Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 6.2 L&L 83-2 Tr4719 HearDate (2) CITY OF DUBLIN AGENDA STATEMENT City Council Meeting Date: August 12, 1991 SUBJECT: Public Hearing: Landscaping and Lighting District No. 83-2 (Tract 4719) Report by: Public Works Director Lee Thompson EXHIBITS ATTACHED: 1) Engineer's Report 2) Resolution Approving Engineer's Report, Confirming Diagram and Assessment, and Ordering Levy of Assessment. 3) Assessment Diagram 4) Copy of Newsletter 5) Statistical sheets quantifying maintenance activities and costs in this assessment district vs. other areas of the City. A- 6) Copy of July 31 Notice to Residents regarding request for additional planting and design work 7) Alternate Engineer's Report showing higher assessment. 8) Alternate Resolution Approving Engineer's Report, Confirming Diagram and Assessment, and Ordering Levy of Assessment (for higher assessment) RECOMMENDATION: 1) Open public hearing 2) Receive Staff report and public comment 144 3) Question Staff and the public II 4) Close public hearing and deliberate 5) Determine whether assessment should be increased for 1992-93 to fund additional planting and design work. 6) Adopt resolution Exhibit 2 approving original Engineer's Report as shown in the adopted 1992- 93 budget OR Adopt resolution Exhibit 8 approving revised Engineer's Report with increased assessment. FINANCIAL STATEMENT: The 1992-93 assessment was originally proposed to be $220.36 per single-family lot and $39.92 per multi-family (apartment) lot (total of $22,035.84 for Amador Lakes) . A second option is presented based upon the neighborhood meeting: The cost of providing additional planting on the interior slopes and design work for future changes on the Stagecoach Road slopes would increase the single family assessment to $265.36 and the Amador Lakes assessment to $23,537.28 (or $42.64 per unit) . The City's costs for maintaining landscaping within District boundaries are reimbursed by the District. DESCRIPTION: The Conditions of Approval for development of Tract 4719 required that a homeowners' association be formed to maintain certain common landscaping improvements within the Tract. Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District No. 1983-2 was formed at the request of the developer as an alternative to providing landscaping maintenance through the Amador Lakes and Dublin Hills Estates ITEM NO. 6.2 COPIES TO: Ron Nahas CITY CLERK FILE l 13 S O homeowners' associations. This District maintains landscaping and irrigation on the slopes along Stagecoach Road and also on the "interior" slopes of the Dublin Hills Estates development on Agate Way and Coral Way. The cost of maintenance of the Stagecoach Road landscaping is spread 60% to the Amador Lakes development, divided among the 552 condominium lots, and 40% to the Dublin Hills Estates development, divided among the 150 single-family lots. The "interior slopes" maintenance is spread among the 150 single-family lots only. The District diagram remains the same as last year's. Based on the approved Preliminary Engineer's Report, the proposed assessment for the 1992-93 tax year is $55,090, which is approximately $6,022 (12.2%) higher than last year's assessment. The increased cost is primarily due to a significant increase in water rates; i.e. , $9,775 water cost in 1991-92 vs. an estimated $15,150 for 1992-93. While it is proposed to utilize approximately $5,853 from existing reserves to help defray the increased water cost, the use of reserves will not totally offset these expenses. At the time of approval of the preliminary engineer's report, the proposed assessment per single-family lot was $220.36, as compared with $194.64 last year. This is an increase of $25.72 or 13.2%. The proposed assessment per condominium (Amador Lakes) lot was $39.92, as compared with $36.00 last year. This is an increase of $3.92 or 10.9%. A notice and newsletter (Exhibit 4) were mailed to the property owners to advise them of this information. On July 29, 1992, Staff held an informational meeting for property owners in the Assessment District. Fifteen people, representing ten different single family homes as well as Amador Lakes, attended the meeting. Staff presented a brief history of the assessment district and discussed and distributed copies of cost and labor hour comparisons between the Stagecoach Assessment District and other areas of the City. Those comparisons are attached as Exhibit 5. One of the most notable statistics contained in this information is the amount of bedding (ground cover) area maintained per single-family property owner (990 square feet) compared with the Dougherty Assessment District (160 square feet) . Staff has made an effort to keep the assessment as low as possible; however, the consequence is that only status quo maintenance is performed, with little or no funding available for replanting. After discussion of several different suggestions from those present at the meeting for improving the appearance of the interior slopes and Stagecoach Road slopes, the consensus reached among those at the neighborhood meeting was that a one-time increase in the assessment would be appropriate to fund (1) additional landscaping and irrigation on the interior slopes and (2) the cost of a preliminary revised landscape plan for the Stagecoach Road slopes. It was suggested by Ron Nahas, owner of Amador Lakes, that the upper and lower portions of the Stagecoach Road slopes be planted with drought-tolerant shrubs and the middle portion be allowed to return to native grasses and flowers which would require less maintenance and less water. This increase would provide for the following work which is not currently planned for in the budget presented with the Preliminary Report: 1) For the interior slopes: Replace 12,000 square feet of groundcover $3,600 Replace 5 15-gallon trees 500 Additional water, fertilizer, and irrigation upgrades 1,650 $5,750 Cost per single-family residence: $5,750 = $38.33 150 2) Preliminary Stagecoach slopes plan and plant palette: $2,500 Cost per single-family residence: 40% x 2,500 = $ 6.67 150 Cost for Amador Lakes: 60% x 2,500 = $1,500 Total additional assessment per single-family residence: $ 45.00 Total additional assessment for Amador Lakes: $1,500.00 This would increase the total paid by single family assessments to $39,804 (or $265.36 per unit) and the Amador Lakes assessment 'to $23,537.28 (or $42.64 per Page 2 unit) . The difference in the Amador Lakes assessment is actually slightly more than $1,500 because of having to spread the cost evenly among the 552 units. It was proposed that the actual type of plant material to be placed on the interior slopes would be reviewed by a committee of City Staff and the single-family homeowners. The preliminary landscape plan for the Stagecoach Road slopes is proposed to be reviewed by a committee of City Staff, single-family homeowners, and representatives of Amador Lakes. Cost estimates would be made for possible future one-time capital costs for implementing a new landscape plan. These estimates would also identify estimated reductions to maintenance and water costs. All future changes to the landscaping would be approved by action of the City Council. It should be noted that the $2,500 landscape plan cost is for a conceptual plan only. Any future design or implementation costs would need to be paid by the District in years to come. One of the ideas mentioned at the neighborhood meeting was to phase any future improvements so that the cost would be spread over several years; however, any expenses to be incurred in future years would need to be presented to the property owners and ultimately approved by the City Council as part of the assessment district hearing process. A notice regarding the results of the neighborhood meeting and the proposed increase in assessment (Exhibit 6) was mailed to all of the property owners on July 31st. Staff recommends that the City Council conduct a public hearing, review the information provided by Staff and comments from the property owners, determine whether the alternate budget which proposes an increase in assessment is appropriate, and adopt EITHER Resolution Exhibit 2 which approves the original Engineer' s Report and assessment as shown in the 1992-93 budget OR Resolution Exhibit 8 which approves the revised Engineer's Report with increased assessment. If the assessment is to be increased, the engineer's report submitted to the County Assessor would indicate the revised figures as shown in Exhibit 7, Alternate Engineer's Report. a: (ad)\83-2\83-2ph Page 3 CITY OF DUBLIN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 1983-2 (TRACT 4719) FISCAL YEAR 1992-93 ENGINEER'S REPORT CONTENTS 1. Assessment: Including Scope of Work, Estimate of Costs, Assessment Roll, and Method of Apportioning. 2 . Assessment Diagram • :icey o CNsG i t3L—e7 .'s 2 2T ASSESSMENT WHEREAS, on April 13, 1992, the City Council of the City of Dublin, California, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, adopted its Resolution Directing Preparation of Annual Report for Maintenance Assessment District 1983-2 for the maintenance of improvements more particularly therein described; and WHEREAS, said Resolution directed the undersigned to prepare and file a report pursuant to Section 22565, et. seq. , of said Act; NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned, by virtue of the power vested in me under said Act and the order of the Council of said City, hereby make the following assessment to cover the portion of the estimated cost of the maintenance of said improvements and the cost and expenses incidental thereto, to be paid by said District. ESTIMATE OF COSTS (1) (2) (3) As Filed As Preliminarily As Finally Approved Approved Cost of Maintenance $ 57,745 $ 57,745 $ Incidental Expenses $ 17,230 $ 17,230 $ TOTAL COST: $ 74,975 $ 74,975 $ Estimated 1992-93 Interest Income Applied to 1992-93 Operating Costs: $ 850 $ 850 $ Est. Surplus from 1991-92 Fiscal Year $ 19, 035 $ 19,035 $ NET TO BE ASSESSED FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992-93 $ 55, 090 $ 55, 090 $ As required by said Act, a diagram is hereto attached showing the exterior boundaries of said landscaping maintenance assessment district and also the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within said landscaping maintenance assessment district as the same existed at the time of the passage of said resolution, each of which lots or parcels having been given a separate number upon said diagram. I do hereby assess the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lots or parcels of land within said landscaping maintenance assessment district by apportioning that amount among the several lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the maintenance of said improvements, and more particularly set forth in the list hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof. Said assessment is made upon the several lots or parcels of land within said landscaping maintenance assessment district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by said lots or parcels respectively from the maintenance of said improvements. The diagram and assessment numbers appearing herein are the diagram numbers appearing on said diagram, to which reference is hereby made for a more particular description of said property. Each lot or parcel of land assessed is described in the assessment list by reference to its parcel number as shown on the Assessor's Maps of the County of Alameda for the Fiscal Year 1991-92 and includes all of such parcels excepting those portions thereof within existing public roads or rights of way to be acquired in these proceedings for public road purposes. For a more particular description of said property, reference is hereby made to the deeds and maps on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder of said County. Because the names of the several owners are unknown to me, I hereby place the word "unknown" opposite the number of each lot of parcel of land assessed, the amount assessed thereon, and t - number of the assessment. Dated: June 2, 1992 \ Cit •ineer ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 1992-93 The estimated cost for the maintenance of improvements described in this Report for Fiscal Year 1992-93 is as follows: Maintenance • Slopes, Stagecoach Road: $ 38, 150 • Slopes, Interior: 19,595 $ 57,745 Incidentals • Engineer' s Report and proceedings: $ 1,458 • Cost of Collection (County of Alameda) : 937 • Delinquencies: 1, 653 • Contingencies/Reserve: 13, 182 $ 17, 230 TOTAL: $ 74,975 METHOD OF APPORTIONING Sixty percent (60%) of the annual cost of maintaining the landscaping within and along Stagecoach Road has been assigned to the 552 condominium lots within the multifamily portion of the original Tract 4719, disributed on an equal basis. The balance of this annual cost has been divided equally among Lots 1 through 150, inclusive, of Tract 4719 . The cost of maintaining the excavated slopes and concrete culverts together with its landscaping on the interior slopes of the single- family area (excluding those slopes and concrete culverts adjacent to Stagecoach Road) shall be evenly spread over Lots 1 through 150 of Tract 4719 . Lots 152 and 153 , being park and open space, shall have a zero assessment. Lots 154 and 155, being public agency owned, shall have a zero assessment. SCOPE OF WORK The scope of work shall be the maintenance of landscaping and irrigation within the road right-of-way and within a public easement along Stagecoach Road between the limits of Amador Valley Boulevard and the northerly City Limit. Further, the scope of work shall include the maintenance of the slopes and landscaping and irrigation of the slopes within a public easement for those slope areas to the rear of Lots 80 through 86 and 37 through 48, all within Tract 4719. ASSESSMENT ROLL Amount of Assessment Assessment & Lot No. Property Owners 1992-93 Tax Year Lots 1-150 Tr. 4719 Unknown $220.36/lot = $33 , 054 Lot 152 Tr. 4719 Unknown 0 Lot 153 Tr. 4719 Unknown 0 Lot 154 Public-Owned 0 Lot 155 Public-Owned 0 Lots 1-552 Tr. 5180 Unknown $ 39 . 92/DU = $22, 036 TOTAL: $55, 090 CITY OF DUBLIN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 83-2 CERTIFICATIONS FISCAL YEAR 1992-93 I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify. that the foregoing Engineer' s Report, including Assessment, in the amounts set forth in Column (1) , with the diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on June 2, 1992 . r /y I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that the foregoing Assessment, with the diagram thereto attached, was preliminarily approved and confirmed by the City Council of said. City by its Resolution No. 60-92 duly adopted b aid •uncil on June 8, 1992 . I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that the foregoing Assessment, with the diagram thereto attached, was finally approved and confirmed by the City Council of said City by its Resolution No. -92, duly adopted by said Council on August 10, 1992. I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that a certified copy of the Assessment and diagram was filed in the office of the County Auditor of the County of Alameda, California, on , 1992. RESOLUTION NO. -92 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING ENGINEER'S REPORT, CONFIRMING DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT, AND ORDERING LEVY OF ASSESSMENT CITY OF DUBLIN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1983-2 WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. 33-92, a resolution directing preparation of Annual Report for City of Dublin Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. 1983-2 (the "District") , this Council designated the City Engineer as Engineer and ordered that Engineer to make and file a report in writing in accordance with and pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, said Engineer of Work has made and filed with the City Clerk a preliminary report in writing as called for, which report was presented to the City Council on June 8, 1992; and WHEREAS, said Engineer of Work has filed with the City Clerk an Engineer's Report for final consideration; and WHEREAS, the City Council has duly considered said Report and each and every part thereof and finds that each and every part of said Report is sufficient; and that said Report nor any part thereof requires modification in any respect; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows: a) That the Engineer's estimate of the itemized and total costs and expenses of maintaining said improvements and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith be; and each of them are hereby finally approved; b) That the diagram showing the assessment district, description of improvements to be maintained; and the boundaries and dimensions of the respective lots and parcels of land within said district as contained in said report be, and it is hereby finally approved; c) The assessment of the total amount of cost and expenses of the proposed maintenance of said improvements upon the several lots and parcels of land in said District in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such lots and parcels, respectively, from said maintenance and of the expenses incidental d 1 (RE50Lu-rtor Corei6,a4L T) thereto, as contained in said report be, and they are hereby finally approved and those assessments are hereby ordered levied as contained in said reports. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 10th day of August, 1992. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINING: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk a: (ad)\83-2\83-21evy 2 LE6EN0 •N2 io:Ja N ----- Pm./Boundary �,_ • © Ex/5/in9 Manuerof cf3 ` ® Proposed frisnom<n/ RUE %r/b/c Uh'h/y esmf ,_':':•s. .5 De: Arm Oman Ern,'" _ _ d�N 5.9 E. Sonig7,y Sr�++r Eoern,<n/ 0 200 R00_._6a NI -JO IV ' (• // // r ADuL/erg Ri9hAJ ar AaXSa SCALE IN FEET p 1 i--I 'CPJn9urahed to Gfy . ti / c--- ! � / /_' . • TRACT 4719 `�;aa, �, . / Nrenont7-w 3.5 OG ACFC1:'WOZONE7 __esoa, N 0.00 t 9 NewOoiV /54 �� ASS,.7 N2d'/JSL'N1......_ /53 A77/ I..., ` ` `_` p OO 71lJ NL'Ia Nifi70G7V INrrata-w dll/ ` Z\ti m 70.95 I'_, x'16929 NedItrai+' N/0 ea'N'1ry �'� W" n L• N!s%i/a iv :'I sZ a7 N F40"6 I. ''•. Na Je!7- (, `__ `F, `cg (- N I'-y s.tc,l9W r09r/ - 4..esoce \ •..%.,671:1. /L//55 A /LN 1.fJ.99 ! 1/B } 1. i I 4".1'" _B g TOOK I L Nr77vi 7.'-7'•}+ \'"-- "z' .c DSITSO Ne/brrwl•.,• NN 01:51[ .1 t Ntl iVie'M' ;ti I./OJRB a��°• p LrG9 '1 L111 \' /m.m �� �') hI17J0 �\° nom$._' W ...w/:u>rr W41 :: ' ,..Nrdal;SaY I �RCLE 1780 �•, . © /. , s`•;Iraatl 1�e \7 � 50 I ! G 15 TO PAZ *1.'4'/ ®�®�l' �.� •' • /fa b� nOE Irmo A•/•J7A2'I ri- 1RClE P/!• (IrrAM 1,191.00 'I... rmm • N.9:%d'ZJf I,,,, �� L.N 97 f',. I 14st litli NY.OIiB! I JJ-" e.BS77bJ' 1•jOLVm" cl.79 1 ..Igg g,,,r4/1.1,I 37 38 5' 401, I r x9082 .�,+ ,O� ®CLE ./ I L.ii ar 1.00 N.G'1T09 E ,} 18 a 2 9da0. rJ iC73i iJ 37yB ®R' 2.706 ,� 95 ". <.m� \ 0 4,•�'�.'•Sy I.o,,ro c./9 0 a I- RO ,'-n,,/vt ..- Arr 40 • N47'497JE I........�r o\ 892. n0W®� AD / __\ f . 6495 o L' V W ® ® IL,^ TR ,!j I W/ aoJge� �. 3 ?° mN® w ®®�� ["";%i'_—..<_-_-,g6 �fA //' .04• I / 1,9.anm r4 ,v m ®�u I �1 , 153 dl, m I .F W "<•JUOO e,reloirre,ows lad) . �' C•2s o7 0p 6Art ¢ .N79'1.7. (<J iI 8pg St^ Yk� •'":• y. R ,1800 • I ,ale1 2a.•L 31 I' R 23 tt t 99 x a ra /42 = Z I �' `.p. : .ay T 2 L 8 8'1 ai12 A i0 /[70 a M . 15 I 7 senJ-e W„ i_3 a••v' a e a 8 N12.1514 _1,9 i Zfr'"•' � a /25 /39 0 •.'m�S7 <., :.....•.....,.'•...`< N.vr. i a 3�• a 124 " EEZ \ �.y1e'r,:r• r•. /0/ .I 140 •(P 119'\,_ <-»1me•iYJ• .—zsro F,1oli'2!' $ 8� •W /02 118 j t•arls c /ZL ®� r. .4 8 A•j,, '1 �\ N 17011117\3 is 41 joz&•00 a• Z/L.Z4 t PCi P /Q3 �8�` I UZ W I\ e.3ioa� SEEOE�A} 2 $ L �/' 7 Nf °o„1Ry� DETAIL A OF 2 l (yMP� NO SCALE $ 1.sr98 SNEE't 1 /05 IDb PA61fIG If I 1 o^sµ6 o�"'ERN ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM a' N55 ,�' LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT 1983-2 • TRACTS 4719 815180 b: m zoo' CITY OF DUBLIN• ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA• PI, ni ¢4S/s oF8•61E/NGS SANTINA a THOMPSON INC.• Z� JUNE, 1989 REVISION: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LOTS 1-3 OF TRACT 5180 ge Mona/nen/4)7e of aveeoachgoad CIVIL ENGINEERS WERE SUBDIVIDED INTO CONDOMINIUMS /aken as Nor//r34:SD'OL Hied asshown CONCORD, CALIFORNIA • • Nj6.�r0p8 14^' AS SHOWN ON DETAIL A OF SHEET 2. arl r111//0,41.96. FISCAL YEAR 1992/93 • SHEET.1 OF 2 SHEEN h,' I.; I7 • g: • .,s ' a• .i /S5E5SMl'1JT DIAGl2-AM ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM DETAIL A NOTES: •THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LOT NUMBERS ARE COMPOSED OF: a) A Street Lighting Maintenance . FOUR DIGIT BUILDING NUMBER FOLLOWED BY EACH INDIVIDUAL UN/T '. //�� o /� • LETTER: OR b) A ONE DIGIT AREA NUMBER FOLLOWED BY THE LETTER . Assessment District $.3-2.. "CONN. FOR THE COMMON AREAS. • CITY OF DUBLIN ' E N A D ASSESSMENT I. ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA OO O 4 DISTRICT ©eM AREA '•,y. . O O O _LOT FISCAL YEAR 1992/93•`:: ;• F B C \ NUMBER: SCALE: 1'= 200' • 8467D 04670 • a • I COYI I-1• ` ,. b I • BLDG 8467 _ /• • . NOVO IOVIS i ^` ° NOVOO,Otl1S O... '„ els 4).j.-r;) ' CSC)y)� 2• • - . °-pia ' „. ).y^ X''..' `'.:'AN♦ .' <r\/ea• =�>7 r,,°<: .., /fir T.: ' ° O" ^ r .---- i 7- =m; °� z(e(Je 9 0�£( `:I �CeJG;� � ti=_ ., .- .Ct.•-w el < ,t °CDC')-e °(9<R .:<ZrJ I' C�CJW' "(=JC•ip° °.N.s/ .0-;aAi' =r C�'.e�)° °Cn7° =C��W • • ,(;;'�° °(NJC)a 1 W/�.=i °C��^' " =CSC; �( ' _: r, - �r.0 • • .(.1--.) .,:‘,3.. , ' '^ll"'� ° / I�V'\. " n i = . . °L� , -Ga." ` ",W ° J= ($( C7�?-'I _ . \F� CF.lF J' (�♦R\S�.�' ' CI=C" C�sc; ,♦ '• c X)7 • G I aC�C'm�`�' ? .i� :,C,; J : a / �)- <szJX; ('• `• �6 °C �C?JC✓° ' °.) )° I G�/am�.� e 6s Y.del (�� ^C ; •°C....// '(.." (..7)''° °(?�_ ,.,' °CaC ` ` B • °GJ° .c.:',),-..- -h' ay-, a , �?�S1 ?C�,J" . . "CGi\C d1 . 4 � ;�,‘-;o =C:C0W • . • -000J° °(s; ." a " n;�: wC .�CY`C6i °r CX�W• • °(JCJ" °-k ^3 • ;' °( � =C)CJ': ,' �. °Cm�J (A. "C�� 1 ° Jl�= °(�:::-� =CAW' .WC1 �° .( m1 <` °e "C °�.. °6CGR�' ' "Q® _(gf = C= = • z�.: F m 1 R o% WJJ- �, � -�;,° .°��:, °C5/C�°., °�°1 =■"CY•"aJ°�• =C;C�°d,• _�°�'' . °�1-: Uzi • • • "O _ -CX� "�C7 °C)C^J° Wes= • =Ors;,! • Wc ,= =C °"a ° ' • •W� - n LL W«,. W, W `A'LL �' �.., • DETAIL'..A; •• . . GOr DL�/ 111 STAGECOACH ROAD (TRACT 4719) 19 — 82 STA MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT f LANDSCAPE MAC NEWSLETTER FO6 FACTS ABOUT THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT This assessment district was formed in 1983 for the purpose of maintaining certain landscaping improvements along Stagecoach Road and on the "interior slopes" of the Dublin Hills Estates development • (Coral Way and Agate Way) . The following areas are being maintained by the City at the present time: ■ Landscaping and irrigation within the road right-of-way and within a public easement along Stagecoach Road between Amador Valley Boulevard and the northerly City Limit. ■ Slopes and landscaping and irrigation of the slopes within a . public easement for those slope areas to the rear of Lots 80 through 86 and 37 through 48 of Tract 4719 . These are the "interior slopes" which face houses on Agate Way and Coral Way. In order to arrive at the annual assessment, estimated maintenance costs for the ensuing year are divided among residents of the single- family homes of Dublin Hills Estates and the owners of the Amador Lakes Apartments as follows: ■ Sixty percent (60%) of the annual cost of maintaining the • landscaping within and along Stagecoach Road has been assigned to the 552 apartment/condominium lots of Amador Lakes, distributed on an equal basis. The remaining 40% of this annual cost has been divided equally among the 150 single-family lots in Dublin Hills Estates. N The cost of maintaining the excavated slopes, concrete culverts, and landscaping on the interior slopes of the • single-family area (Agate Way and Coral Way) is divided evenly among the 150 Dublin Hills Estates lots. The monies collected through assessments are carefully accounted for separately from other City funds. These funds can only be used for • specified expenses within the boundaries of the Assessment District. • 4 , 4 Page 1 NEWSLe.Trt LANDSCAPING As of July 1, 1992 , the City of Dublin no longer contracts with Alameda County for weekend inmate workers. Basically, the program could not supply enough inmates to be efficient and productive. In place of the Work Alternative Program, the City' s maintenance contractor, MCE Corporation, has contracted with a local company to perform pre- and post-emergents and fertilization of all bedding areas City-wide, including the Stagecoach Assessment District. The groundcover areas have rebounded fairly well from the past freezes and pest problems. The trees in the District were not damaged any further by frost this past winter and are also coming back. IRRIGATION Since last year, the City has experienced a 50% increase in the cost of water from the Dublin San Ramon Services District. Unfortunately, vandalism of irrigation heads, while not as bad as in past years, is still a problem. The irrigation systems installed in this District were installed to water erosion control grasses, not permanent landscaping. The result is a less-than-efficient system. The City's maintenance department is appreciative of residents who have called regarding broken sprinklers. Our response to these requests will continue to be immediate so that water won't be wasted. If you happen to see a broken sprinkler head or a sprinkler system that is running too long, please call the Public Works Department at 833-6630. PARK IMPROVEMENTS The cost of park maintenance for the Dougherty Hills Open Space and Stagecoach Park, is paid entirely by the City and is not charged to the assessment district. The City' s park masterplans include a number of future improvements for the Dougherty Hills Park (the "hill" to the east of Stagecoach Road) . To date, trails have been cut to allow hiking on the hill. Due to the City' s present budget constraints, the Five Year Capital Improvement Program currently lists any future plans or improvements for this area as unfunded. The residents of Topaz Circle petitioned the City Council and the Dublin San Ramon Services District to aid in providing trees and bushes along the faces of the Dougherty Hills slopes which front Topaz Circle. The City Council allotted $17, 000, and DSRSD has allotted $26, 000 to landscape its access to the water reservoir. These neighbors are proposing to use the money primarily on plant and irrigation materials and to install the plants themselves. Page 2 • � 1 l • PUBLIC HEARING The City is required to hold a public hearing each year prior to establishing the assessment for the upcoming tax year. The attached notice provides information regarding the date, time, and place that the hearing will be held. An informational meeting has also been scheduled to give residents a chance to ask questions and gain information on an informal basis. The City again proposes to use a portion of the assessment district reserve fund to help defray the cost of plant material replacement and increased water rates. Use of this reserve will not, however, totally offset these costs nor the cost of repairs of vandalized irrigation systems. The 1992-93 assessment is therefore proposed to increase from $194 . 64 to $220. 36 per single-family lot. This amounts to an increase on a monthly basis of approximately $2 . 14 per month. The condominium/apartment lot assessment is proposed to be $39 .92 (as compared with $36. 00 last year) . City Staff will be glad to speak with any property owners who have questions regarding the assessment or the maintenance activities in the district. Please feel free to call 833-6630 for information. • • • • ter•}"'r �• ,���• .11fi 11=. • 1, .} j Y �r • • Page 3 CITY OF DUBLIN REVENUE BASE FOR VARIOUS LANDSCAPED AREAS JULY 9, 1992 STAGECOACH DOUGHERTY DUBLIN DUBLIN DESCRIPTION A.D. A.D. STREETS PARKS TOTAL ACRES OF BEDDING 5.38 2.39 5.11 6.17 SUBTRACT EQUIVALENT AREA THAT AMADOR LAKES FUNDS (60% x 3.28) -1.97 1 1 1 ACRES FUNDED BY INDIVIDUAL 3.41 2.39 5.11 6.17 RESIDENTIAL UNITS NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL 150 1 ,150 7,567 7,567 2 UNITS FUNDING MAINTENANCE (652) SQUARE FOOTAGE OF BEDDING 990 160 29 35 (NON-TURF) FUNDED BY SINGLE FAMILY UNITS 1 THESE DOUGHERTY ASSESSMENT DISTRICT, DUBLIN STREETS, AND DUBLIN PARKS ACREAGE FIGURES ARE FOR BEDDING ACREAGES ONLY. TURF ACREAGES WERE REMOVED SO AS TO PROVIDE A SIMILAR BASE FOR COMPARISON. 2 EQUIVALENT SINGLE FAMILY UNITS iT DUBLBASE.MISC:C:WK1 :SPS a 1k1FoRmAltai CITY OF DUBLIN • MA TENANCE COMPARISONS , STAGECOACH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT VERSUS ALL OTHER CITY OF DUBLIN FROM JULY 1 , 1991 THROUGH JUNE 30, 1992 STAGECOACH A.D. AS A PERCENTAGE ALL OTHER STAGECOACH OF ALL OTHER DESCRIPTION CITY OF DUBLIN A.D. CITY OF DUBLIN WORK ALTERNATIVE 3,540 HRS 3,954 HRS 111.7% HOURS USED ACRES OF BEDDING 13.67 5.38 39.4% % OF MAINTENANCE 95.8% 4.2% N/A DOLLARS EXPENDED MANUAL WEEDING BEDDING AREAS LABOR COST/HR. $9.89 $3.38 34.2% TOTAL COST PER $806 $418 51.9% ACRE WEEDED LEVEL OF SERVICE 7.80 8.86 113.6% (TIMES WEEDED) * ALL NORMAL BEDDING $8,273 $4,672 56.5% MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES COST/ INVENTORY ACRE IF THE INDIVIDUAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS IN STAGECOACH A.D. WOULD HAVE PAID THE AVERAGE COST PER ACRE EXPERIENCED IN THE REST OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN FOR JUST THE FIVE NORMAL BEDDING MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES, IT WOULD HAVE COST AN ADDITIONAL $ 12,280 OR $ 82 PER RESIDENCE. * INCLUDES: PRUNE/TRIM BEDDING, BEDDING REPAIR, MANUAL WEED REMOVAL, FERTILIZE BEDDING, AND CHEMICAL WEED CONTROL. DUBLSTAG.MISC.C:WK1 :SPS:7/27/92 821 OF DUBLIN "Celebrating 10 Years Of Cityhood 1982-19922' 3 CITY g PO. Box 2340. Dublin, California 94568 • City Offices, 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin, California 94568 NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS STAGECOACH ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT July 31, 1992 Dear Property Owner: °i This letter has a two-fold purpose: first, to remind you of the Assessment District Public Hearing on Monday, August 10th, at 7:30 p.m. at the Civic Center, and secondly, to let you know the results of the July 29th neighborhood meeting. There were concerns presented at that meeting that additional landscaping and irrigation repair work need to be done which would warrant a one-time assessment of $45.00 per single-family home. The annual assessment has, for several years, been set at a minimal level so as not to significantly increase the cost to each property owner. The budget has allowed sustenance watering, weeding (primarily using low-cost Work Alternative people from the Sheriff' s Department) , fertilizing, and minimal plant replacement. The two years of heavy freeze caused major damage to the plantings in the District, but about 65% to 70% of the ground cover has re-established itself. City Staff prepared a cost estimate to fill in the remainder of missing landscaping with trees and ground cover similar to that which had died and to add a water meter on Stagecoach Road to get better and longer irrigation coverage. The one time cost to individual homeowners would have been $92.00 per unit and $13,950 to the Amador Lakes development. Ron Nahas, owner of Amador Lakes, suggested that the planting on the slopes along Stagecoach Road be changed to a small band of landscaping along the bottom of the slopes and return the upper portions to native grasses and flowers. This would cut down the cost of both watering and maintenance. The final consensus was that City Staff would prepare an estimate to be presented at the public hearing to do the following: 1) Fill in the missing landscaping on the interior slopes (above Agate Way and Coral Way) and to upgrade the interior slope irrigation to cure the poor coverage areas. The actual type of plant material to be installed would be decided through discussions with a landscape architect and a committee of interested homeowners. 2) Hire a landscape architect to prepare a preliminary landscape plan to change the Stagecoach Road slopes to a much less water- and maintenance-intensive plan. This plan could include a strip of planting along Stagecoach Road and at the top-of the slopes next to the single-family homes and return the midslopes to native grasses and flowers. The resulting schematic plan(s) would be reviewed by City Administration (510) 833-6650 • City Council (510) 833-6605 • Finance Code Enforcement(510) 833-6620 • Engineering (510_ Police (510) 833-6670 • Public Works(510) 833-6 6EC0 1L3� N)troce' 7;32 ocJdl S Staff and a committee of homeowners and the Amador Lakes owner. It is anticipated that a revised plan for the Stagecoach Road landscaping would result in some short- term additional cost to the District to change plantings and irrigation but would result in long-term reductions in maintenance costs. The additional estimated cost for 1992-93 is as follows: 1) Replace 12,000 square feet of groundcover $3,600 Replace 5 15-gallon trees 500 Additional water, fertilizer, and irrigation upgrades 1,650 $5,750 Cost per single-family residence: $5,750 = $38.33 150 2) Preliminary Stagecoach slopes plan and plant palette $2,500 Cost per single-family residence: 40% x 2,500 = $6.67 150 Cost for Amador Lakes: 60% x 2,500 = $1,500 Total additional assessment per single-family residence: $ 45.00 Total additional assessment for Amador Lakes: $1,500.00 City Staff will be presenting this additional option at the August 10th public hearing for review by the City Council. We encourage you to attend this meeting and present your views. If you cannot attend the meeting, you may respond in writing prior to the meeting. If you have any questions, please feel free to call my office at (510) 833-6630. Sincerely, CD4A- 4412.0 Lee S. Thompson Public Works Director LST/gr a:(ad)\83-2\83-21tr CITY OF DUBLIN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 1983-2 (TRACT 4719) FISCAL YEAR 1992-93 ENGINEER'S REPORT CONTENTS 1. Assessment: Including Scope of Work, Estimate of Costs, Assessment Roll, and Method of Apportioning. 2 . Assessment Diagram PrTA ? - ,r,c2 w.174 .14 .1 111.:10Arg ai‘a ASSESSMENT WHEREAS, on April 13 , 1992, the City Council of the City of Dublin, California, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, adopted its Resolution Directing Preparation of Annual Report for Maintenance Assessment District 1983-2 for the maintenance of improvements more particularly therein described; and WHEREAS, said Resolution directed the undersigned to prepare and file a report pursuant to Section 22565, et. seq. , of said Act; NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned, by virtue of the power vested in me under said Act and the order of the Council of said City, hereby make the following assessment to cover the portion of the estimated cost of the maintenance of said improvements and the cost and expenses incidental thereto, to be paid by said District. ESTIMATE OF COSTS (1) (2) (3) As Filed As Preliminarily As Finally Approved Approved REVISED TOTALS Cost of Maintenance $ 57,745 $ 57,745 $ 57,745.00 Miscellaneous Costs $ 8,251.28 Incidental Expenses $ 17,230 $ 17,230 $ 17,230.00 TOTAL COST: $ 74,975 $ 74,975 $ 83,226.28 Estimated 1992-93 Interest Income Applied to 1992-93 Operating Costs: $ 850 $ 850 $ 850.00 Est. Surplus from 1991-92 Fiscal Year $ 19, 035 $ 19, 035 $ 19,035.00 NET TO BE ASSESSED FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992-93 $ 55,090 $ 55, 090 $ 63,341.28 As required by said Act, a diagram is hereto attached showing the exterior boundaries of said landscaping maintenance assessment district and also the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within said landscaping maintenance assessment district as the same existed at the time of the passage of said resolution, each of which lots or parcels having been given a separate number upon said diagram. I do hereby assess the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lots or parcels of land within said landscaping maintenance assessment district by apportioning that amount among the several lots • more particularly set forth in the list hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof. Said assessment is made upon the several lots or parcels of land within said landscaping maintenance assessment district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by said lots or parcels respectively from the maintenance of said improvements. The diagram and assessment numbers appearing herein are the diagram numbers appearing on said diagram, to which reference is hereby made for a more particular description of said property. Each lot or parcel of land assessed is described in the assessment list by r%ference to its parcel number as shown on the Assessor's Maps of the County of Alameda for the Fiscal Year 1991-92 and includes all of such parcels excepting those portions thereof within existing public roads or rights of way to be acquired in these proceedings for public road purposes. For a more particular description of said property, reference is hereby made to the deeds and maps on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder of said County. Because the names of the several owners are unknown to me, I hereby place the word "unknown" opposite the number of each lot of parcel of land assessed, the amount assessed thereon, and the number of the assessment. Dated: June 2, 1992 City Engineer ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 1992-93 The estimated cost for the maintenance of improvements described in this Report for Fiscal Year 1992-93 is as follows: Maintenance • Slopes, Stagecoach Road: $ 38, 150. 00 • Slopes, Interior: 19,595. 00 $ 57,745. 00 Miscellaneous Costs .i ■ Irrigation and Replanting, Interior Slopes $ 5,750.00 ■ Landscape Design, Stagecoach Road Slopes 2,501.28 $ 8,251.28 Incidentals • Engineer's Report and proceedings: $ 1,458. 00 ■ Cost of Collection (Alameda Co. ) : 1, 077. 00 ■ Delinquencies: 1,513 . 00 • Contingencies/Reserve: 13,182 . 00 $ 17,230. 00 REVISED TOTAL: $ 83 ,226.28 r METHOD OF APPORTIONING Sixty percent (60%) of the annual cost of maintaining the landscaping within and along Stagecoach Road has been assigned to the 552 condominium lots within the multifamily portion of the original Tract 4719, disributed on an equal basis. The balance of this annual cost has been divided equally among Lots 1 through 150, inclusive, of Tract 4719. The cost of maintaining the excavated slopes and concrete culverts together with its landscaping on the interior slopes of the single- family area (excluding those slopes and concrete culverts adjacent to Stagecoach Road) shall be evenly spread over Lots 1 through 150 of Tract 4719 . Lots 152 and 153 , being park and open space, shall have a zero assessment. Lots 154 and 155, being public agency owned, shall have a zero assessment. SCOPE OF WORK The scope of work shall be the maintenance of landscaping and irrigation within the road right-of-way and within a public easement along Stagecoach Road between the limits of Amador Valley Boulevard and the northerly City Limit. Further, the scope of work shall include the maintenance of the slopes and landscaping and irrigation of the slopes within a public easement for those slope areas to the rear of Lots 80 through 86 and 37 through 48, all within Tract 4719. ASSESSMENT ROLL REVISED Amount of Assessment Assessment & Lot No. Property Owners 1992-93 Tax Year Lots 1-150 Tr. 4719 Unknown $265.36/1ot = $39,804.00 Lot 152 Tr. 4719 Unknown .00 Lot 153 Tr. 4719 Unknown .00 Lot 154 Public-Owned .00 Lot 155 Public-Owned .00 Lots 1-552 Tr. 5180 Unknown $ 42.64/DU = $23,537.28 TOTAL: $63,341.28 • CITY OF DUBLIN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 83-2 CERTIFICATIONS FISCAL YEAR 1992-93 I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that the foregoing Engineer's Report, including Assessment, in the amounts set forth in Column (1) , with the diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on June 2, 1992 . I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that the foregoing Assessment, with the diagram thereto attached, was preliminarily approved and confirmed by the City Council of said City by its Resolution No. 60-92 duly adopted by said Council on June 8, 1992 . I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that the foregoing Assessment, with the diagram thereto attached, was finally approved and confirmed by the City Council of said City by its Resolution No. -92, duly adopted by said Council on August 10, 1992 . I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that a certified copy of the Assessment and diagram was filed in the office of the County Auditor of the County of Alameda, California, on , 1992 . RESOLUTION NO. -92 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING ENGINEER'S REPORT, CONFIRMING DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT, AND ORDERING LEVY OF ASSESSMENT CITY OF DUBLIN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1983-2 WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. 33-92, a resolution directing preparation of Annual Report for City of Dublin Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. 1983-2 (the "District") , this Council designated the City Engineer as Engineer and ordered that Engineer to make and file a report in writing in accordance with and pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, said Engineer of Work has made and filed with the City Clerk a preliminary report in writing as called for, which report was presented to the City Council on June 8, 1992; and WHEREAS, said Engineer of Work has filed with the City Clerk an Engineer' s Report for final consideration; and WHEREAS, property owners in said District have requested that the assessment be increased in order to fund additional work in the District; and WHEREAS, the Engineer of Work has prepared a Revised Engineer's Report including the increased assessment; and WHEREAS, the City Council has duly considered said Revised Report and each and every part thereof and finds that each and every part of said Revised Report is sufficient; and that said Revised Report nor any part thereof requires modification in any respect; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows: a) That the Revised Engineer's Estimate of the itemized and total costs and expenses of maintaining said improvements and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith be; and each of them are hereby finally approved; b) That the diagram showing the assessment district, description of improvements to be maintained; and the boundaries and dimensions of the respective r0-5 pg-4,71 P, 7i•114 f•PESO TI ( JtSM lots and parcels of land within said district as contained in said report be, and it is hereby finally approved; c) The assessment of the total amount of cost and expenses of the proposed maintenance of said improvements upon the several lots and parcels of land in said District in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such lots and parcels, respectively, from said maintenance and of the expenses incidental thereto, as contained in said Revised Report be, and they are hereby finally approved and those assessments are hereby ordered levied as contained in said Revised Report. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 10th day of August, 1992. ". AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINING: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk a: (ad)\83-2\altreso 2