HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.2 Village Parkway Fencing W2-0 -2-0.
CITY OF DUBLIN
AGENDA STATEMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 23 , 1984
SUBJECT Village Parkway Fencing
EXHIBITS ATTACHED Maps depicting results of previous mail survey;
82 x 11 schematic sidewalk/landscape sketch; Slides
indicating colors and textures of precast concrete
walls will be displayed at the meeting
RECOMMENDATION 1 ) Take public testimony
2 ) Authorize Staff to proceed to obtain easements from
the property owners
3 ) Give Staff direction in the event that one or more
property owners do not want their fence replaced
a) Leave the fence as is for those property owners
b) Proceed to condemn the easements and authorize
Staff to contract for appraisals
c ) Design the fence within the public right-of-way
leaving the fence as is
4 ) Give Staff direction as to color and pattern of
wall
5 ) Authorize Staff to proceed with plans and specifi-
cations for :
Project #1 - Sound wall along the west side of
Village Parkway between Amador Valley
Boulevard and Kimball Avenue
Project #2 - Landscape and sidewalk improvements
for the same limits
6 ) Make additional appropriation of $200 , 000 for the
wall
If the City Council also wishes to pursue land-
scaping at this time, an additional appropriation
of $120 , 000 would be necessary
FINANCIAL STATEMENT: Preliminary estimate for engineering and construction
for the wall is $200 , 000 ; Preliminary estimate for
sidewalk and landscaping along the wall is $120 , 000
DESCRIPTION Staff has conducted a mail survey at Council direction
to ascertain from the residents who back onto Village Parkway as to their
feeling regarding replacing the fence along Village Parkway with a precast
decorative concrete wall . To replace the fence with a wall in the same
location will require an easement from the property owners as the existing
fence is on their property .
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ COPIES TO:
ITEM NO. (D - X-1
AGENDA STATEMENT : Village Parkway Fencing
Page 2
The results of the survey, as of this writing, are as follows :
Mailed out 71
Would like fence replaced 52
Would not like fence replaced 4
No response 15
The purpose of this hearing is to obtain verbal input from the affected
property owners and determine the course of further action on this matter .
If the Council does not wish to replace the fence of those people opposed to
a new wall , a concrete wall could be constructed with a vertical board
finish and painted a dark brown so that there would not be much of a visual
contrast between the new wall and the old fence . However, this alternative
is not recommended by Staff . Also, the actual decision of the finish of the
wall can be postponed until it can be determined whether all the property
owners will dedicate the easement for the new wall .
Three standard wall finishes are :
1 ) Slumpstone
2 ) Skip Trowel ( like stucco)
3 ) Vertical Board Finish
The first two of these finishes can be seen at the Springs development
( inside and outside of wall) . The vertical board finish appears as a heavy
redwood fence with a lot of grain relief .
The slumpstone and vertical board finishes are the formed side of the wall
and the skip trowel is hand finished on the other side, the panels being
poured on a flat bed.
There are an infinite number of textures that can be constructed, however,
the more exotic the design, the more costly the wall becomes .
Staff would recommend either a' slumpstone/skip trowel or a vertical
board/skip trowel finish on the wall and that Council select the finish that
it prefers to have face the street.
/
CAP
LOW
0 OAKS
*INEBERRY 'vv
'.P4
cow CT
04,ON4
BRIGHTON AV
ID
KNOLLWOOD
co
NEWPOpr
IV CT.
ONE
ci
Ir
LN HE
COA
VALLEf
AIAADOR
CT m
LdAIDSUPE POCKET
NEla� 4"P�E'ECQST !i/QLL SHRUBS OMO IMES
I E,4CH PANEL
zz iFX/ST/NG cr/R g GUTTER
5yl�4L� TREE /NPLANTER @35'
NEW sioEWWA<
5CR Eta Ax i c LAwDSCAPING
ALONG V PAIZXWADY