HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 6.2 Intent to Establish ROW (2) CITY CLERK
File #670-40
('-" AGENDA STATEMENT
"- CITY COUNCIL MEETI'NG' DATE: July 20, 1999
SUBJECT: Public Hearing: Resolution of Intention to Establish
Rights-of-Way fo~ portions of Tassajara Road, Gleason Drive,
Central Parkway and Dublin Boulevard
Report Prepared by: Lee S. Thompson, Public Works Director
ATTACHMENTS: I. Res_olutio~o.~]g_t,~8.fi_g~.g.~tP.~s.~tgbl~_is_~,h~Right-of-way Lines
2. Copy of Agenda Statement fi.om Planning Commission.meeting
of June 8, 1999
RECOMMENDATION: 1) Open Public Hearing
~~. 2) Receive Staff Presentation and Public Comment
· 3) .Question Staff and the Public
4) Close Public Hearing and Deliberate
5) Adopt Resolution of Intention to establish right-of-way lines on
Tassajara Road, Gleason Drive, Central Parkway and Dublin
Boulevard, and set Public Hearings for protest for 7:00 p.m. on
August 3, 1999, and August 17, 1999
FINANCIAL STATEMENTi The cost to acquire the rights-of-way and build the roadways will be
borne by MSSH Dublin Development (Shea Homes) and the Dublin
Ranch Assessment District, currently in the process of formation.
MSSH Dublin Development (Shea Homes) and the Assessment
District Developer (the Lins) will each receive a credit against
payment of future Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fees (TIF) in
amounts equal to funds advanced for the acquisition of rights-of-way
and improvements. Use of these credits has been~defi~eO ~i~..~e_
respective Development Agreements for the Dublin Ranch projects
and will be used according to the established TIF policy at the time
of development.
DESCRIPTION: One of the goals of the Eastern DUblin Specific Plan (EDSP) is to
establish a vehicle circulation system which provides sufficient capacity for projected traffic and allows
convenient access to land use~. _The EDSP states ~at .arterial. s~t~.~i.~.~a.~s~.~g.~n~$~g~be designed to
ITEM NO.
H:kPWkTassajara Rd row alignmtkreso of intent cc agenstmt 20Ju199.doc
carry very high traffic volumes 'with a rfiifii~UTM 0f interfei:~hs-e"-'~n{-'C$~/i~i~g ff~fiSi~'-' D~blin
Boulevard, Tassajara Road, Gleason Road and Central Parkway are all designated in the City's Land Use
Plan as major elements needed for traffic circulation.
The EDSP states that .m!~efi.fl..s~eets are to be four, six and eight lanes wide to carry the community and~'~Ip~
sub-regional traffic through the sp'ecific Plan flea~.' Traffic repo~s-f0r sp~sifie i3r0jeets, ~uCh~ Dublin
Ranch Phase I, TaSSajara Meadows I and II, Koll center, ~Emerald Glen and T01I Brothers, require that'
TaSsajara Road be widened from two lanes to four, six and eight lanes in various'locations. With the
proposed Development of Dublin RanCh'Areas AzEand Areas~ F,G"andH (currently tinder Staff review),
the respective traffic reports " require the widening of Tassajm"a R6ad afid~'e~ehsi0ns '0f"Gl~as'dii~D'fi~)~
Central Parkway and Dublin Boulevard~~ The "/il~imht~' i:0ad"figti~,bf-w~iy' air'gibe'htr' 'of' each-6f'these
arterial streets were mapped and their respective Specific pieci-se'i:ight-0i,iwayHfi~iieed t6bead0pted b3~
the City.
for projects to existing roadways and the freeway as shorn- in the DubiinG~ii~ml Plan (Planning
Commission Attachment 5) and'th~E//~[ernD~fibli~ff~gp~ifi'~'Plan'~¢l~fig 'c6~ssi6n~Atta-c~nt ~5)2
The right-of-way lines are in their ultimate configurations and inclUde ali 0f"~' ne~ded'-h~s'~-ar~ ......
through-lanes and mm-lanes for the proposed level 'of develOPment, staff-haS been ~oi:king ~th'the
Lins, MSSH/Shea _Devel°pment (Dublin R~ch 'Phas~ I), and 'their engineering cOnStiltant, 'IgIh'dKh~;-&
Somps, to determine the best alignment for these roadway segments. The'right-of-way lines need to be
established so that these portions of improvements can be designed and coristructed as c6iiditioned With'
their respective approvals of the Jennifer Lin (Dublin Ranch Assessment DiS/Hot developer)and
MSSH/Shea Developments.
TM eXisting Tassajara Road right-Of-way varies from.66 feet to 101 feet Wide. The rights-of-way
Dublin Boulevard, Gleason Drive and central ParlCway east of Tassajara Road do not currently exist. The
alignment of Tassajara Road is generally symmetrical from the exiSting right-of-way centerline running
north-south from Interstate. 580 at the Tassajara Road interchange'to the city limit line located on the
northerly boundary of Dublin ~Ch' Pha~e'-I ~¢ql~i~h156i:hbOd M: i)Y'The proposed right-Of-way-Width will
vary from 128 feet at the northern end 0f"thb"i:0ad to 187 feet 'wide'at"~e~"sofithe~'~nd' (piing
Commission Attachment 9). From the freeway interchang~;'the roadway will need t6be 8 through lanes
with a large median to accommodate double and ~iple ieft:m laries-'to central"P~kwhy.~ -F?6m cenfi-al'
Parkway, the road will accommodate Six lanes for"thi/0iigh trna'and on-e~' le~t-~ l~e in the median, to
the northerly boundary of Dublin Ranch phaSe I. A large-radius curve haS been inclUded in the alignment
at the northerly end of the road in order to move the road away from an existing large building located
next to the road 300 feet north of tha~13t~uhd~'iSfD*fil6ifi{RhndhPh~b~i2
The area which makes up the proposed 'T~sajkra: t~6ad right,6f-waY lines. pi:esentl~ contains b6th the
existing Tassajara Road (two lanes) and vacant land owned by Dublin Land Company (DiManto).
Property owners'have already made right-of-way dedications on the westerly side of TasSajara ROad. The
proposed roadway haS four lanes in each direction from Interstaie 580~t6Cefih?al-PfirlC~a3/, ~d'~'i~s
in each direction froTM central Parkway to the n0~i?l~Ci~"'fi~i~sT'--Xddlii6~na'l~e-ft-,~'-'~'d'~Hghi:~
lanes are also proposed as needed at intersections.
The rightS-of-way forGleaSOn Drive (104 feett° 125 feet ~de)'; cefit?aI Parkway (i04 fea~{"tb"l~2'sTe~i '~
wide) and Dublin Boulevard (140 feet to 161'feet wid~)'~'e all-si~ated on currently vacant land oWned by
-2-
D~blin Land Company (DiManto) and need to be acquired by the City of Dublin for roadway
improvements. The proposed right-of-way lines generally include the intersection transitions of each road
at Tassajara Road with the associated lef~-mrn and right-mm lanes.
A Negative Declaration has been prepared pursuant to the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),
State CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Dublin Environmental Guidelines (see Attachment 3
Planning Commission Agenda Statement). The proposed project will not have a significant effect on the
environment.
On June 8, 1999, the Planning Commission reviewed the report and recommendation of the City Engineer
regarding this proposal. Based on information presented in the report, the Planning Commission and the
City Engineer believe that the proposed right-of-way lines are appropriate and have recommended_that the
City Council adopt a Resolution of Intention to establish right-of-way lines ~is shown on Attachment 9 of
the attached Planning Commission Agenda Statement. It is further recommende, d. that th~..~ity Council,
pursuant to Section 7.68 of the Dublin Municipal Code, set public hearings on August 3, 1999, and
August 17, 1999, to hear any protests Or objections to the establishment of the proposed rights-of-way.
Staff recommends that.~o.~.City Council adopt the attached Resolution of Intention to ~ ~s~b!_~s~_h~,.right-of-
way lines on Tassajara Road, Gleason Drive, Central Parkway and Dublin Boulevard, and set Public
Hearings for protest for 7:00 p.m. on August 3, 1999, and August 17, 1999.
-3-
RESOLUTION NO. - 99
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
ADOPTING A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ESTABLISH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES
FOR A PORTION OF TASSAJARA ROAD (FROM NORTH OF INTERSTATE 580 TO
THE NORTHERLY CITY LIMIT LINE THAT IS LOCATED AT THE NORTHERLY
BOUNDARY OF DUBLIN RANCH TRACT 6962-NEIGItBORHOOD M1, AND FOR
PORTIONS OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD, GLEASON DRIVE AND CENTRAL PARKWAY
(FROM TASSAJARA ROAD TO THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF
DUBLIN RANCH AREAS F, G & II)
PA 99-015
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Dublin has received a report and recommendation
from the Planning Commission recommending the establishment of right-of-way lines for a portion of
Tassajara Road from north of Interstate 580 to the northerlY City limit line that is located at the northerly
boundary of Dublin Ranch Tract 6962-Neighborhood M 1, and for portions of Dublin Boulevard, Gleason
Drive and Central Drive (from Tassajara Road to the westerly boundary of Dublin Ranch Areas F, G &
H); and
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City Council to establish rights-of-way for said roads; and
WHEREAS, Sections 7.68.080 through 7.68.100 of the Dublin Municipal Code, require that the
City Council set a public hearing to hear protests and objections to the establishment of said proposed
right-of-way lines as described previously and as shown and described in Exhibit A.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Dublin City Council does hereby set public
hearings on August 3,1999, at 7:00 p.m. and on August 17, 1999, at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council
Chambers, 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin, California, to hear protests and objections to the establishment of the
following proposed right of way lines:
1. . A portion of Tassajara Road from north of Interstate 580 to the northerly City limit line located at
the northerly boundary of Dublin Ranch Tract 6962-Neighborhood MI; and
2. A portion of Dublin Boulevard from Tassajara Road to the westerly boundary of Dublin Ranch
Areas F, G & H; and
3. A portion of Central Parkway from Tassaj ara Road to the westerly boundary of Dublin Ranch
Areas F, G & H; and
4. A portion of Gleason Drive from Tassajara Road to the westerly boundary of Dublin Ranch Areas
F,G&H.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this Resolution shall be pOsted in accordance with
Section 7.68.070 of the Dublin Municipal Code at least ten (10) days before the date of the hearing, and
any person having any interest in any land as described above upon which said fight-of-way lines are
proposed to be established may file a written objection with the City Clerk at any time no later than the
hour set for hearing objections.
-1-
!
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of July, 1999.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
H: PW~Tass Rd row alignmt~reso of intention 20Ju199. doc
-2-
.... -2 ........... - .........
......... __-~__-~__-._-__-.~__-.- ..... _ .........
____=-__--__--=~- - .......
~- / I ~.~..,~;.
I ./ I
-I- ~½' ,,,'--,,r~ -- -- , .... ~ .... ,.- - - z_,,._,~ -~--'}'- _-,I,._-_ c zl .... -. -_: =,_- ---_ _ =
I. __~'_ ............. k=--_..=-- -- -~,~ -- - ~ ~ ~ ~----~ --- ---
.,,. ............. I~1_ ,_: "~°' ' 'i' I~,"~'r,'~ ~ - I. -'"
,._,~,.~_,..,__ .... ,,,._ ....
=-- -L- - -~--~ -- ~ .......'
[- --.~ .... - - -, .... ,. _ .... - .I- --
q~-I' - --=¢---=-~-~Z-_ ~ ----- ~- - ~,~,.,~.~ - - ~I.-
I
.................................................. ..A . . ,_4,
~T~' .~ -' ~-- ~1~ I~ ..... '
- ~ ,-- ~ ~ ~ __ ~ -----.~L ........
~-~- - -~ -~ ...... , -- ~--~ ~ - _ ..... ~ - _
I
' 4 ~ ~,.~,.,,-,.-,~~ 'r' ~ ~ -- ~ ~. ---
:~ ,.,
-,~ .... ' ........ CITY OF DUBLIN ~'
~ ~a ~ ~ YARRA-YARRA ~----~-"---
.......... ~ -- '~[~1 --I .... ~? --~-I -~-- -- - ~r~ -- -- ~' ............. I~. z~'_ !~ ..................
~~1~-I -,,~ '"~ -" ~ - '- ~ --r ~- "=~iI .... 'i...~~ _ I, ?i~ ~I-I~ ~ ..... ' .... - -~ '";~ ~
._ ~-~ I: ,~ .... ~ 6~% - ....... ~ ............ ~.,,. ............... --- ,,~ .... ~--,=
............. ~.~ ......... ~ ............. ~,~,~n~ · .......... CITY Olp DUBLIN ~.
' , ...................... · TAS~AJARA ROAD
- .?- ,!-I- - -'~-° '
'.F- --~-'t- b,.~-'lz_-~ - - :,? - - + ':
~-l'-~5.1~'_:-d[ '--_-F~_-_'":"---'-'?~'":--:-- -~f,:m~'-' -"-: ...... .~-::'m~,.~-- .,
/
· I~!__~.1 ' .... '= ...........Ira"" .............. I CITY 0¥ DUBLIN I
AGENDA STATEMENT
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: June 8, 1999
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: PA 99-015, Establish Right of Way Lines for portions of
Tassajara Road, Dublin Boulevard, Gleason Drive and Central Parkway.
(Report prepared by: Kevin Van Katwyk, Senior Civil Engineer)
(1) Initiation of the Process to Establish Right of Way Lines for portions of Tassajara
Road, Dublin Boulevard, Gleason Drive and Central Parkway
(2) Review of Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration
(3) Review of plans for Adoption of Right of Way Lines for a portion of Tassajara Road
within the City from north of Interstate 580 to the northerly City limit line that located at
the northerly boundary of Dublin Ranch Tract 6962-NeighborhOod M-l, and for portions
of Dublin Boulevard, Gleason Drive and Central Parkway (from Tassajara Road to the
westerly boundary of Dublin Ranch Areas F, G & H)
(4) Determination of Conformity of Location, Purpose and Extent of said Right of Way
Lines with the Dublin General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan
ATTACHMENTS: 1) Resolution Initiating Process to Establish Right of Way Lines for portions of
· ~ Tassajara Road, Dublin Boulevard, Gleason Drive and Central Parkway
2) Resolution ReCommending the City Council ApproVe the Finding of Conformity
of Location, Purpose and Extent of said Right of Way Lines with the Dublin
General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan; the Negative Declaration and
approval of right of way lines
3) Negative Declaration
4) Environmental Initial Study
5) Figure 2B of the General Plan, Land Use Map
6) Figure 4.1 of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, Land Use Map
7) Figure 5.1 Proposed Road System from the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan
8) Tassajara Road Typical Section
9) Reduced Plan Lines for portions of Tassajara Road, Dublin Boulevard, Gleason
Drive and Central Parkway prepared by MacKay & Somps
RECOM~MENDATIONS:
I) Hear Staff Presentation;
2) Take testimony from the public;
3) Question Staff and the public;
COPIES TO: pUbliC Worl(~ Direct°r
PA file
H;~pwW~saj~ Rd row ~ignmt'~gst initiation
4) Deliberate;
5) Adopt Resolution initiating process to establish fight of way lines for a portion of
Tassajara Road from north of Interstate 580 to the northerly boundary of Dublin
Ranch Neiehborhood M-l, and portions of Dublin Boulevard, Gleason Drive
Central PmTkway, from Tassajara Road to the westerly boundary of Dublin Ranc't~~'
Areas F, G & H;
6) Adopt Resolution finding conformity of location, purpose and extent of said fight
of way lines with the Dublin General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan;
recommend to the City Council that they Approve and Adopt the Negative
Declaration for said portions of streets and recommend to the City Council that
they Adopt Right of Way Lines for said portions of streets.
DESCRIPTION:
One of the goals of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan is to establish a vehicle circulation system which provides
s.~'-ficient capaci¢- for projected tralk'lc and allows convenient access to land uses. It states that the arterial
su'ee~ in East Dublin are to be des, igned to carry very high tm_ffic volumes with a minimum of interference from
comnezting u-affic. Shov~m on the land use map (Attachment 5) are all arterial streets including Dublin
Boulevard, ~ weit as Tassajara Road, Gleason Road and Central Park~'ay (shovm as Transit Spine)
('Attachment 7). The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan states arterial streets are to be four, six and eight lanes wide
to c?-. ~-ry the cormmu.~' Md sub-regional traffic through the specific plan area. Traffic reports of specific
woj...s such as Dublin Ranch Phase I, Tassajara Meadows I and II, KoI1 Center, Emerald Glen and Tool
Brothers requ'Lre Tassaiara Road be widened from two lanes to four, six and eight lanes in various locations.
'~,fth the proposed De'[.'elopment of Dublin Ranch .~a-eas A-E and Az-ca F, G and H (currently under staff
review), their respective u'affic reports require widening of Tassajara Road and the ex-tension of Dublin
Boulevard, Gleason Road and Central Parkm,ay from Tassajara Road to Fallon Road. Recently the ultimate
road fight of way aii_m~ments of each of these arterial streets were mapped, and provisions were made for the
s,-udy of specific precise fight of way lines to be adopted by the City.
The Cie' of Dublin M~..icipal Code (Sections 7.6830 '~o 7.68.100) outline the required process for adopting
specific fight of way plan Iines. Listed below ai-e the necessary steps that must be taken to adopt specific fight
of way prec,.'se plmn lines:
7.68.30 Ini.:'.'ation of the process may be accomplished by (A) petition of one or more affected property
ov,~ers; CB) Resolution of the City Council; or (C) Resolution of the Planning Commission.
In fffis case. staff recormmends that the z)rocess be initiated by Resolution of the Planning Commission
(Auacbment t3. ~ne D~¢artrnent of Pubtic Works, under the direction of the City Engineer,rDirector of Public
Works. has smcnea the proposed fight of way Iines using the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, City Standards, an
Em,h-on_mental Initial Study (Attachment's4), traffic studies and have reviewed plans prepared by MacKay &
Somps to assure confor-~ance with the City and CEQA requirementS. The City's Municipal Code further directs
the ~%IIo~%g:
7.68.50 The Ptarming Commission shall hold at l~ast one public hearing regarding the proposed fight of
way lines. The heating shall be noticed at least five days in advance of the hearing date by
publication and posting the fiotice along the planned fight of way.
This meeting has been noticed to the public ~u required, and staff' is now presenting the results of the studies
the Pl~,-zning Com~-,..2ssion and public for review and input so that the Planning Commission can make a
recommendation to the City Council concerning the proposed right of way lines. The City's Municipal Code
5arther directs the remaining process be the following:
f-'"?.68.60 Upon receipt ora report from the Planning CommissiOn, the City Council shall adopt a
Resolution of Intention which designates the right of way lines to be established.
7.68.70 The Resolutiori of Intention is to be published or posted at least 10 days prior to the date
established for hearing objections to the proposal.
7.68.80 The time for hearing objections to the proposal shall be not less than fourteen (14) days or more
than th/rty-five (35) days from the date of adoption of the Resolution of Intention.
7.68.90 Any person having interest in any land upon which the fight of way lines are proposed to be
established may file a written objection at any time not later than the time set for hearing
objections.
7.68.100 At the time set for hearing, the City Council shall proceed to hear and pass on all protests or
objections to establishment of the fight of way lines. The City Council's decision is final and
conclusive. Following the hearing of protests, the City Council may abandon the proceeding or
deny the protests and adopt an ordinance establishing the right of way lines.
At this time. staff:~ is proposing that the City initiate the establishment of precise right of way plan lines for the
~Sdening of Tassajara Road from 1-580 to the northerly City limit line (Northerly boundary of Dublin Ranch),
and the extension of Dublin Boulevard, Gteason Road and Central Parkway (formally transit spine) from
~,.ssajara Road to the boundary of Areas F, G & H of the Jennifer Lin/Dublin Ranch Development
~approximately 850 feet east of Tassajara Road). After the precise right of lines have been adopted by the City
Council, the City will acquire the additional needed fight of way from the undeveloped landowners in order to
construct the first phase of street improvements and public utilities needed to serve the Eastern Dublin
developed areas.
BACKGROUND:
Over the past several years, various portions of Tassajara Road, Dublin Boulevard and Central Parkway have
been required to be dedicated and improved. The Dublin Ranch Phase I Developments with the cooperation of
neighboring Tassajara Meadows I (Casterson) and II developments are conditioned to widen and improve
Tassajara Road from Dublin Boulevard to northerly limit of their project. Dublin Ranch Phase I is required to
dedicate, on their respective final maps, all the required right of way along the frontage of their project along
Tassajara Road to the configuration shown in the right of way precise plan lines attached hereto as (Attachment
8_)). Likewise KolI Center Development was conditioned to widen, dedicate and improve Tassajara Road along
their respective project frontage to the alignments shown on these right of way precise plan lines also. Alameda
County Surplus Authority was conditioned on Tentative Map 7355, to dedicate a large portion of right of way
along the west side of Tassajara ROad from Dublin BOulevard to GleaSon Road in accordance to these right of
way precise plan lines. The only remaining pieces of Tassajara Road right of way that have not been required to
be dedicated and improved are approximately 3,600 linear feet of the easterly section of right way located on
the Dublin Land Company property (DiManto property frontage), approximately 3,050 linear fee of westerly
~!f section of rig_bt of way located on the Yarra-Yarra Property and appro 'ximately 500 linear feet of the
Sterly half section of right located on Federal property at the north west comer of Tassajara Road and Dublin
Boulevard. The Yarra-Yarra property, and Federal property right of way w/Il be granted with the approvals of
proposed development projects on their respective parcels. The City is expecting t° condemn the needed east
side of Tassajara Road across the Dublin Land Company (DiManto property) since there has not recently been'a
development project submitted for City approval requiring the needed dedications and improvements.
The needed right of way improvements will provide a connection for the projects to existing roadways and tb
freeway and will include all of the needed necessary through-lanes and turn-lanes for the proposed level of '~
development as defined by the respective traffic reports for the specific projects. Staff has been working with
the Lins, MSSH / Shea Development (Dublin Ranch Phase I), and their engineering consultant, MacKay &
Somps, to determine the best alignment for these roadway segments. The general alignment of these roadways
is shown in the Dublin General Plan (see Attachment 5) and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan (see Attachment
6_). The right of way lines need to be further established for these portions of roadways that are being proposed
by the Jennifer Lin (Dublin Ranch Assessment District developer) and MSSH/Shea Development so that the
Assessment Distr/ct improvements can be designed, with full connections from the Dublin Ranch Areas F, G &
H project sites to existing roadways and so that the Dublin Ranch Phase I projects are connected to existing
ro.adways as conditioned with their approvals.
The area,, which makes up the proposed Tassajara Road right of way, varies from 66 feet to 10Ifeet wide.
Dublin Boulevarck Gleason Drive and Central Parkway right of ways do not currently exist. The alignment of
Tassajara Road is basically a straight line running north-south from north of Interstate 580 at the Tassajara Road
interchange to the City limit line located on the northerly boundary of Dublin Ranch Phase I (Neighborhood M-
1). The right of way width will vary from 128 feet at the northern end of the road to 187 feet wide at the
southern end (Attachment 9). From the FreewaY interchange, the roadway will need to be 8 through lanes and a
large median to accommodate double and triple left turn lanes to Central Parkwcay. From Central Parkway the
road will accommodate 6 lanes of through traffic and one left turn lane in the median, to the northerly boundary
of Dublin Ranch Phase I. A large-radius curve has been included in the alignment at the northerly end of the
road in order to pul1 the road away from an existing large building located next to the road 300 north of the
boundary of Dublin Ranch Phase I (M-1 Neighborhood). '
The alignments of Dublin Boulevard, Gleason Drive and Central Parkwvay are also all basically straight lines
running e~t-west between Tassajara Road and the westerly boundary of Dublin Ranch Areas F, G & H. The
roadways are located perpendicular to Tassajara Road. On the northerly and southerly sides of each of the
streets, is Dublin Land Company (DiManto property). The Dublin Boulevard right of way MI1 vary. from 140
feet to 161 feet wide and will accommodate 6 lanes of through traffic. The Gleason Drive right of way will vary
from 104 feet to 125 feet wide and will accommodate 4 through lanes of traffic.. The Central Parkwcay right of
way will vary from 104 feet to 130 feet wide and will accommodate 4 through lanes of traffic. Attachment 8
delineates the actual lane requirements and Attachment 9 are the detailed specific right of way plan alignment
which are the focus of this review and approval.
ENVIRONMENTAL AN.kLYSIS:
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), State CEQA Guidelines and the City of Dublin
Environmental Guidelines, a Negative Declaration and Environmental Initial Study (see Attachment 3 & 4)
were prepared for the proposed project so that it could be evaluated to determine any significant environmental
impacts. The study concludes that there could not be any sigxificant effects on the environment as the
necessary roadway improvements were considered as part of the EIR for the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and a
Negative Declaration was therefore, prepared (see Attachment 3). These documents are required to be approved
and certified by the City Council. They are first reviewed by the Planning Commission and then forwarded to
the City Council with recommendations. .~
4
GENERA J-, PLAN CONFORMITY:
~[~overnment Code Section 65402(a) states, in part, that if a General Plan has been adopted, no real property
ail be acquired by dedication for street pUrPoses until the location, purpose and extent of such acquisition has
been reported upon by the planning agency (Planning Commission) as to conformity with the General Plan.
The proposed project is the establishment of right of way lines along a route provided and established within the
Dublin General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. The fight of ways are located within lands described
by the Dublin General Plan. The land along the right of ways will be developed for roadway purposes in
accordance with the requirements and purposes of the Dublin General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific
Plan. The proposed right of ways are within the physical scope of the Dublin General Plan and Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan and, therefore, the extent will be encompassed by, and consistent with, the General Plan and the
Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. As such, it is found that the establishment of the fight of ways is consistent wSth
regard to location, purpose and extent with the Dub/in General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff'recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution initiating the process for the
establishment o£r/ght of way lines for said portions of Tassajara Road, Dublin Boulevard, Gleason Drive and
Central Parkway (Attachment I) and adopt the attached resolution recommending City Council approval of
finding the location, purpose and extent of the establishment of fight of way lines in conformity with the Dublin
General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan~(Attachment 2): and adopt the Negative Declaration (Attachment
3_)) for said portions of streets, and adopt the recommended Right of Way Lines for said portions of streets
(Attachment 9).
GENERAL INFORMATION:
General Plan Land Use Designations: General Commercial; High Density, Medium-High Density and
Medium Density Residential; and Public/Semi-Public Facility
(High School)
Eastern Dublin Specific Plan
Land Use Desi~muations: General Commercial; Neighborhood Commercial; High Density,
Medium-High Density and Medium Density Residential; and
Public/Semi-Public Facility (High School)
Existing Land Use: Vacant'
Existing Zoning: Agricultural, General Commercial; Neighborhood Commercial;
High Density, Medium-High Density and Medium Density
Residential.
RESOLUTION NO. - 99
A RESOLUTION OF TIlE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
FINDING OF CONFORMITY OF LOCATION, PURPOSE AND EXTENT OF RIGHT OF WAY
LINES FOR A PORTION OF TASSAJARA ROAD (FROM NORTH OF INTERSTATE 580 TO
THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF DUBLIN RANCH TRACT 6962-NEIGHBORI-IOOD M1),
AND FOR PORTIONS OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD, GLEASON DRIVE AND CENTRAL
PARKWAY (FROM TASSAJARA ROAD TO THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF DUBLIN
RA~NCH AREAS F, G & H) WITH THE DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN A/ND
THE EASTERN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN
AND RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT THE NEGATIVE
DECLARATION AND RIGHT OF WAY LINES FOR SAID PORTIONS OF STREETS AND
Al)OPT RIGHT OF WAY LINES FOR SAID PORTIONS OF STREETS
PA 99-015
WHER_EAS, the Planning Commission pursuant to the Dublin Municipal Code (Sections 7.68.3 0
to 7.68.100) has initiated the process for the establishment o£right of way lines/'or a portion of Tassajara
Road from north of Interstate 580 to the nonherly boundary of Dublin Ranch Tract 6962-Neighborhood
MI, and for portions of Dublin Boulevard, Gleason Drive and Central Drive (from Tassajara Road to the
westerly boundary of Dublin Ranch Areas F, G & H) on June 8, 1999 and;
WHEREAS, said fight of ways will pass through lands designated General Commercial, High
Density Residential, Medium-High Density Residential, Medium Density Residential and Public/Semi-
Public Facility (High School) on the Dublin General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65402(a) states, in part, that ifa general plan has been
adopted, no real property shall be acquired by dedication for street purposes until the location, purpose
and extent of such acquisition has been reported upon by the planning agency (Planning Commission) as
to conformity with the adopted general plan; and '
WHEREAS, the City of Dublin has adopted a General Plan and such Plan is applicable to the
properties through which the proposed right of ways pass; and
WHEREAS, the properties through which the proposed right of ways pass is located within an
area encompassed by the lands designated General Commei'cial, High Density Residential, Medium-High
Density Residential, Medium Density Residential and Public/Semi-Public Facility (High School) on the
Dublin General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, and developed for circulation purposes in a
manner consistent wSth those desig~nations; and
V~q-IEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and recommends that the City Council
approve and certify the Negative Declaration for fight of way lines for said portions of streets; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Dublin Planning Commission does hereby find
that:
1. The properties through which the proposed fight of ways pass is proposed to be developed
for circulation purposes are in accordance with the requirements and purposes of the General Commercial,
High Density Residential, Medium-High Density Residential, Medium Density Residential and
Public/Semi-Public Facility (High School) designations on the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, and
therefore the establishment of a right of way across said land is consistent with regard to purpose of the
Dublin General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan: Said proposed fight of ways are consistant with
Government Code Section 65402(a).
2. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the negative declaration and adopt rights of
way lines for said portions of streets as identified in Attachments 8 and 9.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of June, 1999.
AYES:
NOES:
.~3SENT:
ABSTAIN:
Planning Commission Chairperson ~'~
ATTEST:
Community Development Director
RESOLUTION NO. - 99 / 7 ~/ g ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COM~q[SSION
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
I~TE4T~G PROCESS OF EST~LIS~G ~GHT OF WAY L~S
FOR A PORTION OF TASSAJ~ RO~ ~ROM NORTH OF ~E~TATE 580 TO THE
NORThlY BO~~Y OF D~LIN ~CH T~CT 6962-~IG~O~OOD M1),
~ FOR PORTIONS OF D~L~ BO~EV~, GLEASON D~ ~ CE~~
PA~WAY ~ROM TASSAJ~ RO~.TO ~ ~STE~Y BOlDlY OF DUBL~
~CH A~AS F, G & ~
PA 99-015
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Dublin Municipal Code Sections 7.68.30 to 7.68.100, the
adoption of specific right of way lines must first be initiated by either a Petition of one or more affected
property owaaers, or resolution of the City Council or resolution of the Planning Commission; and
'~,~EREAS, the City of I~ublin Department of Public Works desires to irfitiate the process to
establish fight of way lines for a portion of Tassajara Road from north of Interstate 580 to the northerly
boundary of Dublin Ranch Tract 6962-Neighborhood MI, and for portions of Dublin Boulevard, Gleason
Drive and Central Drive (from Tassajara Road to the westerly boundary of Dublin Ranch Areas F, G & H);
mad
WHEREAS, a study of the right of way lines has been completed by the City Engineer and is now
referred to the Planning Commission for review and recommendations prior to any City Council action.
Vv-I-IEREAS, the Planning Commission did hear and consider said study, recommendations and
testimony herein above set forth and is in support of initiating said right of way process.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the pl~ng C°mmiSSi°n approves the initiati°n of
the process to establish fight of way lines for said portions of Tassajara Road, Dublin Boulevard, Gleason
Drive and Central Drive;
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th daY of jUne, 1999.
AYES:
NOES'
ABSENT:
.~d3STAIN:
Planning COmmission Chairperson
ATTEST:
Com_munity Development Director A I'TAOHMENT
RESOLUTION NO. - 99
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
FINDING OF CONFORMITY OF LOCATION, PURPOSE AND EXTENT OF RIGHT OF WAY
LIN-ES FOR A PORTION OF TASSAJARA ROAD (FROM NORTH OF INTERSTATE 580 TO
THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF DUBLIN RANCH TRACT 6962-NEIGHBORttOOD MI),
AND FOR PORTIONS OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD, GLEASON DRIVE AND CENTI~iL
PARKWAY (FROM TASSAJARA ROAD TO THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF DUBLIN
I~4NCH AREAS F, G & H) WITH THE DUBLIN GENERA~L PLAN AND
THE EASTERN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN
AND RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT THE NEGATIVE
DECLAtkiTION AND RIGHT OF WAY LINES FOR SAID PORTIONS OF STREETS AND
ADOPT RIGHT OF WAY LINES FOR SAID PORTIONS OF STREETS
PA 99-015
WHEtLEAS, the Planning Commission pursuant to the Dublin Municipal Code (Sections 7.68.30
to 7.68.100) has initiated the proceSS for the establishment of right of way lines for a portion of Tassajara
Road fi.om north of Interstate $80 to the ndrtherly boundary of Dublin Ranch Tract 6962-Neighborhood
M1, and for portions of Dublin Boulevard, Gleason Drive and Central Drive (fi.om Tassajara Road to the
westerly boundary of Dublin Ranch Areas F, G & H) on June 8, 1999 and;
WHEt~AS, said fight of ways will pass through lands designated General Commercial, High
Densi~ Residential, Medium-High Density Residential, Medium Density Residential and Public/Semi-
Public Facility (High School) on the Dublin General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan; and
WHEP~AS, Government Code Section 65402(a) states, in part, that ifa general plan has been
adopted, no real property, shall be acquired by dedication for street purposes until the location, purpose
and extent of such acquisition has been reported upon by the planning agency (Planning Commission) as
to conformity with the adopted general plan; and :
Wb-IEtLEAS, the City of Dublin has adopted a General Plan and such Plan is applicable to the
properties through which the proposed right of ways pass; and
WHEREAS, the properties through which the proposed right of ways pass is located within an
area encompassed by the lands designated General Commercial, High Density Residential, Medium-High
Density Residential, Medium Density Residential and Public/Semi-Public Facility (High School) on the
Dublin General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, and developed for circulation purposes in a
manner consistent vdth those designations; and
\¥~-IER~AS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and recommends that the City Council
approve and certify the Negative Declaration for fight of way lines for said portions of streets; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Dubtin Planning Commission does hereby find
that:
"m' CHMENT ..
1. The properties through which the proposed right of ways pass is proposed to be developed
for circulation purposes are in accordance with the requirements and purposes of the General Commercial,
High Density Residential, Medium-High Density Residential, Medium Density Residential and
pUblic/Semi-Public Facility (High School) designations On the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, and
therefore the establishment of a right of way across said land is consistent with regard to purpose of the
Dublin General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan... Said proposed right of ways are consistant with
Government Code Section 65402(a).
2. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the negative declaration and adopt fights of
way lines for said portions of streets as identified in Attachments 8 and 9.
PASSED, .~r~PROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day °f June, 1999.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABST.~d-N:
Planning Commission Chairperson
ATTEST:
Community. Development Director
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
(Prepared pursuant to City of Dublin
Environmental Guidelines, Section 1.7(c), 5.5)
Description of Project: The project will establish official right-ofiway lines for major
arteria!s in Eastern Dublin, as well as construct improvements to those streets.
Acquisition of lands, either by purchase or eminent domain, will be required for
constnJction of the roadways.
ProjectAoc~tion: Major arterials in Eastern Dublin, including Tassajara Road (noAh of
t-5S0 Interchange to no,hotly boundary of Dublin Ranch Tract 6962 - Neighborhood
M-I), Gfeason Road, Central Parkway, and Dublin Boulevard (from Tassajara Road to
westerly boundary of Dublin Ranch Areas F, G, & H).
Name of Proponents: City of Dublin, Public Works Department; 100 Civic Plaza,
Dublin, CA 94568
I hereby find that the above project will not have a significant adverse effect on the
environment.
Attached is a copy of the initial Study ("Environmental Information Form" and
"Environmental Checklist") documenting the reasons to suppo~ t,~e above finding.
Mitigation Measures have been included-imth~project , / ..
:, / L.~_,_.-'.P~/,'~..~
Dated: May 19, 1999 ' -Le~e S. ThompSop~-. Director ~f Public Works
m~aon~ ~ :~nts
G:?A~604S'~D
C.::e --_nf:::-:m_n; ,c'~-m ,:,.=--.,~ Er,",ineerL-'.= S32-5£3C.' ,~"~.~l-~
, =, ........... ~ * . . "'-' - P-cr~ ,. ·
City of Dublfn
Environmental CheckIist Form
Initial Study
1. Project title: Eastern Dublin Arterial Street Improvements - A Portion of Capital Imt~rovement
Proiect (CIP) No. 9640
2. Lead agency name and address:
City of Dublir~ Public Works Department - 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin. CA 94568
3. Contact person and phone number: Lee Thomr>son, Director of Public Works: 925/833-6630
4. Project location: Maior arterials in Eastern Dubtin, includin_~ Tassaiara Road (north of 1-580
Interohzn~e to ar~r>ro×im~.telv 1.125 feet north of Gleason Road). Gleason Road. Central Park-wax,.
and Dublin Boulevard (from Tassaiara Road to ar>r>roximatelv 850 feet east of Tassaiara Road;
westerly boundary of Dubtin Ranch .Areas F, G & I-D.
5. Assessors ParceINumber(s): N/A
6. ProjeCt sponsor's name and address:
Ciw of'Dublin_ Public Works Der~artment: 100 Civic Pt~7~ Dublin. CA 94568
7. GeneraI Plan designation: N/A 8. Zoning: N/A
9. Specific Plan designation: N/A
10. Description of project: (Descr/be the whole action involved, including but not timited to later
phases of the pro. ject, and any secondary, support, or off-siie features necessary for irs
implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
TbJs vroie~ will establish official ri_~ht-of-wav tines for maior arterials in Eastern Dublin. as weI] as
construct irnvrovements to those streets. Acquisition of lands, either bv vurchase or eminent domain. ~511
be resuired fvr construction of the roadways. Please also refer to va_~e 18.
11. Surrounding land uses and setting: Briefly deScribe the project's surroundings:
Plezse refer to r~a_*e 18.
12. Other public agencies whose approval is required: (e.g., permits, financing approval, or
p~.-ticipation aga-eernent.)
~orle.
ENV/~RONN~NTAL FACTORS POTENTL~LLY A_FFECYED:
The environmenta/factors checked below Would be poteJtially affected by this project, involving at least
one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact': as indicated by the checklist on the folIowing pages.
~-] Aesthetics ~ A_~culture Resources. ~ Air Quality
Biological Resources ~-~ Cultural Resources ~ Geolo=o-y/Soils
I .I Hazards & Hazard°us Matefiats ~ Hydrology / Water QualitY ~--] L~d Use / Pieing
I t u~i~iti~s / S~:e Systems !, 1 ~andato,-y ~indin~s of Si~c~ce
DETEKMD~ATION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
~ I find Sat the proposed project COUI_,D NOT have a signkfcant effect on the environment, and a
h-EGATIVE DECLA~-t. TION will be prepared.
i ! I fred rk~at although the proposed project could hive a si_m-ificant effect on the environment, there
Mil not be a si_maificant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or a~ead to
by the proj~_~ proponent. A/~flTIGATED lk-EGATI¥'E DECI_,.4~-iTION will be prepared.
fl.,nd that ~e proposed project 3,£-iY have a si_~cant effect on the enx~iromment, and an
E.N-VI]RONMiENTAL Ih[PACT REPORT is required.
2
--[ I find that the proposed project ~£iY have a' "potentially significant impact" or "potentially
significant un]. ess'mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one.e.ffect 1) has been adequateIy
analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable Iegal standards, and 2) has. been addressed by
mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. A.n
EhWYROl~f. ENTAL I~fl:'ACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze ovJy the effects that remain
to be addressed.
'-] I find that although the proposed project could have a si=~ificant effect on the environment,
because ail potentially si_m'fificant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or
h-EGATIVE DECL.4J~ATION pursuant to applicable standards, and Co) have been avoided or
mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECL.4aRATION, including revisions or
mitigation mgasures that,~re.. ,/reposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.
~_S~gnature ~ Date
Lee Thompson. Director of Pubtic Works
Printed nm-ne
EVALUA. TtON OF ENVIRO/X%/fENTA.L I/V~ACTS:
1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately
supported by the information sources a Icad ~ency cites in the parentheses following each question.
A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced im'o"rmation sources show that the
impact simpty does not apply to projects like the one invotved (e.g., the project fails outside a fault
rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on proje~-specific
factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to polIu, tants,.
based on a project-specific screening analysis). For the purposes of analysis for this document, a
"No Impact" wilI signify that no ,new, impacts. (as .analyzed in the Eastern Dublin GeneraI Plan
AmendmenffSpecific Plan El/*,) have been identified.
2) A.II answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site,
cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational
impacts.
3) Once the lead ac, ency has d..t,.nmn~d that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist
answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than si_mn.ificant with
mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Si~m'ifcant Impact" is appropriate if there ts
3
substantial evidence that an effect may be sigrfificant: If there are one or more "Potentially
Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required.
4) ""'e=~,~ __at, ye' Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitieation_ Incorporated" applies where the
incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a
"Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly
i explain how they reduce the effect to a Iess than significant level (mitigation measures from Section
: XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced).
5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pu.rsu .ant to the tiering pro,urn El]R, or other CEQA process,
an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section
15063(c)(3)0D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following:
a) Eartier Analysis Used. Identify and state Where they are available for review.
b) ]L'npacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were
v, Srhin the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable
legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by miti.garion measures
based on the earlier analysis.
c) M]zigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Sig-nificant with iXiiti.~arion Measures
Incorporated," desc~be the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined fforr,
the earlier document and the ex-tent to wh/ch they address site-specific conditions for
project.
' 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for
potenzial imf:acts. (e=.__., _aeneral plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or
outsid, document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the p~e or pages where the
statement is substantiated.
7) Support'lng Lnforrnation Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or
hadiv/du~s contacted should be cited in the discussion.
=~ ,. * different formats; however, lead
8) This is only a su____.st.d form, and l~d f~ '~
a_~.nc~s are tree to use
agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to project's
enviromnaental effects in whatever format is selected.
The explanation of each issue should identify:
a) 1-ne si=m'ificance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and
b) ~ne mitigation measure identified, fi.any, to reduce the impact to less than si_m'fificance.
EnVironmentaI Impacts. The sourCe of determination is listed in parenthesis. See listing ofsources
used to determine each potential impact at the end of the checklist. A full discussion of each item is
found folIowing the checklist
Potentially Less Than Less Than No New
Si=mgficant Si_m4ficant Signfficant Impa:~
Impact aSth Impart
Mitigation
Insomoration
I. AESTFI'ETICS - Would the project:
-- a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? / X
(Source: 1, 2, 7)
!
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, includin& but nott
limited to, trees, rock outcro~>pin~s, and histo,dc buildin_~s ~ X
within a state szenic hiahway? (Source: 1, 2, 7)
c) Substanzialty e._, ad,. the existing visual character or
quaiiry of the sire and its surroundings?
(Source: o, 7)
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which
X
would advers~_iy affect day or nighttime views in the area?
(Source: 2)
II. AGRICULTL'-R_E RESOURCES - In determining
whether impacts to a~m-icuttural resources are si~cant
environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the
CalLfo,,-zia A=m-iculmral Land Evaluation and Site
.~zsessment Model (1997) prepared by the Calit%rnia Dept.
of Conservation as mn optional model to use in assessing
impacts on a=m-iculmre and farmland. Would the project:
a) Convert ?;5me Fm,-rnland, U~que Fm,-niand, or
Fm,-nt---.nd of StateMde Importance (F~-nland), as shown
on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping
an.eel Mo~to~ng Progam of the California Resources
A?_nc.v, to non-a_m-icultural use? (Source: 2, 7)
b) Co.irt vdth exisrin_= zoning for agricultural use, or a .
,. Wiiliamson Act contract? (Source: 2, 7) X
Potentially | Less Than Less Than No Nc
Si_~¢a~t/ Sigmificant S~gnificant Impact'
Impact Mth Impact
Mitigation
Incorooration
c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, X
due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland, to non-agricultural use?
(Source: 2, 7)
IH. AIR OUALITY - Where available, the si_m'lificance
Criteria established by the applicable ak quali~
Management or ak pollution control district may be
Relied upon to make the following determinations. Would
/he project: :
z) Con.riict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?(SourCe: 2, 7) X
b) Violate ma5, air c~uatiry standard or contribute
suesrantmLy to an ex~stin_~ or projected air quaiiry
violation? (Source: 2, 7)
c) Result. hna cumulatively considerable net'~n,~,~ .... ~_s,. of X
any c~teri, a pollutant for which the project re, on is non-
zr~aL-~ment under an applicable federal or state ambient
air quality mzndard (including rele~ing emissions which
excee.d quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)?
(Source: 2, 7)
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
con:.sntrations?(Source: 2, 7) X
e) Create objecrionable odors a~ecring a substantial
number ofpeople?(Source: 8) X
6
Potentially
Less
Th~n
No
New
' ' Si~m~iflcantSignificant Significant Impac~
Impa~ ~5~ Impact
~figafion
' Incomomfion
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -Would the project:
a) Have a s",~bstanrial adverse effect, either directly or
through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a X
candidate, sensitive, or special stares species in local or
re~onal plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California
Department offish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Sen,ice? (Source: 2, 7) :
b) Have a substanfi~ adverse effect on any riparian habitat
or other sensitive natural community identified in local or
r~gionaI plans, poiic, ies, re~lations or by the Californ/a
Department offish and Game or US Fish and Wildli£e
Sea'ice? (Source:.;," 7 )
c) Have a substanri~ adverse effect on rSderally protected
wetI~nds as defined by Sexton 404 of the Clean Water Act
(including, but not iirnited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal,
etc.) through dire:.t removal, filtin~ hydrolo~caI
inte,wuprio~ or other means? (Source: 2, 7)
d) inte~ffere subst?ntialty Mth the movement of any native
resident or m/grato,-y fish or wSldiiz~ species or with
eszzbi/shed native r¢sident or minatory wildtiz~ co.dots,
or [mpede the use o£native Mldlk~ nursery sites?
(Source: 2, 7)
e) Co.ici wilth any local policies or ordinances protecting X
biolo~ical resources, such as a tree preservation poticy or
ordin,..nce? (Source: 2, 7)
i) Cor~ict with the erovisions of an adopted ~ ' '
Consa,wation Plan. Natural Commu~ty Conse~'ation ?lan
f.~:~ or other approved local, re, oriel, or state habitat
~ conSe,-x-ation Plan? (source: 2, 7)
?otentially I.~ss Than Less Than No N~
Si=,~nificant Significant $ignkficant Impa~
Impact with Impact
Mitigation
' Incoroomtion
V. CULTUK~L RESOURCES - Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance
of a kisto~cal resource as defined in § 15064.5?
(Source: 2, 7) X
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance
of an archaeological resource pursuant to ~ 15064.5?
(Source: 2, 7)
c) Directly or indkectty destroy a unique paleontological
resource or site or unique geolo~c feature7 (Source: 2, 7)
d) DisruFD tony human remains, including those interred
outsi~e offo~'-mal cemeteries? (Source: 2, 7)
XJ. GEOLOGY AND SOILS- Would the project:
a) Expose paople or structures to potential substantial
adverse eff'e~s, including the risk of loss, injury, or death
invoMng:
i) Rupture of a 'known earthquake ~ault, as delineated on the
most recent .~quist-Priolo E~,'-rhquake Fault Zoning Map : X
issue.8 by tn. State Geologist for the area or based on other
sub~,ntial evidence ora known fault? Refer to Division of
-~nes and G~ology Special Publication 42. (Source: 2, 7)
ii) Strong seismic Found shaking? (Source: 2, 7) X
iii) Seis~c-retated ~ound failure, including Iiquefaction?
(Source: 2, 7) X
iv) Landslides? (Source: 2, 7) X
b) Result in substa~nrial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
(Source: 2, 7) X
8
Pot:ntially L~ Than L~xs Thzn No N~w
Si_mzific~t Si_mzificant Signific~m Impa:~
Impact ~th Impact
Mitigation
Incomora~Jon
c) Be loczted on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or
that would become unstable as a result of the project, and X
potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral
spreading subsidence, liquefaction or colIapse7
(Source: 2, 7)
d) Be located on expansive soiI, as defined in Table 18-1-B
of the U~-o'''m Building Code (1994), creating substantial X
risks to lif~ or property? (Source: 2, 7)
e) Have soi.~s incapable of adequately supporting the use of X
septic tarJ:.s or alternative waste water disposal systems
where sewn_rs are not available for the diipesal of waste
water? (Soxrce: 8)
Y-fi. tgAZARDS A~D lgAZA. RDOUS .~{ATERI-iLS -
Would the project:
a) Crest-.. a s,~gnkfcant h,~_ard to the public or the X
environment through the routine tr~sport, use, or disposal
ofh~-.~.zrdous materials? (Source: 8)
b) Create a s~_=nificant h~ard to the public or the
· .'7 ·
envaronmanr .~ou~.n reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident candirions involving the rele~e of hazardous
mater,s into the environment? (Source: 8)
c) Errfit h~=_za~-dous en-Jssions or handle hazardous or acutely
h,._zm-dous mzrerials, substances, - '~ ' ' '
or was[,, v~utmn one-
qum~er rni]~_ o~an ex~sting or proposed school?
(Source: 8)
9
Pot:ntially Less Than Less Than No NE
Sig'rdficantSig'ltificant Si~cant
Impact with Impact
Mitigation
Incorporation
d) Be located on a site wMch is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to X
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment? (Source: 8)
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan
or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two X
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the
project result in a safety hazird for people residing or
working in the project area? (Source: 8)
0 For a project v&kin the vicinity ofa p,fivate airsnfp,
would the project result in a safer), hazard for people X
residing or working in the project a-ea? (Source: 8)
g) Lnnpair implementation of or physically inte~ere with
an adopted emergency response plan or emergency X
evacuation plan? (Source: 8)
h) Expose peopte or structures to a significant Nsk of loss,
hnjury or dec.ch invoMng wildland fires, including where X
wildtands a-e a{iacent to urbanized areas or where
residences a-e intermixed with wiIdlands? (Source: 8) :
*v-lTl. i~-DROLOGY AND WATER OUALITY-
Would the project:
a)_.~._.~-v';,~.--*~ any water qualiry standards or waste dls~har_., ~' fa
requirements? (Source: 8) X
b) Subst~-.n.:~-_!i~'y deplete groundwater supplies or interfere
substantially wkh ~oundwater recharge such that there
would be a net deScit in aquifer volume or a lowering of
the local _~m'-oundwater table level (e.g., the production
rate ofpre-exJs*.ing nearby wells would drop to a level
v, inich would not suppo~ existing land uses or planned
uses for wbJch pern-Jts have been ~anted)? (Source: 2, 7)
10
.
~'~, Potentially Less Than Less Than No New
'- SiDaificant Si~-~nificant SJ=,~ificant Impa~
: Impact ~Sth Impact
Mitigation
: Incomoration
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the
site or area, including through the alteration of the X
course of a stream or river, in a manner which would
result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site?
(Source: 2, 7)
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the
site or area, including through the alteration of the X
course o£a stream or river, or substantially increase the
rate or amount of surface mnoffin a manner which would
result in flooding on- or off-ske? (Source: 2, 7)
e) Create or contribute runoffwater which would exceed
the ca:ac.:~ of existing or planned stormwater drainage
systems or provide substantial additional sources of
z>oltuted runoffS.. (Source: '~, 7)
0 Otherwise substantially de~ade water quali~?
(Source: 2, 7)
g) Place housing wSthin a 100-year flood h~ard area as X
mapped on a federal Flood Haz. m-d Boundary or Flood
L-,.surance i~te Map or other flood hazard delineation map?
(Source: 8) ;
h) Plar. e w~rhin a 100-year flood hazard area smactures
which would impede or redirect flood flows? (Source: 8) X
i) Ex.~ose p~ople or structures to a significant risk ofloss, X
[%~m"y or daa.:h involving flooding including flooding as a
result of th, £aiture ora levee or dam? (Source: 8)
j) EXpOSe p~ople or structures to a significant risk of loss, in
invoMng inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X
(Source: 8)
11
Potentially t.~ss Than Less Than No Net
Si=mzificantSi__m~ificant Significant Impa:.~
Impact with Impact
Mit/gat[on
Incoroorat/on
IX. LAND USE AND PLAN~'~G - Would the project:
a) PhysicaJty divide an established community?'
(Source: 8) X
b) ConfLi~ with any applicable land use plan, policy, or
regulation of an agency wSth jurisdiction over the project
(including but not limited to the general piers specific
plan, local cozstal pregram, or zoning ordinancQ
adopted for zhe purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
enviro~mmen--.~ effect? (Source: 2, 7) ::
c) Co.itt v.-irh an), applicable habitat conservation plan
or natural community conservation plan? (Source: 2, 7)
X. MIlN-ER_AL RESOGRCES - Would the project:
a) R~sutt tn r'n-~ less ofavailaNIity ora known mineral
resourc, that would be of value to the regdon and the
residents ofzhe stat~? (Source: 8)
b) Result in the less of avaitability ora locally-important
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local X
general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
(Source: 8)
XI. NOISE - Would rn~ project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in
excess of standm-ds established in the Iocal general plan
or no[se ordh':znce, or applicable standards of other X
agencigs? (Source: 2, 7)
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive
g-roundbome vibration or D-oundbomeno~s..' ~ I..x '~ ,~'l...s.? X , ~
(Source: 2, 7) .
!'-
12
?o~=nria/ly Mss Than L:s$ Than No
$i=,~LficantSigni~fi cant $ignLficant Impa~--~s
Impact ~ith Impact
Mitigation
· Incorporation
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise
levels in the project vicinity above Ievels existing without ' X
the project? (Source: 2, 7)
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in
ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels X
existing without the project? (Source: 2, 7)
e) For a project iocated within an ah-port land use plan X
or, where such a plan hzs not been adopted, wkh~n two
miIes o£a public ai~ort or pubiic use airpo~, woutd the
project expose people residing or working in the project
area to excessive noise Ievek? (Source: $)
0 For a project v~d:hin thc viciniW o£a private airstrip, X
would the project expose people residing or working in
the project ~ea to excessive noise levels? (Source: 8)
.%1-/. POP~-LATION Ah~D HOUSI'NG-
V¢ouId the project:
z) Induce substantial population ~owzh in an
ekb, er d~rec~iy (for e×amp]e, by propofing new homes and
businesses) or indh-ect]y (for example, through ex-tension : X
o£rozds or omer zr~rzs~ructure)? (Source: ~, 7)
b) Dis?Iac~ substanfizl numbers o£ existing houfing,
necessitz~n_~ t..hc construction ofreplacement housing
~l~v.,n~r~9 LlrCe:
c) Displace substantial numbers ofpeople, necessitatin~
thc consW.~cfion of replacement housin~
(Source:
13
Po~cwlally I~ss Than Less Than No N' ~
Si_m~Jicant Si=onificant Significam Impa~
Impa~ ~th Impact
Mitigation
In¢o ,rporation
XHI. PUBLIC SER%qCES
a) Would the project resutt in substantial adverse.
physical h-npacts associated with the provision of new or
· .. physically altered governmental facilities, need for new
or ph}'Sicaliy altered governmental facilities, the
consu'uction ofwNch could cause significant
emironmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable
sen,ice ratios, response times or other performance
objectives for any of the public se~dces:
FireProrescion? (Source: 8)
X
Police Proter. rion? (Source: 8) X ,~_,.,
Schools? (Source: 8) X
Parks7 (Source: 8) X
Other Pubi/: Facilities? (Source: 8) X
xI~r. RECREATION-
a) Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and reg-ional parks or other recreational X
r%cilities such that substantial physical deterioration of
the hciiity would occur or D. accelerated? (Source: 8)
b) Does the proje~ include recreational facilities or X
require the construction or expansion ofre~eational
facilities wNch migSnt have an adverse physical effect on
the en~Sronrn=nt? (Source: 8)
I4
$igmificant $i=,mifi:~_nt Significant Impacts
Impact / with Impact
i~tigation
Incorporation
XV. TR_-iNSPO RTA TlrO NfYRAFFIC-
Would the project:
a) Cause mn increase. in franc which is substantial in
relation to the e.'dsting traffic load and capacity of the
-. street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either
the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio
on roads, or congestion at intersections)? (SOurce: 2, 7)
b) Exceed, either indMdualt}' or cumulatively, a level of
sen'ice srmndm-d established by the county congestion
managsm~_nt agency for designated roads or h/ghways?
(Source: 2, 7) ...
c) Result in a change in air trz~,~c patterns, including
either an in,tease in traffic levels or a change in location
that results Lq substantial s~ety riskS? (Source: 2, 7)
d) Substmn~ziiy increase beam-ds due to a desi_o-n feature
- X
(..=., shm'-'o c'a~es or aan~erous intersections) or
m,.ompano.,e uses (~.=., farm equipment)? (Source: 2, 7)
e) Result in h-;adequate eme~ency access7 (Sours. e: 2, 7) X
Result in '?:adequate pm-king capacity? (Source: 8) X
g) Co~qict with adopted policies, plans, or pro.m-ns X
.. -I .... ' 'o transportation (e.g., bus turnouts,
supporting ---' ,-, ~,.~tlX',, . .
bicvcle racks)7 (Source: 2, 7)
XVI. UTt'LiTYES ANI) SERVICE SYSTEMS -
Would the projem:
Potentially Less Than Less 'l-nan No Ne
Si=--mi.ficant Si_m~ificant Si_mai_titan! Impaz'3~
Impact ~dth impact
Mitigation
In~rooratJon
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the X
appticable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
(Source: 8)
b) Kequk~ or result in the construction of new water or X
-- wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause
significmat cnviror, mental effects7 (Source: 8)
c) Require or result in the construction of new sto.'xn ~
water drzk~a~e facilities or expansion of existing
zXzilities, the consnnaction ofv,,h/ch could cause
sigrJScant emdrommental effects? (Source: 2, 7)
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ~-rr[ ,.,~;
.~roje:x from ".xus~n__" .4. ~ entitlements and resources, or are
new or expanded entitlements needed? (Source: 8)
e) Result La a ae~e..-mmat~on by me wastewater treatment _-~
provider wifch serves or may serve the proje~ that it has
adeouate capacity to s~rve the proje~'s projected
demand in addition to the pro~,4der's existing
comrnkments? (Source: 8) ,
z") Be se,wed by a landfill with sur~cient pen'nirted X
capaciD, to accommodate the project's solid waste
disposal n~-ds? (Source: 8)
g) Comply wkh :%deral, state, and local statutes and ' X
reFzlations related to solid waste? (Source: 8)
XX,'-lI. MANT)ATORY ~-TN-DINGS OF SIGNTFICANCE '~
16
Pot¢nfially I.~ss Than L:ss Than No New
Si__,~ficant Si=~cant Significam Impacts
Impact with Impact
Mitigation
· Incorvoration
a) Does the project have the potential to de_m-adc the quality
of the environment, su.bstantially reduce the habitat of a
fish or wiIdtife species, cause a fish or wildlife popuIation to
drop below self-sustaining levels, lhreaten to eIiminate a
plant or m'zimal community, reduce the number or restrict
the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the major periods of
Catifo,mia history or prekistory? (Source: 2, 7)
b) Does the proje= have iNpacts that are indRSdually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerabl~" means that the incremental effe~s of a project
m-e considerable when ',Sewed in co~ection ~h th~
of past pr~ezts, thc effects of other cu~ent projects, ~d
th= effects ofprobi~le ~mre projects)7 (Source: 2, 7)
=s rn- project~ na~,-
wMch will czus~ subs~mtial adv~rs~ eff~s on
hnmmu b~in~s, ~kh~r directly or indirectly7 (Source: 2, 7)
Sources used to determine potential environmental impacts:
1. De.:e,~'xninarion based on location of project. ~
2. Dete,,-q-ninarion based on staff office review.
3. Dete,,-xninarion based on field review.
~ Detm,-rnination based on the City of Dubtin General Plan
5. Dete,wnination based on the City of DUblin Zoning Ordinance.
6. Dete,-x,Jnation based on E~tern Dubtin Specific Pla_n, June 6, J998.'
7. Dete,,-xnination based on Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and SpeciSc Plan Final EUL.
Admh-~istrative Record Volumes I-rtl.
8. Not applicable.
17
City o£DubIin
Explanations for Checklist Form
Proiect Descrir>tion~-
As provided for in Section 7.68.010 of the City's Municipal Code, "A right-of-way line study
may be established.., for the purpose of reSen,ing areas for furore ~5dening, extension, or
creation of streets, highways, or space for future utilities, pedesrr/an ways. fire and police
emergency access, access to propemd, and ail public rights-of-way'." This project ,aiI1 establish
-- ogficiaI r/ght-of-way lines for major arterials in Eastern Dublin, as well as construct
improvements to those sweets for the portion being funded by the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact
Fee. It is anticipated that eminent domain may be initiated for acquisition of some of the
properties necessary for such construction.
The Baste,n Dublin General Plan A. mendment and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan were approved
on May ! 0, 1993 (Resolution No. 51.-93). Several amendments to the Specific Plan and General
Plan have been adopted since.-The-Eastern Dublin Specific Plan provides the planning
fi-amework to guide furore land ,use and development decisions in E~tern Dublin. ~,n area that
encompasses approximately 3,300 acres.
'Fne Envi-onmenr. al Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment a.nfl Specific
Plan (SCH # 91103604) and Addenda thereto dated May 4, 1993 and August 22. 1994 ("FEIR")
analyzed the impact of the development ar>proved by the General Plan Amendment and the
Specific Plan. The roadways included in Table I, attached hereto, facilitate the planned land uses.
This a~natysis looks at the site-specific impacts of the establishment of the right-of-way lines,
consu'-ucfion of the roadways and acquisition of property for such consU-uction.
Major m'-zerials included in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and this Capital Irnr>rovement
Project (CIP No. 9640) are sho'am in Table 1. It is anticipated that most of the actual roadway
construction work v¥5II be accomplished by developers who are required to pay Eastern Dublin
Traffic Impact Fees, w4th fee credits given for the work completed. The time tim-ne for
esrabhsv_ment of ~ght-of-way lines and completion of construction (for those roadway portions
funded) is 1998-2003.
The area of the ~tm-e right-of-way includes pr0per/y that is currently not owned by Cue CiD' of
Dublin or for w'rfich the City has not obtained easements over smd property. The CiD' cm'-rendy
anticipztes that for certain properties involved, eminent domain (defined as the fight of the
governmem [City of Dublin] to take private property for public use by virtue of superior
domkfion of the government over all lands within its jurisdiction) may be irfiriated.
~ ?rojegt Des~-n-ipfion and Setting info,n-nation was provided by the Public Works Deparrrngnt and the Easr,m Dublin
5?~cific Plan, June 6, 1998 O~"allace )~oberts & Todd).
Dublin An'.tiM Street Irnprox'.-rnm~ CIP No. 9640
The actions covered by this environmental document include: l) establishment of the righ:-of-
way lines; 2) construction of roadways; and 3) acquisition of land Co5' purchase or eminem
domain) for pm'poses of constructing the roadways.
Table 1
CIP No. 9640
Major Arterial Streets in Eastern Dublin
Roadws.v/Segment Existing Configuration ] Proposed Configur-~rion
Tassajara Road - north of I-SS0 Interchange to 2 lanes (1 each direction); [ 8 lanes (4 each direction, plus
Dublin Boulevard 100-foot right-of-way [ additional mm lanes at
intersection): 187-foot right-
of-way.
Tassajara Road - north of Dublin Boulevard 2 lanes (1 each direction); 66 S lanes (4 each direction, plus
intersection to Central Parkway intersection to SS-foot right-of-way additional rum lanes m
intersection): 166-foot rigi~i-
of-way, plus additional ri_~ht-
· of-way at intersection with
Dublin Boulevard.
Tassajara Road -north of Cenh'-al Park'way 2 lanes (1 each direction); 66- 6 lanes (3 each direction, plus
intersection to Gle~on Drive intersection foot right-of-way additional rum lanes m
intersection): 141 to 150-foot
right-of-way.
Tassajara Road - nor'da of Gleason Drive 2 lanes (1 each direction); 66- 6 lanes (3 each direction, plus
intersection to nor-da-°m boundary of Dublin foot right-of-way additional mm lanes at
Ranch Tm:t 696_-N~i_hbor'nood M1 intersection); 128 to l Se-foot
h~ht-of-wav.
Dublin Boulevard - west of Tassajm'-a Road None exists. 6 lanes (3 each dire:z/on, plus
inrerse~ioJ to wesz.°riy boundary of Dublin additional rum lan es at
Ranch Arza~ O & H intersection);/40 to 161-foot
right-of-way.
Central Parkway - west of Tassajara Road None exists. 4 lanes (2 each dire:zion plus
inz:rsection to west:rty boundary.' of Dubtin additional rum lanes at
Ranch Are~ F & O intersection); 104 to ]SO-foot
right-of-way.
Gleason Drive - west of Tassajm-a Road None exists. 4 lanes (2 each dire:zion plus
intersection to wes'.¢rly boundary of Dublin additional rum lanes at
Ranch .A~-ea F intersection); 104 ~o ]25-foot
right-of-way.
Source: Draft Precise Plan Lines Plan, Ci0, of Dubtin Public ~l"or~:s Department, ~vrepared by MacKay & Somas
I~o~rastruature Group, dated recei,,ed S'~ray 7, 1999.
Dublin Arterial Sm=et Improvements, CIP No. 9640 Page 19
'Fne legal description and approved plats for the roadways indicated in Table 1 are included as
Appendix A to this report.
Surrounding Land Uses and Setting
The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan' Area is .surrounded primarily by open space, grazing and
agriculn.u'al lands, and developable vacant commercial property. The Parks Resen,e Forces
Training .Area, knowT~ as Camp Parks, and the Federal Correctional Institute are located :o the
west. Lands in the jurisdiction of Contra Costa CounD' are located to the north and are
predominantly open space consisting of hilly, _m'ass-c°vered grazing land. The area east of
Specific Plan .Area is unincorporated land Mihin Alameda County: consisting of rural open space
with limited a_m-icultural and rural residential uses and veo' hill), terraim Major land uses to the
" south (south ofi-580) include Hacienda Business Park, car dealerships, and highway commercial
uses. l--ne ciD' of Pleasanton is located south ofi-580.
Projects either under coFsrruction (UC), recently approved (A), or currently proposed (P) that
in the project vicinin., include the following:
West of Tassajara Road, starring at nm-them end -
· Gre_=.nbfiar- (P)
· Tassajara MeadOws I & II- (IJC)
· Emerald Glen Park, Phase I - (UC)
· Co',unry Site 3 - (P)
· Koll Center- (A)
East of Tassajm-a Road, staring at northern end -
· Dublin Ranch Phase I - (UC)
· Dublin Ranch .Areas F, G, & H - (P)
Exhibi,:s 1 indicates the Project Vicinity for the proposed project.
Ea~'x:m Dublin An:Hal Srre:t improv:m~m, CIP No. 9640 , a=. _0
Explanations
The foIlowing section provides narrative respons.es that correspond with the environmental
checklist form. Please note that for items checked "No New ImPacts", this signifies that no new
impacts as indicated in the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan Final Ell
CEE/P,.) (SCH No. 91103604), have been identified. Where impacts would be similar to those
identified in the FEIR, applicable mitigation measures from that document are referenced.
I. Aesthetics
a, b, c - The Alameda Coun(y General '7'Ia~ Scenic Element (May I965) designates Tassajara
Road as a scenic route. Planned and approved urban development in the Eastern Dublin Specific
Plan azea will significantly alter the visual experience of travelers on scenic routes in eastern
Dublin. Formerly quiet roads will be transformed into major suburban thoroughfares carrying
significant traffic loads.2 Mitigation measures 3.8/8.0 and 3.8/8.1 identified in the Eastern
Dublin SP/G?A FEll would apply. The proposed project would be in conformance with the
adopted Specific Plan, therefore no new impacts are anticipated.
d- Project plans do not specify the. installation of street lights. It can be assumed, however, that
portions of the roadways would b~ illuminated. The future instaltation of street lights would
create a new source oflight and may affect nighttime v/ews in the area. Inasmuch as the roadway
constracriorfwidening would occur in areas planned and approved for development, impacts are
anticipated to be less than significant.
II. A_~culture Resources
a-c - Portions of the proposed project area are currently utilized for cattle _m-azing. As identified
in the Eastern Dublin SP/GPA Final FIR (Administrm. ive Record Vol. 3, p~e 705), lands on"
either side of Tassajara Road, south of Dublin Boulevard, are considered prime agricultural land
based on criteria established by the Cortes~,~Knox Act (Seztion 56064). The Final FIR states that
loss ofpNme agricultural Iand is considered unavoidable, but for reasons stated in that document,
is not significant. 32Vo new in,acts are a~ticipated.
III. )dr Oualitv
a-e - Once built or -~Sdened, it is anticipated that trmff]c-generated air quality impacts on the
roadways included in this project would increase. The ?'Ell indicates that mobile source
emissions for ROG and NOx would be significant upon full buildout of the Specific Plan area.
Implementation of rrfitigation measures 3.11/5.0 through 3.11/11.0 would not achieve the 98%
reduction in project-related traffic needed to reduce emissions below the ozone precursor
significance th-eshold. Residual air quality impacts would remain significant. Upon completion
of cons-~ruction, no objectionable odors would be created. Aro new impacts are tn~ticipatect
=~_rtem Dublin Sp=i.fi¢ Plan/Gene-al Plan Amgndment, Admini~aative R~ord (from Alameda County Superior
Court A,--don No. V43064774 VO) Vol. I, pp. 294-295.
roi& VoL III, p. 706.
Ibid. ¥'oL I, p. 328.
Dublin A.,-~ml Str----t Imm-ovemenla, CIP No. 964.0
Earthwork typically involved in rOadway construction would produce short-term increases in
particulate matter (PM-10) and NOs (from diesel-powered equipment) concentrations. The FEIR
(Vol. I., 1:'. 326) indicates that thc project area is wlthin a non-attainment air basin for PM-10.
Implementation of mitigation measure 3.11/1:0 would reduce project dust deposition (PM-10)
impacts to a level of insignificance. Under buildout .COnditions, implementation of mitigation
measures 3.11/2.0 through 3.11/4.0 would not reduce ozone precursor emissions (NOs) to less
than significant level. Even with mitigation, cumulative impacts related to construction dust
deposition, construction vehicle emissions, and mobile source emissions remain potentially
significant cumulative impacts, in part .due to non-attainment status of the air basin, .No new
impacts are anticipated[
IV. BioIo~ical R~sources
a-f- /'ne FEIR (Vol. I, pp. 262-269) identifies sensitive habitat and animal species that exist or
potentizlly exist within the Specific Plan area. Fi=oures 3.7 A-C of the FEIR (Vol. I, pp. 283-2g$)
' indicat~ that of the roadways included in CIP No. 9640, only the northern-most portion of
Tassajaza Road has existing or suitable habitat and species present. These habitat and species
include, but are not limited to, Northern Riparian forest, San 3'oaquin kit fox habitat, golden
eagle, burrowing, owl, and Northern 'harrier.
Implementation of mitigation measures 3.7/1.0 through 3.7/4.0 of the FEIR would reduce
: impacts associates With loss of habitat to a level of insignificance. Implementation of mitigation
measure 3.7/5.0 (as revised, see Vol. ]I, p. 570) would reduce impacts associated with vegetation
removal to a level of insignificance. Implementation of mitigation measures 3.7/6.0 through
3.7/17,0 (measure 3.7/g.0 as revised, Vol. 717. p. gg2; measure 3.7/9.0 as revised, Vol. II, p. $8-4)
would reduce impacts associated with loss or de~adation of sensitive habitat to a level of
insignificance. Implementation of mitigation measures 3.7/18.0, 3.7/19.0 and 3.7/18.1 (see Vol.'
II, p. 697) would reduce impacts associated with loss of San ~oaquin kit fox habitat/dens to a
level of insignificance. Implementation of mitigation measure 3.7/25.0 would reduce impacts
associated with lots of golden eagle habitat to a level of insi__oa~Lficance. Implementation of
mitigation measures 3.7/20.0, 3'.7/25.0, and 3.7/27.0 (as revised, see Vol. II, p. 60-4) ~ould
reduc~ impacts associated with burrowing owl and northern bm-tier habitat to a level of
insignificance. Cumulative impacts related to direct loss of habitat and golden eagle habitat ~re
consider-ed potentially significant Implementation of mitigation measures 3.7/1.0 through
3.7/I5.0, 3.7/23.0 and 3.7/25 would result in a level of insignificance..No new irapacls are
V. Cultural Resources
:~-d - No known cultural, paleontolo~cal, or historical resources exist within the proposed
project a~-ek, v,,hich encompasses the existing and future roadways identified in CIP No. 9640.
i~nerefore, no impacts Io ;~wo~,n resources are 'a~ticipale~Z
Previously unidentified pre-historic resources may exist in the project area and would be subject
~o poten:izl disruption or destruc'Jon during construction activities. Implementation of mi~:iga~ion
Dublin Aae..'-ia] Str----t improv=n.'=nt% CIP No. 9640 Pa~= 23
measures 3.9/5.0 and 3.9/6.0 would reduce potential impacts to a level of insignificance. No new
impacts are anticipatec~
VI. Geology and Soils
a-e - ]No -known earthquake faults or Alquist-PrioIo Earthquake Fault Zones traverse the project
area. For those portions of future roadways which are underIain by expansive soiIs and bedrock,
potential shrink/swelI impacts may occur. Implementation of mitigation measures 3.6/14.0
through 3.6/3.I6.0 would reduce potential impacts to a level of insignificance. Construction-
related and long-term erosion and sedimentation impacts associated with construction of the
roadways are anticipated. Implementation of mitigation measures 3.6/27.0 and 3.~5/28.0 wouId
· . reduce potential impacts to a Ievel of insignificance. No new impacts are anticipated
YTI. Hazards and Hazardous Materials
a-h - The proposed project includes the establishment of right-of-way lines and future v~Sdening
existing and proposed roadw'ays. The project does not involve the storage or use of hazardous
· materials. A/'o impacts are cmticipater[
VIII. Hydrology and Water Quality` 7
a, g, j - The proposed project includes establishment of right-of-way lines and future widening of
roadways. These roadways are not located within a floodplain and proposed modifications would
not expose people or structures to flooding. Violations of any water quality standard or wa~e
discharge requirement are not anticipated. No impacts are anticipated
b - f - Proposed roadway modifications would include installation and/or up~ade of the
drainage system. Although widening of the roadways represents an increase in impervious
su,ffaces in the immediate project vicinity, the project wiI1 be designed so as not to impact the
existing drainage system. Implementation of mitigation measures 3.5/44.0 through 3.5/48.0 (Vol.
I, pp. 228-229) would reduce potential project-specific impacts associated with increased runoff
to a level of insignificance. Implementation of mitigation measures 3.5/49.0 and 3.5/50.0 (Vol. I,
p. 229) woutd reduce potential impacts associated with reduced ~roundwater recharge to a level
of insignificance. Implementation of mitigation measures 3.5/51. ~'through 3.5/55 (re~er to Vol. I,
p. 230 and VOl. II, p. 65/;) would reduce impacts associated with non-point source pollution to a
leVel of insignificance. Cumulative impacts related to an increase in impervious surfaces and the
resultm-at potential increase in flood hazards, reduction in ~m-oundwater recharge, and increase in
non-point pollution sources is a potentially significant cumulative impact. Implementation of
mitigation measures 3.5/44.0 through 3.5/52.0 (Vol. I, pp. 377-378) would result in a/ess than
significant cumulative impact. No new impacts are anticipated
IX. Land Use and Planning
a-c - 'FrHs proposed Capital Improvement Pro.am (CIP) project is in response to the adopted
Eastern Dublin Specific Plar~ The entire C~ project is within the City's Sphere of Influence
and/or city limits and is therefore governed by the adopted General Plan and Zoning Ordinance,
=.E.~_"m Dubi~ Art---hl S~'~t Improvements, C~ No. 9640 Page 24
in addition to the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. The proposed fight-of-way lines are in
conformance with ultimate roadway widths discussed in both the Specific Plan and the
Circulation Element of the General Plan. The project area is not included in any habitat
conservation plans or natural community conservation plans. Aro impacts are anticipated
X. Mineral Resources
a-b - According to information provided in the P-ElK (Vol. I, p. 251), although proposed uses
would preclude any future recovery Of aggregate resources, underlying soils are judged to be
inadequate for use as aggmegate. Aro impac, ts af.e anticipate~t.
.lq. Noise
a - f- The FElK identifies po. tentially significant noise impacts related to exposure of existing
and future residences to future roadway noise, and to construction noise. Implementation of
mitigation measures 3.10./1.0, 3.10/2.0, 3.10/4.0 and 3.10/5.0 (Vol. I, pp. 317-319) would reduce
project-specific impacts to a level of insignificance. Even with implementation of mitigation
measure 3.I0/7.0, cumulative impacts related to exposure of existing residences to future
roadway noise would remain at a potentiaIty significant level (Vol. I, p. 381). Aro new impaczs
.'l_qI. Pot)ulation and Housing
a-c - The proposed project includes the establishment of right-of-way lines and cons-h-action of
and/or modifications to portions of four roadways. Proposed roadway modifications were
planned for in the adopted Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. Aro poIralan'on and housing imT~ac~s are
~qiI. ~PubIic Services
a -The proposed project includes estabIishment of right-of-way lines and future widening and
other modifications to existin~future roadways. No impacts to fire protection, police protection,
schools, or parks are anticipated. Due to the fact that the proposed project is a C~ project, any
future required roadway maintenance would be accounted for in the City's yearly budget. A;o
imxpac~ are anticipate~
7XTV. Recreation
a-b - The proposed project includes establishment of right-of-way lines and future widening and
other modifications to e,xistin~future roadways. Aro impacts are anticipaled_
:X~v'. Trans~ortationfrraffic
a-g - The proposed project includes establishment of right-of-way lines and future widening
and/or constrac~ion on roadway segments identified in Table 1. The CIP established for this
work is in response to approved land uses included in the adopted Easter Dublin Specific Plan.
Dublin A.c~al Sn------t improv.~n~tm, CIP ]q'o. ~640 Page 25
The following transportation impacts, identified in Vol. III of the FEIR (pp. 1000 - 1001), would
be applicable to the proposed project:
· cumulative impacts on Dublin Boulevas:d at the Tassajara Road intersection.
Implementation of mitigation measure 3.3/13.0 would reduce the impact, but the impact
would remain significant.
· Cumulative buildout would cause level of service F operations at the intersections of
Tassajara Road with Gleason Road and Central Parkway. Implementation of mitigation
measure 3.3/14.0 would reduce the impact to a level ofinsignificance.
The FEI/>,. (Vol. I, p. 165) identifies potential impacts related to safety of pedestrian and bicycle
traffic when crossing major streets such as Dublin Boulevard and Tassajara Road.
Implementation of mitigation measures 3.3/16.0 and 3.3/16.1 would result in a Ievel of
insignificance.
~Vo new impac'.s are anti"ci~ated
X-VI. Utilities and Service Svsterns
a - g - The proposed project includes establishment of right-of-way Iines and future widening
and other modifications to existin~future roadways..No impacts to utilities a~Td service s3. xtems
are antici~ate:~
~_aZ_,,-'n Dub~ ArU~.~-I SIr___t Improvements, CIP No. 9640 Page 26
APPENDIXA
... Legal Description and Plats
4 ar
Mar~.h 2,
Page I of 4
EXHIBIT "A"
Right of way acquisition for the purposes of-widening Tassajara Road-and-the-construction of Dublin
Boulevard, Central Parkway and Gleason DHve in the City of Dublin, Alameda County, California, a/one
and through the lands of Dublin Land Company, a deed for which was recorded September 30, 19S3,
Series 83-I 82776, Alameda County Records. Parcels A through B are drainage and utility easements
which correspond to the various street right-of-ways as shown on the current plan lines. The ezsements
are =m'anted for purposes of =m-odin: and instailin~, utilities in the ultimate Iocation and paving the TIF
portion of the streets (Pm-eels F, G, H, J & K). The existing poles on Tassajara Road will be mlor. ated.
The d,~nage and utility easements and TIF right-of-ways are describM as follows:
PARCEL A, Tassajara Road Drainage and Utilitj, Easement
-... BEGENZNING at the most northwesterly corner of above said Iand, said comer being on the easterly Iine
of Tassajara Road, 66.00 feet in Mdth and the southerly Iine of Tract 695, Dublin Ranch, the map of
which v,,~ film in Book 241 of Maps at Page 39, Alameda County R~ords; T'nenee Igaving said Point of
Be~nning along the ~asterty line of Tosco. ia.re Road S1"13'07"W I72.80 feet; thence $1°I2'54"W
2207..3=9 f'~t; thence S88°.44'32"E 18.39 feet; thence S 1 °15'28"W 234. I6 feet to a point hereafter known
~ POE~'T A; thence Ieaving the easterly line of Tassaj~,"a ROad S88°47'06"E 43. I3 feet; thenz, e
N00°29'tg"W 381.76 feet; thence Nl°I2'54"E 947.03 feet to a point hereafter 'known ~ PO~'T B;
thence NgS°47'06"W 29.00 feet; thence N02°56'41"W I65.4¢4 feet; thence S88°47'06"E 29.00 feet;
thence N01°!2'54"E 505.98 feet; th:nee S88°47'06"E 9.00 feet; thence NOI°12'54"E 360.00 feet to a
point herr. after Imown as POLNT C; thence N88°47'06"W 26.00 feet; thence N01°I2'54"E 165.00 feet;
th:nc: S88°46'53"E 25.01 feat; thence NIOI3'0T'E 89.66 feet to the southerly line of above said Tract
6925; thence along said southerly tine N88°39'20"W 46.00 feet to the POLNT OF BEGLNN~G.
Containing 2537 acres, more or less.
P.-MRCEL B, Dubiin Boulevard Drainage and Utility Easement
COMM-h'JNCL-NG at the above described POINT A on the easterly line of Tassajara Road: thence
588°47'06'E I0. I2 feet to the TRUE PO/NT OF BEGINNING; thence S00°07'07'E 200.46 feet; th=nc=
S88°47'0:5"E 38.00 f~t; thence N46°12'54"E 28.28 feet; thence S88°47'06"E 275.84 feet; th:nee
S88°29'55'~ 200.00 feet; thence S88°47'06-E 368.67 feet to the easterty tine of Dublin Land Co., Seri=s
83-182776; thence along said easterly Iine NI°08'49"E I40.00 f~t; thence Imvinz said easterly tine
N88°47'06"W 68.51 feet; thence N86°55'~"W' 400.21 feet; thence N88~7'06"W '~30.00 feet: thence
Nl°12'54"F_, 9.00 f~r; thence N88°47'06"W 255.50 feet; thence N44"38'13"W 27.86 feet; thence
N88°47'06"W 3.3.0I feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNq2'qG.
Containing 3.192 acres, mor: or tess.
P.%RCg-L C, Cenr,'-=l Parkw,'ay Drainage and Utility Easement
BEGIN-/'q.k"L-NG at the above desc'zib=d POL-NT B on the easterly Iine of Tassajara Road; thence
N46°12'54"E. 28~8 feet; thence S88°47'06"E 237.93 feet; thence S89°52'35"E 420.08 feet; thence
S88°47'06"E 205.75 f~t to the easterly tine of Dublin Land Co., Series 83-182776; thence along said
easterly Iin, e N1 °08'49"E 104.00 feet; thence l~ving said easterly Iine N88°47'06"W 205.'63 feet; thence
Ngg°01'I6'"W 300.03 f~t; thence N88°47'06"W' 120.00 feet; thence Nl°12'54"E 9.00 feet; th:nee
N88°47'06"W 249.93 f~t; thence N43047'06"W 28.28 feet; thence N88°47'06"W 29.00 feet; thence
S02°56'4 I"E 165.44 feet; thence S88°47'06-E 29.00 feet to the POINq' OF BEGIN'NLNG.
Containing 2.434 acres, more or Ieee.
March 2, 1999
Page 2 of 4
PARCEL D, Gleason DHve Drainage and Utility Easement
BEGIN'Nq2qG at the above described POIN'T C on the easterly line of Tassajara Road: thence
N46°12'54"E 28-28 feet; thence $88°47'06"E 250.00 feet; thence 589°52'35"E 420.08 feet; thence
S88°47'06'E 195.46 feet to the easterly line of Dublin Land Co.; Series 83-182776; thence along said
easterly line N1 °08'49"E 104.00 feet; thence laving said easterly Iine N88047'05"W 195.34 feet; thence
N88°01"16"W 300.03 feet; thence N 88°47'05"W 120.00 feet; thence NIOI2'54"E 9.00 feet: thence
N88047'06"W 250.99 feet; thence N43047'00"W 28.28 feet; thence N88°46'53"W 25.01 feet; thence
S01 °12'54"W 165.00 feet; thence S88°47'05'E 26.00 feet to the POI:NT OF BEGINNqNG.
Containing 2.415 acres, more or Iess.
P.~RCEL E, Tassajara Road Drainage and Utility Easement
BEGt:N,"N~'D4G at the above described POINT A on the easterly line of Tassajara Road; thence along said
e~terly i,:ne $01°15'28"W 503.97 feet; thence along a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 234.02
feet through a central angle of 16°03'36" for an arc Ien~mah of 65.60 feet to a point of compound cu~'ature:
th".nce along a curve to thc left having a radius of 29.00 feet t/-a-ough a central angle of ~4 u~ ._ for an
arc. l~n__~2-1 of 32.43 feet to a point of compound curvature; thence along a cur~,e to the lef[ having a radius
of 164.02 feet through a central angle of 05'34'29" for an arc ]en=~,h of 15.96 feet to a point of
cu,'wav.~re; thence along a curve to the right having a radius of 178.02 feet through a cenu-al angIe of
01 °4-4' ] 0" for an arc len~h of 5.39 feet; thence I~ving said ~zsterIy line of Tassaj. m-a Road NO ] ° 12
391.35 f~=t; then'ce N88°47'06"W 38.00 feet; thence N00°07'07"W' 200~46 feet; thence NgS°47'05"W
10.12 feet to the POIN'T OF BEGINNkNG.
Containing 0.520 acres, more or less.
The por'Jons of the above described parcels that are subj~t t° cr~it against the City of Dublin's Traffic
Impact Fee ~ are described as follows:
PARCEL F, Tassajm"a Road
BEGIN."N~-'~.'G at the first hereinabove referenced POINT OF BEGIN.-N'J_-NG for PARCEL A; thence
leaving smd POIN'T OF BEGINN~G along the easterly tine of T~sajara Road S 1013'07"W 172.80 feet;
thence Si°I2'54"W 2207.39 feet; thence S880~.-.4'32"E 18.39 f~t.; thence SI°15'28"W 234.16 feet;
thence Ixaving said easterly tint S88°47'05"E 10.12 feet; thence N00029'ig"W 38t.27 feet;
N01°12'54'~ ~47.52 feet; then:e S88°47'05"E 4.00 f~t; thence N0i°12'54"E 300.00 feet; th=n~-e
N02056'4I"W' I65.44 feet; thence NOI°I2'54"E 505.98 feet; then:e 588°47'05'E 12.00 feet;
N01°12'54"E 614.72 feet to the southerly line 'of Tract 6925; thenc~ along said south=rly line
N88°39'20"W 20.99 fe~ to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 0.955 a~es, more or less.
' " ~'~ ~ ~ ll,267-02
March 2,, 1999
RRB
Page 3 of 4
PARCEL G, Tassajara Road (TIF)
BEGi]~'NING at the above described POINT A on the easterly line of Tassajara Road; thence along said
easmrly line S01°15'28"W 503.97 feet; thence along a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 234.02
feet through a central angle of 16°03'36" for an arc Ien~h of 65.60 feet to a point of compound curvature;
thence along a cUrVe to the left having a radius of 29.00 feet through a central angle of 25°1'5'3Y' for an
arc Ien=m.h of 12.79 feet; thence leaving said easterly line of Tassajara Road NOI°12'54"E 379.4~4 feet;
thence N00°07'07"W 200.46 feet; thence N88°47'06"W 10.12 feet to the POZNT OF BEGI2qNING.
Containing 0.182 acres, more or less.
PARCEL H, Dublin Boulevard
COMlv~NCLNG at the above described POINT A on the easterly line of Tassajara Road; thence
S88°47' 06"E I 0.12 feet to the TRUE PO~qT OF BEGEN'NING; thence S00007'07"E 200.46 feet; thence
S88°47'06"E 38.00 feet; thence N46°I2'54"E 28.28 f~t; thence N02°IY07'W 32.06 feet; thence
S88°47'06"E 277.84 fez; thence S88°29'55"E 200.00 feet; thence S88°47'06"E 368.56 feet to the
easterly tine of Dublin Land Co., Series 83-182776; thence along said easterly tine N01°08'49"E 76.00
feet; thence t~ving said easterly Iine N88°47'06"W 69.06 feet; thence N86055'25"W 400.21 feet; thence
N88°47'06"W 129.48 feet; thence 'N01°I2'54"E 9.00 feet; thence N88°47'05"W ~3.58 feet; thense
N02°13'07"W 32.06 feet; thence N44°38' IY'W 27.86 feet; thence N88°47'06"W 33.0t feet to the TRUE
POLN-/' OF BEGLN'NING.
Contv./ning 1.944 acres, more or less.
PAav~CEL J, Central Parkway (TIF')
BEG~W'c~LNG at the above described POLNT B; thence N46°12'54"E 28.28 feet; thence N04°l 6'07"W
32.15 fe.g~t; thence S88°47'06"E 240.70 feet; thence S89°52'35"E 420.08 feet; thence $88°47'06"E
206.02feet to the easterly line of Dublin Land Co., Series 83-182776; thence along said easterly tine
N01°08'49"E 40.00 feet; thence leaving said easterly tine N88°47'06"W 205.88 feet; thenze
N88°01'16"W 300.03 feet; thence N88°47'06"W 119.79 feet; thence N01°I2'54"E 9.00 feet; thence
N88°47'06"W 246.86 feet; thence N04°I6'07"W 32.15 feet; thence N43°47'06"W 28.28 feet; thence
N88°47'06"W 29.00 feet; thence $02°56'41'E 165.44 feet; thence S88°47'06'E 29.00 feet to the POLNT
OF BEGENNLNG.
Conm.in:,ng 1.!56 acres, more or less.
?ARCEr__ K, G!zason Drive ~
BEGEN?q-L-NG at the above described POINT C; thence N46°12'54"E 28.28 feet; thence N00°45'32"E
32.00 feet; thence S88°47'06'E 249.95 feet; thence $89°52'35"E 420.08 feet; thence $88°47'06"E
195.73 feet to the easterly line of Dublin Land Co., Series 83-182776; thence along said easterly tine
NI°08'49"E- 40.00 feet; thence Ieaving said easterly line N88°47'06"W 195.59 feet; thence
N88°01' 16"W 300.03 feet; thence N88°47'06"W 1 I9.79 feet; thence N01°12'54"E 9.00 feet; thence
N88°47'06"W *_50.74 feet; thence N00°45'3T'E 32.00 feet; thence 'N43°47'00"W 28.28 feet; thence
N88°46'SY'W v~.0I feet; thence S01°I2'54"W I65.00 feet; thence S88°47'06"E 26.0~) feet to the
PO~.'T OF BEGh-N~rlNG.
Con*-,2J. ning 1.142 acres, more or less.
1 .2 7_o2
Mm'~ ~ 1999
P~ge 4 of 4
TEMPORARY SLOPE AND CONSTRUCTION EASE.M]SNT
A temporary slope and construction easement is hereby granted over the lands of Dublin Land Company
flescr/becl as follows:
A str~p of/and [an (lO) fee/in width, contiguous ~o thc perimeter of the ahoy= described Paresis A, B, C,
D, and E.
Szid temporary easement shall expire 30 clays from the date of completion and acceptance of the last
m/Iity installed in the resp~tive utility easement.
Tn/s real propa'ty d~cription has b~n pr~ared by me, or under my dir~tion, in conforman:~ with h~e
Professional Land Surveyors Act.
ND. 25573 ;=l~
San ~amo~ C~.~ifornia
5,7-- ,~. ~' ~' I 1,267-02
March ~ d999
Page 4 of 4
TEMPORARY SLOPE AND CONSTRUCTION EASE.MENT
A temporary slope and construction easement is hereby granted over the lands of Dublin Land Company
d~cribed as follows:
A strip of land ten (10) feet in width, conti~ous to the perimeter of the above d~cribed Parcels A, B, C,
D, and E.
Said tempor ,a3-y easement shall expire 30 clays from the date of completion and acceptance of the last
utility ipmtallecl in the respestive utility easement.
This re2/property description has been prepared by me, or under my direst, ion, in conformance with the
Professional Land Sur~'eyors Act.
S~n Ramon, Califo,'-rfia
NSS'47'OD'W {--. ~ NSB.47.05~W
' =~., ~1 k" ""-
~ i-'~ ~ 29.4S' ~.~,..~
PARCEL B PARCEL H~
275.~4' I ~'~ "~ 200.~'
N~47'0~ W I N~2g
N4~12'54'E
~-~' DUBLIN
B L
0 100 2OO
SCALE: 1"
=100'
PL~T TO ACCOMP~ DESCRIP~ON
DUBUN L~D COMP~
(BASIS OF BEARINO)" --'---- -
i401'""-- ...... - ~ .... "--'-- NOl°12'54"E 22 .. ,
~~ g47.03' ~ NOi'i~'~ ~ - : _
.
0
~ ~ I1' o
DUBLIN LAND COMPANY
o
,
N$~.~7'O~'W 9.00'
°47'05"W
12.00'
~- 0 100 200
;- SCALE: 1" = 100'
N45'47'o~W N01'I 2'54' E
.- 28.2S' i49.95' ~~ 120.~
p~CEL d
/ ~.~ ~-- '~ / I ..... ~s'
_ 240.70
t.
_.,.~,,..oz- I A::::SUAJAI-'<A h:UAD "7'~.~."'~7 "' b/ r----~u'a' ^
234.16'
PARCEL G 50..3.97'
~" NO1°12"54'E / ~ --~'1~o
,',=5"34'29' PARCEL E-.-' / , ~l l' b ,,.,.,.
L=15.96' ~ al /~ e ...,,.:,
,
..R.= 178.02" c~.. [ I"0 ' ~...:
~=1o44'10'
"= .,'..
· 5b ? I\ "" '
" ¢!.h ~ IX,
<- ~1"'"" -'-"-~--~cA/-/az
%/-,eec /
...
General Plan
-Eastern Extended Planning Area
I LAND USE MAP '.
.. Legend
j CONIIdr. RCIAL
~ ~ Heiol-~oc~hood Commercial
· ! ~'~']~Gonecal Commercial
~ Cam)us Ollice
J J I "'Tt'--J Indusldal Pa'k
RE SlOEI'ITIAL
i j ~ High Oel~siiy 25- alu/ac
· 1 ~F'~J Med~n-H'~ll'~ Oensily 14-25 alu/ac
: J ~-"~ Low Densily O.Ocb/ac
! j r_~_~ rl,~a, ResldenllaV^gricul,ure, du/100 ac
PUrJl.lCl S EMI,P UI]LIC/O PEN
""~'I FUTURE STUDY AREA ~ E"Z1 .,,~,r.=,s.~-~',,,,,,=Pao.,y
J J[-~ Elementary Sol,eel
J I ab Junior' I.,igh School
· (1~ High School
, AGRICULTUREi e
j ~ Parks & Recreation
~ro.-- ('~ City Park
J ! Lc'~t C°mmu~ilY Park
nnA 2743.9 Acres {;.~ tlleighbod~ood Pa*k
I X ~ I-,eighborhood Squa,e
' }~ Open Space
CIrlCULA rlOH
------ ^tlerial Slreel
j ----, Colecmr Silo.el '
J J Tl'ar~l ~
---~ SOl Dounda~'¥
.... Gene~a~ Flan ^mendmenl Sludy
' , EASTERN ,.,,,y lo. 10.
r .........
Acres
j ./-'-' DUBLIN
.... ,:_. · ~ ,, 'v ..... · .' " ' " ' .... "' : - '.' -" Legend
~ " -°" ', ,~'"'2'"*' **' !. ' " " ."*'*" i ' i ' ,; ' ~' ". ' '.' ;'.*' "*~.":
. '. ' , ... ,;~._, ., .s .'"'" *'~ "... !' ', ~, ,~'" ? i '. ,.' ',..;=.: '.,~' -. .' ~' ~. :"
I ':t':::'i'i" :~:. ' Z'. ¢ ,,,,~' ...... ' -' , ," ' ". ..... ' · ' ' . ; ..... ' ~ Roads
...... . ; · ' . .;~.-, / '/.,' .... ..' .' ....,' .... ~...-' · : .' ,r '-...' ...... ,J, ".. '., ..... ;' ~' · · .. z' . .... .:
'i ~ ', ".":'/ ~ ' ..... ~ ·' ,~" .' . .. '... I .... ' RuralResldontlal/
~ '-,'~ .' .' ... J~ Agriculture .01 du/ac
. .., - , , :....:.~'· ....;..,.'.:..!'; .· ..' ......... ,:~ .....',... .... .....: .
.... '.'.,':'~ ~.':.' ." ."':, .J / .. : ........ . .... .. ~ SIn'g'le Family 0.9-6.0 duiac
~ '. ...,"".'.-,. .......~:', ...'.. , ,., .. ] ,' ..., :.,./,'~ ,.' .., .....
...:' / ,." ....,.. - .... ·
,. . ..~ ~ .- '. .... ,' ,' .... ~ ;' .. ~ ' ' ~ .Medium Density 6.1-14,0 du/m
· .~ .( · . ~ '.. :,.'.'?';.,".., ~ ...~ .... ..... ;' ~? .... ., .. .
][, ,,~.~,,,..-~ ...., '~ . :.- . ,.~,'-:'"/./ .... r ,'~' ~ ,.., ......~. . ..... .,-, t .'' ' ; j~ Med-Hi Density 14,1-25.0 du/a
~t~ ~:~....'.. I , .' :' '. '.' · · -: ·
,'" '. ' ~- ' ...... "'" '-' ' ' " ¢ ' ' ; ' "' ' '" ~J I'ligl~ Density 25.1 ~. du/ac
,,,.,.,,,.-.,'" , ,,...... .. ' '~ "' ~ ~' ' :,"". .... ,.~ '../'; , ~' ... a..,,~,~ ...' ~ ,' .... . · .~ ' '. ' ' . .
.,: .' .',~". .. . '~ . J "'-' . .. ~ - . .
I -' ; . ;.~'. ;;'~- .":~. ':.'. · · ' I . :'"" , ,'." .' " "' '.-' ? ~] ' COMMERCIAL'/INDUSTRIAL
,.,, ... · / ',.. '~'i'. .... "-"'"' '" ...... "'"" '"" .... ' ' .... ' ' ' ' '
" ' -"~'-. .: ";'~' . ';~:. ' t. ' ..... ;. ~, , , .,.; .. .... . . .,. .. .. :.. . ,. ~ General Commercial
· ,...:':' ,/ · ~:.'~ ,' ,'...r. · ..'.' .'. 'i' " ~ ' ~ " ' " ' "" " '" '
· , ...... , ' · ~ , "· ' .. ' ~ Neighborhood Commercial
· "" "; ...... " ' ' '" ' ~ ' JX~J Campus Ollico
i ..% ....... ;. ... , · . ! -. ....... . .... .
; :"" ' "' '" " ' '.- ,". · ' "' ' '"' · ~ Industrial Park
! · [ '...,.,... . : :' , ,. .... :.., ',..
~ .... . , ,. . .. ; PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC
,4 i ~ "" ' ) ' ""' '~ '" '::' .... " ' ' ''';~ ~ Public/Semi-Public
' t .. ,', . ; ,~ - , . ' ~ .... . % J~ Elementary School
:',", "';" ~ / / ! 1 .... ~' .. . · ...... ~ : t ..... ¢ '..~' ~ Jun'lot High Scl~ool
· ,/,....,~,....~:::~. =., ~ , ....: ,. , ..., .., :. ; . ~ '... . ·{ ', .... .,, - ;.
".~ ~..?. ""-.\...../ ~ ~ · .. ~, ~ , .' , .-
...... , ! '. ....... ;.. ..[ ....-., ,-,-..,..~.~ ............ ) ~ High School
,-..~. .:': , ~ .: :~. ."
· ~ , "I ~ "~ i ~ '".~,'~ .... .PARKS AND'OPEN SPACE
~f,'., ['~ !./ -
,., v-.-~ ..: '.-...-'. .Neighborhood Square
" :: '": ' '"' ~ Neighborhood Park
~' .::.;.,~ ..'; :" .
· ., ~ :.~;"::.
· ..'"' ".. "-' ~ Community. Park
':.'"',," ""~="" ..... ~ City Park
::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :':" '"" "' ~ Open Space '..
'""' EASTERN DUBLIN
..'"" :: .::, :: ,::,
;') ."" Specific Plan
· ..' ...,.," Wallace Roberts &Todd
.......... ' .'?' [4 IS) 54 I'~B3Q
, :' .. local streets showu in
.'JC' General Co n lmrcial may be pormilled by a Plaimod Doveloplimnt Zoning Procoss (sec lex, lot co,nplele discussionJJ mis li,j,,,o is
· · ' !1 ~ ilhlslralive only ..... ~ ..,
~,JC ~,J,~ Will convorl I'o Futura ,Study Aron/Agrlmdture where determined Inconsistent wilb Llvermore APA (see lexl for complete ~lisc/Jsslon).'" '
LEGEND "~
· OLD ~l~dWlly Go,lion · . ' "~
~ ~oway I '
~ al~o divided I
~ oho undlvldod I
..... ~nodlvldod ,I ' . . J
Fl
Sotlta HJla Rehabilitation Canler ~
DUBLIfI BL~. ~ 49,8~ I ~ 37 500
OLO ( ~ GLD I .......
~1,700 42,~
, North
~ Not to
Dublin ~..~t
East Dublin Existing and 2010 Projected Traffic Volumes_ Figure ~~
2010 and Beyond Network 5? b
] I __ . I I I I I I I B . III I I
...... ;' i ' "' : ~:.':: '" .::.:5: ? :" :':,, I ;:;,.~;;~ 2~ .... .'~ t :Z J '.'-'-'-" :l "'?:':'.':I
.... ': ' . .......... ¢~ .......... '.'?.F:,;-I .' I
R.O.W.
., ILOoWo
56' 28' 56'
WAS SAJARA ROAD
TYPICAL SECTION
I
' I CITY PARK
Z ~~, ~ m~' / ............ ~. ,,I
_ --~ :-- - g ...... ~ ~~~]- ~ ~ ~*~*- .I.~,~ ~;*.,., ~ i~ ,,,~ , ,,,., -
.... ' "' ~;-~ L ~-=[-~,_ ~ ~- ........ .~. ~.... '"'
" c '~'~ --~t~ , ~1~ - - ....... ~:l~~~~-- ....
~ ~1%~'~'~'~u~J~ '- IJ~' ~ -- - LI f. i -- ~ , I .~ -.
~ ~ ~. ~l~lm~, - ~' '~"---- -~- --~.-'r---;~.--~l ....... d---;,~--fld ...... ~--
~ ~ .... . ,~-~-- ~[~-- ,~t~' , -.~~ .~--; , ~--[-~--, ----
~I~ I~ ] _ ~ ...... ,~ ~ ...... [ .............. __~k ,~. ~/ .... ~ ' ,~. l I ] ~
~I- - - '~ ~l -:~k~.:~__~:,~,. ,~. ,. _ ,.. ................ ~ ] ~.---~--.~- ~-~ ..... ~,~--~,~,- - ~-
~ ..... ,~m .................. -'- ~'Z -/--- ,?-- I-' ~ ........ ?---I-I- ~
/
· .:...- .... ,,.. ~o ~ TASSAJARA ROAD ' '~, "'
'"*"''~ I .
~ ~ ~L__:' -- -I ..... 'A ~' .~ ~ ,~' / ' I ' t '. ~ i ~_~'_~-
......... ' ,"---" ............ ' ...........
......... *,~ - - - L - ~- '~ ~ .. ~,. -
.... ~o' , ~ -I-- !~ ~ ' - -~- i- U~7 - - -I ............. ~:~ ~i ,o' ~
' '
g 'C-- ~ I~ ;: ~ ~C C YARRA-YARRA
I 2.' ~ I I -- ~[~ g~~ ' I--IL. I
__ =~, --I ....... ~-2t; ~~77~ ........... ~F.-$~'---q .......... __~_
~'--~1 ,~' ~ o~ ~--, ,:.. Y . ~--1:-, 4.---- --:1: ..........................
I ...... I- -- q,m .... ~ - I ~t~ I .... 1- -~ ........ L ~' / '
,o. ____ , ~ -~'- -t ................. ~ ..... - .....................
_1 I ~t"
~ .... ,.=~ ~, ~, _r ,. n -I'
.~,to0. PRECIS~ PlAN ~N~
-- ~ F~?~z?~,?~m~ TASSAJARA ROAD
-.
[Hl, I u --Ui~F- !: ..
-~l*L-., --------~, ,~------ ' ~-Ll[-,----~, ~X~""~"'""~,,., __ ,,o... ~.~/"°°',,..,0,~ ,,ooo. ,'m ....... · ..........--~/ ,.,,'o,~ ,,,.,,' ~.
~'~l~ ~{ ¢ e I, ~ = ~U-- ~- . ~ ....... '0'""~ ..... ·
.... ~}2}~=~` ~'}~.~; ,~--~ ......... ~ ....... _ ~ _ _ ~ +{
. ~ -* -~_;~._ ....... ~ ...... .,,.,.,
J J' J 'l ...... ~
I I~- ;~';', ....
..... "f-'-Irl- -- I
I
b iii, ~tltE[~ ' ...... r .... .,,.,,-,,,..,. ~- ,,,.,,.,~
CITY
OF
DUBLIN
....~ "" I w,. I - ........ *.,o' I
.......... mnc~y& s0mrs ........... ,
................... _ _ . y~n~,,,~,._. ,~.,- .... .,~=~=:= .... GLEASON AND C~NTRAL
"1- ":M'-r-'~ """'"'h" ' I
_l-i .... I 1
-- - -I,~' -I .... -~ Ih-I--`
III ~ I III ,, , ... -~f- I
I
I
---~~ ~ l, ~ ~:5~?-' ....... ~: ~ ...... ~ -- '1q
:~~_/I ~,.,. ~ ~C----;--: :.~---~: ....... I ....... ,.: -- ~ .... :~ .....
.... :,~-:::~ ,- - -~,~- ~4 -. i. ~.,~_ -~_~_=_-~::,,:~ ......... ~__~ -- ---~- ~
-~t~'~ ..... ~ '~.~- .... --~. .... ~--~: --'--~ --:--':~.
~ '1 II
~ -- -I-I~ - - .I .... I~ -I-I-'--
., ~ I II I~11 .
I , , I I
~.,.1 I I I ..~ , ~ ~ ·