Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 4.8 Economic/Traffic Consult Downtown Plan (2) CITY OF DUBLIN �aOO-30 AGENDA STATEMENT City Council Meeting Date: December 9, 1985 SUBJECT: Economic Consultant and Traffic Consultant for Downtown Improvement Plan EXHIBITS ATTACHED: A. Draft Agreement with Laventhol & Horwath B . Laventhol & Horwath Proposal with Addendum C. Draft Letter authorizing traffic engineering services D. TJKM Proposal RECOMMENDATION: , w' 1 ) Approve hiring of Laventhol & Horwath for U� economic consultant services . 2 ) Approve hiring of TJKM for traffic engineering services . 3 ) Authorize budget transfer . 4 ) Authorize City Manager to execute agreements . FINANCIAL STATEMENT: The budget for Fiscal Year 1985-1986 contains $80 ,000 for Downtown Improvement Plan consultant services . The City Council has approved $65 , 000 for Planning consultant services . The proposed economic consultant services would need $22,500 and the traffic engineering services would need $11 , 000 , for an overall total of $98 , 500 . A budget transfer of $18, 500 from the Contingent Reserve is recommended to cover the Downtown Improvement Plan consultant services . DESCRIPTION: On October 28 , 1985 , the City Council approved a Request for Proposal for economic consultant services, requested a recommendation from the Downtown Improvement Study Committee, and directed Staff to bring the proposal to the City Council for approval prior to entering into the agreement . In response to the Request for Proposal, Laventhol and Horwath and Gruen, Gruen + Associates submitted proposals . On November 21 , 1985 , the Downtown Improvement Study Committee interviewed the two economic consultant firms. The Downtown Improvement Study Committee, by consensus, recommended Laventhol and Horwath. The economic consultant services proposal involves analyzing existing economic data, conducting a survey of shoppers and merchants, analyzing the retail, office, and hotel markets, and developing financial programs . Richard Caplan would be the project manager . Staff has prepared a draft agreement ( see Exhibit A) which includes the Laventhol and Horwath proposal with an addendum as part of the appendix . For traffic engineering services , the Staff and Larry Cannon, Planning Consultant for the Downtown Improvement Plan, met with Chris Kinzel of TJKM to discuss a scope of services . The TJKM proposal involves updating downtown traffic data, surveying parking needs, developing specific transportation plans in response to alternative Downtown scenarios, and developing an action plan for the adopted Downtown scenario. Staff has prepared a draft letter ( see Exhibit C) which authorizes TJKM to perform the traffic engineering services. Staff recommends that the City Council approve the selection of the economic and traffic consultants, authorize the budget transfer of $18 , 500 from the Contingent Reserve, and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreements. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ITEM NO. COPIES TO: AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES 1. CLIENT AND CONSULTANT AGREEMENT. The following terms and conditions constitute an Agreement dated , 198_, between the City of Dublin ( hereafter referred to as CLIENT) and Laventhol and Horwath (hereafter. referred to as CONSULTANT) , for Planning services in conjunction with work to be performed . under the direction of the Dublin Planning Department . 2 . SCOPE OF SERVICES/WORK. The consultant shall provide the CLIENT with the scope of service/work described in APPENDIX A attached hereto and made a part hereof . 3 . INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. It is specifically understood and agreed that in the making and performance of this Agreement , CONSULTANT is an independent contractor and is not and shall not be construed to be an employee, agent, or servant of the CLIENT. 4 . INTEREST OF CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT covenants that he/she presently has no interest and shall not acquire an interest, direct or indirect , which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of services required to be performed under this Agreement . CONSULTANT further covenants that to the best of its knowledge, no person having any such interest shall be employed in the performance of this Agreement . 5 . EXCLUSIVE SERVICES . CONSULTANT agrees to restrict its firm and its subcontractors from any employment, other than the CLIENT, in any way pertaining to the subject of this employment or to the proposed project which this report will review, for a period of two years after the effective date of this agreement without first obtaining the prior written consent of the Director of Planning for such employment . CONSULTANT further agrees to insert this condition into all contracts or work agreements with his subcontractors . 6 . PUBLICATION, REPRODUCTION. AND USE OF MATERIAL. No material produced in whole or in part under this Agreement shall be subject to copyright in the United States or in any other country. The CLIENT shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose, distribute and otherwise use, in whole or in part, any reports, data, or other materials prepared under this Agreement . If the CLIENT discloses to any other party any reports, data or other material prepared by the CONSULTANT, the CLIENT must make reference to any final report prepared under this Agreement by the CONSULTANT. 7 . FINDINGS CONFIDENTIAL. Any reports, information or data given to or prepared or assembled by the CONSULTANT under this Agreement shall not be made available to any individual or organization by the CONSULTANT without the prior written approval of the CLIENT. CONSULTANT is entitled to retain copies of all data working papers, interim documents , memoranda and reports produced under this Agreement for use in the normal conduct of its business, except that no confidential information will be disclosed, provided, however , that nothing contained herein shall prevent the disclosure of such information if compelled by legal process, and in the event thereof, only after notice to CLIENT. 8 . CHANGES. The Agreement between CLIENT AND CONSULTANT and this supplement of terms and conditions is the only agreement between the parties and supersedes all negotiations, proposals , notices of award, agreements, and understandings written or oral heretofore had between the parties relating to the work to be performed. If changes are requested by either party, including any changes in the scope of services, any increase or decrease in the amount of the CONSULTANT ' s compensation, they must be agreed to in writing and signed by both parties . "Fyn NIBIRP A -1- 9 . PAYMENT. Payment for services shall be on a time and materials basis not to exceed the Laventhol and Horwath Budget Estimate total . At the end of each calendar month during the term of this Agreement CONSULTANT shall submit an invoice detailing the hours of work recorded and the expenses incurred in the performance of his agreement . CLIENT may specify that a progress report accompany each invoice. Payment for services by the CONSULTANT shall be at the following rates (See Appendix A) : 1 . Planning /hour 2 . Reimbursable expenses a. $ . 25/mile for travel during working hours excluding travel to and from office b, film, drafting materials, and the like, at cost with each invoice. The CLIENT shall retain ten percent ( 10% ) of the payment . The CLIENT shall forward the retained payment within 20 days of completion of the consultant work and final acceptance by the CLIENT. Except for the 10% retention specified above, within 20 days of receipt of each invoice, CLIENT shall forward payment to CONSULTANT for all items on the invoice that are not in dispute and CLIENT and CONSULTANT will proceed to negotiate, arbitrate or litigate the disputed items as specified elsewhere in this Agreement . 10 . TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT FOR CAUSE. If CLIENT considers CONSULTANT to be in default of any of the terms of this Agreement , CLIENT shall give CONSULTANT written notice of such default specifying the manner in which he considers CONSULTANT to be in default . CONSULTANT shall then have 10 days in which to cure said default . If after 10 days the default is not cured, the CLIENT may terminate the Agreement . In that event, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies , surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographics and reports or other material prepared by the CONSULTANT through this Agreement shall, at the option of the CLIENT, become the property of the CLIENT and the CONSULTANT shall be entitled to receive an amount which bears the same ratio to the total compensation under this Agreement as the services actually performed bear to the total services of the CONSULTANT covered by this Agreement less payments of compensation previously made. 11 . TERMINATION OF THE AGREEMENT FOR CONVENIENCE OF THE CLIENT OR CONSULTANT. The CLIENT may terminate this Agreement by giving written notice to the CONSULTANT of such termination, specifying the effective date thereof, at least fifteen days before the effective date of such termination. Within 5 working days after such termination, CONSULTANT shall submit a final notice to CLIENT, which CLIENT shall pay in full within 20 days of receipt of invoice, excepting any items that are in dispute. The CONSULTANT may terminate this Agreement in the similar fashion as described above for the CLIENT, at lease fifteen days before the effective date of such termination. 12 . PREVENTION OF PERFORMANCE. CONSULTANT shall not be in default under this Agreement if its performance is prevented or hindered by an act of God, fire, riot, labor disturbances ( including, without limitations, lockouts) , accidents, wars, acts of any government (whether foreign or domestic, federal, state, county or municipal) , partial or total interruption of loss or shortage of transportation facilities, or by any other causes beyond the control of the parties. So long as the impossibility continues the time for performance under the contract is extended. 13 . ARBITRATION. Any controversy or, claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach thereof shall be settled by arbitration procedures in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association and judgment upon any awards rendered by the Arbitrators shall be entered in any court of - competent jurisdiction. ' -2- 14 . CALIFORNIA LAW. The interpretation and performance of this Agreement shall be governed by the law of the State of California . 15 . CAPTIONS. The captions inserted herein are inserted only as a matter of convenience and for reference and in no way define, limit or describe the scope of this contract nor the intent of any of the provisions thereof. 16 . NOTICE. Wherever notice is required to be given under the terms of this Agreement, it shall be in writing and shall be effective the day it is mailed, properly addressed to the party to receive such notice. Notice delivered other than by mail shall be effective when received. When notice is to be given by CLIENT, unless otherwise provide, shall be mailed or delivered to: Richard Ambrose, City Manager City of Dublin 6500 Dublin Blvd. Ste. D Dublin, CA 94568 Notice to CONSULTANT, unless otherwise provided shall be addressed to: 17 . COMPENSATION FOR TESTIMONY AND PREPARATION THEREOF. If any legal action other than action that is the result of incompetence or malfeasance by the CONSULTANT, is brought against the CLIENT by any third party in connection with matters which are the subject of this Agreement, and it becomes necessary for CONSULTANT or any employee thereof or any subcontractor to testify, provide information or produce material in any such action, or if the CLIENT requests such involvement, the CLIENT shall compensate the CONSULTANT and any such employee or subcontractor for time so spent at CONSULTANT or subcontractor ' s standard rates then in effect and for any expenses , including attorney ' s fees, reasonably incurred in connection with such testimony or production or the preparation thereof . Such compensation shall be in addtion to the maximum charge for services defined in the Agreement . -3- 18 . IN WITNESS WHEREOF: CLIENT and CONSULTANT have accepted the above terms and conditions and have incorporated them into this Agreement . These signatures attest the parties ' agreement hereto: CITY OF DUBLIN By Date: City of Dublin CONSULTANT by: Date: ( Designate official capacity in the business ) by: Date: (Designate official capacity in the business ) Note to CONSULTANT: ( 1 ) Execute acknowledgement form below, and ( 2 ) if a corporation, signatures must conform to designated representative groups pursuant to Corporations Code Sec. 313 . State of California ) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (by Corporation, )ss Partnership, or individual ) County of On this day of , in the year before me personally appeared , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence ) to be the person who executed the within instrument as proprietor or as president (or secretary) or on behalf of the corporation therein named and acknowledged to me that the corporation executed it. DATED: (NOTARIAL SEAL) Notary Public -4- APPENDIX A Appendix A shall include: 1 ) The Laventhol and Horwath proposal dated and received by the City of Dublin on November 12 , 1985 , and 2 ) The Laventhol and Horwath addendum dated November 27 , 1985 , and received by the City of Dublin on December 3 , 1985 . ® Laventhol &Horwath Suite 3600 One Metropolitan Plaza Certified Public Accountants 425 Market Street San Francisco,CA 94105 (415) 896-1800 Telex:384061 November 27, 1985 Mr. Lawrence L. Tong RECEIVED Planning Director DEC 3 1985. City of Dublin 6500 Dublin Boulevard DUBLIN PLANNING Suite E Dublin, California 94568 Dear Mr. Tong: Laventhol & Horwath (L&H) is pleased to submit this addendum to our proposal of November 12, 1985 to assist the City of Dublin with a market analysis as part of the Downtown Dublin Improvement Plan. This letter is in response to your telephone request of November 26, 1985 regarding surveys to be performed on behalf of this project, additional meeting attendance by our firm and our firm's billing rate for professional staff. As part of our retail market analysis, we will conduct surveys of at least 50 shoppers at different locations during different times of day in the downtown Dublin area. The purposes of the survey includes gaining shopper's perceptions about area parking, the type of items or services they require on that visit, their frequency for shopping in the downtown area, other retail areas which they patronize, attitudes about appearances of the shops and downtown area, other merchandise, stores and/or services they would like to see in the downtown and other issues that we may mutually determine. We will also conduct a survey of at least 25 merchants in the area. These surveys will provide insight into where their customers come from, where they advertise, their rating of the downtown in terms of selection of goods, store hours, parking, competiveness of prices, advertising, appearance of buildings, proposed renovation and/or expansion plans, rental rates, lease issues and the existing and potential role of the City of Dublin in regard to the downtown improvement plan. Both of these surveys will be incorporated into our analysis to complete our understanding of the retail market. As was indicated to you and the Downtown Improvement Committee during our interview on November 21, 1985, we will attend a total of seven, rather than four, public meetings with the Downtown Improvement Study Committee, Planning Commission and City Council. The fees required for this increased meeting attendance w.a; 1, B- T A member of Horwath&Horwath International Mr. Lawrence L. Tong City of Dublin November 27, 1985 Page Two will be offset by a reduction in the Hotel Market Analysis section of our report from a detailed market analysis to a market overview. The billing rates for the professionals assigned to this project are as follows: Susan Giles Levy $130.00 per hour Richard A. Caplan 95 .00 per hour Barry Abramson 65.00 per hour Michael Caplan 55.00 per hour If there are any additional matters related to our proposal, please do not hesitate to contact us. We are looking forward to becoming a member of the City of Dublin team and assisting you with this important project. Very truly yours, LAVENTHOL & HORWATH '4�v Susan Giles Levy Senior Principal / /�. 4,4— Richard A. Caplan Manager Laventhol &Horwath Suite 3600 One Metropolitan Plaza FIR Certified Public Accountants 425 Market Street San Francisco,CA 94105 (415) 896-1800 Telex: 384061 November 12, 1985 Mr. Lawrence L. Tong Planning Director City of Dublin 6500 Dublin Boulevard, Suite D Dublin, California 94568 Dear Mr . Tong: Laventhol & Horwath (L&H) is pleased to submit this proposal to assist the City of Dublin with a market analysis as part of the Dublin Downtown Improvement Plan. This proposal. outlines the approach we will take, the estimated time and fee requirements for our work, as well as the additional information requested in your Request for Proposals dated October 29 , 1985. Laventhol & Horwath ( including the former Land Economics Group) is particularly familiar with the City' s objectives as a result of our firm' s prior meeting with the Downtown Improvement Committee and City staff on September 19 , 1985 . More importantly, we have considerable experience in performing similar studies on behalf of cities throughout California. Copies of some of these studies have been previously submitted to you for your review. Prior to the initiation of this study, L&H will meet with the City Council, City staff and Downtown Improvement Committee to discuss the purpose of this study and to identify opportunities and procedures for public input as the study proceeds. SCOPE _QF WORK The scope of work has been developed to include data and analysis pertaining to the economic base, analysis of the assets and liabilities relating to development in Dublin and implementation strategies for Downtown development. Given below is a detailed description of the work program. Our results will be fully documented in our reports to the City of Dublin. Laventhol & Horwath will focus the research . and analysis on identifying the potential development desirable for Dublin and determining the financial implications of economic development. While the format of the report will more fully integrate the economic, financial and implementation aspects of RECEIVED 1 : . ..V 1 ;? 198 A member of Horwath &Horwath International with affiliated offices worldwide. DUBLIN PLAT mmr. Mr. Lawrence L. Tong November 12, 1985 Page 2 the work program, the research and analysis will proceed as follows : Task 1. Geogran ic. Demogranhic znd Employment Analysis Laventhol & Horwath will evaluate Dublin' s economic activities by analyzing the structure of the local and regional economy as well as the demographic and labor force characteristics of the local population. Standard methodologies of economic analysis will be employed to address the following topics : o Historical growth trends of the City of Dublin and Alameda County; o Growth prospects of basic retail sectors; o Growth trends and changes in population characteristics ; and o Target market segments most attractive to the City of Dublin given land availability. To accomplish this analysis, L&H will analyze the retail sales activity in which the study area already has demonstrated acompetitive advantage. This analysis will determine, insofar as possible, those sectors in which the Dublin market area can develop additional competitive advantages. These sectors will include the broad categories incorporating potential commercial, office and hotel development and will assist in identifying target sectors which are attractive to the City of Dublin. These findings will be summarized in a brief letter report. Task Z Retail Market Analysis The purpose of the retail market analysis will be to measure the effect of population and economic growth on demand for retail facilities within the market area. In order to develop an implementation plan, we propose to carefuly examine the avail anility and location of existing retail sites. We will interview merchants and developers to identify opportunities for business development and measure the demand for additional retail space required in the Downtown. Upon determination of the additional retail uses that are feasible from a market perspective, specific strategies will be developed to ensure appropriate development. 2 Mr. Lawrence L. Tong November 12, 1985 Page 3 Task Office Market Analysis Through interviews with knowledgeable office leasing agents, brokers and developers, L&H will define the Dublin office market and describe characteristics of the present market including location, absorption, rent levels, and tenant profiles. We will address the issue of target markets of office users that Dublin could likely attract. Any strategy for attracting new office users must be sensitive to the overall amount of space the market can realistically absorb. Task 4 Hotel Market Analysis As a result of numerous hotel market studies performed by L&H in the Dublin area including in Pleasanton, San Ramon, Danville and Walnut Creek, we have an excellent understanding of area hotel market conditions. We will review the area hotel market and evaluate potential sites for lodging facilities in Dublin including their relative strengths with respect to accessibility, visibility, proximity to major market generators, and trends which will enhance or detract from Dublin' s desirability. We will develop a census of all lodging facilities in the market area as well as those planned or rumored for construction which could be considered competitive to Dublin. We will determine the size, seasonality and character of the various market segments (such as [1] commercial, [2] group/convention, [ 3] tourist and others and their estimated growth rates. We will also estimate potential demand that could be generated by proposed lodging facilities. We will then determine an estimated growth rate for the total market demand. We will project the future needs for guest rooms in the market area based on the present and anticipated future supply of rooms and the projected market demand. At the conclusion of Task 4, we will meet with you to discuss our findings and prepare a letter report detailing our retail, office and hotel market findings. We will present this report at a public meeting. Task I Assessment -qf Community Assets Dm-d Liabilities In determining the strengths and weaknesses for Dublin' s development, L&H will undertake an analysis of business assets and liabilities. This analysis will rely in part on data assembled in other tasks . It will examine factors related to the attractiveness of Dublin to business and provide an understanding of local strengths and weaknesses for development. 3 Mr. Lawrence L. Tong November 12, 1985 Pa ge 4 The factors that L&H will examine closely as we undertake this analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the Dublin market willl include the following: o Land availability, site suitability, existing vacant retail and office space, relative cost to acquire, lease, and/or develop sites and buildings ; o Transportation: highway access, BART, air, truck, bus; al so co st , availability and q u a 1 i t y of telecommunication links ; maintenance of streets and highways; o Utilities (availability and cost) - electricity, water sewers, gas and other fuels ; consistency of power, quality of power, and ability to expand all utilities; o Labor cost, availability, and quality - wage levels in manufacturing and clerical occupations, skill levels of available workforce, labor-management relations ; o Relative cost, availability and quality of business inputs ; that is, materials, access to suppliers, and business services, computing, accounting, legal, hotel and motel accommodations, business meeting places, etc. ; o Local taxes ; and o Specific local zoning or environmental controls and regulations. Additional factors may be added to each of the groups as a result of detailed local review and analysis. The results of this analysis will be used to provide a profile of Dublin as an economic center. At the conclusion of Task 5, we will prepare a written summary of Dublin' s assets and liabilities and present these findings at a public meeting. ,Task E Evaluate Alternative Development Scenarios In cooperation with the City staff and the City's planning consultants, we will evaluate alternative scenarios for the central commercial area in order to assess the overall economic impact on the Downtown area and the City of Dublin's municipal budget. This analysis will take into consideration existing and proposed development in nearby communities. 4 Mr. Lawrence L. Tong November 12, 1985 Page 5 The information from Phase I and the results of this evaluation will provide the tools that will permit the City to seek out targeted potential employers who will receive benefits from and add significantly to the Dublin economy. The results of the prior tasks will be reviewed again to identify : o The economic sectors with moderate to high growth potential for which the City and surrounding area have demonstrated tangible competitive advantages. o The applicability of economic development incentives (e.g. , public and private sector financing) that could be expected to improve the competitive advantage. o The tax-generating capability of specific growth sectors. o The availability of land and infrastructure. o The types of employers and small business persons who could be expected to pursue opportunities in Dublin and their economic impact on the City. This analysis will carefully consider the potential in a national and regional market to attract major retailers, office tenants and hotels into Dublin in spite of the fact that small businesses produce the majority of new jobs in California and despite the fact that local businesses can be expected to be already familiar with the locational advantages of the City. We will outline these strategies and evaluate them in terms of market feasibility and overall financial benefit to both the public and private sectors. At the end of this task, we will discuss the alternatives, their impacts, and our findings and conclusions with you. We will be available to present these findings at a public meeting. Task Z Implementation plan L&H will assist the City and its planning consultants in the development of a set of recommendations together with a strategy to implement the Downtown Improvement Plan. We will develop a financial program for implementing the optimum strategy. We will identify both private and public resources available for financing infrastructure, Downtown public improvements and marketing. We expect to work closely with the Downtown Improvement Committee, the planning consultants and the 5 Mr. Lawrence L. Tong November 12, 1985 Page 6 City staff throughout the work program. The plan will carefully consider the City's goals and policies. At the end of this task, we will prepare a final letter report summarizing our findings from Tasks 6 and 7, as well as updating any information and additional analysis that may be appropriate from earlier letter reports. FEES AM TIMING Fees for the services described in this letter will be based on the actual time required to perform the services. Based on our experience with similar projects, we estimate that our fees will be as follows: Fees Timing Task 1 $ 2,350 2 weeks Task 2,3,4 11, 900 3-4 weeks Task 5 2,750 3 weeks Task 6 3,250 2 weeks Task 7 2,250 2 weeks Total Fees (Not To Exceed) $22,500 Tasks 1 to 5 will be completed_ within 60 days. Out-of-pocket expenses (travel, computer charges, postage, etc.) are estimated at 5 to 10 percent of fees; however, they will not exceed $2,000. This budget includes attendance at four public meetings. If additional public meetings are required, the actual cost required to attend these meetings will be added to our invoices at our standard billing rates. Resumes for the key professionals are attached to this proposal . The fees and professionals assigned to each task of this study are also attached. 6 Mr. Lawrence L. Tong November 12, 1985 Page 7 TERMS AND ,CONDITIONS Our reports will be based on estimates, assumptions and other information developed from research of the market, knowledge of the industry and from reports and data which you will provide. Sources of information and bases of the estimates and assumptions will be stated in the reports. The terms of this engagement are such that we have no obligation to revise our findings to reflect events or conditions which occur subsequent to the last day of our fieldwork. However, we will be available to discuss the necessity for revision in view of changes in the economic or market factors affecting Dublin. Our findings and reports are intended solely for the information of the City of Dublin. Neither the reports nor their contents may be referred to or quoted in any registration statement, prospectus, or other agreement or document without our prior written consent. We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal and look forward to working with you on this engagement. Very truly yours, LAVENTHOL & HORWATH Susan Giles Levy Senior Principal A,,4'C-/W- Richard A. Caplan Manager ACCEPTED: BY: DATE: SGL:RAC:mac Enclosure 7 PROPOSED TABLE OF CONTENTS DOWNTOWN DUBLIN MARKET ANALYSIS I. Introduction and Summary of Findings A. Introduction B. Methods of Analysis C. Summary of Development Potential by Category II. Dublin Geographic, Demographic and Employment Analysis A. Geographic Analysis (plus map) B. Demographic Analysis (plus charts) C. Overview of the Economy D. Employment Profile (plus charts) E. Shift-Share Analysis III. Retail Market Analysis A. Market Area Definition (plus map) B. Supply of Retail Space (plus charts) C. Projects Currently Underway D. Projects Planned E. Demand for Retail Space F. Retail Development Opportunities IV. Office Market Analysis A. Market Area (plus map) B. Supply of Office Space (plus chart) C. Projects Currently Underway D. Projects Planned E. Demand for Office Space F. Office Development Opportunities V. Hotel Market Analysis A. Market Area Definition B. Supply of Lodging C. Projects Currently Underway D. Proposed Facilities E. Review of Area Sites F. Demand for Hotel Accommodations G. Hotel Development Opportunities VI. Assessment of Community Assets and Liabilities A. Community Assets and Liabilities B. Business Operations and Constraints C. Institutional Assets and Liabilities D. Summary (plus chart) PROPOSED TABLE OF CONTENTS DOWNTOWN DUBLIN MARKET ANALYSIS (continued) VII. Alternative Development Scenarios A. Description of Alternatives Considered B. Economic Impacts of Alternatives C. Summary VIII. Implementation Plan A. Summary of Development Potential B. Infrastructure Needs C. Development Strategy STAFFING PLAN AND BUDGET FEES ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Levy Caplan Abramson Caplan Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 . Geographic ,Demographic 350 800 0 1200 2350 and Employment Analysis 2. Retail Market Analysis 500 1750 1250 1500 5000 3 . Office Market Analysis 300 1500 0 1800 3600 4 . Hotel Market Analysis 300 1000 500 1500 3300 5 . Community Assessment 750 750 0 1250 2750 6 . Development Scenarios 1000 1250 500 500 3250 7 . Implementation Plan 1000 1250 0 0 2250 TOTAL 4,200 8,300 2,250 7 ,750 22 ,500 STATEMENT QF QUALIFICATIONS Laventhol & Horwath (L&H) and its professionals have been active in the promotion of economic development. Our assignments have ranged from project-land market research to the design of broad community and region-wide economic development strategies. Laventhol & Horwath is in a unique position to help the City of Lafayette with economic development, since our economic development planning an-d financial expertise provide our clients with a pragmatic view of the development process and the public and/or private resources needed to achieve specific goals. Eco=mir-- Analysis An-d Implementation Plan fQ1 th-Q City D-f Lafayette Laventhol & Horwath was retained by the City of Lafayette to evaluate the downtown retail market and associated parking issues in order to develop a comprehensive strategy for downtown. In addition to the market analysis, L&H is evaluating alternative development scenarios for maximizing the economic benefit to the City. Pal m Springs Industrial Market Study and Action Plan Laventhol & Horwath is currently performing an industrial market analysis in evaluating the fiscal effects of additional industrial development on the City of Palm Springs. L&H surveyed users of industrial space in the city and the area and developed an action plan with the city focused on achieving the cities industrial and economic development objectives. Market Analysis and Imilementation Strategy f9L tha City Qf Napa For the City of Napa, Laventhol & Horwath is performing a market assessment of the retail office housing, hotel, cultural and recreational facilities in the city. The purpose of the study is to focus on the downtown area in order to strengthen the city's economy to the attraction of acceptable and financially beneficial land uses compatable with the Napa River. Laventhol & Horwath is a member of the planning team of this project which will result in an overall implementation strategy for the city over the next ten to f if teen years. 1 Retail Market Anal is Anal Implementation Plan J-Qx Jb_Q City Qf Cotati Laventhol & Horwath (The Land Economics Group) was retained by the City of. Cotati to evaluate the downtown retail and office markets and associated parking issues in order to develop a comprehensive strategy for an economic development plan for the city. In addition to the market analysis, L&H is developing a financial program for implementing the optimum strategy recognizing the community goals, policies and broad citizen involvement that is part of the development of the program. Economic Development Action Plan fQr thg City Df Salinas The Land Economics Group was retained by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Salinas to develop an economic development action plan that would focus on the strategies for diversifying and enhancing the local economy. The Land EconomicsGroup evaluated industrial, retail and office potential throughout the City, and outlined the community assets and liabilities in order to assist the City in developing a marketing strategy for potential major employers. The results of the plan are being used to focus growth and strengthen the economy of the area. Action Plan f-Qr City 9J S-am Jose' s Monterey Corridor The Monterey Corridor section of San Jose has been the neglected southern entrance to the City's downtown. The Land Economics Group worked with a community advisory committee to formulate an economic development action plan for the Corridor. Analysis of the industrial, commercial and housing markets in this mixed-use area revealed that a transition from heavy to light industrial use is in progress and could be encouraged through an implementation strategy that will focus on public/private sector partnership, community participation and redevelopment. City Qf 5�an Jose Alum Rock Revitalization Study The Land Economics Group developed strategies for enhancing the Alum Rock Business District, based on an in-depth study which determined demand for commercial establishments ; commercial facade rehabilitation; development opportunities; and financial analysis of commercial improvement. In addition, The Land Economics Group assisted the City in establishing a merchants' association. 2 Economic St f_Qr the City of Benicia The Benicia Chamber of Commerce retained The Land Economics Group to perform a feasibility. study and prepare an action plan for revitalizing First Street. The project entailed conducting shopper, resident, merchant and property owner surveys; analyzing the City's business climate and physical condition of its downtown; performing cash flow analyses for various development scenarios; and analyzing historic preservation tax credits as a development incentive. The City is curren'Lly ii„rlementing the action plan. Hayward Downtown Development Plan The Land Economics Group was retained by the City of Hayw ard's Redevelopment Agency to update its downtown plan. The Land Economics Group assessed market conditions for retail, office and industrial development, the physical character of the area and its buildings. The City has accepted and is implementing our recommendations. Santa Cruz Airport Reuse The Land Economics Group was retained by the City of Santa Cruz to determine how its airport could best be redeveloped to generate greater financial returns. Accordingly, The Land Economics Group gauged the demand for and financial performance of retail, office, and industrial alternatives. Ways in which the City could participate in the airport' s development were also identified. The results of The Land Economics Group's effort revealed that an industrial project codeveloped by the City and a developer would be the most advantageous course of action. U.S. Department Df Labor The Land Economics Group conducted segments of a year-long technical assistance program funded by the U.S. Department of Labor. Aimed at providing local, private-industry councils with economic development assistance, the project incorporated 25 community assessments and ten strategy plans for localities throughout California and Arizona. In Arizona, for example, The Land Economics Group helped establish a local economic development corporation and prepared short-term and long-term plans for bringing economic development to the west side of Phoenix. The corporation accepted the plan and is now working to implement it. 3 REFERENCES for City of Dublin Mr. Carlos Anglin Planning Director City of Lafayette (415) 284-1968 Mr. Dennis A. Dorch Planning Director City of Cotati (7 07) 7 95-547 8 Mr. John Yost Planning Director City of Napa (707) 252-7711 Mr. William Carlson City Manager City of Salinas (408) 758-7201 Mr. Rick de la Cruz City of San Jose Office of Redevelopment (40 8) 277-4744 SUSAN GILES LEVY Oualifications in Real Estate Advisory-Services Susan Giles Levy is the Director of Real Estate Advisory Services for Northern California for Laventhol & Horwath, a national management consulting and public accounting firm. Ms. Levy is an economist with extensive experience in providing economic and financial consulting services to private and public sector clients. Ms. Levy' s areas of expertise include : market and financial feasibility analysis for real property development; downtown commercial revitalization strategies; - economic development program design for public/private sector partnerships; valuation of individual and large-scale real estate holdings; housing affordability strategies and fiscal impact assessments. Ms. Levy has served as consultant to the California Building Industry Association, Kaiser Development Company, Chevron Land and Development Company, the Los Angeles Department of Airports, the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the U. S. Department of Labor, the San Francisco Mayor's Office of Housing and Economic Development, investment banking firms and numerous public and private sector clients throughout California. Prior to the merger of The Land Economics Group with Laventhol & Horwath, Ms. Levy was the founder and President of Land Economics, a San Francisco based real estate consulting firm. Ms. Levy holds a Master's degree in City Planning from the University of California, Berkeley; she was a Graduate Exchange Student at Stanford University Graduate Business School. Ms. Levy has a B.A. in Political Science, Distinction with High Honors, from the University of North Carolina. She is a member of Lambda Alpha International, an honorary land economics society, the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, the American Planning Association and the Urban Land Institute (ULI ) . Ms. Levy is a member of ULI ' s Research Committee and Recreational Development Executive Council. Ms. Levy is a Lecturer at Stanford University Graduate School of Business, where she teaches a course entitled "Property Development in the Urban Environment." Among Ms. Levy's publications are: "Consumer Response to High Housing Prices : The Case of Palo Alto, California," Institute for Real Estate and Urban Economics, University of California, Berkeley; an energy policy analysis article entitled "Project Independence: Formulation, Change and Fragmentation," Journal Qf Political Science; and a Bibliography on Consumer Behavior in the Housing Market, Vance Bibliographies for the Council of Planning Librarians. RICHARD A. CAPLAN Qualifications in Real Estate Advisory Services Richard Caplan is a Manager for Northern California in the Real Estate Advisory Services practice of Laventhol & Horwath, a national management consulting and public accounting firm. Mr. Caplan has had fourteen years of experience with a wide variety of publicly-financed projects and public/private partner- ships in California and Colorado. As a city 'manager, he has managed the establishment of special improvement districts which incorporated public/private financing; overseen the development of a multi-purpose arena and transportation center; and has been the lead participant in the attraction of and negotiation with several hotel developers. He was the director of economic development for a major suburban city in Southern California, coordinating the community 's efforts in expanding its commercial and industrial activity, development of an airport, and over- seeing the development of the city's Civic and Cultural Center. Mr. Caplan's areas of specialization include: • Development of alternative revenue sources for financing public improvements; • Strategic planning and structuring of public/private partnerships; • Formulation of economic development plans and redevelopment strategies; • Socio-economic, management, and fiscal impact analyses; and • Site selection analysis for commercial and industrial developments. Mr. Caplan has managed projects encompassing the issuance of mortgage revenue bonds, industrial revenue bonds, tax anticipation warrants, and negotiated the acquisition of major parcels and land for public purposes. His work has included development advisory services for Westin Hotels, Chevron Land and Development Company, Sea Containers, Inc. , and other major development companies. He has had extensive experience with federal government departments and agencies, as well as various state departments and agencies throughout California and Colorado. Mr. Caplan is a member of the Board of Directors of the California Association for Local Economic Development and the International City Management Association. Mr. Caplan received his B.A. degree in Political Science and his Masters of Public Administration from the University of California at Berkeley. BARRY M. ABRAMSON Qualifications in Real Estate Advisory Services Barry Abramson has a broad range of experience in the market and development analysis and planning of complex real estate projects . With Laventhol & Horwath , Mr. Abramson has directed consulting engagements entailing market and financial analyses and strategy formulation for a broad range of projects including mixed-use , office , hotel , residential and a wide variety of retail projects including major regional malls , specialty, festival market, commu- nity and neighborhood shopping centers . Consulting engagements in the area of public-private development projects have included guidance to the City of Albuquerque , New Mexico on the development and financing of a major downtown re- development project including retail , office , hotel and convention center expansion ; and preparation on behalf of a private developer of a proposal entailing market , financial and design strategies for a $60 million mixed-use project in response to an RFP issued by the City of Baton Rouge , Louisiana. Prior to joining Laventhol & Horwath, Mr. Abramson served as projeC= manager of the Boston Redevelopment Authority 's Downtown Crossing Plan in which he directed the development of a comprehensive market analysis and economic and physical development plan for the city' s commercial core. This effort encompassed the development of market- ing and management strategies as well as the site planning and project programming of a $500 million program of mixed-use develop- ment. Mr. Abramson played an active role in implementation through coordination with developers and involvement with UDAG and other subsidy programs. Mr. Abramson' s professional experience also includes work for a variety of governmental and business promotion organizations in- cluding the New York City Public Development Corporation , the New York City Department of Planning, the Brooklyn Chamber of Commerce , the Nassau Street Mall Association and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers on projects entailing commercial revitalization, economic development and regional planning. Mr. Abramson holds a B.A. from Queens College of the City University of New York and a Master of Science in City and Regional Planning from Pratt Institute in New York. He has also completed courses in real estate finance at the University of Houston, the Northwest Professional Education Center and New York University's Real Estate Institute. Mr. Abramson is a member of the International Council of Shopping Centers and the American Planning Association. MICHAEL J. CAPLAN Oualifications in Real Estate Advisory Services MICHAEL J. CAPLAN is a city and regional planner with experience in housing and local economic development strategies. He has conducted research on local government programs to foster affordable housing throughout California and has worked with community-based organizations on housing and economic development issues. Prior to joining Laventhol & Horwath, Mr. Caplan was an Associate at The Land Economics Group and a research intern for the California Department of Housing and Community Development where he studied the local impact of State legislation on affordable housing. He wrote a report on the use of density bonuses by local jurisdictions in designing programs that are effective and in compliance with State policy. In working with Innovative Housing, a non-profit housing development organization, Mr. Caplan conducted a feasibility analysis of artist-based economic development in Crockett, California. He has also conducted research on approaches to develop affordable housing for the East Bay Asian Local Development Corporation. Mr. Caplan received a Master of City and Regional Planning from the University of California at Berkeley. where his coursework included housing finance, economic development finance, land use law and administration, public finance and statistics. He also holds a B.A. in History and Anthropology from the University of. Wisconsin at Madison. L J Development Services CITY OF DUBLIN Planning/Zoning 829-4916 P.O. Box 2340 Building & Safety 829-0822 Dublin, CA 94568 Engineering/Public Works 829-4927 DR AFT Mr . Chris Kinzel, Principal TJKM Transportation Consultants 4637 Chabot Drive Suite 214 Pleasanton CA 94566 Re: Traffic Engineering Services for Downtown Improvement Plan Dear Mr . Kinzel, This letter authorizes TJKM Transportation Consultants to perform the traffic engineering services for the Downtown Improvement Plan as specified in the TJKM scope of services dated and received December 2 , 1985, with the following amendments which you and the Staff discussed on December 4, 1985 : 1 ) Task 1 - Traffic Overview and Constraints will update traffic information critical to the Downtown Improvement Plan. The estimated fee for Task 1 is amended to $2,850 . 00 . 2 ) Task 7 - Meetings will include eight meetings on an as- needed basis only. The estimated fee for Task 7 is amended to $1 , 600 . 00 . 3 ) The overall estimated fee total is amended to not exceed $11 ,000 . The authorization to proceed is being granted pursuant to the terms of the existing agreement between the City of Dublin and TJKM Transportation Consultants dated October 14 , 1985 . If you have any questions regarding this matter , please contact Laurence L. Tong, Planning Director , or me. Sincerely yours, Richard C. Ambrose City Manager RCA/gr ! A A' l PLEASANTON SACRAMENTO FRESNO [kKITRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS CONCORD December 2, 1985 iZ::;E ..,rc:1 VQ(E D, .�: ll: '.r:�JV�, Mr. Larry Tong DE CI. . Planning Director City of Dublin DUBLIN PLANNING 6500 Dublin Boulevard Dublin, CA 94568 Dear Mr. Tong: This is to present the proposal of TJK14 to provide traffic engineering services in conjunction with the Downtown Improvement Plan for Dublin. This proposal is based on a recent discussion in your office involving yourself, Larry L. Cannon of Wurster, Bernardi and Emmons, (WBE) Incorporated and myself. TJKM proposes to provide the traffic engineering services related to the proposed Downtown Plan. We are excited about the prospect of being involved in this project, both from the standpoint of working toward an improved downtown Dublin and in working with WBE, the Downtown Committee and the staff. At our meeting, we discussed a potential scope of services for TJKM. We have identified the following potential tasks: Task 1 - Traffic Overview and Constraints The primary purpose of this task would be to provide a paper summarizing the existing downtown traffic situation. We would describe current traffic conditions in general on the principal downtown streets including San Ramon Road, Amador Valley Boulevard, Village Parkway, Dublin Boulevard, Regional Street and Amador Plaza. As a part of this task, we are planning to update intersection turning movement counts at 11 key downtown intersections. These intersections form the basis for the current transportation network in and near the downtown area and constitute the potential constraints to intensified downtown development from a transportation standpoint. The volume-to-capacity ratio and level of service at each intersection will be determined during the evening peak period. In this task, we would also address current transit utilization in the downtown area and plans for changes. Task 2 - Downtown Parking In this task, we would inventory all downtown parking both on-street and off-street, and determine parking occupancies during peak periods. In this regard, we would believe it to be a good idea to take advantage of the upcoming Christmas season peak parking by making some of the parking surveys during the month of December. During this survey, we would also a A'BIT 4637 Chabot Drive, Suite 214/ Pleasanton, t Mr. Larry Tong -2- December 2, 1985 ascertain current commuter parking statistics along with the retail and employment oriented parking. A principal use of this parking survey would be to determine under-utilized parking areas, appropriate parking ratios for the downtown area, and areas where joint use of parking facilities currently occurs and might be expanded in the future. Task 3 - Develop Alternatives TJKM's role in this task would be primarily to participate in "brain- storming sessions" in which we either develop or comment on ideas for an enhanced downtown area. It is expected that the WBE team, the staff and the Downtown Committee would be principle participants in this task. Task 4 - Evaluate Alternatives TJKM's role in this task would be to provide an evaluation from a traffic, parking, circulation and safety standpoint of the various alternatives that have been developed. We would expect that this would consist of developing. parking requirements and comparing with existing supply, determine intersection levels of service with alternative plans and to comment on any safety and circulation issues related to the alternatives. Task 5 - Refine Final Plan TJKM would work with the study team to finalize a plan which would be recommended for adoption and implementation. Task 6 - Develop Action Plan TJKM would assist WBE in developing a specific action plan including scheduling, priorities and unique features from a traffic, parking and safety standpoint. Task 7 - Meetings TJKM would expect to meet with the Downtown Study team probably on a regular monthly basis. We have assumed that the meeting requirements for this project would be approximately 12 meetings for TJKM. We are prepared to assist the team by meeting the schedule developed for this project by Wurster, Bernardi and Emmons, Incorporated. Our estimated fee for this project is a total of $12,800. The attached table indicates the breakdown of costs by tasks. TJKM proposes .to invoice charges on an hourly basis in accordance with the attached TJKM rate schedule. We are pleased to be considered for this project. If there are any questions about this, please contact me. V hr trruly yours s D. Kinzel psw Attachments cc: Larry L. Cannon TABLE I ESTIMATED TASK COSTS - TRAFFIC STUDY DOWNTOWN PLAN, CITY OF DUBLIN Task Description Estimated Fee 1 Overview and Existing Conditions $ 3,850 2 Parking Studies 1,100 3 Develop Alternatives 700 4 Evaluate Alternatives 3,000 5 Refine Final Plan 700 6 Develop Actions Plan 1,050 7 Committee and Public Meetings 2,400 $12,800 TJKM HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE Principal $98 Principal Associate 82 Senior Associate 76 Associate 72 Senior Traffic Engineer 68 Senior Transportation Engineer 68 Traffic Engineer 60 Transportation Engineer 60 Assistant Traffic Engineer 49 Traffic Engineering Assistant 42 Technician II 34 Technician 1 22 Graphics Supervisor 42 Draftsman 34 Secretarial 35 Computer 30 Above rates include standard overhead items. Travel costs are billed at 30 cents/mile. Outside services are billed at cost plus 10 percent for handling. Invoices are due and payable within 30 days. Invoices paid after 30 days will besubject to separate billings of 1-1/2 percent per month of unpaid balance. Late charges are not included in any agreement for maximum charges. Expert.witness charges available on' request. Effective March 1, 1985