Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 4.7 TDA Allocation 1985-86 (2) IOU, � CITY OF DUBLIN AGENDA STATEMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: March 25 , 1985 SUBJECT Transportation Development Act Allocation 1985-86 EXHIBITS ATTACHED Resolution; Opinion of Counsel ; 1985-86 Draft Budget Projection ; Description of Program RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution authorizing Staff to file a claim for the allocation of Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds with the Metropolitan Transportation Commission FINANCIAL STATEMENT: 1985-86 TDA funds allocated to Dublin estimated at $11 , 440 DESCRIPTION The City of Dublin has participated in the Transpor- tation Development Act program for the past 3 years . The funds claimed by the City under this program have been utilized to provide for paratransit services to elderly and handicapped residents . The distribution of these funds is handled by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC ) . Alameda County has developed specific criteria for allocating paratransit funds among the 11 agencies which operate this type of service . It is estimated that $1 ,439, 495 will be available in 1985-86 for paratransit programs in Alameda County. Staff representatives of the agencies providing this service have met to determine the most appropriate method of distribu- ting the funds . Ninety percent of the funds available are distributed to agencies based on the percentage of population which is 65 years old and older, plus the number of transportation disabled. These figures are taken from the 1980 census . The providers have agreed to distribute 5/ of the funds available based on performance criteria which will be discussed below and the additional 5% is retained as a reserve . The performance criteria utilized for granting additional monies include the following criteria : % of shared trips ; / of administrative cost ; cost per trip ; cost per revenue vehicle mile ; trips per revenue vehicle mile ; % local support ; and fo of fare box. This formula was utilized in the determination of 1984-85 allocations and the agencies agreed to continue to utilize this method for the 1985-86 requests . Based on the summary of performance criteria , the City of Dublin program receives a large share of the discretionary funds . Of the 11 agencies competing, the Dublin program ranks #5 and receives 10% of this discretionary fund . Due to the fact that the type of programs differ, it is difficult to directly compare one program to the other. For example , some programs provide van transportation, while others are operating subsidized taxi service . The intent of the performance allocations is to recognize programs which are capable of providing the service in an efficient manner. The City of Dublin also receives a higher ranking due to the General Fund subsidy which is required to meet the cost of the program. j Staff has held initial meetings with the Cities of San Ramon and Danville , and representatives of the San Ramon Valley Community Center, which operates the paratransit program. SRVCC has provided a draft budget which will be revised through negotiation between the Cities and the service provider. Once a final budget is available , Staff will report to the City Council the level of subsidy necessary to conduct the 1985-86 Paratransit Program. Based on the estimated TDA allocation and the draft budget presented by the Community Center, it is estimated that the maximum City subsidy required will be approximately $7 , 200 . The division of the subsidy between the participating agencies is based on the percentage of rides taken by residents from that community . The residents of Dublin who are qualified to utilize this program have increased their participation during the past year. In 1983-84 the City of Dublin participation represented 17/ of the program. The current year utilization represents 23/ of the riders as Dublin residents . At this time it is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing Staff to file a claim for the Transportation Development Act funds with the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for !Fiscal Year 1985-86. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- COPIES TO : Dave Stegman , SRVCC ITEM NO . - DOCUMENT B: RESOLUTION NO . - 85 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN -------------------------------------- AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A CLAIM WITH THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FOR ALLOCATION OF TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1985-86 WHEREAS , the Transportation Development Act (TDA) , (Pub . Util . Code Section 99200 et seq. ) , provides for the disbursement of funds from the Local Transportation Fund of the County of Alameda for use by eligible claimants for the purpose of Paratransit Services ; and WHEREAS , pursuant to the provisions of the TDA, and pursuant to the applicable rules and regulations thereunder (21 Cal . Adm. Code 6600 et seq. ) a prospective claimant wishing to receive an allocation from the Local Transportation Fund shall file its claim with the Metropolitan Transportation Commission; and WHEREAS , the City of Dublin is an eligible claimant for TDA funds pursuant to PUC Section 99275 et seq. as attested by the Dublin City Attorney' s opinion of counsel dated March 2 , 1985 ; and WHEREAS , TDA funds from the Local Transportation Fund of Alameda County will be required by claimant in Fiscal Year 1985-86 for operation costs of Paratransit Services . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to execute and file an appropriate TDA claim together with all necessary supporting documents , with the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for an allocation of TDA funds in Fiscal Year 1985-86. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission in conjunction with the filing of the claim; and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission be requested to grant the allocations of funds as specified herein. PASSED , APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 25thday of March, 1985 . AYES : NOES : ABSENT : Mayor ATTEST : City Clerk CITY OF DUBLIN P.O. Box 2340 Dublin, CA 94565 (415) 829-4000 TO : METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FROM: City of Dublin DATE: March 26 , 1985 SUBJECT: ELIGIBILITY FOR TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT FUNDS This communication will serve as the requisite opinion of counsel in connection with the application of the City of Dublin for an allocation of Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds . 1 . The City of Dublin is authorized to provide and assist public transportation by acquisition, construction and operation of existing or additional transit facilities . This assistance may be provided directly or by contractual arrangements with other parties . 2 . The City of Dublin is an eligible claimant for Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds pursuant to PUC Section(s ) 99200 et . seq. 3 . I have reviewed the pertinent State and local laws , and I am of the opinion that there is no legal impediment to the City of Dublin making applications for TDA funds . Furthermore , as a result of my examinations , I find that there is no pending or threatened litigation which might in any way adversely affect the proposed projects , or the ability of the City of Dublin to carry out such projects . Sincerely, Michael R. Nave MRN:kk City Attorney 1 1985-86 SAN RAMON VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTER, INC. DRAFT PARATRANSIT BUDGET MARCH 19, 1985 Expenditures 1984-85 1984-85 1985-86 Total Program Total Program Total Program Budget Estimated Costs Proposed Costs I. Personnel 60,760 55,798 63,135 II. Services & Supplies 37,687 39,075 42,644 Total 98,447 94,873 105,779 Al AkFDA COUNTY TDA Art, 4,5 PROMM DESCRIPTION 1. CLAIMANT City of Dublin. 2. PROF M NAME AND ADDRESS City of Dublin 6500 Dublin Blvd. , Suite. 101 Dublin, CA 94568 3. CONTACT PERSON Paul S. Rankin, Administrative Assistant 829-4600 4. SERYICE AREA Within the city limits of Dublin, Sa Ramon, Danville and to the out- lying hospitals of Eden in Castro Valley, Valley Memorial in Livermore and John Muir in Walnut Creek. A few other trips out of the area may be arranged on an individual basis. 5. TYPE(S) OF SERYICE PROYIDED Dublin contracts with the dial-a-ride reserve response system of San Ramon Valley Community Center. 6. DAYS AND H%RS OF OPERATION (BY TYPE OF SERVICE) Service is available on weekdays between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m., except during holidays. Phone reservations are taken between the hours of 9 a.m. and 1 p.m. on days of service operation. It is preferred that reservations are made 24 hours in advance; however, same day service is offered when space allows. 7. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Patrons must either be registered by the driver as over the age of 59 years or 'verified by a physician or social worker as being dis- abled. Because some clients are very isolated, the average trip length is 9 miles. 8. NUMBER OF PEOPLE ENROLLED IN PROGRAM Sixty-nine individuals are enrolled. 9 . WAITING LIST None . Clients are taken as space allows . 10 . FARE STRUCTURE BY TYPE OF SERVICE Fares are charged according to the number of zones traveled through. The first zone is the area where the rider is picked-up, the second is the adjacent zone , and the third zone is the designated area beyond the second zone . Each one-way trip within a zone costs $0. 75 , with an additional charge of $0. 75 for each zone traveled through. 11 . LIMITATION ON VOUCHERS (RIDES ) There is no stated limitation on local trips . Trips out of the service area are accepted on an individual basis . 12 . INCOME CRITERIA There is no income scale , although clients unable to pay the full fare of $7. 50 for a book of ten scrip may apply for assistance to the Community Center' s charitable support fund . 13 . PROCEDURE FOR SALE AND REDEMPTION OF SCRIP Scripbooks are ordered by phone . Clients receive the Scripbooks from the driver when the service is used. Individual tickets are redeemed when a trip is taken. 14 . STAFF SIZE .6 FTE 15 . PROVIDER REIMBURSEMENT Through Contra Costa Public Works Department 16 . NUMBER AND TYPE OF VEHICLES OPERATED There are three vans , only two of which are available at any given time . 17 . CITY SUBSIDY The City of Dublin TDA allocation has never been at a level which would support this service . Therefore , the Dublin City Councils has authorized a subsidy paid by the City' s General Fund. The following chart indicates a historical record of City support for the program: Estimated 1982-83 1983-84 1984-85 1985-86 Total TDA & City Subsidy 14 ,745 14 ,113 14 ,084 18 ,647 Total City Subsidy 3 , 348 5 , 821 5 ,192 7, 207 Percent of Program Paid by City General Fund 22 . 7% 41 . 3% 36.9% 38 .7% Revised 3/20/85