HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 3.1 G&O Discussion (2)C I T Y 0 F D U D L I N
PRELI~~IINARY G~ALS AND ODJECTIUES
19n2-Ei3
PROGRA~~i AREA/GOAL
PROPOSED OQJECTIVES FOR ACCOhiPLISNING GOAL
C0~~1I~1UP;ITY DE'lELOPi~1Er~T
,
TIME FRAPiE FOR,
ACCOhIPLISHhiENT OF
PROPOSED OQJECTIVE
CU~~IULATIVE
CITY COUPlCIL'S
PRIORITY STATUS
ON SCALE OF OF
1 TO 5 ODJECTIUE
. ~~ilgfl~ ~LOhl~
Plannina/To develop plans for future 2~
3 ~evelop the General Plan for the City.
R 83 - 84 ~ 1.4 • PC Rev~•~g Issues; Consult
,
growth and develop~nent; administet~ eview the.ultimate desirable boundary configuration for the
Cit
t
f
h II3 - 44 l.o\ ant selection unden~~ay
tne existing zoning, subdivision and y as a par
o
t
e;,eneral Plan Review Process.
To be reviewed by PC
sign ordinance and revise them as ~ l. Determine areas of planning responsibilit,y betwe_en City Council/ B2 - 83 1.75 '~ Completed
necessar;/; analyze environmental• ~ Planning Co~rl~ission and Staff.
reports and provide assistance to 4. Improve the coordination of the planning application review On-going l.B Improvements unden~iay
developers and applicants in a timely process in order to ininimize delay and inconvenience to
manner. . . applicants.
6. Develop City Sign Ordinance in accordance with new Zoning II4 - a5 2 To be revie~r~ed by Staff
Ordinance. ~ and PC
. 5. Develop City Zoning Ordinance in accordance with new General Plan. 84 - 85 2,2 Plo action to date
. . 1. Determ~ne status of all tentative maps ~~hich liave been filed with 82 - 83 2.2 Partial list received
the County, fran County.
, S, Update-assessor's maps to include all previous planning actions 83 - 84 2.2 50;~ Complete
~~rhich impact individual parcels. ~
' 9. Review adequacy of planning and zoning fees. 83 - 84 2.75 hlo action to date
CITI' COUi;~IL CG~~1;1E~~TS OR ADDITIONS ~
10: ~ga~i-~e-~i-taz~a-~homea~ner~hus_iness/landQ~ner/develo_p_er representatives
into the General Plan process with special advisory groups assigned
.. to particular General Plan elements.
11. Creation of Dublin's General Plan together with determination of its
sphere of influence, should have #1 priority making certain that
-~. decisions made during the interim period do not conflict with the
final General Plan.
12. Planning process should proceed as follows: the individual/developer .,.
in question should submit his plan to the City Planning Director. Q
Prior to the Planning Commission hearing, the City Planning Director ~
will call a general meeting of the full Planning Staff, the developer
~ and any interested parties for review. Any comments/suggestions of (
. the Planning Staff should be dealt with by the developer prior to
"'-
the Planning Commission hearing. The Planning Staff will then make ~
its reco~endation/denial to the Planning Commission who will then Cf
make its decision. If the developer does not choose to meet all the
~ ni _ • ~L_rt ~ ~,..,, nr ~.,. ~+~.,,,.., a....:..:,._,.
demands af tr~e r i aliii i uy J LQ I I QIIU/ V f f l. ~ fIC IIIQ~' Q~1f1CQ I LIICJC UCI. I J I VIIJ
directly to the City Council.
CITY OF DUBLIN
PRELIMINARY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
1982-83 '
~ TIME FRAME FOR,
PROGRAM AREA/GOAL ~ PROPOSED OBJECTIVES FOR ACCOMPLISHING GOAL PROPOSEDIOBJECTI~E
Building & Saf~y/To administer and
en orce e tty s Building, Plumbing,
Electrical, Mechanical, Housing and
Zoning Codes to ensure the safe con-
struction and maintenance of
buildings and structures.
2. Effectuate orderly transfer of all building records from the
County to the City. _,
82 - 83
CITY COUrJCIL COMMENTS OR ADDITIONS
En ineerin /To provide local review
of subdivision and parcel maps; '~
recommend solutions to traffic '
safety problems; act as an advocate
for the City on all engineering '
related problems. ;
CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS OR ADDITIONS
l. Secure cnntract building inspection services.~
3. Resolve.Nichandros building violat~ons.
4. Nave a committee including developers/manufacturer, Staff, Planning
Commission review new State laws that pre-empt local codes on
modular or pre-built manufactured homes to determine where and how
to implement. #3 should coincide with resolution of San Ramon
Road master plan,
5. Strict enforcement of the City's building and safety codes is an
obli ation of the City Council.
6. The Nichandros case is a prime example of a blatant violation of
the City's codes and the City's lack of enforcement thereof.
This condition should be corrected immediately and future viola-
tions should not be allowed to happen.
1. Secure contract Engineering Services
3. Recommend alternative configurations for improvement of San Ramon
Road.
5. Development of a City base map system.
2. Propose solution for traffic safety problem at Dublin Boulevard
and Silvergate Drive
4. Review the necessity of center street medians throughout City.
6. The City should contract with a local engineering firm.
7. Decision must be made on whether or not to widen Amador Valley
Blvd. from Village Parkway to Dougherty Road.
8. Medians should be evaluated and future maintenance should be
improved,i.e. rock should be replaced/supplemented with plants,etc.
82 - 83
82-83
CUMULATIVE
CITY COUNCIL'S
PRIORITY STATUS
ON SCALE OF OF
1 TO 5 OBJECTIVE
. (High) (Lo~~r)
1.75 No action until Bldg,
Insn,Svc. secured
RFP nearly complete -
Z Several proposals rec'd
2 Pending review of ~an
Ramon Road
Contract to be appr~ ~
82 - g3 1.6 by City Council
$2 ' 83 1.8 Staff has reviewed with
County its proposal.
83 - 84 2.6 No action to date
$2 - 83 2.75 Solution ~pproved,by CC
Design underway
82 ' 83 2.8 No action to date
PROGRr,i4 AREA/GOAL
Community Iden~tit,y /To enhance the
identity of the ty, so that it's
viewed as a distinct entity.
CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS OR ADDITIONS
PUBLIC SAFETY
PROPOSED OBJECTIVES FOR ACCOMPLISHING GOAL
2. Provide more adequate signing to identify interim City offices.
3. Mark police units with local identification
1. Development of a City seal and logo
4. Consider placement of monument signs at entrance to the City.
5. Replace all street name signs to include block number and City
identification.
TIME FRAh1E FOR,
ACCOMPLISHMENT OF
PROPOSED OBJECTIVE
82 - 83
82-83
82 - 83
CI~(Y COUNCIL'S
PRIORITY STATUS
ON SCALE OF OF
1 TO 5 06JECTIVE
. (Nigh) (Lo«)
1.2 Complete
1.8 Some I.D. installed -tc
be negotiated
2.6 Design underway
4.0 No action to date
4.25 No action to date
6. Development of a unique City seal and logo should be accomplished
as soon as possible.
7. Dublin, the crossroads of the Valley, should be made highly visible
and identifiable to passers by through proper use of signs, markers,
etc. City offices should be recognizable and easily located and
all City vehicles should be properly marked.
8. Have large (8" x 20"±) number signs located at each '100' on main
business streets. Could be in median strip where available. Study
where entrance welcome signs and over-the-street banners should be
located.
Police/To deter crime, respond to Z, Determine how police services provided by Sheriff's Dept can be
calls, apprenend criminals and improved.
enforce traffic regulations in 3. Develop and implement more effective crime prevention programs.
order to maintain community safety
and security.
l. Review of acle~uacy of ~olice services presently provided.
4. Determine if other alternative means of providing police service
should be evaluated this year.
82 - 83 1.6 Staff review underway
82 - 83 1.8 merciagv~lo~ed ~sn~ua~rd ~o
lr~ n~e~to~a~oone ~~~ a
~io~~reviewrp~r~c~~s, ~'pgic
Or~ nan°ces~~a~acou~d~~elmo~di~ied°~olmee~l~u~~ingsur
nee~ds.
hxu t e o fice of crime rev ntion pff'cer S t D
~a~cli rogra~iing communit~ ln~erest in ~eighb~rfioo~
Fu€nishin~ peak~rs,to schools and co~nmunitv or$ani
za ions w t~h emp asis on crime preven ion measu es.
82 -~3 2 Staff rev. UndeLway
82 - 83 " 3.6 No action to date.
G11Y COUNCIL COMMENTS OR ADDITIONS
. The citizens of Dublin seem satisfied with the present police services. Thought should be given, however, to the
fiitiirA whAn tha f.itv will h~va itc nwn nnlira fnrra anri will nnt ha rnntrartinn thrnunh tha ('niintv
C I T Y 0 F D U B L I N
PRELI«INARY GOALS A~~D OE3JECTIVES
1982-83 ` CU~~IULATIVE
. CITY COUNCIL'S
TIME FR AME FOR, PRIORITY STATUS
PROGRAi~ AREA/GOAL ~ PROPOSED OQ~ECTIUES FOR ACCOh1PLISHING GOAL PROPOSEDI OBJECTI~E ON1ST~ALS OF OB~~ECTIVE
_ . . (High) (Lo~~~ )
Animal Control/To protect persons,
animals and property through ade- 2. Determine if more effective animal licensing program could be 82 - 83 :.8 Study underway
provided in-house.
quate enfor~ement of animal
regulations 1. Investigate the feasibility of increasing services to provide 82 - 83 3.2 Study underway
. adequate leash law enforcement.
CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS OR ADDITIONS
3. As a community service, have vaccination and licensing clinics every
6 months or a year in a downtown location. Leash law enforcement
should not take up much manpower time exceptas required by complaints.
4. Leash law should be enforced.
PUBLIC WORKS
Capital Improvements/To develop a.
l
f
~~• ---- ---
Develop~a 5 year Capi,tal Improvement Program. 82
P
ib
- 83
City
No action to date
p
an
or additiona investment in oss
le project might include: Council
community facilities. a. Road widen or redesign Response
b. Removal, redesign or beautification of street center medians Inconsistent
c. Additional traffic signal installations
d. Undergrounding of utilities
e. Resarfacing program
~ f. Identify site and acquire, build or lease permanent City offices
2. Identify sources of funding for capital improvement projects 82 - 83 2.2 No action to ~'~
3. Review federal Aid Urban (FAU) eligible projects. • 82 - 83 2,8 Underway with ~,,unty
CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS OR ADDITIONS
4. Plan f~r future City facility.
5. The most important street in town is San Ramon Road between the freeway and
Silvergate Drive. This is the only opportunity we will have to develop a
"first class downtown street". Planning by a professional shopping center
designer should be started immediately. Plans for a Civic Center should be
discussed with the community before most of the options (land/buildings) are
lost. What does the c~mmunity want in their civic center? Administration
building only? Meeting facilities? Auditorium? Culture art center? This will
determine location, parking, land area, etc.
6. Removing overhead wires on Dublin Blvd should be instituted as soon as possible
~ r n r n ~,,..... ~ ~ . . . .
Wlth r~~~ futi,~ra fIPVP~f111111PYItC fl117111~1/~Y1fi Cor~~i~o ~~ ii+il;+~~ +,J;..~.,,,:...~ L__.__ .L_.____J i~~
-r •-••-- ~•,r•~•"a• ~ u~~~i~y u~~caauiCn~ ui~~i i~t, uel~~y ~uriueu wi~~cy part~cipating.
PROGRA(~ AREAJGOAL
'ntenance/T~ maintain and improve
the overall quality and appearance
of public facilities and property.
CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS OR ADDITIONS
Transportation/To assess and attempt
to meet where possible the needs far
public transportation in the
community.
CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS OR ADDITIONS
C I T Y 0 F D U Q L I N
PRELI~~INARY GOALS AND ODJECTIVES
19a2-83
PROPOSED OBJECTIVES FOR ACCOMPLISHING GOAL
TIME FRAh1E FOR,
ACCOMPLISHMENT OF
PROPOSED OBJECTIVE
CUMULATIVE
CITY COUNCIL'S
PRIORITY
ON SCALE OF
1 TO 5
. (Nigh) (Lo~~r)
STATUS
OF
OBJECTIVE
'.. ;Set-up a local street lighting assessment district 82 - 83 1 Pending CC review
, Review condition of street center median and parkways and 82 - 83 1.6 No action to date
develop a program for improving maintenance
1. Identify service levels of m~intenance provided by the Alameda 82 - 83 2.2 Staff review underway
County Road Department
5. Develop a street tree ordinance or policy along with specifica- 82 - 83 3 No action to date
tions for securing private tree maintenance firm
2. Develop a service request/complaint system 82 - 83 3.4 Partially developed
6. Should review having other agencies, public or private, bid on
street maintenance. Doubtful whether County Road Dept will be in
our best interest in the long run.
7. Medians should be evaluated and future maintenance should be
improved, i.e. rock should be replaced/supplemented with plants
8. Present local street lighting is inadequate and should be improved.
1. Work with Cities of Pleasanton and Livermore, MTC and ABAG on On-going 2 Request sent to MTC for
the feasibility of developing a tri-valley bus system. transit study funds
2. Review the performance of the dial-a-ride program and determine 82 - 83 2.6 Staff has met with
whether or not to continue with the San Ramon Valley Community County Paratransit CC
Center as a provider. & Contra Costa Cou„~y
Groups
3. Small local bus that toured Dublin and possible San Ramon could be
used by school children, shoppers, seniors, commuters, etc. It would
be subsidized by the City because the sales tax revenue generated in
Dublin would offset much of the costs. Fares should be minimal.
4. Plans should be started to build wind and rainproof bus stop shelters
at key downtown locations, especially at BART transfer stops. If
organized properly, citizen's groups or service clubs could participate.
CITY OF ~U4LIN
PRELIMINARY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
1982-83 '
TIME FRAME FOR,
ACCOMPLISH~~ENT OF
PROGRAI~ AREA/GOAL ~ PROPOSED OBJECTIVES FOR ACCOMPLISHING GOAL PROPOSED OBJECTIVE
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
FinancelTo effectively manage the 10.
City's financial resources; maxi- l;
mize City revenues; control 2.
expenditures; and develop an 4.
adequate reporting system.
7.
3.
6.
5.
8.
11.
12.
13.
9.
CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS OR ADDITIONS
Prepare Fiscal Year 1983-84 Budget
Develop Chart of Accounts
Set up accounting and financial reporting system
Develop an investment program which maximizes the return on
all available cash
Prepare a mid-year financial forecast.
Set up inventory control system
Work with County Departments in developing adequate reporting
on bills for services
Draft City purchasing procedures
Improve internal controls in financial function
Develop a business license regulatory program and ordinance
Develop a hotel occupancy tax ordinance
Investigate use of data processing for financial reporting
Change payroll system from monthly to semi-monthly
14. Give consideration to contracting out data processing for the next
several years
15. Summarize warrant register instead of itemize (If interested,
Council can go to office for details)
16. Report dollar amounts charged to budget categories for month.
CUh1ULATIVE
CITY COUNCIL'S
PRIORITY STATUS
0(J SCALE OF OF
1 TO 5 OBJECTIVE
. (High) (Lo~~~)
82 - 83 1.25 No action to date
82 - 83 1.3 Complete
82 - 83 1.3 Complete
82 - 83 1.5 Staff reviews invE nent
return on regular oasis
82 - 83 1.5 To be presented to CC 1/83
82 - 83 1.7 No action to date
82 - 83 1.15 Billing information
being refined
82 - 83 2 No action to date
82 - 83 2 Nearly completed
2.5 No action to date
3 No action to date
83 - 84 3 No action to date
82 - 83 3.5 No action to date
Camplete
C I T Y 0 F D U B L I N
PRELI~~INARY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
1982-83
PROGRAl~ AREA/GOAL
Administration/To ensure the smooth
and efficient functioning of those
services provided to the comnunity.
PROPOSED OBJECTIVES FOR ACCOMPLISHING GOAL
1. Recruit and hire a planning secretary
4. Draft a Personnel Ordinance
5. Provide training for Staff in the area of election administra-
tion and other areas which improve services to the community
6. Investigate and acquire the equipment approved in the budget
2. Hire part-time bookkeeper
7. Set up municipal code utilizing municipal code service
3. Set up employee fringe benefit programs
,
CUMULATIVE
CITY COUNCIL'S
PRIORITY STATUS
ON SCALE OF OF
1 TO 5 OBJECTIVE
. (Nigh) (Lo~~~)
TIME fRAhiE FOR,
ACCOMPLISHMENT OF
PROPOSED OBJECTIVE
82 - 83
82 - 83
82 - 83
82 - 83
82 - 83
82 - 83/83 - 84
82 - 83
CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS OR ADDITIONS
Inter4overnmental Relations/To work
with other agencies on problems of
area wide concern; keep abreast of
legislature impacting the City.
CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS OR ADDITIONS
8. All of above should be sought after in next year. Ti~ning shoulci
be Stai'f's decision. The emphasis with Staff concerning community
services should be on accessability, expediting, and public relations.
Staff should be visible to the community as much as practical to
reduce the "We - They" syndrome.
_ _ ._____
_ . _ _
1. Work with City of Pleasanton in securing representation on
Pleasanton Housing Authority.
2. Determine most appropriate means of providing fire service to
Arroyo Vista.
3. Continue discussion with DSRSD on services which are provided to
residents of Dubtin.
1 Complete
2 Under Staff review
2 FPPC Training Seminar
2.25 Major acquis comply d
2.3 Selection imminent
2.3 Staff investigating cost
2.5 Partially complete
82 - 83 2.4 Request sent to City af
Pleasanton
82 - 83 2.4 Dependent upon City ofPleas/
response
On-going 2,4
4. Work with DSRSD to determine if recreation program is feasible
5. Develop a better working relationship with the DSRSD Board
6. Suggest that Pleasanton and Dublin (& San Ramon in the future) exchange
agendas and minutes of their meetings that pertain to each other to open
up a dialogue. We all impact each other on almost every major decision.
Common areas of discussion already are: fire, Police, hazardous wastes
and spills on the freeways, transportation, taxi service, water, sewer,
traffic, commercial development, housing, etc.
1. After the March elections, serious discussions should start with DSRSD
re parks and recreation, fire, water and sewer. The City should have
more control Of Snme nf thP~P ~Pryirac ~nrl/nr ha ranracantari in tha rlaricinn,
- - -r• ---•^--
PROGRAhi AREA/GOAL
CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS OR ADDITIONS
COUNCIL/MANAGER RELATIONS
To develop a working relationship that
recognizes the necessity of teamwork by
clearly defining the duties and respon-
sibilities of each party.
C I T Y 0 F D U D L I N
PRELIf~1INARY GOALS AND ODJECTIVES
1982-II3
PROPOSED 06JECTIVES FOR ACCOI~IPLISHING GOAL
1. Develop a system of exchange of information that is equal
for all parties.
2. Conduct a goals & objective study session once a year with
a follow up session at the end of the year to determine
status and re-evaluation of priorities, as necessary.
' CU~~IULATIVE
CITY COUP~CIL'S
TIME FRAPIE FOR, PRIORITY STATUS
ACCOh1PLISHME~~T OF ~ ON SCALE OF OF
PROPOSED ODJECTIVE 1 TO 5 O4JECTIVE
~ . (Nigf~) (Lo~~~)