Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4.11 MAD 86-1 PrelEngRpt t. -+ - CITY OF DUBLIN AGENDA STATEMENT City Council Meeting Date: May 24, 1993 SUBJECT: Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Assessment District 86-1 (Dougherty Road): Preliminary Engineer's Report Report by: Public Works Director Lee Thompson EXHIBITS ATTACHED: 1)l Preliminary Engineer's Report 2) /Resolution Approving Preliminary Engineer's Report 3) / Resolution Appointing Time and Place of Hearing Protests of Proposed Assessments. 4) /' Assessment Diagram RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolutions. 7zity FINANCIAL STATEMENT: The proposed District cost estimate for Fiscal Year 1993-94 is $73,443 (excluding reserves); $119,536 will be carried over from 1992-93 in the form of reserves. $55,195 will be assessed to property owners for the 1993-94 street landscaping maintenance costs. DESCRIPTION: This maintenance assessment district was formed in 1986 as part of the review and approval of the Villages at Willow Creek development. This assessment district funds the maintenance of landscaping, including fencing and soundwalls, along the west side of Dougherty Road from Amador Valley Boulevard to the northerly City Limit, along Amador Valley Boulevard from Dougherty Road to Wildwood Road, along Wildwood Road and Fall Creek Road, and certain landscaped areas within the Ridgecreek single-family home development. Landscaping within the condominium and apartment developments is the responsibility of the property owner or homeowners' association for those individual developments. The landscaping along and within the Alamo Creek channel area is not included in the assessment district as it is the responsibility of Alameda County Flood Control, Zone 7. For Fiscal Year 1993-94, no change is recommended with respect to the method of determining the assessments. The District boundary remains the same. The District assessment for this year is $1,488 higher than last year's assessment. It is proposed to utilize$9,988 of the accumulated reserve in this District. The maintenance and utility costs are actually projected to be $5,945 less than that budgeted for 1992-93; however, in 1992-93, a much higher amount of reserve funds was used. For 1993-94, the assessment to the property owners is proposed to be $84.72 per single-family home and $42.36 per multi-family dwelling unit, an increase of approximately 2.8%. The new noticing and hearing requirements for assessment districts state that property owners must be provided with a 45-day mailed and published notice prior to the public hearing at which the City Council takes action on the assessment. Prior to the noticed public hearing, the City must also hold a public meeting at which property owners have an opportunity to give testimony regarding the proposed assessment. Since the deadline for providing assessments to the County Auditor is mid- August, Staff recommends that the first public meeting be held at the July 26th City Council meeting and that the public hearing be held at the August 9th meeting. Staff has scheduled informational meetings with the property owners in this assessment district for the past several years; however, no one has attended the meetings. Staff is therefore recommending that the informational meeting be discontinued for this assessment district, particularly since two public hearings are required. Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolutions approving the preliminary Engineer's Report and setting public hearing dates of July 26 and August 9, 1993, for the purpose of hearing protests to the proposed assessment. a:(ad)186-11 agstpre I/ ITEM NO. 4 4 COPIES TO: CITY CLERK FILE [bIIo-iJo E CITY OF DUBLIN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 1986-1 (TRACT 5511) FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT CONTENTS 1. Assessment: Including Scope of Work, Estimate of Costs, Assessment Roll, and Method of Apportioning. 2. Assessment Diagram PRELAM+t.?A2N 1 �\ ASSESSMENT WHEREAS, on January 25, 1993, the City Council of the City of Dublin, California, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, adopted its Resolution Directing Preparation of Annual Report for Maintenance Assessment District 1986-1 for the maintenance of improvements more particularly therein described; and WHEREAS, said Resolution directed the undersigned to prepare and file a report pursuant to Section 22565, et. seq., of said Act; NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned, by virtue of the power vested in me under said Act and the order of the Council of said City, hereby make the following assessment to cover the portion of the estimated cost of the maintenance of said improvements and the cost and expenses incidental thereto, to be paid by said District. ESTIMATE OF COSTS (1) (2) (3) As Filed As Preliminarily As Finally Approved Approved Cost of Maintenance $ 69,620.00 Incidental Expenses $ 113,371.08 TOTAL COST: $ 182,991.08 Estimated 1993-94 Interest Income Applied to 1993-94 Operating • Costs: $ (5,360.00) Est. Surplus from 1992-93 Fiscal Year $ (119,536.00) Income from Other Sources $ (2,900.001 NET TO BE ASSESSED FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 $ 55,195.08 As required by said Act, a diagram is hereto attached showing the exterior boundaries of said landscaping maintenance assessment district and also the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within said landscaping maintenance assessment district as the same existed at the time of the passage of said resolution, each of which lots or parcels having been given a separate number upon said diagram. I do hereby assess the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lots or parcels of land within said landscaping maintenance assessment district by apportioning that amount among the several lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the maintenance of said improvements, and more particularly set forth in the list hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof. 2 11 \ l f Said assessment is made upon the several lots or parcels of land within said landscaping maintenance assessment district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by said lots or parcels respectively from the maintenance of said improvements. The diagram and assessment numbers appearing herein are the diagram numbers appearing on said diagram, to which reference is hereby made for a more particular description of said property. Each lot or parcel of land assessed is described in the assessment list by reference to its parcel number as shown on the Assessor's Maps of the County of Alameda for the Fiscal Year 1993- 94 and includes all of such parcels excepting those portions thereof within existing public roads or rights of way to be acquired in these proceedings for public road purposes. For a more particular description of said property, reference is hereby made to the deeds and maps on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder of said County. Because the names of the several owners are unknown to me, I hereby place the word "unknown" opposite the number of each lot of parcel of land assessed, the amount assessed thereon, and the number of the assessment. Dated: May 24, 1993 City Engineer 3 SCOPE OF WORK The following areas are to be maintained by this Maintenance Assessment District: 1) The median and roadside landscaping along the north side of the street for the entire length of Willow Creek Drive. 2) Roadside landscaping along Shady Creek Drive within Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 15, 16, 37, 38, and south of Lot 145, all within Tract 5511. 3) Roadside landscaping, wall, fence, and pathway improvements along the west side of Dougherty Road between Amador Valley Boulevard and the northerly City Limit line, and along the north side of Amador Valley Boulevard between Dougherty Road and Wildwood Road. 4) Roadside landscaping, fence, and pathway improvements along the west side of Wildwood Road. 5) Roadside landscaping, fence, wall, and pathway improvements along the west side of Dougherty Road and the south side of Amador Valley Boulevard adjacent to Lot 150. 6) Roadside landscaping, fence, and pathway improvements along the west and north sides of Fall Creek Road. 7) Roadside landscaping and emergency access surfacing at the north end of Crossridge Road within the street right-of-way. 4 ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 The estimated cost for the maintenance of improvements described in this Report for Fiscal Year 1993-94 is as follows: Maintenance 1. Weeding, fertilizing, pruning, plant replacement, irrigation system: $ 48,600.00 2. Utilities: 21.020.00 $ 69,620.00 Incidentals 1. Engineer's Report and proceedings: $ 1,228.00 2. Cost of Collection (County of Alameda): 938.32 3. Delinquencies: 1,656.76 4. Contingencies/Reserve: 109,548.00 $113,371.08 TOTAL: $182,991.08 5 ASSESSMENT ROLL Amount of Assessment Assessment & Lot No. Property Owners 1993-94 Tax Year Lots 1-145 (Village VI) Unknown 145 lots $84.72/lot = $12,284.40 Lot 150 (Village I) Unknown 56 units $42.36/unit = 2,372.16 Lot 151 (Comm'l. Corner) Unknown 4 units $84.72/unit = 338.88 Lot 149 (Village II) Unknown 248 units $42.36/unit = 10,505.28 Lot 148 (Village III) Unknown 224 units $42.36/unit = 9,488.64 Lot 146A (Village IV) Unknown 135 units $42.36/unit = 5,718.60 Lot 146B (Village V) Unknown 204 units $42.36/unit = 8,641.44 Lots 152-177 (Vill. VII) Unknown 138 units $42.36/unit = 5,845.68 $55,195.08 6 METHOD OF APPORTIONING Each single family lot shall be assigned a benefit unit of one (1), each multifamily unit assigned a benefit unit of one-half (1/2), the commercial lot shall have a benefit unit of four (4), and the open space lots shall have a benefit unit of zero. This gives the following benefit units and apportionments for each Village for this Fiscal Year: Number of Benefit % of Total Living Units Units Assessment Lot 150 Village I 56 28 4.30 Lot 149 Village II 248 124 19.03 Lot 148 Village III 224 .112 17.19 Lot 146A Village IV 135 67.5 10.36 Lot 146B Village V 204 102 15.66 Lots 1-145 Village VI 145 145 22.26 Lots 152-177 Village VII 138 69 10.59 Lot 151 Commercial 0 4 0.61 Lots A - D Open Space 0 0 0.00 Total: 1,150 651.5 100.00 7 CITY OF DUBLIN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 86-1 CERTIFICATIONS FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that the foregoing Engineer's Report, including Assessment, in the amounts set forth in Column (1), with the diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on May 24, 1993. I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that the foregoing Assessment, with the diagram thereto attached, was preliminarily approved and confirmed by the City Council of said City by its Resolution No. -93 duly adopted by said Council on May 24, 1993. I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that the foregoing Assessment, with the diagram thereto attached, was finally approved and confirmed by the City Council of said City by its Resolution No. -93, duly adopted by said Council on , 1993. I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that a certified copy of the Assessment and diagram was filed in the office of the County Auditor of the County of Alameda, California, on , 1993. 8 RESOLUTION NO. -93 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT, CONFIRMING DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 86-1 (TRACT 5511) WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. 22-93, a Resolution Directing Preparation of Annual Report for City of Dublin Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. 86-1 (the . "District"), this Council designated the City Engineer as Engineer of Work and ordered said Engineer to make and file a report in writing in accordance with and pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, said Engineer of Work has made and filed with the City Clerk a preliminary report in writing as called for in said Resolution No. 22-93 and under and pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient; and that said report, nor any part thereof requires or should be modified in any respect; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED a) That the Engineer's estimate of the itemized and total costs and expenses of maintaining said improvements and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, as contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed; b) That the diagram showing the assessment district, description of the improvements to be maintained, and the boundaries and dimensions of the respective lots and parcels of land within said District, as contained in said report be, and it is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed; c) That the assessment of the total amount of the cost and expenses of the proposed maintenance of said improvements upon the several lots and parcels of land in said District in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such lots and parcels, respectively, from said maintenance, and of the expenses incidental thereto, as contained in said report be, and they are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of May, 1993. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk r a:(ad)186-11resopre �11LG/�/ 1MTtf1.•1� �l�'�C7 .1/ gag--\(2-43- RESOLUTION NO. -93 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL. OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPOINTING TIME AND PLACE OF HEARING PROTESTS IN RELATION TO PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS CITY OF DUBLIN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 86-1 WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. 22-93, a resolution directing preparation of annual report for City of Dublin Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Assessment District (the "District") this Council designated the City Engineer as Engineer of Work and ordered that Engineer to make and file a report in writing in accordance with and pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, said Engineer of Work has made and filed with the City Clerk a preliminary report in writing as called for in said Resolution No. 22-93, and under and pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that a public hearing shall be held on July 26, 1993, at 7:30 p.m. at the Dublin Civic Center, 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin, California, at which the City Council shall take public testimony regarding the proposed assessment; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a public hearing shall be held on August 9, 1993, at 7:30 p.m. at the Dublin Civic Center, 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin, California, at which time the City Council will hear protests and will consider and finally act upon the Engineer's Report. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby directed to give notice of said hearing by the following means: publishing a notice once a week for two weeks in a local newspaper published and circulated in the City, conspicuously posting a notice at not less than three public locations; and a postage-prepaid mailing via U. S. Mail to each property owner in accordance with Government Code Section 54954.6, said noticing to be completed at least forty-five (45) days before the date herein set for hearing of protests. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said notices shall contain the following information: the estimated assessment per parcel, the general description of the purpose or improvements the assessment will fund, the address to which a protest may be mailed, and the date, hour, and place set for the abovedescribed public hearings. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 24th day of May, 1993. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk a:(ad)186-11 resopme _ _______ ta'd ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LIK KARIM ■IRANK OAK MTh 100NA1 K JAKOR 0100 0100 MI U I CAMP ~AV I II 17•10'70'v 60.10 I 10'10'10' 00.00 71.54 50.00 71.71 N 11.10•0.1 V C e I N 27'10'1041 110.N 1 70.0'0• 810.00 ■w.71 171.71 114.11 N 71'11•1WL ow/LO Y 1 N 10.11'0'N 70.0 0 70.10.0' 110.00 701.15 011.N 704.10 1 71.11.11'[ \ 4 N 10.11.0'1 10.11 4 10•10•10' 00.00 71.64 60.00 70.71 N40•41.14.0 n AIJ�� *� Street Lighting Maintenance ■ 'N 04.00.0.1 000.N ■ 1.11.10' I®.00 60.01 17.60 60.10 N 11.5.17.N _j\-Ai" J "' ' ■ N 0.70.10'1 60.10 1 11•00•21' 1080.00 460.60 211.71 . 110.11 N 0.11.44'[ 4LlfE '` ' Assessment District BE-I 7 N 0.11.10'6 110.0 7 60.0.0• 00.00 111.10 151.70 111.11 N 71.11.70'1 ■ N 10•15.061 10.1 ■ N 10.18'0.1 110.51 • 1 4z ✓ CITY OF DUBLIN 11 N 11•27.10.11 15=Wore 110.04 1 11 X05.0.51.1 210.14 ' it N w•r•w'N 60.11 I 70.60 JJ sr IS N w'A•w•N .ALAMEDA COUNTY( CALIFORNIA; 11 N 18'10'0611 1X.17 15 N 17.1 4141.1 251.. 10150100 SO 1 SOS I00 10 v/C/N/Ty MAP - t 1■ N 10'70•2111 I111.11 17 6 60.11.7060 f10.0 ,Y•YS. FISCL YEAR 1993/94 ,I 1 16 X10'70'07'[ 10.10 lJfL JN R(1 11 N w•70'w'1 60.0 'SCALE& T•800' + �., , CAMP PARKS • """"'"' �I Y ROAD 1l'J.BB A•.C..60•N J'W. ! _ rows 1[1X101 FORAY pOUGHERT �-'''' f /-' . stOPA[NT AAA .„.,■ o _..1.1,....- .L1A� 1 LOT 'C' 1 \' 8 DISTRIG N N 11ItI'- _- 0' I l 1 !J,` BOUND 14C�' ri.1e 1 i OT F N 1 ,���_- jr".- 7f i� II �RTT R0A0 1 7 `` .'_ __ ∎I.T/Ilf N:'L=a r ∎miz 1 I( I w'rrIrrv'Y7 7f'� a■L lJ_-M•- e• ppUO G ip. __ __ --11X51 .1�110t,M 11170'70 L'� MpENIN 1 Y I 11 1/e e N N M KO GHE TY ROAD ,w.., 601 r :o SEu LLI I 1 0 148 A 1 r i'• 10 1 y �� 146 B • • SH .(:: 3 for B' \ :� ,t \ 150 . is Alf . A, s ,� (IJLN(NiA \\\\ \ �\ :e' a., I \ \ $ ak g. C1pfEK n ��� ,. - . �� 1 \ ‘. •\ sr. 1 •Y. q/� C •�• .' \\ ''''''',..L- \\ SEE DETAIL B ,�•,.4�` 1 H rirom".‘ ^"<;IR \' �`".. \\. SHEET 2 OF �m o�:. � � 31 SEE DETAIL A \%`` �• �\\. /// + ; `�^ D 21 o SHEET 2 OF 7 `` \` ROAD• ® 2iti1t1 A @� - ;\ LOT 'C� O'g .. ©�4 0 Q*. 151 A �; LOT 13�I2HE1ME ESTANDIBOUND D¢scta �or D a°�y ALAMEOA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL THIS DISTRICT ARE THE SAMI.:PT THE V.) �� ", �� ��� 1 ®®� , SHOWN FOR TRACT SS11 EXCEPT THE ������ ����plittit WATER CC"SER✓ES N O84-07T FARCE[FUTURE IS E DISTRICT AND RESERVED 1Lltif PLACED A COUNTY LO D CON 931 FOR A FUTURE DISTRICT ANNE%ATZON. '-A I THE INTERIOR DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN•LOT 'A' .9 . • DISTRICT BOUNDARY ON TRACT MAP 5511,-TRACT MAP 5700. ^^^•.` JUNE, 1988 REVISION: ASSESSMENT • DISTRICT LOT 147 DIVIDED INTO LOTS • 152 THROUGH 177 AND LOTS I THROUGH W. LOT 148 DIVIDED INTO LOTS 148A 1 a LOT 183 TRACT 4719--142 M 41 AND LOT 1480. I DISTRICT 198 L REVISION ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LOTS 14461 6A AND 1460 0 WERE BASIS OF BEARINGS JUNE, 1991 REVISION: ASSESSMENT ANNEXED INTO THE DISTRICT. LOT • ---s... ...--, I DISTRICT LOT 146A DIVIDED INTO 20 149, AND LOTS 152-177 6 LOTS I-W 1 A 7K LINK NUM 7K 1010 076[[7 1015:171 ' LOTS ,(19 BUILDING AND 1 COMMON WERE SUBDIVIDED INTO CONDOMINIUMS 1 X404012/CA5TR CO/IA AREA). ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LOTS 16 AS SHOWN ON SHEET 2, DETAILS B AND rrwwrfNT r1.! NUM 7K I1001■17 UK OF 0511059171'PK AND 17 ON DETAIL A, SHEET 2 DIVIDED A RESPECTIVELY. LOTS 77-79 AND INTO LOTS 194-200 LOTS 201-205 LOTS B,C,E,F AND G WERE ADJUSTED I. 764M111114111.11.111.1. 101 P.1.1171 ' RESPECTIVELY FOR LOT LINES. 1 6060 110 I1M1. PAN 07. - SHEET I OF ........ - 0033401"` ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM • /. •••T As. mY p 1 I` '??�., • Street Lighting Maintenance a !G Assessment District 86-1 "�• CREEK nrn�' SHADY • r[;, ..w... r.4.• _ .°r ,D . CITY OF DUBLIN• E .aJm•.p .,e ,.- e� r..r v ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA . I. m z. I ��= -'.Lp2°50„M �" r�0 t FISCAL YEAR 1993/94 , •• s��I 12.rz51Y612 I=B 1391.1 II)?IJJ ° ,I SCALE: T- 200'• ri) e]a e O m°- ° �:se.°/x �, c sHfq•l�°bslel' .P.•' 'i•• 'J�v° . 4 F,;.11 J9 J f _.,., 2'-64) , •, .6,0 • as. ..., N 6r r,„.. „ • ....,, ,,,,,,, ,, „,..?( ,. ..i 14�r a qrr ' )ry Cir \9t • 6]Lt ATTI 'I�I I ' ++�� ,',]M i •/� J' i '�/';l 0 l 6 C �e s°f eer 6,, 1,.. 1 o°QP+'®i oft•g....1. '''','e 4• . • '°Ei,7, c o t4,.�©° eeeee® 2 ��WJ],. r t • • 1t ® z MM c ooCVJ.O /''@(,9'� t •"[ kV...I J i ° ... ./ ., O 0 w ' , , • 1 © 0 d � '' ,.. JN�, r 0e °o„ h„ 44'a ?mil© J�:I�J,'."Ji'° ® •�(t�°�(� c cQ;6 e c ! e e � i.7 • ., /,r•• may. / /� ..0... , iJim..3-. , alJ`�t � t ..®,:y. C �e [•C' 0 o80••�•�"yG� Y 1. ",• ,,�i .. "a. . 0�rC' e . •• .a�r • 8888 ee84,,e e a�0 I Nril 15: .0,J",... tsl+ ,. C.j c 4aq�c �3, • ['hQ�c ®C V0 c r,ar r ••0Y[�Pd,.•'•, r •P ' DETAIL A NOTES; 4th'�� N .lr81 5.59'' THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LOT NUMBERS ARE N00.4 NT/ „...,,,,D r �„ 0 6 c o!]r?j♦ COMPOSED Olt a) A LOT NUMBER FOLLOWED BY A i 6 0 :.11.9 er�t°° oOre f' O r0 ae as - `-' • •`,�4� HYPHEN AND EACH INDIVIDUAL UNIT NUMBER; OR b) o ;��'O /11.1149•; ��- eo' �-( wm•.•• O0 •r A LOT NUMBER FOLLOWED BY A HYPHEN AND THE o t C�J [(ld6• reQ A'r 08010 �� • ' •LETTERS •COUP TOR BUILDING COMMON AREAS; OR 3 R °2' OOo e✓!e.6 ♦d 4 cnc•i.• 0 c!2'x 6 - !. c) A LETTER FOLLOWED BY A HYPHEN AND THE ---.. `-� •9] i nc.a,r LETTERS •COIOP FOR GENERAL COMMON AREAS. 3 ..a•.•a•o '\°�O� oQ er a c 6O l0' r.l9A,. ((9)6 „e••,.. ,. n .,,,0, _ • DETAIL B NOTE; ."1 6O @c o®•y1 o P'-''''O'`r�]°r'J16 /J //]ate� 6 0 „Oj ,r[ /�®a u rl� CU\J�� OO 1 . /, r]O er Q]](,e o a O A THE COMPOSED DISTRICT DIGIT LOT NUMBERS NUMBER a8tJ' 6 6 t1-� 4+� • •' COMPOSED 011 a) A FOUR DIGIT BUILDING NUMBER +7� ...*�'O' \ 4 °® • .,. • FOLLOWED BY EACH INDIVIDUAL UNIT LETTER; OR •7' (� • ,^' , b) AN AREA LETTER FOLLOWED EY A HYPHEN,AND 7. �/l`J ''0'4� 'Q`'q� , • THE LETTERS CUM[• FOR THE COMMON AREAS. '8®JJIy`-'o o. (,\ t BLVD. • ((ooff� ql O • • • EXAMPLES: �"L�,;° �.r 14t LOT 31 AREA ASSESSMENT E 47 ( 1 II ASSESSMENT �`0-0.\ . • DETAIL A LOT l ID G DISTRICT •6 U (r� "r ' oe 3TO• 60 69 70 71 77 NUMBER 9 C. EAT 4'•0 y •ON. 107 100 109 110 111 P... • PG'.. • \ 1i-111. BLDG 6570 NUMBER �pOO 5 I-COMM N ..\6570G v DETAIL B • CONS ®5 AREA N-COMM • SHEET 2 OF 3 • • C09746 a ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM t ® Street Lighting Maintenance • Assessment District 86-1 • CITY OF DUBLIN ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FISCAL YEAR 1993/94 2782 i '®�_ ~ ®.o®` - y;co ; caw z `� CAI L, D 0.� A _ 0 o 9" ..-, a mBQ 0 i ; 2782 ` ® %62, 2782 _, •jilMc-� �(tl. .� . ,•, Q�N © . I. r+.� g __ s .2 6, `.,dm R \ • 4?•4 f . +(;),,..9. . • o I• - ti . r„...©•..1 Y©ikFi r.. �® �? WILLOW CREEK DL . • 1 SHEET 3 OF 3 . z781 003345