HomeMy WebLinkAbout4.10 SchaeferRnchGPA&Contrct
,.
e
.
CITY OF DUBLIN
AGENDA STATEMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JUNE 13,1995
SUBJECT:
REPORT PREPARED BY:
EXHIBITS ATTACHED:
P A 94-028 Schaefer Ranch General Plan Amendment EIR
First Amendment to the Contract between the City of Dublin and WPM
Planning Team, Inc.
Tasha Huston, Associate Planner ;J ~
Exhibit 1. / Draft Resolution approving the first amendment to the
Consulting Contract between the City and WPM
Exhibit 2. I Contract Amendment from WPM Planning Team, Inc.
Exhibit 3. / Letter from Robert Y ohai, of Schaefer Heights Inc.
BACKGROUND A TT ACHMENT: Vicinity Map
RECOMMENDATIOCAu
tr /~
FINANCIAL STATEMENT:
DESCRIPTION:
1. Adopt Resolution approving the first amendment to the contract
between the City and WPM Planning Team
2. Authorize the City Manager to Execute
_ the Contract after the funding has been received from the applicant
The Contract amendment will not exceed $21,045. The applicant is
responsible for all processing costs associated with the contract
amendment. A payment method and schedule will be developed with the
Applicant and the City's Finance Department.
On October 24, 1994, the City Council authorized the City Manager to sign an agreement with WPM Planning
Team, Inc. (WPM) to undertake the Schaefer Ranch General Plan Amendment Study. The study involves a
General Plan Amendment document and Environmental Impact Report (EIR), which will include a fiscal impact
analysis and traffic impact study. The original EIR scope of work schedule anticipated an approximately 7 month
time frame, with a total cost not to exceed $139,150.00.
As expected under the original project description, the applicants have submitted applications for a Planned
Development Prezone, Annexation, and Tentative Map. A Notice of Preparation (NOP) of the project EIR was
distributed in March of 1995, and several response letters have been received.
The response letter from the Dougherty Regional Fire Authority raises significant issues about fire facilities on
the Schaefer Ranch site. The consultant's original work scope included only a nominal budget for analysis offire
protection impacts, and did not anticipate the issues raised in response to the NOP. To address these issues
properly, a subcontractor specializing in fire protection impact analysis is needed.
The City's EIR consultant, WPM, has obtained a proposal from Gage-Babcock and Associates, a leading
consulting firm in the field offire protection. The cost for the contract amendment, to include additional analysis
of fire protection facilities and services, is as follows:
Gage and Babcock:
WPM:
$18,300.
$ 2,745. (15% of subcontractor cost, for contract administration and coordination)
A letter has been received (Exhibit 3) from Robert Y ohai, the Schaefer Ranch project applicant, agreeing to
deposit with the city the funds for the additional analysis.
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the first amendment to the
Consulting Contract between the City and WPM Planning Team, Inc. (Exhibit 1), and authorize the City
Manager to execute the contract amendment with WPM Planning Team, Inc. (Exhibit 2) after the project
applicants have committed the funds needed to cover the total cost of the work scope.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ITEM NO. 4.JlJ
COPIES TO:
Applicants
PA File
Senior planner
Project Planner
CITY CLERK
FILE ~
........ r'
~
tI
e
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
APPROVING FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE CONSULTING CONTRACT WITH WPM PLANNING TEAM
WHEREAS, Schaefer Heights Incorporated has applied for PA 94-028
Schaefer Ranch General Plan Amendment study, requiring preparation of an
Environmental Impact Report (EIR); and
WHEREAS, the city Council approved Resolution No. 111-94 awarding the
EIR consulting contract to WPM Planning Team, Inc.; and
WHEREAS, additional specialized information on fire and emergency
response services is needed in the EIR as a result of responses to the
Notice of Preparation for the EIR; and
WHEREAS, the applicant agrees to fund the cost for the amendment to
the EIR contract for additional analysis as proposed by Gage Babcock; and
WHEREAS, the Staff Report was submitted recommending that the City
Council award the proposed contract to WPM Planning Team; and
WHEREAS, the City Council did consider said report and
recommendations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city Council does hereby
approve the first amendment to the consulting contract with WPM Planning
Team, Inc.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of June, 1995.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Mayor
ATTEST:
city Clerk
EXHIBIT 1
e
e
FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT
FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES: PREPARATION OF
THE SCHAEFER RANCH ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
\VHEREAS, the CITY OF DUBLIN ("The City") and WPM PLANNING TEAM, INe. ("The
Consultant") are parties to an agreement entitled "AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT
SERVICES FOR PREPARATION OF THE SCHAEFER RANCH ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT, dated October 24, 1994 (the "AGREEMENT"); and
\VHEREAS, additional specialized information on fIre prot<<?ction and emergency response
services is needed in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) as a result of responses to the
Notice of Preparation for the EIR, and
\VHEREAS, The City and The Consultant desire to amend the AGREE11ENT to provide for
additional services to evaluate flre protection and emergency response services in the EIR,
NOW, THEREFORE, The City and The Consultant agree to amend the Contract of October
14, 1994 as follows:
A. Consultant's Services. Exhibit A is amended by adding Item 8.5.1, Speciali:ed fire
protection and em ergency response analysis, with revised item and total costs.
B. Additional Services. Exhibit A-2 is added to the contract, with detailed scope of
services for specialized fIre protection analysis.
C. Compensation. Contract paragraphs 7 and 8, referring to total compensation, are
3
EXHIBIT 2
e
e
amended by deleting the sum of $139.150 and adding in its place the sum of
$160,195.
D. Schedule. Exhibit B, Time Schedule, is replaced by Exhibit B, Revised Time
Schedule.
E. Progress Payment Limits. Exhibit C, "Progress Payment Limits," is amended to
incorporate payment for specialized fIre protection analysis.
Except as expressly set forth herein, the AGREEMENT shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this First Amendment to the
AGREEMENT to be executed the day and year first written below.
THE CITY OF DUBLIN
(a municipal corporation)
A'ITEST:
City Clerk
By:
Richard C. Ambrose City Manager
Date:
WPM PLANNING TEAM. JNC#~_
By: tS{td4 !(lot . L
Rudolph R. Platzek, President
Date:
5/~II"'s
4
e
REVISED PAGES OF ORIGINAL CONTRACT
e
6. Terms. Tim.' of the essence. Consultant shall be~work immediately. The
work as described in Exhibi ", Scope of Work, shall be completeacording to the schedule
of Exhibit B. The days allowed in Schedule B may be extended to allow additional City review
time or to receive necessary materials from the applicant.
7. Compensation. For full perfonnance of the services to be rendered pursuant to
this contract for time and materials, the City shall pay the Consultant a total sum not to exceed
$139,150.00 $160,195.00. The City shall pay Consultant on a time and materials basis as set
forth in attached Exhibit "C". Partial payment shall be made on a monthly basis in proportion
to the percentage of work completed, upon receipt of Consultant's invoice and the approval of
the Planning Director, in accordance with the City's schedule for processing invoices. Invoices
submitted to City for payment must contain a brief description of work performed, including the
work phase and task performed, the percentage of work completed in prior periods, and the
percentage of work being billed in the current period.
8. Cham!es. City may request, from time to time, changes in the scope of services
to be provided by Consultant. Any changes and related fees shall be mutually agreed upon
between City and Consultant and shall be the subject of a written amendment to this Agreement
which may be signed on behalf of City by City Manager if the change in total compensation does
not exceed 5% of $139,150 $160,195.00.
9. Consultant's Status. In the perfonnance of the obligations set forth in this
Agreement, Consultant shall have the status of an independent contractor and Consultant shall
not be considered to be an employee of the City for any purpose. All persons working for or
under the direction of Consultant 1U'e its agents, servants, and employees and are not agents,
servants, or employees of City.
10. Termination for Convenience of City. The City may tenninate this Agreement
at any time by mailing a notice in writing to Consultant that the Agreement is terminated. Said
Agreement shall be deemed tenninated as of the date specified in the notice and no further work
shall be performed by Consultant. If the Agreement is so tenninated, the Consultant shall be
paid for that percentage of the work actually completed, based on a pro rata portion of the total
fixed sum compensation described in Section 7 herein at the time the notice of termination is
received.
11. Non-Assi2:nabilitv. The Consultant shall not assign, sublet, or transfer this
Agreement or any interest or obligation therein without the prior written consent of the City, and
then only upon such tenns and conditions as City may set forth in writing.
12. Indemnifv and Hold Harmless. Consultant shall defend, indemnify, and hold
harmless, the City and its officers and employees from and against all claims, losses, damage,
injury, and liability for damages arising from errors, omissions, negligent or wrongful acts of the
Consultant in the performance of its services under this Agreement, regardless of whether the
City has reviewed and/or approved the work or services which has given rise to the claim, loss,
damage, injury or liability for damages. The City's acceptance of the insurance certificates
required under this Agreement does not relieve the Consultant from its obligation under this
paragraph.
13. Insurance. During the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain in full
force and effect at its own cost and expense the following insurance coverage:
1 :\930'l'-CONTRACT.SH
e
REVISED APPENDIX A
e
\\1'M I'l;uUling Te",,,. Inc.
e
EXHIBIT A
OcIOt><,r 14. 1994
_C"i~Cd May 18. 1995 (or Contract Amendment I
PROPOSAL 3: WITH STANLEY R. HOFFMAN ASSOCIATES AND TJKM
SCHAEFER HEIGHTS PROJECT
EIR - CEQA FINDL~GS - GPA - UNIFIED GP I GPAs
SUJ\1J\1ARY SCOPE OF SERVICES AND COST ESTIMATE
Te.am Member Responsibility Te.am Member Costs
WPM "TM WPM Sub- Sub-- Cost
"""1 Planning Team Tasks Hours Rll te S tafT Consultant WPM Consultant To t.a.l
EIR PREP" R" 110:'\
0.0 Initi:lle Project 64 5140 180 5320
0.1 Scoping Mectinss
. 7/1Sf.l4 - OakJ:md - 160 miles 4 !l5 PlalZek Mileage 340 40 380
. 7(.!.9f.l4 . Dublin - 140 miles 4 !l5 Platzek Mileage 340 35 375
. !I/lO;'94 . Dublin - 140 miles 4 !IS Platzek Mileage 340 35 375
. 9M4 - Dublin - 140 miles 4 85 Platzek Mileage 340 35 375
. COlYUnunity Meeting - 140 miles !I !IS Platzek Mileage 680 35 715
0.2 Prepare Dr~tlnitiaJ Study
. Review Program EIR 4 85 Platzek - - 340 - + 340
. Prepare Sec. 5162 Checklist 2 85 Platzek - - 170 . + 170
. Prepare Checklist EV:llualion 4 85 Platzek - - 340 - - 340
. Consultation - City - Proponent 2 !IS PlalZek - - 170 - - 170
. Word Processing 6 35 Fait - - 210 - - 210
0.3 Prepare Work Scopc/ProPOS:ll 18 !l5 Platzek - - 1530 - - 1530
0.4 Prcparc/Execute Contract 4 85 Platzek - - 340 - - 340
1.0 Chap. 1: Intro. and Project Description 34 1990 195 2185
1.1 Introduction 2 75 Dahlin - - 150 - - 150
1.2 Project Description
. Site and Vicinity Characteristics 1 75 Dahlin - - 75 - - 75
. Proposed Development 0.5 75 Dahlin - - 37.50 + - 37.50
. Housing and Lot Characteristics 0.5 75 Dahlin - . 37.50 - - 37.50
. Project Objectives/Actions 1 75 Dahlin - - 75 . . 75
. ConstraintslOpporruni ties 1 75 Dahlin - . 75 - - 75
1.3 Graphics: Setups. 7 Figures
. City Selling 2 55 Schilling Repro 110 15 125
I :\9309\9309-S84
.
Octnber 14. 1994
Rc\'i.cd May 1 R. 1995 fC1r ennt met Amend",elll I
e
EXHIBIT A
e
WPM Planning Tel\m. Inc.
Continued PROPOSAL 3: \Vith Stanley R. Hoffman Associates and T1KM
SCHAEFER HEIGHTS PROJECT
EIR - CEQA FINDINGS - GPA - UNIFIED GP I GPAs
~llJ\1J\1ARY ~COPE OF ~ERVICE~ AND CO~T E~TIMATE
Team Member Responsibility Team Member Costs
WPM WPM WPM Sulr Sub- Cost
WPM Planning Team Tasks Hours Rate S tafT Consultant WPM Consultant Total
. Site and Vicinity 2 55 Se;hilling Repro 110 15 125
. Site; Feature Names 2 55 Se;hiIling Repro 110 30 14D
. Site Plan 2 55 Schilling Repro 110 15 125
. Land Use Plan 8 55 Schilling Repro 440 15 455
. Prelim. Tenl..:ltive Map 2 55 Schilling Repro 110 15 125
. Aerial Photo 2 55 Schilling Repro 110 30 140
. Slope Analysis 4 55 Schilling Repro 220 30 2..50
. Selected Site Constraints . 4 55 Se;hilling Repro 220 30 250
2.0 Chap.2; Summary 15 1125 - . 1125
2.1 Lnpacts and Mitigations MatJix 12 75 Dahlin - . 900 - - 900
2.2 Alternatives 2 75 Dahlin - - 150 - - 150
2.3 Controversies/lssues to Resolve 1 75 Dahlin - - 75 . - 75
3.0 Chap_ 3: Socioeconomic EffecLo;/Fiscal1 17 1275 27,3501 28,6251
3.1 Selling
. Population 1 75 Dahlin Cone 75 520 595
. Employment 1 75 Dahlin Cone 75 130 205
. Retail Sales 1 75 Dahlin Cone 75 130 205
. Assessed Valuation 1 75 Dahlin Cone 75 130 205
. Housing Characteristics 1 75 Dahlin Cone 75 350 425
. lobslHousing Balance 1 75 Dahlin Cone 75 130 205
3.2 Impacts and Mitigation Measures
. Corrununity Scx:iocconomic Effects I 75 Dahlin Cone 75 2080 2155
. Population Growth 1 75 Dahlin Cone 75 520 595
. Housing Stock 1 75 Dahlin Cone 75 350 425
. Affordable Housing 1 75 . Dahlin Cone 75 350 425
. Employment 1 75 Dahlin Cone 75 130 205
. lobslHousing Balance 1 75 Dahlin Cone 75 130 205
. Sales Tax Revenues 0.5 75 Dahlin Cone 37.50 130 167 50
2
I :\9309\9309-I'B4
.....1'M I'la,u\;ng Team. Inc.
e
EXHIBIT A
Q,;lnbcr 14, 1994
eRc\';~cdM.Y 18,1995 fnrC<;>nll"3ct Amendment 1 -
Continued PROPOSAL 3: \Vith Stanley R. Hoffman Associates and TJKM
SCHAEFER HEIGHTS PROJECT
EIR _ CEQA FINDINGS - GPA - UNIFIED GP I GPAs
SlIMJ\1ARY SCOPE OF SERVICES AND COST ESTIMATE
Team Member Responsibility Team Member Costs
WPM WPM WPM Sub- Sub- Cost
WPM Planning Team Tasks Hours Rate Staff Consultant WPM Consultant Total
. Property Tv; Revenues 0.5 75 Dahlin Cone 37.50 130 167 .50
. Competitive Commerciallmpac.:LS 2 75 Dahlin Cone 150 1040 1190
3.3 Fisc.:a.\ Sludyl 2 75 Dahlin Hoffman 150 21.1001 21.2501
~.O Chap.~: Land Use and Planning 70 5050 180 5 2..'\0
4.1 Sc.:ning
. Existing Land Use 4 85 Pla12ck - - 340 - - 340
. Property O....l1erships 2 85 Platzck - - 170 - - 170
~.2 LnpacLS and Mitigation Mcasu..:s ..
. ConsiSlency .....ith Adopted Plans 8 85 Platzek - - 680 - + 680
. Sphere/Anncxation Issues 4 85 Pla12ck - + 340 - - 340
. Land Use Compatibility 2 85 PI atzck - - 170 - - 170
. Agricultural Resources 4 85 Pla12ck - - 340 - - 340
. Open Space 8 85 Platzck + - 680 - - 680
. Regional Trail Corridor 8 85 Platzck . - 680 - - 680
4.3 Graphics: Serups + 11 Figures
. Existing Land Use 3 55 Schilling Repro 165 15 180
. Ownership PallemS 3 55 Schlling Repro 165 15 180
. Sub-Regional Selling 1 55 Schilling Rcpro 55 15 70
. Dublin General Plan 3 55 Schilling Repro 165 15 180
. We:>lem Extended Planning Area 3 55 Schilling Repro 165 15 180
. Spheres of lnIluenee 3 55 Sc.:hilling Repro 165 15 180
. Agriculrural Suitability 3 55 Sc.:hilling Rcpro 165 15 180
. Williamson Acl Land 3 55 Schilling Repro 165 15 180
. Urban/Ag Relationships 3 55 Schilling Rcpro 165 30 195
. Open Space Plan 4 55 Schilling Repro 220 15 235
. Region! Trail Syslem 1 55 Schilling Repro 55 15 70
3
1 :\9309\9309-I'\B4
WPM Planning Team. Inc.
Oclohcr 14. 1994
Rc"i.cd May 18, 1995 for Conl...a Amendmcnl 1 e
EXHIBIT A
e
Continued PROPOSAL 3: With Stanley R. Hoffman Associates and TJKM
SCHAEFER HEIGHTS PROJECT
EIR - CEQA FINDINGS - GPA - UNIFIED GP I GPAs
SllMMARY SCOPE OF SERVICES AND COST ESTIMATE
Te.::lm Member Responsibility Te.::lm Member Costs
WPM WPM WPM Sub- Sub- Cost
WPM Planning Te.::lm Tasks Hours Rale Staff Consultant WPM Consultant Total
5.0 Chap.5: Traffic and Circulation" 47 2905 17,495" 20,400"
5.1 Sclling
. Project Iniliation ! 1 75 Dahlin TJKM 75 6502 7252
. Data Collection & ExisL Conditions 2 1 75 Dahlin TlKM 75 9f1:P 1035"
. Travel Demand Forecast! 2 75 Dahlin TJKM 150 19202 20702
5.2 LnpaclS and Mitigation M~urcs
Future LnpaclS and Mitisalions2 12 75 D:lhlin TJKM 900 , 69cxr
. ffXXY
, 46302 4630:
. Traffie Study Report- . - - - - - TJKM - -
-.
. TVTM Model Runs (2 @ S 1 000/ - - - - - - TJK.M - - 30002 30ClCl'"
. Reproduction" - - - - - - TJK.M - - 200" 2cxr
5.3 Graphics: Setups - 10 Figures
. Road.....ay System 3 55 Schilling Repro 165 15 180
. BikefTrail System 2 55 Schilling Repro 110 15 125
. Project Trip Distrihution 4 55 Schiling Rcpro 220 15 235
. ADT - Proj~t 4 55 Schilling Repro 220 15 235
. ADT - Cumulative 4 55 Schilling Repro 220 15 235
. Peak Hour - Projcct 4 55 Schilling Repro 220 15 235
. Peak Hour - Cumulative 4 55 Schilling Repro 220 15 235
. Geometries. Project 3 55 Schilling Repro 165 15 180
. Geometries. Cumulative 3 55 Schilling Repro 165 15 180
6.0 Chap.6: Visual and Site Design 43 2905 7465 10,370
6.1 Selling
. Visual Conte:l.l!Features 8 75 Dahlin miles/photos 600 50 650
. Methodology 1 75 Dahlin - - 75 - . 75
6.2 Impacts and Mitigation Mea.~ures
. Significance Criteria 1 75 Dahlin . - 75 - . 75
. Alteration of Landscape Character 1 75 Dahlin . . 75 - . 75
. Grading 8 75 Dahlin - - 600 . - 600
4
1:\930'1\9309- NB4
\\1'M I'I:Uloiog Team. loc.
e
EXHIBIT A
Oclober 14. 1994.
~e"i~ed May 1 S. 1995 for Cooll1lct Ameodmeot I
Continued PROPOSAL 3: \Vith Stanley R. Hoffman Associates and TJKM
SCHAEFER HEIGHTS PROJECT
EIR _ CEQA FINDINGS - GPA - UNIFIED GP I GPAs
SUMMARY SCOPE OF SERVICES AND COST ESTIMATE
Team Member Responsibility Team Member Costs
WPM WPM WPM $ulr Sub- Cost
WPM Planning Team Tasks Hours Rate Staff Consulmnt WPM Consultnnt Total
. Tree Removal 4 75 Dahlin . - 300 - - 300
. Fencing I 75 Dahlin - . 75 - - 75
. Light and Glare 1 75 Dahlin - - 75 - - 75
. Energy Conservation 2 75 Dahlin - - 150 - - 150
6.3 Graphics: Setups. 11 Figures
. Visual Features 2 55 Schilling Rcpro 110 30 140
. Offsite Visual Sensitivity 3 55 Schilling Rcpro 165 30 195
. Vie....-points 3 55 Schilling Rcpro 165 15 ISO
. Design Impact Areas 3 55 Schilling Repro 165 30 195
. Sclected Mitigation Measures 3 55 Schilling Repro 165 30 195
. View of Site: Rodeo Park 1 55 Schilling CADP 55 3640 3695
. View of Site: 1-51'0 I 55 Schilling CADP 55 3640 3695
7.0 Chap.7: Vegetlltion and Wildlife 19 1225 4605 5830
7.1 Selling
. Plant/Animal Conunuruties 1 75 Dahlin McGinnis 75 440 515
. End:mgercd/TIlrcatened Species 2 75 Dahlin McGinnis 150 440 590
7.2 Impacts and Mitigation Measures
. Signific;ance Criteria 0.5 75 Dahlin McGinnis 37.50 100 137.50
. Grassland 0.5 75 Dahlin McGinnis 37.50 440 477.50
. Northern Coastal Scrub 0.5 75 Dahlin McGinnis 3750 440 477 .50
. Coast Live Oak Woodland 0.5 75 Dahlin McGinnis 37.50 440 477.50
. Riparian/Stream 0.5 75 Dahlin McGinnis 37.50 440 477 .50
. Aquatic Biomes 1 75 Dahlin McGinnis 75 440 515
. Wildlife CorridorslHabitJts 1 75 Dahlin McGinnis 75 440 515
. Domestic Plants and Animals 0.5 75 Dahlin McGinnis 37.50 220 257.50
. EndaJ'lgeredfThreatened Species 1 75 Dahlin McGinnis 75 660 735
7.3 Graphics: Setups' 4 Figures
. Plant/Animal Communities 3 55 Schilling Repro 165 30 195
5
I :\9309\9309-I\B4
Ocl~hcr 14. 1994
R~,'i>cd May 18.1995 (NConlrad Amcndlll~nll
WI'M Planning T~am. Inc.
e
EXHIB IT A
e
Continued PROPOSAL 3: \Vith Stanley R. Hoffman Associates and TJKM
SCHAEFER HEIGHTS PROJECT
EIR ~ CEQA FINDINGS - GPA ~ UNIFIED GP / GPAs
SlIMMARY SCOPE OF SERVICES AND COST ESTIMATE
T~m Member Responsibilit). Te:lm Member Costs
WPM WPM WPM Sub- Sub~ . Cost
WPM Planning Team Tasks Hours Rate S tnff Consultant WPM Consultant Total
. Str= Channel Alterations 3 55 Schilling Repro 165 30 195
. Areas of Vegetation Removal 3 55 Schilling Repro 165 30 195
. Typical Reconstructed Pond 1 55 Schilling Repro 55 15 70
8.0 Chap.8: Public Facilities and Ser\'ices 41 5700 *" 24,3306W(l 30,030 &9&5
8.\ Domestic Water Supply
. Selling 1 75 Dahlin Greiner 75 1000 1075
. Impacts and Mitigation Measures 1 75 Dahlin Greiner 75 2000 2075
8.2 Wa.$tewater ..
. Selling I 75 Dahlin Greiner 75 1000 1075
. Impacts and Mitigation Measures 1 75 Dahlin Greiner 75 2000 2075
8.3 Solid Wa.ste
. Selling 1 75 Dahlin - - 75 - - 75
. Impacts and Mitigation Measures 2 75 Dahlin - - 150 - - 150
8,4 Police Protection
. Selling 2 75 Dahlin . - 150 . - 150
. Impacts and Mitigation Measures :2 75 Dahlin - - 150 - - 150
8.5 Fire Protection
. Seuing 2 75 Dahlin - - 150 - - 150
. Impacts and Mitigation Mea.surcs 2 75 Dahlin - - 150 . - 150
8S.1 Speciali;edflre protection and emcr- LS LS Dahlin Gage - 2745 18300 21.045
se1'lC)' response analysis Babcock
8.6 Parks and Recreation
. Selling 2 75 Dahlin - - 150 - - 150
. Impacts and Mitigation Measures 2 75 Dahlin - . 150 - - 150
8.7 Open Space
. Selling 2 75 Dahlin . - 150 - . 150
. Impacts and Mitigation Measures 2 75 Dahlin - - 150 . . 150
8.8 Regional Trail
. Seuing 1 75 Dahlin . - 75 . . 75
6
I :\930C1\9309-NB4
.....1"M I'lanning Tcam. Inc.
_
EXHIBIT A
Oclober 14. 1994
_RcViSCd May 18. 1995 ror Conlr1lCI Amendmcnt 1
Continued PROPOSAL 3: \Vith Stanley R. Hoffman Associates and TJKM
SCHAEFER HEIGHTS PROJECT
EIR _ CEQA FINDINGS - GPA - UNIFIED GP I GPAs
SllMMARY SCOPE OF SERVICES AND COST ESTIMATE
Team Member Responsibility Team Member Costs
WPM WPM. WPM Sub- Sub- Cost
'WPM Planning Team Tasks Hours Rate Staff Consultant WPM Consultant Total
. Impacts and Mitigation Mea.sures 2 75 Dahlin - - 150 - - 150
8.9 Schools
. Setting 3 75 Dahlin - - 225 - - 225
. Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3 75 Dahlin . - 225 - - 225
8.10 Other Services
. Setting I 75 Dahlin - . 75 - - 75
. Impacts and Mitigation Measures 2 75 Dahlin - - 150 - . 150
8.11 Graphics: Setups - 2 Figures ..
. Water Supply Plan 3 55 Schilling Repro 165 15 180
. Wastewater Plan 3 55 Schilling Repro 165 15 180
9.0 Chap.9: H)'drolog)'1Water Qualit}. 10 630 3030 3660
9.1 Drainage
. Selling I 75 Dahlin Greiner 75 500 575
. Impacts and Mitigation Measures 1 75 Dahlin Greiner 75 1000 1075
9.2 Water QualilY
. Setting I 75 Dahlin Greiner 75 500 575
. Impacts and Mitigation Measures 1 75 Dahlin Greiner 75 1000 1075
9.3 Graphics: Setups - 2 Figures
. Watershcd/Drainage Patterns 3 55 Schilling Repro 165 15 180
. Stonn Drainage Plan 3 55 Schilling Repro 165 15 180
10.0 Chnp. 10: Geology, Soils and Grading 21 1315 3665 4980
10.1 Setting
. Sile Conditions I 75 Dahlin HOC 75 350 425
. Proposed Grading 2 75 Dahlin HOC 150 350 500
10.2 Impacts and Mitigation Measures
. Significance Criteria 0.5 75 Dahlin BOC 3750 350 38750
. Mass Grading 1 75 Dahlin BOC 75 350 425
. Slope Stability 1 75 Dahlin HOC 75 350 425
7
1 :\9309\9309-I'B4
Ocloocr 14.1994
R~vj.cd lvby 18. 1995 for COlllraCl. ^m~llwn~1l1 t
e
EXHIBIT A
e
WPM Planning T~am. In~.
Continued PROPOSAL 3: \Vith Stanley R. Hoffman Associates and TJKM
SCHAEFER HEIGHTS PROJECT
EIR - CEQA FINDINGS - GPA - UNIFIED GP I GPAs
SUMMARY SCOPE OF SERVICES AND COST ESTIMATE
Team Member Responsibility Team Member Costs
WPM WPM WPM Sub- Sub- Cost
WPM Planning Team Tasks Hours Rale Staff Consultant "l'M Consultant Total
. Erosion 0.5 75 Dahlin BGC 3750 350 38750
. Fill Seulement 0.5 75 Dahlin BGC 3750 350 38750
. Expansive/Corrosive Soil 0.5 75 Dahlin BGC 3750 350 387.50
. Seismic H=d 0.5 75 Dahlin BGC 37.50 350 387.50
. Excavation 0.5 75 Dahlin BGC 37.50 350 38750
10.3 Graphics: Setups - 7 Figures
. Area Geologic Map 2 55 Schilling Repro 110 30 140
. R~gional Faull/Seismicity Map - I 55 Schilling Repro 55 15 70
. Prelim. Geologic Map 2 55 Schillng R~pro 110 30 140
. Landslide Hazards 2 55 Schilling Repro 110 30 140
. Other Geologic Constraints 2 55 Schilling Repro 110 30 J4(1
. Grading Plan 3 55 Schilling Repro 165 15 180
. Landslide Mitigation Measures I 55 Schilling Repro 55 15 70
11.0 Soi.~e3 11 685 60 745
11.1 Setting
. Noise Context3 0.5 75 Dahlin - - 37.503 - - 37.sri
. Noise Levels3 0.5 75 Dahlin - - 37.503 - - 37.sri
11.2 Impacts and Mitigation Measures
. Significance Criteria3 0.5 75 Dahlin - . 37.503 . - 375ri
. Construction Noise3 0.5 75 Dahlin - - 37.503 - - 37.5a'
. Highway and Street Noise3 2 75 Dahlin - - 1503 - - 15cr
11.3 Graphics: Setups. 2 Figures
. Existing Noise Conditions 4 55 Schilling Repro 220 30 250
. Year 201 0 Noise 3 55 Schilling Repro 165 30 195
12.0 Air Quality 6 450 2100 2550
12.1 Selling
. Regulations 1 75 Dahlin Pollack 75 100 175
. Existing Conditions 1 75 Dahlin Pollack 75 300 375
8
1:\930'1\9309-1\84
e
EXHIBIT A
OClober 14. 1994
_CVi'Cd May Ill. 1995 forConl",cl Amendment I
\\1'M Planning Team. Inc.
Continued PROPOSAL 3: \Vith Stanley R. Hoffman Associates and TJKM
SCHAEFER HEIG HTS PROJECT
EIR - CEQA FINDINGS - GPA . UNIFIED GP / GPAs
SUMMARY SCOPE OF SERVICES AND COST ESTIMATE
Team Member Responsibilit). Team Member Costs
WPM WPM WPl\1 Sub- Sub- Cost
WPM Planning Team Tasks Hours Rate Staff Consultant WPM Consultant Total
12.2 Impacts and Mitigation Measures
. Significance Crileria 0.5 75 Dahlin Pollack 37.50 100 137.50
. Particulates 0.5 75 Dahlin - . 37.50 . - 37.50
. Construction Emissions 0.5 75 Dahlin - - 37.50 - . 37.50
. Regional Owne Emissions 0.5 75 Dahlin Pollac:k 37.50 1200 1237.50
. CO Emissions 0.5 75 Dahlin Pollac:k 37.50 400 437.50
. Wood Buming Emissions 0.5 I 75 Dahlin - - 37.50 - - 37.50
. Global Warming I 75 Dahlin - - 75 - . 75
13.0 Enef1:), Resources 5 375 . . 375
13.1 SC:lling3 1 75 Dahlin - - 753 - - 753
13.2 Impacls and Mitigation Mea..<ures3 4 75 Dahlin - - 3003 - - 3003
14.0 Cultural Resources3 5 3353 30 3653
14.1 Selling 3 1 75 Dahlin 753 753
- - - -
14.2 Impacts and Mitigation Mea.<un:s3 2 75 Dahlin - - 1503 - - 1503
14.3 Graphics: Setups - 1 Figure
. Cultural Resource Locations3 2 55 Sc:hilling Repro 1103 30 14&
15.0 Other Environmenbl Issues 5 375 - - 375
15.1 Hazardous Materials3
. Selling3 1 75 Dahlin - - 753 - - 753
. Impacls and Mitigation Measures3 2 75 Dahlin . - 1503 . - 15o-l
15.2 Other Potential Issues
. Selling 1 75 Dahlin - - 75 - - 75
. Impacls and Mitigation Measures 1 75 Dahlin - - 75 - - 75
16.0 Other Legal Requirements 6 450 - . 450
16.1 Unavoidable Significant Effects 1 75 Dahlin - - 75 - - 75
16.2 Short-Tenn Use,lLong-Tenn Productivity 1 75 Dahlin - - 75 - - 75
16.3 Significant Irreversible 'Effects 1 75 Dahlin - - 75 - - 75
16.4 Growth-Inducement
9
1:\9309\9309-1\64
Odohcr 14.1994
Re,';<cJ May IR. 1995 for Contract Amen..!lllcnl 1 e
WPM Pl:Illning TC:llll. Inc.
EXHIBIT A
e
Continued PROPOSAL 3; \Vith Stanley R. Hoffman Associates and TJKM
SCHAEFER HEIGHTS PROJECT
EIR - CEQA FINDINGS - GPA - UNIFIED GP I GPAs
SIIMMARY SCOPE OF SERVICES AND COST ESTIMATE
Team Member Responsibility Team Member Costs
WPM WPM WPM Sub- Sub- Cost
WPM Planning Team Tasks Hours Rate S t.aJT Consultant 'WPM Consultant Total
. Indirect 1 75 Dahlin . . 75 . . 75
. Expansion of Facilities 0.5 75 Dahlin . . 37.50 . - 37.50
. Improved Access 0.5 75 Dahlin . . 37.50 . . 37.50
. Other Potential Effects 1 75 Dahlin . . 75 - . 75
17.0 Alternath'es 53 4195 1590 5785
17.1 No-Projcct Ahemative I 75 Dahlin . - 75 - . 75
17.2 Rural Residential Alternativc 4 75 Dahlin - - 300 - - 300
17.3 Mitigated Plan Alternative ..
. Prepare Concept Plan 24 75 Dahlin Team 1800 1500 3300
. Forward to City/Proponcnt 1 75 Dahlin CopicslUPS 75 30 105
. Allend Staff/Proponent Mceting 8 75 Dahlin . . 600 . . 60Cl
. Prepare Rcvised Concept Plan 8 75 Dahlin . . 600 . - 60Cl
17.4 Off-Site Alternative 3 75 Dahlin - - 225 - . 225
17.5 Evaluation of Alternatives 2 75 Dahlin - . 150 . . 150
17.6 Envirorunentally Superior Allernatives 1 75 Dahlin - . 75 - - 75
17.7 Alternatives Not Considered 1 75 Dahlin . . 75 . . 75
17.8 Graphics: Setups. 2 Figures
. Rural Residential Alternative 2 55 Schilling Repro 110 30 140
. Mitigated Plan Alternative 2 55 Schilling Repro 110 30 140
18.0 Cumulative Impacts 23 1645 30 1675
18.1 Cwnulative Projects 2 75 Dahlin . . 150 . . 150
18.2 Impacts and Mitigation Measures
. Cumulative Traffic 1 75 Dahlin . . 75 . . 75
. Cwnulative Water Supply 6 75 Dahlin . . 450 . . 450
. Cumulative Wastewater 4 75 Dahlin . . 300 - . 300
. Cwnulative Public Service 2 75 Dahlin . - 150 - . 150
. Cwnulative Air Quality 2 75 Dahlin - - 150 - - 150
. Cwnulative: Other Issues 2 75 Dahlin - . 150 . . 150
10
I :\9309\9309-NB4
e
EXHIBIT A
October 14. 1994
_e\'i~ed May 18. 1995 for Contract Amcndment I
WPM !'lanning TC3lll. Inc.
Continued PROPOSAL 3: \Vith Stanley R. Hoffman Associates and TJKl\1
SCHAEFER HEIGHTS PROJECT
EIR - CEQA FINDINGS - GPA - UNIFIED GP I GPAs
SllMMARY SCOPE OF SERVICES AND COST ESTIMATE
Te:1m Member Responsibility Te:1m Member Costs
WPM WPM WPM Sub-- Sub. Cost
WPM Planning Te:1m Tasks Hours Rate S tafT Consultant 'WPM Consultant Total
18.3 Graphics: $ctups - 2 Figures
. Cumulative Sites 3 55 Schilling Repro 165 15 180
. Tri. Valley Traffic Zones I 55 Schilling Repro 55 15 70
19.0 :'.liti:;ation :'.lonitoring 33 2155 . - 2155
19.1 MiL Monitoring Rccommendations 24 75 Dahlin . . 1800 . . lSOO
19.2 Master Mitigation Measures Lisl I 75 Dahlin . . 75 . . 75
19.3 Word Processing 8 35 Fait . . 280 - . 280
20.0 ADEIR - DEIR Prep:lr.llion 84 3900 . . 3900
.-
20.1 Synthesis and Editing: ADEIR 24 75 Dahlin . . 1800 - - 1800
20.2 Word Processing
. ADEIR Document 48 35 Foit . - 1680 - . 1680
. ADEIR Revisions \2 35 Foit . . 420 - . 420
21.0 ADEIR - OEIR Printing 28 1080 2665 3745
2 J.J ADEIR Printing
. City:15 copies @ $2S each 2 35 Foit Printer 70 375 445
. Proponent.: 4 copies @ $25 each I 35 Foit Printer 35 100 135
. Binding and Delivery 3 35 Foit UPS 105 15 \20
21.2 DEIR Printing
. Offset Printing - 7 Figures 5 55 Schilling Prin tet 275 390 665
. City: 60 copies @ $25 each 4 35 Fait Printet 140 1500 1640
. Proponent.: 10 copies @ $25 each I 35 Foit Prill ter 35 250 285
. Binding and Delivery 12 35 Foit UPS 420 35 455
22.0 AOEIR - OEIR Meetings 40 3000 245 3245
22.1 2 Staff Meetings (280 miles) 8 75 Dahlin Mileage 600 70 670
22.2 3 Public Meetings (420 miles) 24 75 Dahlin Mileage 1800 105 1905
22.3 2 Other Meetings (280 miles) 8 75 Dahlin Mileage 600 70 670
23.0 Response to Comments: OEIR4 Nolincludel Dahlin Team SOl in~ludcd 4 Not includcl Not includcl
11
1 :\9309\9309.:>:84
O~lobcr 14. 1994
Rc\'j",J May 18. 1995 for COllin'" AlllcnJmcll1 1
WPM PI:IIlninj: Tcalll. Inc.
e
EXHIBIT A
e
Continued PROPOSAL 3: \Vith Stanley R, Hoffman Associates and TJKM
SCHAEFER HEIGHTS PROJECT
EIR - CEQA FINDINGS - GPA - UNIFIED GP I GPAs
SllMMARY SCOPE OF SERVICES AND COST ESTIMATE
Team Member Responsibility Team Member Costs
WPM WPM WPM Sub- Sub. Cost
"l'M Planning Team Tasks Hours Rate Staff Consultant WPM Consultant Total
2..1.0 FEIR Preporotion 4S USO - - USO
24.1 Revisions to DElR 20 75 Dahlin - - 1500 - - 1500
24.2 Word Processing
. Response to Comments 24 35 Foit . - 840 - . 840
. Revisions to DElR 4 35 Foit - - 140 - - 140
25.0 FEIR Printing 22 870 2075 29..15
25.1 FEIR
. Offsel Printing - 7 Figures .. 5 S5 Schillin Printer 275 390 665
. City: 60 copies @ $25 c.:lch 4 35 Foit Prin ter 140 1500 1640
. Proponent: 6 copies @ $15 each I 35 Fait Prinler 35 150 185
. Binding and Delivery 11 35 Foit UPS 420 35 455
St.:llTOTAL: EIR 750 5/ .155 97.190 148,545
4S;&Hl .:t&;99Q 127,:99
rFCH mOI'\GS PRFPAR.\TIO\;
26.0 CEQA Findings Document 60 3780 25 3805
26.1 Findings of Fact - Impacts 16 75 Dahlin - - 1200 - . 1100
16.2 Findings of Fact. Alternatives 4 75 Dahlin . . 300 - - 300
26.3 Findings of Fact -Growth Inducement 4 75 Dahlin - - 300 - - 300
26.4 Statement of Overriding Considerations 4 75 Dahlin - - 300 - - 300
26.5 Word Processing 8 35 Fait - - 180 - . 180
26.6 Print Draft Findings Docwnent
. City: 6 copies @ $8 each 1 35 Fait Printer 35 . - 35
. Proponent: 6 copies @ 58 each I 35 Fait Prin ter 35 - - 35
. Binding and Dc:livery 1 35 Fait UPS 70 10 80
26.7 Phone Review w/ City Allorney 8 75 Dahlin - - 600 - . 600
16.8 Revise Draft Findings Document 6 75 Dahlin - - 450 - . 450
16.9 Print Final Findings Document
. City: 20 copies @ 58 each 1 2 35 Fait Prin ter 70 . - 70
12
I :\9309\9309-NB4
e
EXHIBIT A
Octoher 14. 1994
_~"i'~d May I R. 1995 for CO"I...~1 ^1lI~f1Jm~"1 I
V,1'1'1 I'lalu.ing T~am. Inc.
Continued PROPOSAL 3: \Vith Stanley R. Hoffman Associates and TJK.M
SCHAEFER HEIGHTS PROJECT
EIR - CEQA FINDINGS - GPA - UNIFIED GP I GPAs
SlIMMARY SCOPE OF SERVICES AND COST ESTIMATE
Team Member Responsibility Team Member Costs
WPM WPM WPM Sub- Sub- Cost
WPM Planning Team Tasks Hours R:lle Sl:lff Consultant WPM Consultant To t.aJ
. Proponent.: 4 copies @ $8 each 1 35 Foit Printer 35 - - 35
. Binding andDdivery 3 35 Foit UPS 105 15 120
GE"FR .\1. PI..\ "-: .\ \fE'iD\fF\T PR FP.\R.\ 110'11
27.0 Sch:lefer Heights GPA Document 77 4,355 no 5,075
27.1 GP/GPA Polic)' Issues 8 75 Dahlin - - 600 - - fOO
27.2 GP/GPA Text Changes 8 75 Dahin ~ . 600 . . fOO
27.3 GPA Graphics: Setups. 3 Figures
. W. Plan Arl'3 L.U./Circ. Map 8 55 Schilling Rcpro 440 30 470
."
. GP btended Plan Area ~bp I 55 Schilling Repro 55 15 70
. Development Potential I 55 Schilling Repro 55 15 70
. Constraints Map I 55 Schilling Repro 55 15 70
27.4 Consultations w/ City Attorney 8 75 Dahlin . . 600 - - fOO
27.5 Revise GPA - ifnccdcd 8 75 Dahlin . . 600 - - fOO
27.6 Word Processing
. Admin. Draft GPA 11 35 Foit + . 410 . - 420
. Revise Admin. Draft GPA 4 35 Foit - - 140 - - 140
. Revise Draft 2 35 Foil - - 70 - - 70
17.7 GPA Printing
. Admin. Draft GPA: 4 copies $5 each 2 55 Schilling Printer 110 101 130
. Draft GPA: 60 copies $5 each 3 55 Schilling Printer 165 300 465
. Final GPA: 60 copies $5 each 3 55 Schilling Printer 165 300 465
. Binding and Delivery 8 35 Foit UPS 280 25 305
l,,'IFIFD GP I SCHAFF'FR RA'iCH GPA \fo\l' I'RFPAR 0\ 110:-';
28.0 Unify GP/SH M:lp Grnphic
28.1 Digitize SH GPA onto GP MapS l1S 55 Schilling - - 66fi . - 6W
28.2 High Resolution Negative 4 55 Schilling Repro. 220 30 250
28.3 Crononex Mylai 26 55 Schilling Repro. 1106 806 1906
28.4 Layout and Coordination 2 75 Dahlin . . 150 - . 150
13
I :\9309\9309-1'\B4
October 14, 1994
Revised May 18, 1995 for Contract Amendment I
e
EXHIBIT A
e
WPM Planning Team. Inc.
Continued PROPOSAL 3: With Stanley R. Hoffman Associates and TJKM
SCHAEFER HEIGHTS PROJECT
EIR - CEQA FINDINGS. GPA . UNIFIED GP I GPAs
SUMMARY SCOPE OF SERVICES AND COST ESTIMATE
. ... .
Team Member Responsibility Team Member Costs
WPM WPM.. WPM . ....... Sub....... .. .. Sub~ Cost
WPM Planning Team Tasks Hours I.... ... Rate> Staff . Consultant ....WPM... Consultant Total
18.5 Consultations wI City Staff 2 75 Dahlin - - 150 - - 150
29.0 Print Unified GP Maps
19.1 Graphic Setup for Color Printing 3 55 Schilling - - 165 - - 165
19.2 24 x 36 GP Map - Color Printing
Option 1: Color Plotting 7 27 55 Schilling CAD Sol. 1107 10007 11107
Optiah:. Colo. Off Jet P.d,tiht; 6 55 Sd.illin~ Printer 33e t65e +98e
19.3 Delivery of Color Gp Maps 2 35 Fait UPS 70 25 95
311.9 Optionlll: Motlnted Cohn GP l\111p ..
30.1 Calor Crliflhie Setl:lp +81t ~ Sehillin~ ReI'f&. !)9G1t 33elt ~lt
:;0.2 Color Plolld~g 4lt ~ Senillmg ReI'f&. ~lt (;Glt ~lt
30.3 M(ll:ll1td',g. rellm CI\:3l\ B6M'a +11 ~ Schilling ReI'f&. ~lt ;.511 Wit
20.1 Delivel') e.f MSl:lnted CP Mop ;11 ;.5 fttif ~ -Hl51t a5lt -t4Q1t
SU1TOTAL: V~aFIED CP I 811 MAP ,19lt - - - i;Q51t i;B5lt ~'4
,
TOTAL COST: EIR _ CEQA FINDINGS - GPA -UNIFIED GP I SCHAEFER RANCH GPA MAP
Subtotal: EIR - - - - - - - - 51J.55 97,290 H~~~i
48;5Hl -1S;999
Subtotal: CEQA Findings ~ - - - - - ~ - 3,780 25 3,805
Subtotal: GpA ~ - - - + - ~ + 4,355 720 5,075
Subtotal: Unified GP I Schaefer Ranch GPA ~ ~ - - ~ - - + 1,6358 1.1358 2,7708
Map
TOTAL - - - - - - - - 61 ,OO~ ::'8~~q 160,19i
~ ~
14
I :\9309\9309-NB4
"-l'M l'l:\IUling Team. Inc.
e
EXHIBIT A
_ Octoocr 14, 1994
_Revised May 18, 1995 for Contract Amendment I
F00tn0tCS:
I. See Exhibit A-I: Stanley R. Hoffman Associates proposal for detail of Stanley R. Hoffman Associates Scope of Services
which is the binding Scope of Services.
2. See Exhibit A-2: TJKM proposal for detail of TJKM Scope of Services which is the binding Scope of Services.
3. TIle source of infonnation for these environmental topics shall be the Western Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan
Amendment Final EIR. No original field work or quantitative analysis will be perfOffiled.
4. Since the numlx:r of commcnts and the level of response ean vary widely. it is difficult to prediet and provide a fixed fee
for Task 23.0. Prior to undertaking Task 23.0 Response to Comments: DEIR the consultant will estimate the time and
matcrials cost for preparation of response to comments and will report that estimate to the City. Task 23.0 work will not be
initiated by the consultlli1t and his subconsultants until the City notifies the consultant to proceed and complete Task 23.0.
Actual costs of this task will be carefully recorded. At the conclusion of this task, an amendmcnt to the contract will be made,
based on this actual COSL
5. Assumcs Unified GP/East Dublin GP A Map disc will read into WPM's CAD and will require only minimal cleanup. Also
assumcs applicant or City will provide full size to scale Schacfcr Ranch GPA Map.
6. WPM to provide one full size (scale to be detcmlined) unified General Plan Map mylar to City (no copies).
-
7. Cost for color printing assumcs Option I: Color Plotting.
S. Cost for optional Task 30.0 Mountcd Color GP Map not included in total cost.
15
, .\n"2t'\l>.01:no_l('nA
e
e
EXHffiIT A-2
(a part of Exhibit A)
SCOPE OF WORK AND COSTS FOR
ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
SPECIALIZED FIRE PROTECTION AND EMERGENCY SERVICES ANALYSIS
e
~ c:B\.
e
GAGE.BABCOCK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE. 1890 NORTH CALIFORNIA BLVD., SUITf 200 . WALI~UT CR'=.'=.K, CA !J45S6.3i'1 1
1 HOl,A,o\S W. JAE"fR, P.E.. F",~'rl.;"'
JOliN C. WOYCHCE$C. r.E.. "fV,,'lp~'
TEL (510) ?30.aooo
fAY. (~'O) P30-o-133
PROPOSAL TO:
WPM PlannIng Team Inc.
1200 "G. St..
Suite 1 B
Modesto, CA 94607
TO PROVIDE:
Fire Protection Consulting Services for analyzing requIrements for fire
department and medical response to proposed new development.
PURPOSE:
To provide en objective, professional and technical response to fire and
emergency medical service (EMS) requirements for the proposed Schaefer
Heights development.
SCOPE OF WORK:
1. Cond uet dete-[JetlltlriIJQ Inttllvltlw:. wltll II Hi FI1 ~ CllltJf. Pel illntrdlC !.8lVlctr pi ovld81 S, tilt! dtrVtlh)lJtrl'~
representatives.
2. Study and analysis will include, but not necessarily be limited to the following aspects:
a. 1.5.0. Rating Impacts - Review and summarize standards of significance for fire and
emergency response times. Identity response time requirements In codes and policies
applicable to Dublin. Determine If there Is a regionally predomInant response time standard
for hillside communities comparable to the proposed project. Giva examples of how
comparable fringe residential projects hava met local fire protection requirements, whether
by performance standards (sprinkler requirements, etc.) or standard application of "flatland"
urban response times.
b. The development's built-in fire prevention and protection features.
c. Brief site visit; assesS wlldland exposures.
d. Evaluation of existing fire and EMS resources, and ability to provIde an adequate level of
servIce.
e. Develop related fire and EMS experience statistics.
f. E6timate fire potential.
g. Estimate EMS & Paramedic service demands. Determine the following: average medical and
fire response time; worst-case response time for the most remote parcel.
h. Evaluation of project and altarnatives considering existing fire and emergency response
stratoglc plans.
CNCltltUISM~~1 C.,:'N~.L'~lA'II:i IN 11111 l'II(}lll.lI0N. :;AI L '" ANI! :;!.(;lJlII I'Y
CHI(;A(:O . !;N~ III",jCI:;CO . I O~'; t,'J(\ELES . NEW YO,.;K . WASHltK,TON . ATLl\r~lA . VAN('.OUVEFI
~
e
e
I. Provide wrttten respollse lo EIR commenl::; 011 fill: UIIU t:lll Itllgency responsEI iSSUClS (assume
two hours).
3. Report: Prepare a comprehensive summary report of findings, professional opinions, conclusions and
any recommendations. Prepare responses to comments on the report.
4. Meetings: Attend one meeting with the developer to review and receive comments on the draft report,
prior to finalization. Attend and particlpate 8S necessary In up to two public meetings involving aspacts
of this study.
COt~TRACTUAL DATA:
The Agreement made this 15th Day of May, 1995, by and between WPM Planning Team Inc.. hereinafter callod
WPM and Gage-Babcock & Assoc1ates, Inc., hereinafter called the Engineer.
Now therefore. WPM and the Engineer agree as follows: The Engineer agrees to provide qualified fire
protection consulting talent and Incidental servIces for the above named work as set forth In PURPOSE and
SCOPE OF WORK.
WPM agrees to pay the Engineer for such services on a time and expense fee basIs, wilh an estimated
maximum of Eighteen Thousand Three Hundred Dollars, ($18,300). This includes estimates for data search,
and travel costs. Each Invoice will summarize progress and tasks completed.
Personnel rates would be charged for at the following established rates:
PrincIpal S140.00 per hour
Sr. Consultant S175.00 per hour
Supervisory Engineer $110.00 per hour
Senior Engineer S 95.00 per hour
Staff EngIneer $ 85.00 per hour
Cad Operator S 55.00 per hottr
Drafter $ 45.00 per hour
No work beyond the scope of work would be conducted wIthout previous approval of the WPM. Only time
actually spent on this project. would bo charged. In addition, direct Job expenses would be charged at cost plus
10% and automobile use at 37 cents per mile. Billing would be made monthly for actual time exponded and
costs Incurred. Payments not made within 30 days of InvoIce are subject to a service charge of 1-112% per
month.
1. Engineering Services. Shall consist of providing the necessary engineering talent and attendant
services to perform the fire protection consulting service described under PURPOSE and SCOPE OF
WORK.
2. Extra Servlces and Special Cases. In the event the Engineer Is caused extra work, or other expense
due to changes or alternate designs ordered by WPM, he shall be equItably paid for such extra
expense and the service Involved. If any work speclfied by the EngIneer Is left unfinished or suspended,
Gage-Babcock & AssocIates, Inc.
2
WPM Planning Team Inc. Proposal
May 15,1995
e
e
In whole or In part, the EngIneer Is to be paid for the !'.ervlces rendered on account of It. This shell
Include at\ernatlves Involving extra drawings and scope, whIch were not accepted In the original
contract, and meetings, site visits find submittals beyond those listed In SCOPE OF WORK.
Work specifically excluded from this agreement which constltutes e>.'tra work are provision of technical
specifications. design drawings, cost estimates, drafting or AuloCAO work, bidding Information, bid
forms and general conditions of contract, extra meetings or options based on research into support
documentation to support non-code supported approaches.)
Payrnent to tile En91neer for extra services authorlzod In writing shall be at the Engintler's establlshod
hourly rates specified In SCOPE OF WORK.
3. Successol1> and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding on WPM and Engineer and their partners,
successors, executors, administrators and legal representatives. Neither WPM nor Engineer shall
asslgn. sublet or transfer any rights under or Interest in this Agreement without the written consent of
the other. Nothing under this Agreement shall be construed to give any rights or benefits in this
Agreement to anyone other than WPM or Engineer, and all duties and responslbllltles undertaken
pursuant to this Agreement ....111 be for the sole and exclusIve benefit of WPM and Engineer and not for
the benefit of any other perty.
4. Quality of Services. Gage-Babcock 8. Associates acknowledges that Its services under this Proposal
v.-111 be of reasonable and acceptable professlonel quality In consonance with the Code of Ethics of the
National Society or Professlonal Engineers, and to be carried out by or under the direct supervision of
8 regIstered professional engIneer.
5. Services FurnIshed by WPM. The compensation agreed to herein anticipates tllat WPM will furnlst)
the Engineer with such fire protection Information and data as may be available. with architectural,
mechanical and electrical dra~ngs, and the schematic basis for desIgn of the building. with necessary
access to premIses. and with consultation from time to time.
6. Scheduling. The Engineer agrees to commence work on this project within 10 days after execution
of this Contract, end continuously pursued thereafter. It is recognized that completion will depend upon
the timely avallal.llllty of essenUal data and personnel for Interviews. The Engineer will be available for
consultation and meeting attendance after reasonable advance notice. The EngIneer will make every
effort, consistent with prior agreements with other clients, to complete this study within the time table
agreed to at our May 9th meeting.
7. Termination. ThIs Agreement may be terminated by either party upon seven days' written notice in
the event of substantial failure by the other party to perform In accordance with the terms hereof
through no faull of the terminating party. In the event of termInation due to fault of other than Engineer,
Engineer will be paid for all services rendered and all reimbursable expenses to the date of
termination.
8. Controlling Law. ThIs Agreement Is to bo governfild by the laws of the State of California.
9. Insuranco. Engineer shall procure and maintain in effect insurance policies for protection against
t.:li:llrlls u"r.J~, wUlke,'s compensation acts; claims for damages because of bodily InJury Including
personal InJury, sickness or disease or death of any and all employees or of any person other than
such employees; from claims or damages because of Injury to or destruction of property Including loss
of use resulting therefrom, as such coverage Is normally provided In generatllabllltv, contractual
liability, Automobile liability and professIonal liability policies; and eny other Insurances prescribed by
law.
Gage-Babcock & Associates, Inc.
3
WPM Planning Team Inc. Proposal
May 15,1095
e
e
Limits of policies currently In force are as follows:
Business Auto Liability _ $1 Million, Workers Compensation. Statutol)'/$SOO,OOO Employer Liability,
Comprehensive General liability - $1 Million, ProfessIonal Uablllty - $2 Million and Umbrella liability
. $1 Million excess of $500,000. Certificates of Insurance will be furnished If requested.
WPM and EnginEler hereby agree to tho full performance of the covenants contained herein.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF they have executed thIs Agreement, the day and year first above written.
GAGE-BABCOCK & ASSOCIATES. INC.
By
G)~ ~~~ '1f
/t.:;~ i1f/J :t.Q::~ / ( .
cl< Woychees~ .E. / (.-'
Principal
ACCEPTED:
l \?eYld;"'o c..\'tj CCl.>V\c.',\ O'f'r'....."4 \ )
By
Title
Date
Gage-Babcock & AssocIates, Inc.
5
WPM Planning Team Inc. Propo&al
May 15,1995
--=-
Date
*
June 9, 1995
June 13, 1995
June 19. 1995
June 30.1995
Jllly 7. 1995
Jul..... 7. 1995
July 17.1995
July 31. 1995
August 1, 1995
S eptem ber 1. 1995
September 15.1995
S eptem ber 1995
(to be determined)
1 :\9309\CONTRACT.SH
e
e
EXHID IT B
REVISED TIME SCHEDULE (MAY 1995)
for preparation and processing of
SCHAEFER RANCH EIR/ CEQA FINDINGS/ GPA
Davs Allowed
Action
Submission of 19 copies of Administrative
Draft EIR for City staff and applicant
review (excluding fire protection section)
(15 copies City I 4 copies applicant)
Estimated date for notice to proceed on
Colltract Amendment 1 (Fire protection)
Submission of 4 copies of Administrative
Draft General Plan Amendment to City
21
Staff retillns ADEIR comments to WPM
18
Staff retillns ADGP A comments to WPM
25
S ubm ission of AD EIR fire protection
section to City
10
Staff returns ADEIR fire protection
commellts to HI PM
14
Submission of 70 copies of Draft ErR
60 copies for City
10 copies for applicant
1
Begin Draft EIR review period;
delivery to State Clearinghouse
Submission of 60 copies of Draft GP A
· 56 copies to City
. 4 copies for applicant
Submission of Draft CEQA Findings to
City (6 copies City I 6 copies applicant)
Public hearing on Draft ErR
e
e
EXHIBIT B, Continued
~
Dm's A /lowed
A crion
September 15.1995
45
End of Draft EIR public review
period (assumes a 45-day public
review period starting August 1,
1995 )
S eptem bel' 25. 1995
10
Evaluate comments on Draft EIR
and request contract amendment for
preparation of Resp. to Comments
October 3. 1995
8
Estimated date of notice to proceed
on contract amendment for resp. to
comments
October 10.1995
42
Staff rctUr1lS com m ems 011 Findings
TO WPM
October 24.1995
21
Submission of 66 copies of Draft
Final EIR to City (60 copies City /
6 copies applicant)
October 31. 1995
Submission of 60 copies of Draft
Final GP A to City (56 copies City /
4 copies applicant)
OCTober 31. 1995
7
Submission of 24 copies of Draft
Final CEQA Findings to City (20
copies City / 4 copies applicant)
to be deteml ined
Planning Com mission and CiT)'
Council hearings
E1R Cenification
. GPA Adoption
'Ie Schedule to be revised based upon completion of fiscal and transportation sections
1:\9309\CONTRACT.SH
e
e
REVISED
EXHIBIT C
PROGRESS PAYMENT LIMITS
for work on
SCHAEFER RANCH EIR/CEQA FINDINGS/GPA/UNIFIED GP/GPA MAP
Maximum Amount of Pro cress Pavments
Actions
Not to exceed $97,405.00
Administrative Draft EIR / GPA (within 30
days of acceptance submittal: excluding fire
section)
Not to e.rceed $18,940.00
Administrative Draft EIR - fire section and
CPA (within 30 days of submittal)
Not to exceed $13,915.00
Draft EIR / GPA (within 30 days of
acceptance)*
Not to exceed $13,915.00
Final EIR / GPA CEQA Findings (within 30
days of acceptance)
Not to exceed $11,132.00 $13,237.00
Approval of Final EIR / CEQA Findings /
GPA (within 30 days of certification)**
Not to exceed $2,783.00
Unified GP / Schaefer Ranch GPA Map
NOTE: This payment schedule assumes prompt and timely adherence to Exhibit B: Time
Schedule of this contract. If work is delayed for reasons beyond the control of the Consultant,
the Consultant shall submit an invoice for work completed to that point together with evidence
of work completed on the contract. Upon verification of work completed by the Consultant, the
City shall pay the Consultant according to the invoice. The Consultant shall submit statements
on a monthly basis, with prompt payment by the City in keeping with this schedule.
* The City shall retain 10% of the amount requested at each invoice. After receipt and
acceptance by the City of the Draft EIR, the total retention amount accrued at that point will be
released, upon City acceptance.
** The City shall retain 10% of the amount requested at each invoice. After certification of the
Final EIR and adoption of the General Plan Amendment, the remainder of the retention will be
release, upon City acceptance.
1 :\9309\CONlRACT.SH
,~y~~~~~~~,,~ e
SCHAEFER
HEIGHTS
May 18, 1995
Mr. Laurence L. Tong, Planning Director
City of Dublin
100 Civic Plaza
P.O. Box 2340
Dublin, CA 94568-2340
Re: "SCHAEFER RANCH" - EIR Contract Amendment
Dublin, CaliCornia
Dear Mr. Tong,
Please accept this letter as our support for the proposed EIR contract amendment proposed by
WPM Planning Team, Inc. to include experts in the area of analyzing fire safety and medical
emergency requirements.
We believe that creating a safe project is essential and must be studied thoroughly to explore
the alternatives and consider the actual benefits and the associated costs the taxpayers.'
We encourage you to expedite WPM Planning Team's request for the contract amendment to the
City Council so it can be considered at their June 13, 1995 regular meeting as a consent item on
the agenda.
We understand and agree that Schaefer Heights, Inc. will be responsible to pay for the addition-
al cost of the contract amendment.
We look forward to your support in this matter and, as always, would be happy to answer any
questions you may have.
Very' truly yours,
4<~~
Robert Yohai
)resident
..' -:-....
pc: R. Ambrose, Dublin
R. Platzek, wpM.
S. Zagari, SRI
D. Fitzpatrick, SRI
J. Parsons, PjADR
,/
I'
Schaefer Heights, Inc.
155 Filbert St.. Suite 200
Oakland, CA 94607
415.893.8186
Fax 415.893.0205
R.ECEIV~[)
tjAY 2 3 J99L-.-
EXHIBIT 3
.!
c
co
-
a.
e
(1)
c
Q)
"
c
.-
-
.c
~
.0:
e
.
I
g IUil uftl I
/ c
I 10
/ <(a....
I
./ W-
I ~o
iU1ti ill~~ <(0;
c
oU>m
wZ(.!)
dlln 1mb OZc
~~~
wo..O
Z ~ Al i! ~€i
:::J Ii fl
CDO~ ~z
::>w
00(1) Jf1 i
zzz
I.~!
Ii"
hili
~ 11111
i' ~Q
dlh~
z ~
:::Jo~
~w4;;
OO~
.zzz,
~~2
~ ~
~
I
"..
ATTACHMENT