the schedule for each major work item
· Forecast completion dates from current progress
· Advise the CITY of any work not in this scope or in any area which is out of the
required sequence
· Provide updated estimates of time, manpower and dollars required for major work
elements
Subcontract Services
Due. to the nature and scope of the required services, the CONSULTANT will subcontract
portions of the work. The CONSULTANT will review and coordinate the work of all
subconsultants and they will abide by the terms and conditions of this scope as applicable
to them.
Quality Control
The CONSULTANT and subconsultants have total responsibility for the accuracy and
completeness of the plans and related design prepared under this project and will check all
such material accordingly. The CONSULTANT will prepare and have a quality control plan
in effect during the entire time work is being performed under this contract. The quality
control plan will establish a process whereby plans, calculations, and documents that the
CONSULTANT submits for review will be clearly marked as fully checked prior to
submittals by a qualified individual other than the originator.
CONSULTANT Personnel
The CONSULTANT's work will be performed and/or directed by the key personnel
identified in the CONSULTANT's proposal. Any changes in the indicated key personnel
will be subject to review and approval by The CITY.
Acceptability of the Work
The plans, designs, calculations, reports and other documents furnished under this scope of
work will conform to the CITY's standard of quality. The criteria for acceptance will be'a
J:~2262~Admin\Contract$~SCOPE~ CO?E 1 a. WPD 1 0
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT
Scope of Services
July 6, 2000
Page 11
780
product of neat appearance, well organized, accurate and complete, technically and
grammatically correct, checked and dated in accordance with the Quality Control Plan, and
having the originator and checker identified. The minimum standards of appearance,
organization, and content of drawing will are similar to the type produced by the CITY.
Design Documentation
The CONSULTANT will submit all design notes, sketches, worksheets and computations
to document the design conclusions. The design notes and computations wilt be recorded
on 8 1/2" x 1 1" computation sheets, appropriately titled, numbered, dated, indexed, and
signed by the designer and checker. The data will be bound in a hardback folder or a three-
ring binder for submittals to the CITY. Computer output forms and other oversized sheets
will be bound or placed in a binder. Design notes and computations will include, but not
necessarily be limited to, the following data:
· Design criteria used for the project
· Geometric design calculations for horizontal and vertical alignment
· - Quantity calculations
· Documentation of decisions reached from meetings, telephone conversations or ~ite
visits
J:~262~.dmin\Comract s~.SC OP E~COPE 1 a. WPD 1 1
MKCENTENNIAL Dublin Boulevard Widening - Village Parkway to Sierra Court
Phase 1 and Phase 2
2000 2001 2002
ID TaskName Duration Start Finish 'Ja--~JF"bJMarJAprJMaYJJunJJul JAuglSePJOctlN°vlDecl'Jenlj=ebtMarlAprlMeylJunljal IAuglSe@IOctlNOviDec'Jen'Feb'Mar
I Notice To Proceed 0 days 2/9100 2/9/00 ; ~ ' ~ ' = . , ·
2 'P~'~j;~:i"~;~'~i ................................... 2~1~ ~;; ................. ~i~JO~ ............ 2/2/ol ........... ~ ............ ~ .............. ~ ...................... i ....... t ......... ~ ............................................ ~ .............. i ............................ i,'"'"'"'-'i ................ i ............. i ............ ~ .............. i ....................................... ~ ............
'......... ............... .: ......... ij i !ilia! ............. ............. .............................. ' ............... i i"'ii .
4 .............. ............. i~i~;~'~;ii';',~ ~'~;"~ .......................................................................... - .
8 ~'~"~;;~'~'~'~'~.;~.~.~ ....~.......~_,_~ ............ ~ ................................
8 ............. ~i~;~"id~;;ii[~'~"~;~a~;'~ ................................................................................................................................. . ............................ ~ .....
0 days 7117100 7/17/00 ~l~
l'~' 7/17 [
233 days 1112100 12/1/00 .........i' ' ' ' ~ i ~ [ : ~ ~ ~ ' ~ '~' ! ~ ? · :
................. · ' = ' ' ~F' i i [ i i
a E~i'~'~i'~i ............................................................................................................ 80 days 1/12/00 5/2/00 ~ .-..,..i ............... i ............ i ........... i ............... i .......... ~,~ ........ i .............. i ...... i .............. i ........................... ~ ............ i ....... [ .......... i ....... [ ............ ~ ! .......... ~ i
9 ........ -~;~'~;i';~[~'"i~'i~ ~"i~;~";;'~i";~;~ ;[;i["b'~'b'~;ii;~ ~ ~ ............................... ~'~i~; ..................... ~'~'~ ................... ~'~)~ ......... , , ........................ , ...................... ~ ............... ~ .............. ~ ~ ............ ~ ................................................................ , .............. ~ ......... , ...................
10 ..... ~'~'~i'i~'~i~i ~J~'~i~ .................................................... 4 wks 1/26/00 2/22./00 " ' ~ ~ ~ ........... [ ......................... ~ ......... ~ ............ i ............. i .......................................... ~ ................
11 .......................... I~'~'~;~"~ ~"~7~'~i' ~X ....................................................................................... ~"~ .......... 1/26/00 2/22/00 ' ~ ~ ~ !'i ~ ~ ~ ! ! i ! ~ , !
~2 .......... :................. i~;;'i;ii'~"~;;;;i'~;"i~'~i~'~i 4 wks 2/23/00 3/21/00 i ~ J ! [ [ i '
,4 ................ ,~;'~'~'~'~'"~'~"~'~"~"~a~,,'~,~, ........... ~,~ .................... ~.~ ....... 4,4,00 ii ~'~ ! i, ~ :. '! i ~ .......... ............ ........ ~, ............ ......... ! i ~ ~i ............. ............ ............ ...... ..........
~5 ................. i~;i';~;'i~B ~'~;~s 415100 4n8~00 : , [] ....
16 ............... i:;~;~;.~;ii.,-~;.~0;,.g~--.~B..i~;..i~WA.i~;;.a~;p;;~,i .................... 4.Wi~ 4~i'~)60 .... ~,i~-S)00 ..... i ........ i ............ :, .......... . ........ ! ......... q ...... i ...... ~ ..... : ......... ~ ............ i ....... . ..... ~ ........ ~.. : .....
17 Final approval '0 da~'; ............. $)2~0 ....... 5/21oo ; : ' ; : ...... ! .......................................... ~ : "i ..........................
18 Preliminary E ngI, em;ir~ .................................. 76 days ....... 1/21~i~1~ ............. 5/;I ~)0'0 ........ i ...... ! ...... [ ! ..... ! ...... iJ .... i ......... i ..... i ............. i ...................... i ............. i ........ i ........... i ......................... ! :
~ .............. b~;i~;"b;;~i~o~';;;~'~i"'~i;i~iE;;;i';~; .......................... 1 wk 1/26/00 '2FfiOb ........... ~ ............. i .............................................. j'"'"'"'t i ............. i ...................... i ........ ; : .................
~o .... i~'~i~;;";~;:i'i~;~':: ~ ............... , ............ ~ ...................... 1 ....... i ................ ~ ........ + ....................................... i ........... i ....... ~ ........................................ ',.
13.4 wks 2/2/00 5/4/00 : -. '. ..... : ·
21 Struclure General Plan 4 wks 2/9/00 5/10/00 ....... ~ ............ ~ ............ ~ ............. ~ ............. ~ ............ ?~'"""~ ....... ' ............. i .............. ~ ............. ! .............. i ........... J ......... ~ ........ ~ : ...... [ .......... ! .......... ', ........ ; .......... , ; i . ..
22 ........ I~'ii'~l'~'r~'~'~j~'~ 12.4wks 2/9/00 §/4/00 i ~:~[i ' JJ .................... ~ .......................... i ................................................................................... ~ : .....
23 ............ ~';;'~;~i~"~'~;B,;;;;]~;"~'~'~i'"~i~'i;'iL~;~:~;"E, ~i'~ ~;;;i~ ~ ........ 80 days 5/5/00 8/24/00 i ............... ~!'""'"'" '"'~ ............... ~ .......... ~ ............. ~ ............................... i i ........................................................................... ; ........ ~ ..........
......... ~. ~ '~ J '~
24 .......... ~j'~g , , ......................... ,
4 wks 5/5/00 6/1/00 ! ~ ~ ~ .... i .......
28 .......................... ?i~'~"~'~'~'~' .................................................................................................. § : ............... i ................ ' .......................................... !, ........... ~' ............ ~ .................................... J ........... J.. ~ ....... I
wks 6/2/00 7/13/00 ~ i J [ ........ ~ ~ ....................... ? .....
27 ......................... ~ ~; i ~'~ i J
4 wks 8/2/00 6/Z8/00 ~ ~ l i ~ i ...................................... '~
28 .......................... ~;i'~i;"~;';;~i"i;'~;;i'~ 8 ~' ........ ................................ ' , ~ ' ~ , ......... ' ..... ·
wks 7/14/00 8/24/00 j ~ ~ ..' i ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ............ ~ ........... ~ ...... : .......... ~ ...............
2~ .......... i~'~'ii~'"~i;'~;:~';;~'i~ 2O~d.ys 2/2~,/oo, '~2n/oo i~i '"" ............... ' ............... ' ............... j'- j' ................. ~ .............
~o ...................... ~;~i'~";~i~"~;'i~;;~'~;i~i~i~ ! J ..... i ............ i .............. i ....... i ~1 ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = ~ ~ ~ '- : i :
., 40 6 wks 2/23/00 12/1/00 i i i i i i i i ~i i ! i ' i
'
Project:
DUBLIN12.MPP
Date: 7/6/00 8:12 PM Task ~:.'~'~,~,~,.~.~m~'~jX~ Critical Task L~~,'~,~'j Progress - I Milestone ~!~ Summary
MK CENTENNIAL Dublin Boulevard Widening -Village Parkway to Sierra Court
Phase I and Phase 2
2000 ' : 2OOl 2oo2
lO Task Name Duration Sta,~ Fin,sh Jen lFeb I Mar IAPr IMaY 1J"n I Ju' IA"g ISeP l Oc' INoviDe° I Jan IFebl Mar IApr IMay taun I J., IA.0 ISep Oct INovlOee
34 Dra~ foundation report 4 wks 7/17/00 8/11/00 i i i r ':'--' :. : . ' .... , '
1 wk 9/4/00 918/00 i i !
39 CITY review 4 wks 9/11/00 10/6/00 i ~ ............. ~"'"'"'"'~ ............... i ............................ i .......... ? ........................ ~ ................. i .................. j ........ ! ..... ! i .... i "i
........ · I",,'",1 ~ ~ :
65 days 10/9/00 1/5/01 ~ .... ~ ..... ~ ........................ ~ ................. ~ .........
43 90% plans 6 wks 10/9/00 11117/00 ........... [ ............. ] .......... ] ............ i ....... ~' ............ [ ....................!
i ' i ~ ! ~ . ...i...
44 Construction Costs i wk 11120/00 11/24/00 i ..................... i ........... i ................................ i'"
50 ~-~na~ p~ans 4 wks 1/8/01 2/2/01 i := ..... ': ......... i .... :: . ........................................... ~ ......... ! ..... ! ...... : .... · ....... : : ~ :
51 Construction Costs 1 wk 2/5/01 2/9/01 '! ~ ........ ~ ....... ~ ; " ...........................................................................
Project: DUBLIN12.MPP I
Date: 7/6100 8:12 PM Task I~ I Critical Task L~~'~ Progress - -- Milestone ,~ Summa~ -~ I
File: y:\etty\scope\DUBLIN 12.MPpI
Dublin Boulevard Widening Project
COST PROPOSAL
MK CENTENNIAL
LABOR:
Classification
Proj Prin
Proj Mgr
Sr Eng
Engineer
CADD
Clerical
TOTAL DIRECT LABOR
MKC DIRECT COSTS:
DIRECT COSTS;
Hours Rate Total
8 $ 54.00 $ 432.00
164 $ 45.00 $ 7,380.00
136 $ 34.00 $ 4,624.00
100 $ 24.00 $ 2,400.00
56 $ 23.00 $ 1,288.00
30 $ 16.00 $ 480.00
494 $ 16,604.00
OVERHEAD ~ 1.69293 $ 28.109.41
SUBTOTAL LABOR + OVERHEAD $ 44,713.41
Mailing, Telephone, Supplies, Photos ....
Reproduction & Presentation Materials
CADD Computer
Transportation
SUBTOTAL MKC DIRECT COSTS
FEE ibased on 10% profit of labor)
$ 500.00
$ 305.00
$
$
$ 805.00
$ 4,471.34
L SUBTOTAL MKC $
49~989.75
J35%
Page 1
y:\etty~dublin~scope\Engcstl .xls Labor + ODCs Revised: 7/6/00 8:10 PM
Dublin Boulevard Widening Project
COST PROPOSAL
PUBLIC AFFAIRS MANAGEMENT
LABOR:
Classification Hours
Principal - Env 28
Proj Mgr o Env 68
Associate - Env 138
Clerical 48
Rate Total
$ 50.16 $ 1,404.48
S 29.57 $ 2.010.62
$ 18.59 $ 2.564.81
$ 20.38 $ 978.28
DIRECT LABOR
DIRECT COSTS:
282 $ 6, 958.20
OVERHEAD ~ 1.44 $ 10.019.80
SUBTOTAL LABOR + OVERHEAD $ 16,978.00
Printing, Mailing, Telephone & Supplies $ 3,000.00
Transportatio~ $ 500.00
Graphic Suppor~ $ 1,500.00
Subconsuitants $ 8,000.00
SUBTOTAL DIRECT COSTS $ 13,000.00
FEE (based on 10¥o profit of labor) $ 1,697.80
SUBTOTAL PAM $ 31~675.80
122%
Page 2
y:\etty~,dubfin',scope~.Engcstl .xls Labor + ODCs Re~sed: 7/6/00 8:10 PM
Dublin Boulevard Widening Project
COST PROPOSAL
TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 143,480.02
Chaudhary & Associates
LABOR:
Prin Mngr
Proj Surveyor
Office Surveyor
2-man Field Crew
Eng / CADD
DIRECT LABOR
DIRECT COSTS:
Hcum Rate
20 $ 48.00
56 $ 37.00
8 S 28.00
110 $ 53.97
64 $ 25.00
258
OVERHEAD ~ 1.8612
SUBTOTAL LABOR + OVERHEAD
Total
$ 960.00
$ 2,072.00
$ 224.00
$ 5,938.70
$ 1,600.00
~lileage $
Reproduction & Matedats $
Photogrametrist $
$
Title Reports at cost (assumes 15 total @ 1000 per title report)
SUBTOTAL DIRECT COSTS
FEE (based on 10% profit of labor)
SUBTOTAL CHAUDHARY
$ 10,792.70
$ 20,087.37
$ 30,880.07
500.00
50C 00
3,700.00
15,000.00
19.700.00
3,088.01
~37%
(assumes 5 field days)
Page 3
y:\etty\dub/in~scope\Engcstl .xts Labor + ODCs Revised: 7/6100 8:10 PM
Dublin Boulevard Widening Project
COST PROPOSAL
FEHR & PEERS ASSOCIATES
LABOR:
Froj Prin
Sr Engineer
Engineer
Technical
DIRECT LABOR
DIRECT COSTS:
Hou~ R~e
14 $ 54.81
27 S 28.85
52 $ 21.64
14 $ 19.00
Total
$ 787.34
$ 778.95
$ 1 125.28
$ 266.00
107
OVERHEAD @ 1.4437
SUBTOTAL LABOR + OVERHEAD
Travel Mileage
Prin[ing, Mailing, Tel~'hone & Supplies
SUBTOTAL DIRECT COSTS
FEE (based on 10% crofit cf labor)
$ 2,937.57
$ 4.240.97
$ 7,178.54
250.00
$ 250.00
$ 717.85
SUBTOTAL FEER & PEERS $
8.146.39 ,t6%
Page 4
y:\etty\dublin\scope\Engcstl.xls Labor 4- ODCs Revised: 7~6~00 8:10 PM
COST PROPOSAL- LABOR ONLY Dublin Boulevard Widening Project Revised: 7/6/00 8:10 PM
: MK Centennial
~ · ProJ Prln ProJ Mgr Sr Eng Engineer CADD Clerical MKC
{~ ' · ' ' - t. ahnrRale~ $ 54.00 $ 45.00 $ 34.00 $ 24.00 $ 23.00 $ 16.00
· · Task
i' ' . No Descrli~tlon Hours Cost Hours Cost I Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost
Project Management & Administration Hours Cost Hours Cost
I Acm!r~stfa'.,on ! Invoic~s (4) 2 108 12 540 8 128 22 776.00
j c- ,:,~.'., ¢cl~ s u .1:1:~:" ' Oc~;rdu,a',.o,~ 2 108 40 1.800 49 128 64 46 26 1,972.00 956.00
j K,Ck-c, ff u,r:e!:ng 8 360 8 272 2 32 18 664.00
,~.{eu!i-';!s li'.$ency Cecr: ~ c:'~ '.4) 2 108 12 540 I 12 408 12 288 8 128 46 1.472.00
! SUBIOIAL 8 432 88 3,960 20 680 12 288 0 30 480 158 5,840.00
iE~lvir°nme~talt;cqfim~ [-"~!v,l(',.'l','l~R~l I)Cc[im,~rt,! 2 90 J 2 90.00
i 'I u.;hr, ~'~! ~;l,dd:es 8 360 24 816 32 1,176.00
CECA I~,!t!ai S,,ucy I ;",'~G Duc 8 ;.360 24 816 32 1,176.00
SUBTOTAL 0 t8 810 48 1,632 0 0 0 66 2,442.00
Right.of-Way En.31neering & Surveys
:
I F:< ~ n3 u!,:,!y p';ms & cc,.;r(' ~d;~m 8 360: 8 272 8 192 8 184 32 1,008.00
I 5uDp;emen'.a! Su.~eys 8 360 8 272 16 632.00
: R~,'V sm.l ,'.l.~,,)Fing Con!re: 8 360 8 272 16 632.00
,[ SUBTOTAl 0 24 1,080 24 816 8 192 8 184 0 64 2.272
iPrelimi,~nry Emjiqeering
j ',Jatn cclleclinn ~Pd .~e?J reviews 4 136 8 .: 192 12 328.00
I Geomotr'c layo'.~t 2 90 20 680 40 · 960 32 736 94 2,466.00
! Sit-:ch;re Ge:~sra' Plus 8 360: 8 272 20 480 16 368 52 1,480.00
R~spense lc co'~,ments 4 180 4 136 4 96 12 412.00
Q;4QC 16 720 16 720.00
JEs',im~tas 4 180 8 272 8 192 20 644.00
al .... BUBTOTAL 0 34 1,530 44 1,496 80 1,920 48 1,104 0 206 6,050.00
· ~**GRAND TOTAL***'"' -~ -.· 'i~l ~ ,a~") 4~'~ 7,'~en '~'~" 4,624 '100 2,400 56 '1,288 30 480 494 16,604
I
COST PROPOSA_L - LABOR ONLY
Dublin Boulevard ~n(i~ening Project
Revised: ?/61_00 8 10 PM
Task ._
No Di=.';crl~.lloe
Admir!:slrnlion /
E.viroementa]
CRO~ IH.lia~ 5tu=? !Nc[I ( )oc
RI[Iht-BI-Way E lg ~merln0 & S~rveys
Prelhninary Engineering
Data colloctiun Dnd
*****GRAND TOTAL*'''~ '.--'- .;'.. .. ..'
Labo
SUBTOTAL
SUBTOTAL
SUBTOTAL
St.IR'IOT~
20!
40!
,,10~,
4
710 4,0
?,Ol I 138
0
7/,3
149
!.6/3
2.555
1,404 68 2,011 138 2,555
0
0
0
O
16
32 Gf~? 178 4310.17
4.'l .~t78 282 6958.20
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.~
0 0.00
0 0.~
0 0
COST PROPOSAL- LABOR ONLY Dublin Boulevard Widening Project Revised. 7/6/00 8;10 PM
-Task
.!. . No Descdptlen '
i. Project Manager;lent & Administration
Labor Rate >
Administration I hlvoices (4)
t.'O:'t!:l!y Prc~ress l:~o2o.ts i Scl;ed'. lo (4)
K;ck-cff
Me~hngs I Agl!qcy Co:)m !13!.o11
SUBTOTAL
[ ~chP!c~l SJtltJ'es
C["OA Inflml Study I No3 D~c
SUB rOTAL
, fbg al.of.Way Eegh~eerln.q & Surveys
il R,'-;,~ al](t Mappi:~g Con!rcl
:' SUB ! OT^L
i Prelln:inary Eng!neer!r~g
!i Da~a c~!!,.~chcn and I~:'c .'e,, ews
,.
ii ffshmntas
IL sub lOfAt.
.... ...............
96
864
4
52
0
i,'.~
1,924 8
54
;).514
5.937
64
2 072 ;~ 224 !10
o _ o [ o o
20 960 56 2,072 8 224 110 5,937 64
"~%- ~-. '..J.--.-; -.-~-~--.~...~-~-2-_ ..... ~ ............ ....
2O9
1
1.600
' ~',~-0o
0 0 0'3
O 0 00
0 0 00
o 0 00
0 o.00
D
0 0 oo
0 0
o o ()0
(!
0 !) (:(]
68 3.358 3B
160 1,434 32
258 10.79:J
0 -3 O0
0 0.00
0 0 O0
0 o 6-3
o 0 oo
0 o CO
0
.... iSb .... 'i0,79T
COST PROPO. ~AL - LABOR ONLY
Dublin Boulevarrl-~idening Project
Revised: 7/6100 8:10 PM
· ProJ Prin Sr Err§lin:er Er'~¢ Ineer Techolcal :] ' · .' ·: ~Fehr & Peers Tota
· - · Labor Rate> ¢ 54
Project ;,lanailmztertt & Admiltl~ralioll
Adm:nlstrn;m'~ I ;nvomes (4)
Mcolll'.y 1~l!.~lrff%s p(rl;Ol[$ I SC!i~tILI~e (4t ! 0 0.00
~;i.nco, 's ?tnnl Coo;dimd.ol~ 0 0.00
0 0.00
.Moot'no,~ ! A§c:P. Cy Coordio._.! ol~. (4) 0 0.00
SUDTOTAI. 0 3 8i 0 0 3 86.55
Erl¥1ronmet~t,l!
0 0.00
'[ e~.!ir ~ic;fi .q.t~ !d~OS 7 :534 1 ? 34ti 3? fi~.}7 ii 152 59 1,574.35
CEOA Irl:~,ol SI,;dy I/'.~e q Doc 7 38 ~, ! 2 34(i ?(t .;.'1.:t 6 '{ 14 45 1,276.67
SU[H'OTAL 14 7.q1 ~ 24 I=.'~ 2 52 1,12!) 14 268 t04 2,851.02
R!uht-of-Way Eogineerlng & Surveys
Supp!e.m~.'~ n ,Su~eys
· 0 0.00
R/W anti I'J;i..bp;ftfj COl ;~ , I 0 0.00
Preliminary En§lneerirlg SUBTOTAL !! ] 0 0 0 0
Dala c..3,~[_~c{~ori arid lie~d reviews
Oo~,melr!c laynu', 0 0.00
Slmc!!~.'o Genr;ral Plal; 0 0,00
0 0.00
l{esp.~;mn In coll[;men!s 0 0.00
0/,./¢'~C 0 0.00
....... ~ ............ =.,=.~:~. ................................ ~ ......'_..~.==..., ...... '-.', ........ --_ _ n o
..... GRAND TOTAL'*'*'- ~ ~'~ '~ ~' '~ 27 779 52 1,125 14 266 107 2,938
COST PROPOSAL- LABOR ONLY Dublin Boulevard Widenin'[j Project Revised: 7/6/00 8:10 PM
Task
No Descriptlmt
Project Mallaqef'.teltt & A(hrlhllstr,ltioz!
Meutip~;s I/',gun;y Coorc:.naJ.on
Rlght.ol'-W3y Engineering & Surveys
Ex:S!;I",.I td;:ily pla'is & coo=,'!
SupF:emenl:il S,p.'eys
Rf~ nl,d M~pplng Conl'o~
Preli~nlnary Engineering
Q,',IOC
*~'*GRAND TOTAL
Lahcr Rata >J--~J
I
· IIOUR$
SURTOTAL
SUBTOTAL
SLII]TOTAL
SURTOTAL
TOTAL
22
48 $
21 $
4fl
10
179
255
452
32 $
84 $
206
322 $
'12
94 $
12 $
10
20 $
200 $
1,t41
cos
776.00 "i
956.00
1,972.00
790.55
1,472.00
5,927
597.60
4,930.7Jl
$,762.R4
12,251
1,008.00
3,990.38
8,066.32
13,064.70
328.00
2,45fi.00
1,400.00
412.00
720.00
64,i.00
6,050
37,292
EXHIBIT
A Professional Services Agreement Between
CITY OF DUBLIN
(C~TY)
and
MK CENTENNIAL
(CONSULTANT)
for the
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT
SCOPE OF SERVICES
PHASE 2
INDEX DESCRIPTION
PAGE
100
110
120
140
150
160
170
180
190
GENERAL ......................................................................................................................... 3
Location ........................ ~ ...................................................................................................... 3
Description .......................................................................................................................... 3
Design Contraet ......................................................................................................... i ......... 3
Construction Cost ................................................................................................................ 4
.Length of Services ............................................................................................................... 4
Project Scheduling .............................................................................................................. 4
Project Progress Meetings and Monthly Progress Reporting ............................................. 4
Design Monitoring and Subconsultant Management .......................................................... 4
200
210
220
240
DESIGN REFERENCES .................................................................................................. 5
Caltrans Publications ........................................................................................................... 5
AASHTO Publications ........................................................................................................ 5
Publications From Other Sources ....................................................................................... 5
300
310
320
330
340
PHASE 1 DESIGN WORK PERFORMED BY CONSULTANT ................................ 5
Data Collection and Field Reviews ..................................................................................... 5
Site Mapping and Supplemental Field Surveys .................................................................. 5
Public Outreach ................................................................................................................... 6
Right-of-Way ...................................................................................................................... 6
400
410
420
430
440
441
442
443
444
445
450
460
470
PHASE 2 DESIGN WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY CONSULTANT ................... 6
Coordination with the CITY and Other Parties .................................................................. 6
Permits ................................................................................................................................. 6
Geotechnical ........................................................................................................................ 8
P. S. & E. Documents .......................................................................................................... 8
Lighting and Signal Design ................................................................................................. 9
Construction Staging ........................................................................................................... 9
Utility Plans ......................................................................................................................... 9
Drainage .............................................................................................................................. 9
Landscaping and Irrigation ............................................................................................... 10
Project Submittals ............................................................................................................. 10
Design Reviews ................................................................................................................. 12
Quantities and Cost Estimates ........................................................................................... 12
k[CEI_PL I\VOL I ~CEI D AT~262kADM II~CONTKACT S~PHASE2'~q COPE2.WPD 1
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT
Scope of Services
June 28, 2000
Page 2
5OO
510
520
60O
610
620
630
640
650
66O
670
680
MATERIALS FURNISIq'ED BY The CITY ................................................................. 12
Recoi-d Documents ............................................................................................................ 12
Miscellaneous Information ............................................................................................... 12
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION ............................................................................... 12
The CITY .......................................................................................................................... !2
CONSULTANT ................................................................................................................ 13
Project Control .................................................................................................................. 13
Subcontract Services ......................................................................................................... 13
Quality Control .................................................................................................................. 13
CONSULTANT Personnel ................................................................................................ 14
Acceptability of the Work ................................................................................................. 14
Design Documentation ...................................................................................................... 14
\\CEI_PL 1 WOL I\CEIDA"B2262~dDMIN~CONTRACTS~HASE2~COPE.2.WPD 2
DUBLIN BOULEVARD V~DENING PROJECT
Scope of Services
June 28, 2000
Page 3
100
110
120
140
GENERAL
Location
The project is located in Dublin, California. The City of Dublin is proposing to widen
Dublin Boulevard between Village Parkway and Sierra Court/Civic Plaza from a four-lane
to a six-lane facility. The existing street has been improved to a six-lane facility from
Village Parkway to San Ramon Road. The proposed project will extend the six-lane facility
to just east of the Sierra Court intersection. The widening of Dublin Boulevard is to both
sides of the street to obtain additional roadway width. This wilI require both demolition and
reconstruction of existing improvements on both sides 0fthe street including widening of
an existing bridge and repair of the creek slopes below the bridge. During the
reconstruction, existing overhead utilities will be placed underground.
Description
The CONSULTANT will prepare final plans, specification and estimates. The design &the
project elements described herein, will be in accordance with The CITY, and Caltrans
Standards in effect at the time this agreement is executed. The documents will be produced
in metric units.
The project will consist of the following basic features:
Prepare environmental technical studies and environmental documents required for
environmental clearance
Attend project status meetings and City Council meetings
Prepare contract bid documents (plans, specifications and estimates - PS&E)
Design Contract
The CONSULTANT services will be divided into three phases of work:
Phase 1 was completed under a separate consulting engineering services contract dated
November 16, 1999 with the City of Dublin and included:
· Environmental documents and clearance
· Topographic mapping, title reports, supplemental surveys and right-of-way maps
· Field reviews and data collection
· Preliminary engineering and design criteria
· Right-of-way maps, plats and legal descriptions including permanent and temporary
construction easements (TCE)
Phase 2 work will include the following scope of services:
Phase 2
Final construction documents: plans, estimate and specifications (one construction
bid document) including landscaping and irrigation plans and traffic handling and
stage construction plans
Assist The CITY with utility relocation and right-of-way coordination
\\CEI-P L I ~VOL 1 \CEIDAT~'262X'2~DM1N~'C oN'rRACTS~HASE2\SC OPE2' WPD 3
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT
Scope of Services
June 28, 2000
Page 4
150
160
170
180
190
Phase 2 (Continuation).
· Assist the CITY with response to bidders' questions as they pertain to design only
· Construction support services during construction will be provided by CITY staff
Construction Cost
The CONSULTANT will prepare cost estimates of the probable construction costs using the
CITY and Caltrans unit prices. The estimate will include construction costs for roadway,
structures and drainage facilities.
Length of Services
The project will be initiated with a notice to proceed from the CITY. The engineering work
would then proceed without delay for 8 months. Review periods at the milestones will be:
four weeks at the 30% submittal, four weeks at the 90% submittal, and four weeks at the
final submittal. A four-week review period is scheduled for each review of the draft and
final environmental document packages.
The CITY may wish to amend the scope of services to be provided by CONSULTANT.
When this occurs the CITY and the CONSULTANT will agree on a revised scope and any
adjustments to the project schedule and/or compensation due the CONSULTANT.
Project Scheduling
The project schedule will include all project activities and milestones. The schedule will
identify all milestones, tasks and sub tasks, review periods, and coordination activities
associated with engineering and design. Attachment A, "Design Schedule," shows the time
phased tasks to be performed for the required work.
Project Progress Meetings and Monthly Progress Reporting
Monthly progress reports will be submitted to the CITY with each invoice for payment for
engineering services. The report will indicate the tasks that were completed during the
preceding period, work planned for the next period, identification of design issues or
problems being encountered, and a comparison of planned and actual progress. The updated
schedule will accompany this report. Monthly reports will be submitted throughout the
project duration assumed above. Reports will not be submitted for any period where no
work was performed.
The CONSULTANT Project Manager will meet with the appointed CITY representatives
on a monthly basis to discuss the status of the project design work. These meetings wilt
focus on resolution of any design issues requiring the CITY involvement, the design
progress, potential problems, and to address any particular detail of the work previously
identified for resolution.
Design Monitoring and Subconsultant Management
The CONSULTANT Project Manager and each subconsultant principal will monitor the
work underway to assure it complies with the criteria and standards established for the work,
and to ensure that the design work is being accomplished in the most efficient manner
possible.
The CONSULTANT will establish effective and efficient project procedures to direct and
monitor the subconsultants' work. Regular scheduled reviews of the subconsultant design
\\CEI-PL I \VOL 1 \CEIDA'IX2262Led2'M IN~CO~CTS~HA SE2~SCOPE2' WPD 4
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT
Scope of Services
June 28, 2000
Page 5
20O
210
220
240
300
310
320
will be performed:to ensure compliance with the quality standards established, coordination
among team members, and that design operations are being conducted in a timely and
efficient manner.
DESIGN REFERENCES
Caltrans Publications
211 Standard Drawin.~s
Bridge Standard Details (Current Edition - Metric).
Standard Plans (1999 Edition - Metric)
212 Specifications
Standard Specifications (1999 Edition - Metric)
213 Manuals
Highway Design Manual, 5th edition (Metric)
Bridge Design Specifications (Current Edition - Metric)
Bridge Design Practice (Current Edition)
Bridge Memo to Designers (Current Edition)
Bridge Design Aids (Current Edition)
Bridge Design Details (Current Edition)
AASHTO Publications
A Policy on Geometric Design of'Highways and Streets, 1994 ("Green Book")
Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, with interim revisions through 1997
Manual on Foundation Investigations, 1978
Guide for Design of Pavement Structures, 1993
Guide for Specifications and Standards
Standard Specifications for Structural Supports for Highway Sig, ns, Luminaries and Traffic
Signals, Edition of 1985 and Interim Specifications through 1991
Roadside Design Guide, 1996
An Information Guide for Roadway Lighting, 1984
AASHTO Drainage Guidelines, 1992
Publications From Other Sources
City of Dublin Standard Plans
PHASE 1 DESIGN WORK PERFORMED BY CONSULTANT
Data Collection and Field Reviews
Under phase I contract, the CONSULTANT met with the CITY and the local agencies to
collect available information pertinent to the project. A review of available information and
an on-site investigation was conducted to further define site conditions and determine the
need for additional investigation and data.
Site Mapping and Supplemental Field Surveys
Under phase 1 contract, the CONSULTANT prepared topo~aphic base mapping at 1:500
with 0.5-meter continuous intervals based on 1983 NAD (horizontal control) and 1929
NGVD (vertical control). Mapping standards will be checked by the CONSULTANT and
\~CEI_PL I \VOL I\CEID A T~226 2k4.DMrN~CONTRA CTS~PHASE2~SCOPE2. WPD ~
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT
Scope of Services
June 28, 2000
Page 6
330
340
400
410
420
will conform to the CITY's survey/mapping standards, as required for this project. The
CONSULTANT will conduct field surveys. Work .will include conform areas, pavement
spot elevations, storm drainage inlets/outlets, selected utilities and potholed utilities.
Potholing is not included in this scope of services.
Public Outreach
Public outreach activities are included in phase 1 contract. Public outreach activities are
assumed to be minimal during the design phase. We have assumed that the City may want
to have one to two follow-up meetings with local business owners to review the project
status. In addition, we have budgeted for mailings for these two meetings and the
preparation and distribution of one (post-card size) project update during the design phase.
If the City wishes to conduct additional outreach activities such as newsletters, or more
community meetings, they would be billed on a time and materials basis.
Right-of-Way
As part of the phase 1 contract, the CONSULTANT will identify right-of-way necessary for
the project alternatives based on information derived from existing right-of-way information
provided by The CITY. The CONSULTANT will prepare right-of-way maps and conduct
right-of-way surveys. The CITY will provide right-of-way costs to the CONSULTANT.
PHASE 2 DESIGN WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY CONSULTANT
Coordination with the CITY and Other Parties
In phase 2, the Design team members will continue to attend scheduled meetings. The
coordination will be conducted during desig~ revfew submittals, monthly meetings, and at
such other times as specific issues need resolution. It will be necessary for the
CONSULTANT to meet with representatives of the local agencies and The CITY for the
purpose of discussing design details. The number of meetings budgeted for this work are as
follows:
Description NumlS& of Meetings
Monthly progress 6
meetings and / or utility
coordination meetings
The agency contacts anticipated are with Zone 7 and the CITY.
Permits
In phase 2, the CONSULTANT will oversee the application and approval of regulatory
permits for the project. These will include permits from the US Army Corps of Engineers,
401 Certification from the RegionaI Water Quality Control Board, Streambed Alteration
Agreement from the California Deparh,ent offish and Game, and possibly a Section 7
permit from the US Fish and Wildlife Service. The CONSULTANT will utilize the
assistance of Barry Anderson and Monk & Associates in preparing applications and
consulting with the regu!atory agencies. Coordination with the City and Zone 7 will an
integral part of preparing the applications and consultation with the regulatory agencies
regarding any mitigation requirements within the Creek Channel.
\~CEI_PL [\VOL 1 \CE I DATX2.262'~DMIN~CONTRACTSX, PHASE2",SCOPE2.WPD 6
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WTDENING PROJECT
Scope of Services
June 28, 2000
Page 7
Task 1 Obtaining a Corps Permit We are assuming that the project will be eligible for a
Nationwide Permit pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. It is likely that two
permits may be required: Nationwide 14 for linear corridors, and Nationwide 33 for
temporary construction impacts. Although these general permits have already been issued
by the Corps, the applicant must provide the Corps with a Preconstmction Notification (also
known as a PCN). We would prepare PCN and submit it to the Corps.
Task 20btainin g a 401 Certification or Waiver In California the Regional Water Quality
Control Board (RWQCB) in each district administers Section 401 of the Clean Water Act.
We believe the project will receive a Certification waiver. We will prepare the necessary
forms and submit them to the Board for their review. Also, note that as part of the
application package the Board requires adequate California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) documentation which we are assuming the Negative Declaration approved by the
City under the phase 1 contract will be adequate for RWQCB purposes.
Task 3 Obtaining a 1603 Streambed Alteration Agreement The Californ ia Department of
Fish and Game (CDFG) issues Streambed Alteration Agreements for projects that affect the
bed or bank of creeks and stream s in California. We will prepare the necessary forms and
submit them to the Department for their approval. The applicant or applicants consultant
usually meets with the Department in the field to discuss the project and how impacts can
beeliminated or reduced. The Department has recently revised its policy on Streambed
Alteration Agreements and now requires that the project be in compliance with CEQA. We
are assuming that the Negative Declaration approved by the City will be adequate for CDFG
purposes.
Task 4 Assisting With the California Red-lezged Frog (CRLF) Permit Monk & Associates
has already prepar, ed a CRLF site assessment and submitted it to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service for their approval. We do not know what type of permit or permit conditions the
Service will require. For small impacts to frog habitat, the Service has a programmatic
Section 7 permit that they append to the Corps 404 permit. Ideally, this is what would
happen here, and this is what we are providing a budget for.
Task 5 Mitigation Plan Because impacts to various resources are small, we are assuming
that the mitigation requirements will be to reconstruct the .:bank to its previous extent and
hydroseeding bare soil. In this task we will discuss mitigation with the regulatory agencies
and prepare a brief(several pages) document describing the methods for restoration.
Assumptions Because we do not know the exact permits or requirements the agencies will
request, I have made some assumptions that limit what we are prepared to do for the budget
proposed here.
CEQA documentation has been prepared by the City. We assume it ~vill be adequate for
both the Regional Board and the Department offish and Game. Preparation of new CEQA
documents is beyond the scope oft_his proposal. We assume the project wilt be eligible for
a Corps Nationwide Permit. Preparing an application for an Individual Corps permit is
beyond the scope of this proposal. The Fish and Wildlife Service may require a full Section
7 consultation and associated mitigation and monitoring requirements. We assume the
project will receive a Programmatic Section 7, and a regular Section 7 (or Section 10) is
beyond the scope of this proposal. All permits require some sort of mitigation plan. We
assume that restoration to the original state of the channel will be all that is required, and
preparation of full mitigation and monitoring plans that the agencies could require is beyond
the scope of this proposal. We assume the Engineers will provide the necessary engineering
drawings that will be required for several of the permits described above.
\\CEI_PL l \VOL I \CEI DATX2262~KD M IN'\CONT KACT$'xP H A $ E2\SCOPE2. WPD
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT
Scope of Services
June 28, 2000
Page 8
430
44O
Geotechnical
In phase 2, the CONSULTANT will provide pavement section evaluation by first evaluating
the existing pavement conditions of the street and subgrade soils. We will first perform a
document search, followed by a brief pavement conditions survey of the surface of the
pavement following Pavement Management Standards (PMS). The pavement section will
be based on an R-value of 5 where new pavement section design and reconstruction is
needed. Pavement section options will be provided so that the most economic means of
paving the road may be selected.
To obtain subsurface information for the bridge and abutment design, we will drill a deep
.boring at each end of the 1964 bridge. Samples obtained from the borings will be used to
provide geotechnical parameters for the bridge in accordance with Caltrans design
requirements. The samples will also be used for evaluating the Alamo Creek bank
stabilization recommendations and the repair of the bicycle path under the bridge. In
addition, these borings will be used for further information in the evaluation o£the existing
roadway. We plan to provide seismic design parameters for use in the upgrade of the
bridge. Our scope of work includes researching available information regarding the
geology, tectonics, and seismicity of the project site, establishing the controlling seismic
source, estimating peak bedrock acceleration using Caltrans Seismic Hazard Map (1996),
and recommending the appropriate acceleration respons6 spectra (ARS) curve from the
Applied Technology Council publication ATC-32 for the design based on the subsurface
soil information from our field investigation.
The CONSULTANT will draw upon our extensive local experience with Alameda County
Zone 7 as well as that of our staff, in addressing the Alamo Creek channel stabilization. We
will draw upon Zone 7's Channel Repair Standards as defined by Alameda County Flood
Control and Water Conservation District's Resolution No. 1757. We will also consider the
concerns of the Army Corps of Engineers and the Fish and Game Department in assessing
stabilization methods. We will include mitigation measures as outlined in the CEQA
Negative Declaration into the plans and specifications.
The CONSULTANT will also drill three to four shallow borings along the alignment of the
proposed joint utility trench. This is so that we can obtain engineering perimeters and
identify the subsurface conditions that will be encountered during excavation and
construction of the utility vaults, conduits, and trench sections and will also be used for
pavement evaluation. Based on our experience the surface soils in the area are generally
very expansive clays wifh deeper soils consisting of alluvial silty clays with some sand
P.S. & E. Documents
The desig-n objective is to provide plans, specifications and construction cost estimates for
the construction of the project. CADD digital drawings will be prepared in Microstation
format. The documents will be produced in metric units.
Specifications will be composed of supplements to the Caltrans Standard Specifications for
Construction, with general conditions and contract format, including special provisions, as
directed by the CITY. These compositions will be carefully coordinated with the work
depictions shown on the plans and the bid items included in the construction cost estimate.
Construction cost estimates will be assimilated using Caltrans bid item designations,
'~\CEI-PL I \VOL 1 \C£IDAT~'262La'DMR~CONTKACTS'~PHASE2LSCOPE2.WPD ~
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT
Scope of Services
June 28, 2000
Page 9
441
442
443
444
estimating a quantity and expanding it to a cost application of the expected unit price. This
estimate will be performed at each to the design submittal stages. The accuracy of the
estimate will increase throughout the design process.
Lighting and Signal Design
In phase 2, plans specifications & estimates (PS&E) documents will be prepared for the
following project elements:
· Traffic signal modifications at the Dublin Boulevard/Sierra Court and Dublin
Boulevard/Clark Avenue intersections;
· Traffic signal interconnection along Dublin Boulevard between Village Parkway
and Sierra Court; and
· Street li~hting on Dublin Boulevard between Village Parkway and Sierra Court.
Available record and/or construction drawings will be obtained for each project element.
Detailed field verification of as-built existing conditions will be performed. All work will
be conducted in accordance with the current applicable City, County, and State standards.
Electrical load calculations will be prepared and submitted to facilitate verification of
service point locations with the utility company. Final design documents will be provided
based on comments. An internal quality control review will.be conducted prior to each
submittal. Technical special provisions will be prepared and submitted at the 90% design
stage. A construction cost estimate will be prepared and submitted at the 30%, 90%, and
final design stages.
Construction Staging
· As part of the PS&E package in phase 2, the CONSULTANT will prepare construction
staging and traffic handling plans. The existing traffic capacity will be maintained during
construction. However, temporary lane closures will be required. CONSULTANT will
identify lane closure hour constraints in the specifications.
Utility Plans
In phase 2, the CONSULTANT will prepare utility maps that identify the existing utilities
based on existing as-built data obtained from the CITY and utilities. The CONSULTANT
shall coordinate with the utilities to identify, propose final locations, and prepare plans for
utilkies which are affected by the project and not included in the utility under~ound district
work. Utility owners will design the relocation of their own facilities as identified by the
CONSULTANT. Pot holing is not included in this scope of services. The CITY may wish
to amend the scope of services to be provided by CONSULTANT for utility relocation
design. When this occurs The CITY and CONSULTANT will agree on a revised scope and
any adjustments to the project schedule and/or compensation due CONSULTANT.
Drainage
The CONSULTANT will review the affected sub-basin drainage areas for the project and
determine the drainage impacts. The CONSULTANT will then report to the CITY their
findings of the drainage impacts. The CITY will review the CONSULTANT'S f'mding and
make a determination on how to proceed with the design of the project's drainage system.
The CITY has previously provided the CONSULTANT with record drawings of the existing
drainage system for the projects. The CITY has researched their existing files and has
determined that what was previously provided to the CONSULTANT is the best information
\\CI~I_P L 1 \VOL l \CEIDATk2262'~M~MIN~CONTR.ACT$'kPHASE2~COPE2. WPD 9
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT
Scope of Services
June 28, 2000
Page 10
445
450
available.
The CONSULTANT will prepare drainage plans as determined and as directed by the CITY.
It is assumed that no additional drainage design nor changes to the existing main line system
will be required. This does not preclude the necessity of amending the scope of work if this
assumption is found to be in error.
Landscaping and Irrigation
Landscaping and irrigation are included in phase 2 work. The landscape architectural
portion of the work involves providing construction documents for planting and irrigation
for street trees within cut-outs in the city sidewalks and trees, shrubs and ground cover in
the new median. The contractor will be instructed to maintain the plants that are to remain
during construction.
For the property frontages that will be disrupted as a result of the road widening, the
contractor wilt be responsible for repairin~ and reconnecting existing irrigation systems in
~hese areas using new equipment comparable to the existing systems, and installing the
equipment in such a manner as to provide full irrigation coverage of the planting bead along
the road frontages. In addition to the irrigation along these frontages, the contractor will also
be responsible for installing ground cover to match existing materials (e.g. sod, ivy, mulch,
crushed rock, etc.) to restore the property to a neat and clean appearance. Any existing trees
and shrubs that are damaged as a result of the construction that are outside of the edge of
pavement and are to remain will be replaced by the contractor with new plants of the same
species. Direction for this work will be covered in the construction documents.
The landscape planning portion of the work will occur concurrently with the public outreach
effort. Concept plans will be prepared for presentation to staff at the 30% level of team
production. Planting plans will be completed by 90% and will be reviewed by city staff.
Upon acceptance of planting plans, irrigation plans will be prepared and submitted at the
100% Submittal. The final bid set will incorporate all comments made by the city staff.
Project Submittals
CONSULTANT will prepare PS&E documents for the project. CADD digital drawings will
be prepared in Microstation format in accordafice with the CITY procedures. Final plans
will be submitted in an electronic format compatible to the CITY's electronic equipment
which is AUTOCAD version 14. Drawings will be in dual (Metric/Imperial) units as
established by the CITY. This Scope of Services provides for a design process that will
produce several documents that will serve as a record of the design development. Design
submittals will be made at the 30% and 90%. Final design documents will be provided
based on comments. An internal quality control review will be conducted prior to each
submittal. Technical special provisions and a construction cost estimate will also be
prepared and submitted at the 90% design stage.
5 copies of each submittal at 30%, 90% and Final
One hard copy to each utility owner and electronic files
One print-ready original PS&E for advertisement
¥,CEI_ ? L I \VOL I \CE I DA~2262L, MD MII~CONTRAc'rs'xPHASE2VSCOPF-2.WPD 10
DUBUN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT
Scope of Services
June 28, 2000
Page 11
The following documents will be submitted to the CITY at project milestone points:
30% plans consistinz of.'
Title Sheet
Typical Cross Sections
Key Map and Line Index
Layout
Utility Plan (existing only)
Signal and Lighting Plans
Define Right-of-Way
Preliminary Construction Cost Estimate
List of permits required and draft permit applications
Draft Foundation Report
Bridge General Plan
90% plans consisting of all plan sheets (revised') listed for the 30% submittal and:
Construction Details
Drainage Plans and Details
Utility Plans
Stage Construction and Traffic Handling Plans
Construction Area Signs
Pavement DeIineation and Sign Plans
Signal and Lighting Details
Planting Plan, Details, Plant List
Irrigation Plan and Details
Foundation Report
Construction Cost Estimate
Permit Applications Exhibits
Construction Schedule
Specifications
Final plans consisting of all plan
submittal and:
Construction Cost Estimate
sheets (revised). fully completed, listed for the 90%
Construction Support Services during construction will be provided bv the CITY as stated
in section 140 of this scope
The CITY will provide the CONSULTANT with a marked up set of plans that reflect
changes that occurred during the construction phase of the project. The CONSULTANT
shall transfer the reflected changes to the original set of plans with appropriated annotation
that clearly indicates what change occurred during construction. The CONSULTANT shall
then label each sheet of the plans as RECORD DRAWINGS. The CONSULTANT shall
provide to the CITY a copy of the RECORD DRAWING plans in an electronic median
acceptable to the CITY, (AutoCADD Release I4).
\\CEI_PL 1WOL P, CEID AT~2262kADM IN~CONTR.ACTS~PHASE2~SCOPE2. WPD I
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT
Scope of Services
June 28, 2000
Page 12
460
470
500
510
520
600
610
Design Reviews
At milestone points, the CONSULTANT will submit materials to the CITY and
participating local agencies for review and comment. Review per/ods will be four weeksfor
all milestones. Each reviewing agency will submit a single set of coordinated review
comments to the CONSULTANT. The CONSULTANT will compile review comments
from the reviewing agencies and schedule a meeting with The CITY and the other reviewing
agencies to discuss any conflicting comments and to reach a consensus on resolution of any
conflicts. Minutes of the resolution meeting will be distributed within five working days
of the meeting. The CONSULTANT will incorporate agreed upon resolutions into the
reviewed documents. Should future reviews generate comments which require changes to
previously agreed upon elements of the documents and such changes result in additional
work on the part of the CONSULTANT, such changes will be performed as Additional
Services.
Quantities and Cost Estimate
An itemized cost estimate will be prepared based upon the project's required list of Standard
Items of Work. The quantity estimate will address general requirements, retaining wails,
electrical systems, drainage structures, and all construction work items as applicable. A
preliminary cost estimate will also be prepared that identifies the various work items,
quantities, unit costs, and the project's cost, including allowances for mobilization and
contingencies. Quantities and estimates will be updated to respond to each respective
submittals's review comments.
MATERIALS FURNISHED BY The CITY
Record Documents
The CITY will provide the following items:
· Current standard Drawings, Manuals, Guides, and Procedures-that pertain to the
project
· Available CITY "as-built" plans and specifications of existing conditions including
roadways, utilities, drainage improvements, and structures
· Available CITY right-of-way plans
· Surveying and mapping information including existing monument locations
· Sample plans 'and reports to be used as guidelines for fbrmat, organization and
content
Access to all records available at the CITY
Miscellaneous Information
· Entry permits on private parcels
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
The CITY
The CITY will:
· Conduct ongoing reviews of the CONSULTANT's progress in performing the work
and furnish technical comments in a timely manner on all submissions
· Review and approve the CONSULTANT's billings in a timely manner
· Review, evaluate and may approve CONSULTANT's requests for extension of time
and amendments to the agreement
~CEI_PL I\VOL 1 \CEIDAT~2262~m_DlvflI~CONTRACTS~HAS E2~SCOPE2. WPD 12
DUBLIN BOULEVARD VVTDENING PROJECT
Scope of Services
June 28, 2000
Page 13
620
630
640
650
Attend all progress meefffigs with the CONSULTANT-
Attend meetings with the CONSULTANT and others as requested
Consultant
CONSULTANT will:
· Establish, furnish and maintain suitable office facilities to serve as the project office
for the duration of the project
· Maintain an adequate staff of qualified support personnel to perform the work
necessary to compIete the project
Establish internal accounting methods and procedures for documenting and
monitoring project costs consistent with the State auditor's requirements.
Establish and maintain contract administration procedures which will include
amendments, time extensions and subcontracts
Maintain a project workbook with all the pertinent information relating to the
project to be given to the CITY at the close of the project
Attehd meetings-with other agencies as requested by the CITY. However, if number
of meetings exceed tho~e indicated-in this scope of services, then those meetings
will be performed as Additional Services
The CONSULTANT is responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the contract
documents and related design prepared under this project and prior to submittals will check
ail material accordingly. The plans will be reviewed by the CITY for conformity with the
CITY procedures and the terms of the contract.
Project Control
The CONSULTANT will provide and maintain a Management Information System to
monitor costs and manpower and to report progress with the following:
· Identify progress against the schedule for each major Work item
· Forecast completion dates from current progress
· Advise the CITY of any work not in this scope or in any area which is out of the
required sequence
· Provide updated estimates of time, manpower and dollars required for major work
elements
Subcontract Services
Due to the nature and scope of the required services, the CONSULTANT will subcontract
portions of the work. The subcontract firm will be approved by the CITY in writing prior
to initiation of any work bY the subconsultant firms. The CONSULTANT will review and
coordinate the work of all subconsultants and they will abide by the terms and conditions
of this scope as applicable to them.
Quality Control
The CONSULTANT and subconsultants have total responsibility for the accuracy and
completeness of the plans and related design prepared under this project and will check all
such material accordingly. The CONSULTANT will have a quality control plan in effect
during the entire time work is being performed under this contract. The quality control plan
will establish a process whereby, plans, calculations, and documents that the
CONSULTANT submits for review will be clearly marked as fully checked prior to
submittals by a qualified individual other than the originator.
\\CEI_PL ! \VOL 1 \CEIDA'r'~.262~.DM[NSCONTRACTS~,P HAS E2.~COPE2. WPD 13
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT
Scope of Services
June 28, 2000
Page '14
660
670
680
CONSULTANT Personnel
The CONSULT.~dqT's work will be performed and/or directed by the key personnel
identified in the CONSULTANT's proposal. Any changes in the indicated key personnel
will be subject to review and approval by The CITY.
Acceptability of the Work
The plans, designs, calculations, reports and other documents furnished under this scope of
work will conform to the CITY's standard of quality. The criteria for acceptance will be a
product of neat appearance, well organized, accurate and complete, technically and
grammatically correct, checked and dated in accordance with the Quality Control Plan, and
having the originator and checker identified. The minimum standards of appearance,
organization, and content of drawing will are similar to the type produced by the CITY.
Design Documentation
The CONSULTANT will submit all design notes, sketches, reports, worksheets and
computations to document the design conclusions. The design notes and computations will
be recorded on 8 ½ "x 11" computation sheets, appropriately titled, numbered, dated,
indexed, and signed by the designer and checker. The data will be bound in a hardback
folder or a three-ring binder for submittals to the CITY. Computer output forms and other
oversized sheets will be bound or placed in a binder. ...
Design notes and computations will include, but not necessarily be limited to, the following
data:
· Design criteria used for the project
· Geometric design calculations for horizontal and vertical alignment
· Quantity calculations
· Documentation of decisions reached from meetings, telephone conversations or site
visits
· Bridge structural calculations
k\CEI_PL I \VOL I\CEID A'I~262~MrNXCONTP~CTS~PHASE2~SCOP E2.WPD 1 4
MK CENTENNIAL
Task Name
Dublin Boulevard Widening - Village Parkway to Sierra Court
Phase 1 and Phase 2
Duralion Start
Notice To Proceed 0 days 2/9100
Project Management
project Schedule'i' QA Plan'. Sub contracts
Finish
2/gl00
258 days 2/9100 2/2/01
51.6 wks 2/9/0a 2/2/01
0 days '219100 219100"
51.6 wks 2/9/00 2/2/01
0 days 711710g ?117100
233 days 1112100 1211100
80 days 1112/00 512100
2 wks 1112/00 1125/00
4 wke 1/26/00 2/22/00
4 wks 1126100 2/22/00
4 wks 2/23/00 3121/00
I day 3/21/00 3/21/00
2 wks 3/22/00 414100
2 wks 4/5100 4/18/00
1 wi{ 4/19/00 4/25/00
0 days 512/00 512/00
.... '~';~;~;~; .......... ~i~ ..... 5~OlO0
............. ~"~i~' ......... ~b-O~ .... 2/Moo
13.4 wks 2/2/00 514/00
";~"~;i~;; 2/~/oo 5/~o/0o
'~L:~'~k; .......... ~d0 ..... 5/4/00
80 days 815/00 8/24100
4 wl~s 5/5/00 6/1/00
4 wks 6/2/00 6/29/00
6 wks 6/2/00 7/13/00
4 wks ~/2~00 ~/2e/00
6 wk~ 7/t4/(~0 8/24/00
203 days 2/23/00 1211/00
40.6 wks 2/23/00 12/1/00
Kickoff Meeting Phase 1
UlJlily Coordination Meetings
..... kiC~ Mse{l~g Pha~e 2
HASE 1 OE~I~"
Environmen~l
Complete PES fo~ and consult w/Caltrans
Conduct te~ni~l sludles
Prepare ED for Cat Ex
Public Review Period
Public Headng and Ci~ adoption of ED
Prepare Final ED and submit to Caltrans and City
Review ED
Transmit approved ED to FHWA for approval
Final approval
Prellmtna~ Engineering
Dala Collec~on and Field Reviews
Design ~teHa
S~cture General Plan
Prellmlna~ roadway design
Mapplng, Su~eys and Right-of. Way Engineering
Mapping
Supplemental Su~eys
Ti~e Repo~s
R~ Sumeys
Plals and legals
Public Outreach
'~e~U~'~"~i~"~i~ke,o~ ..................................
2000 2001 2002
~ 7l|'l
i
! IIIII J I i .
Project: DUBLIN 12.MPP I
Date: 716100 8:12 PM Task
File: y:~.etty~scope\D U BLIN 12.M P P
I~~J Cdtical Task L~~'J Progress I Milestone ~. Summary
MKCENTENNIAL Dublin Boulevard Widening -Village Parkway to Sierra Court
Phase 1 and Phase 2
2000 ' . 2001 '
ID TaskName Duration Stad Finish JanlFeblUarlAprlMaylJunlJu~ IAuglSeplOct Nov Dec JanlFeblMa~-IAprlUaytJunlJu~
'31 PHASE 2 DESIGN Jan. i Febl Mar
............ ~'"'"~;;~aote~,,,~, .............................................................................................................................. !~.~.¥.I.. ..ioo ~11~1o1 ~ ! ! il~ .... ~-,',~., .... ......'-,',,. ' .'.
3~ ', ~. 60aa';; ......... ~;'~7~ ................. i'ai~ ............. i ............. i ..................................... i ........... t~"'"'i ....................................................................
i ............. ; .............. i ............... ! ................ i ............. ! ........................... ~ .............. i ............. ¢ ............. ~ .............. ¢ .......... i .......... ~ ........ ~ .......... ~ .........................................
33
exploration 4 wka 7/17/00 8/11/00 i ! I ~
34 Draft foundation repeal .............................................. '~'~ ................................................................................................................................................ ¢ ......... ? ............... i .............. i .............. ~ .......... i ........... i ......................... ~ .................. ; ..............................
7/17/00 8/11/00 i I ~ ! ! ! : · ' ' :
......................... ~ ................................................................. , '. · ! __ i ~
~ ~0'~¢ans ~'~; ..................... ~{~7~. .................. ~)~)~.-.....i...._...,i ............ ! ............ ! .............................. t.~.i ............. ! ............... i ............... i ............ l ......... i .....
....................................................... ~ ! i i ., -. ~ -~! i ! { : ' : .
~ Con,*.c,o. co,ts ................ ~";;~ .............. i~ ~'~ ......... ! ......... ! ............. ! .................. : .................... i .............. ~:!''~ ..... i ................ i ....................................... :." i "! .... ~ ..... ; ;": '
37 ...... Q~d~ :l'~k ......... 9~,~) ....... ~/~'~ I ; . ; ; . .i ....... ! : i · ; · . ! .....
~--~- ......... 81:r~";~,;;ia; ................................. ;~W~s .~t~;~O ..... ,~/6~b ' : ; ' '~] ' i : ' '
40 ........ ~';);'6;;'~i~';~ 6~ uays' lOl9i0o 1/s)~1 ..... : ............ ~ ..... "": ~' '
41 Final foundation report 2 wks ' 10/9/(J0 10~20)00 ' .......... ~
.... , ........... . :: . ~ .... ~ . ~ ~ ......
' 42 .................... F~it ;;;;~i~g~{g;~'s ............................... 4'wks ...... to~0~ ' ,r~i~'i~ ..... i ~ ...... :
' 43 gO% plans 6wks 10/9/00 11/17/00' ! ............. ! ..... i i } ', "
.~ s,o~,~,o.s l~,k11/~1oo 12,1,oo~ i i "'' ...........
47 Submit 90% PS&E 0 days 12/8100 12/8100 i ............ i .............. i .............. i ............ : .................... f [ ............. ii ........... ii ............. i} ............ ~ i ...... 1~8 J ...................... i ............... [ .............. ! ........... i ............... '~ ............. ~, .......... i ...... '
,:6 ................. ~i~";:~;i'~ ,~"~;~ ................ i'~)~i~OO ........ i)~ ......................... i ............... i ........... ~ ................................... i ............... i ............. J ............. i ........... ~ ........ ~ ..........
4g ............. ~i~i"6~'~i~' 50 days ............ ;{}i~i~ .................. ~/;J i~}~'{ .............. i .......... i ........... i .......... ! ........ } ........ i i i
.6o ......... ~ai..~a; ............ ,~k, ............ ~.i ................... ~.i ............. .....i .......... i .............. ~ ........... ~ .... ~ ....... ~ ! i i .......... [ ...............................x,,.
.......... 'aa';'aaaa;;i; ................................................................................ 1.k ~6/01 ~.,ol iiii'' '''' " ' ' '': '
i ........... i ............... i .......... ' .... i.. "' i i ' ~ '
~2 ........................ ~'~'~'~g~; ............................................................................. l~k 2~5/ol 2~9/Ol ~ ! , i ~ ~ ' .. ~ , · ·
53 ................... ~/~'"~' i ............. i .............. i .............. i ............. i ............. i ............ ~- ............................. "
1 wk 2/12/01 2/16/01 ........... I } ...... , .......
4 .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. i ! i ~ ! i i ~ ~ ~ ~ ·
6 Submit Final PS&E 0 days 2/16/01 2/16/01 i i : i : j i ........ ~ ............ t .................................................................... } ...................... i ..........................................
.................................................... i ~ ; i i [ [ i '."~
56 CONSTRUCTION 230 days 3/19101 2/1102 ' ""' ....... ] ........... ~ ............... ! ......... ? I ' : .... ! .............. ~ .......... i ...... i
.... . i ......... i ....... [ i i ...... i ......... i ...... } .... i ..,[ ~.,.~.~.~..~...~..~.~..~...~.~..~..~. ........ -
58 ConstrucUon 40 wks 4/30/01 2/1/02 ! : ~ ~ , ............................. . ............... :'" ~ ..... i ........ i ............ ' .............. ....... i ....... i .... i · '
,
Project: DUBLIN12.MPP a · ;¢' , ~ a~,? [%,XXXXXX~] Progress Milestone · Summary I~1 I '~'
Date: 7/6/00 8:12 PM Task [-~[%~~:;] Critical Task ' '
File: y:\etty~scope\D U~"" ' ~2.MPP ~ =
Dublin Boulevard Widening Project
COST PROPOSAL
PHASE 2 WORK
MK CENTENNIAL.
LABOR:
Classification
Proj Prin
Pr~j Mgr
Sr Eng
Engineer
CADD
Clerical
TOTAL DIRECT LABOR
MKC DIRECT COSTS:
DIRECT COSTS:
Houm Rate Total
2 $ 54.00 $ 108.00
232 $ 45.00 $ 10,440.00
450 $ 34.00 $ 15,300.00
536 $ 24.00 $ 12,864.00
424 $ 23.00 $ 9,752.00
128 $ 16.00 $ 2~048.00
1772 $ 50,512.00
OVERHEAD @ 1.69293 $ 85,513.28
SUBTOTAL LABOR + OVERHEAD $ 136,025.28
Mailing, Telephone, Supplies, Photos ....
Reproduction & Presentation Materials
CADD Computer
Transportation
SUBTOTAL MKC DIRECT COSTS
FEE (based on 10% profit of labor)
SUBTOTAL MKC S
500.00
3,600.00
4,100.00
13,601.50
153,726.78 157%
Revised 8:43 PM 8:43 PM
J:~2262~admin~contracts~ohase2~Engcst2.yJs Labor + ODCs Page I
Dublin Boulevard Widening Project
COST PROPOSAL
PHASE 2 WORK
PUBLIC AFFAIRS MANAGEMENT
LABOR:
Classification Hours Rate
Principal - Env 64 $ 50.16
Principal - PI 0 _ $ 44.88
Proj Mgr - Env 0 $ 29.57
Proj Mgr - Pi 0 $ 39.07
Associate - Env 72 $ 18.59
Associate - PI 0 $ 23.23
Clerical 30 $ 20.38
Total
$ 3,210.24
$
$
$
$ 1,338.48
$
$ 611.40
DIRECT LABOR
DIRECT COSTS:
166
OVERHEAD @ 1.6
SUBTOTAL LABOR + OVERHEAD
$ 5,160.12
$ 8.256.19
$ 13,416.31
Printing, Mailing, Telephone & Supplies $ 400.00
Transportation $ 250.00
Graphic Support $
Miscellaneous $ 200.00
Biology Subconsultant $ 15~000.00
SUBTOTAL DIRECT COSTS $ 15,850.00
FEE (based on 10% profit of labor) $ 1 ~341.63
I SUBTOTAL PAM $ 30~607.94
II1%
Revised 8:43 PM 8:43 PM
J:~2262~admin~contracts~phase2~ngcst2..xls Labor + ODes Page 2
Dublin Boulevard Widening Project
COST PROPOSAL
PHASE 2 WORK
~O.TAL PROJ .E?T cos'~: .$ .... 267,519.98' i
Chaudhary & Associates
lABOR:
Pdn Mngr
Proj Surveyor
Office Surveyor
2-man Fieid Crew
Eng / CADD
DIRECT LABOR
DIRECT COSTS:
Hours Rate
0 $ 48.00
0 $ 37.00
0 $ 28.00
0 $ 53.97
0 $ 25.00
Total
$
$
$
$
$
22,500-.00
0 $
OVERHEAD ~ 1.8612 $
SUBTOTAL LABOR + OVERHEAD $
Mileage
Reproduction & Materials
SUBTOTAL DIRECT COSTS
FEE (based on 10% profit of labor)
SUBTOTAL CHAUDHARY $
2,250.00
24~750.00 19%
Revised 8:43 PM 8:43 PM
J:~262~admin~contracts~ohase2~Engcst2.xls Labor + ODCs Page 3
Dublin Boulevard Widening Project
COST PROPOSAL
PHASE 2 WORK
KLEINFELDER
LABOR:
Prin Eng
Proj Mng / Eng
Snr StaffProf
.Professional
Technician
Drafting / Admin
DIRECT LABOR
DIRECT COSTS:
Hours Rate Total
8 $ 46.64 $ 373.12
50 $ 33.65 $ 1,682.50
42 $ 25.80 $ 1,083.60
18 $ 17.88 $ 321.84
7 $ 15.60 $ 109.20
18 $ 18.03 $ 324.54
143 $ 3,894.80
OVERHEAD @ 1.92 $ 7~478.02
SUBTOTAL LABOR + OVERHEAD $ 11,372.82
Drilling
Permits & backfill
Laboratory testing
Analys~s
Data research & materials
SUBTOTAL DIRECT COSTS
FEE (based on 10% profit of labor)
SUBTOTAL KLEINFELDER
$ 2,958.00
$ 1,900.00
$ 4,858.00
$ 1,137.28
$ 17t368.10 16%
Revised 8:43 PM 8:43 PM
J:~262~admin~contracts~ohase2'~ngcst2.xls Labor + ODCs Page 4
Dublin Boulevard Widening Project
COST PROPOSAL
PHASE 2 WORK
FEHR & PEERS ASSOCIATES
LABOR:
Hours Rate
Proj Prin 24 $ 58.65
Sr Engineer 61 $ 33.17
Engineer 80 $ 23.80
Technical 88 $ 20.67
DIRECT LABOR 253
OVERHEAD @ 1.4653
SUBTOTAL LABOR + OVERHEAD
DIRECT COSTS:
Travel Mileage
Printing, Mailing, Telephone & Supplies
SUBTOTAL DIRECT COSTS
FEE {'based on 10% profit of labor)
I SUBTOTAL FEER & PEERS
Total
$ 1,407.60
$ 2,023.37
$ 1,904.00
$ 1 ~818.96
$ 7,153.93
$ 10.482.65
$ 17,636.58
$ 180.00
$ 815.00
$ 995.00
$ 1 ~763.66
$ 20.395.24J8%
Revised 8:43 PM 8:43 PM
J:~262~admin~contracts~phase2~ngcst2._xls Labor + ODCs Page 5
Dublin Boulevard Widening Project
COST PROPOSAL
PHASE 2 WORK
267,5.19.98.
HAYGOOD & ASSOCIATES
LABOR:
Proj Prin / Proj Mgr
Landscape Assoc
Jr Landscape Arch
CADD Tech
Field Tech
Clerical
DIRECT LABOR
DIRECT COSTS:
Hours Rate
27.5 $ 45.00
211 $ 26.00
0 $ 15.00
0 $ 25.00
0 $ 17.oo
0 $ 14.00
Total
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,237.5O
5,486.00
238.5
OVERHEAD @ 1.4468
SUBTOTAL LABOR + OVERHEAD
$ 6,723.50
$ 9r726.22
$ !,6,449.72
Irrigation Subconsuttant
Horticulture Subconsultant
Reproductions
Delivery Charges
Film
Mileage, toils, parking
Per Diem Travel
Project Equipment
SUBTOTAL DIRECT COSTS
FEE (based on 10% profit of labor)
SUBTOTAl. HAYGOOD
,700.00
704.88
144.00
28~35
2,577.23
1 ~644.97
20~671.92 18%
Revised 8:43 PM 8:43 PM
J:~282~admin~contracts~ohase2~Engcst2.xls Labor + ODCs Page 6
· ,, MK Centennial
ProJ Prln ProJ Mgr Sr Eng Engineer cADD Cledcal MKC
.' La!mr ~{=:le; $ 54.00 $ 45.00 $ 34.00 $ 24.00 $ 23.00 $ 16.00
· - T~.~k . .
" ,~{-q I!e-~r-r¥.l''-'n Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cosl Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cosl
;~" ' : ='"-:': "; .-' ' '" '- - 32 1,440 24 384 56 1,824.00
.V--.-"-: :',: ---..,.-: ,-., ~: .; '-' ' '-' ' ' ':" 32 1,440 24 384 I 56 1,824.00
~: '~'' "- "': ." '- ~" ': "-'~ 40 1,800 40 1,360 - 24 384 104 3.544.00
""' ~ '"' ?' "" ~ ~ '~ 4 180 4 138 4 96 4 64 18 476.00
:;-'--"': '-: ":",' '.'-~ "-" ": ' , .... "; 2 108 20 900 20 480 14 224 58 1,712.00
-e, il: I: ( J I',"! 2 108 128 5,760 44 1,496 24 576 0 90 1,440 288 g,380.00
!"' :' "- ':'";:"'.. I .:" :' -..- ,, ~'; '- · ': · · !~. ?,.......'~ 20 900 32 1,088 52 1,988.00
!.'!-.'[: I~) ! f,! 0 20 900 32 1,088 0 0 0 52 1,988.00
1.1:'"'.-~'= !-:!5,¥..~.~.W;,y ~.r¢:!::t".'l',!' &
~ ::' :" · .: .'-'-', .' '.., :'.a: ',.. ' .. .... ; .~ -.
:~. :::- =;-.- 8 360 20 680 40 960 40 920 108 2,920.00
5UII ~.': I,',1. 0 - ' 8 360 20 680 40 960 i 40 920 0 108 2,920
r:.-.., "" "~' "' ' ' "'"" ~'' !":':~' 8 272 - 8 272.00
t:'"" '"' ' -"" 4 180 24 5~6 24 552 52 1,308.00
'; --'.,r -_.'...= ,:-.!.., 2 gO 24 816 40 960 ' 40 920 106 2,786.00
::; "-"~ 20 900 120 4,080 160 3,840 160 3,680 460 12,$00.00
:'"-""'"' ': ...... ' ...... ::'-'- : ' '-. '.- 2 90 4 136 40 960: 32 736 78 1,922.00
i, -=, !- ,~. ,-.,-,~ :,,-,-.-~ .,.,:, :~ *: - ..:, - ..:: ~ ... ~ 2 90 4 138 40 960 32 736 78 1,g22.00
~ '" "~ -": 2 ~0 10 340 40 960 24 552 76 1,942.00
~:. ';! :.,::-:., '-.;,.-'. ;'-, -,v .:. ~ 2 90 8 272 8 192 2 32 20
! '"" ° -- '~ '": :- "'" : ' -:'; :" o 2 90 8 272 8 192 2 32 20 586.00
' ';" ' '" ': "';:" 2 90 8 272 8 192 2 32 20
';" ~'~ :" '~:'- ' :' -""J :" '. "': ' . 2 90 40 1,360 40 920 82 2,370.00
;';'" ' ' ' ' (' ' '" ':" 2 90 4 13{i 40 960 32 736 78 1,922.00
:'""~:';':'": ': "=" ..... :' 2 90 24 816 24 576 50 1,482.00
'"'r'"-'; 16 720 32 1,088 48 1.808.00
":" ':" '"" 8 360 40 1,360 32 512 80 2,232.00
:;:" '" · '""' ;"-]' ": -- 8 360 20 680 40 960 68
5_1.-':: r: ;.", L 0 76 3,420 354 12,036 472 11,326 384 §,832 38 BO8 1324 3§,224.00
0.00
I l' ''l II ~ lll l] l[ ' [ ' 'il' ~'--'ll Il I I I I :l~ :Il: 'l(:l l' ill ~ ' Ill: support ~erv] . ] l 0 0,~
SIJI3T~T/': LI 0 g 0 0 0 0 0
't"'GRAND:.. ..... : .............. TOTAL ..... . ' iii 2 108 232 10,440 450 t5,300 536 12,864 424 9,752 ~28 2,048 1,772 $0,$t2
y:~elty'~dublin~scope'~Engcsl2..xls Labor
Page 7
COST PROPOSAL - LABOR ONLY Dublin Boulevard Widening Project Ra,~sed: ?/6/008:43PM
:~roJect Management & Adminlatrallon
Admmi$ffaUon I Invo;cos (8)
Monthly Progress Repeals I Sct;odulo (§)
St;bco;'~sultanl Coordination
Kic~.-o ft ;nearing ( I )
MeelJngs/Agency Ceord:natiu:t (4)
SUBTOTA[
Permits and Public Outreach
P'..~lic OuL~each
Pe;m ts (Coq.~s, Fish&Gamo, Walur Quali~y. Z~ne 7)
SUBTOTAl.
Utility° Right.gl.Way Engineering & Surveys
Uh;lly plal~S & cocl¢,a'al on (aS3tll]les Precsicn
p!an!ling ~:rov~(los al~ peltiJlel:t J:lfannuti~n ;or
mapping)
SUBTOTAL
~lglneerlng
Geotechnlcal exploration & analysis & repo~ts
Geometric layout
Construction delails
Bddge
Channel erosion control design and plans
Bike path ramp design and repair at bridge only
Drainage
Joint trench plans (review only)
Landscaping and irrigation plans
Lighting and signals
Stage construction and traffic handling
Pavement detineation
Response to comments
QA~QC
Specifications
Conslmction cost estimates
SUBTOTAt
:onstructlon Support Se~.,tces
RE file (not Included In Ihis scope o~ services)
Construction bidding support (not Included in this scop*
Post award assistance IOublin to provide constn~ction
SUBTOTAL
40 2,006
24 1,204
64 3.210
32
40
72
O
595
744
.338 0
0
0
18 367
12 245
30 611
0 0,00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
90 2968.12
76 2192.00:
IGO 5160.12
0 0.0(
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 Q00
0
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.0~
0 0.0~
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 O.00
0 O.OO
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 O00
0
COS I' PROPOSAL - LABOR ONLY
Dublin Boulevard Widening Project
Revise~t: ...7/6/00 8:43 PM
l~qk
0 0.00
P'.' ::.(~ ',, ,-.il 0 0.00
I
I
0 0.00
0
. SpeOfic. atlons 0 0.00
. Construction cos! osiimatos 0 0.00
' SUBTOTAL 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 ~0
r~onstructlon Suppoll Services
RE file (not included in this scope of services) 0 0.00
Construction bidding support (not included In this scop 0 0.00
Post award assistance (Dublin to provide consttUclion 0 0.00
/-
y:\eily~dublin~sco]De\Engcst2.xls Labor Page 9
COST PROPOSAL - LABOR ONLY Dublin Boulevard Widening Project Revised: 1/6/00 8;43 PM
¥ .... ,,~ ....... . .... 0 0.00
I
0 0.00
$ U ,'.1 TO~, Al0 0 0 0 0 0 0
· ] 0 0.00
0
':!'-""'~" ...... ;' "' ": :'" ~' :'"' '"I~
0
0.00
'~-'.r" -..', ',:'..,~ -.~ i..-:-,, .-.-. ;..:: :.-.:,-. '?
I
0
0.00
; '. I. "-.,; · .., .,.- ' -, .-.,,.:, .- :, . --. 0 0.00
0 0.00
".'~: ..... :'.. -r-: .:.~ 0 0,00
--,:, ....... I.: .: -: ::. 0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
S"-!q?:'A.. H ~7:~ ' 50 ~..,3,'3.~ I 42 1.0.n. 4 ~.) 2{2;) 7 1{30 18 325, 143 3.894.80
0 0.00
!;HiIIOIA: 0 I 0 O 0 0 0 0
COST PROPOSAL. LABOR ONLY
Dublin Boule,'---~ Widening Project
716/00 8:43 PM
'r,1 -.k
SU!~ T:) FA'
?'"BRAN[)-TO'rAL' .... ' -. -
'----'-' ............ ~ .............. '" PEERS ASSOOIA'I~-- ' ;:i: ".. : ·; '; :~ ' .' · ·
................... i:i.:;,::..i?.;i:?.:~;:; .:./.::. FE._....~_._
· ':,.J ."'r:'~ .' ':::': :h'S~'E~ir)eer En§lneer Teclmlcal ;' ':'F&hr&.pee~ To~al
- 5 ~...::.x~:::...:..-$ 33.17
,'.-..,. ,:-:.. ~ :?.:~'~;'~?:~:~:~:~ 6~t~-t~,,,~, ' c.~ Ho,~, co~t .. ~,:~h:~::;:?~'~';.,.:.:'::::.~::;'~' ,:;':.'~ '
0 0.~
0 0.~
0 0.~
3 16~ ~ 99.51
6 199 4 ~ 10 281.70
'~ 9 ~99 0 4 83 t3
0 0.~
0 0.~
· i 0 C (} 0
I
0 0.~
:: 0 0 (1 0
I
I 0 0.~
0 0.~
0 0.~
0 O.ffi
I o o.~
I 0 0.~
0 0.~
0 0.~
' - · 38 40 1.327 I}U 1.4211 11~ 1.~54 1~ 5,346.80
0 0.~
0 0.~
0 0.00
0 0.00
4 7 15 8 265 1~ ?m~ 2 4 ~ 26 826,90
4 ; ~5 4 132 ?~ 190 2 4 ~ 18 599.02
;: :.4')8 52 I./25 80 1.9U4 ~14 1.736 240 8,772,72
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0,00
[: 0 0 0 0
24 1,408 6t 2,023 80 1,904 88 ~,8t9 253 7,154
v:~etlv\dublin\scooe\Enec, sl2 xls I ¢~hnr Page 11
COST PROPOSAL - LABOR ONLY Dbblin Boulevard Widening Project Revised: 7/6/00 8:43 PM
· . . HAYGOOD & ASSOCIATES
~il .....' ':" ..: . ' .' Labor Rate > ProJ Prln I Pr0J Mgr Landscape Assoc Jr Landscape Arch LADD Tech Field Tech Clerical HAYGOOD Total
Pr~iuct:'"'":'"" "M, anageme~!': No D~hl~il~"& Admlflistratio~t ':~:'=:" ' "' ':' ':' '~ ' ...... :'" ' ~ =~Hours, ' Cost. = Hours' '~- :'~ CoSl ' Hours Cost Hours,, 'Cost Hours Cost. Hours Cost Hours Cost
Ad~r!:nJstra!!on I I?.vc,cos (8)
~ M~nzhly Progress Rep3rls I Schod~;~e (8) 0 0.~
I SU~/ISUI[a!~[ Coord,r~a~,on ' 0 0.~
IlK,c~,, meeting (1) 0 0.00
i~ee'.ir:3s I Aoe~cy Coo~d.rmlicn (4) ~ 0 0.00
II SUBTOTAl 0 0 0 0 0 0
[fPemllts and Public Ct treach 0
I PLIb~ic Ouereach .
Il. Per[n~ts (Ce,ps. r=sh&Game. Water O~aqly. Zone 7) ' O0 0.~O'~
I SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
I Utlllty Right-of. Way Engineering & Su~eys
I ~ U~g=ily dans & ~o[dmallo~ (aSSL n es Precsioq
I planning provides ~[[ port'.ne[it irlfo~natlOq for
~ mapping) 0
I SUBTOTAL 0 ' 0 0
Englneerlng ' 0 0 - 0 0
Geotschnf~] axpl3ralion & a~:ysis & repods
~ (3eomo~ic !ayoul 0 0.~
I
ConsbGc~Jon dele Is ' - 0 0.~
, Ddd~e 0 0.~
[J~ke pe~ romp deslgrl a~ld ~89a~r al hridoe L)nly , . ' 0 0.~
i [)ra:nage 0 0.~
i Jo:nl I~el~t plans (review oP!y) 0 0.~
i; F' 0 0.~
:e Landscaping and im~a[i~n p~uns 27.5 1,238 211 5,486
il LighHn~ an~ s ~ a s ', 238.5 6,723.50
II. ~kag~ conslmc~on and !ratfic hg,~dl[ng 0 0.~
Pavement de'.ioea~or~ ~ ' " 0 0.~
Responso Io ~1111~el:ls 0 0.00
~F~cJficolJofls 0 0.~
Cc~s[AJceion
0 0.~
SUBTOTAL 27.5 1,238 211 5,486 0 0 0 0 238.5 6,723.50
Cofislructlon Supporl Se~lces
}{E fi~o (f~ol Inck~ded in tiffs SCCpe Of seduces} ~ ,
Const~lcl'oi1 b(dding s[Jppo~ (no! inc",cdad in th~s scop 0 0.~
Pcsl award assislance (Cult'.iLl [o prowde ~nslruc!ioft ~' * 0 0.~
SUBTOTAL 0 0 . 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 . 0 0.~
COST PROPOSAL - LAOOR OHLY
Dublin Bouleva~ Widening Project
Revt.qd: 7/6/00 8:4:3 PM
.. · .......... ·TOTAL .... ·
- ' , '" :. Labor Rater, " ' "' ' '
· :"- Task ' ' '"' "' '"
'. '' No Description : IIOUJ~S 'COST
Project Maltagemellt & AdJtl~rl]s~raliuo
Ad~.nistf,~h~=:l/Iftv~]ice= (~J) 56 $ 1,824.00
Mon~e~y r'ro[lmss Hepods I [.;['l~,~,fL:'e [~) 5G S 1,824.00
~;td:cOns.:la,,t Coufdul;~ea~a 104 $ 3,544.00
K;ck-off mouti~'~ (1) 19 $ 575.51
MOOllqg~ I A j~n:;y Cccf .llilidlOO (4) GG $ 1~903.70
SUBTOTAL 301 S 9,761
Permits aod Public Oldreach
Ft J[Jh[: ()HII tJaCtt 90 $ 2,968.12
SIJBTOIAI. 218 $ 7,148
Utlllly, Rlghl-e[-Way Engineering &
mnFp:~g) 108 $ 2,920.00
~UDTOTAL 108 $ 2,920.00
Enghmerlng
OOuhmh,:',:[:l ,~x~:ora'i,m & npa~ys,s R feporl5 151 $ 4,1GG.80
Oeom~t;~ layoul 52 $ 1,308.00
Ccnst~t.ction []et;,Is 106 $ 2,766.00
~r~(t~je 460 $ 12,500.00
(~r,~ftrtt~l erosion conlml (fgS;~fl alitt p!;sr15 78 $ 1,922.00
;~iko path ramp dosig 1 af'd repair a~ brid3,) dnl~' 78 S 1,922.00
Dr aqlu(je 76 $ 1.942.00
Joliet Iren~t plans (review culy} 20 $ 586.00
Lar~dscap:r~g end JrrJ[jil ~0 I ?~i~;IG 258.5 $ 7,309.50
Llohtk~U m~d s~gnals 216 $ 5,932.80
SlOgO co~ls~,t;ct.O:l a;td trafhc hand:;n~ 82 $ 2,370.00
Pavemon~ d.l~nn;~ticn 78 S 1,922.00
RospcllSO Ic) conlmon:~ 60 S 1,482.00
QNQC 48 $ 1,aaa.00
}[p~tcff:e~lOllS 106 ~
SUHTOrAI 1~.15.5 S 63,615
Coltstroctlon Support Services
I{E f Ia {ftOt II!Ch=(l~d Jr1 ~hlS 5cO~O C~ SuI~iC~S) 0
SlmTOTAI.I 0
y:~etty~dubtin\scope\EngcsL2.xts Labor Page 13
MKC Job No. 2262
Printed: 7/6/00 8:44 PM
SUMMARY
Dublin Boulevard Widening - Phase 1 and Phase 2 Fee Estimates
I Labor I ODes I Fee I TOTAL
Phase I (with adjustments for revised scope)
MKC f$ 44,713.41J$ 805.00 $ 4,471.3415 49,989.75
PAM I $ 16,978.00 $ 13,000.00 $ 1,697.80 $ 31,675.80
ChaudharyI $ 30,880.07 $ 19,700.00 $ 3,088.01 IS 53,668.08
Kleinfelder $ - $ I$ - I$
Fehr&Peers $ 7,178.54 $ 250.00I $ 717.85 $ 8,146.39
Haygood $ - $ $ - $ _
Subtotal Phase 1 $ 99,750.02 $ 33,755.00 $ 9,975.00 $ · 1'43,48,0.02.
Phase 2
MKC $ 136,025.28 I $ 4,100.0015 13,601.50 $ ' 153,726.78
PAM $~ 13,416.31 IS 15,850.00I $ 1,341.63 $ 30,607.94
Chaudhary $ 22,500.00t $ - I$ 2,250.00 t $ 24,750.00
Kleinfelder $ 11,372.8215 4,858.00 $ 1,137.28 $ 17,368.10
Fehr&Peers $' 17,636.58 $ 995.00 $ 1,763.66 $ "20,395.24
Haygood $ 16,449.72~$ 2,577.23 $ 1,644.97 $ 20,671.92
Subtotal Phas-~ 2 $ 217,400.71 $ 28,380.23 $ 21,739.04 $ 267.,519.98-
TOTAL= I$ 317,150-73 I $ 62,135.23 f$ 31,714.04 t $ 411,000.00
j:~262~admin\contracts\budget\Total Fixed Fee.xls Sheet1
EXHIBIT B
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
The method of payment for this contract will be based on actual costs plus fixed fee.
The City will reimburse the Consultant for actual costs (including labor costs, employee benefits,
travel, overhead and other direct costs) incurred by the Consultant in performance of the work,
exclusive of any fixed fee, not to exceed the amount of THREE HUNDRED SEVENTY NINE
THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED EIGHTY FIVE DOLLARS AND NINTY SIX CENTS
($379,285.96). Actual costs shall be based on the estimated wage rates and other estimated costs set
forth in the Consultant's cost proposal unless otherwise authorized by the City Council in writing.
In addition to the actual costs, the City will pay the Consultant a fixed fee as set forth
and attached hereto in Consultant's (MK Centennial) proposal dated July 6, 2000 in the amount of
THIRTY ONE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED FOURTEEN AND FOUR ($31,714.04). The
fixed fee is nonadjustable for the term of the contract except in the event ora change in the scope of
work and such adjustment is made by contract amendment. The fixed fee shall be billed monthly ar
the ration that the Direct Labor Costs incurred during the billing period bears to the maximum total
estimated Direct Labor Cost for this Agreement, with any un-billed fixed fee being paid upon the
satisfactory completion of the scope of services hereunder.
The total amount payable by the City, including the fixed fee, shall not exceed
FOUR HUNDRED ELEVEN THOUSAND AND ZERO CENTS ($411,000.00).
Consultant shall submit invoices on a monthly basis based of the actual cost for
services performed in accordance with the cost estimate included in the Consultant's (MK
Centennial) proposal dated July 6, 2000. The monthly invoices shall also include a portion of the
fixed fee determined in accordance with the provisions of the second paragraph of this Exhibit B.
The total amount, actual cost plus fixed fee stated above, shall be the total which
City shall pay for the services to be rendered by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement. City shall
not pay any additional sum for any expense or cost whatsoever incurred by Consultant in rendering
services pursuant to this Agreement
City shall make no payment for any extra, further or additional service pursuant ro
this Agreement unless such extra service and the price therefor is agreed to in writing executed'¢y
the City Manager or other designated official of City authorized to obligate City thereto prior to the
time such extra service is rendered and in no event shall such change order exceed twenty-five
percent (25%) of the initial contract price.
The services to be provided under this Agreement may be terminated without cause
at any point in time in the sole and exclusive discretion of City. If the Agreemem is terminated by
City, Consultant shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any satisfactory
work completed on such documents and other materials to the effective date of such termination. In
that event, all finished and unfinished documents and other materials shall, at the option of the City~
become City's sole and exclusive property. Consultant hereby expressly waives any and all claims
for damages or compensation arising under this Agreement. Consultant shall ma/ntain adequate
logs and timesheets in order to verify costs incurred to date.
Exhibit B
Page 1 of 1
07/10/00
EXHIBIT C
City shall furnish physical facilities such as desks, filing cabinets, and conference
space, as may be reasonably necessary for Contractor's use while consuking with City employees
and reviewing records and the information in possession of City. The location, quantity, and
time of furnishing said physical facilities shall be in the sole discretion of City. In no event shall
City be obligated to furnish any facility which may involve incurring any direct expense,
including, but not limiting the generality of this exclusion, long-distance telephone or other
communication charges, vehicles, and reproduction facilities.
Exhibit C
Page 1 of 1
07/10/00
EXHIBIT D
GENERAL PROVISIONS
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. At all times during the term ofth/s Agreement, Consultant
shall be an independent contractor and shall not be an employee of City. City shall have the right
to control Consultant only insofar as the results of Consultant's engineering services rendered
pursuant to this Agreement; however, City shall not have the right to control the means by which
Consultant accomplishes services rendered pursuant to this Agreement.
LICENSES: PERMITS: ETC. Consultant represents and warrants to City that he has all
li~ses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatsoever nature, which are legally required
for Consultant to practice his profession. Consult~mt represents and warrants to City that
Consultant shall, at his sole cost and expense, keep in effect at all times during the term of this
Agreement any licenses, permits, and approvals which are legally required for Consultant to
practice his profession.
TIME. Consultant shall devote such time to the performance of services pursuant to thi~
Agreement as may be reasonably necessary for satisfactory performance of Consultant's
obligations pursuant to this Agreement.
INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the
contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise
from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, his agents,
representatives, employees or subcontractors. The cost of such insurance shall be included in the
Consultant's bid.
A. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1)
Insurance Services Office form number GL 0002 (Ed. 1/73) covering
comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services Office form number GL
0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability; or Insurance
Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage ("occurrence" form CG
0001).
(2)
Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/78) covering Automobile
Liability, code 1 "any auto" and endorsement CA 0025.
(3)
Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the Labor Code of the State of
California and Employers Liability Insurance.
B. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:
(1)
General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily
injury, personal injury and property damage. If commercial General Liability
Exhibit D
Page 1 of 5
07/10/00
Do
Exhibit D
Page 2 of 5
07/10/00
Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general
aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general
aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
(2)
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily
injury and property damage.
(3)
Workers Compensation and Employers Liability: Workers Compensation limits
as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers Liability
limits of $1,000,000 per accident.
Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must
be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall
reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its
officers, officials and employees; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing
paymen.t of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses.
Other Insurance Provisions. The policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the
following provisions:
(1) General Liability and Automobile Liability Coverages.
(a)
The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered
as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed byor
on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the
Consultant, premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant, or
automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The
coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of the protection
afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(b)
The Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects
the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance
or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees
or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not
contribute with it.
(c)
Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not
affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or
volunteers.
(d)
The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against
whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of
the insurer's liability.
(2) Worker's Compensation and Employers Liability Coverage.
The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work
performed by the Consultant for the City.
(3) Professional Liability.
Consultant shall carry professional liability insurance in an amount deemed by the
City to adequately protect the City against liability caused by negligent acts,
errors or omissions on the part of the Consultant in the course of performance of
the services specified in this Agreement.
(4) All Coverages.
Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that
coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled by either party, reduced in
coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified
mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City.
Acceptability 6f Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a Bests' rating of
no less than A:VIII.
Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish City with certificates of insurance and
with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The certificates
and endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by
that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The certificates and endorsements are to be
received and approved by the City before work commences. The City reserves the right
to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time.
II,
The Risk Manager of City may approve a variation of those insurance requirements upon
a determination that the coverages, scope, limits and forms of such insurance are either
not commercially available or that the City's interests are otherwise fully protected.
CONSULTANT NO AGENT. Except as City may specify in writing, Consultant shall have no
authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of City in any capacity whatsoever as an agent.
Consultant shall have no authority, express or implied, pursuant to this Agreement to bind City
to any obligation whatsoever.
ASSIGNMENT PROHIBITED. No party to this Agreement may assign any right or obligation
pursuant to this Agreement. Any attempted or purported assignment of any right or obligation
pursuant to this Agreement shall be void and of no effect.
Exhibit D
Page 3 of 5
07/10/00
o
10.
PERSOI%NEL. Consultant shall assign only competent personnel to perform services pursuant to
this Agreement. In the event that City, in its sole discretion, at any time during the term of this
Agreement, desires the removal of any such persons, Consultant shall, immediately upon
receiving notice from City of such desire of City, cause the removal of such person or persons.
STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall perform all services required pursuant to
this Agreement in the manner and according to the standards observed by a competent
practitioner of the profession in which Consultant is engaged in the geographical area in which
Consultant practices his profession. All instruments of service of whatsoever nature which
Consultant delivers to City pursuant to this Agreement shall be prepared in a substantial, first
class and workmanlike manner and conform to the standards of quality normally observed by a
person practicing in Consultant's profession.
HOLD HARMLESS AND RESPONSIBILITY OF CONSULTANTS. Consultant shall take ail
responsibility for the work, shall bear all losses and damages directly or indirectly resulting to
him, to any subconsultant, to the City, to City officers and employees, or to parties designated by
the City, on account of the negligent performance, unforeseen difficulties, accidents, occurrences
or other causes predicated on active or passive negligence of the Consultant or of his
subconsultant. Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers,
officials, directors, employees and agents from and against any or all loss, liability, expense,
claim, costs (including costs of defense)} suits, and dard'ages of every kind, nature and description
directly or indirectly arising from the negligent performance of the work. This paragraph shall
not be construed to exempt the City, its employees and officers from its own fraud, willful injury
or violation of law whether willful or negligent. For purposes of Section 2782 of the Civil Code
the parties hereto recognize and agree that this Agreement is not a construction contract. By
execution of this Agreement Consultant acknowledges and agrees that he has read and
understands the provisions hereof and that this paragraph is a material element of consideration.
Approval of the insurance contracts does not relieve the Consultant or sub-consultants from
liability under this paragraph.
GOVERNMENTAL REGULATIONS. To the extent .that this Agreement may be funded by
fiscal assistance from another governmental entity, Consultant shall comply with all applicable
rules and regulations to which City is bound by the terms of such fiscal assistance program.
This may included but not limited to:
a) Representatives of the City, State of California Department of Transportation
(Caltrans) or the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) shall have access to review
alt* relative documents to the project, including but not limited to accounting records,
design reports, design calculations, construction documents and other documents as
outlined in paragraph 11 DOCUMENTS.
Exhibit D
Page 4 of 5
07/10/00
b) The Consultant agrees that the Contract Cost Principles and Procedures, 48 CFR,
Federal Acquisition Regulations System, Chapter 1, Part 31 et seq., shall be used to
determine the allowability of individual items of cost to be paid by City to Consultant.
c) The Consultant also agrees to comply with Federal procedures in accordance with 49
CFR, Part 18, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative
Agreements to State and Local Governments.
d) Any costs for which payment has been made to consultant that are determined by
subsequent audit to be unallowable under 48 CFR, Federal Acquisition Regulations
System, Chapter 1, Part 31 et seq., or 49 CFR, Part 18, uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments
shall be repaid by Consultant to City.
e) For the purpose of determining compliance with Public Contract Code Section 10115,
et.seq7 and Title 2t, California Code of Regulations, Chapter 21 Section 2500 et seq.,
when applicable, and other matters connected with the performance of the contract
pursuant to Governmental Code Section 8546.7, the Consultant, sub-consultants and the
City shall maintain all books, documents, papers, accounting record, and other evidence
pertaining to the performance of the contract, including but not limited to, the costs of
-administering the contract. All parties shall make such materials available at their
respective offices at all reasonable times during the contract period and for three years
from the date of final payment under the contract. The City, State, the State Auditor,
FHWA, or any duly authorized representative of the Federal government having
jurisdiction under Federal laws or regulation (including the basis of Federal funding in
whole or in part) shall have access to any books, records, and documents of the
Consultant that are pertinent to the contract for audits, examinations, excerpts, and
transactions, and copies thereof shall be furnished if requested.
f) Any subcontract entered into as a result of this contract shall contain all of the
provisions of this article, paragraph 10 GOVERNMENTAL REGULATIONS.
11.
DOCUMENTS. All reports, data, maps, models, charts, designs, plans, studies, surveys,
photographs, memoranda or other written documents or materials prepared by Consultant
pursuant to this Agreement shall become the property of City upon completion of the work to be
performed hereunder or upon termination of the Agreement. No such materials or properties
produced in whole or in part under this Agreement shall be subject to private use, copyrights, or
patent rights by Consultant in the United States or in any other country without the express
written consent of City. City shall have um*estricted authority to publish, disclose (as may be
limited by the provisions of the California Public Records Act), distribute, and otherwise use,
copyright or patent, in whole or in part, any such reports, studies, data, statistics, forms or other
materials or properties produced under this Agreement.
Exhibit D
Page 5 of 5
07/10/00
CITY OF DUBLIN
BUDGET CHANGE FORM
New Appropriations (City Council Approval Required):
Budget Transfers:
CHANGE FORM #
From Unappropriated Reserves From Budgeted Contingent Reserve (1080-799.000)
(If Other than General Fund, Fund No - Within Same Department Activity
x__ From New Revenues (unspent FY 99-00 budgeted Between Departments (City Council Approval Required)
STIP funds) Other:
.i:i!?!DECREASE BUDGET ACCOUNT :AMOUNT INCREASE BUDGET ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Name: Name: Dublin Boulevard Widening $50,000
Village Parkway to Sierra
Account #: Account #: 219-96920-740-078
Name: Name:
Account #: Account #:
Name: Name:
Account #: Account #:
Name: Name:
Account #: Account #:
Name: Name:
Account #: Account #:
City Manager: Date:
ASD/Fin Mgr
Signature
Signature
Date:
REASON FOR BUDGET CHANGE ENTRY:
$50,000 of STIP funds was previously allocated in FY 99-00. Moving these available grant funds to
FY 00-01 will provide a total of $267,000 of STIP funds for the preparation of PS&E.
Mayor: Date:
Signature
Posted By: Date:
Signature