HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 4.4 School Crossing Guard Study (2) 1
600 -30
CITY OF DUBLIN
AGENDA STATEMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE : December 10, 1984
SUBJECT School Safety/Crossing Guard Study
EXHIBITS ATTACHED Memorandum from Chris Kinzel dated December 4 , 1934 ;
State crossing guard warrants
RECOMMENDATI 1 ) Approve scope of work
2 ) Authorize City Traffic Engineer to proceed with
study
3 ) Authorize a budget transfer of $4 ,000 from
Contingent Reserve to Engineering
FINANCIAL STATEMENT:
DESCRIPTION At its meeting of November 26 , 1984 , the City Council
directed Staff to prepare the scope of work and cost of performing a school
safety study.
Attached is a memorandum from the City ' s Traffic Engineer outlining the
scope of work and cost for conducting a school safety study. This study
would not only address the issue of crossing guard locations , but would also
address other issues related to traffic safety for pedestrians and motorists
in the vicinity of local schools . This study and the accompanying
recoi-jimendat ions should also help to mitigate traffic problems that have been
identified by the City ' s Police Department . This study should assist the
Staff and City Council in dealing with requests for crossing guards and
other traffic safety iiieasures in the vicinity of schools in the future .
It is recommended that the City Council approve the scope of work , authorize
the City Traffic Engineer to proceed and authorize a budget transfer of
$4 ,000 .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
COPIES TO : Judy Olson
Richard Cochran , Hurray School District
ITEd NO. 0 TJKi;i
4637 Chabot Drive,Suite 214
- Pleasanton Ca. 94566
(415)463-0611
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 4, 1984
TO: Richard Ambrose,
City of Dublin
FROM: Chris D. Kinzel , i
TJKM
SUBJECT: Safe Routes to School/Crossing Guards
At the recent City Council meeting , it was requested that TJKM develop a
recommended program for investigating the need for crossing guards throughout
the City. In addition, the program could consider general school-age children
Pedestrian safety throughout the City. I am suggesting a comprehensive but
'no-frills" program as follows:
Task I - Meet with School Officials - 'A meeting at each elementary and junior
high school would be held involving a school representative , the Police
Uepartment and a traffic engineer. The purpose of this meeting would be to
identify pedestrian or other traffic safety problems near each school . We would
also confer with Uistrict officials in order to deal with changing attendance
boundaries or closing or consolidating campuses. This could involve five or six
meetings and result in a list of concerns to identify to the Council for
possible future study. If the Council so chooses, we could also include the one
or two larger private schools in this phase.
Task 2 - Develop Recommended Crossing Guard Warrants - We would develop a
recommended guideline, or warrant, for the placement of adult crossing guards in
the City of Dublin. Since there is already a recommended practice for use in
the State of California, our task would be to review its applicability to
Dublin, and revise as necessary. The State standard is attached.
Task 8 - Apply Recommended Warrant to Dublin - The purpose of this task would be
to determine which locations in Dublin are currently in need of adult crossing
guards, following the application of the proposed warrants. TJKM does not
envision that the warrant, or its application to Dublin, will produce wholesale
changes to the present situation.
Task 4 - On-going School Area Studies - This task, which is optional , would be
to perform any follow-up studies after problems are presented in Task 1. This
could include investigation for STOP signs, crosswalks, warning signs, selective
parking prohibition or even crossing guards . The list of items could be
presented to the Council prior to commencement of any studies.
The following is an estimate of TJKM costs and general schedule:
PLEASANTON•SACRAMENTO•FRESNO•CONCORD
. Richard Ambrose -2- December 4, 1984
Task 1 - $1,500 maximum (Two months)
Task 2 - $ 300 maximum (One month, concurrent with Task 1)
Task 3 - $ 700 maximum (Two months, following Task 2)
Task 4 - $2,000 approx. (This would be on-going and is the type of activity that
TJ KM is currently performing for the City. Therefore,
at least some of the costs would, in a sense, not be
new
The total elapsed time for Tasks 1, 2 and 3 is `indicated to be .three 'months.
.This could be reduced somewhat if desired.
z3:=. Lsx �.i ..I l•. ; !
As this i•s a `suggested ,study outline, we would be.-happy to refine or revise as :..
necessary.
psw
Attachment
15701
1
'4 Y
10-6, SCHOOL AREA PEDESTRIAN SAFETY Traffic Manual
8.1979
y�Adult Crossing.- Guard 1048 - -r ' -
.10-08.1 General ternate controlled.*crossing within 600 feet; and
Adult Crossing Guards'are a supplemental tech- a. In urban areas where the'vehicular traffic
nique and not a traffic control device. They may be volume exceeds 350 in each of any two daily ;
'
assigned (CVC 2815) at designated school crossings, `` _., hours during°which 40 or more school pede-'_<,• _'` :`
to assist elementary school pedestrians at specified strians cross while going to"or from school;or ;
hours when going to or from school. The following b. In rural areas'where the vehicular traffic vol-
suggested policy for their assignment applies only to ume exceeds 300 in•`each'of any"two daily
crossings serving elementary school pedestrians on hours during which`30 or more•school pede-
the "Suggested Route to School." strians cross while going to or from school. +
An Adult Crossing Guard should be considered Whenever the critical approach speed ex- s,
when: ceeds 40 mph, the warrants for rural areas
1. Special problems exist which make it necessary should be applied. ar.
to assist elementary school pedestrians in cross- 2. At stop sign controlled crossings:
ing the street,such as at an unusually complicat- a. Where the vehicular traffic volume on undi-
ed intersection with frequent turning move- vided highways of four or more lanes exceeds
ments and high vehicular speeds; or 500 per hour during any period when the
2. A change in the school crossing location is immi- school pedestrians are going to or from
nent but prevailing conditions require school school.
crossing supervision for a limited time and it is 3. At traffic signal-controlled crossings:
infeasible to install another form of control for a. Where the number of vehicular turning
a temporary period. movements through the school crosswalk ex-
10-08.2 Warrants for Adult Crossing Guards ceeds 300 per hour while school pedestrians
Adult Crossing Guards normally are assigned are going to or from school.
where official supervision of elementary school b. .Where there are circumstances not nor-
pedestrians is desirable while they cross a public mally present at a signalized intersection,
highway on the"Suggested Route to School",and at such as crosswalks more than 80 feet long
with 'no intermediate refuge, or an abnor-
least 40 elementary school pedestrians for each of
any two hours daily use the crossing while going to mally high proportion of large commercial
or from school. Adult crossing guards may be war- vehicles.
ranted under the following conditions:
1. At uncontrolled crossings where there is no al-