HomeMy WebLinkAbout4.1 Approve Dec. 6, 10, 18, 1990 Minutes SPECIAL WORKSHOP STUDY SESSION MEETING - December 6 , 1990
A special joint Dublin Planning Commission and City Council workshop
study session meeting was held on December 6, 1990, in the Council
Chambers of the Dublin Civic Center. The meeting was called to order
at 7 : 00 p.m. , by Mayor Snyder.
* * * *
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Councilmembers Burton, Howard, Jeffery, Moffatt, and Mayor
Snyder; Planning Commissioner Burnham.
ABSENT: Commissioners Barnes and Zika.
* * * *
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Mayor led the Council, Staff and those present in the pledge of
allegiance to the flag.
* * * *
EAST DUBLIN PLANNING WORKSHOP
Planning Consultant Brenda Gillarde recapped the last meeting
(Workshop #1) held on November 15, 1990 . Among the topics discussed
were positive attributes about existing Dublin. Comments made
included easy access to shopping, good mix of housing, city close but
country quiet, excellent schools, and uncluttered hills and open
space. Some ideas for the future Dublin were also discussed,
including additional recreational facilities, access to open space,
additional transportation, a retail/commercial core, mixed densities,
affordable housing for the homeless/seniors, housing affordability for
local workers, pedestrian pockets and utilization of the frontage of
I-580 .
Arlene Willits discussed the procedures for the meeting and indicated
that this meeting would not be the final opportunity for public input
and requested that the public be aware of their time on the floor in
order to give everyone an opportunity to speak.
Steve Hammond, WRT, gave background information regarding office,
industrial and business parks .
The Council, Commission and members of the audience were asked what
type of employment generating uses were needed and the desired
jobs/housing balance. Mr. Hammond advised that the real estate market
should be considered when deciding how much additional office/business
park space will be developed.
Commissioner Burnham asked what the current percentage of business
versus residential development was in Dublin.
CM - Vol 9 - 334
Workshop Study Session Meeting December 6 , 1990
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COPIES TO:
r,
ITEM NO. ,�� I)c
Mr. Tong, Planning Director, indicated that there were approximately
400-600 acres of non-residential development in Dublin which equaled
one-quarter of the developed area of the City.
A member of the audience asked how much office space could be leased
at the Hacienda Business Park.
Mr. Martinelli, Alameda County Planning Department, indicated that
there was approximately 600 acres available.
Mr. Fairfield discussed the potential for Dublin to develop commercial
and office space. He felt that 200 acres was a conservative estimate
and that now was the time to be more aggressive. He did not want the
City to have to go back later to try and make accommodations .
Mr. Martinelli indicated that the 200 acre figure was based on an
early ABAG allocation for the Tri-Valley area. A 1300-1400 acre
demand through 2010 was a much more realistic figure.
Ms . Marjorie LaBar felt that there were other revenue generators
besides business parks . There were many good uses that could be
accommodated within an airport buffer zone.
Other comments that were discussed included: needed construction/
electronic industry sites for corporation yards, suppliers, etc . ;
mixed office uses; heavy industrial uses that could be used as a
buffer zone; market flexibility/logical progression to react to
current and upcoming needs .
Commissioner Burnham questioned if there was any need for Dublin to
compete with the Hacienda and Bishop Ranch business parks .
Mayor Snyder commented that Dublin needed to keep an open mind and
maintain a good jobs/housing balance.
Cm. Burton felt that the 2010 buildout figures were over estimated.
We should think about developing interim land uses, such as a golf
course, RV park and mobile homes -- let the market determine what is
needed.
Cm. Jeffery felt that there should be certain types of development
such as large community facilities, a centralized retail core,
neighborhood services -- enough for everyone to use. We should
develop uses that the Tri-Valley needs such as someplace to hold large
gatherings . She had no problems with industrial uses, however they
should be environmentally safe - no smoke stacks . The market would
control how much office space was needed.
Cm. Moffatt felt that the I-580 frontage had great visibility and
should be developed with commercial uses, such as hotels, auto malls,
etc . Strip commercial, mixed uses could be considered - the market
demand could determine what to develop.
CM - Vol 9 - 335
Workshop Study Session Meeting December 6 , 1990
Cm. Howard agreed with Cm. Jeffery. She felt that retail and light
industry should be considered.
Cm. Jeffery felt that strip commercial was not a good idea. There
would be transportation problems . She felt that a retail core should
be considered.
Cm. Moffatt felt that the I-580 frontage was an asset. The area could
be divided into separate commercial areas .
Cm. Burton felt that manufacturing uses should not be discouraged -
Camp Parks would be a prime location. Environmentally safe industry
should be looked into, perhaps as buffers .
Mr. Ambrose commented that the planning staff needed to focus on land
uses . It would be helpful if comments were directed as to how much
and where these land uses should occur.
Mayor Snyder indicated that we were in a very competitive situation
and it was very difficult to define or itemize such land uses .
Mr. Ambrose indicated that we cannot just let uses occur - that would
be poor planning. We need to be more specific in order to designate
land uses on the General Plan map.
Cm. Burton felt that highway commercial should be considered for the
freeway frontage.
Cm. Jeffery wanted to see the same 75% residential and 25%, commercial
ratio as Dublin currently has .
Cm. Moffatt felt that Dublin needed major intersections with
commercialized pockets, with residential development closer to the
foothills .
Cm. Jeffery felt that Dublin could not compete with Hacienda and
Bishop Ranch business parks and felt that additional office/retail
space was needed. She indicated that industrial business parks could
be developed adjacent to the freeway.
Cm. Burton wanted to see highway commercial uses along the freeway.
Also commercial uses should be located on a north/south axis .
Together this would create a good grid concept.
Mayor Snyder felt that it was difficult to visualize how much was
needed and where to put the specific land uses .
Cm. Jeffery did not want to see business parks where the land was not
being utilized at night and/or on the weekends .
Cm. Moffatt felt that hi-rise residential areas along the freeway
would be permissible.
CM - Vol 9 - 336
Workshop Study Session Meeting December 6 , 1990
Cm. Jeffery wanted to avoid residential neighborhoods along the
freeway.
Mr. Fairfield commented that the various concerns presented so far
were not in conflict with Concept #5 .
Mr. Hammond described the current traffic system. The Commission,
Council and members of the audience were asked how should land uses
and the transportation system be arranged.
Comments included: a trolley system with connections to BART; an
additional BART station; create an expressway on Fallon Road
connecting with Bollinger Canyon; move Dublin Boulevard further north;
redesign Hacienda Drive; additional bus routes; bike lanes/trails
directly to schools and shopping areas . Some concerns included:
Doolan/Fallon Road *could not accommodate buses because of the grade
and the freeway is near capacity.
Commissioner Burnham indicated that he had trouble committing himself .
He would like to see high density commercial along the freeway.
Cm. Jeffery commented that the residential areas needed to be
protected from traffic . She would like to see cozy streets and bike
lanes . She doesn' t want to see all grids on straight roads like San
Francisco. Transportation concerns needed to be considered for the
Tri-Valley area, not just Dublin.
Cm. Moffatt liked to see the pedestrian pocket concept and preferred
not to see a straight grid system.
Cm. Burton advised that the arterials needed the capacity for a light
rail system. He would like to see two main arterials; one going
north and south; one going east and west; with pedestrian pockets
inside.
Cm. Howard liked the light rail option and did not want to see houses
backing up against the freeway or streets . Buildings should be
designed to aid transit with good bicycle/pedestrian/auto interface
and design.
Mayor Snyder indicated that all roads should be accessible to public
transit and that a joint powers agreement needs to be considered.
Ms . Willits summarized the comments, which included no houses facing
arterial corridors; good grid system; bike lanes/bus/light rail
needed; transportation center concept; and various modes of
transportation.
A member of the audience requested that a trolly system not be used
and indicated that it was not a feasible transportation system.
Mayor Snyder indicated that whatever system we use should be a
regional transportation system.
CM - Vol 9 - 337
Workshop Study Session Meeting December 6 , 1990
Mr. Hammond discussed the park/recreation facilities located in
Dublin. The Commission, Council and members of the audience were
asked 1 ) how much and what kinds of park/recreation facilities should
be provided in East Dublin? and 2 ) how much and what kinds of
community facilities should be considered for East Dublin? For
example, should we have a certain percentage of neighborhood parks, a
citywide park, golf courses, and/or hiking trails .
Comments from the audience included: unique community park to give
the area popularity; miniature golf course; pedestrian trails/hiking;
create a focal point ( i .e. , Lake Merritt - lakes are a valued
attraction) ; major public facilities ( i .e. , library, conference
center) ; create a major park facility in the foothills protecting it
from the strong winds; cultural facilities like small theaters ;
regional trail network; amphitheaters; parks should be created in
concert with housing development; make sure there are enough
facilities for everyone ' s needs .
Some of the concerns included: parks should not be located by main
arteries, prison areas, Camp Parks ( i .e. , "super" park designated in
Concept #4 should not be considered) .
Cm. Jeffery wanted to see adult oriented uses such as golf courses , an
amphitheater, tennis courts . She felt the current ratio for
neighborhood park facilities for the City was adequate. Parks should
also have plenty of amenities, more than just a single use ( like a
sports park) .
Cm. Howard wanted to see public facilities such as a public gym,
senior center and intermediate care facilities .
Cm. Burton felt that passive open space should be considered versus
active park/recreational areas for undeveloped areas . He would like
to see senior centers with care facilities and living accommodations .
Cm. Jeffery commented that a super park concept could be considered;
however all property owners needed to share the impact of that park.
Cm. Moffatt felt that the lake concept was a good concept, as well as
art theaters, sports fields , large community centers with
activities/events .
Mayor Snyder wanted to see multi-purpose facilities such as
gymnasiums , theaters , golf courses - public/private, post office, and
joint use facilities .
Cm. Burton indicated that a theme park could be considered.
Cm. Moffatt indicated that in-lieu fees should be required to fund
recreational facilities .
Mr. Hammond discussed appropriate uses for the areas surrounding �Camp
Parks, Santa Rita and BART. The Commission, Council and members of
the audience were asked 1 ) What types of uses were appropriate to be
CM - Vol 9 - 338
Workshop Study Session Meeting December 6 , 1990
located adjacent to Camp Parks? Santa Rita? BART? and 2 ) What types of
uses should be permitted in the area proposed as the Airport
Protection Area?
Concerns regarding the inmates of the Santa Rita jail facility were
discussed. Transportation availability for the released individuals
should be considered so that once released, they were not just
wandering around the area. Buffer possibilities were: construction
of a speedway, golf course between Camp Parks and jail facility, and
commercial/industrial uses .
A member of the audience indicated that a bus stopped in front of the
facility four times a day.
Mr. Pat Adams reminded everyone that there was one mile between Santa
Rita and Tassajara Road. He felt that there should be additional
transportation available for the jail facility. Public business
entities and general commercial should be considered for these areas .
Mr. Adolf Martinelli indicated that there were 16 designated acres for
a buffer zone around the Santa Rita facility, then 70 acres for public
uses - sheriff ' s training center, commercial, CHP office, etc .
Cm. Moffatt and Cm. Burton felt that the facilities were adequately
screened.
Cm. Howard did not want to see residential development in the close
proximity of these facilities . Offices/commercial uses should be
considered.
Mayor Snyder felt that industrial uses should be considered.
Cm. Burton felt that commercial/industrial uses should be considered
between Camp Parks and the Santa Rita jail .
Comments regarding land uses around the future BART station were:
need for high density housing and/or office facilities; transit
oriented development; mixture of residential and commercial;
condominiums; and multi-level parking for BART/commercial areas .
Single-family detached housing should not be considered.
Cm. Jeffery wanted to allow high-density residential areas with
possible bike trails . Single-family homes should not be allowed.
Cm. Burton requested that commercial/office and/or high density
structures be considered.
Cm. Howard felt that high density housing would be appropriate.
Cm. Moffatt indicated that transportation access to and from the area
was very important.
Mayor Snyder felt that high density housing should be considered.
@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*g*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*
CM - Vol 9 - 339
Workshop Study Session Meeting December 6 , 1990
Comments regarding possible land uses for the proposed Airport
Protection Area were: commercial; warehouse/food processing uses;
hotels; industrial parks . Residential , schools, malls, hospitals
should not be considered.
Commissioner Burnham had a concern with using the area for office
space. There were more people in an office building than in a
residential area.
Cm. Burton indicated that it was the noise concern not the safety
concern for the buffer zone.
Cm. Moffatt indicated that it could be used as a transportation
corridor and used for low intensity industrial and business uses .
Dublin needed to be involved with the Livermore airport.
Cm. Jeffery disagreed that this land should be a protection zone for
the Livermore airport. It was Dublin' s land. The freeway frontage
should be used for business or industrial uses . She reminded everyone
that the Airport Commission was an advisory board.
Mayor Snyder felt that public services and low density employment or a
transportation corridor would be appropriate.
Ms . Brenda Gillarde thanked everyone for attending the meeting. The
comments and concerns heard tonight will be translated into a
preliminary land use map and brought back to the next joint study
session on December 18, 1990 .
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 11 : 00 p.m.
* * * *
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
* * * *
CM - Vol 9 - 340
Workshop Study Session Meeting December 6 , 1990
r
REGULAR MEETING - December 10, 1990
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Dublin was
held on Monday, December 10, 1990, in the Council Chambers of
the Dublin Civic Center. The meeting was called to order at
7 : 31 p.m. by Mayor Peter Snyder.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Councilmembers Burton, Howard, Jeffery, Moffatt, and
Mayor Snyder.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Mayor led the Council, Staff, and those present in the
pledge of allegiance to the flag.
* * * *
INTRODUCTION OF NEW POLICE PERSONNEL
Lt. Norm Gomes introduced new police personnel, Sgt. Bill
Gaudinier and Deputy Dean Stavert.
The Council welcomed Sgt. Gaudinier and Deputy Stavert aboard.
* * * *
INTRODUCTION OF NEW COMMISSION AND COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS
(110-30)
Cm. Howard introduced her new appointee to the Senior Citizen
Advisory Committee, Rose Jurich.
Cm. Howard also introduced her new appointee to the Park and
Recreation Commission, Steve Lockhart.
Cm. Burton introduced Ralph Rafanelli, his appointee to the
Planning Commission.
Cm. Burton also introduced Frank Zagarelli, his appointee to the
Senior Citizen Advisory Committee.
The Council welcomed all of the new appointees.
* * * *
PRESENTATION OF PLAQUE TO OUTGOING MAYOR
Mayor Snyder presented a plaque to outgoing Mayor Paul Moffatt
in recognition of his service and leadership as Mayor from 1988
to 1990.
CM - VOL 9 - 341
Regular Meeting December 10, 1990
Mayor Snyder also presented a plaque to Cm. Jeffery in
recognition of her service as Mayor from 1986 to 1988 .
CONSENT CALENDAR
On motion of Cm. Moffatt, seconded by Cm. Jeffery, and by
unanimous vote, .the Council took the following actions:
Approved Minutes of the Special Workshop Study Session Meeting
of November 15, 1990, and of the Regular Meeting of November 26,
1990;
Approved an exemption from competitive bid process and
authorized Staff to purchase one Mobil traffic zone radar speed
trailer from Mobil Traffic Zone, Inc. , at a cost of $7, 587 . 94 ,
and authorized a budget transfer from the Contingent Reserve in
the amount of $88 . 00 (350-20) ;
Adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 148-90
AWARDING CONTRACT 90-11 FREDERIKSEN SCHOOL
PLAY AREA IMPROVEMENTS TO
MUNKDALE BROS. , INC. (600-30)
Approved City Treasurer's Investment Report of November 30, 1990
(320-30) ;
Adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 149-90
DECLARING PROPERTY SURPLUS (350-40)
and approved the sale of four police vehicles, and directed the
Finance Director to work with Nationwide to auction the
vehicles;
Adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 150-90
ORDERING TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS "CITY OF DUBLIN
ANNEXATION NO. 9 DONLAN CANYON PROJECT SITE"
ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF DUBLIN (620-20)
Adopted a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Providing for
Preparation of Source Reduction and recycling Element (SRRE)
(810-60) ;
CM - VOL 9 - 342
Regular Meeting December 10, 1990
Received Financial Statements dated November 30, 1990 (330-50) ;
Approved Warrant Register dated December 10, 1990 in the amount
of $361, 843 . 39 .
* * * *
ALAMEDA COUNTY TRAINING AND EMPLOYMENT BOARD (ACTEB) (710-60)
Cm. Moffatt requested that Item 4 .4 regarding support of the
Alameda County Training and Employment Board (ACTEB) be removed
from the Consent Calendar for discussion.
Cm. Moffatt stated that, as delegate to ACTEB, he wanted to
provide some additional information. The City of Berkeley had
had an agreement with ACTEB that allowed different treatment
than the rest of the members in that funds were simply passed
through. The ACTEB Staff and Board felt that the City of
Berkeley should adhere to the same rules and regulations as
other members and no longer supported the pass through;
therefore, Berkeley vetoed the 1990-91 plan and is out of the
consortium.
Cm. Moffatt continued that the State had indicated the plan
would be defunded if the consortium did not agree. The County
pulled the funds and made the Board of Supervisors the governing
board. A resolution in support of the continued existence and
operation of ACTEB was adopted by the Mayors' Conference.
ACTEB funds are used for a lunch program at Arroyo Vista and
help with a youth employment program.
On motion of Cm. Moffatt, seconded by Cm. Jeffery, and by
unanimous vote, the City Council adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 151-90
SUPPORTING THE CONTINUED EXISTENCE AND OPERATION
OF THE ALAMEDA COUNTY TRAINING
AND EMPLOYMENT BOARD (ACTEB)
* * * *
FUNDING EAST DUBLIN BART STATION (1060-30)
Mayor Snyder said that Mayor Mercer had asked that this item be
deferred until the next meeting; therefore, no discussion was
held.
* * * *
CM - VOL 9 - 343
Regular Meeting December 10, 1990
PUBLIC HEARING: TRAFFIC CODE UPDATE (590-20)
Mayor Snyder opened the public hearing.
Mr. Thompson stated that this was the second reading of a
proposed ordinance to bring the City' s Traffic Code into
conformance with existing signing and pavement markings.
The proposed ordinance includes only items which are presently
existing on the street. No new traffic devices are to be
installed as a result of this ordinance.
The City Council had no questions regarding this item, and no
comments were received from the public.
Mayor Snyder closed the public hearing.
On motion of Cm. Moffatt, seconded by Cm. Burton, and by
unanimous vote, the City Council adopted
ORDINANCE NO. 13-90
AMENDING THE CITY OF DUBLIN TRAFFIC CODE
* * * *
PUBLIC HEARING: SALE OF EXCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY TO STROUD'S PLAZA
(670-80)
Mayor Snyder opened the public hearing.
Public Works Director Lee Thompson stated that in order to
provide the required setback for a proposed new building,
Phillip Smith representing Stroud's Plaza Shopping Center had
requested to purchase approximately 4, 451. 68 square feet of
excess right-of-way from the City. The right-of-way is located
in two parcels at the southwest corner of San Ramon Road and
Amador Valley Boulevard. The proposed purchase price is $13 . 97
per square foot, or a total of $62, 189.97. Similar right-of-way
sales have been made to the Fishery, Arbor Creek, and Public
Storage.
Mr. Thompson continued that since the Parcel 1 property was
originally purchased by the San Ramon Road Specific Plan
Assessment District, the funds from the sale of that parcel
would go back to the Assessment District, and the funds from the
sale of Parcel 2 would go into the City's General Fund.
Phillip Smith stated that he would be happy to answer any
questions.
CM - VOL 9 - 344
Regular Meeting December 10, 1990
Y
No other public comment was received on this issue.
Mayor Snyder closed the public hearing.
On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Moffatt, and by
unanimous vote, the City Council adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 152-90
APPROVING SALE OF CITY PROPERTY TO STROUD'S PLAZA
AND AUTHORIZING MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE DEED
TRANSFERRING THE PROPERTY
* * * *
PUBLIC HEARING: NIELSEN SCHOOL TRAFFIC STUDY (590-50)
Mayor Snyder opened the public hearing.
Chris Kinzel of TJKM, the City' s contract Traffic Engineer,
stated that at the October 29, 1990, City Council meeting,
representatives of the Nielsen School Parent-Faculty Club had
presented a letter and petition expressing concern over traffic
congestion on Amarillo Road at the school and requesting
provision of adult crossing guards at two locations on Amarillo
Road.
Mr. Kinzel identified several improvements that the City has
made on Amarillo Road since 1985 at the request of the School
District.
Meetings were held with school staff and parents, and TJKM
conducted a new analysis of traffic problems on Amarillo Road.
A high percentage of children are being driven to school. The
school grounds has inadequate space to accommodate both staff
and parents picking up or dropping off children. The deficiency
is approximately 20 parking spaces.
Slides of the traffic congestion and volunteer crossing guards
were shown, and diagrams of existing and proposed improvements
were displayed.
An adult crossing guard is not warranted; however, TJKM felt
that the volunteer crossing guards were beneficial. It was
suggested that the School District provide some type of formal
training and investigate insurance consequences. Staff
concluded that an official adult crossing guard would be
beneficial but that providing an unwarranted crossing guard
would set a precedent for placement of crossing guards at other
schools in Dublin.
Closing off the school driveways with orange cones during the
peak pick-up period, combined with an expanded passenger loading
zone along the school frontage may eliminate some congestion.
CM - VOL 9 - 345
Regular Meeting December 10, 1990
Staff provided a diagram of proposed reconstruction of the
school parking lot to provide more drop-off spaces on-site. It
was also suggested to use the parking lot at the adjacent
church.
TJKM recommended installing a crosswalk across Alegre Drive and
painting the curb red near a fire hydrant to discourage drivers
from parking on the curb radii, blocking the fire hydrant, and
impeding pedestrian circulation.
No parking zones were recommended on the east side of Amarillo
Road near the driveways for visibility. It was recommended that
an on-street handicapped parking space which had been installed
by the school be moved to a different location, also to improve
visibility.
It was suggested that the school provide benches at designated
locations to consolidate children conveniently near where
parents would pick them up.
It was recommended that the existing and proposed traffic
control on Amarillo Road be enforced and that the school send
out yearly mailers to parents requesting that specific routes be
used to avoid congestion.
It was suggested that the school construct a path between San
Sabana Road and the school buildings and encourage school staff
to park along the Mape Park frontage. Use of the San Sabana
gate as an additional student entry point was investigated and
rejected because of the distance between San Sabana and the
school buildings and because of the traffic impact on the
neighborhood.
It was suggested that the School District be encouraged to
provide additional on-site parking and on-site student drop-off
spaces by redesigning their parking lot and landscaped area at
the front of the school.
Mr. Kinzel added that he was very impressed by the volunteer
crossing guards ' performance.
Cm. Moffatt asked whether a southbound No Left Turn had been
considered at Amarillo Road and Alegre and whether there was
enough room for two-way traffic in the school parking lot.
Mr. Kinzel responded that there was not sufficient room for
two-way traffic. The orange cones prohibit making a left turn
from Amarillo into the parking lot in the afternoon; in the
morning the left turns do not seem to be a problem.
Cm. Burton asked how many cars had to be parked to pick up
children.
CM - VOL 9 - 346
Regular Meeting December lo, 1990
Mr. Kinzel said that no specific survey was done on this
subject. Many of the cars were parked along the curb for a long
time, mainly across the street and on Alegre. More cars were
parked than would fit.
Cm. Burton asked how many children crossed the street.
Mr. Kinzel stated that there were about 36 in the morning and
about 76 in the . afternoon, which was a fair amount. Some of the
children were escorted by parents.
Cm. Jeffery asked if removing the loading zone in the parking
lot and using that curb for regular parking had been considered.
Mr. Kinzel said that this had not been considered. The first
choice would be to improve the area on the grounds. The on-site
passenger loading zone could be converted to about four to five
parallel parking spaces; however, its use as a loading zone
works effectively most of the day.
Cm. Howard asked about the average speed of cars on Amarillo
Road and stated that she was concerned about speeding.
Mr. Kinzel said that a speed survey had not been taken but felt
that many travel faster than 25 mph. During the time the
children are crossing, the congestion prevents speeding. The
traffic volume is the main problem.
Cm. Burton asked Mr. Kinzel to confirm that the problem only
exists for 15 to 20 minutes at a time.
Mr. Kinzel said that was true but that the 15 to 20 minute
problem occurred several times a day. The biggest problem
occurs in the afternoon when more children cross the street.
The school lets children out at staggered times. A student
safety patrol had been considered, but the parents were not in
favor.
Cm. Jeffery said that she had been involved in a school safety
patrol as a child and asked whether any studies had been done
with concern for the safety of children acting as crossing
guards.
Mr. Kinzel said that the record of school safety patrols was
excellent but that it might not work in the case of Nielsen
School since the children were released at so many different
times of day.
Mayor Snyder asked Mr. Kinzel to describe the genesis of the
term "warrants" and explain its importance.
CM - VOL 9 - 347
Regular Meeting December 10, 1990
Mr. Kinzel said that warrants were set up for the purpose of
performing an objective evaluation from location to location, to
compare one situation with another, and to provide a point for
financial evaluation.
Mayor Snyder asked if the warrants that are used come from the
State Vehicle Code.
Mr. Kinzel said .that the warrants were guidelines which were
recommended by the State but were not required. Most
jurisdictions use the State warrants.
Elizabeth Adolph, Nielsen School Parent Faculty Club, said that
it was important to reiterate that the warrants do not address
child security, safety, or the type of traffic. She felt that
the alternative for the crossing guard was the most effective.
Pedestrian crossing is delayed by the frequency of the vehicles.
The volunteer crossing guards have been effective. A student
patrol was considered but the staggered hours present a problem.
She added that drivers have a complete disregard for the person
in the crosswalk. She stated that she doubted that the proposed
passenger loading zone would be effective because of double
parking. She also indicated that she was agreeable to the curb
painting but did not feel it would be enough. Also, a person
needs to monitor the cones across the driveway because certain
vehicles need to get in. Ms. Adolph continued that she had
heard that using the church parking lot would be a problem. If
providing an adult crossing guard sets a precedent, so be it.
She urged the Council to go against the Staff recommendation.
Cm. Burton asked how a crossing guard would change the
situation.
Ms. Adolph said that the volunteer crossing guards were working
now but that drivers ignore someone that doesn't have an orange
vest.
Mayor Snyder asked about the comment that the passenger loading
zone was not working.
Ms. Adolph said that she was not sure if it would work but was
willing to try.
Mayor Snyder commented that he understood cars were permanently
parked there now and asked if Ms. Adolph had any additional
questions about the diagram.
Ms. Adolph said that she did not.
Christine Campbell, Nielsen School Parent Faculty Club, said
that she coordinated the parent volunteers. She stated that if
the parent volunteers are used as crossing guards, their
assistance in the classroom is lost. Ms. Campbell said that she
CM - VOL 9 - 348
Regular Meeting December 10, 1990
had counted cars on Amarillo Road while working as a crossing
guard and that she had seen 223 cars on December 3rd. On
another day, she used other persons to count and came up with a
total of 304 cars and 121 pedestrians during a 35 minute period.
She questioned the accuracy of TJKM's traffic counts. Ms.
Campbell also stated that she was told by the police that the
driver of a car in a passenger loading zone could leave the car
for five minutes.
Ms. Campbell stated that a reason for speeding may be that
drivers are impatient after being stuck in traffic. Regarding
the path from Mape Park, she said that a path would disrupt the
Little League diamonds and soccer field unless the path were
installed as part of the scheduled field renovation. She
continued that the traffic problem has not gotten any better
through TJKM' s previous work and that the parents had been able
to solve the problem in three months. She urged that the City
Council approve the crossing guard.
Mayor Snyder asked for verification of Ms. Campbell ' s comment
regarding the passenger loading zone time limit.
Mr. Kinzel stated that he had not heard that interpretation
before but that the ordinance could be changed. He knew of no
conflicting State law. He referred to the situation of a
passenger loading zone adjacent to a mailbox where a person
could get out of the car to drop mail in the box.
City Attorney Elizabeth Silver said that she did not think the
City' s traffic ordinance specified a time limit.
Edward Campbell, Nielsen School Parent Faculty Club, said he was
surprised the problem had been studied for five years. He said
that the graphics were nice but that he felt the crosswalk and
red curb should have been thought of before and that they were
not unique. He added that he did not agree with TJKM' s case and
felt a crossing guard was needed.
Mayor Snyder commented that the street had been studied for
different reasons, not all related to the same issue. He added
that the problem was exacerbated in the past year.
Christy Gobel, Co-President of the Parent Faculty Club, said
that a crossing guard would take care of the concerns of the
parents. This subject was discussed at all of the Parent
Faculty Club meetings and that they had tried several things but
the crossing guards work.
Steve Chandler, Briarhill Homeowners' Association, asked if the
issue was child safety or $8, 000 per year. He asked how much
had been spent on studies and improvements and said that the
priority should be the children.
CM - VOL 9 - 349
Regular Meeting December 10, 1990
Cindy Cobb-Adams of Cresta Lane said that she had a concern if
traffic was re-routed onto Silvergate Drive in that crosswalks
should be installed at Silvergate and Hansen.
Mayor Snyder closed the public hearing.
Cm. Burton asked what amount of time was involved to do the curb
painting and what the cost would be.
Mr. Thompson said that the cost was approximately $500. The
passenger loading zone involved adoption of an ordinance and had
to come back for a second reading so the work could not be done
until the ordinance was effective. The no parking and
handicapped zones would be adopted by resolution and could be
done within a few weeks.
Cm. Burton mentioned that there was already a crossing guard on
Silvergate and asked if that guard would be moved to Amarillo
Road at the school.
Mr. Kinzel said that Staff would wait until the stop signs had
been installed and take another look.
Mr. Thompson said that Staff would come back to the City Council
before making any changes in regard to the crossing guard on
Silvergate.
Cm. Jeffery asked how many parking spaces would be available if
the school lot was reconstructed.
Mr. Thompson said that about 24 spaces would be added, but that
the on-street parking would be eliminated in the process.
Cm. Jeffery asked what the cost would be.
Mr. Thompson said an estimate had not been done but that it
would be expensive.
Cm. Howard asked how long the volunteers could continue and
stated that she felt if the City could spend $8, 000 on a radar
trailer, then a crossing guard could also be provided.
Cm. Jeffery said there were quite a few suggestions that the
City could do. She added that the parents had done a
commendable job and said that she would support a motion to
provide the improvements but wanted the school to also make
improvements. She stated that the parents should attend the
School Board meetings to encourage the school to take action.
Cm. Burton asked whether a crossing guard would be for a limited
period of time or would be there indefinitely.
CM - VOL 9 - 350
Regular Meeting December 10, 1990
Mayor Snyder said that if approved the crossing guard would be
ongoing. He asked how long it would take to obtain the crossing
guard.
Mr. Thompson said that the crossing guard supervisor at the
County had indicated a person is available to start right away
but that the details would have to be worked out.
Cm. Burton complimented the parents on the presentation of their
case.
On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Howard, and by
unanimous vote, the City Council adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 153-90
DESIGNATING A NO PARKING ZONE ON THE
EAST SIDE OF AMARILLO ROAD
and INTRODUCED an ordinance establishing a passenger loading
zone on the east side of Amarillo Road. In the same action, the
City Council also approved an adult crossing guard for Amarillo
Road at Alegre Drive and the appropriate budget transfer, and
directed Staff to transmit recommendations for on-site
improvements to the School District.
* * * *
PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE ENACTING A SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AND
SUPERSEDING SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AS ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE NO. 13
(410-50)
Mayor Snyder opened the public hearing.
Mr. Thompson stated that the City' s existing subdivision
ordinance is the Alameda County Subdivision Ordinance which was
adopted by reference when the City incorporated. This
subdivision ordinance has been updated four times since
adoption. The proposed ordinance is intended to supersede the
existing ordinance and the four updates, which related to map
submittal requirements, park dedication requirements, vesting
tentative map provisions, and submittal of soils reports.
Mr. Thompson continued that the proposed ordinance incorporates
several major changes which are as follows:
1) An increase in the amount of park and recreation land
required to be dedicated. Mr. Thompson said that Planning
Director Larry Tong would comment on this item.
2) A requirement that the Park and Recreation Commission
or Recreation Director report to the Planning Commission
regarding proposed location of facilities and adequacy of fees
or land dedications.
CM - VOL 9 - 351
Regular Meeting December 10, 1990
3) Consolidation of the three articles concerning vesting
tentative maps into one article.
4) Setting the maximum grade for a street at 12%. The
present ordinance has no maximum grade.
5) Addition of a definition of "developable acreage. "
6) Provision for supplemental improvement capacity to
allow oversizing of facilities and reimbursement agreements from
future developments.
Mr. Tong stated that in 1983 , the parkland in existence amounted
to 2 . 3 acres per 1, 000 in population and now, the parkland
amounts to 5 acres per 1, 000 in population. The current
requirement for single-family lots is . 011 acres per dwelling
unit and proposed to be raised to . 016 acres per dwelling unit.
The requirement for multi-family lots is . 009 acres per dwelling
unit and proposed to be raised to . 010 acres per dwelling unit.
Cm. Moffatt asked whether there was any concern or language
regarding a major City park or any excess to put into the Dublin
Sports Grounds.
Mr. Tong said that how the City uses the fees is open for the
City Council to decide; the fees may be used for a community
park or a neighborhood park.
Cm. Burton asked the difference between a Tentative Map and a
Vesting Tentative Map.
Mr. Tong said that a Vesting Tentative Map is a guarantee that a
Tentative Map would be good for a number of years beyond the
regular Tentative Map. Specific documents and requirements
pertain to the Vesting Tentative Map. The term is relatively
new.
Cm. Burton asked whether the County had had a maximum grade of
15% as opposed to the 12% maximum specified in the proposed
ordinance.
Mr. Thompson said that the County had approved a 12% maximum for
the existing subdivisions, and the City has required 12% on
others except that there are short stretches at 15%. Grades
steeper than 12% cause problems for fire trucks and even for
stopping regular vehicles.
Mr. Thompson added that Staff' s recommendation was to waive the
reading and introduce the ordinance, and it would be appreciated
if the Council kept the copy of the draft ordinance for the
second public hearing in January.
CM - VOL 9 - 352
Regular Meeting December 10, 1990
There was no public comment on this issue.
Mayor Snyder closed the public hearing.
On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Moffatt, and by
unanimous vote, the City Council waived the reading and
INTRODUCED the ordinance enacting a subdivision ordinance and
superseding subdivision ordinance as adopted by Ordinance No.
13 , 19-83 , 33-85, 6-90, and Resolution No. 74-83 .
* * * *
CHILD CARE NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND MASTER PLAN (950-70)
Cm. Moffatt stated that he had a conflict of interest and would
not participate in discussion or any decisions regarding this
item.
Recreation Director Diane Lowart said that the final report of
the Livermore/Pleasanton/Dublin (LPD) Child Care Task Force had
been released. This report assesses the needs and current
status of the child care system in the three cities and sets
forth goals and strategies for improvement of the child care
system. The report was divided into two sections reflecting the
process followed to create it.
Ms. Lowart said that the first section was Needs Assessment.
This section discusses demand, supply, and unmet need for child
care in the LPD area. Surveys were taken of LPD residents,
employers, employees, and providers, to discover percentages
using child care and perceived needs or deficiencies.
The second section, Master Plan, recommends goals and objectives
which are as follows:
Goal 1: Expand the supply of general and targeted child care
services and facilities. Targeted child care services and
facilities should include subsidized care (for low income
families) , infant care, school-age care, odd-hours care, sick
care, and children with special needs and disabilities.
Goal 2 : Strengthen the quality of all child care services and
facilities for both providers and families.
The Master Plan identifies a number of objectives to be used to
accomplish the goals. Each City is to decide how to implement
these objectives.
Ms. Lowart said that, in analyzing the statistics presented in
the report, Dublin was found to have sufficient child care
facilities for children 0 to 5 years of age but that there is a
need for space for children ages 6 years and above.
CM - VOL 9 - 353
Regular Meeting December 10, 1990
Ms. Lowart added that the City currently provides preschool and
after school programs.
Ms. Lowart said that during the budget hearings for Fiscal Year
1990-91, the City Council had deferred a request for funding
from Resources for Family Development (RFD) until completion of
the Master Plan. The request for $12,500 would fund the
following services: (1) assisting the City in planning for
child care needs, (2) coordinating child care resources, (3)
monitoring and reporting on county, state, and federal policies
that impact on local ability to generate funds, and (4)
advocating for increased child care services at the national,
state, and county levels. Supplementary services would include
increasing visibility of the City' s role in child care and (2)
upgrading the quality of child care.
Cm. Jeffery asked whether it was possible that the parents of
older children don't demand child care.
Ms. Lowart stated that the statistics had come from people who
wanted child care but were not able to find it and also from the
schools. Three Dublin schools have child care facilities but
are full. Nielsen School has been trying to implement a
program. People feel comfortable with having their children
stay at the school.
Cm. Jeffery asked for a population estimate for the current
child care program.
Ms. Lowart said that there is care for about 40 children at the
schools. The City program is drop-in type. An average of 25 to
40 children a day typically attend at two sites.
Miriam Miller, Director of Resources for Family Development
(RFD) , stated that there was no statutory requirement for the
City to address child care issues. The important thing was the
relationship between the quality of life and quality child care.
The issues are the availability of service and family
prosperity. An investment in child care will pay off five to
ten years from now with a decrease in juvenile delinquency.
Children learn values from quality child care. Adequate child
care needs to be on the community's agenda. Ms. Miller added
that Pleasanton had already adopted the Master Plan.
Mayor Snyder asked what licensed child care providers do to
assist in the areas in which RFD would provide services.
Ms. Miller said that the owners try to obtain training and to
reduce their fees for the second child. She stated that the
daycare operators work eleven or twelve hours a day and need
community support. Ms. Miller commented further that turnover
was a substantial problem.
CM - VOL 9 - 354
Regular Meeting December 10, 1990
Mayor Snyder stated that this was not a satisfactory answer and
asked why the City would have to pay for the pamphlet on how to
apply for licensing.
Ms. Miller said that the application packet was about 1/2" thick
and that the State does hold a no-cost meeting for new
applicants on how to fill out the forms. She added that the
process was time-consuming.
Mayor Snyder asked about RFD' s attempts to lobby the State.
Ms. Miller said that the State was not responsive. No specific
legislator was asked, however.
Cm. Burton said that Dublin appeared to be doing fairly well in
the figures but asked for an explanation of the statistics for
the age 5 to 9 group.
Ms. Miller said that child care was not cost-effective for
school age children since they are not at the facility all day.
She commented that one cannot have a one-parent one-space
relationship because a given space may not fit a particular
person' s needs. She added that parents who need care on a
limited basis were more likely to use a nursery school. Most
child care spaces are used by parents who work.
Mayor Snyder asked if a distinction was drawn between parents
who had to work for economic reasons and those who just wanted
to work.
Ms. Miller said that 80 - 90% nationwide feel that they have to
work.
Cm. Burton asked how funding RFD would help in the 5 - 9 age
group.
Ms. Miller said that RFD was in touch with State and Federal
people and that there was a possibility that Dublin could get
access to funds. RFD could serve as an advocate to make sure
Dublin gets what it needs. Funds could be used for school age
care or to subsidize families with low earning power.
Cm. Jeffery asked what the cost of the proposed training would
be.
Ms. Miller said that the program includes about 15 hours of
training, which involved staff time.
CM - VOL 9 - 355
Regular Meeting December 10, 1990
Cm. Jeffery asked about the program to provide substitutes.
Ms. Miller said that if the center provider is ill or on
vacation, the registry can supply a substitute that has been
pre-screened. The provider pays for the service. RFD' s cost is
primarily maintaining the registry and training.
Cm. Jeffery said that she felt the registry was a good idea but
wanted to know the specific cost to the City.
Ms. Miller said that the registry cost would be $3 , 000 per year
and added that if substitutes are not available, the provider is
out of compliance with State regulations by not having the
required number of persons available.
Cm. Jeffery stated that she had difficulty seeing the
relationship between the $3 , 000 annual cost for the registry vs.
the $6, 250 total cost for six months.
Ms. Miller said that the breakdown of the $12 , 500 annual cost
would be $6, 000 to assist with the licensing process, $3 , 000 for
the substitute registry, and $3, 000 for advocacy, consumer
information to businesses, and keeping the City informed for
adequate planning. There were two training items involved: for
the substitutes and for the providers.
Cindy Cobb-Adams, resident of Cresta Lane, said that RFD offers
invaluable services but cautioned the City to move slowly on the
Master Plan. She stated that the Plan was good in theory but
questioned the point at which the City should become involved.
She said that she had a concern regarding the lack of concern
and suggested getting more input before getting involved.
Mayor Snyder asked who really needed the service of child care
and which persons were using child care for their own benefit.
He stated that only the ones that needed it should be funded.
Ms. Cobb-Adams stated that she had the same problem but didn't
know how to tell. She said the public needed to be educated.
Cm. Jeffery stated that she felt it was not the City's business
to consider who had to work vs. who wanted to work.
Mayor Snyder said he felt people who didn't need funding
shouldn't get it.
Cm. Jeffery said that it was the City's business what happens to
children and that she was interested in the registry aspect.
She added that the advocacy part was not necessary and that the
providers should have the ability to find good help.
Mayor Snyder asked whether the providers would contribute to the
substitute base.
CM - VOL 9 - 356
Regular Meeting December 10, 1990
Ruth Frieze, representing RFD, said she was also responsible for
the subsitute program. She said that many private providers
were out of compliance with State laws because of not having
enough adults to care for the number of children enrolled. She
stated that the providers could not afford to keep a big staff
and therefore couldn't get substitutes. She said that the
private facilities contribute by paying a registration fee but
that they couldn't afford the entire amount.
Mayor Snyder asked how many providers had been fined.
Ms. Frieze said that one had been threatened with having her
license revoked.
Mayor Snyder said that if fines were levied, the agencies should
do something to keep it from happening. He said that he would
rather use the money as a deposit than a fine.
Ms. Frieze said that a benefit of using the registry was to
provide a subsitute that was familiar with the setting and was
not a stranger to the children.
Eleanor Todd, a private daycare provider, said that her center
sometimes had more children that she had planned on, and RFD was
unable to send a subsitute because they were not funded by the
City. She said she felt the subsitute program was worthwhile.
Mayor Snyder asked if Ms. Todd felt the City was being held
hostage.
Ms. Todd said no, that she had wondered why the City was not
interested in child care. She added that she did not feel the
pamphlet was necessary to explain the application for the State
license. She said that most providers get into the business
because they like children and that child care was an economic
need.
Mayor Snyder asked if there were any alternatives to the
substitute registry.
Ms. Todd said that she couldn't think of any and felt that the
registry was important.
Ms. Cobb-Adams said that the common thread was not to repeat
services and that RFD filled a regional need.
Mayor Snyder said that he was concerned that RFD would not
provide a substitute because the City did not contribute.
Ms. Cobb-Adams said that she could use some services and that
she felt the City should contribute.
CM - VOL 9 - 357
Regular Meeting December 10, 1990
Cm. Jeffery said that the City had demonstrated its commitment
through the Recreation Department. She said that she wanted to
encourage child care but did not agree with all the proposals;
however the registry is a good idea.
Cm. Burton said that he does not have any children. He felt
that the City was dealing with a business and that a business
could not be supported with City funds. He added that he felt
the subsidy was .not necessary.
Cm. Jeffery stated that she did not disagree but that she felt
the registry was a regional program and wanted the providers to
be able to use it.
Cm. Howard asked whether RFD was a non-profit organization.
Ms. Miller replied that it was.
Ms. Todd said that the providers pay a $35. 00 per year fee for
the registry. She said that the problem is the provider' s
overall budget and that she operates in the red. She stated
that she does not know where the idea comes from that daycare is
a lucrative business.
Cm. Burton asked how the daycare rates are established.
Ms. Todd said that a market survey was done and that she had
dropped her rates in order to get more business. She said that
most people can't afford high prices and that other operators
may have the same problem.
Cm. Burton asked how the City could underwrite this type of
business without including all types of business.
Ms. Todd said that the registry would be helpful.
Ms. Lowart said that the Master Plan report is only the tip of
the iceberg. There is a perceived image of people who go into
the daycare business. The City' s Recreation Department has a
problem getting qualified people and that training needs to be
looked at. The means of solving the training problem was not
identified in the Master Plan.
Cm. Burton asked how training could help people who were not
making money.
Ms. Lowart said that families need to work and that people don't
want to provide child care at no profit.
CM - VOL 9 - 358
Regular Meeting December 10, 1990
On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Burton, and by
majority vote, the City Council accepted the report, directed
Staff to take a look at recommendations that could be
accomplished, and determined to include $3 , 000 for the subsitute
registry only at the time of the next budget hearings.
Cm. Moffatt abstained from this item.
* * * *
ORGANIZATION AND COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS (610-40)
Mr. Ambrose stated that at the November 26, 1990, City Council
meeting, the City Council had requested that Staff prepare a
report identifying the responsibilities, outstanding issues, and
meeting information regarding each organization and committee.
Cm. Moffatt said that he was the Association of Bay Area
Governments (ABAG) delegate to the General Assembly.
Cm. Burton suggested that if anyone had any changes from the
current assignments to let it be known. He and Cm. Howard had
split up the assignments of the previous Councilmembers.
Cm. Moffatt asked whether those who were alternates would want
to become the member on that assignment and have the new
Councilmember become the alternate; for example, for the
Dougherty Regional Fire Authority, Cm. Moffatt would become the
member and Cm. Howard would be the alternate. Cm. Moffatt
further stated that he would like to represent Dublin on the
Tri-Valley Transportation Council (TVTC) .
Cm. Burton said that he would like to have a voting position on
the TVTC and asked the City Council to consider his request.
Cm. Moffatt said that the TVTC was in the process of adopting a
new Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) and that someone who knew the
background should be the representative.
Cm. Burton stated that he felt he knew the issues and could do
the necessary research.
Cm. Jeffery asked whether Georgean Vonheeder could become the
alternate to the TVTC.
Mayor Snyder stated that the decision on the TVTC representative
could be deferred until the new JPA was ratified and asked what
the timing would be.
Mr. Ambrose said that the document had not been formally
transmitted but that it should be on the January 14, 1991,
agenda.
CM - VOL 9 - 359
Regular Meeting December 10, 1990
Cm. Howard requested that she represent the City in the Alameda
County Soviet Exchange Program.
By consensus, the City Council deferred the decision on the
assignment to the Tri-Valley Transportation Council until after
the Joint Powers Agreement has been ratified and confirmed the
following committee assignments:
Cm. Howard: Audit Review Committee; Dougherty Regional
Fire Authority alternate; Dublin Unified School District
Liaison Committee; East Bay Division/League of California
Cities alternate; Citizen/Organization of the Year
Committee; Community Television Corporation; Park
Masterplans Committee; Alameda County Soviet Exchange
Program.
Cm. Burton: Alameda County Library Advisory Committee;
Alameda Co. Housing Authority; DSRSD Liaison Committee;
East Bay Division/League of California Cities alternate;
Zone 7 Liaison Committee; East Bay Regional Park District
Liaison; Alameda County Transportation Commission
alternate; Livermore/Amador Valley Transit Authority JPA
alternate.
* * * *
ANNUAL ST. PATRICK'S DAY CELEBRATION (950-40)
Ms. Lowart said that for the last six years, the City of Dublin
has celebrated St. Patrick' s Day with a parade and community
celebration. The Chamber of Commerce has proposed that the City
and the Chamber work together to expand the scope of the St.
Patrick' s Day celebration to include the business community.
Ideas for the celebration include sidewalk sales, promotions,
participation in special advertising supplements, and a
professional arts and crafts show and sale. Dublin Place
Shopping Center has offered its parking lot for the celebration.
Ms. Lowart said that since only three months remained for
planning, time was very short.
Cm. Moffatt said that he was in favor of the proposal.
Cm. Burton asked whose arts and crafts would be displayed for
sale.
Ms. Lowart responded that it had not been determined but that
the intent was to contract with a professional. The St.
Patrick' s Day celebration has not been a moneymaker in the past
but was an opportunity for local clubs and organizations to
raise money. The arts and crafts sale would offset costs.
CM - VOL 9 - 360
Regular Meeting December 10, 1990
Cm. Jeffery said that the City should look into doing something
major next year but that not enough time remained this year to
arrange for the arts and crafts.
Cm. Burton said that it was important for the City to retain its
identity with St. Patrick' s Day.
Ms. Lowart said that the City did have a successful event and
that she did not want to form a premature relationship with the
Chamber. She asked the Council to provide direction for 1991.
Cm. Jeffery said she felt the business community would want to
have the celebration in the downtown area.
Cm. Moffatt agreed that the parade route should remain the same
and that sidewalk sales should be discussed with the businesses.
Cm. Jeffery suggested that the business community capitalize on
the parade with sidewalk sales and food booths and that the
children' s activities be conducted at the Civic Center. The
arts and crafts event wouldn't be possible this year.
Mayor Snyder said that he had understood from the parade
chairman that the route might change.
Ms. Lowart said that some discussion had taken place with the
idea that the normal route would be good if the celebration were
held downtown but that perhaps the parade should end at the
Civic Center if the celebration is to be held there.
Mayor Snyder commented that the City would lose control by not
having the events at the Civic Center.
Cm. Jeffery said that it was difficult to work in a benefit for
the businesses.
Ms. Lowart said that it may be possible to make an exception to
the Zoning Ordinance to allow sidewalk sales for resident
businesses.
Cm. Moffatt asked about the businesses that were not in the
downtown area.
Ms. Lowart stated that the intent was to benefit businesses in
the parade route area, as they normally perceived the parade as
detrimental.
Cm. Jeffery suggested that the program start in one area and
that other areas be added when the program is successful.
Ms. Lowart commented that policing businesses that come in from
another area might be difficult.
CM - VOL 9 - 361
Regular Meeting December 10, 1990
Mr. Ambrose said that this is a complicated issue and won't be
completely worked out in two or three months.
Cm. Jeffery commented that the venture has to be done as a
partnership; the City can't take the lead. She suggested
checking with the Chamber and the Park and Recreation Commission
to see what is possible.
On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Moffatt, and by
unanimous vote, the City Council supported the concept of the
major celebration for 1992 and cooperation with the Chamber of
Commerce for 1991 within the existing budget.
* * * *
GARBAGE SERVICE AND PROPOSED RATE INCREASE (810-30)
Assistant City Manager Paul Rankin stated that the City of
Dublin is a member of the Joint Refuse Rate Review Committee
(JRRRC) , which was formed through a Joint Powers Agreement to
provide rate review assistance to agencies serviced by the
Oakland Scavenger Company (OSC) . The joint effort allows
agencies to review rate applications in a cost effective manner.
Oakland Scavenger Company (OSC) , which is owned by Waste
Management, Inc. (WMI) , holds the franchise for the City of
Dublin. Local service is provided by Livermore/Dublin Disposal
(LDD) , which is operated as a division of OSC. The curbside
recycling program is not included as a part of this rate review
process.
The OSC rate application covers the years 1991 through 1993 .
Costs are presently exceeding estimates made two years ago. Mr.
Rankin said that the later years may require additional
adjustment. The Consultant reviewed both expenses and revenues
to determine whether the rate increase is accurate. The JRRRC
recommends that the increase be implemented.
The primary areas of increased costs impacting the amount OSC
has requested were as follows:
Reimbursement for lawsuit expenses: The JRRRC did not concur
with this request, and the Consultant was directed to adjust the
company's estimated expenses accordingly.
Dumping fees: Disposal costs have increased due to additional
tipping fees levied by State and regional agencies; also, OSC is
experiencing added costs to prepare landfill areas for closure.
Earthquake costs: Some of the company's facilities were damaged
in the 1989 earthquake necessitating relocation to temporary
quarters.
CM - VOL 9 - 362
Regular Meeting December 10, 1990
Collection wages and salaries: This category contributed toward
a reduction in estimated expenses.
Mr. Rankin continued that five policy areas were discussed by
the Rate Review Committee. Two areas will potentially need to
be considered in future rate applications. These are costs
associated with the Durham Road landfill and the issue of
landfill closure and post-closure costs. The Consultant
recommended eliminating these costs from the current rate
application.
OSC requested a 16% increase for 1991, followed by 11 to 12%
increases for the two succeeding years. Implementation of the
16% increase in 1991 would reduce projected unfunded expenses
from $21. 5 million to $8.4 million. Mr. Rankin said that the
Consultant had calculated that a 28% increase would be needed to
fully compensate the company for its costs at the end of 1991,
not including tipping fees. It was estimated that the tipping
fees would correlate to a 1% increase in rates.
The cumulative impact of rate adjustments recommended by the
JRRRC is 30%, including 16% for increased company expenses, 13%
for Measure D County Recycling, and 1% for tipping fees.
Mr. Rankin continued that the Consultant had supplied a
breakdown of regulatory fees paid for disposal in Alameda
County. The JRRRC recommended that OSC identify which portion
of the customer' s bill is associated with regulatory fees.
The current Dublin residential service is considered "backyard"
service, meaning that the customer does not need to move the can
to the curb for pickup. Included in the rates are two special
pickups which allow the customer to place large accumulations at
the curb on specified Saturdays. The City provides two
additional cleanups which are paid from a special fund. This
fund represents excess revenues generated by OSC during a period
prior to the City' s assumption of the franchise agreement. It
is estimated that the fund for special cleanups will be depleted
by the end of 1991.
Mr. Rankin said that the City has a separate agreement with LDD
for provision of the residential curbside recycling program.
Increases in the cost of this program are linked to changes in
the consumer price index. The contractor is also required to
coordinate increases with changes in the regular garbage rate.
No increase is being considered at this time.
The final component of the local garbage service is a surcharge
for the Household Hazardous Waste Collection conducted on May 5,
1990.
CM - VOL 9 - 363
Regular Meeting December 10, 1990
Mr. Rankin said that Staff had had preliminary discussions with
LDD regarding potential changes to the service which would
reduce rates. The two options investigated were curbside
service utilizing either the resident' s own cans (a 10% savings)
or special containers for automated pickup (a 4% savings) .
Cm. Moffatt asked if the 10% reduction would be 10% of the total
cost or 10% of the 30% increase.
Mr. Rankin said that the increase would be reduced from 30% to
20%.
Cm. Moffatt asked if the increase in expense to provide
automatic containers would be a one-time expense.
Mary Evans of Livermore/Dublin Disposal said that the cost of
the capital equipment was depreciated over eight years; so the
increase to pay for the equipment would last eight years.
Cm. Burton asked how much trouble it would be to show the
regulatory fees as a separate item on the bill.
Ms. Evans said that LDD had already considered doing that, and
that the fees would be shown separately on the bill starting in
January. The fees are 15. 6% of the total bill.
Mr. Rankin continued that the JRRRC had commissioned a survey of
alternative rate structures in order to analyze options
available as a method to assist in achieving the landfill
diversion goals established by AB939. The report suggests that
the City Council may want to consider changing the per-can rate
to reduce the differential between single-can and additional-can
service. The greatest opportunity for adjusting service levels
typically comes in conjunction with a composting or yard waste
program. Mr. Rankin said that the second portion of the
Alternative Rate Structure Report is concerned with commercial
rates, which are more complicated. Mr. Rankin said that Staff
would take comments made in this report into consideration as
the City prepares its Source Reduction and Recycling Element.
In order to implement the rate increase, the City Council would
need to hold a public hearing at the January 14, 1991, meeting.
Mr. Rankin said that Staff would like more input as to the
preferred method of adjusting the rates in order to post the
required notices for the hearing.
The options are a 30% across-the-board increase, loading only
25% or 20% on the first can, or an adjustment which would
penalize residents who require more than a single can. Mr.
Rankin said that Staff recommended a rate adjustment which would
begin to equalize the differential between service levels; i.e. ,
loading either 25% or 20% on the first can.
CM - VOL 9 - 364
Regular Meeting December 10, 1990
Mayor Snyder said that he felt there should be more equity for
second cans.
Cm. Jeffery said she felt the cost per can should be equal.
Mr. Ambrose responded that part of the cost is pickup and
billing. 59% of the residents would be impacted by an increase
in the cost of the second can.
Cm. Jeffery commented that charging more for the second can
would encourage recycling.
Mr. Ambrose said that a recycling program was needed first.
Cm. Burton emphasized the use of the Bag-Its, which can be used
for extra trash or clippings. The Bag-Its are available at a
cost of $1. 25 each at the City offices.
Mr. Rankin said that different resolutions could be prepared but
if the City Council had a preference, Staff would like to know.
Cm. Moffatt stated that the cans should be the same price.
Mayor Synder asked if the City started with Option B, whether
the same level would be attained.
Mr. Rankin said that it would, and that there could be a move
toward equalizing the cost.
Mayor Snyder said that the use of additional cans couldn't be
gauged until the City was further into the recycling program.
Mr. Rankin commented that the preliminary curbside recycling
program was only 4% of the trash.
Mr. Rankin then discussed the Hazardous Household Waste
surcharge. Single-family customers are currently paying 20
cents per month: Bin service customers are charged 15 cents per
cubic yard. City Staff is currently pursuing a State grant
which would provide reimbursement for a portion of the May 5,
1990, HHW collection. It appears that a surplus of funds will
be generated, which could be used to offset recycling program
costs, used to reduce the amount of future rate increases, or
applied toward future residential cleanups. Mr. Rankin asked
for input regarding use for the excess funds, which amount to
approximately $2 , 000.
On motion of Cm. Moffatt, seconded by Cm. Jeffery, and by
unanimous vote, the City Council ratified the surcharge,
established January 14, 1991 as a public hearing date for the
rate increase, and selected Option B in relation to the per-can
increase, with the idea of reaching parity in the future.
CM - VOL 9 - 365
Regular Meeting December 10, 1990
Dave McDonald of LDD introduced Dan Borges, who will be the new
General Manager. Mr. Borges replaces Bill Brandi, who is
retiring.
* * * *
WEST DUBLIN FIELD TRIP (420-30)
Planning Director Larry Tong said that a West Dublin field trip
had been preliminarily scheduled for Saturday, January 12 , 1991
from 10: 00 a.m. to approximately 12 : 30 p.m. Participants were
requested to meet in the Civic Center parking lot. Mr. Tong
said that the field trip was for informational purposes only and
that no action would be taken.
Mr. Ambrose said that the trip would be cancelled if it rained.
He added that since the number of members of the public that may
attend could not be anticipated, the City would not be able to
provide transportation for the public. Mr. Ambrose expressed
concern for the property owner if the public provided its own
four-wheel drive vehicles.
By consensus, the City Council felt the proposed date and time
were agreeable.
* * * *
Nielsen School (590-50)
Mayor Snyder asked whether using an officer to help implement
the programs and issue advisory citations could be considered.
Mr. Ambrose said that it could.
Regarding the passenger loading zone question, Lt. Norm Gomes
commented that the ordinance specifies a three-minute time limit
for vehicles parked in a passenger loading zone.
* * * *
East Dublin Study Session (420-30)
Mr. Ambrose reminded the City Council of the East Dublin study
session that would be held on December 18th. It was decided to
hold a regular meeting beginning at 6: 00 p.m. prior to the study
session in order to discuss the designs for the Dublin High
School baseball and girls ' athletic fields.
* * * *
CM - VOL 9 - 366
Regular Meeting December 10, 1990
CLOSED SESSION
At 11: 52 p.m. , the Council recessed to a closed executive
session to discuss potential litigation in accordance with
Government Code Section 54956. 9 (c) .
* * * *
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Council, the
meeting was adjourned at 12 : 41 p.m. to a special meeting on
December 18, 1990 at 6: 00 p.m.
* * * *
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CM - VOL 9 - 367
Regular Meeting December 10, 1990
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING - December 18, 1990
An adjourned regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Dublin
was held on Tuesday, December 18, 1990, in the Council Chambers of the
Dublin Civic Center. The meeting was called to order at 5: 58 p.m. , by
Mayor Moffatt.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Councilmembers Hegarty, Jeffery, Snyder, Vonheeder and Mayor
Moffatt.
ABSENT: None.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Mayor led the Council, Staff and those present in the pledge of
allegiance to the flag.
CONSENT CALENDAR
On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Moffatt, and by unanimous
vote, the Council took the following actions:
Adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 154 - 90
APPROVING 2 SAFETY-RELATED IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS AND DIRECTING STAFF
TO APPLY TO THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FOR
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT ARTICLE 3 FUNDING (1060-90)
Approved Warrant Register in the amount of $285, 623 . 51.
* * * *
DUBLIN HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC FIELDS RENOVATION (280-30)
Recreation Director Lowart advised that funds have been included in
the 1990-95 Capital Improvement Program for the renovation of the
Dublin High School baseball fields and girls athletic fields. The
City has entered into an agreement with Singer & Hodges, Inc. , to
prepare the design and construction documents. Preliminary design
costs were: Baseball Fields Turf Area - $186,408; Varsity Infield and
Bleachers - $77, 273 ; Junior Varsity Infield and Bleachers - $50, 654 ;
Girls Softball Fields - $99,735; Irrigation Upgrade - $33,263; Total -
$447, 334 . In addition, Ms. Lowart advised that in the event that the
project comes in under budget, alternates were identified. These
included: Replace existing sprinkler heads - $45, 137; Additional
landscaping - $37,881; Scorers Booth - $4, 600; High net fencing along
canal - $69, 000; Total - $156, 618.
Ms. Lowart advised that the total budget for the project is $549,500
which includes $496,250 for improvements and $53 ,250 for design and
inspection. We do not anticipate receiving any funding from the
School District. The Park & Recreation Commission reviewed and
CM - VOL 9 - 368
Adjourned Regular Meeting December 18, 1990
approved the design at their meeting of December 11, 1990. The design
has also been reviewed by both the administration of the Dublin
Unified School District and the staff at Dublin High School.
Dave Evans, with Singer & Hodges made a project presentation to the
Council.
Cm. Burton stated that with regard to the fence, the proposal is to
save only the poles. He did not feel this made sense and clarified
that the actual agreement would come before the Council at a future
date.
Cm. Moffatt questioned if fencing materials like fiberglass or plastic
might work.
Ms. Lowart pointed out that a large expansive area is being discussed.
Cm. Burton asked if the sprinklers are in bad shape and if they
propose to upgrade or replace them.
Ms. Lowart advised that there has been a lot of repairs done over the
years and by replacing them we will be bringing them up to a good
level and also standardizing the type of heads we use.
Mr. Evans advised that the existing rotors are a large water design
and there is some kind of a safety issue involved. Those proposed are
more state-of-the-art and more efficient regarding water usage. Mr.
Evans displayed maps showing the existing site and the master plan and
discussed proposed improvements.
Cm. Jeffery questioned the possibility of moving the location of home
plate so that it would face the other way and also questioned the
location of where the canal ran alongside the site.
Ms. Lowart pointed out that soccer fields are adjacent to these fields
and this causes some restrictions with regard to field placement.
Mayor Snyder pointed out that the trees along the creek have been
planted twice by the Lions Club but they have not been maintained. He
questioned if there was some means by which they could be maintained
in the future.
Mr. Evans advised that some of the trees are now taking hold and
establishing themselves. They certainly are worth building upon.
Ms. Lowart advised that as part of the agreement, similar to the
football field agreement, the City will maintain all the landscaping
that it puts in.
Cm. Jeffery asked if the City will schedule the fields.
Ms. Lowart advised that we currently schedule them and we will
continue. High School programs mostly utilize the fields, but Dublin
CM - VOL 9 - 369
Adjourned Regular Meeting December 18, 1990
Little League is rapidly expanding and they will be able to use the
bigger diamonds.
Cm. Burton asked if this money would come from the General Fund or a
special fund.
Mr. Ambrose advised that General Fund monies will be used.
Cm. Moffatt questioned if the tree area around the diamond will be
fenced off.
Mr. Evans advised that there is some fencing proposed in some of the
area. All the fields have fencing that extends beyond the dugouts.
Ms. Lowart summarized that Staff is working with the School District
to prepare a development agreement for this project which will be
brought before the City Council for approval at the January 14, 1991
meeting.
On motion of Cm. Moffatt, seconded by Cm. Jeffery, and by unanimous
vote, the Council approved the design and directed the Consultant to
proceed with preparation of construction documents.
* * * *
OTHER BUSINESS
State Budget SB 2557 (330-80)
Cm. Jeffery suggested that the City Council consider doing what the
League of CA Cities suggests in talking to the Board of Supervisors.
In correspondence from the League, they state that cities have been
pitted against counties in California by the State Legislature. With
the passage of SB 2557, the State underfunded counties and forced them
to make up the lost revenues by charging cities. They are considering
an option which would provide the same income to counties as booking
fees and property tax collection. A plan calls for a 1-year extension
of the depreciation schedule for the motor vehicle in-lieu fee (VLF) .
This would raise $345 million for counties; precisely the amount they
will collect from cities, schools and special districts to book
prisoners and collect property taxes. The League is requesting that
cities work with their counties to present this new solution.
Cm. Burton asked if the State will merely take the licensing fees and
hold them.
Cm. Jeffery stated she feels this gives State Legislators a way to
back out of something they did. The pressure this year is for money.
On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Burton, and by unanimous
vote, the Council agreed that this was an urgency item which needed to
be placed on the agenda for discussion.
Cm. Jeffery advised that this was discussed at a League Board meeting
last Friday. Costs have gone up a lot from the early estimates. She
CM - VOL 9 - 370
Adjourned Regular Meeting December 18, 1990
advised that there are several legislators who have offered to author
legislation repealing SB 2557.
Cm. Burton questioned some of the discussion related to pros and cons.
Cm. Jeffery stated some counties feel that since it has already been
given to them, why should they now give it up. The Contra Costa
County Administrator argued against giving it up. She felt we should
lobby the Board of Supervisors and get their consensus, and then lobby
the Legislators.
Mr. Ambrose indicated that booking fees and property tax administra-
tion would cost Dublin approximately $130, 000.
On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Burton, and by unanimous
vote, the Council agreed to work toward presenting the VLF legislative
proposal to the Alameda County Board of Supervisors in order to gain
their concurrence and then to lobby State Legislators. Staff was
directed to prepare a letter stating this position.
*
CLOSED SESSION
At 6: 37 p.m. , the Council recessed to a closed executive session to
discuss Potential Litigation, in accordance with Government Code
Section 54956.9 (c) .
* * * *
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Council, the
meeting was adjourned at 7: 15 p.m.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CM - VOL 9 - 371
Adjourned Regular Meeting December 18, 1990