Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.1 BART Extension Livermore/Pleasanton CITY OF DUBLIN 10 �76 -30 AGENDA STATEMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: February 13 , 1984 SUBJECT Liveriore-Pleasanton BART Extension EXHIBITS ATTACHED Letters from Bob Allen dated February 2 and 6 , 1984 ; Letter to BART Board supporting the Livermore- Pleasanton Extension; BART Bond Measure Information RECOMMENDATION Consider appropriate action FINANCIAL STATEMENT: None DESCRIPTION As you may be aware, on Thursday, February 2 , 1984 , the BART Board of Directors voted to include the extension of rail to the Sari Francisco Airport in the Phase I submittal to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission. As a result of that action, representatives from the Cities of Danville, Dublin, Livermore, Pleasanton and San Ramon have met to discuss an appropriate strategy in presenting the Valley ' s case to the BART Board of Directors. Councilmember Jeffery and representatives from the other Cities have _ developed a letter to the BART Board emphasizing the need for the Valley _ extension . The BART Board of Directors will be meeting on February 16 , 1984 . Staff has submitted a request to the BART Board that the representatives from the 5 Valley Cities be given an opportunity to address the BART Board regarding the Livermore-Pleasanton Extension. Councilmernber Jeffery has requested that this item be placed on the agenda in order for the Council to determine in what manner the City should be represented at that meeting . ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- COPIES TO: ITEM NO. I9 ® A R T BAY AREA RAPID TRAPISIT D1S1*nlCT 800 Madison Street P.O. Box 12688 94 Oakland, CA A 94604-2688 Telephone (415) 465-4100 February 2, 1984 The. Honorable Quentin Kopp, Chairman Metropolitan. Transportation Commission ARTHUR J.SHARTSIS Hotel Claremont PRESIDENT Berkeley, CA 94705 NELLO BIANCO VICE-PRESIDENT Dear Quentin: KEITH BERNARD GENERAL MANAGER Further regarding my letters of January 31 and .February 1 and the MTC staff proposal for new transit starts and extensions. Our Board this morning revised BART's proposed extension phasing DIRECTORS as shown on the attached: BARCLAYSIMPSON In view of our Board's action which I support - I prsapose these 1ST DISTRICT NELLO BIANCO concurrent BART Phase I extensions for MTC approval: _ 2ND DISTRICT North Concord/West Pittsburg $362 million estimated. ARTHUR J.SIiARTSI 3RD DISTRICT T Irvington/WarmEprings (over Lake Elizabeth) $304 million estimated. MARGARET K.PRYOR Castro Valley/Dublin $202 million estimated. 4TH DISTRICT ROBERT S.ALLEN San Francisco Airport (station west of 101) $390 million estimated. 5TH DISTRICT Total (1983 dollars) $1258 million estimated. JOHIJGLENrJ Should funds run short, I suggest the first cutback be to single track. 6TH DISTRICT t- .,q6e,\) WILFRED T.USSERY Further cu s,,should be across the' board to the first station on each 7TH DISTRICT extension (North Concord, Irvington, Castro Valley, and S.F. Airport) . EUGENE GARFINKLE 6TH DISTRICT Given the basic BART Phase I program above, I suggest these concurrent JOHN H.KIRKWOOD non-BART projects: 9TH DISTRICT Extend Muni Metro to 4th and Townsend. Oakland Airport connector. Extend Muni Metro toward Fisherman's Wharf.. Buy SPT San Ramon Branch ROW north of Alamo and a6ut.h of Danville. Buy station sites and critical ROW for future BART extensions. I also urge a freeze on adding lanes to I-80 (Bay Bridge to Route 4, and I-680 (Dublin to Pleasant Hill) , until BART alternatives are analyzed. Very truly yours, Robert S-. Allen attachment '4 f BART EXTENSION STAGING (The several segments shown under each Roman numeral are understood to be implemented concurrently . ) WITHIN CURRE:-IT THREE-COUNTY DISTRICT I . North Concord/West Pittsburg " Irvington/Warm Springs Castro Valley/Dublin San Francisco9- A1IfPGV� II . Pittsburg/West Antioch/East Antioch Pleasanton/West Livermore/East Livermore San Francisco* I-80 Corridor (Partial) III . San Francisco* I-80 Corridor (Partial) r ' San Ramon Corridor OUTSIDE CURRENT DISTRICT (Subject to a satisfactory cost-sharing arrangement) _ I . - Serramonte/Tanforan 11brae _f Milpitas/San Jose 9 III . Burlingame/:Menlo Park/Palo Alto /San Jose *San Francisco has a 3ART commitment for a northwest corridor extension or an equivalent project . Board adopted Se�; t3mlaas 1 , gRZ Z, 1 c\54 B A R T BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT ' 800 Madison Street P.O. Box 12688 Oakland, CA 94604-2688 Telephone (415)465-4100 February 6, 1984 The Honorable Dale Turner, Mayor ARTHUR J.SHARTSIS City of Livermore PRESIDENT NELLO BIANCO VICE-PRESIDENT Dear Dale: ' KEITH BERNARD GENERAL MANAGER Last Thursday our Board, at the united request of the three directors from San Francisco, defined BART's in-district DIRECTORS commitment to San Francisco as a line to the San Francisco Airport. (See attached copy of BART Extension Phasing.) We BARCLAYSIMPSON also agreed to support a people :mover linking BART Coliseum 1ST DISTRICT station with the Oakland Airport, to be built concurrent with NELLOBIANCO or sooner than the S.F. Airport extension. 2ND DISTRICT ARTHUR J.SHARTSIS BART's proposed $390 million extension 'beyond the end of 3RD DISTRICT our planned Daly City tail track and a station trainside with MARGARET K.PRYOR the Caltrain Peninsula Commute west of U.S. 101 aims to cut out 4TH DISTRICT Caltrans proposal to extend the commute rail about a mile in ROBERT S.ALLEN San Francisco for an estimated $340 million. 5TH DISTRICT ' JOHN GLENN Our package achieves a startling equity to the people in 6TH DISTRICT each of the three BART counties: .- WILFRED T.USSERY Contra Costa: 7TH DISTRICT North Concord/ West Pittsburg $362 million estimated. EUGENE GARFINKLE Contra Costa County Total $362 million ($552/capita) . 8TH DISTRICT Alameda: — JOHNH.KIRKWOOD Irvington/Warm Springs (over = 9TH DISTRICT Lake Elizabeth) $304 million estimated Castro Valley/Dublin. $202 million estimated Oakland Airport Connector $ 90 million estimated Alameda County Total - $596 million ($539/capita) . San Francisco: San Francisco Airport $390 million estimated San Francisco County Total $390 million ($574/capita) . If necessary to cut back on Phase I, I am strongly urging that it be done across the board. Interim single track would probably cost about 60% to 70%. The next cut should be the end station on each extension. But I really thing the entire BART Phase I is doable and am working hard to this goal. Very tru1 yours,_ Robert S. Allen CC: Mayor Pete Snyder, City of Dublin 44 3-0►A 4 Mayor Bob Butler, City of Pleasanton i BART EXTENSION STACINC, (The several segments shown under each Ronan numeral are understood to be implemented concurrently ..) WITHIN CURRENT THREE-COUNTY DISTRICT I . North Concord/West Pittsburg ° Irvington/Warm Springs Castro Galley/Dublin San FranciscoDAi,,r II . Pittsburg/West Antioch/East Antioch Pleasanton/West Livermore/East Livermore San Francisco* I-80 Corridor (Partial) III .- San Francisco* 1,80 Corridor (Partial) r San Ramon Corridor OUTSIDE CURRENT DISTRICT . (Subject to a satisfactory cost-sharing arrangement) - I . Serramonte/Tanforan 11 b r a e Milpitas/San Jose III . Burlingame/:Menlo Park/Palo Alto/San Jose *San Francisco• has a BART commitment for a northwest corridor extension or an equivalent project . Board adopted 2, 1q54- r February 6, 1984 TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES: Today representatives from the cities of Danville, Dublin, Livermore, Pleasanton, and San Ramon met to discuss the recent action, by the BART Board of Directors, to include a rail extension to the San Francisco Airport, as part of BART'_'I submittal to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission. As a result of today' s meeting, repre- sentatives from each community agreed to coordinate efforts to lobby BART for placing a high priority on the Livermore-Pleasanton Rail Extension. Attached is a draft letter developed for your consideration. It is recommended that you copy this letter onto your own letterhead, sending the original to the BART Board of Directors with copies to those individuals and organizations on the attached list. All letters should be mailed to the BART Board of Directorsrllprior to their next meeting, which will be held on Thursday, February 16, 1984 , at 9 : 00 a.m. The meeting will be held in BART' S Administrative Offices on the first floor at 800 Madison Street in Oakland. In the meantime) if you have any questions, please contact your local Chamber of Commerce. — February 6, 1984 Board of Directors Bay Area Rapid Transit District 800 Madison Street Oakland, CA 94607 Honorable Bart Board of Directors : We would like to express our disappointment and anger at the recent decision; by your �oard< to adjust the Barrt Rail expansion plan to include the San Francisco airport extension at the expense of°; the Livermore-Pleasanton extension. Our community has already invested 37 million dollars in property taxes and 27 million dollars in sales tax to insure the building of a transportation system to service our area. In the past, we have been both supportive and patient with BART ' S plans, knowing that the Livermore-Pleasanton extension would be built as soon as the funds became available . Over 20 years ago, when our citizens agreed to pay for the BART system, we felt that we were investing in our future . -.That.' future is now. Mr. Arthur Shartsis, at a recent Metropolitan Transportation Commission public hearing supported the plan for the Livermore Valley. We find it interesting that he has now changed his mind. As taxpayers we do not understand the logic of building in a non- BART county where no contributions to the system have previously been made by the taxpayers . BART ' S decision really leads one to question the integrity of the manner in which BART funds the entire rail system. We would urge your Board to reconsider its decision, and give the Livermore-Pleasanton Rail Extension a priority which will assure funding in the first phase. Bay Area Rapid Transit District 800 Madison Street Oakland, CA 94607 Metropolitan Transportation Commission Hotel Claremont Berkeley, CA 94705 Tri-Valley Herald P . 0. Box 3000 Livermore, CA 94550 Valley Times P . 0. Box 6071 Pleasanton, CA 94566 Oakland Tribune 1834 Catalina Court Livermore, CA 94550 San Francisco Examiner 925 Mission Street San Francisco, CA 94103 U . S . Representative Fortney Stark 22300 Foothill Boulevard, -Suite 1029 Hayward, CA 94541 t' BEFORE THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT In the matter of confirming the canvass of votes in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties and the City and County -of San Francisco on special district bond election held November 6, 1962. / Resolution No. 241 WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Alameda County has duly can- vassed or caused to be canvassed the votes cast in the County of Alameda at the special district boar election consolidated with the State of California General Election held on November 6, 1962, in the County of I, Alameda, by the electors of the County upon the measure hereinafter set forth, and there has been certified to this Board the result of the votes cast at said election Opon said measure, which said certification is now C11- on file in the office of the Secretary of the District; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County has duly canvassed or caused to be canvassed the votes -cast in the County of Contra Costa at the special district bond election consolidated with the State of California General Election held on November 6, 19629 in the County of Contra Costa, by the electors of the County upon the measure hereinafter set forth, and there has been certified to this Board the result of the votes cast at said election upon said measure, which said certification is now on file in the office of the Secretary of the District; and WHEREAS, the Registrar of Voters of the City and County of San Francisco has duly canvassed or caused to be canvassed the votes cast in the City and County of San Francisco at the special district bond election consolidated with the State of California General Election held ~2- " Resolution No. 241 on November 6, 19620 in the City and County of San Francisco, by the electors of the City and County upon the measure hereinafter set forth, and there has been certified to this Board the result of the votes cast at said election upon said measure, which said certification is now on file in the office of the Secretary of the District, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District as follows; 1. Said canvasses by or on behalf of said Boards of Supervisors of Alameda and Contra Costa Counties and the Registrar of Voters of the City and County of San Francisco as shown by said certifications and the result of said election are hereby ratified, confirmed and approved. 2. At said election the following measure for incurring bonded indebtedness was submitted to the electors of the Counties of Alameda and Contra Costa and the City and County of San Francisco and the number of votes cast in the Counties of Alameda and Contra Costa and the City and County of San Francisco for and against said measure was as follows: MEASURE A: Shall San Francisco Bay Area Rapid = (Rapid Transit) Transit District incur a bonded in- debtedness in the principal amount of $792,000,000 for the object and purpose of acquiring, con- structing and operating a rapid transit system for the transportation of passengers and their incidental baggage# including rights of way, rail lines, bus lines, stations, " platforms, switches, yards, terminals, parking lots and any and all other facilities necessary or convenient for rapid transit service within or partly without the district, under- ground, upon or above the ground and under, upon, or over public streets, highways, bridges, tubes, tunnels, or other public ways or waterways, together with all physical struc- tures necessary or convenient for the access of persons and vehicles thereto, including lands, easements, rights to the use or joint use of any or all of the foregoing and all other works, property or structures necessary or convenient to carry out the objects, purposes and powers vested in the District under the "San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District Act"? -3- Resolution No. 241 and was summarized on voting machine ballot labels, as follows: SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT BONDS: AUTHORIZING SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT TO INCUR A BONDED INDEBTEDNESS OF $792,000,000 FOR A RAPID TRANSIT SYSTEM PURSUANT TO THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT ACT, Total Vote Total Vote 11YES11 "NO" Alameda County 193,402 128,726 Contra Costa County _81,543 68,134, City and County of San Francisco 163,559 80,967 TOTAL 438,504 277,827 3 The total number of votes cast in the District at said special district bond election and the total number of votes given in each pre- cinct and by absentee voters of the District.'for and against said measure were and are .set forth in said canvasses by or on behalf of said Boards of Supervisors of Alameda and Contra Costa Counties and the Registrar of Voters of the City and County of San Francisco as more fully appears on the official records of said Boards of Supervisors and said Registrar of Voters which are incorporated herein and made a part hereof, 4. That more than 607, of all of the votes cast at said special district bond election on said measure were in favor of said measure and that said measure carried. SECRETARY'S CERTIFICATE I, Richard J. Shephard, Secretary of San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors of said District at a special meeting of said Board duly and regularly and legally held at the regular meeting place thereof on the 6th day of December, 1962, of which meeting all of the members of said Board had due notice and at which a majority thereof was present and acted; that at said meeting said resolution was introduced by Director and read in full, and was thereupon, upon motion of Director seconded by Director , adopted by the following vote: AYES: Directors NOES: ABSENT: That I have carefully compared the same with the original minutes - of said meeting on file.and of record in my-office -and that said resolu- tion is duly entered of record in said minutes of said Board, and said resolution is a full, true and correct copy of the original resolution adopted at said meeting and entered in said minutes. That said resolution has not been amended, modified or rescinded since the date of its adopt- tion and the same is now in full force and effect. WITNESS my hand and the seal of the District this day of 1962. Secretary of San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District BEEURE THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE SAN FRAuCISCO BAY AIM. RAPID TRANSIT P" -RICT Resolution of the Board of Directors San Francisco Bay Area Rapid �.._. transit District requesting the Board of Supervisors of Alameda County to provide for the consolidation of a special district bond election with the State of California general elec- tion to be held November 6 1962. / Resolution No. 227 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors (hereinafter sometimes called the "Board" w of San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District " � has determined to call a special district bond election nint the cDistricteto betheldr') on Tuesday, November 6, 1962, at which will be submitted to the qualified electors the measure for incurring a bonded indebtedness of the District as hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, a State of California General Election will be held on Tuesday, November 6, 1962, and it is the desire of the Board that said special district bond election be consolidated with said general election; and WHEREAS, the territory in which said elections are to be held is iii part the 1 same, to wit, all of the territory of the District lying within the County of Alameda (hereinafter called the "County"); NOW* THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, as follows: Section 1. Said special district bond election is hereby called to be held in said District and the same shall be consolidated with the State of California General Election to be held on Tuesday, November 6, 1962, at which election shall be submitted to the qualified electors the following.measure, to wit: • SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT MEASURE URE Shall (Rapid San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit s District incur a bonded indebtedness in the Transit), principal amount of $792,000,000 for the • object and purpose of acquiring,, construct- �ygS or and operating a rapid transit system for the trans- ; portation of passengers and their incidental baggage, Including rights of way, rail lines, bus lines, stations, Platforms, switches, yards, terminals, parking lots and any and all other facilities necessary or convenient for rapid transit service within or partly without the district#•_ underground, upon or above the ground and under, upon, or over public streets, highways, bridges, tubes, tunnels, or other public ways or waterways, together with all physical structures necessary or convenient for the access of per- sons and vehicles thereto, including lands, easements; NO • rights to the use or joint use of any or all of the fore- : going and all other works ' • or convenient to carry out the pobjects, spurp ses necessary Purposes and ; Powers vested in the District under the "San Francisco Ba ; Area Rapid Transit District Act"? y #227 -2- ' Said measure shall be set forth on the ballots to be used at said General Cand District Bond elections within said County in substantially the form herein- above set forth. On the ballots to be used at said elections each voter to vote for said measure hereby submitted and for the incurring of said district bonded indebtedness shall stamp a cross (X) in the blank space opposite the word "YES" on the ballot to the right of said measure, and to vote against said measure and against incurring said district bonded indebtedness shall stamp a cross (X) in the blank space opposite the word "NO" on the ballot to the right of said measure. On absent voter ballots the cross (X) may be marked with pen or pencil. Section 2. The Board of Supervisors of the County is hereby requested to order the consolidation of said special district bond election with said general election to be held on Tuesday, November 6, 1962, insofar as the District is con- cerned, and to further provide that within the territory affected by said order of consolidation, to wit, the County, the election precincts, polling places and voting booths shall in every case be the same, and there shall be only one set of election officers in each of said precincts. All residents of the County who are qualified electors possessing the qualifications prescribed by the general election laws of the State of California shall be entitled to vote at said special district bond election. Said Board of Supervisors of the County is further request- ed to order the County Clerk of the County (i) to set forth on all sample ballots relating to said consolidated elections, to be mailed to the qualified electors, said measure hereinabove set forth, and (ii) to provide absent voter ballots for said general election and said special district bond election consolidated there- with for use by qualified electors who are entitled thereto, in the manner pro- vided by law. Section 3. Said Board of Supervisors of the County is hereby urther authorized to canvass,. or cause to be canvassed as y provided by law, the returns of said special district bond election with respect to the votes cast on said measure and to certify such canvass of the votes cast for and against said measure to this Board. Section 4. The Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to certify to the due adoption of this resolution and to transmit a copy thereof so certified to the Board of Supervisors of the County and to file a copy hereof so certified with the County Clerk of the County. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of July, 1962, by the following vote: AYES: 11 - Directors Anderson, Charles, Cummings, Dolan, Gray, Joseph; MacLeod, Morrison, Silliman, Swan and Falk. NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 s/ AdrienJ. Falk President Attest: s/ Richard J. Shephard Secretary