Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 6.1 MAD 97-1 LevyAccess (2) `,; CITY CLERK File # (o n- �O AGENDA STATEMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 1, 1996 SUBJECT: Public Hearing: Formation of Landscape Maintenance Assessment District 97-1 (Santa Rita Area) and Levy of Assessments Report Prepared by: Lee S. Thompson,Public Works Director EXHIBITS ATTACHED: 1) Resolution Ordering Improvements and Formation of the District, Approving the Final Engineer's Report, and Confirming the Assessment and Diagram 2) Engineer's Report and Diagram • RECOMMENDATION: 1) Open Public Hearing 2) Receive Staff presentation and public testimony 3) Question Staff and the public 4) Close Public Hearing and deliberate 5) Adopt Resolution Ordering Improvements and Formation of the District, Approving the Final Engineer's Report, and Confirming the Assessment and Diagram FINANCIAL STATEMENT: No assessments are proposed for FY 1996-97. The estimated assessment for`FY 1997-98 is $39,411, or$460.40 per acre(based on 85.6 acres), depending on the extent of landscaping that is installed for that year. Additional financial information is provided in the Description below. Assessments are subject to review and approval of the City Council on an annual basis through the required public hearing process. DESCRIPTION: On August 13, 1996, the City Council adopted a Resolution of Intention to form Landscape Maintenance Assessment District 97-1 (Santa Rita Area). This is the second of two public hearings regarding this proposed assessment district. The first public hearing was held on September 17th. No public comment was received at that meeting. This assessment district would fund street landscape maintenance and utility costs for the Santa Rita development area. This area is bounded by Arnold(Sebille)Road on the west, Gleason Drive on the north, Tassajara Road on the east, and Interstate 580 on the south, as shown on the assessment diagram included with Exhibit 3. COPIES TO: Pat Cashman, Surplus Property Authority ITEM NO. g:lassessdist197-1lagstfrm3 The scope of work includes maintenance of roadside landscaping for Dublin Boulevard, Hacienda Drive, the"transit spine," a portion of Arnold (Sebille)Road, Tassajara Road (westerly portion), and a portion of Gleason Drive, plus the maintenance of the trail and landscaping along the Tassajara Creek channel, as delineated in the scope of work on Page 1 and 2 of the Engineer's Report. At this time, the Surplus Property Authority is the only property owner within the proposed area of assessment. As various properties are sold and developed, the new property owners would be assessed according to the formula set forth in the Engineer's Report. It is proposed that the cost of maintenance be spread equally among the property owners on a per-acre basis. In the case of single-family or multi-family residential developments, the assessment would be based on the total acreage of the development, divided equally among the single-family or multi-family housing units. (If a residential development contains both single- and multi-family units, the proportion between the two housing types may be different, based on their relative areas divided by the number of units for each density category.) The estimated assessment for the 1997-98 fiscal year is$39,411, or$460.40 per acre, based on 85.6 acres anticipated to be developed at that time. The ultimate assessment at buildout is estimated to be $317,756, or$710 per acre, based on 447.6 acres, and based on 1996-97 unit costs. The Engineer's Report further specifies that the maximum developed,acre assessment will be increased annually by the percentage of increase of the Consumer Price Index(San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners), insofar as non-utility costs are concerned. Any actual increase in utility costs will also be passed on to the properties directly as part of the assessment. Any costs in excess of the total maximum allowable assessment"cap" of$710 per acre for developed properties would be assessed to the Surplus Property Authority's remaining undeveloped property. The Engineer's Report proposes a formula for calculating the assessment at buildout of the Santa Rita property. As such, once the initial assessment is levied, it will merely be necessary for the Council to annually determine the amount of the assessment by applying the formula. Staff recommends that the City Council conduct a public hearing, deliberate, and adopt the Resolution Ordering Improvements and Formation of the District, Approving the Final Engineer's Report, and Confirming the Assessment and Diagram. Page 2 RESOLUTION NO. - 96 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN RESOLUTION CONFIRMING REPORT, ORDERING IMPROVEMENT, AND LEVYING FIRST ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 97-1 (SANTA RITA AREA) The City Council of the City of Dublin resolves: This City Council has taken a series of actions-preliminary to ordering the improvement in Landscape Maintenance Assessment District 97-1 (Santa Rita Area) and now makes the following findings and orders: 1. The City Council adopted its Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the improvement described therein under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, and directed the City Engineer, as Engineer of Work for the assessment district,to prepare the report required by Section 22565, and ,following, of the Streets and Highways Code. The improvement is generally described as follows: The maintenance and repair of landscaped and open space areas, entry features, entry lighting, masonry soundwalls, wrought iron fences, publicly-owned drainage ditches,irrigation systems,trees and plantings, furnishing of water and power for irrigation systems, together with all appurtenant and incidental expenses for the following areas: a) The northerly and southerly street frontages for Dublin Boulevard from Sebille Road (Arnold Road)to Tassajara Road. b) The northerly and southerly street frontages for the"transit spine"from Sebille Road (Arnold Road)to Tassajara Road excluding the future school frontage landscaping. c) .The southerly street.frontage.for Gleason Drive from Sebille Road(Arnold Road)to Tassajara Road and the northerly street frontage for Gleason Drive from Tassajara.Creek to Tassajara Road. d) The easterly street frontage for Sebille Road(Arnold Road)from Dublin Boulevard to Gleason Drive. e) The easterly and westerly street frontages for Hacienda Drive from the I-580/Hacienda interchange to Gleason Drive. f) The westerly street frontage of Tassajara Road 350 feet southerly of Tassajara Road and Dublin Boulevard intersection to 450'northerly of the Gleason Drive and Tassajara Road intersection. g) Tassajara-Creek and trail from I-580 to the northerly property boundary of the Alameda County Surplus Property Authority property (portion of APN 986-1-1-10). h) Street median landscaping is not part of this District. P, IT 1 -�- 2. The Engineer of Work filed the report as directed, and the City Council adopted its Resolution of Intention calling a hearing on the report as required by Section 22587 of the Streets and Highways Code. Notice of the hearing was given by publication and by mailing to affected property owners, all according to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. Affidavits of publication and mailing were filed with the City Clerk. 3. At the time and place for which notice was given, the City Council conducted a public hearing and gave every interested person an opportunity to object to the proposed improvement, the extent of the assessment district, or the proposed assessment. 4. The City Council finds that written protests against the proposed improvement have not been made by owners representing more than one half of the area of the land to be assessed for the improvement. 5. The documents and events described in Paragraphs 1 to 4, inclusive, are stated herein tabular form,with.their dates and,where appropriate,their numbers. All documents are now on file with the City Clerk. Document or Event Date Number a. Resolution Initiating Proceedings 7/23/96 . 94-96 b. Filing of Engineer's Report 7/23/96 N/A • c. Resolution Preliminarily Approving Engineer's Report 8/13/96 100-96 c. Resolution of Intention 8/13/96 101-96 d. Certificate of Mailing Notice 8/14/96 N/A e. Affidavit of Publication of Notice 8/15/96 063646 f. Public hearing conducted 9/17/96 10/1/96 N/A 6. The City Council approves the Engineer's Report and each component part of it, including each exhibit incorporated by reference in the report. 7. The City Council finds that the Engineer of Work, in the Engineer's Report has fairly and properly apportioned the cost of the improvement to each parcel of land in the assessment district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each parcel, respectively, from the improvement. The City Council hereby confirms and levies each individual assessment as stated in the Engineer's Report. 2 8. The City Council orders the improvement described in Paragraph 1 and as detailed in the Engineer's Report. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1st day of October, 1996. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk g:\assessdist\97-1\resolevy 3 -i OF DUa 0C--)/ / / 4\ 19 imil — — 82 C4-(//FoO\ ENGINEER'S REPORT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 (SANTA RITA AREA) (Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972) The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed report as directed by the City Council. DATED: SEPTEMBER 17, 1996 06 En, .eer,of Work i/Awd: . k Page 1 v ENGINEER'S REPORT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 (SANTA RITA AREA) (Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972) LEE THOMPSON, City Engineer of the City of Dublin and Engineer of Work for Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. 97-1 (Santa Rita Area), City of Dublin, Alameda County, California, makes this report, as directed by the City Council, pursuant to Section 22585 of the Streets and Highways Code (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). The total assessment District area shall be 447.6 acres as shown in Part F (the Assessment Diagram) of this report. The Ultimate Improvements which are the subject of this report are briefly described as follows (hereinafter"Improvements"): The maintenance and repair of landscaped and open space areas, entry features, entry lighting, masonry soundwalls, wrought iron fences, publicly-owned drainage ditches, irrigation systems, trees and plantings, furnishing of water and power for irrigation systems, together with all appurtenant and incidental expenses for the following areas: 1. The northerly and southerly street frontages for Dublin Boulevard from Sebille Road (Arnold Road)to Tassajara Road. 2. The northerly and southerly street frontages for the "transit spine" from Sebille Road (Arnold Road) to Tassajara Road excluding the future school frontage landscaping. 3. The southerly street frontage for Gleason Drive from Sebille Road (Arnold Road) to Tassajara Road and the northerly street frontage for Gleason Drive from Tassajara Creek to Tassajara Road. 4. The easterly street frontage for Sebille Road (Arnold Road) from Dublin Boulevard to Gleason Drive. 5. The easterly and westerly street frontages for Hacienda Drive from the I-580/Hacienda interchange to Gleason Drive. Page 2 7 6. The westerly street frontage of Tassajara Road 350 feet southerly of Tassajara Road and Dublin Boulevard intersection to 450' northerly of the Gleason Drive and Tassajara Road intersection. 7. Tassajara Creek and trail from 1-580 to the northerly property boundary of the Alameda County Surplus Property Authority property (APN 986- 1-1-10). 8. Street median landscapings are not part of this District. This report consists of six parts, as follows: PART A - Site plan and street cross sections. PART B -An Estimate of the annual maintenance costs of the ultimate Improvements. PART C -An assessment of the estimated cost of the Improvement on each benefitted parcel of land within the assessment district. PART D A statement of the method by which the undersigned has determined the amount proposed to be assessed against each parcel. PART E -A list of the names and addresses of the owners of real property within this assessment district, as shown on the last equalized assessment roll for taxes, or as known to the Clerk. PART F -A diagram showing all of the parcels of real property within this assessment district. Respectfully submitted, Alp C---) 2(. ° 1 J LEE THOMPSON Engineer of Work Page 3 Q PART A SITE PLAN AND STREET CROSS SECTIONS, Page 4 142' nw 2o' 44' 14' 44' 20' p 110' n/w 3'E e I 1x' 12'.� ix' I t2' I 1x I2' I e' 9' NIEounED ton xE' I 0x' Sr I —�— I _� 1_4 SW CNAIINEL R/W) 40' 1 10', --- �— 24' 41 24' r DUBLIN BLVD. -- (-6 2 e' t ' I ' e' 5' sw (ARNOLD ROAD 10 IIACIENDA DRIVE it 1ASSAJARA CREEK 10 TASSAJARA ROAD) N.T.S. ARNOLD ROAD 60' • (FROM DUBLIN BLVD. TO GLEASON DRIVE) 143' nil" 10' 70' 10' 10 21' i3. 6' N.T.S. I L.E..1_1...____t5' e' 12' 12' 12' ' 2j1' 12' 12' _ I r' '51 12' I 12' 4' sw— — 4' 5W s_ i I1— s sw /W 1 I 102' R COLLECTOR ROAD "A" 1r 32' 1 14' 32' iv DUBLIN BLVD. (DUBLIN BLVD 10 TRANSIT SPINE) 5, sW a 12 12' I 12' 12' 1 (FRoM HACIENDA DR, TO COLLECTOR ROAD "Al _ I— ` 1 Ir N.i.5. N.T.S. 162' nW HACIENDA DRIVE J7'-JS' 41' ro 46' 24' ^ us: (FROM,ROUTE 580 10 GLEASON DRIVE) wear e' It' _Jr_ — —5'5' Sw N.T.S. •PARE — 102' R/W 106' R/W DUBLIN BLVD. l 24' J 15' 1 15' za• 10 211" 14' 12' 32' 1� 32' Ir 14' sw h I �'^ —5-SW s'sW � ' 12' I 12' a —I il sw (FRoM COLLECTOR ROAD 'A" TO TASSAJARA CREEK) jI fff N.T.S. tr,---- ---- I CENTRAL PARKWAY GLEASON DRIVE 94' R/w (HACIENDA DRIVE TO TASSAJARA ROAD) (ARNOLD ROAD 10 TASSAJARA ROAD) e'1 6' _ _4' 14' 24' e' e N.T.S. SW BEIIIUD SW 901111D PROPERTY LIME I PnOPERrr LINE 142' R/w —1,--- I --e-----� Z0' 1 44' 14' 44' 20' CENTRAL PARKWAY I 5' 12 12' 12' I 12' 12' 12' 5 (ARNOLD ROAD TO HACIENDA DRIVE) 1 sw I_ I L e' i + i I I I f —I 5' Sw N.LS. • TASSAJARA ROAD (FROM ROUTE 580 TO DUBLIN BLVD.) N.T.S. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO, 97-1 (SANTA RITA AREA) Ruggeri 1 Ch5Cr1 and DAtE! AUGUST 7, 1996 JOB 140.1 961069 AS$OC�dtes L�Al�iiLE1gInsup iyui-Y4 un 9eoia (1795 , X(5 )2 -0 fee ,Plle 50)22 - 100 6 VA 10 7930 _ - SIRE! 7d2 11 I cLLASON DRIVE , ' ib� I —N— 111nN01ntmn MUIMmWIDnnnlmn 1 1 t 9' 1 1 1 1 lil:t I:lit 1,i - -=_ 1450' I Jor7' a1 I --= Sr. ne-mcn a Il 'U 1;1is 1� 1600' !ij ^S . :1171:•., =-1- Id,:Ia:•:.'--•,•1�: -------_ N.'I'.S. O I 1 Ikin:1.1;x. I_ ;mills...! ••••:.t:I lUlwla$Ani1'81HUUU:. ...:441: tg oII1 I II• b • couuERau sr. DEMOTED 11 I Mb `�. PARK p • =ic o ISal00L a •i I --'i •50'f NN A Cowman. 11: N50' I :• I 1 1I C�TRANSIT SPINE) _4 I 1 n 1 t sA[ar1pIIffitlnRitl tu1;1;:: I; J00' 450' 600' 800' 1500' ' 500' , -- t :111 I :1:111 '' :11;l Ii: 1 It:I:I;33111II F- �1:1:I I1 Iit•:1:1•• 11'1111 I II111 31 : I�. --11 1.∎....II11tH -1-------.• 1 Ilittt t13.-... .1'. :I,I:It."-.I.. i 171.1 tl l:".--7 -- i III /150' 1UI 1 1A:Iil l I ,II:1111:3 Iti 1•it ti:a t:t I 1 1 1 411 f:::111 3:1::a1 1:i1411.:11:1:I•u:i:1$1 II 11 LP1::=1 :11:3II:!L:::a..:..•31j1:4i1?Iitl::::P: ...:::IF1!1:1I:.:1:::3;111al....••:•::::::;t:': (/t IA/ 3 I '� 750 1450 -• n-rM .r __ — 1500'1500' 500' f- * = 1'1A t 1 1 uu n-i-Aux r w coma-Rau I ft Sr: DETACNCO ' •3 / �.- Sr. orrAaa .' .1400' 1 6 .' 1 t:.!4:`1 1-1 I 1-11 t 1:11 uy7=P3-,m:u:�tid. I 1 111 1:I woo;II::rI r a 16 'Ii:urm4 at111::31 I:1 �, _ =- �, �LIBLr� r�1 t gt:1u: ► . :t It 1 43 3; Itoml$1133mu I::I::I!:• I 1:14i 1141 t q:1 1 t 91:1;t;•I11;t41ill•:11t111III;9 111;•:I i~- ;•j 11f .1 li •Ut•;11='=II:tIt:1•:dlli4:;•:;:,,II200'i::hr I7:41:t1 1:::::4::: :: ......::;•1ItUiDDiIT<Ulllilp► t p t 1 f i t sit all I • 1400' I :i. :11 1 2400 :.1::1::1i:•::t:I:.,1 - — ------------ :1y y1 3::'I'tt71 141::=1 Ul&Httl}J EDIMBINIM 8111111/iII l ll••I::I.•••• i 1 I = 1650' }, I I a 1 . ' COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL canERaa =I . _� • f•-----; I11011WAY ROUTE .ISO . Ruggeri — LEGEND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 Ct%SCh and M IASSAJARA CREEK LANDSCAPE AREA SS�CI$tCS (SANTA RITA AREA) 'Associates 135 . P CA11T' M SIRUF MONTAGE LANDSCAPE AREA �_______-.� -=---� eeapiloNC(510)2 -9IOIOe�••r�I�i(510)Tl1-30O4sne ASSESSMENT OISIRICr 80UNUARY DAIE: AUOU51 7, IDD6 JO 170.1 961060 • veal 10, PART B _ AN ESTIMATE OF THE ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COST OF THE ULTIMATE IMPROVEMENT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 (SANTA RITA AREA) The budget for the Ultimate Improvement shall be $317,756/YR. It is estimated that the budget for the fiscal year 1997/98 will be in the amount of $39,411. 1997-1998 Ultimate 1997-1998 1997-98 Ultimate Ultimate Maintenance Maintenance Base Unit Maintenance Base Unit Maintenance Areas Areas Cost/SF Cost/Yr. Cost/SF Cost/Yr. A.Landscaped Areas(maintenance) 1. Dublin Blvd.Area (51,800 SF) (189,100 SF) $0.30 $15,540 $0.30 $56,730/Yr. 2. 'Transit Spine'Area (9,100 SF) (53,700 SF) $0.30 $2,730 $0.30 $16,110/Yr. 3. Gleason Drive Area (0.00 SF) (48,100 SF) $0.30 $0.00 $0.30 $14,430/Yr. 4. Arnold Road Area (0.00 SF) (11,600 SF) $0.30 $0.00 $0.30 $3,480/Yr. 5. Hacienda Drive Area (6,300 SF) (42,100 SF) $0.30 $1,890 $0.30 $12,630/Yr. 6. Tassajara Rd.Area (0.00 S9 (44,800 SR $0.30 $0.00 $0.30 $13,440/Yr. Total Area: 67,200 SF 389,400 SF $20,160/Yr. $116,820/Yr. B.Tassajara Creek 1. Trail Maintenance (0.00 SF) (45,000 SF) $0.06 $0.00/Yr. $0.06 $2,700/Yr. 2. Creek Landscape (0.00 SF) (895,000 SF) $0.08 $0.00/Yr. $0.08 $71,600/Yr. 3. Trail Connections (0.00 SF) (17,000 SF) $0.36 $0.00/Yr. $0.36 - $6,120/Yr. Total: $80,420/Yr. C.Soundwalls 1. Repair and Maint. (1,600 SF) (7,100 SF) $6,400/Yr. $28,400/Yr. D.Dublin.Blvd.Trail (46,800 SF) $0.06 $2,808/Yr. E.Sidewalk 1. Dublin Blvd.Area (30,300 SF) $0.05 $1,515/Yr. 2. 'Transit Spine'Area (56,500 SF) $0.05 $2,825/Yr. 3. Gleason Drive Area (37,000 SF) $0.05 $1,850/Yr. 4. Arnold Road Area (12,800 SF) $0.05 $640/Yr. 5. Hacienda Drive Area (32,350 SF) $0.05 $16,175/Yr. 6. Tassajara Rd.Area (15,450 SF) $0.05 $773/Yr. Total: (184,400 SF) $9,220/Yr. F.Vandalism Repair-all-planting area: $3,500/Yr. $14,000/Yr. G.Water 1. All Planting $4,000/Yr. $23,364/Yr. Page 5 /z 1997-1998 Ultimate 1997-1998 1997-98 Ultimate Ultimate Maintenance Maintenance Base Unit Maintenance Base Unit Maintenance Areas Areas Cost/SF Cost/Yr. Cost/SF Cost/Yr. H. Power 1. Controllers $300/Yr. $2.000/Yr. Subtotal: $34,360/Yr. $277,032/Yr. I. Administration Fees 1. City of Dublin Administration©8% $2,749/Yr. $22,163/Yr. 2. County Fees for Collection of Assessments© 1.7% $584/Yr. $4,709/Yr. 3. Delinquency Factor©5% $1.718/Yr. $13,852/Yr. $5,051/Yr. $40,724/Yr. Total: $39,411/Yr. $317,756/Yr. Assessment per Acre, 1997-98 (85.6 Acres) $460.41/Yr. Assessment per Acre Ultimate (447.6 Acres) $710.00/Yr. The annual levy of assessment shall be established as a range between $0.00 and $710.00 per developed acres. However, the maximum amount of the assessment of$710.00 per developed acre., shall be increased annually, beginning on July 1, 1998, by the percentage increase in the Bay Area Urban Wage Earner Price Index (applies to all costs except water and electricity), plus any increase in the cost of water and electricity. If the Bay Area Urban Wage Earner Index is unavailable or deemed by the City Council to be inappropriate, a comparable consumer price index, as approved by the City Council, shall be used to replace the Bay Area Urban Wage Earner.Index. Page 6 13 PART C ASSESSMENT ROLL LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 (SANTA RITA AREA) ASSESSMENT AND LOT AMOUNT OF ASSESSMENT FOR NUMBER PROPERTY OWNERS ACRES LOTS 1997-98 TAX YEAR Per Acre Per Lot TOTAL 1 Remainder of Undeveloped Surplus Property 362 $0.00 $0.00 Parcel Authority of Alameda County 2 Lots 1-154(Single Family)of Unknown 21.9 154 $460.41 $65.472 $10,082.76 Tract 6822 - 3 Lots 155-277(Townhomes) Unknown 7.7 122 $460.41 $29.058 $3,545.08 of Tract 6822 4 Parcels 1,2, and 3 of Parcel Unknown 56 $460.41 $25,782.40 Map 6879 TOTAL: $39,410.24 Page 7 '`' • PART D METHOD OF SPREAD OF ASSESSMENTS LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 (SANTA RITA AREA) The maximum developed acre assessment will be $710 per year, based on a total of 389,400 square footage of street improvements and a total of 957,000 square footage of creek improvements and 447.6 acres of developed property at buildout of all property within the District. The cost of the Improvements will be divided equally among the total number of developed properties within the boundaries of the District on a per acre basis. "Developed acres" shall include property which has a recorded final map or parcel map as of July 1st of each year. Each year the City Council shall determine the assessment for that year based on the following: 1. Actual square footage of installed improvements ("I") relative to the total amount of square footage of Improvements. 2. Cost of maintenance of installed Improvements ("M"). 3. Total amount of developed acres ("A"). 4. The annual assessment for the developed acres for that year("I" x "M") shall be spread on a per-acre basis (".I" x "M" ÷ "A") based on the following: A. Commercial developed area, per acre basis. B. Single-family residential area, per acre basis. C. Multifamily residential area, per acre basis. 5. The single-family and multi family residential area per acre assessment will be spread on a per lot basis based on the number of lots on the final map or parcel map for each particular development. 6. If the assessment in any year would exceed $710 per acre, the amount in excess of$710 shall be assessed to the remaining undeveloped acres on a per acre basis, subject to the maximum developed acre amount. _ Page 8 5� 7. The maximum developed acre assessment of $710 per year will be increased annually by the percentage increase in the Bay area Urban Wage Earner Price Index (applies to all costs except water and electricity), plus any actual increase in the cost for water and electricity. 8. If the square footage cost of the Improvements will be less than the '.. amount set forth herein (after adjustment in accordance with Paragraph 7), the assessment shall be reduced proportionately to reflect the reduced cost of Improvements in that year. The cost of the Improvements and the total square footage of the Improvements are taken from Part B of the Engineer's Report. The following is an example calculation for a first year and second year assessment scenarios: SAMPLE ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS 1. FIRST YEAR A. ASSUMPTIONS Constructed Landscape Area; 50,000 s.f. Constructed Creek Area: 0 s.f. Maintenance Cost per Square Foot $0.30 Developed Area: 15 Acres Subdivision "A", 100 single-family detached lots 5 Acres Subdivision "B" 70 multi family lots 20 Acres Commercial 40 Acres Total B. ASSESSMENT CALCULATION: Total Landscape Maintenance Cost=$0.30 x 50,000 S.F.=$15,000 Assessment per Developed Acre=$15,000/40 Acres=$375 per acre Subdivision "A" Assessment=l 5 Acres x°$375/Acre=$5,625 Subdivision "A"Assessment per lot=$5,625/100=$56.25 per lot Subdivision "B" Assessment=5 Acres x $375/Acre=$1,875 Subdivision "B" Assessment per unit=$1,875170 lot=$26.79 per lot Page 9 �� Commercial Assessment= 20 Acres x $375.00 per acre = $7,500 Undeveloped Property Assessment=$0 per acre 2. SECOND YEAR A. ASSUMPTIONS: Constructed Landscape Area 70,000 SF Constructed Creek Area: 400,000 S.F. Maintenance Cost per Square Foot for landscaped area $0.309 Maintenance Cost per Square Foot for creek area $0.0824 Developed Area: 15 Acres (Subdivision "A" 100 Single-Family Detached Lots 5 Acres (Subdivision "B") 70 Multi-Family Lots) 8 Acres (Subdivision "C" 64 Single-Family Lots 7 Acres (Subdivision "D" 140 Multi-Family Lots 20 Acres Commercial 55 Acres Total Undeveloped Area 392.6 Acres Cost of Living Increase: 3% Over Year One Water Cost Increase 3% Over Year One Electrical Cost Increase 3% Over Year One B. ASSESSMENT CALCULATION: Maximum Allowable Assessment=Year One Maximum Assessment + Electrical, Water,.& Cost of Living Increases =$710.00 + $21.30=$731.30/Acre Total Max. Allowable Assessment=Max. Assessment x Devel. Acres =$731.30/Acre x 55 Acres=$40,221.50 Maintenance Cost=Landscape Area Cost+ Creek Cost 70,000 x $0.309 + 400,000 x $0.0824=$54,590 Undeveloped Property Assessment=Maintenance Cost - Max. Allow Assessment =$54,590 - $40,221.50=$14,368.50 Page 10 Undeveloped Property Assessment Per Acre=$14,368.50/392.6 Acres =$36.60/Acre Assessment per Developed Acre=Max. Assessment=$731.30 per Acre Subdivision "A" Assessment=l5 Acres x $731.30/Acre=$10,969.50 Subdivision "A" Assessment per Lot=$10,969.50/100=$109.70 per Lot Subdivision "B" Assessment=5 Acres x $731.30/Acre=$3,656.50 Subdivision "B" Assessment per Lot=$3,656.50/70=$52.24 per Lot Subdivision "C" Assessment= 8 Acres x $731.30/Acre=$5,850.40 Subdivision "C" Assessment per Lot=$ 5,850.40/64=$91.41 per Lot Subdivision "D" Assessment= 7 Acres x $731.30/Acre=$5,119.10 Subdivision "D" Assessment per Lot=$ 5,119.10/140=$36.57 per Lot Commercial Assessment= 20 Acres x $731.30/Acre = $14,626 Page 11 PART E PROPERTY OWNERS'S LIST LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 (SANTA RITA AREA) Assessment No. Name of Property Owner L1 Surplus Property Authority of Alameda County 224 W. Winton Avenue, Rm 151 Hayward, CA 94544 Page 12 . LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 (SANTA RITA AREA) CERTIFICATIONS I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that the foregoing Engineer's Report, including Assessment, in the amounts set forth in Part B, with the diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on August 8, 1996. I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that the foregoing Engineer's Report, together with the Assessment, and the diagram thereto attached, was preliminarily approved and confirmed by the City Council of said City by its Resolution No. 100-96, duly adopted by said Council on August 13, 1996. I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that the foregoing Engineer's Report with Assessment and diagram was filed in the office of the County Auditor of the County of Alameda, California on 1996. Page 13 . . - ,. . rpn LARI DAY REGIO1AI. PARK blsIfltc - RE 3382 IM .iiB _� %���• 6 n t/lid CLII_SN_DU.nLIdSEN1uCMLS —N— rn711lt- A°'� '� Fr1Tk •7__—J-' 4 It4 rlltn IN nit orrict or nit CM'citnk nns nrmrroull��—hT. - I`7rr.r Z N DAY a . 199_. 4 d UNITED srAyES or AMERICA k n'al R7t4 rcEcK, cii C[LRR b PARCEL 2, RE 2433 IM 213 (f 5°i o 000 1100 1000 =r CITY a DUBLIN !-�� I v lunttr [ J y2 r`inii t �l'i k a.11 1 IIEnEBY CERnri n1AT nlS NAP WAS APPROVED BY I I•I _ I o nit cirr Council or DIE CITY or DUBLIN Al A too a 41; N REGULAR littliNG n1EREa. HEED ON nit _DAY M'�•17 or 199_, BY ITS REsoIUnon no. • C11YCLLR t! °t .kill� .11' RhYTECK, g rail,N• ciTY or Dunllrl III r rr _ ; �i r it f j rargr�lr '�• �.; Aaf1 xY e•.0+fYY InNb9 or CISTER9ON .l 1 t 11111[:; R•,Icylq' °Minn AN1!•yT J SERIE9 No. 80-229808 ; t,.— niAfP 1-J/A!r' I111t Pe et' NEW•. 1 1i { +•I letrr !sfl�' .� ' _ _ . . nrrvl�rt CWHLLAUDnoIts_ctanrJGA1L ------ ----�-- - - -- TILED Di DIE °MGT Cr DIE COUNTY AUDITOR a TILE G O a•• r. COUNTY Or AUUEDA• STATE Or CAUroRllu nns ,1 � ! It: DAY a 199 ��ffll[�_ — i 1 . wools*-1 ',r, _'}1/17 3 stir P7;tRICJ[-if Ci1i1NELL > 11� °tug r;, ^i 1 COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER [1101st ++llL"i I!� i STATE a ALAUENI i}ilftt: tt I�• STATE a CALIrORN1A lYi mm i I -r rAn Mr 1 , .. 4 =i i " iillill""` '• i�',''t(` "��� TILED nlls DAY a 199-.. AT / �•I r'rr t -1+ Ity, © """"1. AI, IN BOOK n1E 11O0 OF O'CLOCK -.. ////////////�% ///ii•�%/%/%t;.r.,.,' � "►•r!'— % Or NAPS a ASSESSUENT Distinct AT PACE Mrnnit j -Mimi.Olrc r -''"//�// //// �!��. • nitntor Ri nit orrict or nit county RECORDER a LV Ilr,u �I- FM nu r�e�N119:"_/17" DIE CouNIY a ALAUEDA. SIATE a C Alit ORNIA. -5-7,11r-rig. O I "°11Jt rtt. SERIES r1O. I ►Area rwir COI 01' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM trr1 it oil ` PH tin If— _. _ III_ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE C r Plop HP Q1 Jet rARctl.111t r I PATnicK 0 CO1111EL1.Cagily RECORDER IN Alit rN tin 1!— ion nit couurr a ALAutok ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 L (SANTA RITA AREA) rl „$4 T ■ Ur Il I I M017rrne S1AIE a CALI►ORr1tA Ir, watt t.l!'!II .• C III i (I A • CITY OF DUBLIN Wawa? 110110 sto If 11 CI ALAUIEDA COUNTY, CAUFORNIA • to If LEGEND RUGGERI - JENSEN AND ASSOCIA1ES :..- -. Asstlsytlll bitnael nMIIOAgY CiMIL ENGINEERS. PLANNERS. SURVEYORS let till W/r ilIASANtoN. ulollA AVeVtt Irt1 tm..r»I�.0 USSIIAtA VItUI lAll0stArt At1A trAmm »11 110th 1tt•iIAtt)rgseArt AttA - PART F 10,N0.011074.10 011.f0 111111 I 0? I mttt! a.,