HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 6.1 EDub TIF/BenefitFee (2)
CITY CLERK
File # D[3][2][Q]-[2J[Q]
AGENDA STATEMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 7,1999
SUBJECT:
PUBLIC HEARING: Revision to Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee and
Area of Benefit Fee
Report Prepared by: Lee S. Thompson, Public Works Director
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution Revising the Traffic Impact Fee and Area of Benefit Fee for
Future Developments within the Eastern Dublin Area, as Previously
Established by Resolution No. 1-95 and Revised by Resolution 41-96,
including the following Exhibits:
Exhibit A:
Exhibit B:
Exhibit C:
Exhibit D:
Exhibit E:
BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS:
(to be available at Council meeting)
RECOMMENDATION:
~~
COPIES TO:
Land Use Map
1999 Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee Update, prepared by
City of Dublin Department of Public Works, dated
November 8, 1999
Traffic Impact Fee Schedule
Allocation Between Land and Construction Costs
Area of Benefit, Major Thoroughfares and Bridges
l.
2.
3.
4.
General Plan
Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment
- Eastern Dublin Specific Plan (as amended)
TJKM Transportation Consultants Five-Year Traffic
Projection Report
Resolution No. 1-95 (with all Exhibits)
Resolution No. 41-96 (with all Exhibits)
5.
6.
l.
2.
3.
Open Public Hearing
Receive Staff presentation and public testimony
Close Public Hearing, determine value of protests (to
Area of Benefit fee only) and deliberate
Adopt Resolution Revising the Traffic Impact Fee
and .Area of Benefit Fee for Future Developments
within the Eastern Dublin Area, as Previously
Established by Resolution No. 1-95 and Revised by
Resolution 41-96
4.
ITEM NO. -6. 1
Eastern Dublin TIF Update
December 7, 1999
Page 2
FINANCIAL STATEMENT:
Fees collected are used to finance public facilities and~
improvements needed to reduce the traffic-related impacts
caused by development in Eastern Dublin. The Fee was last
revised in April, 1996, and needs to be updated to reflect the
current cost of acquiring land and constructing TIF
improvements. The cost of preparing the 1999 Eastern
Dublin Traffic Impact Fee Update is included in the Fee.
DESCRIPTION: The Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee (TIF), which was originally established in
January, 1995, was last revised in April, 1996. Since that time, some of the background data used in
determining the fee has changed, requiring that the fee be revised to reflect current conditions.
Accordingly, a 1999 TIF Study Update has been prepared, the details of which are discussed in the body
of this report. Based on this 1999 Study Update, an increase in TIF rates is recommended for adoption by
the City Council. Further, on October 6, 1998, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 146-98,
expressing the City's intent to adjust Traffic Impact Fees annually to reflect changes in land and
construction costs. Accordingly, the proposed resolution includes an automatic annual fee adjustment,
which is based on indicators measuring the annual increase in land and construction costs.
Proposed TIF Rates
The proposed per trip TIF rates (Section I and Section II only) are summarized on the following table.
The per trip rate for residential uses is proposed at $496 per trip, while the per trip rate for non-residential~
uses is proposed at $452 per trip. The $44 per trip difference is due to the Section I residential
adjustment, which allocates improvements that benefit residential uses to the residential fee.
The proposed rates represent a 30%~40% increase over the current fees, which have been in place for
nearly four years. The non-residential rate increase is greater than the residential rate increase. This is
because, under the current fee schedule, residential trips are charged a higher rate than non-residential
trips to account for trips to and from public facilities. In the 1999 Study Update, trips to and from public
facilities are excluded, resulting in the same fee rate for both residential and non-residential trips, except
for the residential adjustment.
Land Use Residential Non-Residential
Existing Proposed % change Existing Proposed % change
Section I $301 $405 35% $248 $361 46%
Section II $82 $91 11% $74 $91 23%
Total $383 $496 30% $322 $452 40%
Non-Residential Fee
The Fee for non-residential development is determined by applying the per trip fee of $452 to the
estimated average weekday trip generation of the particular development, utilizing the trip generation-",.".,
rates detailed on Exhibit C to the proposed resolution, entitled "Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee
Schedule." These trip generation rates are the same as under the current fee schedule.
Eastern Dublin TIF Update
December 7, 1999
Page 3
Residential Fee
The Fee for residential development is determined by applying the per trip fee of $496 to the estimated
average weekday trip generation of the particular housing type, based on the land designation included in
the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan. The residential fee schedule is
summarized below:
Type Density Trips per Day per Fee per Unit
Unit
Low Density Up to 6 units/acre 10 $4,960
Medium Density 7-14 units/acre 10 $4,960
Medium! High Density 15-25 units/acre 7 $3,472
High Density 26 or more units/acre 6 $2,976
Background
The Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment (GP A) and Specific Plan (SP) were adopted by the City in
1993. The GPA outlines future land use plans for the 4,176 acre Eastern Dublin Sphere of Influence.
Approximately 13,906 dwelling units and 9.737 million square feet of commercial/office/industrial
development are anticipated in the GP A area, in addition to parks, open space, and institutional uses. The
SP provides more specific detailed goals, policies, and action programs for the 3,313 acre portion of the
GPA nearest the City. Approximately 2,744 acres to the east of the City's Sphere of Influence are
designated on the Land Use Map (Exhibit A of resolution) as "Future Study Area." The GPA does not
outline future land uses in this area, and this area was not considered in developing the Traffic Impact Fee.
A Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for the GPA and SP (SCH No. 91103064).
The EIR was certified by the City Council on May 10, 1993 (Resolution No. 51-93). Two addenda, dated
May 4, 1993 and August 22, 1994, have been prepared.
Chapter 5.0 of the SP addresses Traffic and Circulation. At the time of adoption of the SP, the existing
roads were generally rural in character and adequately served existing development in the area, which was
rural residential (EIR, pp. 2-3). Portions of the SP area have been developed and some of the new roads
have been constructed. The transportation and circulation systems for the SP are designed to provide
convenient access to and mobility within the SP area.
The road system is characterized by three major north-south and east-west streets to accommodate traffic
in the SP area (SP 5.2.1). The north-south streets are Hacienda Drive, Tassajara Road, and Fallon Road,
and the east-west streets are Dublin Boulevard, Central Parkway, and Gleason Road. These streets are all
planned as major four-lane or six-lane streets. Other streets necessary for development of the SP are local
roads, which will be constructed by developers to provide access to their properties as they develop. No
fees are necessary to provide for such roads.
The SP also identifies certain freeway improvements and interchange improvements necessary to
accommodate traffic to and from the SP area (SP 5.2.12). The SP includes a policy (Policy 5-10) that
Eastern Dublin TIF Update
December 7, 1999
Page 4
transit service should be provided within one quarter mile of 95 percent of the SP population. It als~
establishes park-and-ride lots adjacent to freeway interchanges on the three north-south streets (SP 5.7.2).
Finally, to encourage non-motorized forms of transportation, the SP provides for a network of pedestrian
trails (Policy 5-15) and bike paths (policy 5-17 and Figure 5.3).
In analyzing the traffic impacts of the project, the EIR assumed that certain improvements would be
constructed and that development within the SP/GP A areas would pay its proportionate share of the cost
of such improvements (EIR, pp 3.3-16 to 3.3-18). The EIR also includes a number of measures to
mitigate the transportation-related impacts of the project (EIR, p.3.3-l9 to 3.3-29). These mitigation
measures were adopted by the City Council as part of the Mitigation Monitoring Program (Resolution No.
53-93).
The General Plan contains a policy that requires new development to pay for infrastructure necessary to
accommodate the development (2.1.4, Implementing Policy C). The SP contains a similar goal and policy
(Policy 10-1, page 151).
The City Council adopted a Transportation Impact Fee ordinance at its December 12, 1994, meeting
(Ordinance No. 14-94). This ordinance provides the authority for the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee
("TIF"), which was adopted by the Council on January 9, 1995 by Resolution 1-95. The TIF was based
on two reports: a study prepared by Barton-Aschman Associates ("Study"), and a report prepared by
Santina & Thompson ("Cost Estimate Report").
.....,
The City Council subsequently adopted a revised Traffic Impact Fee at its meeting of April 9, 1996, under
Resolution No. 41-96. The revised fee was based on two reports which are Exhibits B and C, respectively
to Resolution No. 41-96: A study prepared by TJKM Transportation Consultants ("1996 Study Update")
and a revised cost estimate by Santina and Thompson ("1996 Cost Estimate").
1999 Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact FeelJpdate
The 1999 Study Update utilizes similar methodology as was used in the original 1995 Study and the 1996
Study Update to determine the appropriate Fee rate. This approach first estimates the cost of all TIF
improvements to be constructed and then allocates these estimated costs to new development based on the
estimated average weekday trip generation of different types of land uses. TIF improvements are
categorized in three sections: Section 1 improvements are needed solely to accommodate new
development projects within Eastern Dublin, and these improvements are funded 100% by the TIF.
Section II improvements are needed to accommodate new development projected within Eastern Dublin
and the nearby vicinity, and the TIF funds Eastern Dublin's fair proportional share of these improvements.
Section III improvements are necessary to accommodate new development projected within the region by
the Year 2010.
Section I improvements include two projects that are funded solely by residential development through a
residential adjustment: the Park and Ride lots and the Tassajara Creek Bike Path. The remainder of .
Section I improvements are fu.D.ded by both residential and non-residential development. ..""
Eastern Dublin TIF Update
December 7, 1999
Page 5
The 1999 Study Update calculates the appropriate Fee rates for Section I and Section II improvements, as
well as for the Section I residential adjustment. The Section III portion of the Fee was suspended with
the adoption of the Tri-Valley Transportation Development Fee (TVTDF) in 1998, and, therefore, the
1999 Study Update does not determine the appropriate Fee rate for Section III fees. In the event that the
Section III portion of the Fee becomes effective again, the rate will be adjusted to account for all changes
in land and construction costs since the effective date of the TVTDF.
While the 1999 Study Update employs the same methodology as used in the past, the fact that the TIF
program is well underway has complicated the calculation. The 1999 Study Update must account for TIF
improvements that have been completed or are under construction by private developers in return for TIF
credits, as well as for TIF funds that have been received to date. The 1999 Study Update must also refine
the trip generation estimates and determine the remaining trips upon which to base the revised Fee. Table
1, which is attached to the 1999 Study Update, details the calculation of the revised TIF rates. The
following discussion highlights the specific issues that were considered in calculating the revised TIF
rates.
Cost Estimates
The 1999 Study Update relies on a number of data sources to determine the costs that must be financed by
the revised TIF, which are listed below:
.-
1. Santina & Thompson prepared a new report, entitled "Cost Analysis, 1999 Update," which is included
as Attachment 1 to the proposed resolution. This report updates cost estimates for all TIF
. improvements remaining to be funded, except improvements that have already been completed or are
currently being constructed by private developers under existing development agreements.
2. The Public Works Department prepared estimates of credits to be given to developers (at new TIF
rates) under the terms of existing development agreements for improvements that are currently bonded
or under construction. These estimates are included as Attachment 2 to the proposed resolution.
3. The Finance Department provided information regarding the outstanding balance due on prior funding
advances and TIF credits, as well as the cash balance of TIF funds collected and unallocated as of June
30, 1999.
4. The City prepared an estimate of the cost of TIF improvements proposed to be funded by Contra
Costa County. !
The co~t and credit estimates irI. items 1 and 2, above, rely on updated right-of-way values~ These values
were provided in the Valuation Analysis Report for Traffic and Facilities Impact Fee Study, Eastern
Dublin, prepared by Associated Right-of-Way Services, Inc., dated September 10, 1999. The values were
based on the same methodology and policy as in the past, but were updated to reflect current economic
conditions.
Certain TIF improvements changed in scope since the 1996 Study Update, and these changes are reflected
in the cost and credit estimates. These changes are largely due to refinements in street design, which
resulted from more detailed traffic studies of specific developments. They are minor in scope and are
consistent with the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. The specific changes are described in
detail in the 1999 Study Update.
Eastern Dublin TIF Update
December 7, 1999
Page 6
Contra Costa County Contribution
.~
As described above, the 1999 Study Update includes an estimated $19.45 million of traffic mitigation
funds to be provided by Contra Costa County to pay for portions of TIF improvements needed as a result
of development in the Dougherty Valley. The cost estimates included in the 1999 Study Update reflect
the full cost of the improvements, including the portion to be funded by Contra Costa County. In the event
that the contribution from the County of Contra Costa is less than the estimated $19,450,000, the City of
Dublin may need to delete selected improvements to offset the revenue reduction.
Trip Generation
The 1999 Study Update refines the estimated trip generation from land subject to the fee, based on actual
land use proposals. This refinement results in a total number of trips to be generated within the fee area
of356,369, as compared to 344,078 in the 1996 Update. The majority of the increase appears to be due to
higher development densities within the Dublin Ranch properties than previously anticipated. The 1999
Study Update excludes trips generated from public facility land uses, including public schools and parks,
as these uses are exempt from paying the TIF.
Based upon building permits issued in Eastern Dublin through June 30, 1999 and construction activity
under existing development agreements, the 1999 Study Update estimates the number of trips for which
the TIF has already been paid or will be paid at the current TIF rate at 44,375. This results in an estimated....,
311,994 trips that will be subject to the new fee, of which 102,115 are generated from residential
development and 209,879 are generated by non-residential development.
Proposed TIF Rates
Based on the updated cost estimates and trip generation rates, the 1999 Study Update proposes a revised
TIF rate of $452 per trip for non-residential uses and $496 per trip for residential uses. The application of
these per trip rates to particular non-residential and residential land uses is described at the beginning of
this staff report.
Future Adjustments to the TIF
. On October 6, 1998, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 146-98, expressing the City's intent to
adjust Traffic Impact Fees annually to reflect changes in land and construction costs. Accordingly, the
proposed resolution includes a process for making future adjustments to the Fee, either based on further
study and analysis or based on an automatic adjustment.
The proposed resolution provides that the City will continue to conduct further study and analysis to
determine whether the Fee should be revised. When additional information is available, the Fee shall be
reviewed and revised to include amounts that are reasonably related to impacts of development in Eastern
Dublin. The City will evaluate land values through an appraisal at least once every three (3) years.
...,
The proposed resolution further provides that, in years in which the Fee is not adjusted based on specific
studies and analysis, it shall be automatically adjusted (on July 1) based on a formula which accounts for
Eastern Dublin TIF Update
December 7, 1999
Page 7
changes in construction and land costs. The formula applies indicators of the change in construction and
land costs to the Fee rates, based on the relative allocation between the cost estimates for construction and
land acquisition for certain improvements included the 1999 Study Update. This allocation is 62% for
improvements and 38% for land, and the formula will be weighted accordingly.
Area of Benefit Fee
The adoption of an Area of Benefit Fee is required by the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. This Area of
Benefit Fee covers the cost of construction of the major thoroughfares and bridges within the SP. Exhibit
E of the proposed resolution identifies the major thoroughfares and bridges included in the Specific Plan
Area. Exhibit E also includes costs estimates for construction of these improvements, using the updated
cost estimates prepared by Santina & Thompson for improvements that have not yet been constructed or
bonded. Exhibit E does not include credits due for construction of portions of these major thoroughfares
and bridges, but provides that, in the event the Area of Benefit Fee becomes effective, these credits will be
calculated and the Fee will be adjusted accordingly.
The improvements included in the Area of Benefit Fee are also included in Section I of the Eastern Dublin
Traffic Impact Fee. Imposition of both the Traffic Impact Fee and the Area of Benefit Fee would be
duplicative.
In order to eliminate any doubt as to the validity of the Traffic Impact Fee to pay for the construction of
such improvements, Section 11 of the proposed resolution has been included to satisfy both the procedural
requirements for adoption of a fee under the Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance (No. 14-94) and the
Area of Benefit Ordinance (No. 10-94). Section 13 provides that the Area of Benefit Fee would be
collected only in the event that the Traffic Impact Fc:(e for the same improvements is held to be legally
invalid. Thus, there will be no duplication of fees.
Review Process for 1999 Study Update
A prior draft of the 1999 Study Update was sent to developers and affected property owners in Eastern
Dublin on October 22, 1999 for their review and comment, and an informational meeting was held on
November 1, 1999. Comments were received from three developers: the Alameda County Surplus
Property Authority, Dublin Ranch, and the Greenbriar Land Company. Many of these comments focused
on the scope of projects and cost estimates included in the report. Based on the input received,
appropriate corrections have been made to the 1999 Study Update.
Conclusion
Notice of this public hearing was advertised, published, mailed and posted as required. In addition, copies
of the Public Hearing notice, draft staff report and draft resolution (including the revised 1999 Study
Update) were mailed to the developers and affected property owners in Eastern Dublin on November 23,
1999.
----
It is recommended that the City Council conduct the public hearing and adopt the proposed resolution.
/ ~ 1ft 1
RESOLUTION NO. - 99
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
"""
*********
RESOLUTION REVISING THE TRAFFIC IMP ACT FEE AND AREA OF BENEFIT FEE FOR
FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE EASTERN DUBLIN AREA,
AS PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED BY RESOLUTION NO. 1-95
AND REVISED BY RESOLUTION NO. 41-96
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Dublin has adopted Ordinance No. 14-94 which
creates and establishes the authority for imposing and charging a Transportation Impact Fee; and
WHEREAS, the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment ("GP A") and Specific Plan ("SP") were
adopted by the City in 1993; and
WHEREAS, the SP was amended by Resolution No. 124-96; and
WHEREAS, the GPA outlines future land uses for approximately 4,176 acres within the City's
eastern sphere of influence including approximately 13,906 dwelling units and 9.737 million square fee of
commercial, office, and industrial development; and
WHEREAS, the SP provides more specific detailed goals, policies, and action programs for
approximately 3,313 acres within the GP A area nearest to the City; and ...".,
WHEREAS, the GPA and SP areas ("Eastern Dublin") are shown on the Land Use Map contained
in the GPA (attached hereto as Exhibit A) and exclude the area shown on the Land Use Map as "Future
Study Areal Agriculture"; and
WHEREAS, a Program Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") was prepared for the GPA and SP
(SCH No. 91103604) and certified by the Council on May 10, 1993 by Resolution No. 5l~93, and two
Addendadated May 4, 1993, and August 22, 1994 "(Addenda") have been prepared and considered by the
Council; and
WHEREAS, the SP, EIR and Addenda describe the freeway, freeway interchange, and road
improvements necessary for implementation of the SP, along with transit improvements, pedestrian trails,
and bicycle paths; and
WHEREAs, the EIR and Addenda assumed that certain traffic improvements would be made and
that development within Eastern Dublin would pay its proportionate share of such improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted a "Mitigation Monitoring Program: Eastern Dublin Specific
Plan/General Plan Amendment" by Resolution No. 53-93 which requires development within Eastern
Dublin to pay its proportionate share of certain transportation improvements necessary to mitigate impacts.
caused by development within Eastern Dublin; and "'wJI
;I ~ /) 1
WHEREAS, the SP, EIR, and Addenda describe the impacts of contemplated future development
on existi.ng public facilities in Eastern Dublin through the Year 2010, and contain an analysis of the need
for new public facilities and improvements required by future development within Eastern Dublin; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 1-95 on January 9, 1995, establishing an
"Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee" for development within Eastern Dublin; and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 1-95 relies upon and incorporates a report prepared for the City of
Dublin by Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc., in a document dated November 1994 and entitled "Traffic
Impact Fee-Eastern Dublin" (hereafter "Study"), which is attached as Exhibit B to Resolution No. 1-95;
and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 1-95 further relies upon a second report which was prepared for the
City of Dublin by Santina & Thompson, Inc., in a document dated December 30, 1994, entitled "Eastern
Dublin Traffic Impact Fee StudyIRoadway Costs, Initial Level" (hereinafter "Report"), which was
attached as Exhibit C to Resolution No. 1-95; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 41-96 on April 9, 1996, revising the fee
established under Resolution No. 1-95, and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 41-96 relies upon and incorporates a report prepared for the City by
TJKM ("1996 Study Update") and cost estimates prepared by Santina & Thompson, Inc. ("1996 Cost
Estimate Update"); and
/----
WHEREAS, Section 8 of Resolution No. 1-95 provides that the City will periodically review the
fee and make revisions as appropriate; and
WHEREAS, the City of Dublin Department of Public Works has prepared a revised report dated
November 8, 1999, entitled "1999 Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee Update" (hereafter "1999 Study
Update") which is attached hereto as Exhibit B; and
WHEREAS, the 1999 Study Update includes and incorporates the following items:
. Table 1, which summarizes the calculation of the revised per trip traffic impact fee for Section
1 improvements, Section 1 residential improvements and Section 2 improvements;
. Table 2, which provides detail of total (unadjusted) improvement costs by section and project
segment;
. Attachment 1, entitled "Cost Analysis, 1999 Update Traffic Impact Fee Eastern Dublin Area,"
prepared by Santina & Thompson, Inc., and dated November 9, 1999, which includes revised
cost estimates anticipated roadway improvements that have not yet been constructed or
guaranteed;
. Attachment 2, prepared by the Department of Public Works, which includes estimates of
credits valued at the revised rates to be provided to developers for construction of TIF
improvements and dedication of TIF right-of-way as specified in development agreements
(Toll, Koll, Tassajara Meadows, General Motors and MSSH Dublin-Shea Homes), as well as
an estimate of additional credits to be provided at current TIF rates for the Emerald Pointe
development;
2
3 qf I~ ~
· Attachment 3, entitled "Summary of Activity Under Existing Development Agreements as of
June 30, 1999;"
· Attachment 4, entitled "Traffic Impact Fees - Trip Generation," which provides detailec'
information regarding the assumed trip generation rates for each parcel in the Eastern Dublin""'"
Specific Plan area; and
WHEREAS, Resolution Nos. 1-95 and 41-96 set forth the relationship between future
development in Eastern Dublin, the needed improvements and facilities, and the estimated costs of those
improvements and facilities; and
WHEREAS, the 1999 Study Update demonstrates the appropriateness of modifying the Eastern
Dublin Traffic Impact Fee in certain respects; and
WHEREAS, the 1999 Study Update was available for public inspection and review for ten (10)
days prior to this public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds as follows:
A. The purpose of the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee (hereafter "Fee") is to fmance public
improvements and facilities needed to reduce the traffic-related impacts caused by future development in
Eastern Dublin. The public improvements and facilities are listed in the Study, 1996 Study Update and
the 1999 Study Update under Sections I, II and III and are hereafter defined and referred to as
"Improvements and Facilities". The Improvements and Facilities listed under Section I are needed solely
to accommodate new development projected within Eastern Dublin. The Improvements and Facilities
listed under Section II are needed to accommodate new development projected within Eastern Dublin an~
the nearby vicinity, and development within. Eastern Dublin will pay its fair proportional share of such
Improvements and Facilities with the implementation of this Fee. The Improvements and Facilities listed
under Section III ("Section III Improvements") are all necessary to accommodate new development
projected within the region by the Year 2010, including development within Eastern Dublin.
Although the City has adopted the TVTD Fee by Resolution 89-98, and Section 10 of that
resolution suspends Section III fees, the portion of the Fee attributable to Section III improvements will be
adjusted if and when the Section In portion of the Fee becomes effective again by any adjustments made
to the cost of improvements and/or right-of-way from the effective date of Resolution 89-98 to the date
the Section III portion of the Fee becomes effective.
B. The fees collected pursuant to this resolution shall be used to finance the Improvements
and Facilities.
- -.-_-
C. After consideriri.gthe Study, the 1996 Study Update~the Cost Estimate Report, the 1996
Cost Estimate, the 1999 Study Update, Resolution No. 1-95, Resolution 41-96, the Agenda Statement, the
GPA, the SP, the General Plan, the EIR and Addenda, all correspondence received and the testimony
received at the noticed public hearing held on December 7, 1999, the Council reapproves and readopts the
Study and Cost Estimate, as revised by the 1996 Study Update and the 1996 Cost Estimate, and as further
revised by the 1999 Study Update, and incorporates each herein, and further finds that future development
......,
3
tj ~ //21
in Eastern Dublin will generate the need for the Improvements and Facilities and the Improvements and
Facilitie~ are consistent with the GPA, the SP, and the City's General Plan.
D. The adoption of the Fee is within the scope of the EIR and Addenda. The Improvements
and Facilities were all identified in the EIR as necessary to accommodate traffic from and/or to, to
mitigate impacts of development in Eastern Dublin. The impacts of such development, including the
Improvements and Facilities, were adequately analyzed at a Program level in the EIR. Since the
certification of the EIR, there have been no substantial changes in the projections of future development
as identified in the EIR, no substantial changes in the surrounding circumstances, and no other new
information of substantial importance so as to require important revisions in the EIR's analysis of
impacts, mitigation measures, and alternatives. Subsequent project-specific environmental review under
CEQA of the Specific Improvements and Facilities at this stage, as they will be implemented over at least
a 20-year period and specific details as to their timing and construction, are not presently known.
E. The record establishes:
1. That there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the Improvements and
Facilities and the impacts of the types of development for which the corresponding fee is charged in that
new development in Eastern Dublin - both residential and non-residential-will generate traffic which
generates or contributes to the need for the Improvements and Facilities; and
.-
2. That there is a reasonable relationship between the Fee's use (to pay for the
construction of the Improvements and Facilities) and the type of development for which the Fee is
charged in that all development in Eastern Dublin - both residential and non-residential - generates or
contributes to the need for the Improvements and Facilities; and
3. That there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the Fee and the cost
of the Improvements and Facilities or portion thereof attributable to development in Eastern Dublin in that
the Fee is calculated based on the number of trips generated by specific types of land uses, the total
amount it will cost to construct the Improvements and Facilities, and the percentage by which
developmeIlt within Eastern Dublin contributes to the need for the Improvements and Facilities; and
4. That the cost estimates set forth in the Study and the Cost Estimate Report, as
revised by the 1996 Study Update and the 1996 Cost Estimate, and as further revised by the 1999 Study
Update, are reasonable cost estimates for constructing .the Improvements and Facilities, and the Fees
expected to be generated by future development will not exceed the projected costs of constructing the
Improvements and Facilities; and
-
5. The method of allocation of the Fee to a particular development, set forth in the
Study, as revised in the 1996 Study Update and 1999 Study Update, bears a fair and reasonable
relationship to each development's burden on, and benefit from, the Improvements and Facilities to be
funded by the Fee, in that the Fee is calculated based on the number of automobile trips each particular
development will generate.
4
s ~ /), 1
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Dublin does RESOLVE as follows:
1.
Definitions
""'"
a. "Development" shall mean the construction, alteration or addition of any building
or structure within Eastern Dublin.
b. "Eastern Dublin" shall mean all property within the "General Plan Amendment
Study Area" as shown on the Land Use Map (Exhibit A hereto) excepting the property designated as
"Future Study Area/Agriculture."
c. "Improvements and Facilities" shall include those transportation and transit
improvements and facilities as are described in Section I, II and III of the Study and as described in the
Cost Estimate Report, 1996 Study Update, 1996 Cost Estimate Report, 1999 Study Update, SP, EIR and
Addenda. "Improvements and Facilities" shall also include comparable alternative improvements and
facilities should later changes in projections of development in the region necessitate construction of such
alternative improvements and facilities; provided that the City Council later determines (1) that there is a
reasonable relationship between development within Eastern Dublin and the need for the alternative
improvements and facilities, (2) that the alternative improvements and facilities are comparable to the
improvements and facilities in the Study, 1996 Study Update and 1999 Study Update, and (3) that the
revenue from the Fee will be used only to pay Eastern Dublin development's fair and proportionate share
of the alternative improvements and facilities.
d. "Low Density Dwelling Unit" shall mean a dwelling unit as defined in the Uniform~
Building Code (UBC) as adopted by the City of Dublin constructed or to be constructed on property
designated by the SP and GP A for up to six units per acre.
e. "Medium Density Dwelling Unit" shall mean a dwelling unit as defined in the
Uniform Building Code (UBC) as adopted by the City of Dublin constructed or to be constructed on
property designated by the SP and GP A for over 6 to 14 units per acre.
, f. "Medium/High Density Dwelling Unit" shall mean a dwelling unit as defined in the
Uniform Building Code (UBC) as adopted by the City of Dublin constructed or to be constructed on
property designated by the SP and GP A for over 14 to 25 units per acre.
g. "High Density Dwelling Unit" shall mean a dwelling unit as defmed in the Uniform
Building Code (UBC) as adopted by the City of Dublin Constructed or to be constructed on property
desigtlated by the SP and GP A for over 25 units per acre.
2. Traffic Impact Fee Imposed
a. A Traffic Impact Fee ("Fee") shall be charged and paid for each Low Density
Dwelling Unit, Medium Density Dwelling Unit, Medium/High Density Dwelling Unit, and High Density
Dwelling Unit within Eastern Dublin at the time of issuance of the building permit for such unit.
"<ttttIII11
5
h ~ /;1
b. A Fee shall be charged and paid for non-residential buildings or structures within
Eastern Dublin at the time of issuance of the building permit for such building or structure, except where
the building or structure will require a later stage of discretionary approval by the City before it can be
occupied, in which case, with the approval of the Public Works Director, the Fee for that building or
structure may be deferred for payment to the date the City makes the last discretionary approval which is
required prior to occupancy.
c. A Fee shall be charged and paid for additions to existing non-residential buildings
or structures that result in an increase of 500 square feet or more to the building or structure. The Fee
shall. be paid at the time of issuance of the building permit for such additions.
3. Amount of Fee - Sections I and II
a. Low Density Dwelling Units. The amount of the Fee for each Low Density
Dwelling Unit shall be $4,960 per unit.
b. Medium Density Dwelling Units. The amount of the Fee for each Medium Density
Dwelling Unit shall be $4,960 per unit.
c. Medium/High Density Dwelling Units. The amount of the Fee for each
Medium/High Density Dwelling Unit shall be $3,472 per unit.
.-
d. High Density Dwelling Units. The amount of the Fee for each High Density
Dwelling Unit shall be $2,976 per unit.
e. Non-Residential Buildings or Structures. The amount of the Fee for each Non-
Residential Building or Structure shall be $452 per average weekly trip. The amount of Traffic Impact
Fees for Residential and Non-Residential Uses is shown on Exhibit C.
4. Exemptions From Fee
a. The Fee shall not be imposed on any of the following:
1) Any alteration or addition to a residential structure, except to the extent that
a residential unit is added to a single-family residential unit or is added to an
existing multi-family residential unit;
2) Any replacement or reconstruction of an existing residential structure that
has been destroyed or demolished provided that the building permit for
reconstruction is obtained within one year after the building was destroyed
or demolished unless the replacement or reconstruction increases the square
footage of the structure fifty percent or more.
3) Any replacement or reconstruction of an existing non-residential structure
that has been destroyed or demolished provided that the building permit for
new reconstruction is obtained within one year after the building was
6
J ~ /J,-1
destroyed or demolished and the reconstructed building would not increase
the destroyed or demolished building's trips based on Exhibit C.
4) Any non-residential building or structure constructed on property on whic~
a building or structure was demolished for which the Fee has been paid
within the prior ten year period, provided the exemption shall be in the
amount of the previously-paid Fee only, and the applicant shall pay any
additional amount based on the then-current Fee.
5. Use of Fee Revenues
a. The revenues raised by payment of the Fee shall be placed in the Traffic Impact Fee
Fund. Separate and special accounts within the Traffic Impact Fee Fund shall be used to account for such
revenues, along with any interest earnings on each account. The revenues (and interest) shall be used for
the following purposes:
1)
To pay for design, engineering, right-of-way acquisition and construction of
the Improvements and Facilities and reasonable costs of outside consultant
studies related thereto;
2)
To reimburse the City for Improvements and Facilities constructed by the
City with funds from other sources including funds from other public
entities, unless the City funds were obtained from grants or gifts intended
by the grantor to be used for traffic improvements.
"will
3)
To reimburse developers and/or public agencies who have constructed
Improvements and Facilities; and
4)
To pay for and/or reimburse costs of program development and ongoing
administration of the Fee program.
b. Fees in these accounts shall be expended only for the Improvements and Facilities
and only for the purpose for which the Fee was collected.
6. Standards
The standards upon which the needs for the Improvements and Facilities are based are the
standards of the City of Dublin, including the standards contained in the General Plan, GPA, SP, EIR, and
.. Addenda. .
7. No Existing Deficiencies
The City Council determines that there are no existing deficiencies within Eastern Dublin
and that the need for the Improvements and Facilities in Category I (Section I) of the Study, 1996 Study
Update and 1999 Study Update, is generated entirely by new development within Eastern Dublin and,
further, that the need for the Improvements and Facilities in Category II and III (Section II and III) of the --
7
y ~ /; '1
--
Study, 1996 Study Update and 1999 Study Update, is generated by new development within Eastern
Dublin <m.d other new development and, therefore, the Study, as revised by the 1996 Study Update and
1999 Study Update, has determined the proportionate share of the cost of the Improvements and Facilities
for which development within Eastern Dublin is responsible.
8. Periodic Review
a. During each fiscal year, the City Manager shall prepare a report for the City
Council, pursuant to Government Code Section 66006, identifying the balance of fees in each account.
b. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66002, the City Council shall also review, as
part of any adopted Capital Improvement Program each year, the approximate location, size, time of
availability and estimates of cost for all Improvements and Facilities to be financed with the Fee. The
estimated costs shall be adjusted in accordance with appropriate indices of inflation. The City Council
shall make findings identifying the purpose to which the existing Fee balances are to be put and
demonstrating a reasonable relationship between the Fee and the purpose for which it is charged.
9. Subsequent Analysis of the Fee
--
The Fee established herein is adopted and implemented by the Council in reliance on the
record identified above. The City will continue to conduct further study and analysis to determine
whether the Fee should be revised. When additional information is available, the City Council shall
review the Fee to determine that the amounts are reasonably related to the impacts of development within
Eastern Dublin. The City Council may revise the Fee to incorporate the fmdings and conclusions of
further studies and any standards in the GPA, SP and General Plan, as well as increases/decreases due to
construction costs and land values. The City will evaluate land values through an appraisal at least every
three (3) years.
10. Automatic Increase in Fee
The purpose of this section is to provide for an automatic annual adjustment to the Fee in
years when the City Council does not revise the Fee pursuant to Section 9 above. The City Manager shall
adjust the Fee automatically, effective July 1,2000 and each July 1 thereafter, according to the following
formula:
The Fee shall be adjusted based on the change in construction costs and land costs using
the percentage increase/decrease in the two indicators described in Items (a) and (b), below. These
percentage changes shall be applied to the Fee rate based on the relative allocation between the cost
estimate for construction of improvements and acquisition of land for certain improvements included the
1999 Study Update. The calculation of this relative allocation is detailed on Exhibit D, which is attached
to this resolution. Based on the improvements that have not yet been constructed or guaranteed (detailed
in Attachment 1 of the 1999 Study Update) and the improvements to be constructed by developers under
development agreements at the new TIF rate (detailed in Attachment 2 of the 1999 Study Update, pages 2-
6), 62% of the cost estimate is attributable to the construction of improvements, and 38% of the cost
estimate is attributable to the acquisition of land. Accordingly, the construction cost indicator (Item a)
shall be weighted 62% and land cost indicator (Item b) shall be weighted 38%.
8
f ~6 J:L 1
a. The construction cost indicator shall be calculated as the annual percentage
increase/decrease in the Engineering News Record's Construction Cost Index (20-city average) for the....."
month of April over the same Construction Cost Index for the month of April of the prior year. The City
Manager may round the Fee adjustment to whole dollars.
b. The land cost indicator shall be calculated as the percentage increase/decrease
between the land cost per acre in the most recent land appraisal (prepared for the City for purpose of
adjusting the Fee) over the land cost per acre in the immediately preceding appraisal (prepared for the City
for purposes of adjusting the Fee and using the same methodology), calculated as an annual
increase/decrease. The City Manager may round the Fee adjustment to whole dollars.
11. Area of Benefit Fee
A portion of the Fee shall also be deemed to be an Area of Benefit Fee adopted pursuant to
Ordinance No. 10-94. This is the portion of the Fee designated for the construction of those
improvements and facilities identified in Category I (Section I) of the Study which are major
thoroughfares and bridges. These improvements and the estimated cost of such improvements are listed
on Exhibit E attached hereto. The "Area of Benefit" is Eastern Dublin as defined herein. The fee shall
be apportioned over the Area of Benefit in the same manner set forth in Section 3 of this resolution and in
the Study, 1996 Study Update and 1999 Study Update, with the amount to be assessed for residential and
non-residential as shown on Exhibit E. The Area of Benefit Fee shall be deposited into the City's Traffic
Impact Fee Fund into separate accounts established for each of the improvements identified in Exhibit E.
12.
Administrative Guidelines
""-'
The Council may, by resolution, adopt administrative guidelines to provide procedures for
reimbursement, credit or other administrative aspects of the Fee. The amount of any reimbursement or
credit shall be determined by the Public Works Director using the costs of construction and value of right-
of-way used by the City in calculating and establishing the Fee. The amount of any reimbursement or
credit, once established, shall not be increased for inflation nor shall interest accrue on such amount. No
credit or reimbursement shall be given unless the improvements constructed are the Improvements and
Facilities described herein. Reimbursement shall only be from revenues raised by Payment ofthe Fee.
13. Effective Date
This resolution shall become effective immediately. The Fee provided in Sections 2 and 3
of this resolution shall be effective 60 days from the effective date of the resolution and shall supersede
the Fee established by Resolution No. 41-96sixty (60) days from the effective date of the resolution. The
Area of Benefit Fee established in Section 11 of this resolution shall be effective only if the Fee provided
in Sections 2 and 3 hereof is declared invalid for'any reason.
14. Severability
Each component of the Fee and all portions of this resolution are severable. Should any
individual component of the Fee or other provision of this resolution be adjudged to be invalid and """""
9
:---
~
(
\
/0 qj /J. /)
unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall be and continue to be fully effective, and the Fee shall be
fully effective except as to that portion that has been judged to be invalid.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this_ day of
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
, 1999.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
10
Mayor
);~{;~r11t!f}]j?':'
~!i~~..~
General Plan
-Eastern Extended Planning Area
~
~
'-
~
-~
993
FI9ure 28
COMMERCIAL
~ Neighbcthood Commercial
~ General Commercial
i:;::::.::,:;::;::,:J Carrous Offce
j:::::::..f industrial Park
RESIDENTIAL
[JC] High Densny 25- Mac
~ MediJm-High Density 14-25 Mac
c::u Medium Density 6-14 dJlac
CO Low Densny (}6 Mac
[@I] Rural ResidenliaVAgricullure 1 Ml00 ac
May 10,
Arlerial Street
Colector Streel
Transit Sc:t1e
SOl Boundary
General Plan Amendment Sludy Area
Sgecific Plan Study Area
PUBUC/SEM~PUBLIC/OPEN
I":{;;~;,".j PubflC/Semi-Pub&c Fac.ty
o Elementary Schoot
@ Junior High School
@ High School
@I Pubic/Semi'Pubic
Parks & Recreation
o CUy Park
@ Communily Park
@ Neighborhood Park
Neighborhood Square
EASTERN
DUBLIN
Walaee Roberts & Todd
[ID]
r/i~;\il Open Space
E::l Stream Corrido
CIRCULATION
LAND USE MAP
Rfi..,
..
"
Legend
o
AGRICUL TURE
r--
I
I - "'.......-.
, A.... ...... '"
______r.......... \ ...-'"
Acres
2743.9
--:R~l
... " '/'
.... 1
~... - I
,;,'" ...., t
1 , , I
. \.' . "/, I
_ L t. ~.. ~'. --,
. . " I' . - ~ .-
.. , I "\1'1 .~f, -- ..........1
...'" .... .. ."..... ". "" 'I
........;.. .... ..... ...1........'. ,. r '"
, .;__.,.....:..:.:.;~.< I ~'.:""'" ___!iW I
...," .'" . I . -"'~
...:.. .. ~ I ". L II
- ____ . . I ' . ~
_______ . ~ L.: :, "''''
.." --1--_""::"" [ .. ", 14 A""
.. . ~I .:.... -- II (C
..~.. ..- ... "",)
.. . _~,;.=.::......=="'::: __n_\'-~ ~ I :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::\,:'0~'
....~_b.: '" ....... ..'I!
~;_~_::~~~.~:.:..'::.:.;}::.::::::LJi.
I
I
(.
'" General com(.',c,al may be permilled by a Planned Developmenl Zon"9 Process (see lexllar complete discussion
** Will converllo Future StudY AreafAoricullure where determinF!C1 inr:nn<:::ic:hmt wirh APA (c.oo tOY' f,..I' "............1..1.. ~:...,.,..,....;^...
-'
i
j
~-,-
J:'J('Li: .-
~'=:;..
;.~ <::.;\~:.. .1
~.::.,<...-
..~~)~~:~(;
,..".:.
.~~
I.
111
ct~
A1(}.\
rn -
(J' -l
9)>
..
/rJ v3 /:21
,.--.,
City of Dublin
1999 Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee Update
Prepared by Department of Public Works
November 8,1999
The following is the 1999 update for the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee (TIF). This
memorandum explains the methodology used in updating the previous reports prepared in
1996 by TJKM Transportation Consultants and Santina and Thompson for the 1996 fee
update.
Summary
The following Summary Table identifies the changes on the per trip TIF for Section I and
Section II improvements for both residential and non-residential development projects:
/''''""'
Land Use Residential Non-Residential
Existing Proposed % Existing Proposed %
Increase Increase
Section I $301 $405 35% $248 $361 46%
Section IT $82 $91 11% $74 $91 23%
Total Section I $383 $496 30% $322 $452 40%
and Section II
The revised fee results in the following fees per housing unit:
Type Density Trips per Day Fee
per Unit per Unit
Low Density Up to 6 units/acre 10 $4,960
Medium Density 7-14 units/acre 10 $4,960
Medium! High Density 15-25 units/acre 7 $3,472
High Density 26 or more units/acre 6 $2,976
Section 1 fees pay for which are needed solely to accommodate development of Eastern
Dublin. Section II fees pay for Eastern Dublin's share of improvements located within the
City of Dublin but outside of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Area which are needed, in
part, to support development in Eastern Dublin.
/..-~
Page 1 of9
EX H \e\T 1S
-to RE"=>O.
jqq q 6+off l)~F\\i:
/ s ~ /) /)
Section I fees include a Residential Adjustment that is applied to all residential
development in Eastern Dublin to pay for two Park and Ride lots and the Tassajara Creek .....,
Regional Trail. These improvements benefit only residential development.
The Section III fee rate was not updated, as the collection of the Section III fee was
suspended with the adoption by the City (Resolution No. 89-98) of the Tri-Valley
Transportation Development (TVTD) fee. The TVTD fee, which is collected from new
development in addition to the Section I and II TIF, funds improvements formerly
covered by the Section III fee. In the event collection of the Section III fee becomes
necessary at some point in the future, the fee rate will be adjusted at that time for all
adjustments made to the TIF since the effective date ofTVTD fee.
Background
The Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee was last updated in 1996. Since that time, some
of the background data used in determining the fee has changed, requiring that the fee be
revised to reflect current conditions. Background information that has changed includes
more accurate projections of land use, minor changes in the scope of infrastructure
improvements to be funded by the fee and substantial increases in the land value of right-
of-way needed for the construction of improvements. The revised fee also takes into
account the current status (as of June 30, 1999) of those improvements that are complete,
under construction, or guaranteed under a development or improvement agreement.
.~
The boundaries of the properties subject to the fee are shown on Exhibit A. The
boundaries include all properties within the General Plan Amendment Study Area, except
the property designated Future Study Area Agriculture.
The 1999 Fee Update
TIie following is adetaileddescripti6n of the' methodology used to calculate the new fee,
as shown on the attached Table 1.
Line 1 - Cost of Imorovements/Right-of-Way Not Currently Guaranteed
The cost of remaining improvements to be funded by the TIF is shown in the attached
report from Santina and Thompson, Inc (Attachment 1). This fIrm provided the cost
estimates for the 1996 update of the TIF. The revised cost estimate includes the
following changes:
a) The cost of improvements that have been completed or are currently being
constructed by private developers under existing development agreements has been
removed from the total estimate completed by Santina and Thompson. The cost of
these improvements is included in Lines 3 and 4 below.
"""'"
Page 2 of9
/y crt /:41
/---
b) The cost of right-of-way acquisition has been increased to reflect higher land
values resulting from development in the Eastern Dublin area. The revised right-of-
way costs were obtained from the appraisal prepared by Associated Right-of-Way
Services, Inc., dated September, 1999. The total right-of-way costs include a
contingency of $1 ,000,000 to cover acquisition services or land cost in the event that
right-of-way must be obtained through condemnation and the value of the land is
greater than the appraisal value.
c) The cost of the improvements for the remaining street segments not guaranteed
under existing or pending development or improvement agreements has been
increased to cover minor changes in the scope of improvements on these streets.
Changes are summarized as follows:
. The cost of the Community Park frontage improvements located in the eastern
portion of Dublin Ranch is included in the TIF, as these improvements benefit all
of Eastern Dublin. This includes frontage improvements on Tassajara Road,
Gleason Drive, Fallon Road and Central Parkway.
/"'-
. The cost estimate for Scarlett Drive (between Dougherty Road and Dublin
Boulevard) is amended based on a new cross-section for the street. The 1996
update assumed a 140' right-of-way to allow separate bus lanes, a pedestrian!
bicycle trail and a two-lane street. The revised cross-section reduces the right-of-
way to 80' and eliminates the bus lanes.
. The right-of-way width for Tassajara Road between Dublin Boulevard and
Central Parkway has been increased to allow eight travel lanes instead of six
travel lanes, in conformance with the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific
Plan (Figure 5.1).
. The minimum median width is increased from 14' to 16', so that the width of left
turn pockets can be increased from 10' to 12'.
. The right-of-way width for a number of streets is increased to allow for a wider
center median, which in turn is necessary to accommodate double-left turn lanes
at intersections, as warranted by traffic studies for adjoining land use.
The costs for the remaining improvements have been summarized in three categories:
a) Section I Improvements
b) Section I Residential Improvements
c) Section II Improvements
$ 85,755,480
$ 1,947,335
$ 38,148,755
Page 3 of9
/5 C7! ):<1
The Section 1 improvemeilts are required solely to accommodate development of the
Eastern Dublin Specific Pl<o.l1 Area. The Santina and Thompson report assigns 100% ....,
of the cost of each Section 1 improvement to the Section 1 TIF.
The Section I Residential Improyements categories include several improvements that
benefit only the residential development in Eastern Dublin. These improvements
include the Tassajara Creek Regioral Trail and one Park and Ride lot near Fallon
Road (a second Park and Ride Lot will be constructed by the Koll Corporate Center
on Tassajara Road, the cost of which is included in Line 4). The Santina and
Thompson report assigns 100% of the cost of the improvements to the Section I
Residential TIF.
The Section II improvements are needed to accommodate development of the Eastern
Dublin Specific Plan Area, as well as serve traffic generated outside of the Specific
Plan Area. Therefore, it is appropriate that the Sectior! II TIF fund only a share of the
improvement costs based on the proportion of traffic generated within the Specific
Plan Area. Under the Santina and Thompson report, the Section II TIF is assigned
45% of the total cost of the Fallon Road! 1-580 Interchange and 16% of the Airway
Boulevard! 1-580 Interchange, with the remainder of the costs assigned to the Cities of
Pleasanton and Livermore. The costs for the remaining Section II improvements are
shown in the Santina and Thompson report at 100% of the total cost; the $19.5
Million contribution by Contra Costa County to the TIF (as shown on Line 9) will
reduce the Section II TIF by the amount of the costs which r.hould be assigned to __
Contra Costa County.
Line 2 - Balance on Prior Funding Advances
The City of Dublin received funding advances from Alameda County, the City of
Pleasanton and the Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) for construction of
certain improvements needed to serve Eastern Dublin development. These funding
advances are subject to cash reimbursement and credit agreements with these
agencies, with' the cost of reimbursement funded by the TIF Section I and II fees.
These reimbursements and credits are subject to accrual of interest. To date, the
Alameda County Surplus Property Authority (ACSP A) has used a portion of the
credits to offset traffic impact fees due on development in the Santa Rita property,
which reduces the balance owed on the advance. The outstanding balances as of June
30, 1999, as provided by the Finance Department, are shown below:
'''''''
Page 4 of9
/b otf J~/)
Section I
a) Cash Reimbursements (City of Pleasant on Advance):
b) Interest-Bearing Credits (ACSPA Freeway Interchange Work):
c) Estimated Three- Year Interest:
$2,839,597
$2,791,765
$927.848
Total:
$6,559,210
Section II
a) Cash Reimbursements (BART/ACSPA Advances):
b) Estimated Three-Year Interest:
$3,509,640
$603.789
Total:
$4,113,429
The above costs must be included in the revenue to be raised under the revised TIF
Section I and Section II fees.
Line 3 - Balance Due on TIF Credits (Existing: TIF)
-~
Between 1995 and 1998, the City of Dublin entered into a number of development
agreements with the ACSP A and one development agreement with Mission Peak for
projects in Eastern Dublin. Under these development agreements, the developer
constructed or guaranteed TIF infrastructure improvements needed to serve the
projects, and received TIF credits in return. To date, a portion of the credits have been
used to offset TIF fees due for projects constructed or underway. The outstanding
balances of credits as of June 30, 1999, as provided by the Finance Department, total
$10,880,956. In addition, the Emerald Pointe development has been granted
additional credits (not included in the Finance Department total) for additional
improvements on Dublin Boulevard and Hacienda Drive which were not included in
the original credit total. The additional credits are shown on Attachment 2, page 1,
provided by the City Public Works Department staff. These balances are identified
below:
Project Credit Balance (as of June 30, 1999)
Hacienda Crossings $67,127
Creekside Business Park $3,581,961
Summer Glen Homes $376,881
Emerald Pointe Business Park $6,758,917
Mission Peak (Tassajara Meadows I) $96,070
Finance Department Balance $10,880,956
Emerald Pointe Adjustment $687,851
Total Due on TIF Credits (Existing TIF) $11,568,807
Page 5 of9
/1 ~ ;;21
Credits for these development agreements are based on the current (1996) TIF. Fees
for these projects will be paid at the TIF rate in effect at the time that building permits -...-'
are issued.
Line 4 - Balance of Credits Due on TIF Credits (New TIF)
The City of Dublin has entered into development agreements with the ACSP A for
four additional projects: the Tassajara Meadows and Toll Brothers residential
projects, the General Motors commercial project and the Koll Corporate Center office
project. Under these agreements, the ACSP A will be responsible for construction of
certain improvements and the dedication of TIF right-of-way on Gleason Drive,
Central Parkway and Dublin Boulevard. The Koll Corporate Center is also required to
provide the right-of-way for and construct a Park and Ride Lot within its property.
The cost of the right-of-way and improvements will be credited against the fees due
from these developments. The improvement cost includes frontage improvements and
50% of the cost of traffic signals at the park entrances on both Gleason Drive and
Central Parkway.
In addition, the City of Dublin has negotiated a development agreement with MSSH
Dublin (Shea Homes) for Dublin Ranch Units Ll-5 and Ml-3. Under this agreement,
MSSH Dublin (Shea Homes) will be responsible for construction of improvements to
Tassajara Road from Dublin Boulevard to North Dublin Ranch Drive.
These credits, which are all for Section I improvements, are shown in Attachment 2,
Pages 2-6, provided by City Public Works Department staff. Credits are as follows:
'~
Development Total Credits. General Residential
Improvements Improvements
Koll Corporate Center $2,529,460 $0 $2,529,460
Tassajara Meadows 2 $4,136,521 $4,071,001 $65,520
Toll Brothers $12,378,535 $12,171,055 $207,480
MSSH Dublin (Shea $4,135,329 $4,135,329 $0
Homes)
Total $23,179,845 $20,377,385 $2,802,460
The credits for the general improvements must be added to the revenue to be raised
under the revised TIF Section I fees. The credits for the residential improvements
(which includes the Park and Ride lot at the Koll Corporate Center and segments of
the Tassajara Creek Regional Trail) must be added to the revenue to be raised under
the TIF Section I Residential Adjustment.
Under these five development agreements, credits and fees will be based on the
updated TIF. The agreements require the retroactive payment of fee increases for any
permits issued prior to adoption of the new fee. Therefore, fees and credits for these ~
Page 6 of9
/ff ?f/~1
~~
agreements must be segregated from fees and credits for the other development
agreements identified in Line 3.
Line 5 - Total Cost ofTIF Improvements
This line shows the total cost of all improvements remaining to be funded under the
TIF. Table 2 provides the detail of these costs by fee section and roadway segment.
Line 6 - Estimated Fees from Remaining Trips Collected at Current Fee Rate
The eight projects listed in Line 3 are expected to generate a total of 44,375 trips, as
shown on Attachment 3. As of June 30, 1999 building permits issued for these
projects have generated an estimated 30,255 trips. It is expected that the remaining
portions of these projects will receive building permits generating an additional
14,120 trips.
~
F or the purpose of calculating the revised TIF, it is assumed that building permits for
these developments will be issued prior to the revised TIF taking effect and that
payment of the TIF will be made at the existing rate (actual payment will be at the
rate in effect at the time the permits are issued). The revenue raised from fees applied
to these trips can be deducted from the total revenue to be raised by the revised fees.
Estimated revenues from the remaining trips collected at the old rate are $3,601,400
for Section I and $1,059,920 for Section II.
Line 7 - Fees Collected To Date
Fees collected from the building permits issued to date, which have not been allocated
to specific TIF improvements, remain in a reserve account and can be deducted from
the total revenue to be raised by the revised fees. The cash balances of Section I and II
TIF fee revenues as of June 30, 1999 have been provided by the Finance Department.
The balance of Section I fees is currently negative in the amount of $774,001, which
results in an increase in the needed Section I revenue. The negative balance of Section
I fees is a result of two prior development agreements (Hacienda Crossings and
California CreeksideIBrookside). These agreements, which were entered into prior to
the implementation of the Eastern Dublin TIF, allowed developers to use Section I
credits to offset Section II and III fees. Since the implementation of the Eastern
Dublin TIF, credits can only be used to offset fees in the same category.
..-c-
The balance of Section II fees is currently $2,463,235. However, this amount must be
adjusted to exclude $39,360 in fees collected at the existing TIF rate from Shea
Homes and Centex in Dublin Ranch Phase 1, as their development agreements require
retroactive payment of the TIF at the new rate (The trips generated by these
developments are included in the total trips paying the revised fee on Line 11). The
appropriate balance for Section II TIF fees for this update is $2,423,875.
Page 7 of9
11 ~ /.J-1
Line 8 - Section 1 Residential Fee Collected at Old Rate.....,
Under the existing fee schedule, the cost of the Section I Residential Improvements is
included under the Section I fee, in the amount of $26 per trip. There are an estimated
44,375 trips which will be generated under existing development agreements; of these
trips, there are 11,775 residential trips. For the purpose of calculating the revised TIF,
it is assumed that permits for these developments will be issued prior to the new fee
taking effect, and that payment of the TIF will be at the existing rate (actual payment
will be at the rate in effect at the time the permits are issued). This will generate
Section I Residential Improvement revenue in the amount of $306, 150.
This amount must be deducted from the existing Section I fee balance (resulting in an
increase in the needed Section I revenues under the revised fee) and deducted from
the needed Section I Residential fees to be raised under the revised fee.
Line 9 - Estimated Contra Costa County Contribution
The City of Dublin is currently negotiating with the County of Contra Costa for the
payment of funds to provide traffic mitigation improvements on City of Dublin streets
as a result of development in the Dougherty Valley. The current proposed level of
contribution is approximately $19,450,000, which can be used to offset the needed
revenue from the TIF. .~
For the purpose of calculating the revised TIF, a total of $9,150,000 of the Contra
Costa County funds is assigned to Section 1 projects, and the remaining $10,300,000
is assigned to Section II projects. This allocation between Section I and Section II
projects is based on the proportionate share of traffic generated by Contra Costa
County development on each improvement within these two TIF categories.
In the event that the contribution from the County of Contra Costa is less than the
estimated $19,450,000, the City of Dublin may need to delete selected improvements
to offset the revenue reduction.
Line 10 - Adiusted Costs to be Financed bv Revised Fee
This line shows the total amount of revenue that must be raised under the revised fee
to cover the cost'ofimprovements not funded through another source.
Line 11 - Estimated Remaining Trips Paving Revised Fee
A total of 344,078 new vehicle trips were assumed to be subject to the fee under the
1996 TJKM report. This figure was based on the land use projections in the Eastern
Dublin Specific Plan. At the present time, individual development proposals have ~
been approved on the majority of the ASPCA Santa Rita property, the Casterson
Page 8 of9
c2 t? cef' /.:J. 1
(~
. property and portions of the Dublin Ranch (Lin) property. It is therefore possible to
revise the trip generation figures based on more accurate projections. The revised total
trips to be generated within the fee area are shown in Attachment 4. The table lists
trip generations by each property, with the basis of the estimate shown. The total
includes an estimate of trips from those properties located to the east of the Eastern
Dublin Specific Plan area, which are included within the boundaries of the current
General Plan. The revised trip generation totals 356,369 trips, of which 113,890 are
generated from residential uses and 242,479 are generated from non-residential uses.
For the purpose of the revised fee calculation, it is assumed that the 44,375 trips
within Eastern Dublin will pay the fee at the existing rate and that all remaining trips
generated from other projects will be subject to the revised fee. This results in an
estimated 311,994 trips subject to the new fee, of which 102,115 are generated from
residential development and 209,879 are generated by non~residential development.
Line 12 - Revised Fee (Cost per Trip)
The revised fee for each section is determined by dividing the cost of improvements
(Line 10) by the number of trips subject to the fee (Line 11).
,~
Page 9of9
.:ZJ % /;11
ATTACHMENT 1
~
City of Dublin
Cost Analysis, 1999 Update
Traffic Imp~ct Fee
Eastern DubllifArea
~.
. File:
0231.02 rg4ph
Stmtbta & Tlwmps014 IftC..
Consulting Engineers
/-
~ l- trtf /:11
SANTINA&=
THOMPSON.INC.
November 9, 1999
Munidpal Engineering Surveying
Railroad Engineering Planning
Lee Thompson
Public Works Director
City of Dublin
100 Civic Plaza
Dublin, CA 94568
Re: Eastern Dublin Area Traffic Impact Fee
Cost Analysis, 1999 Update
Dear Mr. Thompson:
Please find attached our cost analysis for the roadway network of existing and proposed
roads associated with new development in the eastern Dublin area;
~
We provided the initial cost analysis for these roadways in 1996. At that time, the
geometry for many of the roadways was approximate. We based the 1996 analysis on a
typical roadway section throughout tl1e roadway length.
The cost to build the improved roadway network is shared by the frontage developers and
the City of Dublin. Typically, the outside lanes and sidewalk improvements along with
any necessary underlying right of way are built and/or paid for by the frontage
. developers. The construction and other costs associated with the inside lanes and median
are typically borne by the City using revenue generated by the Traffic Impact Fee.
In 1999, many of the roadways have either been built or a detailed planline.ofthe
proposed improvements is available. The information available is thus much better than
the information available in 1996.
Additionally, many of the roadways are currently covered by an existing or pending
development agreement. Through the development agreement, the frontage developer
may agree to construct and pay for portions of the roadway that the City would typically
pay for; or, the frontage developer may build portions of the roadway that the City would
typically build, but receive credits from the City for the traffic impact fees.
.--
For the 1999 analysis, if existing development agreements or pending development
agreements provide for the frontage developer to pay for portions of the roadway that are
typically the responsibility of the City, then those roadway portions were not included in
our 1999 cost analysis.
1355 Willow Way, Suite 280 Concord, CA 94520-5728
Telephone 925-827-3200 Fax 925-687-1011
~.'3 1:1 /~ 1
..,
Also, if the frontage developer, through the development agreement, agreed to construct '--.-/
improvements that are typically the responsibility of the City in return for credits, then
those roadway portions were not included in our 1999 cost analysis.
We acknowledged credits during our 1999 Traffic Impact Fee study. However, the credit
values are described as development agreement entries throughout the financial reports
prepared by others for the Traffic Impact Fee. Those financial reports are not contained
in our exhibits.
By necessity, the accounting for the various portions of the work is complex. We have
worked closely with City staff to insure that costs of the various classifications were
segregated so that City staff could correctly calculate the traffic impact fees.
We have presented the result of our cost analysis in tables I, 2 and 3. These tables are
located at the end of this section of our report.
We have included supporting documents with this cost analysis. The supporting
documents are described in the "Supporting Documents Table of Contents". We believe
the summary sheets for the individual roadway segments along with these supporting
documents explain the formulation of the costs presented in tables 1,2 and 3.
Sincerely,
Santina & Thompson, Inc.
~
'------/'
- ~~~~-
y .
. Paul E. Har y .,- \ .
Project Manager
Attachllents
"-"
~
SANTINA&=
THOMPSON,INC.
Dougherty Road - Segment 1
4000 feet, 104 feet curb to curb
City Limits to Amador Valley (Widening)
. Portion of Existing Improvements to be Re-Used
-
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Improvements, eastern portion $2,068,514
Intersection Improvements wi right of way @ $22/sf
Amador (modification) & Willow Ck (new) signals, incl'ing minor rlw and civil costs, 3 legs ea. $695,047
Right-of-Way
None $0
City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $552,712
Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) $3,592,629
Dougherty Road - Segment 2
4,350 feet, 104 feet curb to curb
Amador Valley Boulevard to Houston Place
Portion of Existing Improvements to be Re-Used
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Improvements; 3200 ft to be widened and 1150 ft to be re-built @ $75011f $2,166,238
Intersection Improvements wi right of way
Two Legs at Scarlet Drive, including civil and rlw costs $396,698
Right-of-Way @ 100%
at Southern Pacific Right-of-Way . $0
500 x 38 X $22, near Houston Place $418,000
'y Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $596,187
Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) $3,875,217
, Dougherty Road - Segment 3
Houston Place to Dublin Boulevard (900')
" -
Totals for TIF Share
Civillmprovmts, 300' of new median, 485' of re-model median & 200 ft of rt turn pocket $50,933
Right-of-Way @ $22, none $0
Intersection Improvements, modify 1 leg at Dublin Boulevard $50,000
City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $20,187
Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) $131,213
99Nrw
c2y ~ /.P-1
0231h; 11/8/99, 5:28 PM
Page 1
99Nrw
99Nrw ~5~ /)1
Dougherty Road - Segment 4
550 feet
Dublin Boulevard to North of 1-580 Off-Ramp
Widen Roadway """",,
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Improvements @ 100% $237;699
Intersection Improvements; modify 1 leg at Dublin Boulevard $50,000
Right-of-Way on east side only, (23,OOO*$22)+$50*9000sf for demo+$1 OOk relocation $1,076,000
Building demo and remodel on south east side of segment (400sf*$300/sf) $120,000
City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $296,740
Total with 10% Continoency (0 on Admin.) $1,928,809
Dougherty Road Subtotal (without Freeway Interchange) $9,527,868
(Note that the City of San Ramon and Contra Costa County are responsible for that portion of
Dougherty Road from the City Limits north to Old Ranch Road)
-
Dublin Boulevard- Segment 5
1,800 feet, 108 Right-of-Way, 6 Lanes
East of Village Parkway to Sierra Court (Widening)
As Submitted to Caltrans (FUNDED)
. Totals for TIF Share
Civil Improvements at 330.50 per Linear Foot @ 100% $0
Intersection Improvements wI right of way ..fiiIii
Clark Modification $0
Sierra Ct Modification $0
Bridge Widening $0
Right-of-Way and Demo; have 100, need 108, $22 @ 100% . $0
City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $0
Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) $0
ISTEA Funded $0
Net Total for this Seoment $0
0231h; 11/8/99,5:28 PM
Page 2
"'-'
99Nrw
, 99Nrw ~~ 0Jf /). /)
Dublin Boulevard, Segment 6
2,030 feet, 108 Right-of-Way, 6 Lanes
. Sierra Court to Dougherty Road (Widening)
"
Future Improvements Will Be Similar to Segment 5
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Improvements at 330 per Linear Foot @ 100% $669.900
Intersection Improvements wI right of way
Sierra Ct. Civic - Modification $130,000
Dublin Court - Modification $130,000
Dougherty, signal modification and civil work, no rlw costs; 1 leg $100,000
Right-of-Way, 8* $22+100K demo @ 100% $457,280
City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $297,436
Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) $1.933,334
Dublin Boulevard Extension, Segment 7
1,650 feet, 6 Lanes
Dougherty to Southern Pacific Right-of-Way
- Totals for TIF Share
Civil Improvements, south side remodel $235,539
Intersection Improvements
Dougherty, completed $0
Scarlet; signals only, 1 leg $56,250
Existing building on south side; purchase, demo, and remodel portion thereof $1,100,000
Right-of-Way, $22@19,465 SF (3 parcels on south side) $428,230
BART Loan of $2.938M, to be repaid with TIF funds, not included $0
. ity Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0%; 0% on Loan $364,004
Total with 10% ContinQency, includinQ loan (0 on Admin.) , $2,366,025
Dublin Boulevard Subtotal (to Southern Pacific Right-of-Way) . $4,299,359
Dublin Boulevard Extension, Segment 8
1950 feet, 6 Lanes
From Southern Pacific Right-of-Way to East BART Access
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Improvements, path and path right of way on north side, all in DA. $0
Intersection Improvements, no associated rlw or civil costs; 1 leg at Scarlet $56,250
Right-of-Way-' - . $0
City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $11,250
'.
Total with 10% ContinQency (0 on Admin.) $73,125
-.
0231h; 11/8/99, 5:28 PM
Page 3
99Nrw
Dublin Boulevard Extension, Segment 8A
2650 feet, 6 Lanes
. East BART Access (Iron Horse Parkway) to Hacienda Drive
-
.,..."
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Improvements, path on' north side, no other roadway improvements $279,840
Intersection Improvements wi right of way $0
RfW, 30-12-18 ft for path from Arnold to Hacienda at $22/sf; in DA $0
City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $55,968
Total with 10% ContinQency (0 on Admin.) $363,792
Dublin Boulevard - Segment 9
4,600 feet, 6 Lanes
Hacienda to Tassajara Road
-
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Improvements, path on north side to creek (2600ft) $0
Intersection Improvements wi right of way
Tassajara Road, 1leg; including signals, civil & RIW (@$20) $0
Bridge $0
RfW, 30-12=18 ft for path from Hacienda to creek, 2600ft at $20/sf; none for rdway $0
City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $0
-
Total with 10% ContinQency (0 on Admin.); all in DA $0- ..
Dublin Boulevard - Segment 10
6,320 feet, 6 Lanes
Tassajara Road to Fallon
All New Roadway Included
'.
Totals for TIF Share
Civillmprovmts at $750/1f and 50%, (cl to c1), (1 ft grading incl'd) $2,370,000
Intersection Improvements
1 leg each at Tassajara and Fallon (r/w (50% at Tassajara), signals, civil & gradng) $280,828
Box culvert; 10 fix8 ft, 140 ft long (@ $450/cy)+84inch x 140 ft pipe ($95/1f)+4 wingwalls $106,900
Right-of-Way, 64 ft @ $15.44 + Ok demo $6,245,171
City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $1,800,580
.., - . -... .. ,---.---.. .
Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) $11,703,768
99Nrw
;2 /) ~ /~ '1
"""
0231h; 11/8/99, 5:28 PM
Page 4
99Nrw
Dublin Boulevard Extension - Segment 11
9500 feet, 6 Lanes
- Fallon Road to Airway
All New Roadway Included
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Improvements at $750 per lineal foot @ 50%, (c1 to c1), (1 ft grading) $3,562,500
Intersection Improvements ..
1 leg at Fallon, 4 at Airway & 4 At Doolan (r/w, signals, civil & gradng) $1,284,741
Bridge,$110*120VV*100L $1,320,000
Right-of-VVay, 64*$12 + Ok demo $7,296,000
City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROVV Acquisition, 20.0% $2,692,648
Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) $17,502,213
Dublin Blvd. Ext.(SP RfW to Airway) Subtotal (without Freeway Interchange) $29,642,899
(The City of Dublin received $573,000 from State of California (SB300 funds) and $400,000
from the City of Pleasanton for roadway improvements from the Southern Pacific R of VV to
Tassajara Rd.) -973.000
(The City of Dublin borrowed $2,408,955 from the City of Pleasanton to build the 40 ft. width of
Dublin Blvd Extension from SPRVV to Tassajara Road; This loan must be repaid but is not
included.) 0
Subtotal is therefore $28,669,899
~- Freeway Interchange - Segment 12
Dublin Boulevard Extension with 1-580 - (Airway Boulevard)
Totals for TIF Share
Civillmprovm'ts, Demo ext'g & build new 6 lane bridge wi Ramps. signals; (Dublin's share) n/a
Right-of-VVay nla
City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROVV Acquisition, 20% nla
Dublin pays 16% of total $13,000,000 cost; (note that Livermore will payaddit'l percentage) $2,080,000
Hacienda - Segment 13
1525 feet, 6 Lanes
1-580 (Not including interchange) to Dublin Boulevard Extension
... . ~ . ..
... .-. Totals for TIF Share
.. ._. ~- . m. ". .. .
Civil Improvements ~ "" $0
Intersection Improvements wi right of way (Rt turn lane at Dublin Blvd.) $100,000
Right-of-VVay $0
City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROVV Acquisition, 20.0% $20,000
Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) $130,000
99Nrw
;2% q{ Ij, 1
0231h; 11/8/99. 5:28 PM
Page 5
99Nrw
Hacienda - Segment 14
2,640 feet, 6 Lanes
Dublin Boulevard Extension to Gleason Drive
......,
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Improvements, 800 ft and 1800 ft lengths . $454,239
Intersection Improvements wi rightot way
1 leg at Gleason, signals only $56,250
development agreement exists $0
Right-ot-Way $0
City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $102,098
Total with 10% Continoencv (0 on Admin.) $663,636
Hacienda Road Subtotal (Without Freeway Interchange) $793,636
- Freeway Interchange - Segment 15
Hacienda Road with 1-580
Widen Offramp and Modify Signal (Loan amount built prior)
Totals tor TIF Share
Civil Improvements, Ramps, including signal modification $1,000,000
Alameda County $3.762 M Loan (including interest); not included $0
City Administration, Design, CM, ROW Acquisition, 20.0%; (0% on Loan) $200,000... ..,
Total with 10% Continoency (0 on Admin.) $1,300,000
.
Arnold Drive - Segment 16
2,640 feet, 4 Lanes
Dublin Boulevard Extension to Gleason
(Camp Parks is on one side of Roadway)
~ .
Totals tor TIF Share
.Civillmprovements, including new pipe tor existing open channel $1,742,660
Intersection Improvements:
2 legs at Central and 1 leg NB leg at Gleason, signals only; 5B leg @ Gleason, sig+civil+RIW costs $271,948
Right-ot-Way @ $22/sf (will come trom Camp Parks, 74,432 SF) . . $0
City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $402,922
..
Total with 10% Contingency (O on Admin.) $2,618,990
99Nrw
~:r ~ /~'?
0231 h; 11/8/99, 5:28 PM
Page 6
....,.,
99Nrw
Central Parkway - Segment 16A
1,400 feet, 4 Lanes
- . ArnOld to Haclenaa
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Improvements (credit for one 12 lane and 16 ft median) $195,702
Intersection Improvements wi right of way
1 leg at Arnold, signal cost only, no civil or r/w costs $56,250
Right-of-Way $0
City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $50,390
Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) $327,538
Central Parkway - Segment 17
4,575 feet, 4 Lanes
Hacienda to Tassajara
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Improvements
2250 ft of remodeled median $277,011
2000 ft of median and #1 lane in each direction; (no park improvements) $428,575
Intersection Improvements
Tassajara; signals, civil and no right of way, 1 leg $0
Hibernia Drive; signals only, 4 legs $225,000
Future Park Entrance at 50%; signals only, 4 legs $112,500
8ridge, in development agreement $0
.-{ight-of-Way; none, paid by park fees $0
City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $208,617
Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) , $1,356,012
- ..... .. .... .. j
Central Parkway - Segment 18
4 Lanes
Tassajara to Fallon, Western 3,640 Ft.
All New Roadway
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Improvements at 650+38 (addl grading) per lineal foot @ 38%, (cl to c1), (3 ft grading) $951,642
Intersection Improvements wi right of way
1 leg at Tassajara; r/w 50%, signals, civil & gradng) $121,066
Sports Park, 1500 ft of frontage, 20 ft. of pavement and c&g, (incl in 18A) $0
Right..,of-Way, 104 If. @ $15.46+1 OOk demo, all at 38% $2,261,964
City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $666,934
Total with 10% Continqencv (0 on Admin.) $4,335,073
99Nrw
3D otf J~ 1
0231 h;11/8/99, 5:28 PM
Page 7
99Nrw
99Nrw '51 ~ /fi/}
Central Parkway - Segment 18A
4 Lanes
Tassajara to Fallon, Eastern 2,830 Ft.
All New Roadway '-i.
. Totals for TIF Share
Civil Improvements at 650+76 (6 ft grading) per linear foot @ 38% $780,740
Intersection Improvements; 1 leg at Fallon, signals, r/w and civil $167,132
Right-of-Way, 104 If. @ $15.46+1 OOk demo, all at 38% $1,767,071
Sports Park, 1500 ft. of frontage, 20 ft. of pavement and c&g $292,343
City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $601,457
Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.); $3,909,472
Central Parkway and Arnold Drive Subtotal $12,547,085
Gleason - Segment 19
1,600 feet, 4 Lanes
- Arnold Rd. to Hacienda
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Improvements $0
Hacienda and Arnold Intersection Improvements; signals only, 2 legs $112,500
Right~of-Way, none $0
City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $22,500
\
Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) $146,25~
....,
0231h; 11/8/99, 5:2~ PM
Page 8
99Nrw
Gleason - Segment 19A
4,650 feet, 4 Lanes
- Hacienda to Tassajara
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Improvements
Cross-over work, $0
Median and #1 lanes for 1750 ft . $0
Park work $0
Intersection Improvements
Hacienda Signals; signals only $0
Tassajara Meadows; 4 signal legs and 2 R/W legs, all at 50% $0
Tassajara Road; 1 leg with signal and civil work (no R/W) $0
Bridge.$11 0*55W*1 OOL (1/2) $0
Right-of-Way, 1750 ft at 102ft*$18 @ 38% $0
City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $0
Total with 10% ContinQency (0 on Admin.) $0
Gleason - Segment 20
4800 feet, 4 Lanes
Tassajara to Fallon
All New Roadway
Totals for TIF Share
~ivillmprovements at 650+133 (addl grading) per L.F. @ 38%, (cl to r/w), (8 ft grading) $1,428,192
Intersection Improvements wI right of way
1 leg each at Tassajara (civil and grading only) & Fallon (r/w, signals, civil & grading) $243,748
Sports Park, 250 ft. of frontage, 20 ft. of pavement and c&g $49,050
Right-of-Way, 104 It. @ $13.90 at 38% $2,636,774
City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $871,553
Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) $5,665,094
99Nrw
3,z u6 /.21
.,
0231h; 11/8/99, 5:28PM
Page 9
99Nrw
Gleason Roadway Subtotal $5,811,344
(Note the portion of Gleason Road from Fallon Road to Doolan Road
is not included because no development is proposed for Doolan Canyon as part of the
Dublin General Plan Amendment) "di!
..."'"
Scarlet Drive - Segment 21
2,400 feet, 52 ft curb to curb, 80 ft R!W
Dougherty Road to Dublin Boulevard Extension
All New Roadway
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Improvements, $526/1f @ 100% $1 ,262,400
Intersection Improvements wi right of way $0
Dougherty, Major; signals, civil and R/W, 11eg $164,989
Dublin Boulevard, Major; signals, civil and R/W, 2 legs $329,978
Railroad Utilities, demo and/or relocation $1,000,000
Bridge, $11 0*80W*65L $572,000
Right-of-Way, 80 ft*$15 - $3,072,000
City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $1,280,273
Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) $8,321,777
Tassajara Road - Segment 22
5,660 feet, 6 Lanes
5000 ft north of Gleason to Contra Costa Co. line
All New Roadway .....~
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Improvements, median and number 1 and 2 lanes, each direction $2,255,766
Intersection Improvements wi right of way
Fallon; signals, civil and R/W @ $11, 2 legs $284,668
Two Bridges, 120W*100L*$110 *2 $2,640,000
R/W 600 ft * 40 ft shift to miss school; Demolition = $500,000 for relocation of 2 houses $764,000
City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition~ 20.0% $1,188,887
Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) $7,727,764
99Nrw
~1 ~7 ):2/j
....."
0231h; 11/8/99,5:28 PM
Page 10
99Nrw
99Nrw
.3~ P{{ /)?
Tassajara Road - Segment 22A
5,000 feet, 6 Lanes
Gleason to 5000 ft. north of Gleason
...- All New Roadway
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Improvements, median and number 1 and 2 lanes, each direction $1,790,845
Intersection Improvements
Gleason signal, 50% of civil costs only, 1 leg $9,890
Right-of-Way, TIF portion exists. $0
City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $360,147
Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) $2,340,955
Tassajara Road. Segment 23
2,470 feet, 6 and 8 Lanes
Dublin Boulevard Extension to Gleason Road
All New Roadway
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Improvements, 1 lane in each direction andmedin curb $427,347
Civil Park Improvements, development agreement exists $0
Intersection Improvements $0
.,-- Gleason signal, 50% of civil costs only, 1 leg $9,890
Central Parkway signal, 50% of signal costs, no civil or rlw, 1 leg $28,125
Right-of-Way, TIF portion exists. $0
City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $93,072
Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) $604,970
Tassajara Road. Segment 24
800 feet, 8 Lanes
Dublin Boulevard Extension to 1580; (not including Interchange)
All New Roadway
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Improvements, add 1 12 foot lane $48,000
Intersection Improvements wI right of way, 1 leg at Dublin Boulevard $0
Right-of-Way, TIF portion exists $0
City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $9,600
Total with 10% Continqency (O on Admin.) $62,400
Tassajara Road Subtotal (without Freeway Interchange) $10,736,089
0231h; 11/8/99, 5:2a PM
Page 11
99Nrw
99Nrw 35 ~ /:(1
Tassajara Road - Segment 25
at Freeway Intersection
. Freeway Interchange
1/2 of Interchange Exists
....,
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Improvements, Including new 4 lane Bridge $11,315,008
Signalized intersection incl
Right-of-Way n/a
City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 23.0% incl
Total, (Contingency included with basic price); (includes 100% of interchanQe costs) $11,315,008
Fallon Road - Segment 26
8,080 feet, 4 Lanes
Tassajara to Gleason
All New Roadway
-
Totals for TIF Share
Civillmpv'ts at 650+(8*19) (some addl gdng) per LF@38%, (CCCo listed separately), (r/w to cJ), (8 ft gding) $2,238,352
Intersection Improvements w/ right of way
1 leg at Tassajara and 1 leg at Gleason (r/w, signals, civil & gradng) $266,544
Right-of-Way, 104 ft, $9.00 @ 38% $2,873,894
City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $1,075,758
Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) $6,992,42f
-
Fallon Road - Segment 26A
4840 feet, 4 Lanes
Gleason to Dublin Boulevard Extension
All New Roadway
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Improvements at 650+95 (addl gdng) per LF @ 38%, (CCCo separately), (el to r/w), (6 ft gding) $1,370,204
Intersection Improvements
1 leg at Gleason, 2 at Central and 1 at Dublin Ext (r/w. signals, civil & gradng) $500,837 .
Sports Park, 3100 ft. of frontage, 20 ft. of pavement and c&g, no r/w $672,488
Right-of-Way, 104 If. @ $7.92 at 38% $1.514,912
City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $811,688
Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) $5,275,973
0231h; 11/8/99, 5:2~ PM
Page 12
....,
99Nrw
Fallon Road - Segment 27
680 feet, 6 lanes
. Dublin Boulevard Extension to North of 1-580
-
All New Roadway
Totals for TIF Share
Civillmprovmts at $40011f for 2 inside lanes & 28 ft median, (r/w to r/w), (1' grading) $272,000
Intersection Improvements wi right of way
1 leg at Dublin Blvd Extension (r/w, signals, civil & gradng) $159,429
Right-of-Way, (76-60) ft.@ $15 $163,200
City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $118,926
Total with 10% ContinQency (0 on Admin.) $773,018
Fallon Road Subtotal (without Freeway Interchange) $13,041,419
.
Fallon & 1.-580 Freeway Interchange with Signals - Segment 28
,
Totals for TIF Share
Freeway Intercnge, new 61n Br; Ph1=$17,649,782 & Ph2=$11,182,999 $28,832,781
Right of Way (3.2 acres, Phase 2 only) $2,100,000
City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition incl
Livermore and Pleasanton will contribute, see table 2-3
.- Dublin pays 45% of cost; Livermore and Pleasanton will contribute $13,919,751
Tassajara Creek Bike Path - Segment 29
8,900 feet
Casterson Property Line to Contra Costa County Line
Totals for TIF Share
Bike path, 12 ft. @ $7/sf @ 100% (+7ftx150ftx$134@50% for Bridge at Tassajara Ck) $817,950
Right of Way, none; included with Tassajara of Creek Improvements $0
City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $163,590
Total with 10% ContinQency (0 on Admin.) $1,063,335
99Nrw
3c:. c:?t j;{ 1
0231h; 11/8/99, 5:28 PM
Page 13
99Nrw
Park & Ride
40,000 s.f. for 150 cars
.
Totals for TIF Shal ~,4
East of Tassajara, 40,000 s.f. @ ($4 Improv. & $7 right of way) $0" ~
East of Hacienda, 40,000 @ ($4 Improv. & $7 right of way) $0
East of Fallon, 40,000 @($4 Improv. & $13 for right of way) $680,000
City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $136,000
Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) $884,000
Precise Plan Line Costs
Totals for TIF Share
Total Cost $451,000
OTHER COSTS
Town Square, civil only at $83k ea.; 7 town squares, no right of way (not included) $0
Neighborhood Parks, civil only at $202k ea.; 10 parks, no right of way (not included) $0
ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY TAKE COSTS
Tassajara eastern frontage, 168,398 SF at ($19+$15+$15+$14)/4 (not included) $0
Dublin Blvd, 126W*880L*$18*50%, not included; (126W*880L*$15*50% in seg 10) $0
Central Pkwy: 102W*880L*$15*38%, not included; (126W*880L *$14*38% in seg 18) $0
Gleason Road: 102W*880L*$14*38%, not included; (126W*880L*$10.35*38% in seg 20) $0
OTHER
Fallon Road: 1800 ft at north end: 102*1800*11.50-102*1800*11.50 $0
Right of Way Condemnation Contingency, (for north end of Tassajara) $1,000,000
blank dJ
blank "'lIl"
TOTAL OF OTHER COSTS $1,000,000
15 and 16
99Nrw
31 ~ 1.:41
.......,
0231h; 11/8/99,5:28 PM
Page 14
99Nrw.
33 ozf /~1
..r--._
Table 1; Category One Costs used to determine RESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL FEE
Dublin Blvd. Ext., SP r/w to Airway Boulevard, adj. for -$973,000 $28,669,899
Hacienda Drive, excluding 1-580 Interchange $793,636
Hacienda Drive 1-580 Interchange, 100% of cost, excluding $3.762M Alameda County Loan $1,300,000
Central Parkway and Arnold Drive $12,547,085
Gleason Drive $5,811,344
Tassajara Road $10,736,089
Tassajara Road 1-580 Interchange, 100% of cost $11,315,008
Fallon Road $13,041,419
PSR Reports, (included in segment take-off) $0
Fee Study, (not in segment take-off) $90,000
Alignment Study $451,000
Other Costs $1,000,000
SUBTOTAL OF TABLE 1 $85,755,479
check sum $85,755,479
Table 2; Category Two -Costs used to determine RESIDENTIAL FEE/COMMERCIAL FEE
Dublin Boulevard, Village Parkway to Southern Pacific Right of Way $4,299,359
Scarlet Drive, Dublin Boulevard to Dougherty Road $8,321,777
Dougherty Road, 1-580 to CCCo $9,527,868
1-580 Fallon/EI Charro Interchange, with R/W at $13 per S.F. (45% of cost to reflect Dublin's share) $13,919,751
1-580/Airway Boulevard Interchange (Dublin's portion of cost only) $2,080,000
SUBTOTAL OF TABLE 2 $38,148,755
check sum $38,148,755
Table 3; Category One Adjustment Costs used to determine RESIDENTIAL SURCHARGE FEE
Tassajara Creek Bike Path $1,063,335
Park and Ride Lots $884,000
SUBTOTAL OF TABLE 3 $1,947,335
Summation of Tables 1, 2, and 3 $125,851,569
0231 h; 11/8/99, 5:33 PM
Page 1
newtbls
." . ." ."
1i .".",
OS~" cou~......-
co\\~..." ~ . ""'cOi'ill't'l .
.".."..... "';:.\."",to"
.... ." . ....
,"-
!
i
!
I
i
i
'I~
::;
'0
I....
~
I
~
I
.".....
.".....
\. -''';
~ ." . ....
,
\
\
LEGEND:
\
\
\
\
E
1
~
:s
fi
.........
.........
.... . .... .
\>:I
~
]t\
~
....J'SIIIXHl2 ~
CITY OF DUBlJN ROADWAYS
TO BE IMPROVED
OF 2
@ SEGMENT NUMBER
e+- TRAFFIC SIGNAL (DENOTES 1 LEG)
- DENOTES TIF ROADWAY NETWORK
0' 1000' 2000' 3000' 4000' 5000' 6000'
~.. -
.. GRAPmC SCALE: (IN FEET)
1
SHEET
.... .... . -
-'
-
)@
~
i8P
/
~.
'"1
.J
-
-
-
LE
@ SEGMENT NUMBER
... TRAFFIC SIGNAL (DENOTES 1 . LEG).
- DENOTES TIF ROADWAY NETWORK I CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
0' 1000' 2000' 3000' 4000' 5000' 6000' ROADWAYS TO BE IMPROVED
P"\_. -
- . SHEET 2 OF 2
GRAPIDC SCALE: (IN FEET) C)
~..~ 0\
"-
~
~
.........
Si ~ CO~i:.............
co~II;~2.- 'C00~ii
.... "~\..~\i.<'o"
rhi ,/1
:: ..-..,...-:
r,.-l Lh_"_"_"~ \
: J
I :
i I
! f:) ~(.
, I
:t
pia
I
~l
~I'
~
:.l'
I
i
I
~~
0\>:
:;;~
~~
-....
)
)
TABLE 1
EASTERN DUBLIN TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE -1999 UPDATE
Calculation of the Per Trip TIF by Section
"-
}
Section I Section I Section II TOTAL
Residential
1 Costs of Improvements/Right-of-Way Not Currently Guaranteed $85,755,480 $1,947,335 $38,148,755 $125,851,570
2 Balance on Prior Funding Advances $6,559,210 $0 $4,113,429 $10,672,639
3 Balance Due on TIF Credits (Existing TIF) $11,568,807 $0 $0 $11,568,807
4 Balance Due on TIF Credits (New TIF) $20,377,385 $2,802,460 $0 $23,179,845
5 Total Costs of TIF Improvements $124,260,882 $4,749,795 $42,262,184 $171,272,861
6 Estimated Fees From Remaining Trips Collected at Current Rate ($3,601,400) $0 ($1,059,920) -
7 Fees Collected to Date $774,001 $0 ($2,423,875) -
8 Section 1 Residential Fee Collected at Old Rate $306,150 ($306,150) $0 -
9 Estimated Contra Costa County Contribution ($9,150,000) $0 ($10,300,000) -
10 Adjusted Costs to be Financed by Revised Fee $112,589,633 $4,443,645 $28,478,389 -
11 Estimated Remaining Trips Paying Revised Fee I 311,994 102,115 311,994 -
12 Revised Fee (Cost per trip) $361 $44 $91 -
--c:.
...........
ci\
~
~
Page 1 of 1
Tiftab-1, Table 1 TIF
Printed: 11/08/1999
::5 [11 ,
~~~
\l' ~ 01
i~~1
C; ~ :-
a1 a-
~,
TABLE 2
flj.. v3 jrJ /}
EASTERN DUBLIN TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE -1999 UPDATE
Detail of Total Costs (Prior to Adjustments) by Section and Project Segment
Segment
1999 Cost Estimate Credits or Advances
S& T Balance at 6/30/99
Total
.~
SECTION I IMPROVEMENTS
8 Dublin - SP row to East BART Access $73,125 $0 $73,125
8A Dublin - East BART Access to Hacienda $363,792 $0 $363,792
9 Dublin - Hacienda to Tassajara $0 $6,118,464 $6,118,464
10 Dublin - Tassajara to Fallon $11,703,768 $0 $11,703,768
11 Dublin - Fallon to Airway $17,502,214 $0 $17,502,214
8-11 Dublin Blvd. Adjustment -$973,000 $0 -$973,000
13 Hacienda - 1580 to Dublin $130,000 $0 $130,000
14 Hacienda - Gleason to Dublin $663,636 $0 $663,636
15 Interchange at Hacienda $1,300,000 $0 $1,300,000
16 Arnold - Dublin to Gleason $2,618,990 $0 $2,618,990
16A Central Parkway - Hacienda to Arnold $327,538 $0 $327,538
17 Central Parkway - Hacienda to Tassajara $1,356,012 $5,325,050 $6,681,062
18 Central Parkway - Tassajara to Fallon (West) $4,335,073 $0 $4,335,073
18A Central Parkway - Tassajara to Fallon (East) $3,909,472 $0 $3,909,472
19 Gleason - Arnold to Hacienda $146,250 $0 $146,250
19A Gleason - Hacienda to Tassajara $0 $3,820,445 $3,820,445
20 Gleason - Tassajara to Fallon $5,665,094 $0 $5,665,094
22 Tassajara - North of Gleason to CCCounty Line $7,727,764 $0 $7,727,764
22A Tassajara - Gleason to North of Gleason $2,340,955 $1,577,575 $3,918,530
23 Tassajara - Gleason to Dublin $604,970 $3,340,851 $3,945,821
24 Tassajara - Dublin to 1580 $62,400 $195,000 $257,400
25 Interchange at Tassajara $11,315,008 $0 $11,315,008
26 Fallon - Tassajara to Dublin (Gleason) $6,992,428 $0 $6,992,428
26A Fallon - Gleason to Dublin $5,275,973 $0 $5,275,973 <J
27 Fallon - Dublin to North of 1580 $773,018 $0 $773,018 r--
31 Precise Plan Line Costs $451,000 $0 $451,000
NA TIF Update $90,000 $0 $90,000
NA ROW Contingency $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000
NA Balance on Prior Funding Advances $0 $6,559,210 $6,559,210
NA Balance on Credits Existing TIF $0 $11,568,807 $11,568,807
TOTAL SECTION I IMPROVEMENTS $85,755,480 $38,505,402 $124,260,882
SECTION II IMPROVEMENTS
1 Dougherty - City Limits to A VB $3,592,629 $0 $3,592,629
2 Dougherty - AVB to Houston $3,875,217 $0 $3,875,217
3 Dougherty - Right Turn, Houston to Dublin $131,213 $0 $131,213
4 Dougherty - Dublin to North of 1-580 $1,928,809 $0 $1,928,809
5 Dublin - E of VP to Sierra Court $0 $0 $0
6 Dublin - Sierra to Dougherty $1,933,334 $0 $1,933,334
7 Dublin - Dougherty to SP row $2,366,025 $0 $2,366,025
12 Interchange at Airway $2,080,000 $0 $2,080,000
21 Scarlett - Dougherty to Dublin $8,321,777 $0 $8,321,777
.28 Interchange at Fallon $13,919,751 $0 $13,919,751
NA Balance on Prior Funding Advances $0 $4,113,429 $4,113,429
TOTAL SECTION II IMPROVEMENTS $38,148,755 $4,113,429 $42,262,184
SECTION I RESIDENTIAL IMPROVEMENTS
8 Dublin - SP row to East BART Access $0 $0 $0
29 Tassajara Creek Bike Path $1,063,335 $273,000 $1,336,335
30 Park and Ride I-ots $884,000 $2,529,460 $3,413,460
TOTAL SECTION I RESIDENTIAL IMPROVEMENTS $1,947,335 $2,802,460 $4,749,795
$125,851,570 I
$45,421,2911
..,.,
$171,272,8611
GRAND TOTAL, ALL IMPROVEMENTS (TABLE 1, LINE 5)
TA'BLE. ~. -to
EXH \"O\T -e_
Jqq q SroOlJ L.?!1:lATE
,
)
)
~}:"..:;t.::f~}~111~ll;;:~X{;{
'(7f~
-----------~
~I
~- M ,... I
'/ .'.."'... RRA I
Ii /- RRA)"~l~~..>' ~---I FUTURE STUDY AREA I
\lM~~ I I I
)J..;~~1j' i ': ' ""\ I AGRICUL lURE I
"'"...,1 :. ,.' / '.: \ ;! l J
r ::: ,"", . . .~; Ii L \ \;0> tOO
I ~,~ I: ;',., , ,,-,'I;'~.i "/ 2743.9 Acres \
elM.j</",'\' L -\l~,-.. '~.::- /' L ' \
t j ." I ~ I ~\. I .)\:'~, . ." I 'L
r I', - I . \.; - \', ' ...-.-'" ...--
: : ", I~ -~, M,.,. ~ I
I I . I... ,"'" ......~.,,,. "\.~. I I
L' I I' -..-,. -' f I
---------.... /.,,~ " I' .= .......--:.. ,: u' I
'\... ............... r~j . :i~....""'''' /" ~ 'w ".'''
r ___ -------f-----... -_:/ I" \.. u,' ,-y I .......~I' I
I '\. .~ . .,,, .
, \ l ._:1 1_ - , M" I.,:. .. :~ .. . ,. ;- '..,,' . I: I
I ,1"- .'f r .., -: ,n ','. '. ';:,,::~~ }...
.., . 'U'M";", . 1 ,,",,' .,... " ...........,......:................ @~' I
I. ... : .. .~.. ....:.. . II.. \. . ....: ""1 i.' ,~t
..1'..........,.....1......................"...............,...1.....,.,. - . . -" .' .... - . -. I.. -~" 't/---- -
... " : Lf< - .....--..~ :'_ - ~ ;.,~, i.-::-:i:~:~.:.::..:.::;..-::::......T ',... . I -', ",,~'l(;j:.' L II :
.... . r:,: "'I , " I .. , ' , - ' - L' . I.j I < 1 -', .....\. . ** ~ r------u..
" ::-....:--r::~-:,-=:--':"~---:...;.I-":....:l:.:l..-::.... '. " ;;..... '.. , : .~. .::;:;;, Il ~;r.? L '1'1 14 Acres I ,f1I14--
.,' 1 -,~~~_:,- . '-'j, r" -, ,-------------1-------- M** I (Crosby) I ",'"
I:. I"<:~~~:'~-~~~~ ::i ... .-:.- .,' ,'. v "," 1.:.::.::::7~-~~--'1 · ;~.....--:-..................."
,.. ',"" I., . . . ..... , ......
-="'='=-=Io:~~":,=...,....,.,!.,.--=--.=-l-~~ ' ~-----...._ .._':"n': ~\........ - '.. .::. : :.:. .) I r
, '""-, .:"".-.-=~-.=-.",.{'"-=d\.1"~-.-.~-- _____11-_ ------
, I \
.
General Plan
-Eastern Extended Planning Area
25- clJIac
14-25 clJIac
6'14 clJIac
Legend
COMMERCIAL
~ Neighborhood Commercial
~ General Commercial
i:.:;;:::;:.:,::::,:J Camous Olfi;e
k:.:::-I nduSlrial Park
RESIDENTIAL
CD High Dens~y
~ MedlJrn-High Density
CD Medium Densily
CD Low Dens~y
[@ Rural ResklentiaVAgriculture
LAND USE MAP
---....-..,
..-....-- '
OS' ~ cg,.....-.. I'
COS1~"~
.....~..~\.,...~'C.o,.. .
I
I
I
L_
------1
I
--c:::.
~.
~
~
10, 1993~
m~. J
"
o 10CXl 2COGFHI
.. O~'
~~
Figure 28
D-6 clJIac
clJIl00ac
Area
May
Study
PUBLICI SEM~PUBLIC/OPEN
PXf;;,d PubrIC/Semt-Pubi:: Faciity
@ Elementary School
@ Junior High School
@ High School
@ Publlc/Semi-Pub6c
Parks & Recreation
CV City Park
@ Community Park
@ Neighborhood Park
Neighborhood SQuare
[1]L]
~Xj{~~~1 Open Space
El 'Slream Corrido
CIRCULATION
--- Arlerial Slreet
Colee tor Street
Wa.ace Roberts & Todd
~,.'".
L..-:.J
10\ P
* General Commercial may be permitled by a Pfanned Development Zoning Process (sse taxt 'or complels discussion
..... IA.... ___. "_ r'....__ ro........ 1._.....,,,_.:_..10._.. ...~___ ...._.___l__... I_____.d__. .__,.... ....... 1___
~ 111~
~ 7J x. :r:
fTl T -
(,} lJ'::: VI
~ 0 VI -
a . _ -{
D -I
-<.
c:;
-v
Ig
1(;\
~d
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
if q{ /J1
ATTACHMENT 1
City of Dublin
'...,I
Cost Analysis, 1999 Update
Traffic Impact Fee
Eastern Dublin Area
\...,1
-
File:
0231.02 rg4ph
Santina & ThoWtpSon, Il'IC
Consulting Engineers
....",
ATTACHMENT /.
o-F EXHIBIT. ~
/Cjqq .s7VCY lJP6A1C
Development Section
Public Works Department
City of Dublin
Emerald Pointe
New Traffic Impact Fee
Calculation
ATTACHMENT 2
11/9/99
1(5 '15 /~ /)
Hacienda Drive (Segment 14)
840 lineal feet
Additional widening due to double left turns on Dublin Blvd and Central
Civil Improvements 840' x $650/lf x 38% $207.480
Rioht of Way 38' x 840' x $4.55/sf $145,236
City Administration, Desion, Construction Management, ROW, 20% $70,543
Total with 10% Continaencv $458 531
Dublin Blvd Bike Path (SP ROW to Iron Horse Drive)
2100 lineal feet, 12'
Civil Improvements $0
Right of Way 12' x 2100' x $7/sf $176,400
City Administration, Desion. Construction Manaoement. ROW, 20% $35,280
Total with 10% Continaencv $229 320
IGRAND TOTAL
$687.8511
TIF New Format 11-9-99 Emerald Pointe
Page 1
ATrPtC.HMEA.JT ~.
of eXH/aIT -e>
jqqq. 5mb'l V(:)/),c,Th
Development Section
Public Works Department
City of Dublin
KolI
New Traffic Impact Fee
Calculation
f6 0;5 1;1 1
11/9/99
Park-n-Ride lots
Civillmorovements, 74,836 sf x $7.00/sf $523,853
Right of Way 74,836 sf x $19/sf $1,421 ,886
City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW, 20% $389,148
Total with 10% Continaencv $2529461
~
.~
~
TIF New Format 11~9-99 KolI
Page 2
Development Section
Public Works Department
City of Dublin
Tassajara Meadows 2
New Traffic Impact Fee
Calculation
tj? ~ /;1
11/9/99
Gleason Drive - Segment 19A
1,908 linear feet; 88 feet curb to curb
Civil Improvements, $425/l.f. x 61% $492,332
Park Entrances $25,000
Intersection Improvements Park Access Driveway (2 leg) @ 50% $183,360
Bridge $134/sf x 80' x 55' x 100% $589,600
Right of Way 48' x $18 sf x 100% $1,648,512
City Administration, Desian, Construction Management, ROW, 20% $587,761
Total with 10% Continoencv $3 820 445
Tassajara Road (Segment 22A)
250 lineal feet, 5' wide
Civil Improvements 5' x 250' x $15.00/sf x 100% $0
Right of Way 5' x 250' x $15.00/sf x 100% x.5 $9,375
Intersection Improvements $183,360
City Administration, Desian, Construction Manaaement, ROW, 20% $38,547
Total with 10% Continoencv $250 556
/-
Tassajara Creek Bike Path (29)
600 lineal feet, 12' wide
Civil Improvements 12' x 600' x $87/sf:x 100% $50,400
City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW, 20% $10,080
Total with 10% Continaency $65 520
IGRAND TOTAL
$4,136,5211
TIF New Format 11-9-99 Tass Meadows
Page 3
Development Section
Public Works Department
City of D~blin
Toll
New Traffic Impact Fee
Calculation
Ij $ at' 1.21
11/9/99
Central Parkway (Segment 17)
2,330 lineal feet, Tassajara Creek to Tassajara Road
~
$604,701
50%
$112,500
$168,360
$1,439,831
$1,770,800
$819,238.40
Total with 10% Contin enc
5 325 050
Tassajara Creek Bike Path 29
900 lineal feet, Central Parkway North to Park Path
1000 lineal feet, Dublin Blvd to Central Parkway
Civil Improvements $7.00 x 1900 If x 12' x 100% $159,600
City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW, 20% $31,920
Total with 10% Continaencv $207 480
Dublin Blvd (Segment 9)
2095 lineal feet, Tassajara Creek to Tassajara Road
Civil Improvements 2095 If x $150/1f x 54% $575,902
Intersection Improvements (Tassaiara Road)
Tass (2 leg) 50% x 442,058 $221,029
Bridge 120 If x 55' x $134 $884,400
Right of Way 141' x 2095' x $19/sf x 54% $3,025,180
City Administration, Design, Construction Manaoement, ROW, 20% $941,302
Total with 10% Continaencv $6 118 464
....,
Tassajara Road (24)
1000 lineal feet, 8 lanes
Civil Improvements 1000 If x $150/sf x 100% $150,000
Intersection Improvements $0
Rioht of Way $0
City Administration, Desion, Construction Management, ROW, 20% $30,000
Total with 10% Continaencv $195000
'W'
TIF New Format 11-9-99 Toll
Page 4
Development Section
Public Works Department
City of qublin
Toll
New Traffic Impact Fee
Calculation
'/7 15 j) '/
11/9/99
Tassajara Road (23)
Gleason to Central Parkway
Civil Improvements $0
Riaht of Way 609 If x 5' x $15/sf $45,675
Right of Way 514 If x 5' x $18/sf $46,260
Right of Way 701 If x 17' x $18/sf $214,506
Riaht of Way 700 If x 17' x $19/sf $226,100
.
Total with 10% Continaencv S532 541
I GRAND TOTAL
$12,378,5351
.--.
TIF New Format 11-9-99 Toll
Page 5
56 oz5 J :z./l
New TIF Costs
10/18/99
Development Section
Pubic Works Department
Tassajara Road
Cost Analysis
City of Dublin for Shea Develooment
I Tassajara Road - Segment 22A
I 2923 feet, 6 Lanes
I Gleason to 5000ft. North of Gleason
j All New Roadway
I
Civil Improvements, $750/sf, 50%' $1,103,625
Intersection Improvements
Gleason Signal. Civil & ROW (1 Leg) $91,680
Right of Way, TIF portion Exists $23,679
City Administration, Design, Constr. Managmnt.,ROW, 20% $239,061
Total with 10% Contingency $1,577,575
I
I Tassajara Road - Segment 23
I 2600 feet, 6 and 8 Lanes
I Dublin Boulevard Extension to Gleason Road
I All New Roadway
I
Civil Improvements I $1,175,000
Park Improvements I $232,013
I
Intersection Improvements
Central Parkway (1 leg) $91,680
Gleason,Major (1 leg) I $91,680
Right of Way, TIF Portion Exists ___H" _I . . ..- ~90,269 . --. - -
City Administration, Design, Constr. Managmnt. 20% $318,075
Total with 10% Contingency $2,557,754
i
f
Grand Total Credits (22a+23) $4,135,329
I I
t
I
I
I
new book sheaTassRoad 16oct99
Page 6
-...,.,
~
"""
'1
)
)
ATTACHMENT 3
Dublin Traffic Impact Fee Revisions
Summary of Activity Under Existing Development Agreements
Activity as of June 30, 1999
Permits Issued
to Date Trips to Remaining Category 1 Category 2 Remaining Remaining
Development Agreement Approved Trip Rate Total Trips (June 30, 1999) Date Trips Fee Rate Fee Rate Category 1 Fees Category 2 Fees
Homart {Hacienda Crossinasl 800 ksf 22 ksf 17 600 604 13288 4312 $248 $74 $1 069376 $319088
Qous Industrial 400 kds 8 ksf 3,200 384 3072 128 $248 $74 $31 744 $9 472
California Creekside 154 Units 10 Unit 1,540 154 1,540 0 $0 $0
California Creekside 123 Units 7 Unit 861 123 861 0 $0 $0
Villas 324 Units 7 Unit 2268 324 2268 0 $0 $0
Summer Glen 347 Units 10 Unit 3.470 265 2650 820 $301 $82 $246 820 $67 240
Jefferson 368 Units 7 Unit 2576 368 2576 0 $0 $0
Emerald Pointe 590 ksf 20 ksf 11 800 , 200 4000 7800 $248 $74 $1 934400 $577 200
Mission Peak 106 Units 10 Unit 1,060 0 0 1,060 $301 $82 $319,060 $86,920
Total 44,376 30,266 14,120 $3,601,400 $1,069,920
VI
""
'\
~
~
Page 1 of 1
t~ tables november 8, Attachm 3 Fee Rev Jun 30 99
Printed: 11/10/1999
n1~
~p
-J:
~3
-f (TI
Z
,ol -l
U)
~
-
..0
..0
..c
~
D
-<.
C
17
D-
~
oJ,
ATTACHMENT 4
City of Dublin
Traffic Impact Fees - Trip Generation
5;2 zz( /;4 IJ
Units or
Property Category Square Trip Rate Totals Source
Footage
Residential Commercial Total
Santa Rita Property
RESIDENTIAL
Single Family Trips!
Califomia Creekside Residential 154 Units 10 Unit 1,540 Built
Medium High Density Trips!
California Creekside Residential 123 Units 7 Unit 861 Built
Medium High Density Trips! Under
The Villas Residential 324 Units 7 Unit 2,268 Construction
Single Family Trips! Under
Summer Glen Residential 347 Units 10 Unit 3,470 Construction
Medium High Density Trips! Under
Jefferson Residential 368 Units 7 Unit 2,576 Construction
Single Family Trips! Approved
Tassaiara Meadows Residential 95 Units 10 Unit 950 Tentative MaD
Medium Density Trips! Pending Tentative
Toll Brothers Residential 143 Units 10 Unit 1 ,430 Mao
Medium Density Trips! Pending Tentative
Toll Brothers Residential 152 Units 10 Unit 1,520 MaD
SUBTOTAL
RESIDENTIAL 14,615
COMMERCIAL
Under
Hacienda Crossin as General Commercial 800,000 S.F. 22 Trios!ksf 17,600 Construction
Under
Oous Industrial Licht Industrial 400,000 S.F. 8 Trioslksf 3,200 Construction
Under
Emerald Pointe Camous Office 590,000 S.F. 20 Trios!ksf 11 ,800 Construction
Approved Use
General Motors Auto Dealershin 63,300 - S.F. 48 Trios!ksf 3,038 Permit
Approved Use
General Motors Auto Service 12,360 S.F. 29 Trios!ksf 358 Permit
Approved Use
KolI Comorate Camous Office 595.000 S.F, 20 Trios! ksf 11,900 Permit
Approved Use
KolI Comorate Hotel 155 Rooms 10 Trios! ksf 1,550 Permit
Approved Use
KolI Coroorate Restaurant 14,000 S.F. 133 TrioS! ksf 1,862 Permit
Pending Use
Peoolesoft Camous Office 1,600,000 S.F. 20 Tri os! ksf 32,000 Permit
Eastem Dublin
Site 15 Camous Office 500,000 S.F. 20 Trios! ksf 10,000 Soecific Plan
Neighborhood Eastem Dublin
Site 3 Commercial 150,000 S.F. 46 Trios! ksf 6,900 Soecific Plan
SUBTOTAL
COMMERCIAL 100,208
Subtotal
Santa Rita Property 114,823
'-.I
~
.'ottt6IJI
A7TA~HMc.NT 4. of
EKH IBIT 13
Page 1016
TiflBb-l, AttBctvn 4 Trip Generation
Printed: 1110811999
19996TUCY I)POATe
ATTACHMENT 4
City of Dublin
Traffic Impact Fees - Trip Generation
53 ~ /;/)
Units or
Property Category Square Trip Rate Totals Source
Footage
Residential Commercial Total
Single Family Trips! Approved
Casterson Property Residential 106 Units 10 Unit 1,060 1060 Tentative Map
GreenbrierlY arra- Yarra
Property, Tract Medium Density Trips! Pending
7075 Residential 126 Units 10 Unit 1,260 1260 Tentative Map
Dublin Ranch,
Phase I
Single Family Trips! Approved
Units L 1-6 Residential 568 Units 10 Unit 5,680 Tentative Map
Medium Density Trips! Approved
Units M1-3 Residential 279 Units 10 Unit 2,790 Tentative Map
Subtotal Dublin Ranch,
Phase I 8,470
GreenbrierlYarra-Yarra Medium Density Trips! Pending
Property, Parcels A-E Residential 319 Units 10 Unit 3190 3190 Tentative Map
Dublin Rancl1, ~mgle t-amllY Tnpsl Approved PO
Area A Residential 573 Units 10 Unit 5730 5730 Zoning
Dublin Ranch,
Area B
Medium Density Trips! Approved PD
Units M1-8 Residential 958 Units 10 Unit 9,580 Zonino
Medium High Density Trips! Approved PD
Unit MH Residential 172 Units 7 Unit 1.204 Zoning
High Density Trips! Approved PD
Units H1-2 Residential 744 Units 6 Unit 4,464 Zonina
Approved PD
GC General Commercial 163,350 S.F. 33 Trips/ksf 5,391 Zonino
Subtotal, Area B 20,639
Dublin Ranch,
Area C
Approved PD
GC General Commercial , 625,086 S.F. 33 Tripsl ksf 20,628 Zoning
Approved PD
CO Campus Office 971,388 S.F. 20 Tripsl ksf 19,428 Zoning
Subtotal, Area C 40,056
UUblln tomcn, 10 eastern Dublin
AreaD Rural Residential 1 Unit TripslUnit 10 10 Specific Plan
Dublin Ranch,
Area F
Single Family Trips! Pending PD
SFR Residential 91 Units 10 Unit 910 Zonina
Medium Density Trips! Pending PD
M Residential 661 Units 10 Unit 6,610 Zonino
Medium High Density Trips! Pending PD
MH Residential 0 Units 7 Unit 0 Zoning
High Density Trips! Pending PD
H Residential 0 Units 6 Unit 0 Zonina
Neighborhood
Villaae Center Commercial 0 S.F. 33 Trios! ksf 0
Subtotal, Area F 7,520
Page 2 of 6
Tiftab-1, Attachm 4 Trip Generation
Printed: 11108/1999
:5:/ zt: /jL/)
ATTACHMENT 4
City of Dublin
Traffic Impact Fees - Trip Generation
Units or
Property Category Square Trip Rate Totals Source
Footage Total
Residential Commercial
Dublin Ranch,
Area G
Medium High Density Trips! Pending PD
MH Residential 621 Units 7 Unit 4,347 Zonina
High Density Trips! Pending PD
H Residential 854 Units 6 Unit 5,124 Zonina
Neighborhood Pending PD
Villaae Center Commercial 179,925 S.F. 33 Trips! ksf 5,938 Zonina
Subtotal, Area G 15,409
Dublin Ranch,
Area H
Pending PD
GC General Commercial 282,269 S.F. 33 Trips 9,315 Zonina
Pending PD
CO Campus Office 559,528 S.F. 20 Trios! ksf 16,514 Zonina
General Commercial! Pending PD
GC!CO Campus Office 182,952 S.F. 26.5 Trios! ksf 4,848 Zonina
Subtotal, Area H 30,677
Lin Property, West of
Tassajara Road
Neighborhood Eastern Dublin
NC Commercial 36,590 S.F. 33 Trips! ksf 1.207 Soecific Plan
Medium High Density Trips! Eastern Dublin
MH Residential 300 Units 7 Unit 2,100 Soecific Plan
Medium Density Trips! Eastem Dublin
M Residential 500 Units 10 Unit 5,000 Soecific Plan
Single Family Trips! Eastem Dublin ~
L Residential 100 Units 10 Unit 1,000 Soecific Plan
Subtotal,
Lin Property 9,307
Medium DenSity 1 npsl Eastern Dublin
Moura Property Residential 82 Units 10 Unit 820 820 Specific Plan
Vargas Property
Medium Density Trips! Eastern Dublin
M Residential 14 Units 10 Unit 140 Soecific Plan
Medium High Density Trips! Eastern Dublin
MH Residential 72 Units 7 Unit 504 Soecific Plan
Subtotal,
Vargas Property 644
Herrera Property
Neighborhood Eastern Dublin
NC Commercial 58,806 S.F. 33 Trips! ksf 1,941 Soecific Plan
Medium High Density Trips! Eastern Dublin
MH Residential 68 Units 7 Unit 476 Soecific Plan
Subtotal,
Herrera Property 2,417
I Medium Hlgn DenSity Inpsl Eastern Dublin
Haight Property Residential 42 Units 7 Unit 294 294 Specific Plan
--
.......,
Page3of6
Tiftab-1, Attachm 4 Trip Generation
Printed: 11108/1999
...'.:.-
.^-
/r-~.
ATTACHMENT 4
City of Dublin
Traffic Impact Fees - Trip Generation
~s % /~1
Units or
Property Category Square Trip Rate Totals Source
Footage Residential Commercial Total
Mission Peak
Homes Property
Neighborhood Trips! Eastern Dublin
NC Commercial 16,988 S.F. 33 Unit 561 SDecific Plan
Medium High Density Trips! Eastern Dublin
MH Residential 22 Units 7 Unit 154 SDecific Plan
Single Family Trips! Eastern Dublin
SFR Residential 97 Units 10 Unit 970 SDecific Plan
Trips! Eastern Dublin
R Rural Residential 1 Unit 10 Unit 10 SDecific Plan
Subtotal,
Mission Peak Homes
Property 1,695
Redgwick Property
Single Family Trips! Eastern Dublin
SFR Residential 67 Units 10 Unit 670 Soecific Plan
Trips! Eastern Dublin
R Rural 1 Unit 10 Unit 10 Soecific Plan
Subtotal,
Redgwick Property 680
Silvera Property
Medium High Density Trips! Eastern Dublin
MH Residential 80 Units 7 Unit 560 Specific Plan
Medium Density Trips! Eastern Dublin
M Residential 210 Units 10 Unit 2,100 Specific Plan
Single Family Trips! Eastern Dublin
SFR Residential 35 Units 10 Unit 350 SDecific Plan
Trips! Eastern Dublin
R Rural Residential 1 Unit 10 Unit 10 Specific Plan
Subtotal,
Silvera Property 3,020
TnpsJ eastern Dublin
Plato Property Rural Residential 1 Unit 10 Unit 10 10 Specific Plan
Medium DensIty Tnps! eastern uuolln
Zimmer Property Residential 65 Units 10 Unit 650 650 Specific Plan
Mealum uenslty TnpST Eastern DUblin
Raley Property Residential 20 Units 10 Unit 200 200 Specific Plan
I Mealum DensIty Tnps! Eastern Dublm
Gygi Property Residential 10 Units 10 Unit 100 100 Specific Plan
Dublin Land Company
Property
Eastern Dublin
GC General Commercial 846,153 S.F. 33 Trins! ksf 27,923 Specific Plan
Neighborhood Eastern Dublin
NC Commercial 56,410 S.F. 33 Trios! ksf 1,862 Soecific Plan
High Density Trips! Eastern Dublin
H Residential 112 Units 6 Unit 672 Specific Plan
Medium High Density ," Trips! Eastern Dublin
MH Residential 106 Units 7 Unit 742 Soecific Plan
Medium Density Trips! Eastern Dublin
M Residential 43 Units 10 Unit 430 Specific Plan
Subtotal,
Dublin Land Company 31,629
Page 4 of 6
Tlflob-1, Altoctvn 4 Trip Generation
Printed: 11/OB/1999
ATTACHMENT 4
City of Dublin
Traffic Impact Fees - Trip Generation
$b- ~ /rJ1
Units or
Property Category Square Trip Rate Totals Source
Footage
Residential Commercial Total
Jordan Property
Neighborhood Eastern Dublin
NC Commercial 148,975 S.F. 33 Trios! ksf 4,916 Specific Plan
Medium High Density Trips! Eastem Dublin
MH Residential 628 Units 7 Unit 4,396 Soecific Plan
Medium Density Trips! Eastem Dublin
M Residential 96 Units 10 Unit 960 Soecific Plan
Single Family Trips! Eastern Dublin
SFR Residential 353 Units 10 Unit 3,530 Specific Plan
Subtotal,
Jordan Property 13,802
TMI Property
Eastern Dublin
GC General Commercial 446,490 S.F. 33 Trios! ksf 14,734 Soecific Plan
Eastern Dublin
I Industrial Park 219,542 S.F. 8 TrioS! ksf 1,756 Specific Plan
Medium High Density Trips! Eastern Dublin
MH Residential 254 Units 7 Unit 1,778 Soecific Plan
Medium Density Trips! Eastern Dublin
M Residential 185 Units 10 Unit 1,850 Specific Plan
Subtotal,
TMI Property 20,118
Anderson Property
Trips! Eastern Dublin
I Industrial Park 247,595 S.F. 8 Unit 1,981 Specific Plan
Medium Density Trips! Eastern Dublin ~
M Residential 57 Units 10 Unit 570 Specific Plan
Single Family Trips! Eastern Dublin
SFR Residential 55 Units 10 Unit 550 Specific Plan
Subtotal,
Anderson Property 3,101
Righetti Property
Trips! Eastern Dublin
I Industrial Park 217,103 S.F. 8 Unit 1,737 Specific Plan
Medium Density Trips! Eastern Dublin
M Residential 61 Units 10 Unit 610 Specific Plan
Single Family Trips! Eastern Dublin
SFR Residential 99 Units 10 Unit 990 Specific Plan
Subtotal,
Righetti Property 3,337
Branaugh Property
Eastern Dublin
I Industrial Park 91,476 S.F. 8 Trios! ksf 732 Specific Plan
Medium Density Trips! Eastern Dublin
M Residential 60 Units 10 Unit 600 Soecific Plan
Single Family Trips! Eastern Dublin
SFR Residential 105 Units 10 Unit 1,050 Specific Plan
Subtotal,
Branaugh Property 2,382
.~
""'"
_ Page5of6
Tlftab-1, Attachm 4 Trip Generation
Printed: 1111l8t1999
ATTACHMENT 4
City of Dublin
Traffic Impact Fees - Trip Generation
5 ;; ~ /1- 1
~.-
Units or
Property Category Square Trip Rate Totals Source
Footage
Residential Commercial Total
Tripsl Eastern Dublin
Campbell Property Industrial Park 107,352 S.F. 8 ksf 859 859 Specific Plan
Residential Areas wlin
General Plan Area, East
and North of Specific
Plan Area (Excluding
Future Study Area)
Single Family Trips!
SFR Residential 1,244 Units 10 Unit 12,440 General Plan
Trips!
R Rural Residential 2 Units 10 Unit 20 General Plan
Subtotal,
Remaining General Plan 12,460
Total Residential Trips 113,890
Total Non-Residential Trips 242,479
TotalTrips 356,369
->"1_.,
Page 6 of 6
Tiflab-1. Allachm 4 Trip Generation
Printed: 11108/1999
~g ~ t~~1
EASTERN DUBLIN TRAFFIC IMP ACT FEE
FEE SCHEDULE
.....",
Residential
Low Density Dwelling (up to 6 units per acre)
Medium Density Dwelling (7-14 units per acre)
MediumlHigh Density Dwelling (15-25 units per acre)
High Density Dwelling (more than 25 units per acre)
Non-Residential
Development Other Than Residential
$4,960/unit
$4,960/unit
$3,472/unit
$2,976/unit
$ 452/trip
LAND USE
(Non-Residential)
ESTIMATED WEEKDAY VEHICLE
TRIP GENERATION RATE*
HOTELIMOTEL OR OTHER LODGING:
10/room
OFFICE:
Standard Commercial Office
Medical/Denta1
20/1,000 sf
34/1,000 sf
RECREATION:
Recreation Community Center
Health Club
Bowling Center
Golf Course
Tennis Courts
Theaters:
26/1,000 sf
40/1,000 sf
33/1,000 sf
8/acre
33/acre
'..r
Movie
Live
Video Arcade
220/screen
0.2/seat
96/1,000 sf
EDUCATION (Private Schools):
l.5/student
HOSPITAL:
General
Conva1esentINursing
Clinic
12/bed
3/bed
24/1,000 sf
CHURCH:
911,000 sf
INDUSTRIAL:
Industrial (with retail)
Industrial (without retail)
16/1,000 sf
8/1,000 sf
..."""
11/09/199911:07 AM
. Page 1 of2
EXHiBIT c..
of "RE~O.
LAND USE
(Non-Residential)
d~ ~ /~;;
ESTIMATED WEEKDAY VEHICLE
TRIP GENERA nON RATE
(WIlli PASS-BYS)
RESTAURANT:
Quality (leisure)
Sit-down, high turnover (usually chain other than fast food)
Fast Food (with or without drive through)
Bar/Tavern
63/1,000 sf
133/1,000 sf
511/1,000 sf
100/1,000 sf
AUTOMOBILE:
Car Wash:
Automatic
Self-Serve
Gas Station with or without food mart
Tire Store/Oil Change Store
Auto Sales/Parts Store
Auto Repair Center
Truck Terminal
585/site
70/wash stall
97/pump
28/service bay
(no pass-bys) 48/1,000 sf
(no pass-bys) 20/1,000 sf
(no pass-bys) 80/acre
FINANCIAL:
Bank (Walk-In Only)
Savings and Loan (Walk-In Only)
Drive-Through/ATM (Add to Bank or Savings & Loan)
91/1,000 sf
40/1,000 sf
65/lane or machine
-~
COMMERCIALlRETAIL:
Super Regional Shopping Center
(More than 600,000 SF; usually
more than 60 acres, with
usually 3 + major stores)
22/1,000 sf
Regional Shopping Center
(300,000 - 600,000 SF; usually
30 - 60 acres, w/usually 2 + major stores)
33/1,000 sf
Community or Neighborhood Shopping Center
(Less than 300,000 sf; less than 30 acres
w/usually 1 major store or grocery store
and detached restaurant and/or drug store)
46/1,000 sf
Commercial Shops:
Retail/Strip Commercial
Commercial with unknown tenant
Supermarket
Convenience Market
Discount Store
Lumber Store/Building Material
Garden Nursery
Cemetery
26/1,000 sf
33/1,000 sf
98/1,000 sf
325/1,000 sf
46/1,000 sf
20/1,000 sf
23/1,000 sf
(no pass bys) 4/acre
.-.
*Source of information for Trip Generation Rates: Base on Institute of Transportation Engineers and
San Diego Assoc. Government Trip Generation Rates. These trip generation rates are based on
averages. Retail commercial has been given a 35% pass-by reduction.
11/09/199911:07 AM
- Page 2 of2
G:/impactfe/Tif schedule l.xIs
1999 Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee Update
Allocation Between Land Acquisition and Construction Costs
66 0-6 /;1
Santina & Thompson Cost Estimate (Study Update Attachment 1)
. Segment Land Land Total .L
Base Cost Including Overhead Project Cost .,W
1 Dougherty - City Limits to AVB $0 $0 $3,592,62~
2 Dougherty - AVB to Houston $418,000 $543,400 $3,875,217
3 Dougherty - Right Turn, Houston to Dublin $0 $0 $131,213
4 Dougherty - Dublin to North of 1-580 $1,196,000 $1,554,800 $1,928,809
5 Dublin - E of VP to Sierra Court $0 $0 $0
6 Dublin - Sierra to Dougherty $457,280 $594,464 $1,933,334
7 Dublin - Dougherty to SP row $1,528,230 $1,986,699 $2,366,025
8 Dublin - SP row to East BART Access $0 $0 $73,125
8A Dublin - East BART Access to Hacienda $0 $0 $363,792
9 Dublin - Hacienda to Tassajara $0 $0 $0
10 Dublin - Tassajara to Fallon $6,245,171 $8,118,722 $11,703,768
11 Dublin - Fallon to Airway $7,296,000 $9,484,800 $17,502,213
Dublin Boulevard Adjustment $0 $0 -$973,000
12 Interchange at Airway $0 $0 $2,080,000
13 Hacienda - 1580 to Dublin $0 $0 $130,000
14 Hacienda - Gleason to Dublin $0 $0 $663,636
15 Interchange at Hacienda $0 $0 $1,300,000
16 Arnold - Dublin to Gleason $0 $0 $2,618,990
16A Transit Spine - Hacienda to Arnold $0 $0 $327,538
17 Transit Spine - Hacienda to Tassajara $0 $0 $1,356,012
18 Transit Spine - Tassajara to Fallon (West) $2,261,964 $2,940,553 $4,335,073
18A Transit Spine - Tassajara to Fallon (East) $1,767,071 $2,297,192 $3,909,472
19 Gleason - Arnold to Hacienda $0 $0 $146,250
19A Gleason - Hacienda to T assajara $0 $0 $0
20 Gleason - Tassajara to Fallon $2,636,774 $3,427,806 $5,665,094
21 Scarlet - Dougherty to Dublin $3,072,000 $3,993,600 $8,321,777-
22 Tassajara - North of Gleason to CCCounty Line $764,000 $993,200 $7,727,7l :;1)
22A Tassajara - Gleason to North of Gleason $0 $0 $2,340,955
23 Tassajara - Gleason to Dublin $0 $0 $604,970
24 Tassajara - Dublin to 1580 $0 $0 $62,400
25 Interchange at Tassajara $0 $0 $11,315,008
26 Fallon - Tassajara to Dublin (Gleason) $2,873,894 $3,736,062 $6,992,428
26A Fallon - Gleason to Dublin $1,514,912 $1,969,386 $5,275,973
27 Fallon - Dublin to North of 1580 $163,200 $212,160 $773,018
28 Interchange at Fallon $2,100,000 $2,100,000 $13,919,751
29 Tassajara Creek Bike Path $0 $0 $1,063,335
30 Park and Ride Lots $520,000 $676,000 $884,000
31 Precise Plan Line Costs $0 $0 $451,000
TIF Update $0 $0 $90,000
ROW Contingency $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000
TOTAL $45,628,845 $125,851,569
Department of Public Works Estimates of New Credits (Study Update Attachment 2)
KolI $1,421,886 $1,848,452 $2,529,460
Tassajara Meadows $1,657,887 $2,155,253 $4,136,521
Toll $4,795,980 $6,234,774 $12,378,535
Toll no mark-up $532,541 $532,541 $0
Shea $513,948 $668,132 $4,135,329
TOTAL $11,439,152 $23,179,845
TOTAL
$57,067,997
$149,031,414
% Right of Way
% Improvements
38%
62%
E)(H Ie \T -o~
of' ""Rl::. SD .
AREA OF BENEFIT
MAJOR THOROUGHFARES AND BRIDGES
WITHIN EASTERN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN AREA
6/ crt //1
*Cost of Roadway
Improvements
*Cost of Bridge
Improvements
Dublin Blvd.. Extend and widen to 6 lanes from the Southern Pacific
Right-of-way to Airway Blvd. (from the EIR future road improvement
assumptions on pages 1 and 2 of the DKS revised report from December
15, 1992 and mitigation measure 3.3/10)
$26,953,898
$1,716,000
Hacienda Drive. Widen and extend as 4 lanes from Dublin Blvd. to
Gleason Drive and to 6 lanes from 1-580 to Dublin Blvd. (from the EIR
future road improvement assuptions on page 1 of the DKS revised report)
$793,636
o
Central Parkway. Construct four-lane road from Dublin Blvd. West
of Hacienda Drive to Fallon road (from the EIR future road improvement
assumptions on page 1 of the DKS revised report)
$12,547,085
o
Gleason Drive. Construct new 4-1ane road from west of Hacienda Drive
to Fallon road (from the EIR future road imporvement assumptions on
page 1 of the DKS revised report) (The Project does not require
extension of Gleason Drive to Doolan Road due to no development
proposed in the future study area)
$5,811,344
o
Tassajara road. Widen to 4 lanes over a 6-1ane right-of-way from Dublin
Blvd. To the Contra Costa County Line, and to 6 lanes over an 8-1ane
right-of-way from Dublin Blvd. To 1-580 from the EIR future road
improvement assumptions on page 1 of the DKS revised report and
mitigation measure 3.3/14.0)
$7,304,089
$3,432,000
Fallon Road. Extend to Tassajara road, widen to 4 l~es over a 6-1ane
right-of-way from 1-580 to Tassajara road (from the EIR future road
improvement assumptions on page 1 of the DKS revised report)
$13,041,419
o
Street Alignment Study. A study is required to specify the exact street
alignments in the Eastern Dublin area.
$451,000
o
Right of way contingency. Funds are required to acquire land in the
event that right of way must be obtained through condemnation and
value of land is greater than the appraised value.
$1.000.000
$67,902,471
o
$5,148,000
TOTAL IMPROVEMENTS:
$73,050,471
The Area of Benefit Fee for roadway improvements based on 102,115 related trips for residential and 209,879 trips for
non-residential is $2, 180/unit for Low Density (1-6 units per acre) and Medium Density Residential (7-14 units per
acre), $1,526 for Medium/High Density residential (15-25 units per acre), and $1,308 for High Density Residential (more
than 25 units); and $218/trip for non-residential.
The Area of Benefit Fee for bridge improvements for Low and Medium Density residential is $160/unit, for
Medium/High Density Residential is $112/unit, and for High Density Residential is $96/unit; and non- residential is
$16/trip.
The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area has 3,916 Low Density units; 4,863 Medium Density units; 2,680 MediumlHigh
Density units; and 2,447 High Density units.
c-
*These cost estimates do not include credits due for construction of portions of these major thoroughfares and
bridges. In the event that the Area of Benefit fee becomes effective, the appriate credit amounts will be calculated and
the Area of Benefit fee will be adjusted accordingly. _
EXH IB IT -E,
of ""?\t:.:~O.
11/09/199911:03 AM
b~ ert /;21
CITYOFDUBLIN
1999 TRAFFIC[MPACTFEES
EASTERN DUBLIN ROADWAY STUDY
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
Table of Contents
Cross Sections of Selected Segments
. Non-typical Roadway Segments
. Typical Roadway Segments
. Typical Bridge Section
Cost Estimates, Detail
. Non-typical Roadway Segments
. Sports Parks Improvements
. Typical Four-Lane Roadway with 16-foot Median
. Typical Six-Lane Roadway With 16-foot Median
. Typical Six-Lane Roadway with 28-foot Median
. Hacienda Drive Freeway Interchange
. Tassajara Road Freeway Interchange
. Fallon Drive Freeway Interchange
. Airway Boulevard (Dublin Boulevard Extension) Freeway Interchange
. Central Freeway Bridge Crossing
. Tassajara Creek and Typical Unit Cost Calculation with Drawing
. Signalized Intersection, Typical Unit Costs with Drawing
. Right-of-Way Weighted Average Unit
Costs with selected pages 'from right-of-way appraisal
of the area east of Tassajara Road
Signalized Intersections, Cost Allocations-
/-
SANTINAK
THOMPSON.INC.
~
104' R/W
50'E
EXISTING ROADWAY
It~ 12'E 12'E
.
- F
-
20 12 12 16
SEGIIENT Q) DOUGHERTY ROAD
ROADWAY ESTINATE
( CITY OF DUBIJN
B'E
5
\l\.
~
\
"'-
~
~
(
(
~
~
"'-
~
.~
~
104' R/W
72'E + 32'
EXISTING ROADWAY
12'E;. 12'E 12'E 14'E I 33'NEW 5' L a'E
- -
---
-
-
20 12 12 16
SEGIIENT @ DOUGHERTY ROAD
ROADWAY ESTIMATE
CITY OF DUBIJN
\
f~
()\
lJ)
~
~
"
~
~
(~
. wrosc~\lIG !t1m\\G.-1I0~ 0\\1.'1
...
f
ROADWAY ESTIMATE
CITY OF DUBLIN
DOUGHERTY ROAD
HOUSTON PLACE TO DUBIJN BLVD.
MEDIAN WORK ONLY
(
.~
I
SEGIIENT @
(c
()\
~
\
~
~
118' R/W
1
NEW lANDSCAPING & IRRIG.
R
'7
I-
EXISTING
-
EXISTING NEW
-
TO REMAIN
SEGMENT@ DOUGHERTY ROAD
SECTION A-A . SEGMENT 3
RIGHT TURN POCKET ONLY AND lANDSCAPING & IRRIG.
ROADWAY ESTIMATE
CITY OF DUBLIN
~\
"'~
q;
-!.> --
1/1/ /,<1 '"
1/ ;! #' /.f/
,/ ,/ -II 1 i] j
r /If' 1 /y7 I.'
/1. 1 7
I 1,/ I I
;,S ~./Ii / ../ ;,~Ib V
,1-. 1 I .....
,... ''j .-' .'~' ,
I I.' ..."........
I; 1// 'i
,.P I It\
( _... '" 1,
I '" ..
, .. !.
l ,....../
~,;;
\
I,a.,)
,1l?V
")
)
~
~I
"-
~
~
ROADWAY ES'mfATE
CITY OF DUBI.JN
(
DOUGHERTY ROAD
DUBLIN BLVD. TO NORTH 1-580 OFF-RAMP
(
SEGIIENT CD
(
8'
~
~
\
~
~
DEMO. BLDG.
118' R/W
-
+r ,
12'112' 12' I 12' 12' ~
I
- - I
- -
- -
:UT l
EXISTING
- - - -
EXISTING .1 NEW
- - - - -
TO REMAIN
SEGIlENT @ DOUGHERTY ROAD
DUBLIN BLVD. TO NORTH 1-580 OFF-RAMP
ROADWAY ESTIYATE
CITY OF DUBLIN
20'
12'
"'
)'
118t R/W
12t 12t _12'-rf 12t 12t 12t 20t 12t EXIST.
-
BLDG.
\ I
_--1 - - -
- - - ~
~W( -
EXISTING ~
- - - - - -
EXISTING
- - - - - ....
TO REYAIN
SECXENT@ DOUGHERTY ROAD
DUBUN BLVD. TO NORTH 1-580 OFF-RAMP
ROADWAY ESTIl4ATE
( CITY OF DUBlJN (
REMODEL BLDG.
20'
12t
IS\
~
\
......
~
~
(
%
~
~
EXISTING R/W = 100'
lOa' R/W
11' 11' I; 7' 7' 11' 17' 8'
----Y L 4' Add'} R/W
- I i
EXISTIN TO REMAIN 4-
- -
SEGMENT 00 DUBLIN BLVD.
VILLAGE PARKWAY TO SIERRA CT. 1JIDENING
ROADWAY ESTIMATE
CITY OF DUBIJN
17'
8'
R/1J
Add'}
4'
~
~
Q
;
~
<b~
\
~
~
~
"-
\.:.
"-.J
ROADWAY ESTDIATE (...
CITY OF DUBLIN ..
DUBLIN BLVD.
(
SEGMENT (2)
(
14f R/i
102' FIe TO F/~
20'. 12' - 12' 7' 7' -
. .
-
I
SEGJaNT @ DUBUN BLVD.
12'
'()
~
~
~
ROADWAY ESTIMATE
CITY OF DUBUN
~
~
\
~
~
(
32' NEW R/W 72' R,I1r
- -
12' 20' 12' t- 20' 12'
- ---.
- - - -
L_-- -
- ---
La 44' EXIST. TO REMAIN
SEGMM@ ARNOLD RD.
ROADWAY ESTIMATE
( CITY OF DUBlJN
(
~
~
>\
~
~
80' R/W
ALL NEW
SCARLETT DRIVE
ROADWAY ESTIMATE
CITY OF DUBUN
6'
./
20'
SEGlIENT @
~
V)
0\
\:;
~
(
12'
ROADWAY ESTIMATE
CITY OF DUBUN
20'
104' R/I
80'
12' ~ 12'
-I -
- -
TIF
- -
TYPICAL
4 LANE ROAD
(
20'
12'
(
) I
l~~ 11,/ "
~ 104' ,
12' II 20' 12' II 12' ~ 8' II 8' II 12' 12' II 20' II 12'
~ ~
8' 4' IL 4' 8'
I ~
0- L
-
TIF
TYPICAL 6 LANE ROAD
WITH 16 FT. MEDIAN
~
~
~
~
ROADWAY ESTIMATE
CITY OF DUBIJN
~
~
\
~
~
(
If{ R}
II 140' R/f I
,
if 12' , 8' 12' 12' I, 12' 14' .I 14' II 12' 12' 12' , 8' ~ 12' I
II 8' , I 8' "
. 1 1 ,
,
ALL NEW
32' TIF 32'
FRONTAGE
FRONTAGE
DlPROVEMENT
ROADWAY ESTDlATE
CflY OF DUBLIN
TYPICAL 6 LANE ROAD
WITH 28 FT MEDIAN
(
IMPROVEMENT
R
(
~
~
~
"-
\.)
~
)
I .
ROADWAY ESTIMATE
CITY OF DUBlJN
96' BRIDGE
80'
20' 12' ~ 12' _ 20'
- -
- - - -
- - - -
TYPICAL 4 LANE
BRIDGE
6'
51
~
."'\)
~I
~
~
(
112' BffiDGE
~
tot j
~ ,
j
~6' ~ ~ tr lr ~r ~r ~ lr ~ ~ 20' ,r~ ~
~ ~j ~
I I
ROADWAY ESTIMATE
CITY OF DUBIJN
TYPICAL 6 LANE
BRIDGE
(
(
go ~ /)1
Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fees for 1999 I
Dougherty Dougherty Dougherty Dougherty Dougherty Dougherty
Road Road Road Road Road Road
1999 UNIT Units SEGM'T 1 SEGM'T 1 SEGM'T 2 SEGM'T 2 SEGM'T 3 SEGM'T 3
DESCRIPTION PRICES QUANTIY COST QUANTIY COST QUANTIY COST
Mobilization 3% EA 1 $62,055 1 $39,112 1 $1,528
Traffic Control 2% EA 1 $41,370 1 $26,075 . 1 $1,019
Clear & Grub 2% EA 1 $41,370 1 $26,075 1 $1,019
Saw Cut $ 1.00 LF 4000 $4,000 9600 $9,600 800 $800
Grind $ 1.50 LF 16000 $24,000 0 $0 800 $1,200
Remove Ex Pvm't/sw $ 1.00 SF 28000 $28,000 44800 $44,800 8330 $8,330
Full Pavm't Section $ 3.80 SF 196000 $744,800 105600 $401,280 1360 $5,168
Curb & Gutter $ 12.00 LF 4000 $48,000 3200 $38,400 200 $2,400
Sidewalk $ 3.10 SF 0 $0 25600 $79,360 1600 $4,960
Median Curb, Std $ 10.00 LF 4000 $40,000 0 $0 600 $6,000
Median Curb, Glue $ 7.00 LF 4000 $28,000 6400 $44,800 $0
Overlay $ 1.40 SF 176000 $246,400 0 $0 $0
Earthwork $ 5.00 CY 6667 $33,333 5452 $27,259 $0
Drop Inlets & MH's(1) $ 2,0.00.00 EA 14 $28,000 11 $22,000 $0
Storm Drain Pipe(2) $ 45.00 LF 4500 $202,500 4500 $202,500 $0
Striping(3) $ 1.50 LF 32000 $48,000 25600 $38,400 7200 $10,800
Markings $ 100.00 EA 32 $3,200 28 $2,800 18 $1,800
Signs(4) $ 100.00 EA 40 $4,000 32 $3,200 6 $600
Electroliers(5) $ 2,000.00 EA 14 $28,000 11 $22,000 1 $2,000
Signal Interconnect $ 15.00 LF 4000 $60,000 3200 $48,000 $0
New Utilities $ - LF 0 $0 0 $0 $0
Existing Utilities $ - LF 0 $0 0 $0 $0
Landscape & Irrig(6) $ 3.20 SF 104000 $332,800 67200 $215,040 $0
Survey $ 0.01 LS 1 $20,685 1 $13,037 1 $509
Grading Depth 1 1 0
Signal Legs 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Signal Price (not included) 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Bridges (not included) SF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Demolition .. 0
Building (not included) EA 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Median Gut $ 3.00 SF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Exist curb $ 7.00 LF 0 $0 0 $0 400 $2,800
RIW Cost (not included) SF 0 nia 0 nia nia
Other
RIW cost/SF 0
Length 4000 3200 900
RIW width 104 104
TIF width nla
Total, civil only $2,068,514 $1,303,738 $50,933
COST/LF
Footnotes:
(1) @200 ft. Intervals along length of roadway ..
(2) one pipe, each side of roadway, total = $90/LF
(3) per strip I
(4) @ 50 Ft intervals along all lanes I
(5) @150ft. Intervals along all lanes, including conduit
(6) 16'+4'+4' andfor area of frontage restoration
original file for base information is 981030; sheet 990331
.
(-
11/8/99, 5:50 PM
Page 1
0231h
y! q( /J1
Eastern Dublil} Traffic Impact Fees for 1999
Dougherty Dougherty Dublin Dublin Dublin Dublin
Road Road Boulevard Boulevard Boulevard Boulevard
1999 UNIT Units SEGM'T 4 SEGM'T 4 SEGM'T 6 SEGM'T 6 SEGM'T 7 SEGM'T 7
DESCRIPTION PRICES QUANTIY COST QUANTIY COST QUANTIY COST
Mobilization 3% EA . 1 $7,131 1 $20,132 1 $7,066
Traffic Control 2% EA 1 $4.754 1 $13,422 1 $4,711
Clear & Grub 2% EA 1 $4.754 1 $13,422 1 $4.711
Saw Cut $ 1.00 LF 1100 $1,100 4060 $4.060 0 $0
Grind $ 1.50 LF 1100 $1,650 0 $0 640 $960
Remove Ex Pvm't/sw $ 1.00 SF 13200 $13,200 12180 $12,180 0 $0
Full Pavm't Section $ 3.80 SF 17200 $65.360 28420 $107,996 25210 $95,798
Curb & Gutter $ 12.00 LF 1100 $13,200 4060 $48,720 790 $9,480
Sidewalk $ 3.10 SF 8800 $27,280 32480 $100.688 6320 $19,592
Median Curb, Std $ 10.00 LF 0 $0 2030 $20,300 0 $0
Median Curb, Glue $ 7.00 LF 0 $0 0 $0 1300 $9.100
Overlay $ 1.40 SF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Earthwork $ 5.00 CY 1467 $7.333 2256 $11,278 1143 $5,716
Drop Inlets & MH's(1) $ 2.000.00 EA 4 $8,000 10 $20,300 2 $4,000
Storm Drain Pipe(2) $ 45.00 LF 200 $9,000 4060 $182,700 790 $35,550
Striping(3) $ 1.50 LF 5500 $8,250 16240 $24,360 9600 $14,400
Markings $ 100.00 EA 16 $1,600 28 $2,800 10 $1,000
Signs(4) $ 100.00 EA 10 $1,000 41 $4,060 10 $1,000
Electroliers(5) $ 2,000.00 EA 0 $0 0 $0 2 $4.000
Signal Interconnect $ 15.00 LF 550 $8.250 0 $0 0 $0
New Utilities $ - LF 0 $0 $0 0 $0
Existing Utilities $ - LF 0 $0 $0 0 $0
Landscape & Irrig(6) $ 3.20 SF 14300 $45,760 24360 $77,952 3250 $10,400
Survey $ 0.01 LS 1 $2,377 1 $6,711 1 $2.355
Grading Depth 1 1
Signal Legs 0 $0 $0 0 $0
Signal Price (not included) 0 $0 $0 0 $0
Bridges (not included) SF 0 $0 $0 0 $0
Demolition
Building (not included) EA 0 $0 $0 1 $0
Median Gut $ 3.00 SF 0 $0 $0 1760 $5,280
Exist curb $ 7.00 LF 1100 $7,700 $0 60 $420
R/W Cost (not included) SF 0 nla nla 19465 nla
Other 0 $0
R/W cost/SF
Length 550 2030
R/W width' nla
TIF width
Total, civil only $237.699 $671,080 $235,539
COST/LF $331
Footnotes: use $330
(1) @200 ft. Intervals along length of roadway
(2) one pipe, each side of roadway, total = $90/LF
(3) per strip I
(4)@ 50 Ft intervals along all lanes
(5) @150 ft. Intervals along all lanes, including conduit
(6) 16'+4'+4' andlor area of frontage restoration
11/8/99, 5:50 PM
Page 2
./'~-"
.....,
.....,
\...,1
0231h
%,.1 0{ /J- J
Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fees for 1999
Hacienda Hacienda Arnold Arnold Arnold Arnold
Road Road Road Road Road Road
1999 UNIT Units SEGM'T 14 SEGM'T 14 SEGM'T 16 SEGM'T 16 SEGM'T 16A SEGM'T 16A
DESCRIPTION PRICES QUANTIY COST QUANTIY COST QUANTIY COST
Mobilization 3% EA 1 $4,175 1 $52,280 1 $5,871
Traffic Control 2% EA 1 $2,783 1 $34,853 1 $3,914
Clear & Grub 2% EA 1 $2,783 1 $34,853 1 $3,914
Saw Cut $ 1.00 LF 800 $800 2326 $2,326 0 $0
Grind $ 1.50 LF 800 $1,200 0 $0 0 $0
Remove Ex Pvm't/sw $ 1.00 SF 17600 $17,600 32564 $32,564 0 $0
Full Pavm't Section $ 3.80 SF 17600 $66,880 74432 $282,842 16800 $63,840
Curb & Gutter $ 12.00 LF 800 $9,600 2326 $27,912 0 $0
Sidewalk $ 3.10 SF 0 $0 18608 $57,685 0 $0
Median Curb, Std $ 10.00 LF 0 $0 4652 $46,520 1400 $14,000
Median Curb, Glue $ 7.00 LF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Overlay $ 1.40 SF 0 $0 see x-sect $38,800 0 $0
Earthwork $ 5.00 CY 652 $3,259 0 $0 1452 $7,259
Drop Inlets & MH's(1) $ 2,000.00 EA 5 $10,000 8 $16,000 0 $0
Storm Drain Pipe(2) $ 45.00 LF 100 $4,500 see x-sect $930,400 0 $0
Striping(3) $ 1.50 LF 4800 $7,200 18608 $27,912 2800 $4,200
Markings $ 100.00 EA 6 $600 14 $1,400 4 $400
Slgns(4) $ 100.00 EA 8 $800 24 $2,400 0 $0
Electroliers(5) $ 2,000.00 EA 0 $0 8 $16,000 9 $18,667
Signal Interconnect $ 15.00 LF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
New Utilities $ - LF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Existing Utilities $ - LF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Landscape & Irrig(6) $ 3.20 SF 0 $0 32564 $104,205 22400 $71,680
Survey $ 0.01 LS 1 $1,392 1 $17,427 1 $1,957
Grading Depth 1 1
Signal Legs 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Signal Price (not included) 0 $0 $0 0 $0
Bridges (not included) SF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Demolition 0 0
Building (not included) EA 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Median Gut $ 3.00 SF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Exist curb $ 7.00 LF 800 $5,600 2326 $16,282 0 $0
RJW Cost (not included) SF 0 n/a 74432 n/a 0 n/a
Other 0
RJW cost/SF n/a 20
Length 800 2326 1400
RIW width n/a 104
TIF width $139,173 28
Total, civil only $139,173 $1,742,660 $195,702
COST/LF
Footnotes:
(1) @200 ft. Intervals along length of roadway
(2) one pipe, each side of roadway, total = $901LF
(3) per strip I
(4) @ 50 Ft intervals along all lanes I
(5) @150 ft. Intervals along all lanes, including conduit ,
(6) 16'+4'+4' and/or area of frontage restoration
11/8/99, 5:50 PM
Page 3
0231h
73 c:rC;.J /)/)
Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fees for 1999
Central Pkwy Central Pkwy Central Pkwy Central Pkwy Scarlet Scarlet
2250 2250 2000 ft 2000 ft Drive Drive
1999 UNIT Units SEGMT 17a SEGM'T 17a SEGM'T 17b SEGM'T 17b SEGMT 21 SEGM'T 21
DESCRIPTION PRICES QUANTIY COST QUANTIY COST QUANTIY COST
Mobilization 3% EA 1 $8,310 1 $12,857 1 $37,900
Traffic Control 2% EA 1 $5,540 1 $8,571 1 $25,267
Clear & Grub 2% EA 1 $5,540 1 $8,571 1 $25,267
Saw Cut $ 1.00 LF 4500 $4,500 0 $0 0 $0
Grind $ 1.50 LF 4500 $6,750 0 $0 0 $0
Remove Ex Pvm't/sw $ 1.00 SF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Full Pavm't Section $ 3.80 SF 36000 $136,800 48000 $182,400 96000 $364,800
Curb & Gutter $ 12.00 LF 0 $0 0 $0 4800 $57,600
Sidewalk $ 3.10 SF 0 $0 0 $0 19200 $59,520
Median Curb, Std $ 10.00 LF 0 $0 4000 $40,000 4800 $48,000
Median Curb, Glue $ 7.00 LF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Overlay $ 1.40 SF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Earthwork $ 5.00 CY 0 $0 1778 $8,889 7111 $35,556
Drop Inlets & MH's(1) $ 2,000.00 EA 0 $0 0 $0 12 $24,000
Storm Drain Pipe(2) $ 45.00 LF 0 $0 0 $0 4800 $216,000
Striping(3) $ 1.50 LF 9000 $13,500 8000 $12,000 9600 $14,400
Markings $ 100.00 EA 6 $600 4 $400 8 $800
Signs(4) $ 100.00 EA 11 $1,100 10 $1,000 48 $4,800
Electroliers(5) $ 2,000.00 EA 4 $8,000 15 $30,000 16 $32,000
Signal Interconnect $ 15.00 LF 0 $0 2000 $30,000 2400 $36,000
New Utilities $ - LF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Existing Utilities $ - LF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Landscape & Irrig(6) $ 3.20 SF 10500 $33,600 28000 $89,600 48000 $153,600
Survey $ 0.01 LS 1 $2,770 1 $4,286 1 $12,633
Grading Depth 1 1 1
Signal Legs 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Signal Price (not included) 0 $0 $0 $0
Bridges (not inclUded) SF $0 $0 n/a $0
Demolition 1 $50,000
Building (not included) EA $0 $0 $0
Median Gut $ 3.00 SF $0 $0 $0
Exist curb $ 7.00 LF $0 $0 $0
RJIN Cost (not included) SF 0 n/a n/a 208000 $0
Other trail $115,200
RJIN cost/SF 0
Length 2250 2000 2400
RJIN width
TIF width
Total, civil only $277,011 $428,575 $1,263,343
COST/LF $526
Footnotes:
(1) @200 ft. Intervals along length of roadway ,
(2) one pipe, each side of roadway, total = $90/LF
(3) per strip
(4) @ 50 Ft intervals along all lanes
(5) @150 ft. Intervals along all lanes, including conduit
(6) 16'+4'+4' and/or area of frontage restoration
11/8/99, 5:50 PM
Page 4
''''''''''''
"wi!
~
0231h
yy cD /.f- '/
Eastern Dublio Traffic Impact Fees for 1999
Tassajara Tassajara Tassajara Tassajara Tassajara Tassajara
Road Road Raod Road Raod Road
1999 UNIT Units SEGM'T 22 SEGM'T 22 SEGM'T 22a SEGM'T 22a SEGM'T 23 SEGM'T 23a
DESCRIPTION PRICES QUANTIY COST QUANTIY COST QUANTIY COST
Mobilization 3% EA 1 $45,359 1 $36,375 1 $12,820
Traffic Control 2% EA 1 $30,239 1 $24,250 1 $8,547
Clear & Grub 2% EA 1 $30,239 1 $24,250 1 $8,547
Saw Cut $ 1.00 LF 0 $0 0 $0 4940 $4,940
Grind $ 1.50 LF 0 $0 0 $0 4940 $7,410
Remove Ex Pvm't/sw $ 1.00 SF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Full Pavm't Section $ 3.80 SF 135840 $516,192 120000 $456,000 79040 $300,352
Curb & Gutter $ 12.00 LF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Sidewalk $ 3.10 SF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Median Curb, Std $ 10.00 LF 11320 $113,200 10000 $100,000 4940 $49,400
Median Curb, Glue $ 7.00 LF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Overlay $ 1.40 SF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Earthwork $ 5.00 CY 50311 $251,556 22222 $111,111 2927 $14,637
Drop Inlets & MH's(1) $ 2,OOO.OQ EA $0 $0 0 $0
Storm Drain Pipe(2) $ 45.00 LF $0 $0 0 $0
Striping(3) $ 1.50 LF 22640 $33,960 24000 $36,000 9880 $14,820
Markings $ 100.00 EA 14 $1,400 14 $1,400 4 $400
Signs( 4) $ 100.00 EA 0 $0 0 $0 12 $1,200
Electroliers(5) $ 2,000.00 EA 50 $100,000 40 $80,000 0 $0
Signal Interconnect $ 15.00 LF 5660 $84,900 5000 $75,000 0 $0
New Utilities $ - LF $0 $0 0 $0
Existing Utilities $ - LF $0 $0 0 $0
Landscape & Irrig(6) $ 3.20 SF 90560 $289,792 80000 $256,000 0 $0
Survey $ 0.01 LS 1 $15,120 1 $12,125 1 $4,273
Grading Depth 6 1 1
Signal Legs 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Signal Price (not included) 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Bridges (not included) SF 2 $0 1 $0 0 $0
Demolition
Building (not included) EA 2 houses $0 $0 0 $0
Median Gut $ 3.00 SF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Exist curb $ 7.00 LF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
RIW Cost (not included) SF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Other $0 $0 0 $0
RIW cost/SF
Length I 5660 5000 2470
RIW width
TIF width
Total, civil only $1,511,956 $1,212,512 $427,347
COSTILF
Footnotes:
(1) @200 ft. Intervals along length of roadway
(2) one pipe, each side ofroadway, total - $90/LF
(3) per strip I
(4) @ 50 Ft intervals along all lanes
(5) @150 ft. Intervals along all lanes, including conduit
(6) 16'+4'+4' and/or area of frontage restoration
/-
11/8/99, 5:50 PM
Page 5
0231h
g"S %' /)1
Eastern DublLn Traffic Impact Fees for 1999 I
Sports Sports Sports Sports Sports Sports
Park Park Park Park Park Park
1999 UNIT Units at Seg 18 at Seg 18 at Seg 20 at Seg 20 at Seg 26A at Seg 26A
DESCRIPTION PRICES QUANTIY COST QUANTIY COST QUANTIY COST
Mobilization 3% EA 1 $8,770 1 $1,471 1 $20,175
Traffic Control . 2% EA 1 $5,847 1 $981 1 $13,450
Clear & Grub 2% EA 1 $5,847 1 $981 1 $13,450
Saw Cut $ 1.00 LF $0 $0 $0
Grind $ 1.50 LF $0 $0 $0
Remove Ex Pvm'tlsw $ 1.00 SF $0 $0 $0
Full Pavm't Section $ 3.80 SF 30000 $114,000 5000 $19,000 62000 $235,600
Curb & Gutter $ 12.00 LF 1500 $18,000 250 $3,000 3100 $37,200
Sidewalk $ 3.10 SF $0 $0 $0
Median Curb, Std $ 10.00 LFI $0 $0 $0
Median Curb, Glue $ 7.00 LF $0 $0 $0
Overlay $ 1.40 SF $0 $0 $0
Earthwork $ 5.00 CY 1111 $5,556 185 $926 13778 $68,889
Drop Inlets & MH's(1) $ 2,009.00 EA 14 $28,000 2 $4,000 31 $62,000
Storm Drain Pipe(2) $ 45.00 LF 1500 $67,500 250 $11,250 3100 $139,500
Striping(3) $ 1.50 LF 3000 $4,500 500 $750 6200 $9,300
Markings $ 100.00 EA $0 $0 $0
Signs(4) $ 100.00 EA 14 $1 ,400 2 $200 62 $6,200
Electroliers(5) $ 2,000.00 EA special $30,000 special $6,000 special $60,000
Signal Interconnect $ 15.00 LF $0 $0 $0
New Utilities $ - LF $0 $0 $0
Existing Utilities $ - LF $0 $0 $0
Landscape & Irrig(6) $ 3.20 SF $0 $0 $0
Survey $ 0.01 LS 1 $2,923 1 $490 1 $6,725
Grading Depth 1 1 6
Signal Legs 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Signal Price (not included) 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Bridges (not included) SF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Demolition 0 0 0
Building (not included) EA 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Median Gut $ 3.00 SF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Exist curb $ 7.00 LF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
RNIJ Cost (not included) SF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Other $0 $0 $0
RNIJ costlSF 0 0 0
Length 1500 250 3100
RNIJ width 0 0 0
TIF width 0 0 0
Total, civil only $292,343 $49,050 $672,488
COST/LF
Footnotes: ,
(1) @200 ft. Intervals along length of roadway
(2) one pipe, each side of roadway, total = $90/LF
(3) per strip I
(4) @ 50 Ft intervals along all lanes I
(5) @150ft. Intervals along all lanes, including conduit
(6) 16'+4'+4' and/or area of frontage restoration
11/8/99, 5:50 PM
Page 6
',"""""
'WI
'...""",
0231h
gb crt I:<?
Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fees for 1999 .
2 inside lanes of 2 inside lanes of
typical typical
4 Lane Rdwy 4 Lane Rdwy 6 Lane Rdwy 6 Lane Rdwy 6 Lane Rdwy 6 Lane Rdwy
1999 UNIT Units Typical Typical Typical Typical w/28 ft median w/28 ft median
DESCRIPTION PRICES QUANTIY COST QUANTIY COST QUANTIY COST
Mobilization 3% EA 1 $37,778 1 $44,015 1 $23,649
Traffic Control 2% EA 1 $25,185 1 $29,344 1 $15,766
Clear & Grub 2% EA 1 $25,185 1 $29,344 1 $15,766
Saw Cut $ 1.00 LF $0 $0 $0
Grind $ 1.50 LF $0 $0 $0
Remove Ex Pvm't1sw $ 1.00 SF $0 $0 $0
Full Pavm't Section $ 3.80 SF 128000 $486,400 176000 $668,800 96000 $364,800
Curb & Gutter $ 12.00 LF 4000 $48,000 4000 $48,000 0 $0
Sidewalk $ 3.10 SF 32000 $99,200 32000 $99,200 0 $0
Median Curb, Std $ 10.00 LF 4000 $40,000 4000 $40,000 4000 $40,000
Median Curb, Glue $ 7.00 LF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Overlay . $ 1.40 SF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Earthwork $ 5.00 CY 7704 $38,519 9481 $47,407 5630 $28,148
Drop Inlets & MH's(1) $ 2,000.OQ EA 10 $20,000 10 $20,000 0 $0
Storm Drain Pipe(2) $ 45.00 LF 4000 $180,000 4000 $180,000 500 $22,500
Striping(3) $ 1.50 LF 12000 $18,000 12000 $18,000 12000 $18,000
Markings $ 100.00 EA 8 $800 8 $800 6 $600
Signs(4) $ 100.00 EA 40 $4,000 40 $4,000 20 $2,000
Electroliers(5) $ 2,000.00 EA 20 $40,000 20 $40,000 20 $40,000
Signal Interconnect $ 15.00 LF 2000 $30,000 2000 $30,000 2000 $30,000
New Utilities $ - IF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Existing Utilities $ - IF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Landscape & Irrig(6) $ 3.20 SF 48000 $153,600 48000 $153,600 56000 $179,200
Survey $ 0.01 LS 1 $12,593 1 $14,672 1 $7,883
Grading Depth 1 1 1
Signal Legs 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Signal Price (not included) 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Bridges (not included) SF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Demolition 0 0 0
Building (not included) EA 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Median Gut $ 3.00 SF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Exist curb $ 7.00 LF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
R/W Cost (not included) SF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Other
R/W cost/SF 0 0 0
Length 2000 2000 2000
R/W width 104 128 140
TIF width 40 64 76
Total, civil only $1,259,259 $291,564 $1,467,182 $788,313
COST/LF $630 $734 $394
Footnotes: use $650/lf use $750 use $400
(1) @200 ft. Intervals along length of roadway
(2) one pipe, each side of roadway, total = $90/LF
(3) per strip I I I
(4) @ 50 Ft intervals along all lanes I
(5) @150 ft. Intervals along all lanes, including conduit.
(6) 16'+4'+4' and/or area of frontage restoration
1--,
11/8/99, 5:50 PM
Page 7
0231h
XJ:: · Civil Engineering-
. . Transportalion Planning
. · HIghWay.s Rail 0fiI9n
3"1 15 /;!,?
2116 N. Main Street, Suite K
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
TEL: 925-934-6932
FAX: 925-934-6933
E-Mail: hqe@pacbell.net
HIGH QUAtrTY ENGINEERING
'~
September 17, 1998
Mr. Kevin Van Katwyk
City of Dublin
100 Civic Plaza
P.O. Box 3240
Dublin, CA 94568-
Subject:
Hacienda Drivell-S80 Improvements Project
Encroachment PermitlPS&E Scope of Work
Dean Kevin:
Enclosed per. yow:. r.e.q.uest.. is-. a. .!:ummary o[the scope of work for the above project. We have
also attached our letter of August 26, 1998 which contained the fee proposal for your reference.
'...,
Please call me if you have any questions-or need additional information.
Sincerely,
"
. -~.
HeidiM. Duren. P.E.
Principal/Owner
c: George Homolka
Enclosure
.".,
I
55 oz( /)7
CIITY OF DUBLIN
/'~~
HACIENDA DRIVEII-58!} INTERCHANGE
IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
SCOPE OF WORK SUMMARY
Proieet Description
The purpose of this project is to provide access for development occurring in the East Dublin
area, specifically for the People Soft development located in the northwest quadrant of the
interchange. In order to accommodate the anticipated traffic demand, the following
improvements will be required (see attached plan for graphical reference):
. Widen Hacienda Drive to provide three left twn lanes into the proposed People Soft
development.
. Add one through lane on southbound Hacienda Drive.
. Widen the westbound 1-580 on ramp for use by High Occupancy Vehicles (HOV),
provide a Calfornia Highway Patrol (CHP) enforcement area, and install ramp
metering signal system.
. Widen the eastbound 1-580 off ramp to provide an additional left turn lane.
Scope of ED2ineeriD~ Services
High Quality Engineering (HQE) will -provide engineering services to complete the Plans,
Specifications & Estimate (PS&E) in accordance with Caltrans metric standards. An
Encroachment Permit application and permiL.Engineer's Evaluation Report (PEER) will be
processed with the completed PS&E to obtain Caltrans approval to construct the improvements
within the State right-of-way.
The specific services to be provided include:
. Preparation of metric PS&E for construction.
. Coordination with the City of Dublin, Caltrans. affected Utility Companies, and other
consultants working within the project area.
. Man.agement of SUbCOllsultants required for geotechnical, surveys, and electrical
servIces.
. Preparation of a signal maintenance agreement between the City and Caltrans.
. Schedule and budget preparation and monitoring.
~.
2
. -/1
31 cro /),.
r
....",
, \. ,
WIDE~'-;k~IENDA DRive TO PROitOE .
TRIPlE LEFT TURN POCKET AND',
AN ADornONAL SOUTHBOUNO LANE',
" /', '\ "
. ,~ "
" ,
~" '\
" "
", '
"
. ,
, "-
, "-
, '\
'-.,,,\.
WIDEN WESTBOUND ON RAMP \',
TO PROVIDE HOV BYPAS8 LANE \.
AND CHP ENFORCEMENT AREA
../'
~
J,J
q-
t.?
"
..~,
.~
--.--..---
-----------..---
--------.--------------.
'''wi
....-..... -. .... ..- --..-...
.................................. "'..
- .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. . .. . .. . .. . . . .. ~ .. .. .. . ..
..
... :
....- .--
I I I~
-
... _..,_~__ ._u.....,__. _~_ ...~~!~. la,
-
.
'"'..--... - ..._-.-.- .-.............. .....---.-, -..-..-....-
. .... ........... '.e'.',',."", ".". .' . ~'_"'._.,..". ,"" "0. '" . ,
-.... ..-. ~ ....._--.... ~.......,..
'-'~':....--~""-~~::""__""'" '.~_..._.._... _......... . ",.0"''''.''_
.......-.......
r
j.
.... ..;~ 0 ....
//';~:;:;J';:;::' '-
'J
,
. .i .~~=~.~= --- -'. -
I
I
,
.....,
I
I
!
l~;~. A
.' J'
. -'" j
'" . -'::':-::.-://r
WIDEN EASTBOUND OFF RAMP TO
PROVIDE ADDITIONAL LEFT TURN LANE
HACIENDA DRIVE/I-580 INTERCHANGE
IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT.
......-
3
Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee for 1999
Segment 15
Hacienda Drive/I-580 Freeway Interchange Modifications
Construction Cost Estimate from HQE:
Right of Entry/PermittinglReview Process:
Administration, Design, CM, ROW Acquisition:
TOTAL WITH CONTINGENCY .
$ 820,000
$ 180,000
$ 200,000
$1,300,000
10 t6' 1~/1
JU:
~rF
ecs
1/ utl.2
PL.ANNING AND ENG1NEERING
I~CORPo~"reO
6 Crow CanYO/l CQurt . Salt Ramoll, CA 94583-:1,6~
(925) 314-]]20 · Fax (925) 31 ..;~
E-mail: sro@Ccsoffi_,
DATE:
FAX TRANSMISSION
I
October 9, 1998 TOTAL PAGES: 5
(Including this transmittal sheet)
TO:
Kevin Van Kamyk FAX: 925-833-6628
COPY TO:
FAX:
FROM:
Jane AldenOk'
CCS P'an~Mg & Engineering. inc.
PROJECT: 1-580 ffassajara !Fallon Rd
PROJ. NO.: CCS 98035
RE:
Conceptual Construction Cost Estimates
If you have any problem. receiying this fax please call (925) 3 J 4~1220
REMARKS:
Kevin:
'....-f
Per George Homolka's request, I am forwarding a copy of~he conceptual cost estimates for the proposed
improvements at the 1-580/Fallon Road Interchange ahd the I-580rfassajara Road Interchange. Please
note the items that have bt:enexclllded are listed at the bottom of each estimate and that both qf these
estimates are preliminary in nature. .
Let me know if you need any additional information.
Thanks - Jane
....,
d:\98035\admin\fnx~\dubljnfax14.doc
.....
!;
/"...,-
J..6OO fr~i~ R~! S ~ ~ fnwd'la~
f~ Con5tl'ue-tIOJ'l Phtif'
Cc.nc:eptua! Co--s-t ~~
(eamM 1&$2.T$.'f~).
0; ) ~ /~ 1
!l~?J~
I ." .. ..,,~ ~- ~ r~~I...~;~
~~j~&_~ _ ... ,. .._ ~ tS ..' 1 $ 5G.wg $ &l~
<
tt4~~-m& 7~~F~es
Ea.1.~
,11CO 1 $
1 .. i . ~,OJ:P~ $." &~,OOO
1~}$- i1~
..~
3:U
1
L5
r;:<I
~~~~~~ - ,,~~~ t ~~
~.~~~;~)J J . n, '. ,: . i +=;:1- ~.: ~QQ $
- ..... no .' .. .~~ _... ::: ,,::': ......'.
o.~r;ase . .. is 1
21~blm $
5li $
$ ~};l,a.:)O $
i~M#~J~
lS
{I
i}'t~~ ~s ~i!y ede&lID E<\ 2 ~$,OOO $-
~~~~='ao. ~.~.:
1~&S:it~{5%i' 1-- - - J.S
~~~i}~%)~ '-','-~ ,.'~~":~J~=~:_::t~ -~=t.~ :_~ .J}::
S3Q<~~
1i4~QOO
.2m),OOO
tf
-'0
"I!tl:l,OoSO
i()sreo
trn,@
..1~
. "'fi-
ua~7.5
JCorI.;~(2f))~1~ ~.~ ..::::::::-':[ - ~J..::. . _1.. . :~=. rs . 002,425J
r r-Il_ ." ,,:,~~ .._~$tjg:~~~"~;;;v.~~~<.u_"u- .'. ..- ,,~""""'J~_"~~~d
I... .. . ,. . .. ..1 u...
f.~~kt~~!~~~em~tlillI.::' - ,C~= ' .'-T~"f'_' -~-_::J:~"1r~
1_.. _:d...~ ~ :~= ~ :~T.~AL~~~~il~': "~:::." d':- ~ J~ ~J
~~ 'l~ a~~~~~ 16
r=-'~'R" -:]'~..~.iq~~~p~$~~~~i-
~~ .
1, 1'l9.'f;~C1X'IStr~~~Q~fl)!'ii1t-~~~~~~~.g r-wo1la-~N8
-&W~.$8)~FM~~/F.ICftargp~by~~~~fi~~_'~'~~
:,fu~~~~~te~~~~!$tWs;~lm~~" -
/)'. Revision, 10/14/99
~ Cordoba Consulting, Inc.
/--
c,
$17,649,782
r ~ ~ /;2 1
~ I FaJkm Road l.EJ Cflar:-c Em/a ~~;m~
~
stag, 1. CQ~ctfan Phase
Com;~p~~ CQ$t ~~!e
I -- ~<"" "'''''' "" , , ,,1.11 -. · .~~! '~~(t
. r . _, ~ fh)~M J U!"J.LJ Quanmrd .$ j . $
-. ..----h~H fill 11111'" ~~~~l" .. . ooJ. ..-- n."_ . J ". r ....~~.. f ......... .. .~. -
~~~& Gf~.{;g -~"~1 :: L$ :El '::::: 1:::0.1:: tOQ.ooo.rtff s 9Q>~
. ...J!. '~r. III. n-r ..~~~ .:~.~.~~~:-~It~. J ,~ .
v........u.: ":i~~~:;-;;;';:-':.cw 11111 -.Y."._ } 1U1!','...-...._ . ""4....... .1 . r.~~I~.1 If ~~
t...~~~_~S: lti:~ F~~ l u;: i 1 "$ -2!'w~""".. i, $ ~.~
t~.: ..=': """"" -;;-r! _ $ '" ~~
~~~'&~..:. ~'_~'m SF! Wtsz..~ ls d ."S!j ~.n5.~
&Il - :" r,::: :;;.;.~'_;;l.': .. ~ ---- I L. ",,:;: ; .~ d;.!t .....5 ~.~ 41-.. "'\""...
. . U~~ ~Wfde.""l v"'&r",,ua) r"'l" ! ~SZ.W . ... "" : 4l/ ... <"4,~~
'" 6 ~
tS f 1 ~ S ~<&A .S". 32$7"600'.
OiiiM~
?~.p ~~ SY"'~
t.S l
';.
~
1 fS 1:SQ,@1'
~
..... ~ ~ S. ..ro,~ $
~~.~
.~
trnrne ~nW.i i~ Ei'~~~
~il". ~-J~ fi:~}
EA
f:A
Zj
i
$
4,@ 1;
w...~
* .u~~
S:~;M & 00'fl:lfuc t 5 % ,
s ~
'''WII
,~~~f1~~}
:~
~
>
~ " ~:n,f;'j4
I. ,::: .
!~~~~~ ~ 20 %:i =:: ~ : r -:JI ~.: ..::...:_ -=r'$ 'l:4oo.1&S~
..,::~~~i~!~~e~;~~;~~t:::::""..:,,' .
IT ,-~' ...."........._.~- -..'" -.... .----..
....-!"t.,. ..... ol'.1Y'''' "'.,....., .~'1 .....~ 0\1: '" ~
_'W..~'N~ ~ C~~...tIe,,:l'l'lIJ.a;.03~,~m-~... (~ ". I : !
1l'Il. 01 ~ --......... "..' .....-..........__.......
, :1~ :._:~~.w;t7Jl
lT3~?~~t
uuu:r]t.#~~J
r" ":_1:: I i':::::::.:_ :.. ......' ~~~AL~il~~:~~X, .. ::,::",~: I
"
TOTAL stAGE ~ COHS1RUOnoH COST {~~d1n9 rfgnt4~1l: -
.ft. hto - :
"'~~ Q~~ 46:.+a::r.-
! ?~1 ~ (Fa~~'a CMmi tcl:i<Wtr,t) _..., uu - __. -:es .
.~ r .. a-~
'_ , " - "/6, . j:2Acre,
1<{"~~..~~~~OOmrr}NC1.~"OS ~W~:iM>if,C.~ ~w;.: l't>~~~~
~d~~~~~~~#~~~'~;~zl~S~~;~ ~~~,M~~;!:.t1
~< ~es~~~~>4,~$-~~ M ~W f-:t:hV,
8 $11,182,999
fA
Revision, 10/14/99
Cordoba Consulting, Inc.
.
,~
.~
7
,-~
!~!f~lbn R~!S O<~~r., ~~ ~r.,Itft!hm~
T _"S If"<,._. t....^.~.... f ."!-"'. ~~... ~........... ..... 1
..~ ~~~*"""'U':w;~ \ =~~.ran ~ ~~~'iF .A:. I
~W'~{$t~ C.OS! ~~~a
r
lfuim ~~c,'1
~l<~ &. Gt>~lrn.
t: .~. ..~ -~
,
ijt'~~~.~t~~'~1.f~"'. '"
I~'t.~::: ==:: ::,:, ,:: :.
~ - -. ~ 1111 1"
711r- _Jrn-!. rf $~~! I'. ;
. "'~l".$~"@r, tl ~~
J .Y.'.-S- - r II s -
~ '!l
s..:d~f) t j
I _.
1:; ~
: :::lL~
~t
\
~~..;
~U~J
\
.. $3--:l,~!
~.& Sam'!
t~'~~-~
!~_____., .1
I~-~~~:,_:::
t ~_"""",,_.''''''''''.''."'~oIlO''''
ffir'!1- ",.. "t.'$ 'v,',;,i" fir'";);,!'''
r~"~'.}'::'~!).::..:''''''~ ~~.. ~ . "" .. ~t'.
u.... n_." ....... ...._.. ___u.
~ ~
-.,.::
t 1~4,"~ ~S
, ,.
''''~~~':&\1 'I
..ft,._.. ..' . i
r $~
_......,I ",,,,.,,.^ _.._
... ....,~~."".""..._.... ':0:' :-~::; L
~i !.-:
...... ~ . 9G,'>l':;J t
r . IT
~~31~~~e~}
~1'(~j'W.r& Striiil'.D \ ~~) -..-
. ..
~~~on-%'l
~~ltl'lCY t E'^%l"~'
:- ......._uun.". t
. -.~~fSQ I
-......- .. Ii
z:~.~7.5H
II
5t~.~2 ! i
oo.tlOO !
ii
~~!;
-'.~~ 1~
1,300,UOO .
1-
f.7?S~u i
iM"U~tJ!l
,
r~ ~ /;1
7&4:!~
C:1;w.:~v.~
:$
1<<i,00}
"'_Y''"~'''iOO"
.. .", of. ....
'l~t1.$";;U
:i;40U\w
1.,'li5,(>1);7
~..
325-,OOC 52&.,000 t
~
1~,Qli~ : - ~$i~
~..., ... _.._.....n
", .... ". ..:.~-..-~.~.-.........:::..:;"':",v.-
:JV'"" .C'I"~ ~. .""" :,.....,:,...
..........f+....,.,..-----;.:..
00,000
m_..'..... {
.""..;..*~. 1~~.
~:n,~ 11
r iC~ I
~'7"J~.!I
~l
t~.T$5 Ii
t~,OO:a I
!
~
-4:n;~1
~
.~.~l
~
1.~4~~2Qi.
r S\l~7Ci~Cci;.~Sl:"'~Iiir.i\ll'm. ; tj 'i," '.."'.i;g.i:i;S~7:r-~,$.w.nI1fT 1t.'li$~1
:s....--.........~ ~__..,........."..M.""..~o,""..w..___ I --
I). ......___..........M.Uolllll_..--.-._....... ,...n. ,..... .... ,...-._.__._--,..,_.-..,....~.'.~..~...;.........:.., ;....-.-~~~~
::-=m ~lt':C~:~~.:s. c:: .~~!-.;C~~f1 \1.;nl1rQ~t"":~r:! ~ .:3Z" 6o.J.. f:! !,:~ ..)C.:: ~. ::; ~~.~e3.4:,,:7 H ~ !."<,:".7!!.J
[:::=-.----.....:::::::.-----..-.-=:::~...~.=-::==:..--.,.,..-.._...II:::=~:::::~,~~~~:,~~~:_:_J~-.......""...:~:::~
1 SL~T:'1"~ ~;U*~~I&:no~ lr~m~ : ;: $ llOUl;S!; i ~ 2.til'~M3:1 F, S 3..~tt:7.197 i
~_... II .nu.......................,_"'....__........ ..................._.,,_'..__...._ I I I III .. I ..
TarM.. ~ tr.....~~Wc,,~~r~::.. 11A~~~~fh ....~$4;if.t,~l
~...,...n-';. . ; , ~=.J1. ....;.rrrrur _.. ..11.:. ... ~ml1-
"ro-r~ CQil~~~~=~~ l ~'~':~;'.;j ;!~.;r~.r:;: 1- _.::"'-'~!l '11 ~~~f!;~J/r'.
'tlCl.~Olllrr t,.,J J
r~~~----' .w. !C>>~- III! 5,4a~~ !l::;~~:~i'i~.~Jffi
~$~
1-. ~~~~l$~PO~l i~~~ ~..~.1~~~1QJ.C1{l-$~~u-:..Tt:@t?Jt~J~Ii!:t""~
~ll!tff;~~~~~ ~~n<Qt.iIt~~~~~J1-W,~l~~f.l.~~ .
t!s~~~~f!~_>t$~~f<<*'''i$n'" ~I;l
$30,932,781
3.2 Af:res
i, ~.s&"~ ,~~ ~ W,;i'" NtU.\P'"f. ~t t~,*,~::1 !;"...f.,!!\r~,'7i,..:; ~~'lI'JIiWt'~~~f"m~i>
~ ~~~~. flwJ ~+oc':c !';;.o.~i~;;;;~;. 1~r~,f t'~',ad. .i' CI'c..X'~~~. ~~''':;: :..:c:;.~..';& 'No .~:~~ ~~".s j~"ga~5
ta~lt'~.U'l#;~~e-~~.
".......""""....
~, ~~~~~~~~"WPI~faw.at1~~~fi}~~n..~&!!~~.$~~>4'<<~~~
."f:~~tw~e~~~~~Jl~4~~
~
Revision, 10/14/99
Cordoba Consulting, Ine
8
J.~ iT~Jtll'1i Read I $~ R#Ji tt~d tllte.rdl<mge
CQ;W~1 Cost EWlm~~
l' -~ ~
t .
! . ~ ~~n ! \Is ~ntit:t
i.......-~- .......r-------
ki1'f.r~ .l6."''&:4~ ' ~r. tS l 1
i ~ .1
;:.:'~-.;.. ""--.....r:r. IHi . i". . ~.~ ~
iT<~._ ~"" ",,;llg & Def:O(.!! ...'" ; 1
r I i
'f:" . .. "11 I 11111 "Yo J 1)offt t -.-,- --
e~'tf~ I Cf ! lOC:OO s
k-.-~- .. " !. m~_
~1"'p'i~ & ~ J $,~ eooOO. ~
l i ~~ t
tStr~;d:~EI$ (t'kw f\c'& 130) ;SF .~eoo! $
'~~#i~~~~~~;;'::':"::uu,: ,. . u',E:' L$:'U: 1=' Uj ',ls:u
~ ~.
t~:l~~&~ m.__. ~ $r 1 1600 S
~ t ~
~~a L ,!:IU I II! tf
~:'.': :::':: ..:~: ~- 'i:
iP.aa:.# ~..l:l~ ~"1>.t-am J ts
t. ~
iil2ffie~~s(.~~Y;.o.,;- l ~. .. z
t ~ i 'Z~.;. r-::---
'R~~limIi~l&t':t~~ ; ...-. t----:.a 5
~ ~ ____'"""..._1 I ~ _~__~ It 1'* p>-
I U ." .J:. .! r
l. I ") T ""'111111 ..............._ ._.___._...;...........N'N'~o( ! . _ 1 III .t .
~*'tll &~t~~) ~. ,.. ~-_..==t.-:-:
UNt~ '
$ ~
~
i $ <),00!;l t S
.l._..., T
$ 41Xl.m I S
L
~Si$
!
~l~
;
$
.Q&f$,.
~: . .
2i"~,Q~ i ~
SOlS
T
~l$
1
$
~.ooo. $
J
7~.llOO I ,-
I
4,&-..0 r i
f*
5
15 v~ /c2J
---
If!:lm ~.:::&
$
40,000
. ..~-
400'.000
1ro.oon
.~1:~
i,411.QOO
~;~
~a.aoo
1.t4.D-:)o
50'.~
T
100,~_
~.OOQ
UR:i-@
lS
1iIMl'JO
.."
,U-<'I>>z...o.-l>tf.. % J
~~4~~ Ie 1'"\Z ~
~~~1~!)%)
t
L~
f'
:: '::':::11:::'::::":::.': .
: .--. ",::
$11,315,008
..,~ :
1. Pr~ ~~~~,fDR.~& $a."lia~~a."e ~~~.lh$'fri..v~Tr.!ffir;
M<Xld~~ml51ctt!WY~ !mMF~~~ttfrel FSSR ~p;~tIy HQea.TJI".M. h:ii~~"I ti'l&~
~~z..~~.~~~.N~~"W:R3ta ~ ~C(I~t~~~~.ad&~~'ll(,i*.telhr..llaMa..u..~~
mr-s:.a.1e- ~ sa ~tum ~.and ~ SM/'t:d ES ~mp mm mne gna t.#ltt.w.l~ lrtNm.li=l,
C~I'l~$o.''WffleoNOT rf,lCtWfthepr(l.'.'Wi~fl?~S~~M! NJ ~v lall$.
:'1!~a~~~NSOt-Ra'!!P~~"':~*im,.4~_sirla;cldi~{~. {A..~W!!a
#m(;CStcf~~_~~~~~~d'~~tf~~~mtr-<$~tQ
~~~lOOp>~rrr~~}. ~'M~~^<s4~~.in!c$l'md<cSin~r..
$. A$$;ft"i'lfle Na T.~~ lIcid5tllr4 ~e~ ~~Et ~l1$t/'~{;i'l#i,\?a ttlt'i~ Ot!-Aa:.'i'lfst!> ~ C$mm
~a.~~~~. ~ T~ OOC~~JiSea."t'a':r~bt~uf~~~vmn~1t:iSt.~Ot<-Ra~
>me ~~m ~Ra!'t~ ~ ~ ttl p~~t:&exlsilr:i'~~:a Off>R,adi<~*lP1 ~l!m1 .a:,,'l"lp~
~~...r..'Wior~
4.. 1'1'.il$~~ r~,..ae:ar.t~ l6~MI~l~l~... ~;JGl'lrLii:~~$t..v{jt~~W$~~~
~~~I;!eta!ied~~,
&
Revision, 10/14/99
CCS
~
......,
I~-I~-I~~~ o:~~~~
r-KUM L.Ur'lV'lAL I t:~.r\,jL>J.I'I ~UUi'" 0 I ~ ~~ 010"':::":)
i"'. I
fG ot /~1
ZUMWALT ENGINEERING GROUP
Civil EngineeringIProject Management
2680 Bishop Drive; Suite 150 . San Ramon, California 94583
Tel. (925) 830-5016 Fax (925) 830-5023
TIME:
./~h~/9~
5".';5.;.A.
"
FAX NUMBER
(925) 830-5023
DATE:
ZUMWALT ENGINEERING GROUP
Civil EngineeringIProject Management
2680 Bishop Drive, Suite 150'
San Ramon. CA 94583
CONFIDENTIAL
Facsimile Transmission Sheet
PLEASE DELIVER THE FOLLOWING PAGES TO:
FIRM:
h~/ /~~
/'
,.
~..'?~ or 7ZT5Pf
6'g7 -/P//
NAME:
FAX NUMBER:
FROM:
//b;/ L4,..~_
TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES t=-. INCLUDING THIS PAGE.
IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL THE PAGES, PLEASE CALL (925) 830-5016
MESSAGE
,,~"
u,/'e<'I""'.,h 7/ r .'
,/
./) //,.".c-45c- -:;7;,.:S$#/~'~ ~~/...z:. ~o ./"~"'~.-L: ~
/ ~ ~
~ // J/ f 00 f? ('~;, ~:d~ jpZJ ~)
/ ./
L / .L?c::-/~ ff 1'-'}p z:t?L? hL.'. ;1f, ~ ~ /.>.R
. ../
~/ /.&:-~~L. ~l #.~~~:t!<.L- s~t!!? /L4~..&'r- ~~*
:6 ~ /3 ~fL~ Jrfz.. R~ /~. 19's,99tj?
(L7;d~' r~x.. ~ f 5 % )
~. /
/0
/1
.ent By: COROOBA CONSULTING, INC.;
.,..~ .
..
925 671 5472;
Oct-13-9911:49AM; Page 1
crll ~f /)1
.. -cTR;G-<F~~T!. ....
......,
.... : ..-
TO:KEVJN VANKATWYK
Voice Phone Number: ~925) 833-6630 FAX (925) 833-6628
From: ERIC CORDOBA
Oompany: CORDOBA CONSULTING, INC.
Fax Number: ~925) 671-5472
Voice Number: (925) 671-5458
IVIESSi\.GE
kevIN. AS WE DISCUSSED. PREVIOUS COSf-ESTIMATeS FOR FALLON ROAD INTERCHANGE. TO MY .."".
RECOLLECTION STAGE 1 IS FOR THE YEAR 2025. STAGE 2 IS ADDITSVE TO ACCOMODATE BUILOOUT OF
THE WORLD SO TO SPEAK CAlL IF ANY QUESTIONS; THANKSU
~
Date: 10/13/99
Pages:, 1 of 3
10-13-1999 c:4ldAl'-1 FROM ZUMWALT ENGIN GROUP 510 830 5023
J~ROOBA CONSULTING, INC.; 925 671 5472j Oct-13-9911:49AMj
I..S80/Fallon Road Interchange - Stage 1 Modifications
Cost Summary
Construction Costi
Total RoadwayJBridge CO$ts $9.111.699
Minor Items (5%) $455,585
Subtotal $9,567.284
Roadway Moblization (10%) $955,728
Supplemental WOfk (5%) $478,364'
Contingency (25%) $2,391.821
Subtotaf $3.826,914
-
Subtotal Construction Cost $13,;394,198
D9:sig~ G.2~
PSR $306.122
PRJED $400,000
Design (12%) $1,607,304
Subtotal Design Cost $2.313~426
Con$..truction Suppor1 Cos..t:l
Construction Services (3%) $401,826
ESDC (1.5%) $200.913
CM/Cl (10%) $1.339,420
Subtotal Construction Support $11942,159
GRANO TOTAL = $17,6':'9,782
P.3
Page 2/~
97 ~ /J-1.
NOTE: The Stage 1 Improvements Include the fotJowJng: .
... Auxiliary Janes EB and WB to Airway' ... '" A,~-- ~n'~ ~ o/~O
· Auxllisry lane VVB to T?ssajata exit auxiliary ...
· Air ramps are now two lane. ...'
NOTE: No Right-of-way i$ required.
P;\98104\Admin\8illjnS\CosfSurnmary Stage 1_98104.xls
J7"
Page 1 of1
As of 6/15199
~UV~A LUN~ULI!N~J iNC.;
9~5 e'11 '5472;
Oct.13-9911:49AM;
Page 3/3
'17 q:( /1-1
1-580/Fallon Road Interchange - stage 2 Modifications
Cost Summary
..,.,
POQstrJ.'~ion Costs
Total Roadway/Bridge Costs $6,013.S20
Minot Items (5%) $300,691
Subtotal $6.314.511
. Roadway Moblization (10%) $631,451
Supplemental Work (5%) $315,726
Contingency (25%) $1,578,628
Subtotal $2,525,804
Subtotal Construction Cost $8,840,315
Design ~o~
Design (12%) $1,060,838
S..,btotat D~$jgn Cost $1,060,838
Construction Support COS~
Construction SetVices {3%) S2GS,209
ESDC (1.5%) $132,605
eM/CI (10%) $884.032
Subtotal COnstruction Suppott $1,281,846
Right-or-Way yosts
Right-of-way .$2.100.000
Subtotal Right-of.Way $2,100,000
GRAND TOTAL = $13,282.999
..
.....""
Il J~.~.
. ) , ..'-.
NOTE: Right--of-Way is approximately 1.3 hectares (12,775 sq. In),
equivalent to approximately 3.2 acres (137,509 ft. sq.)
Used $10/sCf. fl .
\,)J t~~,", ~ftJ..bV -\;0 b +- ~~ ) f..) W"~ t..
~Ou-J.
P:\9S104\Admirl\Bilnn9\CostSummary stage 2_98104.Xls
Page 1 of 1
ks of 6115199
...."
/3
r"-
IsaOel Ave.lSR 84 Extension. Airway/I.580 Interchange
Budget and Expenditures Summary ,
Prepared by: Ken Ross
\8950budg.xls
[AIRWAY' 580 INTERCHANGE
Item
Encumbered
. Amount
Revision Date:
/00 06 /J '1
Budget Fund Paid Balance
Amount Nos. to date to finish
S 6,008,500.00 87
S 75,000.00 93
S 260,000.00 23
S 234,400.00 09 (Triad Comm.Fac. Disl)
S 2,000,000.00 "Og"
S 29.400.00 .0.
S 8,607,300.00 $5,389,000.17 $ 3,218,239.83
5 253.000.00 TR 5240.887.28 S 12,112.72
S 8,860.300.00
S 906,600.00 87 $410,248.07 $ 496,351.93
S 5,000.00 TR NlA
S 340.000.00 87 S 182.806.73
S 150,000.00 87 537,500.00 S 112,500.00
1. Construction:.
AIRWA Y/5eO:
Airwayf580 Total:
N. CANYONS PKWY:
. includes 10% contingencies.
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION:
2. COnstruction Management
Inspection. testing, (VCA "'2%):
Inspection, testing. Triad:
2a. Construction Support! Staking (MTCo +2%):
2b. In-house Engineering: .
(from Finance Dept. figures)
Total Constr. Management/Support: S
3. Design Consultant costs:
Mark Thomas & Co. (generaQ: $ 867.000.00
Mark Thomas & Co. (water):
Mark Thomas & Co. (Triad):
/""1"--
Total Consultants:
4. Property Acquisition costs:
(Purchase, R1W agent. atty's fees)
5. Environmental Mitigations:
6. Utility Charge~:
(Relocations, connections, ete,)
7. City Fees
8. Other Agency Permi13/Fees
(Caltrans encroachment)
(Zone 7 connection fee)
9. .Miscellaneous costs:
(printing, UPS. ete)
AIRWAY/580 BUDGET TOTALS:
,.'
\ 'Kt...
. CDuoll]/
s'
. . J;:;'
CITY OF LIVERMORE
PHILIP E. BOYDsnm
City Enginur
Engiacering Divbioll
3589 Pacific Ave. · Livermore, CA 94550-7017
925) 373-5249 · FAX (925) 373-5267 · TOO (925) 373-5052
pcboydstun @ci.livermo(C.ca.~
.-r--
/1
s
1.401,500.00
S925.000.00 87
$40,000.00 23
$15,000.00 TR
. 5980,000.00
$35,000.00 87
SO,OO 87
$250,000.00 87
550,000.00 87
$10,000.00 87
S10,OOO.00 67
11.596,500.00
962.137.04 S2.862.96
16,029.60 . ($1.029.60)
$32,941.11 $ 2,058.89
SO.OO $
$13.167.00 $236,833.00
$1.684.29 548,315.71
$0.00 SO.OO
$6.158.39 S3,841.61
/>
Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee for 1999
Segment 12
Dublin Boulevard Extension/I-580 Freeway Interchange Modifications
(Airway)
Budget Amount: .. $11,596,500
Projected amount using construction progress payments: $13,000,000
(per information from Livermore City Engineer, includes all contingencies)
Dublin's share estimated at 16%
$2,080,000
/0/ oz5 ;) 1
"'WI'
--
......,
BIGGS CARDOSA
ASSOCIATES INC
ST;::;UCTL..:r=!AL ENG:NEE;::;S
/0;2 ~ /Jl-1
~=j. Se=:or"!d S=.:~ec. s~.-;= -.: . ==
Sa~ !==:-sncsco. Califor-nliS 9.::l": c:-
-- e"e::ho,-,e .: 15-538-8aGO
S::SIl"!""lII-e: .: 15-535-2= "; 1
TASSAJARA CREEK CROSSING
oAT
CENTRAL P ARK\V A Y
CITY OF DUBLIN
BRIDGE FEASIBILITY STUDY
PRESENTED TO: BRV\N KANGAS FOULK
OCTOBER 24, 1997
,J"I""'-..,
B, E-- ~
-,,"E::':"- -~: _"':,
BIGGS CA~DOSA
AS?SOCIA ~E~ ~~_C:
ST~L.;CTURAL :..:;:'JG,!'':=:=~1.~
""
/O~
crI /J 1
=-:J 1 ::~,=:::~= 3-::",:-;:::. :;5\,.:;,:.~ ~ 1 :2
S3r: F-a:-:::s:=:J. Ca..t::j-.~IC::: e"::"1 07
- -""-_D 41 ::-538-8600
~~i~;..~.!; ..J! 5.=::5.3::; 1 :
Ocrober 23. 1997
94114.1
~
, Brian Kangas Foulk
540 Price Avenue
Redwood City, CA 94063-1411
Subject:
Tassajara Creek Central Transit Spine
Santa Rita Property
Attention:
Ed Boscacci
Dear Ed:
Biggs Cardosa Associates is pleased to provide the results of the Planning Study for the subject
project. Our evaluations of the channel have been based upon preliminary layouts and concept
meetings with Roland Haga of your firm and Stuart Cook or-Alameda County.
GENERo\L:
Bridge configurations were based up'on two stages of development. The first stage consists of
1-14 foot vehicular lane, a 6 foot bicycle lane, and a 6 foot sidewalk in each direction, separated """.,
by a 14 foot wide median barrier. The final. stage of development involves widening the roadway
in both directions to provide 2-] 2 foot vehicular lanes in lieu of a single lane. In addition, the
channel crossings need to accommodate the installation of a 14 inch and 8 inch water lines
through or attached to the side of the bridge structures.
GEOMETRY:
Because one side ofTassajara Creek is already developed, approach roadway alignments and
profiles are well established in terms of conforming the bridge to the existing conditions. In order
to minimize impacts to existing properties it is the design team's goal to match the existing
roadway profiles as closely as practicable for the bridge profile and conforms., Coupled with the
desire to match approach roadway alignments is the County's clearance requirements for the
bridge soffit hydraulic freeboard. lJternate span configurations were considered to minimize the
depth of structure and eliminate bridge pier placement in the low flow channel. Using the profile
grade and the freeboard criteria provided by Brian Kangas Foulk, it was determined that a
maximum structure depth of30 inches could be provided and still maintain 2 feet offreeboard at .
the highest point of the soffit above the 100 year design storm capacity. Because there is a
vertical curve in the bridge profile, this means that there will be slightly Jess than 2 feet of
freeboard at the edges of the channel. The maximum allowable structure depths determined by
the profile geometry mandate a structure with spans in the 50-70 foot range.
-...."I
2
B- E--.P
-==- - ,= ,.': "
/oY ~ /).1
Page 2
Tassajara Creek Crossings
Biggs Cardosa Associates
SUPERSTRUCTURE:
The final structure evaluations are based upon two parallel bridge structures that utilize a precast,
prestressed voided slab superstructure. The precast, prestressed voided slab superstructure
alternative was selected for economy, ease of construction, minimum depth of structure, and to
facilitate a widening anticipated in the near future. This system also eliminates the need for
fa!sework in the channel and can accommodate the installation of larger utility casings than a
shallow conventional cast-in-place box girder structure. A closed median was initially considered
with one contiguous structure for both directions of travel. However, since median utilization for
traffic is not anticipated in the future, the additional costs associated with the additional
superstructure, substructure and piling elements warrant the use of two separate structures.
Our initial proposal was' based upon a 195 foot long structure, however that option was
abandoned early in the planning process in lieu of evaluating two separate channel configurations:
l)a shon span (165 ft.), and 2) a long span (220 ft.) configuration.
The long span configuration was also abandoned due to cost and freeboard considerations. The
additional, structure costs associated with the longer bridge were essentially a result of a greater
area of structure, as well as the fact that precast planks were no longer a viable option with a
three span bridge unless an additional pier was added within the channel to reduce the spans.
SUBSTRUCTURE:
Based upon the designated superstructure type and a bridge configuration of 3-55 foot spans,
three substructure types were considered.
Alternative 1:
Alternative 1 W:
Pier wall substructure on standard class 70 piles:
Widening in kind
Alternative 2:
AJternative 2W:
Cylindrical columns on pile caps and standard class 70 piles
Widening in kind
Alternative 3:
Alternative 3 A:
Cylindrical columns on pile shaft extensions
Widening in kind.
Both substructure configurations can perform well hydraulically with the pier wall having a
slightly better performance. Cost comparisons between alternatives 1 and 2 show a very small
difference in construction cost. However, it appears that a drilled shaft substructure alternative
could result in some cost savings if this is a feasible substructure from a geotechnical engineering
perspective. It should be noted that construction of a large diameter cast-in-drilled hole concrete
pile (CIDH) in an area with high ground water can be problematic in terms of construction
:5
~-- ,--
- -
"
#'"
/o~>
~/~1
Page .3
Tassajara Creek Crossings
Biggs Cardosa Associates
..."
techniques. inspection and approval. A cast-in-steel she!! pile (CISS) can eliminate some of the
. construction dewatering issues and provide a more controlled environment for concrete
placement.
A review of the materials r,eport prepared by CH2tvf Hill in 1992 indicated that nearby borings to
the project site encountered groundwater at depths of approximately 30 feet. The project site is
on a creek bed and it is very likely that groundwater is present. Prior to pursuing a large diameter
pile shaft foundation, it is imperative that geotechnical input be provided regarding the ability of
the pile shafts to support service loads on the order of 600-700 kips as well as evaluating
driveability of the steel shells.
CONCLUSION:
The recommended bridge configuration for the Tassajara Creek crossing is 2 separate structures
approximately 165 feet long, consisting of 3 equal spans of precast, prestressed voided slab and a
.6 inch topping slab. Substructures shall consist of cast-in-place concrete pier walls on standard
precast concrete 70 ton piles. Additionalgeorechnical investigation is warranted prior to
recommending a large diameter pile shaft alternative.
Please refer to the attached typical sections and cost estimates for the three alternatives described """
above.
:::::---
...",
~
~'.
- -
'-
n.m
':1: .-<
^
lJ
In
-<
o
)>
-I
rn
,
l
W
c-
rn
n
-l
(fl
c- :r
o nl
Ul nJ
-,
Z Z
o ()
o
"1
o
)>
-I
rn
~
G'\
c\
~
~
-1:
I
_..-il-
..
'I
?>
4; IvfEDIIIN -'
4; SYfvfMeT'l
I '-'1::. /1
.---'
"', ) ')
-(:.,:', qT _.0:-_0~_._+. '2.0'-3" I~ql
-,.,.... ..-. - . ,.- '7'
I ~" 01 A <; "f\!F.t...
\Y1'6 2." 7 (,MINe. "~u"'t.ny f\
" 1'1" DICl SiaL '\
CA~er~ It YOID, Tyf?
~~~I e R- .) CAS1~C. fo~
'nlclt'( ~
\ ~
C ~OO~ ~Q~9Q~OO~OC
.~ ;, G '? '- Go" , J< )~. ...... ~'<9 ':3'- ",'" J.
1.. (f' 'l ~. 0 I.
- ._-_._--,.~----_.._-_.._--
- '-- -A:{- -.---------..-...-
----.-- --.... .... ... . ......... ...... .....-...--.-............-.- --
))W
lJ)-
lJ) Gl
o Gl
n Ul
- n l-~-------._._---_.----_._--_._.__..._-_._. ----
~))
mD
lJ) 0 TI-----u~.lr- ,
- 0
2lJ) . . .-~~~r-..-----rl-
Pl>
I
5-
sr,\n: OF CA!..!FOR:-;l." - Ol:i'.-\R7ME:'TOFTP_"SSI'ORTATIOS
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE - ALTERNATE CREEK
n~.("l.l"()11) (p.E'V ~<J~~ .ISr::l. REV r F'O~1
CONTRACT NO:
lor; ~ /)1
F~;:'-';Cr:):Ol.'"
----- ---=-=:~----_.__--_.._---------------~':---:.o....:.:,., --------- .. - -. .-., -....:.0==..::;..:;;:.::.-..-.-
.UCTURE. T ASSAJARA CREEK SRIDGE(AL TERNA liVE 1) .
:TYPE: PRECAST PRESTRESSED VOIDED SLA.B (PIER WALL)
:LENGTH 165ft x WIDTH saft AREA q '510
DES:GN SECTION
PROJECT INCLUDES
.:..NOS
STRUCTURE(S)
ROADWORK
! CODE I CONTRACT ITEMS
I 192003 ISTRUCTURE EXCAVATION (BRIDGE)
i 193003 !STRUCTURE BACKFILL (BRIDGE)
!4907131FURNISH PILING (CLASS 70)
149071410RIVE PILE (CLA.SS 70)
1510051 ISTRUCTURAL CONCRETE. BRIDGE FOOTING
1510053lsTRUCTURAL CONCRETE. BRIDGE
i 512350 IFURNISH PRECAST PRESTRESSED CONCRETE SLA.B
1512510 IERECT PRECAST PRESTRESSED CONCRETE DECK UNiT
! 5201021BAR REINFORCING STEEL RIDGE)
, S33088ITUBUlAR HANDRAlLlNG
18331251cONCRETE BARRIER PE 2
1833140 ICONCRETE BARRIER PE 26)
I I
I
i
I
I
...~BR~Q_ ~~VD l?Y.
:DIST. 04 'CO: ALA.MEDA .RTE.
~5Z.Q SO FT
: t'ol
!PM; I uc..'"t
I
. """,;;
DATE: 6/09/97 ESTIMATE: NO: 2
DATE: 10/2419 PRICED BY: BCA
COST INDEX_
QUANTITIES BY: V. SALVAOOR
OUANTITiES CHECKED BY: S, YUAN
CHARGE UNIT AND EA :
I UNIT I QUANTITY I CHECK USE I PRICE I AMOUNT I
CY I 5621 5601 S5O.oo I S28.ooo I
CY I 3021 3001 S40.oo I S 12.0001
LF I 5.7201 5.7201 S25.oo I s143.0001
I 88i I S2.ooo.oo I
EA 881 S176.ooo
CY I 163! 160! s3OO.001 $48.000
! , 2801 S45O.oo i $ 126.000;
CY 2781
SF I 9.5701 9.5701 S25.00 I S239.25O I
EA I 481 481 S7oo.oo I S33.6OO I
L8 I 113.7101 114.0001 sO,601 $58.400
LF I 6001 6601 s27.001 S17.8201
LF 3301 3301 s4O.001 S13.2oo I
LF 3301 3301 $60.001 S19.500
I I I I
I.' I I !
I 1 I
I
,
--- --_.~-_..._._---_....._----_.__._.._-!.. --- ....
I I ,
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I . I I
I' I . I I I I I I
SUBTOTAL I S925.070
ROUTING ... MOBILIZATION (10%) I S102.786
1. DESIGN SECTION . SUBTOTAL STRUCTURE ITEMS I S1.027.ssa
2. DESIGN A SUPERVISOR CONTINGENCIES (25%) I $258.964
3. D!:SIGN B SUPERVISOR BRIDGE TOTAL (S I sa It) (S134.25j S1.284.819
4. PLANNING BRIDGE REMOVAL (cont. incl.) I SO
IWORK BY RAILROAD OR UTILITY FORCES I - . :SC}.
I . I
GRAND TOTAL S1,284.819. ,
- FOR BUDGET PURPOSES. SAY i .S 1.2a~.000 , .
I
,
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
.1
ESTIM.... TING. L-\ST
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
1
I
i i i i
I I I I .....,
/ I 1 1 I
I I I I I
I
I I I 1 I
I 1 I 1
! 1 I I 1
I 1 I I I
j I I : I
I I i
! j ,-,.1..-- L._. ___ ___....J
COMMENTS
'.."""I
II'AOTI, WXJ
,
IJJ
-<
o
)>
-I
IT1
n
J:
^
o
OJ
-<
)
)
..J:..'o ,_ :3"
.-.--
~.
I
!
/I
~/_O
" . I
)
-I It
?'-=-~--P1-'
ry Pc 't.!;
Ot.'M!Ren:;
J?Nt.,( I f5lZ..
o
).
-I
nl
'--'1'
-'>f<~.
.-...-
1~~'DIf\
cAs\tJc...
I<
"OlD
I
llt
1'~O" 1
71
~
Type; '2..C:,
CA~Jclerl!
~f.(1..rtl e p-.
en
c
OJ
'-
nl
n
-;
~:"o~'1
~ <1
~ M61)IAJ,)
,/- . I
1:: S'IMMFrr<,/
I
."5~'::~"--r -
I
....---
2 e. q./- a"
~ G -;'-<.
en
J:
nl
nl
-;
z
9
(..
o
OJ
z
9
J
"-
~
~
t\
):;
~
o
.'1
1'1/' DIFI S1'~I!L
CA.<;II'\J(;, fol1..
v.T\\,..\1'(
OOOOOOOOQO 000]2}\OO~
~( .-.....-..----.-
./1.
-
}> m
III -
III Ii)
o Ii)
n III
~ n
-t}>
mD
lIlO
- 0
2 III
P }>
ST.... r.; OF C...I.IFORSIA. OEI'ARThIEl'o"T OF "TllA."SP'JRTATIUN
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE - ALTERNATE CREEK (ADDITIONAL COST DUE TO WIDENING)
(;:;.0-0010 (REV M1))..nCA REV 11/951
CONiRACT NO.
lo? ~ /{), '1
~"~CCllot:'JI
:UCiURE: TASSAJARA CREEK BRIDGE (AL TERNATNE llN)
iTYPE: PRECAST PRESTRESSED VOIDED SLA.B (WIDEN. PIER WALL)
'LENGTH 165tl x WIDTH 20tl = AREA
:6R. NO: lRCVD. BY:
iDIST: 04 Ico: AUo.MEDA iRTE:
~SQFT
IPM:
I '" I
I 0"'" I
I
i
I
,
.1
~
DATE: &'09/97 ESTIMATE NO: 2
DATE: 10124/9 PRICED BY: BCA
COST INDEX
DESIGN SECTION
PROJECT INCLUDES
ANDS
STRUCTURE(S}
ROADWORK
ICODEI CONTRACT ITEMS
I 157560 i8RIDGE REMOVAL (PORTION)
1'92003 !STRUCTURE EXCAVATION (BRIDGE)
I 193003 ISTRUCTURE BACKFILL (BRIDGE)
QUA."ITlTIES BY: V. SALVADOR
QUANTiTIES CHECKED BY: S. YUAN
CHARGE UNIT AND EA .:
I UNIT I QUANTITY CHECK
I LS I 1!
I Cy I 182 i
I Cy I 951
USE I
11
1801
951
! 4S0713lFURNISH PILING (CL.6.SS 70) I LF I 2.0801 I 2.0801 S25.00 I S52.OOO
14907141DRrvE PILE (CUo.SS 70) I EA I 321 1 321 S2.ooo.oo I S54.ooo
1510051 !STRUCTUP.AL CONCRETE. BRIDGE FOOTING I Cy I sol I 561 $400.001 S22.4OO
1510053 !STRUCTURAL CONCRETE. BRIDGE I CY I 941 I 941 $600.00 I S50.4OO
1512350 IFURNISH PRECAST PRESTRESSED CONCRETE SUo.B I SF I 3.3001 I 3.3001 s30.ool S99.ooo
1512510 lERECT PRECAST PRESTRESSED CONCRETE DECK UNIT I EA I 18i I 181 S940.oo I S 16.920
- - - - -
I 52010ZlBAR REINr-ORCING STeEL (oRIDGe
I 833088 iTUBULAR HANDRAlLlNG
I LB I
I LF I
I LF I
, I
i I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I i
I I
I !
I I
I I
I I
j
I 833125 ICON CRETE BARRIER
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
18.530 I
3301
3301
I
i.'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
!
I
!
18.700 1
330
3301
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PRICE I
S5.ooo.oo I
$75.001
I
S50 00 I
AMOUNT
S5.ooo !
S13.5OO I
$4 8CO I
so,sol
$27.00 I
S40.oo I
I
$ 11.220 I
$8.910
$13.200
1
I
I
i
I
, I I I I I 1 I
;
, I I 1 I I I I
i .
I I I I I I I
I
I I I I f I I I
.
I I I I I I
I I I I I I ,
i I I I I I I
, I I I I I I
I
SUBTOTAL I $362.350
ROUTING - MOBILIZATION (10%) I $40.261
1. DESIGN SECTION SUBTOTAL STRUCTURE ITEMS I $4OZ.611
2. DESIGN A SUPERVISOR CONTINGENCIES (25%) I S1oo.653 i
3. DESIGN B SUPERVISOR BRIDGE TOTAL ($/ SCl Il) (S 152.50) $503.264
4. PLANNING BRIDGE REMOVAL (cont incl.) I SO
WORK BY RAlLROAD OR UTIlITY FORCES I SO
- GRAND TOTAL I $503.264
- FOR BUDGETPURPOSES-SAY I $504.000
!':,.,MAnNO. LAST
COMMENTS
""-'
u.....ar,. WX1
B
S; ATE OF CAl.IFOR~:A . ot:rARn.IE~, 01' TRA~SI'ORT AT10N
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE - ALTERNATE CREEK
OS.::>-oGlo (REV ~'9Jl. i!leA REV 11:95)
CONTRACT NO:
)1/ 06 /rf.-J
~nsCi..""Of""
JCTURE: T ASSAJAP-A CREEK BRIDGE (AL TERNA TIVE 2)
iTY?E: PRECAST PRESTRESSED VOIDED SLAB (COLUMNS)
:LENGTH 1651\ x WIDTH 58/t AREA
ISR. NO: IRCVO. BY:
IoIST: 04 Ico: AlAMEDA JRTE:
~SCFT
, ,
I IS I
lPM: i ()(,,.f
STRUCTURE(S)
ROADWORK
QUANTITlES 8Y: V, SALVADOR
QUANTITIES CHECKED SY : S. YUAN
CHARGE UNIT AND EA :
....,
DATE:06/09197 ESTIMATE NO: 2
DATE: 10/2419 PRICED BY: 6CA
COST INDEX
DESIGN SECTION
PROJECT INCLUDES
ANDS
! CODE I CONTRACT ITEMS
I 192003!STRUCTURE EXCAVATION (BRIDGE)
1193003 !STRUCTURE BACKFILL (BRIDGE)
! 4907131FURN1SH PILING (CL.e.SS 70)
I UNIT I QUANTITY ! CHECK
I CY I 6121
I CY I 3061
1 LF I 5 720 I
USE I
6101
3101
5.7201
PRICE I
S5O.00!
$40.00 I
$25001
AMOUNT
S3O.5OO
$12.400
S143 000 I
/490714 IDRNE PILE (ClASS 70) I EA I 83! 851 S2.000.00 I S176,000
/510051 !STRUCTURAL CONCRETE. BRIDGE FOOTING I CY I 187/ 1901 S3OO,00 1 S57.000
1510053 !STRUCTURAL CONCRETE. BRIDGE I CY I 2261 2301 $450.001 S103.5OO
1512350 IFURNISH PRECAST PRESTRESSED CONCRETE SLAB I SF I 9.5701 9.5701 S25.00 I S239.25O
1512510 IERECT PRECAST PRESTRESSED CONCRETE DECK UNIT I EA I 481 481 S7oo.oo I S33.600
,
;
~
/520102 'BAR REINFORCING STEEL (BRIDGE)
833088 !TUBULAR HANDP..AILlNG
5331251cONCRETE BARRIER (iY?E 25) -
1833140 ICONCRETE BARRIER j ?E 25)
I I
I 1
i I
I I
I
I
I
I LB I 121.9461 122.0001 so.601
I LF I 6501 6501 s27.001
I LF I 3301 3301 $40.00 I
I LF I 3301 3301 s50.ool
I j I I 1
I
I 1 1 I
I , i I
I ! I I
I 1 I I
1 1 1 I
I I I I
I 1 I I
I __-+_ _"__' _ 1.. i
"
I
I !
i I I
'I I I I
I I
I I I I
I I 1 I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I
I I I I
I I I I
S73.2oo I
$17.520,
s13.2001
$19.800 I
',-v
I
I
I
/
I
I
I
I
ISUBTOTAL
S 9 7
ROUTING
1.. DESIGN SECTION
2. DESIGN A SUPERVISOR
3. DESIGN B SUPERVISOR
4. PLANNING
, 91 .2 O.
MOSILlZATION (10%) I $102.141
SUSTOTALSTRUCTUREITEMS I S1.021.411
CONTINGENCIES (25%) I $255.353
BRIDGE TOTAL (S I sq ft) (S133All . $ 1.276.764
BRIDGE REMOVAL (cont incl.) - I
-.. SO
WORK BY RAILROAD OR UTILITY FORCES I $0
GRAND TOTAL I $1.276,764
FOR BUDGETPURPOSES-SAY I $1,277.000
COMMENTS
EmMA nNa. LAST
....,
11.AE.3'TT.wx'1
/0
(I)
-<
o
)".
-I
111
o
).>
-~
rn
()
:1:
^
o
Ul
.<
15~ :,-' "_
--_._~
...-....
')
")
~Ol- 3.
.--......------- -'-.--
1<0" 011\ ~I~L.. -
cASHJ~ ~ \.ff\u 1'(
)
J.~-:. ,:" "~'._.K~' -.--" :- ~:_..._"-+._.__......-
.......
.......
1"':1 PE 'l-{;
()l:....k!~€ 715
t#-/l~
(/\
L
n,
n
-J
,~
?J ~ 0"
_. .L:..=
Q_goPQ~O(J~O 0
I
"5 <P ~ ,.:."~. I--
I
11" DlfI C':ii8rL.
cA'" rJ(;.. fo,t.
lATl\..-I1'(
0'
I~ "olD
-- .
O~O 000 6~pOtO
-.+
Tyf'e '4:.
~~6rEt
~P.,q.l e f!-
2 e q.'- 0"
~ <3 3 '- <."
I
(/\
1:
III
/I'
..\
Z
o
L.
a
(II
z
o
lJ
~t~~~tIVS
<1
f /vi6D1 RJ .)
i S'IMtv\€,w-y I
r----.-~
.........
........
~
~C\
~
.......... '\
-- ---- --
-eJ-II.--U-cr
'1JD'
l> m
(J) -
Ul Gl
o Cil
o (J)
~n
....)>
m n
UlO
- 0
2 Ul
!l l>
$IA"-:: OF' CAUFOR~I.". O::PA;::'T~1E~"T OF T1L,,:-':SPOR.TA nON
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE -ALTERNATE CREEK (ADDITIONAL COST DUE TO WIDENING)
DS.~JI6(R.EV 50'93) - (Be.... REV ll:cm
CONT~C30~ /) 1
F~",~C;CollOf'"
JCTURE: T ASSAJARA CREEK BRIDGE (AL TERNA TIVE 2W)
lTYPE: PRECAST PRESTRESSED VOIDED SLAB (WIDEN. COLUMNS)
iLENGTH 165ft x WIDTH 20ft AREA
IBR. NO: iRCVD. BY:
----,.-.. ._.. . .---.. .
iDIST: 04 ICO: ALAMEDA ;RTE: ,PM:
;uQQSQFT
DESIGN SECTION
PROJECT INCLUDES
ANDS
STRUCTURE(S)
ROADWORK
ICODEI CONTRACT ITEMS
1157560 !BRIDGE REMOVAL RTION)
152003 !STRUCTURE EXCAVATION (BRIDGE)
1193003 !STRUCTURE BACKFILL (BRIDGE)
, 490713lFURNISH PILING (CLASS 70)
1490714 IDRNE PILE (CLASS 70)
1510051 ISTRUCTURAL CONCRETE. BRIDGE FOOTING
1510053 !STRUCTURAL CONCRETE. BRIDGE
1512350 IFURNISH PRECAST PRESTRESSED CONCRETE SLAB
1512510 !ERECT PRECAST PRESTRESSED CONCRETE DECK UNIT
5201021BAR REINFORCING STEEL BRIDGE
I 833088ITUBULAR HANDP..AIUNG
I 8331251cONCRETE BARRIER (TYPE 25\
I !
I
I
I LS I
I CY I
I CY I
I LF I
I EA I
I Cy I
I CY 1
I SF I
I EA I
1 LB I
I LF I
I u= I
I I
,
L
!
I
I
I
I
i
,
i
I
QUANTiTIES BY: V. SALVADOR
QUANTITIES CHECKED BY : S. YUAN
CHARGE UNIT AND EA :
CHECK I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
! IS I
I vt,.'" I
,..J
DATE: 6109/97 ESTIMATE NO : 2
DATE:l0/24/97 PRICED BY: 8CA
COST INDEX _
PRICE I
S5.ooo.oo I
S75.001
S5O.oo I
s25.001
S2.ooo.oo I
$400,00 I
S600.oo I
S3O.oo I
s94O.001
SO.60/
s27.001
S40,00 !
I
AMOUNT
S5.000 !
S18.7501
S6.000 I
S55.ooo I
I
S80.000.
S32.800 i
S43.ooo I
s99.oool
S16.520 I
S15.560
S8,910,
$13.200 i
I
~.
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I ---
I I
i I I I I I I
! I
I I I I I I I
I. I I I I I T I
I I I I I I I I
SUBTOTAL I S404.24.0
.- MOBILIZATION (10%) I
ROUTING S44.916
1. DESIGN SECTION SUBTOTAL STRUCTURE ITEMS I S449.156
2. DESIGN A SUPERVISOR CONTINGENCIES (25%) I S112.2e9
3. DESIGN 8 SUPERVISOR BRIDGE TOTAL (S I "" Itl ($170.131 S561.444
4. PLANNING BRIDGE REMOVAL (cent. incl.) I SO
WORK BY RAILROAD OR UTILITY FORCES I SO
- GRAND TOTAL I $561.444 i
- FOR BUDGET PURPOSES - SAY I S562.ooo
I UNIT I QUANTITY I
11
2481
1181
2.6001
I
401
821
801
3.3001
181
26.018/
3301
330!
I
I"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ESTIMA m;c. L...sr
USE I
11
2501
1201
2.6001
401
821
801
3.3001
181
26.1001
3301
3301
I
I i
I I
I I
---L--.- ___.L_..___...___. -
i I
I I
I I
I I
I I
1 I
I I
I !
I
I
I
I
COMMENTS
.~
1l4AESn,wx.l
/2.
~ ) ) 1
n l1J
, I' If :[ .<
1 - 0 G" ,_ 0 + . ' " I " I " ^
-.. - .~' roo, .- -. . - 0--'- . ?-o - '3 - '1 I 5 - ~ lJ
, >,. 0 .. l1J
...... '" . --:
I!\ ~ 01" <; ~C:L-
'tyr€. 'l.G, _ l'./t<,.'NI'.. "'<ffL U'1:.q.'{ n TV". 1
7 " '\ II r fIE. 'l.~
Co~er6" I I~ ""'D, Tvf' I~" DIn """- \ J) CoNcfeTE I
~~p.It, e g.. .)- I CASH.J(.. fotf. . 4 J!>^KR IrE}!... 0 ?
190~oOf09~O Q9_9i;o~ dK?q" I ~ ,;:
.~ ' _. - J< .--. >k J
:,G,?>-G." 2.@ 'I~o" "'~e 3'-"'.... . -/
- -I = --- 4; Iv1E[)fIlN _~ ~~
-J
c/; Si"'lMeTt.(
'~l-- {0
-. ~'>-'//~'Y'I/~' I~/{~ 0
.~ II,''YI/A')'>'/// . I. I
417p. 1-10tlV't:.. :? (Jl
......w '- J:
y 0 111
Ul (j)_ 01 111
Ul " -,
(j') ........ Z 2
o 0 ._ , I, ..z 0 0
o UI LO L.... t/ - G. 4) C.I 0 Ii
- n
h 6\.
UlO ~
-0 \.- 0
2 ~ ..,
p~ ~ I
STATE OF CAL1FOR.'1lA. DEPARTMEI-o.. OFTRA.'1S?ORTATION
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE - ALTERNATE CREEK
OS.D-0016 (REV ~3). (BCA REV 11/9$)
/ I c;NT~ N~j J
E.....~A~(;CJI0t<p
TRUCTURE: T ASSAJARA CREEK BRIDGE (Al TERNA TNE 3)
I NPE: PRECAST PRESTRESSED VOIDED SLAB (COLUMNS. CIDH)
IU::NGTH 16St! x WIDTH 58t! AREA
Di::SIGN SECTION
PROJECT INCLUDES
AND $
STRUCTURE(S)
ROADWORK
ISR. NO: IRCVD. BY:
bST: 04 lco: ALAMEDA IRTE: IPM:
~SQFT
QUANTITIES BY: V. SALVADOR
QUANTITIES CHECKED BY : S, YUAN
CHARGE UNIT AND EA :
I "" I
I OUT i
j
I
~
,~;
DATE: 6109197 ESTIMATE NO : 2
DATE: 1012319 PRICED BY: SCA
COST INDEX _
[CODEI
I I
CONTRACT ITEMS
! S12350 IFURNISH PRECAST PRESTRES'SED CONCRETE SLA8
1512s10 IERECT PRECAST PRESTRESSED CONCRETE DECK UNIT
IS201021BAR REINFORCING STEEL (BRIDGE)
8330es/TU8ULAR HANDRAlLlNG
8331251cONCRETE BARRIER PE 25
1833140 ICONCRETE BARRIER (TYPE 25)
I I
I ,
I I
I I
I I
I !
I
i
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I UNIT I QUANTITY I CHECK
I I I
SF I
EA I
L8 I
LF I
I LF I
I LF I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I ,
I I
I j
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
9.5701
481
132.3021
6601
330!
3301
I
I
I
. I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
1
USE . I PRICE
I
AMOUNT
I
I
I
/
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
9.5701
481
133,0001
6601
3301
3301
I
I
I
I
I
$25.oo!
s700.001
so.601
$27.00 ,
$40.00 I
s60,001
I
I
,
I
i
I I
I I
_.__.___.. ...1._..
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
$239.250 I
$33.500 I
S79,800
S17.820
I
S13.200 I
$ 19.800 I
I
I
i
i
I
. ---"-- ._~
-....r
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
i
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
ISUBTOTAL I 5753,370
ROUTING M081LlZATION (10%) I $83.708
1. DESIGN SECTION SU8TOTAl STRUCTURE ITEMS I 5837.078
2. DESIGN A SUPERVISOR CONTINGENCIES (25%) I S209.269
BRIDGE TOTAL ( 5' sq tt) I
:3. DESIGN B SUPERVISOR ($ 109.34) .. $1.046.347
4. PLANNING SRIDGE REMOVAL (cont. incl.) I $0
152003 STRUCTURE EXCAVATION (BRIDGE) CY 348 350 SSO.OO 517,500 I
115:3003 ISTRUCTURE BACKFILL (BRIDGE) , CY I 2371 2401 S40.00 I S5.500 I
1490608154- CAST-IN-DRrLlED-HOLE CONCRETE PILING I LF I 4801 4801 S4oo.00 I $ 192.000 I
/510051/STRUCTURAl CONCRETE. BRIDGE FOOTING I CY I 9d 91 I 5300.001 s27.3001
IS10C53/STRUCTUP..Al CONCRETE, BRIDGE I CY I 2261 I 2301 s45O.001 S 1 03.500 1
ESTIMA ns,:;. LAST
I . --. -!. -...... -------,
IWORK 8Y RAILROAD OR UTILITY FORCES i $0 i
IGRAND TOTAL I '.S~':046.347
IFOR BUDGET PURPOSES - SAY _ ___L_.. S 1.047.000
COMMENTS
"wi
llAAES'n. W'h.J
}f
()'lll
. J: .-<
^
o
llJ
-<
)
- ,_.-Jt.~~'_?:~~-?i-'
~o '- 3 ~
..a___.._._......__, _ _ a_
+-
.
,
" ,_ 01/
...- ....--...-.
)
f ' - 0 "
M..... _ .~
"-
~
-....-..-.
o
o l>
). -I
-j III
111
L
Co
OJ
L.
In
()
-j
4;.1-I6J).nJ :;1
<t: SiM~W.,/ I
n~~Y/"'7"
C1DH
cJl
, II
Lkl-- (r-G
1'6" Ol^ O;:f~L.
cASltJGo. ~ url\.flY
11" D'A ':.i€"V:\..
CA.<;I1J~ foyt
lAl1\,...l1'(
"olD
It
j(
Tyee: 2.G, ~
(Ar-tl e fE: -; [ "
~P.P.I e lL '~.
)>m
Ul -
In (j)
o (j)
o U'l,
j; 0
-f ~
m D
InO
- 0
2 In
P )>
STATE OF CALIFOR.....IA - DE? ARTME!>o"T OF TR.A.-:SPORT AnON
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE -ALTERNATE CREEK (ADDITIONAL COST DUE TO WIDENING)
Ds-04l1o (REV ~3) - ceCA REV 1119$)
CONTRACT NO:
1/1 q) I)}
E..~""",,,OGll:Ot...,.
.TRUCTURE: T ASSAJA?.A CREEK BRIDGE (ALTERNATIVE 3W)
:TYPE: PRECAST PRESTRESSED VOIDED SLAB (WIDEN. COLUMNS.CIDH)
ILENGTH 165ft x WIDTH 20ft AREA
DESIGN SECTION
PROJECT INCLUDES
ANDS
STRUCTURE(S)
ROADWORK
IBR. NO: IRCVO. BY:
IDIST: 04 Ico: ALAMEDA iRTE: _ .f',:\: d
;uooSQFT
QUANTITIES BY: V. SALVADOR
QUANTITIES CHECKED BY :S. YUAN
CHARGE UNIT AND EA :
I l>< I
I
! ~lo:. .
"I"flIIII
DATE: 6109/97 ESTIMATE NO: 2
DA TE:1 0f24/97 PRICED BY: BCA
COST INDEX
ICODEI CONTRACT ITEMS I UNIT QUANTITY I . CHECK I USE I. PRICE I . AMOUNT I
157560 IBRIDGE REMOVAL (PORTION) I LS 11 I 1 I S5.CXXl.00 I S5.CXXl !
192oo3!STRUCTURE EXCAVATION (BRIDGE) I CY 921 I 921 s75.001 S6.900 !
193003!STRUCTURE BACKFILL (BRIDGE) I CY 821 I 82! S50,oo 1 S4,1OO1
490608154" CAST-IN-DRILLED-HOLE CONCRETE PILING I LF I 2401 I 2401 S450.oo 1 S 1 D8,CXXlI
510051ISTRUCTURAL CONCRETE, BRIDGE FOOTING I CY I 341 I 341 S4oo.oo I S13.600 I
I 510053 ISTRUCTURAL CONCRETE. BRIDGE
1512350 IFURNISH PRECAST PRESTRESSED CONCRETE SlAB
/512510 IERECT PRECAST PRESTRESSED CONCRETE DECK UNIT
! 520102 I BAR REINFORCING STEEL BRIDGE)
833D88ITUBULAR HANDRAlLlNG
. 833125 ICOGRETE BARRIER YPE 25)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CY
SF
EA
LB
LF
LF 1
1
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
1 1
1 I
I I
I I
I I
! I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I-I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
,
)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
ROUTING
1. DESIGN SECTION
2. DESIGN A SUPERVISOR
3. DESIGN B SUPERVlSbR
4. PLANNING
ESTIMA nSG .LA$T
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
;
I I
I ,
I I
I
_ .-1-__ ..J
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
$334.350 I
S37,15O
S371.5OO
S92.8751
$464.375
SO
SO
I $464,375'
---'--r--'" --.
S465.ClO2J
801
3.3001
181
26.1701
3301
3301
!
I
I
- 1
1
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I sol
-- . -T--"';:;-;;r
I 181
26.200 I
3301
3301
1
I
I
I
I
I
S600.oo I .
S30.oo I
S940.00 I
so.801
s27.001
S40.oo I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
r
I
I
I
S48.ooo !
S99.CXXl i
S16.920 !
S15.7201
$8,9101
$13.200
I
I
...., ,
I
I
i
\~~
IJ.tAESTC Whl
)6
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
-1--" .
1
!SU6TOTAL
MOBILIZATION 10%)
SUBTOTAl STRUCTURE ITEMS
CONTINGENCIES (25%)
IBRIDGE TOTAL S I It
BRIDGE REMOVAl conL incl.
ORK BY RAILROAD OR UTIUTY FORCES
GRAND TOTAL
FOR BUDGET PURPOSES - SAY
COMMENTS
.~
/7
Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee for 1999
Typical bridge cost, per square foot.
From Briggs Cardosa Associates, Inc. 10/23/97 study
liS- ~ Id-}
. .. .
. .
Construction costs for six scenarios range from $87 to $136 per square foot. Use $120/sf
:;:::1
.....1
:::::1
:::::.1
!\\j
:.:.:.:.
:....1
:::::}
.:.:-:~
..:::.:;.........-..,...'.-..:..:.:.:;,.;.;.:.....:.:.:.:.~..,..:.;....;...:.....:..........:.:....;.;.;.;.;;.:.;.;;;;......,':.-......,....;. .--.-
'\. '\.
---------
---------
-
-
--
--- ----
--
--- --
\\\r'::':::::;::::':':':'::::::::::':':':'::::::::::':.:':'::::::::::::::::~:::::::::~::;:::;::ilii:::.:.:.::::::::;:::.:.:::::::~:::::::.:::.:::::::::::;.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:..........:.;.:.......................................
I.
tII~
,~\
::'
l~
:::
:;
'.
::
I
.
I
I
I \1\
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
1I1I I
I
I
\ I
}
f I
.
_ 120' '_,
. ~
--
--- ---
-
-
-
---------
------------
'\0 '\0
- . - - . :.:.:.:.:.~.:.::...:~~~:......!:.:.:.:.:.~l
"-
'"
""4)
0\
"'--
~
~
(
TYPICAL
ROADWAY INTERSECTION
CITY OF DUBUN
\ \
\ \
I I
,';
::
:.
;::
1\
:.
(
/rJ..O "Zf /~ 1
Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee for 1999
Signalized Intersection Costs:
Per signal leg costs:
1 signal leg =
Right of Way area per leg =
Grading costs for I foot of grading per leg: =
Civil improvements for I signal. leg: =
$56,250
5;560 sf
$ 1,029
$18,750
-,
/,;2/ ~ ;:1)
c-
RIGHT OF WAY CALCULATIONS
EASTERN DUBLIN TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES
10/5/98; revised 10/8/99
right of way calculations:
Section 10, Dublin from Tassajara to Fallon:
-(0.5*(17.5+19}*1 +0.5*(12+16}*1 +0.5*(13+14)*1 +0.5*(13+19)*1 )/4
=$15.44 per sq foot
Section 11, Dublin Boulevard from Fallon to Airway
=(0.5*(7+ 7)*30+0.5*(13+18)*1 0+0.5*(13+18)*10+0.5*(13+14)*1 0)/60
-$11 per sq foot; but increase to $12 for October, 1999
Section 18, Central Parkway from Tassajara to Fallon
=18*0.15+19*0.4+16*0.2+(12+7.5)*0.5*0.15+5*0.1
-$15.46 per sq foot
-
Section 20, Gleason Road from Tassajara to Fallon
=0.5*(18+15}*0.2+0.5*(1 0+18)*0.2+0.5*(1 0+16)*0.6
=$13.90 per sq foot
Section 26A, Fallon Road from Gleason to Dublin
=(0.5*(7.5+8}*50+5*50+5*20+13*20+19*10)/150
-$7.92 per sq foot
Section 26B, Fallon Road from Dublin Boulevard to Freeway Ramp
=$13 per sq foot; Revised to $15 for October, 1999
.
Footnotes:
Segment 10: 1/4 of roadway length is bounded by $17.50/sf ROW on one side and $19/sf on the other side.
Segment 11: 30/60 of roadway length is bounded by $7/sf ROW on both sides.
Segment 18: 15% of roadway length is bounded by $18/sf ROW on both sides.
Seoment20: 20% of roadway lenoth is bounded bv $18/sf ROW on one side and $15/sf on the other
0231g; 10/14/99, 1:38 PM
1
_ RWcalcs
:?~o.
~ I::i~
o't:! 0
iilg.....
o -s' t::l
.... c::
0-0-
5o.g S-
::-. tJ
::l P,
G=;r
i r.
::r:r.
vg,
~ '..-:
"
~
~
.,
is.
m
3
"
.,
c:
CJ
g
:-t;
g
<Q,
:::l
t:
~
~.
~
""
~.
"-
C
'-
~~~
~~
'~ > {11
(
EMERALD GLEN
ALAMEDA COUNTY SU!(PLUS I'ROPEI!IY AUTHORITY
..;.;.. 1 UU6LI~I, CALIFORNIA
L
LAND use
eMERALD HI.lS APARTMENTS
Afclulone Cammunlllul
EMERALD GLEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
llI.tlHn Unllitd School Olslrlcl
JEffERSON AT DUBLIN APARTMeNTS
JPI
SUMMER GLEN
Summerhlt Home
PURLlC/SEMI.PUBlIC
AlomGda CounlY
CAUFORNlA CREEKSIDE BUSINESS PARK
Humphrey Insirulllenls/E.loan/S.E.T.lnc:.
EMERAlD rOINIE BUSINESS PARK
Opus Wesl/Micro DenIal
CAMPUS OFflCEIH01EL
I" Currenlly Zone~ MufMomlly
CAMPUS OfflCE/HOTEL
ProPLESO~T CAMPUS
PeoploSofl Inc.
:AMP PARKS
(
SITE
,
10
IA
11
12
T3
14
15
I6A
168
/~ s cr: /cr21
..A..R/'W'"S
Pleasant mn. CA
City of Dublin
East Dublin 11l:p<JLI ;~.<.: S:uJ:-
Portions of l)u~li:: !{:ir1ch I 1c'.'ci"'Pill<,.'lli ':U:t} J:Hil.:r~lu (;!\:!: rl':u:l {~r 1 '~.' t,-',.""'. (',..-
,.-1-,
'B
DlTBLIN RANCH
A Master Plmu:ed Commun.Ity
@ftlDtIW.ac=tST1'"'_"':':'::~':O.
, .
.. OOOt.ul'lftSr .AI$(
E
.. ........... -..... ..~. ......
~m:R:::R~A~::;:m;
::;:.'0-,.;:;;:'
D
.-l
"
i
I.
It H"
~~ CD
If- r:'\ -
I' 0
i Gr<-
. ....
-1'
llT~
, I~l11
.\ \
"
]", ,
I..~" . ...
':6 " .... .
.
I
---r
I,
I'
,- , f
(9 [/
_.."" I r
_... 11
__--.... r
jf-.
S-l
If'~
II.
\ II
, II
\ !I.-
c
A
GC
CD
co
@
.....
City of Dublin
East Dublin Impact Fee Study
Dublin Ranch Develqmu:nt and Portions of Emerald Glen (East ifTassajara Creek)
.A..R/VfZS
Pleasant HiD, CA
/~'1 //21
Summary
Date of Valuation - September 10, 1999
""'"
$!Sf. Estimated Value
R.a 12e
Area Planned Uses Highest & Best Use Low High $'slSf.
No. Blended
Value
A-I GC Commercial $16.00 $20.00 $17.50
A-2 OC Commercial $12.00 $16.00 $14.00
A-3 GC Commercial $11.00 $15.00 $p.oo
A-4 GC Commercial $18.00 $20.00 .gg~@:.;
B-1 GC Commercial $16.00 $20.00 $19.00
B-2 MD Res - NP Residential $14.00 $18.00 $16.00
B-3 MD Res - NP Residential $13.00 $16.00 $14.00
B-4 GC Commercial $12~00 $15.00 $13.00
B-5 NC!MD Res Commercial! Residential $18.00 $21. 00 $19.00
B-6 MH -MD-SF Res Residential $19.00 $22.00 $20.00
C-l GC Commercial $16.00 $19.00 $18.00
C-2 NC - HD Res - P!S-P Commercial! Residential! Park $14.00 $21. 00 $19.00
C-3 HD -MDRes Residential $14.00 $19.00 $16.00
C-4 OS - MD Res Residential! Open Space $8.00 $15.00 $12.00
C-5 MH (outside City) Medium Density Residential $4.00 $7.00 $5.00 """"'"
C-6 CP Medium Density Residential $15.00 $22.00 $20.00
D-l GC ' Commercial $14.00 $16.00 $15.00
D-2 MD Res - NP Residential! Park $16.00 $22.00 $18.00
D-3 MD Res - OS Residential! Open Space $14.00 $20.00 $16.00
D-4 CP Residential $6.00 $9.00 $7.50
D-5 CP (outside City) Medium Density Residential $4.00 $7.00 $5.00
E-l MD Res - OS - RR - CP Residential! Park! Open Space $16.00 $19.00 $18.00
E-2 SF-MDRes-OS-CP Residential! Park! Open Space 8.00 $12.00 $10.00
E-3 SF Res - OS Residential! Park! Open Space $7.00 $10.00 $8.00
E-3A RR1AG Rural Residential! Agricultural $I,ooo!Acre $6,ooo! Acre $3,ooo!Acre
E-4 MD Res Residential $14.00 $17.00 $16.00
SF = Single-family Residential
MD Medium-density Residential
MH Medium-high-density Residential
HD = High-density Residential If)!; .
GC = General Commercial
NC = Neighborhood Commercial
CP = Community Park
OS Open Space ~
RR1AG Rural Residential! Agricultural ......,
'. v,__"~"."",, :.L-~_ ~ _. ..r.",%~~.,,_""'~,f'"':',~__6;."~... _. "._.... "'..~_" ''-'' ~."""",,"," ..~~...... "" ~~~. .,.",!.~~;'", " ~.. v:"," ~"" I.'''''~ ...... .....,..,.., ,'P
-
.,~
Inter
/ :< 5 ~ /J?
I
INTERSECTION AT ARNOLD ROAD AND CENTRAL PARKWAY, 3 LEGS ..
Segment 16, Arnold Road, Southbound Segment 16, Arnold Road, Northbound I
TIF Other TIF Other
Share Share Share Share
RJW costs 0% 100% 0% 0% RJW costs 0% 100% 0% 0%
Civil costs 0% 100% 0% 0% Civil costs 0% 100% 0% 0%
Signal costs 100% 0% 0% 0% Siqnal costs 100% 0% 0% 0%
Segment 16A, Central Parkway, Westbound I
TIF Other
Share Share
RJW costs 0% 100% 0% 0%
Civil costs 0% 100% 0% 0%
Siqnal costs 100% 0% 0% 0%
'-'-'\JTERSECTION AT ARNOLD ROAD AND DUBLIN BOULEVARD, 4 LEGS.
.
Segment 16, Arnold Road, Southbound Segment 16, Arnold Road, Northbound I
TIF Other TIF Other
Share Share Share Share
RJW costs 0% 100% 0% 0% RJW costs 0% nla 0% 0%
Civil costs 0% 100% 0% 0% Civil costs 0% nla 0% 0%
Siqnal costs 0% 100% 0% 0% Siqnal costs 0% nla 0% 0%
Segment BA, Dublin Boulevard, Westbound Segment BA, Dublin Boulevard, Eastbound
TIF Other TIF Other
Share Share Share Share
RJW costs 0% 100% 0% 0% RJW costs 0% 100% 0% 0%
Civil costs 0% 100% 0% 0% Civil costs 0% 100% 0% 0%
Signal costs 0% 100% 0% 0% Signal costs 0% 100% 0% 0%
r-
4/9/99, 6:29 PM
Inter
.9B1030.XLS
Inter
/ ~t; ~ /.)..?
ALLOCATION OF SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION COSTS FOR EASTERN DUBLIN IMPACT FEES, 1999 -
.-4i
--
INTERSECTION AT GLEASON DRIVE AND TASSAJARA ROAD, 4 LEGS
Segment 22A, Tassajara Road, Southbound Segment 23, Tassajara Road, Northbound
Tassajara Tassajara
TIF Shae Meadows Other TIF Shae Meadows Other
Share Share Share Share Share Share Share Share
R/W costs 0% 0% 100% 0% R/W costs 0% 0% 100% 0%
Civil costs 50% 50% 0% 0% Civil costs 50% 50% 0% 0%
Sianal costs 0% 0% 100% 0% Sianal costs 0% 0% 100% 0%
Segment 19A, Gleason Drive, Eastbound Segment 20, Gleason Road, Westbound
Tassajara Tassajara
TIF Shae Meadows Other TIF Lynn Meadows Other
Share Share Share Share Share Share Share Share
R/W costs 0% 0% 100% 0% R/W costs 0% 100% 0% 0%
Civil costs 0% 0% 100% 0% Civil costs 100% 0% 0% 0%
Signal costs 0% 0% 100% 0% Sianal costs 100% 0% 0% 0%
'""'-.,
INTERSECTION AT CENTRAL PARKWAY AND TASSAJARA ROAD, 4 LEGS -
~
-
Segment 23, Tassajara Road, Southbound Segment 23, Tassajara Road, Norghbound I
TIF Toll Shae Park TIF Shae Toll Other
Share Share Share Share Share Share Share Share
R/W costs 0% 0% 50% 50% R/Wcosts 0% 0% 50% 50%
Civil costs 0% 0% 50% 50% Civil costs 0% 100% 0% 0%
Signal costs 50% 50% 0% 0% Sianal costs 0% 0% 100% 0%
Segment 17, Central Parkway, Eastbound Segment 18, Central Parkway, Westbound
TIF Toll Other Other TIF Lynn. Other Other
Share Share Share Share Share . Share Share Share
R/W costs 0% 100% 0% 0% R/W costs 50% 50% 0% 0%
Civil costs ...0% .... 100% 0% 0% Civil costs 100% 0% 0% 0%
Sianal costs 0% 100% 0% 0% Sianal costs 100% 0% 0% 0%
-....1-
4/9/99, 6:29 PM
Inter
981030.xLS
Inter
/~ 1 ~/c:L?
..----
INTERSECTION AT DUBLIN BOULEVARD AND TASSAJARA ROAD, 4 LEGS
Segment 23, Tassajara Road, Southbound Segment 24, Tassajara Road, Norghbound
TIF Kole Shae Other TIF Kole Lynn Other
Share Share Share Share Share Share Share Sharel
R/W costs 0% 50% 50% 0% R/W costs 0% 50% 50% 0%
Civil costs 50% 0% 50% 0% Civil costs 50% 50% 0% 0%
Signal costs 0% 100% 0% 0% Si!::mal costs 0% 100% 0% 0%
Segment 9. Dublin Boulevard. Eastbound Segment 10, Dublin Boulevard, Westbound
TIF Kole Other Other TIF Kole Lynn Shae
Share Share Share Share Share Share Share Share
R/W costs 0% 100% 0% 0% R/W costs 50% 0% 50% 0%
Civil costs 0% 100% 0% 0% Civil costs 100% 0% 0% 0%
Signal costs 0% 100% 0% 0% Signal costs 100% 0% 0% 0%
INTERSECTION AT ARNOLD ROAD AND GLEASON DRIVE, 3 LEGS
/~
....cgment 16, Arnold Road, Southbound Segment 16. Arnold Road, Northbound
TIF Other TIF Other
Share Share Share Share
R/W costs 100% 0% 0% 0% R/W costs 0% 100% 0% 0%
Civil costs 100% 0% 0% 0% Civil costs 0% 100% 0% 0%
SiQnal costs 100% 0% 0% 0% Signal costs 100% 0% 0% 0%
Segment 19, Gleason Drive, Westbound I
TIF Other
Share Share
R/W costs 0% 100% 0% 0%
Civil costs 0% 100% 0% 0%
Signal costs 100% 0% 0% 0%
-
I
4/9/99,6:29 PM
Inter
981030 XLS