HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 6.3 Attachment A, B, C (2)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
REZONING APPLICATION FOR 7S ACRE SANTA RITA RETAIL SITE
GENERAL INFORMATION
Project Location:
Seventy-five acre site in the northeast quadrant of the 1-
580/Hacienda Drive interchange; Bounded by Hacienda
Drive on the west, Dublin Boulevard on the north,
Tassajara Creek on the east, and 1-580 on the south.
Project Name:
Santa Rita Commercial Center - Tri-Valley Crossings
Project
Description:
Stand-alone Planned Development rezoning to permit
General Commercial uses, with subsequent permits to be
processed separately.
Zoning District:
Planned Development
APN:
946-15-1-4 (partial)
Co-Applicant Name:
Homart Community Centers!
Alameda County Surplus Property Authority
WRITTEN STATEMENT
Homart Community Centers and Alameda County Surplus Property Authority ("Applicants") are
requesting that the City of Dublin rezone a 75+ acre portion of the 951 acre Santa Rita property in
Eastern Dublin to permit general commerciaVretail uses.
Presently, the site is zoned "Planned Development - Business Park/lndustrial (low coverage)" as defined
in Zoning Ordinance 25-85. Under this ordinance, all projects within this District must be processed as
a new Planned Development rezoning, complying with the 1985 General Plan designation.
The Dublin General Plan (pages 1-5) states that the existing zoning classification is "intended to provide
a campus-like setting with open plazas and landscaped pedestrian amenities for the Primary Planning area
(research, limited manufacturing and distribution activities, and administrative offices that do not involve
heavy trucking or generate nuisances) and to allow retail uses to serve business and residents (emphasis
added). Maximum floor area ratio, to be determined by zoning regulations, should be between .25 and
.37".
In May, 1993, the Dublin City Council approved the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, which was upheld by
a citywide referendum in November, 1993. The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan designates this site for
General Commercial (.20 to .60 FAR). According to the Specific Plan, this designation "accommodates
a range of regional and community-serving retail, service, and office uses."
RECEIVED
SEP 0 6 1994
'I'BUN PLANNINr
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Rezoning Application
Page 2
Consistent with both the 1985 General Plan designation and the newly adopted Eastern Dublin Specific
Plan, and as required by current zoning, the applicants are requesting that this 75 acre site be rezoned
to a PD (Planned Development General Commercial) District to provide a dynamic
retail/office/entertainment environment to serve businesses and residents.
The Alameda County Surplus Property Authority is seeking to sell this 75 + acre site to Homart
Community Centers for general commercial uses, while retaining full control over the remaining portion
of the 951 acre Santa Rita property. On May 2, 1994 the Dublin Planning Commission found that this
proposed sale is consistent with the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan.
The Authority and Homart Community Centers will seek subsequent Site Development Review from the
City for commercial projects, following leasing of the site. All structures, circulation, parking, landscaping
and signage is subject to site development review and the development standards set forth herein. A
parcel map is required to be completed in accordance with City of Dublin standards and recorded prior
to issuance of a building permit.
The Santa Rita Rehabilitation Center, of which this site is a part, is an ASPIS listed site, requiring "low
priority preliminary endangerment assessment" by the Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC)
Office. A Phase 1 Environmental Assessment Report was completed in January, 1994. Several
underground storage tanks have been removed and are currently under review by regulators for closure.
PROJECT BENEFITS
This rezoning will have the following benefits to the City of Dublin:
1. It will replace an existing unsightly vacant property with a vibrant retail environment to
serve Dublin businesses and residents.
2. It will provide much needed space for existing Dublin retail businesses to expand, while still
remaining within the City of Dublin.
3. It will provide increased tax revenue to the City through increased retail sales tax.
4. It will provide job opportunities to City residents.
5. It will provide a source of funds to pay for the recently completed Hacienda DrivelDublin
Boulevard extension.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Rezoning Application
Page 3
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
The PD District will have the following standards:
I. Permitted Uses
The following principal uses are permitted in the PD District.
A. Retail commercial establishments, including, but not limited to, the following:
1. General Merchandise Store
2. Discount/Warehouse Retail Store
3. Clothing/Fashion Store
4. Shoe Store
5. Home Furnishing Store
6. Office Supply Store
7. Home AppliancelElectronics Store
8. Home Improvement Store
9. Music Store
to. Hobby/Special Interest Store
11. Gifts/Specialty Store
12. Jewelry and Cosmetic Store
13. Drug Store
14. Auto Parts Store
15. Toy Store
16. Book Store
17. Pet Supplies Store (including in-store veterinary clinic)
18. Sporting Goods Store
19. GrocerylFood Store
20. Automobile Service
and similar uses that sell goods based on price and quality.
B. Eating, drinking and entertainment establishments, including, but not limited
to, the following:
1. Restaurant
2. Wine or liquor bar with on-sale liquor license
3. Micro-brewery
4. Nightclub
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Rezoning Application
Page 4
5. Indoor movie theater
6. Delicatessen
7. Specialty Food
8. Bakery
9. Ice Cream Shop
to. Sandwich Shop
11. Video ArcadelRentals
12. Drive-thru Facilities, including restaurants.
C. Office and service establishments including, but not limited to:
1. Bank/Savings and Loan
2. Real Estate/Title Office
3. Travel Agent
4. Legal
5. Accounting
6. Medical and Dental
7. Optometrist
8. Architect
9. Employment Agency
to. HairlBeauty Salon
11. Cleaner and Dryer
12. Shoe Repair
13. Key Shop
14. Tailor
15. Athletic Club
16. Formal WearlRental
17. Other Administrative and Professional Office
18. Hotel
19. Technology Access Center
20. Tele-Commuting Center
II. Conditional Uses
The following are conditional uses in the PD District and shall be permitted only if
approved by the Planning Commission or the Zoning Administrator pursuant to Section 8 -
94.0, "CONDITIONAL USES," of the City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance.
\.
A. Commercial uses such as:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Rezoning Application
Page 5
1. Community, religious and charitable institutional facilities
2. Public Facilities and uses
3. Veterinary Office
4. Recycling Center
5. In-patient and out-patient health facilities as licensed by the
State Department of Health Services
6. Gas Station
7. Outdoor food vendors
8. Automobile sales
B. Prohibited Uses:
1. Residential uses
2. Drilling for and/or removal of oil, gas, or other hydrocarbon
resources
3. Distillation of bones
4. Dumping, disposal, incineration, or reduction of garbage, sewer,
offal, dead animals or refuse
5. Stockyard or slaughter of animals
6. Cemeteries
7. Migrant or other camps
8. Storage of radioactive materials
III. Site Development Review
Any structure, circulation, parking, landscaping and signage shall be subject to Site
Development Review (pursuant to Section 8-95): unless zoning approval is granted upon
the determination that the construction constitutes a minor project and that the Building
Permit plans are in accord with the intent and objectives of the Site Development Review
procedures.
IV. Setbacks and Yards
A.
Minimum Setbacks: The minimum setbacks for buildings, accessory structures,
parking areas, driveways and loading areas shall be as follows:
.
Along Interstate 580: 20 feet from right-of-way.
.
Along Hacienda Drive: 20 feet from right-of-way.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Rezoning Application
Page 6
· Along Dublin Boulevard: 20 feet from right-of-way.
· Along Tassajara Creek: A minimum 100 foot setback from the top of bank
will be maintained along Tassajara Creek.
The setback zones shall be fully landscaped with both hardscape (private sidewalks and
other hard surfaced areas) and softscape (trees, shrubs, ground cover, etc.).
Exceptions to the above setback requirements are the following:
1. Architectural projections (such as eaves, columns, balconies,
arcades, awnings, steps and decks) which may encroach up to
a maximum of to feet into a required setback, with a minimum
setback of to feet from a street right-of-way.
2. Freestanding signage: As permitted in the Master Sign
Program.
B. Minimum Yards: The required setback for all yards is 0 feet.
V. Maximum Building Heights
Buildings and other structures will be limited to a maximum height of 75 feet in this
District.
VI. Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR)
The overall maximum floor area ratio for this district will be .25% permitting a total of
approximately 800,000 square feet of Gross Leasable Area (GLA) on 75 acres.
VII. Parking and Loading
A. Parking and Loading Spaces. There shall be provided and maintained in
accordance with these standards, off-street automobile parking and loading
spaces for every building and use. No building or structure shall be erected
or use established and no existing building shall be structurally altered, unless
there be already in existence, or unless provision therefore is made
concurrently with such erection or structural alteration or new use, the
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Rezoning Application
Page 7
number of parking spaces and loading spaces necessary to meet the minimum
requirements hereinafter set forth.
B. Continuing Character of Obligation. The maintenance of the parking and
loading spaces required shall be a continuing obligation of the owner of the
real estate upon which the building or structure is located as long as the
building or structure exists and the use requiring such space continues. It shall
be unlawful for an owner of a building or structure affected by these
requirements to discontinue, change or dispense with or to cause the
discontinuance, sale or transfer of such building or structure, without
establishing alternative spaces which conform to those requirements; or for
any person, firm, or corporation to use such building or structure without
providing such required parking or loading spaces, in compliance with these
standards.
C. Parking Spaces: Accessibility. These standards are intended to provide off-
street spaces for the parking of the automobiles of tenants of the premises
and for clients, customers, employees, and callers. They are required to be
kept accessible for the purposes continuously, and the use of any such
required space or spaces, uses other than these specified, shall constitute
discontinuance thereof in violation of Section 8-63.1.
D. Parking Spaces: Size and Location. A standard parking stall shall be a
minimum of nine (9) feet wide by a minimum of eighteen (18) feet in length.
Compact stalls shall be a minimum of eight (8) feet wide by a minimum of
seventeen (17) feet in length. Compact parking spaces may comprise up to
25% of the required parking spaces. Where parking spaces abut sidewalks or
landscape areas the length of parking stall may be reduced by two feet. -
E. Loading Spaces: Size and Location. Required loading space at buildings
aggregate floor area less than forty-thousand (40,000) s.f. shall be not less
than ten (to) feet in width and twenty (20) feet in length. Required loading
spaces at buildings with an aggregate floor area over forty-thousand (40,000)
s.f. shall be not less than ten (to) feet in width and sixty (60) feet in length.
Every required loading space shall be clear to height of not less than fourteen
(14) feet. Every required loading space shall be on the same lot as the
structure it serves or on an abutting lot and shall be continuously accessible
from the street. No loading space shall occupy any part of a required parking
space, or any required street side yard or a corner lot.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Rezoning Application
Page 8
F. Parking and Loading Spaces: Approval of Plan. A site plan showing the
location of the existing and proposed building or buildings and other
improvements, the location of all required parking and loading spaces, and all
provisions for maneuvering space and access thereto from a public right-of-
way including proposed curb cuts, shall be submitted and approved as being
convenient and functional prior to the issuance of Building Permit. No
approval of occupancy shall be issued upon completion of a building or
structural alteration of a building or for any land use when no buildings are
erected or altered, unless and until all such spaces as required and as shown
upon approved plans and made a part of the Building Permit are in place and
ready for use.
G. Parking and Loading Spaces: Maintenance. All parking and loading spaces,
access driveways, and maneuvering areas required shall be graded and well
drained and shall be maintained with all weather dust-free surfacing. Lighting
of parking and loading spaces shall be so arranged as to be directed
downward and away from any residential area.
H. Collective Action Permitted. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to
prevent the joint use of parking or loading space for two (2) or more
buildings or uses if the total of such spaces provided is not less than the sum
of the requirements for the individual uses computed separately in accordance
with these standards.
I. Number of Spaces Required. The number of parking and/or loading spaces
required shall be calculated based on gross floor area for retail and office
uses, and customer service area for restaurant uses. When the calculation
results in a fractional number, any fraction up to and including one-half (112)
shall be disregarded and any fraction over one-half (112) shall be adjusted to
the next higher whole number.
J. Parking Spaces Required: The number of parking spaces required shall be
not less than specified in the following table:
USE
PARKING REQUIRED
4.5/toOO sq. ft.
7/toOO sq. ft.
115 seats
4/toOO sq. ft.
Retail
Restaurant
Theater
Office
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Rezoning Application
Page 9
Exception: Where an attested copy of a contract between the parties
concerned is filed with the Application for Building Permit, which contract
sets forth a valid agreement for joint use of parking spaces for the life of the
buildings or uses concerned and a parking study has been approved by the
Zoning Administrator demonstrating that a lesser number of parking spaces
would be appropriate for the proposed used, through shared use of parking,
then the number of required parking spaces shall be reduced in accordance
with the number indicated in the approved parking study.
K. Loading Spaces Required: Every allowable use which has an aggregate gross
floor area of fifteen-thousand (15,000) square feet or more, shall provide
loading spaces in accordance with the following:
Aggregate Gross floor
Area (sq. ft)
Number of Loading
Spaces required
15,000 - 40,000
over 40,000 - toO,OOO
over 100,000 - 160,000
over 160,000
1
2
3
3 plus 1 for each
full 80,000 square
feet in excess of 160,000
L. Minimum Aisles Widths: Parking aisles with two-way traffic shall have a
minimum width of twenty-two (22) feet for parking angles of 0, 30, 45 and 60
degrees. Parking aisles with two-way traffic shall have a minimum width of
24 feet for 90 degree parking angle.
Parking aisles with one-way traffic shall have minimum widths as follows:
a) 15 feet for parking angles of 0, 30, and 45 degrees.
b) 18 feet for a parking angle of 60 degrees.
c) 24 feet for a parking angle of 90 degrees.
M. Bicycle Facilities: Bicycle parking facilities shall be provided, at the
minimum, at a ration of one space per 150 required automobile spaces.
These facilities, which would provide for convenient parking and locking of
bicycles shall be located adjacent the fronts of buildings and dispersed
throughout the shopping center.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Rezoning Application
Page 10
IX. Signage:
The Master Sign Program will be submitted for review with the Site Development Reveiw
package.
X. Landscape:
A minimum ratio of twenty (20%) percent of the gross land area will be provided in open
space, which shall include landscape, entry, plaza and sidewalk areas. The minimum ratio
of landscape to gross land area shall be as follows:
Perimeter site areas:
Parking areas:
Ten (10%) percent
Five (5%) percent
The landscape/open space concept is illustrated in the sketches following this section.
wp51\homart\dublin\rezoning.app
/
I
n
'. n
A
n
n
n
o
ft 00
V)
I
~
a
D 11
~
D
[~
~
~
......
eJIIIIIIIII
00.
~
~
=
......
Q.c
~
u
=
Q
U
Q
n I
n
Q
. 110
~ 0 q
=-
~ "'" 0
CO
~
~ a
CO
;:J
0
&:>
<:! ~
~~
~ 0
~~c~~
4:>
aArna~~6YH~~
c1
.-
==
Q
"I
a
u
n
o
g
n
....
"'"
~
~
-------------------
n
-------------------
Flowering trees in evergreen groundcover
Vehicular lighting
T,rees in groundcover
Low berm or shrubs
Concave median catches rainwater
TRI-V ALLEY CROSSINGS, DUBLIN
Homart Community Centers
Hacienda Drive Section
Conceptual Sketch
-------------------
Flowering tree in median
Sidewalk
Evergreen groundcover.
?
TRI- VALLEY CROSSINGS, DUBLIN
Homart Community Centers
Cluster of street trees
Berm or shrubs to reduce view
into rear of buildinos
b
Dublin Boulevard Section
Conceptual Sketch
-------------------
I
Evergreen groundcover or shrub
Annual color
Groundcover
Light poles
Service Area
Large columnar
entry framing tree
J
TRI- VALLEY CROSSINGS, DUBLIN
Homart Community Centers
Dublin Boulevard Entry
Conceptual Sketch
-------------------
Utilize landscaping to reinforce circulation hierarchy
Tall delineating trees & low hedges define auto entry
spines & interior streets
. ft--~~ ~ OJ--
o
Provide landscaped pedestrian promenades through
parking areas to linK various parts of shopping
complex
Cluster trees in parking areas to provide
views of storefronts
TRI- VALLEY CROSSINGS, DUBLIN
Parking Landscape Concept
Homart Community Centers
Conceptual Sketch
-------------------
Pots @ wall ends
~~
i~
. .. 'D
Shade trees
"
Thematic lighting
Bollard
Seating wall
f'/\~
\(._ 0 ~
C: ?-. 'j,S
'<. Co .;, I,
c( L-- J ?
~
TRI- VALLEY CROSSINGS, DUBLIN
Typical Pedestrian Section
Homart Community Centers
Conceptual Sketch
-------------------
Painted, colored concrete wall panels
w /rustication accent banding
Accent elements or lighting
. .
. . .
Textural finish accent
,ffi
.
. .
Tenant signage
Entrance el.ament
. "
En'
U1
. .-
Post and Beam system
Storefront window system
TRI- VALLEY CROSSINGS, DUBLIN
Homart Community Centers
Typical Building Elevation
Conceptual Sketch
I'~
';
; ,
j, '~I
, I'
\~~~~
I ~
"
i \
~
i I
. I
11
Ii J
: t ,
, ~
\
i
~
r.rJ.
~
~
::r:
~
.:0
uZ
......0
~~
~O
0000
t.(')
~ I
~. ~
i~
~O
~~
Q~
U>
i
/ /
, I
1\
-------------------
RESOLUTION -95
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
RESOLUTION APPROVING NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND
MAKING FINDINGS REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
CONCERNING THE SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER
WHEREAS, the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment ("GPA")
and Specific Plan ("SP") were adopted by the City in i993: and
WHEREAS, the GPA outlines future land uses for approximately
4176 acres within the City'S eastern sphere of influence
including approximately 13,906 dwelling units and 9.737 million
square feet of commercial, office, and industrial development:
and
WHEREAS, the SP provides more specific and detailed goals,
policies and action programs for approximately 3313 acres within
the GPA area nearest to the City: and
WHEREAS, the GPA and SP areas ("Eastern Dublin") are shown
on the Land Use Map contained in the GPA (attached hereto as
Exhibit A) and exclude the area shown on the Land Use Map as
"Future Study Area/Agriculturell; and
WHEREAS, a Program Environmental Impact Report (IIProgram
EIR") was prepared for the GPA and SP (SCH No. 91103604) and
certified by the Council on May 10, 1993 by Resolution No. 51-
1
EXHIBIT B
1 -23--,5" (P.~
93, and two Addenda dated May 4, 1993 and August 22, 1994
("Addenda") have been prepared and considered by the Council; and
WHEREAS, on May 10, 1993, the Council also adopted
Resolution No. 53-93, adopting the GPA and SP, making findings as
to the environmental impacts and mitigation measures relating to
the GPA and SP, and adopting a Mitigation Monitoring Program
(lIprogram MMplI) for the GPA and SP; and
WHEREAS, Homart Community Centers (IIHomart") and the Surplus
Property Authority of the County of Alameda ("Countyll) have
proposed development of the Santa Rita Commercial Center (lithe
Project") on approximately 75 acres within Eastern Dublin, in the
location shown on the map attached hereto as Exhibit B; and
WHEREAS, the Project consists of development of an
approximately 800,000 square root commercial center to include
retail shops, offices, movie theatres, restaurants, and/or
similar commercial uses; and
WHEREAS, development of the Project will require certain
discretionary implementary actions by the City, including
rezoning approximately 75 acres from Planned Development --
Business Park/Industrial (low coverage) to a standard Planned
Development consistent with the GPA and SP ("Rezoning"), approval
of a Development Agreement with Homart and the County
("Development Agreement"), approval of a Tentative Parcel Map,
and Site Development Review; and
WHEREAS, in November, 1994, the City prepared an Initial
Study for the Project, as designed, which consisted of a project
description, and environmental checklist with supporting
2
JAN-19-35 THU 12:30
P. 02/02
analysis, and a detailed ~atrix addre~sing the applicability
ar.d
implerner.tu.tion of each cf the programs in the SF and each of
the
mitigation measures iC1 t.he Program MMP1 nr:d the c;ity ame~.~ded chis
Initial Study on NovemDe~ 221 1994, to include a Project-specific
Traffic I~pac~ ~~~alY$is p~epared by BarLon-Ascnman Associates,
lnc. (IITraffic Impact AnalysislI).; and
WHER3AS, tne InlLial Study demonstrated that the Project, as
designed, would have no potcnt~ally sigr.ificant environffie~tal
impacts which were no~ adequately described and analyzed
in th€:
~rog~am ErR (with t~e exception of site-specific traffic
. "
~nroac:s
a~-l zed 'n ~~c m_~~~~c Tm--~~ n~alvOl'D) ~na' ~~a~ ~~A D-_~~~~
-~~._y .:.~ ~_..- I I "".I__~- ----:'''''_'- ___ -.l~ ., ,...... <..u '- ,-__"" --~J-C:-
would ~ave no significant envi=onreental impacts with the
implemen~atio!1 of mitigation ~easures al~eady required p~=suan~
to the Prog:r-a2 MNP ar.n t.hc)se 2.ciditional sit:e-specific traffic
measures identified in the Traffic Impact Fnalysis; and
WHEREAS, :;n.-ior to Novem:Ocr 22, 19941 Homart and the County
agreed wi~h City staff to implement the site-specific t~~:Efic
measuree identified in the Traffic Impact Analysis 1 as well as
all of the mitigation m22sur~s
required u~cler the
P=ograr:'"~
ivr'vr '0 ..
......- I
and
WEEREAS, on November
') "J
~";"'1
i C 0.4
_.J,J _I
the City ci:::-cu2.ated. a r':itiaa:.ed
. . - ~
Negative uecla~aticn for the Project (which included th~ !nit.i~l
Study), a copy of which is at~ached a~ Exhibit C to the Jar.~ary 23,
1995, City Coc:nc.i 1. Agenda Report ("Negative Dcclaration"); and
WEEREAS1 the Negative Declaration was circulated for public
review and com:nent from NO'v8!t'.ber 22, 1994 through Decembe:r 231
1994:; and
3
WHEREAS, three letters commenting on the Negative
Declaration were received during the comment period, copies of
which are attached as Exhibit D to the January 23, 1995, City
Council Agenda Report; and
WHEREAS, the City reviewed and prepared a written response
to the three letters of comment, a copy of which is attached as
Exhibit E to the January 23, 1995, City Council Agenda Report;
~
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held public hearings on the
Project, particularly on the Rezoning on December 19, 1994, and
January 3 and 17, 1995, and on the Development Agreement on
January 17, 1995, and adopted Resolution No. 95-01 recommending
that the City Council approve the Negative Declaration,
Resolution No. 95-02 recommending that the City Council adopt the
Rezoning, and Resolution No. 95-03 recommending that the City
Council approve the Development Agreement; and
WHEREAS, on January 23, 1995, the City Council held a duly
noticed public hearing on the Project, during which it considered
the Agenda Statement, the General Plan, the GPA, the SP, the
Program EIR, the Addenda, the Negative Declaration, the three
letters of comment on the Negative Declaration and the City's
written responses thereto, all related correspondence received
and the testimony received at the hearing, the recommendation of
the Planning Commission, and other items in the administrative
record;
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Dublin does
RESOLVE as follows:
4
Section 1. The City Council finds that the foregoing
Recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein as a
part of this resolution.
Section 2. Pursuant to section 21083.3, subdivisions (b)
and (e), of the Public Resources Code and pursuant to section
15168 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that
the Project is within the scope of the SP and the GPA, that the
Project and all of its potentially significant environmental
impacts were adequately described and analyzed in the EIR, that
the Project incorporates all applicable mitigation measures
identified in the Program EIR, and that all of the Project's
potentially significant environmental impacts will be mitigated
to a level of insignificance with the imposition of the
mitigation measures identified in the Program MMP and the site-
specific traffic mitigation measures identified in the Traffic
Impact Analysis.
Section 3. Pursuant to section 21166 and section 21083.3,
subdivisions (b) and (e), of the Public Resources Code, and
pursuant to sections 15162 and 15168 of the State CEQA
Guidelines, the City Council finds:
(1) that the Project does not constitute a change from
the program (i.e. the GPA and the SP) analyzed in the Program EIR
which would require major revisions in the Program EIR,
(2) that there are no substantial changes in the
surrounding circumstances under which the Project is being
undertaken from those circumstances which existed when the City
5
certified the Program EIR which would require major revisions in
the Program EIR, and
(3) that there is no new information of substantial
importance to the GPA, the SP, or the Project which, despite the
exercise of reasonable diligence, could not have been known when
the Program EIR was certified and which shows either (i) that the
Project will have significant environmental effects not discussed
or substantially underestimated in the Program EIR or, (ii) that
there are mitigation measures or alternatives not identified as
feasible in the Program EIR and not included as part of the
Project which would reduce or avoid any significant environmental
impacts.
Section 4. Pursuant to section 21080, subdivision (c), of
the Public Resources Code and pursuant to section 15074,
subdivision (b), of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council
(1) certifies that it has considered the Negative Declaration,
along with the three letters or comment received and the City's
responses thereto; (2) finds that there is no substantial
evidence in light of the whole record that the Project will have
a significant effect on the environment; and (3) hereby approves
the Negative Declaration.
Section 5. The City Council does hereby adopt the project-
specific Mitigation Monitoring Program (a copy of which is
attached as Exhibit F to the January 23, 1995, City Council
Agenda Report) as the reporting and monitoring program required
by Public Resources Code section 21081.6 for the Project, as a
supplement to the Program MMP.
6
Section 6. Pursuant to Public Resources Code section
21081.6, subdivision (a) (2), the City Council specifies that the
documents which constitute the record of proceedings upon which
its findings and decision herein are based shall be located at
City Hall, and their custodians shall be the City Clerk, the
Planning Director and the Public Works Director of the City.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this
day of
, 1995, by
the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
114\resol\S2\ceqa
7
nin Process (see text for complete discuSSion.)
* General Commercial may be permitted by a Pl~nnedd~~~:~:e~ei~~~~sist~nt with APA (see text for complete discussion)
* * Will convert to Future Study Area/Agriculture were
General Plan
-Eastern Extended Planning Area
LAND USE MAP
Legend
COMMERCIAL
~ Neighborhood CommerCial
~ General Commercial
,':::::::::;::::::;il Carnous Offk;e
CTI Industrial Park
RESIDENTIAL
~ High Denstty
~ Medium-High Density
CB:J Medium Denslly
[IJ LOw Density 0-6 cIJIac
[@ Rural ResldenliaVAgriculture 1 cIJIl00 ao
PU BLIC/ SEM~PUBLlC/OPEN
Public/Semi-Public Facilily
@ Elementary School
@ Junior High School
@ High School
@I PubrlC/Semi-Public
c:::JJ Parks & Recrealion
<V Cily Park
@ Community Park
@ Neighborhood Pa,k
Neighbo,hood Soua,e
Open Space
Slream Corridor
25- dulae
14-25 dulac
6-14 dulac
lID
r~g$~"7~,t~
~
CIRCUlA TION
Arterial Slreel
COlleClor Slreel
Transit $oi'le
501 Boundary
General Plan Amendment Study Area
Specific Plan Sludy Area
EASTERN
DUBLIN
Mey 10, 1993
Welece Roberts & Todd
Figure 28
~".. IBITn ~
~,
., ~-
~
Eft
~
VICINITY 1vfAP
(N.T.S.)
I DOO[
! CJCJCJ
ODD
r---'Ir---l r-::::::;:'
~ 0
LIi ULI '..J
IL ~IT. ..LJ
t [01 i -JDD
II --
~i l :N: %T. I CJ l j
irlYL ) /
ii>L~~!'
.1 i ~~~~c' us="./0~. ./
:) "......-.. -~ .'.~./
- - . ----"y ., !
l.'subiect Pro erty
~
<
3
~
~
CAMP PAFlKS
\
3:
5\
~,
0'
~:
0,
t
~ t _
~
DUBLIN
::e::
(':
.- ,m
::==- ,- ~~-----VI -~~'--a->-' C:AA.... .0- "I: ,:
. \\ HAC:E~CA DRIVE ;
\ . OVS;:;C:;CSSiNG '\~ '
\ I '
\ / n "-C~9fJ;.E:1TY . J.
. .~ /' OVE:-tHI::.~D lei
l;0 c IF)"~ o~= /fl
~ ~ ' " '0/
~ ~ pmirON ~~
EXHIBIT ~
1'"
. ~",--flt. r
~, ,
-' !
""'.
NlENDED
NEGATTVR DECLARATION'
J'
(Prepared pursuant to city of Dublin
Environmental Guidelinesr Section 1.7(C)J ~.~)
Description of Project:
A reauest to rezone 75 +/- acres
from Planned Develooment - Business ParklIndustrial (lm-; coveraae) tc
a standard Planned Develooment.
The nroiect will also include a
site Deve.loDment Revi eTt! and Tentative Parcel Man. This Drolect has a
Soecif ic Plan and Genera 1 pl;::n Desianation of Gener21 COTI'21ercial.
The Drooosed Planned Deve 1 oDment would allow for an 800.000 sauere
foot cOTIU."TIercial center wh i c:-: may ; nclude retail shoos. off; ces. movi e
theatres and restaurents amonc other uses.
project Location:
75 +/- acres on the southe~st corner of
Hecienda and Dublin Eoulevard
Name of Propenent:
r.omart Community Centers
I hereby find ~na~
the
above ~roject will not have 2
. . - . .
S 2.~7:l~ lC2.rr;:
effect on the
. .
en'\llronmen"L. .
Attached is e copy of the Ir:i.tial Study (HEnviroru:lent~l Ir::orB2.tion
Form" and Enviror:::sental Chec::dist") doclli:lenting the reascr:s to si.rppcr-:
the above findina.
. ~
Mitigation measures
significant effects
Initial study.
ere included in the project to avoid potentially
on the environment and ere included 25 p~rt of t~e
~\ 17.-!-
;V~ JJ Lc.;\;~0:-)
signature~ U
Dennis E. Carrinaton
Printed Name
Senior Planner
Title
N.D\J e+U~ YL "'2-"?., I C1 c. Lf
Date J
.?-.tt2.chrnents
EXHIBIT L-
Date Published:
Date Posted:
Date Notice Mailed:
consice=ed by:
On:
1-'"2.. '"30 -'""IS- c.:...3. ':'
Acticn en Negative
Dec!.=.~2.tic:;. :....
I
;.P9=oved
Di.sa~~=o".:ec.
,'\. ",
'-"~
./--
r-
"~
SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER
INTIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Prepared by the city of Dublin
Planning Department
November, 1994
,.-
,
r'
INTRODUCTION
This Initial study has been prepared by the city of Dublin to assess
the potential environmental effects of the proposed Santa Rita
Commercial Center. The analysis is intended to setisfy the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)( and
provide the city with adequate information for project review.
The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment Final EIR
(consisting of the DEIR dated August 28 ( 1992; Responses to Comments
Part I dated December 7, 1992; Responses to Comments Part II dated
December 21( 1992; Revisions to Part I of the Responses to Comments
relating to the Kit Fox; an p.ddendum to the DEIR dated Hay 4( 1993;
and a DKS A.'ssociates Traffic study dated December 15, 1992) (SCH
91103064); was adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993. The FEIR
is available to the Public at the city of Dublin Planning Department
located at 100 Civic Plaza( Dublin( California. An Addendum to the
FEIR was approved by the City Council on August 22, 1994. The
environmental impact report that was prepared for the Eastern Dublin
General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan was a IIprogramll environmental
impact report. If a program environmental impact report is prepared,
subsequent environmental documents need to be prepared only if there
were addi tional environmental impacts not considered in the
preparation of the original environmental document (CEQp-. Guidelines
section 15168). The Santa Rita Commercial Center is proposed to be
located wi thin the boundaries of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan.
Although the City of Dublin has determined that the project will not
have .s..D.Y additional environmental impacts that are not reduced to
insignificance by mitigation measures and corresponding conditions of
approval ( the city wants to ensure that the environmental review
process is set forth in a document and opened for public review.
Therefore( an Initial Study and Negative Declaration have been
prepared.
This Initial Study includes a project description, environmental
checklist( and discussion focused upon issues identified in the
checklist. The attachment to the Initial study is a Matrix which has
incorporated the Mitigation Measures and Action Programs of the
Eastern Dublin General Plan p..,i"nendment and Specific Plan which will
reduce the environmental impacts of the project to a level of
insignificance.
The Matrix has been designed for use in evaluating SpeC.lIlC project
proposals in Eastern Dublin for compliance with the Eastern Dublin
Final Environmental Impact Report and Mitigation Monitoring Program.
Please see the Legend which is the cover page to the Metrix for an
explanation of the headings and abbreviations within the Matrix. The
Mitigation Measures of the Eastern Dublin General Plan Ji..:uend:nent and
Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (IIFEIRII) and the two
approved addenda thereto are referenced throughout this Initial Study.
Please refer to the Matrix to review the Mitigation Measures and/or
Action Programs.
'..
.-....\
In summarYr the Initial study concludes that the proje9t will not pose
any significant adverse effects that cannot be mitigated through
mitigation measures required through the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan
Final Environmental Impact Report and Mitigation Monitoring Program.
The project is in conformance with the General Plan and Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan Designations and conflicts will not be created with
established land uses on surrounding properties.
This study was prepared based upon the location of the project, staff
office review ( field review, comments from City ( County and special
Districts ( comments submitted by local agenciesj use of city Planning
documentsr the CEQA Law and Guidelines( City of Dublin CEQA
Guidelines, and previously certified Environmental Impact Reports.
'.
2
.....
r
(
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Homart Community Centers of Denver, Colorado (the applicant) is
proposing a commercial project consisting of an 800rOOO ~ square
foot center on approximately 75 acres of land on the southeast
corner of Hacienda Boulevard and Dublin Boulevard. The site has
a General Plan Designation of General Commercial; a Specific Plan
Designation of General Commercialj and is in Plann~d Development
- Business Park/Industrial (low coverage) Zoning District. The
applicants propose as part of the project to rezone the site to
be consistent with the General Plan and Specific Plan to a
standard Planned Development. The Planned Development Tdould
allow general commercial type uses. As part of the project, they
will process a site Development Review approval and a Tentative
Parcel Map. The l>.pplicant plans to process the Rezone to a
Planned Development first, following shortly thereafter with the
site Development Review and Tentative Parcel Map applications.
'.
..,
"
~.
FIGURES
Figure One: Vicinity Map
Figure Two: Preliminary site Plan
Figure Three: Dublin San Ramon Services District
Proposed Homart Development Water
and Sewer Facilities
~
"'r
,
J
r
.
CC<{
Wz
r-~
20
WLL
U-1
...J<{
<(U
- .
U ~
CCZ
W--1
~aJ
~::J
00
U
<(
}-
-
cr::
<(
r-
:z
<
(j)
b~C'EIVED
r... x:
J A. N 0 5 1994
'PA 'N. -00 (
,..... !"'UN PLANNING
u
- e::
~
Z ~
c
u
<
i-
U 2
<
i-
- 2:
<
> t:)
. ..i:....:::..,..T~;,j,l;;~:-j;;'trr~..:~..::.: It.;;.. .h
.... ~,.., .,~..;_.~ .:;?~~:--.:~;';';'~~":'::~~:i:i!~;';:
'"
~-;:cu
'f,
"
...::.111 I ;:-..
;~.jll ~
'~';'-:::-';C;lo
~~!.=,X t :: .
-'.1 Hi' :.....
..:.. ... _I "
· ;:.~ ri I :::::
-"I12-,J -...
~'-I"- __
- ~J;': ?-'
- 1!l II r: (. 1 :-
t_. . ~7.4' f ~
'-0 .-J.t 1'"
.1:::R-lrJJ..:.~ t
........;--,;~~] 0
'''~~...s r,;
'~'-:il -
....:.1. .1 ~
~(:;.,:~" ;~'1 -
~f::~ti-.~ ~
-Il:! 'l '..1..:: -...J
~":;1'1-2
~-=~;r; S
I Sir0' _
:1 ....,,,~ :J
.....~P..~i.:~. 'I :.r.
'.~;~ 'l."'iL
:"~;':.-o:j'"
-.:::::J~ ~-:-l :'"'
~:F-:..~~~ ~
~'5.lj 2:
-;~~~~~ ~
-- ~- ....iJ ...
.~~~~~1~ 8
~.~:-*: ;:;
..~~. =:;
'.:a :::
~ 2-
\ <
,
<
- FIGiJ'RE 1
....:..........~-::-':"J:-:~"\
.a:a .::.~:';loo~......~..._-~-t".::...'-.4:.r.....-;.....-:.-.:.'""'-l:":.....: _~....s........ _.......~....~ .....
. ..~ ~ ..
";"..:":.i.:~:'1:-.f''''':;'.l:i~'",;
.... . J
. ... ~
'.','
';. .
.
',..j ..
~.!.
., .
"
'.'1'
';~i(r
.: .:~
. 1.'"
:1\:
'. '. .:'.',.: .:
.i;':f:f.N>: ....
';:!.'::'l:";'d
'_.~. -. ,
...-----.. ...- .---.-----....--.--..-.----------.----------------------
L. '. , --- --------1:>-1- -, iTTlL YD,. Y,~ ,~.q;"4qn.cq;_':::,;rqnQ""'~= ~ ~_".. _'_~ .. . '. _ .
. . . '-'-.'" ...... -- D l{,i~{4'O'''''''',.c,,,,,O 0 .. -..,..""'-".,>~CC., ~_ ... , ''''''=."",~=- .. Ur> ""''''<' ".'. .
~.-q,,, · ,," ,-, "'''''''''C . "'1'... "_ ~''''''~' """,) "_"-' ---...._
' =~~=J · .:---c-;.;::,,,ii~i~~I"xa@}<"d~'i'll:'c:.C,.;._:,:;;;~:~. ':~&UI1~j~~,~ .
' ,::'p tm~~~ ~ : !mtk ~q:fc ",,', ,~"F<I~i\1 \:Jo ''-' L: '\J~'1<>"'''-~o(~("<'j~. .
- - c '.. . i\ ~ f' fIJ] .{ C0 - 'G, '" -. C,> '"" 'Gd, 'Cf "j''; 7-' <f II" ~ 'J {'.: Q, T fh it : Jjy' /1=
.~. @('[l'<"'i' '~I I! ~
~=~~ ,j , .': I '\ "I ~. l ~
"'. '"",~: I!, 4. <>.,<l ',' /' ".'1, , ,.n. i., ,I I n ,~~ .;. .- '. "
.' "u ~~- ----I ',. -.- . -'. 'lh'J.!; .,. G/), [. . 0-9 _ .!,:_____
. XI · - ': "".--,.. . . 'H'-<=--""".. ~ ~10 ~;.> . u ---"'b!I~OJ
~ ." -~" ""C.:..::::J. "-'I --'-"-/,1))' 'f' l1l-n_~_ '1
. ," - . ',,,,,. ,~ ":' I. ,u.--.., .. . ~ ""=--0. I
'. . .~. '~"I2J-r~l - . 11')1 ~:~ o".~. --'. ", ,,', 4"-~7-<!J . , , P----..'-'::.;.'--iJ' ~r--___ '. ,
' '''~ ';E\. , """,.'.., ,~. , A , ~( "
~-,... .,,~ '.<;i?li!l'o", ':1' <(l;--'~" '-.''', ,.. "---" ~---=o- A 'II ,
.'. ", ~, 'Ii'" , " - ___ ''''''lli \&-" ".} C """"'.~~ :'_. :. .
' ' ,'<;; , A .<UlL....----, ,=,"""'.~ "" O.----____Il (, ',~ . .
. . ~.. .'. ~'" ~l" 'r.)_ %'='='<ltu :(ll1II';~;'n ill'~~~':)'~'~11j-J?;fI3l;1"t~.)\ ~=~:::-f~l :Z~fI. /~i. :.',',..
~~Lor:t " "."'" N . <: ,,' ",_, "~or .~..Y.l'. ..
I~. .... .~~(1lb~~nm-tnr' .IJ=M~'.." ~ 'Iii. '1,---11" --" ;;~.' ~"Dll:::'=?---~ '.. .
" ~""., '. , ., ""CO'" n,' , ' <"'''::/.''. . kic'~lc;;,,-, q --"='-'_~''''._ " "'..
' , , '. . 1(2);"'1' c-" .. "'''+\,., "'--~,,~,~__ . " " u__ ___.
...... ~~"'~":~ >:-"O'~"'~:~,~'.::-:: ,~"C~':5~O '::=, .... ."_
~__m___ __. ..... ... __, ,.. . '" "_
--.---
_."---
~,
_..-=-~:~:~::-I~~ =:':.::~.
.. r=\
l~..._. _...
-- ---- -- :--':':::-':-';:":::::=::::.~':":'~::'~;.;;-"-.
------ . .,........-
II
~_.-----
-(?~
.----- --- .-~-
- --
---~~.;..---" --.
/:----
- FIGURE ~
1. al Site Pla~,,<=-...~..._
", '- .~~
Con C (;J) .l~rmt,..<-"""..,
.~
,
. ;' '.::~.: .:
"':',
,i~J~i:i~
1~ij
......J.'
. :~h~~~
.'.'" "
. );';!!;1:;~!1
" '. j ',~,
. "~';:;,\l
!;~~
:';'1
',,;::;1
::i:l.~?:}:
~ ~ .~ ~;i',: J~~~~;
.:\1
O-"'~Iifi&1jI
.~
-~-
\
~
EXISTING ROAD
ADANDOf.lED ROAD
FU1VRE ROAD
EXISTING l'tA TER FACILITIES
PROPOSED WATER FACILITIES
EXISTING SEWm FACILITIES
PROPOSED SEYlER
FACILITIES (ALT. 1)
PROPOSED SEWER
fACILITIES (ALT. 2)
PROPOSED SEWER
fACILITIES (ALT, :1)
o 500
C::;,,-
'"=1000'
1000 F'T
,
~,s,.12QrJ$Q~n~A<;~;-(j(rAI C:!
C 0 " S U l , I " Co {II I, 1" [ { , S
[lOUGlfERTY
IlESERVOIR
STOll AGE TAI.II(
4.0 1.1e; CAPACITY
;=-
SANTA I"TA JAIL
Cl
<(
o
n:. l!'
:'(
~ ~==_-,!.l'-' Srr{~I:T_~=~_~.~==,==~.('
BRoom
IJLVO
'"
:r,
~
.,
CI-IP
CAMP "ARKS n: I"
~ ~l :"( ~
g I:J a ~
1--'[--- r,.\lL~U!1.Sg" ,.:./ ~i ~ = = ~ ~
_ __ ___ 51h STI1En i:~ '!l) , 1/
I[ ~ - :~,:",~II~~~I ~'::I,,,,,,",,\,",I.J;
[===II="=~ ,== ~,= ._0. = =':~!,= = = L -- -- -.-!:'.~ J~ ~TrlEET
""";~:.'...~~!:~="",.='~=r~_",'"",,,",,,=~~ ~"""===-~",",,!L,'''\~,~,};,n~):i!;},l!~-,,,,~,:, - - -- .. - = =ANIMAL
/' '.,. ..".., ..... l:a~. ............... 2nd.STrlE.ET..iii ~ ~~~[~g~
Ii DUBLIN ,J II BLV[) Ji"'-- -~.~ ..' -' ~~l"" .-<
~ Cl ~ ..... ,.. .....
:r; II fJAfH I ~ r;:,
:- II PARKING I ii' U IIOMART
#' Sc:, ~ LOT <t. ~ DEVELOPMENT
P'" I,?~ ~ ~). 3(t 3D" lr," .'
~" ~ // 3D"; _
_ _ '\ ' ~.:-~__t~~~~~~~===-~_0 ~ -::;-{/ . r-"~""- ~~,~' ~
'..J ()X~=._-_. ---- . ~ ,;=~~:.1-.------. ~ . -_:='="-""""-'::~-=:_Oor-:=C~IIO-' - _r;-
}'
_J
.,
~
:l!
.,
m.EASOH
o R1 vt:
/
GLEASON
." '~_:
n:
'"
rj
:>
o
Cl
DUBLIN \
/
,;yo
li
.lJ;
"':
. '..,.~.. ._.u~.._ .".
....-. .... ..
(
J
/
!
o
C3
'"
DRIVE
BLVD'
-<
~
...,
<(
Vl
Vl
~
/
'!
~ r;;;ln~;i"l'~~o:m.~1fm'n~"""'~~
-FTGURE 3
-------.-1--
DUBLIN SAN RAMON
SEW ICES DISTRICT
PIlOPOSED HOMART DEVELOPMENT
WATER AND SEWEFI FACILITIES
fiGURE NUMBEf,
JOB NO,
"~-,
INITIAL STUDY
(ENVIRONMENTAL CHECXLIST FORM)
(Completed pursuant to city of Dublin
Environmental Guidelinesr section 1.~
APPLICATION NO.:
PA 94-001
I. BACKGROUND
1. Name, Address and Phone Number of Proponent: HomartConunun i tv
Centers
2. Agency Requiring Checklist: citv of Dublin
3. Name of Proposal, if applicable: Santa Rita Cowuercial Center
4.
Description of project:
A reouest to rezone 75 +/- acres
from pl2.nned DeveloDment - Business Park/Industrial (low
coveraGe) to a standard Planned DeveloDment. This Drolect has 2.
SDecific Plan Desionation of General Commercial. The oroDosed
Planned DeveloDment would allow for an 800.000 sGUare foot
commercial center which mav include retail shoDs. offices. movie
theatres and restaurants amonG other uses.
"
5
II.: .ENVIRONMENTAL IM~~TS (See Part III for disc~. jion of environmental
- ,
topics)
YES MAYBE NO SOURCE2
1.
X 1(3,6
X 1,3,6
X 1(3,6
X 1(3(6
X 1(3,6
X 1,3,6
X
1(3,6
EARTH. will the proposal result in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes of
geologic substructures?
b. Disruptions ( displacements, compaction or
over covering of the soil?
c. Change in topography or ground surface relief
features?
d. The destruction, covering or modification of
any unique geologic or physical features?
e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of
soils, either on or off the site?
f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach
sands, or changes in siltation( deposition!
or erosion which may modify the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake?
g.
Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, Dud
slides, ground failure( or si~ilar hezerds?
2. AIR. Will the proposal result in:
X
2,6
X
2,6
X
2(6
X
2,6
a.
Substantial air emissions of deterioration of
embient air quality?
b.
The creation of objectionable odors?
c.
Alteration of air movement, ~oisture or
temperature, or any change in climater either
locally or regionally?
d.
Construction or alteration of a facility
within one-fourth of a mile of a school which
might emit hazardous air emissions? If Yes,
school district must be consulted and must
be given written notification of the project
not less than 30 days prior to approval of
EIR or Negative Declaration (Pub. Res. Code
21151.4).
3. WATER. will the proposal result ~n:
X
2(6
a.
Changes in currents, or the course of
direction of water movements, in either
marine or fresh waters?
2Refer to appropriate note on page 12
b .
-".
II.. .ENVIRONMENT1':..L IM:" ..":TS (See Part III for discu ,ion of environmental
topics)
YES MAYBE NO SOURCE2
x
x
x
x
2,6
b.
Changes in absorption rates( drainage
patterns or the rate and amount of surface
water runoff?
x
2,6
c.
Alterations to the course or flow of flood
waters?
x
2,6
d.
Change in the amount of surface water in any
water body?
x..
2,6
e.
Discharge into surface waters, or in any
alteration of surface water quality,
including but not limited to, temperature,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
x
2,6
f.
Alteration of the direction of rate of flow
of ground waters?
x
2(6
g.
Change in the quantity of ground watersr
either through direct additions or
withdrawalsr or through interception of an
aquifer by cuts or excavations?
x
2(6
h.
Substantial reduction in the c30unt of
otherwise available for public water
supplies?
-'--C"'r"
we. '-__
v
.r..
2,6
i.
Exposure of people or property to water
related hazards such as flooding or tidal
waves?
x
1(3,6
a.
4. PLANT LIFE. will the proposal result in:
Change in the diversity of specles, or nu~ber
of any species of plants. (including trees,
shrubs ( grassr crops, and aquatic plants)?
Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of plants?
Introduction of new species of plants in a
barrier to the normal~replenishment of
existing species?
Reduction in acreage of any aqricultural
crop?
5. ANIMAL LIFE. will the proposal result in:
Change in the diversity of species, or
numbers of any species of ani~als {birds!
2Refer to appropriate note on page 12
x
b.
1,3,6
1,3(6
c.
1(3,6
d.
6
a.
i
:1;1., 'ENVIRONMENTAL IMPr._rS (See Part III for discus..d.on of environmental
topics)
YES MAYBE NO SOURCE2
x
x
x
x
6
land animals including reptilesr fish and
shellfish( benthic organisms or insects)?
b.
Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of animels?
x
6
c.
Introduction of new species of animals into
an arear or result in a barrier to the
migration or movement of animals?
x
6
d.
Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat?
x
lr2(3,6
6. NOISE. will the proposal result in:
a.
Increases in existing noise levels?
x
1,6
b.
Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
x
1,6
7. LIGHT AND GLARE. will the proposal produce
new light or glare?
8. LAND USE. will the proposal result in a
substantial alteration of the present or planned
land use of an area?
9. NATURAL RESOURCES. will the proposal result
in:
a.
Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
x
6
b.
Substantial depletion of any non-reneweble
natural resource?
x
6
10. RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve:
a.
A risk of an explosion or the release of
hazardous substances (includinq( but not
limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation) in the event of an accident or
upset conditions?
v
....
6
b.
possible interference with an emergency
response plan or an emergency evacuation
plan?
6
6
6
11. POPULATION. will the proposal alter the
location, distributionr density, or growth rate of
the human population of an area?
2Refer to app=opriate note on page 12
8
II. ENVIRONMENTAL 1MI-. _TS (See Part III for discu;.._J.on of environmental
t.opics)
YES MAYBE NO SOURCE2
X 6
X
l(6
X
1(6
X
6
X
1(6
X
l(6
x
2(6
X 2(6
X 2(6
X 2,6
X 2,6
X 2,6
X 2,6
X
2(6
X
2,6
12. HOUSING. will the proposal affect existing
housingr or create a demand for additional
housing?
13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION.
proposal result in:
will the
a.
.
Generation of substantial additional
vehicular movement?
b.
Effects on existing parking facilities( or
demand for new parking?
c.
Substantial impact upon existing
transportation and traffic systems?
d.
Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people and/or
goods?
e.
Alterations to waterborne ( rail or air
traffic?
f.
Increase in traffic hazards to motor
vehiclesr bicyclists or pedest~ians?
14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the preposal have a~
effect uponl or result in a need for new or
altered governmental services in any of the
following areas?
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
e. Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads?
f. Othe~ governmental services?
15. ENERGY. will the proposal result in:
a.
Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
b.
Substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources of energy or require the development
of new sources of energy?
2Refe= to appropriate note on page 12
9
,II. ,ENVIRONMENTAL IML_"::TS (S~e Part III for discu~::iion of environmental
topics)
YES MAYBE NO SOURCE2
16. UTILITIES. will the proposal result in a
need for new systems or substantial alterations to
the following utilities:
X 6 a. Power or natural gas?
X 6 b. Communications systems?
X 6 c. Water?
X ., 6 d. SetHer or septic tanks?
v 6 e. storm water drainage?
f>.
v 6 f. Solid waste and disposal?
...
17. HW...AN HEALTH. will the proposal result in:
X
6
X
6
X
1,3,6
X
1,6
X
1,2,6
X
1,2(6
b.
X
1(2(6
c.
X
1,2(6
d.
2Refer to appropriate note on page 12
a.
Creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
b.
Exposure of people to potential health
hazards?
18. AESTHETICS. will the proposal result in the
obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to
the public, or will the proposal result in the
creation of an aesthetically offensive site open
to public view?
19. RECREATION. will the proposel result in en
impact upon the quality or quantity of existing
recreational opportunities?
20. CULTURAL RESOURCES.
a.
will the proposal result'in ~~e alteration of
or the destruction of a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site?
Will the proposal result in adverse physical
or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric,
historic( or architecturally significant
buildingr structurer or object?
Does the proposal have the po~ential to cause
a physical change which would affect unique
ethnic cultural values?
Will the proposal restrict existing religious
or sacred uses within the pote~tial impact
area?
10
II~. ~NVIRONMENTAL IMPl'__'rS (See Part III for discussion of environmental
topics)
YES MAYBE NO SOURCE2
x
1(2,3,6
x
1(2,3,6
V
.L"\.
1(2,3,6
c.
x
1,2,3,6
d.
x
1(2(3,6
21. J.f.J....NDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a.
Does the project have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining
levelsr threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal communitYr reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminete inportent
examples of the major periods of California
history or prehistory?
b.
Does the project have the potential to
achieve short-term to the disedvantage of
long-termr environmental goals? (A short-
term impact on the environment is one which
occurs in a relatively brief( definitive
period of time while long-term impacts will
endure well into the future).
Does the project have impacts which are
individually limited but cumulatively
considerable? (A project B2Y impact en two
or more separate resources where the impact
on each resource is relatively small, but
where the effect of the total of those
impacts on the environment is significant).
Does the project have environme~tal effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings( either directly or
indirectly?
22. EIR REQUIRED BY STATUTE. Does the project
involve construction of any facility which burns
municipal waste or refuse-derived fuel? NOTE: If
the answer is yes( then an EIR must be DreDared
and certified under Public Resources Code secticn
21151.2(a) unless subsections (b) and (c) make
that section inapplicable. '
LRefer to appropriate note on page 12
11
-II.' ENVIRONMENTAL .L1"lr'ACTS (See Part III for disl,,;tlssion of
environmental topics)
YES MAYBE NO SOURCE2
III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (See attached statement)
IV. DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect
on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREP?~ED.
X I find that although the proposed project could have a
significant effect on the environment, there will not be a
significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures
described on an attached sheet have been added to the project.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment and an ENVIRON~ENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that state statute requires that an ENVIRONM~NTAL IMPAC~
REPORT be prepared and certified.
}J-'--. Ii
Signature
"7
Senior Planner
Title
Dennis H. Carrington
Printed Name
November 22 I 1994
Date
(1) Determination based on location of project.
(2) Determination based on staff office review.
(3) Determination based on field review.
(4) Determination based on the city of Dublin General Plan.
(5) Determination based on the city of Dublin Zoning Ordinance.
(6) Determination based on Eastern Dublin General Plan ?~endmen~ and
Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (consisting of the
DEIR dated August 28, 1992; Responses to Co~~ents Part I dated
December 7 ( 1992; Responses to Comments Part II dated December 21,
1992; Revisions to Part I of the Responses to Comments relating to the
Kit Fox; an Addendum to the DEIR dated May 4, 1992; and a DKS
Associates Traffic study dated December 15( 1992) (SCH91103064)r and an
Adendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report dated August 22(
1,9 9 4 .
(7) Not applicable.
(8)
2Refer to appropriate note on page 12
12
/~-...... ~,
ISSUES FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT
The following issues have been found not to be significant as is
indicated by a "No" response on the Environmental Checklist. The
development will not produce significant adverse impacts for the
following reasons:
1. Earth: The topography of the site is relatively level with
minor surface variation; only minor gradingr trenchingr and
compacting of soils is required to complete the building
foundationsr water mains, sewer linesr storm drains,-and
pavement. .No significant ground alteration will occur to produce
erosion or destruction of any unique features. No geologic
hazards are known or suspected to exist on the site or in
surrounding areas. Mitigation Measures of the Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report that will be
applied to this project in relation to this topic include
03.06/01.0; 03.06/02.0; 03.06/06.0; 03.06/07.0; 03.06/08.0;
03.06/11.0; 03.06/12.0; 03.06/14.0 - 03.06/16; 03.06/21;
03.06/25; andr 03.06/27, ~nclusion of these mitigation measures
and corresponding conditions of approval will mitigate any
impacts in this topic area to a level of insignificance
2. Air: The Santa Rita Commercial Center project is a
commercial development ( dependent upon automobile traffic and
therefore( automobile emissions will be generated. The FEIR
developed mitigation measures to reduce mobile and stationery
source emissions. certain uses that might include stationary
source emissions or objectionable odors will be required to
obtain a Conditional Use Permit, which would require additional
environmental review. Since the project is a Commercial Center it
will not be creating or causing any climatic changes regionally
or locally. Additionally, uses within the Center will not be
discharging hazardous emissions. Mitigation Measures of the FEIR
that will be applied to this project in relation to this topic
include 03.11/02.0 - 03.11/4.0; 03.11/06.0; 03.11/07.0;
03.11/08.0; 03.11/09.0; and 03.11/13.0. Inclusion of these
mitigation measures and corresponding conditions of approval will
mitigate any impacts in this topic area to a level of
insignificance.
3. Water: The project site does not cross over any water ways.
Although the project is adjacent to Tassajara creekr it is set
back at least 100 feet from the top of the bank. A Master
Drainage Plan for the entire Santa Rita Area is required to be
prepared pursuant to the Specific Plan. Therefore, any changes
in drainage patterns and flooding will be fully evaluated in that
Plan to ensure there are no environmental impacts in this topic
area.. DSRSD has indicated that they have water to supply the
project. AdditionallYr the minor trenching necessary for
improvements and construction of water utilities will not
interrupt or disturb any ground water flow. The FEIR contained
several mitigation measures which will be applied to this project
13
to mitigate any impacts in this area to a level of
insignificance as follows 03.05/44.0 through 03.05/55.0. Action
Programs 9T and 9U of the Specific Plan also mitigate these
impacts. .
4. and 5. Plant and Animal Life: The project site is covered
primarily with annual grasses and does not provide unusual or
high quality habitat for any species of rare or endangered
species of ,plants or animals. According to the FEIR the site is
not in a biologically sensitive arear nor has the area been under
cultivation in the recent past. Although the FEIR did not
identify the site as having any endangered species of plants or
animal life( certain mitigation measures of the FEIR and Action
Programs of the Specific Plan have been included for this
project. These measures and corresponding conditions of approval
have been included to either protect any species that meY be
discovered prior to or during construction or to protect
adjoining areas. The mitigation measures are: 3.07/01.0;
3.07/02.0j 03.07/03.03.07/05.0; 03.07/06.0j 3.07/07.0;
03.07/08.0; 03/07/09.0; 3.07/11.0 through 3.07/14.0j 3.07/16.0j
03.07/17.0j 03.07/18.0j 03.07/18.1; 03.07/19.0; 03.07/20.0;
03.07/21.0; 03.07/22.0; 03.07/26.0; 03.07/27.0 and 3.07/28.0.
The Action Programs are: 6A, 6E through GHr 6N and 60.
Inclusion of these mitigation measures and action progreIDs will
mitigate any impacts to a level of insignificance.
6. Noise: The noise impacts of potential projects in the
Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area were analyzed in the Eestern
Dublin Final Environmental Impact Report (IIFEIR"). The proj ect
would result in increases in existing noise levels but would not
result in the exposure of people to severe noise levels.
Mitigation measures of the Eastern Dublin Specific plan that have
been applied to this project as conditions of approval in
relation to Noise include 3.10/05.0 and 3.10/07.0. These
mitigation measures would reduce any noise impacts of this
project to a level of insignificance.
7. LIGHT AND GLARE: The project will produce new light or
glare. These impacts will be reduced to a level of
insignificance by incorporating signage which conforms to the
Sign Ordinance of the City of Dublin and the design of the
project which will orient the main entrances of structuresr and
signage at those entrances ( inward toward the parking lot.
Parking and associated lighting will be located in the center of
the project and will not be directly visible off-site due to
screening by buildings and landscaping and by the use of
luminaires which reflect light downward and not off-site. These
measures will reduce the impacts of light and glare ~f this
project to a level of insignificance.
8. LAND USE. The project does not have an impact to Land Use
because it does not have the following impacts as described in
Guidelines Section 15002(g):
.'f!
1"
."1'
..':;'.".
c'
...........-.
(
1 "','
a. The project will not disrupt or divide the physical
arrangement of an established community as there is no
established community and as the project is consistent with
the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and the Eastern
Dublin Specific Plan;
b. The project will not conflict with established
recreational, educational, religious, or scientific uses in
an area as there are no established recreational(
educational ( religious or scientific uses in the area and as
the project is consistent with the Eastern Dublin General
Plan Amendment and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan;
c. The project will not convert prime agricultural land to
non-agricultural land or impair the productivity of prime
agricultural land as the project is not located on prime
agricultural land; and
d. The project will not conflict with adopted environmental
plans and goals of the community where it is located andr as
a result, cause "substantial change in the physical
conditions which exist in the area affected by the proposed
proj ect" as the impacts of General commercial land uses in
the project location were addressed in the FEIR and as the
project is consistent with the Eastern Dublin General Plan
F~endment and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan.
CEQA Guidelines: Appendix I calls for an evaluation of potential
environmental impacts if a project would result in the
"substantial alteration" of the present or planned land use of an
area. "Substantial land use al teration" r however J is not in
itself considered a significant environmental effect by C~QA.
9. NATURAL RESOURCES. The project will not result in en
increase in the rate of use of any natural resources or result in
the substantial depletion of any non-renewable natural resource
because no natural resources or renewable natural resources will
be removedr used or depleted by the project.
10. RISK OF UPSET. The project will not involve a risk of an
explos~on or the release of hazardous substances in the event of
an accident or upset conditions because: 1) no hazardous
substances will be stored or handled in the proposed project; 2)
the application of mitigation measures from the FEIR of the
Eastern Dublin General Plan p~endment and Specific Plan as
conditions of approval, and 3) the application of Action Programs
of the Specific Plan as conditions of approval. The mitigation
measures are 03.04/01.0; 03.04/02.0; 03.04/04.0 through
03.04/13.0; 03.06/15.0; 03.06/16.0; and the action prograEs are
8Dr 8Er 8Gr 8H and 8J. The project will not involve the possible
interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency
evacuation plan because it does not physically impact either
Dublin Boulevard or Interstate 580 and therefore would not block
those roadways in the ev&nt of collapse of the project. These
15
,.-.....~ "',
(.?-
measures would reduce any impacts due to risk of upset of this
project to a level of insignificance.
11. POPULATION. The project will not alter the location,
distribution( density or growth rate of the human population of
an area because no humans inhabit the project site or will
inhabit the project site.
12. HOUSING. The project will not effect existing housingr or
create a demand for additional housing because no housing exists
on the project site or will exist on the project site and because
sufficient housing exists or will exist in the Dublin area for
employees ..of businesses within the project. The following
specific plan policies and action programs although not
applicable to this project because it is a commercial project and
not a residential project will encourage affordable housing:
policies 4-7 through 4-10 j and Programs 4F through 41. The
following specific plan policies and action programs will help
Dublin achieve and maintain a balance of jobs and housing:
policies 4-26 and 4-27 and Action Program 4K which will be a
condition of approval. These measures would reduce any impacts
to housing of this project to a level of insignificance.
13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. The project without mitigation
would result in the generation of substantial additional
vehicular movementj demand for new parkingj modifications to
existing transportation and traffic systems and alterations to
present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or
goods. These impacts are mitigated by measures incorporeted into
the attached Traffic Impact Analysis for the Regional Discount
Retail Center in Dublin California dated Novemberr 1994, and by
the following Mitigation Measures of the Eastern Dublin General
Plan Amendment and Specific Plan FEIR including an addendum to
the DEIR dated May 4, 1993 and an addendum to the FEIR dated
August 22, 1994j and Action Programs of the Specific Plan:
Mitigation Measures 03.03/01.0j 03.03/02.1 through 03.03/16.1
03.12/07.0j and Action Programs SA through 5D and 5G which are
incorporated as conditions of approval of the project. In
addition, a traffic Impact Study prepared for this project
addresses the specific impacts of the Santa Rita Commercial
Center. Mitigation measures of the Eastern Dublin General Plan
Amendment and Specific Plan FEIR and of the Traffic ,Impect study
are included as conditions of approval of the project and will
reduce impacts of the project to transportation/circulation to a
level of insignificance.
The project will not result in alterations to waterborne( rail or
air traffic because none of those facilities are near the
project. The project will not result in increases in traffic
hazards to motor vehiclesr bicyclists or pedestrians due to the
design of the project and incorporation of mitigation measures .
which reduces those impacts to a level of insignificance.
',r.
16
?
(
.'
14. Public Services: The Santa Rita Commercial Center will
require some of the improvements or service increases that were
planned for in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. Mitigation
measures of the FEIR required certain studies be performed to
determine service and improvement needs at the time of
development of projects. Therefore, service or improvements
relating to fire and police protection, schoolsr parks (
government services and facilities will be determined by these
studies. The studies are presently being performed and will be
completed prior to the City and Applicant entering into a
Development Agreement. Prior to any development occurring in the
Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Arear a Development Agreement is
required between the City and Applicant pursuant to the Eastern
Dublin Specific Plan. The Applicant's fair share of improvements
and increased service will be determined and contained in the
Development Agreement. Mitigation measures in the FEIR that will
be implemented as conditions of this project include: 03.12/05.0j
03.12/08.0j 03.04/02.0j ..03.04/04.0j 03.04/06.0 through
03.04/13.0j 03.04/16.0; 03.04/17.0; 03.04/18.0j 03.04/20.0;
03.04/21.0j 03.04/22.0; 03.04/23.0; 03.04/24.0; 03.04/28.0;
3.04/29.0j 03.04/34.0 through 03.04/37.0. 03.04/49.0j 03.04/50.0;
and( 03.04/51.0. Action Programs of the Specific Plan that will
be implemented as conditions of this project include 40j 8A
through 8E; 8Gj 8Hj 8Jj 8Kj and 8N. Inclusion of these
mitigation measures and actions programs and corresponding
conditions of approval will mitigate any impacts in this topic
area to a level of insignificance.
15. Energy: The development proposed is for a cOThuercial
center and wpuld not use substantial amounts of energy.
Mitigation measures 03.04/45.0 and 03.04/46.0 relate to
demonstration projects of cost effective energy conservation
techniques and the incorporation of energy conservation measures
into the design, construction( and operation of the development.
These mitigation measures and their corresponding conditions of
approval will mitigate any impacts in this topic area to e level
of insignificance.
16. utilities: The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan anticipeted and
planned for expansion of major utilities to the site. Although
expansion was plannedr as development occurs, the location of the
lines will have to be determined.
The Dublin San Ramon Services District (DSRSD) has been
developing plans to serve the Santa Rita Commercial Center with
potable water and wastewater services_ and has the wastewater
capacity to serve this project. Figure 3 is a copy of the
proposed alternative routes for these services. These routes are
generally consistent with schematic routes shown in the FEIR.
The alternatives would either locate lines within an area alreadY
disturbed by the BART construction project or replace existing -
lines within the public right of way. Although some of the
improvements are outside of the Specific Plan Arear they are in
areas that are not environmentally sensitive because they are
17
~
r> "-. ,
located in disturbed areas . Additionally r the improvements
located within the Specific Plan Area are not indicated as
biologically sensitive in the FEIR. DSRSD will be required to
adhere to mitigation measures located in the FEIR to ensure that
no significant environmental impacts occur. These Mitigation
Measures are referenced at the end of this section of the Initial
study and also within other sections of this Study.
The FEIR also considered solid waste, power and natural gasr
water, sewerr septic tanks and storm water drainage and developed
mitigation measures to ensure environmentally sensitive provlslon
of these services. The city's site Development Review procedure
coordinates review of the site with the various utilities. At
that time( locations of structures and utilities will be more
clearly defined. Mitigation Measures were included in the FEIR
to ensure that the extension of DSRSD and other services would
not create significant environmental impacts. Inclusion of the
following implementing actions( action programs and mitigation
measures from the FEIR, and corresponding conditions of approvalr
will mitigate any impacts to utilities to a level of
insignificance: Specific Plan Implementing Actions 11.2.10 and
11.3.3j Action Programs 6E through 6Ij 8H; 8Kj 8L; 9A through 9C;
9E through 9X; and Mitigation Measures 03.04/09.0; 03.04/37.0j
03.04/40.0; 03.04/41.0; 03.04/42.0; 03.04/43.0; 03.04/44.0;
03.05/01.0; 03.05/02.0; 03.05/03.0; 03.05/04.0; 03.05/05.0;
03.05/07.0; 03.05/07.1; 03.05/08.0j 03.05/09.0; 03.05/11.0 -
03.05/14; 03.05/20.0 - 03.05/28.0; 03.05/30.0 - 03.05/35.0;
03.05/37.0 - 03.05/39.0j 03.05/44.0 - 49.0; 03.07/09.0 through
03.07/12.0; 03.07/14.0; 03.07/17.0; 03.11/13.0j 03.12/03.0 and:
03.12/08.0.
17. Human Health: The project consists of primarily vacant land
that was previously developed with the Santa Rita Jail Facility.
In the southwest corner of the siter adjacent to Hacienda Drive
are the partial remains of the Madigan Building( which was a
portion of jail facility. A portion of the Madigan Building was
removed during the construction of Hacienda Drive. "However,
building surveys have indicated that the remaining portion of the
building contains asbestos. Removal of the building will be
completed prior to construction on the site. Standard building
demolition practices require that removal of asbestos be
undertaken in a manner that will not endanger either the general
public's health nor that of the construction workers.
The site also had two underground storage tanks that have been
removed. Alameda County Environmental Health monitors the site
for a period of time after the removal of the tanks. At the
present timer the monitoring period has not been completed. As
part of the site Development Review process, staff routinely
coordinates between the reviewing agencies to ensure that the
monitoring process is completed prior to issuing building permits
over the area. In general ( co~~ercial land use does not pose any
significant risk that substances and/or machinery stored will
create or expose people t~,health hazards. The list of permitted
18
and conditional uses has been designed so that there would not be
any impacts to human health from the development.
Mitigation Measures of the FEIR and Action Programs of the
Specific Plan and corresponding conditions of approval that would
apply ,to this area are as follows: 03.04/03.0; 03.04/05.0 thrQugh
03.04/09.0; 03.05/01.0; 03.05/03.0; 03.06/15.0; 03.06/16.0;
03.1010~_Q,.L03.10/07.0; 03.11/03.0; 03.11/07.0; BE; 9P and 9Q.
Inclusion of these mitigation measures will mitigate any impacts
in this topic area to a level of insignificance.
18G Aesthetics: During the site Development Review processr the
site plan and elevations are reviewed for many items, including
aesthetics. The City of Dublin has in place site Development
Review:~Guidelines for use by the Applicant in the design of the
project. Additionally( the project layout has been designed so
that 'scenic vistas will not be blocked from 1-580. Mitigation
Measures-~T the FEIR and Action Programs of the Specific Plan and
corresponding conditions of approval that will apply in this area
are 'as';:follows: 03.04/43.0; 03.07/06.0; 03.07/08.0; 03.08/07.1j
03.08/08.0; 03.08/08.1j 6R and 6Q. Inclusion of these mitigation
measures will mitigate any impacts in this topic ar~a to a level
of insignificance.
19. Recreation: Commercial developments are exemp~ Iron the
requirements of the Subdivision Map Act related to parkl2.!1d
dedi~atlDn or payment of fees in lieu thereof. However, the
improvement of parkland( open space and open space trail systems
is not'restricted to residential development. The city is
preparing several studies that will identify community needs and
costs.~ The studies will examine improvements under this topic
arear among others. Policies in the General Plan and Specific
Plan require that development pay its fair share of costs to
maintain the sane levels of service presently in place in the
city .':Therefore, after the studies are completedr impact fees
will.~l?e....:ascertained and costs will be included in the Development
Agreement. As noted above( in section No. 14, a Development
Agreement is required to be entered into between the City and
applicant. This is a requirement of the Specific Plan.
Mitigation Measures of the FEIR and Action Programs of the
Specific Plan and corresponding conditions of approval that would
apply iri this area include: 03.04/20.0 - 03.04/24.0j 03.04/28.0j
03.04/29.n; 03.04/34.0j 03.04/35.0; 03.04/36.0j 03.07/13.0j 4P;
6Aj 6B ;~6G j and 9V. Inclusion of these mitigation.:..measures will
mitigate any impacts in this topic area to a level of
insign:t:fi.cance.
20 . CULTURAL RESOURCES. The proj ect will not result in the
alteration of or the destruction of a historic or historic
archaeological site. The Project will not result in adverse
physical'. or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric, historic, or
architecturally significant buildingr structurer or object. The
project does not have the potential to cause a physical change
which would affect unique",ethnic cultural values. The project
..'
19
.--
...,< '0,
"
will not restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area. These impacts will not occur because of
Mitigation Measures of the Eastern Dublin General Plan ~~endment
and Specific Plan FEIR and an Action Program of the Specific Plan
have been incorporated as conditions of approval of this project.
Those Mitigation Measures and Action Program are as follows:
Mitigation Measures 03.09/01.0 through 03.09/06.0 and Action
Programs,-:6P_.and 7E.
Mandatory Findings of significance
(a.): As discussed throughout the checklist formr but
specifical,ly under the headings "Animal Life" r "Plant Life", and
"Cultural Resources", the project will not substantially degrade
the quality of the environmentr reduce the habitat of a plant or
animal;:;pecies or eliminate important examples of California
histori or,.prehistory.
'......
(b. ): .All potentially significant environmental impects can
be mitigated to reduce both the long term and the short term
environmental impacts below a level of significance. A
description of the mitigation measures is listed below.
. (c.): All potentially significant cumulative enviro~ental
impacts have been addressed in the FEIR.
(d..}: .. .As discussed under the headinq of "Risk of
Upset/Hum'an Health" r the Commercial land lises that have the
potential. for the storage, handling and use of potentially
hazardous substances are subject to the requirements of the
Uniform Fire Code( Uniform Building Code, and the Alamede County
Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Plan. No business
licenses are issued to these business types until all
requirem~nts have been satisfied.
/ 94 001I~_'..
-"'............:::r..
,
, ,
20
:. ,-
IT. NO.:
.../'~"-
,;:-:+
HOMART PROJECT MATRIX
LEGEND
(Item Number)
MIT. MEAS. NO.: (Hi tigation Measure Number per Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan)
ACT. PROG. NO.: (Action Program Number per Eastern Dublin specific
Plan)
LEAD: (city Department with primary responsibility)
PW
PL
REC
CM
PO
DRFA
'public Works
Planning
Recreation and Community services
City Manager
Police
Dublin San Ramon Fire Authority
WHAT IS THE ACTION OR MEASURE: (A capsule summary or a task that
needs to be completed. For a complete description" see the Eastern
Dublin . General Plan Amendment" Specific Plan" Final .EIR and Mitigation
Monitoring Program.)
ST1\RT lEND:
PREZ
ANNE
REZO
TMAP
FMAP
BLDP
SDR
CONT
FIIO
GRAD
TBD
(When work on the action should begin; end)
Prezone
Imnexation
Rezone
Tentative Map
Final Map
Building Permit
site Development Review
Continuous
Final Inspection/occupancy
Grading Permit
To be Determined
NA: (The Action or Measure is not applicable to the Project)
PROJ: (The Action/Measure is part of the Project)
COND: (The Action/Measure is a Condition of Approv..al)
ASAP: (The Action/Measure needs to be addressed as soon as possible)
ACTION TAKEN: (A capsule su~~ary of the action taken or that needs to
be taken regarding the task)
COMPLETED: . (Project Planner to enter 1) date" 2) initials" and 3) any
comments after the task is completed)
ISSUE: (Identifies the general topic of the task)
, /.1
.'
'.fnSKS REL1\TI!:D TO S1\NT1\ RITn COHHERCInL CENTER SOHTED BY HITI01\TIOIl HE1\SUHE tltlHDER, t10VEHDER 9, 1994
E1\STEHtI DUDLItI GEtlEHnT. PLntl nHEllDHEtlT/ SPECIFIC PUN
HITIGnTION HEnSUHES/nCTIOIl PHOGHnHS/IHPLEHI!:NT1\TION HEnSUHES
,,'
'."!'{~ C1.t:y needs to further analyze potential
tlllP':j.Lc financing'techniques ouch as 1\ssessment
O~ ~~tlo Hooo Districts, Lighting, landscape
""<I Haintenance Districts or Geologic Hazards
~batement Districts.
nLLJl'
The applicant is financing his own
infrastructure and has not asked the
City for public financing assistance,
The city is analyzing public financinij
techniques and as development occurs in
the east area( will work with individu~l
applicants or groups of applicants, if
requested, to provide information and
aosistance in this area.
X Write l_tter to school district.
";!i;/'~'
"';'"2,.
~. '~~rf) .
, ' :'i;ir;dr.H\
ad
- . !.. '. '"
fjjf'Elncourage tl1(1 school t1ist~ rt;:t (s l to \lae best PI1EZ
~f!o~.s tb qualify for and obtaih state funding 1\NNE
assistanoe for the con9tru~tlon of new schoolo.
[it:' Dsltatop hou9ing and employment monitoring 'flil\P
programs. SDR
IVA8
4K
eOt-I'r
- x X 'l'he City ..hould set up a mon toring
program. 1\ condition will require
provision of employment information by
employers.
:IS3
a. Track residential growth in terms of unit
type and price categories.
b. Track employment generating uses in terms
of nUmber, type, and salary level of
employees in the planning area.
PL Prepare summary of implementation programs to COWl'
asaist developmenc applioacions
CONT
X This matrix implements this mitigation
measure.
VIVA1 . :,:,.' Ii ,....., ...\.
. .~, ::..~!~~j:~~i~~;
6
ClI
Work w th developers at freeway interchanges
to provide park and ride lots. Parking locs
will provide a minimum Qf 100 pal:'lting spaces
and will include ligh~ihqand landscaping.
Encourage local merchants to participate in
pl:'ogramming and marketing special events in
public areas, such as o~en air markets, weekend
or lunch time concerts and seasonal
celebrati.ona.
FI/O
CON'l'
x
Park and Ride should be located on west
side of Hacienda per Eascern Dublin
Specific Plan.
7E
TH1\P
son
COWl'
x
city Manager needs to send a letter to
the Chamber of Commerce.
:::',:;;
5
SH
PW
1.
'I..
~J
TJ\SKS RELJ\'rED TO SJ\NTJ\ RITJ\ COHHERCIJ\I, CENTER SOWl'!':D BY HITIGJ\Tlotl H!':l\SURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
El\STERll DUBI,HI OEH!':RJ\T, PLI\Il l\HI~llDM!':NTI SPECI1"IC PI.I\N
MITIOI\TIOll HEI\SUR!':S/J\CTION PROOnl\MS/IHPL!':HEtlTJ\TIOIl M!':J\SURES
..,
neq\lil:'e review and approval of the following as nEZO FI/o X
a condition of pl:'oject approval for applicable THl\P
project" in eastern Dublin: son
al Public transit:; route and phanin') plnn, to be
prepared in consultation with LJ\VTJ\.
bl Bus turnouts and transit shelters, in
consultation with L1\VT1\.
cl Pedestrian paths between transit stops and
bui.ldfng entrances.
9W PW l1equire the cleve lop<"; t:o obI;" in PZ:OPf:H: snn 1>1/0 X
apr"oval.D for storm drnlnllgo.
41' HE ~Iorlt with the East: Day l1egional park9 l>int:,:ict: 'nll\t' l"HI\I' -XX
to provide etaging areas in the Speci.fic Plan
aI:'GI...
S1\ PH Submit detailed development: plans that include THl\P Flil\t' XX-
the atandarde for arterial st:reete, collector son DT.f)P
streets, residential streets, and industrinl
roads.
see P. 137 of Specific Plan to develop
conclJ.t:J.on.
Dogin working wit:h EDnPD re Dtaging area
ro<]u.lrcffient for this aite. Writ..
condit:ion reI cooperat:ion with EDI1PD in
thi.o rocene.
Part: of SDn Proceos. l1equiro condition.
VX7 .
IISl
;\{":,;:, '.,;;
.1
._\
./
2
1'nSI<S IlEI./\Tlm TO SnNTn nIT/\ COf.lHEnCI/\T. ClmTIm sonTED ny HrrIGnTION HEnsun" NllI-!n"n, NOV!':HnEIl 9, 1994
!':1\ST"1lI1 DunT,nl GI;NEnnT. pr.nll I\I.mllIlJ.mWl'/ SI'!':CII'IC l'1.nll
IHTIG1\'XIOll HI;nSUIlI;S/1\CTIOll pnOGIl1\I-IS/IHP1."HlmT1\TIOll H!':1\SUnES
l'Lnl~t}'.Il,re revie\o1 and app....oval of the following
ql~mcnts as part of the application for
~rqp8~ed developments in eastern Dublin:
ft: Clear and detailed identification of all
potential open space areas.
b. Clear and detailed description of the
purpose and/ or function of open space areas
nnd their relationship to other open space
.reas bpyond the development of these a~cas;
prppoded treatment (i.e., restoration,
l"evegetal:ion, etc. ) of thesEl a rea"; p.;opofJnd
foaintonance and cm~rgency access provi.oj.ona;
the proposed ownership of open apace arElas; and
the respon9ibility for theit" managelOqnt and
maintenance.
c. Negotiated agreements with any public
agencies that arc going to acquire, manage,
and/ or maintain open apace as a result of the
project, or when private entities will be
responsible for open space managElment and
maintenance, a detailed set of codes,
covenants, and restri,ctions lLe., CC&!l' !I) that
set forth maintenance and management standards
and, responsibilities.
d. Review of open space plans by the City PD
and fire deparl:menta and other applicable
lIQencios le.g., Dept. of Flah & Game, Zone 7,
etc.) to ena\lre compatibility with their
_ stan~~!l~I?ract,ices.
PH Determine the appropriate f\lnc\i.nC) IlHH:IHlni'J1l\ln)
for on Q0109 loaintenance of opel\ apnea oreau.
rmzo
THIIP
SOH
TasOJajara Creek is not a part of this
project. The Development IIgreement
oho\lld provide for agreement with
1I1ameda county that when development
occurs to the east all specific plan
measures relating, improvement of
Tassajara Creek should be required.
City should begin coordinative effort
ensure that (c) occurs and that open
npacc pinna are reviewed.
to
ro.,,_
6C'
PI. lleCj\lire open apace iand.. that: OCCIIl; within ,
development project be restricted to permanent
open space, with binding agreements established
\4ith the city of O\lbU.n to permanently pc'otect
!]llch ilt"cas.
---.-----
In:zo F'H!\P X 'l'nfJUn:inL"il Cr:ock io not n Pill-t. of the
'l'HIII' nl..1l1' project; thet'eeoc"e, the project doeD
~!2n_ ___,_ ..__ _ _ _ .1:.!!!:.!J2!.!!!~!}L~p'en !!~/lce.
HP.ZO 1'11111' X 'l'i1"saj/lc'a C':Elok 1D not a paL'l: of the
'l'HI\P II('DI' pL"oject; thorefore, the project does
SDn inclUde any open space.
111112
60
not:
II 11\3
not:
J
6B
61
6J PH
01 PL
9T\ P~I
~P\oI
9E PL
11. 3 CH
';1,'
4C PL
\':.1
'1'n51<5 HELnTED TO SnllTn' HI'.rn COmmHClnr. CEIITEll SOH'1,'ED BY l-lITlCn',nOIl HEnSllllE IIUHlllm, Il0VElmER 9, 199<1
EnSTERN DUIlLIll CENEHJ\L PLntl nHI~IIOHENT/SPEClF'lC PI.nll
MlTlCJ\TlOll HEnSURES Il\CTlOll PROCRl\HSI I HPLEHENTl\TlOll HEl\SURl!:S
1'[. rl;;KPlore optiono for ownership and management of
I ar.ea!.l oet aaJ.de ao open space.
~. Encourage the Eaot !Jay Regional Park
DLstrictto accept ownership of the Taooajara
I CJ:'eek open apace corrJ.dor.
b. Nork with the Park Oiotr1ct to develop
guidelines for management and uses in open
space areas.
PH Negotiate the level of flood control
improv.ements needed ~Iith Zone 7 to meet
di$tr.ict standards nnd r 19htso fwny r.,,'1" irement"
and maintenance responoibilities.
Establioh a landocape maintenance c.lilltt"ict or
other equJ.valent mechanism to cover the
longterm costs of maintaining publJ.c facilJ.tieo
(J..e., trails, benches, etc.) along the stream
corrJ.dors.
Ensure that nn asoeoornent disl:t:ict, homeowner!]
asoociation, or some other mechaniom is in
place that will provide regular longterm
lOa intcanance of the \lrbanL-2e!!.!!-!!El\ce l,nter. E nce.
T\equire developero to obtain proper approvaln
for wastewater service.
Require the aeveloperto obtain proper approval
for water oervlce.
DSRSD standards. nequire, that des J.gn and
construction of all water' and recycled water
system facility lmprovements be in Ilccorclance
",ith Dsnso policien, otnndzu:do, l1nd lUaotet:
_plnns.
Prepare and adopt a Haoter Oevelopment
1\gracrncnt: no n format:. for all fut:uJ;"Q
develo~~r.eemenl:1l
Place a planned development district overlay
zone on the entJ.re planning area.
nEZO
THill'
son
FHIII'
OLDP
THill' F l.l/\P X X
SOR OLDP
THill' ["H1\1' x--
SDH OI,OP
IlI~ZO HI 1\ I' x
'1'Hnp
')'H1\I' 1."HII1' ---X-
son llLPP
'1'11111' FMi\'P---Y
SOR OLDP
TH1\[, FH"i\P---T
SDT\ GRIIO
PllEZ
1\ tlllI;:
nr:zo
PllEZ
I'IlEZ x
I\lINfo:
llf:ZO
-[,jil';7,- -- x -
i\
x X 1I1though Tassajara Creek is not a part
of the project, the City needs to begin
diocussJ.ons with the various agencies
regarding development and ownership.
IIdditionally, J.n the development
agreement need to're~lire dedication and
development when property to the east
develo s.
Zone 7 is a reviewing agency on the
project. Staff needs to continue
wor.kJ.ng with them in thio area.
Tascajara Creek is not a part of this
project. 'l'he City will begin worlcing on
a maintenance financing plan when
lmprovement of the stream corridors
occUrS and maintenance needs are known.
Project J.s not in the foothills - area
of conCSrn 1n the specific Plan.
\~t'1tG con<lll:ion aOllllint..nt \.itll chart on
p. 136 of SpGCific Plan.
Hrite condition aonsiotent with Chart on
1'.135 of sEecif1c Plan.
Condition that infrastructure conforms
to policies.
'I'he Cit:y hao Ilpproved a Haster
Development: 1\gl:eemenl:..
'I'hi.s project includes a rezone to a PO
and wi.ll therefore meet the intent of
ole.
1IIA6
1UBS
IIIB6
IVC9
VD2
VR7
)
VIlIAl
IA2
(
T1\SKS Rr:;TJ1\TED TO S1\IIT1\ RIT1\ COHH!':IlCI1\L CENTEIl SOllT!':O ny HITIC1\TIOlI HE1\SlJIlE IIlJHOEIl, IIOVEHOER 9, 1994
E1\STERN DunLIN OENEIl1\L PL1\N nHEIIDHENT/SPECIFIC PL1\N
HITIC1\TION HE1\SURES/1\CTION PIlOCIl1\HS/IHPLEHENT1\TION HE1\SURES
applications for consistency
1\irport P~otection 1\rea.
71\ pi:'; Bst;;abliah nesi']n Review ']llidclineo a"d
procedures and asni']n review renponoibilit;;ieo
for. projects proposed in eastern Dublin.
78 PL Require development applicants to aubmit, at a
minimum, the following materials for review:
Existing, Condition Map(s), Design Concepts,
Site-Plans (Preliminary & Final), nuilding
_ Deoiqn, and Special Concerns.
7C I'TJ Eot:abli.ah a Haster 5I:r081:0c"p" Plan for. 1:110
Town Center Commerci.al area. to j,nclude I:lIe
followin'] elemenl:s: otreet t;;ree planting plan,
paving standards, lighting atandardo, ai']na']o
standards, and amenities otandarde.
70 I'L Establioh a working relationship with
developers in the Town Center to encourage
join\> development of public parking lots and
_~es by area merchants and the City.
11.0 PL Hequire more opacific Planned DevelopmrHlt (I'D)
2.07 plans, Deoi']"s, sequencing, miti']ation
measures, etc.
11.2 PW nequire infrastructure sGquencing progralll as
.10 part; of PUblic Improvement Plans to allow
orderly devGlopment; throllghollt; spGclfic plan
area. nend, lIewer, wa\.:"!r, drnlnagG and o\:hor
ut1.1itl.oo shnll be pr1.orl.t1"oc\ IIn<l 1n place
prlor to opecl,fl.c levels of c\eve1.o~ellt.
PilE?
pn!':z
x
plmz
/lNNE
llE?O
[;nil X-
ICl
'1.'he City 0 S1te Development RGview
Guidelineo follows procedures identified
in this Act1.on when reviewing Planned
Develo ments and SDn /I 1ications.
These requirements are part of the
application requirements for Planned
Developments.
PREZ
REZO
son x
IC2
1'1l1~Z
IlF.ZO
'I'h \,.., pl:oject io l.ocnted 1.11 I:hOll Ill\ciondll
Gateway /lroll.
nnn X
:tC3
I'n!':z
llEZO
This project io located ill the Ilacienda
Gateway area.
SDIl X
IC4
I'lmz
IlE Z 0
---
TI-IIlP X
SOil
1
Thl.., project includes a I'D llezone and
the applicant; waD required to Dllbmit "
specific 1nformat;ion as required for
that; t;ype of a1'1'11ca\>10n,
The dGvelopment: agreement: .."d
improvement plano will contain t;he
i1CllC]lIencing pro<;lr..m.
PRI~Z
1\NN1~
REZO
'1.'1-1/11' X-
son
2
,-
.'
Tl\SKS HELl\TED TO Sl\IlTl\ nITl\ COf.lf.lEnCI1\L CEllTEn SOIl'.l'En BY f.lI'.rIGl\TIOll HEl\SllHE llllHIlEIt, NOVEHIlEIt 9, 1994
I':l\STI':RN DllllLnl Ol':lmHl\L PLl\1I 1\HEIIDHI':IlT/SPECIFIC PLI\II
IUTIGl\TIOII HI!:l\SllRI!:S/1\CTIOII PROGRIIHS/IHPI,EHEIIT1\TIOII HlmSllRES
1\1 PL
., .n._ zoning
HI?.. I.se regulation" to meet E:aster.n P!1EZ 'I'Hl\1' X 1\) Not applicable, the project is not in 11\1 "
publin plan" and policie". 1\NNE snn tho campufJ oEfice area.
nEZO
11: nevioe zoning regulation" to permi.t (1) The Santa Rita area combines many '.
I b:>91dential lIlle" in Campll" OEElce de"ignated uses. 1\lthough this project is not a .-':
;:areas ~Ihen development is conoi"tent with "mixed use" project, it will have nearby G'!
!.lr,ecific Plan and does not reoult in adver.se residential uses..
..nvironmental impacts or eervice impacts. n::
b. Dev:elop Commercial Mixed Use zoning that
accoml)1odates a mi.x of retail oEEl.ce, nOl-vi.ce,
llnd reoLdentinl U"OIl in the tleighboJ:hnod and
Cleneral Commercial dl;loignated at'"caa of nnul:er.n
Dubl.1.n.
Promote development agJ:eemento to l:hill: 'I'H1\1' - X - '1'ho p"ojcct incl.ucJc9 developmcnt.:.
enuut'u I'IU,Z a 11\,3
project 1.B conoiotent with Specific Plan 1\1l1/I:: SI)1l. nCJreemenl:.
policies and la'ld uoe proq."am. nEZO
X - -
DeveloL' an incluoionary houoing program which 199'1 TH1\1' Thl.s J.s a commercial project, not: IBl
requires a minimum percentage of all approved son reoidentJ,lll.
unito to be affordabla to vary low, low, and .'
moderate income households.
Explore poseibJ.lity of establishing in lieu 1991\ 'l'HI\P X - - 'I'his relnte9 to reoLdential pr:ojects 1B2
an
fee Bupporting below marleet rate hOllainC] SDH
development. .
Develop Bpecific numeric goal fo" percentage 1991\ X - - ThLs relates to housing and 184
a '1'/11\1' not:.
of affordable unit" in eaBtern DubU.n which son commercinl developments .
ahould be ownership unit".,' -aD oppoBod to rontal
units. -- - -
!1equlre appll,cant" to demonstrate that p"opooed PH!': 7- TH1\1' X The wr:J.tten statement and p."oposal 1F8
developm.mt13 are J.n conformance >I.lth the 1\t/N8 son i.nclude infor:mntion that indicates the
Eaotern Dublin Specific Plan poU.cien nne1 T..nlld IU;7,O pt'oject ls in confOL~mance with the
_~LEr.oQE.~~!!.' .._--~_.._- -- - -- -- _~P~.9.l:Q~!~~.!"I
I,,, tilb 1 J,nh l\ bic;ycle cJ.rcuJ.ut.lcJll nynl;em 1:0 hcdp 1'111';7. '1".11\ l' l( X 1\ bUee lnnc ., .i.l, 1 be pJ:ov.i.c1e<l Oil Dublin Irel
oer,va the neod (:or: nonmot:orJ.zed t: ):n no pOI:"t: n l: ion I\flllf: snit llo\llav8J~d. IIdaC]lIllte oetbac)e nreas are
and recroation in Dublin. Hl,ZO provl,ded 610ng the Creele for a future
tr.a.ll. 1\ condl.tion will, r.equire bicycle
__ __ _ _ _l:.!'.E]e i.!~ r:nci.li.tl.c!I nt: the project.
I\[J
I\J
I\L
~ Pi:'"
I\F PI..
I\e P""L
I\A PI,
~r;w
()
SC
SE Pf..
SF
9S PL
9F PL
9V PL
9X PL
4H PL
Tl\SKS RELI\TED TO SI\NTI\ RITI\ COHHERCII\L CENTER SORTED DY MITIGI\TION MEI\SURE NUHDER, NOVEMDER 9, 1994
EI\STERN DUDLIII OElIERI\L PLI\N I\HE1IDHENT/SPECII'IC PLAN
MITIGATION MEI\SURES/I\CTIOlI PROGRAMS / IMPLEMENTI\TION' HEI\SURES
~~ 'Require applicants to submit a detailed
pedestrian circulation plan. The plan ohall
include the foLlowing components: Taosajara
Creek Trail, Staging Area and Trailheads and
sidewalks.
Revise the city's existing zoning ordinance as
needed to allow flexible parking standards in
eastern. Dublin.
Requ~re the siting of wastewater system
infrlstructure to be consistent with the
Resource Hanogement Policioo of the Specific
Plan.
Require tho siting of water system
infrastructllre to be conaiatent with the
Reaource Management policies of the specific
Plan.
Coordinate modifications or enhancements to
creeks or the abutting ripsrian areas with the
re uired ermittin a enciea as necessar .
Require the siting of storm drainage
infraotructurs be conoistent with the Resource
Management policies of the Specific Plan.
Develop a monitoring program that will track
residential growth in Dublin in terms of unit
type and price categories.. Such a program will
provide City decisi6n-makers with data
necessary to make informed decisions rolating
to c\.t:y !\ollo.l.n</ g.oals and clevc.l.o~!:9.~~:'
PREZ
IINNE
RE7.0
PJ1EZ
ANNE
REZO
PREZ
liNN!;:
RE7.0
PIU~Z
ntlNE
REZO
PHEZ
IINNE
nEZO
['nE7.
IImm
liE 7.0
1994
THill'
!inn
THAP X
SDJ1
TI1l\P -X-
son.
'['l.lll\, -7
son.
'l'1.!IIP -7
SDR
'1'!11\P -x
son
'1'11111' X
son
7
X
The I'D Rezone & SDJ1 will include review
of pedestrian transit facilities along
Dublin nlvd. The Creek is not a part of
this project but buildings will be
setback 150' from the Creek to allow for
future trail desi n.
The proj~ct includes a PO Rezone which
establishes specific parking standards
for this project.
Write condition of approval.
Condition that infraat:.rllctllre conforms
to policieo.
IIny modificationa to the Creek will be
required to go through the appropriate
ermlttin a encies.
storm drainoge infrastructure shall be
designed in conjunction with zone 7 and
wl.ll, be conoiatent with these 1'011.cie'",.
Zone 7 is a reviewing aqency.
This relatea to housing and not
commerdial developments
"
IIC4
IIEl
VA?
VR6
VX6
vxa
'.
)
03.01
/01. 0
03.03
/01. 0
03.03
04.0
03.03
_ /05.0
03.03
/06.0
03.03
/07.0
TJ\SKS llELJ\TED TO SJ\ll'.r1\ llIT1\ COI.lr.t811CII\L CEllTEll SOIlTlm ny llI'I'IOI\TION HEI\StJllE lllJl1nEll, llOVEH13En 9, 1994
l':I\STP.:lllI DtJlII.III (Jl':lmnI\L 1'r.1\1I J\HlmfH.mll',r/sp!':CII"IC 1'1,1\11
HITIGJ\TION 1.fE1\5tJlll':S / I\CTIOII pnOGllJ\I.IS/ Il11'r.!':Hl':llTI\TION Hl':I\SUnl':S
n.5~lve potential land use conflicts between
~~civiti.co at Camp l)nr)cs aflcl propooQ(1 tl0Cn J.n
C~c Project. area.
so
a. Establish a liaison committee between
the City and the Army.
b. Establish a schedule for periodic
meetings to discuss and provide
updates on planning and development
flf,fOrts Hithin the Project si.te and i,n
Camp Parlc9.
c. Provide the base commandor ",;,l:h a copy
ot new davelopment appl.J.clltJ,ollo
IHljacent 1;0 Camp l'arlcD for rovio"' ..n.1
comm13nt:..
PH Caltrano in coopernt.ion wit.h local
jurisdictione could construct auxLliarry lanes
on 1-5130 bet.ween Taoeajara noad and Fallon Road
to provide a t.otal of 10 lanee in that oecl;ion,
coneistent with the Coltrane Rout.e Concept
Re~ort tor 1-580.
PH Establish n Tranoport.at.ion Syot.emD /'Iallagcmenl:
(TSH) l'roCJr:am.
PH 1\seist in the funding of improvement.s to
reqional transportation system.
PH 1\ssist in funding the conetruction of auxiliary
lanes on 1580 between Tllssajara and Air:way
boulevard...
P~I Est:ablioh funding for conet:ruct.ion of fut.ure
_ ~L I6130 Intercllan~e i~provemelll:o.
PH Est:abli..h funding for const.ruct.ion of auxiliary
_ ~~~!' 1-500 east: of AJ.rway nlvd.
PH l':n:;J\I):"c t:hu f:\lndJ.ng nod COt\fJt:ruct:1.()1l 01:
improvements t:o the Dougherty Road/ Dllblin
nlvd. intersection as needed.
PH Provide improvement:s that will prevent
cOllgestJ.on on the Qust:bound offl:ampo ["om 1500
at. lIacJ.endn or.lvc.
---
CONT
'1'he city is doi.ng all item.. on a
cont:1.nno\.1o bnsis.
IE1
COI'l'!'
x
THill'
son
-x-
Traffic study will eXamine thio isoue.
Payment of fee will be made a condit:ion
of approval..
nr..D['
---
'l'he CJ.t:y adopted a '1'HO whl-cll wou.td apply
___ to t:his '-0 ect..
X Part of traffic study and requirement
___~p"yment: ot fee.
X Part of tratfic otudy and requirement
for payment. of fee.
'1'HIIP nr..op -X- Part of t:raffic ot:lIdy and requirement
SDn ___ for ~y-ment. of fee.
'1'HII[, IILUP X Part of l:1:affic study and requi,'ement
_~l?~ ____ _ _ _ _ ....!2EJ?~y.~..!!nt o,f tee.
Tf.11\P "I,DI' X Pill~t. of. t.t'nf:f:i.c atudy and l:cC]\1iecT1lQnt
son COI'I'1' for payment 0 f fee.
['1/0 <':01'1'1' X
TH1I.P ULDp
son
THill' Ol..DP
son
IIF4
1101
IIF12
IIFll
IIF10
IIF9
'1'1.1111'
snn
-X-
IIFB
Par.t of traffi.c study and req\lirement
for. payment: of fee.
HI.DP
11
~r/\SKS HE:L/\'.J:ED TO s/\wr/\ HIT/\ COH!.lEIlCI/\L CEI/TEIl SOIITED I1Y HU~IG/\TIO!I HE/\SUIlE NlIHIIEIl, 1I0VEHIIEn 9, 1994
E/\STlmll OllIlLIII OImEn/\T. PL/\ll /\Hlmm.mHT/SPECII"IC PL/\lI
MITIO/\Tlotl lm/\SURI~S//\CTIOll PROGH/\HS/ UIPLEHElITJ\TIOll HE/\SUIlES
03.03 Fund and implement improvements necessary to '1'H/\P IlLDP and requirement
/08.0 ensUl:'e the efficient operation of the son
intersectIon of Tassajara noad with the 1500
westbound r.amps.
03.03 Prl' Fund and Implement improvements necessary to '1'H/\P IILlJP X Part of traffic study and requirement IIF6
/09.0 ensure adequate service levels on Santa nita son for payment of fee.
noad and IS80 eastbound ramps.
03.03 I'll Airway Boulevard and Dublin Boulevard. The '1'HI\P OLDP X Part of traffic !ltudy and requirement
/10.0 City of ..l~ubl.in shall. implement improvements in S011 for payment of fee.
coordi.n'ation with the City of r",i.vermore to
mod J:fy the intersection to provJ.de three
thl:'ough lanes and a right-turn ],nno en!Jt:bo\1nd,
and 1:"'0 lefl:-t:\irn lane" nnd two thl:oll9h lnnen
westbound. The Project shall const:I:ibllte a
pl:'oportionate "hare of the impI:ovement costo as
detel:'mtned by a regional transportation study
s\lch ao the current study by the Tri.-Valley
Transpol:'t:ation Council. These impr:ovemen t a
would provide LOS C conditions.
03.03 PH Fund and implement J,mprovement:.Iil nlllCQOOllry to '1'HI\P IlI.D!"' -X- I'art of t:rllffic at:ucly and roquirement: IU'S
/11,0 enaure adequ..t:a flervice levelfl at: t:he GOR tor, p..yrnent ot t.....
intaroectl.on ot 1\irway nlvd. llnd tho wQtJt:.bo\Jnd
PW ramps. implement --X-~ of t:l:'atftc study and requirement UF3
03.03 Fund and improvements necessary to 'l'J.lI\f' BI.DP f'nrt
/12.0 ensure unimpeded movement of trucks to and from son for payment of fee.
~uarl:J.efl on El Charro nOlld /Joul:h ot I-SOO. ----~_._-
9
, ,
1/
TJ\SKS mn.1\TEO TO SJ\NTJ\ IlITJ\ COI.l/.1EIlCIJ\I, C~~NTER SOIlTIW IIY BITIOJ\'rIotl U1~J\Sl/ltE Ill/HilER, NOVEllllER 9, 1994
1~J\STI~1l!1 OUIlLIlI GENElt1\I. PLAN l\l.mIIOHEHT/SPECIlr1C PL1\lI
H1T101\'1'10II ME1\StlRl~S/1\C'1'10II PROGRAHS/ H1PLEMElITAT1otl MEASURES
03.03 ~
/13.0 I '
03.03 -PiT
/14.0
03.03 PW
15.0
03.03 PW
/15.1
03.0J -PL'
/15.2
03.03
/15.3
03.03
/16.0
03.03
/16.1
03.04
/01. 0
l'W
Cumulative impacts on Dublin 130uleval:d. The CON'l' BLDP X Part of traffic study and requirement IIF2
c;it.:y of Dublin ahall continue to partl.cipate in 1'I1I\P CO lIT f.or. payment of. fee.
regional otudies of future tranaportation son.
requirements, improvement alternatives and
t;unding programs, such as the current Dtudy by \'~:)
the 'rt" i-Valley Transportation Council.
l3ulldout of development outside of Eastern
Dublin beyond 2010 levels would reqll ire the .,
construction of grade-separated interchange!! on
DUbl.if1, ..ri'ou1ovard and/or establi!lho,ent of. :,
a1t:er.natJ.vu roul:eo to redl.otri,but:o tr.aff:ic
flo\ol+ Tho project: oha1l par.tJ.cl.pate i.n the
implementatJ.on and fundJ.ng of regional
tranoportatJ.on improvement proC)'rillt\O ClO
~rmin~ theoe roC/J.onal stuclioo.
Reserve CJufficient right of along 'l'a9flujara FI'II\!' - X of traffic atudy and requi>:cllnent
way '1'111\1' Pal:t:. to I'IFl
Road to nccommodate cumulative development: of SDn. I\LDP pay feo
proi..cta north of the project area..
- - -
Extend t:.!:'anait u..rvice within 1/4 mJ.le of 9S'L PIlEZ CON'l' x 'rhe CJ.ty ncods to coordinate and meet:. IIAl
of the P!:'oiect area population. 1994 with LI\V'rl\.
- - -
Provide tt:anoLt aervice, at a minimum f re('1t1ency nr::zo COWl' X The cJ.ty nocda to coordinate and meet I I 1\2
of one bus every 30 mJ.nutou duri.nl) peak hO\1ro, son ".I.\:h LI\V'rI\.
to employment cente!:'s wJ.th 100 or more ,
employees. ~ -
Provide funcli.ng in Bupport. of expl\nsion of '1'111\[> FHJ\!' X St.nff needs to cont.act. t.he transit IIA:!
tranait se>:vice to the project son authorJ.ty rega>:ding poaaib1e ~.,
area.. ..
,'. . - - - - _p'a>:t1.c1.pnt.iol~ the developer.
Coordinat.e pt'ovioion of f eetlet" bun service to l' Ill:: Z corlT X The C1.ty neetlo to coordinate and meet IIA4
t.he planned B1\nT stations from the Project 1994 wi,th T.1\VTI\. .'
area. .- -
Pr.ovJ.de " paved Clag~ I bicycle/ pedeol:l:"J.i\r1 '1'1.\1\1' I"'.I^I' X 'I'D he cont:.alrHHl in Development l\9L~cement I102
path along 'l'ansajara Creelc. SDn. nr.nl' fo,: county to provJ.de at the tJ.me of
~!:..,:"clocrnent: of cant: o1.ele of C.,cck.
---- -- - - -
Provide for nafe pedcstr1."n/ bicycle cl:o!lfJinC]!J '1.'1.[/\1"' 1"1.11\1' X Hill be roqll irod J.f detel.ol11ined necesgar..~y II03
of major ar.t.erial. streets. SDn. nT,lIp ~Eart of son procesa,
- - - -
Prov iele adelit 1.0na 1 personnel, facili.t:icn, nnd PIH:Z COil'!' X 1\ flacal. nn<llyni.s ia being pr.epnred and IVBl
prOCCd\II:CS 1:0 1'0 ner.vice ot:D.ndnr.c.ln. l.t:n l:"ccommnndnt.i.on9 "ill be J.mplell1""t:ed
___~~~i.t:i.O!'!J of the p~ect:.
-
)
Pl.
PH
PO
10
.1
03.04
/02.0
03.04
03.0
03.04
/04.0
03.04
/05.0
03.04
/06.0
03.04
/07.0
03.04
/00.0
03.04
/09.0
03.04
/10.0
00
~ l>c)
~Fit
~ Fl\
---
FIl
;''':.l
~l'J\SI{S IlELJ\'rt~n TO SJ\NTJ\ l\I'J'J\ COHI.mRCIJ\T. CENTER SORTEO BY In~l',IGI\TIOIl HEI\SUllr.: N!J~lTmR, 1l0VEHnr.:R 9, I!)!) 01
EI\S'J'lmN OUIIT.IN OI~llIm1\L 1'J.I\N I\Hlmnlmll~l'/spr.:CIIrIC PLJ\1l
HITIGI\TIOIl HlmStJRES/J\CTIOIl PTtOGRJ\HS/ HIPLr.:HEHTJ\T.IOIl HEJ\SURr.:S
-i7T7o------x X Cnnc:\.i.ttoll requi.l."i.IH] fire fic1."vice to tho
nite. I\dditionhlly, staff neodo to work
w!.l:h O.l.nl:t:ict on pr()v.l.slon of station
sH:o.
Ennure nHFJ\ input: on project desi\)n rel.lLting \:0 '1'1.\1\1' ~;un - X X - I'm:t of project review pL'ocesD.
accesD, water preDDure, fire safet:y an,\ SOn 1"1.11\1' ConditJ.on aosuring compliance with DRFl\
_~!:~~~!~!:.!.~~~. . ______ ___ _ _ _ _!'~!I~!..!:E.~.~~!~!:~.
It:n!Jur'o l:hat it llleChani.:lIo i.o in p1."c(-~ l:op70~r(fc- '-:riTi\I~- vr'1^1' X Hcchi.\ni.nm~1 nhnl.l be 1.n pli\cn to pr.ovide
long tCl~111 n\i\.intcnilnce for. nafe' fi.l:C condi.t:.i.onn !inn. IlL!)P J:(~l)\11nr lOlllj-tcl:m.ma1.ntcnancc of the
..!!.l~.!~f)~!l.!:_!.~E.!,~~ ~L!:p.!:. !~_~ ['!~~!:...J:!:.!:!2!:.f,,~,~J!;.:~_~_____..__._._~ _______. ._"_.._...~.__ ___ __ ___ __. _~!~.:'~!.~:.~!L<};p~ !~--!~ [~~!:~:!~!:~~E~.~~D_
-"Rovide the PO Dept. j,nformatJ.on needed too
I aqt!~ll1l1t:ely pliln for expansion o. f service",
06prclinllte wJ.th the City PO Depllrtment
rtlgnrding the timing of annexation lInd proposed
c1p~elopment, 00 thilt the Depllrtment clln
adequately plan for the necessary expansion of
_~erviceD to the area.
Provide for PO Dept. input into the deoign of
-EropoBed' development.
Prep,re a budget otrategy to hire the rcguJ.rcel
additional pernonnel anel implement necesslIry
chang<its in the "bent" ayotem.
EnDure I'D Dept. review of proponed development:
for oafety luau",". Incorporate into the
requirementD of project approval PO Dept.
recommendationo on pr.oject design thol: lLffect
traffic oafety and crime prevention.
1'<)
"'"PO
FA
Provide for the conDtructlon of new fire
facl,lltieQ coincident with nn., service dernnnd
in oaotern Dublin.
CH
Establish appropr.iate funding mecllllnJ.omo (e.\).
Hello ROOD DLstrict, developer financJ.ng with
reimbursement agreements~.ect.) to cover
upfront costs of capital' improvements (i.e.
fire stations and related facilLtieo and
--!"0~E!!~!!!\ t 1 .
Ennure i'lCCj\1 i.nit:.ton
new fJ.re ototiona.
of oiL:.cn f(H: connl:J~\Ic;l:.i.on of:
PHE?'
1INNE
'1'111\['
SOn
COWl'
'l'li 1\ I'
son
'1'111\['
son
'1'1-1111'
Son
'l'1.\1\1'
SOH
COI'IT
'1'he Dublin Police Department i.s tile
reviewing agency for tllis project.
1Id(litiol\nll.y, a fiscal. anal.YDin was
prepllred and itD recommendations will be
made conditions of the project approval..
IVB2
. .;~i;
:~
IVS3
IVB4
.c.
IVBS
:.c
x
IlLI)!'
Police Dept, ia a reviewing "gency on
the proiect.
11 fiocnl analysis wao prepared and its
reoornmenelat:ions will be made conditions
____..2~J:!E!!jacl: arnrovlll.
X '1'he Pollce !Jept. should revie" i.temo in
Olnl\ anel make sure that they comment on
thooe speclfic items ao well as their
uDual. areal3. Need a lettor from the
Poll.ce DpacificallY,oayLng they are
revJ.ewino J.tems 3.4/5.0
- X X negui.re condition for provioion of fire
aervice to the project. Enter into an
llgr.eemf1lnl: .,it:h I\larn'Hla county for
inl:eL'im fir.e facility on the Sonta ni.ta
---_..!.~~.
X X Tho applicant will be financing ita own
infrastructue. Tllay will either
conlltruct: the facilities, pay impact
feea, and/or enter into reimburoement
agreementD.
;"'............
1'11111'
nLDI'
-COWI'- -- - X
X
["I/O
IVCl
1'1/0
IVC2
IVC3
IVC4
IVC5
11
03.04
/11.0
03.04
/12.0
03.04
/13.0
03.04
/13.1
03.04
/14.0
03.04
/15.0
03.04
/16.0
~
T/\SJ<S ItELI\TED TO S/\t1T/\ 11ITJ\ COI-lI-lE:IlCII\T. CE:t1TE:1t 501t']~En I\Y HITIG/\TIOH Hl;;I\SllltE IIll1.InEIt, lIOVE!.lUEIt 9, 1991
E/\STEltll DllDLIlI OlmlmJ\TJ prJlI1I 1IH1~IIDHEtlT/ SPECIl'IC PLIIII
HITIGJ\TIOII HEIISllltES/lICTIOII PltOGltl\MS/IHPLEHE!lTI\TIOII HEIISURES
OJ
t"h I' fntegrate fire trails and fire breales
6~en space trail nystem.
a. Heet fire district ntandards for acceso
r~ads in the open space trail nyntem while
minimizing environmental impacts.
7R prepat"(~ a wildfire manaCJement plan fo~" the
Project area in order to reduce the risle of
impact related to wild land fire
l"lt Determi.ne the number., location and timing of
additional fire otationo for areas within the
Project nrea yet o\ltnLde the Spcc:tfi.c Pll\n nrnn
PI. Iteserve ochool DiteD within the Project area ao
deDignated in the Specific Plan and Gonoral
Plan I\mendment (PleaDe notel Thio mitigation
measure has been renumbered as 3.41 13.1 vorous
3.4/ 13.0 because it 1.9 ident1.cally numbered as
the m1.tLgntion measure regarding SiteD for Fire
Facil1.tics for GPII Incre~ent),
PI. l;;nsure t:llat adoquate capacity 1" provl.dod fo,:
junior high ochool age students.
PL Enoure that adequate clao....room apace io
provided pd.or to the development of new homes.
Oil
1'1. Hor.le oll.th the PllbJ.J.n 11l1lr..I.ed school. DJ.!lI:rJ.ct
and the TJl.ver.mor.e .JoJ.nt Hnifi.ed School rli.nl;r.icl:
t;o reaolve the jllr.in<llctlonal. innue reO"l'dJ,ng
wlllch d1.nt:rict(n) nhoule! aervo the "'1I..t:ern
Dubl.in plann1.ng orea.
a. uetcr.mine the Gervicc
that bent flervc,", the ncedn
student:!J ilnd mi.nimi.:r.cn the
~~~ i.ci"'=-t:.t~o,:".i.~~~..E~,.
dJ.st~J.ct: n~)~n"9crnan':
oE planni.IH] ilr'on
fi.ncnl bllt:dr.n of I:he
Pltli:Z
MINE
Plt8(.
liNN!':
'1'/,\1\1'
SPit
'l'HI\P
SOH
'l'/-lI\P
SOIt
199!i
11I~(.()
FHIIP
OLDP
IlI,O P
TlLIlP
1'1,11\1'
OIJPP
l"HI\P
Or..DI'
n. 1 0
- ':::[/0-
1. ~~
x Condition that access road be required
to onFII otandards. Needs will be
determined dllr1.ng son, fire authority is
part of review process,
X The fire diotr;ict rev1.ewes at the time
of Site Development Review and comments
on each project. At that time a plan is
prepared by the dintrict on a project by
_ _ _ J?E~j,ect ba.. 1.0 as needed.
X Fire protection for the project area and
other ourrollnding areas are being
nrlalyzc(l nn pnrt of tl1e project'o fincal
anal.yu1.o. 1\ condl.tion for provinion of
___ fl.r.e oel"vice wlll be re \lired.
X No ochool oitee Were indicatec1 on t:hio
nite in the Spec1.fic Plan.
Tlddl.tionally, I;he Bchool c\iotrict 1.s one
of the review1.ng agencies.
IVC7
IVCB
IVAl
X No ochool 011:00 were indicated on thi"
site in the Speciflc Plan.
IIdditionally, the school distr1.ct 1.0 one
of the reviewing ogencl.es.
X No Bchool s1.teB are indicated on this
aite in the Specific Plan. The project
dooo not lnvolve residential
devel.o~I1'ellt .
"x - - X Tla;;ddo'cllrnentatl,oll fa;: tho file that we
ilr.O <101,ng t:hJ.n. !lowove..., thin project:
io comnwn:cJ.al. and the GaL-vice j,u!JueG do
not <11.roctly apply.
IVA2
IVA3
IVI\4
03.04
117.0
03.04 8B
118.0
03.04 SF
/19.0
03.04
/20.0
03.04
/21.0
03.04
/22.0
~1'/\SI(5 HEr../\'l.'~~[) TO SlItlTlI HI'l'/\ COf.ll.leHCIlIr., CEtlTI'.H :;OIl'.l.'ED lIY HI'l'IOI\TIOII HI'.lISlHlI'. lIlJHnJ,H, UOVEf.lnEIt 9, 1994
1,1I5'1.'I'.IlII Dt/llT.IU OE!mHlIT. PU\tl 1I!mlHl!mtl1.'/5PECIlrIC PT.lIU
HI'rIOllTIOII HI'.I\SURES/lICTIOII PItOOHI\M5/IHPLEH!':t1TnTION HEnSURES
I-'~lri~fjre that adequate school facilities al'e
,,"ai1.abl.e pri,or to development in the Project
ilrea to the e>etent permitted by law.
~ ensure that the development of new Bchool
facilities is provided for through the
dedication of school sites andl or payment of
developr~ent fees by developerD, or by any other
_ ~n 'p'ermi.tt.ed by law.
CH !!:etabl.illh appropriate funding mechani...Il,,,, o\1ch
aD Hello Roos Community Facilitios Diotrict,
development impact feeo, or a general
ol~liQation bond measure, 1:0 fund new "chool
development in eautern Dublin.
It!!: E>epand parI, I1l;"ea throughout the Primary lI11(1
E>etended Planning Tlreas to serve new
dovel,opmQnt.
RR Haintain and improve outdoor facilities in
conformance ~/it:h the recommandations of the
City's Park and recreati6riHaster Plan 1992.
----'--
HE Provj,ch..: ncl:ivf~ pi\rks and .fnc.i.lit:.1.ou \o/hich Ul;e
adequate to meet citywide needs for open space,
cultural, and sports facilities, as well as the
local needs of the Eastern E>eton~cd plnnning
lIrea.
HEZO
x
DUSD is a reviewing agency on this
project.They have indicated that the
sterling Fee will adequately mitigate
impacts from this development. Need
condition re uirin a ment of fees.
Condition of approval to pay Sterling
fees (letter from OUSO indicated those
fees would provide all needed mitigation
from this project.)
IVA6
CaNT
THI\P [,'1.\1\1'
son BLOP
l'nl~Z nl,DP
I\NlIl~
COWl' COWl'
x
cOIn
COH'l'
x 't'he lltJSD ind.lcated by letteu' that this
projoct does not adversely impact the
P1..t>:1.ct z,nd t:hat impact" can be
mJ,tJ.gat:...d through payment of the
standard "chool fee (sterling Fee) by
letter dated 9 23 94 .
XX- The Public Facilitiecs Fea scucly will
e>eam1.ne the impactcs on parkland and
whether thJ." project shoulcl participate
in acquiring , improving or maintaining
them. If npplJ.cablo, the"e issues will
be nogotiated in n development agreement
and this will be made a condition of
_ _ _ .1!.EJ2.Eova 1.. .
x X The Public Facilit1es Fee Study will
e>eamine the ~npacts on parkland and
whether thJ." project should participate
in acquiring, improving or maintaining
them. If applicable, these is Dues will
1)0 negotl.ritcd in ~ development agreemellt
nnd tills wi].l ))0 made a condition of
._ _. _ ~ ~1~P~~9_~~.1 .
X X '1'lle Publ.i.c FacJ.litlco 1'"0<<2 Study will
examJ.ne the impacts on parkland and
whether this project should participate
in aCC)l1iring, improving or maintaining
l:hem. I ~ appl icable, theDe issues will
be negotiated 1n a development agreement
nnd this will he made a condition of
____ _ _ ~:.P.P.E..ov;~l..:_.
",;;
IV1\.7
.-l....,
cOtI1-;-- '"'(;0,;:;;"-'
13
Tl\SKS nEIJ\TED TO S1\NTl\ nl'.rl\ CO~Il,lEnCI1\r. CEllTElt sonTED BY IHTIGl\TIOll HEl\SIHlE llUMBEn, IlOVEMllER 9, 1994
El\ST8Rll 1IllllLIll OENER1\L PLl\1l l\MENIIM8NT/SPECIFIC PLl\1l
HITI01\TIOll HI~1\StIRES/1\CTrOlf PROGRl\MS/ HIPLEM8NT1\TIOlI H!!:1\SURI~S
03.04
/23.0
ng I\<'CJtlir.c and improve pal:ltlands in con[ol:",nnce
wlth tho priorities and phasing recommended in
bne City's Park and Recreation Hnster Pl.nn.
COWl'
cor'lT
03.04
/24.0
PL Reqllire"land dedication and improvements for
the 25" par.lt!! 9 deaignat:ed in the GoneraJ. plan
l\menClment (01'1\) and collect in 11.ell feo" per.
City fJtanclard.
THl\1'
FI.IM'
x X The Public Facilities Fee Study will
cKam1.ne the impacts on parkland and
whether thin project should participate
in acquiring, improving or maintaining
them. If applicable, the~e issues will
be negotiated in ~ development agreement
and this will be made a condition of
_-!E roval.
X X No dedication will be required of this
appL1.cant, however, improvement needs
wilL bo addressed thorugh the Public
Fnc1.J.i.tiefl Fee Study wh1.ch is being
prepared by the C1.ty. Idenfitiecl needs
w1.LI be negot1.ated in the development
agreement and this will be made a
cond1.tion of approval.
101
102
;~;":' ~~.i
03.04
/25.0
PL
Provide an adequate ra~io of developed
parklanda to population.
'1'HI\P
F/1I\P
x
03.04
/26.0
Pl.,
lleaignate uit:<HI tOt" 17 par.lta in thl.! Speci.r:ic
Pl.an area and fJ additional lJites in the General
Plan Amendment Extension to ensure maintenance
of the CLty's parks provision standard..
Ensure that park development is consistent with
the standards and phasing recommended 1.n the
..slJ:.Y's Parle a!!eI necreatio'ri'Master Pl,a,!.
EnD\l~e tIle provision of open opaco, acceou arld
areas for publ1.e recreal:io~.
'1'/-11\['
l\ccompl.ished in the Specific Plan. This
project (con\l\'lfllrci/l.l) J,,, not r"'CJuirood to
__ _ _ _ _ ded!:~I!'":'lel"ncl per pOlicies.
1-'1-11\1' X l\ccol1lpliuhctl in the SpecJ.fic Plan. 'rhi.s
project (comnu~rcJ.al) ia not re'luit"ed to
dediCate parkland per policies,
103
03.04
/29.0
PI.
J~n!Jl1re that oach 1\13...1 (lavclopmcnt J;crJ(.!!:Vf.Hi the
open space nnd parkland designated in the Plan.
Park Haster Plan incorporated Eastern
Dublin recreation and open apace
___~~l2.!:..!!.
X Include provision in Development
l\greement: regarding dedication of the
stl:ellm corridot" at the time the ellstern
side of creek develops. This will be a
r;ondit.lon of nPl:~I:oVllJ..
-Tl.I1\I)-~- -'vrSi\I.;--~ .--. - x -lic(j~lrrel~lQi)f-eol.; c.lcvclopn\cnt ugl:cclllcnt BO
that County will dedicate open space
ar.ea at time of development of east
parcel. nl.Do Tnosnjnrn C~eel( ig not n
pi1.1~': of: t:he pr.oject: but iHlcC")\li\t:C
Bcl:hack9 have been designated to rcnerve
opan opace. '1'hi9 will be mnde i\
.__________h__~ ___._.__ ____.....4' .~_._ ___ _ _.. _~~~.~!~~.~...!.:J:~~,~.~2E__~~I2P~~~...
'I'/11\P
l"HI\P
X
104
03.04
/27.0
RE
03.04
/28.0
PL
'1'11l\P
FHl\p
IDS
ID6
1'1
03.04
/30.0
03.04 4N
31.0
03.04
/32.0
03.04
/33.0
03.04
/34.0
03.04
/35.0
03.04 40
/36.0
Tl\SKS RELl\TED TO S1\llTl\ RIT1\ COH/-l8RCI1\L CEllTER SORTlm BY HITIGl\TIOll HE1\SURE IWlolDER, IIOVEHDER 9, 1994
. EI}STERll nUnLn~ OEI/!':R1\r. pr'1\ll 1\HEIIDJ.lEllT/SPECIl"IC PL1\ll
Uf~tdn~IOll HEl\Su"iYlt~TIDll.PROGnnJ.ln/IJ.lPLEHEllT1\TIOll MEl\SURES
. ..0.:'.
n~velop a parks Implementation Plan for eastern
~ublin that identifies the following:
preferreel phas1.ng of lanel e1edicat1.on and
improvements, facilit1.es priorities and their
location, and the design and construction of
parks.
PL Calculate and assess in lieu park fees based on THAI'
Dublin's parkland and dedication ordinance.
PT, Estall.l,.J.sh a trail system with connect1.ons to '1'1.1 1\ P
plan~ed regional and aubregional syatem, son
includi.ng the north-south corridors ollch aD
EBnPD'a proposed trail along Taosajarn creek
north to Haunt O1.abLo State Park.
PL EotablJ.oh a compt"ehenoive, 1.nl:egrated 1;,:aiL
network that permits oafe Bnd convenient
_Eeclestrian and b1.cycle acceos.
PL Establish n continuous open space network that
integrates large natural open space areas,
stream corridors, and developed parks and
recreation areas.
P'/-lI\P
107
X Not a residential project.
P'HI\l'
IOS
l'I1I\P
nr.Of'
X T~ssaja~a Creek is not a part of th1.s
proje6t. Tho City will begin working on
a maintenance fin~ncing plan when
lrnprovmcllt: of ti,e otream corridor occurs
and tho loa.i.n\:ananco need!] ill';e known.
X --- - - 1\ccolI\pliohc(1 by the Spoclf ic Plan and
Parka Hautor Plan.
1II1\4
'1'1.11\1' 1"1.11\1.'
SDn flY-I)P
TI1I\P [0'1.11\[>
son nLOP
-x E"tabLJ,shed in the Specif1.c PLBn and
p~rks l1aster Plan. Need provision in
the development agreement for dedication
of oteam corridor. This will be made a
__ _ _ _ _~~tlJ.t:.I.Q!L.or. ul?proval.
1."1'11\1' X Contact l~nllPD regarding otaging areas.
nLDl' for Tassaj~ra Creek Tr~il.
1II1\7
PL Provide convenient pedeotri~n connectiono TI1I\P
between developed areas and designated open son
space areas and trails.
PL Require developers to dedicate pubLic access T/-lI\P
eaaements along ridge top 0 .~nd stream corridors son
to accommodate the development of trails and
_ "taQl:..!:!9 araao.
1II1\8
FHI\P ---X
nt,DP
Include provisions in the development
agreement for dedication of otream
corridor.
IIIAS
lS
~ ,~
.il
I'
TlISK9 REL1\TED TO SANTlI RIT1\ COMMERCIlIL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGlITION MElISURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 199G
EASTERN nUnI.IN GENERlIL PLlIN MmllDMEllT/ SPECIFIC PLlIll
IUTIG1\TIOll ME1\SURES /lICTION PROGR1\MS / IJ.lPLEHENTlITIOll ME1\SURBS
03.04
/38.0
03.04
/39.0
03.04 CM
40.0
03.04 8L PL
/41.0
03.04
/42.~
03.04 PW
/43.0
03.04 -Pi":""
/44.0
CH
r (If-e['lwo " Solid Hante: Hanagcmcnt: plan (OJ: 1995/ [Jr.!)!' X X r)~epare SI-IHP u['da te for Eastern Dublin, VAAl
10 ;HltH~ r n Dublin, meeting the req\1 irernen t s of the 1996 'I'hin project will not exceed thresholds
ft<l"'pted City SlmE, which inCludes: o( current SRRE. Therefore, preparation :
1:. 1\ requirement for the City to compost all of an update p['ior to project approval
organic Vlllt'ltes resulting from the ongoing is not necessary. Require condition of )
mii.lntanance of public parkis and open spaca. approval to ansure compliance with >:
:1 . extension of Dublin's curbside recycling requirements of the SWHP and SRRE
p~ogram for recyclable materials. . ;i I;
3. Sp~Qific 8['eas designated for the
ool1.ec'I:i.on of recyc1.able mated.n1.n i.n ITlllltt-
famtly and cormnerci.al arens, wl.th coor.cLlllati.on
as nl!ll;!ded for pJ.clc-u p.
1\ . Support for re-UD13 of compofltccl mnt:cn:lnlll .'
in lanclDcaped nreap of all new dCVQloI2!~!J.I: . - -
Revise V/aate generation projectiona o( Dubli.n'o 1995/ Ilr.DP X CIIL"rellt sHIm ac:comodat:.e:a Ilomart.. Vl\1\2
SRI'le:/ IIImE All needed to reflect the population l'J'JG
and oOl'1'lm..rcinl land use projectiono of the
adopted PI~o;ect . forJ - -
Ensure thnt: the Sol.id \~aste Managcment:. Pl.iln 19%/ IlLDP X cJ.ty ru:!cdo to prepare SWHI'. howe.ver, the Vl\1\3
Eastern Dul,U,n addreooes and .tncorpor.a.t.es the 1996 cUL-ront snRn: includes !lol\1art Project.
goalo, objocti,v"D, and progr.amo of oubli.n'o
SRREE and IImm. .- - ,
Ensl.lt'c that:. adequate landfill capacity iEl '1'11111' ~'HI\I' X- nequire will nerve letter VAA4
available to accommodate pro;ect waste. SDR Dr,DP -
lIave project: applicants provide documentation nEZO J."Hl\P X- nequire will oarve letter. lVOl ;,Z)
that electric, gaD, and telephone eervice can TH1\P OLDP
be provided to all new c1eveiopment. -
Require all ut1liti,es be located belovl gl:ude OLDP n/o X- X ~Irite condJ,tion, also City ohould begin IVD2
\.-1hCL.O roan J.hle Ilnd denl.gned to Cl.l:y nt:nnc1"rdn. contllcti.ng major utl.J.l.t1eo regllL'ding
-~. - - - .J:.!~ei~,!,_,!.:!.!o~pllln" for. the area,
l'Iodt with PGI.a: 1:0 plnl\ I:he underCjI:-oundi.n(J 0': SDIt X Staff neccJo to begin mcet:.Lngn wi.th PG&E IVD3
a1.l nnw clcct:I:".i.c lines nod 1:0 rant:c IlLDP l:"ncJilrcling p,:,ov.i.nlon of \ll:i.litJ."s nnd
infraot:ruct:ur.Q n\o,ny fr.om flcnoil:ivQ hnbi.t:nt: nnd t:hoi.J: locnl:ion i.n rolati.on to thi!J
open "paca land.. to mitigate tho of; facl:.rJ of miti.{JatJ.on menlJuz:a.
IItJ.lit1Gls ex E!!.!' '" i !?!}~ JiT.j)p - - X-
nCH] " I,:" I'I.'0J'JCI; nppllcllnl::J to liuhllli.t ,. Fnl\J> 11<",,1 (;oncli,t: Lon, IVD4
\It.\. 1 U;lon n(~):v.i.cn t:npO):I'. 1".0 I:hr~ City pl.'in.: 1:0
~!::.l i.c JI1~pr:ovemcnt 111.An llEp['ov!!..l, - - - --.
CiT
PiT
Hi
03.04 PT,
/46.0
03.04 [lL
/47.0
03.04 011 (>L
/48.0
03.04
/49.0
03.04 8N
/50.0
03.04
/51. 0
03.05 !lQ
/01. 0
'I~J\SlCS RELI\TEll TO Sl\llTI\ IlITJ\ COl.If-lEnCII\T. CEllTETt SOllTEIl BY HITIGI\TIOll HEI\SlJRE llUI1IlI':R, 1I0VEHIlEIl !l, 1991
EI\STlmll lllJDLIll Ol!:llImJ\L PLIIIl 1\!.\ImlllmllT/SPECIFIC PLl\lI
HITIGI\TIOII HI!:I\SUIlES/I\CTION PIlOCRIIHS/IHPLEHElITI\TIOlI HEI\SUIlES
"~equire ~he installation of a demonstration
rrojeC~(B) of coot effective enerqy
conoarvntlnn tecl\ni.qllca.
Require developers to demonstrate the
incorporation of energy conservation measures
into the design, construction, and operation of
propoaed development.
Encollrag~ and auppor~ ~he efforts of the U.S.
POetal" 'Sl1rv ice to establish a poat: 0 f f ice .II,th
~ha callto!;'n !Jublin 'I'own Cent,,>:.
CQordinate witi\t."h" u.s. Pootal. So>:vicu to
identify facility needa and aite criteria for a
new poe~ office in Eastern Dublin, and direct
~he land owner/developer of ~he
Public/Bc'miPublic area designated in the 'I'own
Center to explore the potential for a post
offiCe in thia lOcation.
ftE Encourage nnd support the efforts of the
1\lameda county T.ibrary Syatem 1:0 establish a
lLbra~y(ioo) and aSDociatad Da~viceD tor
Eastern Dublin ao determined to be npprop>:Latc
given the DL~11 and population of the planning
area.
ftE Coordinate with J\lameda county to provide
lib~ary aerviceD to Eastern. Dllblin.
t.' .
f1.E Require tho Ci~y r.1.brary Task 1>O>:C<l identify
appropriate 10cat1.on and timing fo~ development
Of new library(ien).
PH IhH]tl.i.r.o t:.hnt:. ;tl.l. dcvelo(>lIlcnt:. ,."i.thin t:"o
SpecJ.fic Pliln be connected 1:0 [ll\bl..i.r. nn.m.:n.
Except ions to this ~equ irE1ment, in particlllat'
septic tank oystnmn, will only bn allowed on n
cant) by enn!'! hnni.n upon rcr.:ci.pt: of \-Jr.i.l:t:nn
nppt."ovnl [l-om 1\1.;1111(1<.1i\ CO\lnl:y Ji:l\v1..~(lr\ll\etll:ill
_ !leE' 1 t~!..J?_!::p~-=-"~!~Q~~!~:.D.
1'11111'
s!Jn
'1'1'\1\1'
SDn
'l'I1J\P
son
'I'111\l'
son.
pm~z
I\NNE
HE7.0
I'HEZ
1INlIE
I1E7.0
PIU:Z
/\l.1 N I"
HE7.0
THI\I'
:1DI1
~ ~. .
1>1/0
Require project to use energy
conservation techniques as identified in
bllildinC) code. 1\lso, encourage other
___ energy aavJ.n techni Ilea,
X X Part of project review will be to
analyze these issues and require
compliance with current energy
standards.
X This project ia not in the TOwneenter.
nr.DP
fHIII'
1lf.1)!'
FIII\['-- -j( - -
IlLD!'
Con\:actJ,n<) tho pODt of f ice regal;"cling the
location in \:he Town Center should not
begin until the Dtraet layoutD are known
J,n thnt area.
IVE~
[i' 1-\ 1\ I'
IJLIH'
X City needs to write a letter.
1>/.1 1\ P
OLD!'
X City neads to write a letter.
IVE3
f'i:1iiP- -- - - X 'I'he p>:oject is not in a site that .,as
OLDp identified an n possible library
l.ocnt:lon 1." l:ha Specific Plnn. ltO\.;,ravcL4,
the C.l.l:y need \:0 beqin ,oorlcJ.nq with the
tnol< force in tills nrea.
'--I;rt-;\P'-"'---x--Nnr~~l will 1.;1l':1;'VO lol:.t.eL4 <<IB.I conc1i.l:.ion
nLnp \:hnt the r,,'oject be connnetr"I, DsnSD
Code p>:ohJ.bit!l the lIDe of septic or non-
p\1hltc ['jn"'Jf!t~ oystems for. nny commer;,cial
pl.'ojecl: (P"": r."'l:l:e.: 1:0 The Ci.t:y of
llubl.i.ll dal:od Novell\bet" 3, 19~H).
IVE4
V1\2
17
03.05
/02.0
03.05 91'
/03.0
03.05 9N
/011.0
03.05 90
/05.0
03.05
/06.0
03.05
/07.0
03.05
/07.1
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTEn BY MITIGATION HEASURE NUHnER, NOVEHBER 9, 1994
RASTlmN DlIDI.ItI GEmmA!, PI.AI/ AHENnHEN'.r/SPECIFIC PLAI/
HITIOATIOI/ MEASURES/ACTIOI/ PROGHAHS/IHPLEMENTATION MlmSUTtES
9J
11\( lIave Dsasa update its wantewatec collection
!JI/MI,cm maal,ec plan compul,el:' model. to l:'eflect
1.110 adopted Specific Pl.an/GPJ\. projectn mun!:
pay fol:' deDign level wastewatel:' collection
system master plan computel:' model. (nRIII, P.
819)
VA3
x X DSRSD has all:'eady pl:'epal:'ed the Eastern
Dublin Facilities Plan, Final Report,
da!:cd Decembec, 1993, (Dodnon and
nssociates) to pl:'ovide the updated
computel:' nimulations and mastel:' plan
analyses foc wastewatel:' collection and
potable and recycled water systems.
nlameda County funded the Dodson study
in part.Applicant shall install required
______.E~si:1JI:l..'=E-'.'.n a condl.ti.on of aEl'coval.
x 1'1:'(,1jCf:1.:. will be 1.4Qq\licecl l:.o hook i.nto
pub1.ic \Iti.1.itieo and wate\:"/wantcwatcr
nyot.cmo.
PHEZ
nt/Np.
HE'l.O
TM/\P
snn
(I \-1 nifJCOUriH;Q t:ha tUH: of onoJ.t:.e [Jl\CIUH]U pJ.nnt~1J ilod
oept!.c oyotoms with!.n tho Project' al:oa in
accol:'danco ~Iith policieo of the San F,:ancl.nco
_ ...!!!!.y. n"g.h2!lal. Hate\:" Q\lnU.ty.....s.2!l!.:.E.2.!:-.!!~!!.!CQ.
PH Hantewatc!:'. Roq\ll.ro a "wil.l oerve" lottot' from
DSRSD prior to po!:'mit approval for grading.
cc:;r;:p- 'ru~
!>Dll
Vl\4
1;'1'1/\1' .---X
anl\!)
COIl(IJ,tl.on/J l:ugn...ding provision of will
nerve lettero for waatewnter.
'1'11/\1'
SDf1.
1'1/0
---x
VAG
Standard condition regarding al'P\:"ovnl by
DSRSD of wautewater oYDtema.
PH
Require design and construction of all
wastewater aYBtems to be in accordance with
DSAse uorvLcQ pOlicies, procectu\:"cs, design nnd
-E2!!~EJ~!~!!..!:.n!!.~l\r:'d~!.~I1\l\:lt:cl~l~li.'.!~:.i_:..____ _____ ______ ._.._ _ _ ___~
Enoure t:.hE\t~ tho pl.anned \olaot:e\olill:cr colleGt:.i.cll\ 'J'Hl\P FH!\P X Tht] J::..\~tCI:'Il Dubli.n Fi\cilil:ic!J Pinn
system has heEm 'ol.zed to accommodate only the Sl)f1. prepared by DSnSI) pL-oviden pipeline
development within the Eastern Dublin General sizing only to accommodate development
Plan and Speci,!ic Pllln area. w.l.thin the Specific Plan area and areas
located between the Specific Plan's wast
boundary and existing development within
the City. No oversizing for areas east
or: no,:I:h of the Speciflc P1.an have been
.I.lIcl.uded (pOl: lel:ter to 1'I1e City of
Dublin from nsn.s[) dated November 3,
_____.__ __ _ ._ _ -,U!..~_/U .
I:".U\I' X IhH.!c.l to l:l'H.ll1.1.t:l! 1:r<.11t\ appli.clll\t; i\U pnl:l:.
of; the t:ent:nt:.iva mOl? condJ.l:.ions of
appt'oval.
Val
ULDP
PH
VFl
911
l'i\T It(:).(J'll}:I~ ,;;:0:1 (.:0 t:. nppl.j,cilnl:u t:CJ 1'):nl.ln~.;;-(TO"E7\1l.(i';"r- -1;jTj,P-'P
waot:.c\o,ntoJ:" cupnci.ty l.nvcol:1.gal:lonfi, i.ncl\lcli.nCj :;nn.
meana to minimlze waatewater flown, to
ollpplemonl: t;he l.nforrnation tn I;he Spec i.f j.c
Pli\n.
-- ---,--
1'\-1 '1'1'1/\.
pl:ior:
I-'Hl\l' X Cond.i.l:ioIlD J:n~Jn!:di.1l9 pJ:ovi.~)i.on of wi.ll
GRnn nar:vn lnttnr:n for: wantewn!:ar: ncr:vl.cc via
_________ __ ~ _ _ .2~'~0-.;___.__.
J t tJ q \ I i. 1: l'.~ it .. VI .i. 11. n c 1: v e" -1 ctr:m.:-~;;'~;-'I)fi.iT?';i)-"'"
tn pnr:mLt npp...ovnl fnr: gr:ndLng.
THAI'
:;nn
18
03.05
/08.0
03.05
/09.0
03.05
/10.0
03.05 91
/H.O
03.05
/12.0
03.05 .9K
/13.0
03.05
/111.0
03.05
/15.0
!'1
TJ\SKS llELJ\TED TO SJUITJ\ ll1~'J\ COHHEI1C1J\TJ CEllTEIt SOItTEIl lIY HITIOJ\'rIOll HEJ\SllI1E lIUHlJEIt, IIOVEHlJER 9, 1991
EJ\STJmll Dll llTJ III o Ell I'. RJ\T, PI.1\1l nr.mllDHElIT/SPECIIrIC P1,1\H
J.IIT.I01\TIOIl HlmstJl1l"S/1\CTIOll PItOGItJ\HS / IHPLI"HElITJ\'.rIOIl J.IEJ\StJItES
1'\,1
Ennure t:hat: \tlastewater treatment Clnd di~poaal
j'"cilit:ies are available to meet the needs of
future development in' eastern Dublin.
Ensure that proposed development is consistent
with wastewater treatment plant expansion as
set fOrth in DsnSD's master plan.
l'~r
p~, Inclt.tdr;;t (J(\l):r~IY of.Ci.clcnl:. t.:.rclll;IIH.3nt: oyul:omu .i.n
any waoccwatcr trontment pl.nnt oxpnntJi.on ntlC}
operata tho plant to talco nclvantll'J'" of off:po"k
-2!l~Y .
CH Support r,l\VHH1\ and DSRSD in their cur):ont
efforts to implement a now wastewater export
.Jl!:pelin~E1tom.
PH l1equire recycled wate): une or landscape
irrigl\tJ.on l.n accordance with DSItSD'" nocycled
_ Hnl:eE_!~.U:.~_e.!'!!::.-~!l....!.g-p'g. 021.
P~I Itequire devel.opment ~d,thin thio pJ:ojoct to fund
a recycled water distribution syotem computer
model to reflect the adopted Specific plan/
GP1\. (1\IUIIr P. 821)
1\ will oerve letter will be required
ensure this. Additionally, DSRSD is
reviewing agency on the project. No
expansion of the DSRSD wastewater
treatment plant is necessary to
accommodate this project (per letter
'rho City of Dublin from DSRSD dated
_ ______ _ _ .___ ..J~!l~!~~!201~ 3~'.:22..'!J.
(;O/oJ'j' X p(~r: 1\1\11.1, 1'. 021, tic cx[)nnoion ia
L4QCp,d,I:c:sd no l\ rQoult: of I.:hio Pl:'ojoct..
Condition reo ):C!cyclad water in
landscaping plan - pr.ovide for
,_-.- _ _ _ _ .J;!!f:r.~~~~~E.9-i!1~~1.-oven!:.!~El:ans.
'HI 1\ I' X DSn~;n hno al1:eady prepared tho l~asterll
SDn Dublin Facilities plan, Final Report,
dated December, 1993, (Dodson and
l\ssociates) to provide the updated
computer aimulationo and master plan
analyses for wastewater collection and
potable and recycled water systems.
l\1i\11lcdl\ County funded the DodfJon study
J.lI pal:l:. I\ppJ,J.callt oh"11 inotill.l
required facilities no a condition of
_.__.._..... .~_ _ __ _ ~~l~L:_~!?~!~.l..
cor'I'!' X X cOIHli.l:i.on J:U: l:l:!cyclcc:l \oJnl:ur 1n peojocl:..
1\100 wr.ite letter to Zono 7.
PI1EZ
lINNE
nEZO
THI\P
SDR
THill'
SOn.
PI'lllP
nLDP
COll'l'
COH'l'
'HIliI'
SDn
'1'1.11\['
son
COII'l'
1'1lI,;Z
lINNE
m:zo
PH tjuppor.t: tho uf:!Ot:t:.o 01: I:.ho 'l't:'i. v~II(!y \-/itt;;-;:--- -'Piij:;~'-"
RocyclJ.n<J 'I'onle ForGO Study through ZOllQ 7, J\tlt'm
oncouraging wasl:ewat:ar roc;:yc).J.ng alld L'e11l1ll1 for. RF:7.0
_ -l.!!.~~!!!;.!ll2.~_.Lr:t: J.9~1: J.~~!.
1'\'1 r';ncolI","~,Q r.IIV~IHJ\ to continlle J,t:1 p"'o~J1:i1;"Qr-- PTti':i-- -c;iii:j:r'.'x --
offpoalc pllmpJ.ng of Hilst:eHal:nr: 1:0 IHll.illlGe 1\11111':
electric dem"ndn ill the PG&F: nyntcm RF:ZO
!l rJ
x
ncquire a will serve letter.
VCl
x
to
a
VC2
.~
1.t",~}fJ
to
VOl
X
Need 1:0 write lettera.
VGl
X
VG2
VG3
VG4
The cJ.l:y '":01:<: n lol:l:tH;' to I.I\VI"IlIJ\ on
10/3/91\ vnd,Cyint) a phone call verifying
1:11.1." policy "nd encOlII:1\tJJ.ng I:holO 1:0
cont:i,l\\lo il:.
-- -----'- -- --- - ---- --_..~.._.~--------,...-_.--.---
19
VEl
03.05
/17.0
03.05
/lB.O
03.05
/19.0
03.05
/20.0
03.05
/21.0
--
P
Tl\SKS REL1\TED TO SIUITl\ RITl\ COHHERCIl\L CEI/TER SOltTED BY HITIGI\TION HEI\SURE NUHDER, NOVEHDER 9, 199<1
EI\STlmN DlJDLItI OErmRI\L PT,I\N l\HI~lIDHEtl'.r/SPECIFIC PLI\U
HITIGI\TIOtl HEI\SURES/l\CTI011 PROGRI\HS/IHPLEHEtlTl\TION HEl\SURES
.. .~r
\./ Enllure that tha recycled water treatment 9Y9tem PRE? CON'!' X 'l'he City needs to write a letter to VE2 '!fi: ...
1.0 plannad, desl.gned and con9tructecl for. ener.gy IINNP. nsnSD rcmJ.ndl.nC) them of the requirement
eEf l.cl.O!'GY......!:...'LEper.at ion) . HE7.0 - - of tlll.s Hi.tigation Measure.
H l\void pol;enl;ial failure in the operation of tile TOD TOO X Heference 'l'W1\ DErR (see page 3.5-10 of VH1 ~~ I;
pumps in the TW/\ wastewater collection system. Eastern Dublin DEIRi.
W Ensure that pump station design minimizes TOD TOD X Reference THI\ DEIR (see page 3.5-10 of VIl
potential for impacts related to noise and Eastern Dublin DEIR) .
odors.
1'1 EnBur!?;t:hnt waate~/ater stor.age ball ins - - Heference 'nll\ DEIR (see 3.5-10 of . :;~\; ..
arc THO T!lD X page VJ1
designed to control odors and mini.mi.zo the rlnk Enutern Dublin DEIR) . DsnSD stated in a
of failure> in tile event of an oi1rthqunlt'Q. lel:ter to The City of Dublin dated .,
Novembor a, 1994, thnt the Oictrict 10
not at: thl.o tl,me .,ropoaln9 II ':W1\ .:;;,:,'
wnut:.ewntor OXpOI:'t: Pl:'oject J.nvolvin9
pumping anel expol:'t: of raw wn::Jtewat:er nnd
thua waotewat:el:' atorage baaino al:'e not
anti.cipated for tis project. The entire ,
wastewater collection aystem needed fol:'
thl.a project will be a gravity system
flo~d,lig to the exiflting District pump . ,'.
utnt:.J.on fncJ,lJ,tie" l.ocnt..:.ed llonth of 1-
- - 500. ,
H nequil:'e that Clonotl.'uction of the l.'ecycled water 'rIlD '1'f)1l X Need to wl.'ite condition. VK1
distribution system be in accordance with all .:~
..!~ble State and local regulations. - - - . :;,;~,:,
~I Ensure that reservoJ.1:' conotruction meeto all TI.1D '1'~ X DSHSD otated in a letter to The City of VLl
applicable standardo of DSnSD and hppropl.' ia te Dublin dated November 3, .1994, that in ..
health agencies. accordance ~/ith the Policy on Hajor
Infrnstr\lcturc adopted by the Diotl:'ict,
nll rnnjot. fncU.i.l:co fll:e deeiCJnccl and
L__- botlt by the Dietl.'l.ct:. nnd thUD will I
l'ldhat.e t~o nll Dint:.rl.ct atnnclill':da. 1\11
I I h,,,Il.l:h ut;nnclnrc1 wi.ll be required to b..
IlHl t:.
-
(,
r
l'
P
20
'l'J\SKS IlE:LIITED TO SJ\IIT'J\ IlI'J'J\ COI.IHEHCIJ\T, CE:Il'J'E:H SOHTI':1l IlY rUT-Ir.J\'.CIOIl 1.l!';J\SIJllE IIllHIlEIl, IIOVElmEIl 9, 1994
1,J\STEIlH IlllnT.III r.lmEI!1lT. !,T,IIII l\1.mllot-l!:.ln/SpECIFIC PLIIII
HITIGJ\T.IOII l.mJ\SUIll~S/IICT.IOll PllOC;Ill\HS/ H1PLEHEIITJ\TIOH HEnSll!{ES
l'~ i ..0'" l <0 ,he p<opoood <eoyd ed "",0< p'''''p
stations meet to meet all applicable standards
of DSIlSD. An III pg. 023.
1
03.05
/23.0
2
03.05
/211.0
91\
PH
90 PH
7 03.05 9D PH
/29.0
8' 03.05 PH
/30.0
PH Ensure that recycled water projects meet any
applicable salt mitigation requirements of Zone
7.
PH Expana 1)51\5D service }}o\lndarien to enCOll\pann
the entire eastern Dublin Specific Plant Grn
aren.
P\-l EnCQUCh90 all devoloprnaul: in tho pl:njoct. nrCla.
to connect to the DSI\SD water By'!!~ern.
PH Ilequire water conDervation meaDur.eD to be
deoLgned into individual projects.
Require a recycled water distribution syotern be
incorporated into individual proiectn.
Enoure that Sona 7. has water Dupply neaded to
me.t requirements of the project.
Zone 7 and DSRSD ehould construct two
additional turnouts from the Zone 7 Cross
Valley Pipeline to Derv~ the Eastern Dublin
area.
PJ:'ovide for: lncl~ei\oc:d water nourcr..: rcl.i.nb.i.li.t.y,
the Project water oystern should be
interconnected with exiating adjoJ.nJ,ng oyotoms.
TOD
PIli': 7.
l\Nlm
1\1>7.0
'1'111\1'
son
'l'HJ\P
son
THI\P
son
'!'I1l\l'
son
'l'l-ll\l'
son
x
DSRSD stated in 11 letter to The City of
Dllblin dated November 3, 19911, that as
the owner and operator of allan and 00-
site recycled water facilities needed
for this project, the District will
ensure that all Duch facilities shll
meet all aE licable standards.
Staff will work with Zone 7 when they
begin design of any recycled water
project for this area. Staff should
wr.ite letter.
DSIlSD Gtnted in a letter. to The City of
Dublin dated Novcnilier 3, 1994, that the
project oite is already located within
the OJ.otrlct boundarleo.
CondJ.ti.on foe PC'QvJ..o.1.on of w 11 BQJ."VQ
l.etter.
Require water conservation methodD
identified in DEIn ~ FEIn be
incorporated into project per City Hater
Conservation Ordinance.
Write condJ.tion regarding DSIlSD comment
letter.
nequire wil,. ..erve letter. Get cop.y of
contraot or letter from Zone 7 re9ar~in9
contract for file.
This project w 11 not present a ~emand
which would require the construction of
either turnout at th~s time.
VP4
TnD
x
VNJ.
VOl
'l'Hl\p
snn
x
';~I~'~~1
V02
1"1,11\1' --7-
nr..r>p
-F"Mi\p--T-
nLD!'
VPJ.
1'111\1' -7
ilL!)!'
1"1,11\1' --7
11T,r> I'
VP2
VP3
CON'!' X
COIIT
<';011'1.' - - x - -Pinna !Hlhmil:ted by J)Sn.SD Lndici\te design
La in nccordance witl, tIlls mitigation
nlenOllra. DSRSO will construct
fncJ.l.U,J.on recommencled by the Dodoon
otudy. Hay need a condition regarding
nn Cl\ocrnr::nt aC1."osa lIomn!:t propat-ty along
Tnsoaj.ra Creek and I-SOD per. DSnSD
~ __.____ _ _ _ _ ~~n!!.'!~:.!' t: 1 c l: t~er a
VP5
7.:1
" 3 -I ~
I,
T1\SKS REL1\TEO 1'0 S1\/IT1\ RIT1\ COI,nIERCI1\L CEtlTrm SOltTEIl BY IH'.rIGI\TIOll HEI\SlJRE llUHf\ER, lfOVEf.lflER 9, 1994
EI\STERlf DlJflLIlf GEtlERI\L PLl\tI I\f.lEtlDHElfT/SPECIFIC PLl\lf
HITIGI\'.rION f.lEI\SURES/1\CTION PIWGRI\f.lS/ H1PLEHE1ITI\TIOtl HEI\SURES
Provide a baclcup source of water supply to il:o
Zone 7 source. DSASD will reimburse City of
Pleasanton for construction and operation of
new groundwater wells south of the Project area
'l'llD
TOD
o
03.05
/32.0
03.05
/33.0
PH E;atabJ.l.nh n phalling for wat:or ta'enl:ll\'Hlt:. ny"l:of1\
improvements to meet incrQa"lng demand" on it:.s
wat:.er 13Y13tem.
PH Require DSRsn constrUction of two new
chlorination/ fluoridation stations at tho two
proposed Zone 7 turnouts tO,eastern Dublin to
meet increased demand resulting from the
ro ect.
'l'1l1J
Tllll
x
DIAsn stated in a letter to The City of
Dublin dated November 3, 1994, that it
acknowledges that the baclcup water
supply source ia desireable for ultimate
build-out: of the Specific Plan area.
The acope of thia project, however, does
not warrant a backup supply source from
outside the DiB~rict service area. The
District has recently signed a new water
supply contract with Zone 7 which
specifies the Zone will provide all wter
requested for the Specific Plan Area
wi.t:.hi.n t:he conr,trainto of its ability to
do 00. TIle Distric dOQD not C\lrrcntly
ant:.icipate obtaining ~ny water aupp1y
from t:he Ci.ty of Ple~llnnton' 0 well
project referonced in the Mitigation
Monoure. The Diotrict anticipated-s
providing oignLflcant: amounts of
recycled water to landscaping
improvements to this nnd future projects
i.n the are".
Choclt w;,t:.h 7.ono 7 rtO I B\:~t:UO of ph"sing
plan liotecl in PEIR. Staff should write
le\:t:e~'.
Write status letter on western turnout
and chlorination/fluoridation otation
et~tue to DSRSD and Zone 7
VP6
VQl
1
'i'UD
'1'00
x
VQ2
I
',' .,:
:.\,~
--' \
. '
, ~
. ....,
2~
52
03.05
/3<1.0
53
03.05
/35.0
5<1
03.05
/36.,0,
03.05
/37.0
55
\,
TI\SKS RELI\TED TO SI\NTI\ 11I'l'1\ CO~II'lERCII\T. ClmTER SOR'I'lm OY IH'l'IGI\'l'IOII HEI\SIlRE IIlJ1.mER, 1I0VEnDER 9, 1994
EI\STlr.n1l DUIlT.!!l rmllEnl\T. PT.1\1l I\HI~rlllHElI'l~/SPECIFIC PLI\II
HITIGl\'l'IOll HEI\SUnES/ l\C'l~IOll PIWGHI\HS / IHPT"EHElITI\'l'IOIl HEI\SUnES
PH Provide an adequate water supply system and
related J,mprovemanto and otorage facilities for
all new development in the project arca.
90
l')H r::nu\u.'c thnt I)SHSO updateo it:.u \>li\l:ol: nYEJl:.OII\
mal'lter plan computer model to reflect the
adopted Specific plan/cPI\ land uscn.
Development must pay cost.
PH COr\llo1.i.clnt:c t.:ho CIlI11[) P(ll~)ctJ ond l\lnlT\(H1H C01.1nt::y
wnt~("r UY{l1:f,.'~mfJ nn<1 t;llr:nout;u \.oI1.t:h t:ho f)tiU:jn
_-!:!'y'sl;(un.
PH Require that dooign and conntnlCtion of. all
water system facility improvements be in
iJccorclanc::r~ wi.th n~HSO :Jt:nndnr:d!!~
'1'I.IIIP
SDH
pll.r:i'.
I\rnm
HI~7.0
co j.f.i;--
'!'!-IIIP
son
GHI\D
OLDP
'1'1.1 II P
son.
COH',.
x Require will serve letter. DsnSD is
currently completing an engineering
analysis of interim water distribution
~nd storage alternatives to adequately
oupply the proposed project while
providlng facilities \~hich can be
incorporated successfully into the
ultimate system required to accommoclatd
build-au I:. of the Santa Rita area and
adjacent properties. The results of
this analysis will indicate any required
ol:or.a')o f:ncJ.li\:1.en whic;1I will become
t:oC]uir.emento of I:.he pt"ovision of
oDt:vicc. 1\1:. I:.hio I:.ime DaRSD ol:.ates that
it doeo nol:. appear that new sl:.orage
facilitleo will be neceoBary for this
development. The existing Zone 7
turnoul:. to ~lameda county will be
util1.zed (per letter to The city of
Dublin fL"om DSRSD elated November 3,
_ _ _ -!22..1..1 .
x x Danso hall already prepnreel the Enatarn
DUblin Facilities Plan, Final Report,
e1atecl Dacember, 1993, (Dodoon ",nd
I\ssociates) to provide the updated
computer simulations and master plan
analyses for wastewater co11ect1.on and
potable and recycled water systems.
I\lameda County funded the Dodson Study
in part. I\pplicant ohall install
requirod facilities aD a condition of
____~EI?L.ovaJ..
X Plnno oubmi.ttcd by DsnSD lndicate
GOmpl.i.llrlCn with t:11 to ml. t~ j.Qlll: lon lnot\Qura.
VRl
.","
~
VR2
.~
,).
VR3
Viil\i! - - X
nLDP
;->.:1
I-/"il:a conditio!\ regarding approval by
DSRSD re')arding water system.
VR4
T1\SKS RELII~'CD TO S1\IIT1\ RIT1\ CQl.\I.mRCI1\1, CEllTCR SORTEll lIY I-\TTIGIITIOIl 1'H'1\SURE IlUHIlER, 1l0VEHnER 9, 1994
I':1\S1:ERII llunLIH GlmEIlIIT" P1,II11 1\HEIlDHEIlT/ SPECIFIC PI-1\1l
HITIG1\TIOII HE1\SURES/1\CTIOII PHOGR1\I.1S/IHPLI':HEIIT1\TIOIl HE1\SURES
57 03.05
/39.0
~\'Iater. Require a "will serve" l.etter from
n~RSD prior to permit approval for grading.
piT'l1educe the gL'owth induci.ng potential. of water.
syctem expansion, the water. distribution system
will be sized to accommodate only the estimated
water demanda from approved land uses withi.n
the Eastern Dublin specific plan and General
Plan Amendment.
sa 03.05
/40.0
pH Ensure that the water distribution cyatem is
planned, driB igned ancl conlltruct:.ed for energy
efficient:. operation.
59 03.05
/41.0
P\-l llcq\lix:c all roner:voJ.r conutr\lction to meet all
tho applicable otandards of DSIlSP, to meet
C\l)~J:Cl1t lIo.i.nmlc hut.l.cli.n() L1t:nllr\nr~f.lfJ, nrld \:'0
pt.ovJ.dn ndc(junt:o nlt:c dt:ninn{Jc.
'1'/111[>
SDn
Conditions regarding provision of will
serve letters for fresh water.
[>Hl~Z
1\NIlE
REZO
'I'/1M' X -x IlSnSD hilS already prepared the Eastern
son Dublin Facilities Plan, Final Report,
dated December, 1993, (Dodson and
Associates) to provide the updated
computer simulations and master plan
analyses for wastewater collection and
potable and recycled water systems.
The report provides for pipeline sizing
enJ.y to nccolnodate dovcloplncnt witllin
the spoci.fic Plan area nnd nraaD located
betwoen the specific Plan's weot
boundary and existing development within
the City. No oversizing for areao east
or north of the specific Plan have been
included. Alameda County funded the
Dodson study in part. 1\pplicant shall
install required facilities as a
condition of approval. (Per Letter to
1~o City of Dublin from DSRSD dated
November 3. 1994
COI-/'!' 'X--- 1\11 utility Ilystenu! designed and bu'ilt
to be owned by DSRSD are and will
continue to be designed and built for
energy efficient operation in
conformance with sound engineering
principleo as required by the District
Code (letter to The City of Dublin from
DsnSD dated November 3, 1994 .
FHl\l' X - - - -65"1\50 ol:ol:ed i.n a letter to The City of
Ill,!"> I' Dublin dnted November 3, 1994, that in
nccol:dnncc wit), tIle I'ol.J.cy Oil Major
Inf:l.~nf.lt:r.\1ct:'l1l.~C iHlopt:.cd by the })l.Gt:.L"ict:.,
Ill1 fnci11teo are designed and built by
the District and thus will adhere to all
I)i.n~rj.ct ntnndnrda.
COllT
')'1-11\1'
SDn
211
VSl
vorl
VUl
TI\Sl<S RELI\TED TO S1\t1T/\ IU'l'1\ COl-lI-lERCI1\TJ CEN'].'EIl SOIlTEIJ BY !-1ITIGI\TIOtl I-lE1\SlIRE lllll.lllER, NOVEI.lDER 9, 1994
E1\STEllll nUIlLIIl GEllEIl1\T, PL1\1l 1\HEllDBEIl':r/SPECIFIC PL1\1l
HITIG1\'.rIOlI J.lE1\SURES/1\CTIOll PIWGR1\HS/ HIPLE!-1EIlT1\TION HE1\SlIRES
it
~.
'I
\
Hcquire t:he proposed new water pump stations to
meet all the applicable standards of DsnSD and
i.nclude cmer.<Jcncy power gencraf:.orD nf: Ouch pump
station.
61 03.05
/43.0
PH Include dcul.C)n pl:ovioionn t.o pump nl:iltionf.J t:o
l':cd\lca pound levelu fr.orn opol::a(:.l.l14) pump mot:or.o
and erncrQcncy g~ncrat.o)~o.
62 03.05
/44.0
63 03.05
/45.0
64 03.05 9T
/46.0
65 03.05 9U
/47.0
66 03.05
/40.0
67 03.05
/49.0
PW Provide drainago facilities that will minimiz..
any increaned ~otential for erosion or
floodi.nq.
P\~ nequire channel improvements consioting of
natural creek bottomo and .ide slopes with
natural veqetation wher~'possible.
P\~ nequire the preparati.on of a Haatcr Ih'aina'Je
Plan Eor each develoE!!'.ent.
--Pw- ncCJu i.x:e Project: aL~ca development:. l:o [u.~ov ide
facilJ.ti.cn to nl.).cviate potentJ.nl clowrlut:.:en,"
_ _Q~~~~l!~~-!,!!.!.!!-~~_!l )~O l~!!.E2!'__!.!..~!.'!.~!.I~P!!!.~:!~,l: .
1'\-1 Hc'll! i.':c t.:hu COlllJ t.:.J:'"ucl.: i.on of t.IH~ bHc1c.hono
c1ral.nngo Enc11.i.t:ioo to bo cantlintclI!: wi.t:h the
Storm Drainage Haster Plan.
PW Plnn filci.l.ltico l1nd InnniH)Cmulll.: IH:'"OICl:i.r.O:l t:llnl:
pr.otact: i\nd enhnnce \.Ji\t:CJ:O l)uilli.t:y.
'1'1.\/\['
son
'1',.,,,p
snn
'l'1-I1\1'
son
'1'l-l1\P
son
'l'111\ l'
son
TH1\P
snn
DSHSD stated 1n a letter to The City of
Oub11n dated November 3, 1994, that no
new potn))).e water pump stations arc
requi.rod OL" antic1pated for thio
project. In accordance with the
lJistrlct'o Policy on Bajor
Infrastructure 'all ~ump stations are
designed and built by the District and
thus will adhrer to all Distric
standards which address factors such as
_ ____,. _ _ _ _ ,..<::.!~~r!]~!!E.Y_p.0\''''''7 anel noine attenuatl.on.
1<'1'\1\1' X nsn!.J1J lJt:atocl in a lettel: to 'J.'he City of
Ill..nl' Dub1.l.n dated November 3, 1994, that no
now potable water pump stationa are
required or anticipated for thia
project. In accordance with the
Oistrl.ct'lJ Policy on Major
InfrastrucbJre all pump stationo are
designed and built by the District and
thuo will adhrer to all Distric
standarda which add~eas factora such aa
_______~g~o"'!er. Bnd no.l.nCl ntten\lnt:.ion.
FI-I1\P X Condition rcgarding compliance au part
OJ.oP of grading plan. "
FIII\P
nLDP
x
FHI\P
OLOP
-x
Condition in the event of alterati.on to
the Creek.
FI-II\P -X
nr.np
-j:'i:ji\i;- - - X
111.111'
County ia preparin'J'
pnrt of ~tllnter Drninngo Pinll.
'I'Tii\P~~ -ir;ii\i.-.~ - - X
.'inJl nT.,1l1'
'l'I-II\P
~nn
Nouc.l cfJlld.i.t:.J.on.
-X
ZOlle '/, nsnSD r.. Ci.ty l'ubJ.i.c Hodes will
lI\on1t:o..0 t:h.i.n reC)u1.r.eI\\CI1I: t:)ll:ouCJh project
rcvi.c\-Jo
FIII\I'
Hr.1l1'
2S
VWl
"'8
:.,.,
, "~~;' :
V\~2
VXl
VX2
.:~
VX3
VXol
VXS
VVl
68 03.05
/50.0
69 03.05
/51. 0
70 03.05
/52.0
71 03.05
/53.0
72 03.05
/511.0
73 03.05
/55.0
74 03.06
/01. 0
75 03.06
/02.0
76 03.06'
/03.0
'l'J\SKS 1u::r.J\TED TO SJ\II'.rJ\ IlITI\ Cotir-tEIlCI1\L CEIlTf;It SClJt'l.'IW IIY I-lITIGJ\'rIOH f.lEI\SlJIlE !HJ!.lllrm, NOV"Ef.lDEll 9, 1991
E1\STERIl OUDLIN GEHER1\L pr.nll nf.lf;1l0f.lENT/SPECIFIC PLJ\II
MITIGJ\TIOII HEJ\SURES/J\CTIOIl PROGItnMs/IMPLEMEWCJ\TIOH HEJ\SUItES
Protect groundwater resources with
support for an ongoing groundwater
rorftm for the Central Dasin.
~Iater QUlIlity Inve'ltiglltion. Tlequl.t'e II
"pec!.fic water q\1a1!.l:y J.nveotigal:),on be
suhmJ.tted ~Iith ench (levelopmen!: npPlicat!.on to
demonstrate existing water quality and impacts
that urban runoff would have. The water
qllal!.ty investigation should addreol'l the
I]lIlInl:il:y, or: i:uno~f' a.hd the ~ffecti1 {'ot'm
dluch,r~ed ~o111ltahts from nurface rurio!f in~o
breeks alld detention facill~ieD.
'""Fi1-DeVolop corm,,"nity bae..d progrlll"o i:~Cllto
local reoidenta and buaLneeaea on m..thod.. to
reduco nonpoLnt eo~rcee of poLlution. and
coordinate sllch programe with current 1\Lamoda
_ COllntY~ramo.
1'1-/ Requit.s all development to meet the l:aql\it'ement
ot the City of Dublin's "Dest Hanagement
Practices" to mitigate storm water poLlution.
I'H Tlequire all development to meet the water
quality requirement;" of the CLty of DlIbl1.n'a
_ ...!~f.!l!!L pe J:'"ll. t; .
I'W Hequire all development to meet the WiJ!;el:
ql\!\lity requirements of the Alameda County
Urban Runoff Clean Water Pro ram.
nL Require the use of modern seismic design in
con.truation of development projects, and build
in accordance with Uniform Duilding code and
applicable cOllllty and city code re'"l~liro~~nts.
D~ Provido setbacke from or modificat1.on of
\lnatnlllQ nnel poCantJ.nlly lJnBtnl,l.e lnnclforn,o,
and uoe af appropriate dcaJ.CJn to en!J\,1L~O nai.nOlle
_ 13af:ety..
P\'/ norJui.ro nppr.opl:"J.nl:o 1Jl:i.H.llng nnd don.i.~JI1 \':0
completely remove unotable nnd potenl:i.1l1ly
unstabl.e materi.nls in hi.lilli.de arean Hher.e
develop_mont '!'.~Y..2:~lIire ollb!lt'!.!:!!:.!~.:!._gl=~!i.!:<]-,,--- __.~___~ ____
'1'1.\I\P
son
'I'l-lJ\I'
son
'1'1-1111'
SIHl
'1'111\1'
son
'l'~I1\ l'
SDR
'1'11111'
son
TH1\t'
son
'J'I.IIlP
!)tln
'l'H1\1'
[;nH
nll\ I'
nLDP
x
Write letter to Zone 7
l'l-I 71 I'
nUll'
xx
!loq'lire applicant 1:0 pr<llpare
investigation and sllbmit as soon as
pooaiblo. Conditons may be required
depending on results of the
investigation. .
COII'I'
----x- St.Clf.f u).L~(~nc.1y conc.htct:.o l:.hco~ proc;p:nma.
llLDI'
-x-
Need condition.
1.ILDP
x
!leed oon<\1.tion.
1IT-f)P
--x
!leed condition.
HIli!'
OLUI'
x
Write standard condition
FHIIP
nr..I1P
--x
Nued condition regilrdlng L"eD\.11tn of
~lQol:.ochnJ.c.nl ),,~epor.t:. may l."cCJulre r~vi[]lon
to aLto plan.
n.,i\'P""'--X--- '\I::I:r~l:fJ t:o }\.ll.lclide devclopmcl\l:.
111.111'
~r;
VIE3
7
03.06
104.0
8 03.06
105.0
9 03.06
/06.0
0 03.06
/07.0
1 03.06
108.0
2 03.06
/09.0
3 03.06
/10.0
-I 03.06"
/11.0
TIISKS RELIITED TO SIIIITl\ 11ITl\ COmmRCIl\T. Cr:;NTr:;R SaRTI>!) BY HITIGl\'l'IOII I1EIISUHE Nl1I-10ER, llOVEHOER 9, 1994
EIISTERlI DIIIILIII Glmr:;RIIT. PLl\tl 1I1-mllDllElI'.r/spECIFIC pLIIN
MITIGl\TION MEIISl1RESIl\CTIOII pROGRIIHS/II1PLEHENTl\TIOII MEl\SURES
.,
~
i!"
retention structures and surface and
~ubsurface drainage improvements should be used
.s appropriate to improve the stability of
sidehill fills and potentially unstable
materials, particularly colluvium~ not entirely
removed bY-9radinq.
PH Reduce eeismically-induced fill settlement by
reqtlil:'ing pl:'opel:'ly designed fi.lls with key.,ays
and subsul:'faca drainage, and whl.ch are
adequately compacted (i.e. minimum 90% relative
_~p'ac;t;ion) .
PH I)oo!.gn r.ondo,-l3tt,.ucl:ural fO\lnclnt:loflfJ, nnr.t
unct'arCJr.'ound ut:J.l1.l_:icoEJ to accornrnoc1ntc cnt:.i.mntnd
settlement without failure, especially Bcross
tranoitiono batweon fills nnd O"to, nllel to
I:'emove or reconstruct potentially uno table
Btock pond embankments in development: areas.
P~I Require all development projects in the I'roject
area to perform design level geotechnical
inveatiqations prl.or 1:0 issuinC:L.~.!ly_permi.ts.
CM Provide for the development of earthquake
preparedneaa plans and the dissemination of
appropriate emergency measures to all Project
residenta and employees.
PH Reduce alteration to existing landforms through
the preparation of grading plans that adapt
improvements to natural landforms and
implementation of such techniques as partial
pads and retaininq structures.
PH Reduce landform alteration by carefully siting
indivJ,dllnl improvcmanto to avoid nclvcrno
conditions and tl,ua the need for rnmodlnl
_ ..9E!!~.!1~..
PH 1":OPl1 l,'n dot:/1 t.lod d0I1147J1\ .lr.:vn.1. ~Jnnl:f)r.;11111,(:n 1
J.nv(JlJt~J.C'JH '~.t.orHJ on dovol.opUlont: f1J,l:U(I "I.i,t:h I.n bhr.J
Project area, to locate and characterize
grouncl'Hlter condi.ti.orts and formulate denign
cri.t:cri.n nnd menfHlrcn t.o miti.<Jnt:e i\Clvcl:no
condi.ti.ona..
development.
Refers to hillside development.
'1'1-11\1'
SDR
Fl11\P
IJLDP
x
VIE4
,~,~
--~-X
Hd.tc (;on<lJ,t.l.ol\ 1:<19al:cl.lnl) guoteCllnicnl
ropol:t fll1l\ utoc)t pond rel"ovnl.
'1'1-1111'
!:inn.
/"111\1'
1)1.\)[>
VIll;S
--x
Condition regarding geo\:echnical l:eport
.,hich is requirement of tentative map
f1ubmittal.
Responsibility of the City to prepare
and distribute per DEln. Need to
prepare.
'nJIIP FI.I 11 I'
son OLDP
1995 FI-1 11 I'
OLDI'
'1'1,1111' fHIIP
SDR nr~DP
VIE6
x
VIE7
Relates to hillside developments.
x
VIAl
l\eJ.ntco to hillside developments..
'.1'1-1111'
SDH
PI-1 II I'
IILTlP
x
VIA2
J7fii\i';- -- - -X -
II LIll'
(:'"llld.i.t~ tOil l.'f.I~'1I1~tl.t.Il(J (:JfJ(:)t~nr:hl\ l(u\ l. ~:'cpc)J::'t:.
wllJ.oll .Lu 1.""J"l.l:pment of L:cntllti.vc map
uubnd.tl:.nl. .
'(''''/\1'
:,:1)1\
VIUl
27
'"
TJ\SKS RELJ\TEI1 TO S1\ll'rJ\ IUT1\ cor.1/.mItCIJ\r, CF.II:rr:ll SOIlTEIl BY IHTIGJ\TIOlI HE1\SllItE lIUHnEIt, llOVEHIlER 9, 199<1
E1\STlmrr TlllllLIIl GEllIr.J11\r, 1'1.1\11 1\HEIII1HEllT/SPECIFIC rL1\ll
HITIGI\TIOII HEI\SURES/ J\CTIOII PIWGRI\I.IS/ HIPLEHEIITI\TIOH HEI\SUItES
5
subdrain systems, drainage pipe and
materials to reduce groundwater
6
03.06 - 'PW nemove stock pond embankment and drain
/13.0 reservoirs in development areas to reduce
_ ,..groundwater impacts.
PH Prepare design level geotechnical
investigations for development projects in the
Project area to characterize site specific
soil~~nd bedrock conditions, and to formulate
_ _ .1!EI?iepr.inl:o....!:!eal.!Jn crl.toria.
03.06 PH Irnplorn~nt monout:oo 1~o control. moJ.lJt\ll;C 1n l:h(J
/15.0 ground to reduce the potentl.al tor l.mpact
reaulting from cKpanaive sol.ls and rock.
IlL neduce the potential effects of eKpanoJ.ve ooi.l
and rock through appropriate foundation and
__ pavement desiqn.
PH Prepare design level geotechnical
inveotigationo for development wi.thin the
Project area to characterize oite opecific
olope stability conditions and to fornmlato
__~pd...te doui'ln critoril1.
PH J\void impacts from unstable olopcs by siting
development away from unstable landforms and
from slopes greater than 30%, and providing
lower density development in steep, unstable
areaD.
03.06 -PiT Implement measures such as removi.ng,
/19.0 reconstructing, or repairing unatable nrean, or
ol:r\lcl:ural ongineoring, whQn un..table areas
cannot: be avoided.
03.06 - ""PW neg\l ire grading plans for hills i.de al:ons, which
/20.0.. . pl.an" mJ.ni.rni:r.e gL'aclin<J nnd requi,lCerl cut:n nn,\
. . fJ.lln hy adapt:ing roads 1:0 nat:ur.aJ. 1nn,1for.mo
and ote .p'J,nq~cturen do.,n nteop"'r. \llopos.
7
03.06
/14.0
o
9
03.06
/16.0
o
03.06
/17.0
1
03.06
/16.0
2
3
TI-IJ\P
son
x
Condition regarding findings of
geotechnical report, however, subdrains
are normally used in hi.llside
development:s.
There are no stock ponds on this site.
VIB3
I'I-IJ\P
IJT.,O r
'1'1-11\1'
son
------
FI1I\P X
OLDP
'1'l-II\P
son
---X- Submittal of a geotechnical report
required at Tentative Hap application or
prior to grading and building permit
approval.
VIB4
FI-IJ\P
nLDr
'1'1-11\1' II I.Il I'
SDH
THill' 1'"1111l'
son Dl.,DP
'1'1.11\1' L'HJ\P
son nr.DJ:>
- - x - t:or\c.U.t:ion l1\ny ba roql1.i.roc\ ul; 'l'Qntat.:ive
Hap after. oubmil:tal of geotechnical
_ _ _ _ ..E~pOl:t.
X Condition required at grading and
building permit approval.
-X--- nefers to hillaide development.
VICl
VI135
:.;;~;~\~~~i~
VIS6
~:~~t;::::.:':~:,;{
'1'1-1111'
son
[.'HIII' -X--- HefeL"S to hillaJ.de development.
DLDP
VIC2
.'1'HJ\1'
SDn
FI-I1\1' x--- nefers to hillside. development.
nLDp
VIC3
'1'111\ l'
I1IlIl
t::i1~-X--- Hefol:S 1.:0 hi,llside dovAlopment.
nr.,1l1'
VIOl
7.n
4 03.06
/21. 0
5 03.06
/22.0
6 03.06
/23.0
7 0:).06
/24.0
a 03.06
25.0
9 03.06
/26.0
03.06
/27.0
03.06
/28.0
03.07
/01.0
, ,
lj
"1
'.r/\SKS REL/\TED TO S1\IIT/\ RIT/\ COf.IJ.lEIlCI/\T. CEI/TER r;ORTEIl BY IHTIG/\'.rIOIl HE1\SURE raHmER, llOVEJ.lBER 9, 1994
!,;/\STEIlIl DUIlT.II/ GEIIEIl1\T. Pr.1\N /\I.IEIlIll.mWr:/SPECIFIC PL/\I/
MITIG/\TIOI' HE/\SURES/ACTIOIl PROGR1\HS/IHPLEHEIITATIOII MEASURES
PH Require grading plan and mitigation measure
compliance with the minimum requirements of the
Uniform lluildin9 Code and applicable County and
___ Cit~~~uirements.
or, Require that un retained cut slopes nhould not
exceed 3:1 unless detailed, site specific
geotechnical investigations indicate that
steeper inclinations are a~priate and safe.
PH Requil;;e that slopes steeper that 5: 1 should be
keyed and benched into competent material and
provid~d with BUbdrainage, prior to pLacement
_ of. e'!l9lnocu:ed fill..
PH He')uil'Q that unrein forced fill alop..o ollou).d 1><0
no steepol' than 2:1 and provided with benches
anel BublJurface drainage, aa appL'opr ia te.
rw Require that fill be engineered (compacted) to
at leaat 90 percent I'elativecompnction.
PW Hequiro that development projects prepare plans
for tho periodic inspection and maintenance of
subaurfacc drainage featurcs, and the removal
and disposal of materials deposited in surface
drains and catch basins.
PW Hequire that grading activities be timcd to
avoid the rainy season as much aD pODsl.ble, and
that interim control meaSureD be implemented to
control runoff and reduce eroDi~!!-potenl:ia'l.
PW Reduce longterm erosion and sedimentation
impacta through approprJ,ate. design,
conatruction, and continued maintenance of
!lllrfnco nnd llllbsllr.face dr.ainarre.
--pr:-1':n(J"t~() I:hn'.:, dJ.I:uct: c1.i.ul:ul:hnnr.:u- (If: l.-elllovnl 01:
t:,l:QCJl1 or nal:J.vo vCCJot:nl:lon covel:' he Ild.nl.m.L:r.cd
and L"cotrictcd to thoBe nreaa actllally
c1eol.<]nntcc1 f.or: I;ho conotrllctJ.on of
__ ...l!.f!r.:!!Z.2.~!!!!~~l].~t!~ . ___"
'1'H1\1I 1"'.11\1.
SOn. II Ll)!'
'1'1 11\ I' 1'111\1'
SDn nLDl"'
'1'l-\1\P FH1\I'
SDH nLDP
!'l-\1\ l' !JLDI'
spn
'1'1.11\1'
SDn
Tl-\1\1'
SDH
'l'l-\I\P
SDn
'1'/11\ P
son
'1'1-1I\1'
nnn
,
", :':';
I
:j
FI.II\l'
nLDI'
Write standard condition.
i'
~~;..f~:.' Ii
. ,:\~?'; Ii
,.
,':;";;:;~:)i:
'*t~~i
:.:'!}~"::-;i;l
x
VID2
-----
[.'11/\1' X
!lLPP
Hefero t:o hillside development:.
VID3
FI.l/\P
DLDP
Refera to hillside development.
VI04
x
X
nct.."" to hJ.:l.loJ.de dQVllllopmont:.
VIes
- T Requirement of gl:ad1n9 pal:mit and soil..
_ _ _ _ -E.e.eort.
X Retero to hillside development.
VID6
. ,.~.
VID7
X
'1'hio l.s Il I:equiremellt of t;he City's
Grading Ol:dinance. 1I0wever, also write
condition.
VIDa
FI.l/\P
nr-op
Refers to hillside development and/or
large undeveloped area...
VID9
x
~---x-
"'..1)1'
Cnl1rltt:.i.l'Hl l~n(Jnl:(li.JHJ flood c:o"l:1."oJ.
lmpl;'QVClIH'.H\l:.O t:o l:.hu Creak nnd
L-evegotation.
IIICl
29
!l
TJ\S~:S HELJ\TED '1'0 Sntl'J'J\ IllT/\ cot-lI.mItCI/\I. ClmTEll SOItTEIl BY IHTIGJ\TIOII Im/\StJItE lllJllIIEIt, 1l0VEf.lIlETl 9, 1994
E/\S'.rEIlIl IltllJl.IfI GENlm/\T.. PL/\ll J\I-lE11D1-lEIlT/SPECIFIC PLllfI
IH'l:IGII'rrOfl f.l1~J\StlllES/ IICTIOIl PItOGIt/lf.IS/IHPI.El.I!':IlTJ\'J'Iotl 1-lE/\SIlItES
PL'ovide for the prepnration of vegetati.on
enhancement/ manngement pIano for all open
"pace areas (,.hetheL' held publicly oc-
privately) with the intent to enhance the
biologic potential of the area as wildlife
habJ.tat.
ltequJ.re a detailed revegetation/ eestoral:i.oll
plan be developed for all disturbed areao that
are to remain undeveloped.
203
Need to pc-epnre plall in coordinntion
"Jith nKF/J\LJ\CO study. I1ny r.equire
condition (oJ: n project to ensure'
COllfOI:l1Iity with stlldy,
03.07
/02.0
x
x
TI.II\P
snn
FHI\I'
I1I.DP
(;t) .~- PL
204 03.07
/03.0
205 03.07
/04.0
206 03.07
/05.0
nequiee fellcing on ens tern boundney of
site during constrllction and grading.
If area is disturbed also need condition
regnrdin reve etation,
The subject site is within the City
limit" and is in n ~oning district which
doeo not pormJ.!:: graEing activities.
SDn IlLDP X
F l.lI\ P
J\ImE !lEZO X
'J'HI\P
-"P'L' neqllire the City of Dllblin to develop and
imRfement gra~ing manngement plans to protect
rtparian and wetland aeeao, illcraaoe pInnt
d i.var'a icy, flnd cnco\lr1lge t.ho rccovf.U;Y 0 r: nn t.':lvr.!
_ _ .planto.
PL Ensure l:hat all areaa of diol:Ul:blU1CC be
revegetated aa qllickly as possible to peevcn~
aL'OS ion.
3~li~--x
FI.\I\P
Iteq\li.t'c. fencing on cnsl.:,en:n boundary of
aite dllring conotrllction alld grading.
If aroa ia distllrbed alao need condition
regnrdin eeve etation.
-X- I\ny moeli.fication to 'fnsBajara creek for
flood control purpooes will be completed
in n manner senoitive to ita native
otate.
IWft- ~-- -- - X -;'r"alJnjnrn Croclt ia not a pa>:t of this
!'1.IIIP project. Need to check ..-egarding _ -
drainage area adjacent the highway. nny
alteration or modification to TaBsajara
Creek will be approved throllgh
______~J:'peoprinte federal and otate agencies.
Il!.DI' X TasBajara Creek io not a part of this
project. Shollld the creek be modi.fied
or: chnncJoc1 i.n nny \o..ny, n. );"cvcCJctati.on
~_________l~.!~!l WO\11<1 be rcq~11recl, etc.
1'11/\1' X 'I'ho projoct Gl,to clooo not deain to
nl.l)p 'l'i'\unnjn,:,a Cr.ook. IJOWQVQI:, no n
r"~l.lvant:.nt:i.vo rnC)llD\lI..-(1) t.\ condtt..:.ion \.Jill be
,:eqlli.:o<1 that nny mocli,fl.cation to the
Creek ao a result of this project will
It..l.ck 1n t:l1c~e mitlgnt:lon mnnnurOD - need
condi.t:i.ot1n.
---------.--.,.-- --...------"-. .._-".._~--- - - ._- - _.~_...._-..-....._.-
- '"'PL"' nO<]lIi>:e the pecoe>:vation of natll>:nl ol:I.'onll\
corrJ.dorn, pondo, springs, neepo, and wetlnnd
arena wherever posoible.
207
03.07
/06.0
fiftH:?'.
I\NNE
lm7.0
FI1I\P
1l1,f)P
';~'t:>.~;
- ""PL
He'lllJ.>:<:l the inc::oeporntion of ri.pnr:J.nn nnd
wetland areas into project open opnce arenn,
and ensure that loss of ripnrinn or wetland
habitat be mitigated per Dept. of Fish & Game/
Corps of Engineers.
200
03.07
/07.0
IIIC7
--
PI.
neguire all oteenm coieidoes be r.evegetatod
with native plant species to enhilllCC theiL"
nnt.\lJ~al nppeilt'"nllcc and i.mpt:ovc hnhi.t:'i1(:' vnlucn..
snn
1'1'11\1'
209
03.07
/00.0
-PiT
f::ns\lrc ntorm L.uooff i.u cilt:):i.e(\ i.n nnt:11I:nl
!It:.r.C!nrn ahnnnC!lo \o,honovcr. ponnihlo, r:llt:hnt: l:hnn
l:CJplnclng \o/1.t:h tJl1dar:<iJ!.:'onnct dr.n.l.IH19t.1' D)'nt:nmn
(Hit, I-lcno\ll'o 3.7/9.0), IIltII 1'. 5n~ - ooe fol'
additional language re mnintennnce.
'/'1-11\1'
"nil
03.07
/09,0
210
]0
1
03.07
/10.0
2
03.07
/11. 0
3
03.07
/12.0
4
03.07
/13.0
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTEn ny MITIGATION MEASURE NUMDER, NOVEMDER 9, 1994
EASTER!! DUm,I11 GErIERAr, PLA!! n!-1E!!Df.lENT/SPP.:CIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
Establish a stt'eam corridor syatem that
provides multipurpose open apace corridors
capable of accommodating wildlife and
pedestrian circulation.
~~ PI, l\equire all pt'oject applicallta "ubmit
multiparameter wetlands delineation to the COE
for verification and jurisdictional
establishment, and submit plans for proposed
alteration to any watercourse to the DFG for
their.review and aeproval.
~ r>i:'" Proy,i'de for the development of II compr'llhenoive
ot~onr" corridor rQutorati.on prog~nln tl1nt:
identifies a detailed aet of criteria far
grading, Gtnbilization, and revegetation of
_ _ .J?,lanninq area otream channelo.
60 PL Provido for the dedication of land and
improvemento (i.e., trnilG, revcgetation, etc.)
along both aidea of strellm corridors as a
condition of project approval.
5 03.07 ~ PH
/14.0
6 03.07 ~ PL
/15.0
7
03.07
/16.0
Provide for the enactment of an erooLon and
sedimentation control ordinance establishing
performance standards to ensure maintenance of
water quality and protection of stream
channels.
Establish and maintain a liaiaon between the
City of publin and resource management agencies
(i.e. California Dept. of Fish & Game, U.S.
Fish & Wildlife Service, U.S. ftrmy Corp of
Engineer.a) for t:ho pu r.pOflC 0 f monitor. i.n~1
compliance with SpecLfic Plan poLicicn.
" "
I'r.~ nuC]uir.e uQn[j.tt~lvc hllbil:.nt llt:aan I)(~ nvo.tdod tln(\
protocted wherevet" feasible.
'I'1.1lI t'
son
FHftP X Tho Specific plan and Parks Master Plan
BLOt' establishes a trail system. One of the
trails will be along Taasajara Creek.
The project is setback at least ISO'
from the Creek.
FHlIl' - X should any alterations be required to
IlLnp Tassajara Creek, the appropriate
agencies will be contacted for
compliance with permitting requiremerits.
The negative dec. will be circulated
through OPR.
'1'1,1111' - X X I\lthough TaGflajara Creel~ ia not a part
GOR of this p~oject. any modifications for
flood control. will rcquire thio type of
reotoration program. DegLn prepllration
of D pr.ogram.
\""11\1' - - X The City will requil:e 21.0 part of the
IlLJ)[> development agreement that when the
parcel to the east develops, the County
will eatab1ish a trail system and
dedicnte it to the City or agency
___ desi.qnated by the City.
THill' X Need cOndi.tion regarding thio mitigation
son mensure. City has ordinance covering
this issue. "
'1'1.11\1'
SOR
Plm?
ANNI~
11r,:?O
'1'111\1"'
SOn.
PHE?
ANlm
HEZO
J.9SlI\ CON'l' X 'I'hio area ia not a biologically
sensitive area per the Draft EIR Figure
6.2. It is ehbwn on the map (includi.ng
the creek area) as "developed".
Jlawever, tho Negatlve Dr"claration will
be circulated throbgh the OfElce of
Plnnni.ng nnd T\aocarch, fjO 1':110 ci.ty will
__.._~~_ ___ __ _ _ -..!l!L!!~!!.1!ll:.ll!&!..ll9 l~hQnc 1.it\loonn.
'1'1.11\1' FIl1\P X No aqnoi.tl.vQ habitato have bOGn
son J1LOP J.dentifi.ed on the project liIite. Require
fenclng nlong eastern project boundary
___._._____..0.!~rJ.~ connl:r\lct.i.on to .:ot",ct Ct-eek.
:.11
r.
\;
i ~
8
03.07
/17.0
9
03.07
/18.0
o
03.07
/16.1
1 03.07 6N
/19.0
2 03.07
/20.0
3 03.07
/2,1. 0
4 03.07
j;l.2.0
5 03.07
/23.0
TI\SKS IlELIITEn TO SlIllTI\ ItITI\ COHl.IEIlCIl\r. cr::rlTEll SOllTlm nv HITIGIITIOIl HEIISl/IlE llur-mER, NOVEI.mEIl 9, 199<1
I:.IISTEIlII nl/nr.III GlmElllIL ['Lilli nlmlllll.lr::llT/SP~~CIFIC PI.IIN
MITIG1\TIOll HE1\SUIlES/1\CTIOII PIlOGIl1\HS/IHPLEHENT1\TIOll HE1\Sl/IlES
h':tr ltequJ,t:Cl all development
comply with the Eastern
FOx Protection Plan.
in the Project ilt.ea
nublin San Joaquin Kit
1'1. Provi,de for the coopernti.on between t:he City of
l'Jubl:in and other approprinto a<J"'nGJ.fHJ in lohe
proparntJ.on at. a Kit Fox lIabit"t: Hanu<Jcmont
Plan.
PH Restrict the use of rodenticides and herbicides
within the Project area in order to reduce
potential impact.. to wildlife.
PI, Tr i-colored illacl,bird. Hequire developers
conduct a preconstruct ion survey within 60 days
prior to habitat modification to verify the
resence of sensitive species.
l'L Ensure the protection and ,enhancement of
sensitive species habit~t areas.
PI.. noqui.rc Che mnint:cnl\llce of: a bllf.fcl.~ l\J:"C.HIrH.l
breeding sites of the red legged frog,
Callforrd.ll t i.ger oalnmnnder, nnc\ t:h~ Wcnl:cr.n
__EE!.!!d t:\lrt:.1.o ..bofol-C c01T\roenclng CO~!!!l:),;"\l::.~.!.'.
PL Ensure that a natural open spaco zone (Goldon
Eagle Protection zone) is maintained around tho
golden ea<Jle neDt located in the northeast
corner. of t:l!~p2.~!,i.n9 al:cn.
TI.IIIP
son
THill'
snll
19911
THill'
SOil
'1'/1111'
son
'1'1'IIIP
SOrt
FI.I1\1'
OLDI'
'1'1'11\1'
snIt
FHIIP
ilLOP
Modification or construction within 100'
of stream bank needs to be in dry
oenson.
-X- - The pl:oject env. is not associnted with
Kit Fox dens. No kit foxes were
observed on the site during the Specific
plan biological.survey. Need condition
that should preconstruct ion survey
identify foxes, S.J. Kit Fox Protection
Plan will be followed.
The project site is flat and is not
oho..n J.n t:he OEIR to be in an area ..here
Kit FoxeD would locate. Reference page
205 and Pi<J. 6.2 of the Specific Plan -
should preconstruct ion survey identify
Kit Fox - a plan would need to be
prepared; Should a preconstruction
survey identify the presence of the Kit
Fox a Kl'lIHP would have to be ce ared.
nequire developer to contact County Ag
and prepare and distribute handout to
t:tJnnnt:.n: 7\].00 2:'c:tC]'uirQ aho[")ping centcu,,"
___~~-=!!'.!:.!l\: \:0 comply.
X Need condition.
i :1"Y~;:.
~tj{.~",: :
FH/I[>
flL1'J1'
UIC18 I
,. I
..,~..;:.
:. ~i)~}j
,];';,>t,~}:'r
CONT
x
CON'I'
X-
[o'HI\P
BLOP
x
Need condition re pr.econstruction survey
and protection if sensitive species
identJ.fiod.
condi.l:.ion J,"C: if prccollt.1l:t:t1ct.ion o\lrvoy
turns up certain spooieo require n
l.Hlffcr, etc.
IIIC23
FHI\P
BLI'JP
't;'1/0--)(
"pjTi\px --
[H,DI'
Project is not within or near thia area..
IIIC24
:l?
26 03.07
/24,0
27 03.07
/25,0
28 03.07 5H
/26.0
29 03.07
/27.0
30 03.07 6L
/28,0
31 03.00
/01.0
32 03.08
/02.0
33 03.08 65
/03.0
34 03.00.
/04.0
TI\SKS ltELI\TEO TO SI\NTI\ ltIT/\ COf.llmRCII\L CENTER r>ORTEll BY IHTIGl\TIOH }.IEI\SlIflE limmER, NOVE1-IBElt 9, 1994
EI\STlmH nUBLIIl GENER/\L PI,l\1l /\!.IEIlDl,!p.:w.c/sPECIFIC PLl\H
}.IITIG/\TIOIl }.IEI\SUREr>II\CTIOH PltOGRI\}.Is/IMPLEHENTI\TION }.I!':/\SURES
i'f- Require an additional temporal bu f fer be
established within 250 feet of the Golden Eagle
Protection Zone during the golden cagle
lO'eproductJ.vQ per.iod, pr.iOL- to const:L"ucti.on.
-rf:' Require that the Project maintain substantial
lO'ural residential/agricultural acreage to
provide suitable forage for the golden eaglen.
PH Require the placement of all transmission lines
underground whenever feasible, to avoid the
potential for raptor electrocutions.
pH Requite a minimum buffer (at least 300 fect) bc
mairi't;ained around nesting sites of the
bur.roo/in<] owl and blO'eeding ai,teo (either: lcnoom
or those identified in plO'econotr.ucti.on our.veyo)
of the nmelO'ican bad<]elO' dUlO'ing the blO'ccding
Deason to avoid direct'loss of indivJ.duale.
PL speoLal Status Invertevrateo, Require
developers conduct a preconstruct ion survey
within 50 days prior to habitat modification to
verify~rQsence of sensitive specieD.
PL Establioh a vJ.oual.ly diatincti.ve community
which plO'''Serv'ul the chnr.lIctor of I:h" nat,,,:n1
lnndac/lpo by pr.ot<oct;i.n9' l~"y vipunJ. elemonto llrHI
maintainin9' views from major travel corridolO's
and ublic s aces.
PL Ensure implementation of the Specific planl
GenelO'al Plan land use plan, which was developed
to retain predominant n~~ural features and a
sense of openness.
I'L Estllbl ish techn iq\le (D) for implement:i.ng the
long term proo"rvati.on of vi.DURtly n1QnJ.f1cnnt
portions of hi.lloidea and othor 1mportnnt
vi.nltal r.esource!].
--py:- ncclocC"t:)\o ~ta\lnl impncl: of: O)C\:OIlIl.i.v(J cJl:il{I.i.llC]
t:hr.oul)h nenniti.ve engineeri.ng c.ll'lni.gn thnl: tlllOn
grad\lnl transiti.onn from graded a~C~5 to
natural 610~~d revegetation.
IlLO!' PlIO X
'1'/11\1' F/.Il\p X
SDR flLOP
'1'/11\1' FI1I\!' X
SDn flLDP
flLDP I'J. I 0 -X
Site is nowhere near Golden Eagle
Protection Zone.
':;~~~':~
IIIC25
Provided in specific Plan.
Need condition.
Standard condition regarding
prcconotructi,on survey. No bndgers
i.dontified on site durln<] biological
Dllrvey of DI~IR.
THI\P
SDn
Need condition.
FHl\p
IlLOP
X
pnEZ
I'lNNr::
l\l~ 1. 0
X-
The project.: hns been designed with this
mi.ti.gnti.on lOon Dura i.n mind. It ia
oonnit.:i.ve to the cr.eak nnd cloee not
block viewo of vi.ataa fr.om I-Saa.
F'H^P
or..op
PREZ
ANNE
n87.0
FHI\P X 'l'his project has been designed with this
BLOP mitlgation measure in mind. It is
sensitive to the Creek and does not
block vistas from I-saD.
l"/oII\P X 'l'hi<1 project has been designed with thio
11T..np 0\11:1gnt10n menoure in mind. It io
oonni.tive to tho Creek and doeo not
hlock vi.ntae from I-SOD.
-j7-Til\P-x-----;j;i\IfJ t:e.ltl.t~;!I to hilluide development:..
nr..!)]>
1I1D4
IIJ:02
PHr,z
I\NIH:
n1~'l.O
:tIID3
I'IH':'l.
1\ Ntll~
nE1.0
;';'l.'"
JJ
"
Tl\SKS RELl\TED TO Sl\NTl\ RITA COMMERCIl\L CENTER SORTED BY MITIGl\TION MEl\SURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
l~l\STP;Rll DlJBLIll GElIERl\r. PLl\lI lHlElllll,IEIIT/SPECII'IC PLAN
MITIGl\TION MEl\SURES/l\CTION PROGRl\MS/IMPLEMEllTl\TION MEl\SURES
to existillg natural
03.00
/0....2
03.00
/04.3
03.08
/04.4
03.08
/0....5
240 03.08
/05.0
41 03.08
/05.1
...2 03.0e
/05.2
243 03.08
/06.0
PL nvoid extensive areas of flat development.
PL Encourage building design to conform to natural
land forms as much as possible.
PI. Heqlli,re graded slopes be recontoured to
ref!embl.e existing land forma in the immediate
arcn.
PH Minimize the height of cut and fill olopen aD
much ilD pOBoible.
PL MinimizQ vioual impacts by prohibiting
devel.opment on the main ridgeline, and ensuring
that development on foreground hills meetO
certain standards.
PL Locate otructuros 00 they do not obstruct
Bcanic views or: appaar to extend above an
identitiod ocontc bnclcdrop whon vJ,ewed from n
deal"lnat(!d ocenJ,c routa.
PL l\"lltrict;. otructllroo on tho hillnides that
appear t;.o project above major ridge1ineo.
I'L nvoid unnecessary alteration o~' diotur.bance and
maintain access to the ,stream corridors from
adjoining development ~o protect the vioual
cllaractcr of the ctrenm corridoro.
24...
03.00
/07.0
I'L IJrcnorvQ vicWG of cleaignal:od olJel) "[)n(:u 01:0;':J.
PHI':Z
ANNE
1m Z 0
PHE7.
l\llN8
HE7.0
PHEZ
nllN8
HE7.0
PHEZ Fl-II\P
nNNE nLDP
nE7..~______
PIlJ':7. 1'111\1' X
1\NNr:: nLD!'
HE~W
1'1181.
ANNE
nEZO
1'1187.
l\NN8
nElIO
Pin: 1.
nNNE
nr;:zo
PHEZ
AN1l8
HEZO
1'111\1'
IlLDP
x
Tasaajarn Creak is not a part of this
project. structures will be set back
150 from the top of bank. nny,
alterationo to the creek for flood
control purpooeo will bo minimal and
done with consultation with permitting
ftgcncj.cA. Acceoa and viawo of ti,e creek
wi.ll be Il\nlnl:.cd.nod.
-piti7:"~-- -pj'.t'i\i;-- -- X - - -'ri)~Tocnt:io~i (leoigll of utrllctureo
l\NNg ilL!)!' will not block view"" from I-SOD.
~!'X~f2-_ __ _ _ __.
l'I1I\P
IlLDP
x
The project site is flat. Varying pad
heights would change the natural
contours of the land.
This relates to hillside development.
SDR
x
x
This relates to hillside development.
Thiu relateD to hillside development
1'111\1'
IlLDP
Thio relate" to hillside development.
x
I'HI\P
nr..Dr
x-
The location and design of structures
will not blOck scenic views from I-SeD.
1"HIII'
l31.PP
x--
This relateS \0 hillaide developme~t.
I'Ml\P
IlLDP
x-
:"\t1
I.t
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CEllTER SORTED DY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMDER, NOVEMDER 9, 1994
I~ASTERl/ DUOT.ItI GEl/EHAL PLAlI AHEIIDHENT/SPECIFIC PI.AlI
MITIGA'rIOlI HEASUHES/ ACTIOll PHOGH1HIS/ UIPLEHEl/TATIOll MEASllHES
45
Provide for tho preparation of a vilJlIal survey
of the Project area to identify and map
viewsheds of Bcenic vistaa.
~ Provide for the designation of ocenic
corridoro, anel the adoption of scenic corridot"
policies and review procedures for projects
within a scenic corridor viewshed.
46
03.08
/00.0
6Q
a. Adopt Tassajara Hoad, 1-500, and Fallon
,Hoad as designated scenic corridors.
47 03.08 6n
/08.1
48 03.09
/01. 0
49 03.09
/02.0
50 03.09
/0"),.0
51 03.09
/04,0
52 03.09
/05.0
PL Require projects with potential impacts on
Becnie corridora submit a detailed visual
_ analysis with develo",ment project aEp'l.icationa.
I'L Require mechanical' and/ or hand oubaurface
taating on all locationa of prehiatoric
rseourcea to determine the preaence or absence
of midden deposits.
PL Require all locatlons containing either midden
componenta or concentrationa of cultural
materiala located on the surfnce be recorded on
State of CnlifornJ.a site surY!'!Y. forma.
PL Require evaluative testing if propoaed
devlllopment would directly or incHr.cctly impact
recorded and mapped locations Of resources.
PL Require aqualifLedarchaeologiat develop a
protection program for '.'s'ignificant" resourCOD
whose condition will b~ altered by the proposed
develapmont.
PH Roquire grading and construction ceaClo i.n tho
event that hiataric or prehistori.c ramaln. are
di.scovered dur i.09 such activi.t:JcB.
pnEZ
ANNE
REZO
pn,"z
ANNJ~
PHEZ
IIN/H~
REZO
THAI'
SDn
'1'111\P
son.
'1'HI\P
son
'.l.'HI\t'
SOR
!If.!) I'
TWIP
SOH
x x nequire preparation of a visual survey
as part of project site Development
Review submittal.
-X- X Staff is currently working on a scenic
corridor policy for the Specific Plan
Area. The location and design of
structures will not significantly block
or impact views from I-580 to major
scenic views. ~ visual survey will be
required as part of site development
review liE lication.
The project han been deoigned to not
block Bcanic viBtaa of oither tho Creek
or hilloide areas.
1\lthough no prehistoric resources were
identified ne a result of the DEIRt the
standard condition re discovery will be
inoluded.
Although no prehistoric resourceD were
identified ae a result of the DEIR, the
standard condition re di.ocovcry will be
inol.uded.
J"/'lIiT>- - - 7 -1\TETiQi'i'9h no prchiatori.c r.ooouroeo were
OLDp identified au a result Of the PEIR," the
otandard condition re discovery will be
included.
I\lthou9h no preh storie resources l<erG)
identified as a result of the DEIRt the
standard oondition re discovery will be
J.nclucled.
Wril:e ol:andard conditi.",n.
1\Nlm
snn
1'/.\111'
x
FI.\1\P
nl-Dp
---
X
FI.\lIp
OLDP
X
1'1-11\1'
nr.D!'
-x
1'1/0
-7
J5
...;:,..~ ~ '.,......
3
03.09
/06.0
4 03.09
/07.0
55 03.09
/00.0
56 03.09
/09.0
57 03.09
/10.0
58 03.09
/11.0
59 03.09
/12.0
\)
T1\SKS IlEL1\TE[) ~'O S1\l/T1\ lln.'1\ COf.ll.IEIlCI1\T, CEl/TEll SOIlTlm BY HITIG1\TIOll I.IE1\SlIIlE N Ul-IO Ell , 1l0VEHllEIl 9, 1994
E1\ST!':lltl [)llnLIll GEIlEIl1\T, PL1\ll 1I1-lEllDHENT/SPI!:CIl"IC PLI\Il
MITIG1\TION HEIISllRES/1\CTlml PROGR1\HS/IHPLEMENT1\TION HE1\SURES
a. Ootormino whethor the subject sito i.n
Ldentifiod as having prehistoric or
historic resources potentially located on it
based on the first stage cultural resource
survey of the area.
b. D!=termine the level of archaeological or
historical significance in the socond level of
detallecl reoenrcl1 and field rcconnniollnncc for
sLt~s with potential resourcos.
c. Oevolop a mitigation plan consistent with
policies in the specific Plan and current cmQ~
Guidelines concerning cultural rooourceo for
sLtOD c2ntaLninCJ~nificant rellOUrceo.
PL Require all properties with historic rellources
which may be impacted by development be subjoct
to inderth archival research.
PL Encourage the adaptive reuse or rostoration of
historic structures whenever feaal.ble.
PL Require an architec~llral tlistoriin to aoocon
the significance of all standing structures and
other indicators of historic occupation and/ or
USe of the area.
PL Require archival research and oral iuterviews
to determine the local or. 'regional significance
of structures or locaticins (identified in the
1980 report) by their association with
important: persons or events.
PL Hequire thllt all previously nol.;ed locationo (in THT\P - F~ X---
1900 report) be recorded on off1c1al stnte of son nLUp
Cnlj.to~nln llintorJ.cnl gJ.t:c Inv~nt:ol~Y fnl~ln". .
IlL -necJlII.re~pre;ervntlon of a" i.,;:;J1icr;iiT:-Ic;oo._. -:rHT\P- P1.'i'l\P- X - - ,-
program for historic sites which CJuali.fy I1ndell: SDn BLDp
CEQ1\ Gu ide lines as historicall' s i9n i.f: ica!1t.
6P
--TflL
I
Tlequire as part of the development application
process that steps be talcen to ensure that
cultural resources are not impacted.
THill' FHl\p X S Ltc not
snn or.,nl' h1ol:ol:1.c
'1'i1io.P--l'i.ii\i"- X - - - 51\:e 1\01:
son GLOP historic
'1'HI\I'
son
1'1.\1\1'
DLDP
'1'111\P
SOil
FH 1\ I'
DLOP
x,
'1'H1\P
son
FHI\P
OLOP
x
J(,
x
site not identified as having any
prehistoric remains or historic
structures. However, stnndard condition
regzll:ding discovery of prehistoric
remains will be required.
site not identified ns having any
historic structures.
identified as
otruct:urea..
J.c1entified aD
ot;ructurea.
having any
having
any
Site not identified as having any
historic structures.
sil:e not identified as having any
h1.ol.:o):lo at::.rucl:ures:.
5J,to T,ot idontified DO llUvitlQ
hi.otor tc structures.
any
..
,",
T1\5K5 J1.E!.1\TED TO 51\111.'1\ lU1.'1\ COI.ll-IEHC I 1\1. CEll1.'Elt SOlt1.'ED IlY IHTIG1\TIOtl HE1\SlIJ1.E IlllHlmn, lIOVEHllEJ1. 9, 199"-
E1\5TEJ1.1l DUm.IlI GlmEH1\I. P1.1\1I 1\l-1E!IllHEIIT / SPEC I FI C P1,1\1l
HI1.'IG1\TIOIl HE1\5l/H!':S/1\C1.'IOII pnOGH1\HS/ HIPLEI.lEIIT1\TION HE1\SUllES
'-,=;,;,< -neqllLl:e acoustical studies fOI: all I:esidential
development projects within the future CUE!. 60
contour to show how interior noise levels will
ba r:edllcec1 to 45 (In.
~,~~ pl. rtci~tl)at all development: [H:ojecl:s in 1:lle '1'1,11\1'
project area provide noise bal:l:iers or berms SDn
near existing residences to control noise in
outdoor use spaces.
pH Require acoustical studie~ priol: to future T}.\I\P
residential development in the' Foothill SDJ1.
n,ElB.idential, Tasoajara Village Center, county
Crll'ltor, lInd Haciendll Gateway "uhnreas to
dBtarmino whether future noi.no impncl:o from
Camp Park" and the county jail will be within
acceptable limito.
~ Require development projectu in tho Projecl: '['1.\1\1'
area to submit a conotruction Noioe Hanllgement SDn
program that identifies measureS proposed to
minimize construction noioe impacto on exiating
residents.
~ nequire applicants to ml.nimize conotructl.on IlI,DP
noJ.a'" l,mpnet;s.
260 03.10
/01. 0
261 03.10
/02.0
262 03.10
/03.0
2,63 03.10
/0<1.0
264 03.10
/05.0
265 03.10 PL
/06.0
266 03,10 - -pr:-
/07.0
a. Request that all constructl.on operntl.ono
comply with local noise standards and be
limited to normal daytime hours, and stationary
equipment be adequately muffled and located
away from sensitive receptors.
nequire the preparation of noioe f1\nna']ement
plans for all mixed uoe projects in w~ich
residential unita would be combined wl.th
commer-el.al, office, or other: lll:bnn
nonresidential uoes.
l't:ovi.da for t.he eotahl.i.ohmcnt. CJ[ i\ noi.uo
ml.t;igatLon monitorin'] fee to pay for on nnd
offsite noise mitigations, including but not
limited to, noise barriera, earthen berms, or.
rct:rofi.t:ting nt.r\lctur.C[] 1o'/i.t:h ooundr.ill:cd
\o,1.ntlo\>/o. 'l~hi.n rn1.t1.C]nt:.lon mnafJ\1t:'O npp('!al~D i.n
the cUlOlIlativa impact:s oectio.!' of: the DETft.
FI'II\l' X
nLllp
Not a residential pl:oject.
11"2
FH1\p X
01.01'
No significant noise impacts on existing
residences.
IF3
1'1.11\1' X
nLDP
I~O rculdential davelopmallt ill the
vl.cinl.ty of thio project.
IF4
1;'1/0 --X
1\ condi.tion will be requl.r:ed
l.mplementl.ng thia.
IFS
THI\I' FHI\P X
SDn nLDI'
1'1U':'l, '1'1,\1\1'
/lIHm $1)[\
1\81'.0
No re5l.dential development l.s included
in this'project,
11"6
- X X 'rho orcli.nl1nce ",\lut. be pJ:~pilred l\nc.\ a
condi.tion applied whl.ch ensuros that
dovelopers partl.cl.pato.
IF7
'f.
:1 'J
67 03.11
/01.0
68 03.11
/02.0
69 03.11
/03.0
70 03.11
/O~.O
71 03.11
/05.0
72 03.11
106.0
73 03.11
107.0
74 03.11
/08.0
75 03.11
109.0
76
03.11
110.0
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTEn UY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMDER, NOVEMDER 9, 1994
EAs~rERN nUIlT.Ill GENERAl. PT.AN AIlErmMEN~'/ SPECIFIC PLI\N
IUTIGA'j~IOll HEASlJlll~S/ ACTIOfl PROGRIIMS/ UIPT.E11ENTATION MEI\SURES
PH
Require development projects to implement dust
control measures to reduce project dust
deposition to acceEtable level~.
HJ.nlmize construction interfeJ:l~ncc wIth
regional non-project traffic movement.
PL Require emissions control from onsite equipment
through a routine mandatory program of low
emissions tuneups.
PL Require preparation of a construction impact
redu,c't ion pLan t ha t incorpor.n tea IlU, propoGcrl
_~ul'lll,ty mitl.qnt:i.on str.atel]J.en.
PW EnQOUrAge cooperation to integrat:c nJ.r qunlit:y
plannino effortn on l'l rOQional bnnio.
P!. Iiaint:/d,n consJ.otency among epecJ.fJ.c devo1.opment
plane and regJ.onal tranoportation and growth
_~~ent pLans. .
PH Implement transportation demand management
techniques to reduce mobile eource emiosJ.ons.
PH Opt.:.iln.tz.e tho oxlnci.nQ t;'l:nnrJ(>ol:t:.nt:.i.ol\ nYrJt(~ll\ t:.o
roduce congestion and shift travel to nonpenk
travel perJ.ods.
PH Coordinate leveLs of growth with roadway
transportation facilities. improvements to
accommodate travel demand without inducing
demand by providing eKc~ss system capacity.
PL l:'":ncouL.age mi.Ked une development: l:hal: rn:ovic1cu
hO\1ning, jOb:9, C)ooc.1n nnd [H:~rvi.C(:!:!J 1n clone
proKi.mity.
"HAP FI/O X This is required by the city's Grading
GR1\D Ordinance
OLOp
Fi.7c)' .--- I'/rite condition regarding
FHAI' X approval of
GR1\D construction traffic route.
DLOP
FHI\[, FI/O X Need condition regarding construction
GR1\O equipment at the site.
OLDP
SOR FI/O X Require as condition of tentative map.
199-1 COWl'
THill' I"Hlll'
son nT_IH'
THI\P Fl.llIl'
SI)R !3LDP
CCH1'l' COII'I'
THill? FHIIP
son OLDP
'I'he CJ.ty parti,ci,pates in all. regional
and subrogional .Cforts that havo
influence on aJ.r unlit .
consistency findings need to be made on
project. Conditions may be necessary.
x
-"j(-
-"j(-
Require developer to submit employment
information. Also require compliance
with Trip Reduction ordinance.
'I'he City adopted a Trip Reduction
Ordinance which will implement this
mitigation measure. D1\I\QHD adminstere
the Ordinance.
'j'he traffic study will address these
issues. 1\ Traffic Impact Fee will be
developed to fund construction of
transportation improvements as they are
needed. A condition that applicant pay
traffic fee will be required.
IIlthollgh the project is solely
commercial, tlle SAnta nitn area, of
",hich thi.o project is a part hao both
r.enident:1.nl and commerc1.n1 and providee
.lL..9ood balance ot iobe and hou9ing.
--"j(
x
PRE?
I\NtH:
nJ':'l.O
-;~-"j(--
:;nn
JIl
,~
I
S'
...
~.
77
78 03.11
/12.0
79 03.11
/13.0
eo 03.12
/01. 0
81 03.12
/02.0
82 03.12
/03.0
83 03.12
104.0
84 03.12
105.0
85 03.12
/06.0
11.3
.1
~
':I
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTRR SORTED ny MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
Ir.ASTEIUl DunT.IIl m::rlERAr. PL1\N Ar.l811Dl.IEIIT/SPECIPIC PI.1\N
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
Require linkage between 9ro\1th or
job opportunities consistent \1ith
slIbrogJ.onal cont:rJ.buti.on to jobsl
bnll1nces. .
hOllsi.ng and
a positive
hou5i.nC) ratio
PI. I'r~tll're developmont ngroomonl:o wlth dotaJ,lcd
financing plnno prior to specific lovelo of
development approval to identify necosoary
capital improvement:.o, incllld ing publl.c
facilities, streets and utilJ.tJ.eo, and aonuro
their timely financing.
CM ndopt an Area of Denefit Ordinance and form an
Area of Denefit for those properties benefiting
from construction of public improvemento
described in the Specific Plan.
CM Croate one or more Mello ROOD CFn or Special
AOOOBPm"'nt PiGt:rict~o to flnance conotL-\lctl.on of
the infrastructure to serve the Area of
!lenefit.
CM Have bond cOllnsel evaluate the beneflt to the
City, in terms of savingo of money and
avoidance of undue risk, ~f poollng bonds under
the Harks Roos !lond Pociiing Act
CM AnalY7.e the citywide infrastL'uct:ure ncedo 1:0 PH8Z '1'1.11\1' -X AOlGOO studies are being prepared for
nSneon I:he ullofulness of lmplcment:lng an j.mpnct: I\NUE s!>n !:he Enlltorn Dubl1.n SpocJ,f.1.c Plan. Any
fee program, ln compliance with 1\n 1600, !:hnt Imzo participation in identifled improvements
could draw some funding from new development will be made condit1.ons of approval or
~ _ ~!~'!_!!"J:!!." 1 Hap- or !l~' Udl.n~E..mi!:-"-._~:..!!-:!:_~!:'.~~!2~!..:_ ___ ___ __ _ _ _ ..2:!!.cl'!f1ed i.n the 1?eveloP!!lE!~9.,:eement.
CH Coor:dillllte city and Sc:hool UJ.nl:J:.l.ct nrt:ortn to /'HI':Z 01'1\1\1' X The nus!> han lnd.Lcnted thn!: th1.o projoct:
func! necelJsnry ochool fnc1.litias and collect: All I'll; SUR wl.ll not ndversely lmpact: the District
payable fees. REZO and that the impacts can be mitigated by
pnyment of: the stnndarcl school impact
_______ f:ee lst:p.rl.i.n PGG.
PT,
Hinimize stationary sOllrce emissions associated
with Project development wherever feasible.
PL
Incorporate solid waste recycling in all
development planning.
PREZ
ANNE
m:zo
PI<EZ
ANilE
REZO
PREZ
ANNE
REZO
PIH,Z
1\87.0
PHE7.
ANNr::
REZO
l'R87.
I\Ulll;
RE7.0
PREZ
ANNE
REZO
CONT
This commercial projGct, whGn combined
with other projects, commercial and
rGsidentinl in the specific plan,
provides n positive linkage between
housln and ob ratio balances.
Development standards for the project
havG been designed to satisfy this
condition.
Write condition.
x
THAI'
SDR
x
CONT
x
'J'HI\1'
!;Dn
X-
3
1\ development agreement io being
prepnrod that will odclreos iaBuoa
llpeclflc to thla project.
'l'I-l/\ P
son
'rhe Ci.ty adopted nn Area of Denefit
Ordinance.
x
Tl.II\P
son
The devolopur wll1 be putting in the
infrnutructuro surrounding tho projoct.
An area of benefit mny need to be formed
for some of the im rovements,
Thls project is not requesting
assistance from the City in the area of
bond flnancing.
x
'l'I-1AP
son
x
'1~!it)
VIIIJ\6
'.~, ":.
39
(
~
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMDER, NOVEMDER 9, 1994
EASTlmN DUIILIN Gf:lmRAL pI.AN AJ.mNDHENT/SpECIFIC PLAII
IU'.rIGATION HEASUHES/lICTIOll pIWGRAJ.IS/IHPLEt,!ENTI\'.rIOII MEI\SURES
':'
7 03.12
/00.0
Coo~dinate City and Calt~ans efforts to fund
necessa~y freeway i.mprovements and collect
develo~erB' share of costs.
CH Coo~dinate city and DSRSD efforts to fund
utilities se~vices and collect developcr'o
share of costa.
THAI'
SDn
x
11 t~affic study will identify impacts
and develop a fee to mitigate the
ro'ect s fai~ sha~e of these im acts.
See DSRSD comments 1ette~ dated 9/21/94
VIIIA7
03.12
/07.0
pREZ
1\NNE
I1EZO
pnEZ
1\NNE
I1EZO
VIIIA8
'1'H1\p
SDI1
x
...)
III
.:~~
'iJ::+r~,tl
""',~",""".
~'ttit(i:'l' ;,1
, :. '. ~" , . i
~
\:
I,
t.
"
,'J
~
~ {~~J
110