Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 6.1 MAD83-2 Public Hearing (2) CITY OF DUBLIN AGENDA STATEMENT City Council Meeting Date: July 23, 1990 SUBJECT: Public Hearing: Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1983-2 (Tract 4719) - Levy of Assessments for Fiscal Year 1990-91 EXHIBITS ATTACHED: 1) Engineer's Report 2) Resolution Approving Engineer's Report, Confirming Diagram and Assessment, and Ordering Levy of Assessment 3) Assessment Diagram RECOMMENDATION: l) ) 5) Open public hearing Receive Engineer's Report and public testimony Question Staff and the public Close public hearing and deliberate Adopt Resolution Approving Engineer's Report, Confirming Diagram and Assessment, and Ordering Levy of Assessment. FINANCIAL STATEMENT: $44,913.96 to be assessed to property owners for 1990-91 landscaping and lighting maintenance costs. No cost to the City. DESCRIPTION: The City formed Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District No. 1983-2 for maintenance of landscaping within Tract 4719 at the request of the developer as an alternative to a combined homeowners' association. The original areas of maintenance included the Stagecoach Road slopes, the "interior" landscaped slopes, the "open space" slopes, and the Stagecoach Mini-Park. The open space maintenance was only included for three years and is no longer a part of the District. In 1989, the City Council determined to remove the cost of maintaining Stagecoach Park from this assessment district. Park maintenance is now paid by the City. The cost of maintenance of the Stagecoach Road landscaping and Stagecoach Park is spread 60% to the Amador Lakes development (divided among the 553 condominium lots) and 40% to the Dublin Hills Estates Development (divided evenly among the 150 single-family lots). All of the Dublin Hills Estates interior slopes (Coral Way and Agate Way) maintenance cost is spread equally to the 150 Dublin Hills Estates lots. The District Diagram remains the same as last year. The proposed assessment for Fiscal Year 1990-91 is $44,913.96, which is the same as last year's assessment. The assessment to the single-family property owners in the Beck development will increase from $165.46 to $181.74 per single-family home, which is still well below the $206.00 assessed in 1988-89. The Amador Lakes Apartments property will be assessed at a rate of $31.98 per dwelling unit, which is $4.42 less than last year. The difference in individual assessments is due to a greater percentage of the costs being utilized on the interior slopes, as opposed to the Stagecoach Road slopes, even though the total assessment is virtually the same as last year's. Staff conducted a neighborhood meeting on July 12 to discuss this year's assessment levy and answer questions. One property owner attended the meeting. Staff recommends that the City Council conduct a public hearing and adopt the resolution approving the Engineer's report, confirming the diagram and assessment, and ordering levy of assessments. ITEM NO.~ COPIES TO: / CITY OF DUBLIN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 1983-2 (TRACT 4719) (FISCAL YEAR 1990-1991) ENGINEER'S REPORT CONTENTS Assessment: Including Estimate of Costs, Method of Apportioning, and Assessment Roll 2. Assessment Diagram ASSESSMENT WHEREAS, on April 9, 1990, the City Council of the City of Dublin, California, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, adopted its Resolution Directing Preparation of Annual Report for Maintenance Assessment District for the maintenance of improvements more particularly therein described; and WHEREAS, said Resolution directed the undersigned to prepare and file a report pursuant to Section 22565, et. seq. of said Act; NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned, by virtue of the power vested in me under said Act and the order of the Council of said City, hereby make the following assessment to cover the portion of the estimated cost of the maintenance of said improvements and the cost and expenses incidental thereto, to be paid by said District. ESTIMATE OF COSTS (1) (2) (3) As Filed As Preliminarily As Finally Approved Approved Cost of Maintenance Incidental Expenses TOTAL COST: Less 1990-91 Interest Income $ Less Surplus from Previous Fiscal Year $ NET TO BE ASSESSED FOR FISCAL YEAR 1990-91 $ 41,130.00 $ 41,130.00 16,864.96 $ 16,864.96 57,994.96 $ 57,994.96 800.00 $ 800.00 12,281.00 $ 12,281.00 $ 44,913.96 $ 44,913.96 $ As required by said Act, a diagram is hereto attached showing the exterior boundaries of said landscaping maintenance assessment district and also the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within said landscaping maintenance assessment district as the same existed at the time of the passage of said resolution, each of which lots or parcels having been given a separate number upon said diagram. I do hereby assess the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lots or parcels of land within said landscaping maintenance assessment district by apportioning that amount among the several lots or parcels in proportion to -2- the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the maintenance of said improvements, and more particularly set forth in the list hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof. Said assessment is made upon the several lots or parcels of land within said landscaping maintenance assessment district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by said lots or parcels respectively from the maintenance of said improvements. The diagram and assessment numbers appearing herein are the diagram numbers appearing on said diagram, to which reference is hereby made for a more particular description of said property. Each lot or parcel of land assessed is described in the assessment list by reference to its parcel number as shown on the Assessor's Maps of the County of Alameda for the fiscal year 1990-1991 and includes all of such parcel excepting those portions thereof within existing public roads or right-of-way to be acquired in these proceedings for public road purposes. For a more particular description of said property, reference is hereby made to the deeds and maps on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder of said County. Because the names of the several owners are unknown to me, I hereby place the word "Unknown" opposite the number of each lot or parcel of land assessed, the amount assessed thereon, and the number of the assessment. Dated: July 16, 1990 -3- CITY OF DUBLIN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 1983-2 (TRACT 4719) ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 1990-1991 MAINTENANCE Slopes - Stagecoach Road Slopes - Interior INCIDENTALS a) b) c) d) Engineer's Report and Proceedings Cost of Collection (County) Estimated Delinquencies Reserve TOTAL $ 26,963.00 14,167.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 763.00 $ 2,245.00 $ 11,856.96 41,130.00 16,864.96 57,994.96 -4- METHOD OF APPORTIONING Sixty percent (60%) of the annual cost of maintaining the landscaping within and along Stagecoach Road has been assigned to the 552 condominium lots within the multifamily portion of the orginal Tract 4719, distributed on an equal basis. The balance of this annual cost has been divided equally among Lots 1 through 150, inclusive, of Tract 4719. The cost of maintaining the excavated slopes and concrete culverts together with its landscaping on the interior slopes of the single-family area (excluding those slopes and concrete culverts adjacent to Stagecoach Road), shall be evenly spread over Lots 1 through 150 of Tract 4719. Lots 152 and 153, being park and open space, shall have a zero assessment. Lots 154 and 155, being public agency owned, shall have a zero assessment. -5- SCOPE OF WORK The scope of work shall be the maintenance of landscaping and irrigation within the road right-of-way and within a public easement along Stagecoach Road between the limits of Amador Valley Blvd. and the northerly City Limit. Further, the scope of work shall include the maintenance of the slopes and landscaping and irrigation of the slopes within a public easement for those slope areas to the rear of Lots 80 through 86 and 37 through 48, all within Tract 4719. ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment and Lot No. Property Owner Amount of Assessment 1990-91 Tax Year Tract 4719 1-150 Tract 4719 152 Tract 4719 153 Public Owned 154 Public Owned 155 Tract 5180 1 552 Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown $181.74 per lot= $27,261.96 $ 0 $ o $ 0 $ 0 $31.98 per lot = $17,652.96 TOTAL: 44,913.96 -7- CITY OF DUBLIN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT CERTIFICATIONS FISCAL YEAR 1990-1991 I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that the foregoing Engineer's Report, including Assessment, in the amounts set forth in Column (1) Page 2, with the diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on June 7, I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, ~e~eby certify that the foregoing Assessment, as set forth in Column 2, Page 2, with the diagram thereto attached, was preliminarily approved and confirmed by the City Council of said City by its Resolution No. 70-90 duly adopted by sa'~Counci~_~ June 11, 1990. I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that the foregoing Assessment, as set forth in Column 3, Page 2, with the diagram thereto attached, was finally approved and confirmed by the City Council of said City by its Resolution No. __ duly adopted by said Council on , 1990. I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that a certified copy of the assessment and diagram was filed in the office of the County Auditor of the County of Alameda, California, on , 1990. -8- RESOLUTION NO. -90 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING ENGINEER'S REPORT, CONFIRMING DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT, AND ORDERING LEVY OF ASSESSMENT CITY OF DUBLIN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1983-2 WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. 38-90, a resolution directing preparation of Annual Report for Maintenance Assessment District, City of Dublin Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. 1983-2 (the "district"), this Council designated the City Engineer as Engineer and ordered that Engineer to make and file a report in writing in accordance with and pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, said Engineer of Work has made and filed with the City Clerk a preliminary report in writing as called for, which report was presented to the City Council on June 11, 1990; and WHEREAS, said Engineer of Work has filed with the City Clerk an Engineer's Report for final consideration; and WHEREAS, the City Council has duly considered said Report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said Report is sufficient; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows: a) That the Engineer's estimate of the itemized and total costs and expenses of maintaining said improvements and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, be; and each of them are hereby finally approved; b) That the diagram showing the assessment district, description of improvements to be maintained; and the boundaries and dimensions of the respective lots and parcels of land within said district as contained in said district as contained in said report be, and it is hereby finally approved; c) The assessment of the total amount of cost and expenses of the proposed maintenance of said improvements upon the several lots and parcels of land in said District in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such lots and parcels, respectively, from said maintenance and of the expenses incidental thereto, as contained in said report be, and they are hereby finally approved, and those assessments are hereby ordered levied as contained in said reports. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 23rd day of July, 1990. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Mayor City Clerk /Vz E6E1UD — - -- Trod Bourx/ary OO Ex/'s11n9 Monu7renf ®O P7r/ooseo' 1wonamen� [i Pub /ic U7`i /liy Esml. N 1 N8383O,W �5 D. E Arm Drain avn \ 5.5. E. 5onifary _1�1usr Eose nen/ a / 22 /in9u/shed fo Cit�r TRACT 4719 -/7 i I I L� / 1 � R= 470. 00 �o d =30322 ' w a L : 25, 07 DO o 100 '03 /3S 9 a R Oq p ,� 0 4:3¢99? -� n ti v W h NI ZI ,P= s3o.GYJ 'Wgl �..1Id= 324%3, � a ao I O N 4 =9 9 7733 70.9-6 I /60. 00 N41 29/:39'W �..., 6769 i ACFC�WD ZONE 7 154 IN?e 4206 "W N6 ao/ 6929 N60 ZO' /8'W N10 4841' ' N20 �2'LYl'W /4. 14 15247 6721 �...... / N74°3942'E I N5 0?508,W /09.2/ I..,. N/4.°34:77"W N58 2930 W . 4776 �': ./ 10 ,1 7Z 73 �,9 scs4air'lvl...:. �� 195, C\RCLE bi NB 0/9?6 E I..... GG JAQ� g/D 63.79 Q N75 Zo' /7 E -7935 NG9%ss1'E 48.26 N62 08%2'E 48.26 N474925'L- 84.95 1l' 82 83 S l05 Sp $r� � WAY 64 J P� p�E 92 q3 94 Aq q0 -91 b� L31 (vl 2 "39 -9 w s 0 SN�E� 2 OF 2 -R'99� g7 04,. d rZ392. Z9 0 200 400 600 SCALE IN FEET / N/o 4e (� 85000 N 34'50--50 00 \ v In 0 a\ A L 19 6428 �. G,830. Gb N27Z942 E(2) \ • = 0/ 88 \ \ V ~ 6 L- / 6542 IN, ,Q =60Gi0 /70.OD j \y w o K= 2s2s0 1m ° .....�/.Ci /°5B47'E �•4 /%f22G" �.. �� •';Y\ 6774 L= 4368 �` 30 3/ 32,33 34 35 36 ; $1; r....MwWs8'E /✓7547%7E 'S0 R 202 17879 '� / +, r /7838 15 ....1N49i3i9'E R = /B�ao TOPAZ C /RC ���, \h \y�� LfNGa25 %E BULB A? 00 d' /4 °5702" i f 1 �` �' r' 1123.70 IQ 1l'D L= 46.97 E .,`, f"-' L �/ , �88.,% E ° .lam r e:852703" IZ 13 . NB9 /54/'{N 37 38 39 40 ¢/ l o� to I I 11 /5.00 � \: 4? 43 :' L:29082 N69Qo44E d• 4227 ', \mil N6G °5632' / X34 50 Q q '19679 s.54 COIVA� �.�nr" 8787 78 L=s �..'_•. /- '1 a q � ; ' . N83W 53 [N 79 (N76 °rG29E e 9 °o�a9' k 48 6zeB f':. 5 ��Z S q5 Zoo _ -- 7500 L-3/42 49 50 5/. S2 S AY N670G Z8'E I QV P Z4 Z / A��ess .e =2000 L =3/ 42 NLi433 /_'iW% _ _`3357 6_ `3 /88.27 SgS.S S { 13990 oi�iv 3 Zp I 22 - j2 p2 L5 STAGECOACH ��L3 °3r'�vlr� GS - N/3�4313/{v 3 -- -- �S8 I N5633%3E(.P) 18 Iq 75, 98 /20 �o �� w /34 /3S R Oq p 97 ir 145 98 `/) 122 w /23 a /37 /43 5 149 99 /2� a a l30 /.3 8 /42 a I� /OD /25 /39 741 141 0 . /26 729 W 7410 RAE ( 119 728 111 IIS 103 /27 Q00 �s III 114 o� IIZ 113 3Z2�. ro 104 _ � 110 111 y oa' '5 2017.88 5UNE, 1989 REVISION: ASSESS14ENT -- DT_STRICT LOTS 1-3 OF TRACT S1o0 WERE SUBDIVIDED INTO CONDOMINIUMS AS SHOWN ON DETAIL A C: SHEET< "I lc:�3 H o rt 109 I $ I - c'014 149g 106 PAC FIG 9o0�NE�N - -- Z l � � /,P =39500 e =24 %G 43 "L =/673g (BndrY) WI /53 a,�a/ o � f IJ I N/9 °5803 "E ?I �`•^:'um hM� 70.0 o m 2 L vv da., I a4S /S OFBEA,2 /71/65 Tile 7i/lo/71197er7f //i7e of 5fa�ecaac/72oad fa den as on 1W114w99- o °a "ti `1 \0n "� /•W 1 ��� %• ��� DETAIL A NO SCALE J ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT 1953 °2 TRACTS 4719 a 5150 CITY OF DUBLIN ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SANTINA 81 THOMPSON INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS CONCORD, CALIFORNIA FISCAL YEAR 1990/91 JUN Saati wmpwna and . h+e. SHEET I OF 2 SHEETS /�.��,nt(� =4Vtr• -6.1 �Xllc1btt7 -� CD3315 DETAIL A NOTES: THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LOT NUMBERS ARE COMPOSED OF: a) A FOUR DIGIT BUILDING NUMBER FOLLOWED BY EACH INDIVIDUAL UNIT LETTER; OR b) A ONE DIGIT AREA NUMBER FOLLOWED BY THE LETTER "COMM" FOR THE COMMON AREAS. E H A D ASSESSMENT 05 O O1 4 DISTRICT O7 O2 3 LOT F G B C NUMBER: 8467D 8467C 1 COMM. BLDG 8467 T, i COMM 202 AREA C& I G r �jC \.✓ \ \. .. -`:/ \/ S '`Cf�/ /'l \i \� �• VI LL \ "1�l rr\ M m' C J \/ 1 r /` �o m' IL m / J /./ I G r �jC 0-512-1. AAA a i1 '�= tom = ardc a Harr n u = U/ MI/ C P-91SCAL YEAR 1990/91 .SCA:: 1"— 20-0, \.✓ \ \. .. -`:/ \/ mil. ti�yl '`Cf�/ /'l \i \� �• VI LL \ "1�l rr\ M m' C J \/ 1 r /` �o m' IL m / J /./ �., lU / I O 1 ✓A °`�/ �' u.' ^ II � �rJ =gym/ �'/ /���e � _'' c V A o� 1... � V r � T . r. / \mil \.1.1 �. /�rl .. / rz:\Wm; r 2 /'1 � •a i� W LL V = I s 0-512-1. AAA a i1 '�= tom = ardc a Harr n u = U/ MI/ C P-91SCAL YEAR 1990/91 .SCA:: 1"— 20-0, !I \.✓ \ \. .. -`:/ \/ mil. ti�yl '`Cf�/ /'l \i \� �• VI LL \ "1�l rr\ M m' C J \/ 1 r /` �o m' IL m / J /./ �., lU / I O 1 ✓A °`�/ �' u.' ^ II � �rJ =gym/ �'/ /���e � _'' c V A o� 1... � V r � T . r. / \mil \.1.1 �. /�rl .. / Ajj !I aQ�� JW � o����a r m( "1 �? %,u m m vii /�i = \= u�/,,♦ �;\ o.. Z /W� /N�1 of /C•.. n. � �l "_ \:.% \RILL ml tP� G v +l S➢�. S 1 yj �CJ m `/nF� \�✓ ml . wOi /J' ^1�I \_^l\=_m� wf IN m ml / 7 \.✓ \ \. .. -`:/ \/ = J w' Vi r. \ "1�l rr\ M m' C J \/ 1 r �o LL. d •- r � T . r. / \mil \.1.1 �. /�rl .. / Ajj r 2 /'1 � •a i� W LL V = I aQ�� JW � o����a r m( "1 �? %,u m m vii /�i = \= u�/,,♦ �;\ o.. Z /W� /N�1 of /C•.. n. � �l "_ \:.% \RILL ml tP� G v +l S➢�. S 1 yj �CJ m `/nF� \�✓ ml . wOi /J' ^1�I \_^l\=_m� wf IN m ml / 7 ° o cJ \/emu \\� a = c, 2 '�I _�`°>' \'' /u m, y Jl\J`��,i " \ ",�•W ml m b '�i •u o wWWI) wTIC) rl W b bvlU L— fl Nt pFtl JUN 11 im Senior WA Imm m, SHEET 2 OF 2 CD3315 u�. �, ✓,m m `� l,�fa �. d •- r � T . r. / \mil \.1.1 �. /�rl .. / Lj ° o cJ \/emu \\� a = c, 2 '�I _�`°>' \'' /u m, y Jl\J`��,i " \ ",�•W ml m b '�i •u o wWWI) wTIC) rl W b bvlU L— fl Nt pFtl JUN 11 im Senior WA Imm m, SHEET 2 OF 2 CD3315 u�. �, ✓,m m `� l,�fa �. ° o cJ \/emu \\� a = c, 2 '�I _�`°>' \'' /u m, y Jl\J`��,i " \ ",�•W ml m b '�i •u o wWWI) wTIC) rl W b bvlU L— fl Nt pFtl JUN 11 im Senior WA Imm m, SHEET 2 OF 2 CD3315