The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutItem 6.4 DB ROW EBart-Hacienda (2) ... . . . CITY OF DUBLIN AGENDA STATEMENT City Council Meeting Date: August 8, 1995 SUBJECT: Public Hearing: PA. 95-018, Dublin Boulevard Precise Plan, establishing a right-of-way line for Dublin Boulevard from the eastern BART access drive to Hacienda Drive REPORT PREPARED BY: j) Lee Thompson, Public Works Director 'J5- Dennis Carrington, Senior Planner EXHIBITS" ATTACHED: RECO;ENDATIO~ 1 A) Draft Ordinance Indicating No Protests Received 1 B) Draft Ordinance Indicating Denial of Protests 2) Negative Declaration 3) Environmental Assessment 4) Resolution Adopting Negative Declaration 5) Map of Proposed Right-of-Way Line 6) Legal Description of Proposed Right-of-Way Line 7) Street Cross Section 8) City Council Resolution of Intention to Establish a Right-of-Way Line (Resolution No. 80-95. 1 ) 2) 3) 4) 5) Open public hearing Receive Staff Report and public testimony Question Staff and the Public Close public hearing and deliberate Adopt Resolution adopting Negative Declaration Waive reading and introduce Ordinance establishing right-of-way lines (Exhibit 1 A if no protests are received or 1 B if protests are received, as appropriate) Continue the item to the August 22, 1995, City Council meeting for second reading 6) 7) ------------------~----~-------------------------------------------------------------------------- Item No. (,'l.,J Copies To: Alameda County US Army PA95-018 File Senior Planner FINANCIAL STATEMENT: . It is anticipated that the cost to construct the roadway will be borne by the County of Alameda and/or by the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee. DESCRIPTION: The proposed right-of-way is a portion of Dublin Boulevard as shown on the General Plan and the East Dublin Specific Plan. Thei construction of this portion of Dublin Boulevard is necessary to connect the developed area of the City of Dublin with the approved Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. The establishment of this right-of- way is required for the construction of this portion of Dublin Boulevard and is governed by Chapter 7.68 of the Dublin Municipal Code. The location of the right- of-way is as shown on a map showing the right-of-way study area (Exhibit 5), and more specifically in the legal description (Exhibit 6) and the Street Cross Section (Exhibit 7). The area which makes up the right-of-way line is presently vacant and is owned by Alameda County and the U.S. Army. Alameda County will dedicate the portion of the Dublin Boulevard right-of-way east of Arnold Road. It is anticipated that Alameda County will be able to construct the road west of Arnold Road (through Camp Parks) by a right-of-entry agreement with the U.S. Army. It is . estimated that the costs for design and improvement of the road will be approximately $ 5.5 million. The proposed project would consist of a roadway with a minimum right-of- way of one hundred and forty-two (142) feet and a maximum right-of-way of one hundred and forty-eight (148) feet. The minimum paved section would be eighty- eight (88) feet and the maximum paved section would be one hundred thirteen (113) feet. The roadway would have six (6) lanes with additional left and right turn lanes as needed. The roadway and right-of-way would run from the eastern BART access drive to Hacienda Drive. The site area consists of relatively flat land lying north of the Eastern Dublin BART station. This roadway would be able to accommodate approximately 50,000 average daily trips. A Negative Declaration has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQAl, State CEQA Guidelines and the City of Dublin Environmental Guidelines. The proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment. On July 25, 1995, with the recommendation of the Planning Commission and Staff, the City Council adopted a Resolution of Intention (Exhibit 8) to establish the right-of-way line. . G:PA9S-018/CCAGST2 . ORDINANCE NO. -95 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ESTABLISHING A RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR DUBLIN BOULEVARD FROM THE EASTERN BART ACCESS ROAD TO HACIENDA DRIVE The City Council of the City of Dublin does ordain as follows: WHEREAS, the City Council adopted a Resolution of Intention calling for a public hearing to consider a future right-of-way line for Dublin Boulevard from the eastern BART access drive to Hacienda Drive (Resolution 80-95) and set a public hearing for August 8. 1995. at 7:00 p.m. to hear objections to the establishment of said right-of-way line; and WHEREAS. proper notice of said public hearing was duly given; and WHEREAS. no protests were made either in writing or orally to the establishment of said right-of-way line. NOW. THEREFORE. the City Council finds and ordains that: Section 1. A Right-of-Way line is hereby established for Dublin Boulevard from the eastern BART access drive to Hacienda Drive as follows: . . EXHIBIT 'A ".. That parcel of land in the City of Dublin, Counry of AJameda, State of California, described as follows: Commencing at concrete monument number 28 in the center line of .A.I110Id Road (formerly Oxsen Road) as shown on Record of Survey No. 385 med in Book 8 of Records of Surveys at Pages 27-29 in the office of the County Recorder of said County; thence along said center line S. 1023 '35" W., 1,269.22 feet to the PONT OF BEGD'-\"N'D\G: thence continuing S. 1023'35" W., 142.00 feet; thence leaying said line N. 88"16'05" W., 676.83 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the south having a radius of 1.965.00 feet; thence westerly 498.65 feet along said curve through a central angle of 14032'23" [Q the southeasterly line of the 160.00.foot wide scrip of land described in the Quitclaim Deed to the Ciry of Dublin filed September 22. 1994, Document 94312570, in said office of the County Recorder, the beginning of a curve concave [Q the northwest having a radius of 2,065.00 feet; thence along said line from a tangent line bemng N. 71 032'03~ E., northeasterly .:!60.96 feet along said curve through a central angle of 12"47'24" to the beginning of a curve concave to the south h2\'ing a radius of 2.0Ti .00 feet: thence leaving said southeasterly line from a tangent line bemng ?\. 87=45'06" E., e2.Sterly 78.12 feet along said CUD'e through a ;:e:mal angle of 2"09'18"; thence cn a non-tangent line S. 87"14'48" E., 277.49 fee~: ulence S. S8~16'05" :C., 402.50 feet to Lhe point of beginning. . Tnat p2.rcel of land in the City or Dublin, County of AJarneda, State of California.. described as follows: , Commencing at concrete monument number 28 in the center line of .!unold Road (formerly Oxsen Road) as shown on Record of Survey No. 385 f1.Ied in Book 8 of Records of Surveys at Pages 27.29 in the office of the County Recorder of said Coumy; L'lence along said center Line S. 1023 '35" W., 1,269.22 feet to me POt\! OF BEGJ]\;~J};G; thence leaving said line S. 88016'05" E., lA74.41 feet; thence );. ~6"27'53" E., 42.62 feet; thence S. 880~8'09" E., 51.00 feet to the center 111e of Hacienda Drive, also kno\vn ES the "H 1" Line; thence along said center line S. 01011' 5 I" W., 101.76 feet to L'le intersection with the center line of Dublin Boulevard, also known 2.5 the "DC" Line; thence continuing S. 01 011'51" \V., 106.09 reet: thence leaving said center line of Hacienda Drive N. 88"~8'09" W., 68.00 feet: thence ~. 43032'07" W.. ..12.23 reet; thence N. 88016'05" W., ~15.30 feet; thence ~. 87;01'07" W.. 275.13 feet: the:1ce N. 88"16'05" W., 768.14 reet to said center line ',\- IdR . h al '. I' N 010'?~'~-"E l'?oo' . . OJ .'-..wO oae: t ence ong S2lQ center me.. _.:.)) .. ""'_. Ieet to tne pOInt of beginning. . . . Section 2. The effect of said right-of-way line shall be governed by the provisions of Chapter 7.68 of the Dublin Municipal Code. Section 3. EFFECTIVE DATE AND POSTING OF ORDINANCE. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after the date of its passage. The City Clerk of the City of Dublin shall cause this Ordinance to be recorded with the County Recorder and posted in at least three (3) public places in the City of Dublin in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code and the State of California. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of ,1995 AYES: NOES: ABSENT Mayor City Clerk g:PA95018\ordl . . ORDINANCE NO. -95 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ESTABLISHING A RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR DUBLIN BOULEVARD FROM THE EASTERN BART ACCESS ROAD TO HACIENDA DRIVE The City Council of the City of Dublin does ordain as follows: WHEREAS, the City Council adopted a Resolution of Intention calling for a public hearing to consider a future right-of-way line for Dublin Boulevard from the eastern BART access drive to Hacienda Drive (Resolution 80-95) and set a public hearing for August 8, 1995, at 7:00 p.m. to hear objections to the establishment of said right-of-way line; and WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was duly given; and WHEREAS, protests to the establishment of said right-of-way line were made by the owners of , which prot~sts are hereby denied. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council finds and ordains that: Section 1. A Right.of-Way line is hereby established for Dublin Boulevard from the eastern BART access drive to Hacienda Drive as follows: EXHIBIT iB . . . That paIcel of land in the City of Dublin, County of .AJameda, State of California, described as follows: . Commencing at concrete monument number 28 in the center line of .!unold Road (fonnerly Oxsen Road) as shown on Record of Survey No. 385 rued in Book 8 of Records of Surveys at Pages 27-'29 in the office of the County Recorder of said County; thence along said center line S. 1023 '35" W., 1.269.'2'2 feet to the POINT OF BEGD'\"NTI\G; thence continuing S. 10'23'35" \V., 142.00 feet; thence leaving said line N. 88016'05" W., 676.83 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the south having a radius of 1.965.00 feet; thence westerly 498.65 feet along said curve through a central angle of 14032'23" to the southeasterly line of the 160.00-foot wide strip of land described in ule Quitclaim Deed to the City of Dublin filed September :;2. 1994. Document 9.:l,31'2570, in said office of the County Recorder, the becinnin2: of a CUI"e . -- concave to the northwest having 2. radius of 2,065.00 feet; thence along said line from a i.angenr line bemng N. 7103'2 '03ft E.. northe.2..Sterly 460.96 feet along said curve through a cemral angle of }2047'24" to the beginning of a CU,i.ve conC2.Ve to the south h2.\'ing a radius of 2.077 .00 reet: thence leaving said southe~terly line from 2. tangent line bemng ?\. 87:45'06" E.. e:?..Sierly 78.12 feet along said curve through a ce:mal angle of '2:09'18"; thence cn a non-tangent line S. Slo14'48" E., '277,~9 fee~: Llence S. 88:16'05" E., ..102.50 feet to Lle point of beginning, That p2.rcel of land in the City of Dublin, County of .-\lameda, State or California.. described as follows: . Commencing at concrete monument number '28 in the center line or .A.rnold Road (formerly Oxsen Road) as sho\vn on Record of Survey No. 385 fIled in Book 8 of Records of Surveys at Pages 27-'29 in the office of the County Recorder of said Counry; Glence along said center line S. 10'23 '35" W., 1.269.'22 feet to the PO])';! OF 3EGI?\:';::Q\=G; thence leaving said line S. 88016'05" E., 1.47~.~l feet; thence ~. ~60'27'53" E.. 4'2.62 feet; thence S. 880~8'09" E., 51.00 feet to the center lirle of Hacienda Drive, also kno\vn 2..S the "HI" Line; thence along said center line S. 01011'51" W., 101.76 feet 10 the intersection with i.he center line of Dublin 3oule\'2.rd, also known as the "DC" Line; thence continuing S. 01011'51" W.. 106.09 reet: thence leaving said center lLle of Hacienda Drive ~. 880~8'09" W.. 68.00 reet; thence ;.;. 43"3'2'07" W., .i2.23 reet; thence N. 88016'05" \\T., ~l5.30 feet; thence ~. 87:01'0/" W.. '275.13 feet: the:1ce N. 88016'05" W., 768.14 feet to said center line - .\- ld R d hal" l' N O]o')~'~-""'" 117 00 f . . OJ .~.J.IlO 03: t ence ong S~lO center me.. _.).)) .c., "'_. eet to me pOlTIt or beginning. . Section 2. The effect of said right-of-way line shall be governed by the provisions of Dublin Chapter 7.68 of the Dublin Municipal Code. . Section 3. EFFECTIVE DATE AND POSTING OF ORDINANCE. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after the date of its passage. The City Clerk of the City of Dublin shall cause this Ordinance to be recorded with the County Recorder and posted in at least three (3) public places in the City of Dublin in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code and the State of California. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this _ day. of , 1995 AYES: NOES: ABSENT Mayor City Clerk g:PA95018\ord2 . . "'-::-:-f r -, /' \...'. ):;, .,.;~,.....~-~~;/> -,.' -:'/' . -./ ~ ',. if! ~I~ \\\' . . ',' \hl~ ~- CIT)' OF DL:BLIN ..-- \\\~. III -~-----_._._--..__. ~ \\ ~~> .' ~'I// . ~""'>_ _-:-'\':..../ ;:>0 50\ 2340 Dublin. Cai,;o:'1:a 9~5i39 ....,,/ 'r. -,,'~'y' .~ ,. - -. CI:V O:kes. iOO C:VIC ?Ia::a. Dublin. Califofnla 9..:568 NEGATIVE DECLARATION (Prepared pursuant to City of Dublin Environmental Guidelines, Section 1. 7(c), 5.5) Description of Project: PA 95-018, Dublin Boulevard Precise Plan Line. Establishment of a right-of-way line for Dublin Boulevard from the Eastern BART access drive to Hacienda Drive. Project Location: From the Eastern BART access drive to Hacienda Drive. Name of Proponents: City of Dublin I hereby find that the above project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment. Attached is a copy of the Initial Study ("Environmental Information Form" and "Environmental Checklist") documenting the reasons to support the above finding. . )J ~-- 'if) ~~~~~, ~~ Signature . ----....." , . J -- \bJ "..'. \..( _ r!../'......-fY?' ......,...:,:-~ ~ Printed Name Senior Planner Title tyJ-1-L- I, J 1-1 S Date - Attachments Date Published: June 7. 1995 Date Posted: May 31. 1995 Date Notice Mailed: May 31. 1995 Considered by: Planning Commission on: Julv 3. 1995 Action on Negative Declaration: Approved Disapproved Notice of Determination filed: Resolution No. . EXHIBIT ~ Ac.-r:m,StraIIO:l :'510') 833-5650 . City Coun:il 151J. S33-5585 . Fir.an::e :5iO 833.554() . 3uild;ng ins:>e::::on 15iO) 833-6620 Code Enforcement (510) 833.5620 . !:rl;)lf'leenng :'510i 833-5530 . ParkS & ComrrlUnlt}' Service iSi 0: 833-6645 Police (5' 0; 833-5670 . Puci::: Worrs (51 OJ 833.5530 . P!anmng ;510) 833.66i 0 li!-~'" '@E>';\\\ ,,' -'<u-'-:" I~: """'\ ~- ,..../,/ .... .. """"" . 'I' CIT'{ e,F Dl.1BLI?\; ~:. S..'\, .~~.:(~, J~.:....\I''i C:!' .:,"~.1 ~1.:~)0S c,:\ o'!ce'~/~')O C,\',:: ?::-::,; Jl.:""'1, C::;:"()':l ,1 0~SG.S C?,--c--c. \ y ~ C-""'" L \ :.-u?_ .~pplication Name: Du"2>L' J>...) \s. l")ULG.U A.{'t'0 INITIAL STUDY (ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM - PART 1) (To be completed by Applicant pursuant to City of Dublin Environmental Guidelines Section 1.6) Date Filed: .- (\ 0 ~"\ ! "1 ~ ""::> :, GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Name and address of developer or project sponsor: [c:. (;) L..t v Ie.... ,-;>(,..... 2-A. ") ~v';i. 1"-' (_"'').. .q L C; /..( Cl~ r;Jg-O....l;\I--1,0 2. f ,'-- ''\- F.ddress 0 ProJect: 'lfU~ .;.A~~-~,...., r~',......~ .':t" r~...- ,1l,. 1\"""': ~~ lt~ c t .....:...'\.~..t.:...... ~i,..""'~ - ~. Name, address and telephone number '.::.j s ?:"oject: "J1:.- I-C'''_' \~ c::..4.,-:::';~, L'(:""'l.-L' ~ (L':C ?j 'i ~ (_ f \.('-" I: ( S ( c;:, F"1, <, - (. t- I 0 of person ~o be contacted concerning C l \.J ,C ~') Ie- j P :J) '-~' b I ;." { r\ . 4. List and descr~De any other related pe=mits and other public approvals =equi:"~d fur this project, including those required by city, regional, state and feueral agencies: 5. Existing zoning district: A...:.. (' I '::...' t "":-'--" ~ ( '-' G. Description of Project: (Include site area, uses, size and number of building5, parking, number of dwelling units, scheduling, and any other information necessary or helpful to understand project. This attached description must be complete and accurate. Exhibits or photographs should be identified and attached.) 7. Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Disc~ss below all items checked (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NO \c 1. Change in e>:isting features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, lakes or hills, or substantial alteration of ground contours. $ 2. Change in scenic vie~s or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. . x 3. Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of _". 5> _'" ::: ~ ecc,~ ~'".".. ,"' 5' ,." 5500 . ~ 1 ,-" ,"' 5; '" 5'"' . s. r"V U1B115,3 _0:1€ ::-'~':e-e'l: ,':-5) E33 652:1 :::'l;J.-eer -::; ,':'5, E3:, 553:; ?;-,l;A.tt _ ~J;:~ ,..:'\51 E.33.65';'"0 . ?~~i:: \..:~t~S t":~5~ 233.66:,J ~ ~'2:r~a;:::.~ \":~5: 223.5:,":5 :..::- - :-..:: :... Signif. .nt amounts of solid ",'aste or 1 .er_ Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity- Site on filled land or on slope of 10 percent (10$ or more. Use of disposal of potentially ha~ardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives. 'i. 10. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, ~ater, sewage, etc.). '< 11. Substantial increase in fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). 'I 12. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING: 8. 3riefly describe the project site as it exists before the project, i~cluding information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, a~d any cultural, historical or scenic-aspects. Describe a~y exis~ing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. If necessary, attach photographs of the site. . -\.~, -, c, ~- (,~.cc!: <;:. \....-;:: v ~ J. .Lo'-- c,. ,- \>"1 .:.,'~ -.....: ~ " I,:::'. \-.<"'-~ ,~\.......c < i':' '-Ie') r....- ' " C \ .....l\ f"- ,- (, \, \ -" I " .,..........,. tI <. i G' \ - >; i <:...,' ( I ,) \" ..l ,--..(. <, .C -..", "r' , t...-\ \1 ~. c,.. -,.r , 9. Briefly describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals, any cultural, of land use. ..ci....::,~l!w"'".~ ''-'4:, U~ ~ . ~.:., U. \1..\;::-z. -; - 1...A.- ( '-='_\0-." '. .....: \,,':>.-(.,.:.,~ historical or scenic aspects and the type 1-.-).::-, ~~ - C~? p~?-~-:. , Sou.,..> 11.-,', 'tSAP1 -0 I '-, .-,..., C..-- I.l.-' \ -:-;." IV''''!. .",,- v', ,-l w v, 00 T- .) CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Dated: ~~_I \J {~'1\ q ) F ~~ ( J::J.-~LC-=~ Signature !) . -p 0 ........J ~ ), \ Print Name -, ~. ,~" II; lr .: \".;l,,/1.1'(..1..?'v Title/Company 7 - H. ( /l..0n, t-.l <; t;D tLJ 2 INITIAL STUDY (ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM) (Completed pursuant to City of Dublin Environmental Guidelines, Section 1.6) . APPLICATION NO.: PA 95-018. Dublin Boulevard Precise Plan Line I. BACKGROUND 1. Name, Address and Phone Number of Proponent: City of Dublin. 100 Civic Plaza. Dublin. CA 94568/ 2. Agency Requiring Checklist: Drive, APN 946-15-1-5. From the Eastern BART access drive to Hacienda 3. Name of Proposal, if applicable: Dublin Boulevard Precise Plan Line 4. Description of Project: The establishment of a right-of-way line for Dublin Boulevard from the Eastern BART access drive to Hacienda Drive pursuant to Chaoter 7.68 of the Dublin Municipal Code. . . 2Refer to appropriate note on page 8 -1- II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (See Part III for discussion of environmental topics) YES MAYBE till. SOURCE2 . 1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in: X 1,3 a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes of geologic substructures? X 1,3 b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or over covering of the soil? X 1,3 c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X 1,3 d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X 1,3 e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? X 1,3 f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition, or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the . bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X 1,3 g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? 2. AIR. Will the proposal result in: X 1,3 a. Substantial air emissions of deterioration of ambient air quality? X 1,3 b. The creation of objectionable odors? X 1,3 c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X 1,3 d. Construction or alteration of a facility within one- fourth of a mile of a school which might emit hazardous air emissions? If Yes, school district must be consulted and must be given written . notification of the project not less than 30 days prior to approval of EIR or Negative Declaration (Pub. Res. Code 21151.4). 2Refer to appropriate note on page 8 - -2- II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (See Part III for discussion of environmental topics) Y.ES MAYBE b!..Q SOURCE2 . 3. WATER. Will the proposal result in: X 1,3 a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X 1,3 b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X 1,3 c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X 1,3 d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X 1,3 e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X 1,3 f. Alteration of the direction of rate of flow of ground waters? . X 1,3 g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X 1,3 h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X 1,3 I. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? 4. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in: X 1,2,3 a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? X 1,2,3 b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? X 1,2,3 c. Introduction of new species of plants in a barrier to . the normal replenishment of existing species? 2Refer to appropriate note on page 8 -3- . . . II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (See Part III for discussion of environmental topics) YES MAYBE b!.Q SOURCE2 x x x Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 1,2,3 d. 5. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in: x Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptile.s, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? 1,2,3 a. x Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? 1,2,3 b. x 1,2,3 c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? x 1,2,3 Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? d. 6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in: x 1,2 a. Increases in existing noise levels? x 1,2,3 Exposure of people to severe noise levels? b. x 1,2,3 7. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? x 1,2,3 8. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? 9. NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result in: x 1,2,3 a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? 1,2,3 b. Substantial depletion of any non.renewable natural resource? 10. RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve: 1,2,3 a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, 2Refer to appropriate note on page 8 -4 - II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (See Part III for discussion of environmental topics) Y.E.S MAYBE NQ SOURCE2 pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? . x 1,2,3 b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? x 2 11. POPULATION. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or, growth rate of the human population of an area T X 1,2,3 12. HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 13. TRANSPORT A TION/CIRCULA TION. Will the proposal result in: X 1,2,3 a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? X 1,2,3 b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X 1,2,3 c, Substantial impact upon existing transportation and . traffic systems? X 1,2,3 d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X 1,2,3 e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X 1,3 f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas? X 1,2,3 a. Fire protection? X 1,2,3 b. Police protection? X 1,2,3 c. Schools? X 1,2,3 d. Parks or other recreational facilities? . 2Refer to appropriate note on page 8 -5- II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (See Part III for discussion of environmental topics) YES MAYSE till. SOURCE2 . X 1,2,3 e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X 1,2,3 f. Other governmental services? 15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in: X 1,2,3 a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X 1,2,3 b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. UTILITIES. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to the following utilities: X 1,2,3 a. Power or natural gas? X 1,2,3 b. Communications systems? . X 1,2,3 c. Water? X 1,2,3 d. Sewer or septic tanks? X 1,2,3 e. Storm water drainage? X 1,2,3 f. Solid waste and disposal? 17. HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in: X 1,3 a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X 1,3 b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? X 1,3 18. AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? . X 2,3 19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 2Refer to appropriate note on page 8 - -6- ~ II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (See Part III for discussion of environmental topics) YES. MAYBE N.Q SOURCE2 20. CUL TURAL RESOURCES. . X 1,2,3 a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? X 1,2,3 b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric, historic, or architecturally significant building, structure, or object? X 1,2,3 c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? X 1,2,3 d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? 21. MANDA TORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. X 1,2,3 a, Does the project have the potential to degrade the . quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X 1,2,3 b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future). X 1,2,3 c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of . those impacts on the environment is significant) , 2Refer to appropriate note on page 8 -7- '\ II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPAcTS (See Part III for discussion of environmental topics) YES. MAYBE NQ SOURCE2 . x 1,2,3 d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X 1,2,3 22. EIR REQUIRED BY STATUTE. Does the project involve construction of any facility which burns municipal waste or refuse-derived fuel? NOTE: If the answer is yes, then an EIR must be oreDared and certified under Public Resources Code Section 211 51.2(a) unless subsections (b) and (c) make that section inapplicable. III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (See attached statement) IV. DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: x . I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that State statute requires that an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT be prepared and certified. }).. -~~~ Signature SG-+--> l0D- ~ ~ J-JL-fi- Title 11. .. u'S l-1. ~0~~ .rinted Name --- 0uv..e. <} /'iC;S Date 2Refer to appropriate note on page 8 -8- II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (See Part III for discussion of environmental topics) YES. MAYBE N.Q SOURCE2 SOURCE . (1) Determination based on location of project. (2) Determination based on staff office review. (3) Determination based on field review. (4) Determination based on the City of Dublin General Plan. (5) Determination based on the City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance. (6) Determination based on Specific Plan. (7) Not applicable. !initial.study . . 2Refer to appropriate note on page 8 -9- . Part II. Environmental Impacts - Explanation of Answers 1 a, Earth, Unstable earth conditions or changes of geologic substructures Impacts addressed in 1 a. for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No. 91103064). This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, no impacts addressed in 1 a. will occur because the roadway will be professionally designed and constructed to City standards. 1 b. Earth. Disruptions. displacements. compaction or over-covering of the soil Impacts addressed in 1 b. for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No. 91103064), This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. . For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, compaction of the soil under the roadbed will occur during the construction of the road. It shall be performed pursuant to standard engineering practices and the requirements of a geotechnical report. 1 c. Earth. Change in topography or ground surface relief features Impacts addressed in 1 c. for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No. 91103064). This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, due to the relatively flat terrain along the right-of-way, minor changes in topography or surface relief features in topography along the roadway may occur. These minor changes may occur to topography and ground surface relief features under the roadway, but will not impact adjacent ground surface relief features. . 1 d, Earth. Destruction. covering or modification of any unique geologic or phvsical features 2Refer to appropriate note on page 8 -10- Impacts addressed in 1 d. for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General . Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No. 91103064). This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, no impacts addressed in 1 d. will occur because there are not unique geologic or physical features along the right-of-way. 1 e. Earth. Increase in wind or water erosion of soils. either on or off the site Impacts addressed in 1 e. for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No. 91103064). This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. . No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, no impacts addressed in 1 e. will occur because the roadway will be professionally designed and constructed to City standards. . 1 f, Earth. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands. or changes in siltation. deposition. or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay. inlet or lake Impacts addressed in 1 f. for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No. 91103064). This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, no impacts addressed in 1 f. will occur because the roadway will not cross the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake, 1 g. Earth, EXDosure of people or propertv to geologic hazards such as earthquakes. landslides. mud slides. ground failure. or similar hazards Impacts addressed in 1 g. for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General . Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH 2Refer to appropriate note on page 8 -11- . . . No. 91103064). This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, a portion of the site is located within an Alquist-Priolo Special Study Zone which has evidence of 3 traces of the Pleasanton Fault. Design and construction of a roadway will include a geotechnical report which precisely locates the faults. Roadway and utilities which cross the fault lines will be designed to minimize damage or loss resulting from the highest magnitude seismic occurrence anticipated for the site. No other impacts addressed in 1 g. will occur because the roadway will be professionally designed and constructed to City standards. 2 a. Air. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality Impacts addressed in 2 a. for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No. 91103064). This Initial Stu'dy has determined that this portion of the project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, Staff has determined that the relocation of this facility from its current northerly location to the proposed location would not, in itself, result in an increase in impacts addressed in 2 a. 2 b. Air, The creation of obiectionable odors Impacts addressed in 2 b. for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No. 91103064). This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, no objectionable odors will be created because no industrial uses will be located along the right-of-way. 2 c. Air. The alteration of air movement. moisture or temperature. or any change in climate. either locally or regionally Impacts addressed in 2 c. for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No. 91103064). This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not 2Refer to appropriate note on page 8 -12- have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. . For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, no alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature or any change in climate, either locally or regionally, will occur because no large or tall structures will be built as part of this project which could cause these impacts. No impacts to air movement, moisture or temperature or to climate were identified for this roadway immediately to the east by the Eastern Dublin Program EIR. 2 d. Air. Construction or alteration of a facility within one-fourth mile of a school which might emit hazardous emissions No portion of this project will be constructed within one-fourth mile of a school. 3 a. Water. Changes in currents. or the course of direction of water movements. in either marine or fresh waters Impacts addressed in 3 a. for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No. 91103064). This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR, No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. . For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, no impacts addressed in 3 a. will occur because the roadway will not cross either marine or fresh waters. 3 b. Water. Changes in absorption rates. drainage patterns or the rate and amount of surface water runoff Impacts addressed in 3 b. for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No. 91103064). This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, minor changes to absorption rates, drainage pattern or the rate of surface water runoff may occur due to construction of the road. These impacts will be very minor and reduced to a level of insignificance because the roadway will be professionally designed and constructed to City standards. 3 c. Water. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters . 2Refer to appropriate note on page 8 -13- . Impacts addressed in 3 c. for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No. 91103064). This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, no alterations to the course or flow of flood waters will occur because the road does not cross floodways and because the roadway will be professionally designed and constructed to City standards. 3 d. Water. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body Impacts addressed in 3 d. for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No. 91103064). This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No "new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, no change in the amount of surface water in any water body will occur because the roadway will not cross, and is not adjacent to, any water body. . 3 e, Water. Discharge into surface waters. or any alteration of surface water quality. including but not limited to. temDerature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity Impacts addressed in 3 e. for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No. 91103064). This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, no impacts in 3 e. will occur because the roadway will not cross surface waters and because the roadway will be professionally designed and constructed to City standards. 3 f. Water. Alteration of the direction of rate of flow of ground waters Impacts addressed in 3 f. for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH . No. 91103064), This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not 2Refer to appropriate note on page 8 -14- have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, there will be no alteration of the direction of rate or flow of ground waters because the construction of the roadway will only involve superficial grading and will not impact ground waters. . 3 g. Water. Change in the quantity of ground waters. either through direct additions or withdrawals. or through interception of an aquifer by cut or excavations Impacts addressed in 3 g. for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No. 91103064). This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, there will be no impacts as described in 3 g, because the construction of the roadway will only involve superficial grading and will not impact ground waters. 3 h. Water. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for Dublic water supplies . Impacts addressed in 3 h. for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No. 91103064), This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, there will be no impacts as described in 3 h. because the construction of the roadway will not consume public water. 3 i. Water. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves Impacts addressed in 3 i. for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No. 91103064). This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. . 2Refer to appropriate note on page 8 -15- . . . For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, there will be no impacts to 3 i. because the roadway will not pass through flood plain and will not be located in a coastal area. 4 a. and 5 a. Plant life and animal life. Change in the diversity of species. or the number of any species of plants (including trees. shrubs, grass. crops. and aquatic plants) or animals (including birds. land animals including reDtiles. fish and shellfish. benthic organisms or insects) Impacts addressed in 4 a. and 5 a. for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No. 91103064). This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, the Veterans Administration National Cemetery Northern California EIR (SCH 86080507) addresses plant and animal life. That EIR states that this area has been used for agriculture, has been mowed and grazed, and has been burned during the occupancy of the site for military uses. Plant life has shifted from normal undisturbed grassland to introduced annual grasses and pioneer weed species and a corresponding change in the fauna from raptor and predators to ground squirrels and graniferous bird species. A survey revealed no endangered or threatened plant or animal species on this site. No impacts to endangered or threatened plant life or animal life will result from this portion of the project. 4 b. and 5 b. Plant life and animal life. Reduction of the numbers of any unique. rare or endangered species of plants or animals. Impacts addressed in 4 b. and 5 b. for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No. 91103064). This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, the Veterans Administration National Cemetery Northern California EIR (SCH 86080507) addresses plant and animal life. That EIR states that this area has been used for agriculture, has been mowed and grazed, and has been burned during the occupancy of the site for military uses. Plant life has shifted from normal undisturbed grassland to introduced annual grasses and pioneer weed species and a corresponding change in the fauna from raptor and predators to ground squirrels and graniferous bird species. A survey revealed no endangered or threatened plant or animal species on this site. This project will not result in impacts addressed by 4 b. or 5 b. 2Refer to appropriate note on page 8 -16- 4 c. and 5 c. Plant life and animal life. Introduction of new species of plants and animals into an area or result in a barrier to the normal replenishment. migration or movement of . existing species of plants and animals Impacts addressed in 4 c. and 5 c. for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No. 91103064). This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, the Veterans Administration National Cemetery Northern California EIR (SCH 86080507) addresses plant and animal life. That EIR states that this area has been used for agriculture, has been mowed and grazed, and has been burned during the occupancy of the site for military uses. Plant life has shifted from normal undisturbed grassland to introduced annual grasses and pioneer weed species and a corresponding change in the fauna from raptor and predators to ground squirrels and graniferous bird species. A survey revealed no endangered or threatened plant or animal species on this site. This project will not result in impacts addressed by 4 c. or 5 c. 4 d. and 5 d. Plant life and animal life. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop or deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat . Impacts addressed in 4 d. and 5 d. for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No. 91103064). This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, the Veterans Administration National Cemetery Northern California EIR (SCH 86080507) addresses plant and animal life. That EIR states that this area has been used for agriculture, has been mowed and grazed, and has been burned during the occupancy of the site for military uses. Plant life has shifted from normal undisturbed grassland to introduced annual grasses and pioneer weed species and a corresponding change in the fauna from raptor and predators to ground squirrels and graniferous bird species. A survey revealed no endangered or threatened plant or animal species on this site. This project will not result in impacts addressed by 4 d. or 5 d because no agricultural crops are grown in this area and because this is a disturbed area and not a wildlife habitat area. 6 a. and 6 b, Noise. Increases in existing noise levels and Exposure of people to severe . noise levels 2Refer to appropriate note on page 8 -17- . Impacts addressed in 6 a. and 6 b. for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No. 91103064). This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, Staff has determined that the relocation of Dublin Boulevard from its current northerly location (the current location is the proposed location of the Transit Spine) to the proposed location would not, in itself, result in an increase in noise impacts addressed in 6 a. and 6 b. 7. Production of new light and glare Impacts addressed in 7 for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No. 91103064). This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. . For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, Staff has determined that a roadway will not produce new light and glare because all street lights will meet City standards, and because the relocation of this facility from its current northerly location to the proposed location would not, in itself, result in an increase in impacts addressed in 7. 8. Land Use Impacts addressed in 8 for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No. 91103064). This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, the construction of Dublin Boulevard along its right-of-way as shown on the Dublin General Plan shows that the roadway will not have an impact to land use other than as intended by the General Plan. 9 a. and 9 b. Natural resources. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources or substantial depletion of any non-renewable resources . Impacts addressed in 9 a. and 9 b. for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern 2Refer to appropriate note on page 8 -18- Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No. 91103064). This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new . effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required, For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, no impacts to 9 a. or 9 b. will occur because both the Eastern Dublin Program EIR and the Veterans Administration National Cemetery Northern California EIR indicate that there are no natural resources to be used or depleted along this right-of-way. 10 a. Risk of upset. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including. but not limited to. oil. oesticides. chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions Impacts addressed in 10 a. for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No. 91103064). This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, Staff has determined that the relocation of this facility from its current northerly location to the proposed location would not, in itself, result in an increase in impacts addressed in 10 a. . 10 b. Risk of upset. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan Impacts addressed in 10 b. for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No. 91103064). This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, Staff has determined that the relocation of this facility from its current northerly location to the proposed location would not, in itself, result in an increase in impacts addressed in 10 b. The construction of Dublin Boulevard along its planned route in the General Plan should enhance the timely evacuation of citizens in the event of upset conditions. 11. Population, Will the proposal alter the location. distribution. density. or growth rate of the human population of an area? . 2Refer to appropriate note on page 8 -19- . Impacts addressed in 11. for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No. 91103064). This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, Staff has determined that the construction of Dublin Boulevard along the route shown in the Dublin General Plan will not have impacts to 11 because it will facilitate the implementation of the Dublin General Plan, 12. Housing. Will the DroDosal affect existing housing. or create a demand for additional housing? Impacts addressed in 12. for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10,' 1993 (SCH No. 91103064), This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. . For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, Staff has determined that the construction of Dublin Boulevard along the route shown in the Dublin Gener'al Plan will not have impacts to 12 because it will not impact existing housing or create a demand for additional housing because it will facilitate the implementation of the Dublin General Plan, and the housing it envisions, and will serve only areas within that General Plan. 13 a. TransDortation/Circulation. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement Impacts addressed in 13 a. for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No. 91103064). This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, Staff has determined that the construction of Dublin Boulevard along the route shown in the Dublin General Plan will not have impacts to 1 3 a. because it will facilitate the implementation of the Dublin General Plan, and the traffic it envisions, and will serve only areas within that General Plan. 13 b, Transportation/Circulation, Effects on existing parking facilities. or demand for new . parking 2Refer to appropriate note on page 8 -20- Impacts addressed in 13 b. for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH . No. 91103064). This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, Staff has determined that the construction of Dublin Boulevard along the route shown in the Dublin General Plan will not have impacts to 13 b. because it will not be a land use. which demands parking facilities. 13 c. Transportation/Circulation. Substantial impact upon existing transportation and traffic systems Impacts addressed in 13 c. for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No. 91103064). This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the .project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, Staff has determined that the construction of Dublin Boulevard along the route shown in the Dublin General Plan will not have impacts to 1 3 c. because it will facilitate the implementation of the Dublin General . Plan and will serve only areas within that General Plan. 13 d. Transportation/Circulation. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods Impacts addressed in 13 d. for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No. 91103064). This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, Staff has determined that the construction of Dublin Boulevard along the route shown in the Dublin General Plan will not have impacts to 13 d. because it will facilitate the implementation of the Dublin General Plan, which addresses patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods, and will serve only areas within that General Plan. 13 e. Transportation/Circulation. Alterations to waterborne. rail or air traffic . 2Refer to appropriate note on page 8 -21- . Impacts addressed in 13 e. for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No. 91103064). This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, Staff has determined that the construction of Dublin Boulevard along the route shown in the Dublin General Plan will not have impacts to 13 e. because it will not cross navigable waterways, railroad facilities or be located near airport facilities. 13 f, Transportation/Circulation. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles. bicyclists or pedestrians Impacts addressed in 13 f. for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No. 91103064). This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. . For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, Staff has determined that the construction of Dublin Boulevard along the route shown in the Dublin General Plan will not have impacts to 1 3 f. because the roadway will be professionally designed and constructed to City standards. 14 a. - 14 f. Public Services. Will the oroposal have an effect uoon. or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in Fire Protection: Police Protection: Schools: Parks or other recreational facilities: maintenance of public facilities. including roads: and other governmental services? Impacts addressed in 14 a. - 14 f. for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No, 91103064). This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, Staff has determined that Dublin Boulevard along the existing route to the north of the route shown in the Dublin General Plan has only minor impacts to fire protection and police because of the nature of a roadway. Staff has determined that the relocation of this facility from its current northerly . location to the proposed location would not, in itself, result in an increase in impacts to fire protection and police. The project would have no impacts to schools, parks or other 2Refer to appropriate note on page 8 -22- recreational facilities or other governmental facilities because it will not cross through any such existing facilities. . 15 a. Energy, Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy Impacts addressed in 15 a, for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No. 91103064). This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, Staff has determined that the construction of Dublin Boulevard along the route shown in the Dublin General Plan will not have impacts to 1 5 a. because the relocation of this facility from its current northerly location to the proposed location would not, in itself, result in a substantial increase in the use of amounts of fuel or energy. 15 b, Energv, Substantial increase in demand UDon existing sources of energy or require the development of new sources of energy Impacts addressed in 15 b. for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General . Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No. 91103064), This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, Staff has determined that the construction of Dublin Boulevard along the route shown in the Dublin General Plan will not have impacts to 15 b. because the relocation of this facility from its current northerly location to the proposed location would not, in itself, result in a substantial increase in the demand upon existing sources of energy or require the development of new sources of energy. 16 a, - 16 f, Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to power or gas utilities: communication systems: water utilities: sewer or septic tanks: storm water drainage systems: or solid waste and disposal systems? Impacts addressed in 16 a. - 16 f. for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No. 91103064). This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the . project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. 2Refer to appropriate note on page 8 -23- . For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, Staff has determined that the construction of Dublin Boulevard along the route shown in the Dublin General Plan will not have impacts to 16 a. - 16 f. because the relocation of this facility (the current location is the proposed location of the Transit Spine) from its current northerly location to the proposed location would not, in itself, result in a need for new utilities or substantial alterations to utilities. 17 a. and 17 b. Human health, Will the proposal result in creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard or in the exposure of people to potential health hazards? Impacts addressed in 17 a. - 17 b. for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No. 91103064). This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. . For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, Staff has determined that the construction of Dublin Boulevard along the route shown in the Dublin General Plan will not have impacts to 17 a. and 17b. because the relocation of this facility from its current northerly location to the proposed location would not, in itself, result in creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard or in the exposure of people to potential health hazards. The new location for the roadway does not pass over any known deposits of hazardous materials. 18 Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public. or will the oroposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? Impacts addressed in 1 8 for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No. 91103064). This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, Staff has determined that the construction of Dublin Boulevard along the route shown in the Dublin General Plan will not have impacts to 1 8 because the relocation of this facility from its current northerly location to the proposed location would not, in itself, result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public or result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to pubic view. . 2Aefer to appropriate note on page 8 -24- 19 Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational facilities? . Impacts addressed in 19 for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No. 91103064). This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, Staff has determined that the construction of Dublin Boulevard along the route shown in the Dublin General Plan will not have impacts to 19 because the relocation of this facility from its current northerly location to the proposed location (which would not pass through such facilities) would not, in itself, result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational facilities. 20 a, Cultural resources, Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a Drehistoric or historic archaeological site Impacts addressed in 20 a. for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No, 91103064). This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. . For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, the Veterans Administration National Cemetery Northern California EIR (SCH 86080507) addresses the impacts in 20 a. That EIR states that this area has been used for agriculture (including extensive cultivation with farm machinery), has been mowed and grazed, and has been burned during the occupancy of the site for military uses. The EIR determined that there were no prehistoric or historic archaeological sites in the area of the project. The project will not result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site. 20 b. and 20 c. Cultural resources. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric. historic. or architecturally significant building. structure. or object. or have the Dotential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? Impacts addressed in 20 b. and 20 c. for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No. 91103064). This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the . 2Refer to appropriate note on page 8 -25- . project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, the Veterans Administration National Cemetery Northern California EIR (SCH 86080507) addresses the impacts in 20 b. and 20 c. That EIR states that this area has been used for agriculture (including extensive cultivation with farm machinery), has been mowed and grazed, and has been burned during the occupancy of the site for military uses. The EIR determined that there were no prehistoric, historic or architecturally significant building, structure or object in the area of the project. The project will not result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric, historic or architecturally significant building, structure or object or have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values. 20 d. Cultural resources. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential imDact area? Impacts addressed in 20 d. for the portion of the project from Arnold Road eastward were addressed by the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (SCH No. 91103064). This Initial Study has determined that this portion of the project will not have effects which were not examined in the Program EIR. No new effects will occur and no new mitigation measures are required. . For the portion of the project west of Arnold Road, the Veterans Administration National Cemetery Northern California EIR (SCH 86080507) addresses the impacts in 20 c. That EIR states that this area has been used for agriculture (including extensive cultivation with farm machinery), has been mowed and grazed, and has been burned during the occupancy of the site for military uses. The EIR determined that there were no existing religious or sacred uses in the area of the project. The project will not restrict religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area. 21 a. Does the proiect have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment. substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species. cause a fish or wildlife population to droD below self-sustaining levels. threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community. reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the maior periods of California historv or prehistory? The alignment of Dublin Boulevard through a disturbed area used historically for agriculture and containing no rare or endangered plant or animal species or examples of California's history or prehistory will not have the potential degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or . animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant 2Refer to appropriate note on page 8 -26- or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory . 21 b. Does the proiect have the potential to achieve short-term to the disadvantage of long-term. environmental goals? The alignment of Dublin Boulevard in the location shown on the Dublin General Plan in areas without the presence of rare or endangered plants or animals does not have the potential to achieve short-term to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals because there are no significant impacts of any kind to lhe environment along its route. 21. c Does the proiect have impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable? , The alignment of Dublin Boulevard in the location shown on the Dublin General Plan in areas without the presence of rare or endangered plants or animals will not have cumulatively considerable impacts because there are no significant impacts of any kind to the environment along its route 21 d, Does the pro.iect have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings. either directly or indirectlv? The alignment of Dublin Boulevard in the location shown on the Dublin General Plan . does not environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. This is because the proposed roadway is necessary to implement the General Plan and to provide access to an area the General Plan envisions as a future residential and commercial community. This roadway does not have significant environmental impacts to human beings as determined in the Program EIR and because the Initial Study has determined that there are no known deposits of hazardous materials, locations of cultural or archaeological resources along the right-of-way, and because the area has been disturbed for a considerable period of time by use for agricultural purposes. 22 Does the proiect involve construction of anv facility which burns municipal waste or refuse-derived fuel? This project does not involve construction of any facility which burns municipal waster or refuse-derived fuel. . 2Refer to appropriate note on page 8 -27- DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT . DUBLIN BOULEVARD PRECISE PLAN LINE ESTABLISHMENT OF A RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR DUBLIN BOULEVARD FROM THE EASTERN BART ACCESS DRIVE TO HACIENDA DRIVE PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 7.68 OF THE DUBLIN MUNICIPAL CODE The project consists of a roadway with a minimum right-of-way of one hundred and forty- two (142) feet and a maximum right-of-way of one hundred and forty-eight (148) feet. The minimum paved section would be eighty-eight (88) feet and the maximum paved section would be one hundred thirteen (113) feet. The roadway would have six (6) lanes with additional left and right turn lanes as needed. The roadway and right-of-way would run from the eastern BART access drive to Hacienda Drive. The site area consists of relatively flat land lying north of the Eastern Dublin BART station. . . 2Refer to appropriate note on page 8 :::. -28- RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE CONCERNING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR DUBLIN BOULEVARD FROM THE EASTERN BART ACCESS DRIVE TO HACIENDA DRIVE WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQAI, as amended together with the State's administrative guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, requires that certain projects be reviewed for environmental impacts and that environmental documents be prepared; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance has been prepared by the Dublin Planning Department; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determined that the project (establishment of right-of-way line for Dublin Boulevard from the eastern BART access drive to Hacienda Drivel will not result in the potential creation of any significant environmental impacts identified in the Initial Study of Environmental Significance. NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council finds that the Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance has been prepared and processed in accordance with State and Local Environmental Law and Guideline Regulations, and that it is adequate and complete and that the City Council hereby adopts the Negative Declaration. PASSED, APPROVED. AND ADOPTED THIS 8th day of August. 1995. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Mayor City Clerk g:PA95018\res03 EXHIBIT A- . . . . . O::;l C_ s: OC) > !:::: ::l z~ n - o 0 r...., ....... < r-,) 0:: ....... r> ~ >-< ~ C)1 -<> Oz Co ~ . HACIENDA DRIVE /I /I ' ';: /I II ~-=-: -=-: --- "_~ . . -. . '- - " II . . I II 'i~JI' ! !~'!I BART WEST -=-:::1T,'" .- " - ACCESS ROAD = 9l 11 IJ 1::,' 'l\~I~~l. , \\~'!i - \W\I:, . "t..l BART EAST ~D\ ACCESS ROAD ;... -.~\ _._ ~t;~q "... u \101 ":"l o it '~l. c .... ~J". CD ~~: .;~~. r :1. ..II z jt:: ::ji, j~l; :;l'i " " CD '1'''' o liii! iil',' . \ c:: to, I'" r iF ';1' m ..:' "j, ~ If!! ;ili :t) il::' :;l! o iii;~' ;il! . to '11 ~I J I 1111 ",' _ _ ...,....---== ;i:;' ~l!_ ~" , 1- .~ - -::.. ARNOLD ROAD ~ J :- - = "~-::-::"1i~ !~ ;-'_u_ -' '. .. !!ii 111 i , -~!!!JI"li ", _ ---oI,C, 'I ' . ~ \'! . I < " ''\ ~11i r. i ,:' '. II!! ~I~ ,::.. .::-....! 11 ~ i , .' ::,;---! 11 fi i f'I'':=--..=......=-,. . ," 'I i : .'. i;I' .' n I ! II ft i I II n i 11 n i ~' n i " n i " It " S i II J! . 11 I! -.---.-----------.--....-/ "~ I' ':.-: , ' .......:::-=.. c__ ," ,. ..... ... -' I I ~ " '. +;. . ...... :t) G> "J: ~ o ." " l ~ :> -< . 'tl -. :t)" '0\ 'I:- ' m' -, C'), '. ~:" .;, . \ CJ) ~: C . " 0, : -< : . , ; . t .~EXHIBIT s "EXHIBIT A" Legal Description Dublin Boulevard Right of Way To be acquired from united States of :\merica . Tnat parcel or land in the City or Dublin, County of AJameda, State of California, described as follows: " Commencing at concrete monument number 28 in the center line of _tv"nold Road (formerly Ox-sen Road) as shown on Record of Survey No. 385 med in Book 8 of Records of Surveys at Pages 27-29 in the office of the County Recorder of said County; thence along said center line S. 1023 '35" \V., 1.269.22 feet to the PONT OF BEG0\;'::C\G: thence continuing S. 1023'35" V.,r., 1~2.00 feer: thence leaving said line ~. 83=16'05" \V., 676.83 feet to the beginning or a curve concave to the south having a ,::.dius qr 1.965.00 reet: thence westerly 498.65 feet along said curve through a ce:1t,2.l angle of 1~o32'23" to the southeasterly line of the 160.00-foot ""ide sw.;p of land descrijed in the Quitclaim Deed to the City of Dublin filed September :2:. 199~. Document 9~3125'iO. in said office of the COUnty Recorder, the beginning of 2. cur"'...e -......,--\.~ '" .:..,,,, "'or.:h\""'st :-'-\'I',.,CO " raO'I'US or' ') 06'i 00 '-"''''t. th"'il"'''' alono- s";d j::"\,,, :-0"'" i"..\,..lJ,-":' .... lL: i......... 1. I. "\ \or .i.J'::' ,;,.l.~.... & _,..... 1....._, ""'....._ 1.:::: (.I.J, UJ..."",.!..J. .,I.1o~ ., '., C'''' t 1;....", . ".,' ,; -1 "~""i.O~.. E nh" ..-',' '0 00' :""t.,l no- ,,'d -" ... - ,_n.=..il .j..... :J..;;.nng _". I _.:.. _ .. no ....ast..!!) -0." l~.. ..:.JOI.= Sa! ,-_i'\.. :i1rough 3. ce:1L"aJ ::.ngle of 12e~7':4" to the beginning of a CUi'\'e conc::."e to the somh :-:::,\'ing: 2. i2.di'.l5 of 2.077.00 feet: tnence leaving said southe:l.Sterly line from 2. r2....'1ger.t Ene be:ui.ng :\. 87=~5'06" E., e~terly 78.12 feet along said CUi'\'e through a ce:mal a.'1g1e or 2=09'18"; thence on a non-t.a1lgent line S. 87el~'48" E.. '277.~9 fee~: Ll'Jence S. 83:>16'05" E.. 402.50 feet to L:le point of beginning. . Containing 2...1 area of 3.02 acres more or less. Tnis real piOperry description has been prepared by me. or under my direction. in conformance \;,;ith the Professional Land Surveyors Act. ?~-:::r (~?~ [/?---, L Robert Ray Vaughn Licensed Land Surveyor No, 5199 ... :::;-<.~..:;.;- Date EXHIBIT b . ~~~ /~\ .:::;;; ..... ::: -, :-,.: -~ ~ ;'\ \,,,:,=:/,,,r\ ...,. :, ~;:. \.. ~ v \ .- I \ '" ~~ :; Is' .,..:t..==\\ /,~~:-;.. '-I ~ ':....:':.--- -l~ :.'::" ,. - -- .:-.-- I ! \ - '- .. I ... =:'_ j ~~-~~~ ~ ,....~..=i.~..:::. _=:....:.. . \ \. \\ \ :...-" \ .......---:j., , \ ....._~5~\. . \ ....-~..:'j... ! -- .-=r--t't:!) \ ~ R -...=-,:,~ j.J \ ::: ~ ~ l--...~EZ.=' ." \ ~ :: . ~ \ "" ,. ;5 \ ~I . I ~I 31 ! \ \ I , '" ~ . i i ! I i I I I J :: := ~I = >< ~;: :> :; ~ '" '..:...; .... :( '::: :::::> ;::, '. >~ W' ~I '" ~I it ::: - - => .;.. . ~....i- - . w :-':":-'=:'7'::- =-0:;>, ~~ F.. S;; > ""' - :....-:-~ >~<CO -.J>m ~~=u,> :'~=::no O::C_=O -;7;-'''50 ";::;0--:3:: >---" 3::~-'O> r:;5-'ZZ ~i:QO-< >0 "'To :E' > -< R::::CORD OF SURVEY NO. 325 . 200K 8, PAGES 2i-29 r i ;<:2.:::;- 5 ~.Z~JS. w ';'=:NOLD ROAD \. ~ :. '; :~ , - i- I i i~ I~ I I I I i I , I i I i" , ':: 1= ,..: ;:."\ I:: ,co !,,; I I=.: I~ i:': j= I '":; j b I ~ 1,,1/ ,..- ~ :~,= :l . .::' . ::1 ~i -~=~ " 5 ;; : .2~~.:2.? -..!.. COUN,Y OF ALAMEQA "EXHIBIT A" Legal Description Dublin Boulevard Right of Way To be acquired from County of :\lamed;). . That parcel of land in the City or Dublin. County of :\lameda, State of California, described as follows: COffiInencing at concrete monument number 28 in the center line of ..<\mold Road (formerly Oxsen Road) as shown on Record of Survey :\0. 385 flIed in Book 8 of Records of Surveys at Pages 27-29 in the office of the County Recorder of said COUnty: tIlence along said cemer line S. 1023'35" \V., 1.269.22 feet [Q the POI\'T OF 3EGD<>~r\G: thence lea\'ing said line S. 88010'05" E., 1 A74,41 feet; thence :-:. ~0~::'i"53" E.. 42.62 feet; L1ence S. 88048'09" E.. 51.00 feet to the center line of H:acien.:a Dn ve. also kilown as the "H I" Line: thence along said center line S. 01011'51" \V., 101./6 reet to the intersection with the center line or Dublin 3ou]e\"~j. also known as the "DC" Line; thence continuing S. 01011'51" \V.. 106.09 feet: the:1ce leaving said center li.I1e of Hacienda Drive :\. S8C:~S'09" \V., 6S.00 feet: :~e:1ce ~. '::3e32'07" \V.. ":'2.23 reet: thence N. 88"16'05" \V., .il5.30 feet; thence ~. S7~Ol'O," W.. 275.13 feet: the:lCe N. 88010'05" W.. ,68.14 feet [Q said ce:1ter line of :\.lllold Road: the:1ce along s::.id centerline N. 01 (:'23'35" En 142.00 feet to tile poim ~: ""-"'oi-,.,;"" Ul ""\...=-.~U"."=--' . Comaining :m area of 5.26 acres more or less. This rea1 properLY description b..s been prepared by me, or under my direction. in conformaI1Ce with the Profession.al Land Surveyors Act. E .r----v' 2-. GL- L I .,- Raben Ray Vaughn Licensed La.'1d Surveyor No. 5199 .., ~- iO- ,?~..,,;>-.> Date . f ~ 3 i G . L.:NI-- I cD STA-- 01: I-S . A'.C....IC- .V1..." A S J'2:,,:::5'/1 ; <?X' AMNCE) ::: ;~ ... 3. :: ~ ,- J .:: I :1 I I ...--1 ,- -" ~~ - , I I J ." ~ I .~~l :; i ......, ":i ", I I - .l. :~ I', I:: /. ;": . ;:;= :":$ '" '" ~ ..... :::: ::;~ '- .":; >:: ~ 0_ <: ~ 0, 'J :> :: ~ ::. '" '" '" ~ ~ :.., . . c g ~ . ;:0 :;; '. : ~ '1l'r : " : ....5. ~ ~ I ::, : I ;:; => \ : ~ ", LY I .~. -. - \ I i ~/' ~ .~" ! \.;' ::,.....!.... I r-"'--r- ;C5.CS' I 101.1;;- i ~ s ..... .. I . HACII: '" 5;"'N - - - ...NDA I DRIVE .... _....~ (" L!NE) dO I oe5 . .r- rZ ZCIJ !!!r < o . ==> C:c:--:l o ;:;::-:-::-- ~=~~> _;7l~>"'" ...J . - -< >~' ....: (')<co OD~;7l -:-:c="'> _",00 >::J ::JO rm::l=O >O;:::;~- 5: ~, ..... :.. m"'=;:::;'".:l _:::J-;:::::> "'0 .- >:;::0-:::;: -:-:Q \'--. "'- ~ .. :..., :::: -< :=: ~ .~ ..... > .~O;.D I.~:; .~~. ---:1'-- ;; ~ :. ..... ~ .:::: .. ~ ~ ~.... . - ~ ~ ,,= . '11 ~~- "'; ]~ . ' :::' . .' -- - ..:.. :==-- l: 142' 20' <!4' '4' 1 " 20' ~"'OlAN / 20' /1 12' / 12' /1 '\,: j' 12' ,2' , , I' j' 20' 'I I" t t t t t t 148. ,2' "I i'-. 73' ". ,I 15' J I\.. :'\. /91K' LAN' V-"",AN '\J .2' , ~ .2' " 1"'- f' f' f' .; t 'Z' 'f' t 12', 10' " t i" I..; f'- I..; 20' t t t DOUBLE LEFT TURN LANES & RIGHT TURN LANE (A T SELECTED INTERSECTIONS) EX.1J:BIT 7 ~nl . . e: , I I I I I I I I I I I STANDARD PL..!ili Sr,VVo;7Jp^STAON STREET CROSS SECTION..........,_ DUBLIN .1). i':l ./He. DUBLIN BDUI..t.yAP.D t.JJ_ ~'" ~ ....W' '!!~h"'r;.~! '~~:.I' ~.Ur:-l ,.:~D S~ ~f t"; ~ ~ r ,='l 'f'7V, RESOLUTION NO. 80 - 95 . A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ADOPTING A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ESTABLISH A RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR DUBLIN BOULEVARD FROM THE EASTERN BART ACCESS DRIVE TO HACIENDA DRIVE RECITALS The City Council of the City of Dublin does resolve as follows: The Council has received a report and recommendation from the Planning Commission recommending the establishment of a right-of-way line for Dublin Boulevard from the eastern BART access drive to Hacienda Drive. It is the intention of the City Council to establish a right-of-way line for the abovesaid road. Pursuant to the provisions of Sections 7.68.080 through 7.68.100 of the Dublin Municipal Code, the City Council hereby calls a public hearing on August 8, 1995, at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin, California, to hear protests and objections to the establishment of the proposed right-of-way line hereinafter set forth: Dublin Boulevard from the eastern BART access drive to Hacienda Drive . All that certain real property situated in the City of Dublin, County of Alameda, State of lifornia, described on Attachment 1. A copy of this Resolution shall be posted in accordance with Section 7.68.070 of the Dublin Municipal Code at least ten (10) days before the date of the hearing. Any person having any interest in any land as described above upon which said right-of-way lines are proposed to be established may file a written objection with the City Clerk at any time no later than the hour set for hearing objections. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 25th day of July, 1995. AYES: Councilmembers Barnes, Burton, Howard, Moffatt and Mayor Houston NOES: None ABSENT: None 41- f)hJ~ '-' Mayor : 9f,a95-018/ROI K n-25-95/reso-roLdoc EXHIBIT B-