Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.2 HrngRealignStPatrckROWCITY CLERK File 6fl[4�Q-Ny[�] AGENDA STATEMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 15, 1996 SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: PA95-043 Realignment of the established Right -of Way Line for a New Road Parallel to and South of Dublin Boulevard Between Golden Gate Drive and Regional Street (the Parallel Road) (Report Prepared By: Lee Thompson, City Engineer and Jeri Ram,( Associate Planner) �' ,) EXHIBIT ATTACHED: 1) Draft Ordinance Indicating No Protests Received 2) Draft Ordinance Indicating Denial of Protests 3) Map of Proposed Right -of -Way Line 4) Legal Description of Proposed Right -of -Way Line 5) Letter dated September 20, 1996, from Matt Brooks to Planning Commission RECOMMENDATION:�, 2) 3) 4) 5) Open public hearing Receive Staff Report and public testimony Question Staff and the Public Close public hearing and deliberate Waive reading and introduce Ordinance establishing right-of-way lines (Exhibit 1 if no protests are received or Exhibit 2 if protests are received, as appropriate) 6) Continue the item to the November 4, 1996 City Council meeting for second reading FINANCIAL STATEMENT: No financial impact at this time. Costs for acquisition of the land would be negotiated with the property owners at such time as the City funds this project as a Capital Improvement Project. DESCRIPTION: The realignment of the established right-of-way line for the Parallel Road between Regional Street and Golden Gate Drive has previously been requested by the affected property owners and has been authorized for study by the City Council. COPIES TO: Matt Brooks Lincoln Properties ITEM NO. V Background: In 1987 the City Council adopted the Downtowri Specific Plan. A road parallel to and south of Dublin Boulevard (the Parallel Road) was included in the circulation element of the Plan to improve circulation in the downtown area. After several public hearings, a Mitigated Negative Declaration for this Parallel Road was adopted on September 26, 1988, and the right-of-way line for the Parallel Road between Amador Plaza Road and Regional Street was approved by the City Council with Planning Commission recommendation, on October 10, 1988. More recently, a portion of the roadway, from Amador Plaza Road to Golden Gate Drive has been incorporated into a plan as a continuation of the new 1-680 hook ramps to Amador Plaza Road. On February 24, 1994, the City Council approved the initiation of a study to realign the approved right-of-way line between Golden Gate and Regional Street. The Study was initiated at the request of the owners of the Orchard Supply Shopping Center and the Unisource Building. Since the Study was initiated, the Unisource Building has been sold to Lincoln Properties. The Planning Commission heard this item at a public hearing on September 24, 1996. At that time, they adopted an Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration and a Resolution recommending the City Council adopt a Resolution of Intention. The City Council approved the Resolution of Intention at their meeting of October 1, 1996. The Resolution of Intention was posted for the required time period. Analysis: The owners of the Orchard Shopping Center and the former owners of the Unisource Building requested that the City perform a Study to determine if the approved fight of way could be realigned to provide area for construction of loading docks behind the shopping center. The City approved the initiation ora Study on February 24, 1994. Carlson Barbee and Gibson, Inc., consulting engineering, prepared the Study to reflect the two property owners' desires. The two property owners then entered into a written agreement for this new alignment. Staff reviewed the proposed alignment and made a small change to line up the intersection at Golden Gate Drive with the approved tight of way connection at Amador Plaza. With this revision, staff.agrees that the new alignment is acceptable. The existing and proposed alignment are illustrated on Exhibit 3 along with a legal description (Exhibit 4) that more accurately describes the realignment. After completion of the study, staff.met with Steve Dunn of Lincoln Properties and Matt Brooks, owner of the shopping center. Both Lincoln Properties and Matt Brooks verbally agreed to the realignment. On September 23, 1996, staff.received a letter from Matt Brooks (Exhibit 5). In that letter Mr. Brooks expresses concern regarding two issues: (1) Is the alignment in accordance with his agreement with Lincoln Properties; and (2) Loss of parking and its impact on the shopping center. To: staff' s best knowledge, the realignment (except to line up the road with the intersection) is the same as what was agreed to between Lincoln Properties and Matt Brooks. The engineer that was hired to do the Realignment Study was hired by the parties to the agreement, not the City. There is no additional loss of parking for the Orchard Shopping Center with the realignment. The impact on parking for the Orchard Shopping Center was analyzed as part of the original alignment study in 1988, and although it was determined that the Center would lose approximately 69 spaces, that amount was not considered significant due to Iow utilization of parking in the downtown area. Staff' s evaluation of the realignment included a review of the impact on existing parking facilities for the Lincoln Properties building. The project involved the potential for acquisition of property currently used for parking and driveways. The Lincoln Properties parking will be reduced below the amount that is required per the Variance and Conditional Use Permit for the property and the zoning requirements for a warehouse. Zoning normally would require 300 spaces; however, the Variance/Conditional Use Permit specified 187 spaces, with annual review to determine if additional spaces should be provided up to 236 spaces. Ifa new use comes into the building, it is reviewed to ensure that there will be sufficient parking spaces. The Parallel Road project would remove approximately 132 existing spaces. However, the parking study done as part of the approved Mitigation Measures indicates that 132 spaces can be replaced with 108 new spaces for a net of 163 spaces (187 original spaces - 132 spaces for the Parallel Road + 108 improved and new spaces) (this does not include a possible land exchange with BART to provide additional parking). Therefore, the loss of an additional 10 spaces is not considered significant in light of the approved mitigation measures. Should the City Council not approve the realignment, the existing alignment as shown on Exhibit 3 would remain. The existing or proposed alignment would adequately satisfy the policies of the General Plan and Downtown Specific Plan. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council conduct a public heating, deliberate, waive the reading and introduce the appropriate Ordinance approving the realignment of the right-of-way. G:WA954)43Xcc~r2 ORDINANCE NO. -96 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN REALIGNING AN ESTABLISHED RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A NEW ROAD PARALLEL TO AND SOUTH OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD BETWEEN GOLDEN GATE DRIVE AND REGIONAL STREET (THE PARALLEL ROAD). The City Council of the City of Dublin does ordain as follows: WHEREAS, the City Council adopted a Resolution of Intention calling for a public hearing to consider a realignment of the future right-of-way line for a new road parallel to and south of Dublin Boulevard between Golden Gate Drive and Regional Street (the Parallel Road) and set a public hearing for October 15, 1996, at 7:00 P.M. to hear objections to the establishment of said right-of-way line; and WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was duly given; and WHEREAS, no protests were made either in writing or orally to the establishment of said right-of-way line. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council finds and ordains that: Section 1. The Parallel Road right-of-way line is hereby realigned between Golden Gate Drive and Regional Street as follows: Real property, situate in the incorporated territory of the City of Dublin, County of Alameda, State of California, described as follows: Being a portion of lot B, lot C and lot E, as said lot B, lot C and lot E are shox~m and so designated on that certain parcel map no. 4224 recorded February 6, 1984 in book 143 of maps at page 6 in the office of the County Recorder of Alameda Count),, also being a portion of parcel C, as said parcel C is shown and so designated on that certain parcel map no. 1307, recorded January 29, 1976 in book 89 of maps at page 8 in said office of the County Recorder of Alameda County, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the northwestern corner of said parcel C (89 M 8); Thence, from said point of beginning, along the southwestern line of said parcel E and parcel B (143 M 6), north 20°51 '45" west 108.00 feet; Thence leaving said southwestern line, along the arc of a non-tangent 40.00 foot radius curve to the left, from which the center of said curve bears north 69o08, 15" east, tln'ough a central angle of 90°00'00'', an arc distance of 62.83 feet; Thence, north 69008, 15" east 234.60 feet; Thence, along the arc of a tangent 416.00 foot radius curve to the left, through a central angle of 14°02'10'', an arc distance of 101.91 feet; Thence, north 55006'05" east 91.76 feet; Thence, along the arc of a tangent 1034.00 foot radius curve to the right, through a central angle of 15°00'48'', an arc distance of 270.94 feet; Thence, north 74056'57" east 57.11 feet; Thence, along the arc of a tangent 400.00 foot radius curve to the left, through a central angle of 11 °08' 14", an arc distance of 77.75 feet; Thence, north 63048'43" east 332.05 feet. Thence, along the arc of a tangent 40.00 foot radius curve to the left, through a central angle of 84°40'28'', an arc distance of 59.11 feet to a point on the southeastern line of said lot C (143 M 6); Thence, along said southeastern line and the southeastern and southern line of said lot E, the follow4ng five (5) courses: 1. South 20°51'45 east 33.42 feet, 2. Along the arc of a tangent 34.00 foot radius curve to the right, through a central angle of 35°57'02'', an arc distance of 21.33 feet, 3. Along the arc ora reverse 50.00 foot radius curve to the left, from which the center of said curve bears south 74054'43" east, through a central angle of 83°06' 19", an arc distance ot'72.52 feet, 4. South 20°51 '45" east 20.37 feet, and 5. South 69°08'15 west 1.00 feet; Thence, leaving said southern line, along the arc of a non tangent 40.00 foot radius curve to the left, from which the center of said curve bears south 69°08'15" west, through a central angle of 82°30'20'', an arc distance of 57.60 feet; Thence, south 63o48'43'' west 296.17 feet; Thence along the arc of a tangent 484.00 foot radius curve to the right, through a central angle of 09°27'40'', an arc distance of 79.92 feet; Thence, south 73°16'23" west 30.97 feet; Thence, along the arc of a tangent 966.00 foot radius curve to the left, through a central angle of 18°10'19'', an arc distance of 306.38 feet; Thence, south 55006'05'' west 91.76 feet; Thence along the arc of a tangent 484.00 foot radius curve to the fight, through a central angle of 14o02, 10", an arc distance of 118.57 feet to a point on the northern boundary line of said parcel C (89 M 8); Thence, along said northwestern line, south 69°08' 15" west 234.60 feet; Thence, leaving said northwestern, along the arc of a tangent 40.00 foot radius curve to the left, through a central angle of 90°00'00'', an arc distance of 62.83 to a point on the southwestern line of said parcel C; Thence, along said southwestern line, north 20°51'45" west 40.00 to said point of beginning and containing 1.9453 acres of land, more or less. Section 2.. The effect of said right-of-way line shall be governed by the provisions of Chapter 7.68 of the Dublin Municipal Code. Section ,3. EFFECTIVE DATE AND POSTING OF ORDINANCE. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after the date of its passage. The City Clerk of the City of Dublin shall cause this Ordinance to be recorded with the County Recorder and posted in at least three (3) public places in the City of Dublin in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code and the State of California. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this __ day of ,1996 AYES: NOES' ABSENT Mayor City Clerk G:\PA95-043\Ord 1 ORDINANCE NO. .-96 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN REALIGNING AN ESTABLISHED RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A NEW ROAD PARALLEL TO AND SOUTH OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD BETWEEN GOLDEN GATE DRIVE AND REGIONAL STREET (THE PARALLEL ROAD). The City Council of the City of Dublin does ordain as follows: WHEREAS, the City Council adopted a Resolution of Intention calling for a public hearing to consider a realignment of the future right-of-way line for a new road parallel to and south of Dublin Boulevard between Golden Gate Drive and Regional Street (the Parallel Road) and set a public hearing for October 15, 1996, at 7:00 P.M. to hear objections to the establishment of said right-of-way line; and WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was duly given; and WHEREAS, protests to the establishment of said right-of-way line were made by the owners of ., which protests are hereby denied. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council finds and ordains that: Section 1. The Parallel Road right-of-way line is hereby realigned between Golden Gate Drive and Regional Street as follows: Real property, situate in the incorporated territory oft he City of Dublin, County of Alameda, State of California, described as follows: Being a portion of lot B, lot C and lot E, as said lot B, lot C and lot E are shown and so designated on that certain parcel map no. 4224 recorded February 6, 1984 in book 143 of maps at page 6 in the office of the County Recorder of Alameda County, also being a portion of parcel C, as said parcel C is shown and so designated on that certain parcel map no. 1307, recorded January 29, 1976 in book 89 of maps at page 8 in said office of the County Recorder of Alameda County, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the northwestern comer of said parcel C (89 M 8); Thence, from said point of beginning, along the southwestern line of said parcel E and parcel B (143 M 6), north 20°51 '45" west 108.00 feet; Thence leaving said southwestern line, along the arc of a non-tangent 40.00 foot radius curve to the left, from which the center of said curve bears north 69°08'15" east, through a central angle of 90°00'00'', an arc distance of 62.83 feet; Thence, north 69°08'15" east 234.60 feet; Thence, along the arc ora tangent 416.00 foot radius curve to the left, through a central angle of 14002, 10", an arc distance of 101.91 feet; Thence, north 55006'05" east 91.76 feet; Thence, along the arc of a tangent 1034.00 foot radius curve to the right, through a central angle of 15°00'48'', an arc distance of 270.94 feet; Thence, north 74°56'57'' east 57.11 feet; Thence, along the arc of a tangent 400.00 foot radius curve to the left, through a central angle of 11 °08' 14", an arc distance of 77.75 feet; Thence, north 63°48'43'' east 332.05 feet. Thence, along the arc ora tangent 40.00 foot radius curve to the left, through a central angle of 84°40'28'', an arc distance of 59.11 feet to a point on the southeastern line of said lot C (143 M 6); Thence, along said southeastern line and the southeastern and southern line of said lot E, the following five (5) courses: 1. South 20°51'45 east 33.42 feet, 2. Along the arc ora tangent 34.00 foot radius curve to the right, through a central angle of 35°57'02'', an arc distance of 21.33 feet, 3. Along the arc ora reverse 50.00 foot radius curve to the left, from which the center of said curve bears south 74°54'43" east, through a central angle of 83°06'19", an arc distance of 72.52 feet, 4. South 20°51 '45" east 20.37 feet, and 5. South 69°08'15 west 1.00 feet; Thence, leaving said southern line, along the arc of a non tangent 40.00 foot radius curve to the left, from which the center of said curve bears south 69°08'15" west, through a central angle of 82°30'20'', an arc distance of 57.60 feet; Thence, south 63o48'43'' west 296.17 feet; Thence along the arc of a tangent 484.00 foot radius curve to the right, through a central angle of 09°27'40", an arc distance of 79.92 feet; Thence, south 73016'23'' west 30.97 feet; Thence, along the arc of a tangent 966.00 foot radius curve to the left, through a central angle of 18010, 19", an arc distance of 306.38 feet; Thence, south 55006'05'' west 91.76 feet; Thence along the arc of a tangent 484.00 foot radius curve to the right, through a central angle of 14°02'10", an arc distance of 118.57 feet to a point on the northern boundary line of said parcel C (89 M 8); Thence, along said northwestern line, south 69°08'15" west 234.60 feet; Thence, leaving said northwestern, along the arc of a tangent 40.00 foot radius curve to the left, through a central angle of 90°00'00'', an arc distance of 62.83 to a point on the southwestern line of said parcel C; Thence, along said southwestern line, north 20°51'45" west 40.00 to said point of beginning and containing 1.9453 acres of land, more or less. Section 2. The effect of said right-of-way line shall be governed by the provisions of Dublin Chapter 7.68 of the Dublin Municipal Code. Section 3. EFFECTIVE DATE AND POSTING OF ORDINANCE. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after the date of its passage. The City Clerk of the City of Dublin shall cause this Ordinance to be recorded with the County Recorder and posted in at least three (3) public places in the City of Dublin in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code and the State of California. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this__ day of ,1996 AYES: NOES: AB SENT Mayor City Clerk G:LPA95-043\Ord2 TYPICAL STREET SECTIOhl W(~OILyFIITON REVISED ALIGNMENT PARALLEL ROAD DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA ~ ¥' ~0' ]~0' i4rl' Carl .... SEPTEMBER 12, 1996 JOB NO.: 91277-05 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROPOSED PARALLEL ROAD DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA REAL PROPERTY, SITUATE IN THE INCORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEING A PORTION OF LOT B, LOT C AND LOT E, AS SAID LOT B, LOT C AND LOT E ARE SHOWN AND SO DESIGNATED ON THAT CERTAIN PARCEL MAP NO. 4224 RECORDED FEBRUARY 6, 1984 IN BOOK 143 OF MAPS AT PAGE 6 IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, ALSO BEING A PORTION OF PARCEL C, AS SAID PARCEL C IS SHOWN AND SO DESIGNATED ON THAT CERTAIN PARCEL MAP NO. 1307, RECORDED JANUARY 29, 1976 IN BOOK 89 OF MAPS AT PAGE 8 IN SAID OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWESTERN CORNER OF SAID PARCEL C (89 M 8) ; THENCE, FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING, ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERN LINE OF SAID PARCEL E AND PARCEL B (143 M 6), NORTH 20051'45" WEST 108.00 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHWESTERN LINE, ALONG THE ARC OF A NON- TANGENT 40.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT, FROM WHICH THE CENTER OF SAID CURVE BEARS NORTH 69°08'15" EAST, THROUGH A CENTR3tL ANGLE OF 90°00'00'', AN ARC DISTANCE OF 62.83 FEET; THENCE, NORTH 69°08'i5" EAST 234.60 FEET; THENCE, ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENT 416.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14°02'10'', AN ARC DISTANCE OF 101.91 FEET; THENCE, NORTH 55o06'05" EAST 91.76 FEET; THENCE, ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENT 1034.00 FOOT PJtDIUS CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15°00'48", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 270.94 FEET; THENCE, NORTH 74°56'57'' EAST 57.11 FEET; LEGAL DESCRIPTION PAGE TWO SEPTEMBER 12, 1996 JOB NO.: 91277-05 THENCE, ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENT 400.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO T~E LEFT, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11°08'14", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 77.75 FEET; THENCE, NORTH 63°48'43'' EAST 332.05 FEET; THENCE, ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENT 40.00 FOOT R3kDIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 84°40'28", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 59.11 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERN LINE OF SAID LOT C (143 M 6); THENCE, ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERN LINE AND THE SOUTHEASTERN A_ND SOUTHERN LINE OF SAID LOT E, THE FOLLOWING FIVE (5) COURSES: 1) SOUTH 20051'45 EAST 33.42 FEET, 2) ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENT 34.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 35°57'02", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 21.33 FEET, 3) ALONG THE ARC OF A REVERSE 50.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT, FROM WHICH THE CENTER OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 74°54'43" EAST, THROUGH A CENTR3tL ANGLE OF 83°06'19", A_N ARC DISTANCE OF 72.52 FEET, 4) SOUTH 20o51'45" EAST 20.37 FEET, 5) SOUTH 69°08'15 WEST t.00 FEET; THENCE, LEAVING SAID SOUTHERN LINE, ALONG THE ARC OF A NON- TANGENT 40.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT, FROM WHICH THE CENTER OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 69°08'15" WEST, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 82°30'20'', AN ARC DISTANCE OF 57.60 FEET; THENCE, SOUTH 63048'43" WEST 296.17 FEET; THENCE, ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENT 484.00 .FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09°27'40=, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 79.92 FEET; THENCE, SOUTH 73016'23" WEST 30.97 FEET; LEGAL DESCRIPTION PAGE THREE SEPTEMBER 12, 1996 JOB NO.: 91277-05 THENCE, ~_LONG THE ARC OF A TANGENT 966.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO T~E LEFT, THROUGH A CENTR3~L ANGLE OF 18°10'19'', AN ARC DISTANCE OF 306.38 FEET; THENCE, SOUTH 55°06'05'' WEST 91.76 FEET; THENCE, ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENT 484.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14°02'10", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 118.57 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID PARCEL C (89 M 8); THENCE, ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERN LINE, SOUTH 69°08'15'' WEST 234.60 FEET; THENCE, LEAVING SAID NORTHWESTERN, ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENT 40.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90°00'00", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 62.83 TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHWESTERN LINE OF SAID PARCEL C; THENCE, ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERN LINE, NORTH 20°51'45'' WEST 40.00 TO SAID POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 1.9453 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS. END OF DESCRIPTION CHRISTOPHER S. HARMISON L.S. 7176 EXPIRES DECEMBER 31, 1999 LOT B : P~ 4224 :" 143 M 6 LoT c PM 4224 "'"--PANT OF BE(~NN~NG : LOT E PCL C PM 4224 ':.:. TANGENT TABLE CURVE TABLE UNE BEARING DISTANCE [CURVE RADIUS LENGTH L1 N 20'51'45" W 108.00' ~ Cl 40.00' 62.83' J 90'00'00" L2 N 69'08'15" E 234.60' C2 416.00' 101.91' J 14'02'10" L3 N 55 '05' E 91.76' C5 270.94' i 15'00'48' L4 N 74'56'57' E 57.11' i 04 400.00' 77.75' L5 N 63'48'43" E 352.05' C5 40.00' 59.1f L6 S 20'51'45' E 35.42' C6 54.00' 21.~' ! 3557'02" L7 S 20'51'45" E 20.57' C7 50.00' 72.52' J L8 S 69'08'15" W 1.00' C8 40.00' 57.60' 82'30'20' L9 S 6Y48'4Y W ' 296.17' C9 484.00' 79.92' ' 09'27'40' LIO S 75'16'25' W 30.97' C10 966.00' 306.~' j 18'10'19' Lll S 55'06'05" W 91.76' Cll 484.00' 118.57' 14'02'10' L12 S 69'08'15" W 254-.60' C12 40.00' ! 62.85' 90'00'00' L15 J N 2051'45' W 40.00' PLAT TO AOOOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIFTlON Carlson, Barbee I , ; . CML ENGINEERS s SURYEYORS · Pt. ANHER~ 2000 CROW CANYON PLACE, SUITE 250 SAN RAMON, CALIFORNIA 94585 TEL (510) 866-0522 FAX (510) 866-8575 UNE BEARING DISTANCE L1 N 20'51'4-5" W 108.00' L2 N 69'08'15' E 234-.60' L3 N 55'06'05" E 91.76' L4 N 74'56'57' E 57.11' L5 N 63'48'43" E 352.05' L6 S 20'51'45" E 35.42' L7 S 20'5f45' E 20.37' L8 S 69'08'15' W 1.00' L9 S 63'48'43' W ' 296.1T LIO S 73'16'23" W 30.9T Lll S 55'06'05" W 91.76' L12 S 69'08'15" W 234.60' L13 N 2051'45' W 40.00' CURVE RADIUS LENGTH ". DELTA Cl 40.00' 62.83' 90'00'00' C2 416.00' 101.91' 14'02'10' C5 1034.00' 270.94-' 15'00'48' C4- 400.00' 77.75' : 11'08'14" C5 40.00' 59.1f . 84'40'28" C6 34.00' 21.33' 35'57'02' C7 50.00' 7Z52' ,::: 83'06'19' C8 40.00' 57.60' 82'30'20' C9 484.00' 79.92' 09'27'40' CiO 966.00' 306.,,T~' 18'10'19' Cll 484.00' 118.57' 14'02'10' C12 40.00' 6Z83' 90'00'00' NOVEMBER 1995 91277-05 Friday, September 20, 1996 Planning Commission of the City of Dublin c/o Lee S. Thompson, City Engineer City of Dublin PO Box 2340 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568 Re: PA 95-043 Re~/gz~ment of new roadway Dear Lee: I received the Agenda and Staff Report concerning the above referred to matter, which is to be heard on the 24th. Although I do not necessarily disagree with any of the materials which I have received, I would like to make several clarifications. First, when asked for my opinion and approval as to the changes in the proposed roadway alignment, I believe I was clear that I had entered into a quite specific ageement already w/th Lincoln Properties concerning this matter. As a part of this ageement, I ageed that I would not propose or a~ee to any other alignment than that ageed to in that a~eement. Due to this situation, I could not agee or disagree to any proposed realig2rnent of the new roadway. I believe that you have a copy of this a~eement, but if you do not I Mll be happy to provide to you a copy of this ageement. Second, that as the new roadway, whether or not it is realigned, will be taking par'king from our Shopping Center. Due to this, the CiB, needs to address my concern that our Property v¥411 not be unfairly penalized or handicapped due to this-lost of parking. I respectively request that the two above mentioned items be considered by the Planning Commission's in its review of this matter. Sincerely, Dublin Shopping Center Ardenb~X~w~;~~ W~li~ Mathews Brooks President cc: S. Moldaw lt09206 The irfformaticm ccmtamed herein l'ms either been given to us or obtained t:rom sour~ ~t we d~ m~. ~ ~ve no ~ ~ d~bt i~ a¢~a~, but we do not guarantee it. The prospective user o£ the information should carefully verify each item and all other information contained herein.