The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About8.3 ABAG Local Hazard Plan'~ r ~~ 1~ 1 _' :~ ~f~/ 1 CITY CLERK File # ^~^2-^-^3 AGENDA STATEMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 15, 2009 SUBJECT: ATTACHMENTS: ABAG Multi jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Report Prepared by Roger Bradley, Administrative Analyst Mitigation Strategies Worksheet RECOMMENDATION: Direct Staff to participate in ABAG's Local Hazard Mitigation Plan and hold a community meeting to receive community input on the City's mitigation strategy priorities. FINANCIAL STATEMENT: None DESCRIPTION: It is inevitable that major natural disasters such as earthquake, fire or flood will strike the Bay Area at some point in the future. Lives will be lost, property will be damaged, and the economy will suffer. The Association of Bay Area Government (ABAG) is leading the effort to coordinate Bay Area local governments to mitigate such losses by developing a multi jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP). Attachment 1 is the strategy spreadsheet developed by ABAG that is the core of the LHMP. Background In 2005, ABAG took the lead in developing the LHMP for the Bay Area. The plan consisted of mitigation strategies focusing on actions that would reduce damage from disasters. Strategies were geared to reduce the loss of life and property damage, as well as speed recovery. Approval of a LHMP by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) allows jurisdictions to be eligible for various mitigation grants through FEMA, and results in the waiver of the 6.25 percent local match for public assistance dollars, when the City seeks reimbursement as a result of a disaster. ABAG is again taking the lead to update the plan as required by FEMA. Over 97 cities, counties, and special districts are participating in the 2009 update and Staff is recommending that the City participate in this update. For the update, the list contains over 350 strategies and has been expanded to include climate change, recovery planning, and mental health issues. In addition, the updated strategies include the regional priorities for mitigation, which are noted by the shaded cells in the spread sheet (Attachment 1). The updated strategies were developed by ABAG by consensus at a series of sub-regional workshops. The final draft and the City of Dublin's responses are due to ABAG by September 30, 2009. As a participant in the LHMP efforts, jurisdictions are required to provide two opportunities for the public to comment on the strategy priorities. Tonight's meeting counts as one opportunity, and Staff is recommending holding a community meeting on Tuesday, September 29, 2009 at 7:30 p.m. in the COPY TO: Page 1 of 3 ITEM NO. ~ • 3 ;~ Regional Meeting Room. Staff will place information about the meeting on the City's website as well as place a notice in the paper. Comments fromthe public will be kept on file in the City Manager's Office. Plan Structure The goal of the LHMP is to maintain and enhance adisaster-resistant region by reducing the potential loss of life, property damage and environmental degradation from natural disasters, while accelerating economic recovery from those disasters. The LHMP identifies major hazards that affect the Bay Area. These include hazards related to earthquakes (surface faulting, ground shaking, liquefaction, landslides and tsunamis) and weather (flooding, landslides, wildfires, and drought). The Plan is organized into eight commitment areas, which are related to the services supplied, either directly or indirectly, by local governments. These commitment areas are: L INFR (Infrastructure) includes strategies that apply to lifeline transportation and utilities facilities and services. 2. HEAL (Health) is generally for hospitals. Some strategies apply to county Offices of Health, and others to cities. 3. HODS (Housing) Most of these strategies apply to the City. "Housing" covers residential buildings. 4. ECON (Economy). Most of these strategies apply to the City. "Economy" covers commercial and industrial buildings. 5. GOVT (Government) covers the buildings owned and used for government services other than transportation, water supply, and sewer functions (covered in INFR). 6. EDUC (Education) is for school districts and county Offices of Education. 7. ENVI (Environment) includes strategies related to environmental sustainability and climate change. 8. LAND (Land Use) covers strategies that address land (often development policies) versus buildings. Thus, requirements for geologic investigations, zoning, development design considerations, smart growth, and hazard abatement districts are included in this category. The spreadsheet also includes a column showing the types of hazards which the strategy is meant to address: EQ =Earthquake DR = Drought LS - Landslide Flu = Pandemic Flu WF =Wildfire Heat =Heat FL - Flood Ag = Agricultural Emergency TS = Tsunami SEC =Security Current Efforts As part of the City of Dublin's participation to date, Staff prepared a Critical Facilities List, which provides basic information regarding the building type and condition of City-owned facilities, including civic buildings, fire stations, community centers, etc. The regional strategies are the next step in the preparation of the LHMP. City staff reviewed the 350+ strategies and ranked each strategy in terms of local priority. Staff identified a significant number of the strategies as existing programs that are Page 2 of 3 consistent with, or exceed, the regional priority. Many of the priorities were identified as "not applicable" because the Responsible Agency was not the City. Other strategies were identified as "moderate" because the City lacks the funds or staff to implement the program. The completed strategies are included (Attachment 1) for comment. The LHMP priorities (noted by a shaded cell in the spreadsheet) reflect the vision of the region as a whole. Individual jurisdictions may have different priorities depending upon the nature of each district or local government. The City of Dublin used the following criteria to evaluate each mitigation strategy: • Existing program - no additional funding needed. • Existing program -under funded. Very high priority - an existing unofficial program made official by the adoption of this plan. No additional funding is needed. • High priority - to be adopted by the local government when funding and resources allow, funding currently being sought. • Moderate priority - to be adopted by the local government when funding and resources allow, no funding being sought at the present. • Under study -currently under study, not just to be studied in the future • Not applicable, not appropriate, or not cost effective. • Not yet considered. Final Steps ABAG must submit the LHMP to FEMA no later than October 22, 2009. Upon FEMA approval of the entire LHMP, the City Council will need to adopt/approve the plan within 12 months. Outreach If directed to hold the community meeting, Staff will place a notice within the local newspaper as well as place a notice about the meeting on the City's website. RECOMMENDATION: Direct Staff to participate in ABAG's Local Hazard Mitigation Plan and hold a community meeting to receive community input on the City's mitigation strategy priorities. Page 3 of 3 Infrastructure Mitigation Strategies I ~ y y~ ~ a ~ c ~ o z a, z N m O a INFR - a - a-1 a-1 Priority (CHECK ONLY a E E w~C°~ l6 (6 O1 [) ~ N ?. Ol 0I a O ~ d N ~ m o o~ ` d0 o c > Specific Mitigation Strategy ~ ~ n. a o c L ~, Q ~' m ~ o m rn ~_ ~ rn c m~ c~ rn ~~at ca 2 E m c Q m~ c m ~°- m .N ' ~w -oo ' Z' o v d w L p c ° ' ~ m _ x W x c W 3 a~ c a~ c o ~~07 O C o~ - 2JLL._ o ~ o m Responsible Agency o i Ordinance or Resolution # (if existing ~ ~ ~ Department (Required program), Estimated Cost and ~, a ~ ~ if Existing Program, Possible Funding Agency (if high ~ ~ o W ~ Existing Program priority), Estimated Date of ~ a a o ~ -oo under funded, Very Completion (if study), WHY if not a~ Q Q U >- N High, High, or Under same as regional priority, OR Other c o 0 0 0 o Study) Comments X Note -Infrastructure agencies, departments, and districts are those that operate transportation and utility facilities and networks. - _ If a dam owner, comply with State of California and EQ federal requirements to assess the vulnerability of LS ti-Hazard (owned by the infrastructure provider fill ing out this form, including a city, county, or specia l district) Assess the vulnerability of critical facilities owned EQ by infrastructure operators subject to damage in LS natural disasters or security threats, including fuel WF ~ tanks and facilities owned outside of the Bay Area FL that can impact service delivery within the region. SEC dams to damage from earthquakes, seiches, WF X landslides, liquefaction, or security threats. FL SEC - - -- -- _ _ a-3 a-3 Encourage the cooperation of utility system EQ providers and cities, counties, and special districts, LS and PG&E to develop strong and effective WF mitigation strategies for infrastructure systems and FL X facilities. DR SEC _ - _ ~_ ~ -- a-4 a-4 Retrofit or replace critical lifeline infrastructure EQ facilities and/or their backup facilities that are shown LS j ' ~ to be vulnerable to damage in natural disasters. WF X X SEC _ ~ _ - _ '' i a-5 a-5 Support and encourage efforts of other (lifeline _ EQ ' I infrastructure) agencies as they plan for and LS arrange financing for seismic retrofits and other WF disaster mitigation strategies. (For example, a city FL X might pass a resolution in support of a transit agency's retrofit program.) DR SEC ~ I ~~ C~ ~ ~~ ~"~'• - yv~ ~ Ica ~ a E m E u o z' rn z Specific Mitigation Strategy ~ ~, ' N ~ - >. O ~ u ~ R N O l6 O O l6 O ~ Q ~ ~ a-6 ~ a-6 Develop a plan for speeding the repair and ECG functional restoration of water and wastewater LS systems through stockpiling of shoring materials, VUF temporary pumps, surtace pipelines, portable FL hydrants, and other supplies, such as those available through the Water (Wastewater Agency DR Response Network (WARN). Communicate that SEC plan to local governments and critical facility operators. a-7 a-7 Engage in, support, and/or encourage research by EQ others (such as USGS, universities, or Pacific LS Earthquake Engineering Research Center-PEER) WF on measures to further strengthen transportation, FL water, sewer, and power systems so that they are DR less vulnerable to damage in disasters. SEC a-8 a-8 Pre-position emergency power generation capacity EQ (or have rental/lease agreements for these LS generators) in critical buildings of cities, counties, WF and special districts to maintain continuity of FL government and services. SEC { a-9 a-9 (REWORDED) Ensure that critical intersection EQ traffic lights function following loss of power by LS installing battery back-ups, emergency WF generators, or lights powered by alternative FL energy sources such as solar. Proper functioning of these lights is essential for rapid SEC evacuation, such as with hazmat releases resulting from natural disasters. a-10 a-10 Develop unused or new pedestrian rights-of-way as EQ walkways to serve as additional evacuation routes LS (such as fire roads in park lands). WF FL SEC a-11 a-11 Minimize the likelihood that power interruptions will EQ adversely impact lifeline utility systems or LS critical facilities by ensuring that they have WF adequate back-up power. FL i Infrastructure Mitigation Strategies a E `o d Responsible Agency or! Ordinance or Resolution # (if existing E E _ m ~ o a ~ ~ Department (Required program), Estimated Cost and m m ° o ~ o- ~ ~ ~, -~o ~ ~ w if Existing Program, Possible Funding Agency (if high ~ ~ a i ~ a O a rn ? $ ~ c~ o ~ Existing Program priority), Estimated Date of rn ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ m ~ cn n Q' o ~ ~ under funded, Very Completion (if study), WHY if not ~ ;~ ~ d a~ Q Q U >- ~ High, High, or Under same as regional priority, OR Other N rn ~ pp ~ Z` O U d ~ p~ O j O C O O O 0 0 $tUdy) Comments X ~_ X X X X ~ ~- T I i ~ ~_ _~ i _ _ 2of55 X _~, Infrastructure Mitigation Strategies ~ ~ E E m m ~ °~ o ~ Responsible Agency or Ordinance or Resolution # (if existing ~ ~ m m m •o ° y a ~ ~ '~ Department (Required program), Estimated Cost and ~ ° ~ > ' > o o ~O o ~ o c v r a O ~ . o ~ a a ~ W ~ v if Existing Program, !, i i P Possible Funding Agency (if high t it E ti t d D f i Z m Z Specific Mitigation Strategy Q ~ ~ v, a a U .. m ~ o d st ng rogram ~~ Ex pr or y), s ma e a e o N rn O rn ~ ~ m ~' .~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~' c m ~ n n o y a ' under funded, Very Completion (if study), WHY if not o ~ o ~ a N N 'N ~ ~, o ~ d w roc a ~ Q Q U } ~ High, High, or Under same as regional priority, OR Other 0 N~ o N W Q ~° 'x 'x c a~ c o o = W W~ ~ m C °-' o~ = J ll- o ~ ~ o 0 0 Z Z Z 0 o Z Study) _ Comments __ __ _ a-12 a-12 Encourage replacing above ground electric and EQ phone wires and other structures with underground LS facilities, and use the planning-approval process to WF i ensure that all new phone and electrical utility lines X I are installed underground. FL SEC - --- - - a-13 a-13 If you own a dam, coordinate with the State Division of Safety of Dams to ensure an adequate EQ LS -- -- - -_ T timeline for the maintenance and inspection of l d F F X ' dams, as required of dam owners by State aw, an L communicate this information to local ! governments and the public. SEC j a-14 a-14 Encourage communication between State EQ Emergency Management Agency (CaIEMA), LS I FEMA, and utilities related to emergencies occurring WF outside of the Bay Area that can affect service X delivery in the region. FL DR SEC ' __ a-15 a-15 Ensure that transit operators, private ambulance EQ i - - _ ! ~ companies, cities, and/or counties have LS mechanisms in place for medical transport during WF and after disasters that take into consideration the potential for reduced capabilities of roads following FL X these same disasters. SEC a-16 new Recognize that heat emergencies produce the Heat ~I need for non-medical transport of people to cooling centers by ensuring that (1) transit operators have plans for non-medical transport j !~ of people during and after such emergencies ~ X including the use of paratransit and (2) cities, counties, and transit agencies have developed ways to communicate the plan to the public. ___ '~ ._ - _ _ - - a-17 a-16 Effectively utilize the Regional Transportation _ EQ Management Center (TMC) in Oakland, the staffing LS '~ of which is provided by Caltrans, the CHP and MTC. WF The TMC is designed to maximize safety and FL efficiency throughout the highway system. It X includes the Emergency Resource Center (ERC) SEC '! which was created specifically for primary planning and procedural disaster management. ! i I RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MTC only. 3 of 55 ~ a E m E v o z o, z Specific Mitigation Strategy ~ N m O ~ ~ ~ ~ fl ~ o ~ o m . b-~ Q ~ N N a-18 N rn new Develop (with the participation of paratransit EQ providers, emergency responders, and public LS health professionals) plans and procedures for WF parasit system response and recovery from FL disasters. Heat a-19 new Coordinate with other critical infrastructure EQ facilities to establish plans for delivery of water LS and wastewater treatment chemicals. WF FL SEC_ a-20 new Establish plans for delivery of fuel to critical EQ infrastructure providers. LS WF FL i 1 new As an infrastructure operator, designate aback- EQ up Emergency Operations Center with LS redundant communications systems. WF FL a-22 new Monitor scientific studies of the Sacramento-San EQ Joaquin Delta and policy decisions related to the FL long-term disaster resistance of that Delta system to ensure that decisions are made based on comprehensive analysis and in a scientifically-defensible manner. Levee failure due to earthquakes, flooding, and climate change (including sea level rise and more frequent and more severe flooding) are all of concern. The Tong-term health of the Delta area is critical to the Bay Area's water supply, is essential for the San Francisco Bay and estuary's environmental health, provides recreation opportunities for Bay Area residents, and provides the long-term sustainability of Delta communities. While only part of the Delta is within the nine Bay Area counties covered by this multi-jurisdictional LHMP, the Delta is tied to the infrastructure, water supply, and economy of the Bay Area. INFR - b -Earthquakes b-1 b-1 Expedite the funding and retrofit of seismically- EQ deficient city- and county-owned bridges and road structures by working with Caltrans and other Infrastructure Mitigation Strategies a `o a> Responsible Agency on Ordinance or Resolution # (if existing ~ m `~ ~ o ~ ~ w Department (Required program), Estimated Cost and ~ m.o o ~ o ~ ~ ~, a c ~ ~ if Existing Program, Possible Funding Agency (if high ~ d ~ Q ' ~ o ~ o uJ `~ ~ Existing Program priority), Estimated Dale of a a t ~ m Q rn m ~ in - n n o ~ ~ under funded, Very Completion (if study), WHY if not ~ rn ~ _ E ~ c ~ Under High. H same as reg y OR Other m ~ a ~ ° s ~ 7 z z z U Study) ments Co 'x x c o ~ ~ o, ~ X X X X X X 4 of 55 Q~- - I J Infrastructure Mitigation Strategies E E a m m ~ a N N m t6 ~ N rn U >, a a m' o o~ a~ _ o~ o ~ ~ ao~ > ~ a o z' o, z' Specific Mitigation Strategy -Q m a a ~ ~ ~ y ¢ c ~ ° ~ ~ p T . - T U~ C C~ 2 V E lC4 C ¢~~ N O O O ~..N rn N m Z' O U d w L p C N 'o N 'o Nrn N(n Q T> W W C Ohm C C 2 C b-2 b-2 Establish a higher priority for funding seismic retrofit EQ of existing transportation and infrastructure systems (such as BART) than for expansion of those s stems. - - - - b-3 b-3 Include "areas subject to high ground shaking, EQ earthquake-induced ground failure, and surface fault rupture" in the list of criteria used for determining a replacement schedule for pipelines (along with , importance, age, type of construction material, size, condition, and maintenance or repair history). b-4 b-4 Install specially-engineered pipelines in areas EQ subject to faulting, liquefaction, earthquake-induced landslidin or other earth uake hazard. _ ~ ---- b-5 b-5 Replace or retrofit water-retention structures that are EQ determined to be structurally deficient, including levees, dams, reservoirs and tanks. I - I b-6 b-6 Install portable facilities (such as hoses, pumps, EQ emergency generators, or other equipment) to allow pipelines to bypass failure zones such as fault rupture areas, areas of liquefaction, and other ground failure areas (using a priority scheme if ed funds are not available for installation at all need locations . b-7 b-7 Install earthquake-resistant connections when pipes EQ enter and exit bridges and work with bridge owners to encourage retrofit of these structures. b-8 b-8 Comply with all applicable building and fire codes, EQ as well as other regulations (such as state requirements for fault, landslide, and liquefaction X investi ations in articular mapped areas) when 9 P constructing or significantly remodeling infrastructure facilities. b-9 b-9 Clarify to workers in critical facilities and emergency EQ personnel, as well as to elected officials and the i public, the extent to which the facilities are expected ~/ !~ to perform only at a life safety level (allowing for the safe evacuation of personnel) or are expected to remain functional following an earthquake. b-10 b-10 Develop awater-based transportation "system" EQ across the Bay for use in the event of major earthquakes. Implementation of such a system could prove extremely useful in the event of structural failure of either the road-bridge systems o r BART and might serve as an adjunct to existing transportation system elements in the movement of I large numbers of people and/or goods. O C 5 of 55 o a~ Responsible Agency or' Ordinance or Resolution # (if existing ~ ~ Department (Required program), Estimated Cost and ~ a `~ ~ if Existing Program, Possible Funding Agency (if high o W d Existing Program priority), Estimated Date of a n o ~ under funded, Very Completion (if study), WHY if not Q Q U ~ ~ ~ High, High, or Under same as regional priority, OR Other 0 0 0 0 o Study) i Comments Z Z Z Z f~ __ - - --_ - - __ --_ -_ X X I - ~ ~- X - - -_ - I- __ I. X I X I i I - X I - - i X Infrastructure Mitigation Strategies a a o z o, z Specific Mitigation Strategy N m 0 m a m E E m o~ ~~ 2% O O ~ O C > • ~ d I d-OC I rnmoQ m v o $... C C `t ~ ~ (S ~ , O 3 L Y Q T. w W> » m o c 2 ~ INFR - c -Wild fire c-1 c-1 Ensure a reliable source of water for fire WF I suppression (meeting acceptable standards for minimum volume and duration of flow) for existing and new develo ment. c-2 c-2 Develop a coordinated approach between fire WF j urisdictions and water supply agencies to identify needed improvements to the water distribution system, initially focusing on areas of highest wildfire hazard (including wildfire threat areas and in wildland-urban-interface areas). 3 3 a defensible space vegetation program that Develo WF c- c- p includes the clearing or thinning of (a) non-fire resistive vegetation within 30 feet of access and evacuation roads and routes to critical facilities, or ~( (b) all non-native species (such as eucalyptus and pine, but not necessarily oaks) within 30 feet of access and evacuation roads and routes to critical facilities. __ c-4 c-4 For new development, ensure all dead-end WF segments of public roads in high hazard areas have X at least a "T" intersection turn-around sufficient for ical wildland fire a ui ment. c-5 c-5 For new development, enforce minimum road WF width of 20 feet with an additional 10-foot clearance on each shoulder on all driveways and road X segments greater than 50 feet in length in wildfire hazard areas. _ - c-6 c-6 Require that development in high fire hazard areas ~/F provide adequate access roads (with width and vertical clearance that meet the minimum standards X of the Fire Code or relevant local ordinance), onsite fire protection systems, evacuation signage, and fire breaks. c-7 c-7 Ensure adequate fire equipment road or fire road N/F X access to develo ed and o ens ace areas. c-8 c-8 Maintain fire roads and/or public right-of-way roads WF ~( and kee them assable at all times. INFR - d -Flooding d-1 d-1 Conduct a watershed analysis of runoff and FL drainage systems to predict areas of insufficient capacity in the storm drain and natural creek s stem. d-2 d-2 Develop procedures for performing awatershed FL analysis to examine the impact of development on flooding potential downstream, including communities outside of the jurisdiction of proposed oroiects. _ o a> Responsible Agency or Ordinance or Resolution # (if existing ~ r Department (Required' program), Estimated Cost and ~, N (6 U a •c ~ if Existing Program, Possible Funding Agency (if high ~ ~ o W ~ Existing Program priority), Estimated Date of c!t n a o ~ v under funded, Very Completion (if study), WHY if not d Q Q U } v, High, High, or Under same as regional priority, OR Other c ~ ~ ~ ~ o Study) Comments +- f X X _II!~ _I t_ ~ I_ X i ~ __ X ~ 1 6 of 55 s -~, s Infrastructure Mitigation Strategies D E o m Responsible Agency or Ordinance or Resolution # (if existing _ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ '~ Department (Required program), Estimated Cost and E ~ ~ m m ~ Q ~ o ~ a ~ >, a c ~ if Existing Program, Possible Funding Agency (if high ~ Z m Z Specific Mitigation Strategy y ~, a a` ~ r ~' ~ Q ~' ~ ~ m o ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ o W ~ Existing Program priority), Estimated Date of Very Completion (if study), WHY if not rn ~ in n n N d under funded o T N m 0 ~, Q m 0 c~ rn rn - C C `t E V E l4 C -_ m o ~ o d w , Q rn ~ C C ~- d O N V L Y .o ~ ~ Q Q U r ~ High, High, or Under same as regional priority, OR Other o m o~ ~ ~~ x x °c a~i ~ a"i c o S W W 3 ~[O C °-' 0 3 o c o 0 0 0 o Study) Comments - _ - _ -_ - - 2JLL ~ ~ ZZZ ZU Ntn N fn - d-3 d-3 Conduct a watershed analysis at least once every FL ten years unless there is a maior development in the watershed or a maior change in the Land X Use Element of the General Plan of the cities or counties within the watershed. d-4 d-4 Assist, support, and/or encourage the U.S. Army FL Corp of Engineers, various Flood Control and Water Conservation Districts, and other responsible agencies to locate and maintain funding for the development of flood control projects that have high X cost-benefit ratios (such as through the writing of letters of support and/or passing resolutions in support of these efforts). - _ - - j- _- - - d-5 d-5 Pursue funding for the design and construction of FL storm drainage projects to protect vulnerable properties, including property acquisitions, upstream storage such as detention basins, and channel X widenin with the associated right-of-way g acquisitions, relocations, and environmental j miti ations. _ - - - - - d-6 d-6 Continue to repair and make structural FL ~ improvements to storm drains, pipelines, and/or channels to enable them to perform to their design ~ capacity in handling water flows as part of regular X maintenance activities. (This strategy has the ~~ secondary benefit of addressing fuel, chemical, and cleaning product issues.) ; - -~ -- - - -_ - - - - d-7 d-7 Continue maintenance efforts to keep storm drains FL T ~ and creeks free of obstructions, while retaining I X vegetation in the channel (as appropriate) to allow for the free flow of water. ~_ -- -- - - - ~ - - - - d-8 d-8 Enforce provisions under creek protection, FL stormwater management, and discharge control ordinances designed to keep watercourses free of X obstructions and to protect drainage facilities to conform with the Regional Water Quality Control Board's Best Mana ement Practices. - _ _- _ - '' - - - - -- - - d-9 d-9 Develop an approach and locations for various FL l I watercourse bank protection strategies, including for I example, (1) an assessment of banks to inventory areas that appear prone to failure, (2) bank stabilization, including installation of rip rap, or i X whatever re ulato a encies allow (3) stream rY 9 9 bed depth management using dredging, and (4) I i removal of out-of-date coffer dams in rivers and ~ ~ I tributary streams. I li I 7 of 55 '- t l Infrastructure Mitigation Strategies ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o y Responsible Agency or Ordinance or Resolution # (if existing ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o '~ n ~ ~, ~ m '~ Department (Required program), Estimated Cost and o ? c ~ m ? SpecifC Mitigation Strategy a~ o o y d 0 o c a a a Q ~ o ' -o ~ n .n ~ w ~ ~ if Existing Program, E i ti P Passible Funding Agency (if high i it E ti t d D t f o . m N a ~ ~ N ~ ` ' ' ' ~ Q y m o w x s ng rogram pr or y), s ma e a e o N ~ O ~ m ,C = _ ~ o ~ m ~ m m m n ii o ~ ~ under funded, Very Completion (if study), WHY if not o ~ o ~ a N y N ~ ~ p $ d w N r Y ~ pjO a ~ ¢ Q U ~- ~ High, High, or Under 'same as regional priority, OR Other 0 N N o N N x xc o cmco ~ T w w> > m c O3 2 ~ u_ o ~ c ~ o00 z Z Z 0o z Stud Y) I Comments d-10 d-10 Use reservoir sediment or reed removal as one FL way to increase storage for both flood control and X water su I I d-11 d-11 Identify critical locally-owned bridges affected by FL __ - - -- - I flooding and either elevate them to increase stream flow and maintain critical ingress and egress routes X or modify the channel to achieve equivalent ~ I ~ d-12 d-12 Provide or support the mechanism to expedite the FL - -- - - - repair or replacement of levees that are vulnerable I to collapse from earthquake-induced shaking or ~ liquefaction, rodents, and other concerns, i I particularly those protecting critical infrastructure. X I d-13 d-13 Ensure that utility systems in new developments are FL - - _ r- - _ - __ _ ~ constructed in ways that reduce or eliminate flood X ~I damage. d-14 d-14 Determine whether or not wastewater treatment FL plants are protected from floods, and if not, i investigate the use of flood-control berms to not only protect from stream or river flooding, but also X increase lant securi d-15 d-15 Work cooperatively with water agencies, flood FL i -- - - - control districts, Caltrans, and local transportation agencies to determine appropriate performance X criteria for watershed analysis. ' d-16 d-16 Work for better cooperation among the patchwork of -- FL i - _ - agencies managing flood control issues. X d-17 d-17 Improve monitoring of creek and watercourse FL _ - ~ i - , _ ~ -- flows to predict potential for flooding downstream by working cooperatively with land owners and the ~ X cities and counties in the watershed. d-18 new Using criteria developed by EPA for asset FL management, inventory existing assets, the condition of those assets, and improvements needed to protect and maintain those assets. ~ ~ Capture this information in a Geographic X ~ Information System (GIS) and use it to select Iota i tons for creek monitorin g gauges. 8of55 Infrastructure Mitigation Strategies n ~ E ~ c ~ ° z 'om Z Specific Mitigation Strategy N ~ O ~ o m o °N U1 N N INFR - e - I anriclidas e-1 a-1 Include "areas subject to ground failure" in the list of criteria used for determining a replacement schedule (along with importance, age, type of construction material, size, condition, and maintenance or repair history) for pipelines. e-2 a-2 Establish requirements in zoning ordinances to address hillside development constraints in areas of steep slopes that are likely to lead to excessive road maintenance or where roads will be difficult to maintain during winter storms due to landsliding. E E m m o a ut o oa a~ °~ o ~ ~ aoa ~ > emu, a o_~ rnm`~ac a~ _ 'i,o va m m~ `t _ ~ ca E m c Q mw ~,; a N ur ura _ Zo cOidw L p~ Q = W W> » m O C 2 J LL LS LS X INFR - f -Building Redccupancy f-1 f-1 Ensure that critical buildings owned or leased by EQ special districts or private utility companies LS participate in a program similar to San Francisco's WF Building Occupancy Resumption Program (BORP). The BORP program permits owners of buildings to FL hire qualified engineers to create facility-specific SEC post-disaster inspection plans and allows these engineers to become automatically deputized as City/County inspectors for these buildings in the event of an earthquake or other disaster. This program allows rapid reoccupancy of the buildings. Note - A qualified (deleted structural) engineer is a California licensed engineer with relevant experience. INFR - g -Public Education g-1 g-1 Provide materials to the public related to planning EQ for power outages. LS WF FL SEC 'g-2 g-2 Provide materials to the public related to family and EQ personal planning for delays due to traffic or road LS closures, or due to transit system disruption WF caused by disasters. FL SEC ~ ~ Responsible Agency or Ordinance or Resolution # (if existing ~ ~ ~ Department (Required program), Estimated Cost and ~ n •Q ~ w ~ ~ if Existing Program, Possible Funding Agency (if high ~ o d Existing Program priority), Estimated Date of ~ Q a o ~ ~ under funded, Very Completion (if study), WHY if not a~ Q Q U } 'N High, High, or Under same as regional priority, OR Other ~ ~ o 0 0 Z Z Z 0 o Z U Study) Comments i r - __ X X ~ i i X -~ X I 9 of 55 ...~', Infrastructure Mitigation Strategies ~ ~ E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ Responsible Agency or Ordinance or Resolution # (if existing ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o •~ n ~ ~, ~ ~ '~ Department (Required program), Estimated Cost and o ~ Z c ~ .+a Z S ecifc Miti atio St t m o o y a - a Q v c m ~ $ ,o .n •Q ~ ~ W ~ if Existing Program, i Possible Funding Agency (if high p g n ra egy a a o ,~ s - ti Q c ~ ,,.. m ~ o m Existin Pro ram ! g g priority), Estimated Date of V } e d ' e l t d ~ ' o ~ o ~ ~ N N w ~ Z p $ a ? .c '~ ~ ° v ~ Q Q N High High, o r Under same as r egional p r orit OR Other 0 N r n o N r n Q~ x x c S W W~ a~ c a~ c o ~ m O c °-' o ~ 2 J l L o rG c ~ o 0 0 Z Z Z 0 o Z U Study) Comments g-3 g-3 Provide materials to the public related to coping with EQ reductions in water supply or contamination of that LS supply BEYOND regulatory notification WF requirements. X FL DR SEC g-4 g-4 Provide materials to the public related to coping with EQ -- disrupted storm drains, sewage lines, and LS wastewater treatment (such as that developed by WF ABAG's Sewer Smart Program). X FL DR SEC g-5 g-5 Facilitate and/or coordinate the distribution of EQ , - - _ - ~ __ -__ emergency preparedness or mitigation materials ! that are prepared by others, such as by making the WF i ~ I j use of the Internet or other electronic means, or ~ i placing materials on community access channels or FL in city or utility newsletters, as appropriate. DR X ~ SEC g-6 new Sponsor the formation and training of Community EQ i Emergency Response Teams (CERT) for the LS employees of your agency. [Note -these WF programs go by a variety of names in various cities X I and areas.] FL i DR SEC ~ g-7 new Develop and distribute culturally appropriate - EQ - _ - _ __ __ materials related to disaster mitigation and LS ! preparedness, such as those on the F http://www.preparenow.org website related to F X infrastructure issues. L DR I SEC 10 of 55 Q a 'r' Health Mitigation Strategies K a E E m E `` m ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ' ~ ~ ~ Responsible Agency or Ordinance or Resolution # if ( i ti ~ c ~ ° Z m Specific Mitigation Strategy ~~ ~ rn ~ rn ~ a-Oi i rn ~ o a a~ "o ~ p_ O ~ ~ ~` > a w. ai .. v ~^ ~ ~ ~ Department (Required if Existing Program i ex s n 9 Program), Estimated Cost and Possible Funding c°~ p m ,~° rn ~ ~ rn m ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ oa w ~ ~ _ ~ , Existing Program Agency (if high priority), ~ m in .. 0 0 ~ _ ~ _ c _ c ~ _ S ~ E m = Y a m ~ a °' m Q Q U ~ under funded, Ve ry Estimated Date of Completion (i c°v N in °- , ~~ `~ w `a a W o Z o v d .- L o w m iu a -o } N ~ High, High, or Under stud WHY if not same as Y). i l i HEAL - a -Hospitals and Other Critical Health Care Facilities (in _ clud th f > >> m o c S ~ ii g j Z Z Z Z U Study) reg ona pr ority, OR Other Comments To be filled t b i i ing ose acddies licensed by OSHPO, as well as water agencies, public & private hospitals as noted) _ ou c t es, counties, and coun health de artments. ._ - - --- - _- a-1 a-1 Work to ensure that cities, counties, coun tY EO LS ~ I health departments, and hospital operators WF FL ~ _ __ coordinate with each other (and that hospitals SEC cooperate with the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development - OSHPD) to comply with current state law that mandates that critical facilities are structurally sound and have nonstructural systems designed to remain functional following disasters by 2013. In particular, this X coordination should include understanding any problems with obtaining needed funding. II RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: Cities, counties, county health departments, and hospitals j Encourage hospitals in your community to work with EO L OSHPD to formalize arrangements with structural WF FLi engineers to report to the hospital, assess damage, SEC and determine if the buildings can be reoccupied. The program should be similar to San Francisco's Building Occupancy Resumption Program (BORP) that permits owners of buildings to hire qualified structural engineers to create building-specific post- disaster inspection plans and allows these engineers to become automatically deputized as inspectors for these buildings in the event of an earthquake or other disaster. OSHPD, rather than city/county building departments, has the authority and responsibility for the structural integrity of hospital structures. RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: Cities, counties, county health departments, and hospitals j a-3 a-3 Ensure health care facilities are adequately EO prepared to care for victims with respiratory WF problems related to smoke and/or particulate matter SEC inhalation. RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: Cities, counties, county health departments, and a-4 Ensure these health care facilities have the capacity EO to shut off outside air and be self-contained. WF RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: Cities, counties, SEC county health departments, and hospitals X - -- -! X j - - _ f J X 11 of 55 ..~- O -°'"~`.= Health Mitigation Strategies o t ~ z' Specific Mitigation Strategy ~ ;~ N ~~ O ~ m a ~ a . ¢ ~ N N (n a-5 a-5 Ensure that hospitals and other major health care EO LS I facilities have auxiliary water and power sources. WF FL RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: Cities, counties, SEC county health departments, water suppliers, and ho i al a-6 a-6 Work to ensure that county health departments work EO with health care facilities to institute isolation WF capacity should a need for them arise following a FL communicable disease epidemic. Isolation SEC capacity varies from a section of the hospital for most communicable diseases to the entire hospital for a major pandemic flu. RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: Cities, counties, county health departments, and hospitals a-7 a-7 Develop printed materials, utilize existing materials EQ LS (such as developed by FEMA, the American Red WF FL Cross, and others, including non-profit SEC organizations), conduct workshops, and/or provide outreach encouraging employees of these critical health care facilities to have family disaster plans and conduct mitigation activities in their own homes. RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: Cities, counties, county health departments, and hospitals a m ~ E m_ o a O U Q ~ ?+ a~ 0 oy ~aOvrn . ''-o a d o rn m m¢ c ' v ¢ m C ' C~ V E N g _ ~, Nay r~°aw =_ Ordinance or Resolution # (if o m > Responsible Agency or existing program), Estimated ~ ~ '~ Department (Required Cost and Possible Funding >, ~ a c ~ ~ n w a if Existing Program, ram ti P E i Agency (if high priority), ~ o m ng rog x s Estimated Date of Completion ~ ` a a o y a under funded, Very study), WHY if not same as a ~ a ¢ ¢ U ~ ur c High, High, or Under regional priority, OR Other ~ z z z z U Study) Comments_ 1LI~ II I ! ~I X X - u - r~ ~~~,~a~ y r,~a~u ~-~~~a«~ ~ ~,~, , incfudin medical offices harmacies free-standing or sgecialy clinics, etc.l b-1 b-1 Identify these ancillary facilities in your community. These facilities are not regulated by OSHPD in the same way as hospitals. RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: Cities, counties, and county health departments b-2 b-2 Encourage these facility operators to develop disaster mitigation plans. RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: Cities, counties, and county health departments b-3 b-3 Encourage these facility operators to create, maintain, and/or continue partnerships with local governments to develop response and business continuity plans for recovery. RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: Cities, counties, and county health EO LS WF FL SEC X EO LS ~ - WF FL, SEC ~ X EQ LS WF FL SEC X i I - c -Coordination Imt~auves -1 Designate locations for the distribution of antibiotics FLU to large numbers of people should the need arise, SEC as required to be included in each county's Strategic X National Stockpile Plan. RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: County Health Departments ~_ I ~_ 12 of 55 d Health Mitigation Strategies £ _ "o o d Responsible Agency or Ordinance or Resolution # (if c d > existing program), Estimated E iu ~ m m E m o a ai := Department (Required ~ ~- d >, ai ~ o Cost and Possible Funding ~° m ~ E ' _ N o o ~O E >r= o c > -o n .a ~ o if Existing Program, Agency (if high priority), w Pro ram i ti E a ~ ~ ~ ° o o m z Specific Mitigation Strategy g s ng x o ~ ~ °' ~ ~, a a ~ .~ N Q c v w ~ Estimated Date of Completion (if Very m a n `a °~ under funded ~ ' m °-' ~ o Q rn °~ a O o , ~ ~ ~ rn c a - m E c ~ _ ~ E ~ ~ ; ~ a o iu Q Q U } 'ui High, High, or Under study), WHY if not same as . . - m 0 in o m N N o Z o$ a ,~ r c o v c regional priority, OR Other G N ~ ~ 'x ~x c m e G> c o °-' °o ~ o c o o o 0 o Study) menu Co N N in m_-- -- ~= w w> > m c= ~ u_ ~ z z z z _ - c-2 c-2 Ensure that you know the Metropolitan Medical EU L5 i Response System (MMRS) cities in your area. WF FL Fremont, Oakland, San Francisco, and San Jose SEC (plus Sacramento and Stockton) are the MMRS cities in or near the Bay Area. MMRS cities are ~ provided with additional federal funds for organizing, ~ equipping, and training groups of local fire, rescue, medical, and other emergency management X personnel to respond to a mass casualty event. (The coordination among public health, medical, emergency management, coroner, EMS, fire, and law enforcement is a model for all cities and counties.} RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: Cities, counties, county health departments, and hospitals c-3 c-3 Know that National Disaster Medical System EQ LS (NDMS) uniformed or non-uniformed personnel are WF FL within one-to-four hours of your community. These SEC federal resources include veterinary, mortuary, and medical personnel. Teams in or near the Bay Area X are headquartered in the cities of Santa Clara and Sacramento. RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: Cities, counties, county health departments, and c-4 c-4 Plan for hazmat related-issues due to a natural EO or technological disaster. Hazmat teams should WF utilize the State of California Department of Health FL Services laboratory in Richmond for confirmation of SEC biological agents and Lawrence Livermore National X Laboratory or Sandia (both in Livermore) for confrmation of radiological agents. I RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: Cities, counties, and hospitals. county health departments ~ ~ ~ , ~_ _ - ~- - - - - lth f d d h FL c-5 d-1 oo an ea Create discussion forums for personnel (including, for example, medical SEC professionals, veterinarians, and plant pathologists) ~ to develop safety, security, and response strategies for food supply contamination (at the source, in X processing facilities, in distribution centers, and ~~ in grocery stores). RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: County environmental health departments 13 of 55 G~1 O ~~ Health Mitigation Strategies ~ E . ~ ~ o m Responsible Agency or E E > Ordinance or Resolution # (if E ti i i d a m m ~ T ai ~ '~ Department (Required m ~ rn ~_ ~°,°- ng program), s ex st mate Cost and Possible Funding ° c ~ Z S if Mi i i n ~ o o a ~ ~ o c °~ T a 'c ~ if Existing Program, d O ~ m ~ o ~ ~ o w ~ P a a Agency (if high priority), o m ec ic on Strate t at p g gy Existing rogram t ~ n. d ~ rn m ~ ~ a Q ~ rn ~ N 'Q n y d ; `~ Estimated Date of Completion (if c~ O d ~ ~ ° ~ c c .t = o ~ ~ c c c ~ n n o y -o under funded, Very U ' study), WHY if not same as 0 0 ~ ~" ~' High, High, or Under ~ N ,N N ~ Z o c~ a ~~- L " -° a °~ Q Q o c a c o c o00 0o X oco ° ' `a regional priority, OR Other 0 c~ o c~ cA x c co Stud - o~ Q ~ w W 3 700 c 2 J u- ~ ~ Z Z Z Z U y) Comments c-6 new Ensure mental health continuity of operations and EQ LS disaster planning is coordinated among county WF FL ~ departments, (including Public Health and SEC Emergency Services), private sector mental health organizations, professional associations, and ~ national and community-based non-profit agencies I ', involved in supporting community mental health i I programs. First, such planning should ensure that the capability exists to provide both immediate on- site mental health support at facilities such as evacuation centers, emergency shelters, and local X assistance centers, as well as to coordinate on- I going mental health support during the long-term recovery process. Second, this planning should ensure that mental health providers, in collaboration with the county agencies responsible for providing I public information, are prepared to provide consistent post-disaster stress and other mental health guidance to the public impacted by the disaster. ~ I, ~ m d-2 (duplicate information to c-2) I ~ v ' 1 ~ a d-3 (duplicate information to c-3) m ~ ~ i ~ m d-4 (duplicate information to c-4) I m a 14 of 55 r-- O {~ `vr~\ ~+ Housing Mitigation Strategies Priori I CNECK ON Y O E) a~ E E , mm~a-°i °> ~ ' ~ ~ 01 ~U ~ N >. N ~ ~U o ~ Z S if Mi ~ $' o~ ap°c > T _ ~~~ ` o rn O pec ic tigation Strategy ~~ a a ~ r_ y Q~ rnm y ~ o ~ 3 ~ o w N a~ ~v ~ rn ~ rn° c't c:o x~Emc Q rnm cc ~ U ` nao m 0 0 ~ ~ Q( N inD Z'o ~dw t~ev ~ a ~ QQU Y N N (n ( ~ Q T ,x ; S C ~ -C. ,,0, c O ~ O ~ ~ C O O O O w u-r~acai u a-1 a-1 Assist in ensuring adequate hazard disclosure by EQ LS working with real estate agents to improve WF FL enforcement of real estate disclosure requirements SEC for residential properties with regard to seven official natural hazard zones: 1) Special Flood Hazard Areas (designated by FEMA), 2) Areas of Potential Flooding from dam failure inundation, 3) Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones, 4) ~ Wildland Fire Zones, 5) Earthquake Fault Zones (designated under the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act), and the 6) Liquefaction and Landslide Hazard Zones (designated under the Seismic Hazard Mapping Act). a-2 a-2 Create incentives for private owners of historic or EQ LS architecturally significant residential buildings to WF FL undertake mitigation to levels that will minimize the SEC likelihood that these buildings will need to be demolished after a disaster, particularly if those ~ alterations conform to the federal Secretary of the Interior's Guidelines for Rehabilitation. a-3 NEW Develop a plan for short-term sheltering of residents EQ LS was of your community in conjunction with the WF FL American Red Cross. SEC T b 4 X EW Develop a plan for interim housing for those EQ LS gas displaced by working with the Regional WF FL OV Catastrophic Planning Grant Program (CPGP) SEC b-4 that funded this effort in 2009. (Estimated completion is 2011.) Responsible Agency or' Ordinance or Resolution # (if existing Department (Required program), Estimated Cost and if Existing Program, Possible Funding Agency (if high Existing Program priority), Estimated Date of under funded, Very Completion (if study), WHY if not High, High, or Under same as regional priority, OR Other Study) Comments _ - X 15 of 55 X O ~~ Housing Mitigation Strategies ~ a o ~ ~ E E m m o a ~ ~ ~ ~ 01 U N ~. N O U dN N ~~ a~ o o~ ap~c _> a mi;.W o ~ z Specific Mitigation Strategy ~ ~, a a ~ L - ~ Q c v ° a> ' ° ° o ~ ~ m rn~ °-'~ °~ c'a Q mm m ~ nno N O O ~ C C 'C S S E t0 w Y.'O a Q1 ~ a> Q Q U O O~ a ti .X X C N C N C O ~ O 7 O C 0 0 0 N Nln ~ T W W 7 ~m C 2_!li- ~ ~ Z22 HSNG - b -Sin le-Famil Homes Vulnerable to Earth uakes b-1 b-1 Utilize or recommend adoption of a retrofit standard EO that includes standard plan sets and construction details for voluntary bolting of homes to their foundations and bracing of outside walls of crawl spaces ("cripple" walls), such as Plan Set A developed by a committee representing the East Bay-Peninsula-Monterey Chapters of the X International Code Council (ICC), California Building ~ Officials (CALBO), the Structural Engineers Association of Northern California (SEAONC), the Northern California Chapter of the Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI-NC), and ABAG's Earthquake Program. J b-2 b-2 Require engineered plan sets for seismic retrofitting EO of heavy two-story homes with living areas over garages, as well as for split level homes (that is, X homes not covered by Plan Set A), until standard plan sets and construction details become available. _- _ - - b-3 b-3 Require engineered plan sets for seismic retrofitting EO of homes on steep hillsides (because these homes , X are not covered by Plan Set A). b-4 b-4 Encourage local government building inspectors to EO take classes on a periodic basis (such as the FEMA- developed training classes offered by ABAG) on )( retrofitting ofsingle-family homes, including application of Plan Set A. _ ~_ 4 b-5 b-5 Encourage private retrofit contractors and home EO inspectors doing work in your area to take retrofit classes on a periodic basis (such as the FEMA- developed training classes offered by ABAG or X additional classes that might be offered by the CALBO Training Institute) on retrofitting of single- f I h m _ { _ _ ~- b-6 b-6 Conduct demonstration projects on common EO existing housing types demonstrating structural and X nonstructural mitigation techniques as community models for earth uake miti ation. ~ -- i b-7 b-7 Provide retrofit classes or workshops for EO homeowners in your community, or help promote utilization of subregional workshops in the South Bay, East Bay, Peninsula, and North Bay as such workshops become available through outreach using existing community education programs. Responsible Agency orl. Ordinance or Resolution # (if existing Depanment (Required program), Estimated Cost and if Existing Program, Possible Funding Agency (if high m Existing Program priority), Estimated Date of °~ under funded, Very Completion (if study), WHY if not } ui High, High, or Under same as regional priority, OR Other Z U Study) i Comments t X 16 of 55 U1 Housing Mitigation Strategies ~ a ~ ~ ~ m o -o ° ~ ~ Responsible Agency or Ordinance or Resolution # (if existing ° ~ E ~ ~ o ~ 'n ~ >. O ~ ~ ~ ~ a . ~ Department (Required program), Estimated Cost and o m Z Specific Mitigation Strategy > ~ ~ ° ~ ° a v c ~ ~ e- a ~ ° ~ n w ~ v if Existing Program, Possible Funding Agency (if high E O ° m ~ ~ Q ~ ~ m c: ~ c ~' ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ ¢ ~' c ~ ~ o n n o m xisting Program priority), Estimated Date of d °o °o m ~ a ~ , ~? N a ~ o r3 d w ~ o ~ ~ .o s' Q 4 U ~ a ~- ~ un er funded, Very Completion (if study), WHY if not High, High, or Under same as regional priority, OR Other w b-8 ~' ~ b-8 Establish tool-lending libraries with common tools d S w w~ I m o °c x ~ ti s j EQ Z Z Z Z° Study) Comments - ~- -- -- needed for retrofitting for use by homeowners with a ro riate trainin i X , b-9 b-9 (reworded) Provide financial incentives to -~ - - EO _ - _ _ - T- - - owners ofsingle-family homes to retrofit if those retrofits comply with Plan Set A or IEBC 2006 in addition to that provided by existing state law X State law that makes such retrofits exempt from increases in properly taxes. HSNG - c -Soft-Sto Multifamil Residential Structures Vulnera ble to Earthquake c-1 c-1 Require engineered plan sets for voluntary or EO i i ~ i - - mandatory soft-story seismic retrofits by private owners until a standard plan set and construction X details become available. ~ c-2 c-2 Adopt the 2009 (changed date) International Existing Building Code or the latest applicable - _ EQ ' - - ~- r - 1 - - -- standard for the design of voluntary or mandatory soft-story building retrofits for use in citylcounty X building department regulations. In addition, allow use of changes to that standard recommended b SEAOC for the 2012 IEBC. c-3 c-3 Work to educate building owners, local government staff, engineers, and contractors on privately- EQ - - owned soft-story retrofit procedures and incentives using materials such as those developed by ABAG X and the City of San Jose (see http:/(quake.abag.ca.gov/eghouse.html.) ~ I c-4 c-4 C d i on uct an nventory of privately-owned existing or suspected soft-story residential structures as a first EO step in establishing voluntary or mandatory X programs for retrofitting these buildings. c-5 c-5 Use th ft t i - e so -s ory nventory to require private EO - - -- -- - owners to inform all existing tenants (and prospective tenants prior to signing a lease X agreement that the ma live in this Y Y type of iI c-6 c-6 Use the soft-story inventory to require private E Q ~ I _ - - -- - -- ~- owners to inform all existing and prospective t enants that they may need to be prepared to live X elsewhere following an earthquake if the building ~ :-7 c -7 I nvestigate and adopt appropriate financial, E Q r - - as o d ry arkin waivers for nvate owners of soft-sto n s p s b u ild to fac il tate eVofit uch as those X d escribed by ABAG (see ~ I I h ttp•//quake abaa ca aov/fixit) . j ' I I 17 of 55 i J --"+-- v'~ Housing Mitigation Strategies ~ ~ ~ 0 mE 0, z Specific Mitigation Strategy a~ o o~ -fl, `y a a -~ ~ ~ N W O ~ ~ ~ ~ m m - - t d N (/1 N ~ 0 N 0 N VI Q ~ W LL ~ c-8 c-8 (reworded) Explore development of State EQ regulations or legislation to require or encourage private owners of soft-story structures to strengthen them. c-9 c-9 Provide technical assistance in seismically EQ strengthening privately-owned soft-story structures. HSNG - d - Unreinforced Mason Housin Stock d-1 d-1 Continue to actively implement existing State law EQ that requires cities and counties to maintain lists of the addresses of unreinforced masonry buildings and inform private property owners that they own this type of hazardous structure. d-2 d-2 Accelerate retrofitting of privately-owned EQ unreinforced masonry structures that have not been retrofitted, for example, by (a) actively working with owners to obtain structural analyses of their buildings, (b) helping owners obtain retrofit funding, (c) adopting a mandatory versus voluntary, retrofit program, and/or (d) applying penalties to owners who show inadequate efforts to upgrade these buildin s. - d-3 d-3 Require private owners to inform all existing EQ tenants (and prospective tenants prior to signing a lease agreement) that they live in an unreinforced masonry building and the standard to which it may d-4 d-4 As required by State law, require private owners to EQ inform all existing tenants that they may need to be prepared to live elsewhere following an earthquake even if the building has been retrofitted, because it has probably been retrofitted to alife-safety standard, not to a standard that will allow occupanc y following major earthquakes. o ~ Responsible Agency orl Ordinance or Resolution # (if existing ~ ~ '~ Department (Required program), Estimated Cost and ~, a ~ ~ if Existing Program, Possible Funding Agency (if high ~ ~ o w d Existing Program priority), Estimated Date of to n n o ~ ~ under funded, Very Completion (if study), WHY if not ~ Q Q U Y N High, High, or Under same as regional priority, OR Other c o 0 0 0 o Study) Comments ~ zZZ ZU -- - _- - - X I - - --~ X ~_ X I I i X ~_ _ ~ - X _ I_ X 18 of 55 a N ~ c N o a o}G nazi a O v c rn m ~ Q ~ ~ ~ x ~ E m e Q a m e m i n s- i7L°i r~ V ~ Housing Mitigation Strategies E E ~ a m ~ ~ ~ ~ E I N f6 v O U n N ~ T ~ o o ' O m z Specifc Mitigation Strategy ~j,,iN a a a ~ ~ ~ Q ~' ~ O N O ( U. ~ ~ 01 C m 7 C `t ~U O C R = E f6 C a C d Q N N gy p- ~ L y N N V) Q= W W 7 Nam C C 2J HSNG - e -Other Private) -Owned Structurally Vulnerable Residential Build ings and Earthquakes e-1 a-1 Identify and work toward tying down mobile homes used as year-round permanent residences using an appropriate cost-sharing basis (for example, 75% rant 25% owner . e-2 e-2 Inventory non-ductile concrete, tilt-up concrete (such as converted lofts), and other privately- owned potentially structurally vulnerable residential buildings. e-3 a-3 Adopt the 2009 International Existing Building Code or the latest applicable standard for the design of voluntary or mandatory retrofit of privately-owned seismically vulnerable buildings. e-4 e-4 Adopt one or more of the following strategies as incentives to encourage retrofitting of privately- owned seismically vulnerable residential buildings: (a) waivers or reductions of permit fees, (b) below- market loans, (c) local tax breaks, (d) grants to cover the cost of retrofitting or of a structural analysis, (e) land use (such as parking requirement waivers) and procedural incentives, or technical assistance. EO -- - EQ EO - - - -_ EO I EO X EO x f-1 f-1 Continue to require that all new housing be constructed in compliance with (deleted "structural") requirements of the most recently ado ted version of the California Buildin Code . f-2 f-2 Conduct appropriate employee training and support continued education to ensure enforcement of building codes and construction standards, as well as identification of typical design inadequacies of housing and recommended improvements. HSNG - -Wildfire and Structural Fires g-1 g-1 Increase efforts to reduce hazards in existing WF private development in wildland-urban-intertace fire- threatened communities or in areas exposed to high to-extreme fire threat through improving engineering ~ design and vegetation management for mitigation, appropriate code enforcement, and public education on defensible space mitigation strategies. g-2 g-2 Tie public education on defensible space and a WF comprehensive defensible space ordinance to a X` feld ro ram of enforcement. o m Responsible Agency or Ordinance or Resolution # (if existing ~ ~ '~ Department (Required j program), Estimated Cost and ~ a a ~ ~ if Existing Program, Possible Funding Agency (if high ~ ~ o w m Existing Program priority), Estimated Date of N o- n. w ~- ~ under funded, Very Completion (if study), WHY if not a`~ Q Q U r ~ High, High, or Under ~ same as regional priority, OR Other 7 Z Z z Z U Study) _ _Comments - -_ X ~_ l- - _ - - - - - - - X _~ _ I'_ - -~ - - -- 1 X ~_ X 19 of 55 ..~ Housing Mitigation Strategies ~ a E E m ~ ~ ° ° ° Responsible Agency or ~ > ° c 3 rn Z Specific Mitigation Strategy ~ ~ ~ o ~ a ~ >. ~ ~ ~ Department (Required ~ o ~' ~ ~ ~ if Existing Program, ~ a a a d ~ ° o ~ rn ~ ~ ~ j rn ~ ~ Q c ~ ~.- ~ ~ ~ o uJ ~ Existing Program ~ m ~ m 0 o ~ 0~ - n n o y a under funded, Very c ~ 't = ° E m c ¢ ~ ~ `~ a~ N in ~ Z• o~ a w t o c ~ -0 4 Q U >- ~ High High or Under , g-3 N U g-3 Require that new homes in wildland-urban-interface , , ,~ = lL W~ O h m O C 2 J LL O C O O O O O SIUdY) ~ Z Z Z Z U_ WF fire-threatened communities or in areas exposed to high-to-extreme fire threat be constructed of fire- resistant building materials (including roofing and exterior walls) and incorporate fire-resistant design features (such as minimal use of eaves internal , corners, and open first floors) to increase structural X survivability and reduce ignitability. Note - See Structural Fire Prevention Field Guide for Mitigation of Wildfires at http://osfm.fire.ca.gov/structural.html. g-4 g-4 Create or identify "model" properties showing WF defensible space and structural survivability in neighborhoods that are wildland-urban-interface fire- X threatened communities or in areas exposed to high to-extreme fire threat. ~ _ g-5 g-5 Consider fire safety, evacuation, and emergency + WF ~ , vehicle access when reviewing proposals to add secondary units or additional residential units in wildland-urban-intertace fire-threatened X ' communities or in areas exposed to high-to-extreme fire threat. g- g-6 Adopt and amend as needed updated versions of _ - ~ WF t _- - the California Building and Fire Codes so that optimal fire-protection standards are used in X construction and renovation projects of private buildings. I g-7 g-7 Create a mechanism to enforce provisions of the - - WF i - - ~ T i California Building and Fire Codes and other local codes that require the installation of smoke detectors and fire-extinguishing systems on existing residential buildings by making installation a condition of (a) finalizing a permit for X an work val y ued at over a fixed amount and/or (b) on any building over 75 feet in height, and/or (b) as a condition for the transfer of property. g-8 g-8 Work to ensure a reliable source of water for fire WF - _ _ _ { -- suppression in rural-residential areas through the ' cooperative efforts of water districts, fire districts, ~ X , and residents. 20 of 55 !Ordinance or Resolution # (if existin4 program), Estimated Cost and Possible Funding Agency (if high priority), Estimated Date of Completion (if study), WHY if not same as regional priority, OR Other 1 _ Comments ~.~ ~ ~.; _. Housing Mitigation Strategies N E U ' ~ C ~ m Z Specific Mitigation Strategy ~ Oi d Of d ~ 2 N O r a O -°o ~ ~ > $ o 0 ,n v~ ~ ~~~c' c ¢m ° ~ ~° 0 , ~ m . ~ `t ~ ' o 2 Emc rn cc o 0 a N.. N Na Zo ~¢.w tYa ~ N N fn _ Q T X X C N c N c 0 ~ o ~ O W O C 1 J g- g- xpand vegetation management programs in WF wildland-urban- interface fire-threatened communities or in areas exposed tohigh-to-extreme fire threat to more effectively manage the fuel load through roadside collection and chipping, mechanical fuel reduction equipment, selected harvesting, use of goats or other organic methods of fuel reduction, and selected use of controlled burnin g-10 g-11 Establish special funding mechanisms (such as WF Fire Hazard Abatement Districts or regional bond funding) to fund reduction in fire risk of existing properties through vegetation management that includes reduction of fuel loads, use of defensible g-11 g-12 Work with residents in rural-residential areas to WF - - - _ C ensure adequate plans are developed for i appropriate access and evacuation in wildland- urban-mtertace fire-threatened communities or in areas exposed to high-to-extreme fire threat. For example, in some areas, additional roads can be created, and in other areas, the communities will need to focus on early warning and evacuation because additional roads are not feasible. g-12 g-13 Require fire sprinklers in new homes located more WF than 1.5 miles or a 5-minute response time from a fire station or in an iden ifi _ t ed high hazard wildland X urban-interface wildfire area. g-13 g-14 Require fire sprinklers in all new or substantially WF remodeled multifamily housing, regardless of X distance from a fire station. g-14 g-15 Require sprinklers in all mixed use development to WF protect residential uses from fires started in non- X r esidential areas. g-15 g-16 Compile a list of privately-owned high-rise and high WF occupancy buildings which are deemed, due to their a ge or construction materials, to be particularly X s usceptible to fire hazards, and determine an e xpeditious timeline for the fire-safety inspection of a ll such structures. 3-16 g -17 C onduct periodic fire-safety inspections of all multi- WF X f amily buildings. as reauireri by Stara ia~~, ~ ~ ~ Responsible Agency or Ordinance or Resolution # (if existing ~ ~ ~ Department (Required program), Estimated Cost and ~ ~ 'Q w ~ if Existing Program, Possible Funding Agency (if high N .Q n N ~ Existing Program priority), Estimated Date of n a o ~ ~ under funded, Very Completion (if study), WHY if not Q Q U } ~ High, High, or Under same as regional priority, OR Other j Z Z Z Z U Study) __ -_ - i Comments . X _I L - -- - { - X I i X ~ - --- -- -~~ - + - I- I ----- _i __ __ ~ i ~ ! ~ ~ - ~ - - - - I - - - - t --- - --- --j-i- -I--I -- -- r - - I --- - -- f --~ - 21 of 55 7~.~ s ~ l V~ Housing Mitigation Strategies ° c~ m N m E o~ Z O ~n m N U Specific Mitigation Strategy o ~ ~ ~ Q ~ a Q g-17 g-18 Ensure that citylcounty-initiated fire-preventive WF LS vegetation-management techniques and practices for creek sides and high-slope areas do not contribute to the landslide and erosion hazard. For example, vegetation in these sensitive areas could be thinned, rather than removed, or replanted with less flammable materials. When thinning, the non-native species should be removed first. Other options would be to use structural mitigation, rather than vegetation management in the most sensitive areas. g-18 g-19 Create a mechanism to require the bracing of water EQ WF heaters and flexible couplings on gas appliances, and/or (as specified under "b. Single-family homes vulnerable to earthquakes" above) the bolting of homes to their foundations and strengthening of cripple walls to reduce fire ignitions due to earthquakes. g-19 g-20 Work with the State Fire Marshall, the California EO Seismic Safety Commission, Pacific Earthquake WF Engineering Research Center (PEER), and other experts to identify and manage gas-related fire risks of soft-story residential or mixed use buildings that are prone to collapse and occupant entrapment consistent with the natural gas safety recommendations of Seismic Safety Commission Report SSC-02-03. Note -See http://www.seismic.ca.gov/pub/CSSC 2002- 03_Natural%20Gas%20Safety.pdf. Also note - anyvalues that are installed may need to have both excess flow and seismic triggers ("hybrid" valves). m m m rn 0 0 a a m ~ c a~i ° ~ Responsible Agency ors Ordinance or Resolution # (if existing o '~ a ~ ~, ~ m '~ Department (Required program), Estimated Cost and O v c ~ ,o ~ .n o if Existing Program, Possible Funding Agency (if high a L - w Q c rnm ° ~ ° m ~ ! . ~ Q ul i ~ ~ Existing Program priority), Estimated Date of c=p 'v E ~ c ,Q rnrn c c ~ A n an a n o N y .o under funded, Very Completion (if study), WHY if not Z. o $ a w L Y 'o °' ° ~ ~ ° c ¢ Q U >- .N High, High, or Under same as regional priority, OR Other ° c o c o ~~ m O c o 2 J LL o ~ ~ o 0 0 Z Z Z 0 o Z U Study) Comments X X g-20 new Work with insurance companies to create a WF public/private partnership to give a discount on fire insurance premiums to "Forester Certified" Fire Wise landscaping and fire-resistant building materials on private property. HSNG - h - Floodin h-1 h-1 To reduce flood risk, thereby reducing the cost of FL flood insurance to private property owners, work to qualify for the highest-feasible rating under the ?( Community Rating System of the National Flood Insurance Pro ram. h-2 h-2 Balance the housing needs of residents against the FL X risk from otential flood-related hazards. i - _ - X i~ I I ~ - ~- ~ - ~ - 22 of 55 v Housing Mitigation Strategies a a E E m m o v ~ m p U d N ~ m E N o o~ a p~ ~ o m z Specifc Mitigation Strategy ~ a a ~ ~ ~ N ¢ ~' ~ ° ~ N O ~ ~ m m~ 2~Emc Qmm m m ~n ~ °- ra .y .N ~ ~^ o coi d w r n ~ ~ O N O~ N (D ~ N X X C ¢ S W W~ h-3 h-3 Ensure that new private development pays its fair FL share of improvements to the storm drainage system necessary to accommodate increased flows X from the development, or does not increase runoff by draining water to pervious areas or detention facilities. 4 h-4 h-4 Provide sandbags and plastic sheeting to residents FL in anticipation of rainstorms, and deliver those X materials to vulnerable populations upon request. h-5 h-5 Provide public information on locations for obtaining FL sandbags and/or deliver those sandbags to those various locations throughout a city and/or county X prior to and/or during the rainy season. h-6 h-6 Apply floodplain management regulations for FL private development in the floodplain and floodway. X h-7 h-7 Ensure that new subdivisions are designed to FL reduce or eliminate flood damage by requiring lots and rights-of-way be laid out for the provision of X approved sewer and drainage facilities, providing on site detention facilities whenever practicable. h-8 h-8 Encourage home and apartment owners to FL participate in home elevation programs within flood t hazard areas. _ i h-9 h-9 As funding opportunities become available, FL ~ encourage home and apartment owners to participate in acquisition and relocation programs for areas within floodwa s. h-10 h-10 Encourage owners of properties in a floodplain to FL consider purchasing flood insurance. For example, point out that most homeowners' insurance policies X do not cover a property for flood damage. 0 o Responsible Agency or' Ordinance or Resolution # (if existing ~ ~ DepaAment (Required program), Estimated Cost and ~, ~ a ~ ~ ~ if Existing Program, Possible Funding Agency (if high ~ `~ o W m Existing Program priority), Estimated Date of under funded, Very Completion (if study), WHY if not ~ Q Q U r '~ High, High, or Under same as regional priority, OR Other a o 0 0 0 o Study) Comments ~ Z_Z Z Z U _. -- - . ..- _ _. _. -_ _... -- -- - -- - - I- I_ r ~i i ~ - - -_ _ _- ' __ _ ~ _ -- , X i '~ i I 23 of 55 Housing Mitigation Strategies a`> E E mmoa ~ N 01 U:. N ], m rn rn a o fC n a~ ~ ° rn Z Specific Mitigation Strategy a~ a a -°'o t °~ ~ Q m ~ o N O N ~~ C C 't = V~ C 'O ¢i C O O m d N N N~ Z` O U a •7L' L Y N N V) Q S W W 7 ~~m O C =J HSNG - i -Landslides and Erosion i-1 i-1 Increase efforts to reduce landslides and erosion in LS existing and future development by improving appropriate code enforcement and use of applicable standards for private property, such as those appearing in the California Building Code, California Geological Survey Special Report 117 -Guidelines for Evaluating and Mitigating Seismic Hazards in !i California, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) report Recommended Procedures for Implementation of DMG Special Publication 117: Guidelines for Analyzing and Mitigating Landslide X - Hazards in California, and the California Board for Geologists and Geophysicists Guidelines for Engineering Geologic Reports. Such standards should cover excavation, fill placement, cut-fill transitions, slope stability, drainage and erosion control, slope setbacks, expansive soils, collapsible soils, environmental issues, geological and geotechnical investigations, grading plans and specifications, protection of adjacent properties, and review and permit issuance. j I i-2 i-2 Increase efforts to reduce landslides and erosion in LS existing and future private development through continuing education of design professionals on i miti ation strategies. o ~ N ~ U >. ~ c ~ ~ ow ~ Q d O G1 a~ QQU >- X Responsible Agency or Ordinance or Resolution # (if existing Department (Required program), Estimated Cost and if Existing Program, Possible Funding Agency (if high Existing Program priority), Estimated Date of under funded, Very Completion (if study), WHY if not High, High, or Under same as regional priority, OR Other Study) Comments ___ I ___- -_, 24 of 55 Q r~ tV~) t Housing Mitigation Strategies t o m z' Specific Mitigation Strategy N O ~ m ~n ~ N N ~ .. o....,.,.,,..~.... j-1 j-1 Develop and enforce a repair and reconstruction sam ordinance to ensure that damaged buildings are e as repaired in an appropriate and timely manner and econ retrofitted concurrently. This repair and i-5 reconstruction ordinance should apply to all public and private buildings, and also apply to repair of all damage, regardless of cause. See http:l/quake.abag.ca.govlrecovery/info-repai r- ord.html. j-2 NE Establish preservation-sensitive measures for the W repair and reoccupancy of historically significant sam privately-owned structures, including requirements e as for temporary shoring or stabilization where needed, econ arrangements for consulting with preservationists, i-6 and expedited permit procedures for suitable repair or rebuilding of historically or architecturally valuable structures. m m N O O n n< o_ a r ~ rn m U C C d ~ u N N m m d ~ w w .Q LS NF FL iEC X .Q LSi JVF FL SEC HSN G - k - Public Education k-1 k-1 Provide information to residents of your community EQ LS on the availability of interactive hazard maps WF FL showing your community on ABAG's web site. SEC k-2 k-2 Develop printed materials, utilize existing materials EQ LS (such as developed by FEMA and the American WF FL, Red Cross), conduct workshops, and/or provide SEC outreach encouraging residents to have family X disaster plans that include drop-cover-hold earthquake drills, fire and storm evacuation procedures, and shelter-in-place emergency uidellnes. k-3 k-3 Inform residents of comprehensive mitigation EQ LS activities, including elevation of appliances above WF FL expected flood levels, use offire-resistant roofing SEC and defensible space in high wildfire threat and wildfire-urban-interface areas, structural retroftting ' X techniques for older homes, and use of intelligent grading practices through workshops, publications, and media announcements and events. i ~ - - k-4 k-4 Develop a public education campaign on the cost, EQ LS I risk, and benefts of earthquake, flood, and other FL I hazard insurance as compared to mitigation. SEC ', I i X o ~ Responsible Agency or' Ordinance or Resolution # (if existing ~ d '~ Department (Required program), Estimated Cost and ~, a c ~ if Existing Program, ~ Possible Funding Agency (if high ~ i4 oa w ~ Existing Program priority), Estimated Date of in a n o ~ under funded, Very Completion (if study), WHY if not ~ q Q U ~ >- N High, High, or Under same as regional priority, OR Other ~ o 0 0 0 o Study) l Comments ~ Z Z Z Z U - - -- - -. - - _ _ r I - - - _- X I - 1 i I __ - __ i - __ j I I x i 25 of 55 _a ~ ~ o a ~.O .d N T d ~ 'O O1 ~ O 2 ~ E m c a °c pp Q. w = Y Z' O U OHO jam o °c S~ I /~/ ~ V, Housing Mitigation Strategies o ~ ~ 0 0, Z Specific Mitigation Strategy ~ ~~ N o ~ -d m ~n ~ am 0 0 ~ ~ nl N N (n Q k-5 k-5 Use disaster anniversaries, such as April (the 1906 EO L earthquake), September (9/11), and October (Loma WF Fl Prieta earthquake and Oakland Hills fire), to remind SEC the public of safety and security mitigation activities. k-6 k-6 Sponsor the formation and training of Community EO LS Emergency Response Teams (CERT) for residents WF FL in your community. [Note -these programs go by SEC X a variety of names in various cities and areas.] k-7 k-7 Include flood fighting technique session based on FL California Department of Water Resources training to the list of available public training classes offered b CERT. k-8 k-8 Institute the neighborhood watch block captain and EO LS team programs outlined in the Citizen Corps WF FL program guide. SEC X k-9 k-9 Assist residents in the development of defensible WF space through the use of, for example, "tool libraries" for weed abatement tools, roadside collection and/or chipping services (for brush, weeds, and tree branches) in wildland-urban- intertace fire-threatened communities or in areas exposed to high-to-extreme fire threat. k-10 k-10 Train homeowners to locate and shut off gas valves EO LS if they smell or hear gas leaking. WF FL SEC X E E m~ca~ N ~ V ~ N m T 0 0 ~ ~ _ ° ~ o c ~ a O -o ~ > a rn a-o rn~ =_ tiQ m rnm a~ '~ o m ca Q rnrn ~X ti~ X C Z'o ~a w N C~ r n tYb ~ R i ~ O ° ~ Responsible Agency or Ordinance or Resolution # (if existing ~ ~ ~ Department (Required program), Estimated Cost and ~ ~ ~ 'Q ~ ul ~ ~ if Existing Program, ~ Possible Funding Agency (if high o ~ Existing Program priority), Estimated Date of ~ a a o y ~ under funded, Very Completion (if study), WHY if not -o Q Q U >- ~ High, High, or Under same as regional priority, OR Other ~ ~ , , , ,°, Study) Comments X X _~ k-11 k-12 Develop a program to provide at-cost NOAA FL weather radios to residents of flood hazard areas that request them, with priority to neighborhood watch captains and others trained in their use. k-12 k-13 Make use of the materials on the ABAG web site at EQ http://quake.abag.ca.gov/fixit and other web sites to increase residential mitigation activities related to ~ i earthquakes. (ABAG plans to continue to improve the quality of those materials over time.) k-13 k-14 Develop a "Maintain-a-Drain" campaign, similar to FL that of the City of Oakland, encouraging private businesses and residents to keep storm drains in ~( their neighborhood free of debris. ] 26 of 55 ~_ i - ~ --~ ~I XI _ _~ __ ~ + , -I- i %~ i }- -I - i fi '~. ` t.~"\ ~~ Housing Mitigation Strategies 'o o a~ Responsible Agency or Ordinance or Resolution # (if existing ~ ~ _ program), Estimated Cosl and ~ ~ ~ !~ o ~ ~ -~-- Department (Required ~ rn rn.o o ~ o ~ ~ ~, a c ~ if Existing Program, Possible Funding Agency (if high i m ~ ~ Q m ~ o m ~ ~ o W ~ Existing Program priority), Estimated Date of a d ~ n o Z Specific Mitigation Strategy ~ N Q rn m m ~ o- n N d under funded, Very Completion (if study), WHY if not a~ c : rn rn N O m ~ o a ~ S c ~ _ ~ o d w ~ Y a ~ ~ Q Q U ~ N High, High, or Under same as regional priority, OR Other 0 O 0~ o-- a~ ~' ~' 'o r°" _m o c o c o 0 0 0 o Stud 1 Comments Q = W W i ~~0~ O C 2JLL ~2 ~ ZZZ ZU - _ - Y) - - - N N (n k-14 k-15 Encourage the formation of a community- and WF neighborhood-based approach to wildfire education and action through local Fire Safe Councils and the Fire Wise Program. This effort is important I X because grant funds are currently available to offset costs of specific council-supported projects. _ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ _ ~ ~- k-15 k-16 Inform shoreline-property owners of the possible FL ~ long-term economic threat posed by rising sea X ~ - - - levels. - - - k-16 k-17 Distribute appropriate materials related to disaster EQ LS mltigatlon and preparedness to residents. WF FL A ro riate materials are (1) culturally PP P SEC appropriate and (2) suitable for special needs populations. For example, such materials are X available on the htto //www pr~arenow org website and from non-governmental organizations that work with these communities n- om bads. on an o g g _ ~ _ _ i- ~ g-10 DELETED -REPLACED BY DISCUSSION OF m m -o REVERSE 911 in GOVT c-14. - - - - -- -- _ - ~ _- - - -- m m k-11 a~ 27 of 55 J Economy Mitigation Strategies N ~ O ?~ Specific Mitigation Strategy FCf'1N _ a _ Multi-Hazard a-1 a-1 Assist in ensuring adequate hazard disclosure by working with real estate agents to improve enforcement of real estate disclosure requirements for commercial and industrial properties with regard to seven official natural hazard zones: 1) Special Flood Hazard Areas (designated by FEMA), 2) Areas of Potential Flooding from dam failure inundation, 3) Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones, 4} Wildland Fire Zones, 5) Earthquake Fault Zones (designated under the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act), and the 6) Liquefaction and Landslide Hazard Zones (designated under the Seismic Hazard Mapping Act). a-2 a-2 Create incentives for private owners of historic or architecturally significant commercial and industrial buildings to undertake mitigation to levels that will minimize the likelihood that these buildings will need to be demolished after a disaster, particularly if those alterations conform to the federal Secretary of the Interior's Guidelines for a~ ~ N m ~ U o S = EQ LS JUF FL SEC EQ LS WF FL SEC ECON - b -Soft-Sto Commercial Buildin s Vulnerable to Earthquakes b-1 b-1 Require engineered plan sets for voluntary or EQ mandatory soft-story seismic retrofits by private owners until a standard plan set and construction details become available. b-2 b-2 Adopt the 2009 (changed date) International EO Existing Building Code or the latest applicable standard for the design of voluntary or mandatory soft-story building retrofits for use in citylcounty building department regulations. In addition, allow use of changes to that standard recommended by SEAOC for the 2012 IEBC. b-3 b-3 Work to educate building owners, local government EO staff, engineers, and contractors on privately- owned soft-story retrofit procedures and incentives using materials such as those developed by ABAG and the City of San Jose (see http:/lq uake.abag.ca.gov/eq house.htm I.) b-4 b-4 Conduct an inventory of privately-owned existing or EQ suspected soft-story commercial or industrial structures as a first step in establishing voluntary or mandatory programs for retrofitting these Pripnty (CHEC E E a ~mo-°o 0 0 ~O a~ ° ~ o c ~ a O m °~ ~ o a ~ av c m t wQ m ~ ~ U C ~ ¢ C .N ~ .N r = E (0 Z'O Ua w i ~ n X X o ~ Responsible Agency or Ordinance or Resolution # (if ~ ~ ~ .., ~ Department (Required existing program), Estimated ': ~, ~ ~ ~ .` ~ if Existing Program, Cost and Possible Funding -o ~ m n ~ o w v ~ Existing Program Agency (if high priority), + .. ~ . a n o m ~ Very under funded Estimated Date of m Q Q U ~ ti , High, High, or Under Completion (if study), WHY if ~c o o 0 0 o Stud Y) ~ not same as regional priority, ~ Z Z 2 Z U -- - ' OR Other Comments -.. ~ _. - _. X I i X 28 of 55 7~ t~ {~ ~1 Economy Mitigation Strategies ~ ~ ~ ~ _ a c a~ L° m a o ~ ~ Responsible Agency or Ordinance or Resolution # (if i i n c ~ m m o ~° o ~O 0 rn v :-. a~ ~ ~ o ~ ~, ~ ~ ., -„ ~ .. o n c ~ Department (Required i ex st ng program), Estimated Cost and Possible Funding ° o om z Specific Mitigation Strategy a d N d -oo t 4. O 'O m N Q C `p ~ ~.- >. ~O ~ °- w ~ o f Existing Program, ~o ~ Existing Program Agency (if high priority), `~ rn 0 O ~ ~ `~- ~ °~ ~ ~ ~ N N c °i ~ c ~ w rn ,m °~ c a _ ~ ~ `° ~ $ a ~ Q °' °~ ~ Y ~ ~ s - in °- n ti ~ Q Q U d under funded, Ve ~ ~° ry Hi h U d H Estimated Date of Completion (if study), WHY if 0 N 0 ~ 0-- w~ . a ~ x ~ S w .o xc w> ~ o ,~ a~cdco > m c o °'oo~ o = a w ~ c o00 ~ Z z z g n er , 00 Study) z U i not same as re Tonal riori 9 P b. ~ R b-5 b-5 Use the soft-story inventory to require private EQ _ Other Comments owners to inform all existing tenants (and prospective tenants prior to signing a lease ~ X b-6 b-6 agreement) that they may work in this type of Use the soft-story inventory to require private _ EQ _ r_ owners to inform all existin and ros ective 9 p p tenants that they may need to be prepared to work X elsewhere following an earthquake if the building ~ b-7 b-, Investigate and adopt appropriate financial, EQ - - d ~ - - procedural, and land use incentives (such as parking waivers) for private owners of soft-story buildings to facilitate retrofit such as those X described byABAG (see htf :// uak . b ov/fixi a b-8 b-8 (reworded) Explore development of State regulations or legislation to require or encourage EQ ~ private owners of soft-story structures to strengthen X i them. i b-9 b-9 Provide technical assistance in seismically EQ strengthening privately-owned soft-story structures. X i 29 of 55 ~..J 1 Economy Mitigation Strategies ~ E E m m c° - .° m m o o 01 U «~ N ], ° ~~ ' ai o o~ a~oc ~ . m Z Specific Mitigation Strategy n ~, o_ a -° c L N Q ~ m ~ N O _~ ~ C C'C _m S V E l6 C Q C 0 0~ a~ .N .N~ Z`o cga' L o N Nrn Q S W W~ ~~m c c 2J ECON - c - Unreinforced Mason Buildin sin Older Down town Areas c-1 c-1 Continue to actively implement existing State law that requires cities and counties to maintain lists of the addresses of unreinforced masonry buildings and inform private property owners that they own this a of hazardous structure. c-2 c-2 Accelerate retrofitting of privately-owned unreinforced masonry structures that have not been retrofitted, for example, by (a) actively working with owners to obtain structural analyses of their buildings, (b) helping owners obtain retrofit funding, (c) adopting a mandatory (rather than voluntary) retrofit program, and/or (d) applying penalties to owners who show inadequate efforts to upgrade these buildings. c-3 c-3 Require private owners to inform all existing tenants (and prospective tenants prior to signing a lease agreement) that they work in an unreinforced masonry building and the standard to which it may c-4 c-4 As required by State law, require private owners to inform all existing tenants that they may need to be prepared to work elsewhere following an earthquake even if the building has been retrofitted, because it has probably been retrofitted to alife-safety standard, not to a standard that will allow occupancy followin ma'or earth uakes EO EO __ _- - - EO i - -- EO ~ __l i I ECON - d -Private) -Owned Structural) Vulnerable Buildin s a d-1 d-1 Inventory non-ductile concrete, tilt-up concrete, and EO other privately-owned structurally vulnerable ~I buildin s. i P 9 9 or the latest applicable standard for the design of voluntary or mandatory retrofit of privately-owned seismically vulnerable buildings. d-3 d-3 Adopt one or more of the following strategies as incentives to encourage retroftting of privately- owned seismically vulnerable commercial and industrial buildings: (a) waivers or reductions of permit fees, (b) below-market loans, (c) local tax breaks, (d) grants to cover the cost of retrofitting or of a structural analysis, (e) land use (such as parking requirement waivers) and procedural incentives, or (f) technical assistance. d-2 d-2 Ado t the 2009 International Existin Buildin Code EO ECON - e -Wildfire 30 of 55 EO o ° Responsible Agency or Ordinance or Resolution # (if ~ ~ y ,.., Department (Required existing program), Estimated >, ~ m o a •c ~ if Existing Program, Cost and Possible Funding ~ a W o -o a~ Existing Program Agency (if high priority), U a a o y ~ ' under funded, Very Estimated Date of Completion (if study) WHY if Q Q U o 0 0 } ~ 0 High, High, or Under , not same as regional priority, c ~ z Z Z o Z U Study) OR Other Comments X X X X X - -1 X Economy Mitigation Strategies Responsible Agency or Ordinance or Resolution # (if E - c ~ o > existing program), Estimated ~ DepaAment (Required E ~ rn ~ ° a~Oi ~., ai ~ ~ Cost and Possible Funding ~ E rn rn Q >G n o a> >, .o ~c °~ if Existing Program, a~ o o~ LL O -oo c ~ v n W D Agency (if high priority), Existing Program ~ o ~ o c~ ~ z Specific Mitigation Strategy o m rn ~ ~ ~, a a ~ ~ ~ ~ ¢ c ~ w a; Estimated Date of ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ m ~ ¢ rn m m ~ a n o y ~ under funded, Very ~ Completion (if study) WHY if c°.i O d ~ _ , a m ~ ~ o a L Y v ~ ~ ¢ ¢ U >- ~ High, High, or Under not same as re tonal riorit g p y' o00 0o d c d pjO 0 0~ Stu y) a~ x X O~ o c eco s= w w> > m C 2 J LL ~ z Z Z Z _ OR Other Comments - N e-1 N in a-1 I ncrease efforts to reduce hazards in existing WF private development in wildland-urban-interface fire- threatened communities or in areas exposed to high to-extreme fire threat through improving engineering ~( design and vegetation management for mitigation, appropriate code enforcement, and public education on defensible space mitigation strategies. 'I I( e-2 new Tie public education on defensible space and a WF 1 comprehensive defensible space ordinance to a X field program of enforcement. -t _ _ - ~ -_ - - - - - -- e-3 a-2 Require that new privately-owned business and WF office buildings in high fire hazard areas be constructed of fire-resistant building materials and incorporate fire-resistant design features (such as X minimal use of eaves, internal corners, and open first floors) to increase structural survivability and reduce ignitability. _ - ~ - _ _ _ _ - - - e-4 e-3 Adopt and amend as needed updated versions of WF i the California Building and Fire Codes so that optimal fire-protection standards are used in X ~ construction and renovation projects of private buildin s. - - ~ It ~ -- - -_ ---- e-5 a-4 Create a mechanism to enforce provisions of the WF I California Building and Fire Codes and other local codes that require the installation of smoke detectors and fire-extinguishing systems on 'I in s b makin - caned but d xistin rivatel o Y 9 e 9 P Y g X Ilation a condition of a finalizin a permd for costa O 9 ~ any work valued at over a fixed amount and/or (b) i on any building over 75 feet in height, and/or (b) as a condition for the transfer of property. I ~- - ~ _{ e-6 a-5 (reworded to more closely match the HSNG WF strategy) Expand vegetation management programs inwildland-urban-interface fire-threatened communities or in areas exposed to high-to-extreme fire threat to more effectively manage the fuel load through roadside collection and chipping, X mechanical fuel reduction equipment, selected harvesting, use of goats or other organic methods o f i fuel reduction, and selected use of controlled burning. i 31 of 55 W (~ V ~ Economy Mitigation Strategies d m E ~ Z N - [) Q Specific Mitigation Strategy E E _ a m ~ ° 6 m m o a 1 ~ o o a °~ o c a~~O ~ ' ~ ~, a as r ~ N Q C o U m ~ ~'t x"E me Q a n ~ S W w ~ ~~ m n~ ~~ e-7 a-6 Establish special funding mechanisms (such as WF i Fire Hazard Abatement Districts or regional bond funding) to fund reduction in fire risk of existing properties through vegetation management that includes reduction of fuel loads, use of defensible f r e-8 a-7 Establish special funding mechanisms (such as WF Fire Hazard Abatement Districts or regional bond funding) to fund fire-safety inspections of private properties, roving firefighter patrols on high fire- hazard days, and public education efforts. e-9 a-8 Compile a list of privately-owned high-rise and high WF occupancy buildings that are deemed, due to their a e or construction material 9 s, to be particularly susceptible to fire hazards, and determine an x expeditious timeline for the fire-safety inspection of all such structures. e-10 a-9 Conduct periodic fire-safety inspections of all WF privately-owned commercial and industrial X buildin s. e-11 a-10 Work with the State Fire Marshall, the California EO i Seismic Safety Commission, Pacific Earthquake WF Engineering Research Center (PEER), and other experts to identify and manage gas-related fire risks of privately-owned soft-story mixed use buildings ii that are prone to collapse and occupant entrapment consistent with the natural gas safety recommendations of Seismic Safety Commission Report SSC-02-03. Note -See http://www.seismio.ca.gov/pub/CSSC 2002- 03_Natural%20Gas%20Safety.pdf. Alsonote- an values that are installed ma need to have both e-12 a-11 Ensure that city/county-initiated fire-preventive WF vegetation-management techniques and practices for creek sides and high-slope areas do not contribute to the landslide and erosion hazard. I e-13 a-12 Work with insurance companies to create a WF publiGprivate partnership to give a discount on fire insurance premiums to "Forester Certified" Fire Wise landscaping and fire-resistant building materials on rivate ro e ECO N - f - Floodin f-1 f-1 To reduce flood risk, thereby reducing the cost of FL ~ flood insurance to private property owners, work to qualify for the highest-feasible rating under the )( Community Rating System of the National Flood ° ~ Responsible Agency or Ordinance or Resolution # (if ~ d :. ~ .-. ° a ~ ~ Department (Required if E i ti existing program), Estimated Cost and Possible Funding ~ ~ o ul d x s ng Program, Agency (if high priority) Existing Program , ~ a a o y ~ under funded, Very Estimated Date of ° ¢ ¢ U } .N Hi h, Hi h, or Under g '~ Completion (if study), WHY if c 0 0 0 0 o Study) Inot same as regional priority, ~ Z z Z 2 _ 1__ OR Other Comments - - X _ _ _- - ' - -_ X _ ff_ 1 - - - ~ -- _ - _ __ __ _~ _ - ~ , __ - I - - - „x -- ~ _- __ X __ _ - - - I ~ X L ~ - -~ - _ __ 32 of 55 !W N 1 Economy Mitigation Strategies ~ _ 'o ~ ~ m ~ o -o o m Responsible Agency or i Ordinance or Resolution # (if l ~ a m y :- o ~ w ~, ~ ... ~ Department (Required existing program), Estimated j C t d P o c a~ o o ~ d ~ o c ~ ~ >, n c ~ if Existing Program, ~ os an ossible Funding o ~rn Z Specific Mitigation Strategy O m ~ a a v .c _ ~ ~, c N Q c ~ o O ~ ~ w ~ ~ ,~ o ~ . o d Existing Program Agency (if high priority), N 0 O a~ o rn m ~ -° °~ °' ~ '~ °~ c `o - S So =~Em= ~ w _ Q rn °' m ~ a °- ~' o under funded, Ve ~' c4'v m d Q4U rN ry Estimated Date of ~ Com letion if stud WHY if P C Y) 0 m 0 .- ,w m .a ~ o ~ a a m x X c d c m c o . s -o .o ~ High, High, or Under °-' °o ~ o c o 0 0 0 o St d . not same as regional priority, N N S W W~ ~ m p c u Y) 2 J l L ~ ~ z z z z v OR Other Comments f-2 f-2 Balance the needs for rivate commercial and p FL __ __ __ __ ,_ _ _ industrial development against the risk from X ~ ~ ~ otential flood-related hazards. ~ ~ f-3 f-3 Ensure that new private development pays its fair FL ~ f -- _ -- _ - share of improvements to the storm drainage I , system necessary to accommodate increased flows from the development, or does not increase runoff by draining water to pervious areas or detention facilities. ' f-4 f-4 Provide sandbags and plastic sheeting to private FL I - - - - ff businesses in anticipation of rainstorms, and deliver ~ ' those materials to vulnerable populations upon I I re uest. -5 -5 rovide information to private business on _ FL _ } - _ _ _ _ - - - ~ __ _- - locations for obtaining sandbags and deliver those X sandbags to those various locations throughout a ci and/or coun f-6 f-6 Apply floodplain management regulations for FL -- private development in the floodplain and floodway. X f-7 f-7 Encourage private business owners to participate in FL ~ ~ _ - - building elevation programs within flood hazard X I I f-8 f-8 As funding becomes available, encourage private FL __ _ I _ - business owners to participate in acquisition and relocation programs for areas within floodways. ~ __ i X f-9 f-9 Require an annual inspection of approved flood- I _ FL _ - _ - - - - - proofed privately-owned buildings to ensure that (a) all flood-proofng components will operate properly under flood conditions and (b) all responsible personnel are aware of their duties and ' X responsibilities as described in their building's Flood Emergency Operation Plan and Inspection & ~ Maintenance Plan. 33 of 55 W w ~1 Economy Mitigation Strategies C 3 ° rn Z Specific Mitigation Strategy N O d o~ ~n 0 0 N °N ~ FCnN - n - I anricliriac and Frncinn g-1 g-1 Increase efforts to reduce landslides and erosion in existing and future development by improving appropriate code enforcement and use of applicable standards for private property, such as those appearing in the California Building Code, California Geological Survey Special Report 117 -Guidelines for Evaluating and Mitigating Seismic Hazards in California, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) report Recommended Procedures for Implementation of DMG Special Publication 117: Guidelines for Analyzing and Mitigating Landslide Hazards in California, and the California Board for Geologists and Geophysicists Guidelines for Engineering Geologic Reports. Such standards should cover excavation, fill placement, cut-fill transitions, slope stability, drainage and erosion control, slope setbacks, expansive soils, collapsible soils, environmental issues, geological and geotechnical investigations, grading plans and specifications, protection of adjacent properties, and review and permit issuance. g-2 g-2 Increase efforts to reduce landslides and erosion in existing and future private development through continuing education of design professionals on mitigation strategies. E E a m m c~ (6 f0 p~'V ~ N >. Of 0 Of o y O tE Q N a 0 o c ~° ~ ~ ~, - a d-~ ~~ N¢ m ~ o O o ro m Ol ~ _ .U E l6 C ~ ai C . a~ oa~ r:r ~;z w w ~ N c a> c 0 >> m O C m$ 2 ~ _S x .S ECON - h -New Construction and Earth wakes h-1 h-1 Continue to require that all new privately-owned EO commercial and industrial buildings be constructed in compliance with (deleted "structural") X requirements of the most recently adopted version of the California Building Code. h-2 h-2 Conduct appropriate employee training and support EQ continued education to ensure enforcement of X construction standards for private development. h-3 h-3 Work with private building owners to help them EQ recognize that many strategies that increase SEC i earthquake resistance also decrease damage in an explosion. In addition, recognize that ventilation systems can be designed to contain airborne biolo ical a ents. ~ Responsible Agency or l Ordinance or Resolution # (if y °? ~ Department (Required ;existing program), Estimated >. a '~ ~ if Existing Program, Cost and Possible Funding a ~ o uJ . ~ Existing Program Agency (if high priority), in Q a y a n o o y ~ under funded, Very Estimated Date of v Q Q U } ~ High, High, or Under Completion (if study), WHY if c o 0 0 0 o Study) not same as regional priority, ~ Z z Z z U OR Other Comments ilk. _. _ _ ~. I I - __ _t - - _' ___ I' X 34 of 55 ~~ ~i A Economy Mitigation Strategies a~ L o m z' Specific Mitigation Strategy c~ O ~ o~ ~n ~ N N U) i-1 i-1 Institute a program to encourage owners of private builldings to participate in a program similar to San Francisco's Building Occupancy Resumption Program (BORP). This program permits owners of private buildings to hire qualified structural engineers to create building-specific post- disasterinspection plans and allows these engineers to become automatically deputized as City/County inspectors for these buildings in the event of an earth uake or other disaster. i-2 i-2 Actively notify private owners of historic or architecturally significant buildings of the availability of the local BORP-type program and encourage them to participate to ensure that appropriately qualified structural engineers are inspecting their buildings, thus reducing the likelihood that the buildings will be inappropriately evaluated following a disaster. i-3 i-3 Actively notify owners of educational facility buildings of the availability of the local BORP-type program and encourage them to participate to ensure that appropriately qualified structural engineers are inspecting their buildings, thus reducing the likelihood that the buildings will be inappropriately evaluated following a disaster. i-4 i-4 Allow private building owners to participate in a BORP-type program as described above, but not actively encourage them to do so. i-5 i-5 Develop and enforce a repair and reconstruction ordinance to ensure that damaged buildings are repaired in an appropriate and timely manner and retrofitted concurrently. This repair and i-6 i-6 Establish preservation-sensitive measures for the repair and reoccupancy of historically significant privately-owned structures, including requirements for temporary shoring or stabilization where needed, arrangements for consulting with preservationists, and expedited permit procedures for suitable repair or rebuilding of historically or architecturally valuable structures. _ a m m ~ m 0-~0 m U O. ~ _>. m ~ o_Ov rn ' o -o ~ 4. d a L N¢ C U c ~ ~ c~ 2 ~ E m c Q c° Q ~ .~? Na Zo $aw L o o~ Q S W W> > j m o c 2 ~ EO LSD WF FL' SEC ': EO LS WF FL'. SEC EO LS'_ WF FLT' SEC EO LS WF FL SEC EO LS WF Fl SEC EO LS, WF FL' SEC -Public Education I Provide information to private business owners and EQ LS ~, their employees on the availability of interactive WF FL hazard maps on ABAG's web site. SEC )C o m Responsible Agency or; Ordinance or Resolution # (if ~ y y ~ Department (Required ii existing program), Estimated d P ibl F di >, ~ a 'c ~ if Existing Program, Cost an oss e un ng ~ n w o -o ~ Existing Program Agency (if high priority), ~ a a o y ~ under funded Very Estimated Date of d ~ ¢ ¢ U >- ~ , High, High, or Under Completion (if study), WHY if OC o 0 0 0 o Study) not same as regional priority, ~ z z Z Z U __ - - _ _ OR Other Comments __ II l - X 35 of 55 W Economy Mitigation Strategies E_ ~ y E E o m Responsible Agency or Ordinance or Resolution # (if d ~ m m m m rn ~~ ~ ~ a ? ~ ~ ~ Department (Required i g program), Estimate existin Cost and Possible Funding o m E . c a~ o o ~O ° ~ o c ~ ~ n' ~ ~O °' m '~ ~ ~, ~ a ~ ~ W ~ o if Existing Program, v E i ti P ~ Agency (if high priority), o ~ Z p g gy S ecific Miti ation Strate N N Q c a a z c m m ~ ° ~ - ~ ,,,, Q o n '- d x s ng rogram I Estimated Date of ~ o rn rn~ _ ~ c a c 't E c rn m c m ~ a n o v~ under funded, Very i ; Completion (if study) WHY if ~ 0 w. 0 m `~ N N N a ~ ~ °~ ~ w ro ' c ~~d ~ '~ -° °'o ~ a ° o c Q Q U o00 ~- m Hi h, Hi h, or Under ! g g 0o , not same as regional priority, N "~ N rq x x co Q ~ W W~ ~m c o 2J W 7 ZZZ Study) ZU I __ _. _OR Othe_r_Comments__ j-2 j-2 Develop printed materials, utilize existing materials EQ LS (such as developed by FEMA and the American WF FL Red Cross), conduct workshops, and/or provide SEC ~ outreach encouraging private businesses' I X ~ employees to have family disaster plans that include ~ drop-cover-hold earthquake drills, fire and storm i evacuation procedures, and shelter-in-place emer enc uidelines. - -- _ -- - - - ---__ j-3 j-3 Develop and print materials, conduct workshops, EO LS and provide outreach to Bay Area private WF FL businesses focusing on business continuity SEC X planning. - -- _ - - 4 1- 4 1- of Y p sl V mi r d WF FL nc ud n elevaton of ation activ iesl ti g g ii appliances above expected flood levels, use of fire- I resistant roofing and defensible space in wildland- i i, urban-intertace fire-threatened communities or in X I areas exposed to high-to-extreme fire threat, ~~ structural retrofitting techniques for older buildings, 'I and use of intelligent grading practices through '~ I workshops, publications, and media ~ I announcements and events. ! _ _ __ - - _ j-5 j-5 Sponsor the formation and training of Community EQ LS _ Emergency Response Teams (CERT) training for WF FL i other than your own employees through SEC X I partnerships with local private businesses. [Note - these programs go by a variety of names in various cities and areas.] j-6 j-6 Assist private businesses in the development of WF i defensible space through the use of, for example, ~, "tool libraries" for weed abatement tools, roadside , collection and/or chipping services (for brush, ' X weeds, and tree branches) in wildland-urban- intertace fire-threatened communities or in areas ~ exposed to high-to-extreme fire threat. I _-_ ' j-7 j-7 Make use of the materials developed by others EQ (such as found on ABAG's web site at htta://puake.abao.ca.aov/business) to increase mitigation activities related to earthquakes by X i groups other than your own agency. ABAG plans '~i t to continue to improve the quality of those materials 'i ', over time. __ _- ._ _ _ ___ __ j-8 j-8 Develop a "Maintain-a-Drain" campaign, similar to FL I that of the City of Oakland, encouraging private X ~ ~ businesses and residents to keep storm drains in i ~I ', their nei hborhood free of debris. 36 of 55 tJ~ r~ t 111 ~\ Economy Mitigation Strategies ~ ~ E E m m o ~ ~ ~ Responsible Agency or ~ Ordinance or Resolution # if . _ a f0 E ~ ~ rn ~_ f, y ° ~ o c ~, ~ ~ ... ~ ~ ~ ~ Department (Required if E i ti P existing program), Estimated Cost and Possible Funding ° ~ Z rn S ecific Miti ation Strate p g gy N o o ~ 9 a a 'oo L o_ O ~° ~ ~ y Q c '~ $ ~ ,~ a j °' w ~ o a: _ ° m x s n ro ram, g g Existing Program Agency (if high priority), N d O °~ c m m ~ ~ °~ ~ ~ °~ c ~ - ~ c c ~ = ~ E `0 Q m rn ' Y a _ _ m N n o- '~ ~ ~ Q Q U ~ r N under funded, Ve Estimated Date of Completion (if study) WHY if ~ ° ~n -- ° `0 ~ ~ o. a i ~ ° x x ~ ° ° c o Hi h, Hi h, or Under g , not same as re ional riorit ° ° i c c a m c o Q -' o ~ o o 0 0 0 Study) g p y, cv c~ in ~ w w > > m c = ~ u_ ~ ~ Z Z 2 Z U O R O ! h e r Co m m e nts j-9 j-9 Encourage the formation of a community- and WF _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ ___ _ __ __ neighborhood-based approach to wildfire education and action through local Fire Safe Councils and the li Fire Wise Program. This effort is important X because grant funds are currently available to ~ ~ offset costs of specific council-supported 'i - - i ' j-10 j-10 Encourage private businesses and laboratories SEC -- handling hazardous materials or pathogens increase EQ security to a level high enough to create a deterrent to crime and terrorism, including active ~ X ~ implementation of "cradle-to-grave" tracking I I II systems. ~ j-11 j-11 Encourage joint meetings of security and operations SEC I _ -- -- _ _ _ _ -- personnel at major private employers to develop EQ innovative ways for these personnel to work X ~ together to increase safety and security. --- j-12 j-12 Inform private shoreline-property owners of the FL _ I possible long-term economic threat posed by rising X sea levels. __ j-13 j-13 Distribute appropriate materials related to disaster EQ LS - - mitigation and preparedness to private business WF FL ~ owners. Appropriate materials are (1) culturally SEC appropriate and {2) suitable for special needs populations. For example, such materials are X available on the http://www.preparenow.org website and from non-governmental organizations that work with these communities ~ on an on-going basis. 37 of 55 ~.J v J V\ Government Mitigation Strategies ~ ~ E E ~ E `~ ~ 7 ° Z C 7 'm Z Specific Mitigation Strategy ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ O ~ m Q N N fn N V) Q Z.>. W GOVT - a -Focus on Critical Facilities ...Owned b the Local Government Filling a-1 a-1 Assess the vulnerability of critical facilities (such as EO LS city halls, fire stations, operations and WF FL communications headquarters, community service centers, seaports, and airports) to damage in natural disasters and make recommendations fora propriate mitigation. a-2 a-2 Retrofit or replace critical facilities that are shown to EO LS be vulnerable to damage in natural disasters. WF FL SEC a-3 a-3 Clarify to workers in critical facilities and emergency EO ersonnel as well as to I P e ected officials and the public, the extent to which the facilities are expected to pertorm only at a life safety level (allowing for the X safe evacuation of personnel) or are expected to remain functional following an earthquake. a-4 a-4 Conduct comprehensive programs to identify and EO LS ~ mitigate problems with facility contents, architectural WF FL components, and equipment that will prevent critical SEC buildings from being functional after major natural disasters. Such contents and equipment includes computers and servers, phones, files, and other tools used by staff to conduct daily a-5 a-5 Encourage joint meetings of security and operations EO LS personnel at critical facilities to develop innovative WF FL ways for these personnel to work together to SEC X i ncrease safety and security. Pnon~ty (CFIECK ONLY PN~'j ~ w ~ o ~ ° ~ Responsible Agency or Ordinance or Resolution # (i ~ rn ~_ ~„ y o ~ ~ ~ ;-, o ~ ~ Department (Required existing program), Estimates o ° o o c ~ a O -° d > o ~ 'a ~ . if Existing Program Cost and Possible Fundin g a c m m ur ¢ c ~ ° ° ~ ~ o W o ~ , Existing Program Agency (if high priority), ~'~E _ = o E m c ¢~~ L° U n a o y a D, under funded,Ve Estimated Date of x c ~ c ~ d w ~ o ~ .o ~ Q Q U > ~~ High, High, or Under Completion (if study), WHY i. W 7 »m O C SJLL o ~ c ~ o 0 0 ZZ Z 0 o Z U Study) not same as regional priority, iut Thls Form) I i -- --- __OR Other Comments __ X J - I ~- __ X - _ f - - - t I ~- -- _ _. I. _ - _ _ _- _ _. _ _ - _- -_ X i , a-6 a-6 eras r e I, around crtcal public assets tied to web--based WF F software, and develop a surveillance protocol to SEC monitor these cameras, investigate the possiblility X of using the cameras for the secondary purpose p g l n e 3-7 a-7 dentity an d u dertake cost effect ve etrofit EO LS ~ - measures related to security on critical facilities WF FL (such as moving and redesigning air intake vents SEC and installing blast-resistant features) when these buildings undergo major renovations related to 38 of 55 - - -- X i - 1 (!~, `~ a ~ E E ~ E m o o 7 C Z - Z m 7 Specific Mitigation Strategy ~ m o ~ n c~ O ~ . `~°_o rn ~ O ° ~ ~ N t Oo ~ ~ c ~ ~ .N ~ a-9 n~ a-9 As a secondary focus, assess the vulnerability of .~, LL EQ LS non-critical facilities to damage in natural disasters WF FL based on occupancy and structural type, make i SEC recommendations on priorities for structural improvements or occupancy reductions, and identify potential funding mechanisms. a-10 a-10 Ensure that new government-owned facilities EQ LS comply with and are subject to the same or more WF FL stringent regulations as imposed on privately-owned X SEC develo ment. a-11 a-11 Comply with all applicable building and fire codes, EQ LS as well as other regulations (such as state WF FL requirements for fault, landslide, and liquefaction SEC investigations in particular mapped areas) when X constructing or significantly remodeling government- owned facilities. a-12 a-12 Prior to acquisition of property to be used as a EQ LS critical facility, conduct a study to ensure the WF FL absence of significant structural hazards and SEC X hazards associated with the building site. a-13 new Ensure that any regulations imposed on private- EQ LS owned businesses related to repair and WF FL reconstruction (see "Economy Section") are SEC X enforced and imposed on local government's 30V T - b - Maintain and Enhance focal Government's Emer en cy Recovery Planninc ~-1 b-1 Establish a framework and process for pre-event EQ LS planning for post-event recovery that specifies roles, WF FL priorities, and responsibilities of various SEC departments within the local government )( organization, and that outlines a structure and process for policy-making involving elected officials and a ointed adviso committees. i-2 b-2 Prepare a basic Recovery Plan that outlines the EQ LS I major issues and tasks that are likely to be the key WF FL elements of community recovery, as well as i SEC integrate this planning into response planning (such X as with continuity of operations plans). -3 b-3 Establish a goal for the resumption of local EQ LS government services that may vary from function to WF FL f unction. SEC X Government Mitigation Strategies E m~o.o °~ N ~ ° ~ ~ ~ .~.. U ~ ~ 7 = 'U C ~° Q °1 LCA ~ rq d °. N vim 2'0 $aw L ~~O -o °? QQU ~ i _ _ - 1 i 39 of 55 Responsible Agency or vramance or KesoWtion # (if Department (Required' existing program), Estimated Co t d P if Existing Program, s an ossible Funding Existing Program Agency (if high priority), under funded, Very Estimated Date of High, High, or Under Completion (if study), WHY if Study) not same as regional priority, - - _ _ ___ _ _ _OR Other Comments X I ~ i- - i - f I - _ I _ _ _ i 1. __T --1 _ 1_ _ I - __ _ W C~ ~ 1 Government Mitigation Strategies _ a `~c0o-° ~ a m m o mU ~ N >, ~ ~~ a> 0 0 '° olEna~ o c ~ ° Z 'rn Z Specific Mitigation Strategy ~ a a a ~ ~ ~ Q m '~ o ~ om om a~ N v 2`oc°~a' 'co O +-' O +-~ X X N c N ~ n NfnN(n `~ ~ W W b-4 b-25 Develop a continuity of operations plan that EO LS includes back-up storage of vital records, such as WF FL plans and back-up procedures to pay employees SEC X and vendors if normal finance department operations are disrupted, as well as other b-5 new Plan for the emergency relocation of EO LS government-owned facilities critical to recovery, WF FL as well as any facilities with known structural SEC X deficiencies or in hazardous areas. GOVT - o-Maintain and Enhance Local Government's Emer ency Response Capacity c-1 new Develop a plan for short-term and intermediate-term EO LS (old sheltering of your employees. WF FL b-a SEC move d to X c-2 new Encourage your employees to have a family EQ LS disaster plan. WF FL SEC X c-3 new Offer CERTlNERT-type training to your EO LS employees. WF FL SEC X c-4 b-5 Periodically assess the need for new or relocated EO LS (a) fre or police stations and other emergency facilities. WF FL X SEC c-5 b-5 Periodically assess the need for changes in staffing EO LS (b) levels, as well as for additional or updated supplies, WF FL X i equipment, technologies, and in-service training SEC classes. c-6 b-6 Ensure that fire, police, and other emergency EO LS personnel have adequate radios, breathing WF FL apparatuses, protective gear, and other equipment SEC X to respond to a major disaster. l c-7 b-7 Participate in developing and maintaining a system EQ LS i of interoperable communications for first responders WF FL from cities, counties, special districts, state, and SEC ' X federal agencies. m Responsible Agency or ~i Ordinance or Resolution # (if ~ w ~ ... Department (Required I existing program), Estimated ~, ° m y .n •c ~ if Existing Program, Cost and Possible Funding n W ~ o a m Existing Program Agency (if high priority), _ U ~ n n o ~ ~ under funded, Very Estimated Date of Completion (if study) WHY if Q Q U > ~+ High, High, or Under , c o 0 0 0 o Study) not same as regional priority, ~ Z Z Z Z U OR Other Comments ~ --- i III II -. - ---_.. 40 of 55 S r~ t~.2~~ v 1 o Z 3 C 7 :o> Z Specific Mitigation Strategy y ~ N ~ O ~ N ~ O o ~ o~ o ~ o~ ~- 1° N ~n ~ S c-8 b-8 Harden emergency response communications, EO LS including, for example, building redundant capacity WF FL i into public safety alerting and/or answering points, SEC replacing or hardening microwave and simulcast systems, adding digital encryption for programmable radios, and ensuring aplug-and-play capability for amateur radio. j c-9 b-9 Purchase command vehicles for use as mobile EO LS command/EOC vehicles if current vehicles are WF FL unsuitable or inadequate. SEC c-10 b-10 Maintain the local government's emergency EO operations center in a fully functional state of WF FL readiness. SEC i c-11 b-11 Expand or participate in expanding traditional EO LS ~ disaster exercises involving city and county WF FL emergency personnel to include airport and port SEC personnel, transit and infrastructure providers, hospitals, schools, park districts, and major i em to ers. c-12 b-12 Maintain and update as necessary the local EO LS government's Standardized Emergency WF FL Management System (BEMs) Plan and the SEC National Incident Management System (NIMS) X Plan, and submit an appropriate NIMSCAST c-13 b-13 Continue to participate not only in general mutual- EO LS aid agreements, but also in agreements with WF FL adjoining jurisdictions for cooperative response to SEC X fires, floods, earthquakes, and other disasters. c-14 b-14 Install alert and warning systems for rapid EQ LS i & b- evacuation orshelter-in-place. Such systems WF FL 22 include outdoor sirens andlor reverse-911 calling SEC ~ X s stems. c-15 b-15 Conduct periodic tests of the alerting and warning EO LS system. (deleted some wording) WF FL i SEC X c-16 - b 16 Regulate and enforce the location and desi n of 9 EO LS street-address numbers on buildings and minimize WF FL t he naming of short streets (that are actually SEC X d riveways) to single homes. 17 b -17 Monitor weather during times of high fire risk using, WF f or example, weather stations tied into police and X Government Mitigation Strategies E E E ~ `a~o~ °> m m m m o~~aa~i ~' ai ~ ~ 0 0~ apoc > >. a•c~ ~ ~ L N¢ ~ m N V O ~ ~ ~ ~ W c m c~ _~Em=o Qmm m iA actin .N vi -moo Z` O VO a .~. L Y 'C! -is N Q Q U } X X X X _ _ I _ _. + 1 _ - r I _ _ I I- - ' - I ~_ ~ _ f ~ _ 41 of 55 Responsible Agency or uroinance or Resolution # (if Department (Required existing program), Estimated if Existing Program, Cost and Possible Funding Existing Program i Agency (if high priority), under funded, Very Estimated Date of High, High, or Under Completion (if study), WHY if Study) not same as regional priority, _-_ __ __ _ _~ _ OR Other Comments -1--- i--_._ _-i---~-_____ ---- ~-- --I---- __II_ I _il__ -i------ ---- li- --I---_ i d l ~y~~ v Government Mitigation Strategies .~ a ~ E ~ ~a ~° ' c ' ~ 0 0 o z rn Z Specific Mitigation Strategy ~ n a a N °Oo `~°~-~ , i O~ p N ~- N i ~ ~' Nrn N(n t6 ' ~t ~ ~ c-18 b-18 Establish regional protocols on how to respond to WF the NOAA Monterey weather forecasts, such as the identifying types of closures, limits on work that could cause ignitions, and prepositioning of suppression forces. Amulti-agency coordination of response also helps provide unified messages to the public about how they should respond to these periods of increased fire danger. Response should also be modified based on knowledge of local micro-climates. Local agencies with less risk then may be available for mutual aid. c-19 b-19 Increase local patrolling during periods of high fire WF I weather. II X c-20 b-20 Create and maintain an automated s stem of rai FL LS r y n and flood gauges that is web enabled and publicly- accessible. Work toward creating a coordinated re Tonal s stem. c-21 b-21 Place remote sensors in strategic locations for early EO LS warning of hazmat releases or use of weapons of WF FL mass destruction, understanding that the SEC appropriate early warning strategy depends on c-22 b-23 Review and update, as necessary, procedures EO pursuant to the State Dam Safety Act for the LS emergency evacuation of areas located below major FL water-stora a facilities. S EC c-23 a-8 Improve coordination among cities, counties, _ _ EQ LS and dam owners so that cities and counties can FL better plan for evacuation of areas the could be SEC inundated if a dam failed, impacting their c-24 b-24 Develop procedures for the emergency evacuation EO of areas identified on tsunami evacuation maps as (TS) t hese maps become available. c-25 new Support and encourage planning and EO LS i dentification of facilities for the coordination of WF FL distribution of water, food, blankets, and other SEC s upplies, coordinating this effort with the j ~ D m ~ o~ na°i ~' , a O ~ ~ ~ s ~ Q m •~ o °-~ ~ c a Q a = E _m c c _ --j _ _ r -_ _~ I - - - ~ I X ~ ~ GOVT - d - Partici ate in National, State, Multi-Jurisdictional and Professional Society Efforts to Identify and Mitigate Hazards d-1 c-1 Promote information sharing among overlapping EQ LS and neighboring local governments, including cities, WF FL counties, and special districts, as well as utilities. SEC X d-2 c-2 Recognize that emergency services is more than EO LS ~ _ ~ _ ~ -r the coordination of police and fire response; it also WF FL includes planning activities with providers of water, SEC X food, energy, transportation, financial, information, 42 of 55 ~ ~ Responsible Agency or ' Ordinance or Resolution # (i existing program) Esti t ~ ~ ~ n n ~ Department (Required if Existing Program , ma es Cost and Possible Funding ~ ~ o ul ~ m , Existing Program ~ Agency (if high priority), ~ a a o ~ ~ under funded, Very Estimated Date of ~ Q Q U >' ~ High, High, or Under Completion (if study), WHY i c ~ o 0 0 Z Z z 0 o 2 U Study) ~ not same as regional priority. - ~i - OR Other_Comments_ X - - - ~. I _ _I _ - __ - -- - - - _ _ ~ - _- _ _. _ __ X _- T I_ - - __ _ __ - X l- ~- - _ - __ X ~ I I~ -- -_- X __ - -_ - - X _ _ I --- -~ - - i I ~' \ a a ~ C ~ 4~ o Z :m Z Specific Mitigation Strategy ,.~ ~ N a~ O a~ '~ ~ o m o ~ ~ m N U) N (n <_ ~ S i-3 c-3 Recognize that amulti-agency approach is needed FL to mitigate flooding by having flood control districts, cities, counties, and utilities meet at least annually to jointly discuss their capital improvement programs for most effectively reducing the threat of flooding. Work toward making this process more formal to insure that flooding is considered at existing joint-agency meetings. I-4 c-4 As new flood-control projects are completed, FL request that FEMA revise its flood-insurance rate maps and digital Geographic Information System (GIS) data to reflect flood risks as accurately as possible. -5 c-5 Participate in FEMA's National Flood Insurance FL Pro ram. -6 c-6 Participate in multi-agency efforts to mitigate fire WF threat, such as the Hills Emergency Forum (in the East Bay), various FireSafe Council programs, and city-utility task forces. Such participation increases a jurisidiction's competitiveness in -7 c-7 Work with major employers and agencies that EO LS handle hazardous materials to coordinate mitigation WF FL efforts for the possible release of these materials SEC due to a natural disaster such as an earthquake, flood, fire, or landslide. 8 c-8 Encourage staff to participate in efforts by EO professional organizations to mitigate earthquake LS and landslide disaster losses, such as the efforts of the Northern California Chapter of the Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, the East Bay- Peninsula Chapter of the International Code Council, the Structural Engineers Association of Northern California, and the American Society of Gradin Officials. 9 c-9 Conduct and/or promote attendance at local or EQ LS I regional hazard conferences and workshops for WF FL elected officials and staff to educate them on the SEC critical need for programs in mitigating earthquake, wildfire, flood, and landslide hazards. 10 c-10 Cooperate with researchers working on government EO LS funded projects to refine information on hazards, for WF FL example, by expediting the permit and approval SEC process for installation of seismic arrays, gravity survey instruments, borehole drilling, fault trenching, landslide mapping, flood modeling, and/or damage data collection. )VT - d - Take a Lead in Lnss anri Risk Acscsemcnl e..~;,,:•:,... Government Mitigation Strategies E E ~mca~°i o`m ~ mU ~ N ~ > w~ Of 0 Of 0~ O Q N apoc a , ~ Qj U a, .n c~ m rn ~ Q m rn m v° ~ ~ ig o w c c~ d x ~E m e Q mm m ~ aao m N~ Z`O vow L ~~° -o °: QQU } X X - - _ f- X X -- --1_ X X X i 43 of 55 Responsible Agency orl v~mnance or Kesauuon # (i Department (Required existing program), Estimates C t rf Existing Program, os and Possible Funding Existing Program Agency (if high priority), under funded, Very Estimated Date of High, High, or Under I ~ Completion (if study), WHY i Study) not same as regional priority ___ _ __ ~ _ OR Other_Comments_ n ~- _ - 1 _ - __ I _ _ _~ -- - - _ - - ~ i - - -- i _ -- ~ -_ _ - - _ __ _ - _- - - - - - - C.>,1 d '"t--, +~ V Government Mitigation Strategies ~ ~ E ° ° Z N ~ o o m N (n ~ a _ E ~ ~ ~rn Z O ~ o o ~ N (A pecific Mitigation Strategy -o E E ~ m co v o ~ Responsible Agency or m m ai ~.. ~ ~ o ~_ .Q ~ T ~ m o Department (Required a> o o "O ~ o c ° >, n 'c ~ if Existing Program, ~ ~„ a` a` a r d ~ Q ~ '~ o o ~ ~ o w aai Existing Program '0, c rn ~ d ~ -o O1 °1 ~ v c ~ Q °' °~ ~ ~ °- °- `~ °~ under funded, Ve ~~ c c~ `~ o~ j Y a a a o a~ D Hi ry c ~ '~ '~ -° Z o v o- w L -oo °~ Q Q U } `~ 9h, High, or Under `~ 2 w w~ o~ m o °c 2 ~ ii ~ ~ Z Z Z z coj Study) Ordinance or Resolution # d ' existin ro ram Estimated 9 P 9 ). Cost and Possible Fundin g Agency (if high priority), Estimated Date of i Completion (if study), WHY if not OR Other Commentsrity, e-1 e-1 Work with the cities, counties, and special districts EO LS !, in the Bay Area to encourage them to adopt a Local WF FL j Hazard Mitigation Plan and to assist them in DR TS integrating it into their overall planning process. SEC i, RESPONSIBILITY: ABAG only; all others are Flu Ag "not applicable." Heat ! X I i ~ i e-2 a-2 Improve the risk assessment and loss estimation - - EQ LS _._ - __ I - - -- work in the TnmingNuturnlDisnsters report and WF FL multi-jurisdictional plan related to natural disasters. DR TS RESPONSIBILITY: ABAG only; all others are Flu Ag ' "not applicable." Heat ' X i 44 of 55 d r~^\ V Education Mitigation Strategies cv N o $ eClfiC Mltl atlOn Strate Priority (C FIGCK GNLY iu °~ T ~ N ~ N N U N C C E C rn C 3 ~ o ~ E m Z Specific Mitigation Strategy ~ m a m .a a -~' ? ~ cg m o m c ~ T ar LL ? o o L C E N O tS ~ Q N C G~ O ~ S f 6 N ~ Q ' Q Cl rn uJ ~ . c0 in fn d ~, m V p O 0 ~ ~ a t Y rn o N _ Nr~ Q= W W 7 Q.O C _ SJ EDU C - a -Focus on Critical Facilities (...Owned b School Districts) a-1 a-1 Assess the vulnerability of critical public education facilities to damage in natural disasters and make recommendations for appropriate mitigation. a-2 a-2 Retrofit or replace critical public education facilities that are shown to be vulnerable to damage in natural disasters. a-3 a-3 Conduct comprehensive programs to identify and mitigate problems with facility contents, architectural components, and equipment that will prevent critical public education buildings from being functional after ma'or disasters. a-4 a-4 As a secondary focus, assess the vulnerability of non-critical educational facilities (that is, those that do not house students) to damage in natural disasters based on occupancy and structural type, make recommendations on priorities for structural improvements or occupancy reductions, and identify potential funding mechanisms. a-5 new Assess the vulnerability of critical private education, pre-school, and day care facilities to damage in natural disasters and make recommendations for appropriate mitigation. a-6 a-5 (Major Rewording) Work with CaIEMA and the Division of the State Architect to ensure that there will bean adequate group of Safety Assessment Program (SAP) inspectors trained and deployed by CaIEMA to schools for post- disasterinspection. In addition, if a school district is uncomfortable with delays in inspection due to too few SAP inspectors available in catastrophic disasters, formalized arrangements can also be created with those inspectors certified by the Division of the State Architect as construction inspectors to report to the district, assess damage, and determine if the buildings can be reoccupied. EDUC - b -Use of Educational Facilities as EQ LS WF FL SEC EQ LS'; WF FL SEC EQ LS WF FL'. SEC EQ LS WF FL SEC EQ LS WF FL SEC EQ LS WF FL SEC it Ordinance or Resolution # Z Z ~ Responsible Agency ori, (if existing program), Department (Required Estimated Cost and y v if Existing Program, Possible Funding Agency >, a ~ > ~ Existing Program (if high priority), Estimated a ~ ~ ~ U under funded, Very ~ Date of Completion (if U n.o w v High, High, or Under study), WHY if not same as ~ Q } Study) regional priority, OR Other c o a o o Comments ~ Z Q U Z 45 of 55 y V ~ Education Mitigation Strategies _ ~ a E E ~ ~ a o f c m a o o Z Z ~ Responsible Agency o Department (Required n (if existing program), ' Estimated Cost and cn 0 m >_ ~~ Z Specific Mitigation Strategy ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ? i ~ ~ m a ~ i >. ~ ~ LL` ~ ~ $ ~ ~ ~ .U v if Existing Program, o Existing Program Possible Funding Agency (if high priority), Estimated 0 N m O ~ N ~ ~ i i ~ m e rn E o ~ ~ `t 2 o ~ w ¢ ~' ~ ~ ._ m~ a a U under funded, Very i Date of Completion (if °o ~n °o m q: ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ X .X -~ ~ p ~ ~ ~ o ~ -o -o w Q n ~ High, High, or Under >' Study) ~ study), WHY if not same a i l s `~ `" N Q 2 w w~ a 0 c ~ = ° ~ j . ;~ Z °' U Z reg ona priority, OR Othe Comments r b-1 b-1 Work cooperatively with the American Red Cross, EO LS . cities, counties, and non-profits to set up WF FL memoranda of understanding for use of education SEC X facilities as emergency shelters following disasters. ~ b-2 b-2 W ork cooperatively to ensure that school district - EQ LS - - - I _ - - _ _ _ _ _ + _ _ personnel and relevant staff understand and are WF FL trained that being designated by the American Red SEC Cross or others as a potential emergency shelter does NOT mean that the school has had a hazard X or structural evaluation to ensure that it can be used Not applicable for a cit Y as a shelter followin an s ecific disa 9 Y P ster. b-3 b-3 Work cooperatively to ensure that school district - - EO LS - _ I- - l - _ - - ~- - - - -~- - - -_ _ personnel understand and are trained that they are WF FL designated as disaster service workers and must SEC I X I remain at the school until released. I Not applicable for a city EDU C - c - Actions Related to Disaster Pre aredness and Reco very Planning c-1 new Encourage employees of schools to have family EQ LS ~ disaster plans and conduct miti ation activities in 9 WF FL their own homes. SEC X c-2 c-2 Develop plans, in conjunction with fire jurisdictions, fo i EO LS _ _ _ - - - _ - - - I - - - - I _- - - _ r evacuat on or sheltering in place of school WF FL children during periods of high fire danger, thereby SEC recognizing that overloading of streets near schools by parents attempting to pick up their children during X these eri ods can restrict ac p cess by fire personnel an d equipment. I c-3 c-3 Offer the 20-hour basic CERT training to teachers EO LS ___ - - -~ - - _ and after-school personnel. F FL C S X - ~ i c-4 c-4 Offer the 20-hour basic Student Emer enc 9 Y EO LS - - T - - - _. _ _ __ _ 4 __ _ _ _ Response Training (BERT, rather than CERT) WF FL t raining to middle school and/or high school SEC students as a part of the basic science or civics X curriculum, as an after school club, or as a way to earn ublic service hours. :-5 c-5 Offer the 20-ho r b i CERT - - u as c training course EO LS - ~ _- - - - - t hrough the Adult School system and/or through the WF FL Community College system (either using SEC i nstructors with teaching credentials or by X making facilities available for classes not run b Y L 46 of 55 v Education Mitigation Strategies ~ m rn rn 01 ~ m ~ E m ~ m U to C o ~ ~° c C ~ ~ ~ o ~ E rn Z Specific Mitigation Strategy m ~ a O) .O a~ c o w ~ U 0 0 = m a w >. G1 LL '- $ p O (9 ~,. C m O C U w m in ~ ~ Q N o `' ro °' N N rn Q S w w ~ o_ C c-6 c-6 Develop and maintain the capacity for schools to EQ LS take care of the students for the first 48 hours after a WF FL disaster, and notify parents that this capacity exists. SEC c-7 new Develop a continuity of operations and disaster EQ LS recovery plan using models such as that WF FL developed by the University of California SEC Berkeley. (The American Red Cross has a role in promoting this activity, as well, in schools that ' they plan to use as shelters.) EDU C - d- Actions Related to Schools as Conduits for Informati on to Fa milies Abo ut Emergencies d-1 c-1 Utilize the unique ability of schools to reach families EQ LS through educational materials on hazards, WF FL mitigation, and preparedness, particularly after SEC disasters and at the beginning of the school year. These efforts will not only make the entire community more disaster-resistant, but speed the return of schools from use as shelters to use as teaching facilities, particularly if coordinated with cities, counties, the American Red Cross and others. d-2 c-7 Develop and distribute culturally appropriate EQ LS ' materials related to disaster mitigation and WF FL j preparedness, such as those on the SEC htto://www.preparenow.org website. ~ ~ p ~ Q Cf . m N ~ .. ~ Responsible Agency or (if existing program), Z Z ~ Department (Required ~i Estimated Cost and ai o ~ -moo if Existing Program, ~ Possible Funding Agency >. a > m ~ Existing Program (if high priority), Estimated ~ . U under funded, Very Date of Completion (if ~ n ~ a W High, High, or Under study), WHY if not same as ~ Q ° } Study) regional priority, OR Other c ono 0 Comments X ', i X I X ' X j I 47 of 55 s -sr Environment Mitigation Strategies Priority (GHLGK ONLY ONE -. a c~ ' ~ O O D ~'~ O C N a ° rn Z ` Specific Mitigation Strategy .n N a a a _ ~ ¢ ~, ~~ o ~ ` ~ ~ p a c ~ m m'C~~Emc ¢~~ L° . . ~ a> ~e 'o o 0 o m N N ' ~ >. ~ d w r rn N N(n _ Z.=. W W 7>~mC C 2JLL ENV I - a - Environmental Sustainabili and Pollution Reduction a-1 a-1 Continue to enforce State-mandated requirements, EQ LS j such as the California Environmental Quality Act, to WF FL ensure that mitigation activities for hazards, such as DR seismic retrofits and vegetation clearance programs SEC I for fire threat, are conducted in a way that reduces I environmental degradation such as air quality X impacts, noise during construction, and loss of sensitive habitats and species, while respecting the community value of historic preservation. ' a-2 a-2 Encourage regulatory agencies to work - EQ - __ collaboratively with safety professionals to develop WF FL creative mitigation strategies that effectively balance SEC X ' environmental and safety needs, particularly to meet critical wildfire, flood, and earthquake safety levels. a-3 a-3 Continue to enforce and/or comply with State- _- __ LS WF _~ mandated requirements, such as the California FL DR Environmental Quality Act and environmental SEC regulations to ensure that urban development is conducted in a way to minimize air pollution. For example, air pollution levels can lead to global ~( warming, and then to drought, increased vegetation susceptibility to disease (such as pine bark beetle infestations), and associated increased fire hazard. a-4 a-4 Develop and implement a comprehensive program - __ - _ LS _ __ for watershed management optimizing ecosystem WF FL ii health with water yield to balance water supply, DR flooding, fire, and erosion concerns. SEC ~ ~ I i a-5 a-5 Balance the need for the smooth flow of storm - LS WF waters versus the need to maintain wildlife habitat FL DR i by developing and implementing a comprehensive Streambed Vegetation Management Plan that i ensures the efficacy of flood control efforts, mitigates wildfires and maintains the viability of livin rivers. ~ a-6 a-8 Comply with applicable performance standards of __ _ FL --- ---_ - any National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System municipal stormwater permit that seeks to X manage increases in stormwater run-off flows from j new development and redevelopment construction li - 48 of 55 `o ~ N ~ U 'o m n ~ y v o W ~ aao m Q Q U c o 0 0 Responsible Agency or Ordinance or Resolution # (if Department (Required existing program), Estimated if Existing Program, Cost and Possible Funding d Existing Program Agency (if high priority), ~ -o under funded, Very Estimated Date of } .N High, High, or Under Completion (if study), WHY if Study) not same as regional priority, Z U - I _ OR Other Comments__ X X oQ d r~ V ~ Environment Mitigation Strategies c ~ ° rn z Specific Mitigation Strategy cu - O _. E E mmo-°o m m m m o ~ a a°'i ~' ~ o o~ a p o c v ~ -~ , rn d o_ a - m Q ~ C 71 N '~ o ` ° ~ oa ~ > rY Q ni X ~ ~ .a X ll C N ~ p Q= W ~ ^ p W > » on T a-7 a-9 Enforce and/or comply with the grading, erosion, LS and sedimentation requirements by prohibiting the FL discharge of concentrated stormwater flows by other X than approved methods that seek to minimize associated pollution. a-8 a-10 Explore ways to require that hazardous materials FL stored in the flood zone be elevated or otherwise rotected from flood waters. a-9 a-11 Enforce and/or comply with the hazardous materials EQ LS requirements of the State of California Certified WF FL Unified Program Agency (CUPA). SEC X a-10 a-12 Provide information on hazardous waste disposal EQ LS and/or drop off locations. WF FL SEC a-11 new When remodeling existing government and EQ LS infrastructure buildings and facilities, remove WF FL asbestos to speed up clean up of buildings so SEC X that they can be reoccupied more quickly. ~ a-12 a-13 Develop and implement a program to control WF FF invasive and exotic species that contribute to fire and flooding hazards (such as eucalyptus, cattails, and cordgrass). This program could include vegetation removal, thinning, or replacement in hazard areas where there is a direct threat to a-13 a-14 Enforce provisions under creek protection, FL stormwater management, and discharge control ordinances designed to keep watercourses free of obstructions and to protect drainage facilities to X conform with the Regional Water Quality Control Board's Best Mana ement Practices. ENVI - b -Climate Chan e b-1 a-6 + Stay informed of scientific information compiled LS WF a-7 by regional and state sources on the subject of FL DR rising sea levels and global warming, especially on additional actions that local governments can take to mitigate this hazard including special X design and engineering of government-owned ~ facilities in low-lying areas, such as wastewater treatment plants, ports, and airports. b-2 new Inventory global warming emissions in your own LS WF local government's operations and in the FL DR, community, set reduction targets and create an f _~_ X _~ 49 of 55 ° ~ Responsible Agency or Ordinance or Resolution # (if ~ ;_, ~ .- o Department (Required existing program), Estimated ~ ~ '_ ~ if Existing Program Cost and Possible Funding o W m , Existing Program Agency (if high priority), ~ a a p Q Q U ~ v } under funded, Very Hi h it Estimated Date of Completion (if study) WHY if ~ c o 0 0 ~ 0 o g , High, or Under Study) , not same as regional priority, ~ z 2 z z U _ _ _ _OR Other Comments X _ ~ ~ ~_ - I { ~ I ~ - X (~„~ ~'1 Environment Mitigation Strategies E _ ~° E E m m c o o m Responsible Agency or > ~ ' Ordinance or Resolution # (if existing program), Estimated ~ E m m rn ~~ ° ~ a ~o ~ ~ o c ~ Department (Required y ~ if Existing Program, a ' ~ Cost and Possible Funding ° ~ z rn S ecific Miti ation Strate P 9 9Y ~ a7 0 0 9 d a 'oo ~ a ~ ~ rn o N Q c v •- ~ ca ~ ~ a ~ ~ o ul ~ Existing Program A enc if hi h riorit g y ( g p y)' Estimated Date of o N O c~~ ~ m rn 3- ~- d c a Q rn O1 m ro, E ~ ~ ~ ~ o m Y a y ~ o- n °' °~ underfunded, Ve ~ Q ¢ U } N Completion (if study), WHY if ~ m ~ ~ p, ~ ~ o ~- N N -o _ o v a w rn o c 'o High, High, or Under 'o c i o 0 0 0 not same as regional priority, N ~, N rp , m x x c v c N c o ~- o~ o `~ T W W>>> m o c 2 ~ u_ c o Study) ~ z z Z z U - - _. _, _OR Other Comments b-3 new Adopt and enforce land-use policies that reduce LS WF sprawl, preserve open space, and create FL DR X compact, walkable urban communities. 1i _ _ __ _ ------ b-4 new Promote transportation options such as bicycle LS WF' trails, commute trip reduction programs, FL DR X incentives for car pooling and public transit. b-5 new Increase the use of clean, alternative energy by, LS WF~ for example, investing in "green tags", FL DR advocating for the development of renewable energy resources, recovering landfill methane X for energy production, and supporting the use of ~ I i waste to energy technology. i - - - - - -- - ; _ _ _ b-6 new Make energy efficiency a priority through LS WF building code improvements, retrofitting city FL DR, facilities with energy efficient lighting and urging X employees to conserve energy and save money. - ' --- - i --'- -__ __ _ - -- b-7 new Purchase only Energy Star equipment and LS WF I ' appliances for local government use. FL DR , X ~ - -~ _ _--_ b-8 new Practice and romote sustainable buildin P g LS WF practices using the U.S. Green Building FL DR X ~ ~ Council's LEED program or a similar system. _ - --- ' - --- - _ - - - b-9 new Increase the average fuel efficiency of municipal LS WF fleet vehicles; reduce the number of vehicles; FL DR ', launch an employee education program i X including anti-idling messages; convert diesel ~ _ - b-10 new Evaluate opportunities to increase pump efficiency in water and wastewater systems; LS WF FL DR, X recover wastewater treatment methane for -- b-11 new Increase recycling rates in local government LS WF operations and in the community. FL DR X l~ ', - __ __- _ -- b-12 new Maintain healthy urban forests; promote tree - LS WF~ __ - planting to increase shading and to absorb C02. FL DR X - - { !~ __ _~ _ - ' -_ _ b-13 new Hel educate the ublic, schools, other P P LS WF'i I I jurisdictions, professional associations, FL DRi ~~ !, X business and Indust about reducin lobal ENV I - c - A ricultural and A uaculture Resilience 50 of 55 O ~-+ Environment Mitigation Strategies ~ E E m ~ co a ° ~ Responsible Agency or Ordinance or Resolution # (if c ° N o ~ ~ ~ ;., m o ~ ~ ~ o c ~ ~ ;-, ?> ~ ~ ~ ' Department (Required existing program), Estimated Cost and Possible Funding ° o o~ Z S ecific Miti anon Strate p g gy n ~ a ° ' d ~ v a a a~ w Q ~' ? ~~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ o w v m if Existing Program, Existing Program Agency (if high priority), m ~ ~' ~ m ~ ~'t ~ ° E _m c Q ~ ~ ~ co N a a o ~ v under funded,Ve ry Estimated Date of C o° o° ~ a ~, ~? x .N ~ ?~ o $ a ~ x v c ~ Yo c a ~ ¢ Q U >- ~ High, High, or Under ompletion (if study), WHY if cv N rn q = W c o c o ul > > ~ m c ~- 0 0 2 .~ v_ o c o 0 0 ~ ~ Z z 2 0 o z U Study) not same as regional priority, c-1 b-1 Maintain a variety of crops in rural areas of the Ag _ OR_Other. Camments_ region to increase agricultural diversity and crop DR resiliency. RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: County SEC X Offices of the Agricultural Commissioner. c-2 b-2 Promote and i i t th bli ~ _ ma n a n e pu c-private Ag ! partnerships dedicated to preventing the DR introduction of agricultural pests into regionally- SEC significant crops, such as the glassy-winged X sharpshooter into vineyards. RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: Coun Offices of the A ricultural ty g Cmmi in . c-3 b-4 Encourage livestock operators to develop an early- Ag Flu T_ _ _. warning system to detect animals with SEC communicable diseases (due to natural causes or bioterrorism). RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: I X County Health Department and Office of the Con A ri ultur I C mmi si r. ~ _d v b-3 (deleted since not adisaster-related strategy) i 51 of 55 n Land Use Mitigation Strategies i ~ E ° om Z Specific Mitigation Strategy ~ ~, c°~ O d - ~ 0 0 ~ m n ~ N N (n ¢ S LAND - a - Earth uake Hazard Studies for New Private Develo ments a-1 a-1 Enforce and/or comply with the State-mandated EQ requirement that site-specific geologic reports be prepared for development proposals within Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones, and restrict the placement of structures for human occupancy. (This Act is intended to deal with the specific hazard of active faults that extend to the earth's surface, creating a surface rupture hazard.) a-2 a-2 Require preparation ofsite-specific geologic or EQ geotechnical reports for development and redevelopment proposals in areas subject to earthquake-induced landslides or liquefaction as mandated by the State Seismic Hazard Mapping Act in selected portions of the Bay Area where these maps have been completed, and condition project approval on the incorporation of necessary mitigation measures related to site remediation, structure and foundation design, and/or avoidance. a-3 a-3 Recognizing that some faults may be a hazard for EQ surface rupture, even though they do not meet the strict criteria imposed by the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act, identify and require geologic reports in areas adjacent to locally- si nificant faults. a-4 new Ensure that development proposed near faults EQ with a history of complex surface rupture ' (multiple traces, warping, thrusting, etc.) has larger setbacks than the minimum fifty feet. a-5 new Consider imposing requirements similar to the EQ Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act for structures without human occupancy if these buildings are still essential for the economic recovery of the community or region. a-6 a-4 Recognizing that the California Geological Survey EQ has not completed earthquake-induced landslide and liquefaction mapping for much of the Bay Area, identify and require geologic reports in areas mapped by others as having significant liquefaction or landslide hazards. a-7 a-5 Support and/or facilitate efforts by the California EQ Geological Survey to complete the earthquake- induced landslide and liquefaction mapping for the Ba Area. Prianty (CHECK ONLY ONEj E a E m m o a 0 0 ~O ° ~ o c d n O °~ '` d . vrn rnQ c a ~ o i~~- d 01 nm a~ :o C),C - V E N c m Q m C N .N o y N n ~ U d~ L Y "O .O ~X ~X C~ c d c 0 ~ O 7 ° W W 7~7m o c SJU- ~ _ - i-- - - l Ordinance or Resolution # ° ° ~ ~ Responsible Agency or (if existing program), >, y ~ ~ a ~c ~ (p Department (Regwred Estimated Cost and if Existing Program, j P ib F v 7 a U Q W a d oss le undin A enc Existing Program I g g y (if high priority) Estimated i U d n n o Q Q U ~ a } N , j under funded, Very High, High, or Under Dale of Completion (if ~ o 0 0 0 o Study) ',,study), WHY if not same as ~ z z z z U _ _ j regional priority, OR Other. I X 52 of 55 ATTACHMENT 1 --~~'+ Land Use Mitigation Strategies ~ ~ .o ~ m ~ c ° ~ Responsible Agency o r! Ordinance or Resolution # ~ E = rn o rn'ci :... m Is n m ~, m :- ~ .~- ° (if existing program), Department (Required ° o c .IS Z Specific Mitigation Strategy ~ ~ a ° a~i a O v° c a -o - > ~ `p _ ~ ~ n ~ ~ a if Existing Program, Estimated Cost and ~ ~, _ y Q m cnm ~ o _~ c ° w ~ Existing Program Possible Funding Agency 0 0 ~ Q ~ . ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ m ~ Q ~ ~ c6 y n a o ~ ~ ' under funded, Very (if high priority), Estimated D t f oN N N a' ~° , `~ X x c i c° ~ a " c ° t ° ~ ~ ~ ° = ° ~ ¢ Q U } rn High, High, or Under a e o Completion (if stud ) WHY if a-8 a-6 Require that local government reviews of geologic = EQ W w ~.~m o c S_I LL g i j Z Z z° ~ Z ° U Study) - -- _- _ -_ y , not same a: i regional priority. OR Other. and engineering studies are conducted by appropriately trained and credentialed personnel. X i LAN D - b - Wildland and Structural Fires I ~ b-1 b-1 Review new development proposals to ensure that they incorporate required and appropriate fire- mitigation measures, including adequate provisions for occupant evacuation and access by emergency response personnel and equipment. b-2 b-2 Develop a clear legislative and regulatory framework at both the state and local levels to manage the wildland-urban-intertace consistent with Fire Wise and sustainable community principles. c-1 c-1 Establish and enforce requirements for new development so that site-specific designs and source-control techniques are used to manage peak stormwater runoff flows and impacts from increased runoff volumes. c-2 c-2 Incorporate FEMA guidelines and suggested activities into local government plans and rocedures for mana in flood hazards. c-3 c-3 Provide an institutional mechanism to ensure that development proposals adjacent to floodways and in floodplains are referred to flood control districts and wastewater agencies for review and comment (consistent with the NPDES program). c-4 c-4 Establish and enforce regulations concerning new construction (and major improvements to existing structures) within flood zones in order to be in compliance with federal requirements and, thus, be a participant in the Community Rating System of the National F/pod Insurance Program . c-5 new Encourage new development near floodways to 1 incorporate a buffer zone or setback from that floodway to allow for changes in stormwater flows in the watershed over time. c-6 new For purposes of creating an improved hazard F mitigation plan for the region as a whole, ABAG, and Bay Area cities and counties, jointly request geographically defined repetitive flooding loss ^ data from FEMA for their own jurisdictions. - ~.uII~JII~cJ PI14 CIVJI ViI WF X ~ WF - ~ -- I- ~ I- ~ -,-- -- X I ~ t ~ FL ~ I i - - i - - _-_ - -+--- -- X I =L x - ~ - 1 - ~ - -I -t -1 I ~ - - -1 I I ~ ~ x I I :L - ~ I ~ - ~ -_ -I ~ -_ -- ~~ - L i '- i - -1 i - ~- - - - - --i - - ~ i - - ~- I - - X I ~i I W ---- - - - .- 53 of 55 ATTACHMENT 1 v'\ Land Use Mitigation Strategies o m E c ~ o~ Z Specific Mitigation Strategy ~ N N O m ~ a 0 o 0 ~ Q N N ~ Q m T d-1 d-1 Establish and enforce provisions (under subdivision LS ordinances or other means) that geotechnical and soil-hazard investigations be conducted and filed to prevent grading from creating unstable slopes, and X that any necessary corrective actions be taken prior to development approval. d-2 d-2 Require that local government reviews of these LS investigations are conducted by appropriately X trained and credentialed ersonnel. d-3 d-3 Establish and enforce grading, erosion, and LS sedimentation ordinances by requiring, under certain conditions, grading permits and plans to X control erosion and sedimentation prior to develo ment a royal. d-4 d-4 Establish and enforce provlsions under the creek LS protection, storm water management, and discharge control ordinances designed to control erosion and X sedimentation. d-5 d-5 Establish requirements in zoning ordinances to LS address hillside development constraints, especially X i n areas of existin landslides. I ANf I _ a _ I-Ifue~,~e _ nn„u~ u:,_....a e-1 a-1 For new development, require a buffer zone between residential properties and landslide or wildfire hazard areas. e-2 a-2 Discourage, add additional mitigation strategies or , prevent new construction or major remodels on slopes greater than a set percentage, such as 15%, due to landslide or wildfire hazard concerns. LS WF X _S WF X r+rvu - r - Oman ~rowtn to Revitalize Urban Areas and Promote Sustainability 1 f-1 Prioritize retrofit of infrastructure that serves urban EQ LS areas (or urban services areas) over constructing WF FL new infrastructure to serve outlying areas. DR SEC Work to retrofit homes in older urban EQ LS neighborhoods to provide safe housing close to job WF FL centers. DR SEC Work to retrofit older downtown areas and EQ LS redevelopment districts to protect architectural WF FL diversity and promote disaster-resistance. SEC ~ ~ ~ m o -o ' ° ~ Responsible Agency orl Ordinance or Resolution !J a`r ~ :_. m rn rn a o v a ar ~, d :- ai m o (if existing program), Department (Required I 0 0 o a U o c ~ ~ ~, .o ~ •c ar Q ~ Estimated Cost and if Existing Program ~ rn ~ n m ~ ¢ ~ ~ ~ d ~ ~ Q w ~ d , Existing Program Possible Funding Agency c N S 't - ~ o m c w ¢ c.m Y 'o `6 o U ` a n o ~ v ' under funded, Very i (if high priority), Estimated D ~ ^ o o a ~ ~ m Q Q U } ~ ate of Completion (if High, High, or Under w w~:~ m o c° 2 ~ ri g j Z Z Z Z U Study) study), WHY if not same a: - - - _ _ - 1_reaipnal priority. OR Other - - ~- -- - - - _ - I - 1 _ - -~ - - ~ - - - _f - - - _ _ _ _ _ - I _ - - - - - ----- --- - _- ~ i - ~_ - ~ - - 'f_ I I -I I _ _- _ _~ - - _ - I ~ ~ I x ~ - _ _ -- - - - _ - - ~- -- - - _I- -I- _ ~ ~ -----. ---- - i I -- - i - 1 __ - -f- -- i - - - - _ _ - _ - _ - - - ~/ 1l I 54 of 55 ATTACHMENT1 (~ V Land Use Mitigation Strategies m E o rn Z Specific Mitigation Strategy ~ ~, N Q O U -L' ` m in N m ~ N ~ N N N ~ f-4 f-4 Work with non-profits and through other EQ LS mechanisms to protect as open space those areas WF FL susceptible to extreme hazards (such as through SEC land acquisition, zoning, and designation as f-5 f-5 Strive to preserve existing buffers between EQ LS development and existing users of large amounts of WF FL hazardous materials, such as major industry, due to SEC the potential for catastrophic releases or fires due to an earthquake, accident, or terrorism. (Flooding X might also result in release or spread of these materials; however, it is unlikely.) In areas where buffers do not exist or cannot be created, provide alternative mitigation. LAN D - - Hazard Abatement Districts g-1 new Use hazard abatement districts as a funding EQ LS mechanism to ensure that mitigation strategies WF FL X are implemented and enforced over time. ~ ~ _ -o ~ ~ ~ co ~ o m ~ ! Responsible Agency on Ordinance or Resolution # `` m rn'c:+ w. a~ ~, ~ ~ ~ Department (Required if existin ( 9 Program), 0 n c 0 ~ a ~ -° ~ ~ a n ~ ii Existing Program, Estimated Cost and d o a v ' - N Q r?' '~ ~ m ~ ~ o w ~ m Existing Program Possible Funding Agency ~' r?' ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~' ~' ~ ~ n a o ~ ~ under funded, Very (if high priority), Estimated ~in in o ~ o $ a ? s -Y a -o m - Q ¢ U >' w High, High, or Under Date of Completion (if x w 'x ~ i c o c o °-' °o ~ ~ o OC o 0 0 0 o Study) , study), WHY if not same as w > > m O C J LL ~ ~ z Z Z Z U ' regional priority. OR Other X 55 of 55 ATTACHMENT1 V1