The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About5.1 Appeal Valley Christian Conditional Use Permit AGENDA STATEMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 22 , 1984 SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING Appeal of Planning Commission Action to approve PA 84-041 Valley Christian Center Conditional Use Permit to relocate the future administration building, 10800 Dublin Boulevard EXHIBITS ATTACHED: 1 - Draft Resolution denying the application 2 - Draft Resolution approving the application 3 - Appeal letter from Councilmember Hegarty dated 9/27/84 4 - Planning Commission Agenda Statement of 9/17/84 with adopted Resolution and background attachments 5 - Minutes of 9/4/84 Planning Commission Meeting 6 = Minutes of 9/17/84 Planning Commission Meeting RECOMMENDATION: 1 - Open public hearing and hear Staff presentation 2 - Take testimony from applicant and the public 3 - Question Staff, applicant, and the public 4 - Close public hearing and deliberate 5 - Adopt Resolution approving or denying the Conditional Use Permit, or direct Staff to make revisions and continue the item FINANCIAL STATEMENT : None DESCRIPTION: On September 17 , 1984, the Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit for Valley Christian Center to relocate a future administration building from an ----------------------------------------------------------------- ITEM NO. 5 • � COPIES TO: Ward Tanneberg Mike Goldsworthy approved location to a point approximately 100 feet south of the existing classrooms . In approving the application, the Planning Commission found in part, that : 1) The requested change would result in an insignificant visual difference 2 ) A terraced building stepped with existing land contours, with landscaping and screening, would not be detrimental to the ridgeline, and 3 ) The requested change would not be inconsistent with the preliminary policy decisions in the Draft General Plan On September 27, 1984 , Councilmember Hegarty appealed the Planning Commission action so that the City Council could review the application and make a determination. The application involves two basic issues : 1) the visual effects of the structure on the ridgeline, and 2 ) interpretation of preliminary policy decisions in the Draft General Plan 1 . Visual effects on the ridgeline: The most critical view of the site would be from vehicles travelling eastbound on I-580 down the Dublin Grade coming into the City. CalTrans records show that -in 1983, approximately 40, 000 vehicles per day travelled eastbound. The potential visual impacts would be greatest from this location. The applicant' s statement received July 10, 19.84, and the applicant ' s plans, labelled "Approved office location" and "Proposed office location" indicate that the visual impact from I-580 would be the same at either the approved or proposed location. After a detailed analysis, Staff finds that at the approved location, a one story building would not be visible, and a two story building would only be slightly visible. The top half of a second floor would appear to be on the ridgeline as seen from I-580 . At the proposed location, Staff finds that for either a two or one story structure, the full side of the building would be visible from I-580 . The proposed building would appear to sit right on the ridgeline . 2 . General Plan Policies The revised Draft General Plan contains preliminary policy decisions regarding the ridgeline . Guiding Policy 3 . 3 E reads : "Restrict structures on the hillsides that appear to project above the major ridgelines . " Implementing Policy 3 . 3 F reads : "Use subdivision design and site design review process to preserve or enhance the ridgelines that form the skyline as viewed from freeways or major arterial streets . " The intent of the policies is to keep the natural ridgelines surrounding the City undisturbed. This will help maintain the appearance of a City with open hills buffering it from other communities, as opposed to a City with development coming or going over the hill tops . Additional analysis and background information is contained in the Planning Commission Agenda Statement (Attachment 4 ) . -2- Planning Commission Action In approving the application, the Planning Commission found that the visual impacts were not significant, that the building would be appropriately terraced, landscaped and screened and that the application would not be inconsistent with the General Plan policies . The Planning Commission would, therefore, recommend that the application be approved. Staff Recommendation Based on the Staff ' s analysis of the visual impacts of the application and the Staff ' s reading of the General Plan policies, Staff recommends that the City Council find that: 1) the requested change would result in a significant visual difference 2 ) the requested change would result in a structure that appeared to project over the ridgeline as seen from I-580, west of San Ramon Road 3 ) in the approved location, a two story building would be only slightly visible, whereas in the proposed location, a one or two story building would be highly visible, and 4 ) the requested change would not be consistent with the Draft General Plan policies which attempt to preserve and enhance the ridgelines . Considering the draft findings, Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution denying the application (Attachment 1) . Should the City Council decide to approve the application, Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution making the necessary findings and approving the application (Attachment 2 ) . -3- D R A F T A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ------------------------------------------------------------------ DENYING PA 84-041, VALLEY CHRISTIAN CENTER'S REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO RELOCATE THE FUTURE ADMINISTRATION BUILDING TO A POINT APPROXIMATELY100 FEET SOUTH OF THE PHASE II CLASSROOMS WHEREAS, Valley Christian Center filed an application for a Conditional Use Permit to relocate the future Administration building to a point approximately 100 feet south of the Phase II classrooms; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold public hearings on said application on 9/4/84 and 9/17/84 and approved the application; and WHEREAS, Councilmember Peter J. Hegarty filed an appeal of the Planning Commission ' s action approving the application; and WHEREAS, the City Council did hold a public hearing on said appeal on October 22 , 1984 ; and WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given in all respects as required by law; and WHEREAS, this application is categorically exempt in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act; and WHEREAS, a Staff Report was submitted recommending the application be denied; and WHEREAS, the City Council did hear and consider all said reports, recommendations and testimony as hereinabove set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin City Council does hereby find that : 1 ) The requested change would result in a significant difference from a visual standpoint between the approved location and the proposed location. 2 ) The requested change would result in a structure that projects over the ridgeline along I-580 west of San Ramon Road. 3 ) In the approved location, a one story building would not be visible at all and a two story building would be only slightly visible, whereas in the proposed location a one or two story building would be highly visible . AT DP 83-20 t , 4 ) The requested change would not be consistent with the preliminary policy decisions in the Draft General Plan which attempts to preserve and enhance the ridgelines . PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of 1984 . AYES : NOES: ABSENT: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk DP 83-20 D R A F T A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ----------------------------------------------------------------- APPROVING PA 84-041, VALLEY CHRISTIAN CENTER'S REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO RELOCATE THE FUTURE ADMINISTRATION BUILDING TO A POINT APPROXIMATELY100 FEET SOUTH OF THE PHASE II CLASSROOMS WHEREAS, Valley Christian Center filed an application for a Conditional Use Permit to relocate the future Administration building to a point approximately 100 feet south of the Phase II classrooms ; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold public hearings on said application on 9/4/84 and 9/17/84 and approved the application; and WHEREAS, Councilmember Peter J. Hegarty filed an appeal ;..'.,. of the Planning Commission' s action approving the application; and WHEREAS, the City Council did hold a public hearing on ,.,. said appeal on October 22 , 1984 ; and WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given in all respects as required by law; and WHEREAS, this application is categorically exempt in -1. accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act; and WHEREAS, a Staff Report was submitted recommending .the application be denied; and WHEREAS, the City Council did hear and consider all said reports, recommendations and testimony as hereinabove set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin City Council does hereby find that: 1) The requested change will result in an insignificant difference from a visual standpoint between the approved location and the proposed location. 2 ) A terraced building stepped with existing land contours , with appropriate landscaping and screening, will not be a detriment to the ridgeline . 3 ) The requested change is not inconsistent with the preliminary policy decisions in the Draft General Plan. 4 ) There is little or no probability that the use will be detrimental to or interfere with the future General Plan should the use ultimately be inconsistent with the future General Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Dublin City Council does hereby conditionally approve PA 84-041 Valley Christian Center' s Conditional Use Permit subject to materials labeled Exhibit "B" on file in the Dublin Planning Department and subject to the following conditions : 4;2 ATTAC DP 83-20 1) A Site Development Review shall be required to minimize the visual impacts and to enhance the esthetics of the proposed project . The measures to minimize the impacts and enhance the esthetics shall include, but not be limited to, the following: a) Limited grading and contour grading b) Use of abundant landscaping, with a mixture of 15 gallon and 24" box specimen trees, to present a natural appearance c ) Control of lighting visible from off site d) Architectural treatment to reflect the site and blend with it as much as possible e) Screening and landscaping of parking areas f) Consideration of building below grade g) Consideration of patio landscaping on roof tops 2 ) This approval shall expire if substantial construction in compliance with an approved Site Development Review and Building Permit has not begun before October 22, 1986 . PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of 1984 . AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Mayor - ATTEST: City Clerk v^ v ber 27 1984 ` � E Septem , r:U`�l•' On September 17, 1984 , the Planning nammionalnUseVPermittto PA 84-041 Valley Christian ,Center .Co relocate the future Administration Building at 10800 Dublin` ` a Boulevard. ; The Planning Comm ission adopted Resolution 84-46 :approving the application subject to conditions . I appeal the.-Planning Commission's action -on PA 84-041 Valley ' Christian Center Conditional -Use Permidetermination;City Council can review the application and make a Y Councilmember Vter e ATTACH4tHT------ AGENDA STATEMENT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: September 17, 1984 . SUBJECT: PA 84-041 Valley Christian Center Conditional Use Permit to relocate the future administration building, 10800 Dublin Boulevard. EXHIBITS ATTACHED: 1) Revised Resolution ,;:,,: 2) September 4, 1984 Planning :.'Commission - Staff Report ` RECOMMENDATION: 1) '.,Open public .hearing-,and hear staff presentation 2) Take testimony from applicant and the public 3) ' Question -staff .and the public � � 4 ) Close public hearing and deliberate 5) Adopt Resolution approving or denying the Conditional Use Permit or -direct Staff to make revisions and continue the item FINANCIAL STATEMENT: None DESCRIPTION: On September 4, 1984 the Planning _.. Commission made a motion to approve the Planning Application .;.;, after Staff brought back a Resolution with necessary findings. The Planning Commission continued the item until the September 17 , 1984 meeting, so that Staff could draft findings to support the approval of the application. The attached Resolution,::".. : contains a series of draft findings and conditions of approval. Should the Planning Commission still desire to approve the application, Staff would recommend adopting the attached Resolution approving the application. ----------------------------------------------------------------- ITEM NO. _ COPIES TO: Applicant ATTACHT RESOLUTION NO. 84-46 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ------------------------------------------------------------------ APPROVING PA 84-041, VALLEY CHRISTIAN CENTER'S REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO RELOCATE THE FUTURE ADMINISTRATION BUILDING TO A POINT APPROXIMATELY100 FEET SOUTH OF THE PHASE II CLASSROOMS - WHEREAS, Valley Christian Center filed an application for a Conditional Use Permit to relocate the future Administration building to a point approximately 100 feet south of .the Phase II classrooms ; and _ .. .. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold public hearings on said application on 9/4/84 and 9/17/84; _and .WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given .. in all respects as required by law; and WHEREAS, this application is categorically exempt in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act; and - . WHEREAS, a Staff Report was submitted recommending the application be denied; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hear and consider all said reports, recommendations and testimony as hereinabove set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby find that: 1) The requested change would result in an insignificant difference from a visual standpoint between the approved location and the .proposed location. 2 ) A terraced building stepped with existing land contours, with appropriate landscaping and screening, will not be a detriment to the ridgeline . 3 ) The requested change is not inconsistent with the preliminary policy decisions in the Draft General Plan. 4 ) There is little or no probability that the use will be detrimental to or interfere with the future General Plan should the use ultimately be inconsistent with the future General Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Dublin Planning Commission does hereby conditionally approve PA 84-041 Valley _ Christian Center ' s Conditional Use Permit subject to materials labeled Exhibit "B" on file in the Dublin Planning Department and subject to the following conditions : -- nn �n 1) A Site Development Review shall be required to minimize the visual impacts and to enhance the esthetics of the proposed project. The measures to minimize the impacts and enhance the esthetics shall include, but not be limited to, the following: a) Limited grading and contour grading b) Use of abundant landscaping, with a mixture of 15 gallon and 24" box specimen trees, to present a natural appearance c) Control of lighting visible from off site d) Architectural treatment to reflect the site and blend with it as much as possible e) Screening and landscaping of parking areas f) Consideration of building below grade g) Consideration of patio landscaping on roof tops _ 2) This approval shall expire if substantial .construction in compliance with an approved Site Development Review .and,: Building Permit has not begun before September 17, 1986 . PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of September, 1984 . AYES : Commissioners Alexander, Mack and Petty NOES : Commissioner Raley ABSENT: Commissioner Barnes Planning Commission Chairman ATTEST: Planning Director CITY OF DUBLIN PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT/STAFF REPORT Meeting Date : 9/4/84 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Staff SUBJECT: PA 84-041, Valley Christian Center Conditional Use Permit to relocate the future Administration building . GENERAL INFORMATION PROJECT: A request by Valley Christian Center for a Conditional Use Permit to relocate the future Administration ' ' building from its approved .location to a point approximately 100 ' south of the Phase II classrooms . REPRESENTATIVE Mike Goldsworthy 173 Spring Street, Suite C Pleasanton, California 94566 APPLICANT & PROPERTY OWNER: Valley Christian Center... .- - 11883 Dublin Boulevard, Suite A140 Dublin, California 94568 LOCATION: 10800 Dublin Boulevard Dublin, California 94568 ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: 941-22-2-4 PARCEL SIZE: 53 acres EXISTING ZONING AND LAND USE: Agricultural, Valley Christian Center School and related facilities SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: vacant, Alameda County South: Interestate 580 East: Single Family Residential, R-1-B-E West: vacant, Alameda County ZONING HISTORY: 1/25/78 - Alameda County approved an EIR and Conditional Use Permit to operate a church, school and related activities in an Agricultural District, C-3220 8/23/82 - A Conditional Use Permit was approved to allow the required landscaping to be phased, PA 82-001 11/18/82 - A Conditional Use Permit was approved to allow a wind generator, PA 82-015 6/28/83 - A Site Development Review was approved for the Phase II classrooms, PA 83-024 ----------------------------------------------------------------- ITEM NO. 3/5/84 - A Site Development Review was approved for the Phase II parking lot and soccer field, PA 83-071 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Section 8-94 .0 states that conditional uses must be analyzed to determine : .1) whether or not the use is required by the public need; 2 ) whether or not the use will be properly related to other land uses, transportation and service facilities in the vicinity; 3 ) whether or not the use will materially affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity; and 4 ) whether or not the use will be contrary to the specific intent clauses or peformance standards established for the district in which it is located. Section 8-94 .4 states the approval of a Conditional Use Permit may be valid only for a specified term, and may be made •. contingent upon the acceptance and observance of specified conditions . ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Categorically exempt NOTIFICATION: . Public Notice of the 9/4/84 , .hearing wa.s.•.published ;,t:-= in the Tri-Valley Herald, mailed to adjacent property ;:': owners, and posted in public buildings ANALYSIS: _ The principal issue associated with this application relates to the visual impact from I-580 . The Draft General Plan ;. with preliminary policy decisions by the City Council ;,; ::> .: contains a Guiding Policy which states: "Restrict structures on the hillsides that appear .. .. .. to project above major ridgelines. " The Implementing Policy is : "Use the Site Development Review process to preserve or enhance the ridgelines that form the skyline as viewed from freeways or major arterial streets" . i Although the applicant ' s exhibits appear to indicate that there will be no measurable difference from a visual standpoint between the approved and proposed locations,_ staff has found that the change would be significant. After conducting a detailed analysis, including site visits, . ,_ photographs, and sight profiles of the existing and proposed locations, it is Staff ' s conclusion that a one story - building in the approved location would not be visible at all and a two story building would only be slightly visible, whereas a one or two story building in the proposed location would be highly visible . The critical views of the site -.. . would be from cars travelling eastbound on I-580 from Castro Valley to Dublin. From this area along I-580, the proposed building would be highly visible and appear to project above the ridgeline . Staff could support an application if the "visual difference between the approved location and the proposed location was relatively minor . However, in this case the requested change would result in a significant increase in visibility from I-580 and would appear to project above the ridgeline . Since this proposal would not be consistent with the proposed General Plan, Staff cannot recommend approval . Staff will bring exhibits to the meeting for Planning Commission review. -2- RECOMMENDATION FORMAT: 1) Open public hearing and hear staff presentation 2 ) Take testimony from applicant and the public 3 ) Question staff, applicant and the public 4 ) Close public hearing and deliberate 5) Adopt Resolution regarding the Conditional Use Permit ACTION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution (Exhibit "A" ) which denies Valley Christian Center ' s request for a Conditional Use Permit to relocate the future Administration building. ATTACHMENTS 1) Exhibit "A" - draft Resolution denying request 2) Location Map 3 ) Applicant' s exhibits showing approved and proposed locations 4 ) Applicant' s statement 5) Photographs 6 ) Location map for photographs COPIES TO Applicant File -3- a - EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN --------------------------------------- DENYING PA 84-041, VALLEY CHRISTIAN CENTER' S REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO RELOCATE THE FUTURE ADMINISTRATION BUILDING TO A POINT APPROXIMATELY 100 FEET SOUTH OF THE PHASE II CLASSROOMS WHEREAS, Valley Christian Center filed an application for a Conditional Use Permit to relocate the future Administration building to a point approximately 100 feet south of the Phase'JI ; classrooms ; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold public . : -.; hearings .on ,�aid :application .on::9/4/84 and .9/17/84; and WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given in all respects as required by law; and i WHEREAS, this application is categorically exempt in . .,: • accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act ; and WHEREAS, a Staff Report was submitted recommending the ; application be denied; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hear and consider all said reports, recommendations and testimony as hereinabove set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby find .that: 1 ) The requested change would result in a significant difference from a visual standpoint between the approved location and the proposed location. 2 ) The requested change would result in a structure that projects over the ridgeline along I-580 west of San Ramon 'Road. 3 ) In the approved location, a one story building will not be visible at all and a two story building will be only slightly visible, whereas in the proposed location a one or two story building will be highly visible . 4 ) The requested change is not consistent with the preliminary policy decisions in the Draft General Plan which attempts to preserve and enhance the ridgelines . DP 83-20 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Dublin Planning Commission does hereby deny Valley Christian Center ' s Conditional Use Permit, PA 84-041 . PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this th day of , 1984 . AYES: NOES : ABSENT: Planning Commission Chairman ATTEST: Planning Director DP 83-20 1 HAMSEM �, DA. I ' NaNSEN DA O t • 3 SAES VAIIEY BETLEN DN ' HRISTIAN :. CENTER s BETLEN cr t Na m PAa7 r 1 1 ATTACHMENT---�Z I L o G cLI+ i o rJ M a-P Sca.IG P = YCO` 9 M.ichael goldsworth 3 architect aia 173 spring street, suite'c. pleasanton, california 94566 ,• (41 S) 462-0500 ,101984 CITY OF DUBLIN . '. BUILDING INSPECTION DEP T . ::.' 7. Valley Christian Center 'is .requesting 'a';modification. of their conditional :use permit :to .relocate. 'their;•..proposed ,;.;:'*.°'.. !' administration 'building ; now approved :adjacent ,to .:the ,� -;=•�: existing .sanctuary,' to a ,location south of -the' :S. ?>: re-school/classroom access P The 'relocation,is ''.necessary 'due ,,to the--need for.'parking adjacent to the -building'. and !to eliminate" a 'full .two-story buildin -at 'its' a proved coca o ' The' proposed location -allows 'the 'building""to '•be"stepped with the existing land .contours :and .•provides .views : office area"' f the surrounding countryside: :,;:..' t The `visual/ impact :from the south :would be "virtually .-the same at either ..location, ..except 'for.,the ..overall .bulk "of :`the -' .- . = building hich would be considerabl less' 'at •the ro osed. "' - g . y P P i n =�= . r locat o e ATTAt01E� T�-_ 4b 6 I • I �r e. -^+�: �'. •cr •;w +v,V �.� .at,..�i � �. '"f.+ r itl�FA ^y �,,'� �,�T•t-q��•r -5i ra cx�• i+`��, '4„+.j�;S:�?r\:� .�+ �•ti• .t `•ally t 'ti�i P t 1 tr �: Z' �1 •l�r� r�,. � •,.\h 5 `he ..ii J e :-Si..r �rr �,Y•� ,, c i ♦ � a rl. i\-i� F a cc.1.-,- ii�h.: L 3t 3�y�1�• !S 4S{�1�� `:a1'• •+tt i mil-. +c J a•r"tt � t� �. •'�.> r ,r 1 �r'�'.V'7a• �'� r.tNl,.°�`tir�?t ,�y}�yt+.��tr„�1�a3'}•t� ' ;'(�t�x•�`•.� •�, ;� .� ,y�._+f t,V :. � .i��".T,t rY�,Vr"tc4`~\i TL�N4� �'\"~�•s�'�C '4 ,��,�.r�i Mn,,•T=Y F` } tt>;.+!,s +�yitl�.�► �i �' o•�r,sl,Y�•�,•.h'",(�f S. y��j. �+j t•'�t: 't�h �li1S �,,A;,;. 1'v^ aS�_-'ys,' ' t ..� 9+� �1Rt3� �' '•��.tY. �.r��JLj,'n� r,yl�"?��, �� yj� ,1_ 1 _ k k.�dTJ .7.'�1 �1'�• A�C �.1'.!� .j��c w� ` I�, 'IC .<:�Rl�7P�ttYiV� -�� ..... •'i. �M�3HA\ y,�•. �Q An b►tlt.rii1►R •u• •w��`�✓r •fr•1'�r�: {i'r!'�i'.. Y� a/!•Y +��. `- .� • rtiri�� trli w�s�.,,.'�ir��•rnw.+�I�id.,+Sj� .,...i9"�...a � i.'•�t'. .t ��r•,.`Aafrrr:� ;,�iiL�it.•T`+- � 'r�r:{iry 3r1. r {/iAf s "'�i 3 ��ti� ��!t f►` r w ry �RS't?. �kllf.��i, K y � ....'�,i.=x,�i.,r, S' ,�+YM'},''JI .X'i�i��":'•++N�•-�+" F♦.fit w � ['♦ �•'Y' r�� •• •^t 4.�V►"`'��M"�i lr� fwF�,r� �r .�o•� (' •tj�.: r,,rwif}r<ICT•. r,+ ! ♦ • v tt•..�iv i e'�i"f�°� 6\.T a'.., •,.�. � �V•.} S ?�.r$Sia,J•�.X""`•►' � +rj�. ♦ t �s�.r t•. 'tea ♦�.; +..a�s .�`h{.�MA�y��r✓l(woe. .�wr ,yvt t '"� "' �a ' '.'�sYarn.�.�•. .r4r♦��XFir+lldir Y r;Y� 'i' �^';xtiie '`='-_....._ - �. r _ ::, Taa, r�_'!'i,"?�' ✓ , ♦.r'_..r,_.l...t-r. Rs..•l�.v e. 4.i4T, tIT� t7 t ,.Y Z.°y t t2 +�'Z, a r t ....:�..cam.e� •4, L yy 4 t r i z" ��..r i �t d-i�-- �`syt {l'�'r-�� s cif tee+{_,J.•''\!f I `2'qi�ut.�*y` 'vr•th �'•�,'-: t•'�t l�'�>? .k� .��I.t.`� .�ey r try. ;•. -�c a r -2. _ •t t ta'. } `.,�.r'c.:•.�. •�+p sy�`.}"Z,•�*e,�p...• •r1e�s,i-ya'�z\,�'1:�u..�E '3�titi� �i Ai t t r t i - +-0, ra ro �p -'y. �♦'s •-••,�S• f` s" --� t., o •�. °-.'`�`d 1�t"4a N'i ai s r T i? {. ..t. L V �. rr...a!d r u.t i i3 _ .r- Z� •7 .y1 s.Y t y yF s.. x ! f fk 1 u' .•y t•.r J g G .� c wr-.. r {}� r'C T• '�y,,,�.i . .ems{ t '•o tr +�,L ° •, .t �x � i .•{ �;+�.•.eY•�„�r'-� 4 1' pf t1 raj],rlL: , ''C•r��. F J.irc y ,a S ��rTC 1-. e.A.`4 e t ;4 4, t1'•r��..tr^re sij',•a- � `� .y;'�'7�^bf te"rc'TJ� . C. „hY\•i" .'rg, �. +. Y '{ ��t t•'� e.��+•- ��r.w.- ts�r�.. � �\�`�'ti7I �S"�;=s�7.?.'�•�•y'�.f±i!t:l� ��s,.:,7r�a,y� .`s ♦e "''�s.. 6 . ! t .�w'i .^�i1y Y_.�Ott-+�w'f L.Ri��='.r,.,, •, ,�r�,�t� t i ^'C_ •.. i1t'�.s v'r'n.� R � R 'f -."+_r. .�-..a ;-r fit.. I .Y•..?_ F %- �"V'Fr�``�:1?%st'G`��`;},�'i•" i��,ct -}d�1�.'�..._�4n �•�,ti3`t�R+�s'S�3'�•: 3v„�'T.t�• �� t =a '-7i�CV � '.L��.z��. �,,”. i•`,�., a' *; ;^.•'w. t(i 3 Q fr- €., r _ :s '�-f i. �i•� `^}!`' d"a^.\i rk�'irr "'y.�2*u '.' .. ` •wf�,•t,^� �h1i•� t"';16_'i+1 r>:( ♦p.�)-Zvi-6.�t L� a�-.'' F �r"Lt'� r :Y! 1 rr"e�•y,:-?'i-Y-.•� f '�-tin'n.,•:t',�,+••.'�i�S. �4as:� s�t a"t' 0Oc'iii 1 {.:c 7 r`i! rttl ,R�• c� rz` +y 4 wt°i. >• •�- ""2�'u" r :rttL t. �.- .�Viµ,.. i _ �}. "'T•' .r_. ^�.. .\,..� _ t. � ��4.�[ J.. � e' �•r°.tY 'ANY.—. 1.. 'Yr fi riyy�� a '\\•G:�' _ � •CC.ir",i.r, w-: _ of?�� ,t,,�ri�l� .•�,,.y«ct�,- ? r �rw,t', 'a�'�,• 'r 7'= •t..:_ �.. '.��. • * �• is „�'. .. ^. ?' � --'^t. '' '�. ;:'•: 'St,.�, �a.1•1`�. r. l+.' .. •� �`;ti't�i.}'✓ �'.�'2L-�'i�,:t, `r L.� r:y ��<t��"�7.t r -�y�. -- ti�G' �' ..` wi?.. \'+.t�.-'•��- a.'�c+ :� •• i�.�r-a.. T•r ''3r• ` '� +++- •�'.• 4+.t. g +..aor � ` '° y' •►. tom=+=w ``' ^ ,crs .fr.� y• -w ' �'"r .�� r+*�' 7�.{� • • :r+ �ltr-iC sd•Kam.,:•?-.�j;4?f i'. - rTi •y.'T'j.ia• 1ur��..��..//�� „r slJy,: _ �♦ metal �' L'.a�...+��iaA�ll�:'t^:r�ri'#�� -_7.F,w�.,..<'stf�l;` .�ilw .'�*n_a ►' i i JTI�•�•""ti�+`W,'��'�� "�`,�i�J�" �� ,_�•y+,• .,,.►r�.�'•a •it��•'� tp :1 •1��~'''st..,r�t y�� :�1•`� �� w T�:;�' �i��w � hV. J •� • , •,7�rJ4`.�..1a`•:•��+_r :''"i'rJ r� '�' ""_•. �j� �M ��t►��pp � ±' '` �' ~ ~�• `� �. ->'�''J .1:��i.r�'• '1 .� �""` Z?1i 1::1 :8' +.\.":.J� :``✓; � T��t1,A�'i..f�f �; �' , -'�",�:t„�a rte;.. � r , �a� � �. .. "',`.�. '• Ok S'��• 1ErF� .��'� t' '; ,,,�y •`hY� v\„'m}i:x,� ,. " �`L � , ..v` •A�`��.�J 't •+3�J'T '�.�n. `t'� 'fA t" .V. t., 1cLVaL;..T31:! + G �•I ~ �f .M•'j�4: Y.C, ';1'�`'�-1A:1�'��' � ` •'?�' ,;,�T'J �'C,. ' =�`x'� ,yYy ,y `S l+- ''`'� ' �'�.' "'""" �,i' �• - - t.�'�• .� y4' ,t .;tyl:'i�� .(7' t �_ •�; , 1 .L is Yy l�l 'z.w4;i�!•a� ,��t.�t,"4b�r'•. -t'j tiLr� pay.'+'��.�''1�. ,`,1{�i`i+tr�;.??Y`f"7��Fj1 .1 �- .t`{ a ..• �`t't•-, '�• ��>< �f•��. .r�. `i» ?�; ;; Jt •3` r "ttaJ+�''•\ a..�• .( ' "''' i�, ;f Ro SL r , ..` L�:,�t�� ,.. � �r�i.�i! i"�, _.rI••v.. Sy�°'j�� '`ttl�' X �.,p'•y� .. �R.,�! .��.'/1,�.:rtl .�+. .. . q �f •�r•�y �3.w.. �,4 � Py �' 'JI n;•q•�}. 9 � •S�- ( :1� rd • •_ ,l• R I S T I AN• : •.., .�, �: ��'.� � � t...:-- ,, N Ems. ,. - •-a .. - �.. � ��'.►,,. _ '. \C .� - ` �1y. .1.�_- r aim , •�'}•rj=��ri•a:Y':'•r..! t•':^• r'f�'+�•. •% - 1��7 y,,( . _ y• Y � ,p `l,Y _.•�.LyV PSG.► �,.r•'•,%,J w.� .4'�p ;�V`ti l �� h `� •tom• "•7 Wj / k • • �F \ GPY t � � i ��• IJ - _..p•• !, ♦- � ♦7•"' D'y,.Y,Y:• •r'"'�'.• y-.••2. •fir •^�✓.rV .••,f7.T.�'S�•'�•�• .W• .l.w....s. ,'_ ��•�.. .• y.�y 5 8 0't.•,�?...-� ..��_v��.:�. .. .� �� „�...t.,,........•.r -!�tr..:!.M/.-�.- w.'Ta`✓ ��•i:+•.• +s-.• '.;;y.+r�»-�.:� ,: _- Ycotil,srt•:r:l+�i's�L'.t�aa:�f.taa.s.......'L_-•�•.►+i7C►1�1►7�.`-�%..:��k.W.n.�`�oYb•..a•A.......c._r..»..•.Z.:-Y_� - .n, ice. \ •..i'' +'`t. JJ•+a'�ay. '�:..+.I+,>J+�`v�/ .r•.' •• '=•f..�.,(YT•,Cy'S`l rt.. �aar.:.w.`.w +.+^'�'��' 71 � JCi`,�:r-•�� Yp -- �r�T•1'lJ�a� a �'�. � .r �vr.y T all, ff r _ - ., .. .::.a ': .. :� A•�� _ �C A - r. — 4 —4 4 , OCA ..,. ON. •d. .e: r r d , � -I,J 1' '•r r .I t /. : I- .. 1. r it ,Y — 't• �•�.t� 't r �( 'fY:� h t ,� Jr _ _1 •.Lt S J _t'.':�`_.I• a :fir` '=hr --ia >).�.• t.Y' `` ,, l•" � h'utaii ;�•:� :� .3.. 1. - ..JT'� •f. .1^ Al '�I'. f.1 � 'S': :I ',�-.:•. � �r? xk. °•i I- rat• t , •:-D. t L - C 9^ I�' ^j• '''Y^ ti! x s' 0 t: ,r r -Wfbiirr.I' :S f f V +n 77 '.7" fe. !. -1' { -iii�•.. I 1_- I� /.. •/ L.. it •A !.L "j-, _ +:J!� - a•,6r , \? i. iC �p•. v.t. J'..'if I J vi• ��1'�i' 1 '!', 1. :.tp. •t ..L � •{.r..it �- t k... +� ,•\i•r.\. .i�- ,:�I:r: J �( Ii.?�_^ {{r-- :��. �'f :i. .1'h�Y.x; tri _i•l•�r.Sd� ).•. ';.3;'1, s I ! .1 ..i� !. :L• .�WEd'C60 u t - �( .{.� 1 _ - - t 'I+r ) {•1 <fy; , 47' .' 1,-�`S ;j�.� � �f11T'' w IVA 84-0,41 YALWY Ct-iR15fIAt�l ' - - I • I - - ptGT10N AT'PARKINO ARtA 1 1RArJN rNL�aOUR£ CL1VAf10/I�( tl ! 19A5N llll •Si :r^ 1 I/4 �. fA�IKIM■1 �_ � •O�� K1 -•a-.- n ��, srr+..n.w.n..14.y.ra1.Irraw • - I 1 .-:.-- -,157 - " - r •". -'_..;�. : - - _ r! ;r' 'alit .... Q 1. I qM�/y�4orau�U - '� :rte �'r _- ,L•:;,''e'�:' �..•.:r...eaI - _ _. .. - �� '.1TI1;o.�'- � l �q• l 't '4 i'1•-•) ••.� �i" =r. �` .,� K-m-rx�.y"�"'.;?uie..._�,:..�._ r:_s1• 'v. / r�. �a:• i. 1 saYr;. i�.y'I e;y•;.'s. ar ±a'#�:ti3�s�z�t� �: 5 ` _ ,�' *'S . ... � ��.�` `�.' _�� .rr• "' s` � 1 �� i:,�.--,7 'J' !! _ 1613 L irT �j li j C• = r i i' y ! i�..�2 Val `I ` l.l! ,'•'►r.( ss. �� _ .. 'ter_;..- - ,1.r1µi .f'E�rr r U. _ _r ff AL p ki -( -1-..�'�,1l _ f,, _ _ Y .t._ .F� �,1: ^,�.rr 1. .Sr. .1� '•. t.:.-\,,.'. _ �� I i��r •f5•- ,� 4 - - . T rr: ..... •. I/�oia>aR. acs F _ t ry •�� .Y --�� T-. .�RaG :wl K4 M.OGafa _ ♦1 ,� �I J Y�1�. - ,_ •�.�:rt a - •'« :•��, vt+!' •+,i4: `sue _ �'s' ��:'�C- '�-...'.:_-: .- _ _- ' �' i� !"1-a _ ` -. ': �+:'• •."';, _ ,:.. `3c, '. •arras■-:■a+aaaw Y r� r, '� _'- a.-'' - r �..�• `, '....:a.- ,1.-.: :�' r' -.��'. 1or.�aa{«.v..a.l'f,w.ao s+n "' r ! ,a-jr� :r �'�r I '::i✓#.i ft�?lt:.i�;• . w:t<mlww 2w•,'�'!: I.,:e r%i-�i - - -_ i� � i � ��n+r. ..�* �' � _ r: _ � { ' �•. _awa,'a+.. }_ �a{m ter`-_ss t �,: � •�pi1HaR'. k� �=. :�. �-. .: .. oaf' � �L., •� - Q ,y � h j. {_*-�'" �., ...�hr,Cj 'r �„•"Tff�> }: .T' �i��. �T=a"a� _ a `wa>e NR M�t9'TH' r "r,p.L•'A:N. ir ow \� .. .-1. ( ,. ' :.4D , �1 J'r'.l" _�.�:1.- ...-.... ,( j a1�N.�.LLt�a• - - - ,/I�• - •..�: �••�•-5' / - •qyd•tip--.T t,., ._'lyw-.•., �•�!/ ` _ craw■ .M1 y_ {• ,t! •.1-�.�:�'."�: - 'r _ �t-' .rf -r.,- .� fr=1 V=`tai,. .Tl .t - 1'. .:IJ.•`_''_�=chi'•f=,}',•�` -i -a`.T .;>,t' yam:. 1 b . .. .-,. "Sy_' ='? .1�'- ~I"�Ir?•i�`.� ,`f .-. t.•��•` ��:",bt.. •'�'.,"_ �7.-' .-- ••�... �.�.�}� _fir" t". - - r - r:a c. s 1 'vw'c•�.` i':`��; ~ - fPCT10N AT PARKING AREA "•' . i tsw�u.C-VGl.ohyfL_GL[Yatlo,l 1 y } . 1 __ _ - - ~�� '._0 :�IJ RKt �� ° �.\ n a,,,i.a-■,r.y..rty•ie..no,. 1 ( . 0 ''fi J, `' t * AA�19"� J t - wbwc e_ ui•a n // -•, �`�= ,�a� '�1vJ J V-�-��x � �- ,�X/ -_.V:.. 'r: - .r ��vta/'r�-t;ainas`° t„w.,►1. •. �_ �.• _ J \J R5.1�(wl �/ �l nrr yu.au •s�f un J 1• • _ � KING;l-:�V •. � l - .. .1 J J t' �:`1`r.w.�u.■'= _ - -- -? _ .pH�`ee�\ ",Q�•_Y•�� '�1- (% _ �. - V rvr..rya,.c(•7.x...r4 _ rit l J ,,(� /'� r• \ r:r 1 ;y 1 iwr/•fw:► ,is6 [-:-•_ �- - rti. - ' ,.r.(.'�•.V '�., 'i _ rypJ,'j�/ �.J- _ _ Ow..n..•�ret Y 92 �:.� .•S; __:t, ,{ C.••• -_... J. ��Y �V � .'_. (, - / 1 V7; • .� t JtMOIA' :- N•./AO �W7lnt.... ./ l �+1�•J�� (v�j 1'i�• J_�: � � •-V��V/ 'j5.--.J+•.Y:�....� f/3 S•• wiy+N.i'a•i..--/f iv....:� �►. ir9 •'.Jr�+1•'t.'i -...•. 1 .7 t .: • ir:l __":.�' - _. .'(�.^V-I•--V::—, _,f�' - _ - "'7�' T .-�' s�y ••�-- '_'t..�E.T' :� I."I"`.�i'^'»T: G-'_•.. :y.., i.�`_ .f• �V♦ "-� t,-•"''i,".y (il. •- 7 :. - ..t%=.[�Z ats •�F^': -L'� '.:' s ,Z. --7.i <#is '��y ,x�.�►i }- ±-.r d i 4 .- �;7l./ •s - 'i 1 J^4- "r v.' v iJ•'f',y'�• ; -+J•F�`x'_ C-r` ♦�^" 'iss. �.�.2 T. Z' 14 Kt„s 1 !' •`�J_' t : ! f�. --,-.= 1 s.•L '-Y r '`. r ° 4 �O - 'i•-`� r i:�. / - . . {� •P. trJOY� 1� ','._. i,��,`� "��` 1 t'?C,"�,��;t '':�.�. ,� .s.nr�'-t. l� 'r i t'. -�Z _,' �,.:� :i + on •TtJPe PAP *�1� .. ♦. wi"^'•i�iC +. Y_Jtt tiT •S .\ -y ky'. fN R1at �� ': Q t.y. 1 fV :•y- •.ice 1^ jt.i /.-.5,.� a.. `.t. - - � .r.. a�'.i r '•t. i5r,�t�3�a. Y 'r i �ti t f 'K� =�.� -� •Ti _I 'c: I r t 1.�• J ,r �•, .'. t� 1•Aq s}:i .\ '�. t •, a _ !�\ 7 _ .t`;• aov_�wwooLwu......ti �•'j` .. I � �I•j/ •l:....: IhtaJf �aWiYt :jj)H.a.!l.y •s � ._. _- _ .. - • � • —� i', �At.4 .. _ w� � �Mawt/.r,40u4 i..- - ]1 Ali aaR"-If �.:..-'' y�J .1 _�ti-�`•1 \ i'j 1. ,t■ / i wA �:�' 22 (�y�yMiy • - _ 11.o?o a,rt . ut i" T .-- -- i �8 ptt•V� -1 t�s� _.�.,.*�icuw•�nJ art. _M,amr rt..'41 .{.�..(, /.�•r'� � �-' ooY 1\..' i,j'1� �'KiM `Y.r1. � . t �`• - � � � . .'1 .ice—v�'•�--� .��J�/trE�A"� t: ��pG��'�S n4>rn^ a ._ p a `_Z, .. _ Z _ ¢ r, l _ rAt ! .'— 'oe:%�r"',' \.G " - Vt.'�'.wASO ` e[o•,y�wwo�_,�uruw■• - W` _ ��\� - � _ _ -. - _��_� _ � ��. � 1•• - Iwraiw�(rw wY •1•%.ROe a�.K• si .J� (} C� R _�. .� _.,. �..\ .` :tip- _ _ - .( . 1.• _-u:��nr.--st^ __ > "4 ��-. `�i art•.�s. _ ^'�� :� � -'.�.w4��- 1 �( tt• ;1ciu.�` Mf,feo mrf-'u - 7 - r soy a: 1 .f_�' - - - •'_i'7t. �- � _ �%•! _ IF - � ��N*~ APO .. �,w - _ -::!. - ... - - -- - - j •A t 'row 4. !� pR0 OSED: / •� ,L�o. C�y. MA TER P4AN 1 ( _ .wowT. r t I •.. ;_■CAr. 1�-.,00'.'OI i. _ _ rfa - _ •c / r��• - - - � rte= �Y a�- -- �mow__._. - - ,a �• - .EF�_ ' \KF ------ IV ,-4 11P i7 ��}, •- � � —�•—'� _�'1?: �t -�" t- \ 1\Jt f \;\\. �\� \, t'L\ �,\ `. `c\�/ \\� t1,1''i'''i{i � - '� _ IN I A lit At � I�- , � s � ,: ;1 .... _. ', 1�' 1! r,' lr� ��11 r �i..:Jf ;/'•�i//:/i//' � � :\1 \.f� I J i �._... _ _ _�.�_ _w__ _ 1�0 c _... .. ■ARTM Son" .. �•...... . r-fit' •r Z1 .. ,.� :.^, .. �=4ti,ti:�Y 4 .�1 .;i:��'... -t:`,T �� ,n owa� ►+*[wsrwr[ Tao SITE PROFILE 'OF vAL.L.EV CHRIBTIAN CENTER - - - - - — --- ----r---- - . VIEW FROM IMTINSTATS sA0 � � - �,�,•�� _ ��+� t• .. t r T i _ ' �.,�!O'w.;.mow"o/� 1 -.1 V;' �..•�'7�r: _��-��,, .. -.• 'r. .�.• 7- r - - ��.'+:'!f': ...n� Via, a�.•r,, �,,� • • q' •• • .:_,t�•�-•S.yl'p '�, . '. avY�!!+!+.Iw.µti'r••}1Lr�..,�.��. •��.Y.'�' /�'r�'"a�s�.w :xf 3jM7�+f�•tt� � -7._ �i�•C,w,a�i+ '" .. . "#" !!!i' •`;� _ h.L. �4y�:: ►i:1:Z•�: f.� .(t.1.1�h��h t�l�l�{4� �� i�Yff.: .!t'„'L •,!5 r..F:•- - -� Jc 1?!� ` ! its_ , .'.il •.' i �f� �: 1�� a �' �'i�.•L'•�,W�.r•f-J � �.y�, ••�� .•�Z. ttit�.i�•S�p _ • .. . i7►.��.� `� �Q�►•1 ! • � • _��. _�_� _ • •vita�.► L .A _ '•i ��. .r; may- _- w..w+•�w'�' • _... �w•.••r..w� L' •:arm: .,. . t 7 _ VALLEY CHRISTIAN CENTER OFFICE LOCATION APPRIVED —v-lffW- FROM INTERSTATM 580 sT •.1�.. ��n' ^+�.rl�,�,� wgi � "-'"... '. �r�� yam.. y � + r'C' �R _ �`` ,-^ »�.- 5! •:ea►:Tay;-'r9 3>,, -! y T- • +,s •j- i. �� .. � '� _.rte • .1-�'�0�>'.}rr�"e. ► �' ;Yi?iS r' ��f- ,y„3�� 1 %i�s.»'et` ^",-a!s'�..•'-i�C� � y'T�I+w..r :.�'+ "�Lrlk'�/br�i�s�r`�'!s��•...y�.+�rf-ry...�Py� '.""��r�..- -�- mow,-� .a. . .wf . _�i!'�.• +c'M�+•wnt�'-re�-N '"• ., .-..H-. 7 ��• "_w�.y '��r -. - sG - 1/�.s:'i7 r c:k.a1 Q'i�y �{R'�':.�yX?t�!+ !''�� 3 i'1'•7 ��1l��il�l �il�� r '�- DRI app„__.._,_.,,,,;�ys��' .''� +��i'''��r�•� t - I It� r� 1 r: ,�j..,�ta• � r.r .�cn►.�1��.�� nr,,;;� �'1 -:��" � �^-;��a�T:r► - .,�.—.dwt --��y,;L7PT-�"�.1y, •,dOi- .fir ��Y`�+^.a.»-a_- "�YI�. IV:-._ir. • .Jlwa� ..ti.�-«...i •: .• ". s Regular Meeting - September 4 , 1984 A regular meeting 4f 1984 , in the DMeetinglRoomngDublinsLibrarys held on September m, b Cm. Alexander, The meeting was called to order at 7 : 30 p. y - ' Chairman. ROLL CALL PRESENT. t .Commissloners Alexander, Petty, Mack, Barnes, and y. .`_ Thomas P DeLuca, Associate :Planner, ,'and 'Laurence L 7 Rale !: Tong, Planning Director. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Cm. Alexander led .the Commission, Staff, and those present in the P1 edge of allegiance to the flag. < . i MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes .of the regular meeting of August 20th, were approved as corrected by .Mr. Tong. ORAL COMMUNICATION None WRITTEN COMMUNICATION None PUBLIC HEARING SUBJECT: PA 84-041 Valley Christian Center Conditional Use Permit to relocate the future Administration Building Mr . Tong presented the Staff Report which was a request by Valley Christian Center to relocate the future t100 feetdsouth from its approved located to a p oint approximately of the Phase II classrooms . ATTACHMENT T-� Regular Meeting PCM-3-93 noted that the principal issue associated with this Mr . Tong act from I-580 . The Draft request relates to the visual impact icy decisions by the City General Plan with preliminary p + uiding policy which states "restrict Council contains a g ear to project above major ' structures��on the hillsides thatoipP is to "use the Site ridgelines The implementing policy process .to preserve or enhance the ridgelines Development Review p or arterial . that form the skyline as viewed from freeways or major ti streets" . Mr. Tong stated that after conducting a detairofilesloflthe ar � M hotographs and site p including site visits; p ; 4 { and proposed locations, Staff :;found that-,,a one :story . existing roved location would .not be visible at call; r building in the app be slightly visible. A one building would only ' and a two story ro osed location would be highly or two story building in the p P - visible . support the request because it would not be Staff could not supp reliminary policy decision in the Draft consistent with the p General Plan. opened the public hearing. ` Chairman Alexander op Ward Tannenberg, pastor of Valley Christian Center, gave a brief f the development of the Valley Chiistthe crossris 53 history o tower is 43 ft. tall, stated that the existing is 26 ft. tall. . The Church . , ft. tall, and the newest building does not have enough square footage to handle its . needsed Mr Tannenberg noted that a terracedlttractivehthan a two story :.. location would be more esthetic and a building in the approved location. noted that Valley Christian .Center neededa' two story - He further rov. e a terraced building .. , building and that the intent was to P in the proposed riate landscaping and screening in the approved with aPP ro P osed to a two story building location as opp ro osed building would only .impact :a location. He said the P P acted. The visual impacts of a skyline that was already imp building at the proposed location would be thWOUldealsoahave the to approved location. Parking for the building be added. ! Mike Goldsworthy, Architect for Valley Christian Center, gave a , i brief description of the displays and exhibits which had been . took one photo from a site prepared. He said that he onlyhotos . Mr. Goldsworthy reaffirmed farther west than the Staff ' s p Mr . Tannenberg; that is, that a terraced the points noted by would be more attractive building with appropriate landscaping roved location. and esthetic than a two story building in the apPHe stated that As a compromise, he suggested a landscape berthe Church could the grade is not natural, that in hindsight, avoid the ridgeline issue. have designed a bowl to Regular Meeting PCM-3-94 9/4/84 Mr. Tannenberg stated that the terms "major ridgeline" and "preserve or enhance" were subjective terms, and that the existing buildings already project above the skyline. Gilbert Zaballos , with the Valley Christian Center Building Committee, also stated that at the approved location, the Church must have a two story building. At the proposed location, a terraced building with sloping roofs would conform to the natural terrain and would be more attractive than a two story building in the approved location. - It was moved by Commissioner Raley and seconded by Commissioner, Mack to close the public hearing. 1 Voice vote found all " ..in favor Commissioner Raley said it was unfair to compare a box-like structure in the approved location to a stepped building in the proposed location. . He stated that the proposal did not . appear to be consistent with the policy 'decisions made 'by ahe City •Council and the he could not support the a location. .» Mr. .,Rale ^•,. .`, PP PP Y further noted that the approval of this request could set a precedent for further projects. The other ..Commissioners ; indicated "that •they did not have •a problem with :.the proposed application. Commissioner Mack said she does not see an impact when she drives ,:. .. home along I-580 . Commissioner Alexander questioned whether the site had a major ridgeline. Commissioner Raley stated the the ridgeline :. _ intersects the skyline and is a major ridgeline. In response to the question, Mr. Tannenberg stated that the ridgeline had :::_ ; already been affected. The proposed project would be visible but he did not think it would adversely impact the view or the . ridgeline. In response to, a question from Commissioner Petty, Mr. Tannenberg stated that if the application were denied, the Church would place the building in the approved location and parking in the proposed location. Commissioner Raley made a motion to deny the request, however the motion died for lack of a second. Commissioner Mack made a motion to approve PA 84-041 Valley Christian Center ' s Conditional Use Permit to relocate the future Administration building to a point approximately 100 feet south of the Phase II classrooms, after Staff has brought back a Resolution with the necessary findings . Commissioner Barnes seconded the motion. Regular Meeting PCM-3-95 9/4/84 u Voice vote found all in favor with the exception of Commissioner Raley . The Planning Commission provided Staff with certain specific language suggestions for the findings, including an insignificant visual difference, eliminating the draft finding that the structure projects over the ridgeline, that a split level building stepped with the existing land contours will not be detrimental, and that the project would not be inconsistent with the General Plan. The Commission ,directed Staff to,-bring .back a Resolution ;. approving the request,`"with 'the appropriate findings,' at the 9/17/84 Planning Commission Meeting: =y The item was continued. PUBLIC HEARING SUBJECT: PA 84-047 Crown Books Conditional Use Permit at :7900 Dublin Boulevard Mr. DeLuca presented the Staff Report .which was a request by Crown Books fora Conditional Use Permit .to operate a bookstore at 7900 Dublin -Boulevard. Mr. DeLuca noted that the intent of the Conditional Use Permit requirement was to regulate and control 'the .establishment of adult book stores . Staff did not have any problems with Crown Books since it cannot be classified as an adult book store . Chairman Alexander opened the public hearing. Mark Blancarte, 'property owner, addressed the Planning Commission and stated that he agreed with the Staff recommendation. Commissioner Petty, with a second by Commissioner Barnes, moved to close the public hearing . - 'Voice vote found all in favor. Both Commissioners Mack and Raley *indicated their possible concern in case Crown Books decided to carry sexually explicit material . Staff noted that if this was the case, there would be a good possibility that the Use Permit could be revoked. It was moved by Commissioner Raley and seconded by Commissioner Barnes to approve Crown Books Conditional Use Permit at 7900 Dublin Boulevard. Regular Meeting PCM-3-96 9/4/84 Regular Meeting - September 17 , 1984 A regular meeting of the City of Dublin Planning Commission was held on September 17 , 1984 , in the Meeting Room, Dublin Library. The meeting was called to order at 7 : 30 p .m. by Cm. Alexander, Chairman. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Commissioners Alexander, Petty, Mack, and Raley. Thomas ^ P . DeLuca, Associate Planner, and Laurence L. Tong, 'Planning Director . Commissioner Barnes was absent PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Cm. Alexander led the Commission, Staff, and those present in the pledge of allegiance to the flag. { , MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the regular meeting of September 4, 1984, were approved as written. _ ORAL COMMUNICATION None ' WRITTEN COMMUNICATION Mr. Tong briefly went over the State Office of Planning and Research Letter which granted the City of Dublin an extension for the adoption of the General Plan. PUBLIC HEARING SUBJECT: PA 84-041 Valley Christian Center, Conditional Use Permit to relocate the future Administration Building Mr. Tong presented the Staff Report which was a request by Valley Christian Center for a Conditional Use Permit to relocate the proposed Administration Building to a point approximately 100 ' south of the Phase II classrooms . ATTACHMEN . Regular Meeting PCM-3-100 Mr. Tong noted that the Planning Commission had continued this item from the September 4th meeting so that Staff could draft a series of findings to support the approval of the application. Mr. Tong stated that the resolution attached to the Staff Report contained a series of draft findings and conditions of approval. Mr. Tong further noted that should the Planning Commission desire to approve the application, Staff would recommend the resolution be adopted. Commissioner Raley .stated his previous concern; that is, that the ; request would be .in consistent with the preliminary policy' decisions in the Draft General Plan, 'and would be detrimental'to the future General Plan. Chairman Alex ander `stated that the'.issuelof building on the ridgelines needs to be handled on a case by case basis; however, he did feel it would be appropriate if the Council gave the Commission a definition with respect to what constitutes a major ridgeline. Commissioner Raley noted that he would like to see the Planning Commission discuss implementing policies for the overall guiding ;__. policy to preserve the ridgelines . Commissioner Petty made a motion to approve PA 84-041, Valley Christian Center's request for a Conditional Use Permit, which was seconded by Comm issioner Mack. At this time, Ward Tanneberg, Pastor of Valley Christian Center, . stated that he had concerns with Condition #1 b, f, g and #2 _in the draft resolution. These items related to landscaping, ^ consideration of building below grade, consideration of patio landscaping on roof tops and the expiration date of the _ Conditional Use Permit. At this time Commissioner Petty withdrew his motion, seconded by Commissioner Mack. Mr. Tanneberg also asked why this relocation was being handled by a Conditional Use Permit, whereas a previous relocation has been handled by Staff at a Site Development Review process. Mr. Tong stated that the conditions in the resolution were in an attempt to minimize the visual impact of the proposed office building as seen from I-580 . Mr. Tong also noted that this application is being processed as a Conditional Use Permit because there were policy questions involved which the Commission should vote on. The previous adjustments in the overall site plan did not involve policy issues . Regular Meeting PCM-3-101 9/17/84 Commissioner Petty made another motion to approve PA 84-041, with a change to Condition 2 of the resolution to read; "This approval shall be contingent upon approval of a Site Development Review and the issuance of a building permit by September 17 , 1986" and the title changed to Approving. It was seconded by Commissioner Mack. Commissioner Petty said that the term "substantial construction" was very ambiguous . Commissioner Alexander clarified the conditions for the applicant. Voice vote found Mack and Petty in favor, and Alexander and Raley opposed. _ Commissioner Alexander stated that he would vote for .the motion K if the original wording in Condition #2 was left the "same but'; . simply changing 1985 to 1986 . It was again moved by Commissioner Petty and seconded by Commissioner Mack to approve PA 84-041 with the following two changes : 1) Under item #2 , in the draft Resolution, change the date from 1985 to 1986 2 ) Change the title of the Resolution 'from recommending approval to Approving. _ . Voice vote found all in favor except Commissioner Raley. RESOLUTION 84-46 - APPROVING OF PA 84-041, VALLEY CHRISTIAN CENTER'S REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO RELOCATE THE FUTURE ADMINISTRATION BUILDING TO A POINT APPROXIMATELY 100 FEET SOUTH OF THE PHASE II CLASSROOMS SUBJECT: PA 84-046 Payless, Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review, for an outdoor display area at..- , 7201 Regional Street Mr. DeLuca gave the Staff Report, noting that the application had been continued from the 9/4/84 meeting so that more precise . exhibits could be prepared, particularly relating to the canopy improvements . The revised plans indicate that the existing canopy in front of the main entrance extends far enough out to cover the proposed new sidewalk, consequently no modificiations to the canopy in front of the main entrance are proposed. The canopy in front of the proposed garden display area will be extended as originally shown to cover the new sidewalk. Mr. DeLuca noted that the attached resolution had been changed to reflect the modifications desired by the Planning Commission at the previous meeting. Chairman Alexander opened the public hearing. Andrew Anderson, representing Payless , addressed the Commission and stated that he had no objections to the conditions with the exception of Condition #2 landscaping, and Condition #3 signage . Regular Meeting PCM-3-102 9/17/84