The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutItem 8.1 MapeParkRenovation (2) <1> ". CITY CLERK File # ~[i]Cil~-~[QJ . AGENDA STATEMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: May 28, 1996 SUBJECT: ExmBITS ATTACHED: RECOMMENDATION: ~. "ZtA- .' FINANCIAL STATEMENT: Mape Park Renovation. Report Prepared by: Diane Lowart, Parks & Community Services Director A. Proposed Master Plan B. Preliminary Cost Estimate I. Receive presentation from Staff and Consultant 2. Receive public comment 3. Approve master plan in concept and direct Consultant to begin work on construction documents for the base improvements and include the sand volleyball court, restroom building and pedestrian bridge as additive alternates to the construction documents 4. Direct the Parks & Community Services Commission to reevaluate the Mape Park project against the other park projects and the available funds as part of the 1996~97 Budget process and recommend to the City Council the park priorities for 1996- 97 $24,900 is budgeted for design development and preparation of construction documents; no funds are budgeted for construction of the improvements, however, $51,750 in Community Development Block Grant funds are allocated for this project. The estimated cost of the base park improvements is $205,023; the estimated cost of the optional items is $122,500. DESCRIPTION: At the March 12, 1996 meeting of the Dublin City Council, the Council approved a consultant agreement with John Nicol & Associates, Inc. to provide landscape architectural services for the renovation of Mape Park. Staff has been working with the consultant for the past several months to develop a proposed master plan for the renovation of Mape Park. Although there are no funds budgeted for the construction of the Mape Park improvements in the current Five Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP), the estimated improvement cost that was identified in the CIP was $194,265. This estimate was based on the following design elements: 1) removal of existing play equipment and installation of a new accessible tot and children's play area; 2) replacement of wOrn park furniture including benches, drinking fountains, and trash receptacles; and 3) installation of additional park lighting. \ ------------------------------------------------------------------- .':, , .' F:\mapepark\528ccdes\.doc COPIES TO: Parks & Community Services Commission John Nicol & Associates ITEM NO. Y./ ... .... As part of the design process, two neighborhood meetings were conducted to obtain input on the preferreq., ' .' design for the park. At the first neighborhood meeting the consultant reviewed the existing park .' conditions and solicited input from the neighbors as to what they would like to see included in the park design. At the second neighborhood meeting, the consultant presented two schematic designs that incorporated the design goals and elements that were identified at the first meeting. The preferred design elements from both schematic designs were then merged to form the proposed master plan which is attached in Exhibit A. The proposed master plan includes the following design elements: 1) separated younger and older children's play areas with accessible equipment and surfacing; 2) new park furniture including benches, trash receptacles and picnic tables; 3) two small group picnic areas; 4) concrete walkway encircling the park; 5) upgraded park lighting; 6) sand volleyball court; 7) restroom building; 8) pedestrian bridge over the creek; and 9) enhanced shrub and tree plantings. Exhibit B contains a cost estimate for the improvements. The estimated cost for the base park improvements is $205,023. The sand volleyball court, the pedestrian bridge and the restroom building are shown as optional items as they were not included in the original scope of work for the project. The combined total for these items is estimated to be $122,500. Thus, the total estimated cost for the Mape Park renovation as shown on the proposed master plan is $327,523. At the May 20, 1996 meeting of the Parks and Community Services Commission, the Commission unanimously approved the proposed master plan, including the three optional items. Although it was :.:: recommended that the Commission prioritize the three optional items, they felt strongly that these items ,:.:. should not be identified as options but should instead be included as part of the base park design. Their recommendation was based, in part, on their belief that the Mape Park renovation is a project that is long overdue, and was also influenced by the strong support shown by the neighbors for the total master plan. As stated previously, the Five Year Capital Improvement Program does not currently appropriate funds for construction of the Mape Park Improvements. . The City Council will be adopting a new Five Year Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 1996-2001 in June of this year, so it is conceivable that funds could be shifted from other high priority park projects which are in the current CIP to the Mape Park improvements as part of the new CIP. As has been the case for the past several years, there are more park projects than available funding. The Parks and Community Services Commission will be c.9nducting a special meeting on May 29, 1996 to review and prioritize the park projects and to make recommendations for the funding and scheduling of these projects. Consequently, Staff would recommend that the City Council approve the master plan in concept and direct the Commission to reevaluate the Mape Park project against the other park projects and the available funds. Further, as it is apparent that there is strong support to proceed with renovation of the park in some fashion, it is recommended that the City Council direct the Consultant to begin work on the construction documents for the base improvements as shown in the master plan and includ~ the sand volleyball court, restroom building and pedestrian bridge as additive alternates to the construction documents. In this way, if it is determined that there are insufficient funds to construct the entire park at .: one time, the construction details for the alternate items will be prepared so that they can be re-bid at some . .:--'-' later time. · I~t p~~ I ~ - '~ n l,f. <<-- ] ~ u ~i ~ 3.-,,: f- e" ~ ~ I- ". ~e_ o I!'- V)~~ E e,H .:S!! ~H 0.. ~ ~'~ J! Q.).5 f ~ ~ J.61- ~ b C o ." e C<l -E ." u "'0 u c... ~ ::l '5 gLL. "'O~ . i: .,0 .J:J .- (5 ~ ~ ~\ .r" I ,..... --1........-.... b:::-'".....( j ~ ~-Jt" --I.... ~ ~_ 1,.. ~ _ t- . ~ A" -all ,-,r: J" >>"'"" ~ ~- /I ';;;:: 1.3"" ~ '717~" r~/ , - 5lJ- + ~ ~ ~~ + ~ .~~;;;..~t~,:.:..:. ,:.:,'~~':,"~.~:':::..1 -.-e - ...-IE- .....,..-..(:.,~-5-t ~. 5:V:., ~" ,.' '.~: ; ').~ ( ""\:' :....,':......-: 0.' '. .. ;":., fi : as. .-.....:..: .... ':..:'L /.:J' .::; '.~, c..:! + ..".' ". '.' . :..::~ ~ 1~''\". .:; . :r-7I\:, ..::: "~\' ~ ~~ ......: -t . <.... ~:.-~ // ~...:.. . :"..V .~. ..-f ,;o?:~\ ~8 3 ..' .>..~:-"~.~.:. fi -:j;;JJ~~'" f---:r,--i ::. "~".!!:\ 0.. <C ~ 1'. I I VI E "- ~ I I ' ", ; . .,' '. · . . ell . ~ 0" O::l <.- .' ~ IJ. '. W G 0";( ~ :: .' ~ "5 .:..... '0 W ~Y.'. Vl1 I I I, '.' ..,$' . '. c:;..:'::~ ~ ...J I\. :"'1 ~ ~ I I I I::.' '. ~'- " c.: I..___J ~ '0 ,...... Vi :::;- < ! I ~ ..I'",' ::l ~. 9 ~ - ---- --- .: ~ '" ... . "'~ .......~ 1/\ J-... ''-'.:',..<( r ~ ::. 'r ) ~ " .."..'.,..:" '\, l<M;t.: 11.;~ ""': ])1,.' ' " ~~~.' . ", A; -: )-r> "':;'i;( , ..~ I ~~~~ "''=~..a]' \ ~!'." "','.-"~ , I I I , , IT' "..pj:'Y {' _., ~~ \~"'~ J rn', :/ !t ~\A~l~~~~" t;j,".'" , '. ~l '\~. . .il.( _~ ":~'\\\\" '~':,~.~~"; ",.', ". ',: ,: .:~~ pno'M::lPJ::lA::llluJ ~~ ';.....1'.:.;',. .:. " '\ ',' ,": "':'" "'..:,' "A ~!] I-:~,;...:.~'.' ~,:":'. ,",,;-:,)""'Y:7- ~ r-=z . '.. ' . '. ...., ~ . 'E b ('7\~ ': ~ r. . ;':, :'-',yo: ,X<' ~ J N/'" 7' t. . : , ", . '.. '/ 1--.__ --~ t ~ fi'~ 4' ~~::." ~, <( 0 ,..~ w/Z'; , '= '" .'.'. . .'" ~ '.. ,--4 ..; ~ l! ~ ,:'..: r."7:"'--:-": .;: c:: - - - - ~ ,'/:, :C'p ~ '-;. . . ";g"5 ~ !V ....: I ~ ~~ ~ - '. :. I ' :g .s S 3 III " I "l! is 1-;,.... .t.,.. ' lXle If P. O2 ~ 1 u. f- '" . .1', ~ H 'Vi ~ '.: I- " "1" g .E ~ OJ 0 \ f-- ~.: . . == ~ ~ :'1::' 'i:: I- : . I ~'i: E ~ .!:! I '- i-.,'.. ~Cl<- ~t:l.. . ::1' ,- i '. '. : ~ I: /f'! " I .. I \- t=! = I'll.. .. I '- ~ eo 0 _ ,,", \ u: 0 I e - ~ ;a.~ .b=C ~:.,.JI" i L, ~~~. ~u ~/wi~~ "',::. ;:::: ..oIL... ~ t ~., >:'1. :,"5' ~.- =; "5;~" ~ t -'," ,I .. ~ "'1""" r.€' ~;J.._ fIr:: I, Ull. ~ r '\' ~ ~HJ -,<:. ~.iH\t~5 !n ~ . . I' 0. . < ' '0 . '10: .. en ~ \ .E E ' .. U I- !. "I) .D ~" \ ';'" : ~ 'C .::1 ',~ III ;::l " '" --\ , ~ ~ ]" " 1 ' ~,.., .E ~ ~ j l- I .t:: r-' l:l. VI ...,. · v. -::n " I ~ ~ '; '~i :; .'0''=...~ 3m jj.t' l~HL; I~~ \ .rY. :',.,-:: '/ ~~'.'" .',' ,'.:". ,:-' /11...-';=0 .... ' ',' , - r,,'., : :', ,..- ,- I - ., ", ,.' ;;.- ~ '. ' ~ ,"'. .'" -... ty ;\,' JI , ' " ,I, F-'", ': .: : ". - = , ~/:; ~r'--~~~+~~~-~:, } " · . : ~ W~ 'fa '. .', ,''; , I'~.J:J, I '.-' '. C<l , . 1\ \, I .s .:. :. '. I' ,"" " I :a"~ ,I' ..' .... ....l . ~ . .' {", I ' , ' ", ": I C/} :;:: I ' ,: ." C ' 1l:U ....- I ~', :.: :::. I ',"' ,'. I ':g.", I ,:: ,:,:::~' '.' ,. '..4 \ .,:.'. :i. 1Wj.:.",,,-~ :,:;.'.,~~~.:-b ':"'~.-~.;J ,,<, ',;.: o. . " :. ,:.~~(A I ~ ~ ~k/' ........, ."....,.','.', ,-,>." <..~,. l.P lJ~ -), 4 't- 'l + I";:" ,,",' "".; '.:'" ' , ,'..,:' ~ 1. A. " /'":'';''''~~''''' ,',:' 'I ~: ' . . ./~ '1 ',"",.,.. ' , .' _ ~'" T ",' f! <: .g u E: . . I .,. t - e 6'l e .. ~ ~ CI:l ~ Q:; I I I - , I ~ pno'M nUl~qns uus 1-J I I I \ \ r . . \ \\\ , "I' . III , , - - , ?'" ""IIIIl ,ol ." .~ ~~ / ~ ~ t:Q ~ Q ~ o ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ 11~~ ~ ..t . 1.0 Cj'I -- LI":l ~' ,~ s;:: :3 @~ ~ ~f-< ~ <ej- ii1 5~ S~ uf ~6 ;z< <~5'l ii 15 :> o I-' ' ~z ~iin 9,:s ~:s ~ ~ o co o \0 o -.:t o C"\l o - o . N JOHN NICOL & ASSOCIATES, INC. . LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 3581 Mt. Diablo Blvd., Suire 245, Lafayette, CA 94549 Phone (510) 284-3050 FAX (510) 284-3052 . Cost Opinion Project Nome: MAPE PARK RENOVATION MASTER PLAN Location: Dublin, California Name of Client: City of Dublin Dote of Estimate: May 17,1996 Item Quantity Unit Item Description Unit Price Extensions 1 1 LS Demolition and removals $7,500.00 $ 7 ,500 2 40,000 SF Grading; rough and finish $0.25 $10,000 3 7,400 SF Concrete paving; broom w/ trowel joints $3.50 $25,900 4 430 LF Concrete curbing and playlot $10.00 $4,300 5 160 LF Concrete seatwalls/planters $30.00 $4,800 6 1 LS Playlot equipment $30,000.00 $30,000 7 8,000 SF Playlot surfacing system $3.00 $24,000 8 1,050 SF Decomposed granite picnic area $1.25 $1,31 3 9 1 LS Drainage system; incl. inlets, piping & outfall detail $13,500.00 $13,500 10 30,000 SF Irrigation modifications and extensions $0.75 $22,500 11 1 LS Electrical undergrounding and panel $7,000.00 $ 7 ,000 12 4 EA Replace security lights $2,000.00 $8,000 13 1 EA Drinking Fountain; incl. services $3,500.00 $3,500 14 500 SF Wood shade structure $15.00 $ 7 ,500 15 7 EA Picnic tables $1,200.00 $8,400 16 8 EA Benches $400.00 $3,200 17 3 EA T rash receptacles $400.00 $1,200 18 1 EA Bicycle rock $400.00 $400 19 30,000 SF Soil preparation $0.20 $6,000 20 15,000 SF Hydrosod lawn $0.20 $3,000 21 13 EA 24" box trees $250.00 $3,250 22 38 EA 15 gallon trees $80.00 $3,040 23 7,200 SF Shrubs and groundcover plantings $0.60 $4,320 24 80,000 SF 90 days maintenance period $0.03 $2,400 PARK RENOVATION SUBTOTAL: $205,023 . . 1 1 LS Restroom building, incl.utililties design & processing $75,000.00 $75,000 2 1 LS Volleyball court, incl. curb, sand & lands/irrigation $12,500.00 $12,500 modifications and drainage 3 1 LS Pedestrian bridge w/abutments, incl. design & processing $35,000.00 $35,000 OPTIONAL PARK ITEMS SUBTOTAL: $122,500 Subtotal: $327,523 10% Contingency: $32,752 Total Including Contingency: $360,275 .