HomeMy WebLinkAbout4.01 Approve 05-13-1991 Minutes 4
REGULAR MEETING - May 13, 1991
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Dublin was held
on Monday, May 13 , 1991, in the Council Chambers of the Dublin Civic
Center. The meeting was called to order at 7 : 35 p.m. , by Mayor
Snyder.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Councilmembers Burton, Howard, Jeffery, Moffatt and Mayor
Snyder.
ABSENT: None.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Mayor led the Council, Staff and those present in the pledge of
allegiance to the flag.
ADOPTION OF MILITARY UNIT (150-85)
Assistant to the City Manager Texeira advised that the City has
received a letter from a representative of the Citizen's Committee for
America Supporting Americans. The Committee is requesting that the
City Council adopt a Resolution establishing the City's own "adopted
sons and daughters" , establish a citizen committee which will function
as liaison between the community and the adopted unit, and donate a
symbolic gift such as a key to the City or medallion of the City seal
to each member of the adopted unit.
Shelly Bergbower advised that she and Richard Lee are representatives
of the already formed committee. In order for this program to go
forward, it is imperative that the Council shows its support. Several
documents can be forwarded to the unit. The unit includes one Dublin
resident. They are requesting that the City provide publicity by
press releases. There are over 1200 active units still in the Persian
Gulf.
Richard Lee advised that the unit they are interested in adopting
would be small; between 150 - 175 personnel. The City has previously
received a letter from a Lieutenant in the unit.
Cm. Burton questioned the location of the unit.
Cm. Howard advised that they are in the Persian Gulf, but we don't
know exactly where.
Cm. Burton stated the Council had previously discussed having
something local with people at Camp Parks.
A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A* *A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*^*A*A*A*A*A*
CM - VOL 1 0 - 1 6 8
Regular Meeting May 13, 1991
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COPIES TO:
ITEM NO.
�•3:rr
Ms. Bergbower advised that most of the units have been pre-selected.
Many of the units have come home, but we still need to remember those
that are left over there who may be there another year or two.
Cm. Burton questioned how the selection was made.
Ms. Bergbower advised that this program started several years ago in
San Mateo.
Mr. Lee advised that they selected this unit because there was already
communication established. This unit was selected in the interest of
expediency.
Cm. Jeffery questioned how we know that this unit will be over there
for a while. Most everyone considers all people who serve as sons and
daughters, and for this reason she indicated concern with selecting a
specific group. If we do this, we should do it right. It will take a
lot of work to get people to respond.
Ms. Bergbower advised that she is currently working with 4 different
businesses who are interested in helping with this. She felt the City
will find a lot of people who want to get involved. They are willing
to continue to take the leadership role in moving this forward.
Cm. Jeffery advised that the City has had great difficulty in finding
people's names who participated in Desert Storm. The lists are not
very reliable.
Cm. Moffatt asked if there had been any dialogue with Company A yet.
Mr. Bergbower advised that because we have not yet formally adopted a
unit, correspondence with them has not been great at this time.
Mr. Lee advised that they wrote a letter, but thus far, have not
received a response.
Cm. Burton asked if this was the second 'time this has been attempted.
Mr. Lee stated that the program has been in effect for 22 years.
Recently there has been a reinterest in the project. Thus far, there
have been 30 units adopted by cities and towns.
Cm. Burton asked if they leave the area, do we still stay in contact
with them.
Mr. Lee stated that it is up to the City how far they wish to take
this. We can show support in any way we wish.
Cm. Moffatt asked what needed to happen to move forward.
Ms. Bergbower advised that the rest of the community needs to
recognize that the City Council supports this and they too can become
involved. They are looking for this support of the Council.
A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*
CM - VOL 10 - 169
Regular Meeting May 13, 1991
Mr. Lee advised that the group "America Supporting Americans" can
provide guidelines and information. Once a citizen's committee is set
up, they can begin communicating and suggesting ideas.
Cm. Burton stated he was bothered that they had not heard from Company
A, and asked if they could begin without actually selecting a unit.
Ms. Bergbower advised that we are actually ahead of the game. All• the
information has been provided and they can pursue the correspondence
with the particular unit. She felt that a smaller unit such as
Company A with under 200 people is more realistic than a whole
Battalion.
Cm. Moffatt stated he hoped they would come back and let the City
Council know how they can help out. He would like more specific
details.
Cm. Burton made a motion, which was seconded by Cm. Jeffery to leave
out reference to a specific unit in the resolution. The Committee
should come back with a selection of a unit that has responded.
Mayor Snyder stated he had no problem listing this particular unit so
that it can be announced at the parade on Saturday.
The motion and second were amended.
On motion of Cm. Burton, seconded by Cm. Jeffery, and by unanimous
vote, the Council adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 37 - 91
ADOPTING A COMPANY OF THE UNITED STATES ARMED SERVICES
(COMPANY A, 4TH BATTALION, 32ND REGIMENT OF THE 3RD ARMOURED DIVISION)
Cm. Burton questioned if Dublin was the first Valley City to adopt a
military unit.
Mr. Lee responded that Dublin is the first.
Nielsen After-School Program (950-30)
Ms. Carolyn Vance addressed the Council and stated she is a parent of
a child who attends Nielsen School. Her son is 6 years old and and
has been involved in the after-school program for approximately 1
month. He has been left standing in front of the school several times
at 5: 00 p.m. She was told that this is a potential City liability.
She contacted Tracy O'Shea, the Police Department and the Recreation
Department and was told that it is a Recreation Program rather than a
day care program. This is very near the Misheloff house and she felt
there was potential for a disaster that could happen. There is no
provision for children who are left. She has been as much as 8
minutes late and she felt the City needs to look at this program.
A*A*A*A*A*A*A*^*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*^*A*^*A*^*A*^*
CM - VOL l 0 - 1 7 0
Regular Meeting May 13, 1991
Mayor Snyder requested that this item be placed on a future agenda for
Council discussion.
City Manager Ambrose advised that Ms. Vance was correct, this is not a
day care program, but rather a drop in program.
Award Presented to City (150-20)
Assistant to the City Manager Texeira advised that the City of Dublin
had won an Award of Merit in the Audio-Visual category for the Dublin
Civic Center Documentary. This video was entered in the National City
Hall Digest's 12th Annual City Hall Public Information Awards
Competition in May, 1990. This contest has been a popular nationwide
event for cities of all sizes since 1977. The only other Award of
Merit in this category was presented to the City of Beverly Hills.
Ms. Texeira presented the award to the City Council and also
recognized Darla Stevens, Executive Director of Community Television.
Ms. Texeira advised that a press release had been prepared for
immediate distribution.
The Council pointed out that former Councilmembers Hegarty and
Vonheeder should be recognized as they also played a major part in the
production of the video.
Darla Stevens expressed her pleasure and advised that this was an
extra project for Community TV. This is a very nice piece of history
for Dublin and she congratulated the City.
Cm. Moffatt thanked Ms. Stevens for all her hard work on the project.
Cm. Jeffery suggested that City Staff also advise George Miers.
CONSENT CALENDAR
On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Moffatt, and by unanimous
vote, the Council took the following actions:
Approved Minutes of Regular Meeting of April 22 , 1991;
Accepted the City Treasurer's Investment Report for Period Ending
April 30, 1991 (320-30) ;
Approved an Amendment to the Agreement with Meyers, Nave, Riback &
West for Legal Services (600-30) and authorized the Mayor to execute
same;
w*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*
CM - VOL 10 - 171
Regular Meeting May 13, 1991
I
Accepted improvements under Contract 90-10A (Pedestrian Signal
Handicap Modifications) ; authorized a $347. 50 budget transfer to this
project from the Contingent Reserve; and authorized $18 , 592 payment to
Richard Heaps, Electrical Contractor (600-30) ;
Accepted improvements under Contract 90-11 (Frederiksen School Play
Area Improvements) ; authorized $3,442 . 31 budget transfer from the
Contingent Reserve; authorized $4,947 retention payment to Munkdale
Bros. (600-30) ;
Adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 38, - 91
AUTHORIZING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DUBLIN AND THE
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA WITH REGARD TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
PROGRAMS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 (600-40)
and authorized the Mayor to execute the agreement;
Accepted the Financial Statements for Period Ending April 30, 1991
(330-50) ;
Approved Warrant Register in the amount of $1,216, 663 .93 (300-40) ;
Received a report related to the renegotiation of the Santa Rita
Property Tax Exchange Agreement with Alameda County and authorized
Staff to secure the services of an Economic Consulting Firm with a
cost not to exceed $5, 000 (470-50) .
Cm. Burton requested that the item related to the Clerical
Classification Study be pulled from the Consent Calendar for
discussion. Cm. Burton expressed concern that the City is building up
more and more staffing. He questioned whether this is the right
timing for this as we have a budget problem and people are concerned
over what we are spending.
City Manager Ambrose advised that the City is adding no new positions.
We want to make certain that the job descriptions accurately reflect
the duties of a particular job.- Several Department Heads have
requested in the past that the City look at some position changes to
some of their employees. The City contracted with a Consultant to
look at the entire clerical structure that we have rather than look at
it on a piecemeal basis. Two people's job descriptions did not fit
what their job actually consisted of. The other aspect of the study
was retitling and coming up with a classification plan that actually
gives the City more flexibility.
On motion of Cm. Burton, seconded by Cm. Moffatt, and by unanimous
vote, the Council accepted the Clerical Classification Study (700-20) ,
and adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 39 - 91
AMENDING THE CLASSIFICATION PLAN
and
^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*A*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*^*A*^*^*A*A*
li 1f if �i if if .f i{
CM lf- iVOiiL iii 0 —ii 1 7 2ii ii ii !f a ii a if ii ii ii ii i. ii
Regular Meeting May 13, 1991
RESOLUTION NO. 40 - 91
ESTABLISHING A SALARY PLAN FOR FULL-TIME PERSONNEL
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PERSONNEL RULES
and adopted Revised Position Allocation Plan for Fiscal Year 1990-91;
PUBLIC HEARING
1990 EDITION OF NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE (440-20)
Mayor Snyder opened the public hearing. .
Chief Building Official Taugher advised that State Law requires the
City to adopt the latest edition of the National Electrical Code
within 6 months after the State has adopted the Code. A draft
Ordinance was presented to the Council which amends Section 7 . 36. 030
of the Dublin Municipal Code by changing 1987 to 1990. Also, when
codes are adopted by reference, the Ordinance must contain the
provisions for violations and penalties. Section 2 simply restates
the existing provisions of Section 7. 28. 200.
Mr. Taugher advised that the Council should set a public hearing date
for the adoption of the Ordinance for the meeting of May 28, 1991.
No comments were made by members of the public relative to this issue.
Mayor Snyder closed the public hearing.
Cm. Moffatt questioned why the City has to adopt this.
Mr. Taugher explained that this requirement makes cities keep their
codes up to date.
Cm. Burton commented that this is a standardization so that the code
is uniform.
On motion of Cm. Burton, seconded by Cm. Jeffery, and by unanimous
vote, the Council waived the reading and INTRODUCED the Ordinance and
set a public hearing date for May 28, 1991.
PUBLIC HEARING
APPEAL - AMERICAN CITY TRUCK STOP CUP 6310 HOUSTON PLACE (450-50)
Mayor Snyder opened the public hearing.
Planning Director Tong distributed a revised Resolution to the
Council, Staff and Applicant. Mr. Tong advised that on January 17,
1991, the Applicant submitted an application requesting Conditional
Use Permit approval to continue the operation of a truck stop, weigh
scale, long term storage of trucks and ancillary retail space at 6310
Houston Place. A previous Conditional Use Permit for the truck stop
expired on January 20, 1991.
A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*/ *A.LA J.A*A 1A iA1AiA.L A.L
CM - VOL 10 - 173 i li if ii ii if a if if
Regular Meeting May 13, 1991
Mr. Tong advised that on April 1, 1991, the Planning Commission
adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 91-022 approving the CUP.
On April 4 , 1991, this action was appealed by the Applicant;
specifically, Condition #5 of the resolution which requires the
Applicant to remove and replace the A. C. pavement section and curb
and gutter on Houston Place at the intersection of Dougherty Road
subject to Public Works approval. The Applicant contends that the
repair of the street, curb and gutter is the responsibility of the
City and that water has caused the failure of the pavement and
concrete.
Mr. Tong explained that Staff recommended that the American City Truck
Stop share in the cost of the pavement and curbed gutter repair based
on the truck stop's proportionate share of the truck traffic using
Houston Place. The method of repair and the cost shall be worked out
between the Applicant and the Public Works Director. The City will
need to incur the remaining share of the repair costs since Admiral
Van and Storage is not applying for any new permits.
Cm. Moffatt questioned if the street is private or public.
Mr. Tong advised that it is a public road which was accepted by the
City.
Cm. Burton questioned how the road was built.
Public Works Director Thompson advised that Fred Houston built the
road as part of a minor subdivision.
Cm. Burton questioned if it was built specifically with trucks in mind
and designed accordingly.
Mr. Thompson advised that the biggest problem is at the intersection
where trucks roll over the curb. It will be necessary to beef up the
corner section to make sure this doesn't happen again.
Cm. Moffatt indicated that in his letter, Mr. Houston says there are a
few other conditions he is opposed to. He questioned if these have
been resolved or if they are still outstanding.
Mr. Tong stated that Staff believed that the appeal letter of April
15th clarifies that his only condition of appeal is #5 regarding
asphalt curb and gutter repair.
Cm. Burton questioned if the City was trying to establish that it
could go anywhere and require people to repair the streets.
Mr. Ambrose advised that the City does this now and discussed public
damage incidents. It is basically damage to public property. The
City Council has the ability to impose specific conditions with a CUP.
Fred Houston advised that he owns 3 businesses in Dublin and resides
in Pleasanton. He is appealing the condition that he must repair a
City owned street. The City states that he caused damage and he must
A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A L A*A*A L A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*
CM - VOL 10 17 4
Regular Meeting May 13, 1991
repair it. He felt the damage is due to the City's failure to
properly maintain the road. The City has allowed potholes to stay in
the road up to 3 years and water has undermined the construction. He
gave a history of the road. Five years ago, they wanted to make this
a private street, but City Staff demanded that it be a public road.
They were told that it would be used as a thoroughfare all the way out
to Camp Parks. The road was approved by the City as well as the plans
and specifications. After one year, the City came out and inspected
the road and accepted it. Mr. Houston presented to the Council some
type of an article related to water damage. He stated that water
causes the breakdown of the streets. He also showed pictures taken of
the property showing a pothole that is just starting. The berm is 10"
higher than the street. Had the City gone out and maintained its
property, this would never have occurred. This will happen again on
this road. The pothole got fixed because Kahler's Porsche called the
City and it came out and fixed it. Actually, the City just came out
and put in some cold or hot patch and called it fixed. Now, all of a
sudden, he comes in for a CUP and is told he has to fix it. The
trucks have $700 tires, so they don't try to run over the curb which
will damage their tires. His is not a new business and they are only
asking for status quo. They pay gas taxes and their roads should be
maintained just like everybody elses. $1.50 to $2 . 00 per foot is the
going price for repairs, but the City gave him a cost of $7 . 00 per
foot. Mr. Houston felt that if this is passed, it says this condition
will apply to any future costs to repair the street that the City
owns. Either he owns the street or the City owns it.
Cm. Jeffery stated that it appears that there are tire treads on the
berm and her point was that the trucks run off the road.
Mr. Houston stated the street is not wide enough for 2 trucks.
Cm. Burton questioned if an Engineer had looked at this related to
damage costs.
Mr. Houston explained that there was some misunderstanding related to
the timing of a meeting with Mehran, the- City's Assistant Civil
Engineer. His Engineer told him it was the City's road and damage was
caused by water underneath. This would have been better to have been
a private street.
Mayor Snyder closed the public hearing.
Cm. Jeffery felt the reason for the City owning the street is to make
sure there aren't maintenance problems. She felt that it was obvious
that trucks are responsible for this damage.
Cm. Moffatt felt the City was getting into some soft, spongy ground to
make a property owner pay for repairs caused by his customers. If,
for some reason, a street breaks down in front of a house, then the
homeowner would be responsible. If the City accepts a road, then the
City is responsible for it.
A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*
CM - VOL 10 - 175
Regular Meeting May 13, 1991
Cm. Burton referenced a bump that appeared on Silvergate as a result
of water under the street. Mr. Kahler mentioned to him that the City
did not fix the potholes. If we accept the design of a street, it is
our street. The fact that the trucks go over the curb and break the
curb is another matter. The City has a responsibility to maintain the
roads that it accepts. If we could prove that a truck went over the
curb, this would be a different case.
Mayor Snyder felt this was why the City has a CUP process. The City
has an opportunity to deal with issues such as this when they come up.
On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm., Howard, and by majority
vote, the Council denied Mr. Houston's appeal and adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 41 - 91
APPROVING PA 91-005 AMERICAN CITY TRUCK STOP CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
TO OPERATE A TRUCK STOP, WEIGH SCALE, LONG TERM STORAGE OF
TRUCKS AND ANCILLARY RETAIL SPACE WITH MODIFICATION TO CONDITION #5
AT 6310 HOUSTON PLACE
Cm. 's Burton and Moffatt voted against this motion.
PUBLIC HEARING
ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR REVISIONS TO DUBLIN MUNICIPAL CODE (660-20)
City Attorney Silver advised that in July, 1990, the City's first
Municipal Code was adopted, which contained most of the ordinances
which had been adopted through 1989 .
During the 9 months that Staff has been working with the Code, certain
discrepancies have been noted and a draft ordinance was presented
which incorporated all of the changes noted to date, into one
ordinance. Additions, amendments or deletions have been made to
chapters related to Elections, Peddlers,- Solid Waste Management,
Animal Control, Weed and Litter Abatement, Property Maintenance,
Abatement of Abandoned Vehicles, Abatement of Nuisances, and
Establishing Right-of-Way Lines.
Ms. Silver advised that in accordance with a recent court case,
municipalities are required to obtain a warrant prior to conducting
inspections or abatement activities on private property.
Ms. Silver also indicated that the City Clerk has begun preparation
for the first update to the Code, and this ordinance will correct most
of the housekeeping items, as well as changes recommended as a result
of the court case related to obtaining warrants. The update will make
the Code as current as possible, and will additionally include
ordinances adopted in 1990 and 1991 year-to-date.
Cm. Burton pointed out that Section 4 . 16. 040 B should be revised.
This refers to the Murray Township prior to Dublin's incorporation.
A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*
CM - VOL 1 0 1 7 6
Regular Meeting May 13, 1991
He also questioned if weed abatement was done only by the Fire
Authority.
Mr. Ambrose advised that weed abatement is done by the Fire Authority
on an annual basis.
Ms. Silver advised that the weed abatement ordinance deals also with
litter. The Fire Authority gets its police power through the City.
There are provisions in the Government Code which allow the City to
abate weeds, but it doesn't make much administrative sense to have
both agencies doing this.
With regard to going onto other people's property, Cm. Moffatt
questioned if the County and Federal land was included in this. If
there is a weed problem on County property, he asked if the Fire
Department can go in and then charge the abatement to the County. Do
we have any jurisdiction over this.
Ms. Silver responded that she thought the answer was no we could not
go onto their property, but stated she would have to review this.
Cm. Howard questioned who owned the property on the hillside on San
Ramon Road near Vomac Road and near Alcosta Boulevard.
Mr. Ambrose responded that there is a combination of property owners.
The City owns a portion.
Mr. Thompson advised that MCE is maintaining this property which
consists of about 10 acres.
Cm. Moffatt stated he understood that the City owns most of the
property in front of the Workbench.
Mr. Ambrose advised that part of the property belongs to the City and
the City removes the weeds regularly.
Cm. Jeffery questioned if a peddler permit actually reads Dublin or if
they say Alameda County. The Council then discussed various
situations involving peddlers.
Chief Rose advised that the permits are issued out of ETS.
Mr. Ambrose stated that a business license is also required of a
peddler.
Cm. Burton questioned if anything was going to be done about the weeds
on the side of the hill along San Ramon Road.
Mr. Ambrose advised that the City has been concerned regarding the
soil stability.
Mr. Thompson advised that the City will be doing a soils study and
will probably not be doing landscaping at this time.
A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*-*A*A*A*A*A*A*^*A*A*^*A*^*A*^*A*^*A*A*^*^*A*
CM - VOL l 0 - 1 7 7
Regular Meeting May 13, 1991
r
Mr. Ambrose stated that a fire break is put in however, between the
homes and the hillside.
Mayor Snyder closed the public hearing.
On motion of Cm. Moffatt, seconded by Cm. Burton, and by unanimous
vote, the Council waived the reading and INTRODUCED the Ordinance
providing for revisions to the Dublin Municipal Code.
PUBLIC HEARING
ORDINANCE INCREASING CITY COUNCIL SALARIES (700-20)
Mayor Snyder opened the public hearing.
City Manager Ambrose advised that this ordinance, which was introduced
at the April 22 , 1991 Council meeting would provide for a 5% increase
to City Council salaries for calendar year 1991. However, incumbent
Councilmembers would not be eligible to receive the increase until
after the November, 1992 election.
The City Council's present monthly salary is $382 . 88.
No comments were made by members of the public relative to this issue.
Mayor Snyder closed the public hearing.
On motion of Cm. Moffatt, seconded by Cm. Howard, and by unanimous
vote, the Council waived the reading and adopted
ORDINANCE NO. 6 - 91
AMENDING DUBLIN MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2 . 08. 020 AND PROVIDING
FOR AN INCREASE IN THE SALARY FOR MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARING
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ORDINANCE 600-10
Mayor Snyder opened the public hearing.
Planning Director Tong advised that at the request of the Bren
Company, Staff prepared a draft development agreement enabling
ordinance which establishes procedures and requirements for
consideration of development agreements for specific projects. This
ordinance would add Chapter 8 . 12 to the Dublin Municipal Code.
Mr. Tong advised that after the ordinance is adopted and effective,
Staff will be discussing and processing a development agreement for
the Hansen Ranch project.
w*w*A*�*n*w*A*n*w*A*. *w*n*A*w*n*n*w*A*n*n*n*n*A*n*n*A*^*w*n*n*n*n*n*n*
CM - VOL 10 - 178
Regular Meeting May 13, 1991
Marty Buxton advised that she has worked with the City Attorney and
Staff regarding wording which will allow them to get started on a
development agreement which will be beneficial to both them and the
City. She was looking forward to going forward with the project.
Mayor Snyder closed the public hearing.,
Cm. Moffatt stated he was happy to see this moving along.
On motion of Cm. Moffatt, seconded by Cm. Jeffery, and by unanimous
vote, the Council waived the reading and INTRODUCED the Development
Agreement Ordinance.
UPDATE REPORT ON DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN REVIEW TASK FORCE (470-50)
City Manager Ambrose advised that in January, 1991, the City Council
developed a. Task Force to review issues of interest to the business
community. This included programs identified in the Downtown Specific
Plan. Mayor Snyder, Cm. Burton and City Staff have met with business
representatives to discuss the structure of the Task Force. The
business community representatives have suggested that, given the
scope of issues identified in the Downtown Specific Plan, the Task
Force membership should be expanded. It was suggested that
subcommittees be used to evaluate issues related to: 1) Urban Design
Improvements; 2) Circulation/Parking/Land Use; and 3) Special
Programs.
Mayor Snyder stated that the members have requested that the committee
be expanded to about 12 so that each committee will have about 4
people on it.'
Cm. Jeffery indicated that she had a problem with the subcommittee
structure. She felt it should be expanded, but that there should be
more to it. Perhaps we should have a consultant to work with the
committee. She felt it was unlikely that anyone on the committee is
trained to do market analysis and who could put all the information
together regarding what Dublin needs. A committee will be doing this
from a lay person perspective. ' She felt a consultant could get some
policies down and then the committees would have some way to proceed.
An unbiased consultant could provide a view that would not otherwise
be available. Cm. Jeffery stated she had several resource books which
she would gladly share. She felt it would be a better use of the 12
person committee to have a starting place. She stated she was very
much in support of what the committee should achieve.
Cm. Burton stated there would be times when outside help would be
needed. Progress has been made thus far, and people have recognized
that we might be taking on too much. The volunteers have indicated
that they want to do the work. The danger is that when you get a
consultant, they tend to do it all. This project is bubbling up and
he felt that a very positive action was starting to happen. We have
people willing to work with property owners and retailers. They agree
that there will be times when outside help will be necessary.
A*A*A*A L A*A*A*A*A*A y A* �*A*A*A*A*A*A L A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*
CM - VOL l 0 - 17 9
Regular Meeting May 13, 1991
Cm. Jeffery pointed out that this community is more than retail and in
order to put together a good and viable business community, an
assortment is needed. The business people understand their own
markets geared toward their types of services, but we need to have
someone who can tell us about all aspects. There are ways to get a
lot of the basic information and then the committee can work with the
information.
Cm. Burton stated he understood Cm. Jeffery's position, but when a
volunteer movement starts to take place, this is a very positive
thing. He was asking for a chance to see what these people can do.
Cm. Jeffery questioned the timeframe.
Cm. Burton stated if we get anything by Fall, we will be doing good.
Cm. Jeffery felt this was exactly the right time to move forward and
take advantage of the current economic situation. The City needs to
jump right away so that money can be included in the budget. We
should bring on board somebody who is qualified to work with the
committee.
Cm. Burton felt this is not the time to bring in an outsider who will
put a damper on the enthusiasm of the volunteers. Let them have a
chance.
Cm. Jeffery stated we have discussed economic development twice
previously at budget time.
Cm. Burton stated he was not talking about economic development, per
se.
Mr. Ambrose advised that part of the problem is that there are a
number of different areas that the committee is dealing with. They
are trying to ascertain if there is an interest in implementing
certain portions of the Downtown Plan. The committee will help open
the lines of communication. The County has offered to have someone
come out and look at the area for us free of charge to advise us.
Mayor Snyder stated it is important to recognize that all 3 of the
people have offered to bring to the City resources available through
their organizations. To not utilize those resources, the City would
be wasting a great possibility to develop something in the community.
He felt that Cm. Jeffery was actually 2 steps ahead of them. He felt
the people would be scared away if we approached it in this manner.
Cm. Moffatt stated he felt the text book approach is a viable concept.
He would like to have people on the front lines involved.
On motion of Cm. Moffatt, seconded by Cm. Burton, and by unanimous
vote, the Council authorized the Task Force to seek additional
participation of up to 12 people from the business community.
n*A*n*A*n*A*A*A*A*A*A*n*A*n*A*n*n*n*n*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*�*�*A*�*�*^*^*
CM - VOL 10 - 180
Regular Meeting May 13, 1991
r
STATUS REPORT ON DROUGHT RESTRICTIONS (1000-80)
Public Works Director Thompson presented a report which: 1) detailed
the Dublin San Ramon Services District Board discussion at their May
7th meeting related to drought items; 2) discussed the use of wells at
parks; and 3) discussed City maintenance water cutbacks.
The DSRSD Board determined that the Phase I voluntary water reductions
seem to be working. They honored the City's request to eliminate
street sweeping from their proposal to require the use of recycled
water and exempted pre-existing grading operations from the use of
recycled water, as well as limited this requirement to just the
emergency drought period. They do not anticipate that they will have
to go into any further mandatory rationing stages. The Board also
discussed a surcharge of $1 per month per equivalent 5/8 meter to
raise some money for recycling projects and to finance a well project
that they want to put in in Pleasanton. This surcharge would cost
Dublin $2 , 754 per year, based on existing units. They authorized a
proposal to use recycled water at the Sports Grounds. Staff is still
reviewing this, and will come back to the Council with a response.
Staff is also reviewing the possibility of installing a well at
Shannon Park and if successful, it would pay for itself in
approximately 6 years. A title problem was encountered, however.
When Volk-McLain sold the first piece of property in the area, they
held back the water rights to Shannon Park and Staff is trying to
determine who the assigns were of the original corporation, to try and
get quitclaim deeds. The estimated costs for the well is $50, 000 -
$60, 000.
Mr. Thompson advised that the City has been able to cut back the
requested 25% voluntary usageamounts and actually realized a 40%
reduction compared to last year at the Sports Grounds.
Cm. Jeffery questioned if we would be charged for water rights.
Mr. Thompson advised that this is a possibility. He wasn't sure why
these were kept back.
Cm. Burton stated he thought they had mineral rights below 500 feet.
He thought water could be obtained before going down 500 feet.
Mr. Thompson advised that while we would have to get a permit, there
is no charge to get the water out of the ground.
Cm. Moffatt questioned the meaning of certain verbiage contained in
the Quitclaim Deed to Shannon Park.
Mr. Thompson explained that it meant that that particular corporation
held back the rights to come and draw the water out at some future
time or to sell those rights to someone else.
Cm. Moffatt questioned if DSRSD is giving up these rights.
CM - VOL 10 - 181
Regular Meeting May 13, 1991
r
Mr. Thompson stated that this was something that was on the deed
previously.
Ms. Silver explained that DSRSD never had these rights. When it was
originally conveyed in 1961, Volk-McLain conveyed title to the
property, except for the water rights.
Cm. Moffatt questioned the amount of $40, 000 for irrigation water.
Mr. Thompson advised that the cost analysis was based on what it would
cost us for potable water versus what it would cost us for
fertilization on the turf. The City is reviewing the fertilizer value
that the water actually has.
Mr. Ambrose pointed out that recycling, under this limited proposal,
is not cost effective. If you look at the cost of putting this single
project together, it exceeds the cost of potable water by quite a bit.
If the distribution and amount could be expanded, you might be able to
achieve an economy of scale.
Cm. Burton indicated that we are their only potential customer. They
are spending money to pump water over the hill and if this is reduced
by the fact that we use recycled water, he questioned if this had been
considered.
Mr. Thompson indicated we were given energy credit for this.
Mr. Ambrose advised that we could ask for additional sewer connections
that this would free up.
On motion of Cm. Burton, seconded by Cm. Jeffery, and by unanimous
vote, the Council accepted the report and authorized Staff to prepare
a counter proposal to DSRSD's proposal for use of recycled water at
the Dublin Sports Grounds and authorized Staff to advertise for bids
for test bore, drilling and hook-up of a well at Shannon Park, if
water rights can be obtained.
Cm. Moffatt asked if there was a cap on the amount of money the
Council is authorizing.
Mr. Ambrose stated the Council is not authorizing any money at this
time, but rather just authorizing Staff to go out to bid, if the water
rights can be obtained.
SCHOOL FACILITY IMPROVEMENT PRIORITIES (280-30)
Recreation Director Lowart advised that in September, 1989, the City
Council authorized an agreement between the City of Dublin and the
Dublin Unified School District regarding the use of facilities. A
prioritized list of proposed improvements to school property to be
undertaken by the City as funds became available was provided as an
exhibit to this agreement.
n*A*n*n*n*n*A*A*. *�*A*A*n*n*A*n*A*n*A*n*n*A*A*n*n*A*A*A*A*A*n*n*A*A*A*
CM - VOL 10 - 182
Regular Meeting May 13, 1991
Ms. Lowart advised that Staff was recommending that as part of the
1991-92 Update to the 5-Year CIP, the Council re-evaluate the
priorities of the school projects, due to the increased requests from
individual schools and special interest groups that certain projects
be moved up on the priority list.
The Park & Recreation Commission recently held a meeting and invited
all groups to make presentations.
Ms. Lowart indicated that the City's ability to complete the projects
will depend on a number of factors such as the availability of funds,
availability of water, and the availability of school facilities while
school is in session.
A revised priority list was forwarded to the Dublin Unified School
District for their review and approval and was unanimously approved by
the Board of Trustees on May 1, 1991.
Ms. Lowart advised that once the Council approves the revised priority
list for school facility improvements, Staff will incorporate the
projects into the CIP based on the criteria discussed above.
Cm. Burton asked if Staff was looking for approval on both lists
submitted, or just the first list.
Mr. Lowart indicated that Staff would like for the Council to approve
the total list of projects, but with the understanding that the
Council is not in favor of moving forward with projects that require
landscaping. The actual projects would come before the City Council
for approval in the future.
Mr. Ambrose indicated that Staff was looking for some preliminary
consensus from the Council so that the projects can be input into the
process of the Capital Improvement Program.
Mayor Snyder confirmed that the list coincides with the School
District priorities.
On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Moffatt, and by unanimous
vote, the Council approved the revised priority list.
OTHER BUSINESS
Meeting Reminders (610-10)
Mr. Ambrose advised the Council that the next DRFA meeting would be
held on May 20th beginning at 6: 00 p.m. , in the Council Chambers and
the special joint City Council/Planning Commission/Park & Recreation
Commission study session would follow at 7 : 30 p.m. in the Regional
Meeting Room.
A*A*A*A*A*A*A*^* *A*^*A*A*/ *A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*/ *A*A*A*-*A*A*A*A* *
CM - VOL l 0 - 18 3
Regular Meeting May 13, 1991
State Budget (330-80)
Cm. Moffatt advised that he had an opportunity to attend the East Bay
Division meeting last week and Mr. Santos, on the Board of Directors
of the League of California Cities attended a conference in Tahoe on
the State Budget. Cm. Moffatt distributed literature regarding what
the State Government will be doing. The deficit is up to $13 . 6
billion.
Mayor Snyder stated the question of fines and forfeitures seem to be
the only new thing being discussed.
Mr. Ambrose advised that the City's budget is being put together with
a great deal of uncertainty.
National League of Cities FAIR Committee
Cm. Jeffery advised that the FAIR Committee met over the weekend in
San Francisco and they are recommending that any City deposits in any
institution be totally covered. It is public money and as such, is
different than private deposits so it needs to be insured, regardless
of how much is deposited. They are also recommending some changes to
bank regulations.
Welcome Home Parade 5/18 & Alameda County Fair Parade 6/22 (950-40)
Cm. Jeffery stated she hoped to see everyone at the parade on Saturday
in Hacienda Business Park. The parade begins at 11: 00 a.m. at Willow
and West Las Positas There will be bands, flyovers, veterans, and
lots of activity. The Mayors will read the names of those known from
each City who served in the Persian Gulf. A picnic area will be
behind the Associates building.
Cm. Jeffery also asked if the Council wished to participate in the
Alameda County Fair parade on June 22nd.
Mayor Snyder advised that he will be out of town at that time.
Status of JL Construction Site Clean-up (440-40)
Cm. Burton requested an update on the status of the clean-up of the JL
Construction Dublin Meadows project site.
Mr. Tong advised that the Zoning Investigator sent out notice on May
7th giving them 10 days to comply with cleaning up the site. May 17th
is the end of the 10 day period. If it is not fixed by then, the City
will issue the citations and move forward.
CM - VOL 10 - 184
Regular Meeting May 13, 1991
Mr. Ambrose advised that the City's chances are very slim of being
reimbursed if the City ends up having to do the work. JL has been a
real problem ever since coming into the City. If they would just
clean up their act, they could get occupancy on many of the units
right away.
CLOSED SESSION
At 10: 00 p.m. , the Council recessed to a closed executive session to
discuss: 1) Pending Litigation, (640-30)- City of Dublin vs. Alameda
County et al. (Measure D) in accordance with Government Code Section
54956. 9 (a) ; and 2) Personnel (600-30) in accordance with Government
Code Section 54957 .
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Council, the
meeting was adjourned at 10: 31 p.m.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*
CM - VOL 10 - 185 if �f if if if ii
Regular Meeting May 13, 1991