Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3.01 Approve 08-27-1984 Minutes r REGULAR MEETING - AUGUST 27, 1984 A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Dublin was held on Monday, August 27 , 1984 in the meeting room of the Dublin Library. The meeting was called to order at 7 : 38 p.m. by Mayor Peter Snyder . ROLL CALL PRESENT: Councilmembers Jeffery, Moffatt , Vonheeder and Mayor Snyder . ABSENT: Councilmember Hegarty PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Mayor led the Council, Staff and those present in the pledge of alleg- iance to the flag . CONSENT CALENDAR On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Moffatt , and by unanimous vote, the following were approved: Minutes of Regular .Meeting of August 13 , 1984 ; Minutes of Adjourned Regular Meeting of April 5 , 1984 ; Minutes of Continued General Plan Hearing of April 9 , 1984 ; Warrant Register in the amount of $107 ,316 . 93 ; Adopted RESOLUTION NO. 84 - 84 ' ACCEPTANCE OF FINAL MAP TRACT NO. 5003 Adopted RESOLUTION NO. 85 - 84 ACCEPTANCE OF FINAL MAP TRACT NO. 4943 Adopted RESOLUTION NO. 86 - 84 ACCEPTANCE OF FINAL MAP TRACT NO. 4991 and RESOLUTION, NO. 87 - 84 ACCEPT DEPOSIT IN LIEU TRACT NO. 4991 Adopted RESOLUTION NO. 88 - 84 APPROVING THE AGREEMENT TO COLLECT SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS Adopted RESOLUTION NO. 89 - 84 AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 2-84 ESTABLISHING A MINORITY ENTERPRISE PROGRAM AND SETTING GOALS FOR THIS PROGRAM CM-3-189 August 27, 198 , ZJ Adopted RESOLUTION NO. 90 - 84 PROVIDING WORKERS ' COMPENSATION COVERAGE FOR CERTAIN CITY VOLUNTEERS, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISION OF SECTION 3363 . 5 OF THE LABOR CODE Concurred with the issues identified in the Notice of Preparation of Draft EIR for LAVWMA Export System Interruptible Flow Project , and directed Staff to respond accordingly, including the name of the Planning Director for further contact regarding the EIR. ARROYO VISTA WRITTEN COMMUNICATION FROM CITY OF PLEASANTON The City has received a response from the City of Pleasanton with respect to discussing the future of the Pleasanton Housing Authority Arroyo Vista Development . The City of Pleasanton has appointed Councilmembers Karin Mohr and Walt Wood as a subcommittee to meet with representatives of the Dublin City Council . The City Council appointed a subcommittee consisting of Cm. Hegarty and Cm. Moffatt to meet with representatives from the City of Pleasanton . BANNER POLE INSTALLATION Based on a number of requests for banner installation by non-profit organizations, the City Council adopted a banner policy and accepted PG&E ' s donation of two poles for the purpose of establishing a permanent location for banner location on San Ramon Road. Rosendin Electric, which has just completed the installation of the traffic signal at Amador Plaza Road and Dublin Boulevard, has agreed to construct the two required foundations on a time and materials basis not to exceed $3 ,500 . The actual installation should only take 2-3 weeks . On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Vonheeder , and by unanimous vote ( Cm. Hegarty absent ) , the Council approved the installation of pole foundations by Rosendin Electric on a time and materials basis up to $3 ,500 . TRANSIT AUTHORITY JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT & BYLAWS At its meeting of July 23 , 1984 , the City Council directed the City Attorney to prepare a report for City Council consideration of the Transit Authority Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement . As a result of a meeting between the City Attorneys of Dublin, Livermore and Pleasanton, a revised Transit Authority Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement was prepared. CM-3-190 Regular Meeting August 27, 1984 Staff reviewed the revised Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement and offered comments for discussion . The City Council discussed the issues identified in the July 23 , 1984 Agenda Statement and also addressed the comments of Staff as they related to the revised JEPA and Bylaws . On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Vonheeder , and by majority vote ( Cm. Hegarty absent ) , the Council determined that the JEPA should include the City of Dublin, the City of Pleasanton, the City of Livermore and Alameda County. Voting NO on this motion was Mayor Snyder who felt Dublin did not have enough conclusive information to indicate that this was the best way to proceed. . Mayor Snyder did not feel that this would be the most cost effective method, and stated he did not understand why Livermore wanted to be a part of the JEPA. He felt that Dublin should crawl before it walks . Cm. Moffatt stated he had questions as to why Alameda County would want to come into the JEPA with only one vote . Routes and time schedules were discussed. On motion of Cm. Moffatt, seconded by Cm. Jeffery, and by unanimous vote ( Cm. Hegarty absent ) , the Council defined the basic level of service and directed that it be included within the document and inserted as Exhibit A. TDA funding was discussed with regard to bus stops and Dial-A-Ride . Clari- fication was requested with regard to Article 4 . 0 funds . On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Vonheeder , and by unanimous vote (Cm. Hegarty absent ) , the Council agreed to insert a clarification statement "TDA funds available without limitation under Article 4 . 0 . " Staff was directed to check with MTC to determine whether this creates any problems . Conditions of withdrawal from the Authority were discussed. The provisions ; as stated, do not provide adequate protection to individual jurisdictions, therefore, consideration should be given to changing the number of jurisdic- tions required to withdraw from the Authority before dissolution occurs, from three to one. On motion of Cm. Moffatt, seconded by Cm. Jeffery, and by unanimous vote ( Cm. Hegarty absent ) , the Council agreed to change the number from three to one related to withdrawal from the Authority. The Council reviewed the Transit Authority JPA "Summary of Permitted Actions and Their Method of Accomplishment" and determined the following : Agreed with stated method of accomplishment for first 6 items . Item 7 , Enter Long-term Contracts , felt that 35 days advance notice should be given; Item 8 , Amend Bylaws , felt that 35 days advance notice should be given and that Section 9 . 02 of the Bylaws should be added to the JEPA; Item 9 , Adopt Budget, felt that 35 days advance notice should be given ; Item 10 , Reduce Passenger Miles by 20% or More, felt this should be changed to Reduce Basic Level of Service by 20% or More, and method of accomplishment should read "Majority of CM-3-191 Regular Meeting August 27, 1984 Board of Directors with approval by Representative of Affected Jurisdiction" ; Item 11 ) Change .Bus Routes , same as Item 10 . The above items were adopted by a motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Vonheeder , and by unanimous vote ( Cm. Hegarty absent ) . Discussion was held with regard to the hiring of the general manager . Mayor Snyder indicated he did not feel that it was appropriate that 2 agencies could basically control everything. On motion of Cm. Vonheeder , seconded by Cm. Jeffery, and by majority vote ( Cm. Hegarty absent ) , the Council agreed with the concept that the Board of Directors would contract for the general manager , with the City of Pleasanton administering . It was agreed that in the hiring of the general manager , and in the case of major expenditures, the vote must be unanimous, and the agency representative must have the consent of their respective councils or boards . Voting NO on this motion was Mayor Snyder . The City Council directed the City ' s Policy Committee Member to address the City Council ' s position with the other agencies presently involved in the Policy Committee . RECESS A short recess was called . All Councilmembers were present ( Cm. Hegarty absent ) , when the meeting reconvened. KOLB PARK TENNIS COURT ACQUISITION On September 21, 1983 , the City Council authorized Staff to notify the Murray School District of its interest in acquiring the Fallon School Site, including Kolb Park ( see attached letter ) . On October 3 , 1983 , the School District notified the City that the District would extend the period of time in which the City had to notify the District of its intention to purchase the Fallon School site for 45 days . During the summer , Staff met with Murray School District Staff Representatives to discuss the City' s intentions with respect to the tennis courts. The Murray School District Staff indicated that the School District . will be holding a meeting during the month of September to discuss the future of surplus school sites , including the Fallon School site . The Murray School District Staff suggested that the City have a proposal to the School Board regarding the tennis courts so that the proposal can be discussed as part of the overall discussion on the surplus school sites . CM-3-192 Regular Meeting August 27, 1984 , Given the fact that the School District has not idicated its intention with respect to the ultimate use of the Fallon School site, it is Staff ' s recommendation that the City Council authorize Staff to approach the School District with an interim proposal which would involve the purchase of the tennis courts and the land immediately in front of the tennis courts between the courts and Brighton Drive . By acquiring this portion of the site, the City could refurbish the tennis courts and assume responsibility for their future maintenance . Once the School District has determined which portion of the remainder of the site it plans to dispose of, the City could work with the District in acquiring the remainder of the area which is to be used for a park . The Engineering 'Staff has identified an area of approximately 38 , 000 sq ft which would be included in the acquisition proposal . Since this site has not been appraised, Staff estimated the market value at $1 . 50-$2 . 30 per square foot . Under the provisions of the Naylor Bill , the acquisition cost of the 38 ,000 square feet is estimated at $14 , 250-$21 ,850 . Cm. Jeffery felt the City should take another look at the overall picture, in light of the fact that Frederiksen is no longer being considered available. The City should go back and revise its plan for purchase . If the Dolan site deal does not go through, the City could potentially be able to purchase an additional 10 acres under the Naylor Bill . On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Vonheeder , and by unanimous vote ( Cm. Hegarty absent ) , the Council directed Staff to prepare a new resolution to include the Dolan Site on the exhibit listing surplus properties . Staff was directed to bring back the revised resolution and modified plan to the Council on September 10th . On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Vonheeder , and by unanimous vote ( Cm. Hegarty absent ) , the City Council authorized Staff to submit a proposal to the Board of Trustees for discussion purposes, for 5 acres of the Fallon School site with an alternate plan that would provide for the City ' s acquisition of approximately 38 , 000 square feet of land including the Kolb Park tennis courts . SAN RAMON ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT As part of the San Ramon Road Specific Plan and as conditions upon projects approved within the Plan area, a number of public street improvements are to be constructed by the property owners . Petitions were prepared and sent to the property owners within the proposed District with the result that 3 signatures have been received. These signatures represent the Jeha property, Morrison Homes property and Moret property. These 3 owners represent more than 600 of .the land within the District, which is required to waive certain proceedings and limitations for - the formation of the District . CM-3-193 Regular Meeting August 27, 1984 On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Moffatt , and by unanimous vote ( Cm. Hegarty absent ) , the Council adopted RESOLUTION N0.,. 91 - 84 APPROVING PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. 92 -, 84 APPOINTING ENGINEER AND ATTORNEY RESOLUTION NO. 93 - 84 DETERMINING TO UNDERTAKE PROCEDINGS PURSUANT TO SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AND ASSESSMENT BONDS ACTS FOR THE ACQUISITION AND CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS WITHOUT PROCEEDINGS UNDER DIVISION 4 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE RESOLUTION NO. 94 - 84 INTENTION TO ACQUIRE AND CONSTRUCT IMPROVEMENTS REHABILITATION OF MAJOR ARTERIALS DUBLIN BOULEVARD, AMADOR VALLEY BOULEVARD AND VILLAGE PARKWAY This project would repair pavement failures , provide an asphalt overlay and traffic signal interconnect wire at the following locations : Village Parkway-Amador Valley Boulevard to Dublin Boulevard Dublin Boulevard ( north side ) -San Ramon Road to Alamo Canal Amador Valley Boulevard-San Ramon Road to Donahue Drive The streets are in need of repair and overlay. The south side of Dublin Boulevard was overlayed in 1982 . In addition, street lights would be installed in the median on the Dublin Boulevard project . This project has now been approved for advertising by both the State and Federal agencies . The landscaping of medians and street trees on these streets will follow the improvements undertaken as part of this project . On motion of Cm. Moffatt, seconded by Cm. Vonheeder , and by unanimous vote ( Cm. Hegarty absent ) , the Council authorized Staff to advertise for bids . CM-3-194 Regular Meeting August 27 , 1984 TRACT 4859 ( NIELSEN) CONSENT TO ESTABLISH SILVERGATE DRIVE AS COUNTY ROAD Tract 4859 ( Nielsen) was approved by the City Council on August 13 , 1984 and is scheduled to go before the County Board of Supervisors on August 28 , 1984 . The extension of Silvergate Drive within this Tract falls in both the City and County. It is Staff ' s position that since the bulk of the tract and street is in the County, the County should handle the processing . This action simplifies the process by not requiring both jurisdictions to enter into separate agreements and require separate bonds and fees . Dublin Staff will inspect the improvements and the County will turn over the inspection fees to the City for this purpose . When this tract is annexed to the City, the street will become a Dublin Street and the City will assume maintenance responsibility. On motion of Cm. Moffatt, seconded by Cm. Vonheeder , and by unanimous vote ( Cm. Hegarty absent ) , the Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 95 - 84 CONSENTING TO ESTABLISHMENT OF CITY STREETS AS COUNTY ROADS ( SILVERGATE DRIVE, TRACT 4859 ) SHANNON CENTER UTILIZATION REQUEST FROM SAN RAMON VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTER The San Ramon Valley Community Center ( SRVCC) has submitted a request to utilize the Shannon Facility for several classes during the Fall 1984 session . Staff has reviewed the request in terms of availability and responded. The Park and Recreation Commission reviewed the SRVCC request and discussed the several options at its .August 14 , 1984 meeting. The Commission agreed that one of the primary goals of the City' s Recreation Department should be to maximize the usage of the Shannon facility, with City of Dublin programs and services . There was a good deal of discussion regarding allowing the San Ramon Valley Community Center to continue utilizing Shannon . Recognizing that the Recreation Department increased the number of classes offered from 16 in the summer to 43 in the fall, and that there still are available program hours at the Shannon site, the Commission voted in favor of the option which continues the provision of additional , unduplicated community services and increases the City of Dublin Recreation Department ' s visibility. CM-3-195 Regular Meeting August 27, 1984 On motion of Cm. Vonheeder , seconded by Cm. Jeffery, and by unanimous vote (Cm. Hegarty absent ) , and in accordance with the Park and Recreation Commission recommendation, the City Council authorized the San Ramon Valley Community Center to utilize the Shannon Community Center at those rates identified in Option I of the Staff Report . STREET SWEEPING & LITTER PICK-UP SERVICES AUTHORIZATION TO INVITE BIDS On July 26 , 1982 , the City Council awarded a bid to MARC Sweeping Service to provide Street Sweeping Service on public streets . The scope of services have been expanded and the contract was renewed for an additional year . This contract terminates September 30 , 1984 . In order to assure that services are being provided in a cost effective manner , Staff has prepared documents inviting sealed bids . The specifi- cations outline a service level consistent with what is currently provided in the City of Dublin. This allows for residential areas to be swept once every other week and commercial areas to be swept on a weekly basis . The provision of litter pick-up and removal of trash from City owned receptacles are also provided by the current contractor . The bid specifications request unit costs for each of these services . The specifications establish the framework for a two year agreement which may be amended after the first year of operation to reflect any cost adjustments . The City Council would be required to authorize any adjustment . City Manager Ambrose reported that the current contract expires on September 30 , 1984 and there is no provision for any type of extension. On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Vonheeder , and by unanimous vote ( Cm. Hegarty absent ) , the Council directed Staff to draft a provision for an extension to the current contract with Marc Sweeping Service until such time as a new contract is awarded. The revision was to be brought back to the Council at their September 10th meeting . On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Moffatt , and by unanimous vote ( Cm. Hegarty absent ) , the City Council approved the bid specifications and authorized Staff to proceed with the formal bid process . Following the . opening of the bids, a recommended contract will be prepared and presented to the City Council . ADOPTION OF SCHEDULES FOR FEES AND SERVICES Effective July 1 , 1982 , the City of Dublin assumed the responsibility for the provision of municipal services . Prior to that date the services were provided by the County of Alameda . The Schedules contained in the proposed resolution are identical to those used by the County in 1982 . CM-3-196 Regular Meeting August 27, 1984 As an administrative matter Staff has been collecting the fees and charges at the same rate as was applied by the County in July of 1982 . Fee schedules for the following services were adopted by the County as indicated below. Police Services October 6 , 1981 Grading March 16 , 1982 Encroachment February 3 , 1981 Bonds for Faithful February 3 , 1981 Completion of Encroachment Planning Department April 27 , 1982 The Engineering Subdivision Schedule requires the applicant to pay the actual cost . The schedule only defines the amount to be deposited. The difference must either be paid by the applicant or refunded to the applicant as appropriate . Exhibit 7 : General Fees for service relate to services specifically designed for the City of Dublin and were not established by a prior County Resolution . This includes the cost for photo copies, receiving meeting agendas, etc. All of the schedules contained in the resolution remain unchanged, since they were established by the County. The fees do not exceed the reasonable cost of providing the specified services . On ;notion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Vonheeder , and by unanimous vote ( Cm. Hegarty absent ) , the City Council formalized the schedules by adopting RESOLUTION NO. 96 - 84 ADOPTING FEES, CHARGES, AND BOND AMENDMENTS FOR CERTAIN MUNICIPAL SERVICES 1984 MORTGAGE REVENUE BOND PROGRAM In 1983 the Dublin City Council adopted a resolution authorizing the City to participate in a Mortgage Revenue Bond Program that year . As a result of that program one developer within the City was able to obtain below market financing for new homes . This developer is presently building the Heritage Commons project on Amador Valley Boulevard. The City is in receipt of a letter from the County Planning Director , William Fraley, soliciting the City ' s interest in participating in the 1984 County Mortgage Revenue Bond Program for single family housing . The County has received an allocation of $35 . 5 Million Dollars from the State and expects to issue bonds in that amount in September of 1984 . The County has further indicated that it has received requests for funding in excess of $100 ,000 , 000 dollars from developers from various cities throughout the County. The County has yet to make a final selection as to which developer will be able to participate. Developers within the City of Dublin that have expressed an interest in participating in this program include Morrison Homes, which is presently developing the property behind Iceland; and Kaufman and Broad which is presently developing a portion of the Nielsen Ranch. CM-3-197 Regular Meeting August 27, 1984 The City ' s participation in the County ' s Mortgage Revenue Bond Program would in no way hinder the City from developing its own bond allocation in the future . On motion of Cm. Moffatt , seconded by Cm. Vonheeder , and by unanimous vote ( Cm. Hegarty absent ) , the Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 97 - 84 APPROVING A HOME MORTGAGE FINANCE PROGRAM IN COOPERATION WITH THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA AND THE CITY OF DUBLIN HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ( HCD) BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM PARTICIPATION On September 27 , 1982 , the City Council agreed to participate in the Alameda. County Urban County Housing and Community Development (HCD) Block Grant Program for Fiscal Years 1982-83 , 1983-84 , and 1984-85 . The HCD Program undertakes community renewal and lower income housing assistance primarily for the benefit of low to moderate income households . The HCD Program has partially funded the Dougherty Road Improvement Project . On motion of Cm. Moffatt , seconded by Cm. Vonheeder , and by unanimous vote, the Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 98 - 84 AUTHORIZING CITY OF DUBLIN PARTICIPATION IN THE ALAMEDA COUNTY URBAN COUNTY HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM PERSONNEL SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS At the regular City Council meeting on March 26 , 1984 , the City Council adopted a Salary and Benefit Plan. This document specified salaries for existing positions as previously approved. The salaries were not adjusted to reflect market conditions . Subsequent to the adoption of the Salary and Benefit Plan additional positions have been developed. The proposed salaries for those positions were based on market surveys and they remain unchanged in the proposed resolution. A survey of the full-time positions has been completed to determine average salary ranges in comparable positions , within similar agencies . The positions of Recreation Supervisor and Senior Planner are unchanged, as these positions were newly established in July of this year . CM-3-198 Regular Meeting August 27, 1984 The salary ranges recommended were revised to reflect market conditions . This assures that the City of Dublin will remain competitive in attracting qualified employees . If salary ranges remain stationary the City may experience problems with morale, recruiting qualified employees, and turnover . All of these situations impact the effectiveness of the organization. The recommended salary ranges have been benchmarked with the average salary range for comparable positions in those cities identified in the surveys . Adjustments in employee salaries do not automatically occur as a result of adjusting salary ranges . All adjustments are based on merit pursuant to the Personnel Rules . The development of a personnel system which has the ability to recognize merit and control the City' s long-term financial obligations are prime factors in a system. In a traditional system an employee may reach the maximum salary range and will cease to receive adjustments based on merit . In order to address this situation under the philosophy discussed above, a revision to the personnel rules is proposed. An attached resolution allowed for a one time lump sum payment, when a written performance evaluation indicates the employee ' s performance would warrant an adjustment beyond the adopted salary range. The maximum performance pay adjustment under this provision would be 100 of the employee ' s annual salary. An employee would be eligible for this type of adjustment within 30 days of the employee ' s anniversary date . This proposal allows flexibility to reward exemplary service and at the same time places limitations on the ongoing obligations of the City ' s salary schedule . On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Vonheeder , and by majority vote ( Cm. Hegarty absent ) , the Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 99 - 84 ESTABLISHING A SALARY AND BENEFIT PLAN and RESOLUTION NO. 100 - 84 AMENDING THE PERSONNEL SYSTEM RULES BUILDING LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES CONTRACT EVALUATION On August 1 , 1983 the City entered into agreement with Taugher and Associates for the provision of Building Law Enforcement Services which included; Plan Review, Building Inspection, Zoning Enforcement and Housing Code Enforement . As is customary with other City Contractors, the City annually reviews the performance of the contract service . In order to accomplish the evaluation the City Manager ' s Office has prepared the attached memorandum evaluating the performance of Taugher and Associates , and has also prepared an evalution form for the City Council to use in its evaluation of the contractor ' s performance. CM-3-199 Regular Meeting August 27, 1984 The City ' s Agreement with Taugher and Associates also provides for an annual review of rates . Mr . Taugher proposed rate increases for the period beginning August 1 , 1984 and ending July 31 , 1985 . The rates proposed by Taugher and Associates will not cause the cost of the service to exceed the existing fees received by the City. The rates proposed appear reasonable based upon the performance of Taugher and Associates during the first year of the Agreement . The City Council reviewed the performance of Taugher and Associates . On motion of Cm. Moffatt , seconded by Cm. Jeffery, and by unanimous vote (Cm. Hegarty absent ) , the Council approved the Amendment to the Agreement reflecting the new rates for 1984-85 and authorized the Mayor to execute said agreement . OTHER BUSINESS Camp Parks - Veterans Cemetary City Manager Ambrose reported that Staff had been in touch with the Army Corps of Engineers regarding the disposal of excess property on the Camp Parks Reserve Training Area and the potential use for that property as a National Veteran ' s Cemetary. The Army Corps of Engineers indicated that the disposal report identifies approximately 150 acres on the Camp Parks site as excess . This property is bounded on the south by the I-580 frontage road, on the west by the Southern Pacific Railroad, on the north by Third Street and on the east by the County property. The Council discussed the City ' s position with regard to the proposed location of the national cemetary. Mayor Snyder indicated that he had spoken with Councilmember Bennett from San Ramon, and Councilmember Bennett indicated that San Ramon would welcome the site in the rolling hills area on the Contra Costa County side of the property. The Council directed Staff to prepare a resolution indicating their support of a national cemetary, but simply objecting to the location. The Council felt the cemetary could be more appropriately located in the aesthetically pleasing rolling hills portion of the Camp Parks site RESOLUTION NO. 101 - 84 REGARDING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A NATIONAL CEMETARY AT THE CAMP PARKS FACILITY IN ALAMEDA COUNTY CM-3-200 Regular Meeting August 27, 1984 r Library ' s Young Adult book Cover Art Contest Mayor Snyder indicated that a valley youth had been awarded as the runner-up to the grand-prize winner in the art contest . Tegan McLane entered the contest at the Dublin Library, and Mayor Snyder requested that a proclamation be prepared for presentation to Tegan McLane at a meeting honoring the winners the following evening in Newark . Ozzie Davis Hearing Cm. Vonheeder questioned the outcome of the hearing related to the illegal baloon being displayed on weekends above the Ozzie Davis facility. City Manager Ambrose indicated he had not yet been apprised of the results of the hearing . Los Positas New Town Development Cm. Vonheeder reported that she had been contacted by representatives from Livermore and they are requesting support in fighting Alameda County on the issue of the Los Positas new town development . ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Council , the meeting was adjourned at Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk CM-3-201 Regular Meeting August 27, 1984