HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.1 PblcHrngAD86-1 TR5511
CITY OF DUBLIN
AGENDA STATEMENT
City Council Meeting Date: July 22, 1991
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing: Landscaping and Lighting District
No. 1986-1 (Tract 5511)
Report by: Public Works Director Lee Thompson
EXHIBITS ATTACHED:
1) Engineer's Report
2) Resolution Approving Engineer's Report, Confirming
Diagram and Assessment, and Ordering Levy of Assessment
3) Assessment Diagram
4) Newsletter
RECOMMENDATION:
C\i~¡
4)
5)
Open public hearing
Receive Staff report and public testimony
Question Staff and the public
Close public hearing and deliberate
Adopt Resolution
FINANCIAL STATEMENT: The 1991-92 assessment is proposed to be $78.48 per single-
family lot and $39.24 per condominium/townhouse lot. The City's costs for
maintaining landscaping within District boundaries are reimbursed by the District.
DESCRIPTION: As part of the review and approval of the 145-unit single-family
development (Ridgecreek) and the other, multi-family Villages, certain landscaping
maintenance was made a condition of approval. This maintenance assessment
distirct provides funds for this work. The City Council approved formation of the
District on November 10, 1986, with the initial assessment in the 1987-88 tax
year.
The County Assessor collects these monies for the City for the maintenance of
landscaping and irrigation systems, right-of-way fencing, walls, entrance signs,
and trash removal. The District's boundaries include all of Tract 5511.
This year, it is proposed to add maintenance of landscaping at the small area
north of the Crossridge road cul-de-sac, which is now a weed problem, to the scope
of work for this maintenance district.
This year's assessment is proposed to be $78.48 per single-family lot and $39.24
per multi-family lot. This is approximately 65% of last year's assessment. The
cost of water and some other maintenance activities is anticipated to be less than
last year; additionally, it is proposed to utilize $6,000 of the District's
reserve fund to help defray the cost of replanting frost-damaged material when
water restrictions end.
On June 24th, the City Council adopted resolutions approving the Preliminary
Engineer's Report and setting a public hearing date of July 22, 1991. Notice of
the public hearing was published, posted, and mailed to property owners in
accordance with Government Code regulations. Staff additionally mailed a
newsletter to property owners which described events that took place in the
District over the past year. A copy of the newsletter was previously sent to the
City Council and is also attached to this agenda statement.
Staff recommends that the City Council conduct a public hearing, deliberate, and
adopt the resolution approving the engineer's report, confirming the diagram and
assessment, and ordering levy of assessment for the 1991-92 tax year.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
ITEM NO.
~-1
COPIES TO:
CITY OF DUBLIN
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 1986-1
(TRACT 5511)
FISCAL YEAR 1991-92
ENGINEER'S REPORT
CONTENTS
1. Assessment: Including Scope of Work, Estimate of Costs,
Assessment Roll, and Method of Apportioning
2. Assessment Diagram
-1-
C' '; ;' ?\" -; 7;'. " ',"' 1
:~-./\ t~ 11~~ ~ ~ ~
ENGt~ESt2~ (2EPor¿T ~-'--~
ASSESSMENT
WHEREAS, on March 25, 1991, the City Council of the City of Dublin,
California, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of
1972, adopted its Resolution Directing Preparation of Annual Report for
Maintenance Assessment District for the maintenance of improvements more
particularly therein described; and
WHEREAS, said Resolution directed the undersigned to prepare and file a
report pursuant to Section 22565, et. seq. of said Act;
NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned, by virtue of the power vested in me
under said Act and the order of the Council of said City, hereby make the
following assessment to cover the portion of the estimated cost of the
maintenance of said improvements and the cost and expenses incidental thereto, to
be paid by said District.
ESTIMATE OF COSTS
Incidental Expenses
(1) (2) (3)
As Filed As Preliminarily As Finally
Approved Approved
$ 65,400 $ 65,400 $
$142,153 $ 142,153 $
$207,553 $ 207,553 $
Cost of Maintenance
TOTAL COST:
Est. 1991-92 Interest Income
Applied to 1991-92
Operating Costs $ 9,700 $ 9,700 $
Est. Surplus from 1990-91
Fiscal Year $142,727 $ 142,727 $
Income from Other Sources $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $
NET TO BE ASSESSED FOR
FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 $ 51,126 $ 51,126 $
As required by said Act, a diagram is hereto attached showing the
exterior boundaries of said landscaping maintenance assessment district and also
the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within said landscaping
maintenance assessment district as the same existed at the time of the passage of
said resolution, each of which lots or parcels having been given a separate
number upon said diagram.
-2-
I do hereby assess the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable
lots or parcels of land within said landscaping maintenance assessment district
by apportioning that amount among the several lots or parcels in proportion to
the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the
maintenance of said improvements, and more particularly set forth in the list
hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof.
Said assessment is made upon the several lots or parcels of land within
said landscaping maintenance assessment district in proportion to the estimated
benefits to be received by said lots or parcels respectively from the maintenance
of said improvements. The diagram and assessment numbers appearing herein are
the diagram numbers appearing on said diagram, to which reference is hereby made
for a more particular description of said property.
Each lot or parcel of land assessed is described in the assessment list
by reference to its parcel number as shown on the Assessor's Maps of the County
of Alameda for the fiscal year 1991-1992 and includes all of such parcel
excepting those portions thereof within existing public roads or right-of-way to
be acquired in these proceedings for public road purposes. For a more particular
description of said property, reference is hereby made to the deeds and maps on
file and of record in the office of the County Recorder of said County. Because
the names of the several owners are unknown to me, I hereby place the word
"Unknown" opposite the number of each lot or parcel of land assessed, the amount
assessed thereon, and the number of the assessment.
í
!
J {I'
/
. ./ l
~gin~er - L{,'~~
Dated: July 15, 1991
-3-
SCOPE OF WORK
The following areas are to be maintained by this Maintenance Assessment District:
1) The median and roadside landscaping along the north side of the street for
the entire length of Willow Creek Drive.
2) Roadside landscaping along Shady Creek Drive within Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,
15, 16, 37, 38, and south of Lot 145, all within Tract 5511.
3) Roadside landscaping, wall, fence, and pathway improvements along the west
side of Dougherty Road between Amador Valley Boulevard and the northerly City
Limit line, and along the north side of Amador Valley Boulevard between Dougherty
Road and Wildwood Road.
4) Roadside landscaping, fence, and pathway improvements along the west side of
Wildwood Road.
5) Roadside landscaping, fence, wall, and pathway improvements along the west
side of Dougherty Road and the south side of Amador Valley Boulevard adjacent to
Lot 150.
6) Roadside landscaping, fence, and pathway improvements along the west and
north sides of Fall Creek Road.
7) Roadside landscaping and emergency access surfacing at the north end of
Crossridge Road within the street right-of-way.
-4-
ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATE
FISCAL YEAR 1991-92
The estimated cost for the maintenance of improvements described in this Report
for the fiscal year 1991-92 is as follows:
Maintenance
1. Weeding, fertilizing, pruning, plant replacement,
irrigation system:
2. Utilities:
Incidentals
1. Engineer's Report and Proceedings
2. Cost of Collection (County of Alameda)
3. Delinquencies
4. Contingencies/Reserve
Total
-5-
$ 50,600
14,800
$ 65,400
$ 2,000
870
2,556
136,727
$142,153
$207,553
ASSESSMENT ROLL
Amount of Assessment
Assessment and Lot No. Property Owners 1991-92 Tax Year
Lots 1-145 (Village VI) Unknown $78.48 per lot = $ 11 , 380
Lot 150 (Village I) Unknown $39.24 per D.U. $ 2,196
Lot 151 (Commercial Corner) Unknown $ 310
Lot 149 (Village II) Unknown $39.24 per D.U. $ 9,732
Lot 148 (Village III) Unknown $39.24 per D.U. $ 8,788
Lot 146A (Village IV) Unknown $39.24 per D.U. $ 5,298
Lot 146B (Village V) Unknown $39.24 per D.U. $ 8,006
Lots 152-177 (Village VII) Unknown $39.24 per D.U. $ 5,416
$ 51,126
-6-
METHOD OF APPORTIONING
Each single family lot shall be assigned a benefit unit of one, each multifamily
unit assigned a benefit unit of one-half, the commercial lot shall have a benefit
unit of 4, and the open space lots shall have a benefit unit of zero. This gives
the following benefit units and apportionments for each Village for this Fiscal
Year:
Number of Benefit % of Total
Living Units Units Assessment
Lot 150, Village I 56 28 4.30
Lot 149, Village II 248 124 19.03
Lot 148, Village III 224 112 17 .19
Lot 146A, Village IV 135 67.5 10.36
Lot 146B, Village V 204 102 15.66
Lots 1-145, Village VI 145 145 22.26
Lots 152-177, Village VII 138 69 10.59
Lot 151, Commercial 0 4 0.61
Lots A - D, Open Space 0 0 0.00
Total: 1,150 651. 5 100.00
-7-
CITY OF DUBLIN
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 86-1
CERTIFICATIONS
FISCAL YEAR 1991-92
I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that the
foregoing Engineer's Report, including Assessment, in the amounts set forth in
Column (1), with the diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on June 12, 1991
Richard C. Ambrose, Deputy
I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that the
foregoing Assessment, with the diagram thereto attached, was preliminarily
approved and confirmed by the City Council of said City by its Resolution No.
51-91 duly adopted by said Council on June 24, 1991.
Richard C. Ambrose, Deputy
I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that the
foregoing Assessment, with the diagram thereto attached, was finally approved and
confirmed by the City Council of said City by its Resolution No. -91 duly
adopted by said Council on July 22, 1991.
Richard C. Ambrose, Deputy
I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that a
certified copy of the assessment and diagram was filed in the office of the
County Auditor of the County of Alameda, California, on
1991.
Richard C. Ambrose, Deputy
-8-
RESOLUTION NO. -91
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
---------------------------------------
APPROVING ENGINEER'S REPORT, CONFIRMING DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT,
AND ORDERING LEVY OF ASSESSMENT
CITY OF DUBLIN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1986-1
WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. 30-91, a resolution directing
preparation of Annual Report for City of Dublin Landscaping and
Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. 1986-1 (the "District"),
this council designated the city Engineer as Engineer and ordered that
Engineer to make and file a report in writing in accordance with and
pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and
WHEREAS, said Engineer of Work has made and filed with the
city Clerk a preliminary report in writing as called for, which report
was presented to the city council on June 24, 1991; and
WHEREAS, said Engineer of Work has filed with the city Clerk
an Engineer's Report for final consideration; and
WHEREAS, the city council has duly considered said Report
and each and every part thereof and finds that each and every part of
said Report is sufficient; and that said Report nor any part thereof
requires modification in any respect;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
a) That the Engineer's estimate of the itemized and total
costs and expenses of maintaining said improvements and of the
incidental expenses in connection therewith be; and each of them are
hereby finally approved;
b) That the diagram showing the assessment district,
description of improvements to be maintained; and the boundaries and
dimensions of the respective lots and parcels of land within said
district as contained in said report be, and it is hereby finally
approved;
", '-!2~
~ï ~
~.;..~-_~_~ ~ ~ -ð ~
~.soLLlíl~
z
_~~.--._.....r;¡,¡
c) The assessment of the total amount of cost and expenses
of the proposed maintenance of said improvements upon the several lots
and parcels of land in said District in proportion to the estimated
benefits to be received by such lots and parcels, respectively, from
said maintenance and of the expenses incidental thereto, as contained
in said report be, and they are hereby finally approved and those
assessments are hereby ordered levied as contained in said reports.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of July, 1991.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Mayor
ATTEST:
city Clerk
2
i:>¡ Þ,6èA'iv\
~1'C¡~
3
~-~-_.....~
/~;: _~TII! (!{/¡..
Ifll/ ~ \\\,
J~~.~(~l~/.ll_,~\:.~\~..~! CITY OF DUBLIN
.~, Po. Box 2340 Dublin, Calfornla 94568
.
Cty Ojf:ces, 100 CiVIC P:aza, Dublin, Callforr:a 94568
VILLAGES AT WILLOW CREEK
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
NEWSLETTER
FACTS ABOUT THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
This assessment district was formed in 1986 for the purpose of maintaining
certain landscaping improvements within the Villages at Willow Creek
development. The following areas are being maintained by the City at the
present time:
1) The median and roadside landscaping along the north side of the street
for the entire length of Willow Creek Drive.
2) Roadside landscaping along Shady Creek Drive within Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,
6, 15, 16, 37, 38, and south of Lot 145, and landscaping at the northerly
end of Crossridge Road, all within Tract 5511.
3) Roadside landscaping, wall, fence, and pathway improvements along the
west side of Dougherty Road between Amador Valley Boulevard and the
northerly City Limit line, and along the north side of Amador Valley
Boulevard between Dougherty Road and Wildwood Road.
4) Roadside landscaping, fence, and pathway improvements along the west side
of Wildwood Road.
5) Roadside landscaping, fence, wall, and pathway improvements along the
west side of Dougherty Road and the south side of Amador Valley Boulevard
adjacent to Lot 150.
6) Roadside landscaping, fence, and pathway improvements along the west and
north sides of Fall Creek Road.
Other common landscaping improvements not included in the assessment
district's scope of work are maintained by the homeowners' associations of
individual Villages.
Landscaping within the Alamo Creek area is presently maintained by the
developer, Rafanelli and Nahas. Eventually, the Alameda County Flood Control
and Water Conservation District, Zone 7, will maintain the creek right-of-way
area.
STREET LANDSCAPES
During the past year, the assessment district landscaping has been subjected
to both freezing temperatures and drought conditions. Fortunately, many of
the plant species in this assessment district are California natives and
adapted to the weather conditions without severe damage. Some trees, shrubs,
and groundcovers were lost to frost damage however.
Since the Bay Area has experienced three straight years of damaging frost,
the City's maintenance department has decided that it would be in the
district's best interest to plant in the Spring of 1992 and avoid the
possibility of again damaging newly planted material.
..."., .....,.
':,
.h- ~ -~ ,.J- .;;,.;....;~;r ~,.J j
'..
4
-~.-....."'-..~.~.
:":~,r:S:;2.t;cn (O::15ì 233-õ650 . City Cour,c:1 (.:¡45) 833-E6,:;5 . F!nai"lce (415) (:
Ccce =:';crce:i1ent (¿15; 833-(;620 . E~;;~eer'rg (415) 633,(,(
~clce (¿15: 833-6670 . Pubic Wor'.-;s (4~5) 8336830 .
~ ~
NÐ.05LE.~
Another factor affecting the replacement of plant material is the drought.
The City has, like all residents, been asked to reduce its normal water use
by 25%. The City has been able to do this to date; however, we would like to
ask residents to help by reporting any damage to the irrigation systems from
vandalism or any other cause. Unfortunately, irrigation systems have been
vandalized throughout the district, but particularly on Wildwood Road, Fall
Creek Road, and Dougherty Road. If you notice a broken or malfunctioning
sprinkler head, please advise the City maintenance department at 833-6630,
and a repair will be made as quickly as possible so that unnecessary waste of
water is avoided. Many of you have called us with information in the past,
and your efforts are sincerely appreciated.
To provide a more consistent control of weeds in the district landscapes, the
City proposes to increase the frequency of chemical pre-emergent control and
to add an additional Work Alternative crew on the weekends for weeding
bedding areas.
It is proposed to add the small area behind the curb at the northern end of
the Crossridge Road cul-de-sac to the District. The City will be adding
plant material and maintaining the landscaping in the future.
PARK IMPROVEMENTS
The cost of park improvements and maintenance is paid by the City and not
charged to the assessment district.
The second phase improvements in Alamo Creek Park were completed during the
past fiscal year. These improvements include restroom facilities, play
equipment, picnic areas, a basketball court, and additional landscaping.
The City's park masterplans include a number of improvements for the
Dougherty Hills Park (the "hill" to the west of the Villages). To date,
trails have been cut to allow hiking on the hill. Proposed future projects
would provide a parking area along Amador Valley Boulevard, day camp and
picnic facilities, restrooms, and naturalized landscaping. The City's Five
Year Capital Improvement Program indicates funding for design development in
the 1994-95 Fiscal Year. Upon completion of the design, the Rotary Club has
expressed an interest in pursuing development of portions of the site.
PUBLIC HEARING
The City is required to hold a public hearing each year in order to offer
property owners an opportunity to protest the proposed assessment for the
upcoming tax year. The attached notice provides information regarding the
date, time, and place that the hearing will be held.
This year, the City proposes to use a portion of the assessment district's
reserve fund that has built up and, accordingly, to reduce the assessment to
property owners. The 1991-92 assessment is proposed to $78.48 per single
family lot (as compared with $120.00 last year) and $36.86 per
condominium/apartment lot (as compared with $60.00 last year).
City Staff will be glad to speak with any property owners who have questions
regarding the assessment or the maintenance activities in the district.
Please feel free to call 833-6630 for information.
- 2 -
_~,__'.' ......,""'-\1
. . ~-\ \ \ \ \----)
'__.__l--'""
t)\7-1P~~'{
~
\~
\
\
,
LAtJbSCAPc kA/l0TEDA~
A<S~ê0?HË~T])\~-r(2.H~--T 8£-1
ALAMO 02EÐC
'?A0L
t
27
LINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
CURVE
DELTA
RADIUS
ARC
TANGENT
CHORD
CHORD BRG
1
N
27'40'32'W
63.58
1
90'00'00'
50.00
78.54
50.00
70.71
N 48'13'02'E
2
N
27'40'32'W
288.82
2
38'03'08'
540.00
339.78
175.73
334.21
N 73 *iV 28'E
3
N
88'46'58'W
25.00
3
38'03'08'
480.00
289.45
149.69
284.89
N 73'!1'28'E
4
N
88'48'58'W
59.11
4
90'00'00'
50.00
78.54
50.00
70.71
N 43'48'58'W
5
N
34'50'08'W
00.00
5
3'31'25'
1555.00
95.83
47.83
95.62
N 13'34'08W
6
N
08'38'30'W
85:89
6
18'05'24'
1555.00
438.88
219.79
435.25
N 09'15'440E
7
N
08'38'30'W
180.00
7
38'03'08'
508.00
318.39
164.88
313.18
N 73'11'28'E
8
N
88'15'05'E
52.12
\
I�
9
N
BB'15 *058E
135.54
10
N
19'27'38'W
158.35
LOT 'G''
Si
N
55'09'54'E
290.08
12
N
88'46'58PW
59.11
13
N
88'46'58'W
25.00
14
N
15'20'00'W
210.87
15
N
17 *18'28 "E
294.83
200150100 50 0
200
400
600
18
N
00'22'26'W
180.07
17
N
88'48'58'W
153.11
18
N
80'29'570E
50.00
SCALE IN
FEET
19
N
29'30'03'W
20.98
FOUND ALAMEDA COUNrY
Mo/VU,NENr " 79 -Z'
F-
U
¢ ® I
F-
u� n,
O `O-
U
w
¢ =d
�s
Z
p
U
dP
d •
FOUND ALAMED/CONrR COSTA
COUNTY MONUMENT "79 -1' ,
N N
,O
�Tc_Qn
LOT 'A '
OOUGNERry ROAD
N 11'46'�`Rry ROAD
0 L)G HG /
SEE DETAIL C
SHEET 3 OF 3
LOT 'E '
m
co)'
SNY
G
�I1�5
Ci CAM,° f 4RKS
LOT 'C'
I W
I '
1 �
I �
1 � 1
U
i
v
0)
CD
N m Q t[1 l9 r cu r _
PN
V /C /N /Ty AW
,v. rs.
CAMP PARKS
IV
FIE illil';
Street it <t,.. Lm 5 ti3 " 7 i�d G •,� �� i � *, 5 r e {� ( ?".1,
Assessment District 8 L4 -t, „"
CITY O F DUBLIN
ALAMEDA COUNTYm CALIFORNIA
t`
LOT 'B
LOT 153 TRACT 4719 - -142 M 41
BASIS OF _BEARINGS
THE LINE BETWEEN THE FOUND STREET MONUMENTS _
ALONG THE MONUMENT LINE OF DOUGHERTY ROAD,
TAKEN AS N01'13'020E, PER P.M.4575
BOOK 155 MAPS, PAGE 97.
i
AL AMEDA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL 1'
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT `l
PARCEL .0 " SER /ES NO 84-076934
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
w
JUNE, 1991 REVISION: =SSESSN ?ENT
DISTRICT LOT 146A DIVIDED INTO 20
L37.3 (19 BUILDING AND 1 CONLMON
ARE A) ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LOTS 16
AND 17 ON U7-7AIL ?, SHEET 2 DIVIDED
INTO LOTS 194 -200 LOTS 201 -205
RESPECTIVELY
N'RAGT 47ry
15
3 M 41 NOTES: i
142 T:.IETES AND EC"-
_HIS --STRICT --7 zA4E AS "=HOSE
6 S C :D E Z: .- IT D RESERVED
_: +TERICR ? S___:S AR E SHOW1
D N _'?.. =,CT .4P -5-_, - ='R_ -.C"_' ' AP 00.
.I TC, IE, 1988 RE'i "_S_0N: = ,SSESSi -LENT
DISTRICT LOT _ DT': -7ED INTO LOTS
I THROUGH 177 AND LOTS = THROUGH
:d. LOT _ - ^0 D_': D_D _.TT_'0 LOTS 1=8A
AND T _48B.
- :]E 1989 REVISICN: ASSESSMENT
_STRICT LOTS 1 -6A !,'TD 1 ?6B WERE
._NNE: {ED INTO THE DISTRICT. LO
Ai ID LOTS -52-177 x LOTS - -W
+ERE SUBDI'iIDED INTC CONDO14INIUMS
AS SHOWN ON SHEET I DETAILS B AND
A RES?EC"!"ELY. -- - -9 AND
C
L_TS 3, C,E,F AND G ;;ERE ADJUSTED
.OR LOT LINES.
SHEET 1 OF 3
0
�§1� ,'` G®3;falNTED
' - - � �,/ JUL 101991
J q� Santana and Thompson, Inc.
J
0
148 A
I
IU
na^
\ U
1 wl
150
\
o
^yxa
oa
\
'q..i 437
\\
y J
EASEMENT
SEE. DETAIL B
\ F9 I \
SHEET 2 OF 3����
\ T
Bc `
SEE DETAIL
A
SHEET 2 OF
3 `� s
���
ROAD
\
I�
LOT
LOT 'G''
P!I
AL AMEDA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL 1'
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT `l
PARCEL .0 " SER /ES NO 84-076934
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
w
JUNE, 1991 REVISION: =SSESSN ?ENT
DISTRICT LOT 146A DIVIDED INTO 20
L37.3 (19 BUILDING AND 1 CONLMON
ARE A) ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LOTS 16
AND 17 ON U7-7AIL ?, SHEET 2 DIVIDED
INTO LOTS 194 -200 LOTS 201 -205
RESPECTIVELY
N'RAGT 47ry
15
3 M 41 NOTES: i
142 T:.IETES AND EC"-
_HIS --STRICT --7 zA4E AS "=HOSE
6 S C :D E Z: .- IT D RESERVED
_: +TERICR ? S___:S AR E SHOW1
D N _'?.. =,CT .4P -5-_, - ='R_ -.C"_' ' AP 00.
.I TC, IE, 1988 RE'i "_S_0N: = ,SSESSi -LENT
DISTRICT LOT _ DT': -7ED INTO LOTS
I THROUGH 177 AND LOTS = THROUGH
:d. LOT _ - ^0 D_': D_D _.TT_'0 LOTS 1=8A
AND T _48B.
- :]E 1989 REVISICN: ASSESSMENT
_STRICT LOTS 1 -6A !,'TD 1 ?6B WERE
._NNE: {ED INTO THE DISTRICT. LO
Ai ID LOTS -52-177 x LOTS - -W
+ERE SUBDI'iIDED INTC CONDO14INIUMS
AS SHOWN ON SHEET I DETAILS B AND
A RES?EC"!"ELY. -- - -9 AND
C
L_TS 3, C,E,F AND G ;;ERE ADJUSTED
.OR LOT LINES.
SHEET 1 OF 3
0
�§1� ,'` G®3;falNTED
' - - � �,/ JUL 101991
J q� Santana and Thompson, Inc.
o
P'
!J J
A
0/
S 62fi .
l
n
n
n
J
A
n
A
D CR EK
?r r /S SHADY
+ it if
6 5 q 3
i� 16 15 14 13 19/
12 II Ut 10 3
IAA 20' 20' LOI 199 190 "�
r• �. { � Lo72�corn cm
u'm 20 yraa if
Lot r, eta- -_ r�i1• �+ ..I. :l ;i - -_ uis :r
h Ji
y
NO
llJ�C i /
;q
�33 a \�nJ� 6 134
_iN. l.�I��" i S'�L61� 1261231'q 131 132133
`119
e�
n +
�2
,`rY
If
� � � •i � I :.'_ _III �r �:�'�' � vI 'o i t'u
i N
1 r
o
If
r /r�
Nr• . w�
In D .
1 in 71 g
"X a "r c= 5�e_ t1 In ®yy-;y `',4 F ° wa r.... cog ':tea
AO / ..-- ...�I�;A� �+3�:i.H �.a��- ���I \��.w �� :a t�t"����a�����V ����F..,�7� ���.�
v v
rrf nr•
p y �r� U 9
2145 \\q - `; j• 0 8 ~r Y � r- �J � -
A C C-) U N T Y 9 C;A L F C, R NIA
1 ,f
1� �F y P y.' } I•
Ta s1 SCALE:: T= 200
/
y.
��� Ii rzc•�s �
v
G'
c�
DETAIL A NOTES:
L0, )\� • I \,/ / THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LOT NUMBERS ARE
COMPOSED OF: a) A LOT NUMBER FOLLOWED BY A
HYPHEN AND EACH INDIVIDUAL UNIT NUMBER; OR b)
4 1j `t' / A LOT NUMBER FOLLOWED BY A HYPHEN AND THE
L
TIC F LETTERS "COMM" FOR BUILDING COMMON AREAS; OR
�/
c) A LETTER FOLLOWED BY A HYPHEN AND THE
LETTERS "COMM" FOR GENERAL COMMON AREAS.
DETAIL B NOTES:
THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LOT NUMBERS ARE
COMPOSED OF: a) A FOUR DIGIT BUILDING NUMBER
FOLLOWED BY EACH INDIVIDUAL UNIT LETTER; OR
b) AN AREA LETTER FOLLOWED BY A HYPHEN .AND
THE LETTERS "COMM" FOR THE COMMON AREAS. .
EXAMPLES:
LOT
21
73
COMM
ASSESSMENT
\
A E F B
AREA
DISTRICT
c
4
A
LOT
68"
70
71 72
NUMBER
107
108
109
110 111
21- COMM
\--
21 -111-
(5
E -COMM
A
3
r�
O
O
t� \
.J
,F
1)
,7
/1
\R
E'd1�
a \ /
. C�•d
O
/ � C
\n
v gin,.
°
d/ k
C
4
i
/ �
F
� j
\
A E F B
c
4
A
D 4 L K G1 C
li\�l Ci\J\�J
A E 1 J F 8
D H L K G C
h•3�
\\
�'�� CtB /% 69�
/
�sa 143 0 P
1•} 2 l b H ASSESSMENT ti•. , (/) ") .
5� I4� t
G DISTRICT
139 139 C
LOT \\ \\ %/
\ \ 3,
BLDG 0570 NUMBER '1 ,r� 1
N 6570G
COMM 250 AREA \ N —COMM
B F E q
l
lj
C r H p
,S•SB
G
/
L .iJl
"GQ6
L
v /:z
/
P
O
h
.a
•9 F
G H G C
\ / 'l6�
\/
A E F 8
CG e.e!4
1
J
\/
t i> J
,'46
C rsaz B
/
K 4 j \g J
D H G
a. Y0)
\ C
/� \
3/'-'q
A E F B
G l_V D.
ri
W
w
Z
O'
7
O
!J
SHEET 2 OF 3
GD3345
L v�:y,i � '.. .. .. '.,,rF',. ', 4t'.. _4"!_, rt•.. '.:. .c.. is .. p,: .. :, .... 9?,. .F'n :m .Yt.».'. a . � .. d: .
Lighting Street 1n
Assessment District 86-1
CITY Y LI
ALAMEDA COUNTYP CALIFORNIA
+
FISCAL YEAR I I/I
y
2id2
SCALE: qq p g�
SCALE �g : 1"= 200'
Q-
_
n
-O
Ei]
+O r
c
'r
a°
\
g(,
27a2 fO _
on 9116
0
t�a
a
JO
J � ^I
l
• l
v+
� 1
o
n -
.auaw
2;m
$s
DETAIL
r
DETAIL C NOTES:
THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LOT NUMBERS ARE
COMPOSED OF: a) A LOT NUMBER FOLLOWED BY A
HYPHEN AND EACH INDIVIDUAL UNIT NUMBER; OR b)
A LOT NUMBER FOLLOWED BY A HYPHEN AND THE
LETTERS "COMM" FOR BUILDING COMMON AREAS; OR
c) A LETTER FOLLOWED BY A HYPHEN AND THE
LETTERS "COMM" FOR GENERAL COMMON AREAS.
Y
PRINTED
JUL 101991
r
Santini and 7homm". tnc.
SHEET 3 OF 3
GD3345