Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Item 3.2 BART Annual Report (2)
0 0-30 CITY OF DUBLIN AGENDA STATEMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: May 13 , 1985 SUBJECT Presentation by Bay Area Rapid Transit District EXHIBITS ATTACHED 1983-84 BART Annual Report RECOMMENDATION qO Receive Presentation FINANCIAL STATEMENT: None DESCRIPTION In accordance with earlier City Council direction, Staff has invited Director Bob Allen and representatives from the Bay Area Rapid Transit District to make a presentation to the City Council with respect to the various financial considerations related to the extension of BART rail service to Dublin as well as the operation of the Express Bus System. Staff requested a budget from the Bay Area Rapid Transit District . The District has provided the City with a copy of its 1983-84 Annual Report . As indicated in the report , the revenue and operating expenditures for the Express Bus System related to service to the valley area, is not broken down as part of the operating budget . It is Staff ' s recommendation that the City Council receive the presentation by Mr. Allen and direct any questions that the Council feels to be appropriate with respect to BART service to the Dublin area. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- COPIES TO : Bob Allen & Howard Goode , BART ITEM NO . %3• B A R T BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT 800 Madison Street P.O. Box 12688 Oakland, CA 94604-2688 Telephone (415)464-6000 30 .April 1985 WILFRED T. USSERY PRESIDENT Mr. Richard Ambrose JOHN GLENN City Manager VICE-PRESIDENT City of Dublin KEITH BERNARD P. O.'Box 2340 GENERAL MANAGER Dublin, CA 94568 DIRECTORS Dear Mr. Ambrose: BARCLAY SIMPSON Per your request, I have enclosed herewith a copy of the ISTDISTRICT BART Annual Report for 1983-84. NELLOBIANCO As you are aware, the annual report for 1984-85 will not 2ND DISTRICT be available until the latter part of this year. You may ARTHUR J.SHARTSIS expect to receive a copy as soon as it becomes available. 3RD DISTRICT MARGARET K.PRYOR Thank you for your interest in our operations and please 4TH DISTRICT do not hesitate to call if you have any further questions ROBERT S.ALLEN on the budget. 5TH DISTRICT Very trul yours, JOHN GLENN 6TH DISTRICT(D WILFRED T.USSERY 7TH DISTRICT Alice G. Loo EUGENE GARFINKLE Financial Analyst 8TH DISTRICT y JOHN H.KIRKWOOD 9TH DISTRICT cc: R. Franklin H. Goode i h � bo F'`` Ssit� t" '+7iS < ., -•� 5'�"' ,r fb!�.� �c` �` `r '} .� 't Y V V t•' x y }.s ty '"J'tlr!•ti�4u�`+,s�x3..�.k,•KiR It lfc�.7`~i"s,�.�'Sr 'S3M'��dJxa•�i� r9�f.� 11 Y" {��1��'�•,l "-Y r', a vy� Xj. i x .t c!-•h ••! `y °7 t 7'''..14 ) it-r t J r s f �t x •r? +•'t. } e R ,ii I� ✓ +fi' IM L�t+ I�d17�F .1' 1 u•Y �` ,' �� V N v"• ...�._.. .. .,:.... •.., .•-.�'�...:-. :,.. •! :):- :t. ) -.+- --via•. � �. ,F�r_. v .a... •..... .. .._: .f � ..:.,..- ::.. .,,... _.••- '• 1 .;. ...:::.`.: c w� ..a.1 -.•, r cs: ^t :rr] S `¢}.rr+�l '`:'`!-J. a ...� - .�-, a .!_.:rr.' r r:7: .N. -'2 L t 4•r n. +s- f *T•. _�..r:. ,�a... .'a^e a'.a..: ..':..}.',?:..• ,D:..•°e t..a_:.>... �': ..�.,. -S•.:!e ei.Ctt., .f a .+ 1.. . 'r 1.� _ +.,.::.,t. ..1 .-�,r h�:._ c -...._,,aa• -.. ..b.. r �a:......i....M._....�..,. ,.r_;i~. ., r.: .;� '"4, _r z.: G', :r1 c .et: rt�.•� ..k. r. .. NEW .... ......� .1.-�:.a•. ,..7 fit,...✓. f+7_. ... ] +1: *�,-•.1:. .'1J'i. P f" l��r 1h .:i•�.. .'si. J'.tA'�: Sr ` tis .... ., :r I-.,.._ 'I t. Is -rte :: ..�- ., y,✓. ..e-. � ...-• s•'l:� .,)`+= '�. ..) f .rr ./. }�, .1.•- .}.':,•A 1. ?.•.fit -Y� {. .ZA ,�_ 4 �...r.l-....•..):,..•.. ;. ,,: C :lti Y F t' h �T•, i1'>.- ... ..,i:µ:.i... -fir_ `.1�F - x [ - - -.T •r�rl.- Bard ®f Direct®r1s • • • i o 6 MIPI"M s ► 0 S "' •s Elected to the BART Board of Directors In 1976.Re- v-. ... .ry s^. u v+p .• M1�:•, Appointed to the BART Board of Directors,September vY ..v ,;� San Francisco urban planner,First elected to lfre BART r elected, 1980.BART Board President.1977.1984, ' S+£� 1980.Elected BART Director 1980 and 1982.1984, Board of Directors in 1978 and re-elected in 1980. r3, Chairperson,Engineering and Operations Committee. c Chairperson,Administration Committee.1984•mem- r ':y A 1984,Vice Chairperson.Public Affairs.Access and De g 9 De , ;rte. , + 1984,BART Liaison with Central Contra Costa Transit `a. Der,BART Liaison with the Alameda Contra Costa } _ _ y Legislation Committee.1984,Chairperson,BART iv:.+ s Authority.Represents BART on the Walnut Creek and Transit District.1984,BART Liaison with the Mel- "'e� + A Liaison with Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District Pleasant Hill BART Stations Advisory Committees,en- •_ ropolitan Transportation Commission A8842 Transit ,„ `x^: 1984,Member,Engineering and Operations Commit- ' ;+ Finance Stud ,x." tee.1984,BART Liaison with the San Francisco couraging private development at these stations to V y.Represents BART on Oakland's -�' : provide funds in order to build more parking.Chair- i Downtown Circulation and the Coliseum Area Indust- Municipal Railway.Director of Program Development man of the Board,Simpson Company in San Leandro. :xr rial Advisory committees.BART representative,Oak- for San Francisco Housing Authority.Assistant Con r Owner,Barclay Simpson Art Gallery.Lalayelle. land Chamber of Commerce Transportalion Commit- y' vention Manager for the 1984 Democratic National ' Member,Robert G.Sproul Associates of U.C.Ber- lee.Vice-President.APTA's Governing Board Com- z u^a Convention in San Francisco.Member of Mayor keley.Graduate of U.C.Berkeley and the Stanford * + ' miltee,and Regional Representative,Council of Mi- ` Feinstein's"Save the Giants"committee.Member, Business School Executive Program.WWII Navy air- nority Transit Officials(COMTO).Active with NWPC, San Francisco Black Agenda Council and the San " craft carrier pilot.Resides in Orinda with wile,Sharon ? NAACP,National Association of Neighborhoods,Black ^t Francisco Black Leadership Forum.Co-Founder,prin- t . ' , ,° #" and three children. Women Organized Political Action,and National Black c'ri ' cfpal organizer,former treasurer,and current director —. Caucus of Local Elected Officials.Past Vice-President, of Bay Area Black United Fund.National Chairman International Longshoremen and Warehousemen Union Congress of Racial Equality,1967 to 1969.Attended of Federated Women.Administrator Graduate,Arizona San Francisco City College and U.C.Berkeley.Re- State University.Resides in Oakland. sides in San Francisco with wife,Maxine. 0 i 0 I O i ,♦ � � % Vice President BART Board of Directors,1984.Senior First elected 1974;re-elected 1976 and 1980.Presl- ` ,: A San Francisco attorney appointed to the BART -K'•'�� • - `"t �k ti BART Director since 1969.Elected in 1974,1978 and _ � dent.BART Board of Directors,1983.1984:BART Board of Directors and elected in 1918 and 1982. 1982.BART Board President,1975 and 1980;Vice- , Representative to the Executive Committee of the 1 BART Board President in 1981 and Vice-President in President,1973,1976 and 1978.1984,Member,BART �i'vr APTA'Board of Directors,member of Administration •�� '� �'� 1979.1984.Vice Chairperson.Engineering and Oper- Liaison with the Central Contra Costa Transit Author- - f .• Committee,BART Liaison with Alameda-Contra Costa ' s� _ * ations Committee.1984,Chairperson,BART Liaison ity.1984•BART Liaison with the Eastern Contra Costa !i_s ' s a Transit District,and member of Fremonl/South Bay ;h with the San Francisco Municipal Railway.1984,AI- ti, } r zi5�,"� lernate,BART Liaison with the Metropolitan Trans Transit Authority.First Director to call for litigation +, ,v Corridor Study policy board.Employed by Southern m Pa a against system's original suppliers and developers.In =r .'•J Pacilic since 1965 in engineering and operations. lotion Commission.Partner in law firm of Dreher. 1971,instituted studies of BART rail extensions to """ Member,American Railway Engineering Association; Garfinkle&Watson,San Francisco.Graduated from _- Pittsburg/Antioch.Livermore/Pleasanton and San active on Committee 32(Systems Engineering).BS U.C.Berkeley and U.C.Law School.Received M-BA Francisco's Northwest Corridor.Authored BART Board (Business)University of Colorado at Boulder;graduate from Golden Gate College.Resides in San Francisco. Extension Policy which was adopted by the Mel- work there and at Brigham Young University in Provo, _ ropolitan Transportation Commission,this is the most ,.. ' Utah.Active LOS.Resides in Livermore with wife !� important project since construction of the existing Thelma,and son,Ronald. rail system.1974•first Board member,APTA•.El Sobranle businessman and community leader.Former } Richmond City Councilman and member of the Richmond Personnel Board and other Richmond im- provement commissions and civic groups.In 1984, served as ex-ollicio member of all BART Board standing committees. 'American Punic Transit Association 1 0 i I - • 0 0 0 I I - • President BART Board of Directors,1984.A San ^= First elected to the BART Board of Directors In 1974. t; Elected to the BART Board of Directors..1974:Re-<• Francisco attorney,first elected in 1976 and re-elected Re-elected in 1978 and 1982.BART Board President, elected.1976 and 1980.Unanimously elected Piesi- in 1980.Vice-President BART Board.1982.A partner 1982 and Vice-President,1979.Has served as Chair- ♦: dent of the Board in 1979.BART Vice-President. in the San Francisco law firm of Shartsis.Friese 8 4;: '$ ` person of all BART Board standing committees.1984, 1983.1984,Chairperson,Public Affairs.Access and Ginsberg•specializing in complex litigation.Wile, '' ' ( "5 Vice-chairperson.Administrative Committee. 1984, Legislation Committee.1984,member of BART 1 .� Mary Jo,is a partner in the same law firm with the . :�-;;;+ , BART representative and Vice-chairperson,Frem- ; Liaison with the San Francisco Municipal Railway. same specialization.Graduate of U.C.Berkeley and �r:E. :'s �. on[/South Bay Corridor Study.Founder and President, Served on boards of the Sacramento-Stockton Bay U.C.Boalt Law School.Studied political science at ' John Glenn and Administrators.Past President,East Area Corridor Study.the Northwest San Francisco Oxford University in England.Resides in Oakland with Bay Adjusters Association and Calilornia Association �• .�� Corridor Study and the"BART Traits"Study.Board • children,Alexander and Matthew.In 1984,served as ,.. of Independent Insurance Adjusters.Member,Board of A member of San Francisco Planning and Urban Re- ex-officio member of all BART Board standing com- Regents,Holy Family College,Fremont,CA.Member, V ',+,`t newal Association(SPUR)and Vice-President Na- mittees. Board of Directors,Civic Bank of Commerce,Oakland tional Association of Railway Passengers.Member, and Walnut Creek.Graduated from Southeast Missouri . Bay Area Electric Railway Association,California To- Stale University.Resides In Fremont with wile,Betty morrow.the Planning Conservation League and World — pF.'< and three children. Affairs Council.Graduate Stanford University.Married ¢%;'M and resides in San Francisco. o � - - - - - - - -es AV 11101111111111F 0111101111V 011-Building ®r the Future =nn!n=his year marks an Important turning agencies In the United States. The maturing directions to serve the people of our region as many persons as possible at the lowest point for the Bay Area Rapid Transit of the organization has been reflected in the better. The Metropolitan Transportation po po possible cost. No step forward and no new District. During FY 1983184, we development of a first-class management Commission has since approved the plan, and project should ever be allowed to reduce the began a subtle but significant team at BART, an excellent work force of de- we are now looking to the federal govem- quality of our present performance. change in the role and function of the Dis- dicated employees, and growing stability in ment, as well as exploring other sources, for t' g g g y P g This Is our plan and our challenge for the trict. In order to understand the significance our labor relations. capital to carry out the extension program. future. '.' :'z• ;;;;: of this shift in focus, It is valuable to pause We are now entering BART s third stage of Long before other cities sought massive for a brief review of BART's history. g I am confident that BART can meet it. development. Building for the future upon our federal aid In building new transit systems, BART's first decade — from the mid-1960's base of reliable and established operations, this region committed Its own dollars and to the mid-1970's — was the period of its cre- this third stage will be marked by service en- taxes to build for the future.As a result, we in anon and Initial operation. During the second hancements, increases In capacity, develop- the Bay Area believe that, on the national �ecade, BART evolved from a newly-created ment of the areas around our stations and an ledger sheet of transit accounting, we have P. k public works project Into a mature public enlarged role In regional transit. built up an enormous special credit by paying t i e service operation.A brief comparison of BART As we do this, it Is Important that BART, our own way more than most other regions In _ service In 1976 and BART service today pro- like other transit agencies In the Bay Area, country. We believe that our special credit s the count ' } , ;S vides a dramatic demonstration of the matur- make every effort to Improve the overall level should be honored by federal officials when ity of the system. our transit . of transit service in the region.Our collective plans and requests are balanced In 1976, BART carried an approximate daily ability to provide Inner-city residents with ac- against the plans and requests of other re- f average of 131,000 passengers. We operated cess to burgeoning new job markets In the gions of the country. slightly more than half of our transit cars East Bay and at the southern end of the Bay Our obligation to undertake both capacity `'� t '• each day.There was weekend service only on Area ultimately may be determined by our Increases and system extensions is clear. •t •, 1 y the Saturdays of holiday weekends and there ability to provide adequate public transporta- Transit use In the Bay Area, unlike In many I r: a was no full night service.There was no direct lion throughout the region. other major regional centers in the United service from Richmond to San Francisco. In our efforts to enhance our service, we are States, is Increasing both in absolute num- As of the end of FY 1983/84, BART averaged presently Involved In a plan to expand capac- hers of riders and as a percentage share of j over 206,000 passengers each weekday with Ity which includes elements such as the the travel market.The Bay Area, In fact, ranks approximately 90 percent of our rolling stock purchase of 150 new transit cars, the building third behind New York City and Chicago In i in service.Trains run on weekends and terms of the - L+ of a tumback and yard facility at Daly City, percentages of work trips takenw nights, as well as direct) between Richmond g Y replacement of train operations monitoring on public transit. and San Francisco. Weekly patronage has In- computers in the control center, modification As we move into our third stage of growth, creased approximately 80 percent, and of train operating computers at the wayside, we must avoid becoming complacent about patronage is running more than a year ahead and the construction of additional parking our day-to-day role of serving the public. We •;_;, of projections, spaces. When these programs are completed, must reinforce our sensitivity to our passen- When i joined BART in 1976, as that second we will have expanded our peak period gers'needs, and not take our patrons for decade began, BART was all too frequently capacity by 85 percent. granted. the source of frustration and disappointment PPo Looking to the future, the BART Board of !n expanding its role and operations, BART for the riding public. Today, we can confi- Directors In FY 1983/84 established a far- must adhere to Its key objective, which is ••' {I dently claim to be one of the premier transit reaching program to extend our rails In four providing safe and reliable transportation to ! . , i CAM-160MA IV dn AM MOW W- A oundati®n for the Future BART provided shuttle bus serv- s FY 1983184 came to a close, BART once again Ice to the Alameda County Fair in y — saw several new records set. The ear ended Pleasanton. r..: == with the highest fiscal year ridership since the In cooperation with AC Transit, p 6a•. :: system opened, with 58.3 million patrons traveling on shuttle bus service was provided ::'::`::":_ e previous kcal from BART stations in downtown ercent increase over th fiscal BART, an 8.5 p p Oakland to the "Festival at the ' year. Lake," Alameda County's "Urban A record also was set for the highest ridership in a Fair," in June 1984. A competition • • ' • 1984 when..221 800 involving guessing BART ridership ' single day on Tuesday, April 3, during the "Festival at the Lake" trips were recorded. Contributing to the record were offered patrons an opportunity to 8,000 patrons who rode BART that evening for the win invitations to a private picnic opening day of the 1984 Oakland A's baseball season, and seats in a private box at an A's game; transportation was provided as well as a Warriors basketball game being played in to the winners in a special BART \ \: the Coliseum Arena at the same time. car. Records also were broken for the highest monthly Throughout the year, BART Bevel- ..`: ' _ ejetritrbd66Wfbi the Novemberl weekday average and the highest number of trips in a oped special promotions to attract riders during off-peak hours, as ? 'Ickens single month. v., well as to assist residents of the ` :,-,`downtowA Oakland three counties with special needs. ..,, .. The statistics * Earlier In the fiscal year, a sepa s„ rate competition offered BART pa The statistics show the increasing 1984, when 221,800 trips were trons an opportunity to win free, public acceptance of BART as a taken on BART. The trend con- season tickets to the Oakland �< In- reliable part of the region's trans- tinued into FY 1983/84 with an In- Opera. portation system. Records were crease of 8.5 percent over the once again broken for almost previous fiscal year. At appropriate times of the year, every measurement of service. Trains were 95 percent on time, voter registration forms and IRS The highest ridership on a single the highest level of service BART literature were distributed in BART ' day came on Tuesday, April 3, has ever delivered. stations. 2 Pr -A4- 44 r LZ N t { f': * 5 .rrs� :� �tCp � �f9;•'#',��4°r�'�, t ��z '�c_ - - - 177 pt Assisting BART Police with the 7 program were "Ident-A-IfId. characters 'M Mairlott's Great America Th eme Park In Santa Clara MaMott characters visited BART during November 19a3 and again in . ....... ar: The j!hgerprIntIn4 on,ch� tmas and New Year's holf- Jane 1984. for children was a free days, when BART stations oflered program Oi�ioi#�e and d6�gh '_6 L' community service by Mitt.' V nu as part of The:program gave parents a record i01 .P4o6i BART once again opened three hours the Fifth Annual Safe Holidays celeb. U lion.-More than 1ZOOO doughnuts. 5/fingerprints ahead of Its Sunday schedule, at 6 ra of thelr*child fpr Iden- arrL,for the"Bay to Breakers"foot and about 16,000 cypsof coffeLi tlflcatton purposes In situations in the c&ebratlon, volving a lost r race In San ftancisco on May 20, were'served Cinco,de Maya festivities Included 0 runaway child or a 1984. More than 16,000 passengers co sponsored by nine local com- child who might become a victim of entertainment at several Stations* rode.14 special trains to the event. muriiti service organizations and crime.-The records are not-kepi by and presentation of a special tribute The addition o to the Honorable Ambassador Lken- (four trains and the several local radio stations. 7 police depar6neritik','but aie the sole opening of two more stations than prqperf�o� clado Marcelo Vargas Campos, con- the parents. More than the previous year resulted Iri a 16 Sul general of Mexico In San ftan -1500chlldr�inwere fingerprinted crease to on the rp, c1sco, In percent In -during the ceremonies at the Lake P specla ,rW 'Merritt BART station. I trains. _Mr Under the "Tickets-To-0o" pro- An Important measure of gram, introduced in September employee safety is the amount of 1983, high-value tickets for the work-time lost as a result of in- ; first time were made available at dustrial injuries expressed as a t retail outlets and through high percentage of hours worked. Dur- ,��.a . employment centers. These new ing FY 1983/84, BART's employee outlets sell $20 tickets, worth $21 lost-time rate was at a favorably �•- r: I as well as discount ow 0.38 percent. I in BART rides, i .. tickets for senior citizens, children _ In matters relating to patron secur- ••. r and handicapped people. Also, Ity, BART's 130 sworn officers filed several senior citizen centers 1,341 reports of crimes against ` •�' ,t � z signed on in order to make BART patrons during FY 1983/84. When discount tickets more accessible to ! :gip - T1C1fetSb-GO r; compared to system usage, this r , r their memberships. results in a rate of 23.0 patron- _, Sold H ; a_ By the close of the fiscal year, related crimes per million passen- , y 1. `®9 patrons had purchased well over ger trips. i ' s $1 million worth of BART tickets at r '= The District continued its ongo- j n i program of emergency 2 new "Tickets-To-Go" outlets. g p pre- e highest monthly weekday aver g g i • " .,. ...�...�.... `; ?t;. Patron and employee safety are of paredness. Emergency procedures ...` .F .a�.re..:.w�.-.-w a. '_.:•:` ; highest total• number � trips � .... '� paramount concern to the District. . drills and training exercises were The #� Z. ° AV. a "'�`x `' �" Total incidents of patron acci- : conducted with fire departments a single month also came in Marc& :.�a a�tof the- ��;-:� w: c:.ye•: :; dents amounted to 996 during FY. • along the system, and a multiple with a total of 5,149,67Z.J� 1983/84. Of these accidents, 207 casualty emergency procedures Increase In patronage In FY 19113184 Is ' (20.8 percent) were related to train drill was conducted with volunteers ' " from the Dal City Fire Depart i -_`April 19113. operations. The remaining 789 ac- Y Y p ment. San Mateo Count cidents (79.2 percent) were non- Y Emergency Medical Care volun- , train-related, occurring within sta- lions. The District's patron acci- teens played the role of"victims." j dent rate for FY 1983/84 is 17.1 incidents per million passenger I trips. Since revenue service began r in September 1972, BART has car- I ried 440.4 million patrons 5.8 billion passenger miles without a single fatality. I I 4 r AN i Creating the Structure for the Future.. ., i t the beginning of FY 1983184, BART directors _ _ =took a major step toward planning for the fu- ture in adopting the short-range. . five-year transit plan, a $524.5 million blueprint for the steps that will increase capacity by 85 percent by the end of the 1980s. ® M'" Included in the plan are the purchase of new cars, ar.s new Integrated Control System (ICS), completion of a third track through downtown Oakland, construction of a turnback track and storage yard in Daly City, fire safety improvements to cars, and modifications of the automatic train controls along the trackway. _. New Train Control 4 Computer C-Cars- C tr ( Work continued in France at the Four prototype C-Cars are to be During FY 1983/84, work pro- ,. ,,, • , ALSTHOM ATLANTIQUE plant on delivered during FY 1984/85, with gressed on the new Integrated i prototypes of the newly designed extensive testing scheduled prior Control System (ICS) to replace the.1"4 ` C-Cars, 150 of which were ordered to acceptance. These cars will in- present central control computers.:`u'•.: I by BART in October 1982. The cars clude all of the fire safety lm- The new system, which supervises`.'1:;-' can be used as a lead car or in the provements presently being made main line train movements, is de- middle of a train, increasing flex!- to the current fleet. signed to accommodate the opera- bility as one train can be changed BART expects to obtain federal tion of 75 trains on the system at into two shorter trains, or vice funds for approximately 47 percent one time. This is more than a 50 versa, without returning to a yard. of the total estimated cost of $279 percent increase over the capacity million. of the present system and will i l The K-E track will provide an ad- � K E Track ;r&�7 ` ' �e ,Y, ditional route through the con- <,,ZY4—r g � Work continued on the final phase K <F e. ested Oakland WYE and also cans. , of the K-E track, installation of be used for train storage. 3 running rail, power equipment and Total cost of this project is $24 "r+` is �f G� # ti J2 p, the wayside control system from million, with approximately 80 ; , ' t X,Y the Oakland West BART station to • f-i';-•� _ . '� ,,�?� percent coming from federal the MacArthur BART station. When funds. completed in 1985, the 1.5 mile eFZ! connection, which goes through a j t7"l t ,tL f �.,�/6 [ ^ nti}a i,- K� ' �`" t"' third tunnel from Washington �aly City Turnback and ultat;Cie menl In the expansion of{S: g � rt3ARTcapacity to 'carry more < + Street to 23rd Street, will be the Storage Yard �.# - .passengers;'ls the Daly Clty �;�,r'�,; first addition of main line track Engineering studies were com- 1 The obJectiue of BART's$21 million ; mback-toae;located'south o/them since BART's original construction. pleted for the Daly City Turnback =�•flre-hardening"program is to make Daly C/ty BART Station;whlch'.W! >' . BART cars among the most/ire safe permits a faster tun around of BART }, 1 in the world. � � y • .j� �,jtra tn3.C++jW ;•'{'' ,.t e have an add-on capacity, allowing i ;:::::..,; _ and Storage Yard, with construc- for systemwide operation of 115 ;, f:;- tion scheduled to begin during FY trains at one time. This feature will 0 1984/85. The project will allow d? ;:�.." accommodate future extensions of trains to reverse direction from the the rail system. �, � Daly City terminal at more frequent Completion of the first phase of intervals, as well as provide critical ICS is scheduled for January, - 'Y train storage to support West Ba g PP y 1987, and is estimated to cost ap- i �`•. ';U•,. :..; operations. °' "' "' Federal funds are anticipated for . proximately $25.5 million. P • Development of an improved approximately 74 percent of the on-board automatic train control $150 million project. The turnback system was begun by Westing- is scheduled for completion by late house Electric Corporation during 1987 and the yard is to be corn FY 1983/84, with the prototype pleted during the spring of 1988.spec system due for delivery in time for stations J testing with the prototype C-Cars. ' 6 i f i • I ,i Fire Safety Improvements improving Station Access MetroCenter Opens BART put on public display a "fire- BART took a number of steps to In March, some 150 BART em- hardened" transit car on November make it easier for patrons to reach ployees moved into the recently 29,,1983, the first of the 439-car stations, including improving bus completed MetroCenter, the $12.6 fleet undergoing extensive retrofit- lanes and adding parking spaces. �„.� .. million, four-story governmental ting to reduce the possibility of fire A busway canopy was installed at " LY +*> condominium located across the ji on board or under a BART car. By the Daly City BART station. ,{. ., street from the Lake Merritt Ad- ' the end of FY 1983/84 work on 20 Bus lanes and station access ministration Building. cars had been completed. roads were improved at the Ba P p y BART occupies 42,133 square The $21 million program, with Fair, Concord, El Cerrito Del Norte, „,; feet of the building, which it 28 percent of the cost coming Fremont, Fruitvale, Ha Oil y flit P g Hayward, shares with the Metropolitan from federal funds, involves retro- Richmond, San Leandro, and Transportation Commission and fitting each car with a heat-resist- Union City BART stations. the Association of Bay Area Gov- ant liner and replacing the For the convenience of patrons ernments. All of BART engi- ;t;`•;, polyurethane floor with a balsa who make connections between neering personnel are now located and metal floor. BART has replaced BART and AC Transit buses each next to the main administrative '! ".' seat cushions with a low smoke day, special beacon lights were in- facility. j neoprene material, which has stalled at five BART East Bay sta- Anew central telephone system already proven its ability to resist tions to indicate to passengers that ,`�+ ,'1 also was installed in March, elimi- r'•, fires in scattered arson attempts. a train is arriving at the station Hating the need for all outside platform, as well as to signal bus ' x _ --.'-calls to go through the central ! drivers to wait for passengers who - switchboard , . ' '•�•Y�"';;,i•,�: Wayside Train Controls are leaving the train. The lights are I At the close of FY 1983/84 the Sys- controlled by a microprocessor, j - ' tem Performance Study produced triggered as the trains approach initial insights into the types of the station. t A new midday parking lot modifications to the wayside au- Y P g I! tomated train control (ATC) which opened at the Glen Park BART sta- tion will be required to achieve a 2.25- in San Francisco, and work j minute headway. These modifica- tions began on plans to complete 1,190 , I• , portion k'k additional parking spaces b the f ` lions will be an integral part of P g P Y I BART's capacity expansion. end of FY 1984/85. i i f rs.nwi�e� . a�azzzs.►letittttE�f1 - . Funding the Present and the .Future , BART ended the year on a sound financial basis. Total revenue (including interest income last year's operating ratio of 53.6 and Income from advertising in percent. operating expense was 6.1 percent below budget and trains and stations) was $72.6 Rail cost per passenger mile was total revenue was 1.7 percent above budget, although million for FY 1983/84, or 9.0 per- 16.6 cents, well below the net passenger revenue was 0.8 percent under budget. cent higher than the previous fiscal budgeted level of 18.1 cents. This year. compares favorably to the previous Total operating expenditures for FY1983184 were The District's farebox ratio re-. year's rail cost per passenger mile $134.0 million, compared to a budgeted amount of mained above the 40 percent ob- of 16.2 cents, an increase of only $142.8 million adopted in June 1983.' jective at 48.9 percent, about the 2.5 percent. same as last year's 49.1 percent. The operating ratio, the ratio of Other Resources Operating Revenue passenger fares and other oper- In addition to these funds, BART Net passenger revenue in FY pared to $61.0 million for the pre- ating revenues to operating ex- received $71.1 million in revenues 1983/84 was $65.5 million, com- vious fiscal year. Total operating penses, was 54.1 percent, up from (Continued on page 10) 1 1983/84 Operating Funds - $160,146,000 (Including Capitalized Costs) Where Funds Came From (in thousands) How Funds Were Applied (in thousands) 1 federal financial - Assistance:03 •a' •' y!¢ v;j t �K • I L J a . t r?- - Transactions S - .�.. � &Use Tax Maintenance • $71.136 ._..,. r.•.. . State Financial ' 44.4% • { , .'pis- $54,954 Assistance - .. 34.3% $4.717 rates Police Services k 3.0% ^' $65,492 $7,672 Transportation Construction Funds 40.9% 4.8% $46,556 $4,388 29.1% 2.7% Investment Income& Debt Service s i" .-' GeneralK Other Operating Allocations Administrative $7 764 Regional Financial _ Resources .. • Assistance nce f 44%7 4,996 .y '�� *u• 15.2% 4 $1,900 + .. Construction& _ \: Property Tax Engineering " Capital Allocations ., - .. $4,879 ,r;,.,..,..,,>+0.:4...a.�.a::... w�.....,; 513.947 3.4% Decreax In 3.0% 6.7% Working Capital' 3.4% N 'Funded excess of expenses over revenues. /Less than 0.01 percent. , FERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS ` FY 1983/84 FY 1982/83 FY 1983/84 FY 1982/83 Rail Ridership Passenger accidents reported per million Annual passenger trips 58,277,463 53,699,387 passenger trips 17.09 16.24(c) I Average weekday trips 202,536 186,293 Patron-related crimes reported per million Average trip length 13.1 miles 13.5 miles passenger trips 23.01 18.99 Annual passenger miles 761,799,000 725,077,000 Financial System utilization ratio (passenger miles ° Met passenger revenues $ 65,492,000 60,965,000 i to available seat miles) 35.4% 34.5% End-of-period ratios: , Other operating revenues 7,067,000 5,618,000 f Peak patronage 51.9% ( 54% Total operating revenues 72,559,000 66,583,000 I Net operating expenses 134,047,000 125,281,000 Offpeak patronage 48.1% 46% BART s estimated share of peak period Farebox ratio (net passenger revenues ' transbay trips - gars, trains & buses 36.8% 35.5% to net operating expenses) 48.85% 49.07% Passengers with automobile available Operating ratio (total operating revenues (as alternative to BART) 57%(a) 57% to net operating expenses) 54.12% 53.59% Net rail passenger revenue per Operations passenger mile 8.4¢ 8.2¢(c) Annual revenue car miles 29,852,000 29,177,000 Rail operating cost per passenger mile 16.6¢ 16.2¢ �. - net average rail passenger fare (d) $1.10 $1.11 Unscheduled train removals average per revenue day 2.2 4.5 notes Transit car availability to revenue General note: Data represent annual averages unless otherwise noted. car fleet (b) 89.6% 89.1% (a) Updated figures not available Passenger miles per equivalent gallon (b) At 8 a.m. each day of gasoline 84.8 81.0 (c) Revised (d) Includes BART/MUnI Fast Pass beginning April 1983 i 1 1983/84 Capital Funds $39,725,000 Source of Funds (in thousands) Expenditures (in thousands) siis"371 38.7% �,.e`t r •+t,1. • "o si+ nk Systemwide $496 f 1 Support facilities .t t Management ., � � i S 3,795 Information System f 9.5% $859 , 2.2% Train Control $2.809 Support Vehicles '' ' 1 s c� District 1.2% ^., .r ~' Communications 1 �•_�, -��. $4,463 $5.998 11.2% Other 15.1% I $903 federal 2.3% Transit Vehicles 111 + $21,752 $7,557 i 0 , .n .,1.is7�in 54.8% Miscellaneous Studies < 19.0% Local(Including ,�..� Inventory ' 1 ? capital allocations) .i }GM .+7•; .{ '' a� Stale 8ulldup,etc. Automatic fare Collection 55,482 ,?k y,,-' ;, ,. M, $8,028 h 51,219 - $248 13.8% 20.2% 3.l% .6% t. COr19TftUCTIOf1 111511MCEME LQUIPMErIT Other Revenues—continued from 75 percent of the one-half 46 cent transit sales tax in the three BART counties, $6.6 million in State Transportation Development 10 20 30 ao 50 so 70 so so 100% PERFORMANCE Act (TDA) funds and State Transit Assistance (STA), and $5.4 million �.,:: .-:. -°N• -y JUL in property tax as its share of the y AUG one percent maximum property.tax seP available to all local governments. MM MM MM ME MMM MW 3 ! OCT Directors once again were able IFr> to reduce the property tax BART :.- >_:, -• �•.u:a� •.a,:,� �.,.� ,.a Nov P P Y ;� levies for repayment of the general n<- _ "ryp y DEC Ml as=2MM obligation bonds approved by vot- i :a.a -t. + :•::: ,,.-., ;,: JAN ers in 1962 for construction of the 1 .:• . ..-.v« FEB t system. Directors set a tax rate of rv{R ! 6.17 cents per one hundred dol- $ ,� APR 4 lars of assessed value, down from MM 6.28 cents the previous fiscal year. ": -: MAY j i ssl JUN The property tax generated re- venues of $50.7 million from ' s property owners in Alameda, Con- tra Costa and San Francisco Coun- ties, the three counties making up the district. 1 �' AVG WEEKDAY �- I In the city f Berkeley, where 200 s 150 its ty y� v PATRONAGE (000's) , voters approved a special service district in 1966 to finance subway JUL �: „�: •.;=:: E construction through their city, the JMMMMM Board of Directors set a property AUG SEP tax rate of 2.94 cents per hundred dollars of assessed valuation, oCT i F:N,..,•,.>:, r. „� ,*•r• ,ac;-, .,;x which raised revenues of NOV �,•, :..,a. .nr. r:Aatli% :eee:rn:.a•.,�:ed ,v.pa=• $702,000. DEC During FY 1983/84, BART Jay awarded a total of $7.55 million in FEB M M MMOMMMUMM ZMEMMMEM- goods and services contracts to MAR Disadvantaged Business : IN MOMM Enterprises (DBE) and Women APR ,, ;,- `. �`•;° ^..`r^"' i Business Enterprises (WBE). This MAY ;•. �•. , .:.�, ;�.... represents 29.2 percent of the P P ;tun f•,:-- .-,. ,..; . .... . ..,. •...•.,,:,.- total of $25.54 million let for such contracts. This was 14.9 percent Fir 1983.83 above last fiscal year and 9.2 FY 1982-83 - *�T•---� percent above the District's DBE/WBE goal of 20 percent. i 10 i STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS Financial Statemen& Years Ended June 30, 1984 and 1983 (In Thousands) 1984 1983 The Board of Directors Operating revenues: San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District Fares $ 72,125 $ 67,491 We have examined the balance sheet of San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District Less discounts and other deductions 6,633 6,526 as of June 30, 1984 and 1983 and the related statements of operations, changes In net 65,492 60,965 capital investment, changes in financial position, and revenues, expenditures and fund Other 1,350 1,058 balances of debt service fiends for the years then ended. Our examinations were made In Investment income 5,717 4,560 jaccordance with generally accepted auditing standards anal, accordingly, Included such Total operating revenues 72,559 66,583 tests of the accounting records and such other auditing procedures as we considered _ necessary In the circumstances. Operating expenses: In our opinion, such financial statements present fairly the financial position of San Transportation 46,556 45,658 + Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District as of June 30, 1984 and 1983 and the results o Maintenance f 54,954 50,906 Its operations and the changes in its financial position for the years then ended, In Police services 7,672 6,570 conformity with generally accepted accounting principles applied on a consistent basis. Construction and engineering 4,879 4,261 \ General and administrative 24,374 21,792 Adams, Grant, White&Co. Main Flurdman Certified Public Accountants CertlJled Public Accountants 138,435 129,187 . August 31, 1984 Less capitalized costs 4,388 3,906 +.. BALANCE SHEET Net operating expenses 134,047 125,281 June 30, 1984 and 1983 (In Thousands) Operating loss before 1984 1983 depreciation expense 61,488 58,698 Depreciation (unfunded): ASSETS Of assets acquired with own funds 16,819 16,870 Cash (including time deposits: 1984, $10,807; 1983, $15,500) $ 12,438 $ 17,273 Of assets acquired with grants and contributions by others 13,359 12,204 Securities 169,548 132,259 Securities representing reserves 34,684 45,502 Total depreciation 30,178 29,074 s Deposits, notes and other receivables 45,503 22,610 Operating loss 91,666 87,772 1.0 : i Construction in progress 67,191 53,288 Facilities, property and equipment-at cost Financial assistance: (less accumulated depreciation and amortization: Transactions and use tax 71,136 62,847 1984, $286,959; 1983, $257,350) 1,292,378 1,296,115 Property tax 5,433 5,068 Materials and supplies-at average cost 13,134 12,701 State 4,717 2,439 Debt service funds, net assets 38,619 21,859 Transportation Development Act of 1971 1,900 3,000 I $1,673,495 $1,601,607 Cabitalallo aalolnsations (7,764) (4,525) ' 1 IABILITIES AND CAPITALIZATION p (13,947) (10,720) 1 tes payable - Total financial assistance 61,475 58,109 P Y $ 16,000 $ _ Payroll and other liabilities 44,938 35,966 Net loss 30,191 29,663 ` Unearned passenger revenue 1,432 1,382 Debt service funds 38,619 21,859 Depreciation of assets acquired with grants and contributions by others 13,359 12,204 100,989 59,207 Capitalization: Net loss transferred to accumulated deficit $ 16,832 $ 17,459 • , Reserves 34,684 45,502 Reconciliation to net funded deficit: General Obligation Bonds 568,485 597,450 Operating loss before depreciation expense $ 61,488 $ 58,698 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds 65,000 65,000 Deduct financial assistance 61,475 58,109 I Net Capital Investment 904,337 834,448 Funded excess of expenses over revenues $ 13 $ 589 1,572,506 1,542,400 1 $1,673,495 $1,601,607 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET CAPITAL INVESTMENT Years Ended June 30, 1984 and 1983 (In Thousands) Depreciation and Retirements of Assets Acquired Transactions With Grants and Interest Net Property and Grants and Contributions Accumulated on Capital Tax Use Tax Contributions by Others Deficit Capital Reserves Investment Balance, July 1, 1982 $179,430 $150,000 $568,085 $ (86,216) $(126,220) $151,513 $(47,017) $789,575 Net loss for the year - _ _ (17,459) _ _ (17, N Proceeds from grants and contributions - - 31,214 - - - 31,2214 14 Depreciation of assets acquired with grants and contributions by others 14,687_ - _ (12_204) - - : (12,204) 14,687 Interest on capital - - - - - (7,500) Establishment of operating reserve - - - - - 5,000 5,000 Decrease in vehicle replacement reserve - - - - - 291 291 Decrease in system completion reserve - - - - - - 3,724 3,724 Decrease in system improvement reserve 27,120 - - - - - - 27,120 Bond principal Balance, June 30, 1983 206,550 150,000 599,299 (98,420) (143,679) 166,200 (45,502) 834,448 Net loss for the year - - _ (16_832) _ _ (16,832) Proceeds from grants and contributions - - 43,640 - - - 43,640 Depreciation of assets acquired with grants and contributions by others - - _ (13_359) - - (13,359) Interest on capital - - - 16,657 (2,133) (2,133) Establishment of construction fund reserve - - _ - - - (117) (117) Increase in construction fund reserve - - - - - 3 3 Decrease in system completion reserve - - _ - - - 8,565 8,565 Decrease in system improvement.reserve - - - - - - 4,500 4,500 Decrease in operating reserve 288,,965 - - - - - 28,965 Bond principal - - Balance, June 30, 1984 $235,515 $150,000 $642,939 $(111,779) $(160,511) $182,857 $(34,684) $904,337 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. r SR, rt • �1N-OTES 41r. �`.: Yli:�yy k t:'t .a���Y 3'r..'+ ,if,••+r. i.�. �•.1 A+w 7n.s<•j s t K .A r i t:{.w'4:•;f�n Y i 2 yyi v r}l t>.,� D r� ALTSTATEMENTS TO FINANCI Summary�of Significant;Accounting•Policies ; r.C.,�F 1•X. ..k.'�r�Y�s`�y' � jg,I�_A,�y�kn yj"r.w'tl�f'di�'f.•Fr,+:xi.i t4 L�`r+Q�C.1,��•{l!Sj''e"49�:lb,`a b'�'Y2.�J�)�s r i.x�•it •y• _ oras' ' �' of .o ,'f`a {�. :4'itr..,�' .rr A:; J ,••�1� 't�tx K,.'�1 Si; I..'W N` '.:'£.d + " r g; {�4�MGti.�euY. 'i4l)Jh''+'�..t -W, .. ?. 't�~"' i +"'YkL1»p+��4 tr Description`of:District�'ttz?k - ., '`# •,_„ t � Facilities,".Property;and.Equipment s .r:f5f=• . The San'.Francisco Ba 'Are d:Transd:District is;a publle;agency created:by the legislature e ,.Facilities,Pproperty and`equipment;are;carried:at.cost.fDepreciation`is calculated using the y of;theYState'of Californiaiin 1957;and regulated°by;the San'Francisco Bay;'Area'.Rapid;Transit r�.--strai ht-line method over`the!estimatedtusefulaives of�the!assets":The amount of depreciation of District4Acf�aslamended.aThe`District;doestnot:have'stockholders'.or;equity±holders:and is :i a {:assets'acquired;withiDistrictrfunds+isydistinguishedjfrom depreciation n the statement acquired f Chan es iW,;o f "ri me'tax:`iThe`disbursement'of'.'all funds;received;by,the':District Is•controlledL ;grants'and.contributions byjothers:Thelatteramount',ISshown.o 9 not,subject4to•I co 3 + wit `-Federal and,State: +�" ' net'capital'investmeffwith'the,related:'grants:and�contributions b statutes and:bTprovisionsiofvarious grantcontracts'entered into h �{g�t Y .,.,, �Z y ,�.. �>t`•c'� 'c ; 'a is l M c,, '3��4.•• 1 �:;i ' � `fil�Yrl�:S•?:1,��.FF� � " s .,if '��•�$?'`�f��'�i�t1��: agencies ; ' ' t s, Federal and State,Grants; .,_,. . ,, ,OR ° try° The:District':receives`iamounts from,bothaFederalarid:State:governments to assist in operations 1 Secur is4heiD'strict's! li to holdlinvestments•until thei maturity=,'and, accordingly,.securities are$;,cj Wand;for.*capital'or'other_,projects�Grantsifor;capital:.and-other:projects are recorded as additions It�ls.the: Po cyy carriedtat.cost,At=June_30,X1984'and 1983,,{cost'exceeded':marketivalue'byi$7,067,000 and ;+` to.net:capital:investment;on:receiptrGrants for.operatingA expend urestare inyiudedtas`Tinancia'k I ``The face•`value`of.°securitiesexceeded:cost'at June;30;1984 and.1983 -4-,assistance,inNthe_statement of.operations. t .. 'r..; !�' �' $1'610,000,1�respective y.,. y a }rvt:.. t•t g r. /,{) ? s: S fc ci i Ma�t"f = 1•�. �ltilik}.%��'` ;Y1..' }'.".�y.. r�'wf•N�vy�'!: ,h ::r:i , < Y ..Q ,�.,. 4. �l .1.' •A. I' �' r,3:'ud"i`�by' ar+kYi�' �, }, 6•�",.� `fk.'+t/t�xF ,.t: �'_ }1�tsL, 'rf"S' _ '�`. �'�� s '�' ._Y 't! '''' .,�a.�• fi. .f'�,��y�7st,.3l'�y. .Y ,r,1e;',i.Cr x�� � �'* i, ,� na ..�...- 1+ ..1t� ert,''���.r. °�..a� ..r�.F.'.r;jlf - [t, ����Yw... P,•M i;}: �t 7hY , ..f.. +��,. •U� rr.. k ,�. ,��� [ ti. �r +'1hS. }' .i5..y{,�.�,, A` R' k3 ''Y # 41yFis. i '!•'1-4ac, _'e..: ,!`'4 {..c{I�, ? ,r,• yi,' "�AS°1 .' .f�1'i.. „•*6 �c-s yf'\1y:.- ^.k.P;=5 .7:r .3 r:ci, , ,l+,;,F3f ,. :4� F.rl,�•��:S��i.} _ f ,y.�. S.Lrf..�" °,¢ �i P�,.;':�, �tn. .Y.�., ��,. ,•...,,t; S. ,�,,�, r1;: ti.�.zs.,.�'tfr'� •Y e:r 4f}:' ti's' .9? o• •';y r' .�1r`• MAO; ;,` �!y��c,tt �;.�¢j� ?i`,�•�_ k � �' '!v �'`}a�`��n �{�:.a•. f... '.f� r Yvt� f' K!t".9G• �.?f'r3t�;(r'�' fa'y�':��?^I;. �... i�,t..,a ,... . ,'1 C T•-•. ',,,r "1 �?:. ^� „°tai .e��i.`yy, r ,o• - N ',r `1`:t' �'•i•i J,.< •f Y `(I�_`'!:} ..F'.1.7. y .3, `k� .;!'.. Zi..n. 'c.-. x$. ? '.,°- r .>'r_. �. 'db Y� +.• P ti;: �. ��, .n �'.'3,'yvt.� .1 .��u�•`.••• r .;'rt„ .G.. r „a,. rP .-"�+^ 't.: ��-�.,. :... .r. 3°,Zte+.�:�•r'..n'.-:..��•,. L i.. :.5'.R _�"� hy'.'-'a'.�ti''S..YY`+ � �"'"".6N'C:,.;.�;y ,✓ ,:!' rr.l•3..:Y-:E.i�:CL: x.� S„,..! ... ...::�1...:cf,?:.tt:L:;a��� <.�rL ��...rY ..�:iiL-.. ' �..eia'�L83Sii�u7+e` �.,J:,..>:»:s.ova✓.i»e::4_-:a y 4.a�.•-,a t:.Y:rl:;s __ .. ... _ .. _..--. .. ._... .. t STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FINANCIAL POSITION DEBT SERVICE FUNDS STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND FUND BALANCES Years Ended June 30, 1984 and 1983 (In Thousands) Years Ended June 30, 1984 and 1983 (In Thousands) - I ---- ear Ended June 30, 1984-------------------- - 1984 1983 - ----------------- Y Year Ended - General Sales Tax Sales Tax June 30. Cash and securities (used) provided by: obligation Revenue Anticipation 1983 Operations: Bonds Bonds Notes Combined Combined Net loss transferred to accumulated deficit $(16,832) $(17,459) Revenues: Deduct expenses not requiring cash: Property tax $50,899 $ - $ - $50,899 $48,004 Depreciation of assets acquired with District deposits for principal payment - - 16,000 16,000 own funds 16,819 16,870 Bond proceeds -. - - 00 6,308 Accrued interest from bond sale 210 Cash and securities (used) by operations (13) (589) Allocations from District revenues 6,785 979 7,764 4,525 Issuance of Sales Tax Anticipation Notes 16,000 - Interest 2,087 509 Issuance of Sales Tax Revenue Bonds 65,000 138 2,734 2,703 Contributions from U.S. Government grants 52,986 7,294 17,117 77,397 61,750 and others 43,640 31,214 Expenditures: I Increase in payroll and other liabilities 8,972 7,424 Interest 24,488 6,308 - 30,796 27,379 Increase in unearned passenger revenue 50 132 Prinicipal 28,965 - - 28,965 27,120 Interest on capital 16,657 14,687 Bond service expense - 6 - 3 Interest transmitted to District - 870 - 87 6 6 128 Total cash and securities provided 85,306 117,868 53,453 7,184 - 60,637 54,630 Cash and securities applied to: (467) 110 17,117 16,760 7,120 Increase in deposits, notes and other receivables 22,893 13,461 Balance, beginning of year 12,019 9,840 - 21,859 14,739 Additions to construction in progress 13,903 11,206 Additions to facilities, property and equipment 26,441 23,324 Balance, end of year $11,552 $9,950 $17,117 $38,619 $21,859 Additions to materials and supplies 433 778 Represented by: Total cash and securities applied 63,670 48,769 Cash (including time deposits: 1984, None; 1983, $200) $ 23 $ - $ - $ 23 $ 228 Increase in cash and securities $ 21,636 $ 69,099 Securities 9,903 - - 9,903 10,109 Taxes and interest receivable 1,626 - - 1,626 1,682 Assets with fiscal agent - 9,950 17,117 27,067 9,840 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. $11,552 $9,950 $17,117 $38,619 $21,859 014MA W1 , f Fen yp < O.FINANCIAL`STATEMENTS 1CONT'D xRevenue � ° xi�k y , ; 3:�,r o .. italSources rr �tts� Y:ralfpercenttrarsactions;and:use:taxis(;collected-and:administeredb Stat r�, , , ationrOf;'the'amounts av ' i % ' o , Y• a Board The.Ditit' our: eesfeame ,onipital sourcesias an;increase;ln:net ca Ital allable„for distributionA75/o is transmitted"directly:to'.the r;z ,'�� mves:.rent to';recognize``that this interest`should,be direct) 'associat P ppointed trustee for the,purposeV,paying'.bondiand'n + iv Y ed with theicapital which,M i , P = -�,,,,;,? 9 es,nse;t0�theinterest`and'whichisnot,.available;forcurrento erations on es:riot'required'for;these" ur ses,are tran �;; s ,X. a:��t = P, r•"I`f_ - >t,•r; F :P PO., n smitted to the':Districts,The`District�,""i y.z•,r•. , i �,, ,,,, •n.,� ��:.ci , •,:-,;. _,. •�.:� e Y- 3 . records"the,total_taxes�received as"aransactions and use;tax,and.the'amount-retained b the y" = r�n accordance;,wlth,this policy, management allocated;to:neticapltal investment$11 766 000'of trustee ass pecialdeposits,and`debt•`service`allocations'u n`recei t'ofahe:net=am •. '� VJnterestrevenue;earned;on assetsheld.in-the General°'Operating'Fund but which r I I P°.. P,., ount.Me fit,. �� .s^ # 3 x= h .:-,.., e ated to, ^_State Board:of;Equalization•estimates:that"fransactions:and:use tax;revenues for•=the' eriod A rll:: <<t,capttal projects a :r s; � j .,x 4s_, '1 ;19847to°June'30,1984'will'bef'a roximat I P P „ ::..st ....z , r i• pP , e y.$15;525,000Of this,amtiunt;;$4,657,500 had s:. Self-Insurance;:t, �z _ q , � been,received`and:'recorded'b th 'Di s ,��. � y e, strlct':Comparable figures for;1983.were.,$13,365,000 and -K X-The District.is lar el self-insured for;worker's:compensation';general $4*009500;fespectively ;' ^' w° i t. - w:=. g Y; P 9 ability'claims,.and major it "1oc�^ • t ` t property damageij;The,District'records"the costs'of�self-insured claims and major r`x'' Property Tax,Revenue � ti . ;. .���~.!�'{.!r,yk�'4. damage when they.are'incurred. � `: rid: 3`'- �-, �1 ::tn�':. .�1+1,ti �'.%:Y�^iwY-ii,+c•_. ..y ° .,•c .• l .v�f=i } t• �4: ,.- , he District receives;Property:taz;revenuesto;service the'debt re uiremen -��c :'1�_ 4 bligatio iBonds'and recordsahese`revenues"i ` 4 is of the.:Generale �(� Capital.Allocatlons t�yf �`,f allocatio of. ro tax revenuesao' rovide`f�gthe',debt;service;funds It also receives ant�tl,v rt%'a The Board of Directors.allocates.;a*portion of unrestricted,financial,assistance and eneral fund p. PertY . p o ,general and administrative expenses not`i:<t , ;,revenues net'ca ital investment f_or:ca ital: ro'ects:r �-- .v;�ayr - 9_,4. ;.involving-constructiontalthough'suchrrevenues'ma ;be:used,for�construction if a F • Y ,needed.;:The,�FL '`o�c=x..,s x��;�;x f�:s::.e'�;=i.1�• ��..-•. , Y. P•>�F li :•:�• �;; ifµ �:tK�,•���i.:;r� Distnct records.this'propert tax'allocation`as finan i yY. c al a f t SS S ance: •iY`•��i .wlFf-ti:4 y iIOP✓lYaYlilrlL',C3b� � �� � �J��• a 3-,• ,'�,,', �i i.: j ��-'•� � 1• { 9 Syf G N `F +' NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -CONT'D:` : '2-Reserves`, r'. .�:_. t .,,.i ; .,. ... •,;t :. . - 4-General Obligation Bonds-cont'd' i' Securities are separately classified on the balance sheet to reflect designation by the Board of Directors of a portion In 1962,voters of the member counties of the District authorized a bonded of the District's capitalization as reserves for the following purposes:.;,, " indebtedness totaling$792 million of General Obligation Bonds.Payment of - ;Ar t t-S i• q , both principal and interest is provided by,the levy of District-wide property r --- In Thousands t s ( ) -----" taxes. During 1966, City of Berkeley voters formed Special Service District tJ.at,t 1984 1983 i No. 1 and authorized the issuance of$20.5 million of General Obligation I ?Basic SystemCompletlon r ,; �.4 +t ''�t1 �4�` t $12,287'„ $12,290 >'?" Bonds for construction of subway extensions within that city.Payment of both r System. , s � ' 8,147 ;; 16 712 '.`.principal and interest is provided by taxes levied upon property within the Construction.: °' ° ".° '^ ' +�;; ' 2 250 - .'i Special Service District. Bond principal is payable annually on June 15 and n Self-Insurance +h r , ` 9,000 9,000;•; interest is payable semiannually on June,15 and December 15 from debt ` Operating L} • ', ��a� if "';4" r' s` 4 l� F` "i;?•l i„:',• , service funds. Interest of$11,401,000 on General Obligation Bonds and ' 3,000 ' 7 500 9 $166,000 on Special Service District No.1 Bonds is payable on December 15, A ' :•, %t ii Jt $34,684' $45,502 1984. n 1±I�'}•t[II CS.SS if• k" 'i U l 1" c-/J ,+ ' 'a f :St f,r` S,Ij`C.L :�• s -. ' ¢r,tU, , ,3 as ap�:� ~ ; a-• ,' } , ,Sry, iF , of i :'r•:.•; •,: t, t,;,'The following is a schedule of principal repayments required under General Kit. rN4 ,�•L?1. a a;r:-- ^;;: s' cMss:iai<;, '� :t.::'i,Stir r i 'Obligation Bonds as of June 30,,1984"(' ): 1} - a i Equipment'.- 4} In thousands 3 F cil ties, Property and •.. _ . - ' t •:.:::'. '.�`�: .^.-.. .. , .. t Ti't-Ni - J ) Mta;•, i � f.n l.,i{'`tr:q� Sri .r' . - y Facilities;property 1 `rr 7 1966' p party and equipment,assets lives,and accumulated depreciation and amortization attune 30,1984 and 1983 Year Ending ,�try: 1962 District Special Service sf„ are.summanzed as follows ;z,_t { x y r s June 30 Y Serial Bonds-' " District Bonds Total t 1 r -------------- -------------------------- i ,i;1 985::;'' ,i j 3 1 , „ -(In Thousands) ` , $,-30,350 ..t $ 'r--------- ------ c :1986 :ri'i 32,400;t , t y F 420 32,820 -1984------------- --1983-------------` $ + ,( + • , e c , ? , Accumulated Accumulated; `.1 gg7 ,':;}s j•34,225 440 . 34,665 Depreciation Depreciation 1988 "` .36,250 Y r Lives s r and and s 480 38 880 T Fi. r F ,. ._:• ? h.Y 1989 `38,400- , (Years) Cost Amortization Cost Amortization : Later Years '' 389,300 f• - - 5,350 394,650 Land.,; $ .113,134 $ $ 108,263 lit Improvements y. ;y ' ;80 fi11062480: 138,559 " 1,050,753 125,171 ;:r $560,925, $7,560 $568,485 System-wide operation and control X120 t ;•114,353 49,939 112,761 44,390 t' ; Revenue transit vehicles . ;•;t •` ,30 vt 157,663 51,845 155,963 46,596.'.,,, j` ,` ,,, tr` r�,� ;^t; Service and miscellaneous equipment 3 to 20 ttt� -;f 20,775 t 10,114 18,792' 8,543 ' Capitalized construction and start-up costs 30 f ;'103,557 34,288 =' 99,437 30,647 ? Repairable property items h 30 r�t+ 7,375, 2,214 7,496 2,003 ' r°• C�' ,'llrl ? •it - f`i '. i rCt•t - . r;$1,579,337 $286,959 $1,553,465 $257,350 as. J•'^�,,ipC+ rh-e ... ,. 1� r.t .�v,l(,,. y ,,}t {,..,., }�/rt"i4 :,� i, �i� E• '; } to i t � i ^ 7 � t '. t. i i >�'.rtt x e t 1 ,.t•4 r :4.:."�.,. i S t , M1 I .F}.t 1}-i'i r f" -t - ^ ,et , 1.tl r� ,1.: w"^ r!r?- .vq :` r?Y��t}� "•24�ve r.,",'V{r..' l.s.. hl.--. '! LF/�fti,'7 .i .'at:. ` - 4'$.: ' , if '.} ydi�'+r V h. fa•7 r""'t,.}M1 - .. , r s.F`,e,. ;'e '! e...` •nt -'IJ, , , r; i. t( -y + T.r ^: 't SL y i a `p --4 General Obligation•Bonds 1 i y_r 2 t 4;"� .i-. is c r I..F �} -. .. . .T4 F}, , � t� h nr-• • ' I '' d , ,1F V<i I� iy k`..dC( Y•..�° Year --�- ;ice__•(In Thousands) ----------------------------- --- i ,,•It; -1�5Y'U riFrf.Composite Last .,' OriginalAmounti:�;�;>` ---------1984-------"--,------------1983 --------- , 4�i,� r i ri` vt't ', � •�; .Ytt 5 rr lA , . . - f Interest Series Due In Due In , ,; F f=i •.,; .;;;„ ;. tfj>a t ` 1 + n �f;';�°t" i•' Rate ' " Matures Authorized�,' Issued '":' '' 1 Year Total 1 Year Total .t i}. •" 3 j 1962 District Bonds4 3.97% 1999 :,$792,000; $792,000 >..,$30,350 $560,925 ;..$28,575 $589 500 1966 Special Service:'f• 4 , t ,,;-, .:i;; ;' ,' ti .s�,' , + ; X. District'Bonds �''' 4.37% 1 8 2 200 ,' ''41 7 11 99 0,500' '1 0 0 ,560 390 7,950 �, r- F i • t s t n t `t" , f s <. :� $812,500: $804,000" $30,760 $568,485! $28,965. $597,450 1j •" t,1, j �. ,.i�{fi.�-:r ar •r�' .i•;M :' '' ? .4 ..'('7 ? i ", :r'.• J is'^ 'i•_r(i, rt.� ,g:; � ',. i'j^ 7i�. rt ;�i, - t - yV�f;. 't- S•F}y •. , ,. tF Y 'P I•:' 14 i!• <-, -t .r- i.?' )' �. {r, i,• -? tea. e,t r f r. •'� Nc. ^,.. 't: „IV� ',R { ''T''. ,! r. 1. +3rd%7 h• t. _ a•.a• a ••(.Ir. t. / ? } t I (' {'.l.mil 1 ) l�• f; , 4 F ix yJ t ,• F T f t , ` F ! i t F', _ 1.' t7^5j ,t � ^tS rl. '.J , t ,.. .t Iv ,f ,T.s, •, z NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—CONT'D' i�.�sj`� ! 6—Sales Tax Anticipation Notes _ <rr ,j.ri �` f°-(+ . �� i -r. dkr�lr :,. ,�. .:., <,� , ,.-..... 5—Sales Tax Revenue Bonds ,'` •. w+ + • �i;K`? 1 . -� 'L•:}`" �•.`- '' .r "r In July-.1983, the.District.issued $16 million in subordinated Sales Tax {` .Anticipation Notes to provide.interim financing to defray operating (In Thousands) –----- ,tea s Y Pe 9 ble,from the-General Operating Fund of the District.These r;`•expenses paya –1984 ---------1983---- { -- F notes are payable from taxes;revenue,'and other moneys received by the . Year Last +�+ :Orlglnal Amounts `+' r m F t t r.':_:. *.•_. series>; .: 4z, �:'.;" Due In .f,'i4•,General Operating Fund for,fiscal year;1983/1984:Interest of$979,000 is tr:, ?'• '- xt :., x4�: payable in July.,1984, when notes mature.+i :r Matures :Authorized. Issued 1 Year. Total r. t Year Total F, 4S .fK F,r. ,,7,( i .? 7� "' r s, — t-_7 U.S.'Government Grants- t `. 1969-Sales'Tax Revenue Bonds 1977,;ys ��$150,000,1;.$150,000 Y{ $ F,I..`-$ f $ $ — 6 (] I 1. l.''.,A ii:,;';'ti;'i+.,.r. "tt?•, f J. .i q i;.`:1982 Sales;Tax.Revenue Bonds ;2008 ;;•:;65,000,, _,:65,000. 490''. 65,000:k,,5 5, 00' Cap to f + J _ , .N J+;" ",i r•)',�t;: �Y�.3'i. I ��,i:. rwtl iiJ t:`�s' a'. Ca; .c: + `!t. ckl"%ix i, ,,,/ gh•1+„`f th-d.�4 't�>`. - -$215,000:. $490= :f'r$65,000 �': $ -0- $65,000 'x` ;The U.S.•Government;under.grant contracts with the District, provides ^:= "Yt �' '' ; , -'financial assistance for capital projects."Grants for capital projects are t 1..i1A � �..�N:-.�.�+`+�),.'1:•i.•�.ty.,.,:L?.1�.i^:1 ", �,��.a.. ti:•`V�T,j.}j .��d�.7-? Yrl'(li�,�p•h t�•:1���.�i:'f,'.'�:l..L..i j 1' .+v'. T. l ,recorded as additions to,net.ca ital investment when received. A f• The`1969 Legislature of the State:of Cal ifornia-authorized.the District to impose a 1/2%transactions and use tax ti �. t; , p I .��y__iwithinthe,District and issue.Sales Tax Revenue Bonds totaling:$150 million.rThe State.Legislature later extended the summary of Urban Mass;Transportation;Administration Grants in force at '' :tax to'`June 30''1978`and authorized the District t 'issue bonds t talin 24 million to be used for o erations.=..,:•<- _ , :� •,'-June 30,1984 is;as follows: ihi.i•'�`,- r S}: Payment of:these`Sales:Tax Revenue Bonds was com leted b':June 30:1978.:: ,>� ,t�;+ j� ,���' a r�r�������Y$,�x �}- (In Thousands) – Y P Y.. t rr t t:• %•' .4 r , rt t r L; ; �. e S f } ,Y i• 1 i .F'7�o� ?�`S�''.°`, +�+�.[ %,fit �"•-'s"..ry. ^,-��L •ru;�;�' L�,�t`•f� Maximum Funds 1-1t�•, i,.'c14�taDjt i 4_ OnlSeptember 30 1977.the`Governor'signed legislation which,'extended the transactions stand use tax indefinitely.; •;,�M1,.Type of Grant Grant Received The:tax is collected and administered by the State.Board`of Equalization. Of the amounts available for distribution i =X75%is-'allocated-to the.District and 25%is,allocated b the,Metro titan Transportation.Commission to the District BeautificationG ^-1,961 $ 1,961 I s y PO P i•,.:D r s y c� t'#< x o is .;»y -c ; ''13,360 13,331 City and..County of San Francisco, and the Alameda-Contra;Costa:Transit District for.transit services on the basis :; �? emonstration1u �a y: Ft, . ,A ..' ,�.. ,, Capital i , , ,;v.,•,}..,;t �2T,..,a <rsY .,..r 439,637 340,170 It of regional'priorities established b the Commission. P tr a •?• ": ," 1^ , f, 9 P Y •:�,• ..tsc' ..e,)7 Y•:'• .a,l..t ;ri rt. ,:wr. >s,j`'.: .•, 4: .. t )tF 1, . -i 7 <' .•;5 .f, :-a•t.d:::}i'te c a :'�• �, :•f•L:rr�'= , fM, r�a: 454 958 . $355,462 S, In'October 1982'4he'District issued revenue'bonds`totaling$65`million to pay a portion of the cost of acquisition of $ $ �y .f ;...:y ... :. `..ter.:. ..r.{•+<f 1�.. � .:),-:,t 150.rail.hansit'vehicles and related automatic train control equipment for use in the District's existing rapid transit r 8—Litigation and Disputes with Contractors and Others U '.aystem:;The;°.1982 Bonds are,special obligations of,thelDistrict payable from and secured by a pledge of revenues, y including`certain'sales'tax;revenues; all passenger'fares.'and certain property-tax revenues. Bond coupon rates range;.?; .,.The District is involved in various lawsuits;claims and disputes, which for { ;from7%`.to.10%'depending upon the various maturity.dates .The bonds maturing on or after July 1, 1992 are :':<:4 the most part, are normal to the District's operations. In the opinion of ;. redeemable prior to maturity at the option of the District on various dates-at prices ranging from 103%to 100%.The ;%management, the costs that might be incurred, if any, would not materially x ' +, bonds maturing July 1,'2008 are also subject to redemption to,satisfy sinking account.installments on or after July 1,':. ti affect the District's financial position.or operations. 4 2002:at100 0. . .9—Public Employees Retirement System; j y :Taxes collected by the State Board of Equalization are transmitted directly to the appointed trustee for the purpose of 'YThe District contributes to the Public Employees' Retirement System. The paying bond:interest semiannually on July,1-and January;l,•principal annually on July 1 and expenses of the trustee.::::. System is a contributory pension plan providing retirement, disability, and onies not required-for these purposes are transmitted.to the District. Interest of.$3,154,000 is payable on July 1,:;„ ;;;?;;.death benefits to employees of certain state and local governmental units. Z% 1984.•Additionally,the trustee retains amounts needed for the payment of principal and interest on$16 million Sales Tax:f; rs,Substantially all full-time employees ofthe District are covered by the ?1<:�Anticipation Notes'maturing in July 1984(see Note 6).;Taxes received by the trustee during the current fiscal year were „'';t , System.* Pension'costs of.•the:Systern are determined actuarially and 1 3a -$71,136,000 of which$23,764,000 was retained by the trustee for the above purposes and$47,372,000 was transmitted.`i ;,,.,{ required contributions are expensed currently.:Pension expense was to the Distfict.The District records the total taxes received as transactions and use tax and the amount retained by the s.$7,505,000•and $6,111,000;in:.1984 and 1983,.respectively. b ,.trustee as special*.deposits and debt service allocations upon receipt of the net amount.:i t. z a,;. ..., . :...•t.....:. , «:f 10—Deferred Compensation'Plan'`' <;x'.-�:r> to F The*following�ls a schedule of principal repayments required under;Sales.Tax Revenue Bonds as of June 30, 1984 �; ' (in thousan ds):, CL � :, :• , =;;F �:,"s x,,rr 2 c��' :';: -The District has deposited funds with a custodian pursuant to the District's r«cF ;. , ` ,; fe 4-,'�:•: ;',�� }.r. , f together with earnings had a {k " ..Sr,� deferred compensation plan'IrThese deposits toget e e gs r Sales Tax fi 4 � _ ��, t, market value of.$11,070,000-as'of June 30,`1984.This amount is 1 itx ''t r Ending ";Revenue 4�s. �?l?r�Y,�!t ""t�t��:+ :ar i";'kK}, >'; , ; ! Yea y „ a4°x� ,Ynik�' `;kt}"; t, <; ;,:;,reflected on the balance sheet in deposits,_notes and other receivables June 30 Bonds f a rl _ f1 <"�-+•, rm and in payroll and other. �> :X '?, •,. _ =;•' 1. a:, r .fit' ' ..r,e «_ ' }i. ,. -. o e liabilities .4 ,� L•;j" c3� a.:.' ''•s1: v ^ i[' •,•-^.�5'!'::1,"{•.`yc•I.! al',r L _ . :z ;, r <, '?ta,..s .r .,r:• - .1::1985 -.r $, .,490:�. ,',, ., v;t.. ..i t / -, v '' Yt�'�: .ice• t.' - .,.. . 1986 l' t�..,54S S��"ir .;'w,,)), 11—Subsequent!Events ; k` lilt " 3 r)Jt,?.. �! t4_ ,i {, w {3' � 1987, '. . 610 r :GIB, In Jul 1984 the District sold $19,860,000 in subordinated Sales Tax + ![ t' +tilt},`.':.!*,1:4 •:a +✓'d'>','.f,jF„[ ,' ' t .i t d ,Fy:`t y'i: •'°'Jf`t.,i. 1�-J,�r' ! l�,s(p .F" tr 311 +.it t' j -.•••. .; y , t - ?. :1988 rr•f,''"�685 t� ? ,:. •.I `= 4 ? Antici ation Notes to defra o eratin ex enses a able from the General P Y operating P payable i1; ti:,:1�t .t. u>, r,�� n < {0,� 6rbY t i:fj; `19891 -765-};r; ti c�`; , , t K ;t r , + ,�„ ;., 4 . Operating Fund of the District.,ln addition,the District sold $10,900,000 in •.�;ot.;.t`�'�.,..,Later ears")-' ;' ?at�=�v�:-61,905 715, ,'-':, g Grant Gr nt Anti i a ti n Notes to provide financing for certain capital expenditures. The issuance of these temporary notes is in anticipation of . $65,000 the receipt of taxes, grants, revenue;'and other moneys to be received by „ f+ 'k•fi ((,xG. , ,d 5�� ,r �,,:; +a, ,r. ' y, the General Operating Fund,of the District during or allocable to fiscal _ year 1984/1985.1 r'• :j •'b i r; e , . =� -lt F - ' ':•is�3• �'.r tat'.r -)yv ,+•r.rt; S�S aZ 'i;. I _ MY fig AVftk � -U-7, 1r=:-=-,n�s-, I ' West Pittsburg I Conclusion ..,• � North Concord'Martutei the West Pittsburg station, three With the close of the year, BART challenge for the future, for which i ;: cdrcdrd parcels in Antioch for the Antioch pointed with pride to its increasing preparations are well under way, is .• station and one parcel in Fremont role as a stable, reliable part of the to keep pace with the growth of for the Irvington station. region's public transit system. The the San Francisco Bay Area. 'r Phase I of the BART Extension a` Ja"ei Policy extends the system to North - . 9a�Ga`'�o o�ac Concord/West Pittsburg, Irving- ton/Warm Springs, Castro Val- DCrty `ercP°�. ,ay ley/Dublin and Daly City to San San Frarcrsco 4\�,2 Francisco Airport in accordance with a policy commitment to an ex- tension for San Francisco. �!'z Prue I Extensions—Adapted February.1984 �*•=., " V nsion of Services ' and Capacity Station Area Development Acquisition of station sites for ex- BART made substantial progress a : ° '' -r," �I,,vr ----�, �R ;• f tension is in progress with the ini- during the past fiscal year toward tial effort focusing on the complete its goal of encouraging approp- acquisition of parcels in Phase I of riate development at BART sta- the BART Extension Policy. Interi►t1 lions. At Pleasant hill, Contra ,��t JI_, -.;; 1► ,✓a >_- usage of these sites will be coordi- Costa County approved a specific nated with the District's planned plan for the BART station area, improvements to its Express Bus which makes possible substantial program to provide freeway- commercial development on por- oriented, park/ride lots for the Ex- tions of BART land. At Walnut press Bus operations. Creek, the City Council and the Properties acquired for extension BART Board of Directors endorsed " of the 71-mile basic system in- a preliminary development plan for elude two parcels in Castro Valley the station site. Active Joint plan- . for the Livermore-Pleasanton ex- ning efforts also were initiated in tension, one parcel in Pittsburg for Richmond, El Cerrito and Concord. • " 16 . i M BART SYSTEM MAP �� :Bridge Benleia-M.rtlnez Bridge r¢ T y a�{ T! = 1 Antioch Brldpe - •r•�N} �i r .f t Wa Ptttabx .. vvH4LXXXllliii r �klff > ! s�\Kr r Martlnex H°`th •••••Qlllllrl `- � ,£ *: s + olnrn///IU1n////n/uunit1711u d ••••• pittel .. rAntioch I/Ir1/r Fferulean Concord ©fit ' rQ ` -A• + r 1fd"- ry.s" X + a r. t7. 1 a. '-i h.a.. .' Oakley i J.r••••��,�� v �1C� L�vv��y ri• � C 5F � . � e � 1 r r '•� r -.. : .' • g•t s :.�::'♦ •.s 9'Yr y .i i '� u =Votkner Peek r :�L•'lt(.t..n + c CMfoWd Yard - San Me Bridge Cf>!�o Da Nate•©. f�r Etr ry �.'r O errit Co mvze•,;( -'".� �a•'e r '' T fr 'a�-- s �s Pleasant HMO❑ - Mt.Diable Riasnorfd• .~ •fJarttt '. ...• Berkeley• Berkeley.;_}�.cs�. �*L�j , '. :2.+ '=:!-�i ;J•^ ; Brentwood N:• :.-^ ..r• a { ' .�- �fl'L' WaKd Creek• 4 II - 7 MNaYtI► /111Ir"Atemo. layette r111<III1nDerivlle�- .',"x-,.�st wl9tlf St.-Oakland n-_ _ r •, ©" :r „1;.. -~l - Oakland Clty'Cerdep.-I (Trenafer'StetbrJ �i}r _ WaArthrO 'twa 1 •. _ f 4 `� ��1, ' . Treasure'•San Frencbco-OaklerW (Tranal T f Stadoi)`.= k•-(1� San Ranan �y '.�,,..1 S.-ri•L^.e.F�.: Bay e�'r' •. �� } A?`. it$�,w -�• �Y ' �l v ti ,�-4 11, Golden Gate Bridge f- .� �+ *"Oak a Merrpt '`.l`1•r.�.•;, .2' !f +LrG r" • Ward ls-^t1CCye. '' �"j i.Sr'p. s ~ t�.7'e^-dL� •. p I�lltl •••••••• uvermors tan s 7 �_�sY KWes ..SlJltderQ Fn/tv ale 0�c;�1#;_•_ 't_ ` 't •- � _ + •� •• ..5 '° P.:'r a o.. Co\aeum/OektenZl 1V•' K w.-. 3-u'�i •• Pleasanton 2b! � - a 17• x4; ' x�:_�iy� ���t. C �.5`<i ��_ A � y'�,''f.'�E # � ,'\` , /r0•••••••• l �lbntpoalery SI I ''t'`.. �' •, . ySr� a� •1.;...'..;sYi�w �r� �yet^y`�,�k�4ystrp ♦♦�. y ` PpWed�8 -, t;�}. :'.+ `�\ r rXac °7��i•. San Law,ro .Metropoptan Oaklang .� Nut " '+,-• f/;,�•x F •-�' Chrie:CeMer - err �x e.. to: In -;t. �. International Al ;jfi,+ �'':Bey � s - .♦♦♦♦' f -.� ?. p� -•°-��'^� - s � art Fa k• �,°fa ,�• 1 s. Eb a'.>.t ,�•i�im� I th St.Mlsabn° s,i...i. eY a�t�. - r L - } /♦♦♦'f_ St .a } � .c r.4 �w at „ s•,a..x': .tvslc�?y�. 111111 I I 1`♦ti r .a _ .� ; y Arts=e _f+ Y�;''. ♦ "�'. 24th St,Alaabn �s''�'y L •z t Y't+a 4 Y-r• - ♦♦ r` .. R �`-i X2'4^• t ♦ �i ,w_`9-:"t`�. : :,.h, .,� ):x 4 3 `♦'C5�,Q•c�io raj i� .y C' r "s © VA. HayraNw•�� '.:i•°'--��u f + t 5,� k r� o. GTer1 Parks y:. +' r ® s r7r t +�' `.dam' l �_�"rN- •-. dy.a 4 "^(�y -:V?�'+!` sr ,�' ��� 'l• r -tx v'ti. `�'n'^�,tf'.tr ';•tMi?617kr °� .+.°Y a�s:r R .t s '•4r-r South He y war d• ;�� .•. ti` .... ��\' s eafboa Perkhw_ .; ti.1•rS' i.•..San Franciscows�. }*`• s 4•. ii'�1 '�' ` t '+���lg a„-i1'' r a �r t+ ..•t:,: � .. �` .L,ryy?'ca-,�u§.i.• �' r- ,ti• r• j• ..r Inter a't�ional•'Airport b an Mate o l&. Brk1� Lxr,c.?.e s Yw ar' .'RC•:tr 1:'"••...:_?•, *.l rd s•,_ _, ,-. .,�..3?.r r r r W; ,t�n I �' .. aA''!✓.fit�1 i k ,, . *�s• ? Yr � r;:yr '�" C,:. ( ,3 Daly ,. city© eSefriprtw>rtla�y' rrr�gt ai ;� f�..�.rTy��'+(+ hR't „? 4t .. 1r el✓� JHl1a,. tt .. . .. :.." r'Y•r �r� }1�lt,u,Si ?7"x Yj`*^f'- �> ��..r i.'- f :: ss,� • ,Fremont© .. ,�,�;.g. `gyp, y ls':•.:, i .f.i+r System kiormatlan 1-'._', b -uY- 2 �/,�?'1'`a-.eye ^ ;re sl+�.',sy«ta+r..'s j /t .;P#anbarton;' .: r 43 ti a; Zoo District . s •. } � s Tani nanbar d aubrt+o6ls' .. .. :� .�, , ... - - •K,':?c+`x i+ `" ti ., ped3tp spaces at BART Station: ' 22 00• CONCORD/DALV C1TV tlL ��- �a'�Y�t 6'K'ice Warn Sprhps (10%ol/tees PNMQ sixicas br�dvY Drb^Cl RICHAOF'7D/DALY CrTY '+ ¢ `�.;�' 1 !r_ }wOV#"•cv:�G4-q.' ^- Dist.kt - c:�4'W.45 RICFfgtD/F{iQ.10fJT 3 f {y .. . ■ In accordance with BART Ex- uel'°"t -` FRaatrt/DALY CRV i .� •c rte.ety tension Policy adopted on Feb- A UK.--(Fr+las b tor+Man" z►►as. + � r; V �- Y t OAeiso"a"i of ruary 2,1984,Stations outside M Lkw--pdy City to Oddard WwQ 15 16411011 1111111111 BART Express Bus the District are subject to - Rtkr•-(RkheadbMwArfto 12 Aloe Par10'p satisfactory cost-sharing ar- C Lkw-JD01Mr*wn'ad'b b Corword) 213 Mks Tad Me 713 Moe PaAdp rangement e A R T tA/nice ate colalned tram the n, WYE I BART Ralf System -.j;-• .,s:, BART First Phasa Extensions■ i SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT(BART) Headquarters In downtown Oakland, California 800 Madison Street, P.O. Box 12688 Oakland, CA 94604.2688(415)464-6000 Established in 1957 by the California State Legislature. Authorized to plan, finance,construct and operate a rapid transit system. Governed by a Board of Directors elected for four-year terms by voters In nine election districts within the counties of Alameda,Contra Costa and San Francisco. BOARD Or DIRECTORS— Fiscal Year 1984 PRESIDENT Arthur J.Shartsls, Oakland VICE PRESIDENT Nelio Blanco, El Sobranle MEMBERS OF THE BOARD District #I—Barclay Simpson, Lafayette District #2—Hello Bianco, El Sobrante District #3—Arthur J.Shartsis, Oakland District #4—Margaret K. Pryor,Oakland District #5—Robert S.Allen, Livermore District #6—John Glenn, Fremont District #7—Wilfred T. Ussery, San Francisco District #8—Eugene Garfinkle, San Francisco District #9—John It. Kirkwood,San Francisco BOARD-APPOINTED OFFICERS C. K. Bernard,General Manager Malcolm M. Barrett.General Counsel William F.Goeiz,Corm troller/Treasurer Phillip O.Ormsbee,District Secretary DEPARTMENT HEADS REPORTING TO THE GENERAL MANAGER Richard P.Demko,Executive Manager, Maintenance&Engineering William B. Fleisher,Chief T),ansportatlon Officer Howard L.Goode,Planning&Analysis' Michael C. Healy,Public Affairs . Ernest G. Howard,AdminLsfraflve Services' , John Mack,Affirmative Actfon : Hedy Morant,Budget&Capital Program Control Thomas R.Sheehan,Information Systems William Thomas,Material Management&Procurement Ralph S.Weule,Safety Larry A.Williams,Employee Relations The Annual Report Is published by the District pursuant to Section 28770, Public Utilities Code of the State of California. Art Director:Kauthar Hawkins, Oakland, CA Graphic Design:Bernadette Tyler, San Francisco, CA Printer:Inter-City Printing Co.,Oakland, CA Photography:California Photo Service, Emeryville, CA Gordon Kloess, tlaifmoon Bay,CA System Map:Arthur Richardson, BART Documentation