Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4.01 Draft Minutes 06-14-1993 ~ -- .' REGULAR MEETING - June 14. 1993 A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Dublin was held on Monday, June 14, 1993, in the Council Chambers of the Dublin Civic Center. The meeting was called to order at 7:35 p.m., by Mayor Snyder. * * * * ROLL CALL PRESENT: ABSENT: Councilmembers Burton, Houston, Howard and Mayor Snyder. Councilmember Moffatt * * * * PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (610-20) Mayor Snyder led the Council, Staff and those present in the pledge of allegiance to the flag. * * * * PROCLAMATIONS (610-50) Mayor Snyder read and presented proclamations: Expressing appreciation to Valerie Barnes for her 9 years of service on the Planning Commission. A pen with the City Seal on it was also presented. Expressing appreciation to Dan Downey who has served on the Park & Recreation Commission for almost 6 years. A pen with the City Seal on it was also presented. Expressing appreciation to Jim Rasmussen, who served as student representative on the Park & Recreation Commission for the last year. A pen with the City Seal on it was also to be presented. Since he was not present at the meeting to accept the proclamation and pen, Mary Ekersley, Principal of Dublin High School said she would see that Jim received them at the High School Graduation Ceremony. * * * * APPOINTMENTS (110-30) Mayor Snyder announced the appointments to fill current vacancies on City Commissions: Jon'ette Jordan as student representative on the Park & Recreation Commission for a 1 year term beginning in July. On motion of Cm. Howard, seconded by Cm. Burton, and by unanimous vote (Cm. Moffatt absent), the Council confirmed the appointment of Jon'ette Jordan as student representative on the P&R Commission. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CM - VOL 12 - 250 Regular Meeting June 14, 1993 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COPIES TO: ITEM NO. '-I. I e . Mayor Snyder announced the recommendation to appoint Robert Trimble to the Park & Recreation Commission for a term which expires in December, 1996. On motion of em. Howard, seconded by Cm. Burton, and by unanimous vote (Cm. Moffatt absent), the Council confirmed the appointment of Bob Trimble to the P&R Commission. * * * * RECYCLING PROGRAM WINNERS FOR MONTH OF APRIL 1993 (810-60) Management Assistant Bo Barker announced the five winners in the recycling program contest for the Month of May, 1993. Mr. Barker presented Savings Bonds provided by Livermore Dublin Disposal to: Mr. & Mrs. Leung, Jeri Larson, Mickey & Doreen Wall, Patrice Shumway and Frances McInerney. Staff will see that those who were unable to attend the Council meeting receive their bonds. Staff advised that this is the second month of the program and reminded everyone that five winners will be drawn each month, with Savings Bonds presented at a council meeting. * * * * OPERATION PROM NIGHT PRESENTATION BY DUBLIN HIGH SCHOOL (150-20) Mary Ekersley, Principal of Dublin High School presented a plaque to Joe Silva with the Dougherty Regional Fire Authority, the person primarily responsible for coordinating the recent Operation Prom Night program. A large pictorial poster was presented to Dublin police Services. Chief Rose accepted it on behalf of his department. Chief Rose introduced Deputy Randy Skarpol who was the primary Police Services contact for this program. A plaque was also presented to Dublin Police Services. Ms. Ekersley stated she appreciates the fact that they receive excellent service from the Police Department all the way through the ranks, as well as from the City. They receive a very high level of service. Mayor Snyder stated this event was so authentic, it was wonderful. He felt the whole program was very effective. Mr. Silva advised that DRFA will be continuing this program on an area basis. * * * * CONSENT CALENDAR On motion of Cm. Houston, seconded by Cm. Howard, and by unanimous vote (Cm. Moffatt absent), the Council took the following actions: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CM - VOL 12 - 251 June 14, 1993 Regular Meeting e . Approved Minutes of Regular Meeting of May 24, 1993 and Adjourned Regular Meeting of June 1, 1993; Adopted RESOLUTION NO. 76 - 93 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH DUBLIN SAN RAMON SERVICES DISTRICT FOR REIMBURSEMENT FOR LANDSCAPING AND WATER SERVICE DOUGHERTY RESERVOIR ACCESS ROAD AT TOPAZ CIRCLE (600-40) and authorized the Mayor to execute the agreement; Received the City Treasurer's Investment Report as of May 31, 1993 (320-30); Received the Financial Report for period ending May 31, 1993 (330-50); Accepted improvements constructed under Contract 93-05 (Street Subdrains) and authorized $4,626.82 retention payment to Betchart and Norwood (600-30); Adopted RESOLUTION NO. 77 - 93 APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE SERVICES WITH MCE CORPORATION AND IDENTIFYING THE SCHEDULE OF WORK AND SCHEDULE OF RATES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 (600-30) and authorized the Mayor to execute the agreement; Adopted RESOLUTION NO. 78 - 93 DESIGNATING THE PROVIDER OF BANKING SERVICES AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 68-86 (320-10) and RESOLUTION NO. 79 - 93 ESTABLISHING A POLICY FOR CITY INVESTMENTS AND DESIGNATING THE CITY TREASURER AS AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL TO INVEST CITY MONIES (320-30) and RESOLUTION NO. 80 - 93 ESTABLISHING A POLICY FOR MANAGEMENT AND USE OF GENERAL FUND ASSETS (320-30) Approved Warrant Register in the amount of $888,175.37 (300-40); Cm. Houston requested that the item dealing with the janitorial services contract be removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . eM - VOL 12 - 252 June 14, 1993 Regular Meeting e . One of the letters attached to the Staff Report made reference to a bonding requirement and he questioned whether this is really necessary. Mr. Thompson advised that on all of our contracts we have bonds required to make sure that the contractor fulfills their obligation. We had a sweeping contractor disappear on us a few years ago which cost us a lot of extra money. This is really a guarantee that they will fulfill the job they are hired to do. em. Houston stated he thought this would apply more in the construction trade. Mr. Ambrose advised that at one time the bond was a requirement as noted in the letter which was dated January, 1991. The current janitorial specifications had deleted this requirement as was previously recommended. On motion of Cm. Houston, seconded by Cm. Burton, and by unanimous vote (Cm. Moffatt absent), the Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 81 - 93 (Overruling Protest &) APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH TRI-VALLEY JANITORIAL SERVICE FOR CITY FACILITIES JANITORIAL SERVICES (600-30) and approved a budget transfer from the Building Management budget to the Shannon Center budget ($9,780) and to the Senior Center budget ($408). * * * * BUSINESS COMMUNITY FOURTH OF JULY CELEBRATION (470-50) Associate planner Choy advised that the Dublin Chamber of Commerce Business Development Committee has requested that the City Council waive all fees associated with a Citywide Fourth of July Celebration Sidewalk Sale. The Chamber will be responsible for coordinating the event, including notification of Dublin based businesses. Mr. Choy stated they anticipated that this event would work similar to the st. Patrick's Day activities. Cm. Burton stated he had received calls related to the photograph requirement on the application. He questioned the need for this and if a photo would really be that beneficial. Mr. Choy stated Staff felt this would help to show what the sidewalk area would look like. A quick decision could be made from a photo and hopefully eliminate any need for a Field Review by Staff. Cm. Burton referenced one of the guidelines which related to accessibility and questioned what difference a photo would make or how it would even help. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CM - VOL 12 - 253 Regular Meeting June 14, 1993 e e Mr. Choy advised that what Staff would be asking for is a simple site plan. They don't necessarily have to do a scale drawing, but in lieu of this we would request a photo. What they are trying to accomplish is to be able to approve these things over the counter. Cm. Burton stated he had been asked to consider waiving this requirement. Mr. Choy advised that if there is enough information on file, Staff can always waive the requirements. If it is a situation where a sidewalk sale has been held prior and enough information is in the file, Staff can waive it on a case-by-case basis. Cm. Houston stated he thought a simple drawing would do the same thing. Mr. Choy stated it could, but the thought was that a photo would provide a clear picture of the area. Kathi Schultz, the Chamber of Commerce representative of the Committee organizing the event, asked if it would be possible for an either/or situation, site plan or picture, whichever would be simpler. She was concerned that it might delay someone from participating in the sale if they have to go out and buy film, or even someone who might not have a camera. Mr. Ambrose advised that the intent is to make it as simple as possible. We just want to make sure that an unsafe condition is not allowed. Cm. Burton stated he was agreeable to just see what happens. It may be that more than a photo might be necessary. Ms. Schultz stated this is part of an ongoing process and they hope to formalize it as they go along. Cm. Burton stated the business community had given positive input on this program. Mr. Ambrose stated the words "and/or" could be added to the resolution in the section related to the submittal of a site plan/photo. Staff would use their discretion. On motion of Cm. Burton, seconded by Cm. Howard, and by unanimous vote (Cm. Moffatt absent), the Council adopted a resolution including the modified language RESOLUTION NO. 82 - 93 SUPPORTING THE 1993 FOURTH OF JULY CELEBRATION * * * * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CM - VOL 12 - 254 Regular Meeting June 14, 1993 e e OPPOSITION TO AB 996 (TUCKER) & SUPPORT FOR AB 13 (FRIEDMAN) RELATED TO LOCAL CONTROL OF SMOKING ORDINANCES (560-90/660-40) Management Assistant Barker advised that two separate smoking law changes were being considered by the state. AB 996 would establish a weak statewide tobacco and smoking standard and preempt any local ordinance not in effect April 1, 1993. AB 13 would prohibit all smoking in enclosed places of employment. Mr. Barker advised that both bills failed passage in the ASSembly during the last days of May. However, they were subsequently granted reconsideration and AB 966, heard June 3rd, was passed by a vote of 43 - 33. AB 13 was passed in the Assembly on June 7th. Both bills are now headed to the Senate for consideration by committees and ultimately by the entire Senate. Mr. Barker stated in the interest of local control and the ability to regulate smoking and tobacco control, Staff recommended that the City Council adopt the resolution indicating support for AB 13 and opposition to AB 996 and direct Staff to send a copy to Senator Boatwright. Cm. Burton stated he was concerned that we are getting all concerned about this proposal when more important things are going on. He questioned how this came about. Mr. Barker stated the request came from Councilmember Moffatt. Mr. Ambrose explained that we have a local ordinance and we receive complaints regarding problems. There is one business in the community who gets complaints from patients related to smoke coming in through the building's ventilation system. Cm. Burton stated this is a mechanical problem and the City shouldn't get involved. Mr. Barker explained that City Staff processes smoking complaints. We send out a notice to property owners that they must comply. There is staff time spent administering this. AB 13 would prohibit smoking in all work places or places of employment. Mr. Rankin stated the most difficult areas of the current City Ordinance related to the open work environment. Each person can designate their space as either smoking or non-smoking. The health concerns of the non-smoker takes precedence and it becomes administratively difficult to investigate and follow-up on complaints. Obviously, the easiest way to administer this would be to have a clear no-smoking policy in the work place. em. Burton stated he felt we were getting nit-picky. Mr. Rankin advised that non-smokers who have requested the enforcement of the existing City Ordinance have questioned whether the City is doing enough. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CM - VOL 12 - 255 Regular Meeting June 14, 1993 e e Mayor Snyder stated he felt we have reached a point where we have to help non-smokers. Cm. Howard asked for an explanation of 'enclosed place of employment', and if this would include a bar and restaurant, or an office on a home. Mr. Barker stated it is very comprehensive. Both bills have just passed the Assembly and they will now go to committees in the Senate. They are not set in concrete and will most likely be changed in the Senate. Janet Lockhart, 11751 Betlen Drive, stated the Chamber of Commerce had just recently conducted a restaurant poll. Out of all cities in the Valley, 80% of the restaurant owners in Dublin are definitely in favor of having completely smoke-free restaurants. Dublin is leading the way. They highly support AB 13. Ms Lockhart also indicated that a Valleywide group is looking at the development of such an ordinance which will be presented to each of the cities. Cm. Burton stated he just felt that it all boils down to government getting involved in someone's business. Cm. Houston stated he felt if something needed to be done, the City's ordinance should be reviewed. On motion of em. Burton, seconded by Cm. Houston, and by majority vote (em. Moffatt absent), the council opted to NOT adopt the resolution supporting AB 13 and opposing AB 996, and to NOT send any correspond- ence related to the legislation. Mayor Snyder voted against this motion and stated he would like to see the City support AB 13. * * * * PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST BY KIDDER ROOFING TO WAIVE THE REQUIREMENTS FOR AN INSPECTION OF THE NAILING OF THE ROOF SHEATHING WHERE THE WORK WAS DONE WITHOUT INSPECTION (440-40) Mayor Snyder opened the public hearing. Building Official Taugher advised that Mr. Kidder is requesting a variance to the Building Code requirements for an inspection of the nailing of roof sheathing at 6880 portage Road. The Staff Report contained the specifics of the case which started with a stop Work Notice being left at the site on January 28, 1993, due to failure to obtain a permit. Mr. Taugher summarized that the plywood nailing was not inspected. Uncovering the plywood at one location revealed insufficient nailing and the long edges of the plywood may not be supported. The deflection of the unsupported edge of the plywood can cause the underlayment to tear. Insufficient nails can cause the roof to fail . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CM - VOL 12 - 256 June 14, 1993 Regular Meeting e e due to wind uplift. Therefore, Mr. Taugher stated it was his recommendation that the request be denied. Mr. Taugher advised that he indicated to Mr. Kidder that he could insert supports from the underside. Cm. Burton questioned how Dublin compared to other cities' regulations. He also questioned the purpose of the sheathing. Mr. Taugher stated the nailing requirement is a standard construction requirement. The sheathing supports the roof covering and plywood. Cm. Burton stated he felt the roof was probably better than a shake roof, even with less nails. He was mainly upset that there was no permit. If he is able to solve the support edge by coming up underneath, he questioned if this would be an acceptable process. Mr. Taugher stated yes, this would be acceptable. It would be a lot of work, but there are ways it could be done. Mr. Kidder passed out information to the City Council only. No copies were submitted to the City Clerk to be entered into the record. Mr. Kidder stated he did not get a permit and he got caught and paid the penalty. He typically doesn't question authority, but rather he likes to operate within the guidelines. However, he got what he felt was an unreasonable response from the City's Building Department. His main concerns were: 1) Is the roof reasonable? Mr. Taugher agrees that there has been significant improvement to the structure. It is much stronger than what the City asks for. Mr. Kidder alleged that five major deficiencies were found by his engineer in the City'S handout on acceptable nailing patterns. Mr. Kidder discussed the situation with the box nails versus common nails. On the agenda statement provided to the Council, his account of the process is different from what Mr. Taugher stated. Mr Kidder claimed that Mr. White filed a complaint with the Contractor's Board and the Better Business Bureau, however, the homeowner's name was on the complaint rather than the City of Dublin. He pointed out what he felt were many inconsistencies in the paper trail and as being contrary to what City Staff had said, there have been numerouS telephone conversations. In summary, Mr. Kidder stated the roof that is up there is much better than what was up there previously and it far exceeds standards. If Mr. Taugher had problems, he stated he had invited him or anyone else to come up and jump on the roof to test it. He requested that the City Council pass the roof job. Cm. Burton stated Mr. Kidder had made a good presentation. He asked how long he had been in business. Mr. Kidder stated approximately 10 years, and that he had probably put on about 300 roofs. Cm. Burton asked Mr. Kidder what he had learned through this process. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CM - VOL 12 - 257 June 14, 1993 Regular Meeting e e Mr. Kidder apologized for not getting a permit. He had the roof torn off and the winter weather was bad this year, and he was just more concerned about getting the job done. He did not feel that the person he contacted was communicative. He learned to communicate with the Building Department. He will not do it again. em. Howard questioned how the owner feels about this, and asked if the owner is willing to accept a variance. Mr. Kidder stated it is the prettiest roof on the block. The owner has never expressed any concerns to him. Mr. Taugher stated they have tried to contact the owner and the telephone number is disconnected. They intended to mail the agenda statement, but there was a mix up and it did not get mailed. Mr. Kidder stated his installation is more in conformance with the Uniform Building Code than the flyer put out by the Building Department. Cm. Burton asked questions of Bob White, Building Inspector, who stated the nailing varies from 8" to 9", which is a 2" to 3" difference along the edges. They were nailed in the 2 x 4's. He clarified that he himself had made calls to Mr. Kidder's business, and they were not returned. Mr. Taugher commented on the information presented by Mr. Kidder and clarified that he did not feel that inspection of one sheath of plywood would be representative of the entire roof; i.e., one sheath out of approximately 2,000 square feet is probably not representative. When they met to try to resolve this, he gave Mr. Kidder some technical data regarding the National Plywood Association to help him present his case. Unfortunately, his engineer is not aware that 1" wood is 3/4" thick. He recommended that the inspection requirements not be waived. Cm. Houston felt that due to the information presented by Mr. Kidder, the Council should put this off until the information can be reviewed. Cm. Burton asked if Mr. Taugher would agree that nailing the ends of the 4 x 8 plywood is stronger. Mr. Taugher stated it is equivalent. Cm. Burton asked Mr. Kidder if installing blocks would be an acceptable solution to him and if he would accept this responsibility. Mr. Kidder responded yes, that he would like to put this behind him and move on. Mayor Snyder closed the public hearing. Cm. Burton stated this was an unfortunate circumstance, but felt that this type of resolution might solve it. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CM - VOL 12 - 258 Regular Meeting June 14, 1993 e e On motion of Cm. Burton, seconded by Cm. Houston, and by unanimous vote (Cm. Moffatt absent), the Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 83 - 93 APPROVING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROJECT AT 6880 PORTAGE ROAD WHERE THE ROOF SHEATHING HAS BEEN DONE BY ALLOWING PLACEMENT OF BLOCKING ON THE LONG END OF THE PLYWOOD FROM THE EXPOSED ATTIC UNDERNEATH BUT NOT TO BE APPROVED UNTIL INSPECTED BY THE CITY BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE PROPERTY OWNER * * * * ACCEPTANCE OF GIFT TO CITY (150-70) Recreation Director Lowart advised that the Dublin Senior Center was recently awarded a $4,350 grant from the Tri-Valley Community Fund to purchase a computer, a printer and related software. Mayor Snyder advised that he would abstain from discussion and voting on this item as he serves on the Board of the Tri-Valley Community Fund. On motion of Cm. Houston, seconded by Cm. Howard, and by unanimous vote (Cm. Moffatt absent & Mayor Snyder abstained), the Council accepted the gift and directed Staff to prepare a formal acknowledg- ment to the donor and authorized an additional appropriation of $4,350 to the Data Processing CIP Project. * * * * TRI-VALLEY TRANSPORTATION TRAFFIC MODEL (1060-10) Public Works Director Thompson advised that as part of the data input for the Tri-Valley Transportation Traffic Model, the City of Dublin has been requested to submit a list of the arterial road system which will be constructed and funded by the City or by Dublin developers. Dublin'S list for the Base Network included Dougherty Road, Tassajara Road, Fallon Road and Hacienda Drive from I-580 to Dublin Boulevard, all as 4-lane facilities. Contra Costa County subsequently requested that Dougherty Road, Tassajara Road, and Fallon Road be upgraded to 6-lane facilities, that Hacienda Drive be extended from Dublin Boulevard to Gleason Drive, and that Gleason Drive be added to the network. Dublin Staff has taken the position that if Dublin were to agree to these wider roads and addition, Contra Costa County would have to fund its portion of the improvements. Contra Costa County has since agreed to pay their share of these improvements in Dublin based on Contra costa County's traffic impacts. The Tri-Valley Transportation Council has requested that . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CM - VOL 12 - 259 Regular Meeting June 14, 1993 e e letters be sent from both agencies stating that Dublin and Contra Costa eounty will pay for these road improvements prior to the TVTC showing the road system in the Tri-Valley Transportation Plan. Dublin Planning Staff has identified some concerns with the land use projections in the model, and will be meeting with Alameda County Staff to try to resolve the concerns. Cm. Burton indicated that due to Cm. Moffatt's travel out of town, he had been asked to sit in at the Tri-Valley Transportation Council meeting and requested that he be brought up to speed on the issues involved. He specifically commented that it appears that we are making a brand new suggestion that Highland be used to bypass Dublin. He felt this was an excellent idea. Mr. Thompson advised that we are basically saying we will pay for our share of the improvement of these streets. Mr. Ambrose suggested that Public Works and Planning Staff meet with Cm. Burton in order to brief him prior to the meeting that he will be attending. Clarification was made that 3 different groups were being discussed. Mr. Tong stated he would be meeting on June 21st with Alameda County Staff to discuss land use differences in the land use projections in the east Dublin area. The Tri-Valley Transportation Council Technical Advisory Committee meeting was also being held on June 21st. Then, the meeting that Cm. Burton was going to attend would be on June 23rd. Cm. Burton stated he would make an appointment to meet with Staff on June 22nd. Mayor Snyder pointed out that we have been through a very exhaustive exercise with the east Dublin study and it seemed that we have made all these statements in the plan. We are just reiterating this for the Tri-Valley Transportation Council. Mr. Thompson advised that Contra Costa County is saying for the first time that they are willing to pay their share. On motion of Cm. Burton, seconded by Cm. Houston, and by unanimous vote (Cm. Moffatt absent), the Council approved the draft letter to Ms. Greenberg and TVTC and authorized the Mayor to sign for the City of Dublin. * * * * IMPLEMENTATION OF PROCESSING BY CITY OF PARKING CITATIONS AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW (570-10 & 600-30) Assistant City Manager presented the Staff Report and advised that AB 408, which becomes effective July 1, 1993, would decriminalize parking citations and impose civil penalties on violators. The responsibility for levying and collecting these penalties is being transferred from the Courts, to the City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CM - VOL 12 - 260 Regular Meeting June 14, 1993 e e Mr. Rankin explained that Staff proposed a two phase implementation process. The first phase will involve implementation of a process to collect parking penalties and conduct an administrative review of any contested citations. The second phase will require the City to develop procedures for an independent hearing process before an examiner designated by the City. Mr. Rankin discussed the outline of the parking citation process under AB 408 contained in the Staff Report, as well as the costs involved with contracting with the Phoenix Group. Given the complexities of assuming total responsibility for a service previously provided by the County, it is difficult to project revenues in relationship to costs; however, preliminary data indicates that revenues should increase. Mr. Rankin reviewed the required steps that must be taken to assume full responsibility for this service. He advised that Staff will be reporting back to the Council at a later date on those items which require City Council action. Cm. Burton questioned what the alternatives would be. Mr. Rankin advised that we could not cite parking violators; we could hire staff and do the processing in-house; or we could contract with another agency. Mayor Snyder stated we could have a local citizen be the referee. Mr. Rankin advised that with regard to the hearing examiner, Staff will be coming back to the Council with the guidelines. Cm. Houston asked the difference between blue curb handicapped parking with a $30 fine and the other handicapped parking fine which is $275. He asked if this was at the discretion of the officer as to which citation could take place. Chief Rose stated if it is clearly marked as designated in the Vehicle Code, that was how it is cited. He stated he was not aware of any blue curb zones within the City. Dublin has not designated any blue curbs. On motion of Cm. Houston, seconded by Cm. Burton, and by unanimous vote (Cm. Moffatt absent), the Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 84 - 93 AUTHORIZING AGREEMENT FOR PARKING CITATION PROCESSING SERVICES FROM PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS and RESOLUTION NO. 85 - 93 ESTABLISHING PARKING PENALTIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CM - VOL 12 - 261 June 14, 1993 Regular Meeting e e The Council also authorized an additional appropriation in Fiscal Year 1993-94 of $6,000 from increased parking citation revenue, and authorized Staff to proceed with all tasks necessary to proceed with implementation. * * * * OTHER BUSINESS state Budqet Crisis (330-80) Mr. Ambrose referenced a memo received from ABAG regarding Siege #2 on Sacramento over the budget. The group will gather on the west front steps of the Capitol. Mr. Ambrose also referenced a communication from the League of California Cities regarding options that are bubbling up with regard to the State Budget. So far, most of the options analyzed by the League are less detrimental to our budget; however, they will have no firm idea until the budget is actually adopted. * * * * DSRSD Meeting (960-30) Mr. Ambrose advised that the City had received a notice of a special meeting DSRSD will be holding with LAVWMA and TWA to discuss sewer export projects. The meeting will be on June 16th at 7:00 p.m., in the Pleasanton Council Chambers. * * * * Mayors' Conference (140-15) Mayor Snyder advised that Vice Mayor Burton will be unable to attend the Mayors' Conference meeting on July 7th in his absence, and he requested that Staff write a letter to Cecil Riley advising who will be attending from Dublin. * * * * CLOSED SESSION (640-30) At 9:40 p.m., the Council recessed to a closed executive session to discuss: 1) Potential Litigation, in accordance with Government Code Section 54956.9(b); and 2) Pending Litigation, City of Dublin vs. County of Alameda (Measure D), in accordance with GC Section 54956.9(a). * * * * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CM - VOL 12 - 262 Regular Meeting June 14, 1993 e e ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Council, the meeting was adjourned at 11:15 p.m. * * * * Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk * * * * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CM - VOL 12 - 263 Regular Meeting June 14, 1993