The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutItem 8.2 HeritageCtrRenovation (2) '" .. . "~i\", . CITY OF DUBLIN AGENDA STATEMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: AUgust 8, 1994 SUBJECT EXHIBITS ATTACHED RECOMMENDATION : ~~ FINANCIAL STATEMENT : Heritage Center Renovation Report By Diane Lowart, Recreation Director Survey and Recommendations Report 1. Receive presentation from Staff and the Architect. 2. Approve preliminary design and authorize Architect to proceed with development of construction documents incorporating bid item alternates as necessary. 3. Direct staff to identify those aspects of the project that can be undertaken by volunteers, confirm volunteer labor and report back to the City council at a future meeting. 4. Direct Staff to pursue an advance from the City'S 1995-96 allocation of CDBG funds. : Available funding for this project totals $165,862. The sources for these funds are as follows: Park Dedication Fees ($3,380); East Bay Regional Park District Measure AA funds ($138,338); and Community Development Block Grant funds ($24,144). AVAILABLE ESTIMATED PROJECTED FUNDS BUDGE'r SHORTFALL Design $ 22,395 $ 22,395 $ 0 Improvements Building $124,537 $183,388 - $218,380 $58,851 - $93,843 Grounds $ 7,300 $ 7,300 $ 0 Inspection $ 7,500 $ 7,500 $ 0 Misc. $ 4,130 $ 4,130 $ 0 TOTAL $165,862 $224,713 - $259,705 $58,851 - $93,843 DESCRIPTION : At the February 28, 1994 meeting of the city council, the council approved an agreement with Alan R. Dreyfuss, AlA and H. Ruth Todd, AlA for architectural services for the renovation of the Heritage Center. Mr. Dreyfuss has extensive preservation and construction experience and Ms. Todd is an Historic Restoration Architect specializing in projects which involve exterior restoration. The agreement with Dreyfuss and Todd provided for the following scope of services: Phase 1 - program Planning and Schematic Design 1. prepare as-built drawings based on site measurements and photographs. 2. Prepare topographic survey of site. 3. prepare history of construction from available documentation. 4. Perform structural survey and code analysis. 5. Perform ADA compliance analysis. 6. prepare draft of recommendations, uincluding schematic drawings of proposed improvements and preliminary cost estimate based on above data (Survey and Recommendations Report). 7. Revise recommendations and present to City Parks and Recreation Commission and city Council. ::::-::~~------------::::::-::~--::::::=-~:--------------------- Heritage Task Force Parks and Recreation commission .:;.ill. " , CITY CLERK ~ FILE ~; ..1!4""'". .,~.".<, t . . Phase 2 - Construction Documents 1. Prepare working drawings and technical specifications as necessary to secure approvals and define scope of work. 2. Prepare bid package and assist in selection of contractor. prepare addenda as necessary. SURVEY AND RECOMMENDATIONS REPORT The survey and Recommendations Report that has been prepared by the architects is attached. The document is divided into the following sections: I) construction Chronology; II) Building Survey; III) Building Survey Recommendations; IV) structural Survey and Recommendations; and V) Preliminary co~t Estimate. The Construction Chronology outlines the history of both structures inclUding additions, renovations, relocations, etc. Information for this section was obtained through interviews with members of the Dublin Historical Preservation Association, a review of county Building Permit Files and through document research at the Dublin Library. The Building Survey included a thorough analysis of both structures by the architects, a structural engineer and representatives from the city's public Works and Building Departments. The results of this analysis and a discussion of the recommended improvements is detailed in the report and has been divided into the following areas: A) Exterior Conditions; B) Mechanical & Electrical Systems; C) Access & Exiting; and D) Structural Conditions. PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK The proposed scope of work for Old st. Raymond's Church is as follows: 1) repair church exterior; 2) stabilize the bell tower; 3) provide handicapped access with a minimum of major modifications; and 4) reverse inappropriate changes that relate to the historical integrity of the building. The proposed scope of work for Murray School is more complicated as the school has undergone numerous additions and alterations as well as re-locations and changes of use over the life of the structure. The recommended approach for the school is to restore the exterior of the building to the period of its last use as a school is 1952. This would entail the removal of additions constructed after this period, reconstruction of the original main entry and modifications of other exterior openings. In addition, the scope of work includes modifications for handicapped accessibility as well as modifications for exiting to meet current building code requirements. An additional option that was considered for the renovation of the school relates to the reconstruction of the Italianate bell tower that was originally part of the building. Although this is not possible under the present budget, it has support in the community and presents a natural fundraising opportunity at a later date. Preliminary cost estimates for the reconstruction of the bell tower are included in the report but this option is not recommended at this time. PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE The ~reliminary cost estimate for the recommended improvements conta1ned in the report is as follows: Old st. Raymond's Church Improvements Contingency (20%) Subtotal $ 38,663 - $ 52,523 7.733 10.505 $ 46,396 $ 63,028 Murrav Schoolhouse Improvements Contingency (20%) .' Subtotal $114,160 - $129,460 22.832 25.892 $136,992 - $155,352 COMBINED TOTAL $183,388 $218,380 iIIi - .to .. . . The funds presently available for building renovation total $124,537. Consequently, the preliminary cost estimate for the recommended improvements exceeds the available budget by approximately $58,851- $93,843. POSSIBLE OPTIONS TO ADDRESS THE FUNDING SHORTFALL Staff has researched the availability of additional grant funding for the project. In past years, limited grant funding for historic renovation projects has been available through state and Federal grants. However, funds are currently not available nor is there much hope that funds will be available in the future. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds can be used for a project of this nature but only -for modifications relating to handicapped access. The preliminary cost estimate for handicapped improvements is estimated at $50,000. staff is pursuing an advance from the city's 1995-96 allocation of CDBG funds as one option to close the funding gap. Use of volunteers is another option that is under consideration. One of the recommendations from the Heritage Task Force was to consider utilizing volunteer labor to accomplish a portion of the renovation. staff has been in contact with the Federal Correctional Institution at Camp Parks to determine if any of the work could be undertaken through the prison work program. A review of the project by prison staff is underway and a response is anticipated in the near future. In the event that volunteer labor is utilized, the city Attorney has recommended that the city identify only those discrete projects which can be accomplished by volunteers once the contractor has completed the work and is off the site. She indicates that it is not a good practice to combine the work of volunteers and paid contractors on site at the same time. Additionally she has indicated that the work that is to be done by volunteers should not be included in the construction documents that will be bid by contractors. consequently, it will be necessary to identify, in advance, the work the can be accomplished by volunteers as well as volunteer groups who are willing, able and committed to take on a portion of the project. PROPOSED TIMELINE The timeline for the renovation is as follows: 11-14-94 Design approval by city Council Authorization to bid by city Council Award of bid by city council 08-08-94 10-10-94 02-28-95 Construction Begins Construction Complete 11-28-94 RECOMMENDATION The Parks and Recreation commission reviewed the survey and recommendations prepared by the Architects at their July 12, 1994 meeting. The Commission approved the design and recommended that staff pursue additional funding as well as the use of volunteer labor. It is, therefore, recommended that the city council take the following action: 1. Receive presentation from Staff and the Architect. 2. Approve preliminary design and authorize Architect to proceed with development of construction documents incorporating bid item alternates as necessary. 3. Direct Staff to identify those aspects of the project that can be undertaken by volunteers, confirm volunteer labor and report back to the city council at a future meetings. 4. Direct staff to pursue an advance from the City's 1995-96 allocation of CDBG funds. ..8*~< Dublin Heritage Center Renovation. Survey & Recommendations Alan R. Dreyfuss AlA & H. Ruth Todd AlA ASSOCIATED ARCHITECTS 1725 SIXTH AVENUE OAKLAND CALIFORNIA 9 4 6 0 6 FAX 5 1 0 8 3 5 5 33 5 510 835 5334 g~:t I I TABLE OF CONTENTS I I I. Construction Chronology I St. Raymond's Church Murray School Summary of Changes in Exterior Appearance I Construction Chronology Floor Plans Sheet CC I: St. Raymond's Church Sheet CC 2: Murray School I D. Building Survey I A. Exterior Conditions I B. Mechanical & Electrical Systems C. Access & Exiting I ID. Building Survey Recommendations I St. Raymond's Church Murray School Schematic Design Floor Plans I Sheet SD 1: St. Raymond's Church Sheet SD 2: Murray School I IV. Structural Survey & Recommendations I Murray School St. Raymond's Church I v. Preliminary Cost Estimate I Building Survey Recommendations Structural Survey Recommendations i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Construction Chronology: St RaymOnd's Church, DubHn, CA 1859 Church constructed in current location on 4 acres One of the first woodeQ..churches (VSB, P 61), first church of any kind in Murray Township Just south of church was burial ground for Indian and Spanish settlers, once with wooden markers 1863 1867 Large earthquake occurs on Calaveras Fault Four acres donated by JW Dougherty to Archbishop Alemany for use as a cemetery 1878 Thompson & West, 1878 shows church with entrance on grade and no tower. Rear wing also shown 1880 Belfry added to church c. 1930 Photo shows: Wood entrance steps with no railing Chain link fence Small front yard 1922 Church was extensively repaired 1930 Road in front of Green's Store was widened 1939 Church celebrated its 80th birthday Extensive repairs were made 1940's church vacated 1962 Church was opened especially for baptism of Molly Donlon Cronin 1965 Save the Church campaign was launched 1966 Oakland Diocese gave church to Amador-Uvermore Valley Historical Society on condition that it not be used for services 1967-70 "Restoration completed" New bell tower (steeple) constructed June 67 Approved permit application shows: 30x40 perimeter foundation with 12x12 piers at center, with 12x15 rear wing Existing composite shingles Level floor, plumb corners of building I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Removal of siding and addition of 4 x 8 X 3/8" plywood nailed to sill 8d @ 6", and as bracing 8d @ 6 & 12" typo Recover with existing redwood beveled siding Replace 8 x 8 tower support Install 4 x 6 supporting members on 2x4 redwood mudsill 6 x 6 (joist<;, draWing not labeled) Treat walls and underpinning for termites/rot/fungi Labels 6 x 14 floor vents in wall (9/21/83 letter mentions that vents do not exist and are needed) 1970 May Building Permit describes: Install new roof on steeple Install plywood sheathing on exterior walls of steeple Install 8x8 support for steeple Replace deteriorated members as required 1971 July Building Permit describes: New beams to support joist Replace side stair Install door 1973 May Building Permit describes: Warm air furnace installed with flue, exhaust, 5 registers September Building Permit describes: 100 amp service Outlets/fixtures/receptacles, etc. Furnace 1983 September 20 Letter to AVHS from GCS Consulting outlining work which needs to occur: New or strengthened footing Evidence of lateral movement on north and south walls Verify plywood sheathing which was supposed to be installed in 1973 restoration New ties, straps, bolts at walls and footing/floor beams New roof and replacement of dryroned members, strengthening Other issues: check/repair tie rods between walls; tie roof ridge; better tie of steeple columns to foundation; steps; tower access ladder 21 Lener from Building Official regarding maintenance issues, listing suggested repairs, and advising the instirution of a maintenance program 1985 September Letter from R Nahas describing work to be performed: Raise building , Replace foundation I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1985 October Repair siding New girders and stringers at stairs Stiffen tower with shear bracing and new framing clips Repair roof structure, install new struts and collar ties Building Permit descrioes: New foundation Repair of roof structure Repair of substructure I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I COnstruction Qm>nology : MlIt'rdY School 1856 before 1891 before 1900 between 1932-36 1936 1951 1952 1952 1953- 74 summer November January October March 53 One-room schoolhouse completed on original site on Flanagan Lane (nJ:.ar Stonestown Mall's Black Angus) ltalianate bell tower added second room added, 4 windows on front side of wing 2/2 panel door at rear, transom above 3-4 risers at entrance steps windows at back of Big Room wing 4/4 windows throughout Moved to Dublin Canyon Road (near Farmers Insurance), possibly due to wet location 7 risers at entrance steps, 4 risers at rear wing steps Bell tower partially removed Bell stored under school large bare bulbs hanging from ceiling outlets; wood floor; simple t&g wainscot and ceiling in Big Room; blackboards between windows; teacher's desk in NE corner; stove in SE corner near boy's anteroom Tower and columns changed to simple posts with g3ble roof Bathrooms added little room wing extended Stage set into wall rather than being temporary stage stored under school Bell hung at rear of school until stolen during the war Building Permit describes: Electrical work, no outlets existing Added two outlets Existing floor plan shows: 5-0 x 7-6 doors 0/1 panels) at entrance 12 x 20 stage 3-0 x 7-0 doors at three other doorways graduation of last class Building changed for use as Primitive Vine Baptist Church new floor added all entrances changed Building inspection comments: Electrical wiring needs correcting I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1974 1975 1976 1977-78 Front landing and steps need repair Exterior walls rustic; 28x36 room with plaster walls, rustic ceiling; all other rooms rustic or wood paneling; composite shingle roof 4 x 12 mud sill on ground 4 x 6 girders 10' o.c. 2 x 8 - 16'1 o.C 4 x 4 - 4' o.c. 2 x 4 studs - 16" D.C. Balloon framed off 4 x 6 girder about 11 t ceiling Final inspection 5/4/55 August 53 Building Permit describes: Electrical work: main service, 15 outlets May 61 Little Vine Primitive Baptist Church encloses porch, new foundation, central heating Work being done without permit no longer the Baptist Church 580 Freeway construction by Caltrans requires removal of school from 11390 Dublin Road before 11/30/75 DHPA gets permission to relocate building, store it on cribbing until new foundation and up-to-code work is done. If not accomplished by April 1, 1976, HPA agrees to demolish and remove building Building moved to St Raymond'S Church site November Soils letter received r\ovember Building Permit describes: Electrical work Future porch dotted in on plan Future deck dotted in on plan Demo of porch addition is marked off on plans Work performed by volunteers February 77 HVAC installed (2 3-ron) February 77 Building Permit describes: . tie down of exterior Foundation for stairs and shearwalls . Final inspection 6/19/78 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1977 1979 1980 1981 1982-83 March Variance granted to allow for permit, even though plumbing cannot be connected to a public sewer or an approved private sewage disposal system and to allow for structural requirement variance Variance allowed with conditions: 1. Alternate method of sewage disposal shall be provided prior to occupancy permit 2. Connect to public sewer when sewer permits become available 3. Structural alteration plans re: Associated professions, Inc. 0/77) be completed portion of site within HHD 500 year flood hazard area, min floor elevation must be 378.5' MSLO February Access ramp approved May Building Permit describes: New door access at rear stairs New door to women's restroom No water supply to building June Building Permit describes: Electrical for well pump September Letter describing work to be completed for final inspection August 82 Building Permit describes: Minor electrical alterations such as light switches, grounding of water heater, ceiling lights, etc. Final inspection 4/15/83 Inspection file closed 7/23/82 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CONSTRUCTION CBRONOLOOY Summary of Changes to Exterior Appearance St. Raymond's Church St. Raymond's Church was constructed on this site in 1859, and the bell tower was added in 1880. The siding on the main building and the tower was replaced with like material and new vertical trim was applied over the existing comer boards in 1967. With this exception, the general appearance of the church exterior has remained unchanged since its construction. Murray School The Murray School was constructed on Flanagan Lane in 1856. Sometime before 1891, an Italianate bell tower and new entry stairs were added, along with a new classroom wing and new rear entry stairs. The school was moved to Dublin Canyon Rd. before 1900. The belfry of the tower was removed after 1932, and in 1936 the entire tower was replaced by a simple gabeled entry roof. At the same time, the second classroom wing was extended and bathrooms were added at the rear of the main building. The school was converted into a church in 1953. Between this time and 1961, the front entry was closed and replaced by a stage addition, a new front entry was added at the intersection of the two wings, and the rear entry porch was enclosed. In 1975, the building was moved to the present site. The access ramp and the rear bathroom entry were added in 1979 and 1980 . - - - - - - - - - - - - .- - - - - - - , ._------~~-~~- --~ , , , .~ i i ! I : I , I i I I _. , ." I jj I I C/J -l I ." r- 0 0 :tl '"0 r- > n- O z .. I- oi , i I ~- Vl~ I ,I ;ljZ I c~ 11 ~I O2 SC I 1 '" I ~o ~ LJ- 8lJ: ; I - -I '" ~ 0 ~ I 1\ I .... I I 0 ill ;ll ,. 0 0 ,., 0 ~ 0> 0 ;g. '" 2 I ;ll ,., "'ll -l rl r ~ 0 :E '- c m fl :tl iO I ." :: r- r- h 0 '- '-' I 0 :tl .. --..-- -- -- "-.. '"0 , r- r- h > I Z J l J 1 ; . : ., ", :~, ~ ! I I ! I - - AI," R. Or.yfw.. AlA , It. Rutll Toeld AlA :~ , (') I 1 ~ DUBLIN HERITAGE CENTER OLD ST. RAYMOND'S CHURCH A , . 00 I . t . d ^ t.o II It . 0 t . '....1 (') EXTERIOR REPAIR CONSTRUCTION CHRONOLOGY ... , , . . . . II T H " T ! N U ! , o " I( L " N 0 o " ".0. r!L 131.:134 F " X .:1. .::13_ - - )1111 g I · i l\) - - - - DUBUN HERITAGE CENTER EXTERIOR REPAIR - - - - - ORIGINAL MURRAY SCHOOL CONSmUCTION CHRONOLOGY - - .- - - - - n:a ';>0 -~ ID'V III~ ~ c n a Alan R, Drlt'll.. AlA . H. Rllth Todd AlA Aeeoolltl" Arohltlote 'T" I'XlII AVINUI OAXLIINO 01. ...0. llL .3. .33& FAX .3. 1331 - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I BUILDING SURVEY A. Exterior Conditions St. Raymond's Church 1. Siding & Trim: Exterior wood is in generally good condition. Much ofit appears to have been replaced in 1967 when the plywood sheathing was added to the main building. The siding on the ante room was not replaced at that time, but is still serviceable. The siding on the tower is racked on the north and south elevations due to differential movement between the tower and the main building. This has resulted in a gap at the comers connecting the two structures, exposing the building to weather. The original vertical comer trim on the main building has been overlaid with new Ix 6 to compensate for the addition of the ply sheathing. This has resulted in a very poor detail where the comer trim abuts the soffit. The siding on the interior of the bell tower is poorly patched with plywood and inadequately sealed to weather 2. Roof & Eaves: There is evidence ofleaks inside the main structure, but we were told that these had occurred before the roof was last replaced. The original wood shingle roof has been covered with composite shingles, which appear to be in good condition. The flashing at the intersection of the ante room roof and the main building wall has failed due to some differential movement at this point. The main building has no gutters, resulting in some streaking of the fascia and siding below. Some sections of trim at the roof edge are poorly spliced. 3. Windows & Doors: The wood windows appear to be in good condition although there is some deterioration of the glazing compound in all cases. The original main entry doors have been replaced with a smaller pair of doors necessitating the addition of trim around the opening. The original doors are stored in the utility wing and exhibit deterioration at the bottom rail. The door at the rear entry has separated at the bottom rail and stile. There are visually inappropriate security grates installed over the ante room windows. 4. Porches & Rails: Both entry porches and stairs are deteriorated and unsafe due to cupping and loosening of the treads. The railing at the rear does not appear to be original. The front steps show evidence of a hand rail previous to the existing metal rail but no photographs have been uncovered showing an earlier rail. 5. Exterior paint: The exterior paint appears to be relatively recent and is in generally good condition I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I BUILDING SURVEY A. Exterior Conditions (cont.) Murray School 1. Siding & Trim: The siding on the school varies in style and condition due to the many additions constructed during its life. In general the west and north elevations are extremely weathered while the south elevation shows only moderate weathering, and the east elevation is in fairly good condition ( The building was probably rotated 90 degrees in its fonner location ). All ofthe siding remains serviceable except on the north addition where the thin masonite siding has buckled from moisture penetration. There is also a very poorly executed vertical splice near the rear entry porch enclosure that requires correction. 2. Roof & Eaves: Soffits throughout the building are penetrated by holes and show signs of moisture penetration from above, but do not exhibit extensive rot. Only the main wing has gutters, and these have been covered with plywood and roofed, indicating probable failure at some point. They are wood and show signs of deterioration. The remainder of the structure has no gutters. The fascia on the north addition is sagging noticeably. The original wood shingle roofhas been covered with composition shingles, which appear to be in good condition. Flashing at the intersection of the north addition roof and the main wall is poorly installed and inadequate. 3. Windows & Doors: None of the exterior doors or door openings predate the conversion of the school to a church in 1953. The doors are in generally good condition. The double hung windows on the west and north elevations are very deteriorated and will require extensive repair or possible replacement. All others are in good condition with deteriorating glazing and ill fitting parting beads in some cases. 4. Porches & Rails: All porches are very poorly constructed with layers of deteriorating decking over inadequate framing. The concrete access ramp appears to have been poured directly against the exterior siding with no adequate flashing to prevent water penetration. It is likely that the siding has deteriorated behind the ramp. 5. Exterior Paint: The west and north elevations are extremely weathered exhibiting extensive alligatoring and peeling. The south elevation is more moderately weathered and the east elevation is fair to good. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I BUILDING SURVEY B. Mechanical & Electrical Systems St. Raymond's Church 1. Heating, Ventilating & Air Conditioning The church is served by a 120.000 BTU gas fired forced air furnace approximately 20 years old. Electrical and gas service were cut off at the time of inspection so the unit could not be tested. but it appears to be in operative condition. The size of the furnace is adequate for the building. but the return air duct is undersized in relation to the furnace capacity. The ducting is a combination of galvanized sheet metal and aluminum flex types with exterior insulation. The insulation is missing at the wye joints and register boxes. 2. Electrical The church is served by a 100 Amp overhead feed with distribution at the main panel. The main panel and existing wiring are in generally good condition. The parking lot lighting is connected to the church panel at a time clock. Murray School 1. Beating Ventilation & Air Conditioning: The school is served by two 17 year old General Electric heat pumps. one 3 ton and one 5 ton, both with supplemental electrical heat strips. Both heat pumps are operative and adequate for conditioning the building. The screws on the top panel of the heat pump serving the meeting room are missing and both pumps need to have the coils cleaned. The ducting is aluminum flex type with exterior insulation. The insulation is missing at wye branches. at registers, and where it appears to have been removed by animals. Two floor registers in the museum wing are covered by displays and the air filters in the floor return air grills are inaccessible and may require cleaning or replacement. I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I Murray School (cont.) 2. Electrical Service: The school is served by an overhead 200r\mP service with distribution in the main panel. The main panel is in good condition with spare circuit breaker spaces available. The original knob & tube wiring in the attic has been bypassed and replaced by romex type wiring, and this appears to be the case in the majority of the building. Although some illegal splices were noted, overall the wiring is in good condition and adequate assuming no additional loads. Electrical connections to the HV AC units are in good condition. There are two detached structures at the rear of the school that have electrical connections to the main building. power to the pump house appears to have been disconnected and the other building was locked at the time of the inspection. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I BUILDING SURVEY C. Access & Exiting St. Raymond's Church The church does not meet current code requirements for access and exiting. The following deficiencies were noted: 1. No access ramp exists into the building. 2. There is no access provided on the interior from the main floor level to the raised dais and rear exit. 3. The front entry doors do not swing in the direction of travel and are fitted with non complying hardware. The front landing does not meet current standards. 4. Existing rear exit path doorways are undersized. In addition the exterior door does not swing in the direction of travel and is fitted with non complying hardware for an A-3 occupancy. Murray School The school does not meet current code requirements for access and exiting. The following deficiencies were noted: 1. The existing access ramp does not provide adequate landing space at the top to meet current access requirements. Additionally it enters the building at a rear workroom, which is not in compliance with the ADA. 2. The current bathroom toilet stalls are too narrOW to meet current standards. 3. Existing exterior and interior doors are too narrow and fitted with non complying hardware for an A-3 occupancy. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I RECOMMENDA nONS St. Raymond's Church The church has remained almost unchanged in general appearance since the construction of the bell tower in 1880. Our general approach is to reverse inappropriate changes, repair the church exterior, stabilize the tower and provide access with a minimum of major modifications. A. Building Exterior 1. Siding & Trim a. Comer trim: Remove the second layer of trim that has been applied to the main building and replace with 3/8" or thinner material as necessary to cover the end grain ofthe siding. b. Intersection oftower & main structure: Gap in siding will be caulked and sealed as part of complete paint job. If structure is not painted at this time, no specific recommendation is made. c. Tower interior: Remove plywood and sheet metal patching on walls and ceiling. Replace 1x4 t&g siding as necessary. Line arches with 3/8" bender board to cover end grain of lx4. 2. Roof & Eaves a. Gutter molding: Repair as necessary. Add metal drip edge under roofing at eave. b. Flashing: Replace flashing at intersection of utility room roof and main building wall with properly installed step flashing and counterflashing. Inspect flashing at intersection of tower and main roof and reseal as necessary. 3. Windows & Doors a. Windows, general: Reglaze all windows as necessary. Free windows to move properly. Inspect and replace parting bead as necessary. b. Ante room windows: Remove security grating I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 3. Windows & Doors (cont.) c. Main entry: Repair and reinstall original entry doors. Restore original trim at opening. d. Rear exit: Remove and repair existing door and reinstall. 4. Porches & Rails a. Main entry: Repair existing stairs, replacing with like material as necessary. [Option] Replace existing railing with new wood railing as designed to match original. b. Rear exit: Remove existing porch stair to allow for installation of new access ramp. (See Recommendations Section C) 5. Exterior Paint a. Option 1: Caulk., prime and paint areas of repair and new work to match existing. Option 2: power wash existing building. Install visquine and filter system at base of building if tests indicate presence oflead. Caulk and prime existing and new work as necessal')'. Paint entire structure. B. Mechanical & Electrical Systems 1. HVAC a. Furnace: [Option 1] Inspect, balance and adjust existing furnace. [Option 2] Replace existing with new gas fired furnace. b. Return air duct: Replace undersized duct with correctly sized unit. c. Distribution ducts: Inspect joints for air leaks and seal as necessary. Replace insulation at wye joints, register boxes and as otherwise necessary. 2. Electrical a. Wiring: Inspect all accessible electrical splices and junction boxes and clean up or repair as necessary. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2. Electrical (cont.) b. Exit lighting: Install illuminated signs at both exits. Emergency lighting system is not required. c. Smoke detection system: Not required. c. Access & Exiting Note: Any condition provisionally allowed under the State Historical Building Code must be reviewed by a local disabled representative. 1. Exterior access ramp: provide an access ramp to the rear door on the north side of the church. (See Schematic Floor Plan) Access at this location does not meet current requirements but is provisionally allowed under the State Historical Building Code. Note: The proposed orientation of this ramp is based on the current condition of parking on the site. A master plan should include accessible on site parking. The location of that parking could require a different configuration. 2. Interior Access ramp: Provide inset access ramp at interior dais. (See Schematic Floor Plan ) 3. Front Entry: The Existing door swing is provisionally allowed under the State Historical Building Code. Installation of a complying landing would significantly alter the exterior appearance of the building and would project the stair into the public right of way. It is possible that this condition may be allowed to continue since no major change of use or renovation is anticipated. 4. Rear exit path: Widen doorway at rear of main room to 36" clear to meet current standards. The 32" width (not clear width) of the exterior door complies provisionally under the State Historical Building Code.Reinstall the existing door to swing in direction of travel. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I RECOMMENDATIONS (cont.) Murray School As distinguished from St. Raymond's Church, the Murray School has undergone numerous additions and alterations as well as re-Iocations and changes of use over the life of the structure. Taking into consideration its present use and the era of historic significance, we recommend an approach which generally restores the exterior of the building to the period of its last use as a school in 1952. This would entail the removal of additions constructed after this period by the church and others, the reconstruction of the original main entry, and modification of other exterior openings. We propose some major deviations from this strategy: the installation of an access ramp in one of two locations, as required to meet access compliance standards; the retention of the rear access to the bathrooms for program considerations; the retention and modification of the existing entry at the foyer, required to meet exiting requirements; and the eventual reconstruction of the bell tower as it existed before its demolition in 1936, because of its architectural value and historic significance. This will not qualify as an accurate restoration because it will result in a finished structure which combines elements that did not exist at the same time historically. There are two major decisions that need to be made. The first concerns the location of the new access ramp. Neither of the options presented in this report fully meets current access requirements, but both are provisionally allowed under the State Historical Building Code. Option one, which would locate the ramp at the current main entrance, would most nearly meet the spirit of the ADA. but would also have the most significant impact on the historic appearance of the building. and would compete with the new main entrance as a focal point. Option two, replacing the ramp in its current location, would be less visually obtrusive and provide more convenient access to the bathrooms when the rest of the building was closed, but since the entrance is not one used by the general public, it is a less preferred alternative under the SHBC. The second decision regards the reconstruction of the ltalianate bell tower. Though this is clearly not possible under the present budget, it has support in the community and it presents a natural fundraising opportunity. The decision has to be made whether to undertake the project and, if so, whether to rebuild the entire tower at one time or phase the project, which would entail some additional expense. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I A. Building Exterior 1. Recommended Exterior Modifications a. Main Entry: Remove stage-addition and reconstruct original entry including stairs, entry doors and transom, and windows at either side. b. Tower:[Option 1] Reconstruct tower. [Option 2] Reconstruct 1936 gabled entry roof c. Enclosed rear porch: Remove enclosure and porch at rear entry. Reconstruct original rear entry including stairs, door and transom. Restore original overhang. Replace west entry door to workroom with new exterior door and transom to match original. d. Entry at east side of workroom: Replace door with new exterior door to match original. Reverse swing (See Schematic Floor Plan). 2. Siding & Trim a. Siding, general: Remove siding up to floor plate to allow for inspection and repair of cripple wall and shear ply as described in Structural Report, item #5, and reinstall or replace with like material. 3. Roof & Eaves a. Soffits, general: Inspect and repair holes in soffits as necessary. b. Gutters, museum wing: Retain existing roof condition and seal joint at top edge of gutter. c. Roof edge: Install metal drip edge under roofing. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4. Windows & Doors: a. Windows, general: Repair deteriorated sash members or replace sash if necessary (4 openings). Reglaze remaining windows as necessary. Inspect and replace parting bead as necessary. b. Door and transom at rear bathroom entry: Replace existing door and transom with more historically compatible unit. 5. Porches & Rails a. Porches, general: Remove all existing porches and ramp. b. Porch & stairs at bathrooms: Rebuild in compatible style. c. Rear entry at meeting room: See section A-I d. Existing front entry: See section C. e. East side entry at workroom: See section C. 6. Exterior Paint a. Power wash ~ntire extedor ( Install visquine and filter system at base of building if testing indicates presence oflead) b. Scrape and sand existing paint as necessary. If testing indicates presence oflead: [Option 1] Install visquine barrier tent on scaffolding encapsulating building or; [Option 2] Apply Stripaway to deteriorated paint, bag and remove from site. c. Caulk and prime new and existing work as necessary. Paint entire structure. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I B. Mechanical Systems 1. HVAC a. Heat pumps: Perform maintenance as required including cleaning coils and replacing loose cover b. Distribution ducts: Inspect joints for air leaks and seal as necessary. Replace insulation at wye joints, register boxes and as otherwise necessary. c. Registers: Verify proper clearance from objects and clean return air filters as necessary. 2. Electrical a. Wiring: Inspect all splices and junction boxes and repair as necessary . b. Exit lighting: Install illuminated exit signs at all exits. Install emergency lighting system in museum wing. c. Smoke detection system: Not required. c. Access & Exiting 1. Access ramp: [Option 1] Construct new access ramp at current main entry. Reconstruct covered entry at side of workroom to match original. [Option 2] Construct new access ramp at side of work room. Rebuild stairs and porch at existing main entry in compatible style. 2. Bathrooms: Remove existing partitions and fixtures and replace to meet current access standards (See Schematic Floor Plan). 3. Exit doors: Replace both sets of double doors at existing entry foyer with 36" single doors (See Schematic Floor Plan). Install panic hardware as required (2 doors). Install complying locksets on all other exit doors (6 doors). - - - - - - - - - - - - .- - - - - - - -~_.__._- .~.~" ..... -- . ::ll ::ll~ ~ l:.l", z.... 5 !:'llij , F'" g J::~ '" :j 8~ z <> ~r: ~ ~~ '" ;3 z'" <>~ I T en 1:;0 I -I ~ fl f' I ~ "'tJ 5: \ IL 0 z - -h CIJ , ~ 0 I , 2 ~ )0 - '--- l-----I ~ 0 ;:JJ 8 ~ I 1:9 ON '---1 I I \1 ',12 nN f- ____________L1.2 ON -------- ~- -- ~-------- \ -~~~~~---- -~-~---T- -- ~ ~-~---- l :i ;lll:J:: ::ll::ll '" "'''' ~ ~ .6 ~~ z j~::2 ~ z ~g ;19 ~ ~~~ '" x~ ~ <;>l;:Jil!i ZZ '" II> :j J::::ll~ ...<> Z -4 1 rl r > ~~~ E~ 0 0 a ;:':!!: ~ ~ 1'- Ai -::ll '" 0 "'", ~ xd >~ d go fl ~ ;v ~ III ~ 0 :'- g ::ll Z ~ 0 0 g :xl "ll .... -- 'V .. - .. ___.n_n. - ... -- -- I ~ ..... .~ w.....__ I I I I ,. ') I I I I ... ~ "',n R. Orlylull AlA .. H. Ruth Todd AlA ~ '" III DUBLIN t-ERIT AGE CENTER OLD ST. RAYMOND'S CHURCH I.... A I I 0 -0 I It. d Archllecte 2 ~ \'\ ' ~ ....... EXTERIOR REPAIR SCHEMA TIC FLOOR PLAN · ^' . , I . .. . I . T " " , I " U . ., O"K'''"D C " I a . 0 . .... T I . 111".1' . ~ . II' ."t -- - .--- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - .- - - - - - - ~~ ~ ~ a~;Q ~ ..: .: ::1 ~ %6 2 ~ > i e~ 2 hi::' g - III ~ !llg "Iff> .... IIU ~ ~~ ~iii ~ ....z ::18 a~ ~2 ~ II' ....il ::1 I ~!:l[! ~ ",III ~-< 2 "'i! z" . ~~ :~ . ","" ,.. ",8 ~III a C-i ~~ ~~ lOc I:: Co > III~ -I Q g ~ -< I ~ ~ l::=--=-~-:::::... I'" ;0 %~ ~ ~)> )> !ilg 0 ,.., "'''' Q nl:! 2~ ~ '1Iz :>: )>C> C') ;:jc '11 ~8 0 ;0 ,..,,, 2 "'~ ~c ~ ----l =-~T c i! III ~ ~ ~ ;0 III ~..c.:-.::-=..c.::-+-.c.::-=.:- lfi ~ '" :U~ ~~ z~ ~~ :0 :0 '" '" ~ :::l ::1 lI:: ~ ~~ ~ i i ~ ~i~ ~ ~~ Zz ~~ hi ::' g >:l ~~ ;~ ~ ~ iU ;:j~~ ll:Q 1II ~ ~ ~~ '" \/I ::1 .\/1 " 9 :::l Z ::1 ~z Z C') ~ii IUi C') ~ ~C') \/I ~ !1 i~ i~ ~ ! ~~ a~ ~ III~ :l 1::1 II' ~~ c ~:i! (l; ~<:1 ~ .~ ~~ l5 ~ \2 \/I ~ :;j !i 2 ~ :0 D a <:1 ~ Z Z .,. >- ~ '11 .... ~ >- ::0 Z <:> ---"._- --~_.~- ~ ~ :a i CD .... ~ o o :D "'0 ~ [~- -=-= -=====--===-=-=-= - --- --- -~ ~~....~-~ ~ J: fij =i ::D ~ ~ ~ "" ::D o o :c: I!II! CD a ~ S "" f ... [;] DUBLIN HERITAGE CENTER EXTERIOR REPAIR ORIGINAL WRRA Y SCHOOL SCJ.EMA TIC FLOOR PLAN ' A' Alln R. O"ylu.. AlA " H. Rulh Te.1H AlA Alloolll'. Arolllt.ol' "I' "XlN AV'.U' ClAlClAHO eA ..... 11L ..1. 12:11' 'A. .,. .Ia. _~~~.....---------_~..~_~_._~~__.~~'._n... ___.~. ,.~_ ~."~~-~~~.._~- --~-- --~~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I STRUCTURAL ,NGINEERS May 4, 1994 Allen R. Dreyfuss, Architect, AlA 1735 Sixth Avenue Oakland, California 94606 Reference: MURRAY SCHOOLHOUSE AND ST. RAYMOND'S CHURCH DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA [DEGENKOLB JOB #94082] Dear Allen: We are pleased to present this report of our observations of the structural integrity of the Murray Schoohouse and St. Raymond's Church in Dublin, California. We understand that the City of Dublin is interested in renovating both buildings and we have been asked to provide a general assessment of the structural integrity of each. For our review, we have visited the site with you and spent several hours in each structure. You have made available for our review several documents: 1. Murray School Restoration, construction drawings and structural calculations, 1977 prepared by Associated Professions, Ine. 2. St. Raymond's Church, dated October 5, 1984 and prepared by AAA Engineering Company. 3. A Construction Chronology of St. Raymond's Church. 4. A letter from General Consulting Services, Ine., dated September 20, 1983 describing recommendations of work to be completed to the church building. 5. A September 17, 1985 letter from Rafanelli and Nahas on behalf of the Amador/Livermore Valley Historical Society to the City of Dublin requesting a building pennit to complete several structural measures. We noted several conditions in the field that are of concern. Below is a description of those items and recommendations for structural improvements for each building. H, J. i)e'i;t:nL.,lb A,!,sO(iJ.h Er'I~ln~r.- 3S: SJJ1::>_'ll'lL' Strn-t Suit~ 11:: San Fro>t>c;"" CA 94104. I.' Ph,'ne 41j.392 ,1,952 h, 415.9~1 JI;~ Fm~r~!;,'~l(':Y C.q6552.I"H: Henry J Dq;.nkolb 191) -19~9 Chn.. D ,'"I'>'oJ 1h,\"iJ. R B(,mnt.l\"llJ~ lorinI' ,\ ~,.U;< Jr T:"(..lm,,"~ [) ~:"\~St'T Gt"or~t' F Gr(,~:T1W,-)f)t1 Rj;1\'Lc'l\t' :-'lJ.r~'J.I'ln T PhlPP\ D.1\"id \\' Cc....:ke J..",., 0 ~I.JI.:, Jo;,n A D.J p"", JJ.nii.'j~ :0..1.1:11:': I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Degenkolb Page Two May 4, 1994 Murray Schoolhouse Description: The schoolhouse is a wood-framed building in a general T -shape. According to the records, it has been relocated at least once and was most recently structurally upgraded around 1977. It appears to have been constructed in several stages. Apparently, the original portion of the structure, the main building, is located to the east of the newer office wing. Behind it to the south is an addition, now housing office space and restrooms. In the attic, the original siding is still in place at the face of what was originally the rear wall of the main building. Both portions' framing consists of wood stud walls supporting wood ceiling and roof rafters, but the ceiling is several feet higher in the original main building than in the addition, thus, the walls of the addition are balloon framed. The front or north end of the building was apparently modified in 1977 when last relocated. The modification includes removal of the main entry door and stairway and the addition of a small protrusion with closets at both ends. To the west of the main building is another wing, apparently constructed later and again added to several years later at its west end. The construction of this wing is similar. In 1977, structural calculations and construction drawings were provided that appear to generally bring the expected building's performance up to an acceptable level of safety. However, based on our observations of the as-built conditions, the workmanship provided for that work was below standard and some of the intent of the work appears to have been compromised. In addition, it appears that material was not readily available for this work and old lumber of questionable quality and size was used in lieu of that specified in the documents. Structurally, the building appears to be in relatively sound condition for a building of this age. Waterproofing and other specific condition assessments due to weathering and age are not discussed in this report, but other recommendations concerning structural safety and seismic resistance are included: 1. The concrete perimeter footing and the internal grade beams that were constructed from the 1977 drawings are well conceived and greatly improve the building's performance. The design appears appropriate and we can only assume that they are constructed correctly. However, although the use of screwjacks for the interior fonndation piers does provide a means of adjustment against future settling of the floor, it is in our opinion not an adequate permanent foundation condition. The top and base connection of the screwjacks is not adequate to resist lateral movement and there are already signs of corrosion of the metal because of the damp soil conditions. , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Degenkolb Page Three May 4, 1994 In several locations, the screwjacks were too short and blocks of used lumber were inserted between the framing and the jacks causing an inadequate condition. Recommendations: Provide temporary shoring of the floor framing, remove the screwjacks, provide epoxied dowels into the concrete foundation beam and install a new 6 inch tall pier block with a 4x4 post base. Install a new 4x4 post with proper post cap to the floor beam above. Shoring can be simplified by installing the new posts on alternate locations until all are replaced. 2. The small added structure on the north end of the original main building is poorly constructed. The concrete foundation wall is full of voids, the sill plate construction is haphazard, and the floor joists are notched and misaligned. Recommendations: Repair of this portion of the struchlre will require temporary shoring of the flooring and the load bearing walls and comer posts, removal of the foundation walls, removal of the flooring and the floor joists. The foundation walls should be cast with new concrete and the struchlre reframed. 3. In the attic spaces in the building, the framing is in generally good condition. Several modifications have been made over the years and some connections are susceptible to lateral motion in the event of an earthquake. Recommendations: In the main portion, splice the 2x4 ceiling joist where it has been cut at the former access opening. Provide a vertical1x6 hanger board to the joist similar to the original construction. In the rear addition, add 2x4 collar ties at every other roof rafter (say 4 total) to help brace the roof diaphragm and prevent spreading of the walls. At the rear (south) gable wall in the attic space, add a 2x6 stud adjacent to each flat 2x4 stud to brace the gable against out-of-plane loads. Provide framing clips at the top plate to the roof framing to anchor the wall to the roof diaphragm. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Degenkolb Page Four May 4, 1994 In the western portion of the building, add a collar tie between the top of each roof rafter at about 12 inches below the ridge line (say 6 total). In the western portion, add framing clips at the base of each roof joist where it is cut in a bird-mouth and sits on the top plate of the wall. 4. A wood entry deck has been constructed at the inner corner intersection between the main building and the western portion. This deck sits on wood posts and bears on a ledger bolted to the face of the buildings. The framing of this deck is extremely decayed. Recommendation: Reconstruct the deck using proper waterproofing details and wood treatment. 5. Along the base of the perimeter wall, the drawings show that 3/8 inch plywood was to be installed beneath the exterior siding and nailed at the floor plate and at the sill plate. The existence of the plywood was verified in some locations but not everywhere. Beneath the wood entry deck described in item #4 above, the plywood is exposed and shows minimai nailing, certainly not in conformance to the 1977 drawings. In addition, this portion beneath the deck has been exposed to weather and has severely decayed. From inside the crawlspace, the sill plate also appears to have been installed in a haphazard manner, using many short pieces and sometimes installing used lumber. Shims have been added in many locations and small wood members are stacked to achieve the correct depth in several locations. Recommendations: Remove the siding up to the floor plate to verify the plywood sheathing and proper nailing. At the same time, verify the blocking on the foundation wall and provide new sill plate lumber as required. 6. Along the base of the west end wall of the western portion, several bolts and nuts are exposed on the exterior face. It appears that these were improperly installed based on the 1977 drawings and, as installed, they do not have the full capacity likely intended in the design. Recommendation: Install new anchor bolts (say 6 total) at the base of the west end wall to supplement the existing anchors. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Degenkolb Page Five May 4, 1994 St. Raymond's Church Description: The church building is a wood-frame structure sheathed in straight wood lap siding. On the front of the building at the entrance is a steeple of wood construction. The corners of the steeple structure are supported by large wood timber columns. The foundations of the church building consists of perimeter concrete footings and interior foundation piers and walls. The building is in generally sound structural condition for a building of this age. There are a few noted items that for which structural improvements are recommended. 1. The steeple of the church appears to be out-of-plumb by several inches. It is difficult to determine the exact single cause of the problem or when it happened. Evidence of this condition is noted in the trimwork over the siding. At the foundation, the concrete footing along the front wall of the steeple is in poor condition and the base of the timber columns are not properly bearing on the footing. Recommendations: Reconstruct the concrete footing wall at the front of the steeple and provide adequate anchorage and bearing to the base of the comer column posts. 2. The steeple appears to have negligible connection to the main structure at the roof and intermediate levels. Some effort has been made to connect the lateral loads generate in the steeple back into the building, but more is needed. The inside of the steeple along the front wall is sheathed in plywood but the interconnections are inadequate. Recommendations: Provide a better connection at the upper levels of the steeple back into the main building structure through the use of timber and metal strap collectors and struts. Provide more shear strength for transverse loads by interconnecting the steeple to the church front wall on both sides and by connected the steeple to the main roof diaphragm. 3. The bell support appears to be inadequate. Recommendations: Reconstruct or repair the bell support frame. Strengthen the roof structure above the bell and provide adequate anchorage for the support frame. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Degenkolb Page Six May 4, 1994 4. At one location, it was observed that the plywood sheathing beneath the exterior siding was not properly nailed to the sill plate on top of the foundation. The extent of this deficiency was not clear. Recommendations: Complete a detailed survey of this connection and provide a proper connection were it does not exist. We trust that this information is adequate for your use. We are pleased to work with you on this project and look forward to the next phase. Please feel free to contact us if we can provide any further information. Very truly yours, H.J. DEGENKOLB ASSOCIATES, ENGINEERS QJ?jJ. C "- David W. Cocke V'-- Mail and Fax (510-835-5335) [lWC\dq p: \ prorrt,Q4 \ 94082\d ublin.rpt I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES based upon preceeding recommendations St. Raymond's Church A. Building Exterior 1. Siding and Trim a. Comer trim: Remove the second layer of trim at comers and replace with 3/8" or thinner material as necessary to cover the end grain of the siding. Trim transition from comer trim to horizontal cornice. c. Tower interior: Remove plywood patching on walls and ceiling. Replace 1 x 4 t&g siding as necessary. Line arches with 3/8" bender board to cover end grain of 1 x 4. 2. Roof and Eaves a. Gutter molding: Repair as necessary and add metal drip edge under roofing at eave. b. Replace flashing at intersection of utility room roof and main building wall with properly installed step flashing. Counterflash step flashing to wall into siding saw cut. Caulk at siding. 3. Windows & Doors a. Windows: reglaze all and replace parting bead as necessary. b. Utility room windows: Remove security grating and repair siding. c. Main entry: Repair and reinstall original entry doors on original jambs and restore original trim around opening. d. Rear exit: Remove and repair exiting door and reinstall. 4. Porches & Rails a. Main entry: [Option 1] Repair existing stair structure by replacing and restoring (reuse existing railing). $ 2,028.00 Cost range $ 2,700 to 3,650.00 $ 600.00 $ 850.00 $ 600.00 $ 120.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 360.00 $ 2,600.00 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I [Option 2] Replace stair structure as above and add new wooden railing: b. Rear exit: Remove exiting stair to allow for installation of new access ramp. 5. Exterior paint a. Option 1: Caulk, prime and paint areas of repair and new work to match existing. 4,400.00 $ 240.00 $ 3,200.00 b. Option 2: Power wash existing building. Install visquine and filter Cost range system at base of building if tests indicate presence oflead. $ 7,500.00 Caulk and prime existing work. Paint entire structure. - 10,500.00 B. Mechanical and Electrical Systems 1. HV AC a. Furnace [Option 1] Inspect, balance and adjust existing furnace. [Option 2] Replace existing with new gas fired furnace. b. Return air duct: Replace undersized duct with correctly sized unit. c. Distribution ducts: Inspect joints for air leaks and seal as necessary. Replace insulation at wye joints, register boxes and as otherwise necessary. 2. Electrical a. Wiring: Inspect all accessible electrical splices and junction boxes and repair as necessary. b. Exit lighting: Install illuminated signs at both exits. c. Access and Exiting $ 240.00 2,550.00 $ 800.00 $ 450.00 $ 400.00 $ 1,050.00 1. Exterior ramp: Provide an access ramp to the rear door on the north $ 13,200.00 side of the church including solid sidewall construction sided to match main building. 2. Interior Access ramp: Provide inset access ramp at interior dais. 4. Rear exit path: Widen doorway at rear of main room to 32" clear. $ 725.00 $ 300.00 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE based upon preceeding recommendations Murray School A. Building Exterior 1. Recommended Exterior Modifications a. Main Entry: Remove stage addition and reconstruct original entry $ 14,500.00 including stairs, entry doors and transom. and windows (2) at either side according to 1949 photograph of entry. [Option 1]: Reconstruct complete tower: [Option 2]: Reconstruct 1936 gabled entry roof as seen in 1949 photograph. c. Enclosed rear porch: Remove enclosure and porch at rear entry. Reconstruct original rear entry including stairs. door and transom. Restore original overhang and replace door to workroom with new exterior door and transom to match original. Restore 1 x 4 t&g soffit at entry. Cost range $ 54.000. to 66,400.00 $ 2.840.00 Cost range $ 11,500. to 14.000.00 d. Entry at side of workroom: Replace door with new exterior door $ 780.00 to match original. 2. Siding & Trim a. Siding. general: Remove siding up to floor plate to allow for inspection and repair of cripple wall and shear ply as described in Structural Report. and reinstall or replace with like material. 3. Roof & Eaves a. Soffits, general: Inspect and repair holes in soffits as necessary. b. Gutter, museum wing: Retain existing roof condition and seal joint at top edge of gutter. c. Roof edge. general: Install metal drip edge. Cost range $ 3.200. to 4.500.00 $ 1.200.00 $ 300.00 $ 750.00 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4. Windows & Doors a. Windows, general: Replace window sash with new to match $ 2,280.00 original as necesary ( 2 openings). Replace deteriorated muntins as necessary and reglaze (2 openings). -Reglaze remaining windows as necessary. Inspect and replace parting bead as necessary . b. Door and transom at rear bathroom entry: Replace existing door $ 1,860.00 and transom. Trim. 5. Porches & Rails a. Porches, general: Remove all existing porches and ramp. $ 2,440.00 b. Porch & stairs at bathrooms: Rebuild in compatible style. $ 5,600.00 c. Rear entry at meeting room: Refer to A-1(a) in estimate. d. Existing front entry: Refer to C-1. e. Side entry at workroom: Refer to C-1. 6. Exterior Paint a. Power wash entire exterior (Install visquine and filter system at $ 2,400.00 base of building if testing indicates presence oflead): b. Scrape and sand existing paint as necessary. If testing indicates $ 11,600.00 presence of lead: 1) Install visquine barrier tent on scaffolding encapsulating building or; 2) Apply Strip away to deteriorated paint, bag and remove from site: c. Caulk and prime new and existing work as necessary. Paint $ 8,800.00 entire structure. B. Mechanical Systems 1. HV AC a. Heat pumps: Perform maintenance as required including cleaning $ 480.00 coils and replacing loose cover. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I b. Distribution ducts: Inspect joints for air leaks and seal as necessary. Replace insulation at wye joints, register boxes and as otherwise necessary. c. Registers: Verify proper clearance from-objects and clean return air filters as necessary. 2. Electrical a. Wiring: Inspect all splices and junction boxes and repair as necessary. b. Exit lighting: Install illuminated exit signs at all exits. Install emergency lighting system in museum wing. C. Access and Exiting 1. Access ramp: [Option 1] Construct new access ramp and stairs at current main entry. Reconstruct covered entry at side of workroom to match original. [Option 2] Construct new access ramp at side of work room. Rebuild stairs and porch at existing main entry in compatible style. 2. Bathrooms: Remove existing partitions and fixtures and replace to meet current access standards according to schematic floor plan. Replace all plumbing fixtures. 3. Exit doors: Replace both sets of double doors at existing entry foyer with 36" single doors. Install panic hardware as required (2 doors). Install complying locksets on all other exit doors (6 doors). 4. Include installation of transom window over exterior door to match adjacent window head height: Note: Depending on the selection of options, subtotal all construction costs and add 20% for general conditions, profit, and overhead. $ 320.00 $ 120.00 $ 450.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 15,800.00 (wi stairs & 27' ramp) $ 11,800.00 (42' ramp) $ 7,400.00 $ 5,200.00 $ 800.00 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE based upon the report by Degenkolb Structural Engineering Report, 05-04-94. St. Raymond's Church 1. Footing reconstruction at the front of the steeple with proper anchorage and structural connections. Corrective measures will not correct out of plumb condition but will prevent further differential settlement: 2. Structural steeple connections into main roof diaphragm: 3. Bell support frame reconstruction 4. Possible corrections to plywood sheathing nailing and connections under exterior siding: This item would be impossible to cost range without the removal of exterior siding at several locations. Not addressed at this time. Murray School 1. Remove interior foundation screw jacks and replace with permanent concrete pier blocks, posts, and structural connections to floor above: 2. No cost 3. Roof structure framing corrections: 4. No cost 5. Install new sill plate lumber and proper plywood shear diaphragm as required after siding removal has exposed existing connections: 6. Install anchor bolts at west end wall: Note: Depending upon the selection of options, subtotal all construction costs and add 20% for general conditions, profit, and overhead $ 4,500.00 Cost range $ 1,500 to 3,000.00 Allowance $ 1,000.00 nic $ 3,000.00 mc $ 1,800.00 mc Cost range $ 5,000. to 12,500.00 $ 240.00