Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Item 6.1 RezoningBarrettDevlpmtTr5131 (2)
" ,. ...V' '-" -.-I AGgNDASTATEMENT MEETING DATE: March 12, 1984 SUBJECT: PA 82-033.1,(R) Barratt San Jose, Revised Planned Development Rezoning to allow 88-unit residential condominium/townhouse project; southwest corner of Silvergate Drive and San Ramon Road EXHIBITS ATTACHED: Staff Report RECbMMENDATION: l. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. if 7. Hear'Staf'f presentation Open public hearing Hear applicant and public presentations Close public hearing Adopt Resolution regarding Negative Declaration Adopt Resolution regarding Planned Develoment Rezoning Waive reading and introduce ordinance amending Zoning Ordinance FINANCIAL STATEMENT: Applicant and Staff are negotiating for sale of City property. Item will be brought back to City Council for final action DESCRIPTION: L BACKGROUND A considerable amount of discussion, analysis, and negotiation regarding the Applicant's proposal has occurred over the ,past year. After review of the original plans, and adoption of a Specific Plan, the Applicant has submitted a revised proposal with: - 88 condominium and townhouse dwelling units rather than 112 "mini-condominiums". - A second access from San Ramon Road, in addition to access from Silvergate Drive. - Addition of O.7+acres along San Ramon Road that is currently c;ity property. On February 6, 1984 ~ the Planning Comxn,isSionreviewed ther,evised proposal. At the me-eting, the ,Applicant. submittedaddit;ional revisions to the reyisedpropqsal and made a committmentto ei'\-lcarge the size o:t; the condominium units~. even Hit resulted in ,:t;ewer total unit,s. About 15 residents spoke during the public 'hearing~ some for and some against the proposal. ThePlanning Commission recomxnended approval~ subject to the committments made by the Applicant, and detailed Staf~ review of the site plan prior to city Council public hearing. ----------------------------~------------------------------------ ITEM NO. '., COPIES TO : Applicant Silvertree HOmeowners' Assn. o#~- ~\..,:) '--' .....J II. ISSUES l. Land Use - The San Ramon Road Specific Plan designates the land use on the sUbjec:t site as Multifamily Residential, ,8 to 15 dwelling units per acre. The APplicant's proposal consists of 88 dwelling units on 6.9 acres,fora densityofl2.8 dwelling units per acre. If the proposal were reduced to" 84 dwelling. units, the density would be l2.2dwelling units per acre. In either cftse, the proposal is. within the range permitted by the Specific Plan. 2. Design- The Staff has two major design recommendations: A. Eliminate one bui"ldin in the central ortion of the' site - This act10n w1ll e 1m1nate over-building and eyer-crowding, provide for a more functional open area, and allow for a more attractive entry area~ B. ara es a minimum eart uake au t zone rather prov1de add1t10nal sa ety an damage from ground moveIl\ent. Building Official concur with of 6 feet awa from the than oot awa - Th1S will further m1tpotential The county Geologist and City this recommendation. While the applicant has indicated agreement with all the other Staff recommended conditions, they do not agree with the two recommendations listed above. 3. Environmental Impact - _ The potential environmental impacts were mitigated by revisions to the proposal and by binding agreements. Potential impacts and their mitigation are as follows: A. Noise--units adjacent to San Ramon Road will contain acoustic insulation, and a masonry sound wall will be constructed along San Ramon Road. B. Flooding~-drainage and flood protection measures will be designed into the project; C. Traffic~-the A.pplicant will contribute to signaL and road improvements at the Silvergate Drive/SanRamon Road intersection, road improvements on San Ramon Rd., and will provide two accesS points to the site. D. Seismic-":Detailed seismic studies have been prepared, and habitable buildings have been located away from the earthquake fault zone. III. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission and Staff recommend that the City Council take the following actions: l. Adopt the Resolution approving the Negative Declaration as mitigated. _'_ . ,......:. ',;':.';_C';..: 2.' Adopt the ~esolution. approving, the Planned rie~:LOpIlient: .Rezoning, with Findings and Gener<J1Pl'oviSioi"ls, 3 . Waive reading and introduce the ord'inance"amendinq' t,he Zoning Ordinance. CITY OF DUBLIN STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: March 12, 1984 SUBJECT: City Council Planning Director if ~. PA 82-033.1(R) Barratt San Jose, '88 residential condominium units, southwest corner of Silvergate Drive and San Ramon Road (APN 941-101-4-7, 4-12) TO: FROM: GENERAL INFORMATION PROJECT: Barratt San Jose has applied for a Planned Development (PD) rezoning approval to permit the construction of an 88-unit residential project. The property is currently classified as Multifamily Residential (8-15 units per acre) by the San Ramon Road Specific Plan. APPLICANT: Barratt San Jose 3150 Almaden Expressway Ste 245 San Jose CA 95118 REPRESENTATIVE: Nathan Meeks LOCATION: Southwest corner of Silvergate Drive and San Ramon Road ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: 941-101-4-7 and 941-101-4-13 plus acquired City property PARCEL SIZE: 6.2 acres plus acquisition of City property (approximately .7 acres) PROPERTY OWNER: Barratt San Jose EXISTING ZONING: (C-N) Neighborhood Commercial EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant SURROUNDING ZONING AND LAND USE: North - C-O (Administrative Office), and C-N (Neighborhood Business) with offices and convenient market. South - C-l (Retail Business) with creek and single family dwelling units East - San Ramon Road and Flood Control Canal West - R-S-D-25 and R-S-D-20 (Suburban Residence) 4-plex Residential Condominiums SITE/ZONING HISTORY: On July 21, 1980, the Alameda County Planning Director approved a site plan for the subject property to permit the construction of 110,000 sq.ft. of commerc{al office condominiums with 413 parking spaces. Special fencing and landscape treatment was required along San Ramon Road and along Silvergate Drive, including installation and maintenance agreements related to landscaping within City right-of-way (S-781). -1- On April 18, 1983, the Dublin Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval of a Planned Development (PD) rezoning to allow 112 mini-condominium units on the subject property. The Commission also approved a Tentative Subdivision Map and a Negative Declaration for that development. The Tentative Map approval was appealed by the Silvertree Homeowners' Association. The rezoning and Tentative Map (on appeal) came before the City Council on May 23, 1983. After extensive discussion, the City Council continued the public hearing on the rezoning and Tentative Map until after the City Council had decided what land use designation the San Ramon Road Specific Plan should apply to the subject property. On September 26, 1983, the City Council designated the Barratt property (Area 5 of the San Ramon Specific Plan) Residential Multifamily Use with a density range of between 8 and 15 units per acre. Barratt then redesigned the project and resubmitted the revised plans for a new Planned Development Rezoning and a Tentative Map. On January 23, 1984, the City Council referred the plans to the Planning Commission for review and comment. The City Council continued its public hearing until the Planning Commission submits its comments back to the Council. On February 6, 1984, the Planning Commission reviewed Barratt's 88-unit Arbor Creek proposal. At that meeting, Barratt submitted a revised site plan which sought to address previous Staff concerns. After a lengthy public discussion, the Commission approved the revised sketch plans, with Barratt agreeing that the approval was subject to Staff analysis prior to City Council review, and with the understanding that the larger proposed condominium units might result in a recommendation to reduce the total number of units (see Attachment #3 for meeting minutes.) APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Section 8-31.0 of the Zoning Ordinance lists standards which Planned Developments should meet. Section 8-31.2 states that: a) The proposal shall benefit the public necessity, convenience, and general welfare; b) The rezone is subject to review by the Planning Commission after two (2) years; c) The Planned Development rezone shall be adopted by an Ordinance by the City Council ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: A Negative Declaration (ND) with mitigation was prepared on the initial project. Since the environmental concerns of the current project are similar with the initial project, the previously prepared ND will be considered. NOTIFICATION: Public Hearing notices have been published in the Tri-Valley Herald, mailed to adjacent property owners and posted in public buildings. ANALYSIS: Barratt's Arbor Creek plans have been changed considerably since it first came before the City Council. The changes that have taken place are a direct response to the adoption of the Area 5 -2- multifamily designation for the San Ramon Specific Plan, and to the concerns of local residents, the Planning Commission, and City Council. The most significant changes that have been made are: 1. the number of residential units has been reduced from 112 to 88; 2. the unit type has been changed from 112 mini-condominiums to 40 condominiums and 48 townhouses; 3. a second access road and entrance has been added along San Ramon Road; 4. the plan now includes .7+ acres of City property which was previously shown to be landscaped. The acquisition of the City property has been found acceptable, in concept, by the City Council. Acquisition of this City property will enable 16 of the 88 units to be built. This project seeks approval of a Planned Development (PD) rezoning. Tentative Map and Site Development Review will take place in the future. The PD rezoning is to establish the type and intensity of the residential use, and to approve the preliminary site plan, architecture, and landscaping. Planned Development Rezoning Considerations: There are three primary considerations that need to be evaluated in determining the acceptability of the proposed plans: 1. Land Use - type, amount 2. Design - site plan, architecture, and landscaping 3. Environmental Impact - seismic, traffic, flooding, noise 1. Land Use: The proposed multifamily residential use, at a density of 12.3 units per acre, is within the range permitted by the San Ramon Road Specific Plan, which permits 8-15 units per acre. The City can approve a project at a density anywhere within that range. Typically, in order to acquire approval of a project above the low end of the range, a project must show that it has increased public benefits, aesthetics, and the like. In addition, the type and mix of units is now up to the City Council to determine. As Section 8-31.0, of the Zoning Ordinance states, the subject property should be developed in a manner that will: a. be consistent with City policies; b. provide an efficient use of the land which respects the natural and topographic features of the site; c. provide and encourage the use of common open areas for neighborhood and community activities; d. be compatible with and enhance neighboring development; e. create an attractive, efficient and safe environment. From a strictly land use standpoint, the new proposal contains a unit mix and density that is more in keeping with community and City Council desires than the previous plans. General community support, from people who previously opposed the project, has been acquired. There was some dissatisfaction with the inclusion of the mini-condominiums raised at the January 24th City Council meeting and, again, at the February 6th Planning Commission meeting. It appears that the new mix of the units is consistent with current-market buyer preferences and economics. -3- 2. Design: The project now includes almost 1 acre of land that is currently owned by the City, and is proposed to be acquired by Barratt. This area has been included in the project because the townhouse units require more land than the condominiums. The townhouse units, that are proposed adjacent to San Ramon Road, are much closer to San Ramon Road than the previously proposed condominiums, however, an improved architecture, and the inclusion of landscaping on the remaining City property, mitigates the visual impact of the units that are closer to the street. The schematic landscape plan shows the required landscaped setbacks, and common open space, to be able to be well landscaped. The City's remaining property along San Ramon Road will also be well landscaped. Specific review of the type, size, and location of the landscaping will occur during the Site Development Review process. The San Ramon Road Specific Plan requires that a 20-foot-wide landscaped buffer be provided, adjacent to the Silvertree development. An 8-foot-wide buffer is proposed to be included in private yards for the townhouse units. A row of trees is proposed along the property line. The ability to maintain these trees is questionable because they are located within the private yards, but Homeowner C.C.& R. restrictions will be developed to assure maintenance of these trees. Staff has reviewed the revised plans that Barratt presented at the Planning Commission on February 9, 1984. The plan shows the two-story condominium buildings that had lined the west property line, and overlooked the Silvertree development, being moved into the central portion of the project. One- and two-story townhouse buildings are now located along the west property line. This creates a much better visual relationship between the two developments. The building at the northwest corner of the property is a minimum of 10' from the property line. While a 20' setback is required by the Specific Plan, Staff is comfortable with the minimum 10' setback in this case, since the building sides to the Silvertree property line and has a one-story unit at that location. In an attempt, however, to retain all of the 88 units, five condominium buildings (40 units), and one townhouse building (4 units) have been crowded into the central portion of the site. In addition, the condominiums have been increased in size, which results in some additional crowding. The main concerns that Staff has with the siting of the units concerns the siting of the units in the central portion of the site. These concerns are: a. buildings crowd one another and create a relatively small central common open space; b. the view one has of the development, at the San Ramon entrance, is of a row of garage doors, rather than of the central landscaped open space. Thus, this entrance has no entry feature or special appearance; c. there are very few views of landscaping as one drives around the interior of the project. The views are predominantly garage doors and parking bays; d. sixteen garages are seismic fault zone. should be a minimum located directly next The County Geologist of six feet from that to the believes zone. they -4- Staff has been working with the Applicants to resolve Staff's design concerns. Several changes have been agreed upon, which improve the architecture of the condonimium buildings and create a safer and more attractive "streetscape". Two significant Staff recommendations, however, are not acceptable to the Applicant. The following two recommended changes to the Applicant's proposal (Exhibit B) are illustrated on Exhibit A: A. Reduction of one building in the central portion of the site. This will allow for the spreading out of the buildings, thereby, eliminating the crowding; creation of a significant open area at the end of the San Ramon Road entrance to the project; and the creation of a much improved streetscape, since open landscaped areas can be provided that break up the rows of garage doors and parking bays. B. Setting back the garages that are. between 1 & 3 feet fran the known earthquake fault zone. The County Geologist and the City's Chief Building Official both agree.that the garages should be set back away from the fault zone, a minimum of 6 to 8 feet and, if possible, further. This will improve the chances for limiting damage due to ground movement. 3. Environmental Impacts: The environmental impacts of the previous proposal were mitigated by revisions to the proposal and by a binding agreement, by Barratt, to provide other mitigation such as contributing to the cost of signalizing Silvergate Drive and San Ramon Road. Because the new proposal has fewer units and has the same type of use, the previous environmental assessment and mitigation are appropriate for use with the new proposal. In summary, the four main environmental impacts are: a. Noise - the units adjacent to San Ramon Road will contain acoustic installation, and a masonry sound wall will be installed along San Ramon Road. This will bring the noise levels from the expected heavy traffic along San Ramon Road down to acceptable levels within the units. b. Flooding - drainage and flood protection measures regarding the flooding of Martin Canyon Creek, are to be incorporated into the design of the site. c. Traffic - the developer will pay a fair share for signal and road improvements at Silvergate Drive and San Ramon Road, and for road improvements, across the San Ramon Road frontage of this project, in order to mitigate the project's traffic impacts. The second access on San Ramon Road will also reduce the project's impact on Silvergate Drive. d. Seismic - a defined fault zone crosses the Barratt site. Habitable buildings have been set back, away from the seismic setback zone. Garages, however, are quite close to the fault zone and are within the seismic setback zone. Structural design of the garages will have to show that they can withstand an earthquake that is located right next to them. -5- In summary, there are four aspects of the project which should receive particular comment by the City Council: 1. Is the type of units and the density of the units acceptable? 2. Is the acquisition of the City property for use by this project acceptable? 3. Is the design of the project, particularly the design and location of the condominium and townhouse buildings in the central portion of the project, as well as the internal streetscape and the size of the common open space acceptable? 4. Is the location, type, and proposed maintenance of the landscaping adjacent to the Silvertree development acceptable? The Staff-recommended site plan is labelled "Exhibit A". The Applicant's recommended site plan and architectural plans are labelled "Exhibit B". RECOMMENDATION FORMAT: 1) Hear the Staff presentations 2) Open the public hearing 3) Hear from the applicant and the public 4) Close the public hearing 5) Take action on the Negative Declaration 6) Take action on the Planned Development ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1 ) Adopt Resolution (Exhibit D) approving Negative Declaration as mitigated. 2 ) Adopt Resolution (Exhibit E) aproving Planned Development Rezoning, with Findings and General Provisions (this action would approve the Staff- recommended site plan as an amendment to the Applicant's proposal). 3 ) Waive reading and introduce Ordinance amending Zoning Ordinance (Exhibit F). ATTACHMENTS: Location Map Property Acquisition Map Exhibit A - Staff-recommended site development plan Exhibit B - Applicant's development plans Exhibit C - Negative Declaration Exhibit D - Resolution Approving Negative Declaration Exhibit E - Resolution Approving the Planned Development Rezoning with Findings and General Provisions Exhibit F - Ordinance Amending Zoning Ordinance Background Attachments: 1. Minutes of City Council meeting of May 23, 1983 2. Minutes of City Council meeting of September 26, 1983 3. Minutes of Planning Commission meeting of February 6, 1984 4. Environmental Assessment 5. Newcastle Residents' Survey -6- • ' . . ' , . . r.• . , . . . . . . .. ' . . • . ' . . • " • • .. . . , . ... . . . • . . . . . . / . . r--- -,----..Y7 77--.. .---: Summery Building Areas Pinola Family Atl7hea.... • I 10. ] " 11.2 PLAN NO. DEOPOONS 50. 1 1 . of UNITS FOOTAGE . ‘,. I. MTN°FENCINO A '20 2 700 5 . •\oi • _s-J 1 / •- . ,.-.•. ' 7:::,t .-___-__________•"- ! • .. . • -----n, : ,..•=,,,,,,,..rp,,.... ,,,A , 11 2 054 f"'L ...... o•- 2=1'1'4 55 5 2 11 2 , 12512 • 3 11 a mee , NUMBER Of 015:3. 5.1 • 11 3 1210 . \ ' \ -I--- . . GROSS DENSITY 12.2 , ...... r ---...../ NET DENSITY 122 A Location Map ,....., A --C:: -. ::=1::::er • ,_..-.. litill1111 ---: ---iii Air oi . COVERED,PANNING ,. . ....• OPEN.1=710 . .'''''.)' '>'';‘;';411111 111,11111111111111 II * .' 1111111111.rilikalifilliall41111111111111 1 ..4:4141 IE Lil• ' "".... .4....• •1111)........... . I . IX, ............, ....,...,,......,,_.0„.., Chico 1 ' .illrfirifiTali Letild n i 1 N . , gift, I USEABLE OPEN SPACE-5111 ,...../\ ) 7. ....." .... 7----. I . iI :\"-...-----.....) • GREEN . ' ■11111111 t 41.41/010 lierbo. _ .Z.."--...,...7;4511111111'46 I .tMillitillil . . ' --1 ,N, \„. \ olivrai irj, gra ■ lor I- 1 rmi f • 1 , ist ei.,,, I WrIME..i." \ ifIRAI =1.i _11 li 1411 - Ilan" I ' • 71,1015Milii, ' . 1 N,,, ,,A111-1 rilligliti I idiiii . , .-1etall Commercial . III 111111111 ' .. \ % !LA 10111 1 11"11-71ThEr-T311111 - 1 Singl FomilY •' •••' A•--\7 1,.-.\.t.7...-.s\(-.-4\7\\A■.'\1,1--1"-.-t'-`-I'-'L-l s-e0)1 -'""1‘ ■ 4LO- "-L-11-1c,1-.17,l=7.7.1-.1 I'- j- .7 .1....-_S.r14A■A1n L 10....1.11.•••—,j— k--• I 1 :O • St Ad ---------_- el. • ' \ 1:' -VI -----ert-oml..... 'rr _____ iiiirrEiiiThIrraMil__.C'....:?.. 7117 1 • Ut eloy ) iiiiiiiiiiiirsimi 'Vs is : 1090 1 girl' ai• 1 . mu.mirr.. .... a___....-9,mi ,,,irs 1 mium-1 ; TOE OF 21.0Pi.4\\ '‘ will h minim EL' nil .11111111111111 IN li . • . ... SETBACK LING - , No, 1.11MMIMilill ii".. ..1 .141ft155.•=52.5.i• . . . A"ASPHALT TAAL • . . --.------- • • . .. . . . , _ SAN RAMON ROAD . • . \ 1 ...... .,..,. . . . r • . • . . . . -•71-ssi:-...,:r;.:.^.=r.-....:r3=at-=.r..., . . ....—.............n..........,-...... ARBOR CREEK *) DEVELOPMENT PLAN " • . . . Barratt San Jose '';.,1:,..,"a1V,"..:17.H.:+1,-'1:10-1:772.:1Ell'.2- • , . • • ....r...unnt mule.=•,:Tral.no:-.12:--- PROVIDEO NT BEFILOGAIIK LONO•ABSOCIATE3 of ?ublin ''' 20. ,THE ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER, ,,,,,,,sess.t aue ry . • . ' ./ ' 11201BP 12515/53 . . • 2/277/14 2/105,1 . . . " . . ■ ■ • • • •Silo Summery Building Areas Single Family Attached N • ?ROSS AN. PLAN NO. BEDROOMS SO. \ $Wi.iC'iJ;t t I FO S ol UNITS =c_ LI EXISTING vEUCwn ; � SITE-A 20 1 TOO• D 1 . 1 / i ...--W uuR C ov ERACE t5K t B. .r 4 j___,.._....------.' — N ON 55.5 t BBB \ � `NUMBER \ \ I t` %A tz B SxtD 1 _ +� D6NSm 82B \ ' Location Map t2.e fgin•INCLUDES GARAGES RnD x= s_ ,COVEtE0 OPEN 4JJ USEABLE uSPACE-565 �i . ' :�.-- i I I I I I I `i • ..w u • .0.0.° i - ' ♦I ' ,♦' 1 OUSE 2,.. .._82,2's� . \�Q 9 y`\\\ IA� .�\ aov°',arB �i `\\� .� ' DIRE �� DUBLIN GREEN / iipli, m`oRr z DRIVE, , , . 9 \\ �' eØ'd4 ���� ,POOL - '�i'ti_ _,7,7_,_ ,\ am! j����7 116ii�i A, 1���� Refan Commercial '` ' \ - 1 x,1111it11I lr —� �l W 111 _ , y..y_I1 1� I I ��I f�1 •S11100 Femlly ` ?1�--- + `�. I Z.UiT ZONE .�' i 1,�1 i'T A. ' `fir I rta I I ` > R, 1 NE��---- �cowPACT,rm°s Detached L 6,'�\ GATE ........._1 —=_.. r_INHABITED BULLpIa 6° ETBACR LINE' —� Fa i -:'c' " E.'"'" inn.= MAIN I Milleillirt-171111411111111.11.1" I main WWI • ` \ PRO 06■im ,I ToP BAN.1T S ' tA SON LINE b — ' e ASPHALT TRAIL SAN RAMON ROAD REC [ IVEL7 !(AR 5 1984 °---,m,..=-..1.--=.r.,.. DUBLIN PLANNING �,�..n. ARBOR CREEK �� DEVELOPMENT PLAN Barrett San Jose •FAULY ZONE LgcAT10N AND SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ._..... E. . PROVIDED BY BERLQeAR.LONG a ASSOCIATES of Dublin THE ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER iieei 820.10P • Site Summary Building Areas Single Family Attelhed ~� AREA PLAN NtO. BEOBOOMg: BO,CD MOSS •023 I NITS FOOeTO OE t' ; We... 6'LANDSCAPE BUFFER(EASEMENT/ I I E%ISTWO MGM w °PvEw.aE 27 S• a zo x >BOt J ...•_, i B-r, cOVEBAOE Ma 1 12 P 364 1 ".. � __�' I , 7 M" OPEx a PAvE St a t2' xea �>^� tu.E° g tae \\ I.n^T T ,.,�.. �,. 1i...tam GEES DENSITY 119 A ° \' )�y' .- I r_..AA7Ijl-..``Y``L� -• P Er DENSITY t \ • l t`�i j I'\ �� 'r 17(x' �R F "i � / Location Map ems^ et 3 1 Y E!:=:1. Wa t3e ..,�A"`� tp V �V� �'�i� j'j'.r IIRo� Wt4.1 la_• ANO • - % (* 4 ,4ijS • . ` � olt,� Qi ,1� A,/ lu •1 I� OA-- }a. AWED BY wONmIIAL HOMEOWNERS •V ' f 1,. �, ♦� IIOHi Fl%TV11E TRASH ENCLOSUpE(rypa "����� � O ONiSe ••LEGUMES n G°MPAeT SPACES * y ��,�+•�� �r � y iM� USEABLE OPEN agACE-Bea ,,.� -'� /� 3 f ��� tll: •11 IIIII,ortg I q�. �Y�t,b /�l/2• *tic**eakill11.1„. —00.1111P Lwk..,J„Iti-sim y\ '�'� (��� �'���C(.."�yem+ LTVrt''''..S,'l ' notice au RY t 1,1 v�\\� -� � ��� ePECwL ENmr PAVwa .I� t16��� �/IL��tY���M�n9° 0 Ae.yl ♦I � � F rta�y'^�. 1 DUBLIN GREEN 1 �� . \(��t „ m\ N a lt�e ` irw� `�� • �4ii�j}�t�yT DRIVE A EI iv l 1 e0' P J SC a/1Tf ol `S'N �.e I MIW / � O ?,,, \\\ \\ \ ' ■ 0."01 r I ,1 er !i!�> �Tr 111I! 4,4 1 \\ `\*Wei =t SR. ''tl� sit I �al....%;,. 9�'b tt' 1 !V�4.t fill Detail Commercial.10 j}4tL ■■ ' ,�■' \Yh �IAw 1� Ul U � Vey ,/ ' ;i• , \ , �� �� C\try,� d �i LCi�J�.,A��� t��! W �y�� �� � w Z� `���,.,.4,1—,- .1 1 I °��t�„lN£i� ��'" �"7t11t�Q �1' ` In ly/"iwl` F} l ssRI.._. • r Single Family . _-_.i._I___ _ (. ' !.u. i vat- L_I! mss i� � 1�I�I +1,f P �/ a ,/ x'�\;ilr `^�:: 0 CC I \ ,\ Z i Lam,. R� III IIILLL--- ___ .NE• , 111 J �'1. I S I I /�i/�O• i gl Detached IIE%IeTH_i 1 yy��p h' / MAILBOXES � GOM ACCT TACO y�' ,J \ I�>�l/ t��;(.y�� 4 o�n -�+_��� Ea KIM.SETBACK LINE L.� aA 4(k N I ii: 31 EN iiul Edll�� I���� A r . �t I ' vwvzl 4, I v 1; Rg 4u iii t' 3f&i\b� l 1 kka (�1 awl �� � gel) ��ll , 1 it 1 ` I .g a�.1‘,, .,.. ToE BF sloye at i1 e� � I�\++ u TOP OF BANN•-1� �� �� } \ \ 111 �w�l 'I" 3�fr"IYlj�.�L C,r I �� G,,, �nfla•01.3.-...1Ra4,�( ' A_; w".-41 ',....- • , r'♦ ,-1 . riip�w w 004.440. r-""\3'n-10.47...\TJ�,x,. I N 4 . >n / i +�iEor7.t4,,, ,,tq o� v uR744 W.u' _ �i�i, 7S it rlN, •{ 1� ►""tiiad�! 4 •r4-� ..., l "� 71iFlF�r" e•ASPHALT TRAIL! ,,,,,„,,,,,111,111121 (040014104414'`& l t � LANDSCAPE INTENSIFICATION Tentative Plant fist - ,.....° .�.._ 0°�°�., .e.. .w. :Tx.. SAN RAMON ROAD :. ARBOR �"! C R E,E K CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN " * „W �m - Barratt San Jose tG .�-�° .Yq[ Wm� ....,�� ° ,y° of Dublin °m° THE ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER LY'-`-'9.-, t llelea nom ONMEN AL eeiev FEW ' YtlRT RED MOLTZ AND RED MOLTZ AND ASSOCIATES RESERVES HIS OR ITS COMMONLAW COPYRIGHT TO THE PRELIMINARY AND OR.AL DESIGN CONTENT AND THE USE OF SAME WITHIN THESE DRAWINGS OR PLANS 29:0 u �:�. '''N ,+" 21!0' 3' 21'0 �P '� 1• _o . • . i/ �A-I�>-`. _r i ',di,. E i _ —1 I / I—�_/ ,. III_ ••1 7' I .. • I 'L laud ! „s 2• •I. .:I-GJ' aAvw•-y-- 1 - - �� _7...�. r —K.. I ,I,W ,I 1I J.II �>v/__ .._ ,�in'I �, �_ : ,I. .� _ _:,� KIT . 1 _ . ' ,? 1 '1, .1. t' id LIVING MAyiTER 4n KIT _j0 KIT 1 n i e •• I t 5L"Fr l 1 FAMILY (f4:. I. I�l'1 ,kI'11 :4 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII FAMILY . IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1 t. 1. I . I :. t! i Ik., O I X,I Er a 33 .n F 17 LIVING BEDROO .I i�"!_-1- • 'ITJ--,''' .L'i — 0 BA Ili _ iti:I=W1Am ei �,� '1:-P 0 i LIVING ,un LIVING • �1 BA Ig1 a' . E.,1 IvA 'rI I, , 0. /E '- d E��. vasty - � p.: '11 -.. - n. nu ---- :�: •f;,, t �._.. JW,�I�IIwyiMw,d--- BEDROOM �, I o KIT :- `-- I''� 'i' \__________„--., _---_1�� = up n, Ilooi r r �Id I La F-4t:•- Lower Floor '.��''����I Lower Floor ' ' ,..--)•:-',-. ,1��l � • „, . _. i g :AlN BEDROOM 540 BA. ".-- 300 e.1. I MASTER C'j — _ o I. I•r ( �(► __ F INNNIIIIIIIIII BA•\�,I /r .' COURT !{ COURT J'. -; -°r(� X11 1 / - PLAN 8430 �ll PLAN 8410 ( t �� � �_ ' I n HOUSE ; HOUSE •�l \J 4ft I ' / s'-o 988 B.f. COURT `lt\ COURT 1210 DJ. s!oR !_—o PLAN 8420 PLAN 8440 6rD.,0A I • . . . , . .. . rr in ' I" I typ.overhood storage oahineteJ 12' Ili i e _`9 ® M Iv GARAGE GARAGE • .utiIitYo .I GARAGE GARAGE N tr P, 191-a1(TTr) Igl (P ) * . II�/ 104 �,MUNN 381-01 o:.E=aoLL'(TYP.)•' - . '+c% I l I �l BAR•ATT ARBOR CREEK- DUBLIN LOWER FL• 0-S—Eb_E NO PORTION OF THESE DESIGNS OR PLANS ARE TO BE REPRODUCED,CHANGED,COPIED OR ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF RED MOLTZ OR RED MOLTZ AN I ASSOCIATES . RED MOLTZ AND RED MOLTZ AND ASSOCIATES RESERVES HIS OR ITS COMMONLAW COPYRIGHT To THE uRELIMINARY AND OR FINAL DESIGN CONTENT AND THE USE OF SAME WITHIN THESE DRAWINGS OR PLANS • \ f AI.1 i � I • BEDROOM BEDROOM I I 40 - — —— MASTER lo I10lj r--- J —I . 5la&u,&' I ���i. 61Yudm10rllumnlltl Ilq, `® .NI !yC� B_ one= BEDROOM 1:1,, �� R� IIIIIIIIIIIIIII��w • •. MASER �', I_-If.,I I I 51011•. /AfY �• ••III IW I - _ A J li nvi - I4 IC X4 ...7i1 _ --- 4 .y o / line of L I lower floor r---1 L � --- i� i I I line of 8430 640 s.f. 841 0 445 s.f. - - • lower floor"), I UPPER FLOOR LEVEL. O l • . 1 Jae..;4 BARRATT ARBOR CREEK - DUBLIN ScALGne,,o II Paz Wee C,F3e,,b NO PORTION OF THESE DESIGNS OR PLANS ARE TO BE REPRODUCED,CHANGED,COPIED OS UNSIGNED TO A TMD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS MITTEN PERMISSION OF RED MOLTZ OR RED MOLTZ AND ASSOCIATES . I • • , . . , • • • . . RED MOLTX AND RED MOLT.AND ASSOCIATES RESERVES HIS OR ITS COMMONLAW COPYRIGHT TO THE PRELIMINARY AND OR FINAL DESIGN CONTENT AND THE USE OF SAME WITHIN THESE DRAWINGS CR PLANS • ff . N e N . . I , !I. . D • ALUMINUM WINDOWS . COMPOSITION SHINGLES 40= • / • . • ' • ME . . . . I _ -- STAINED WOOD TRIM,BARGE STUCCO --" -§ , , . )66. .4 • . ------ 1 ---7___.--..., ..v._ _ --- 6 - .... , .. . .......... ,. . .-,--...........-L., 1 ,,,..t:•:.:12., m.rd,.._;-r-7,..._.E-.--.:v1-..z;::f----- •4 .,4.2-;:,,'Ej x.,-.--- --- -2-.-----: .. -IBM priolloirits,,,.... .7_____7.,__..._____,„e„_m___ _. _ __L„._,_._„___,....... .._..___ ...______,._*, .„,,_.__.. -YSIE ,.-------- r • ...._... , • . . ,_ __ .. • .. . :-..5-3 —'---- 44-6,o, --• 4■11,-,1 .1.'..14 =-Z, .,,,t,,_., ---. 9Mibil Er41 ..__ •- ----.:•,-9----67,5m.... .-i_, . ., , • .., . . • r I .. ... Pe.- 't.-1 Ili.; .----.....,..A...,..71...ti.,,,-.27'117-4■33..m...msrar:'": ....rAnima.._.--.1,---_,Ic..,.ni..,,„, gl-- ,-----. .y....:-.7:19.„:...,.._..-_.,__ ------ ---- ---, ..--- I-Tr 11M-rei • P. --.2•=.. -.A.-. A. - ,-;-,iFF. •''-6,,, ,,tia it,., li it iritio.. , Iri,-•111 IIHU14. 4111 4"." I ' i - !Atli -.-?... . 1 ie -'.. ....., .-4— -., v-t., 1 i' ‘. • . •,-..." -.,g..... Jo. ),.,,, 1' 1 1,_,,r et.r A II; a T-11 ff.,ji Rai, , • ,_,,, k...!IFEIBINf..-v,..4m, , , N ,'.i' . .•,2;P-c;w` ..- 0,A1161 • I I --: 01 -•M Rri 1 11 :17 r• 411,rt '(1,1 la 13''-' "17'`I .." - q' ;W.' =.14Willi - -••• 1 4:_. _i_,: ./., ' ,, .e,, -• dbk- , 1',....4e.. , I .. 'tcalrllar..11.-C4'''':i' ...-"4.6. ti,.. 441-:•-:::-■---.4.1W,'"-4 4:;:aitiA.44' 44111:41--:.±. .,..t■r-.1"..-1...11 IiitTh::-..ft:-...-----...... ..."L' 1,-...eg.i.'.....,-.....:441=.4.,•-.--...,V.,..',...,. '--=—' .11.-i. -•.'.....:It.'" '._,.;;:',.--;•--.2..',.._ -..b....••!.. . 1 . . . \ . • ,, , COURT . VIEW . STAINED WOOD SIDING • ' . . 1 ., !! II. . . . i , • . . ' I .1 i Z i . . 11 I , i, • 1 , • . •, . • ...,...... , • . _ • . : _ ........, . . . . . ..___ ....._ . . • „... _i • . i • . 7.7.". •••--- .. . -- I ' I ----. .. .___ ___—_ - -• I • . •. - ....._-___.......---,.... ... • _, .__. ,..... - ''---•--- •' •-•'"" •' •-----..-- —-— . . - ---------- — STAINED WOOD FENCING __ -__ :' - •- _ ___ _ _ " ,..1..• •'....,-• ...ms■ I • .;16.1,111=,....._■qi:tRE4EiiigMMIlliiiiMP..1111EIRVIMINIIIIIMEMIIINEETIE4Iplik11.4AIE...m,04:••...45p •-.•:•,,,....,...unumrimiliiiimv;i$ ..7. •- ;_•- ' . ':1:1•4.;rfE.4:hi:ME II::::173:1:67.:;;;;;;;IIIIIP,III=IIIIIIIIIIIIM IIIIMIIIHIgi IRiliilfimploigigirgp;;;Eit....p=g&F..,:,„„ . ...„. . ,•j.;,.., larliPlaiRE1111124 Sim mompRolimompHo, _••••• ..••• mule.W.=••-T ,.. ....-4*.i.. ..“ ' ,..-.-3-754..41111.,-. • -z 1 E. .11 iii : 1- • I 4 ill I I. li .:, 1111 I-•:...-‘,. ' .27.. ,IFIT—C=__, 1,4,T,,,...-4' kW.l'tilt,'-+ - -F•M I II I IIMIN l' 4-- - ‘ ,•:-., ev-41 ' ',.. ---, :':,-- *I?•.: .. . :. . .. ' • ,Ati.4417,,..:-;-17-47-'-•:-.6xi-:,Amomiic,1:tr;;..LI:X.--:IV:=;p..•: . . .....• • . . . .. . . ••• . •. . • .•••• • . • FRONT • ....... • . . -- • • BARRATT ARBOR CREEK - DUBLIN . . - / NO PORTION OF THESE DESIGNS OR PLANS ARE TORE REPRODUCED,CHANGED,COPIED OR ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF RED MOM OR RED MOLT.AND ASSOCIATES . . . • RED MOLTZ AND RED MOLTZ AND ASSOCIATES RESERVES HIS OR MS COMMONLA W COPYRIGHT!TO THE PRELIMINARY AND OR FINAL DESIGN CONTENT AND THE USE OF SAME WITHIN THESE DRAWINGS OR PLANS /, � \ / `\ Z • ALUMINUM WINDOWS COMPOSITION SHINGLES • .._.. ., • •11_ ___ . . _ -._. _._ ... ___...m .-.. -_- • — ill l I I I!. --— - - Imo. �� I !NI „ ��' ! e, I I' s • -- •.' _• r .H e,-Y:,-.N !IB.� �� :.� Fw I ♦ yam, s: ,.. x t '''''-'4.,,� �a 1�... fh IxIW41III • LI! la._!�M'"-�'i' m, REE.E s;.;. /. �I� a[et .•LL y�? 6t ,4 ;41i'111.1�Er k f �1 AA1, �,.II—I`I �I'I;..I BI IiIl 01AI6 Pel 1 'E �� I 'i-.4,.. t r' I. 1,— ��— - .. y' I — y i --P�vl ` 'S ..pig j1,. �� 'I I••'+ .iV:,. ._ _--""A _.r..l.4_. i� _,...T:rta 4.:►'. __-. •_._ .+.'AC_.dT111.:__:?!ter.r=—;—.�2' r %L..)'CA).'__.,. ., • •- REAR T STAINED.WOOD SIDING (STAINED WOOD FENCING • I \ . . • ,STUCCO ' STAINED WOOD TRIM,BARGE • / �—�. 4 yam_ ? I 1. ' - i 0._ > . , we w• • • !7,',..s.:- L ! 5511fi� f� , ._ 16,410Wilrireita. ,s.( IIai t fl l @III! t 1 II ar �� ,bill lilt .• . -11 /is ..,..:-,, d ,,,,o, ,... , ...,:.,.„,....•V':4-.7cii4W-,-,,.`4.11,.--.,:::,-::-'_'--f.,-6.„.--.....■ 7,/___ -..,.. -- . • TYPICAL SIDE BARRATT ARBOR CREEK- DUBLIN . . . . NO PORTION OF THESE DESIGNS OR PLANS ARE TO BE REPRODUCED,CHANGED,COPIED OR ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT MST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF RED MOLTZ OR RED MOLTZ ANC ASSOCIATES . ' RED MOLTZ AND RED MOLTZ AND ASSOCIATES RESERVES HIS OR ITS COMMONLAW COPYRIGHT TO THE PRELIMINARY AND OR FINAL DESIGN CONTENT AND THE USE OF SAME WITHIN THESE DRAWINGS OH PLANS • �. 4_____B<LB.'OVOrall A ii I . . 11 . . . .i,..,, , LI ,-,73. - , ,!:,-..-.,!,La _ . .• 4si _, it r. . T--' r' P . • . , . T . . . •...., .E \ . r . . , • . , J t .1 i. . . . . . a �. " , I: ' If ) - 1 4 ` 4Ti G° + + �_� �` r. : . • �1 e• j __ ` L ,• . '_� i, ii _ �' X00 OC • • '4weigiepaC7icificif.r.K. . A 7"ti...#1.7,1) . I - Y0, �. . TYPICAL STORAGE ---- -_-----_ \ %"0 [vii• . .• �;I.+iv O �1�j �'�• GARAGE GARAGE GARAGE GARAGE Ta J�,,F ;,�, '.,ley `- - a I� ai�l..'II ,sir'..; . . •',� L � , ./ t�, . Ir..* ' fwd S' I`�I/'� v•t�s>-t1 _ I�,�141 ltfr!A a• BARRATT ARBOR CREEK — DUBLIN • ` DP NO PORTION OF THESE DESIGNS OR PLANS ARE TO BE REPRODUCED,CHANGED,COPIED OR ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF RED MOLTZ OR RED MOLTZ AND ASSOCIATES • • . • . ,/iN6.-.;:iiMIIIIII■11::"'. . .-" ::iillk, --- i • 14AI_r cii...._ -- ---- .. IS k �1:..::.: iiiiiiili ii ' gi': E::: .!:: '111111.111.1117111.11.111 W�i..! miiii 79 '11.5ii'C=t'i. !. ':::ILO 11' 11:14 : AIL • PO . ,,, ,,--u 21 „Aiiii....._ _..:.i.::::.,:i.:‘ __, :.::....., I.mss- . 10.4640 , $0 . . BARRATT ARBOR CREEK - DUBLIN COURTYARD VIEW • . • I • '1,4% ----...„:...,„---:„._..„......_..,.--=.- , �U I��I��I�I.1..2;-11111111M . A b k :71 6.... , ::::::::,::::::7 �` 01 1 I � �� .�. ` ! . :.,1i' i 11,1!1:::..... s:iii::: •i;„ei::::::::::-:::.: ∎.: •i __- _-,106,1 41, • , • V' II ll ,.1 h t III i”- .111"1T••Tv-i . • • BARRATT ARBOR CREEK - • DUBLIN SIDE. PROFILE • RED MOLTZ AND RED MOLTZ AND ASSOCIATES RESERVES HIS OR ITS COMMONLAW COPYRIGHT TO THE PRELIMINARY AND OR FINAL DESIGN CONTENT AND THE USE OF SAME WITHIN THESE DRAWINGS OR PLANS •. • • 4---941611 OYamll 4s wood popped rolling za!sl 'Is MI • m ' , = 5 - ' • ,. ii, Z4 ... ' I ' w..h.f/drY•r '9. Ii F _' I F • - = =CI a4 \- 1 ,4.4 I �_� 1 I I Mg am. m — -= i • ' -� coal. I milarl=a.mrY P. n.=ee �If(]" L__I Ali - ,r_J■\10 �r JL 1 : 1ioo�a r _n��n BRICK VENEER, d/w • [};_s enDe/oven r' OA, - solid docking • ?!• 1�*�Y *V rf' ti l.i:A C' I III III_ m ilml ��1� \-/ 4/1® .. • s2o: , -�.. wdaa a.PPan r.Ll�e �I UP .CK _• ���`� I �„, / .... %E SHOWN • �� LOWER PATIO 1���N111l COURT ! �IlII�I_ I S' �►� O O C� t� .0 ENTRANCE SHO 1■II -- l � � (/�0 ��J�.11 �3 J i______________—________7• —______—___—_—__ S' TYPICAL STORAGE —_-.__ —_—....---_ ,�'1 7641 A ;� : VARASE ) 'onTO' 7/AI . 01114710. •-�, 1— �`� � fry.. �;;! . • iLp I � •fir• `��C1 eV -• • JD� • BARRATT ARBOR CREEK • - DUBLIN , BUILDING .PLAN E. CONDOMINIUM 1 NO PORTION OF THESE DESIGNS OR PLANS ARE TO BE REPRODUCED,CHANGED,COPIED OR ASSIGNED TO A'THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF RED MOLTZ OR RED MOLTZ AND ASSOCIATES • • • RED MOLTZ AND RED MOLTZ AND ASSOCIATES RESERVES HIS OR ITS COMMONLAW COPYRIGHT TO THE PRELIMINARY AND OR FINAL DESIGN CONTENT AND THE USE OF SAME WITHIN THESE DRAWINGS OR PLANS - \ / STAINED SIDING WOOD SHAKE ROOFING \ 2 E • STAINED SIDING I W.:wommillirl411.1Pr-■ .,,i, .. . .,-.7.:F...i■ria4111..111.4111.1-21N. Alli... . ..L.'"IN■1•1■ a � ( a a MO 134.1f ,,pA, mr, prAl m 9 my sio/ , , • N�� ;.� :,;fir` • _. y%1- _ ,: � �":'1►• •. ��� +■l y • ��� �-Fig \� "`��• CO BR' • • �''� COURTYARD VIEW• • • . STAINED WOOD TRIM,•ff =ARG£and FACIA 1 t . ;r ‘,..... ,,,,./ ���/ .tea'/ t.\ ,ar,\�=r�:r `` % .. • • lik_um ■ Iv*,,1 _ = . • I....... .... ....... ,.•I:,,l.;,!. ,••11.::,..::.:::1:...........:.: �� al'11111111 11111111/1 _111 11 �_.11111ffill _gram&�- s A ==llll�llli1 I !'1111111 , .,1111111111 11III'lilllll ;_ i' €111111:1111'1 :1111111111 il'1I111n1 :'.1111111111 y 1 1111111111 :111111111 ! i1111I111!1111 1111111111111 = � titi - SIDING SIDING BRICK VENEER o.o. BARRATT ARBOR CREEK - DUBLIN AS VIEWED FROM STREET RAWNeY • CONDOMINIUM 2 I J Urn NO PORTION OF THESE DESIGNS OR PLANS ARE TO BE REPRODUCED,CHANGED,COPIED OR ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF RED MOLT.OR RED MOLTZ AND ASSOCIATES _ - ' RED MOLTZ AND RED MOLTZ AND ASSOCIATES RESERVES HIS OR FTS COMMONLAW COPYRIGHT TO THE PRELIMINARY AND OR FINAL DESIGN CONTENT AND THE USE OF SAME WITHIN THESE DRAWINGS OR PLANS " . im WOOD SHARE ROOFING STAINED BIDING 1 • I ::! ! * bi &.......g:,.,�' � i....... .:: • ::,:::: lir III -i ,� ,... ` ► , I ] �' rl�1__–, - � � �T . , ^ ':i I 1'L�-s Eiii:iii.ii if I i..,..V,011041._ All ; d?� i If - .' --4 1■1.‘■ l a:r Av 111 La iiiiii*-21... ill ,461..-.7....v....,. ,_._.,..4 . _ rg. _,:ati?,...;.::-..J.:-,-„,e.:,1111[.......................ri-wpt.-,1 firai. • WOOD PATIO FENCING— .STUCCO • - STAINED WOOD TRIM, . BAAGE and FACIA REAR.VIEW Neer` STAINED SIDING �����II���� _I•.-„. Ala�I�1 , `: _ ..� IiI� ll iorl BRICK VENEER STUCCO - SIDE PROFILE _ BARRATT ARBOR CREEK - DUBLIN j ®�i . • CONDOMINIUM. 3; �� \ _ NO PORTION OF THESE DESIGNS OR PLANS ARE TO BE REPRODUCED,CHANGED,COKED ON ASSIGNED TO A TEEM PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF RED MOLTZ OR RED MOLTZ AND ABSOCIATES `. • RED MOLTZ AND RED MOLTZ AND ASSOCIATES RESERVES HIS OR ITS COMMONLAW COPYRIGHT TO THE PRELLONARY AND OR FINAL DESIGN CONTENT AND THE USE OF SAME WITHIN THESE DRAWINGS OR PLANS -- • /02 9Y OYK�QAAL_.____....._.____. _1_//�. ___- -__.-- 29,o ,--- ,o 2110" 3� ZI 0" 0 ∎�,h 0i—" e� -� / .. \/�r in ---- I �.I!N�? uPDa:floor ��T`�'��•i�r� t �' . ���� -J /'e IIII • o :-j�� . �`';� I (� �.. °�' '.� L Iii illlf 1R II IIIP%:' I `I..�� • . . �1� =°_11111111 I({iY, ='111111111I11s �! .,�` al/,\ i1:� j .ie r « €9.� KIT LIV G - _ MA"TER °o KIT rs. KIT n = al�`r/ • 6' SLOPC L4 - 1 III:CII:';1��IIIIIIII,; �I) IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII FAMILY = . IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII FAMILY ■■� °.. •f� ; y CI _ y RP! , ■l•Mds\•N � .a l:,:_,rd....4 , ___ ,_E [x- 1 0 -- _ 1 FX 1 MEEK= • .�;�:s • 2 • {E- Z. _��� LIVING ■EGROO � - • .• p�11� I I�f= S �_ Imi� 5LO� CEa'4 s- t I • . Q LIVING LIV---7. - G . 1_ it IilEt ��A __� A = �?• • • i� A k--•N■■■■E--- '.., 111.. — ' cu.y1 w I1puW m1 I p ■■■■■�■■l.ell� u�l!I1lluunglllnni BEDROOM _■■�■■I!■■Y►11'¢a G D tit Al 'fini f — ' • KIT =■■j.■IN■i■■: it_1,.i0i iit \--- l.p,• 1100! MINIM Lower Floor ," Lower Floor 4115 ��OfJ 1 —��I■ �1 848 •.f. 509 •.f. • O .=mIIIIIII-id01•_ -- BEDROOM �,'� — 111 i idf o MA•TER 1111.4211144.1'A r �' v *AO :.t r IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII BA• • ��� :I COURT • COURT T • at s.Id I — �I� 0 ' %I I PLAN 8430 ' .∎' PLAN 8410 iel 0-- 1 PLAN •:� .984 Sq.Ft. / A i./J HOUSE I ® . `a', HOUSE ' � 61.o1 988 •.f. COURT • � COURT 1210 o.f. 51 d' o ® PLAN 8420 j �I. ®• : ,'I. ; w PLAN 8440 J ° • .. azia • •• _- -_-i_-_Z-_4'. :' ,•% _4--_�_- - _ : typ.overhood storage oabineta� � -•:. -`Q GARAGE GARAGE p.utility 0a T r Nrr--� GARAGE GARAGE NI ;. -/ 9I-nl Cr E) Ia1-lot c -.) �' I !II _ _ ab1-.Di _ rnsrzcr.l_tree> pill 0� \ , pa ,_ ..L \ /I 111 - — RV, ' ..-- -I • BAR - ATT ARBOR CREEK- DUBLIN - LOWER FL• ORS_ LE ,v4"_,J '- A,r; ` cuav, `1���TOWNHOUSE 4,,, NO PORTION OF THESE DESIGNS OR PLANS ARE TO BE REPRODUCED,CHANGED,COPIED OR ASSIGNED TO A.THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF RED MOLTZ OR RED MOLTZ AND ASSOCIATES MEI • • • RED MOLTZ AND RED MOLTZ AND ASSOCIATES RESERVES HIS OR RS COMMONLAW COPYRIGHT TO THE PRELIMINARY AND OR FINAL DESIGN CONTENT AND THE USE OF SAME WITHIN THESE DRAWINGS OR PLANS, - Tie -N . I- - BEDROOM BEDROOM I . . E-1 I ---- - ---- — -- -_ . I I t------� I V MASTER L1101111ni=1..... I so{z as r- ---- I = allallll;llo, I• • �- I1 fillllddlitiliii lm i u,u • I I n I nm rI l•lal I ' I I B•_ IIIIIIIIIIIB0= BEDROOM •. tip q;. 1._1 . • I - ' • I r Iiuguilullllll I�� Tl. , ' MAS .ER 'III . • _ 2a/t IC 4' ICIpili VII?: \•'ic:'\�• VIII I D —-----_1 I • lower floor • I �,-- I I . Li • in ,;,,,Of 8430 640 ..r. 841 O 445 ..�. I I lower floor I . L------.S J L -----------_ UPPER FLOOR 'LEVEL I . .• • • • • • • • • . BARRATT ARBOR CREEK — DUBLIN �� . �_ • TOWNHOUSE s«�� 9 °�__Si I I DCLLMDCR,19e, I NO PORTION OF THESE DESIGNS OR PLANS ARE TO BE REPRODUCED,CHANGED,COPIED OR ASSIGNED TO A TIMID PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF RED MOLTZ OR RED MOLTZ AND ASSOCIATES � • , RED MOLTZ AND RED MOLTZ AND ASSOCIATES RESERVES HIS OR ITS COMMONLAW COPYRIGHT TO THE PRELIMINARY AND OR FINAL DESIGN CONTENT AND THE USE OF SAME WITHIN THESE DRAWINGS OR PLANS I $' ix ALUMINUM WINDOWS WOOD SHAKE ROOFING 40 d • ■ ter_ __...—.. 'lin - .-'--- , STAINED WOOD TRIM,BARGE - II STUCCO M:ir •r .1!l' _I. .,,I �Il l��il!Ip:nn'r 'Illllyty=�i,= ,IlNii IIIfII101I'�RIII�I�!!„E�III% _� �.__ iry... I u11o1 II , ! CFial E of .�^ :�+�� III !ih , v{ I �r :. I I �� I VIII. I,v,l, i� ;....mv .-1-1_ ∎II I 4I,A P i 11�11 �r ;11 111..I--- I∎ _ _�. .~..� II Di 11 M:w ...ail. � h ��I��I5ellljl nl �IIJ '� --- , - T � �' ....H111H lye i a lit r.III�I II I' -_.._ • I rs II .�,fir ��� G _ �� €p !IVII G IUIGllllll I�liui;1111 IJWI i �--- �: I� _ ,,.,q,r—I °kl ik I: I„.;L: '.'-"0'IAIHy H.m.,f.",i n, I i.Illtr-n _ I4111W_. I II T;!, ;H6Bf..'- .. ,.!I:::1” : ..,1•.. !' , t' "`..�.V:"Y:i f� tll nl'. �,' ;ae r 1�: '',I ^.t i:; ILi ®1�!_:: 1'::m Baa.IN.!16:: III AI�u -n. rll 1 1. .E,, 111111:!. %., 11 `0I J” ' o,fl:i li 11 Ili,:� -11111 ;' ° i �� I ! ` •I I� L 11 ' i 1 I i ni�I�• i a � 17111•!116 ,urn !I I I �11 '''`A.7.r.• r fll � lun:il� I I P I� �,■ II E � r� / I r 1 ( a �-3'^ HII 'I I WWI I r IIIIIIIIIII:� � f 'sj�?�� I I;:a: II NW s.s��� 1 Illi R I 1 'dii N 1� 11 r ti,,r_.., 1 U 1 �� pII I, . i31�11iINN ,. 11; 1 r� III�1II I yll ..J" I 11111 I! 1111041:144= 0 l�lwllr!Imnl E'!Vii F ; 1 I 'I,,.. 11111 v:m ,. Y' ra W i1 .�� .. I-.P4 II:I��. I �7r - ,�! C,:ar.�9 ' III • rr. I .r ;eft. 1y 1'I � + ,II:III.�... �..t.i..ViIJ►� , r. •v�.. s :.,✓,�u1�rf!'i?.:._os�. :,i_.Y� v`:Ir sir.:- ti..i�:..�i1� .1"wai?�_.� �. .t.•...,�.::a�r��r .'�_r.■ -�.r*:.+i.A.'�i�l :r COURT VIEW \ STAINED WOOD SIDING • • / 1 1/ WOOD SHAKE ROOFING e , • • . • __ _ _ STAINED WOOD FENCING _ _____ _—_-• ---7--- !..::::: :::: a!�xl r!H::EI::::::::::::::!!::::::::::r::a:F k:!1¢::.H!II..;.............:::!!!!!!!r::!::!!:!� !!!!!! ::::::::: I::;;:: '..,- .::::::-.. : ... — -- — —_— — —- - w N. ..•f,,.,:1!:„...i_v..:.:° .'..'..... ..::�tad... ... ... ........... i.y:;;P I.i,:: ...I.......�'un.....»»q.;ir pe:;:e[I:;:R:::Y.�.:..:R::m!::xSSSrIRUu::.,a!I...: �U:::::::. .:...::...::::�:� .D :»:�!:, -......... ,...,RD: i:e:::I•::. .m:RRV:n':il;i,���:,, = .� L..:L. ......a... !..R.i...... .. I.:u!.::.....:............:iIiiim::::i1 .'.;;;1111-. ;: : tu»::i:,r,.,,...I.,. I ..I �.R�I. .!I. ::,.. ..i.l.lhl.. ,.:. ..! ,. - L=�R��H.N �il!! - .1 p ..• I .I�::!�..:.I.:.I:�:�::rt.l....:e!:::.I..... _ ...I.:,::.::I::I:::��:e!n:n,. ::� Iii:_ ,:,i, „1,:!1.11 ILGI. ;13L•, :,.Vl,.tll _�-:�I .i!!H !::.... .... .........L........,...a I:, :......,.. I :I I :� , -:I I:: I IIIH.:...LI!.L..�1111i�', �i, moll.. L...R€R�saF'B„DII R� - �! !I IIII. II !.!!! ..................I ,:.:,::::..»..:.:..,.,.,.,,»:ILi!,1a_!.11!!II,,,, :a� -�-_._._ ;:. ��_.�- �-- .NIIr,.,,,1al,il:al:..:......,,,.,1,..,,,,,.11.11;!Ii111.1.a11 �6 L..I:a.....H....._I. - , -- im-I 1 _I i .0 I n �!” 1 4��Ilr�l�'Cr` lui1 's+� •�1I 1„II (�■I- I v� _-i_ ;•�• • ''yam, rN.',_G._1_ ._.e1_' :-.. .. a- si.. ,''• FRONT BRICK VENEER BRICK VENEER •• .BARRATT ARBOR CREEK — DUBLIN o( \c- , TOWNHOUSE . - • g J‘T.--\oP NO PORTION OF THESE,DESIGNS OR PLANS ARE TO BE REPRODUCED,CHANGED,COPIED OR ASSIGNED,TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF RED MOLTZ OR RED MOLTZ AND ASSOCIATES. RED MOLTZ AND RED MOLTZ AND ASSOCIATES RESERVES HIS OR ITS COMMONLAW COPYRIGHT TO THE PRELIMINARY AND OR FINAL DESIGN CONTENT AND THE USE OF SAME WITHIN THESE DRAWINGS OR PLANS — �ed . i g • ALUMINUM WINDOWS WOOD SHAKE ROOFING . • • mi , !=l , SI i , . __ . .. � �� illi€i:a!'I i!r«��i:�'IIII ItIP',!iliii....,,„..i,''ll'.1 Vii:IE,iir'i liA klllti`i ,IC!:;I.,il: r ' dill I�� i ��Jul L,I wU,��� sii;�i i�iiii"M�,�:.-q irjj C CA. i' �• ,.._- 111� ea i �.� � I I -.�• I I I�I...- V .. _.L : ' r1: - .P a ,,:..:,�Ilirl dl n ,rl: .199P-1 I _ I ' I f n II I I I. j - !n Rl d '. s�sr----,' •'� 1 ►I�- _. — 1";,,,hi ll,,,,,, t, __° — -.�`Y.'.''^Af��l: � �..L.._iii_. ,,,, _61,vl'i eP,r,P'::i:ii:'�'„y;n:a�;—" .-. . �l,.... "11`i° � I: I �,- ' R,J�ri5�w7� 1' 'Il:r III` I y /�>� i,•/�I'! r,l� rI i�� I �wri ', ti ; •f _ fie, .i:'.�_.�.G�i��.....1.04,_-` p � II!! NN ' . . r,. �..��• _-1Y L itfil .._i�v �J•-1 ��t v,., ._......._ _ 1 Win, Y:,-;.� ,1 � REAR • .�AIRED WOOD SIDING • -, - r STAINED WOOD FENCING • • , STUCCO STAINED•WOOD TRIM, BARGE ■ II`NIIIII,1 Rvv'wova / III III _ �:� ,-� �_ •_7�?• ,,.. ii,iiii I III II _ r I ■ r1I1I1iI1�1i1 Ih;IHI &,�,�.�,�,I1Vo In u L I;i��l r Ni'4I11 ,1�t •��i _BRICK VENEER , . � s, rl � 11 ��I " � �• :r��� Yp G �j� I1! i!Il9 !IpIIIp � , II f:xa ,� TYPICAL SIDE . • BARRATT ARBOR CREEK- DUBLIN (l • TOWNHOUSE •. 7J _iT N. • •NO PORTION OF THESE DEStONS OR PLANS ARE TO BE REPRODUCED,CHANGER,COPIED OR ASSIGNED-TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF RED MOLTZ OR RED MOLTZ AND ASSOCIATES' • • • • •,t.:�:+.. ti:T.•t`:.~L_�J�� _.:1�:-.. •`%�::'C.J•�7:,•...L.^.Jw.�.:1s:i. —•i"-"J-"`"-----`-'''''' w:": arm • ... mot• •,''t^. •�• 1.�• •.. ... ., �, •'r• •`•• , l CITY OF DUBLIN • •P.O. Box 2340 Dublin, CA 94568 • (415) 829-4600 _ • • MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR: Barratt San Jose PA 82-033 - 112 Unit Residential Condominium . ' Planned Development Rezoning - ' (Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq. ) LOCATION AND ' PROPONENT: South west corner of Silvergate Drive and San • ' Ramon Road. . Applicant - Barratt San Jose Owner: APN 941-101-4-7 , ' and 941-101-4-12 :- Union City Investments - `.-.DESCRIPTION: --- • Request to rezone :6 :2 .acres from -Neighborhood . :.Commercial (C-N) to Planned Development .(PD) .-. This . • " - :;•.•will _permit the :construction•:•of_ :a • 1l2-unit-residential . _' •• ;.'.:':., :'•: ;'condominium.project.'•:.:-:Fourteen :'2-story•buildings, plus . . - - • carports ,`-a recreation building . and pool, • and parking . -• for '224 cars are proposed. • . ----J.;.:'FINDINGS: :='I.The :Project;- as now proposed, :,will not have a • • - :••''''�'_'',"•••= - ''-:•••significant -effect •on the environment_ • • INITIAL STUDY=^-:,The :Initial Study is .attached with a brief .•• • •_ - : - . -•: discussion of the following environmental components _ . Each •has been. mitigated by revisions to the initial - - - -•- - • - -: ' project or through a binding committment by the _ . applicant, as outlined in the section below entitled Mitigation Measures : - _ . a. . Noise Imp_ act b . Flooding Impact • c . Seismic Impact . d. Traffic Impact . ' • .MITIGATION MEASURES : .. • - a) Noise - Acoustic. -insulation and air conditioning . will .be provided for the units ..adjacent to San Ramon • • - _ - --- - ^ - _ ... -_ _ y.7-,-, , - _ _-_• = -- - .Floodin - _Martin Can on ,Creek -willybe ;im roved - • - '�.-bt) g y P - - = ';@---1-1== - .and ;.the roj ectr s ite:;graded •to protect-t_he*,:proj ect and - _ _ _ `- = —_,,-` _ - 'ad acent ro ert• from,f load :damage, _as .determined by-- t' - --- _ _ - -_ •,3 .:' -. tier -, :,`-n= s:c'.-.f- f'].=' � - - � � _ _ _ �En ineer __ _ - - _ _ Jahe :Cit - - .J.._ '•L.� -:.. l':-)-J:r...i vC::-J-.'.:•_.<Y-'^�'Z::=. `•1:�'•::---- • VS -- - _ - -- — _•Livl1.:::'l-- e�•J�] •.:z=-- _ r:i1.. 1F __ iiac:`� -_—:r'1 - - ._ — - - = :-21z• 2 ?-'.- y,,;" eis'mic - -A '•fault zone=and building setbacksJiave -. 37: i. : ;'',:,;`° :=':_ been established;as•'ra,'result":of>=extensive :field-°and - _ : -'~ =document` re•search` �--::-.-The 'site `plan is now acceptable to - . - _ ___- •�t�t° - _ : .� - , . .... . .. ... �' • '~ : - -•the County Geologist--from a- seismic~safety .:standpoint.-- EXHIBIT C .•'..1_?..,..!:.'! (' ..j ^.) •� '.i'1. !r,..: •1':.6;i;ti's.•;: _ ! •�r'}..i •_ ..♦ - - -•-12:7-:.: -.';---;:="k:.,3 � :!'''tz Y_ :a_�2_.-4t .-/•:l_, •:r."Y." .Y.• :yam.;:-.•� r�-1:.-.;'•:".•":,-'.!,.:^ } :� .y...• 7.-:....-...-.7.-3.,:".."1/4:-:.;--.... 4�j, ,I. fir... :�� }a.• ri"•• .•yi::.,y a'.Ili.7.4.0 T.-. .A•i.-,_ ' -: •Yy ,. ••••••V -a -. -•,•��:•.:V:t:+�.\''r..."'�-1- �a:_....�i_"'�- •-��ti..--:-•��_ . --.- -._s:•awl-.•.......i•..._...-. ._..-.-a--.•�rLax�'.:• ..i t•?-.::n_�a_�w- . _ '••• • • - Barratt San Jose - Mitigated Negative Declaration - Page Two . • d) Traffic - The applicant will contribute 25% of the cost of signalizing the Silvergate and San Ramon Road - intersection. This will significantly reduce- the traffic impacts of this project. PREPARATION : This Negative Declaration was prepared by the City of Dublin Planning Staff, (415 ) 829-4916. • • I / ' i i Date: March 28, 1983 - -•.SIGNATURE: • • • - - - - Laurence L . Tong, P an ing Director - - - . _ _.. _ • •- - -•- -• 1v _ • • • eS� •C-_ — - - - _ _ - -.• ti r• _c- i -' _ ` - - -- - �_• '- } "......_u_.-........ �^L...-___- _� . -_ _ _-Z.: ^il L._J..:f s��•�r _- - •.�sx t��a�[_.•�-..i, __ _•••'L... �"='Y_ :7.7-7-'1' _-- -- _:i- - - - .�":�:t "YL -- _ t_-cS � . _ - —_ ;••••/;''!..-,;-,7.--•:t7-.. .,..-:_:_ _ _ -tom1i J1 ' S 7.;_ .z _"[ =;-r cam— --- .-7i _ •' . . a f' -•' - - :11:-"` •,i '. 'i n �' tii<i;�a:. _hr`-t,-S- r•.t%z . :(,-•-:.1`-':.,----*--". r-1]i i•_-.+.t.�.1'i_-.-.--.+_.v'1_'•i--.r.-:'-H:Y y.__•Y.s''•`.:_.-7• :-�.i_�..-%'�a l^_- ,:_-7-_-- `--r_-�.•iS a:_ -____::-:.1-•:-Il.-...L-�*.Y�tin---.'Y:>K I;:=.`•--S:•-:r'�-•_"}}'_.(::c-t`r••vim=i..-.a:�'•' ti��.�.t•�-=%fir�_.-. D:i.=-:3-.._.-.v_--._ri: \-:L_='�._r •-Tia.-_ _-__ •y r•�:_ .yl .:r . a i !_ %�' i2 ..-c'-•!; °- `�' + 4.�;1ti;_�::s:.:_'_. ":� �s^,Jr_ •-. ;-77.7.'7.-'7...• t ii1. '::i twYsv: -• =.��.:eo ,__ • ,:..__, : l �f-1-� ._•1- :- .• •c.-y f••:.-Z• _`..._'_�+%+ e _� -• '_ _ _`Y�!�W x - 4•w :•, - ^iC::R:`/-• -� _ FT_'_�•j. -J.1`r..4yfi n•r-.:T.t•:� :'v-7-:J•-:••-1- �.• .� , , . -1��.:i]A• �. " 1.rx:-K—Y e.li.;-ra'../A::j-� s -- . ....,..,7,1.-,.:.,:g--, s•4;:;.'v., .: ;5::-.•,r.:-iri;:_ .,,ti..J-, -:.+}.�T. `:°�-:Sti'_ •=z - -- -: �'�''= ! -...' r _ "=r:f_• _?�:�:•:�-- •..-2;:77..%_` _- -- •.q.��j:�%;�L�{.�'.^:i?•'.�,:!' _ :•1��.-..a ZT:.., � p..rC:n:._�. .:. .•F- -- •_ - __ :.'-- _ --- -it _ _ Y9:C._ 1a•• _ 'ate •-[Y - - • y;Vie•7.. :,i• - - - - '. - - - -4...,,,,...,„.7,,,,,...,-.;.1:• G- f • +.` •,l.'.tiy'sl• .• . -..,...,•:. •fir. • • \�•::�•• lam - �� -� .-N•�:•:��:: :i.'• -.✓- •tY_1• ^I-.• -r• - -• - % + Y ` i : EXHIBIT D RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN - ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WITH MITIGATION CONCERNING PA 82-033 .1 (R) AND PA 82-,033 .2 (R) BARRATT SAN JOSE WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) , as amended together with the State ' s administrative guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and City Environmental regulations, requires that certain projects be reviewed for environmental impact and that environmental documents be prepared; and WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration with mitigation has been prepared by the Dublin Planning Department; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did initially review the Negative Declaration and considered it at a public hearing on = April 18, 1983 ; WHEREAS, the revised project contains fewer units of the same type and the project design is quite similar to that- addressed in the March 28, 1983 , Negative Declaration; and, _ WHEREAS, the environmental conditions and impacts have not changed appreciable; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did review the Negative Declaration and reconsider it at a public hearing on February 6 , 1984 ; WHEREAS, the City Council did review the Negative Declaration with mitigation and considered it at a public hearing on March 12 , 1984 ; NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved as follows: 1) the City Council finds that the project, _ " PA 82-033 .1 (R) and PA 82-033 . 2 (R) , Barratt -San -Jose, -has " either been changed by the applicant or `the applicant has agreed to provide mitigation measures _that:;will:_result:.in _,a. :.: project =that will not have any significant. lenvironmental; impacts that were identified in `the Initial` Study, .- 2 ) the City_Council' finds that the Negative Declaration: has - been ".prepared and. processed in accordance=with State and local :environmental 'law. and guideline regulations and :that` it is adequate and complete, and yr 3 ) the ,City :Council directs .that `the 'specific .flood control measures and security measures 'along th.e `creek-shall be _ : : reviewed by the Planning Commission , PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY.-OF • 1984 . AYES: _ NOES : ABSENT: - .: _ Mayor - ATTEST: City Clerk = • EXHIBIT "E" RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING AND ESTABLISHING FINDINGS AND GENERAL PROVISIONS. OF A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONING CONCERNING PA 82-033 .1(R) BARRATT SAN JOSE WHEREAS, Barratt San Jose, proposes to rezone 7 . 1+ acres of land (APN 941-101-4-7 and APN 941-101-4-13 ) at the southwest corner of Silvergate Drive and San Ramon Road from - C-N (Neighborhood Business ) to PD (Planned Development) , for 40 residential condominiums and 44 residential townhouses; and, WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the City of Dublin is in the process of preparing and adopting a general plan, and that there is reasonable probability that the proposed rezoning will be consistent with the future general ,plan; .and, •. WHEREAS, there is little or no probability that the rezoning will be a detriment to, -or interfere with the future general plan, should the new zoning ultimately be inconsistent with the future general plan; and, . . WHEREAS, the City Council finds that- -the rezoning, will - not have` 'a significant environmental impact; and, WHEREAS, the rezoning is appropriate for the subject - _ property in terms of being compatible to existing land uses in = the area, will ..be -visually attractive, will not overburden public • - services,-.and 'will provide housing of a type and cost that is - - desired,- yet not readily available in the City of Dublin; and, . WHEREAS, . the rezoning will not have substantial adverse - ., effects on health- or safety or be substantially detrimental to _the. public welfare, .or be injurious to property or public improvements ; --- . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the ._City Council . . approves . a Planned Development (PD) rezoning :request -for=-an 84- unit `residential"'project as _shown on ther_Plans`:labelled Exhibit A and: Exhibit B .(as .:amended by ::Exhibit __A ) , and, subject°to the following' Conditions GENERAL PROVIS IONS € c r r l Compliance with the .plans °.contained in `,Exhibit :'A and as amended by these,;Conditions The ,applicant= shall change his` • proposal _(Exhibit`. B) so that is will be in conformance with' the Staff recommendations as shown inzExhibit "A" The ti changes shall=include a a reduction .`of =one;,building_i.n the central portion :of f the remaining 'build ngs and the =site- and: relocation o ', pool to create more 's ace'; between ;:buildings and • J garages, create a substantial open area and entry _of eature the end jof ;the';San i Ramon 'Road entry into``the? e development, and enlarge the size :of the central common open space b moving the:garage, buildings a minimum -of :six= (6) t z feet off Of .,the . faulone, - c . moving "the northwest building a minimum of:_. 10. -feet: from: = the westerly property line; , d. provision. of an open .fence allowing vieing of Martin Canyon .Creek area, at the southeastern portiondf the site; e . reduction of seven parking stalls along the eastern portion of the property to eliminate parking in the Silvergate setback area and allow for some landscaping between the easterly garages; • f . provision of a public access easement along the south side of Martin Canyon Creek (within the Applicant ' s property) ; g. the condominium units shall be a minimum of 650 sq.ft . 2 . Acquisition of the City-owned property proposed for inclusion in this project shall be completed before any permits can be issued for or physical work started on the subject property. 3 . Site Development Review approval by Staff shall be acquired prior to issuance of any Building Permit. The Site Development Review shall implement these General Provisions concerning the physical development of the project. 4 . - The maximum number of residential units shall "not exceed 84 units, of which, no more than 40 may be condominiums , . 5 : The 'condominium architecture shall .be ::consistent in quality _ - - with 'the townhouse architecture including materials, - details, and form. 6 . Roofing shall either be concrete tile or wood shake. 7 All garages '-shall have automatic sectional roll-up :'garage door openers . -Each condominium ;unit shall have `its own garage 8 . The landscaping adjacent to the Silvertree _development shall provide for -a dense fast-growing tree screen,--,'utilizing a --:. minimum of 250, 24" box ..trees, and a maximum of.-_75%, 15-gal trees . -.- The trees shall be _located -in a .minimum'8-foot-wide landscape--easement,' which shall be under.,the control _of the Homeowners ' ._Association: ::.An _;.independent ..automatic irrigation :system -.shall;':be .providedfor, the trees :.. • =. Maintenance and protective measures shall be guaranteed win the ,Codes , ;Covenantsf-and.:Restrictions.; All units shall contain standard and currently available energy :.saving devices, and be ;;insulatedin accordance with•Titl e 24 State of California -Admini.strative�Code and 2 t - evidence.bshall :be provided to the Building .'Offircial from - P G & E that the. units meet -P G .& E 's requirements of the "Energy Conservation °Home;Program", cif wit still- exists at they time_ the units are to=be -constructed �� s10 ▪ Compliance with the City of Dublin ResidentialECondominium Development Guidelines (as amended • 11 Compliance with City of Dublin Site Development Review _ S tan dard :Conditions 12 • Compliance with City_of ,Dublin Police ;Services Standard Residential'-.Building Security :Requirements: a • 13 Full disclosure shall be made~ to -potential buyers of the =project which :.shows location and describesthe-;potential , impact of the earthquake fault that traverses the :property. A written -acknowledgement of the review 'of -:this -information prior to purchase is required of all buyers units _within the development, and a copy shall be filed with the City Planning Department. • • • 14 . The developer is to be responsible for the maintenance of all Homeowner Association facilities for at least a one-year warranty period, commencing when each phase is at least 50% occupied. 15 . The Developer is to provide tb the City Planning Department a status report as to the occupancy characteristics of the development once each year for three years . 16 . There shall be compliance with DSRSD Fire Department requirements, Flood Control District requirements, and Public Works requirements . Written statements from each agency approving the plans over which it has jurisdiction shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to issuance of Building Permits or the installation of any improvements related to this project. . 17 . A 6-foot high architecturally designed masonry wall shall be . installed along the easterly property . line. In addition, an intensive landscaped buffer, containing fast growing trees -- - and shrubs,.-shall be installed within a22-foot-minirnum wide landscaped area to the east of the wall'and within _City right-of-way. The landscaped areas "shall :be irrigated -by. an ▪ automatic irrigation system and be maintained _for,-.-one _year - by the Developer, and thereafter by:`.the :Homeowners ' Association. - = A recorded contract, to run with the land, ,is to be _established providing the City with authority to repair _ - and/or maintain the easterly wall and thek-landscaping within =. -_the public right-of-way This contract:.may be exercised -by - 7 the City- in :the event the developer-:or the Homeowners '- : Association fails to maintain the .wall and landscaping in such a manner that they present a neat and well-taken-care of 'appearance:• - .-, • Provision is to be made in the contract to, enable the City• ▪ to recover .costs, of .work performed .-by ..the !City in the z right-of=way.. and 'on `private "property :;related .-to.-the ..wall-.and ;landscaping The contract should .recite =that the Developer -and Homeowners Association grants the City authority to- enter-,and repair_ and maintain :the wall and landscaping across the adjacent=_private property,if= conditions 'so • require Thee"repair,=and:maintenance costs incurred ,,by •the City;:=are =to be •shared, pro" rata,' by all; units within the_=. Homeowners ' Association and collected as assessments° along ' with nty prope .Cou _ eS= rty tax 18 A par course shall be installed along an, 8 foot wide bikeway v , that shall meander along San Ramon Road � as acceptable to • the Planning Director 19 The :project shall be constructed as` :approved ;Minor - _- F.`p {.3 z modifications in the ,design, but not theuse, Finay be_ approved by 'St:aff Any ,other change will require Planning • Commission,_approval 20 ' Handicapped cramps :-and access to` each ground floor unit ahall i" - be ,prow ided at :the request of the buyer and at,=the :`expense of ::the - developer `;. Four, handicaPPed parking:-`stalls, - appropriately :signed, shall be provided evenly throughout the project `" 21 . `. Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions :(C C :& R "s) _shall be established for -this development. TheC.C.V& R: s shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to filing of -the -. -- Final Map. . . The C.C. & R. ' s shall be reviewed and approved by the City to assure that: • • • a. There is adequate provision for at least the maintenance of all commonly owned facilities, property and landscaping including open space,. roads, parking, Lighting, recreation facilities, landscape and the . exterior of all buildings; b . Payment of dues and assessments shall be both a lien against the assessed land and a personal obligation of property owner . An estimate of these costs shall be provided to each buyer prior to the time of purchase . - C . The Association shall maintain all common areas in good repair, including drainage and erosion control improvements, fences, and landscaping; d. The Association shall keep the City Planning Department informed of the current name, address, and phone number of the Association ' s official representative; - - • e. - Payment of -the .water and street lighting (maintenance " ." --and energy) bills and maintenance and =repair .of .storm drain"lines are the obligations of the Homeowners ' Association, excepting where said storm drain serves public property (streets and/or _:public` land) .in addition to the subdivision, the controlling public agency shall then be responsible for maintenance, • f Each buyer,�is to sign an acknowledgement that has read -.the .;Constitution and Bylaws '`of ":the Homeowners '." ::.Association and the Conditions, .:`Covenants,- and ; Restrictions =-"applying to the development - - g The -Homeowners Association shall contract-,with, :or. _be ;advised ;by °a .professional .management :firm, .as :._to how-to. handle maintenance operations and fee collection - procedures . . h No -recreational vehicle or: boat may be stored within this development. i The ^Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions shallK- provideethat_upon sufficient :notice to homeowners, -the Serving ,ut ilities be ':authorized to enter any portions of the units'_ whenever restoration :of gas, electric,', and; telephonelservice is regiiredy, that the utilities3sha11 `x r� have the right to `install, move, remove; or run new ; ': lines ,:in' or on any portions of the common _area, ' x including the interior and exterior of7the units 4 (except=:where undergroundings required by the a °Subdivision Ordinance as: is ~necessary to maintainer 5 telephone service within the subdivision,� and thatthis ' provision may not be amended or, terminated-without theme ' consent of the utilities • r Guest parking areas -must ..-be identified by signs and the C C:& R:`' s shall `prohibit'-the use of these=areas by homeowner :families k -The Constitution and .Bylaws _of the Homeowners' Association shall include"the._obligations of .the Association to be responsible: for ublic liab,ilit in _s Y ` case of ,injury in connection with :public-utility easements, and for maintenance of `the' privatevehicle - - access ways and utility trenches ;.in-public° utility` easements . - They shall further be void of. any mention of future dedication of the access way to the City as a public street. • • • • 1 . Provisions exist that require each purchaser to - sign a " statement, prior to the purchase of a unit, that -he or she has read a statement that shows "the location and describes the significance of the 'Calav,aras Fault that " :. 22 . Solar hot water systems shall be .offered _to buyers as an , . _ optional improvement, where practical. - - 23 . After the project has been completed, and subject to _ • observing' any minimum and maximum dimensions specified in . - the approved plan: a. In the common areas, plant materials, arbors, fences, paving materials, and similar landscape features may be added or replaced, in kind. b. Any construction, repair or replacement which would . occur in the normal course of maintenance of the common 'areas .--as .the project matures may occur "subject to., the • --i.- -• securing •of any permits . or payingfees required by other ordinances . .7...,_..._..,_. ....,...:, ,, ..., ,: _ , . .27.-".1:.1":'.'::-- -- ..: - • ' : . 24 All utilities fronting and within the ,project shall be undergr-ounded = . j • ,; `, 25 :` ".Utilities .-for::each- unit •shall 'be :individually..,metered. All meters ".shall -be screened from view and ;enclosed by an -, enclosure, that` is compatible.:in design:-'and materials`to `that of_�_the_;building to :which it=is=:installed . -.26 `Secure'1DSRSD ;;agreement to'maintain. the :on s-ite sanitary sewer _collection•,system .-excluding individual ,�laterals _The• system shall be"..designed::"as acceptable=to .DSRSD. .a 2.7 Landscape-:=plans, 'showing _substantial landscaping, ..shall be r . 4. " submitted to;::,and be 'approved by the°:Planning -,Director - pri-or to _:any._.permits.:being ,issued"•for this project. In : ;_general, -3 ::to .5 trees _pr :1,00.0 sq.ft of :landscaping ;shall be shown :within .all "open 'spacelandscaped-,areas." '•At least n 75% shall be 15-gal size a ---- 28 Light standards .:.shall``be"-used which shield _the light ,source „,; from' view:'.from off site, :and shall not shine onto adjacent property - z s , R r. --- -.�. r F f T �.1 i-V •fr .t L af<2 x-+t �• 3 l .� t x y,..-...� 71 ' 29 Street trees shall be -provided along�Slvergateb Way, yas• � hkacceptable to the Planning Department' Y r 4 Y .• -.f ,: 30 Heatingof the Hpool shall- be ,by a4solar heating. system, the w, `zl x location and designrof which wi11J e-reviewed as .part of the-5. s, ' Site` Development Review f r, �Yy ti ?� 5:: qC' fI` b T ' •�.. cv�,�a �,�,.a:t� x �_,,, i � r� ..� ;� i �' , .•-� 1'� w,. r• A �. 4 -f i - r 31 The at grade patios shall be`fenced z ate ` t 4 .; R S - y f r. -- r '..i"ti"`J,i a S ,�C i7'a ,1't; ,c- `y ." ' 'i. '. '�.` Z 1 _-. "' . t 32 Developer -,shall .furni'sh and install signs stating "Not `a Publicly'Mair 7.':•' d Street' and`"Fire 'Access Park';:in Designated .Locations _Only7__,:::i. n ;.night of-=way of ;private _ ,i• streets Parking spaces shall be designated by sign, paint or equal x " .rte i • 4 • : 33 :Fire •:hydrants shall--be installed and operable, .to ",the satisfaction- of :the -Dublin 'San^ Ramon. Services ,bistrict 'Fire Department, prior to combustible-'construction 34 . Prior to final inspection and occupancy of `any units = a. Storm drainage facilities. shall have been installed as• • approved by the City Engineer. :- . • • • b . Fire protection devices shall have been installed, be • operable, and conform to the specifications of and inspections by the Dublin San Ramon Services District Fire Department. c . A 4" high concrete curb (minimum) to separate all paved parking and passageway areas from landscaped areas shall have been installed. Curbs may be deleted where a sidewalk adjoins parking and passageway, provided the sidewalk is at least 4" higher than adjoining ,pavement. • d. Cable TV hook-up shall be provided to each unit in the subdivision, in accordance with existing City . regulations . e. As-built drawings showing the locations of all underground utilities (water, storm and sanitary sewer, gas, electric, telephone, and cable TV). shall be provided to the Homeowners ' Association. _ - f . - Street name signs, bearing such names as are approved - - - _ by the Planning Director, shall have been installed. - - . - 35 . Prior to occupancy of any unit in each phase of_•development, • - landscaping, irrigation, • fencing, and landscape .'lighting .in accordance with approved landscape and erosion control plans,' shall :have been installed, or a bond equal to the . cost plus 100 of the.. landscaping, lighting;- _appurtenant •- _ • _ structures, -irrigation system shall be provided :to the City. _.- A -statement -from the .Project Landsca e:Architect .certif certifying g :that _landscaping 'has _been installed. under his/her',-: - supervision 'and is in accordance with :approved plans shall .°._ ' `: be submitted to the Building Official and Planning Director. _36 -Private Vehicle ..Accessways : . a. Backfill: of all utility trenches in ',private vehicle '',;access :way areas . is to meet the recommendations J.of a ; licensed Civil Engineer :specializing::i -n "the -field:of - soils �engineering. (In the . absence of.:such -a { :. _ recommendation, : City. public: streetr_standards for';-•trench backfill be utilized:) :: The=soils engineer ,shall provide _full-time inspector _services ;when ,trenches are '_;being backfilled:, in accordance with ;this recommendation ::=All work :done within ;public utility easements to be inspected by the responsible :utility to :a point -six inches over the top of _the _p'ipe:: All ;3 other:;work= in ;the access way_:is ..to be inspected by the recommending soils engineer and/or the City Engineer Trench backfill in private vehicle access ways_shall be" compact"ed to. a minimum of: ninety ,,percent relative P r compaction :as determined by ,California Test Method 'No 216 Trench backfill in •"o the r areas outside of the • private :v.ehicle :access ..ways;"`shall be inspected.-and specified -as to material -andcompaction requirements by = • c . The connection between the private vehicle access way and the public street is to be by a standard driveway type of connection. Driveway throat width (at back of sidewalk) shall be the same as the vehicle access way. d. Safety lighting is to be provided on private vehicle access way and on pedestrian-way facilities connecting thereto. Lights shall utilize "vandal resistant" enclosures, and shall have sufficient power and spacing to provide an average maintained foot candle level of 0 . 12 . A uniformity ratio and increased lighting level at entrance shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Planning Director. e . A recorded contract, to run with the land, is to be established providing the City with authority to repair and/or maintain the private vehicle access way in the event the Homeowners ' Association fails to so maintain in a manner that adequate access by vehicular traffic is provided at all times., so that fire, police, health and sanitation vehicles and public utility vehicles can service .the properties contiguous or adjacent thereto, and so that said vehicles will have adequate turning areas . Provision is to be made in the contract to enable the City to recover costs of work performed by the City in these access ways . The contract should recite that the Homeowners ' Association grants the City the authority to enter and repair and maintain the private vehicle access way in consideration of the City allowing the use of private vehicle access ways to less than public street standards, and that repair costs incurred by the City are to be shared, pro rata, by all units and collected as assessments along with County property taxes . 37 . The location of the garages adjacent to the fault zone shall be subject to review and approval by the Alameda County Geologist and City Engineer. 38 . Should this development not require Tentative Map approval prior to any construction, the Applicant shall comply with Engineering requirements as developed by the City Engineer. These requirements shall cover grading, drainage, flood control, road construction and design,. and the like. 39 . Based on the major traffic impact on the Sivergate Drive leg of the Silvergate Drive/San Ramon Road intersection, the developer be required to contribute $25, 000 toward the design, construction, and inspection of a traffic signal at San Ramon Road and Silvergate Drive (this represents approximately 1/4 of the cost. ) 40 . Sidewalk shall be completed along the Silvergate frontage. 41 . The develper shall be responsible for the following frontage improvements along San Ramon Road: a. One lane of traffic and 8 feet of shoulder . (20 feet pavement) or equivalent. b . Curb, gutter, and a 6-foot sidewalk. c . Replacement of the bike path, where necessary, for ultimate improvements . - d. Necessary drainage improvements . e . Related signing and striping. . • • • f . Street lights on one side of street. 42 . Approval of this Planned Development is for two years as is specified in Section 8-31 . 2 (b) of the Zoning Ordinance. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF , 1984 . AYES : NOES: ABSENT: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk • • • • EXHIBIT F ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO PERMIT THE REZONING OF THE REAL PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF DUBLIN The City Council of the City of Dublin does ordain as follows : Section 1 . Chapter 2 of Title 8 of the Dublin - Ordinance Code is hereby amended in the following manner: 7 . 1+ acres, located on the southwest corner of Silvergate Drive and San Ramon Road, designated as Assessor Parcel Number 941-101-4-7 and 941-101-4-13 , are hereby rezoned to PD (Planned Development) District; PA 82-033 .1 Barratt - Arbor Creek, as shown on Exhibit A (Staff-recommended Site Plan) , Exhibit B (Applicant ' s proposal, as amended by Exhibit A) , Exhibit C (Negative Declaration) , and Exhibit E (Approval, Findings and General Provisions) , on file with the Dublin Planning Department, are hereby adopted as the regulations of the use, design, improvement; and maintenance of the property within the District, subject to City approval of the Tentative and Final Subdivision Maps and Site Development Review. A map of the area is as follows : ,t4;01,7:::..,45:77,,,,c. ,.,-L, :\ 't,....Y,.,: r.,,„:.1 !-;1....,:s.:_as:,,sr:H ere mr ' %., .r . 5, rL "e'0i 7;1'1° '1-.4 . ItNy.,;:,;1.1.1 iiii: .: l's . S ;a '- \* .t.„,..2 I ..1 F °— A ' fro 1eGt sr..�� =1� .4 i I q 5 it° a Tg= 1- = v.\LFT`( ; ,,A, C' \ DUBLIN Section 2 . This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30 ) days from, and after, the date of its passage. Before the expiration of fifteen (15) days after its passage, it shall be published once, with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the same, in the Tri-Valley Herald, a newspaper published in Alameda County and available in the City of Dublin. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Dublin on this day of , 1984, by the following votes : - AYES : NOES : ABSENT: Mayor ATTEST: • City Clerk . ' - - -\ c 0 •a ;• ot � /t ,lam I 1 °I P I\r ♦r. w q i C a'dl \7 s C ++'A o . r et1 a 4 n o•r 4 't..1.....:":.4.61 c '..::•:.:-..:.:....:;i111........;:.:1,:f:Y:■.....::-.:11:.::::::-:- ........:.*:.:'..+-:'...2....:•:•'-'`........1.:-..ifiii:, or 1 i Y v▪ a Q n 4 „0,,,„T a• •:o ♦ 'i 0 �� AN�R�MO, •ti • w '1 °o c •.Yi- ? 'Y` a D. Y1:.i p a fi 4 r k W L•9 ♦ '`' .° • ?J i •♦d` l •�O _ nro�7' 0 9 •.......:-::::.-:;,...-•PARKS......RESERVE•. fOACES•. i 6 ♦ S ' .. 010• % 9 b C {I1 f 1?' \ :::: itT,, ^,. 1 =t.4yS.`q..•t P-. Py ,..,,•td ':;� e`�, o;:.:.ter:::::;;:?•}:t:::;::.}}•::_.•::::� :f :.....•:,. .5R `� ` - '1.....'-.0• 81._-..-•'o` 1:'� iRAtNWC:;';:f; AREA • . ♦y.p, T/ 0. S t r z:• : ,Y• •`d J K d`„tN Y Y u : '_ocr - L P 'Urtr t J♦° '';;!is: 1. .:?i�i':Ei=:iiaSt+ ? r.w ao� +`d. 4 �. ::CLUB' 1�G. 9 :rr'•+EAU a i a Z cr .Oct#• 'p� ,o,C :f aI } S= '5` :r.-•::•:•::::.::: •.:yc':;-::.:,::::r::;.::::::.: o N. d t�et g ♦ � a `4r. r s I St ~e 5 \ i " o n m 4 2,y9' O r yy I �ea j •4 4 `` yy _ ♦ 4 -� c o y "E'11 CIA 1/4 y —.will.% • Y'. 1 Wit%: „,,t; �� �.•O' •lw m✓✓✓w - • w t 3TiY A v _ v' � *1--- n.rr t •-. .;- FEDERAL ill C'e•1' 3.t”- Q'�+m4 /� 4 ��`� OL,=ona_ �i.'?i■cl i ee,c 's.�' .. PMKS RESERVE t .•CORRFC(fONA■si r14F' /�r, 'y�. 7 �© wta, tl ' -:•7N57tiU7E= �' � a b ? etc x r:` .3. 4 ,P -' :`°'iy;cii ie:5 . E: -"-. •: E d L r� 9 X - ors i oo..w.. g O' ` r G� \ K._ °! o� I , 44, 4 ^t fDRCEs -. �,• ❑ ru✓r -Q a ,,.n - +r, [:- 'o. O' _r .. ►,Y 0.`- �E c ` - c- ua.. r4c`�. ih '- e A A J i. h 4 .�rt,_ _ fro•e Z A G 3 Z R 4 � t. Z 4 a4 ,..,...7-,..t5... • 1� t tic t� wco ^Y':: r • •1 C'. Wf.{y d•. a r ••W• n ,) I fir. $$wri ,e� .1RAIN GAAEA j::..:�::'..'_ 0. ter;'-'»'.r._ �' n. 4 �" - c•.4 I o coi.:- '(.tf '.grass,,. 7 srrr.. ,t*- �\ , . ' r' DUBLIN _.,,,:,.....7-,,,,,:.4?),;..4-=:- Nus,..,..- Nic.„...\\ '.g`x ��:: .-ir r,/nf ���1 o �`{qr,,.0. �5• .i•'s }...^:.,;-` ttri Si a..:+ 5.v],Y> V4'... 7:71h.'','`,.._;,`,V'''''''-''' ' ,':,1a.7fliA t"...... ..-- -- OR. 1 4t . - . ‘4 c '> '' ' N iiiiii ' _ s s 1 . GW+IP�• y �l,Y)D* z , 0 o RI l d 4\ AY+ - ? S` '- OR nW.l 1100[ a •EPtfOt W mot n G� - _. - - it0`t 1�: . . .:j mow✓ . AM tt EI n .,nE.00' ,. ■L1� - CITY of DUBLIN a PROJECT LOCATION MAP project Tit le = `00 0I 02 03 OA 0,5 0.5 of 08 09 i 0 m le Address a 4 . . , 2-3/46'. inches_1 mile .I. .. • • . • • , 1• . . . L L ` I ' d 1 TRACT -4218 : t,�trr 4 i • • ... •` t'� r �r S 5 rti fs7 <t IQrt l ;, c .1 ; t} 1i a�4' ,,l < eY 4 r 't• t �� 1 1 " \ \ _ r to � N la} ief�ci ir?^ rrr M1 \V/� _ all wl ' • i t i { l a r + t a ! s a PFr Y } • r • • — / -•\ � 'I uo I ( Y F f}1 I Csl a ��I/•t _,\, _ �� Ilt LLL .... _ I i `sitr a'{' 9! �I '}}t `x to Iry Y _ .'•v � — alb t+r� ldtll �1� dlir � a 44n}l,rl {l4S t7t iq }• / ,o.'.1,1.,,' / c !I 1 .. " \\ -' _.i ` 'a+tile "Mai!I17I wrR ,�'• I . -.', • ' '.,..A.- -;--' .7.------A R LA , ....., C• 'a' '--'. lir - 1.- ''.. • -- ,/j3 ' ; 1 C i — / �� \ �'.1 1,:i"•,,,-11. ,01:! it t: • . ":fit\rt \: j dd' Ifs i ii •• I • \ 1\.. t t ! \ \ ' t.'I•— � ;,;,..,',k uw +. ^4AM \\, \ t/ � / '• A " .ri •' M��y 1Y\1Xi ...\.. ./. t� ty $ w p .w4 � /., _r, 7 .• a t - til ';',11-;•,:-:.•,'i,'. • . .,3 d 1 k..•• . . '-' PROPO.SED • ACQUISITION,ivt,f.,;,,,,,,. (o.9±Ac.) • • • • ■ • • • �at • .`' _ I - t' •i t'r}; 4 •i 1 t 1S t••••'•ks I I .. ._ - I 1 Y, ' sv1 ,. .I 11vt l a. y• t ^n a I• fS f1t � f }I ...t, H Au4ad. ,tFirs . st'.. r, . ". r ,t � ....j.� ,n.. !.: �ti • C-z, C� oc.i I ^ . 'REGULAR MIETINC - MAY 23 , 1553 _ : , City Council of the City of .Dud - in was he_:- ,�. r ��Tlll�r meeting O � the- City ',^. - Elementary .- _ i ' S"..:, - . Monday , M y •) 3 1983 in the multipurpose room of C'.-^Lon `Lem'e tarry . The meeting was called to order a 7- 3S p .m. 725 Lar4:d4'_e Avenue . Th me t � Peter Snyder - ROLL CALL - PR7SENT : Councilmembers Heg y Jeffery , Moffat: a d Mayor Snyder.egart , _ Council er Burton was excused for vacation. . �;le:,�b PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Mayor led the Council , Staff and Chose present in the pledge of a ! l .Q1 ance to the flag . • CONS`NT CA7 .-7NDAR On motion c' C- He'z-arcv , secended by C - -nd u-: -._mou= __ - ,:Sent ; -'_?e follow n---- were : _n`= s _o: - -'`- -= C,.. Burton a the _ � - -_ - _J ; �c c- � 1 �ecin,. py April 25 1933 - and Adjourned :. •• - _ %c r R., ter n the amount c: .553 , 920 . 7 ; i nanc_al :.coot: =07 - -_- Eadi gt ;S3 , 1933 and second �mcdi _i --- , of Conditional Use - --is Ending :`.�r__ 3C , I C--03i St . Philip Lutheran Church . . PUBLIC HEARING PA 82-003 BARRATT SAN JOSE Mayor Snyder explained procedure er expl ined the procedue that would be used to conduct this r hearing : 1 . Staff Presentation 2 . Hearing opened by the Mayor 3 . Applicant ' s/Appellant ' s Presentations . 4 . Public Presentation 5 . Question Staff and Applicant 6 . Close Public Hearin 7 . Discuss - Deliberate - Decide The City Manager explained that `! ., Larry tong would mak@ t e Staff - f l on o group of technical people who were i n-:o - -- --- prnSenC�lCiOn , and that a o - - - _ the design issues on the project were present to answer. any auesC:CnS City Council may have . . - ATTACHMENT 1 CM-2-o2 _ � • . ' . . . . . . , . • . . , . . . . I . . . • .. . ' . • • ' . • . • . ., .. (/) 1/1 r U. ( (11 I.1 1.1 In () .,-1 ' • 0 e) ..r.: . ., . U tn. 1. • n) ••t . L) (1) :".;.... I) 1_./ ni :.-, \ (1) HO .-) n) ,.,1 - )t :) E m .r. ti., nj r. 1J (1) . .1: n.,..) Li •U ''•) SI: tirs 1J ii $t 11 to 'In .C. (1) 0 0 to ti.1 .r: ni I) (1/ ....-.. rt) r: :..) ••-I •••I (-.: 0 ••I C) iti ••I (I) . '1) ,I, , III '.1 1-1 .r1 •.-I '0 0 ,I; IJ .> ' • 1: I 'n 0 Ii) .-t n) S, I: ••-1 . ,--t .r.: On $1 (: •.I (1) 0) 1.1 .0 in • ,•-•-t •.-1 n) ••.I - ••■•-1 • 1 --. ), (..) c., “) (I) •..1 . C). CI 0 .n 1.) (-: . II) .. I II I ' V) .1-: 1.1 '. IJ ....1 ' 4) --1 .r.: 11.1 I-1 r; 01 (U tn I,) c.) I, tr.\ (-1.1 .:e. (I) ..1 3 C.: Ill 1.1 .(_) 1 0 •• I t,,l/ . 1 II I I) 1.1 (.: 1.) Ill Ii) •-I kJ 'I) 0. 11.) 00 CU _r:.' •■•1 (A IS) t-I (...) r.: ().1 ii im •t) c: t.i it( (1 •c) 0 It) c: .r: >., . 0. cli u ..•1 0 r: 0 I. . -0 U •.--( .r.: •r_.) c.; 1J 1_) ',/, •,-I -1: c-.1.. n) •U .-i ,- 1 id •••11.1 () 1.1 10 (.: •• ..r. 0 1-1 P---1 G. QJ r '0 1-1 (.: tn 1• ri Ln n) ri '.--: I i vi I-. C. 1., (I) in IJ >, •' C In ::) --1 vi ..1 (1) U It) In I11 U ',A 10 0 ••"-I (I) (I) (1) VI 0. (... ' . r.-7. 4) ,n co >, (I) n) Ti II-, .---4 Q1 (1/ 1-1 t---1 1J CO ••-I v) 0 :.,. I) •C.) (: •..I I.) 1.1 IJ .0 (7.: ..-1 Q) 1 j 1.-) :2 I-,•.-1 '1'I. •-•IJ C .0 (1) I 1 V) , ;..... ,.---1 0 1.1-1 '0 ()f).(:: C 0 U .r; G (/) .(1 .. I C. .(; ni Ill (in ). On) Hi (..) (11 V) ,C 0. 0 . F. V) 'JO s: 1,r) 1'; - . ;-: - I --I . .r: 0 •;..) C. 1../ ;) )t ..I in 1 1 () 1: III () ,11 •. 1 (": (-) it) 1, $1 •,-1 tn 1--) IJ 0 )1 (11 1 i (: ".I 1: ,.1 .1, -.1: •,, r 1. tit t, I/ 0 ;.n .,1 u I 1 s t to (., •• ;••.1 : .11 I I I: ••I (I. (1. :./ III ...1: •0 • .1 II/ '1:1 (Li: t1 (1,..i Itl :I. '11 1 i 1/1 1.1 (U ..f. 1(1 4/4) () In .....(...) 1: 1 I ••I 1 1 I • •1) 1/ 1 4/ I / 4 4 1.4) I I I I i In '• I 1 1) I l l l'i -.1: tO (I. ), t.) •.) ‘,, , 1 • • S, 1) n, ••I :..) c1) (Jr) in •,-I .., tn ,f.) () V/ I) 0 •• 0 ;I III )1 ••••1 () )1 ..I 1/1 0 .-•I V) 1.; I.) 1-1 Il1 '...:. QJ 11 •-I (,.; (..) J.... .0 1-) C. Ill (11 /...4 (1) II) (...) •,--1 ..-) t-I I: I.) I.) (II III (1) V) 0 (l.1 0) • ..--I .) 0 II C.... .L.) (,r) n) I., •,t • ,..-.1 tit IJ C.) • ,--1 >, )•-• Q) (1) (.) •t..1 .c.; (-__-) ,_, 1...) tt) I-1 (f) 0, (P .1.: 0 •--.1 (1) i.i -(j c,-1 tU 0 0 u 0 '0 (1) G. (11 :E.' tn > r: :.) I, 1:.) Ili 0 1.3 C). C) (I) (1) -0 ..-1 ).4 I.) , 0) I: I.) (:: :)..II-1 in r: 0 CO I.) •c) . D. ci •.-1 (I) > ••I > ...I •-• - • - 0 •-1 Q/ c: () 1. 11.1 ,--I •.?, lt../ :1 )1 ;›, ri 0 V) 1) (1) in •• II (.:) •• I Ill .,I () II) IJ ol CTN (1) CI 1)f) ni tn '0 0 (:: •:1 0 1, (_) .r: c.) I.1 ••1 n) "1.71 1/-) c). (.1) (1) (.) n) :1) (.1.•, I .1: r: 4.I) If) )I t--1 ••.1: 0 •;.-• t-I "L) (11 (-: 14 '1.) 1Q r: ), c: 11 -1 1. ;. 1J •U V) • ".:.) > U (1) •,-1 .-I .--.1 u )I I) to 'I) (: 1,) (1) ttl c.) 1J,•,1 IJ ••I .--1 • I I• ••-I (1/ (1. Ill ltl • 1 (.1 •', -(..-) 0 12.0 0) CT.C) •.--I :3. C > -1; 1,-, •,--I V) V) {.., $. $_: (:: I..1 I ...) II-I ..-1 ..-1 ' ki.i r, u .1-:. nJ C.1 I,-, Li C 1-1 .0 ID • ),-1 0 0 Qj > (U 0 III In tt) (1 G IJ 11-1 11-1 •,-1 n) (t) 0 >-, C kir, (1) •E E 4) P.. C :-.) (1. •.--■ (1.) ..-1 (1) C.) Q) -0 0 •--1 Cl„ bi)-t) (1) ::-, 1, 0 li., n) (n .--1 tn O• G ki_t o cff. u op 4 0 -1 (1) cl _C 0 0 n) O.. G. E ,--.1 ,-1 Cr. U ri C) ..C. U ,---I :-.) n) r.: ..r: 1-1 (I) ••-•1 Ti tn (I) ••-I --I U n) n) or)--.1 C)) (1) Li •,-4 .-I 1J U U Ti (1) H .(:: 0 , 0. (1) -0 0 •-1 (1) r-s 1-1 -0 U CU. • ,0 Q.) 1.) r, 1n ).: n) r, Ili (n in () •(...) U IA ln •,1 1-1 C 7,.-; . IA ra, rn n) (1) f--.. .r.: in 0 cr) ri-.. . I.) I-.) -rj'' 1,-) C:: 0 Ti 0 (Ij IJ .1": it I/1 )I in C 0 U •,-1 in D. . (../ (i) $.1 b0 RI li (1) IJ .-1 COL) (.:: I:: -. Ca 4) 4) 114 T) •• 0 c:: > 1 i 0 ',.. (I1 0 6r) D. tn 0.'0 0. G E. a) 0) a.) G .CC C..3 1_, 0 L.) •,-I •,-, L.) ,--, -0 en V) 11-1 (I) VI (_) 0 ••-4 ."-) (1) 0) •• I...) •.-I - >., (1) (1) Q.) •r--1 (1) ,--1 ...0 _C a •,-1 r i ,--1 00,-4 CU v r.) IJ 0) E. vi E. H W C W v) <I' (U i--I (f) 1J. ,.,t 1_, ii.E7t G (1) CO' 0 ••-1 _0 >•-, • 750 0 0.) ,.n u) 0 G >-,..0 •1J .3 U (t) n.1 c.) ./0 >, tn •,.1 m r--1 (1) V") (11 O. (1) “.1 -0 O.. tn G Li 1_, 7-..) c ri •, . _C 0 ---1 f_t 0 L.) tn 1, •.--1 0 (1.1 (/) rn •',, -c) D.!, :-.) .0 :...,• t (..,r) t., :Y.) -c) T) ••-■ C.: .r:: .1-..-: (3f) (11 G ^ 1-, 0 0 0 C. 0/ 0 tn ::•,. , In )t '_?. •,-I 1J 0) .21. :-.3. E vi •,-; > (1) •--I in .0 () (-: cl 0, 0/ 0 (11 1J 1J •.-1 14 (1) •-• V) • C •--I > > 0 •--, U ••-I U Cr) CO n. ::5 . G --1 > 1, ni - 11 -1.. E. C.: •--1 tn :•••:, !II -1 ,---t 1., ti r, 0 0 .c.: 1J •r-I ("1 Q.) 11, •,.. 0 tn 0 I ..rt 0 .0 (....) ,n :I) 1.: 0 (1.1 Of) IJ 'in (--: IJ n) .1) .0 I) 0) - ) c. .) n) 0) n) n) '.3.•,•,-1 0.LJ (_) V) (./D E .--I r•/ I.) a) .1,) •, ,2; CV 0 i..... Q/ 0 CL C C :1 0 IJ) in ,--i (r) :.).: $., in 1.) (kJ ,--1 0 ••.1:: U .1:: 1.) .0 E () n) >,(:)\ 1-, n) I I C) 0. nt ,--1 '-') Ti 00 •,-1 (13 •,-.1 •,•1 . -I; n) ..?...-1 (II In .(, 1-.) •..I •' IJ (1) .., 11-1 *,--1- .--1 r-I 0 .C: •••:i ('') ()) C).1-4 (1 :-.• -- (1) .---r • •• C:. • W Cl. 0 (1) IJ "U C0 (--.. (./1 ....: .-1 I./ •• () t/1 1) 'On) t:', t.) n) 0„t1.1 (-) (1) 0 .1-1 ci •n r. .0 ... .I) U -'•.-1 n) n) (I) t() .,i -.1; Si (-.: (:: )1 't.) •.I r. .1:: (0 ..1 C ' (1) Cl) 0) 0 (0 (-.) I') •-4 0 0 U 1-4 0 0 1-1 0 r---1 •,-1 () (1) ••.-I (2: .-I I/1 (:: (a) 1 t IJ 11/ (.) ••-1 (1) (.:: (E. (U 1--1 (r) 1J cp., -t: co Ln ^ . J.: G :.) G v) 1-.) .....: 0 (1) --1 1, tl) () ,CI. v) •,, s., .---) 0 .C.) - ii -1; •,-.1 ni w •d -• ... '3 (1) •,-1 F-: 011) ,-+ - c:: t: .r.:: L.) 0 Cr U 0 0 L-I -0 0) ^-0 C i c; r---1 C L) 0 •.--1 ;:i (I I 1.I I.) n) '3 - 'l".) .1.-: ,---I 1J ..0 (/) (I-1 C O O U ',-1 11) ,-1 ---1 JJ IJ LJ 0 (D 6---9 c_. “3 0) 0. .3 Cl•I-) r" 0 0 '1-1 (r) (: 0 (q) 1.: (1) V --:J. in cl) ..--I • u -.r-1 ti4 ,--1 a) •-■ --( 0 I-1 1, ILI 2-) 1_,/ C (_/ C ',-I V) ..0 • C-1 (1) U Cl. (.) ••-1 C.).'I I (I) •. I () (: •••I (/) •..1 .0 E St G ..r. (1) ..-1 N L., ,. 0 0 11, :1 0 tn 01 1a) (1) In (11 tt) ;:, 01)-.I; () to ..(:: (1) }-1 0 P, :I) V1 0 1--) 14 $J ••--I 19 0 •" 1J 1-.) E: .,., H ••---) E 1., ,---; 1.1:4 .0 ..-( c.: .r.-: 0..c' --. ).) I) (": 1: ....I 1) rfl :3 tn•0 u 0 () n) •-1 U. 0 fl co >-,-Z) li 111 CIJ 1J In 1J > (j) I-I Id I4) ,-I 0 C1. U (,) J--) 0 < ••-, 1, IJ G c: 0 Il 1-1 r) • . (1) 1, Cr; S:', IJ kc) • , 1 r, (1) C •,-I -c) r: '' (1/ >..c: n) •0 0 (0 1-) Ti (-) 0 (1) •-I 0) .n c) 11-I (a 0. (--. () )r) (7' (II (1) ^ Y., .CO. -1-1 'U r.:1 n) n1 In --I --) 11 I. • 'U 1-1 1.1 n) .--) L) $.. . (U (-_,* ‘14 )1 cr; ) in ..-1 .-:1. 0. • . -r) ''' ::.) If) L) U 0 U I i C ,-I .-1 10 I) (11 1) :1 In :I r--1 1 IU -0 t--I 0 VI c.: (I) 0 0•..1: .--) (1! •,-■ I) (: c.i 0 1, (1) (1.1 (1) C.: E (1) 0) WS (t1 (11 •,•1 If) •• 1 (,) ,--I (I1) V/ 1/ 1./ '1.) ..-1 11.1 .-I CU t-I ni ••-i c; (t) .r.: (/) • 1./ '1,_) In E 0 (1) • (. ),(".: (11 r, 11 it) 0 u ., t, ;1 (1 (0 ()) In • 0) > (I) ..1 "r--) 1) 1J - It) 11 0 (1 (11 In ,c) CI. 0 --I .r: i-4 in in 0 ci) •,--1 n.1 t:-. 1.1 r. t-4 U. •r-1 1.) •f•I I) ,:t (/) IA/ (/) •-I ',..-: •,-) In r-.i 0) () ...3 0 (1) it) 1., nJ •.-I I.) qi sJ .() - (I; .,I 0 lj t'.0 Ti ' .-4 0 X CI. 0. (.1 ' •,-; •,.i •(_) (.1 I.,,, (1) (-_) t: 1 t 0 .---1 i.) ..-1 14 S.. s., ,0 ,-4 (lj 1J 1 (1) (Z) ...) 1/ Ulu Cr:. C CU .-0 U 0 (1) 0 40 in 00.-1 •4-1 r-) 0) (0 r-I 0 n) (1) l, (t) U (11 0 1/1 O. (11 ••() Li rn ..r. U to 41 a) •--1 U --0 ...4 • il) C •--1 C Li P t-1 (n • t":: •■--1 4 'C I. 0 (.., rn (.) D,..... fn. LJ (1) U-1 (1) a.) 1, 0 > 1-1 a) 0 s c.: r_.' '0 C: n) C v. •,--1 •/-1 Qj CL. C (1) >-, 0) C'l Li_l :.) .1_, G a) ^ n) C U 0. (1) ).-1 )-1 (i) > ni E > 4) :3 I-) '' 0 • .% 1J 0 1-..) Cl/ in (-1-1 0. a) > 1--) U co rri (.n n) • ..r.', )1 U •-• ,..,.. (11 IA •.-1 E. •1:1 (0 n.) :I) •-■ •-1 in 7) u-I ..-+ E • 0 0-.) U co N) •-1 > :3 0 10 tn tn 0. (1) •,-I 0 ci• >-, ..-4 (n (--, 0, In .C.) II •.-I c.: •,-1 ...> in .G u a) 00 In G 0 1J 0. Q) Q) ^ 0 CIJ C •-■ CO 1--1 U 0 C) V) $-1 .--1 1i :,,(L) C (I) (1) '0 (0 0) .0 •.-1 Q/ C (1) Li (1) :3 C •r•-1 (11 (t) 0 IJ E U (1) -0 ••-4 I.--4 :} 1-, IJ -2 - .1 IV C 0. •.-I 1J 0 ,--1 C C I I C 11.1 1.1 .--1 .1.7.: VI CU (1) 60 (/) •r-1 ..0 •--1 00.-1 0 0 0 ill 0 Ti 0 -CI 0 0 )0 (1) 1,2) (1) -(._) c.:: r. ..-1 (_, • ..1 RI (I) o c: c: co u c-: > li: 1-1 n) (n 0 1-, E 0 ••--I :3 :.) .0 la) -rJ I 1-4 $., 7-) 0 ln 1.1 I:: or) ..1 -.I - 0 c ni L.) 11) ..-I 0 G ••--4 (1/ 0 cl) ";-1: > L.) WI .--1 •.--4 C :..) rJ 0 v) -c) Li G • 0 a) (1) 0 •r-4 ...-1 (1) 0 (.... (:: U 1_1. V) U •,-.l I:: G .--, OD G. s-I-1 CL G 4-1 Cil c‘l a) n) •.--1 1_, ..0 G 0 E ,--i G .1-.) In .0 _I:.: (,) u :> oo.,-1 iL) 0 o (0 IJ "0 (1) 0 0., 0 Ti l-' (t) 0 Li 60'0 '0 1 e) tin./ CO E_ G 0 1, 0 3 0 -0 c 0 w la) v) LI": LJ 10 •,-I (1.1 11 ..-«n 01) In CI "L--) a) E.- CI. w -.-1 '0 (1) (1) p RICO) r-) 1, (-..: n) -I:, r_.' 0.•-. 00 0 U 0 0 0 c7: --1 in ••--I EC)) (0 > (.• (0 () 1) V) •.-1 -I or) 0) 1_, C, -,-) I J (0 U Q) 1J „I:: 0.. bp LJ •,-I IJ '0 LJ •••1 1J (1) . . - 0 0 F %, .0 -t..) ), a (0 0_, n.) 1J >'• .*•13 Y-, (.) (..) •I•1 tii --i: 1.) rip ., 1 ;.> n) o (.) '3 (0 V) tkl I-) . i--• •-. c.) 0.) .r. T..) .Le. -u . n) •••.1 (11 r) 1), n) (1) v) •,-1 •,-1 .1 t •0 in (.) . I,) ,....I ,_I ), •v.) (1) Or) 0 00 0 .44 (1) a) (IQ L: (11 0 ••-I ..., • W 7..) > (.0-4 0 n) n) ^ co ).4 c, LJ %.' 11.1 (.--; V) ...e. •--1 ,-1 II 1 (1 :,', to .-1 w 0 0, 4 (I) •,--) ;, •,.1 (p..,_1 (1) 1, tn ••-t •,-, G .r: •-1 I: r') ',." • • > C: r-1 ..-4 ::.) 0) „0 1J i--,-.2 011) ' ni ni r.; I., .(..) 0, ..1 '...) () ,'• e.) 't) > 1:1 :.) (n 0 I.) 1 i 0 u n) u (1) (11 > 1-) 11) li -I •-1 .1.) LI n.) () -1 ft) 0. 1-1 1 •t-1 (N1 1/) fla Ei C.. c.: li --.1 0 0 2) (7). ). (.) 1.1 r: (i) C 0 r:', n) 1.. •••i •-) IA -1 rii: I1-) (1) 1, n) •,, ,•-t •,..1 •-1 0 .0 ni 7,-.; 0 (..) 1j) V. ',.e. .0 c,i cn c'l --r; •,-I (1) I-I ',.( (.17 -e. U ''': O. Ill I, II i 11 i 1-1 (..•.) ..i; .,_i 0 w (-Li cm j 1-,-.. 0. E u -,1: ..G a -4 7:, (1. :'. VI El., (f) T.) - . ' • • . t - - . _ . _ r'" • ' . . • . ' • . - . . . The k,--/ issues id this particular proposal appear to concentrate in terms a: Land use , environmental impact , design and economics . in terms of Land use _ issues , and this is probably the single most important issue that Eaces the Council in terms oE this project , is the proposed use and density appropriate for the Location and is the proposed use compatible with and will it enhance the surrounding area? On the question of land use , Staff sees 3 options . One would be continuation of the presently zoned office _ uses , secondly presently zoned retail commercial uses , or third , some sort of multi-family residential use . The current zoning on the site , Neighborhood Business , would allow various retail business and office uses such as retail stores , hardware stores , auto parts stores , offices , banks , -'- ' - etc . These uses would be allowed without a conditional use permit . It would , however ; require a site development review to consider the design aspects of the proposal . . A drawing was presented of a previously approved office complex chat was . approved by the County in 1980., prior CO Dublin ' s incorporation. I: involves 6 2-story buileinc-s for offices and would account for aroma ' 110 ,000 sc . ft . , including 418 ' parkina spaces . Staff compared this proposal with the current Barret: proposal . In comparison. the Barrett proposal would provide more open space and landscaping , orovide less buidinc- coverage , and generate less traffic than the orFi ---= Similnriy , the Staff reviewed and compared the Serra:: propo=7:, with th-',., adjacent cilv-c.-tr tr-wnnouse proposal . Compared wi-th :he exis:tna Silv-=rtr=== proposal , Barra:= would: provide more open --zpac..3 and 1 =ndsc=pin= , 1 ,,=-• building c--,v , and would contain fewer p:-.17.p1 ,.. p.-,.:- acre ,-.-,--- "7(-7. fewer number of bedrooms per unit . From a chv . di---lopment ,,,==ndoint , the Barra:: proposal thus would provide more on-site amenities and more off-site public recreational improvements than the previously approved offices and the adjacent residential project . Ocher issues that n .=,4-.,-,4 to be considered if the project is to proceed would . include the environmental impact - Has there been adecuate consideration of Potential environmental impacts related to the project? Will the r.rojer: impact Dublin Green Drive and Silvergate Drive , and will - the project generate or be .subject to significant flood impacts? From a design aspect ,. will the project provide an attractive efficient and safe environment , and does the project provide adequate common open areas and other amenities? From an economic standpoint , will the project provide sufficient economic benefits to the community - Also , a concern that has been raised is , will . the project be low and moderate income development that will adversely effect the adjacent properties? . . . . _ There are 3 alternatives open to the Council : 1 ) Approve the project , i . e . Planned Development , Rezoning and Tentative ''co . To do so , c, the City Council must first adopt - the ni_tiarP c, Ne ,tiv , Declaration . . . 2 ) Continue the Planned Development , Rezoning and Ten:a:ive until he San Raman Road Specific Plan is completed , and chat would allow the Sono: fe Plan to address the Land use question on this particular sit . - cur.h. an action must be taken prior to going into public hearing , and must have the : applicant ' s consent . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . ' . CM-2-84 . . . . , • ' • m,- • • ' 1' 1J ••-, ( Can Ill 1 0 (J'• 1■ a) t11 in r-1 lJ ,-1 CI : • (L1 Ol n7 •C) r: (DO..-1 (U t C' l) vI :? kJ .C: 11.I v) (.I •I 11r) (• ., 0 11 IJ ,r.: '✓ a) r-1 •.-I C) 0 'C) •-I ci .G - (. 1 li (•1 • IJ 1 '• IJ 0 0 �1 •' r1. .. r(1 (U . , u •.-I (- I- I n1 [:: •n I• .n Ui rU C: U 'C) ) v, c. J: 0 .- t n n I I.? in (•'1 .f.l I •,i ). n) 11 1( .-1 co }. IJ •.-1 C,).1..1 - (; a (:1,,•-I O nl •-, n) '0 :7 U rn 11 11 C) O. C IJ . , tt) in I J .'.4 .1: 1■ CO l i (ll I ,-I n) hn (I) II) I;1 1( 0 •) C If, tU . ,r 1 ..I In 'C) I; n) tii (.1. cU •r, U. a) a) -- •-. On CJ ,.-1 - •-I Ii) IJ 111 O , •--1 11 N N I I": >, 0 In al . V) '� P in 1, al to , . .. r' ,J ,J (30.-I N i J n) al u1 ( I f �! ), > (n U y ~). r D. E .�t v1 C •-I t: r-I 11-1 IJ ,r, ,0 .,.1 a1 u1 it) in al la 1a 11 O fay u0 0 N •-t 1') > 1J •-I C . _rJ f: C) Gl C) a •.-I n1 •,•I Q) •.-1 O O u .1: 1.111 1 0 n) O 'U 1( E (`1 IJ to a (n a C :r: n), . -I. •••I .r: }., • tU .r: 'U ^•(_1 .r.) c: 'U a nl :1 ,•1 :••, (1. n) On In c) IJ U l 1J 11 a. C) !i c•) 1 J _ , • 1I_I l) IJ 1 nl r: •..1 :,••U (I) ...1 11 . I .•I O (11 O I.) (I) J, C,. r. 11 1J )• n1 ,1: .I). ..1 In 'U u1 'lJ vI IJ ('.: v) :1 I.I (u .I 1 I .1 1 I, 1 I )( C. (; 1J W n) (n nl to .(. a1 U ) •• (O •7 r,1 •�-I '' (L I:n (1) .1 • CI. (.l. a) 0 1,0 .I: r-1 1, 'V •.-1 L is (: 1 1., ,-! S.. C�0 G 'U U a1 cU 1.) .-I •,•1 tU :) (J `U t 1 1 ,) 'C) t to •^ 1J .C) •r l }' J.: .C: C: ^ 11 1,,'C.: • • C U 1-I t to C (U C-' U 3 , . ^ N 11-1 O 1J N IJ U Ian U •-! 1 . (-) •(.) c-1 r 0 ) N )1 n, hn ill I1 ) ) _ • nJ O I) c) ,0 .'.> J :-1 ,--: 1( O ) C: (• 1.1 1,) rl) .r 1 ;.•, (1) n1 (': N •• I I N nl 11 .0 .0 Y co C 0 1 -, Li V) U > 1J •rl ^ 1n n) t- [ --I 0(1) (1/ ,r: .0 •-1 :1: al N O. al aJ C hi 14 C C ••-I •C-• IJ •�1` :J i u _) n) O n; 1J N .-1 'V ( l; .-I .n f7 ( (I 11; IJ Cl) 11 0. vl >, C • N 0 •r, ./-4 •H r-1 • :3 •rJ .-1 )(11.1'.O ; 1J a: COO $� 1J U OO U. C: :> 0 .0 al N U ..I 1J ,-1 .0 • N N n) 3 'C-1. N .•r •� J N �. 1;l C U 0. C ,---1,G L, 0 •,i U U j ry I:: ).•U nl .0 • .-1 )a :: •U .-I .-1 0 'Li us) L C a) •V in u •r+ C 0. N C. r••)-, n1 O. in O > u (I) C C )1 C) .1 .t:: N I1 •C1 1 In 2.: It) J (; 0 7 -.1 C. 1J r; .) cU • 1 O^•rc .- n) .,-t r; a •.-1 N N 0 to E 2) N co C .'r .-I N u .0 •.-I nI 3 u 'Ll .1• In w •.-( a) ' 0 U rJ •^1 1J N O. 1� C1. E •.1 7.1 O E. I - •,_1 p N O C: 1. •.1 N G 1_. U E 01 a) r-( E , :I: V c; V cU O,. .r N to E Li 1J U > n) - ), :J •.-I .O r" • 'U N •^ N •r1 U (n in On ). C • a) C •r1 N N .--1 a) C u cU N • n N a) I 00 C N N u (n O N O in .-I n1 r.: 1, r), IJ O , IJ J .0 in N > .-1 •.) IJ Vl _r .r: n) n, r,) cl 1.1 .r A • :J"U U C). C 11 •U 1) [.: .-1 III ••-1 C: ■-I 1-. CC 11 N 1•I _G (/)'r•( 1J U :�. O V) N 0 •i i .0 I I a) C.) U ctl •.I n) 0. C7. U •.-I C). . IJ 1J )• IJ %. ,I N 0 1J 10 ni V. N c: 0 . I I a, (: I: t-: n al nn v) 0 1, I :3 ) . n) 1• al I) •-1 •( 1u •I:1 0 n) n, :) N r: a •1) t: Ii ` a) :J ' tJ r, n, 'r) ! U -1 1. .-I ..) On 1J n) I n) f I.1 nl ,I: I ( cu 1-( 1• %, t:; , .� '1) a) ;) 1 N •r l 1+ C U IJ .n 1■ U r: ,II u 11 n1 (I a) •t(1 N •L C,.O O (1. . L U E •-I :J u c: I, (.J IJ t., 0 Ii U •r1 •,•I C U 'U I I.� :.: (II O 1.,., n)1n 1 .al 0 O 3 t7 N 11_I N COO .0 ill a) 0 Y. C '3 N O (:: _ ^ C: a) N N 1n N N u •r1 N TJ 00 N 0. U J . . J C b u •r1 N C in 'U O r-I L .r r-1 G U C u C I.) •..I u 0 to C u N )-! O. O.1J C • L. , u u 0 C ,n 1J _r; N N O a) O. O.. >, O 1J •,-1 •.-1 }.. y.. t. I-I -1 .n 1.1 •� C N f"i 1 O a) N U O N N to I.J O 7, C,1 cs1 r-1 _, n) ._1 G •.., u H )a u p C ).. L) J r: O n. N al : N c1) O ^ 1 u ',I Y.Y U v)- 0. > V) ,n IJ G V c N n r d 1J N D N u G 0) .n (.1 f V) •' )• c: t:' N N t ► o L :, lI-, N G G (:), o, o. O N a1 t N n) • al I •.I >, In N )-1 co to G �) U --1 •-I ,c: 1, n) •••1 I J •U I J 0 11 N ,-I ') N 0 0 3 (n a1 l I: c: C O N G 1 �.1 ,11 U r, CO r, •U C) U r: O ••-1 1J 1J •el 0. C I N U nl r.l ••) ( C IJ U N On IJ �rl v) 11. 1.1 (1, III) (1, to :.l (') .(: 11.1 I:: U 'U 0 � O ,1 V •:J C 1� _G 1J C 0 u 60 b0 ^•r1 r: in r-1 r-1 In al al O 1, •-1.11-1 U F f' ^ .1,1 '0 Q N ,J (1) •,-1 in •rl u N a) •r! O )-1 ), nl ••I O 0 O G ^) .�•r-I >, N .0 'L7 'N E- U u O -' Cr) r) U C C) G v) C E .0 P .1; J 1P ,J ) C1.11-I ,! u C. •r1 .-1 1-, (n la 14 :3 N .0 E CO I-) C 0 CO v1 I-) N 1-I H 0 00 (s1 ^ � U r•� .GI �1 0 N •rI 1J N iJ 0 N N Cl) to :> [1_) .f: r1 cU 1J C]. U cn cU N •r1 U C U _.•' 1J C) W lJ '� (C) 'C) a) IJ,.). J✓ C O.u-I a) 0 N ' 7 U C) O. co bn '3 , 1__) -C •^ O 1a N N >, C 2) •-a CL) •r, u >, cU "U C C _ co .0 CDN C > >, U C !'1 U) J (1U u a) 0 N >, >, G O b0.0 1-1 a1 >, ,-1 N N CJ' • N G. aJ C co r-! co ,--I C N 1: C: 1, IJ • G 0...r. N N N r C • cJ (V C) C) r_ w 1J -u O. 1 )� C co .1✓ co co _C 11-1 >, N -i E- In (11 •�i N a) >,, )a J O bU N r r'- lf) N C O- ` o O u.•r1 1-+ 00 1J :J u ..0 N 1J v C) O.. U (n 1J G > 3 al a) y.1 U CO N .r: I_) a) v) r-, 1J N O '^ ^ >- U G .--1 U u G G C (U IJ CU al • 1 .0 ^ N U u N .0 U -I 00.0 N N n, u ri.J �, C C (n (U J✓ N •--( 11-, l'-1 H N Cl. $_, 0 Cl) U ),I a) to o0 C1,W •r1 a) N 0 lJ U N _!J 'C7 r1 U E )'. 0 � nJ ,JW �. .� C Li I r-, _C) 00 N LI r ,1:' ^ > .r( iJ '✓ C C .0 1J G .L'. IJ I 0 .O In al C.'. .�1 N (1)".-I t11 a) rl N u I_I 1, N 0 a) O ,C N -� N a) 1J n ,O 1 }.1 )I .t� t: G ). N a/ L) U O u (1 1, u _C ?, C r •rJ > •o n, 1-, 'U la N ^ n) -) a) Ci. On.r: ' u O u CJ O al E 1J •.-1 Of)kJ )-I •r1 1J al n) LL' u 1J 1•) O C IJ :'• U (> 1J V u O F O co L (1) V)G •r1 O lL 1J CJ C :J N C 'd N In ,-1 r-1 E ,-1 G G c:: ••-I N ::) .-+ u G car lu .J c 1J Cl. O n) I I 1 I cU r; (r1 N • co al to Ti 1 N ^ N C) t �, -' O :3 I 0 N 1J fL) al al rl a) .O O U O •.I :• .tJ •,-, (1) •.•I N In ∎0 ).1 Y ).1 N 7 N r-1 O C. N c9 U O O. O C U O.•.-! rJ C O C u )I (I ! N .t_. N • F. to C 1J 0) •.-I -1 G •_■ CJ. .n vi 'U O to N nJ ^� ( !_) ,J N N U (r1 •) 1) $1 u O }.1 1J a7 U C7'•rl N �o N u G 1n•^J N -U C '•�u V N cJ J C •n a) C N N O. 14 'C) C 'U in N r--I 1-I, C; ).1 V a) ,-1 ., (n •,-I 'C) 2) J: (U ^ to •U n) n) (1) •r1 C U ti N O •_I IJ r-( r, C N ! Li N a) O C, c11 N a1 C l., •r1 C�, •r1 L1. N n c 1 1 11 .C1 O1 O u tiJ, al 1 O 00 U C N al C (n 1� 1 'U O O. •r! [G • rU al i t .r: O tU :J L: t; n) , -I co '., -r, r-I U J b0 in co .0 > a1 •.-1 a. c.-_:----_. 0 ^J c: u 0.1 N l+ W •-1 I: U tl. A C co n) 1 J (1 IJ tll co 1 l ,-1 .fJ-:; V •,-1 N -J ,-.1 11-1 1, •,I •rl N co O C, N •J In .> O _C U u r N u :7 J >, •r1 r]._r� •r1 u n) ^ In O N u 't) • 1� c) U N 0. •.I • (. al N : ,H nl I J J 1) .r: (1) N tU N : c,; u V 1..1 0 C L u 0. U 14 1J S_: -0 >,,J Li U 'U 0 (1) IJ • N I-1 •U (1) rl :>, In >,H •C) v1 N a) 0 IJ N G Q) u T) N >, U 1J ill Cl) I:: >• C) 'U) N r-1 ^ u N '^ H' U a) u 0 :� C : w w 0 C,n Li 0 E u C a in Li_I i N Q 0 •,-I ,-1 • C1. v) (11 I rl) N N n) 1J U l-I N r, I_�0 U .^I 0 LJ 0 0 U 0 0 N .O u 1J C N I n .,-I u ,I-, •-I .rj >,� C .0 to •^..-a tU U a) C •r1 u CL N cn •r1 11-1 u U C C E C :) l.1 n, U In •.-I tU 0 •-I >, vl C N N C .-1 )_, • •r1 .r . to 0 D. N ^1 .._.1 -U C "(7 C r-! -U 0 •r1 '-7 11 C= N u ,,.1 C N O G) • 0 .0 rd r• � ,� N -{ 0 r•I al a) a •:) n, N (= N •.�I •.1 to :> .-, .-t ,-1 .-, to �-1 }.1 .t: >-, )+ � O 1. U V N > C: In „) ) • 0. I U J I= r: , .-I 0.•-1 .C) .0 CO N O U • tU 'r1•-1 C ;>, O. ( ( IJ (0 IJ 1.) 1) t11 •l) ,.1 •) O C: (11 a)\1 N )J 1: N G a C: �I '.) V -1 •.1 .LI o nJ ,-_ N. C). }.. Ii, r) .r. C Y, '3 U N •U IC, c: (: r) •'3 I.:, r_) I r-I (n > in L' :3 N .D •rl .l: 1J 0 N 0. 00 M (11CL] 7� .-IN � M i cU r Ii .0 IJ •-.1 N '3 U b0V co Ul , aJII, '3 3 � N >, J C i and slake it their home , just as those who live in la r 11�.:::L S 1,..:-� there pride in ownership . M with the Environmental . Richard Frisbee , cv•i t Center addressed the Cout' _ _ .. audience commenting on the building design . He indicated that as they a: Of these units in various cities , the square fcct be proposing more and more of __ . - is something that always becomes . prominent in discussions of the rj He indicated that the size is probably the only factor that is different about the project being proposed . The units have some very standard ba:hs futures that could be found in townhouses , in other condominiums , and in single family homes . They all have cross ventilation, compartmented ba:h G- - r shower compartment , giving more. privacy) : vanity from - toilet and show _ giving _ r � ( separate - and all bathrooms have exterior windows ( something Chat doesn' t recess=- happen in all kinds of units , but a feature that most people find very '_s desirable) . The one bedroom unit has a walk-in closet , a zee ` e not even always present in single family homes . There are small inside � . - . laundry facilities in each unit , so there won' t be a laundry building 1' which is very typical in condominium/apartment type projects . - o�tsiae , Y �, - area. There is plena:. ::- . Every unit will have its own private deck/patio ae exterior storage for each unit , and when the units were designed , it was -_+ such a way that rooms work together so that the kitchen, for instance_ : instead of uni nc a separate small room is open into the l _v=na^ and C areas so that the Spac° appears much larger when you enter `�' _. . - From Gn e \�-?- _Or SL G. _p0_.-�- Mr . Frisbee explained l- :G_ it N _ a _ ._`_ - building with wood accents for window tr_T and the Private ce^= _ The ..__.__ _ will be redwood . There will be a composi-i O n r oo- , bu: of a h. = er . composition which pattern on the 'oof . The roof will -_ o � ^ building CO ='-�e a pleasant vi --z-e-,' --_ color coordinated with the rest of the O __ -- appearance . There will be extensive landscaping throughout the 7=o j= _ Over half of the site will be an open sp ace , which is notynece_ssarily common situation with - __ condominiums , but Barrett felt desirable and St-- encouraged as well . . The' scale of the buildings is also in keeping—with^the size of thee fi=n__...._ - - Every building contains 8-units ; 4 : units on first floor and 4 on top oor.._ • The two end units are 2 bedroom units and the 2 diddle units are one =acme, They could have increased the yield .on the site av . units on each floor . Thy - _ - - - Q with long runs of buildings , but felt -it would -be .more des_rabi_ l organizing - to keep the buildings very small scale ,, so _they :are in _keeping with the units . -.The buildings 'are only about ;93 .1eet -long .and about 32feet deco` This " also keeps from -giving -it a dense apartment __or_. motel "type look. . you enter the site , you look out into a major -Open -Space . Each unit ha-^a - -In addi tiO , eat- u-�- - - covered parking space very close to the front door .When unit ; you enter - . has . an uncovered guest parking space . -, Y : a small entryway which looks directly through the unit:-and out -into -space . • . Cm . hegarty clarified that this would apply to only ralf of the -::its_. Fi:isbee stated that although not all of the units -wouLd .overLoak cne - --- .- common green area , they would indeed ,look out • into an: open area, _ac cement . . r,.1-1-4h . • : - : . , . and a small spa in C:'Z ;Cr open space . J•1 S`. provided is a Sl11ii;filiny pool._ _ -entrance point into the project and :hey have purposely T,iere is one major entr. - • lane; a=ked it with textured paving Co accent that e t -- al o�n g with SLDS itLa L landscaping , Sc ti. : you get a very pleas,— r,-.'' in as enter the project , and don ' t t ee _ confined . There is _ separate e- crgva access in the event that both of the two lanes were b_eckec • Mr . Frisbee indicated in discussions with the Planning Commission, the City had requested that certain improvements be discussed fer the property along San Ramon Road , i . e . a par course and some extensive _=ndscaping . Barrett __ prepared a schematic of how this could look. P= . M_ - Barry Fell represented the S_lvertree Homeowners Association and a group of 300 people from the neighborhoods surrounding this :roiect who had signed a petition. They have had a series of meetings to discuss the problems , and he addressed several issues of concern. e was that the general growth and development plan for Their major concern � felt it _ �; • Dublin has not yet been written . They felt it inappr_ r atee Co even this e or to adoption of General Plan- COnSi der a project of i type prior •- has "ii: the General Plan would address the haphazard dove_epr .ent' that as occurred along San Ramon Road . The Location of this proposed development is the c n y remaining oc--e_cia_ . Road . The only ocher undeveloped -e-. =I Carr..; � �.Yo,Ce''tV on San Ramon i _.. ,-• _, _ - �-.,...-.. - --- Road_ O^ Dodo tv _Goad . The denS_ty and tra---c studies , when compared .._tn t o- e - _ou aC _sie_ o=- ' ^e complex, were questioned and felt to be _dace- -_ . Fell questioned Barratt ' s marketing survey which Ca "z=ed only 32 units _. H _ nice people .and we C±:__d :eLcc e them in He felt they were probably very -c � Dub?in, ' but not living right .here . . ',With .rard to t of fi c i SSLes _the group felt there Gas : a- .--me to _nc eg _ fora traffic - signal at Si lvergate Drive -and San R^me ;oac,-_even oe_ore ny further development goes in • Tney gUestiOflea' '.the ..f c _gs CL , trle City' s Traffic Engineer who determined that ,,the Ba* Latt 'pro c.Culd _nave a_ 20:o, ::Fell. fe ac o d_ tic to 'e feet on the overall-,:traffic situation }:►1r hiscalculations.;: the _Fincrease in . traffic would be 15 Another concern .was the .issue 'o flooding rt It s«as -f twat S l ertree - homeowners would. be -liable for camages if Hai tin ;Cant' `C eel were 'to ' - overflow- ._-, Statistics . prepared by - technical experts -hi si fie.a -..17.P ..- V =er Questioned. in •summary Mr . Fell stated they ,felt the tra:f'_c, _t e er y , c e fooc - '_ and the location of this development are L'-oorcora_= , Ac-O;C'." tO a - from the .City Attorney , the City Council must- make a' -c:ng .tha•_ is consistent with the General Plan in order to approve _. _s Since -the Cis.. . does not have a General Plan , t`.ie Council should _wa t a Cec_Sicn. . . - until such time as .the General ?Lan is adopted • _ . rm-7-H7 . 11S73 Dublin Green Drive questioned the Ba rat"C r oresent3 CLves as to whether the end product would look Like C[1,2 t wed stated It would , absolutely ! He Indic. eC t�;�'_V had i > l!SCr�?CLOi;S Mr : Head SC C Problems chat were immediately evident Learned from the Fremont project . have been remedied . . Nr . Beechum stated he did not want this development approved at this - meeting , mainly because it is not consistent with the General Plan_ He indicated the house next door to his recently sold for $145 ,000 and people are concerned about the price of these units bringing down the value of - their property . . nc asked M= . Head- if there would be a . An uni denti fied member of the audience �,_ Head responded that . homeowner ' s association Co maintain th=_ grounds . �,r• • there would be a homeowner ' s association , and both at their suggestion and e will be a professional management firm that the Ci ty ' s requirement , there �:i ill need to be retained by the association .on . T:-he monthly dues will be in will be in the -CC&R ' s `Mayor Snyder • ith e $60 - $70 range . This requi r:::ent cY - . referred to the specific paragraph that addresses t.li5 i551:e • the audience questioned f=ee fact that perhaps An unidentified member of tCh a _ ; -ic �� future 112 residents will object to gay for t. sometime in the futL_ ` landsc_l pi n, oF the par course , when i_ is share _ b y _i 1 _e S re -S G . Du .__. . PL Director clarified chat the ongoing _ ai- t_-an c e of the aIe • area along San Ramon Road , including the .Da_ course will area C..or 1 - ;n in the C C&R I S which G 1 _ the "o:eo e have _ _ =- as Dar: v _ their eemenc - it will be in _ _ on_ of tnE and they ___ have _c a C1nO .i edg that they have received and reviewed it . • ` Dennis homeowner in Silvergate , indicated he had moved to -_ �;- Dennis Anderson , a homeo - _ � ^ . _ . Dallc, Texas . His concern was that the area 6 months ago from an area near . , - �1 Because :Je. are a .mobile SoCie.0 + , the DrOjeCt would turn into rent- units . _ he felt that as people investOrS , wil be there TYaitin� to Du': f r �,� p p move out , - e1 felt this was very similar to the federal government rental . property . He L th s very ,. _-° _ trying Co build low cost ..housing in an afflue' n= ghborhoOd - is :-',:Ka thy W aterson , 11769 Serra. Court , :Comoarec"-th' s: issue' to oast • projects ghat-: were :denied.. for -the _same . reasons °She stated .developers tr.iec to -put 9 anartments where .Dub1i n 'Green :.Drive _exists 'to-day _Sho fGt'-cht t-h'-s ) :as -well� --as an area in _Briarhill along-,Hansen Drive She fought -,apartments being - .; . , putin on Village , Partiway She indlcat!d thisproje_ct should hoc pLoce.eC until the =General..Plan is'• Ln place Tim Bowus , a '6 year- Dublin resident exp es5ea concern regarding safety ' fo= school _`children . -- He felt there would be many cailc_en ' in Barract ' S project that '_wouLd need to cross streets . -- - . - - Martin Lucas , President -of the Dublin -cneoc•:ner.` s -ssociation :i o ` -._nsen Drive ,. - stated he supported the SLLvert=ee Ho:::e•Jw'ncr' s -ssoc1at_Cn '_n all:. - their concerns and . viewpOLntb ;, and Stated he c_dn' t rfe_e_l that ..Dub _n was h d alLLn�s _ .founded on apartments , but .rather single fan_l - CM-2-S8 . • - Dave Deccy stated he agreed with all. the other cc<; `nts . His main c,nce • , San \: ii - ei,.t his project , but the whole S t C�aS C==�nSiC\' , in looking at not this ho-,d_cot= _ � . _� e r ecomnend c t a _ t he p ro j ect should be tur n ed dot n pe ,ung c.mpl,tcn cf the Cener . l - -- n , a ;d then tu-n d c..,n ch c w;oLe proposal . . rg ive resident felt concern over the lighting Tom Di:con , a Si lve-� to Dr _ - density of the proposed project . H e felt there would be additional crime problems . .--- qtr . i i sk , a Woodren Court resident identified himself as one of those people --- Road . The mess , according to Mr. risk with a messy fence facing San Ramon � fence was created by the contractor who was allowed by the County to out a` �h he posts appro`imately 6 inches into th°_ ground , and maybe _ Ln t.�_t C. .- 1 Che dr2iv_ _. �.._ =u11 He urged -e Counci to look aC ngs • -i �c hand ' s of concrete . �� `-• cersoeCtive in which they .are C=a • r O felt t h e d_ai ao o Of ` ar t ^ ua V on C=eek, as proposed , was inad quate to �-�- d tae City Council co list°__: Jim Cjerpe , a Woodren Court resident , urg • the ::isi es of the_ ma jority in this issue . The property should stay commercially zoned eve-_v Bcwcs=, _ioccren C:ur` , cue_ _ -"ed Jar -tt r_g`a-din"a- v_is__to- . --k _' '._d _:--1ned that t . - :CL _ to ai L:^ Ver2i °-_y_ `- c s_ `e _• ins_, _ _ _he grounds _or each unit . Oth_- = mace comments were : L ne Dixon . i e -a r "_ `e_ C: ad J ,�S` c Russ jranch of vai , Sre i - lccz_ o_ ,L `_ cce - -_ nmrikl of Cal e Verde Road . _ O COL -al e.ton , a Madera Court res ceC , vas : e uan 1 ye ars ago pres_c RC o f the Silver t= HOmecwner ' s Association. Le add reSSeC C er:2ueGa C; un v Pla: :_ng CCmmisSiOn sore years ago : hen this exact- pa_; t wls roCou -_c_ •_ C C LvC of cial _ felt people were pans king and c lint CCu::erCial CO COmmer �. - _' __s o U It se i n t'le aucienCe 'were trying to r-tie C: emotion ;.was present . :�e fe t:Lo _ - = . :- peopl e" i ^ Dublin , and :not let ,anyone :else Co-e �n a��a'.•"for. us . importanC - in. :`He, was concerned. as to whac hind ' of neighbors .-he .has , 2nd ,aske^ to°°-Y reell v :-feel they should ' shut otr e_s out and not ve them a -chance O -Donald King a resident of Livermc e�ineicater`• he has come to this c_=� 5 -_ " _:years ago He ^stated:he hadn.' t o��ned ;;a home sinceA-9. 1iwhe n ne was divo�ced� � Hefelt a lot of people ere in th is =same situ' ation he is <- concerned :with the plight .of people who d ,own homes , .wiio can' t-o . a.- f • t ` home-to move uo ' to another . . He felt there snoulc be a lot, of c .c2_n- sho.wn by CnOSe -wno -"have made i t" . . th which s^culd be decided a:,-t- i.s :Geet.in kas t-°_ - .:`�,^rty fe'Lt e issue - •^ Cn : .. �_ pint use of the land . If the people wc-'t it left commercial , Che-e is nc in tal:.ing with Bjrratt , or any other housing- developers . - Cur's Kinzel , TJKi1 , the City ' s Traffic Engineering Consuj tans e pla?^.ee C_,= ' Trevar Tooze stated .he: feLt . the l_g:.c � :- ulti-t.:te- plans for San :lemon t�o�d . - • • ; n on L t r - . ` th: t is being oL-opcsed for the intersection of San Ramon Road and SLjv-• ` -e Drive will only make the traffic situation worse . RECESS - A short recess was called . The meeting reconvened at 10 : 5 p.m. with all Councilmembers present . (Cm . Burton absent ) -__ ., t •The City Engineer addressed the subject of last winter ' s flooding "situation . and the possible effects that the Barrett proposal f would have on future fl0oding of Martin Canyon Creek. It was determined that this proposal would have n0 effect on the flooding , as the problem area was above this development - T he Cal aver, as Faultline and q were d earthuake damage possibilities wer dLscuss Cm . Hagerty stated they had heard a lot of comments- from the audience , but be If t_1e L'_Ct remains that there is a DL 2C2 of Land that :._1l e devel? oped e County ' s General ? an had been t- this use would n be 1• audience what :hey wanted o on t--- property , CO-,= _^ ? . He asked the au'C_ -..._ i.•i�a� �-_ -- - _ c -he Council will go thru this sa:Tle _�`..ss eve- time a orO:Cs__ i- have tried to develop o-' this - i s been groups Opposed cc t_.a Darn"'.. . -o :e_t • •-- -". ti"1°_=°_ hive a ::ate c _ = _ .. - J :• - . eriCe f it would be nice_ for the location to be a _ =k - - - . . everyone knows that won ' t happen . - Trevar - Tooze indicated in answer to Cm. Hegarty I s Question, he would like to. -.- Cm . He _rty Questioned ; f he would like to see see a park on the property . C Hegarty.. if _ the City Dublin taxed for a park . Mr . Tooze responded that this was .a - tV of different issue Cm Jew ery'staced �sne.• had received a 'paDe= that .Was Gist i7uced -b those in opposition to this :project . :. Sre received veo :calls from people wno .:%e e_u'cer . the 'imaression ':that - the :City. Council :.hed _ dist>.iouted then' 'Sne u ged the >_ goua , f they chose to do this agaL n,` make it clear 'Yno trey here Cm aJeffery asked the applicant if they Would ooject to-° the ;City-` Counc l •- ' delaying decision -on ` this . issue until ..aft.eL --the _adobtion _of -.the Sjec _ic• Plan - .Nir. :-Head.-:questioned an aoproximate,.timeframe The Planning._D1YOctor indicated the Planning `Commission would .hear, the _dra t .of the Specific P an `the .middle , of. :June , and hopefully to tie City`Cou'ici -at t;�e "end ;_o= -JL-�e = -- 'lr Head agreed that this would be acceotable : Hr _-e_ad ird ca-tec tea he __, , wished to work with and convince - the community_.of the positi Je' esDeots Of this ;project and that a one or two month celey ' woul_d give him the - opportunity to accomplish this . Cm ..''..Jeffery made motion to continue this issue until after C to .aoo=o'ial .o- the- Specific Plan . The motion was seconded by Cm. _heaarty; and was passer by unanimous vote ( Cm . Burton absent ) . - . - . -- , . . . • • . - . I ,-; he nu: o:. ... ....." 1-,-1.e,Led , stating h, fel : \I- GjerPe °'-i - , , • s - ad 0E ju---:''':1:2"c2-111--3)''``i. 's;2---2-- ILIn . e 7 --:ii. .ch'.-2 t.L - Genet-at PLan is adopted in,,L... . , ,.,,,---, .ali. - 41--2,ic,-,:-Dc s - -- . : .-1:-.., popery - --- ---, L oi_ L - -1 , -, ,....., Diane Binetti , a- former o::"2 ' for this property ._ : -.4,-1- oE Dubin and felt concernL.... ,... resi.u-L,- - -r,ccv —1--ous nu.,,, ., proposals sUbMiCCeCi. Eel: this proposal l'-i -h°'''-- he-]..-P: ri' -7sct-lu -:Ii: 1-ciur:22-1 of oo ,-- . 1 1-ina aC the mess on this vacant lot and n good . hereby concinue:- _ _ .-_:-.-- Mayor Snyder indicated that the Public Hearing w - ..„.. * -.,..: * • • ' - - . EXECUTIVE SESSION . session. AA--. 11 : 50p .m• , the r Council recessed to a closed sassLo,, . . * * * * • •. ADJOURNMENT to come before the Council , the mee:ing t2.--as 1 ___„ 1.--,.-i -c no further There being c ....t...hr busj_ness . . _____,,,-; at 1 -. 1-5 a -m - ad ic,.:.:. :.— * * * * • /-----) . .1 I . . .,, _____:•.--- / _ ------•,.,::, •--------- -"-ill'---------- - ,-- ‘-ra v 0 IT z• . . ., . . _. . • -.- .._ • • ATTEST; i,: e ,.. L -- ., ,_..„2,- - 1 ,-- --------- . -- • cicv (-..,i , :., . . _ . . • . . . _. ._._ . . ,... . ...., ,, . . ....• .._ . -..,• : .. • _. • .,.. . .,. .. . . . . .: ,,••‘‘..„-,,•_1.:_:.::_f_::::„..,:•.:,..,--„,.-7,..._.-_..,, :: ,-...,--,•::.:::z.,,,.......;_:-._:,. .„ -;,, ,,,,..f-_-,.-_-__-.._,•:.,..-:„,,,,..-.-:-.... ;. • .,-,-,--...„.-•--,,,, :,„,:-. ..i.::.:-.:-...;.:?,,,-„:,.. -_,..;:,;.•..„:*•••••_:.:• ___-",...„:„.ii_::::,.,,.-_-,:.;:zi.,-,::,,,::::,:,„,...:....",:-:•:-•......„_--.-,',.'''' '',7.:1i.:7':';--=,:.7.,::--:- 1-'''- '-:'-.-1 -7=.::-''---'::'---..-----'-- T.--------'-,1-:-:--- -7,-::-:•.-- --:--,-"---,---fa=-L----::::::;;!;.---::-- --.,:ii-:;,z:',.1--..:-'.- .--:,--.•-' "!---- --'-•-- "---':'--•'-'--.:.- ,:1-,:=.--:':-.:-.:,.,:4-:_.--..:-_,--,.-,,:- -:.----,---..i-z-,_,....;,:-,,,,,...,, ,.._._.--_-:- :-:,, ..., .-.. . .. . .,...-•-„, .. ,-. .._ ._ .. .,, • . .,_ .,-• . . ._. .. . .. ... , ._ . _. . . .. . _ - • .. __ • - - . . - _ _.• - - - , _. .... ...: . .. .-- . .. .....„.. . _ _• . .. ... . . --- ,...: . . , - . . -- -...--: ..: --- .. • . . . .... . . . _._ . . - . . . -- • . .. _ . . . . . . . , .... ,. . . . . • . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - _ .-. -; .. --....;•- - . •-- - . - - - • . • . . . ,.,. ; , -, , -, . - . .• .-. • . . . . . . . . - ------ . --- -- - • - . • . . - - . • .,. . _ .. . . . . .. ,... . • . . - _ - . .. . • , • . . - - . . . . .. , . . . . . . . . . . • . . . ... . . . Z • bstantial in that as part of the San Ramon Road cor_ic_ re .e etc ent , el- would be mitigated in the future . . Hegarty indicated what worried him was whether the C unc _ is seztinc a the specific plan which was just adccte:_ He found ecedent to destroy �. spc = ic p- n _ , ry difficult to deal with the Cuestion of whether a mortuary ,.,as considered tail or personal use . He concurred with Cm. Jeffery that it was a personal e . L. Moffatt made motion which was seconded by Mayor Snyder to deny the a_7°_ -- ,d declare that this particular use is within the concet: of the San Ramon gad Specific Plan - Voting no on this motion weTe Cm. Jeffery and Cm_ t attorne explained that since the - ;garty ._ (Cm. Burton absent ) . The Ci y y e _ _ was • )until took no action , the Planning Commission ruling L:as uphe_ d.` I. Ja-r.=ry made motion which was seconded by C' _ egg - tc _c %° _ the ) Voting no on this nation were tat%`•_ )unCil accept and L'OC101d �•h," a:�CZc.•_ . - ivder and Cm. Moffatt . (Cm. Burton absent ) . The City _.ttc_n_v explained_ vat, again, the Planning Commission ruling is upheld. i r was seconded by Cm. Legart ^.as by ljority vote a. Jeffery .mace motion JCl C Ja S .+ -- i that the Council sit down in the future a- ---==-=' - - t aecific Plan permitted uses . Cm . Moffatt voted no on mat' ,-n . (Cm. __ art= absent) . Mayor Snyder c' - , .-,ned whether it wou_._ not to norm =1 cl --• 'e cu_.st_Cts of this nature arise . ?CESS . short recess was called . The meeting reconvened at 9 : J : __. w--h all l ouncilmemberS present except Cm. Burton . • x * * * N RAi•1ON ROAD SPECIFIC . PLAN - ARE 5 avor Snyder announced that consiceration 'of (San-Ramon_-Brat c-= -'"' Plan - : - .rea 5 , which was scheduled at a. later time on -the :agencawas 'beinc move p . :-.,Cm. ,Hegarty. had •requested _ th'_s change. as it -_was _fe?t that 'it •rakes -ore ense to peal wig ' h the item of Dublin Green when everyt; ::g i -, ' ace .nsofar,:as,. zoning _ - . !r . Martin Locus asked that this issue be put back in- o_de_r, c_ be•-d°r :o a later date . Mr . Locus was under the impression that the Barret- - )roposal was a part of this item- Mayor Snyder explained that although this liscussion and the decision certainly pertains to. Barra:t ' s property! _. :onight ' s decision was related onlv to the question of zc_-._. 4- Tong presented Staff report . . - -ATTACHMENT 2 E i , 4 ram.- indicated the_i had _educed the proposed - - Joe ::eac, re�r _s nt c = from 1 � � t total �s - The a�•�_ --the arratt proj °_CC _ ro o 83 tot un_ ice nsit�• for "•� the - would be - , �, l a 000 to 1 , 200 and the price re. uare soot:.�.� ��,u_�. be 1 , proximo.tely $99 , 000 to $ 130 , 000 . Pe t er .Ba_co Sil .ertr=e Lane , indicated that the Si vert_ sociation was 100% in favor of the project . - • Fisk , Woodren Court, felt the• density issue should be adhered to, ence ;tablished. -- , . Jim Hjerce, Woodren Court , indicated he was also satisfied with the - • : :oject and that the prcerty could be rezoned residential . He further. felt Censity of the project , at 12 dwelling units • per •acre , would be a ocd • le .nsity to strive for on the Dublin Green project to be heard later in this yet; nc ✓ . . (J�.� _ �,-_ ".^.'tit°�.,:•i•'= � r Martin Locus , Betlen Drive , reported that the Dublin is arrangement had been worked our with th°_ SSCCi_ati On felt an a� liCab � -"r�- eveloDer _ S . Cathy Waterson, repre=e_nt :c the Silver.gate ciec w-e.rs Association, had _ l 1 er:t co .l:ti_ca had beer. re ached nC1CcCEG it _ a SCC;ct_CC _ :C - -t.o_ Snyder congratulated - - - Head and members of the unit ' who- -Ct en i n t e 'r c• _c for t" -__ i C.' "� - ed to, - , and heir c=ound and m.,..-:e sus thi ''e--e- done in fa - -- oh:,` e • felt it was a crew= a�=_: -^ the C of -Dublin - be 7.:77-.7.=c __ ;.j _ be - z--^e` _ and heard, a __ eve been shown that their C '�" n the future . n motion of Cm. Hec'art'_i , seconded by Cm. Jeffery, and b unanimous vote, Cm. Burton absent) Area 5 of the San Ramon Road SoecifiC Plan is r -,:-..7.---: . lulti-=amity residential ( 8-15 Dwelling Units per gross Acre) - , - RESOLUTiON NO - 48-83 . . • = ADOPTING S;'-.N P A'-1.ON ROAD SPECIFIC :. _ .. . ._ -_ . -. . . _.. _• • * ?83 004 .DUBLIN GREEN N Che applicant, Calmet , Inc _ , initially applied for, rece vec acproval`for,' • ," �O j eC t . Nearby and appealed •an application for a 145 unit condominium. L^^ residents also appealed the_ approval . The City Council then =rant°= applicant ' s request to ten orari l `J suspend the appeal- to allow consi d ' on of the present a^cl icat_on , repared by Mo :an Howell • _ l is for a planned Development re:oninc a __ .- a 7-57: L' - - The hap iczticn n-• ^a _ _ .,� ; apartment - cars buildings , with two - - - partmE.^.t Cc,:.ple:' in 31 �•.•C S _ l C_lities and re_ated Parking ,_ _laundry fac' 1 ; - : =s , a..' _c':o :o-:e: c7_,-:-. -p r . 4 acre s_ __ - The application . ro,p0ses __'J c e 1. L::_ __ • aCe , In a 1J � t - �- acre . C M-?-lit _ , -3, • DRAFT Cm. Petty questioned whether this project was the begs ring of a trend toward an "Auto Center" in the area, and Mr . ng responded that it was not . Cm. Alexander made the motion, with Cm. Ma. ' s second, to approve the Valley Datsun Conditional Use Perm). with a correction to Condition #7 to reflect 330 feet abov e the M.S .L . and to extend the expiration date to five year (February 6 , 1989 ) . The motion was passed by unanimous vote the Commissioners present. • 'ESOLUTION 84-07 APPROV.. • PA 84-001 VALLEY DATSUN REQUEST FOR - A CONDIE •NAL USE PERMIT TO ESTABLISH A NEW AND USED CAR • DEALERSHIP AT 6015 SCARLETT COURT PA 82-033 (R) BARRATT SAN JOSE • PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONE AND TENTATIVE MAP APPROVAL Mr. Tong presented the historical background of the project, which would permit the construction of an 88-unit residential project. Richard Frisbee, Environmental Center Architect, was present to address the Commission, reminding them of the long-term of the overall project and citing mitigation of neighborhood concerns . . • At this time, he introduced an alternate sketch-plan of the project, which shifted the higher density units to the center of the project . It was noted that this shift was in response to neighbors ' concerns . _ Nate Meeks , representing Barratt San Jose, noted that the new sketch was in response to Condition #5 of the Resolution, which required that the condominium buildings be redesigned such that they reflected the one-story and two-story design of• the . . townhouses , in order to reduce visibility into the neighboring - . property owners ' yards . • Mr. Meeks also noted resistance to Condition ..#20'-concerning handicapped ramps. He suggested that the developer install, at " _ his expense, - handicapped-related revisions, in response_ to , . ' purchaser requests ' only. Additionally, he requested that Condition #22 , concerning solar hot water systems, be struck as - not being cost-effective for the small units ." After clarifying verbage of Conditions #24 and #31, he_ requested that the density of trees required, in Condition 427 , be reduced, • - and finally, asked for clarification of the - term "at-grade patios . " - Dennis -Ransdel , Calle Verde resident, commented that in his estimation, Dublin has a bad image , and he objected -to the , construction of condominiums . • It was his feeling that, it would downgrade Dublin ' s image . He encouraged denial "of the project _ ---- -•-" and a revision of the building code .. __._ Cathy Waterson, 11769 Serra Ct . , asked for more details comparing the new sketch plan to the original plan . She further noted that - the land has historically presented an "eye-sore" , and agreed that it appeared to her that a multifamily residential project was the highest and best use for the property. She urged a positive move toward development . Jim Hjerpe, 7774 Woodren Ct . , noted the response of the developers to citizens ' concerns during the development of plans _ for the project, and encouraged approval of the project. Beth Grant-DeRoos questioned the sizes of the "mini- condominiums" , and commented on the resale statistics of similar projects in the nearby communities . Mr. Joe Head, Project Manager, proposed to increase the average square footage of the condominiums to 650-700 sq.ft. , in order to eliminate the "mini-condo" concept . When questioned whether or not the increase in unit size would have an effect on the number of units in the project, Mr . Head committed to the increase in condominium size even if it meant reducing .the number of units . Steve Mansky, 11583 Manzanita Ln . resident, discouraged approval of the project, citing infringement on the investment of surrounding homeowners . Dick Hopkins , 7501 Calle Verde, opposed the project, objecting that it would erode the tax base of the City and expressing shock over the overflow of Martin Canyon Creek. Peter Baldo, 7508 Silvertree Lane, expressed approval of .the project, as a representative of the Silvertree Homeowners ' Association. He expressed concern over the fact that there was • such a large number of "late-comers" voicing displeasure regarding the project . • Barry Fell, Dublin Green Drive resident, .questioned the ' economic - feasibility of construction of single family homes on the property. Mr: Head responded that it would not conform to the "density requirement nor would it' be a :feasible option. - Candy -Larson, -11696 Corto Ct . , -spoke in favor of townhomes; ,._:however, she expressed concern regarding over-crowding of local - schools • George Patterson, Calle Verde Rd. resident, Kathleen Copeland, 11623 Manzanita Ln . , and Martin Locus , 11781 Betlen Dr. , objected to the "mini-condo ' s" . • • Tim Bellus , 7788 Woodren Ct . , asked if the project ;could consist entirely of townhomes . He also called for a stop to-all the • - objections and comments which have been heard -time-and-time- again. Mr . Head responded negatively to Mr. Bellus '. question ' regarding the townhomes . • Diane Mansky was in favor of development of a park on the site . Stan Harup, 7526 Calle Verde Rd. , objected to the project, with -- the feeling that it was simply an experiment and urging the Commission to obtain more consumer data from other similar projects ., He proposed a development of 68 900+ sq. ft . condominiums . After closing the public hearing, and with little further discussion, Cm. Alexander made the motion to adopt the resolution concerning the Negative Declaration . Cm. Mack offered a second, • and the motion was passed by unanimous vote of the Commissioners _ _ present . RESOLUTION NO. 84-08 _ ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WITH MITIGATION CONCERNING PA 82-033 .1 (R) and PA 82-033 .2 (R) • BARRATT SAN JOSE Cm. Mack motioned to recommend that the City Council accept the draft sketch plan, on the condition that details would be. defined and analyzed by Staff . The motion was seconded by Cm. Alexander and passed by unanimous vote of the Commissioners present . Cm. Mack then made the motion to adopt the resolution recommending approval of the Planned Development Rezoning, with the following changes : Condition n : 1 . Revise to read: "Compliance with the plans . ' contained in the new Conceptual Site Plan showing townhouses and condominium units (with condominiums . a minimum of 650-750 sq.ft . in floor area, even if the - increased size reduces the number of units )., and as . amended by these Conditions . - The details of the Site Plan to be defined and analyzed by Staff prior to 'a City Council public hearing. " 20 . Revise to -read: "Handicapped ;ramps : ` be provided at-:the :request° of :the buyer. and. at the expense of .the developer . " where : ractical " P 24 . - Revise to read: "All utilities=.fronting '. . " 27 • Change number of trees to 3 'to 5 trees -per- 1, 000 sq.ft . . ;' . of landsacping . 31 . Shall now read: ' "The at-grade patios shall be _- - .- fenced. . The motion received a second from Cm. Alexander, and it passed by unanimous vote of the Commissioners present.' • RESOLUTION 84-09 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONING CONCERNING - PA 82-033 . 1 (R) BARRATT SAN JOSE In view of the fact that a sketch plan had been submitted, which would affect the Tentative Map, consideration of the approval of Tentative Map Tract 5131 was continued to a later meeting . _ * * * * After a short break, the meeting reconvened at 10 : 30 p .m. with .- all- Commissioners and Staff present except Cm. Tenery. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Cm. Mack questioned the status of the General P_.-:n, and Mr . Tong responded that a Draft had been received and _ could be ready -for distribution later this week, or early ne week . Cm. Vonheeder questioned the status o the Sign Ordinance .. Mr . Tong indicated that it was still b ' g worked on . Several items were brought to, aff ' s attention which would - require zoning investigatio Z . * * * * ADJOURNMENT There being no urther business , the meeting was adjourned at 10 : 55 p .m. • Respectfully submitted, Planning Commission Chairman _ -- ; Laurence „L. ' ,,Tong, Planning Director - _ • •CITY OF PU L1t-k ' I i (L 84- PA Nolg32'C • . EitiVl »tVMEN-rp,L ASSESSMENT FOP VI, I1,11—R1tv1 (Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21000 et sec_) • The State CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) Guidelines require the City to take an active role in preparing environ- mental documents _ This comprehensive Environmental Assessment Form is designed to assist the City in preparing a complete an accurate environmental assessment in a timely manner and in conformance with the State CEQA Guidelines. The form has three - - sections : General Data, Exemption, and Initial Study. The .applicant is requested to complete Section 1, General Data. The Planning Staff will prepare either Section 2 , Exemption, or Section 3 , Initial Study. Please type or print legibly in ink. SECTION 1. GENERAL. DATA - to be completed by the APPLI-CANT 1 i s _ - - J l _ ARBOR CREEK • 1 . Name (if any) and address of project: San Ramon Road & Silvergate -wax 2. Proposed use oF'property: Single family attached residential- -, • 3_ Name, address, and telephone of Applicant: Barratt San Jose 3150 Almaden Expressway , Suite 245 , San Jose , CA 95113 • (408) 265-5150 • • •• _ Ncme, address, and telephone of confect person ll in addition to applicant or • Q instead of cppl icant: Richard S . Frisbee , The Environmental Center 1961 The Alameda, San Jose , CA 95126 (408) 249-6152 5. Attached plans are fiLl preliminary or n Fully developed..: - . + • • 6_ Building area: 78 , 000- sq.Ft_ • • - ' 7. Site area: 7 . 1L- I I sq_ft_ or lx I acres. S. Current zoning: CN -• 9. tvloximum.Building Height • 2 oft. or L?sories_ . 10. Describe amount of daily traffic generated by number, type and time of day: • Approximately 616 trios per day , 72 oeak h.�ur 5 o . 11 . Number of off-street parking spaces provided: 197 12. Number of loading Facilities provided: N/A • - - _ ATTACHMENT 4 -. • . .. I - - • 13_ Proposed development schedule: beginnincg�pring 1934 comp(etian:summer 1985 14.0. If residential: number of new units 83 ; number of existing units 0 ;number of new bedrooms 180 ; unit sizes * ;range of ® sale prices or ❑rents ** ; type of dwelling I Isingle Family El duplex Ix 1 multiple **$515 sq. sq. ft. • $1 t0 , 000 i - 14.b. IF commercial: scope of projects ne 9 hborhood Ell city, n regional sales urea CI sq.ft. orr1 acre; estimated employment per shift ; hours.of . • operation - 14.c. IF industrial: materials involved • ; estimated employment per shift hours of operation • • 14.d. IF institutional: mayor Function estimated employment per shift • estimated occupancy • ; hours of operation • 15. Describe City permits required: Cn Site j�e-v do?wsew-"- g-e-vic-`'�i II vo.vic `nCe, ❑ Adwtii,nlSfYa ive Cordifia►\cl (1SC Parnnil ; D 12eG1assr;cA�►�(t271�Ytc' , plavwved 92veiaPme,A*; D Co •a.i-iiovio.-1 L 1 n11; 0 Slgv 0,"f .; • Q o-+�e.r - 16. Describe other public approvals required: ® unknown;113 local agencies;❑ regioncl • agencies;❑ state agencies; Fl Federal agencies; For CERTIFICATION - ' I hereby certify that the information submitted is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief_ I understand that the findings of this Environmental Assessment apply only to the project as described above. Date: Orn l►' 1 ,Q¢ Signature: a (/.. r" �!../ 0 - Judith Hug, The Environmental Center Name (print or type): - • -. y- • I - • _ 1 1\ ' FINAL ASSESSMENT \ I ll6Lll`i March 23, 1983 PA No. 82-033 CITY OF V E 1 ! C:35 n; -1"A:4__•-.ASSE"SM T FED.P.eJ , (N � RtM : (Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21000 et sec.) •• Based on the project information submitted in Section 1 General Data, the Planning Staff - - will use Section 3, initial Study, to determine whether a Negative Declaration or an • - . • Environmental Impact Report is required. - - • • • - - • SECTION 3. INITIAL STUDY - •-- :-. to be completed by the PLA�1N I NG STAFF - -.Name-of Project or Applicant: `':.BAR•RATT HOMES . - : - • = • ' • •• -• • , • - , • ' . • • . . ' • . . - . . . ' . • . • . . • •. . . : 9-y • • • • . _ • •, -I - . - _ _ • . . .:: :- ... , . - Lo...3s..ids.p.a; ,...old J. „ -. .. , : . - - X :u•-L...A."•.n.:1.10;;Juu!:uotuw-uo,y;ay;20 Juoso..cl toloodt . .. - _ , .. -- - " :- • • p--- .::F:LiC.1 34..ad/4 puo,o9Lunu:NA LI p.4D31.401 LO . I.414/4.S.L:1..-4 i U2..4 4.4.0:14 UI Ii!tJonp luNceitynt 2.1Dlil Si - ,I.f!SJOAM r-t. .,, ."7------7T--"-.-----..':.IC.C.',L:= ;0_:.,titunu lo!Juoityn:o o;Jo qopods :: . ._ . . . . :._•. .. .2, X J.,■ir....0.....luc,..i..,..!...! 011.011;09 JO FE...J.; Auop fl y...tiovim.jo • •, ..-. tv.11 oli -3...:;.:.._.j t;.t.:h;Al;unanue,:,...I;ozzeo...woy; urv• . . ;. .. - 1 - cr.,;o."...pool Lap Zy poiJonu.(1:..t.:3;•po;.-..9 .-.. _ • ..,-: 10....Joy;Lopu;o0on.Julou,Jo ao.1;JoIr.r.a aJoyi x •.A.,;y1;oo uoturni Lt24.42J JDOCI0 U1 04 01.914d2 :21C Al21,11•4,14.10d • . ., . .,.. 1 2 - ..'f- • • Amu ic.tl titJuicl Jo suopoindod iontoun duo 01091 op,. sneli 411.,rttuu,ro a..!;oio60A z'r : • • • . • ,:- . - • • ' 10.:d op A9 ppAo,cu! 29 li!..%suop,puo2 92!9,,, :. . ... ... ........ .. ..-. ... . I : I '' - :- :- -.. "" ''t •-.: Jui S;0121t-12 JO 41101d JO sapoti: oouos!nu 0.109; oiy "'..:' .-; • : ..•.•.•:-.. •', . _ -i I v •-•- Lsapodt 0.fflp1 itJoyodul! 01 4041909 JO 1700J Auop '.- , • r, ,_ t. *7'.• :. • .. .i•.., I I A . ' iiv.9:41912,JO 0%Oi D91 4U3S4.42d U0140I0EJA 04094 9 - .: ' ". ; ._. r : • ,.• . ' ..... . . •• : LA.,41■■■13°uotuny UJOJJ 4DOC.61 ol olond-z,sn: • - .. . . .:. . . . ' I - I .• . .r X ,_ •-• "AiJoloop.c43 2J0 9,19M.41.22Jd tapods 0,094 a.ov ,_ •. • : 1 • ,- • Liu;::::,.:d sopa&poir.Suopua JO WO)aJotii Div, **, '2PRCIS 1°W1UY puo 4U9C1 I.•P -• . • • • . . •-.. : • • -- ..... Ill - . . . SIYWINY()NV SIN:1d O't '. I I . I • • . .." - . J i ---- . . b••• - I I "X - 1,JooioJr1 oy;0;atop onio... . - _ . . lup.sou.u.:cu luvuoJod Jo snsodop 3159o..06 0.10y; 0.1V • •.sooJnolo,e inJoum OVC . • I f . . z.sav!...goo polcud Ay paAoa4top JO •• . _ . I• I I I .. . . • I t X - . p2c.,..p.9 saJrunoi"io !Goloo5 onblun Auo inm _• -.-. roJnico4 Janbm CC . I I I . . zen,..Jo;uouJcSolaA . I I I x . -op 34 2.1•44ola I suo■i!puoD o:Jo..po jtJOSOJd,IDOI0Jd .. '• 1 I I ' Osii si;!...%pz.lopc•ZSo s!!cl jo AQuooDuLlad oy; ivm • • - '1-1!1!9°'"ui'd 1:1"C I I I I 1- i I 1 v I A . . Es:,3!40oici uo!;on.r;s • " • " -tr.", 0;,...-:.p;■c...1 Jo tsol ioNuoJtynt oy oJati; 11!).„,, _ A-IIII°.!?°i3 L•C • . • I I I 1 I I I • -. . X . I sulA;opuno.; Jopun Jo SPdJ1S u!cvot Jo ,.. • . . •- • uo!;=3;;-..nb2 u; pod oy Jo otr.co;oaluid ay; inm • -• uo■polartbn 9.: ..... • ;/4!..,;;oo a:1°rib • I • - I . I i •Xl . -9;Jor.tuu.:.;iitiNuto,tto; Jo oBoolop Jo 5.191 42.1J94 9 . ' . 1..;!Ac10y o!totroj 5-: 11 x . (...,pa1cud oti; yl!.•••• , ..,.- po;o1>cur,:2:2u44p!sons pun015 Jo!ctu JO)%IJ 0.4094 9 - . - o ouzpl yos r•: • • I I I I • Ls1r.1.:...qut:,•Jc-popuno;Jo uopCpV;OSUCD Q2.1SS20Y0 JO ot.uo=oy/..;Jado,c1 JO 0111 04 li.3.1 29 2.1291 ilvA . : • -•.:. .0Nopflasucr) CC -- ,. - . : • - L9Dpalou.,JO ucgiotwojop 02.3SS7DX7 - . • ' I I --• " . 4 ■ I I X ..... • JO o:r.o:.zsi i,..4.12do,d Jo on!c; •191 ay*Joy; tom ,:„ poddn5 uopopuno c-: • .. . • • . vaJr.oci ocki:04 poiolaJ s.,:.5uop lopuoiocl aJoy; oLy • - -- Al'ImNS 2631S 1-C . I : I . • • . . ... •. .•• ..•' •• . • • . •• . .' •.• • • I -• I • • . • " : • • H.I.)1Y3 0 C '• 1• I I • • " • - .. • . •-• • • - I • • ,. ltivaul2A0U1 puy...lo uo!lonJoyo . •- . • - I I I : - - .• • -.. x " C.,1.-c•"1.1,0:.,1,1012D OUr21444 5u!lauuoyo Gunr.on...Du • .. ' ..- 7. • • ., • . I • I . .s. 1..up‘.31!o-so.:c1 apaclu,!_ulo,,a; pup zoipnig iilm -. ..., . .. uc•io.12,11•7/puu,,,t, r Z .... . •-. - . . -"::::-.., -•:•'i *.•••••• ,...••• :-,-.w."."-.......:,-.(- LympuD4C APIonb ••.;•••'•• ',.:-. ..--::" ...,.':•••.•74-:,- •:-!*.: .".7.:..0 Dt.-..1;;;:■.,340::p,..;.. fly..Li...Nu,pa!oid *:. --;.1..,:,....-:._::-.,.... .._-..-.....f.; •••:...i: ....... --• . .. •. :•-,-.• ..: -:,- -v* -: .:-d:.,4 ,41:.1 iy.o..:c.1'21 JO S.D1,411.14D0 pa;o101 poloid Ay ... -.!.•- • -.:• : :.•• •. •• . ; - •:..- • • • • • : ' • • . .• A sluoin11c:3 Jo uo!sJod9p puo uovo.ratJa.B 09 0.1091 !gm .. ' " *. • '- 'c'Iln11°d-TV l'Z • - . _ ••• 1 • --- L.- • • . ." I ; '-. ''':: ..r::...:.' • . paaouvLe;uu:,Jotpouo 04023 JO t2TO9 JOIra...luDolpo ,... :' ••..•-.. ..: :. . • ...:..• ..-- -i • • - : • I . • . ."... ,_ ; ••• •• tuoij 134Cv.4.p04n110d JO 110S JO uo!snilui .....-Ecdaal -....... . ._ ..,. . . . ,.. ... . • . I • • ; ., • . _ ..„ . ' "- - " '' •;•; 0:01u.s Ay uopouv.uNuoo JOWIS JOja....,puno,6 ;um . . .••", -.'•..: :: . . 1 • - • • ,I t_ p , r....z ULtpoopuoit loJapoi . . • . •.•. •• uo 'Iol iwaol 1■L) ND.. U1Ap02J 111M ., • . . z;polooi; • . - I - X • . • • " - • • puo poic:c.auJuJoo Ata;or.t,oFou! 09.B.....,21 inm . . 1 i . II X z.sp,opuoit io32pDj . . 1 . puo 0101% 44.4..ul 04 4103 Aledllt 2i40.....64.41101.1p t7043 Al110410 1040A4, Cl • I I I • • •-r ":- .-7. . . . . • 0 I `eigIP . ciolclid • • • . ._ ,...• -.° . .,;., . . .• 1 .- 1 . 1 H . • ';-=.). i I 'E'l 1 • . • , . • . . • . I ■ I ON .. •• - NtDN'YY..r) s7._.. CeT.4-reD2.71.10 ON • . • • Eadal-a 2.0 2Tcr-JS Eilarcii4-1. .T.,. 1\1031.■07) • 4 . , . . • ) . . . - - . . • . . , . • - . . . - • . • • . ) .. ) .. . • • • • Li • I: I - Ltuowny • of 6vldouuu suul40,9!A o1 pasodxa o9 7ooltJd D91 IIIM 1'0:10'42A L•8 1 Lclrnal au ou I �s atJDApo DioJau2G J.J u3 p 09 JDalo,d ay1 IIIM clr >�ac!o11 1"!J • 3SION 0"B •III I i X LcaP°'Gv!pl!n9 Io2ol puo ai olt Joaw.of { I I : - - • IIOJ canb!uyol uo!12n2JtuOD patodoJd puo u5!cap 111•M 'ZJaJd 1°'°1°n lS r.L 7 I X Lt»vcs!nu to pDJ2pn UOD e9/o°J JOyj c1oJDOj aloJauDS Jo of pDSodxa a9 JDOIoJd of {i!Ns c2DUO:InN C•L I 1 X LJU wuoJIAU Oulw!I IoD!s.(yd nayi U!/�l:U t5!4 ..-. - I - Jo 6u!Fu.oJO o1 patcdxa a9 ti2cn puo clu2plca,291 il!M /C1!suoc puo Lutp•••oz z•L _ i T X Ls,opo a odxa a9 JDa1oJd 291 um _ t,oPO 1 L _ r. _ 0sualm Auo alo,ou 5 JO 01 pas _ I " - HilV3H 0•t•1 X t9024uO 7!j!oi4 jo •, . : - of Jo u5! p iDDiic puo,(o0t o0 of unp t�c!J iuD Do � sa u P J P!D• I pas02nu!01 pxodxa 9 sJ2sn puo tlwp!sai JOaloid Il!h u61soa puo.(123°S pooy'C-9•_ X {s1DlljuoD uo11o1nDJ!D W anp 11u2p700 0 033 U! mJO 6u1•I ( ': .. _ _ _ -punoiJnc ay; u! cuo!1!puo>Jo 1Daln,d opp jo t.6!cap Il!j,1 . sp>11)UO) uo11o1nont)•L•9 I X :-- Lspuowap (2007 I 1 I - ; s1Da1oJd 2141 aJD,DOWWODDD OJ DJonbapou! 400lo,d 1 I ay1 DAJx yD1yM ca11111DOJ uo!JOJJ0d UOJ1 J2910 294 0314 1 ( 1 X _ L/.J!DOdo, p>aoxa Jo 14703 . . I - • _ • • 01 spOOJ JuaDDipo 2143 oUtOD J=21o.1d x11 149 paioJa - ( _ua5 DWD-II ayJ ll!'^ 'JCU Jl L.(1!DOdo2 awoco Jo 10 . • • 1 ' d1Ju2JJC0D spool JuaDoloo uo spuowop O1JJDJ1 741 aJy • ca1111uoj uo!io4JOdtuoij l-9 • - • NOf1\4 3OOSN'(itl 0"9 •: • i X • ' Ls1uop!soJ I I I 1D0I0Jd 0141 01 DI00110AOUn a9 ta1J1(IODJ lo,n4lnD ll!M ca1J!IIDO j!cumin) OI S I - I I I • L[41J70![2.1 044 cp000 1OUO■1oa1D0J 91 X100W 04 sa1JIlIDOj alonb2p0°i 0 Oy 10010)d ayJ IIIM . UD171Ya4°> 6.5 • - LDJO.O9°-!J o al D21D JO •-- I X S2D!AJ2t aJ!J u! xWJDV!Uo 0Jo3au25 SOJ UOOJ 32410 10 . 'sa!J!I!DOJ 'uollolndod Iouo!J!poot,4OaloJd Dyi o'!j 6-S XLpJC=Oy 0D,13d o a1OaJO Jo - . 'I :2,1AJac oO!1od ut 2:D2JDUI uo OJo.auO5 S7 11NJ Jay;o 10 •'say!IPDJ 'uo!Jolndod Iouoy!ppo t,JDaloJd e41 11!M °D!lod L"S I I LLPJOpU D1S 1CDD1 - . . 1 X puo 0101$ lo.12p2 j 400W 04 puo 6ulpoolJ wo0JJsu.AOp I lUaJOJd'0,1 24Onbap0U1 09•6ou1OJp»Jo.A w,o1c ll!N. 26ou!oJ0 J21o/wJoiS 9.S• l 1 - -- X _ : - - LJDDIowd 044 Jo sp00u Dyi pow o1 .Clddns - - Jam...jo XJ!lonb 10,g1Juonb DJcnbapou! oiapp sI .- Alddn$j01OM S- • '• • 1 X L JD>loJd o4J {9 p JoJaua6 tolcov • ( A pllos Jo l°° Ip JoJ uo!c!AOJd olonbapou! oJop sl Iosod IQ 00/A P!{°S 1 S • I I fi x ._ Lc4uold 4Ua 13004 J040.74ton.143101 palo!O«to -• ( • cJopo puo S OLIcKInu o1 pacodxa 2.9 4D21oJ1• 041 film Lsp,opuolc • •• I. 1 I X A i1o,b 6u!p22Ox2 1noy1!JA JDalo,d 2141 30 spaau ayJ - JoJ olmb'pou! hJ!Dodoo oGo+.00 Joj suo!c!AO,d aJy 1010.4510 a1L0M pjnbll' £"S ( - 1.421°.'d 0133 JO)I 1111100) 1°P-""'"u°' +..: .. .;'-. • - • .•: * ' • ( 1 aIFO�Ii `+"T IMPACTS SG�1TF, OF IMPACT • •• NO Q(JALIFIID . YES L,:�;C(\ • . - • ' NO I t l • I • . I ► 1 � I I� ! E o1c ►o11_3 • • . � IQ1 i5 . ` I I 1 ' 9.0 COMMUNITY Ct{A\RACTirs 1 - 9.1 Community Organization . Will the project disrupt on existing set of• •X organizations or groups within the community? • • • 9.2 Homogenoity and Diversity . Will the project change the character of the . . _ •- community in terms of distribution or concentration _ . - of income, ethnic, housing, or age group? X L I - 9.3 Community Stability and -•-• Will the project 6o exposed to or generate an 1 I ' Physical Conditions .--;-•-• area of poor stability and physical conditions? ; x r 1 t L QUALITY 1 _ 1 10.0 VISL? - 10.1 Views - - Will residents of the surrounding area be adversely -X I :, affected by views of or From the project? .' j I Vi ill the project residents be adversely affected by ••r•V 1 1 1 :'..__• `-.= :: views of or from the surrounding nrca. ' A ■ r i I 10.2 Shadows •• Will the project be exposed to or generate excessive X 1 shadows? I I It 0 HISiCRICANO CULTLFtAI 1 l I :loci ca X• 1 1 •I1.I Historic and Cultural -. . Will the project involve the destruction a alter • . ' t I I Fe:ouree3 : orlon of'a historic resource? • . Will the project result in isolctian of a historic X .• 1 I 1 - resource from its surrounding environment? t I r • `dill the project introduce physical, visual, audible I • I 1 or atmospheric elements thnt arc not in character with X 1 1 I -- o historic resource or its belting? I I t I 11-2 Archoeo!ogicel Sites \Vi11 the projcct involve lh=destruction or alteration + I I• ': I I I I and Structures - of on archaeological rc:nuree? i I I( -•Will the project resort in isolation of on archaeological • resource? I I Will the project introduce physical, visual, audible - X • or atmospheric elements that arc not in character with I I an archaeological resource or its setting• - t I- t . - • I• • 12.0 EENERGY .. 12.1 Energy Requirements Arc there potential problems with the supply of • X • :- I - _ • - energy required for the project? - t • . Will the energy requirements exceed the capacity X - I • - • of the service utility ccmpany? I - va Will there be a nct increase in energy used for the X • _ • project compered to the no project alternative? X 1 12.2 Cansertion Measures Does the project planning anti design frail to include - - availeb!c energy con:ervrstfon measures? s • 13-1 Site la rds _ Da conditions of the site, proposed site dcvalopnr_nt, X 1 j _ - ' w': or surrounding area ornate potentially hazardous situ 13 • Ph- cal Threat Will the project or the surrounding area create a feeling X 1 of insecurity and phystcol threat anon]the residents I :. ...-. , .-' ._ and users? - 13.3 Sanitcry Landfill \Vii! The protect b expose.:{ to srru.turnl dmm�gc, F . 1 ., noise, ou, or rsr(eee ncd ground water pollution - 1 nr other nuisnncrs atsocictel with a sanitary landfill? X -- r 13-d \Vaterway' Wii1 tiro project affect an existing r_tcrway through = ( filling, dredging, dro n.ng, curvetting, v.7sto dis- 1 . chergct, loss of visual quality or other land use - X t -- 1 `' i I _ 1 1 _ . t I t- • • -• A-8 •. -. • , ( . • . ( (- . CCMPON-EN-T 'I PACTS SCALE OF IMPACT • I;(0 QUAL "IED YES I UN••i:04v,I • NO t I r \ • i�.1I . I • • i i El 0 1 Iii o . . . piQl , 15 Other Environmental eomconents. •`r -• 1 - . 1 I I I - . , C. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF S1GNlFICaNCF QL`L`-- ' -') • NO NO YS L�i:2 G'N - 1 (1) Does the project have the potential to degrade the - - • . r - quality of the environment, substantially reduce X . r the habitat of a fish cr wildlife species, cause a . - • .• fish cr wildlife population to drop below self- - sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant . ' . - or animal community, reduce the number cr restrict - • • the ranee of a rare or endangered plant or animal • . • : or elirr.inate important examples of the major periods':- • _ ' . • • : or California history cr prehistory? -- • -: (2) . Does the project have the potential to achieve short- ' • • - . • •term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental X - • • •. • : goals? - ' • • (3) Does the project have impacts which are individually . - • . • limited but cumulateively considerable? (A project • - • may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but X - where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) (4) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human ' - X beings, either directly or indirectly? _• I - • • • 1 ., • • • D. MITIGATION MEASURES - Discussion of the ways to mitiga•e the significant effects identified, if any: See Attached Notes - • E. DETERMINATION - On the bask of this initial evaluation: •_ - . .. -. ' n The City-oFDUblLV • 'finds that there will not be any'significant effect. The par- • . . • ' titular characteristics of this project and the. mitigation measures incorporated into - .--.the design of the'project pro•i de the `actual basis-for the finding- A NEGATIVE D ECLARATION IS ?=QUIRED.•. . - - - 1-1 _:-.The_City ofi7F�bl in _jf inds that the proposed project MAY have a sienificcnt effect • -•_ ; on the environment...AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT IS REQUIRED** - • Signature and date: , f / •�` ., �•. 2 - • -. Name and title: • .L.,kU, ._ -1-0 ' t • 0 tk 6 ( ZDc _ \ . . . . . • • • i • **NOTE: Where a project is revised in response to an Initial Study so that po`?.:i:ial adverse effects are mitigated to a point where no signiFicatnt environmental effects would occur, a revised Initial Study will be prepared and a Negative Declaration will be required iNs`ead of . an EIR. : .. • • • Attachment to Environmental Assessment, Initial Study March 23 , 1983 PA 82-033 - Castle Green - Barrett Homes 1. 6 Recent flooding of Martin Canyon Creek, just west of the subject site, indicates that there is a potential for flooding of the site . Alameda County Flood Control has requested additional hydrdogic . information in order to determine what needs to be done to protect this and adjacent , _ property from flood damage . 3 . 5 Substantial information is available that shows that there is a fault trace that runs north/south across the property. The Calaveras Fault, of which the trace is a part, has a maximum credible earthquake potential of 7 . 5 (Draft Ala. Co . Seismic Safety Element - 3/82 ) . The location of the fault is now known. Setback for buildings and carports have been established to • the satisfaction of the County Geologist and assure that a reasonable safety factor is provided for. Structural design • for all buildings will need to address their proximity to the fault zone . 6 . 2 & 6 . 3 This project will .increase local traffic by about 20% . A 25% contribution to Signal imorovements is procosed to be included for Silvergate and San Ramon Road to assure good circulation in the area . Until they are installed, the addition of traffic will increase accident potential and create some traffic conflicts with local residents . 8 .1 San Ramon Road noise levels are increasing above the current 65dbA level . While the current traffic volumn and the - distance from the current road width will not result in • substantial noise impacts, the likely widening of San Ramon . , Road, and increased future traffic, will result in noise at a level that .will need to .be .mitigated interior ,to _the easterly residential units . : -Adequate acoustic insulation and air -- conditioning .will be .provided for_units_ adjacent .:to San _Ramon Road. - - The site is• :quite 'Visible from San 'Ramon;Road-77a maj or thoroughfare " The ._design of. the,f:project will•=neea to • consider .visual. impacts to and from the project. Current . designs 'indicate that 2-story units will .face directly toward San - Ramon Road with little or no _visual buffer.`., The City' s - . Site •Development Review process will 'address design concerns/details . • • • • • • • (' • 1 11 . 2 No archaeological data is currently available. 12 . 2 No data is currently available regarding energy conservation measures that will be incorporated into building designs . _ C-3 Traffic and noise problems are, and flooding problems will be mitigated. The potential for significant environmental - impact, therefore, does not exist as the project is now designed. C-4 The current site plan addresses seismic safety concerns, and is acceptable to the Alameda County Geologist, based on new data provided by Berlogar Long & Associates which establishes an earthquake fault zone and minimum building setbacks. Each building within the development will be structurally designed to comply with seismic safety standards . Reference Documents : Traffic Noise Assessment for Castle Green by Edward Pack Associates , Jan. 7 , 1983 Traffic Analysis by John Forristal, Jan. , 1983 Geologic Investigations by Berlogar, Long & Associates, March 4 , 1983 , Jan. 28 , 1983 Geologic Investigation by Terrasearch, Inc. , Nov. 22, 1982 • I SYSThMS , INC The Julia Morgan Center 2640 College ., Avenue Berkeley. . CA 94704 (415) 843-3135 NEWCASTLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT • RESIDENTS SURVEY FINAL REPORT DECEMBER 26 , 1983 • SUBMITTED TO : G. Keskey Barrett- Corporation • San Jose, CaLifornia • SUBMITTED', BY : S . Loren Cole, Ph.D . Executive Director Inquiring Systems , Inc. • ATTACHMENT 5 • NEWCASTLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT RESIDENTS SURVEY SURVEY ANALYSIS l I . EXECUTIVE SUMMARY t describes the results of a survey of 32 units of the This repot November, 1983 - `"" Newcastle Housing Development conducted during. The survey :effort had several primary objectives : L ntifthe demographic characteristics of Newcastle 1 . To ide y residents ; 1 Determine • the number of owner occupied units and, % etab long L. 2. Deter and their potential owner occupants' reasons for purchase, term occupancy trends . C . 3 : To assess the value of Barran building other housing compar- able in size and price to Newcastle, based on current occupants' rperceptions of Newcastle: l_ II . SURVEY METHODS mous , confidential questionnaire -vas mailed to each An a non y resident ( see Appendix for sample) with a_,seeducedytheedneedamfoc envelope . To increase return and thereby en was encloed with �' second mailings and personal interviews, a ps each survey . This was intended to strengthen from the recipient. to respond. . Nineteen responses representing 60X return . A second mailing - was conducted, with no additional responses . Total return represents a 20: increase over last years' return... L III . THE SAMPLE DATA - ., • , .._ - ned . froW , a total population Nineteen. questionnaires." were retur these 19 units, - size - . of .- 32 `� - There • .were 24. resid"ents. 'occupying c ates the approximate population of N ewcastle is _. . =".� which indicates that ' ' :82.,,-s.-with a mean average" of -31 5 -_ 54 . . The ages range ,from 19 to 82, _.- yearS . e s am le size is r elatively small, we have included most -_ - Since th P - of the data directly- IV - SIGNIFICANT' THEMES EMERGING FROM SURVEY ANALYSIS • - , . _ _.: data is. . in the significance of this years' survey Much of the .signif i signifying a ` change' of attitude in I comparison with . last years many areas . However , ":a' true tracking- of change of attitudes since those responding and difficult , since the response tnotvnecessarilytrespond. last ! onding id s year year . . i . , - - . • ISI •, . In any case , the major difference is in an apparent shift in overall' satisfaction with life at Newcastle . f This is most evident in the question pertaining to residents' in- tention to stay at Newcastle . In 1982, 68: indicated they planned to stay at Newcastle ; 7: said no . This year, only 16: in- ; dicated an intention to stay, with 687. answering "no . " In addi- tion, only 74". indicated they would recommend Newcastle to a • friend, versus 931 in 1982 . 1. i While this change might be related to reasons for purchase, (that is, if residents have changed their concentration on investment.--- Iaspects of the pUrchase and hence don' t intend to stay as , another factor is also apparent . • . . • • i-- . •From a general reading of the surveys, 68Z seem generally posi- 1 . • tive about Newcastle and Barratt . 421 seem generally dissatis- , .. fied . This dissatisfaction is particularly centered on the pro- posed 7 / 11 store on the property . While Barratt may not he• 1--- • responsible for this , -some residents have focused their concern • I on Barratt . • . One resident, in fact, requested further contact on this issue . • When we phoned him,, he indicated he was planning to sell his unit because of the 7 / 11 , and further, felt he had been "misled" by . - the sales staff about this development. ... • Another unfavorable comment wa. s based on dissatisfaction with the --,: • :, Romeowner' s Association. - . - - - F • . Therefore, while the focus of much of the dissatisfaction is out - of the realm of , direct responsibility of Barratt, Bar-ratt might- increase its sensitivity to these factors, recognizing its impact- on overall credibility and positioning within the market. Final- • 1y, some residents commented on their dissatisfaction with fil- ling out surveys, feeling that changes suggested in the survey were not acted upon. This is certainly valid if the annual. S117.- . - - vey process is to continue. . , . . , A specific objective of this Year' s survey was to gauge owner oc- cupancy . - trends - in the purchasing decision ; that - is, to find the -, - - . overwhelming reasons for purchasing Nevc-estle with -- concentration - • on the investment aspects . According to this years' survey, 42.1.' - were attracted to purchasing Newcastle as investment property . This answer elicited more response in fact , than any other single . factor . In addition, 51 cited the tax break. This year, 841 of 1 the residents thought of Newcastle as a "stepping stone" to pur- chasing other property ; this is a 20: increase over last year. -1 i ) Again, it is difficult to 'point to any one f actor in this in- • crea se in the investment aspect of the Newcastle purchase ; it may i - be that due to unfavorable f actors cited above, residents have • changed their original intention to stay and the purpose for their original purchase . _ It may also be related -to changes in • • . ISI I . 1 individual tax status , or simply in the fact people with more in • vestment concerns responded to the survey this year .-- [ - Some of the areas covered in the survey have remained fairly con- stant . Concerns about size are slightly higher ; the average age has remained the same, as has the number of occupants per unit . C The reason ( s ) for choosing to live at Newcastle (as distinguished from "what attracted you to the purchase? " ) has also remained un—_ changed : cost was most frequently cited (74: this year, 68: last year ) , followed by credit arrangements (26% vs . 32% ) and proximi- L . • ty to work ( 26% vs . 21X last • year) . ( SURVEY HIGHLIGHTS : L • (Some statistical variant-e• should be allowed in making compares— _ . ons to last year' s dzta) . ...... - 68% of the units are occupied by one person, a 3% decrease over •• last years' results ; [ - . . • 100% ar.e employed, •an increase of 18% over last year ; r The average age of residents is under 35 ; •. A significant majority have chosen Newcastle because of cost ; 84 . 2% indicate they are using Newcastle as a stepping stone to other housing, a 20% increase over last years' ; . As indicated last year, small size is the largest complaint about . I- . . .. the units (36 .8 citing it ) ; . . _ Only 74% would recommend it to friends, versus 93: last year; I__ 68% do not intend to stay at Newcastle vs . 77. in 1982 . [ _ . i IS' SURVEY DATA Total sent : 32 Total responses : 19 (601 ) _ 1 , Total number of 1 : 13 ( 68X )2 . 5 ( 26Z )people residing in ( 2Z hone : 3 : 5 2 . Ages of adults : ears Ages range from 19 to 82 ; mean average is 31 .5 years, median age is 49 .5 • ears old or under .Seventy percent are 30 y - Ages of children : 2 mo : .1 married : 3 (16X) 3 . Marital status :. single : 12 - (63X ) _ separated/ divorced : 3 (167.) unmarried, living together : .1 (51 ) 4 . Employment : 100X are employed • 5 . . Occupation : Grocery Clerk . • Programmer Manager/buyer Tax auditor Insurance agent- • Mail clerk Management analyst Instructor Systems analyst R.H . ( 2) Technical illustrator Bank Data processor Sale Reynolds Metal Car. Bank .dept • mgr • Plumber Administrator . - - Administrative Assistant '` 5a . . Spouse occupation : 'Homemaker Medical Cli ' c • o 6 tow long. at your present job? - (Years ) . 'Average : 9 years Less than one year 51 1-5 years : L 421 { 6-10 years : 211 More than 10 : 261 t 1 7 , Your present annual income? • 9 ISI e s from 18 , 000 — 39 000 , with a mean average - Income rang Median income : $ 28 , 500 ., of $ 22, 500 ( same as .last year ) 18 , 000 : 1 _ 20 , 000 : 3 21 , 000 : 2 23 , 000 : 1 ' 24, 000 : 1 24, 800 : 1 . • 26 , 000 : 1 26 , 250 : 1 27 , 000 : 1 28 , 000 : 3 . 32, 000 : 1 ' .35, 000 : 1 39, 000.: 1 • . no answer : 1 Spouses income : • • 14, 000 : 1 • • " • 23 , 000 : 1 - 8 . Total family income when purchasing : Ranged from 17K to 43K _ Average : $ 26 , 066 Median : 30 , 000 20 , 000 : 1 _' _ 22, 200: :1 24, 000 : 1 17 , 000 : 1 27 , 000: '.2 . _ . 28, 000 : 2 . 25, 000 : 2 26 , 250 : 1 32, 000 : 1 • 35 , 000 : 1 40 , 0001-..-i 43, 000 : 1 • _ no answer : 3 0 : (renter) 1 _ - 9 . Are you the property owner? : yes : 17 (891 ) No : 1 ( 51 ) 1/ 2: 1 ( 51) - . 1982 : yes : 931 When purchased? Sept . , :82 :, 8 , . . `..0 c t , .82 = 5 Nov . , 82 3 Dec . , 82 ,., 1 Spring, S3- 1 _ _ • 10 . How long have you resided? Average : 12 .6 months 8 mos . 1 13 mos . 2 14 mos . 6 _ 15 mos . 1 1 year 9 • • • IS 11 If you Pay rent , how much ? unavailable info : 1 12 . Reasons for renting : location quality allowed pets 12a. Prevention of purchase : down payment 13 . , What attracted you to purchase? % As investment property : . 86 Opportunity to live . here 6 (31X) OPP 3 ( 161) Affordability/Price :_ 1 (5% ) Own my own place (51 ) Host inexpensive livable 1 apartment in the Bay Area 1 ( 5% ) Tax break: 1 (51 ) Safe place : • 14 . How long in Fremont area? • • 1 year 631 • 2-10 : 26% 20 ..- 10% • - 2. 5 6 10 20 1 2. Where- did •you live • prior to .::Newcastle� 1 Hayward 2 • 'SF y Oakland 2 Fremont °2 1 -'Sa�l�inas � , Walnut ;Creek . 1 Daly_ City 1 Belmont 2 Mt Campbell : piety : 1 San Jose :, 1 Union City = _ _ Pleasanton . 1 ..Milpitas : 1, . .. '. � . did you choose Newcastle ? (Choose as- ma,ny a's applicable) 16 . Why • Cost : 14 74X (1982 68X )• 32X Credit 5 26X 21X _ Close to work : 5 26z."' 4,.. 21X 5X Unit size : Other answers : ISI Type of comm : 3 161 Mo . rent : 1 To live in Fremont : 1 Other : Freedom to go : 1 - Investment : 1 Animals allowed : 1 17 . Ethnic Background • Latin : 1 5% Caucasian : 10 531 Latin: 1 5% Asian: 1 • 57. Hexican-Amer . : 1 5% No answer : . 6 31 .5% 18 .' Stepping stone to other housing? • - Yes : 16 (84X) _. _ ( 1982: 647. ) If yes, how long do you intend to stay? 2 .or mcre yrs : 4 ( 21X ) a few years: 1 ( 5% ) 1 yr . : :2 (10 .5% ) less than 1 yr :. 1 (5X ) 1 month : .• 1 , ('SX ) - • • _ • as short as • -. . possible : 4 ( 21X) • No answer/ don't know: 6 (311 ) 2 N o.: (10 .57.) 19 Do you intend to stay in .Newcastle Yes . : 3 161 ( 1982 : 68% ) .f- 13 68% 7X No No ans 2 T Undecided 1 - 20 Host sat: sfying about life `at Newcastle?_ L-' Cost 9 47% - Access to . public '-transit : 5X. Location :. 6 31X. . ` Attractiveness SX ., Quiet• 5 26% Tax write off 52 Neighbors • ,3 151 Convenience to shopping 5.. Size & use of space : 3 1 .... ommunity ` 5X "my" 5X Comfort; x 5X " It is my home : 1 ".Quality and building : 1 . '5X Cost effective appliances 5: • ISI No answer : (1 ) - 21 . Disadvantages : 37X limited space: . 7. 6 32I adjacent 7 / 11 store : Too noisy : 1 2 No swimming pool : Freeway noise : 1 Traffic: 1 Distance from Mork : 1 Hard to entertain : 1 _ • None : 1 Proposed shopping center on property : 1 No awnings on patio : 1 patio)(Roof should go all the way to the p . Hearing neighbors through walls : - .2, . .Noise between floors : 1 . Travel/ commute time : 1 . Windy area ;of Fremont : 1 _ No. garage : 2 . • . . Lack of storage space :- 1 . No answer : 1 . 22 . Recommend to otbers? . Yes : 14 74X (1982:.. 937. ) No: 3 . . 16b. • • - Don' t know : 1 23 . Recommendations to Barratt Corporation? - . - • Responses have been rated according to area : S- ` size Q = quality of materials E = extras: D — design- • E" ——Include a few • extras : pool, ..sauna better selling in future. E --Installation of hot/cold water E --Insulation E --Water insulation j D -Keep -„small. unit a but add -a 2 bedroom "unit fw v e) 'placement ` of. buildings (look into neighbor s houses) , D ..--(Impr o ci :;and better beating systems proofed, roof over patio £ D —more privacy - - x -- D ---Ma . need better _de-sign and `developments with mini condo fo 4 y D --More space between neighbors --Put wood cabinets in units pressboard cabinets peel - materials material s are too cheap ; Q --More `sound ' proofing between floors = better sound S, Q --For price , could be bigger and better built, S --2 bedrooms S --At least one car garage but (keep) small units S --Small garages S --Slightly room larger units, especially in living and bedroom areas” S --Keep size of units small - S --More closet space IS I S --Larger . unit , add garage --Too many to list . . - --None : 1 - --No answer : 4 - 24 . Recommendations to City of Fremont? —Maintain strict standards of owner or immediate family living • there ; no buying in order to rent for at least a few years . - —Not let Barratt put in a development like this in Sacramento _ —Support it • —Limit # of units per development _ —Be selective about quality and location —Don' t build 7/11 so close, to property where women , live - - —Build more units but with- a little more space —It would be beneficial to them to be involved in this sort of housing especially since , it'-s close to Silicon Valley • —Limit what other buildings surround the units : NO 7 / 11 1 —A •little bigger: one bedroom studio —Better location of Fremont Blvd . southbound exit from Hwy 17 exit , -Monitor Real estate market when builders are selling units - -No answer : . 5 25 . Received survey last year? Yes : 16 (84: ) ' No 1 .• 26 . Other comments : —City of Fremont and other -should make more housing like this - _ available ; residents have kept place. free of. undesirable - eyesores and it has not lowered property values —The results of last years' survey .were published in S .F Chronicle ; with all positive comments. A -pack `:of—lies-7 nothing I put in . Publish the truth `this time Everyone:I talk to hates it and says it' s "overpriced —Tired of answering surveys hope comments get passed on -Was unhappy with Homeowner Association no action` or improvements = married `'and moved' and now _=Generally enjoyed living there, _ rents Newcastle home —We were not told at the time we bought our unit that Mr. - - Enea sold property next to us that a 7 /11 stores :was going • in with a beer license . There is more to this. Call me —A 7/ 11 next door ? • 24 hours ? Rights? .. , NEWCASTLE DEVELOPMENT DEMOGRAPHIC OPINION SURVEY Please fill out this survey and return, using the enclosed, ad- dressed envelope . You are encouraged to be as candid as possible - since the survey -is anonymous and confidential . We are only in-- terested in the characteristics of the whole population of New- ' castle and not in any particular resident . The information ob- tained from this survey will be used by the City of Fremont and Barratt Corporation in planning future housing projects . Please . complete and return this form by November 25 . 1 . Total number of people normally residing in your , home?. '2. Ages of adults in your home : • Ages of children in your home : • " ' 3 . Marital status : Harried Separated. Divorced Single Unmarried, living together • ' 4 . Are you : Employed to ed Reti=ed, Unemployed y Fixed income - ' =• 3 . Your occupation: -Your_ spouse : ' 6 . How long at your .present job? Your spouse? - • How long retired/unemployed? Your spouse? _ - .. 7 . Your present annual -income : Your spouse : - $ What was your , total family income when qualifying for your -unit? -- -Yes "` No 9 Are you the property owner? If yes -`when ;did you purchase? -.10 . - How •. long have you resided at Newcastle ll . If you pay rent, how much ? m on.th 12 . If you rent, why did you decide to rent .(or, what prevented you from purchasing a unit ? ) • i' 13 . If you own the property , what attracted you to the purchase? Opportunity to live here : As investment property : . . As rental property : Other : (please specify) 14. How long have you lived in the. Fremont area? 15.. Where did you live prior to moving to. Newcastle? 16 . Why did you choose to live in Newcastle? (Select as many as applicable ) - _ Cost of units Honthly rent Close to employment - Type of community - Credit arrangements, `for purchase • Unit size Other :' (please specify) 17 . OPTIONAL : What' is your racial/ ethnic -background? 18 . Do you see this home as a stepping stone to purchase other housing? yes . no If yes, how- long do - you intend to stay in Newcastle? 19 . Do you intend to stay in Newcastle? • 20 . What do you find satisfying about . living in Newcastle? (Such. as cost, 'location, neighbors, unit size, : community, etc. • 21 . What are some of the disadvantages of living -here? - 22 Would you recommend -to others that they live in Newcastle? Yes No _ ^23 :_What -recommendations would you make -to Barra.tt Corporation in designing future developments? 24 . What recommendations would you make to , the City of .Fremont - concerning future . involvement in this type of housing? ' 25 . Did you receive this survey last year?