HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 6.1 Calmet Appeal (2) y 1D--6D
CITY OF DUBLIN
AGENDA STATEMENT
MEETING DATE: February 28, 1983
SUBJECT Request to temporarily suspend the appeal of
Calmet, Inc. , Tentative Map, Tract 5047
EXHIBITS ATTACHED Letter from Calmet, Inc. , dated February 18 , 1983
RECOMMENDATION Consider request. pr
FINANCIAL STATEMENT: None
DESCRIPTION • On July 12 , 1982 , the City Council considered an
appeal of Tentative Map, Tract 5047, proposed by Calmet, Inc. The project
involves 145 condominium units near the interesection of San Ramon Road and
Dublin Boulevard, behind the Iceland skating facility. Appeals to the
Tentative Map were filed by the developer and by area residents. The City
Council continued the matter and directed Staff to try to resolve the
issues. Staff has been concentrating on the traffic issue.
Calmet, Inc. , has requested the City Council to temporarily suspend any
action on the appeal for 150 days . The reason for the suspension is to
allow consideration of a different application on the site. The developer
has indicated a desire to apply for a Planned Development for apartment
units .
Calmet, Inc. , further requests that the appeal of the Tentative Map be
reinstated at no additional cost if 1) the City Council denies the new
application, or 2 ) 150 days lapse, whichever comes first.
TIMING CONSIDERATION
For a Planned Development or other amendment to the Zoning Ordinance, the
processing time would be as follows:
a) With a Negative Declaration, a minimum of 2 to 4 months from time of
complete application to City Council hearing.
b) With an Environmental Impact Report, a minimum of 3 to 6 months from time
of complete application to City Council hearing.
The total number of calendar days involved would depend on when the
completed application is submitted, the complexity of the project, the type
of environmental document required, the issues raised during the project
review, and the number and length of Planning Commission and City Council
hearings . The 150 day time limit requested by the developer could be tight.
At the end of 150 days, the City may or may not have completed the
processing of the new application. The developer has indicated a strong
desire to stay with the 150 day time limit.
COPIES TO:
/
ITEM NO. / .
CALMET , INC .
403 BALRA DRIVE
EL CERRITO, CA 94530
(415) 527-4314
February 18, 1983
Dublin City Council
P.O. Box 2340
Dublin, Ca
94568
Dear Members of the City Council;
On July 12, 1982, our application for a renewal of the Tentative
Map #5047 for 145 Condominium Units on 13.4 acres was appealed by the
neighboring landowners and the Council has referred the application
to Staff with directions to confer with us and the appellants in order
to resolve their differences. There was also the recommendation that
a traffic study should be completed on San Ramon Rd and the intersection
of Dublin Blvd. and Donlon Way before a final decision can be made.
I hereby request that the City Council defer action and temporarily
suspend the Tentative Map appeal for 150 days.
The reason for this request is we have a Developer who is interested in
putting a Planned Unit Development of apartment units on that property
and we will be making that application as soon as we receive notice that
your Council has approved the temporary suspension of the Tentative Map.
We feel that apartments will better serve Dublin's housing needs because
our marketing survey showed there were no vacancies and every apartment
house had a waiting list with several people seeking apartments every
day. Dublin has hundreds of businesses that employ middle and moderate
income people that must have housing. The impact of major businesses
coming into this area will only aggrevate the situation.
We hope you will support the need for affordable rental housing and will
help expedite the processing of this new (PUD) application so it can be
approved by the 150 days. It is our understanding, that if the (PUD1
application is not approved as submitted that the present Tentative Map
will be reinstated to its present status and the suspension, if granted,
will be with that condition, namely without prejudice to our right
(without additional fees) to reinstate our presently pending application.
Such reinstatement would automatically occur either upon the expiration
of 150 days or a negative decision by the City Council on the above
contemplated second planning application for the parcel, whichever occurs
first.
Thank you for your prompt consideration.
P, " CEIVED
FEB 2 21983
Tek Lim
CALMET, INC. DUBLIN PLANNING