HomeMy WebLinkAbout4.1 Approve 02-14-1991 & 02-25-1991 Minutes JOINT PLANNING COMMISSION/CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION - February 14, 1991
A special joint Dublin Planning Commission and City Council study
session meeting was held on February 14, 1991 in the Regional Meeting
Room at the Dublin Civic Center. The meeting was called to order at
7 : 38 p.m. by Mayor Snyder.
* * * *
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Councilmembers Burton, Jeffery, Moffatt, and Mayor Snyder;
Planning Commissioners Burnham, North, Rafanelli, and Zika.
ABSENT: Councilmember Howard and Commissioner Barnes .
* * * *
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Mayor led the Council, Staff, and those present in the pledge of
allegiance to the flag.
EAST DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT STUDY
Planning Consultant Brenda Gillarde presented the revised Preliminary
Draft General Plan Land Use Map and explained that modifications had
been made to the map in response to the comments and concerns presented
at the past two workshops .
Steve Hammond, WRT, explained that the map responds to the comments
presented at the workshops in November, December, and January, as well
as to the City' s existing agreement with the County in terms of the
annexation of the land from the County which has been designated as
business park uses . The main goals of the plan are to try to create a
mixed used community, that is well integrated with both the natural
systems and the existing urban systems and come up with a community that
has a distinctive identity that relates well and complements the
existing City of Dublin but which also creates a viable urban community
that will be a place that the residents and workers can live and work.
The idea is to keep the higher density in the lower; flatter areas with
the development density decreasing in response to the natural conditions
such as slopes, ridgelines, and geotechnical constrains .
Starting with the Land Use Component of the Plan, employment should be
down along the freeway with the residential area above and away from the
freeway protecting them from visual and noise concerns .
The County property south of Gleason Avenue, the Santa Rita Jail, and
CHP facility has been designated as business park. The northern most
part of the County' s property has been designated government
institutional` in response to the existing uses such as Sheriff' s
facility, Highway Patrol Training facility, and proposed uses for other
CM - Vol 10 - 52
Joint Study Session Meeting February 14, 1991
-----------------------------------------
. COPIES TO:
ITEM NO. :1
A AL
„ .
government uses in the area. Directly east of Tassajara has been
designated as office space; either side of Fallon Road would be a major
regional commercial center; and to the east of that would be an
industrial park extending all the way to the eastern boundary of the
study area.
The plan is structured around several community/commercial centers. The
largest will be along Tassajara and will be called the Town Center. The
Town Center is meant to be a commercial center for the East Dublin area.
It has a dual orientation with the north-south orientation along
Tassajara being the high density commercial center including mixed use
development such as high rises and office/commerical. Tassajara will be
an extremely busy corridor so it would provide commercial uses along
that corridor. Extending east-west, it would be more pedestrian
oriented, more neighborhood oriented and provide pedestrian access and
transit access from the transit spine.
In addition to the main Town Center, there will be three village
centers. One is called Doolan Village and would be located in Doolan
Canyon in the mid canyon area. It would provide daily services to the
residents in this area. The second area is the Fallon Village which is
located at the intersection of the transit spine and Fallon Road. The
third would be at the north end of Tassajara and be called Tassajara
Village. It would serve the area to the north.
The idea is to have residential high density around the town center with
it decreasing as you move to the rural, open space area. The same
happens on a smaller scale with each of the village centers with higher
density uses clustered around the community centers and then gradually
decreasing in density away from them.
The actual use of this land designated rural/residential/open space
still needs to be worked out.
Park uses have been provided throughout the area and are consistent with
the City' s Standards which specifies 5 acres/1000 people. There is a
total of 272 acres of park land. It is fairly evenly split between
neighborhood parks and community parks . There are two community parks
designated. The largest, which is about 85 acres, is located just off
Fallon and adjacent to the transit spine for easy access. It would be
the major sports park and will have the most intensive type of
facilities, as well as being located central to the densest portion of
the developments and provide easy access . It is also located along open
space corridors to provide for convenient pedestrian and bicycle access
to the park.
The second community park has been located up to the north between
Fallon and Tassajara Road. This is a more rugged area. The concept on
this park is not finally developed at this point but the idea would be
that it is less intensely developed.
Neighborhood parks have been located central to the various development
areas and distributed in a manner so that they relate to the density of
CM - Vol 10 - 53
Joint Study Session Meeting February 14, 1991
population in the area. The neighborhood parks have also been located
adjacent to one of the open space corridors.
There are also a number of smaller parks which have been referred to as
urban plazas within the urban center. They are needed to serve as a
focal point where people can gather. The Village Centers would give
identity where people can come to shop and work and meet with other
people and sit and enjoy their neighborhood, while the open space in the
drainage corridors will be used for vegetation, pedestrian trails,
bicycles, and equestrian movement.
The Circulation System has two major east-west corridors, the major one
being the Dublin Boulevard extension with the second being the extension
of 7th Street if it is extended.
There is a third east-west corridor that starts at the BART station and
is referred to as the "Transit Spine. " The Transit Spine would be a two
lane road for local traffic but it would also be a dedicated transit
corridor with the possible future development of a bus line to connect
neighborhoods with the BART Station. A light rail might be added later.
The north-south arterials are Tassajara Road, Fallon Road, and Doolan
Road. Tassajara Road would be a major road to come into the town center
to shop, while Fallon Road would have limited access.
There is an imbalance of jobs/housing as it relates to this plan. There
would be 8, 000 more jobs than housing available. 5, 000 units would be
needed to balance the employment created in the area.
Schools were placed so as not to impact the prime development areas, but
schools do require good access roads and flat land. 1 high school, 2
junior high schools, and 8 elementary schools have been planned.
Commissioner . Zika expressed his concern that the high school and one of
the junior highs had been placed at the two busiest streets .
Mr. Hammond responded that it was hard to place the high school and not
take away prime development land. He further stated that high schools
are typically located at one arterial access in that the students do
drive to school .
Commissioner Zika still felt the placement of high school was bad and
would create a need for two police officers each day when school was
getting out.
Commissioner Burnham felt the high school should be near fast food
places .
Commissioner Zika felt that there should be a buffer between the high
school and Tassajara.
Commissioner Burnham questioned what was meant by a transit lane.
CM - Vol 10 - 54
Joint Study Session Meeting February 14, 1991
Mr. Hammond responded that it would be a two lane road carrying traffic
in each direction and it would be a local road for local traffic which
could have parking along the road.
Commissioner North questioned whether 7th Street terminated at Hacienda
Drive. He questioned why it goes to the left.
Mayor Snyder responded that the jail was there.
Cm. Burton felt that prime commercial land was being used for the high
school which would produce too many cars at the wrong time and it will
cause problems . He felt it should be moved to the east closer to the
transit corridor.
Cm. Burton felt that two lanes on Tassajara Road was not a suitable size
road with people using it to come to BART or to use it as a commute
road. He felt that four to six lanes should be planned for the future.
Mr. Hammond responded that the size of the roads was determined due to
the recommendations of the traffic consultant.
Cm. Moffatt inquired if the dark lines on the map represented potential
roads .
Mr. Hammond responded that the dark lines were the outlines of the
development area.
Cm. Moffatt expressed concern over the traffic generated near the
elementary school areas . He further questioned how the two commercial
areas of Dublin were going to be tied together other than by Dublin
Boulevard. He further questioned whether there had been any discussion
with the Army in regards to future land uses in the Camp Parks area.
Cm. Jeffery asked for an example of the acreage for the neighborhood
parks .
Mr. Hammond responded that they would be 4 to 6 acres in size.
Cm. Jeffery expressed concern over the road sizes .
Mr. Hammond responded that the number of lanes had been determined, but
not the actual width of the roads .
Cm. Jeffery felt that the location of schools near main arterials was
not all that bad.
John DiManto questioned the phasing of the General Plan. He felt that
they must have an idea of the phasing in order to address the economic
portion of the planning.
Mr. Hammond responded that the land uses had to first be determined.
Zev Kahn explained that there had been multiple meetings of the City' s
Task Force for the Master Park Plan. In those meetings some of the
CM - Vol 10 - 55
Joint Study Session Meeting February 14, 1991
concerns expressed included: the increase in population from 25, 000 to
85, 000; the present Sports Park, which is leased land, may disappear to
I-580 development; a distinct need for large sports parks to accommodate
soccer and baseball fields; a need for a centralized community center
with a Senior Center, a Teen Meeting Facility, and swimming facilities;
a need for open space with trail systems; that West Dublin would be
developed differently with limitations for parks; and that East Dublin
was the City' s best development opportunity.
Marjorie LeBar expressed the need for better linkage between the open
space corridors and the need for a dedicated bike lane near the high
school area.
Carolyn Morgan felt that condominiums in Doolan Canyon were not
consistent with the rural residential lifestyle. People could complain
about flies from the horses . She felt comments from the residents of
Doolan Canyon were not being listened to.
Ted Fairfield felt that the high densities were not realistic. He felt
market conditions, not maps, should determine land uses . There were not
as many dwelling units to share the cost of the infrastructure. He felt
that there is a general shortage of single family housing. Some areas
shown on the map as rural/open space could be developed as single family
housing. He had doubts about the idea of developing the sides of hills
rather than the top of the hill. Leave the side hills open and put more
units on the hill . He felt that too much was taken from Dublin Ranch
Properties for the use of a high school, a junior high school and open
space. He felt that there is no advantage to taking away the
development of houses .
Mr. Hammond pointed out that there had to be a 1 /2 mile radius from the
Eagle' s nest for its protection.
Don Redgwick, upon whose property the eagles had chosen to homestead,
stated that the "protected" land accounted for 600 acres . Since the
area being preserved was quite large, it might be a good location for a
community park. He felt that it would create a problem as a location
for the high school . He felt a better location for the high school
would be adjacent to one of the planned community parks so that there
could be joint use of the facilities, perhaps an amphitheater.
Bobby Foscilina felt the map did not represent the public input. She
felt the Council had been disenchanted with the plans and that was why
they had been thrown out. The impact on the roads was not acceptable.
They were trying to put too much density in slide prone terrain. The
canyons were narrow so the creek beds would have to be widened, which
would take away from the natural state.
A member of the audience felt that Fallon Road was critical as an
expressway. It would be a continuation from Bollinger Canyon and would
be a linkage as a regional facility rather than as a community facility.
He felt that the transit spine was good, but that it should be continued
to the east. He felt that there was a need for a six lane expressway.
CM - Vol 10 - 56
Joint Study Session Meeting February 14, 1991
Zev Kahn felt that the community park should be moved northwest so that
the community park and the community center could be close together for
easy access and would draw the population more to the City' s center
area.
Georgean Vonheeder stated that the needs of all of Dublin would be part
of the Parks Master Plan. Unfortunately, in the past in-lieu fees were
accepted instead of development of parks . She felt that the City was
lacking passive parks . Further, there is a need for two major facilities
that could accommodate a pool, competitive soccer and baseball fields,
and facilities for seniors. She felt fields can be revenue generators,
but that she did not want to see traffic in residential areas. Major
facilities, not neighborhood parks, are needed in this area.
A Doolan Canyon resident pointed out that the site of two of the schools
put them in the path of the airport runway.
Mr. Hammond responded that they were 3, 500 ft from the north edge of the
runaway which was the standard safety distance.
An audience member felt that even if they moved the schools another 1000
feet away from the runway that it could make it safer.
Brad Chapman of the Dublin Soccer League felt it was a mistake to spread
the fields out. He felt that there should be one large area where the
tournaments could be conducted.
Mr. Hammond responded that this is a general plan and that the Dublin
Master Parks Plan would determine the actual placement of the parks.
Members of the Parks and Recreation Commission felt that they were not
seeing on the Land Use Map what they wanted on the Master Parks Plan.
The location, size, useage were very different. They felt that they
were not tying this area to the present Dublin, but that it would end up
being three sections rather than one community.
Commissioner Burnham asked the present size of the Dublin Sports Park,
the Pleasanton Sports Park and the two parks planned in East Dublin.
Dublin Sports Park is 22 acres, Pleasanton Sports Park is 120 acres, and
the two in East Dubin would be 85 acres and 55 acres .
Steve Jones felt that the high school should be moved over to the canyon
to the east. He felt that the 85 acre park was great, the 55 acre park
okay, but he felt that there was a need for one more 85 acre park to be
used for competitive soccer fields and little league baseball .
The question of where the money was going to come from to pay for the
parks was raised with an estimate of the 85 acre park costing $3
million.
Carolyn Morgan suggested that a Transfer Development Rights (TDR)
Program be used.
CM - Vol 10 - 57
Joint Study Session Meeting February 14, 1991
Marjorie LeBar expressed her favor of small urban parks with big density
in the shopping and employment areas, but she felt that there should be
a place in that area where people could "blow off steam" and walk the
kids, a few pocket areas in the downtown with perhaps a community
garden.
Mr. Redgwick felt that the community park should be moved north closer
to where the eagle' s nest is located with perhaps a small lake.
John DiManto of Dublin Land Company stated his opposition to the
location of the high school. He felt it would create a high security
impact with lots of accidents. He felt a major intersection was an
unsafe place for a high school. He feared that the transit spine could
turn into an area of gang war as had happened in San Jose. He wanted to
see an increase in retail/commercial . He felt there should be a variety
of uses, not just professional office. The market should dictate the
uses . A little lake along the retail area which would be mixed uses
would be good.
Jim Steadman representing the Lin Family felt the plan is well developed
and the land use concepts are appropriate. He did feel that there was
too much land used for the business park and that the area should have
more retail/commercial . There is a great need to generate taxes for the
City. As to the traffic circulation, he felt the plan would result in a
lot of traffic on Tassajara and that there were not enough lanes. He
felt that there should be plenty of circulation available so that there
would be no congestion along the transit spine. Don' t under plan the
traffic. He felt that the open space corridor was not being utilized.
The urban plazas would be expensive to maintain and he was concerned
about public safety. They should be carefully designed in the project.
Diane Lowart, Recreation Director, reiterated that the Parks Master Plan
envisioned two major facilities in the East Dublin area with one being a
major community park which would accommodate team sports while the other
community park would be more of a civic nature with possibly a lake,
community center, theater. They will be working closely with the
consultant to identify needs and alternatives to the urban parks .
Adolph Martinelli of Alameda County felt that the annexation agreement
with the City allows retail/commercial uses as a vested part of the
entitlement and that the area on the map should be extended to pick up
the proposed BART station.
Commissioner North expressed concern that only one road connects Dublin
to the East Dublin area. He felt we would be depending too much on
Dublin Boulevard making East Dublin a part of Dublin. He felt that
there was a need for more roads into Dublin proper. He also questioned
how the number of jobs in the business park had been determined.
Mr. Hammond responded that there would be a more definite plan later.
Commissioner North felt that the measure of the parks did not match the
community need. He felt that East Dublin would be sitting out as a tail
with only one road connecting it to the rest of Dublin.
CM - Vol 10 - 58
Joint Study Session Meeting February 14, 1991
Mr. Hammond responded that they hoped that the 7th Street connection
could be extended later.
Commissioner Rafanelli expressed concern about the location of the high
school, that the traffic would be unbearable, and that there should not
be a concentration of high school students by the business/office area.
George Zika felt that it was important that East Dublin not become a
divided City. He likes the neighborhood park concept because not every
child would participate in competitive sports. There is a need for
community parks, but we must be careful with the location of the parks.
He felt that Mape Park was in a bad location.
Commissioner North questioned whether the plans had been planned along
property lines.
Mr. Hammond responded that they had not been planned based on property
lines .
Commissioner Burnham felt a piece of the pie was missing specifically
the land from the Alameda County line over to the SP track and
questioned what is happening to it and who owns the property.
Mayor Snyder answered that the Federal Government owned that particular
property and they were not interested in negotiating.
Commissioner Burnham stated that there was a need for an expressway. He
liked the idea of a focal point like a lake downtown, but questioned
whether the idea was feasible. Shops and transit could be put around
it. He further reiterated that Doolan Canyon should remain open space.
Cm. Burton felt that the map should be extended so that a sense of
togetherness can be shown. There is a need to relate to the whole City.
He also expressed the fact that the map was trying to define specific
uses too early. The market place will determine the use. A broader
brush should be used with the area close to the freeway being designated
commercial allowing the opportunity for perhaps a large hotel complex.
If we start with little pieces, it could become too broken up. He
expressed a need for more access. The map should be extended into
Dublin and other areas. He felt that the streets as planned would be
overwhelmed too soon. They should have easements wide enough to expand
the streets . The congestion and size of the streets should be re-
examined.
Cm. Moffatt expressed the need to tie the two portions of Dublin
together. Another road into the eastern portion was needed. There
should be a flow of the commercial areas . He felt that this was the
first step, but there is a need for more discussions . What is needed and
what is desired needs to be discussed further.
Cm. Jeffery felt the high school should be moved off one of the major
arterials, but that it not be placed too far into the residential
community. The mix of housing was good, but more housing in the rural
CM - Vol 10 - 59
Joint Study Session Meeting February 14, 1991
areas should be an option. There is a need to tie the current section
with the new section. There is also a need of County support in the
high density housing around the BART station. The frontage along the
freeway which is designated office, should allow the market to determine
its use. The street sizes should be oversized to allow for expansion in
the future.
Mayor Snyder felt that we should maximize the rural residential/open
space area. The small urban park plazas in the high density area can be
determined by site development review and not have the City Council
responsible. In 1970 the enrollment for Dublin High School was 2, 640
students with the current enrollment of 754-793 students. The new high
school may not be needed for quite some time. He expressed concern
about the transit spine that it needs to be wide enough and provide free
flowing lanes. He suggested that perhaps a public use facility could be
combined with an elementary school . He expressed concern about the
length of time for this process . Let' s not drag this out forever.
Commissioner Burnham questioned whether the property owners were told
what they can build and where they can build.
Mr. Hammond acknowledged that there are areas where there are
differences of opinion. The areas above 30% are clear areas.
Commissioner Burnham again stated his concern that landowners say they
want to do it one way while the map is telling them they can' t do that.
He feels that we are blowing smoke up Doolan Canyon.
Commissioner North was concerned about the low student body count and
suggested that the high school site be used as a community park for now
with a high school being built there as needed perhaps 10 years from
now.
Cm. Burton questioned the timeframe of when the people would be able to
start building.
Brenda Gillarde responded that the General Plan Amendment should be
ready by the end of this year or early next year. Once the adoption of
the plan and approval of the annexation has been completed, ground
breaking could take place the end of 1992 .
Larry Tong indicated that ground breaking in 1991 may be too optimistic;
it may be a best case time-frame.
Carolyn Morgan stated that the report has geotechnically unstable areas.
She further questioned how the City can be together if it is not shown
on the map.
An audience member commented that there is already a dam on the Lin
property.
Brenda Gillarde stated that the next step would be taking the concepts
of the map and the comments of the Council, Commission, and the Public
and translating them into general plan policies and text for the
CM - Vol 10 - 60
Joint Study Session Meeting February 14, 1991
Specific Plan. The Preliminary General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan
will be brought back to the Commission and Council in July.
Cm Burton suggested that an overlay of the changes be used to keep the
perspective of the changes rather than creating a whole new map to
incorporate the changes .
* * * *
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 10 : 18 p.m.
* * * *
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
* * * *
CM - Vol 10 - 61
Joint Study Session Meeting February 14, 1991
REGULAR MEETING - February 25, 1991
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Dublin was held
on Monday, February 25, 1991, in the Council Chambers of the Dublin
Civic Center. The meeting was called to order at 7: 37 p.m. , by Mayor
Snyder.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Councilmembers Burton, Howard, Jeffery, Moffatt and Mayor
Snyder.
ABSENT: None.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Mayor led the Council, Staff and those present in the pledge of
allegiance to the flag.
PROCLAMATION THANKING OIL CHANGERS FOR GIFT TO CITY (610-50)
Mayor Snyder read and presented a proclamation to Larry Reed, Chairman
of the Board of Oil Changers thanking them for their check in the
amount of $3 , 000 which was recently donated to the City to help
purchase flag banners which will be displayed throughout the community
to show our support for the troops in the Persian Gulf.
RESOLUTION SUPPORTING AND COMMENDING THE MEN AND
WOMEN ON THE FRONT LINES OF THE PERSIAN GULF WAR (610-50)
Mayor Snyder advised that on February 11, 1991, the City Council
adopted Resolution No. 18-91 in support of the men and women on the
front lines of the Persian Gulf War.
A suggestion was made to have a framed copy on view at Camp Parks in
order that all the men and women who pass through that facility on
their way to Saudi Arabia could see a sign of Dublin's support.
Copies of the Resolution were also sent to local men and women who are
serving in the war.
Major Cook from Parks Reserve Forces Training Area accepted the
Resolution and stated that Camp Parks has played an important part, as
have many other military installations in the United States. Gestures
such as this are very important to our soldiers. We are fortunate to
have such a supportive community.
Mayor Snyder also pointed out that a copy of this Resolution was sent
to every service person who could be identified from the Dublin
community.
A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*/ *A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*^*A*A*A*A*^*A*A* *A i A* *A*A*A
CM - VOL 10 - 62
Regular Meeting February 25, 1991
Kaleidoscope Activity Center (480-30)
Mike Huckins with the Kaleidoscope Center stated he wished to make a
request for future funding of CDBG monies in the future, specifically
FY 1992-93 and 1993-94 . They appreciate the $5, 000 being recommended
tonight later in the agenda, but stated they hope to be able to come
back next year to request future additional funding. Kaleidoscope
Staff, the President and parents were present to address the Council.
Mayor Snyder stated that the item related to the CDBG funding (8 .7)
would be moved forward in the meeting and would be heard following the
Consent Calendar.
CONSENT CALENDAR
On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Moffatt, and by unanimous
vote, the Council took the following actions:
Approved Minutes of Regular Meeting of February 11, 1991;
Approved an RFP to conduct a Needs Assessment Study for a Livermore-
Amador Valley Multipurpose Arts Center (900-40) ;
Accepted gifts of equipment donated to the City for use at the Senior
Center by Dave Burton, Donna Smith and Ray Tillery and directed Staff
to prepare a formal acknowledgment to the donors (150-70) ;
Received the Fall Quarter, 1990, Recreation Report (950-50) ;
Adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 20 - 91
DECLARING INTENTION TO ISSUE BONDS FOR THE PURPOSE OF
PROVIDING FINANCING FOR CERTAIN PUBLIC 'STREET IMPROVEMENTS
& AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 75-90 (340-20)
Accepted the January, 1991 Financial Reports (330-50) ;
Accepted Fiscal Year 1989-90 Audit, Management Letter and Finance
Director's responses (310-30) ;
Authorized Staff to advertise Contract 91-02 Annual Street Overlay and
Repair Program/Dougherty Road Bike Path for bids (600-30) ;
Accepted improvements under Contract 90-07 City Entrance Signs/Park &
Pool Signs; authorized $3 , 879. 07 budget transfer to City Entrance
Signs project from Park Signs project; and authorized final and
retention payments of $10, 412 .85 to Collishaw Construction (600-30) ;
Accepted a Status Report on the Alameda Countywide Transportation Plan
(1060-80) ;
Accepted the Final June 30, 1990 Financial Report (330-50) ;
A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A* *A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A t o* *A*A*A*A*A*A y A*A*A*
CM - VOL 1O - 63
Regular Meeting February 25, 1991
Approved Warrant Register in the amount of $1, 677,483 . 93 (300-40) ;
City Manager advised that Item 4 . 13 , the Mid-Year Financial Review for
Fiscal Year 1990-91 should be continued to the March 11th Council
meeting (330-50) .
Cm. Burton requested that the item dealing with the agreement for
appraisal services be removed from the Consent Calendar for
discussion. He questioned why a $16, 000 budget item was being
approved which did not go out to bid.
Mr. Ambrose advised that the City's Purchasing Ordinance has
exemptions for specific services. The Public Works Director dealt
directly with the City Attorney's Office on this particular item and
recommendation.
Mr. Thompson advised that professional services are exempt. Mike Nave
recommended this person as being very knowledgeable for these
particular appraisals.
Cm. Burton questioned why Mr. Nave was selecting the appraiser.
Mr. Thompson stated that Mr. Nave will be the one that has to go to
court if there are problems. He feels most comfortable with this..
particular person and we must look at the least possible cost to the
City.
Mr. Ambrose advised that certain people have experience in the area of
condemnation. Mr. Nave is recognized as having expertise with
condemnation cases, and this is a case where we must rely on the
professional advice of our Attorney. If it is challenged, he will
have to defend it.
Cm. Burton indicated he was not satisfied that this explanation
justified the action and felt that Staff was trying to rationalize.
On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Moffatt, and by majority
vote, the Council adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 21 - 91
APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH HECTOR LESLIE FOR APPRAISAL SERVICES
FOR THE DUBLIN BOULEVARD EXTENSION PARCELS (600-30)
and authorized the Mayor to execute the agreement. Cm. Burton voted
AGAINST this motion.
Mayor Snyder pointed out that there would be further clarification of
items such as this later in the agenda when the Council discusses
proposed changes to the City's Purchasing Ordinance.
A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*
CM - VOL 10 - 64
Regular Meeting February 25, 1991
1991-92 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM (480-301
Sr. Planner Carrington advised that since 1982 , Dublin has
participated in the Alameda County Urban County Housing and Community
Development Block Grant Program. In May, 1990, the City entered into
a City-County Cooperation Agreement for CDBG Program Years 1991, 1992
and 1993 . In the current program year, CDBG funds were allocated: 1)
Minor Home Repair - $7,700; 2) Arroyo Vista Soundwall Payback -
$14 , 200; and 3) Dublin Senior Center Renovation - $19,900. It is
estimated that the Senior Center renovation will exceed funds budgeted
and a minor carryover will be required to cover the shortfall. Roof
repairs will be required to complete the renovation, with funds
included in the FY 1991-92 application.
Mr. Carrington advised that the estimated funds which will be
available in the upcoming program year is $46, 803 . City Staff,
Kaleidoscope Activity Center and the Dublin Housing Authority Staff
have prepared applications for 3 eligible projects which include: 1)
Dublin Senior Center Renovation - $9,225; 2) Kaleidoscope - $25, 000;
and 3) DHA Playground Equipment Installation Project at Arroyo Vista -
$30, 000.
To equal the anticipated allotment of funds, Staff was recommending
that applications be submitted: 1) Housing Rehabilitation - $8,797;
2) Senior Center Renovation - $9, 225; 3) DHA Playground Equipment
Installation @ AV - $231781; and 4) Kaleidoscope - $5, 000.
Mr. Carrington advised that should the amount of CDBG funding vary,
Staff would recommend that the amounts allocated to the DHA be
increased or decreased accordingly.
Cm. Burton questioned how we would use $8,797 for home repairs.
Mr. Carrington advised that it goes into the Minor Home Repair Program
administered by HCD. They give grants to individuals who meet certain
income requirements. There are also other programs that provide
loans.
Cm. Burton questioned why the installation of playground equipment was
so high.
Mr. Carrington explained that he did not know the value of the
equipment but Ms. Basgal advised that it was quite expensive. The
reason for the high amount to install is that the site needs to be
prepared. There is quite a substantial amount of landscaping work,
etc. , that needs to be done.
Mayor Snyder questioned the use of funds identified as General
Administrative.
Mr. Carrington advised that these funds would be allocated to
programs.
A*A*w*w*A*A*A*w*n*n*n*n*w*A*n*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*^*A*A*^*A*A*^*^*^*A*
CM - VOL 10 - 65
Regular Meeting February 25, 1991
Mr. Ambrose advised that it has been the City's practice not to rely
on grant programs to offset Staff costs, but rather to allocate the
administrative funds directly to the project.
Mike Huckins with Kaleidoscope advised that the information sent to
the City Council did not mention their specific needs. The total
amount they need is $140, 000. The current number of families from
Dublin either using their services or waiting is approximately 20% of
the total enrollment. Twenty percent of the needed $140, 000 would be
about $28, 000. It is difficult for them to go to Pleasanton, being a
Dublin-based program and ask for more money. Thankfully, they are
generous in funding part of their programs.
Larry Schilling addressed the Council and stated his son, Brian, has
attended their program for about 1/2 dozen years. They support
Kaleidoscope's expansion program. They are fortunate that they live
in Dublin and Brian is able to participate at Kaleidoscope. They are
concerned about families on the waiting list. It takes the support of
many when you are dealing with retarded/handicapped people. Families
go through a lot of struggles and have many needs.
Priscilla Seblan advised that her son Cory goes to Kaleidoscope and is
in his second year. They have been great for her son and she supports
their proposal.
Kris Stevens stated her daughter Denise has been in the program for
approximately 9 years. She has been in a number of after school
programs and they were unable to understand or take all the problems
which her daughter has. Her daughter obtained social and community
skills since she has been in the program. She was concerned about
kids on the waiting list for services.
Kim Locke, Program Site Director advised that they have over 30
families on the waiting list. It is very difficult to turn people
away. There are 9 families from Dublin on the list.
Joan Callahan advised that she moved here about 1 1/2 years ago so her
son Justin could associate with his peers. Her 12 1/2 year old
daughter, Tiffany is a volunteer. They have been on the waiting list
for 1 1/2 years. Justin is very anxious to participate in this
program. It is tough being 16 years old and unable to participate
socially. She hoped the program will continue with the City's
support.
Karen Alameida, President of the Board of Directors advised that she
lives in San Ramon. She thanked the City for past support and
indicated that Kaleidoscope has just began their tenth year of
programs in Dublin. Future funding will help them greatly.
Mike Huckins passed out additional information and stated they are
very pleased with the $5, 000 and stated they would like to come back
and work with Staff in Fiscal Years 1992-93 and 1993-94 .
A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*
CM - VOL 10 - 66
Regular Meeting February 25, 1991
Cm. Burton questioned where the difference of the $25, 000 they were
originally requesting was to be spent.
Mr. Huckins explained that they will be purchasing adaptive equipment.
The additional funding for which they are looking in the future is to
provide a long term home for Kaleidoscope. Last July, they met with
the School District and at this point in time they are at the
commercial appraisal stage. Pending certain requirements, they will
come up with an assessment for the property.
Cm. Jeffery stated she thought the money was for expansion.
Mr. Huckins advised that the $5, 000 will be for adaptive equipment.
Future funds will be for the facility. They are at the end of their
current expansion phase.
Cm. Moffatt questioned if they move, would it be within Dublin.
Mr. Huckins advised that it would depend on where facilities were
available. Their current site is ideal, being next to Kolb Park and
just a few blocks from the retail center.
Cm. Moffatt asked how many people they could currently handle.
Mr. Huckins advised that they are licensed for 44, but they currently
have 34 children. The intent is to expand to 15 more youth, with 8
being more challenged or developmentally disabled.
Cm. Jeffery stated that Dublin is fighting now to get as much funding
as possible, but she could see this funding being cut at the Federal
level. We don't know what the dollar amount will be in the future, or
they may be eliminated entirely.
Cm. Moffatt stated that hopefully, the City will get this $46, 000, but
questioned if the City gets less, would the Council have an
opportunity to reallocate the funds.
Mr. Carrington stated that the County HCD has been informed that they
estimate a certain amount of funds will be available. It should not
vary much from this estimated amount. If it comes in much smaller,
Staff will come back to the Council.
On motion of Cm. Burton, seconded by Cm. Jeffery, and by unanimous
vote, the Council directed Staff to submit applications for
approximately $46, 803 in CDBG funding for FY 1991-92 . This funding
would be allocated: 1) Minor Home Repair - $8,797; 2) Dublin Senior
Center Renovation - $9, 225; 3) DHA/Arroyo Vista Playground Equipment
Installation Project - $23 , 781; and 4) Kaleidoscope Activity Center -
$5, 000.
n*A*A*A*n*A*A*n*A*A*A*n*A*A*w*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*
CM - VOL 10 - 67
Regular Meeting February 25, 1991
PUBLIC HEARING - OVERSIZE VEHICLE PERMITS
ORDINANCE AMENDING MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 6. 68 (650-80)
Mayor Snyder opened the public hearing.
Public Works Director Thompson advised that AB 4228 became effective
on January 1, 1991 which relates to oversize vehicle permit
requirements. This new law states that local jurisdictions are no
longer allowed to require a bond as a condition of an oversize vehicle
permit except in circumstances where unusually large or heavy loads
pose a substantial risk to public facilities.
AB 4228 also prohibits a local jurisdiction from requiring that the
permittee submit a Certificate of Insurance with an additional insured
endorsement and limits the amount of the insurance requirement to that
which is required by the Public Utilities Code.
Mr. Thompson advised that the City Attorney reviewed the City's
Municipal Code and recommended that sections which deal with bond
requirements be deleted. A modification to the section which deals
with the insurance requirement is also recommended.
Cm. Moffatt asked Staff to explain the differences between liability
and bond.
Mr. Thompson advised that if the City felt there might be some damage
to street lights, etc. , Staff has been requiring a bond. A bond is
generally carried by an insurance company and it could involve a
lawsuit.
Cm. Burton clarified that this is a State Law that is changing our
law.
No comments were made by the public relative to this issue.
Mayor Snyder closed the public hearing.
On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Moffatt, and by unanimous
vote, the Council waived the reading and INTRODUCED an ordinance
amending Municipal Code Chapter 6. 68 relating to oversize or
overweight vehicle permits.
PUBLIC HEARING - PURCHASING
AMENDMENT TO MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 2 CHAPTER 36 (610-20)
Mayor Snyder opened the public hearing.
Public Works Director Thompson advised that this proposed amendment
came about as a result of difficulties in obtaining a qualified
janitorial service. The existing Code requires that the formal
competitive bid process be used for purchases or services with a cost
in excess of $5, 000. Janitorial service does not fall within any of
the present categories of exempt items. The annual cost for
A*A*A*A*'A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*
CM - VOL 10 - 68
Regular Meeting February 25, 1991
janitorial service, excluding window washing and carpet cleaning, has
been estimated in the range of $45, 000 to $60, 000.
Mr. Thompson gave a brief history of the problems associated with
janitorial service and explained that Staff felt that one of the
problems involved the requirement that the contract be awarded to the
low bidder. A firm will bid low to try to obtain the contract and
then not be able to provide sufficient personnel to do the required
work for that price. By amending the purchasing regulations, Staff
felt that a contract could be successfully negotiated for janitorial
services. A potential contractor would be provided with a scope of
work, the desired appearance of the facilities, and an approximate
budget, and asked to submit a proposal based on estimated manhours and
hourly rates. With this method, items of work could be added or
deleted during the term of the contract on the basis of known cost.
This method would also allow the City to benefit from the contractor's
expertise rather than dictating specific schedules for performance of
individual items.
The proposed amendment also includes sections, which would allow the
same process to be used in contracting for other types of building
maintenance (where permitted by the Public Contracts Code) and for
street maintenance and street sweeping.
Mr. Thompson explained that the intent of this change is not to
eliminate competition for City contracts, but rather to allow Staff to
negotiate with a potential contractor on the basis of ability to
perform the work, as well as price, similar to the Request for
Proposal procedure which is used with architects and other
professional services.
Cm. Burton stated he thought that normally, with these types of bids,
you don't have to take the lowest bid. You can accept a higher bid if
you feel the bidder can better serve your purpose.
Mr. Thompson advised that you have to take the lowest responsible bid.
Mr. Ambrose advised that the proposed amendment is similar to what Cm.
Burton was suggesting. It will be on a negotiated bid basis. We have
not had good janitorial services since moving into the Civic Center.
Staff's intent is to keep the price element as one of the criteria,
but not the only one.
Cm. Burton felt we were writing the rule based on 1 experience, and
this is not good public policy.
Mr. Ambrose advised that Dublin's rules are a lot more restrictive
than what is allowed under State Law. The Council established them
and the Council can change them. It is the prerogative of the Council
to do so.
Cm. Moffatt asked if the proposed change would still be within the
guidelines of the public projects rules.
A*A*w*w*,A*n*n*A*A*A*n*n*A*w*n*A*w*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*
CM - VOL 10 - 69
Regular Meeting February 25, 1991
City Attorney Silver advised that this is an area that gets quite
confusing. She explained "Public Project" as defined by State Law.
The City Council can establish an Ordinance to deal with those
projects that are not a public project, but over the $5, 000 amount.
It is a State Law that the award be to the lowest responsible bidder.
This makes it difficult to determine who is and who isn't responsible.
She stated she thought this had been a State Law for a number of
years.
Mayor Snyder closed the public hearing.
On motion of Cm. Moffatt, seconded by Cm. Jeffery, and by unanimous
vote, the Council waived the reading and INTRODUCED an ordinance
amending Title 2 , Chapter 36 of the Dublin Municipal Code relating to
purchasing.
ALAMEDA COUNTY LEAD ABATEMENT PROGRAM (560-70)
Building Official Taugher advised that the Alameda County Board of
Supervisors recently approved, in principle, the Alameda County Health
Care Services Agency's proposed Lead Abatement Program. The Board
requested that several issues be resolved and the ACHCSA is currently
addressing these issues.
Mr. Taugher stated that the ACHCSA perceives that there is a serious
threat to the children from lead poisoning. They propose to screen
all dwelling units built before 1978 for lead sources. Within the
County, approximately 438, 000 dwelling units would be screened at a
cost of $500 each.
Mr. Taugher presented an analysis of the proposal and its effects on
the City of Dublin, and stated that it was his opinion that very few
pre-1978 homes have lead based paint. Based on the information
presented, it appeared that the costs for treating 2 . 2 cases of lead
poisoning per year would equal about $95, 385.
A special assessment of at least $10 per dwelling unit for at least 25
years is being proposed by the County. There are 3 , 578 single-family
dwelling units and 160 multi-family dwelling units affected by the
program with a minimum cost to Dublin residents of $934 , 500. In
addition, property owners with lead contamination would have to pay
all abatement costs over $1, 000.
Mr. Taugher stated his recommendation to the City Council is to
request the County to do pilot studies to determine, on the basis of
random sampling, how many dwelling units contain lead paint, prior to
Dublin participating in the program.
Cm. Jeffery stated she thought Mr. Taugher had indicated that a tax
would be placed on lead based paint and she thought this was banned.
n*A*A*A*n*n*n*�*A*A*w*n*n*A*n*A*A*n*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*n*n*n*A*A*A*A*A*�*A*
CM - VOL 10 - 70
Regular Meeting February 25, 1991
Mr. Taugher clarified that a tax would be placed on all paint and that
lead based paint had in fact been banned. He summarized that he felt
this program was like shooting at a moving target.
Rafat Shahid, Environmental Health Assistant Agency Director
introduced Dr. Cummings.
Dr. Cummings stated she is a Board Certified Pediatrician and works
with the Childhood Lead Poisoning Program. There is evidence that low
levels of lead in blood may permanently damage a child's intellectual
development. Lead is widely dispersed in our environment. To tackle
this problem, they need to use many approaches. Existing sources will
need to be identified and removed. The public needs to be educated
and abatement issues addressed. The State Legislature has required
that studies be done in areas of the State where there was a very high
proportion of older homes.
Cm. Jeffery questioned where else this type of a program had been done
and also how the proposal started.
Dr. Cummings stated she thought Alameda was the first county to use
this approach to permanently deal with this problem.
Cm. Moffatt questioned the use of zinc oxide.
Dr. Cummings stated that the regulation that took lead out of house
paint was only required of house paint. There is still lots of lead
in other kinds of paint.
Cm. Moffatt asked if there had been any studies done related to lead
getting into the food chain.
Dr. Cummings advised that there is a known amount of lead solder in
cans imported from other countries. Also, soil can be contaminated,
but it usually is at a very low level.
Cm. Moffatt felt that if you consider the lead in fish, the lead in
toxic land waste, etc. , and you take these factors all together, the
lead found in house paint will not be all that significant.
Dr. Cummings stated they feel that lead in house paint is the primary
source of lead poisoning.
Cm. Howard questioned how they would go about removing the lead from
all houses.
Dr. Cummings advised that there are good and bad ways of removing the
paint and she discussed various ways.
Mr. Shahid stated he felt that the numbers presented by City Staff
were taken out of context. There is currently no screening which
advises how many cases there are. Symptoms are very vague. We don't
know how many kids are impacted by lead. They are suggesting that we
A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*
CM - VOL 10 - 71
Regular Meeting February 25, 1991
start somewhere. Whatever costs are paid by the City will come back
to the City. All of the work will be done by local people.
Cm. Jeffery questioned how many years before the problem would just go
away with people repainting their homes.
Mr. Shahid advised that painting over is not the solution. This
program will look at ways to remove. This proposal started 10 or 15
years ago. The money disappeared because no one cared. Oakland ended
the program and 90% of the children tested there were found to have
high levels.
Cm. Jeffery questioned the necessity to form another district, and
asked why it couldn't be done through the Health Department.
Mr. Shahid explained that this is a very specific problem that has to
start and end. It should not be put in with an existing district.
The money will not be used except for the abatement of these specific
conditions.
Cm. Howard asked who would pick the houses to be screened, and also if
it would be mandatory.
Mr. Shahid advised that they will send questionnaires and select
houses having children under 6 years of age. It would not be manda-
tory, but people should be concerned about the safety of children. If
lead is discovered and the children are impacted, then they would be
asked to start abatement. A mandate could be issued. This is on the
books, but it is not funded. One of the Supervisors was concerned and
felt there should be several tiers. They are not, however,
considering this type of approach at this time. In order to be
equitable, they must stick to one level of subsidy.
Cm. Moffatt felt that since there will be an economic impact on the
homeowner, some kind of a vehicle similar to a termite inspection
should be used at the time of transfer of the property.
Mr. Shahid felt that there would probably be very strong objections
from the State for this because it would slow down the selling
process. The asbestos situation of a few years ago was discussed.
Mayor Snyder pointed out that if the houses affected had approximately
a 55 gallon drum full of lead paint, this would have to be disposed of
and would most likely have to go to a Class I disposal site. He
stated he found it very hard to support a program such as this and
felt it would be a witch hunt for someone to come in and find lead in
his house after 25 years.
Cm. Jeffery felt this was premature and not enough good information
had been collected. She felt the Council should instruct Staff to
present concerns to the Board of Supervisors, but knowing they have no
money, perhaps we should not even suggest a pilot program.
n*n*n*n*A*n*n*n*n*n*n*n*A*A*n*n*w*A*n*n*n*A*n*n*w*A*A*n*n*n*n*w*A*n*n*
CM - VOL 10 - 72
Regular Meeting February 25, 1991
Cm. Burton felt this was a contrived house of straw set up by
bureaucrats. Spending this amount of money is silly. We should not
get involved. There are too many other things that need funding. He
suggested the whole issue be dropped.
Cm. Moffatt stated that if there were substantial figures to indicate
this was of great concern, he would like to know about it. We need
more information and studies.
Mr. Taugher questioned if the Council desired someone from Staff to
appear at the Board of Supervisors meeting.
By a consensus, Staff was directed to only send a letter expressing
the Council's concerns to the Alameda County Board of Supervisors.
Mr. Ambrose advised that the City has the option to either be included
or not. There may be other cities that might participate.
INSTALLATION OF HANDICAPPED PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT
AT KOLB PARK BY DUBLIN-SAN RAMON LIONS CLUB (260-30)
Mayor Snyder and Councilmember Moffatt each announced that they would
not participate in the discussion or vote on this matter because of a
conflict of interest in that they are both members of the Dublin-San
Ramon Lions Club. They both then left the Council Chambers.
Recreation Director Lowart advised that the Dublin-San Ramon Lions
Club are proposing to install handicapped playground equipment at Kolb
Park as a potential service project. The playground would, upon
completion, be donated to the City.
Ms. Lowart advised that the proposed location would be the southeast
corner of Kolb Park, which is near the Kaleidoscope Activity Center.
The playground would feature specially designed equipment that
combines totally accessible barrier-free design with the latest
innovations in physical, psychological, therapeutic and emotional
play. The estimated cost for the playground equipment is $28,747 .
The surfacing to be used is "Fibar" , at an estimated cost of $9 , 187 .
The Lions Club anticipates that all other materials necessary for
construction of the playground will be donated. It is proposed that
the project be divided into phases. Phase One would include site
preparation and installation of 1/3 of the equipment. Phase Two would
be to install the second 1/3 of the equipment and the surfacing.
Phase Three would be to install the remainder of the equipment. The
Lions Club is prepared to begin Phase One of the project this Spring.
Ms. Lowart advised that costs to the City for site preparation and
construction supervision have not been determined. A detailed cost
estimate will be prepared in conjunction with the development
agreement if the City Council agrees to proceed with the project.
n*w*n*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*�*A*A*A*A*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*
CM - VOL 10 - 73
Regular Meeting February 25, 1991
The Park & Recreation Commission reviewed the proposed project on
February 12 , 1991, and was supportive of the project and recommended
that the Council give the project due consideration.
Cm. Burton questioned what the site work to be done by the City would
consist of.
Ms. Lowart advised that the list was being developed now and it will
be determined later how the City will be involved.
Bob Trimble representing the Dublin-San Ramon Lions Club addressed the
Council and introduced other members Dick Shephard, Bill Burnham and
Danny Raymond. He stated that this group has a lot of good people who
like to do a lot of good things. They have spent many thousands of
dollars to help those less fortunate in the community. He relayed the
story of how he came up with the idea for this type of a playground.
They feel this project will make the community very proud. Children
with no physical difficulties can also play on the equipment.
Cm. Burton stated this is certainly a high achievement if they can put
this together. It appears to be an outstanding project.
Mike Huckins with Kaleidoscope stated that having this site for play
would be ideal.
Cm. Jeffery felt that what they are doing is a very fine thing. This
equipment will get a lot of use.
On motion of Cm. Burton, seconded by Cm. Howard, and by majority vote,
(Cm. Moffatt & Mayor Snyder abstained) the Council granted conceptual
approval of the project and directed Staff to work with the Lions Club
to develop an agreement which identifies the scope of work, the cost
to the City and the specific responsibilities of each party.
REQUEST FOR AMERICAN FLAG PATCHES
ON POLICE UNIFORMS & VEHICLES (610-20)
Assistant to the City Manager Texeira advised that Councilmember
Burton requested that the City Council consider placing American flag
patches on Police uniforms and flag decals on Police cars.
Ms. Texeira explained that the current Alameda County Sheriff's
uniform includes an American flag tie tack as a standard item. The
Sheriff's Office recently issued a directive stating they will not be
changing their uniforms to include additional flag patches or pins.
It may be possible, however, to amend the City's current agreement to
modify the existing uniform. There are currently 28 uniformed Police
personnel. The approximate costs to provide each uniformed employee
with 4 flag patches would range from $112 to $224 . The approximate
cost to provide each uniformed Police employee with one American flag
cloisonne type pin would be $44 - $110. Because Police vehicles are
..*w*n*n*n*n*A*n*n*n*w*n*n*A*n*n*A*A*n*A*A*n*, *A*n*n*�*..*�*A*A*A*A*A*A*
CM - VOL 10 - 74
Regular Meeting February 25, 1991
City owned, flag decals could be placed on the vehicles. The average
cost for flag decals for the 7 marked patrol cars would be
approximately $7 - $13 .
Chief Rose showed the Council one of the current tie tack flags used
on the uniform.
Cm. Burton stated we all hope the war will be over soon, but it is
important that when the soldiers come back they see what we are doing.
He realized that if it is against the rules, we won't do it. Any
expression that we can make, we should do it. For about $200, it
would be obvious that the Police Officers are making a statement. If
they don't want to wear patches, they won't have to, but he felt we
should make them available.
Mr. Ambrose advised that currently, the flag tie tack is part of the
uniform when Officers are wearing a tie.
Cm. Moffatt felt that an additional patch would be somewhat tacky.
Mayor Snyder asked where a flag decal might be placed on a vehicle.
Chief Rose advised that they are 7" square and could be put in
specific locations on the cars, or on the bumpers, etc.
Cm. Jeffery stated she thought this issue was settled already. She
advised that she got a lot of calls over the weekend and some people
believe Cm. Burton is supporting this in order to make a statement on
the war. She felt that anything additional is inappropriate. This is
not Berkeley. Since the Officers already wear a flag pin on their
uniform, this is enough.
Cm. Burton responded that it is her right to say she feels it is wrong
to have an American Flag patch on the uniforms.
Cm. Burton made a motion for Staff to negotiate with the Sheriff's
Department to have optional patches on the uniforms and for decals for
the cars. This motion died due to lack of a second.
Cm. Moffatt stated the flag is free and should waive. He presented
miniature flags to the Councilmembers.
Cm. Burton made a motion to have decals placed on the cars. This
motion also died due to lack of a second.
BOOKING FEES SB 2557 - JPA TO SECURE LEGAL SERVICES (600-40)
Assistant City Manager Rankin advised that in January, the Alameda
County Board of Supervisors enacted fees in accordance with SB 2557 .
SB 2557 authorized the collection of Property Tax Administration Fees
and Jail Booking Fees. The City Council has objected to the
n*n*A*w*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*�*A*A*A*A*A*A*
CM - VOL 10 - 75
Regular Meeting February 25, 1991
collection of these fees and has supported legislation to repeal the
law and provide a replacement revenue source.
Mr. Rankin advised that the Alameda County Managers Association
recognizes that all of the cities are questioning the legality of the
action taken by the Board of Supervisors. Dublin's main issue
involves whether it is legal to retroactively charge booking fees,
since SB 2557 was not effective until January 1, 1991. A proposed
Joint Powers Agreement would provide a mechanism for a single legal
action to be filed as well as to develop a cost sharing formula. The
proposed agreement provides that 20% of the legal costs would be
associated with the "retroactivity" issue and it has been proposed
that costs be shared based on the agency's assessed valuation as a
percentage of the total assessed valuation for all participating
agencies. The agreement identifies the establishment of an
Administrative Committee consisting of the City Managers from Oakland,
Piedmont and Pleasanton, the Police Chief from San Leandro and the
Finance Director from Fremont. The Committee will also be responsible
for the selection of legal counsel to bring forth the suit. It is
anticipated ,that all agencies will deposit monies billed by the County
for the subject fees, into an escrow or similar account and the monies
would be distributed to either the County or the cities, depending on
a final judgment or settlement.
Mr. Rankin stated that he anticipated that the City of Dublin's cost
would be about $276. The actual cost will be affected by the number
of participants and the extent of the litigation.
Mr. Rankin advised that several legal challenges to SB 2557 have been
initiated throughout the State. Senator Boatwright introduced a bill
which would repeal the legislation and provide replacement funding.
Because of time limits in filing a legal claim, City Council action is
required prior to the development of the final JPA. Staff did not
anticipate that changes to the draft will be significant.
Cm. Burton stated he felt this was a good investment.
On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Moffatt, and by unanimous
vote, the Council authorized the Mayor to execute the JPA on behalf of
the City of Dublin. The Final Agreement shall be substantially in the
form of the Draft Agreement presented.
ESTABLISHMENT OF NEW POSITION - COMMUNITY SAFETY ASSISTANT (700-30)
Assistant City Manager Rankin advised that in 1984, a part-time Crime
Prevention Assistant position was established. The duties of this
position included coordinating various community crime prevention
programs, including the neighborhood watch program and community
safety programs. Prior to filling this currently vacant position,
Staff analyzed the current needs in providing community programs, and
A*A*A*n*n*n*n*n*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*A*
CM - VOL 10 - 76
Regular Meeting February 25, 1991
based on this analysis, Staff is proposing a modification to this
position.
Mr. Rankin discussed Staff's recommendation to create a full time
position entitled Community Safety Assistant. Proposed job duties
were listed in a job description and include crime prevention
activities as well as disaster preparedness duties. The new position
would formally be supervised by the Assistant City Manager, although
Police services would continue to supervise this position in the day-
to-day tasks associated with crime prevention program duties.
Mr. Rankin advised the steps necessary to establish a new position.
These included adding the position to the City's Classification Plan
and Salary Plan for Full-Time Employees, as well as adding to the
1990-91 Position Allocation Plan.
Cm. Burton asked when someone would be on board.
Mr. Rankin stated the estimated time in the budget request assumes
that someone would be on board by May 1st.
Mr. Ambrose stated it is very unusual for Staff to bring a request
such as this to the Council mid-year, but we are at a critical point.
This type of a position will give us flexibility with both crime
prevention and disaster preparedness. Costs were kept at a minimum in
the past because of the limited number of hours that Mr. Leach worked.
Cm. Moffatt felt this was a good marriage of responsibilities. Bill
did a great job, but we need someone to take over these additional
duties. He suggested that we might be able to tie into Camp Parks to
feed and house some people in the event of a disaster.
On motion of Cm. Moffatt, seconded by Cm. Burton, and by unanimous
vote, the Council adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 22 - 91
AMENDING THE CLASSIFICATION PLAN
(Add Community Safety Assistant Position)
and
RESOLUTION NO. 23 - 91
ESTABLISHING A SALARY PLAN FOR FULL-TIME PERSONNEL
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PERSONNEL RULES
and approved the revised 1990-91 Position Allocation Plan, and
authorized a budget transfer from the Police Personal Services budget
to the Disaster Preparedness budget.
^*�*�*A*n*A*n*n*A*A*�*A*A*�*n*A*A*�*w*n*A*A*A*^*A*A*A*w*A*A*�*A*A*A*A*
CM - VOL 10 - 77
Regular Meeting February 25, 1991
J
ANNUAL TRAFFIC SAFETY REPORT (590-90)
Chris Kinzel with TJKM advised that since 1987, Staff has prepared an
annual Traffic Safety Report which identifies locations where a
significant number of traffic accidents have occurred in the previous
year and in which Staff makes recommendations for possible improve-
ments. The Traffic Safety Report is combined with a "downtown
intersection monitoring" report.
The statistical portion of the report was reviewed. Even though a
total of 251 accidents were reported in 1990, this is the lowest
number since 1985. Accident totals show a downward trend even though
traffic volume has increased. There was a 10% drop last year in the
number of traffic accidents. Ten locations were discussed in the
Report as having had more than 5 accidents. These locations were: 1)
San Ramon Road between Alcosta Boulevard and Shannon Avenue; 2)
Dougherty Road and Dublin Boulevard/Scarlett Court; 3) Regional Street
and Dublin Boulevard; 4) Dougherty Road and Sierra Lane; 5) Village
Parkway and Dublin Boulevard; 6) San Ramon Road and Dublin Boulevard;
7) San Ramon Road and Amador Valley Boulevard; 8) Village Parkway and
Amador Valley Boulevard; 9) Dublin Boulevard and Amador Valley
Boulevard; and 10) Dougherty Road and I-580 Westbound Offramp.
Staff discussed various recommendations for improvements, as well as
the costs associated with each.
Cm. Moffatt stated he would support some kind of signage saying that
both lanes may turn right on Dublin Boulevard @ Dougherty Road.
Another problem is that some drivers cut that corner at the BP Service
Station. He questioned if the Dougherty Road/I-580 intersection was
in Pleasanton.
Mr. Ambrose advised that the second signal is in Dublin. In 1983 ,
when the signals were installed, we had to get a timing agreement when
both signals became operative.
Mr. Kinzel advised that they are trying to reduce the visibility of
the second light when cars are coming off the freeway ramp. He also
advised that it is against the law in some cities to cut corners in
order to avoid a signalized intersection.
Mayor Snyder advised that his son was cited for that exact same thing
15 years ago.
Ms. Silver advised that the City must enact an Ordinance prohibiting
this. Ms. Russell with the Public Works Department advised that she
thought the City had adopted this provision.
Mayor Snyder indicated that a lot of people make a right turn on a red
light from the left lane at Dublin Boulevard/Dougherty Road.
w*w*w*n*A*n*w*A*n*n*n*n*n*A*A*n*n*n*n*A*A*A*A*n*A*A*A*n*n*n*n*n*n*w*n*
CM - VOL 10 - 78
Regular Meeting I February 25, 1991
Mayor Snyder advised of another situation causing great concern. West
bound to south bound motorists from Dublin Boulevard to San Ramon Road
continue to go through the intersection after the light has turned
red. This is a terrible situation.
Mr. Kinzel advised that this has come up before and the timing of the
red light needs to be examined.
Mayor Snyder felt that better delineation needs to be done on the
north bound to west bound lanes at this intersection.
Chief Rose advised that this is a very difficult intersection from an
enforcement standpoint.
OTHER BUSINESS
Agenda Procedure (610-10)
Cm. Jeffery stated she wished to advise the new Councilmembers that it
is polite procedure to run items past other Councilmembers before
placing them on the agenda.
Graffiti (830-50)
Cm. Burton had information related to the prevention of graffiti and
asked if this is a problem in Dublin.
Mr. Ambrose advised that we have been very fortunate and graffiti is
not that much of a problem, at least at the present time.
Upcoming Meeting Reminders (610-05)
Mr. Ambrose reminded the Council of the Goals .& Objectives Meeting on
February 27th at 7 : 00 p.m. , and the West Dublin Joint Planning
Commission/City Council Study Session on Thursday, February 28th at
7: 30 p.m. Also, on Friday evening March 1st, the Tri-Valley
Transportation JPA will be signed. A Tri-Valley Joint City Councils
meeting will follow where there will be a presentation by Bay Vision
2020 at 7 : 30 p.m. This will be at the San Ramon Marriott Hotel.
A*w*A*^*A*^*A*A*A*A*�*A*A*A*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*
CM - VOL 10 - 79
Regular Meeting February 25, 1991
N
Flag Banners (585-90)
Mr. Thompson advised that he hoped to get the new flag banners in on
Wednesday. If they come in, they will go up immediately and Staff
will mix and alternate them with the St. Patrick's Day banners.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Council, the
meeting was adjourned at 10: 37 p.m.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
n*n*n*w*n*A*n*n*A*w*n*n*n*n*n*n*n*n*A*A*A*n*n*n*n*n*A*n*A*w*A*n*w*w*A*
CM - VOL 10 - 80
Regular Meeting February 25, 1991