Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
6.5 Attach C
RECREATION PARKS & Q17CREATION MASTER PLAN 8, 0 City of Dublin David Gates & Associates JiAy 1994 , DUBLIN PARKS & RECREATION MASTER PLAN Addendum Introduction Page 5, right column, line 7 should read "Eastern Dublin Specific Plan..." Background & Analysis Page 7, paragraph 1, line 3 should read "...West that may be annexed... ", replacing "will" with "may ". Page 7, paragraph 1, line 5 should read "...annexation will be ... ", replacing "may" with "will ". Goals & Policies Page 25, right column, Ih., paragraph 2, line 2 should read "...with DSRSD's... ". Page 30, right column, 2c, line 2 should read "...along Alamo Creek... ", replacing "...South San Ramon..." with "Alamo ". Page 38, left column, 5e, line 2 should read "...as Mello -Roos Districts, ..." Page 38, left column, 5e, paragraph 2, line 8 should read "...special assessment or special tax." Page 38, right column, 5g., line 1 should read "Consider establishing a city-wide assessment district." as compared to "Consider establishing an ordinance for a city-wide assessment district." Community Park Standards Page 52, paragraph 2, lute I should read "25 acres minimum." Neighborhood Park Standards Page 56, Paragraph 3, line 1 should read "2.00 acres... ", replacing "I.00" with "2.00 ". Implementation Page 82, right column, "BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT" should read "BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS" Page 82, right column, "BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT", paragraph I should read "Benefit Assessment Districts can be used to finance public improvement projects such as parks, libraries, schools, traffic signals and other public facilities. ", as compared to "Benefit Assessment Act finances projects plus park, libraries, fire and police stations, schools, traffic signals and other public facilities." Page 82, right column, "BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ", "ADVANTAGES ", paragraph 2 should read "The Benefit... ", deleting the word "...Facilities..." Page 83, right column, "Restrictive Covenants ", line 3 should read "...the use of their land to a specific purpose." Deleting "... however it doesn't require 2 parties - only requires owner of land to place a restriction on it." Table of Contents ' Introduction In rodq ' Overview: Parks, Environment & Image ........................... ............................... 1 The Master Plan 3 RegionalLocation .............................................................. ............................... 3 PlanningProcess ................................................................. ............................... 5 Organization 6 ' Background & Analysis TheSetting ........................................................................ ............................... 7 Population, Demographics and Growth ........................... ............................... 13 ' Facilities Evaluation & Demand.. ................................................................... 15 Park and Recreation Facility Needs ................................. ............................... 16 Goals & Policies 54 Neighborhood Park Standards ....:.................................... ............................... ParkSystem ..................................................................... ............................... 23 Trailsand Bikeways ......................................................... ............................... 29 60 Community Center Standards .......................................... ............................... 33 OpenSpace Policies ........................................................ ............................... Aquatic Center Standards ................................................ ............................... Community Image & Character ....................................... ............................... 35 Community Theater Standards ........................................ ............................... 67 37 Park Acquisition and Development ................................. ............................... 39 Maintenance and Operations ........................................... ............................... Parks and Recreation Facility Standards ......................... ............................... 43 Parks and Recreation Facility Standards Introduction..................................................................... ............................... 43 Citv Park Standards ......................................................... ............................... 46 SportsPark Standards ...................................................... ............................... 50 rommunity Park Standards ............................................. ............................... 52 Civic Park Standards ............................ ....................... ............................... 54 Neighborhood Park Standards ....:.................................... ............................... 56 Neighborhood Square Standards ..................................... ............................... 58 Historical Park Standards ................................................ ............................... 60 Community Center Standards .......................................... ............................... 61 Recreation Center Standards ........................................... ............................... 63 Aquatic Center Standards ................................................ ............................... 65 Senior Center Standards .................................................. ............................... 66 Community Theater Standards ........................................ ............................... 67 Trails and Bikeway Standards ......................................... ............................... 68 Implementation Overview........................................................................ .............................76 FundingMechanisms ....................................................... ............................... 77 Cost of Development and Operations .............................. ............................... 85 DUBLIN PARKS List of Tables Table 1: - Park Standards .............................................. ............................... 16 Table 2: Sports Standards ........................................... ............................... 17 Table 3A: Existing Facilities Inventory (Parks & Schools) ......................... 18 Table 3B: Existing Facilities Inventory ( Developments ) ............................. 19 Table 4: Park Facilities Distribution .......................... ............................... 45 Table 5: Implementation Priorities ............................. ............................... 75 Table 6: Funding Sources and Regulatory Mechanisms ........................... 77 Table 7: Capital Costs and Operation Revenue .......... ............................... 84 Table 8: City Park Construction Costs ....................... ............................... 85 List of Graphics Fig. I Regional Location Map .................................. ............................... 4 Fig. 2 Existing Resources Plan ............................... ............................... 11 Fig. 3 Population Structure Comparison ................ ............................... 13 Fig. 4 Existing Parks & School/Parks .................... ............................... 20 Fig. 5 Park Facility Plan ......................................... ............................... 27 Fig. 6 Trails Plan .................................................... ............................... 31 Fig. 7 Community Image Components ................... ............................... 36 Fig. 8 Illustrative Parks Plan .................................. ............................... 41 Fig. 9 City Park Prototype ...................................... ............................... 47 Fig. 10 Sports Park Prototype ................................... ............................... 51 Fig. 11 Community Park Prototype .......................... ............................... 53 Fig. 12 Civic Park Prototype .................................... ............................... 55 Fig. 13 Neighborhood Park Prototype ...................... ............................... 57 Fig. 14 Neighborhood Square Prototype .................. ............................... 59 Fig. 15 Class I Bikeways .......................................... ............................... 70 Fig. 16 Class II Bikeways ......................................... ............................... 70 Fig. 17 Creekside Trail ............................................. ............................... 71 Fig. 18 Hiking Trail .................................................. ............................... 74 Fig. 19 Hiking /Equestrian Trail ................................ ............................... 74 DUBLIN PARKS ii OVERVIEW: PARKS, ENVIRONMENT & IMAGE The City ofDublin is concluding this century with plans which anticipate double its current popula- tion. The City's rapid growth has, and will con- tinue to generate the need for additional recre- ation facilities. The presence of a well- designed park system and open space conveys an image of the quality of life in a community. The challenge of this Master Plan would be to find ways to build parks that both enhance the positive image of the City and meet the increased demand on park and recreation facilities. As Dublin moves on to the next century, it is appropriate to answer several questions. What is the special ambiance that characterizes Dublin? How can parks and recreation facilities contribute to the overall quality of life in Dublin? How can the park and recreation system contribute to the preservation or enhancement of these special quali- ties? Introduction ' P Parks provide spaces for functions and gatherings. Historically, parks have played a major role in the urban environment. Even within the twentieth century, parks have had a variety of meanings to different groups of people at different times. To some, parks are for children with an emphasis on playgrounds and ballfields. To another group, parks address the cultural needs of the commu- To some, parks are for children with an emphasis on play. DUBLIN PARKS 1 Fib I,To)B11LyI(OK U nity, providing theaters, museums, art exhibits, and meeting facilities. And to others, the park system is a way to preserve and enhance the natural environment, providing opportunities to interact with nature. A successful park system should meet all these needs and more. In abstract, the park system can be thought of as one ofthe organizing elements ofa city. Parks and trails represent an extended expression of the "Public" realm that reaches out into the private fabric of the city. The green space and visual amenities such as lakes, creekside trails, rose gardens and gazebos found within the park system become an integral part ofthe public's perception of the community. Thus, the park system reflects acommunity'sselfimage. A strong image through strong visual character is what makes Dublin memorable. Given the sprawling, transitional nature of subur- ban areas, one important function of parks is to focus and encourage social interaction. The park r � A �g The park as a facility for outdoor art exhibits. system can help to build a community unity by providing a place where the divergent popula- tions and interests can interact with, learn from, and appreciate each other. A park can be a place where seniors and toddlers meet, where the ath- lete and the artist find a common ground and where social as well as physical needs are met. .......... Ir Performance facilities, like the amphitheater, address the cultural needs of the community. OUBL1N PARKS 2 THE MASTER PLAN The purpose of this Master Plan is to establish goals, long -term policies and standards to guide the City ofDublin in the acquisition, development and management ofDublin's Park and Recreation facilities for the next twenty years. The Master Plan is part of a continuous process which can evolve to respond to the City's growth and changing demographics. Thus, it contains both Specific standards that guide the City's ac- tions, as well as provide clear directions to other agencies and private developers regarding the "rules" under which Dublin is implementing its park and recreation system. General goals and policies are also developed which are flexible enough to accommodate opportunities and shifts in priorities. The warn and dry Dublin climate which allows almost year -round use of the park facilities, com- bined with the active recreation- oriented lifestyle of the population place a significant emphasis on the provision ofhigh quality and sufflcientrecre- ation opportunities for the community. Nation- ally recognized standards for park and recreation facilities establish minimum standards which of- ten do not reflect the recreational demands of the community. The standards and policies set forth in this Master Plan, while recognizing national and peer community standards, are unique to Dublin. This Master Plan is a reflection of the City of Dublin's foresight and commitment to ensuring a high quality of life for the community. REGIONAL LOCATION The City of Dublin is located in the rapidly devel- oping East County Area ofAlameda County. It is bounded to the south by Interstate 580, bisected by Interstate 680, and is the destination ofthe new BART line extension. Because of this hub location within the transpor- tation network of the Tri- Valley, the City of Dublin anticipates more than doubling its popula- tion by the year 2010. This population growth will include more families with children, more young active adults, and an expanding senior population all seeking quality recreational opportunities. The adjacent communities of San Ramon and Pleasanton have developed ambitious park and recreation master plans which emphasize high - quality and generous park facilities. The Liver- more Area Recreation & Park District (LARPD) has recently completed a Trail Plan which in- cludes numerous trail linkages to the Eastern Dublin Area. The East Bay Regional Park Dis- trict (EBRPD) is actively seeking to complete a segment of the ridgeline trail corridor through Western Dublin. They have also developed "Guidelines for Open Space Planning and Man- agement" which could have a significant influ- ence on the provision and design of open space in the Dublin area. The Tri- Valley Trails Council and adjacent communities are seeking to develop a regional network oftrails and bikeways utilizing the railroad right -of -way, flood control channels and existing bikeways within Dublin. Develop- ment plans in San Ramon and Contra Costa County to the north and Livermore to the east are propos- ing potential open space and trail connections. This pressure from surrounding communities and facilities, coupled with Dublin's population pro- jections, make the development ofpark and recre- ation standards not only timely but essential. DUBLIN PARKS 3 INTRODUCTION V, Mt. Diablo State Park DANVIL E Bishop Rand Open Space SAN RAMON HWY 580 Morgan Territory Ta "Jara Creek LIVERMORE Shadow Cliffs Regional Park PLEASANTO.tj n 0 4000 8000 16000 Fig. I Regional Location Map mmmm� DUBUN PARKS 4 PLANNING PROCESS Well- designed and plentiful parks and facilities convey a positive image of the quality of life. As the City of Dublin continues to expand, it is imperative to acquire and develop new parks, open space and recreation facilities in neighbor- hood developments. In addition, the City must continue to upgrade and maintain existing facili- ties, as well as remain committed to providing affordable, innovative and diversified recreation programs. This study utilizes various population data accumulated for the City of Dublin; market- ing analysis, interviews, architectural and engi- neering surveys. • Other documents: LARPD Trails Plan EBRPD Guidelines for Open Space Planning and Management Dublin General Plan Western Dublin Draft Specific Plan Eastern Dublin Specification Plan & Related Documents Dublin Subdivision Ordinance City ofDublin Parks Master Plan Report 1986 City of Dublin Sports Grounds Master Plan Report 1990 Downtown Specific Plan 1987 Dublin Schools Facilities Improvement Task Force Report INTRODUCTION David Gates and Associates, in cooperation with the City of Dublin has gathered information through a series of public meetings, interviews, document review, site visits and joint study ses- sions. The City selected a Steering Committee composed ofrepresentatives ofCity commissions and special recreation interests groups such as the little league, soccer league and the senior group. Included in the process are: • Public meetings designed to gather and dis- seminate information. • Joint study sessions with the Dublin City Council, Dublin Planning Commission and the Dublin Parks and Recreation Commis- sion. • Interviews and meetings with City officials, planners and consultants. • Documentreview which includedEastern and Western annexation work plans, ERA market analysis, Association of Bay Area Govern- ments Projections '90 data, Dublin Unified School District data. • Minutes from Parks and Recreation Commis- sion meetings, study sessions, Eastern and Western Dublin Specific Plan workshops. Through meeting with the Steering Committee and Staff, the consultants identified and evaluated various recreation standards and park site alterna- tives. As potential recreation demands were iden- tified, the consultant team reviewed the park site options with the consultants for the Specific Plans and representatives ofthe affected property own- ers to resolve potential land use issues. Through a process of demand definition, park land require- ment allocation verification, and alternative site testing, the final Park and Recreation Master Plan emerged. Information gathering through meetings with the public and joint study sessions. DUBLIN PARKS ORGANIZATION The Master Plan is divided into five chapters and an appendix. The first chapter, Introduction, discusses the parameters and purpose ofthe Mas- ter Plan. The second chapter summarizes the analysis of background information and projec- tions used in developing the Plan. The general goals and policies established in the Park Master Plan are discussed in Chapter 3. The fourth chap- ter provides specific standards or criteria for Dublin's parks and recreation facilities. The fifth chapter, Implementation, describes the funding sources and regulatory tools available to make the plan a reality. INTRODUCTION © I. Introduction II. Background and Analysis III. Goals and Policies IV. Parks and Recreation Facility Standards V. Implementation VI. Appendix rq- Ni1-GY S /S The Master Plan provides for more ballfelds. K %i /% roil BLS lc,ouc✓E5 Conceptual sketch of the Master Plan thought process. DUBLIN PARKS 6 Background & Analysis ZZ THE SETTING REGIONAL CONTEXT The Dublin Parks Master Plan Study Area in- cludes not only the existing City of Dublin, but areas to the East and West that will be annexed and developed to accommodate future growth. The result ofthis annexation may be a community which is elongated along the east/west axis with the existing City lying at the fulcrum. The primary growth in Dublin will occur in the East and West areas. Consequently, the unification of the pro- posed outlying sections ofthe communitywiththe existing core and each other is a primary goal of the park master plan. Two regional park districts, East Bay Regional Park District ( EBRPD) and Livermore Area Rec- reation & Park District ( LARPD), have overlap- ping jurisdiction in the Master Plan Study Area, although LARPD may be detached as part of future annexations of Eastern Dublin. Both agen- cies are striving to provide regional trail connec- tions with adequate corridor widths and buffers. They are also concerned with the preservation of the natural and rural essence of the undeveloped portions of the community. These natural open spaces are an important part of Dublin's charac- ter. There are also opportunities to make trail connec- tions with the adjacent communities of San Ramon and Pleasanton. The location of trail connections with Pleasanton are significantly constrained by difficulty in crossing I -580, EBRPD is seeking a crossing for the Ridge Trail near Donlan Point. LARPD utilizes a crossing at Donlan Canyon Road. Creek and drainage channels may provide other opportunities. The Southern Pacific Rail- road right -of -way has been utilized for the "Iron Horse Trail" in Contra Costa County. The exten- sion of this trail through Dublin to Pleasanton is a potential regional link. A number of planning studies are occurring alongthe StudyArea's bound- aries in San Ramon, Contra Costa County and Livermore. As these plans evolve there is a potential to provide trail connections between the communities. a�qe� sa$;h, :� ��4' <. $ >� R; ,. `.:,�a "� ����y�3:xa%�9�•��, •a�' ����� °'`'�`�a #ta$�: £x�; . ,. ���Hg �a,���5 r,aa���a�B•� g��� °�i�: � �����Il2 ^� &�q�� sai�is• � °���� �S�r,.,�i �k���� �, &�?, �g� &r� >�`��k�?`.sq.ts -• i��r�'��,��`��� �, €,��������`� y'������'Yi �,��.�&a�a � §8a;�igs }'���' ��$ "p�'�g'.,its: i,���$ �a,�� �����,� &a������.���'��F g�Y ,:.€ � ������� �w�' &� �£� ty�q•�,Y l.�$ �� � . 4�Y, The natural and rural essence is an important part of Dublin's character. DUBLIN PARKS BACKGROUND BACKGROUND Im EXISTING RESOURCES There are numerous creeks and drainage channels throughout the Study Area which provide oppor- tunities to develop creek side trails. The continu- ous connections these creeks and drainage chan- nels provide is especially critical in the developed areas of Dublin where opportunities for trail con- nections have been lostto urbanization. Currently there are two majorpedestrian /bikeways in Dublin along San Ramon Road and Dougherty Road. These paths are separated from the street and are well utilized by the local community. These trails can serve as a foundation for a future Dublin trail network. In a Downtown Improvement Study prepared in 1987, the City recognized the importance of up- grading the central downtown area. The study proposed a central open arcade which could pro- vide a pedestrian focus for the downtown. The opportunity exists to develop a "town square" as a downtown green respite and a community land- mark. The remnants of the historical heritage of the Dublin community have been preserved by the Dublin Historical Preservation Association and the Amador / Livermore Valley Historical Soci- ety. The Old Murray School House and St. Raymond's Church which were recently acquired by the City are located adjacent to the Dublin pioneer cemetery. This historic site, which is located near the downtown area, provides the opportunity to create a special place which would be accessible to the local Dublin community. The Dublin Civic Center is a reflection of the emerging community pride and demand for guide- lines. A goal which permeates the Park Master Plan. The complex includes the City Hall, the Police Facility and a plaza area to accommodate outdoor festivals and civic events. There is an undeveloped area in the rear of the site which could contain additional civic facilities, The adjacent sports grounds contain the bulk of the competitive sports fields in Dublin. The City is currently working cooperatively with the School District to upgrade existing school yard facilities to provide additional sports fields for the commu- nity. To the east, Dublin is bounded by Camp Parks, a Reserve Forces Training Area, and numerous Alameda County facilities and land holdings in- cluding the Santa Rita Rehabilitation Center Camp Downtown focus: A green respite and community landmark DUBLIN PARKS C� iJ [i f 1 i l r-, II fl 1 1.1 1 [1 1 1 1 1 Parks is a 2,000 acre Federal Military Facility used for training reserve Army forces. Santa Rita is x2,500 inmate - 530 staff prison andwork farm. These Federal and County facilities will continue to have a substantial impact on Dublin's growth. First, by their very nature, these uses are not currently compatible with the needs of the local Dublin community and may in fact impose a burden on the community. The release ofparoled inmates directly into the community and the vi- sual blight of abandoned military housing are examples of conflicts frequently mentioned dur- ing public hearings. In addition, these facilities separate the existing City from the Eastern Dublin Area where the greatest portion ofDublin's growth will occur. Alameda County is currently working with the City of Dublin to develop a land use plan for their holdings which will help to bridge the connection to Eastern Dublin and to provide park land for community-wide recreation facilities in this central location, Within the existing city limits, the potential for expansion of park and recreation facilities is ex- tremely limited. The 1986 Parks Master Plan Report and subsequent 1990 Sports Ground Mas- ter Plan Report and School Facilities Plan illus- trate maximum utilization of existing park sites and joint use of school play yards to meet the current demands of the community. As the rec- ommendations contained in these reports are implemented, Dublin will be able to eliminate the shortage of recreation facilities only for the cur- rent population. Thus, the weight of providing park land and facilities for the future growth falls upon the undeveloped west and east portions of the community. Eastern Dublin is characterized by rolling grass lands divided into three canyons. Here the gentle topography and proposed roadway system can accommodate the larger community park facili- ties. The creeks and swales provide natural op- Mr/0 :l/ r ae iy ►}► % ~� >r� � ter`- 4, ��1���� �� ;.,�.'" ♦rte`' �y %•'' ����.�,e����i,! The creeks and swales provide natural opportunities for open space linkages between parks. DUBLIN PARKS 9 BACKGROUND ACKGROUND portunities for open space linkages between parks. The planned preservation of the ridges and much of the open hillsides, as identified in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, will preserve the historic and visual heritage of the area. The Western Extended Planning Area is charac- terized by steep topography and a dense cover of oak woodland. The steep terrain limits the oppor- tunities for large active community recreation facilities, although there are opportunities to lo- cate and develop neighborhood parks which can also accommodate a level of community facility use. The natural features of the area warrant protection through the development of passive recreation areas and regional trail connections. Although a specific plan was done for this area, it was subsequently referended by the Dublin vot- ers. Thus, there is not a current development plan for the Western Extended Planning Area. Currently, the City of Dublin's subdivision ordi- nance requires the dedication of 5 acres of park land per every 1,000 persons. This standard has been retained and further defined in the Dublin Parks & Recreation Master Plan. The Plan was initially developed concurrent with the Specific Plans for both Eastern and Western Dublin to ensure consistency between these three planning tools. However, all references to facilities in Western Dublin (except trail alignments) have been removed due to the referendum of the Spe- cific Plan for this area. Preliminary recommenda- tions contained in the draft of the Parks & Recre- ation Master Plan have also be incorporated into the 1992 Update of the Dublin General Plan. The Western Fxtended Planning Area is characterized by steep topography and dense oak woodland. DUBLIN PARKS 10 it 1 1 C 1 d w � z 0 y H � r �a 0 d oa vA �1 A O l _•• �•o�•i •• • f, ,•fir � . W r A O 7U to aim >R Amo A M p�ra cn r / , r .... .. ..... .. ...... 0 0 C CP 0 25 0�• � � � cn � d o mr M m 'm A p O N z ... > r / , r .... .. ..... .. ...... .. ....... CP 0 25 0�• � � � cn � d o mr M m 'm A p O N z n 1 POPULATION, DEMOGRAPHICS AND Cll.Z��hi��a The City of Dublin, along with the entire Tri- Valley region, continues to experience tremen- dous population growth. Current population esti- mates of Dublin place 26,000 residents within the City and its sphere of influence. Projected growth of approximately 8,300 residents within an eight year period appears to be only the beginning for Dublin, with a forecast of over 66,000 residents by the year 2022. Rapid growth can be attributed in part to the annexation and development of Eastern Dublin General Plan area, the Western .Extended Planning Area, build -out of approved developments and infill growth including resi- dential areas around the BART stations and Camp Parks. This projected 160% increase over thirty years will without question affect all areas of demand for public services, including recreational facilities and programs. 7% 29% 19% 0-4 6% 5 -9 55 and over 14% 10% 10 -19 45 -54 43% 20 -44 Year 1985 POPULATION STRUCTURE Dublin's largest population segment is repre- sented by adults aged 25 - 54. This group statis- tically representing over 40% of the City's popu- lation in any given year and includes young adults and families as well as adults nearing the end of their child raising years. Individuals and families in this category have the most diverse needs in terms of recreation facilities and available pro- grams based on age and interest. Statistically, it is expected that dual - employed families with chil- dren will continue the nation -wide growth trend in the Dublin area. Based on projected population yields, the current Plan provides for six new elementary schools, two new junior high schools and one new high school in the Eastern Dublin expansion area. This growth will impact the need for increased day care services for young children as well as heightened demand for after- school programs for school -aged youth. Parallel to the national "graying" trend, a larger segment of Dublin's population is also expected to age. The increase in the older adult and senior populations, age 45 and older, will further impact recreation, leisure and health care programs. Year 2005 Fig. 3 Population Structure Comparison (Alameda County) DUBLIN PARKS 13 BACKGROUND BACKGROUND Anticipation of and planning for these shifts in population early in the programming process al- lows planning for classes and other opportunities to meet the needs of specific populations in addi- tion to general recreational programs. Recreational needs specific to age groupings in- clude: • pre- school daycare programs appropriate for ages 0 to 4 • after school, intercession and summer session programs for school ages 5 to 19 programs available for young adults, families, working adults and extended use hours for ages 20 to 54 and older • older adult and senior programs for those ages 55 and older, and • organized leagues, classes and facilities to accommodate age specific programs includ- ing: youth and adult sports leagues, art and recreation classes for all ages, senior fitness opportunities, aquatic programs, facilities rental, community affairs and promotions. GROWTH PATTERNS The City of Dublin is directly affected by other communities of the Tri- Valley region. These areas include San Ramon on the north; Pleasanton on the south; and Livermore on the east. Total population in the region is expected to be in excess of 300,000 by the year 2005, representing an approximate 900% increase in fifteen years, according to the Association of Bay Area Govern- ments Projections `90 data. Key growth in the area may be attributed in part to the planned annexation of Eastern Dublin. In addition, the current annexation and building expansion of Hansen Hills and Donlon Canyon areas will fur- ther impact the region. Market analysis has indi- cated rapid development in the areas of employ- ment and housing, with employment projections of 170,000 jobs in the area by the year 2005, representing a 54% increase. There is no question that regional growth of this dimension will severely impact all aspects of the City's operations and management. Develop- ment ofthe annexed areas is tentatively scheduled to begin in 1995, with a full range of housing planned. The character of the east and west annex- ations will be largely influenced by the types of housing planned. The Eastern Dublin expansion is tentatively planned as a distinctive mixed -use community which will be integrated with existing Dublin yet retain a unique identity. The inclusion ofseveral "village centers" [Tassajara Road, Fallon Road, Doolan Canyon Road] along with active recruitment of automobile dealerships, promo- tional and discount centers will augment a sense of community in addition to providing consumer and employment opportunities for residents in the area, Employment in the area is expected to increase by approximately 26,000 jobs with the Eastern Dublin expansion. SUMMARY As the population base and labor market continue to expand, the demand for recreational facilities will continue to grow. In general, the recreational needs and interests of the current population are being met by the existing facilities, however, these facilities will not be sufficient to meet the demand of the projected growth. Recreational needs of the current population are served by three main existing outdoor recreation sites [Dublin Sports Grounds, Shannon Park and Community Center and Dublin Swim Center] and five neigh- borhood parks [Mape, Dolan, Kolb, Stagecoach and Alamo Creek]. There is, however, a current unmet demand for additional ballfields. The City has undertaken a program to renovate athletic fields on school district property and upon comple- tion of the renovation project there will be ad- equate fields to meet the current demand. DUBLIN PARKS 14 1 n ri F t n FACILITIES EVALUATION & DEMAND ASSESSMENT Identifying recreation needs is a very important component of a park and recreation master plan. Assessment of need, however, is also one of the most difficult tasks because many variables will influence public recreation participation and de- mand. Additionally, in the case of Dublin, the population being planned for does not yet reside in the City. It is, therefore, necessary to make projections and assumptions regarding the char- acteristics and preferences of the future popula- tion. Underestimating the future need can result in over - utilization of facilities whereas overesti- mating the need can also result in expenditures for facilities that are not required. The Master Plan does, however, provide flexibility to modify the types of facilities and/or the priority for imple- mentation. This will allow the City to develop facilities in a sequence that matches the recreation demand of the new residents. This report studied the demand for recreation facilities and activities and developed a quantifi- able statement of need based on a process that included six steps. They are: 1. An analysis of trends in recreation participation 2. A study of who presently provides recreation service in Dublin 3. An analysis of who currently participates in recreation 4. Results of public workshop meetings 5. The development of park and facility standards 6. Identification of park and facility needs a population variable, the future park and facility needs of the City of Dublin are forecast based on population growth. The most recognized stan- dards used for municipal planning are those de- veloped by the National Recreation and Parks Association (NRPA). USER TREND ANALYSIS Facility demand estimates are developed by ex- trapolating historical use statistics for each facil- ity. This methodology produces reasonably accu- rate data because it reflects specific community use. However, the trend analysis methodology can be influenced by local conditions or current trends in recreation interest. As an example, ifone charts tennis playing over the last twenty years, a cycle of interest and level of play emerges. Also, operating conditions such as quality ofthe courts, their location, user fees andhours ofoperation can impact the level of use. PUBLIC MEETINGS Input from the general public is anothermethod of assessing community needs. Caution is required, however, since special interest groups can domi- nate the process and may not reflect the broader community interest. STANDARDS DEFINmoNs Another means of measuring need is to develop a standard and measure that standard against the existing inventory. Recreation standards are guides by which Dublin can estimate in quantifiable terms the number of acres of facilities required to meet recreation demand. By attaching the stan- dard to a population variable, it is possible to forecast future needs as the population grows. Standards are important for a number of reasons including: • Standards can be an expression of minimum acceptable facilities and areas. They can be looked upon as goals. • A standard is a guideline to determine land Each method is described in the following: requirements for various types of park and recreation facilities. PARTICIPATION RA-nos Participation ratios are guides by which facilities and park acreage required to meet population demand is quantified. By attaching a standard to • Standards are a basis for relating recreation needs to spatial analysis within a community- wide system of park and open space areas. DUBLIN PARKS 15 BACKGROUND 1CKGROUND PARK AND RECREATION FACILITY NEEDS The City of Dublin offers a wide variety of recre- ational opportunities to the residents of Dublin. The City's inventory of facilities generally meets the minimum established service standards. The City, however, has in place a program to upgrade school facilities, add to the existing park and sports field inventory and to expand existing programs to better serve the interest and needs of the existing population. Dublin, like all Tri- Valley communities, has a very high demand for organized youth and adult sports programs. Again, planned facility im- provements at the schools and the implementation of the Sports Ground Master Plan will meet most of the existing demand. The Master Plan addresses the program and facil- ity needs of the anticipated growth population of Dublin. The development standards for new facilities reflect a higher standard for both the availability and the quality of parks, trails, sports fields and recreation and leisure facilities. The topography and land use patterns for both Eastern and Western Areas make necessary the development of larger community park facilities. The larger parks will allow the City to provide the greatest number of facilities to meet the antici- pated demand. NATIONAL PARK STANDARD COMPARISON The National Recreation and Park Association (NR.PA), published standards in 1970 that have been almost exclusively used for the past decade. In 1979, NRPA developed atask force who worked three years to revise and update park and recre- ation standards. Published in 1983, the report titled "Recreation, Park and Open Space Stan- dards and Guidelines ", represents the most recent consensus on space and facility standards at the national level. In addition to the use of national standards, a comparison with neighboring communities and peer communities is another useful tool in estab- lishing appropriate community standards. DUBLIN PARKS 16 1 1 u u J F� i� J 1 1 e v S b � M Table 1 Park Standards ig o lu 9 0 0 Park Facilities (acres/1000 population) Z ;:3 a n A U a Neighborhood Park 1 -2 2 2 4.5 2.5 2 Community Park 5 -8 2 3 2 2.5 3 Special Use Park variable 3 1 None 33 Regional Park 5 -10 15 400 None Total (Neighborhood / Community) 6 -10 a 5 6.5 8.7 5 DUBLIN PARKS 16 1 1 u u J F� i� J 1 1 EXISTING COMMUNITY INVENTORY The City of Dublin has 1 I parks, 6 school parks and open space areas which account for 165 acres of park land. Ofthis amount only 45% or 74 acres are dedicated as parks. The following table in- cludes only active public park land and does not include school playgrounds, open space or the Heritage Park. Park Type No. of Sites Acreage Neighborhood 5 21.75 Community 6 52.25 Total 11 74 RECREATION FACILITY RECOMMENDATIONS The Recreation Needs Assessment also identified several major buildings for inclusion in the Mas- ter Plan. These facilities have significant costs associated with both the construction and annual operation. On the other hand, due to the high demand for facilities and programs these build- ings can offer, there can be significant revenue generated to offset the operating costs. It is not likely, however, that the revenue would be suffi- cient to finance construction costs. A discussion of each of the major facilities follows. Table 2 Sports Standards Sports Facilities W 9 71u11'1lt K_:&T"_F1L There is a high demand for space for the public to meet for social gatherings such as weddings, family reunions, banquets, fund raising events; neighborhoodmeetings; organizational meetings; and clubs, such as Camp Fire, Boy Scouts, gar- dening clubs, etc. Through the provision of multi -use space, a myriad of activities can be accommodated. These uses can include a pre- school, crafts classes, dance, cooking, a place for youth to "hang -out" as well as participate in activities and games. Classroom facilities for extramural classes. Ballfields 1:5,000 1:2,000 1:1,100 1:6,375 1:1,600 Soccer Fields 1:10,000 11,000 1:1,100 1:2,833 a � a � Softball Fields 1:5,000 c 1:5,000 1:12,750 1:5,000 Swimming 1:20,000 1:35,000 1:13,000 1:25,500 1:20,000 Tennis 1:2,000 1:2,500 1:2,000 1 :12,750 1:2,500 Basketball Courts 1:5,000 None 1:5,000 1:12,750 1:4,000 Z 1:5,000 None Ballfields 1:5,000 1:2,000 1:1,100 1:6,375 1:1,600 Soccer Fields 1:10,000 11,000 1:1,100 1:2,833 1:2,000 Softball Fields 1:5,000 None 1:5,000 1:12,750 1:5,000 Swimming 1:20,000 1:35,000 1:13,000 1:25,500 1:20,000 Tennis 1:2,000 1:2,500 1:2,000 1 :12,750 1:2,500 Basketball Courts 1:5,000 None 1:5,000 1:12,750 1:4,000 Volleyball Courts 1:5,000 None 1:5,000 0 1:5,000 Note: Data in number per population DUBLIN PARKS 17 BACKGROUND Alamo Creek Park J ✓ J ✓ ✓ Kolb Park Dolan Park 5 J J J J J ZKGROUND ✓ J Dougherty Hills Park 4 J J J J Dublin Swim Center 3 1 © ✓ ✓ Heritage Park 5 ✓ Kolb Park 5 2 Table 3A J ✓ ✓ ✓ Mape Park 3 ✓ ✓ ✓ Senior Center .25 Existing Facilities ✓ Shannon Park 10 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Sports Grounds/Civic Center 35 4 Inventory 8 ✓ ✓ ✓ •� ✓ Stagecoach Park 75 ✓ ✓ ✓ Schools /Parks g tl b v r. J Dublin HS 4 2 2 J 00 J✓ F'rederiksen 4 2 ✓ 2 ✓ Murray 7 2 J 1 ✓ Nielsen 6 1 J 5 J w Wells Middle 6 w w 2 CQQ J d m ❑�Q U 0 i3 d d a p �p .� .� � Aa. � Parks Q as ca 0 0 w w cn c. Alamo Creek Park 8 J ✓ J ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Dolan Park 5 J J J J J ✓ J Dougherty Hills Park 4 J J J J Dublin Swim Center 3 1 ✓ ✓ Heritage Park 5 ✓ Kolb Park 5 2 J ✓ ✓ J ✓ ✓ ✓ Mape Park 3 ✓ ✓ ✓ Senior Center .25 ✓ Shannon Park 10 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Sports Grounds/Civic Center 35 4 2 8 ✓ ✓ ✓ •� ✓ Stagecoach Park 75 ✓ ✓ ✓ Schools /Parks Dublin Elementary 9 3 J Dublin HS 4 2 2 J 2 8 1 J✓ F'rederiksen 4 2 ✓ 2 ✓ Murray 7 2 J 1 ✓ Nielsen 6 1 J 1 J Wells Middle 6 2 J 2 DUBLIN PARKS 18 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 IExisting development. ' Table 3B Existing Facilities Inventory v b _ U C2 c 5 op c ' Developments 0 'n w A H 9 F 7 w a» a. U rx O -, Woodlands ✓ Silvergate ✓ ✓ Arbor Creek ✓ ✓ Coral Gate 1 or Heritage Commons 1 Arnador Lakes 3 2 ' Briar Hill 1 Arroyo Vista 1 2 ✓ Cottonwood 1 ✓ ' Dublin Meadows ✓ 2 ✓ ✓ Kildara 1 Parkwood 1 ' Torrey Pines 1 Amador Oaks 1 DUBLIN PARKS 19 Existing development. BACKGROUND 1CKGROUND to SCHOOL/PARK FACILITIES SI Dublin Elementary School S2 Dublin High School S3 Fredriksen Elementary School S4 Murray Elementary School S5 Nielsen Elementary School S6 Wells Middle School \ I 1� \ . . . • Dublin Civic Center • ' ,. ��r, Fig. 4 Existing Parks & School/ Parks DUBLIN PARKS 20 PARK FACILITIES 9 ac P1 Alamo Creek Park 8 ac 4 ac P2 Dolan Park 5 ac 4 ac P3 Dougherty Hills Mini Park 4 ac 7 ac Dougherty Hills Open Space 86 ac 6 ac P4 Dublin Sports Grounds/Civic Center 35 ac 6 ac P5 Dublin Swim Center 3 ac P6 Heritage Park 5 ac P7 Kolb Park 5 ac P8 Mape Park 3 ac P9 Senior Center .25 ac P10 Shannon Park & Community Center 10 ac P1 1 Stagecoach Park .75 ac P12 Tassajara Creek Regional Park (EBRPD) \ I 1� \ . . . • Dublin Civic Center • ' ,. ��r, Fig. 4 Existing Parks & School/ Parks DUBLIN PARKS 20 INDOOR RECREATION CENTER The Recreation Needs Assessment indicated that the demand exists for a multi- purpose recreation center. To meet community demands and to generate sufficient revenue to offset operating costs, the Center must offer a wide range of activities and facilities. These activities and fa- cilities should include: 1. Activities and facilities that will be of interest to all age groups 2. An environment that encourages use by fami- lies 3. Space for drop in recreation and instructional classes 4. Court space for activities such as basketball and volleyball 5. High quality aerobics and dance studio 6. A pleasant, well - maintained, state -of -the -art facility Indoor basketball and volleyball courts. SENIOR CENTER Based on a current census data, approximately 20 percent of Dublin's population is 55 years or older. By the year 2000, that number is projected to increase to nearly 25 percent. The existing Senior Center, located in a converted school facil- ity, is heavily used by senior citizens. Although the size of the facility is sufficient to meet current demand, programming opportunities are some- what limited by the physical characteristics of the - �f M M, /•:, Additional senior center facility with open space for outdoor recreation. DUBLIN PARKS 21 BACKGROUND 1CKGROUND building. An additional senior facility will be needed to serve the population that will be moving into the new development areas, as well as for the increasing number of residents who will be attain- ing senior citizen status. It is recommended that the additional facility be built in conjunction with the proposed community center. Because peak demand time for senior use is typically mornings and early afternoons, developing the facility at the community center would create the opportunity for some shared use of program space and park- ing. Shared use could increase program opportu- nities for seniors while reducing construction and operating costs for the City. During the public workshops there was a strong expression of need to replace the existing senior center with a more functional building at some future date. It is recommended that the replacement facility be developed at the Civic Center site where it would be accessible to residents of central Dublin and could share some parking with the Civic Center complex. The existing building could be con- verted to another appropriate community use. AwAnc FACILITY The City has an appropriate reliance on residen- tial development to provide access to neighbor- hood swimming pools. The City currently main- tains one community pool which meets many of the community needs, however, with the increas- ing demand for instruction, water fitness and age group competitive swimming, the existing facility cannot meet the needs of the growing population. The recommended aquatic facility would be lo- cated in the community sports park and would be designed to meet a broad range of community aquatic needs with an emphasis on meeting the unmet demand for youth and adult competitive swimming. In addition to a 25 meter x 25 yard pool with a shallow water V, the aquatic facility would include sunning and picnic areas, a pool house with changing facilities, meeting and in- structional space, offices and storage. Com uNny THEATER A space that has a lower demand than the commu- nity center, recreation center or aquatic facility is the multi -use community theater. Currently the community has limited access to the "little the- ater" located on the Dublin High School campus. The community has expressed an interest in a facility that provides adequate rehearsal and per- formance space for theater, music and dance. The new regional theater in Walnut Creek has met the demand formajor performance space but does not meet the more modest needs of community play- ers or for children's theater, dance or music. The community theater caters to smaller scale performances. DUBLIN PARKS 22 1 f] it d fJ 1 1 F, 1 �7, I J PARK SYSTEM The plan provides direction for addressing the long -term recreational needs of the City and its changing population over the next twenty years. The plan emphasizes providing community fa- cilities to meetthe program demands ofthe Dublin population. At build -out the plan will encompass a 330 -acre park system providing 5 acres of park land per 1000 residents based on a projected service popu- lation of 66,000. As the existing park system consists of approximately 74 acres of active parks (excluding school parks and the Heritage Park), this plan calls for the acquisition and develop- ment of an additional 256 acres of park land within, the General Plan Area. The plan also provides for a network of park trails, bikeways, staging areas and open space that will link the parks into a community-wide system. This sys- tem will serve to visually link the new Eastern and Western growth areas into a visually unified city. This master plan is based on: The acquisition and development of com- munity and neighborhood park facilities in the yet- to -be- developed portions ofthe City to the east and west. The assumption that the City ofDublin does not wish to be required to utilize school property to achieve the minimum park acre- age standards. The components on which Dublin has built its park master plan area are: • parks which meet community-wide recre- ation needs • parks which meet local neighborhood rec- reation needs • open space areas which protect the existing natural character of the County • linkages (trails, streets, bikeways) which unite the park system into a cohesive whole. Goals & Policies Each of these components has been incorporated into an overall plan which specifically addresses the desire of the Dublin community. Criteria used in the selection of community park sites includes: 1) accessibility of the site to the total Dublin community; 2) proximity to other public facilities such as schools; 3) relationship to natural features (creeks, knolls, open space); 4) visual presence (visibility from major roadways); 5) limited site development constraints such as steep topography; and 6) significant size to ac- commodate community facilities. Goal 1: Provide for a high- quality and diver- sified park system to meet the recreational needs and quality of life goals of existing and future residents of Dublin. GUIDING POLICIES 1.1 Ensure a minimum standard of 5.0 acres of public park per 1000 residents with only usable acreage considered in meeting this criteria. A network of trails / bikeways link the parks into a community-wide system. DUBLIN PARKS 23 R Useable acreage is level land that can be utilized for active facilities (i.e. baUfields, buildings, courts,etc) 1.2 Establish a community park standard of 2.5 acres for every 1000 residents 1.5 Create a park system in which each park satisfies the recreation needs of a variety of user groups and a range of active and pas- sive activities. 1.3 Establish a neighborhood park standard of 2.5 acre for every 1000 residents. Neigh- borhood parks should be dispersed through- out the community. The parks should be 1.6 designed and sited to provide a neighbor- hood identity and social focus. 1.4 Encourage the development ofan integrated park system with landscaped pathways, dedicated open space, trail corridors, and ® school facilities but do not consider these lands as an area credited towards meeting park acreage standards. While these amenities are valuable resources for the community and extremely desirable they should not be considered as a substi- tute for the 5 acre11000 resident active park standard: Parks should meet the needs of passive and active functions. A variety ofparks within the overall system creates a variety ofplaces and experiences where the residents of Dublin can mingle and learn about their community. Avoid substitutions of private recreation facilities for public parks in order to insure permanent availability of facilities for the entire community. 1.7 Incorporate community input into the plan- ning and design of specific park facilities. When appropriate workshops should be conducted to gain input from the immediate neighborhood as well as address commu- nity-wide concerns prior to the design of each park or community facility. 1.8 Develop a policy which encourages devel- opers to construct neighborhood parks con- current with neighborhood developments. Neighborhood parks should create a posi- tive image and functional use area for po- tential residents, thus increasing the sale- ability of the development as a whole. Park Plans should be reviewed and ap- proved by the appropriate City Depart- ments. 1.9 Integrate selection ofpark sites into the land planning process. Parks should be sited so that they can be easily linked to community wide pedestrian and bicycle circulation sys- tems. Generally, the best park sites are predomi- nantly level. Steep slopes created to de- velop level pads should not be included in acreage to achieve minimum park area. 1.10 Select park sites where the configuration and slope will accommodate the proposed facilities. DUBLIN PARKS 24 1 I 1 1 1 1-1 1 I1 L 1 1.1 fl 1 1. 11 Where possible, park sites should be se- lected to relate to natural features such as creeks or open space. 1.12 Avoid sites that are removed from major circulation corridors. The park system is an integral part ofthe community's image thus, the view of recreation facilities from road- ways is critical not only to encourage use but to enhance the "look" of the City. Avoid creating terraces which place the park sig- nificantly above the road and provide only views of steep slopes. 1.13 Where possible, avoid sites that are subject to strong winds. ACTION PROGRAM I a. Locate community parks and facilities in the eastern undeveloped portion of Dublin as close to the existing Dublin Center as possible. Community parks will unite the existing and developing neighborhoods into a cohesive whole. lb. Develop a 56 ± acre city park adjacent to Tassajara Creek. The city park will provide an image and a memorable focus for the community as well as meet the public's recreational needs I c. Develop an 80 ± acre sports park to meet the community demand for high - quality com- petitive sports fields. The proposed site for the sports park is on Fallon Road. Id. Develop an additional 46 ± acres of multi- purpose community parks to meet the park & recreation facility goals. le. Discourage development, of parks of less than 5 acres with the exception of the 3 acre neighborhood squares located in the urban high density city center. Neighborhood parks of less than 5 acres can not provide the practice sports fields and are significantly more costly for the City to maintain on a square foot basis. If Seek to preserve existing and to acquire additional sites of historical interest or to relocate structures of historical value into an "historic park ". lg. Encourage development of private recre- ation amenities in attached residential projects. Recreation areas can serve as social cen- ters for these neighborhoods. Ih. Actively explore opportunities to utilize recycled water to irrigate parks, where eco- nomically feasible. Require recycled water use for landscape GO'B'S irrigation in accordance with DSRSP's re- cycled water policy for park development in Eastern Dublin. Ii. Design community facilities to encourage evening use. Limit night lighting of neigh- borhood parks to level adequate for secu- rity. Discourage night use ofneighborhoodparks except for Western Planning Area Com- petitive Field and Neighborhood Parks. Practice fields can be provided by neighborhood parks that are 5 acres or larger. DUBLIN PARKS 25 N V .b �.N 1 Ad z Tassajara`"' ua 9 m Ilk Fallon `',`• ,':.... , i •� ,. N,.,7 .7777777,;' ) , ,> r z � z TRAILS AND BIKEWAYS Trail use is one of the fastest growing segments of public park and recreation activity. Trails are linear parks or' corridors that are primarily for ' pedestrian, equestrian and bicycle use. Trails can be local or part of a more extensive regional system. They can serve as transportation alterna- tives for children going to and from schools and even for commuters. ' Trails, at a minimum, may be narrow corridors that provide critical linkage to important facili- ties. At best, however, trail corridors may incor- porate many hundreds of acres of significant open space and provide the public with unique opportunities to enjoy the natural environment between developed areas. Both EBRPD and LARPD have developed regional trail plans which include trail corridors within Dublin. Thus, Dublin's trail system can be linked into the over- all Tri- Valley network. The Dublin link will also ' unite the trails of these two regional park districts with each other. Goal 2: To create a continuous network of paths, walks, and trails, thereby providing a recreational resource of routes and linear open spaces enabling the public to travel by non - motorized modes throughout the Dublin com- munity. GUIDING POLICIES 2.1 De- emphasize reliance on the automobile for transportation by encouraging the de- velopment of off -street pedestrian and bi- cycle paths linking community amenities such as parks, schools, open space areas, neighborhood retail and other destinations. Avoid locating bicycle paths where steep gradients would discourage use. 2.2 Identify desired trail alignments in advance of development and work to secure trail easements or dedications, and develop trails in conjunction with development. coAZ,s 2.3 Integrate trails with natural landscape fea- tures such as creeks and ridgelines. 2.4 Encourage joint agency cooperation in projects to promote and develop trails. 2.5 Explore designating private land within 100 feet of the centerline of any creek on subdi- vision maps as a potential trail easement. 2.6 Designate trail right- of-ways that are wide enough to accommodate the designated uses, that provide a buffer between the trail itself and adjacent development, and that allow for both emergency and maintenance vehicles. Non - vehicular network throughout the Dublin community. DUBLIN PARKS 29 1 Trail right -of -ways can occupy the same 2b. Work with EBRPD to develop a trail along easement as emergency and maintenance railroad easement as a continuation of the vehicle access and utility easements. Trail Iron Horse Trail. right -of -ways under overhead power lines should be avoided whenever feasible. For 2c. Work with County Flood Control to pro - single or double -use trails that permit hik- vide a trail along South San Ramon Creek ' ing andlor equestrian use, provide a mini- channel from the Civic Center to Alamo mum right -of -way width of 20 feet. For Creek Park. multiple -use trails thatpermithiking, eques- 1 Irian and bicycle use, provide a minimum 2d. Complete trail segment along Alamo Creek. right -of -way width of 30 to 40 feet. 2e. Continue trail along San Ramon Creek to ' 2.7 Designate wider trail corridors wherever Dublin boundary and under 580 to Pleasan- possible to include sensitive resources, ton. unique natural features or vista points and to provide design flexibility. 2f. Create atrail link along Martin Canyon Creek GOALS to the proposed Donlan Ridge regional © 2.8 Provide staging areas located on arterial or trail and bikeway along San Ramon Road. collector roads that are both convenient to the public and that are easily accessible for 2g. Pursue opportunities to link to Dublin Civic maintenance and operation purposes. Center to City and regional trail system. 2.9 Evaluate all utility rights-of-way for trail 2h. Create a trail along Tassajara Creek. ' development potential. 2i. Encourage development of a regional trail , Trails should be developed in conjunction corridor along Donlan Ridge. with the installation of underground utili- ties where possible. Work with East Bay Regional Park District to provide a link for regional trails in the 2.10 Provide links to regional trails proposed in Liv- Westside hills. ermore Area Recreation and Park District Re- gionalTrailPlan ,andtheDoughertyVafley, San 2j. provide aeegional staging area in the West - Ramon Westside and Tassajara Valley Plans. ern Dublin Extended Planning Area, 2.11 Provide local access trails to open space 2k. Emphasize an east/west trail link with de- areas. velopment of a parkway along Dublin Bou- levard into the extended planning areas. Local trails and trail access points serve local residents and provide pedestrian ac- Where possible, the east -west trail link ' cess for local users to public open space. should be developed as a parkway with Typically, parking is not provided at local separate landscaped pedestrianlbikeway trail accesspoints, although on-streetpark- area. Where existing road cross - section ing may exist as part of a subdivision. cannotaccommodateparkway, visually con- tinue the parkway symbolically with a tree- lined roadway. 2a. Explore potential funding through sources such as private development, the 21. Acquire open space trail corridors in East- Transporation Development Act and simi- ern Dublin as it develops as per LARPD lar programs for trail construction in Cen- tral Dublin. 2m. Develop Class II Bikeways and Pedestrian Parkways along majorroadways in the East- ern ' Dublin Area. DUBLIN PARKS ' 30 w N d W C z a �r b r r� ■"1 �l PW Cl� z 0 f G ✓ .... ,_._...lip . 40 Id O • r n ^^ O • 41 e'e e O • 1 0. G ` CA m �' �. � �. ►d �' � ►°v ego � • a WD CA vii p � Z CD CN "� d e� OPEN SPACE POLICIES The Dublin community is bounded to the east and west by significant areas of undeveloped land. By providing policies for the development of an open space system, the City of Dublin ensures the pres- ervation of the visual character of the community, the protection of wildlife populations and signifi- cant vegetation patterns, as well as providing opportunities for passive recreational pursuits. The purpose ofopen space designation can vary. Itmay be the visual contrast to urban development pat- terns, protection of environmental resources, or the development ofpublicly accessible open space with trails, staging areas, and environmental edu- cation programs. It is possible to preserve visual open space without requiring public ownership by limiting the density of units and establishing guide- lines which preserve significant visual features. However, without establishing areas ofpublic open space, the City does not have the ability to control the land management of the undeveloped area and provide public access and recreation opportunities. Goal 3: First, to preserve the visual quality of the hillsides and creeks that contribute to the character of Dublin and secondly, to provide public access to and passive recreation oppor- tunities within open space areas. W_* Ir �-,r t► f 11u , ' ntt )tow. GUIDING POLICIES 3.1 Protect the visual quality in the Dublin com- munity through the creation of a continuous visual open space system. As a general principle, large unbroken open spaces are more valuable for both recre- ational uses and hab itat protection than frag- mented areas surrounded by development. 3.2 Encourage preservation ofridgelines, riparian corridors and within oak woodland areas so that these natural resources may be a part of the open space system. Providing a variety of terrain and vegetation within an area selected for protection con- tributes to the ecological health of the open space system. 3.3 Minimize the fragmentation of open space areas by "fingers" of development. The greatest number of management issues and highest maintenance costs occur at the direct interface between development and open space. Thus, reducing the length of the perimeter simplifies the management of the open space system. iF Encourage preservation of natural resources like ridgelines and oak woodlands. DUBLIN PARKS 33 0 5 I M n 3.4 Maximize community use and exposure to open space. Multiple local access points and community staging areas increase public enjoyment of open space and spread the impact of that use over the open space area Single loaded roadways facilitate visual and public access to open space. 3.5 Avoid including identified landslides, erosion areas and slope hazards within publicly -owned open space adjacent to developed areas. Where development abuts open space in land- slide-prone areas, create a privately -owned GOALS buffer zone with the responsibility for all © landslide repair and maintenance resting with a Geologic Hazard Abatement District or a Homeowners Association. The buffer zone should include all engineered slopes and drainage structures. 3.6 Emphasize protection ofwildlife habitats and corridors. Barriers to the movement of wildlife species such as roadways, power lines, pipelines and strip development that fragment open space should be avoided. Actively work with Fish & Game to define and preserve wildlife habi- tats. 3.7 Cooperate in regional efforts to create contigu- ous trails and open space system. Opportuni- ties exist with San Ramon's Westside Area, the Dougherty and Tassajara Valleys, and along Livermore's northwestern boundary. Provide regional staging areas in both east- ern and western Dublin adjacent to trail and open space corridors. ACTION PROGRAM 3a. Develop specific open space guidelines forthe Dublin community which establish criteria to evaluate the desirability and feasibility of ac- cepting specific public open space dedica- tions. Guidelines might define minimum open space acreages, access opportunities, maintenance responsibility, dedication procedures, open space land criteria, buffer and trail ease- ment corridor widths and improvements which must be in place prior to dedication. 3b. Establish standards for treatment of interface between the perimeter of development and open space areas, Standards should discuss fire breaks, widths and materials, geologic hazard buffers, mini- mum acreage, emergency access, trail widths and access, fencing and maintenance prac- tices. 3c. Explore the variety of mechanisms used to ensure protection of open space lands desired by the community. City ordinances should either be in place or open space regions negotiated directly as developmentproceeds. Some ofthe tools the City can use include open space easements, transfer of development rights, restrictive covenants and planned unit developments. 3d. Explore financing mechanisms for open space operation and management costs. DUBLIN PARKS 34 It is critical that the costs of the open space maintenance are not overlooked or underfunded Regardless of who owns the remaining open space lands, there will be maintenance costs. Maintenance and liabil- ity costs will be influenced by the amount of land dedicated, the proximity to developed areas, the type of facilities provided and the presence of fire or geologic hazards. Some funding mechanisms include special assess- ment districts, homeowner associations, or geologic hazard abatement districts. I i I I n J J 1 1 1 1 1 r �1 J 1 COMMUNITY IMAGE & CHARACTER The parks system is an essential component of a city's image. It is a visible reflection of commu- nity pride. To create a community with land- scaped pathways, well- designed parks, and at- tractive public buildings requires careful long - range planning and guidelines. By planning for a "village green" in the urban area where workers enjoy their lunch or parkways along which com- muters can walk and bicycle, Dublin is creating a community not a suburb. The Dublin popula- tion can then derive pleasure from community amenities each day. The park system becomes an integral part of their lives. , Goal 4: Use the park and open space system to provide community identity and character for Dublin, improving the area's visual quality. GUIDING POLICIES 4.1 Preserve riddelines, riparian corridors and sig- nificant vegetation and other features of Dublin's natural setting. Features may be preserved through acquisi- tion of open space or restrictions on develop- ment requiring setbacks from natural fea- tures and preservation of view corridors. 4.2 Develop off-street bicycle/pedestrian paths in parkways along major roads creating tree - lined boulevards and a streetscape system. Views of the park system from the road are a major component of the visual impression of the community and will enhance the City's image. Image enhancement should be a com- ponent of the design of each park or facility, regardless of sue or use. ACTION PROGRAM 4a. Enhance the presence of riparian corridors through landscaping. 4b. Protect and emphasize the layout ofneighbor- hoods. Ideally each neighborhood would derive a sense of identityjrom sensitive land planning which focuses attention on special features such as rock outcrops, specimen trees, vista points and knolls. 4c. Create a green Town Square to act as a central focus as a part of the redevelopment of the existing downtown area. 4d. Continue to develop a landscape buffer along the perimeter of Camp Parks. Explore oppor- A "village green" serves as a lunchtime retreat in the urban area. DUBLIN PARKS 35 GOALS tunities to utilize this buffer area for recreation purposes such as a trail system or a joint -use golf course with Camp Parks. 4e. Develop aft attractive, consistent identity pro- gram for city parks and recreation facilities. A thematic signage system, entry arbor, or standardized site furniture are methods to unify the park system with a "Dublin" look 4f. Reflect the historical heritage of the commu- nity within the park system. As development occurs to the east and west, where feasible, remnants of the ranching history should be preserved and incorporated into the parks GOALS and open space system. © 4g. Unite the community with pedestrian path- ways linking parks, schools and open space areas to each other and other community destinations. 4h. Develop public cultural facilities such as com- munity centers, museums and performing arts centers in conjunction with park areas. Facili- ties should be designed to reflect the high - quality standards Dublin has chosen to exem- plify in the design of the Civic Center. 4i. Design each neighborhood with a focal point. In some neighborhoods this will be a park or school, in other areas it may be an entry or trail head. 4j. Design neighborhood retail centers to encour- age pedestrian use. The village center can be a destination linked to trail system. Outdoor plazas, cafes and display areas can encourage people to lin- ger. The plaza areas can become social centers. 4k. Develop design guidelines to insure high qual- ity site planning, architecture and landscape design in downtown and developing areas. Emphasize the need for quality and visual continuity during the design process. 41. Incorporate water - conserving planning and native plant materials into the landscaping of all parks to the extent possible. Develop and implement streetscape design standards to provide a tree canopy along major arterials. Landscape Buffer --� at Camps Park Central City Park Green » r East -West Green Connecto Civic Center Hwy 580 Park Hwy 680 Fig. 7 Community Image Components DUBLIN PARKS 36 I � I I 1 L� 1 u r� PARK ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT The Parks and Recreation Master Plan goals outlined in this document are ambitious. If dili- gently followed, they will provide the citizens of Dublin with a system of quality parks and recre- ation facilities for years to come. Implementation of funding sources will require extensive pre - planning efforts. In addition to utilizing existing funds for park and playfield renovations, strategies for acquiring additional funds need to be addressed early in the pre- planning phase. The success in implementing this Plan depends largely on adequate funding, not only to acquire and develop park land, but to ensure that the revenue needed to operate and maintain the facilities is always available. The implementation chapter of this Plan exam- ines the existing and potential funding sources available to acquire, develop, operate and main- tain recreational facilities. A successful imple- mentation program will rely on a combination of regulatory mechanisms, public and private fund- ing sources and innovative and creative ap- proaches to accomplishing park, recreation and resource objectives. Goal 5: Generate the necessary funds and utilize land dedication policies to insure imple- mentation of parks and facilities acquisition and development. GUIDING POLICIES 5.1 Emphasize the acquisition and development ofcommunity facilities. 5.2 Continue to emphasize communication be- tween the City Recreation, Public Works and Planning Departments to ensure adequate and appropriate park land and trail linkages are provided with each development. It will require special diligence to ensure that trail corridors, open space areas and park lands are acquired and consolidated in an overall appropriate fashion. 53 Continue to implement and update the City's Subdivision Ordinance with regard to the dedication of lands for park and recreation purposes to insure that it keeps pace with land costs in Dublin. 5.4 Diligently explore options to address park land acquisition, improvements and opera- tion expenses beyond the minimum estab- lished by the Subdivision Map Act for park dedication. Opportunities may exist during the negotiations for Planned Unit Develop- ment rezoning, the Development Agreement Process, and review of tentative maps for General Plan consistency. Frequently new development sales are di- rectly benefited when the park facilities are constructed concurrent with housing. 5.5 Continue to explore inter- agency agreements and joint - control agreements to implement park improvements. Agencies which would be interested in coop- erative arrangements might include EBRPD, LARPD, the school district and Alameda County Flood Control District. 5.6 Explore the variety of techniques for land acquisition including life estates, open space easements, contributions of surplus real es- tate, "unilateral" options on property desired at a low option price, sequential donations or purchases, tax delinquent property, and pur- chase and leaseback programs with landown- ers. Each of these will require coordination with land owners, developers, the Planning De- partment and the City Manager's office. 5.7 Examine opportunities to preserve open space through open space easements and transfer of development rights and PUD planning. ' DUBLIN PARKS 37 Open Space Easement Act of 1974, in which local governments can obtain the conserva- tion value of property that it does not actu- ally own. The open space easement is a R restriction which runs with the land and restricts the potential use of land for the Purpose of preserving its natural or scenic character. The benefit to the landowner which either grants or sells such an easement is a reduction in property tax assessments and an income tax deduction. ACTION PROGRAM 5a. Provide an in-lieu fee banking program which allows fees to be collected and used to acquire park land in other areas of the City. 5b. Maintain a fair and equitable rate structure for user fees which takes into account the special coats need of seniors, children, teenagers and the © disabled. 5c. Continue to actively pursue State and Federal grants to develop park facilities. 5d. Continue to implement park and school yard facility improvements as per existing master plan program as funding is available. 5e. Consider formulation of special assessment districts such as Mello -Roos, where appro- priate. Special assessment districts should be passed early in the development process to maxi- mize funding opportunities and planning. The district may finance facilities on a pay- as-you-go basis until the facilities are con- structed The City may also use the proceeds of bonds to finance facilities and repay bonds with the levied special tax. 5f. Consider developing a park dedication ordi- nance or an assessment base for park im- provements from new commercial and in- dustrial uses. The daytimepopulation ofthe businessparks, commercial centers and other employment bases frequently utilize the communities park system directly for company teams and pic- nics as well as indirectly through the benefit of association with a community with a high quality image. Thus, it is appropriate to seek contributions from non - residential develop- ment. 5g. Consider establishing an ordinance for a city- wide assessment district. 5h. Actively pursue opportunities to jointly de- velop recreation amenities with the Federal government on Camp Parks land. 5i. Consider use of bond and tax measures to finance specific park and recreation improve- ments. Prior to initiating a bond referendum or tax increase, the City should conduct market research and organize an effective campaign which emphasizes the benefits of the im- provements to the community. 5j. Explore private or service club sponsorship of park improvements through an "adapt -a- park" concept. Identify interested corporations, organiza- tions or individuals and create an action plan tailored to fit a variety of budgets and interests. 5k. Considerrevenue generating concessions when designing park facilities. Water slide fees, food concessions, and re- ception facilities can all be revenue generat- ing park uses. 51. Consider forming anon - profit foundation or a "Friends of the Parks" to provide funding in a variety of ways for the advancement of parks and recreation. DUBLIN PARKS 38 I i 1-1 u 1 � I � I � I I I I I MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS The City of Dublin will continue to face the challenge ofineeting increased demands forparks, facilities and services with disproportionately less available funds. Limited resources, includ- ing energy and water supplies and their associ- ated costs compounds the dilemma park officials face. Maintenance is integral with planning in the development of community recreation facili- ties of all levels and uses. The City's challenge will be to provide direction, services and man- agement for the existing parks and facilities while planning accurately for the recreational needs of a rapidly expanding community. This will require developing an efficient system of operations and maintenance which capitalizes on cost effective, resource conservative methods. Development of sufficient leadership, funding and staffing for operations and maintenance is critical to the success and longevity of the City of Dublin's parks and facilities. Goal 6: Provide planning for allocation direc- tion, services management and funding for the existing parks and facilities while developing a thorough list of the recreational needs of the rapidly expanding Dublin community. GUIDING POLICIES 6.1 Develop a program for interagency, commu- nity and volunteer participation and coordi- nation. 6.2 Continue to develop an efficient operations and maintenance schedule to reduce costs by implementing preventative maintenance pro- cedures and contracting specialty services through a competitive bidding process. ACTION PROGRAM 6a. Continue joint use agreement between the City of Dublin and Dublin Unified School District. 6b. Utilize, where appropriate, inexpensive con- tract labor such as California Conservation Corps and neighborhood groups to augment full -time maintenance personnel. 6c. Evaluate water management practices. Con- duct water auditing evaluations at each park and recreational facility and encourage water conservation in irrigating and landscape de- sign. Turf irrigation represents the largest water usage in landscape. Use can be reduced through variant landscaping, drip irriga- tion, low flow fixtures and central irrigation scheduling. Severe water restrictions due to drought conditions are likely to continue. GOALS This will require innovative and creative planning in the areas of landscape design and architecture. 6d. Provide adequate storage at all facilities to promote efficient operations andmaintenance. 6e. Explore joint agreements with EBRPD, LARPD, Camp Parks, Alameda County, the school district and other agencies to combine resources in maintaining public facilities. 6f. Explore and identify new funding sources for maintenance and operations of proposed fa- cilities. DUBLIN PARKS 39 411 np -At AP* 00 0 man m m mm ti Ix c� c 49P CA n n n z 0 It r) > Z o. Ow IV r4l CrQ yR°C7 0 > > Z yR°C7 0 Parks and Recreation Facility Standards IM INTRODUCTION Utilizing data gatheredthrough workshops, inter- views and review of existing recreation programs, the master plan established the number and type of facilities which will be required if the City of Dublin is to meet the recreation needs of future residents at the level of service demanded by the current population. This master plan was devel- oped incorporating the development plans in the extended planning areas to ensure consistency and compatibility with previously established goals. The Master Plan emphasizes the acquisi- tion and development of community facilities and restricting the use of neighborhood parks to those activities which will not impact adjacent residen- tial use. This ambitious program requires judi- cious allocation offacilities when using the 5 acres / 1000 residents park land standard. Table 4 Park Facility Distribution describes a possible distri- bution of parks and other facilities. The siting of new facilities and buildings within a major park complex provides opportunity for shared use on the site. Shared use can reduce the acreage required for parking, vehicular and emergency vehicle access, some building sizes and provides other types of land use efficiencies. It must be noted that if these facilities are not sited in the proposed parks or as parts of a larger complex, the acreage requirements must be increased. The distribution table has been used as the basis to Neighborhood park with practice courts. develop the guidelines for the character and pro- grams for the various types of parks proposed within Dublin. As population growth and com- munity needs are more precisely defined, the facility distribution plan and standards must also be refined and development priorities identified. The Table also describes existing parks and the proposed use of school grounds for sports fields and a number of other types of parks which make up the Dublin Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Descriptive standards have been developed to elaborate on the characteristics of these compo- nents. As each park is developed, it is essential to incorporate community input into the planning of these facilities to insure the master plan continues to be a direct reflection of the Dublin citizens needs and aspirations. The park and recreation facility standards have been divided into three sections. The fast section discusses the elements and program for the vari- ous types of park facilities including: • city park • sports park • community park • civic park • neighborhood park • neighborhood square • special use facilities - historic park and town square Provision of facilities for group /family gathering. DUBLIN PARKS 43 STANDARDS Within the proposed parks a number of indoor recreation and leisure facilities are proposed. The second portion of this chapter sets forth recommendations for the use and square footage requirements of each facility. During the next stage ofplanning for development ofthese facili- ties, a public participation process is recommended to verify community needs and the attendant space components for each building. Planning standards have been developed for: • community center • recreation facility • aquatic facility • senior center rANDAMS • Community theater The final portion of the standards chapter has been developed to address trail standards. The use of these standards will enable an incremental development of the comprehensive community - wide trail system. Aquatic facility provides tactile play. The Civic Park will be integrated into the existing Civic Center. DUBLIN PARKS 44 "Facility should be replaced. DUBLIN PARKS 45 STANDARDS potential additional facility distribution N TABLE 4 a PARKFACILITIES g b p DISTRIBUTION o s � a � •p 7 w O 0. ate' O O O O R< o W � Q .4 b Outdoor Baseball Little League 16 3 13 0 4 2 7 0 0 0 Pony/Babe Ruth 6 1 5 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 Practice 19 0 19 10 0 0 0 0 9 0 Soccer Pee Wee 3 1 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 10's/8's 7 4 3 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 Regulation 8 4 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 Practice 15 0 15 8 0 0 4 0 3 0 Softball 13 2 11 2 3 1 6 0 0 0 Tennis Courts 26 2 24 8 2 2 0 0 8 4 Swimming Pools 3 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 Basketball Courts 16 2 14 0 2 0 2 0 7 3 Volleyball 13 0 13 0 2 2 3 0 6 0 Equestrian Staging 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Indoor Community Center 40,000 sf 12,178 28,000 0 28,000 0 0 0 0 0 Recreation Center 35,000 sf 0 35,000 0 0 0 35,000 0 0 0 Community Theater 16,000 sf 0 169000 0 0 0 0 16,000 0 0 Historical/nature museum 2-3 1 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 Senior Center 12,000 sf 6,600 12,000" 0 6,000 0 0 6,000 0 0 "Facility should be replaced. DUBLIN PARKS 45 STANDARDS City Park Standards This park should offer a variety of recreational opportunities that attract a wide range of local age groups and interests. It should feature large open space areas, unique natural and cultural areas as well as group picnic areas, interpretive centers, bicycling and hiking trails, sports facilities, aquatics facility, community center, senior center and other unique features or facilities. Size: 50 acres minimum. Service Area: Centralized within the entire City of Dublin. Highly visible and easily accessible. Access/Location: County land bounded by Tassajara Creek proposed parkway, Tassajara Road, and a proposed road which serves as a major spine running through Dublin. The community center should be utilized to create a central focus for the Dublin community. Park Design: Create a memorable 21 st century social hub and landmark public destination which would be a source of pride for the City. Facilities that maximize the recreational and leisure experience of all citizens. Provide a mixture of facilities to attract a broad spectrum of user groups. iTANDARDS Develop a trail system along Tassajara Creek to provide links to other regional and local © parks, City destinations, and BART. Provide a pedestrian spine linking the uses on the site to the surrounding existing retail, residential and recreational facilities. Play Area: High quality and innovative play structures. Water feature specifically designed for children's play. Separate facilities for tots from those for older children. Provide parents seating area. Potential Sports Facilities: Lighted ball fields, graded and maintained for practice and competitive baseball. (Babe Ruth, adult softball and little league fields arranged in triplexes and quadraplexes to take advantage of centralized score boards and similar facilities) Spectator amenities. Regulation soccer fields. Practice soccer fields (may overlap ball fields). Outdoor basketball courts. Outdoor volleyball courts. Lighted tennis courts. Picnic Facilities: Shaded and secluded picnic areas with tables for 6 to 8 people located throughout the park providing available areas for spontaneous picnic use. Group picnic facilities. Natural Areas: Open meadow zones that provide soft, green use areas for picnics, informal sports as well as passive group and individual uses. Restore and revegetate Tassajara Creek and develop a nature center for interpretative programs. Provide a pedestrian trail along Tassajara Creek to link with regional trail and transit systems. DUBLIN PARKS 46 r� I� 1 f] 1 1 1] i 11 1 FIG. 9 CITY PARK PROTOTYPE 1 Main Auto Entry 13 Play Area 2 Drop Off 14 WaterFeature 3 Plaza 15 Conservatory 4 Aquatics Complex 16 Tennis Court 5 Community Center & Senior Center 17 Basketball Court 6 Museum 1$ SoccerField 7 Library 19 Baseball Field TASSAIARA ROAD 8 Lake 20 Jogging Trail 9 Rose Garden 21 Creek Corridor .5310 Nodes - Seating and Concessions 22 Parking . 11 ParkPromenade 23 Pedestrian Entry Feature 4 12 Secondary Auto Entry 24 Maintenance Yard LINK TO COMMERCIAL / RETAIL 0 O LINK TO REGIONAL PARKS DUBLIN PARKS 47 __I LINK TO BART Potential Special Features: Comprehensive community center building with teen facilities. Senior center attached to community center. Water feature and take for visual impact. Library. 1/2 acre maintenance yard. Aquatics center - competition pool with instructional `L' and recreational use wading pool, potential for slides or water feature. The feeling of town square and village green should supplement the sports and open space components. Additional unique features may include an education center or museum, outdoor amphitheater, rose gardens, or outdoor wedding facilities. Restrooms: Permanent restroom structure. Parking: Major parking lot to accommodate demand during high use periods. Lighting: Provide lighting at the park entry and parking lots to promote safe night use of the areas. A strong lighting concept is important and can establish facility presence and orient users rANna,xDS to the site. DUBLIN PARKS 48 Section where the creek is featured as a highlight. M n n Image of area adjacent to creek The creek is incorporated into the overall design. DUBLIN PARKS 49 STANDARDS Sports Park Standards A park facility developed to accommodate the majority ofcompetition ballfields in the City. Couldbeutilized for tournaments. Architecturally significant recreation building is central hub of park. Focal element for Dublin community. Link to adjacent open space. Size: 80 acres. Site Characteristics: Predominantly level terrain adjacent to open space area. Access/Location: Intersection of Collier Canyon and Dublin Boulevard extension. Park Design: Design should create a sense of arrival and place. Centralized recreation center is hub of park. Allees of trees spoking through fields. Provide pedestrian walkways and scale to park. rANDAMS Play Area: Play equipment and parents seating area. © Potential Sports Facilities: Regulation sports facilities for organized league practice and game play including competition facilities for Babe Ruth fields, little league baseball fields, softball fields, competition and practice soccer fields. Basketball courts. Volleyball courts. Tennis courts. Jogging or walking loop, minimum distance one mile, with par course. Picnic Facilities: Family picnic areas with tables for 6 to 8 people. Group picnic area for 50 -100 people - designed to accommodate reserved picnics and support sports activities. Locate in the proximity of play areas and restrooms. Provide separation between group use and more passive use. Barbecue facilities. Shade structures and secluded, wind protected areas. Natural Areas: Link to open space corridor adjacent park. Provide picnic areas in natural setting and other natural areas to support the sports uses. Potential Special Features: Indoor Recreation Center. Scoreboard/concessionaire. Central events plaza. Park -like setting with a variety of contours and large plantations of trees. Rcstrooms: Permanent restroom structures integrated into concession/scomboard areas. Parking: Provide parking for 350 cars in satellite parking areas. Lockable bicycle parking. Lighting: Lighting for sports fields, building, parking and surrounding areas. Mitigate spill over lighting that may impact adjacent residential. DUBLIN PARKS 50 1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 FIG. 10 SPORTS PARK PROTOTYPE 1 Main Auto Entry 8 Tennis Court 2 Entry Area 9 Basketball Court 3 Recreation Center &Gymnasium 10 Picnic Area 4 Nodes - SeatingandConcessions 11 Play Area 5 Park Promenade 12 7oggingTrail 6 Baseball Field 13 Creek Corridor 7 Soccer Field 14 Parking STANDARDS DUBLIN PARKS 51 Community Park Standards A park facility which retains the rural/natural essence of the site while providing sports and indoor facilities to accommodate Dublin's recreation needs. Emphasis on environmental systems. Provide for equestrian and hiking trail use staging. Size: 25 acres. Site Characteristics: Interesting natural and visual characteristics such as existing trees, creek, vistas. Level areas for parking and sports use. Access/Location: Provide access from Tassajara Road along open space connector. Access from Collier Canyon Road. Park Design: Dominance of natural systems - creek, hillsides. Design should create a sense of arrival and place. rAMA.RDS Link to adjacent open space and residential development. © Incorporate topography and drainage system into design. Play Area: High quality and innovative play structures. Separate facilities for tots from those for older children. Potential Sports Facilities: Regulation sports facilities for organized league practice and game play including competition fields for little league baseball, softball and soccer fields. Basketball courts. Volleyball courts. Tennis courts. Jogging or walking loop, minimum distance one mile, with par course. Picnic Facilities: Family picnic areas with tables for 6 to 8 people. Group picnic area for 50 - 100 people. Locate proximate to play areas and restrooms. Shade structures and secluded, wind protected areas. Natural Areas: Recreate riparian corridor as swale. Habitat for plants and small wildlife. Water feature, i.e. lake with overlook. Potential Special Features: Historical/Nature Museum. Community Center. Equestrian Staging Area. Outdoor performance space such as amphitheater or bandstand. Special use areas, gardens and plazas, for activities such as wedding receptions, art exhibits, nature displays, and demonstration garden. Restrooms: Permanentrestroom structure. Parking: Provide parking for 100 cars or an adequate number to meet planned uses of the park. Lockable bicycle parking for 35. Lighting: Lighting for sports fields, building, parking and surrounding areas. Mitigate spill over lighting that may impact adjacent residential. DUBLIN PARKS 52 fl !I rl 1 1 FIG. 11 COMMUNITY PARK PROTOTYPE ' 1 Main Auto Entry 14 Picnic Area 2 Entry Plaza 15 Secondary Auto Entry 3 CommunityCcntcr 16 Staging Area 4 Floral Garden- 17 Nature Area �- 1 5 Water Feature 18 Creek Corridor' 6 Amphitheater 19 Equestrian Trail 7 Tree Buffer 20 Parking � 8 Play Area = 'f 9 Drop Off 10 Basketball Court 11 TennisCourt 12 Soccer Field 5 13 Baseball Field z .; D fff x F STANDARDS Civic Park Standards A complex ofcivic facilities clustered aroundthe Dublin Civic Center. Reconfiguration ofsports fields layout as per Sports Grounds MasterPlan 1990. Two ofthe existing little league fields andsoccer field nearthe Civic Plaza would be replaced in the City and/or Sports Park. Site Characteristics: Predominantly level site. Adjacent to Civic Center. Access/Location: Utilize existing access road from Dublin Boulevard. Facility Design: Extensive plaza system with display areas. Pedestrian promenade linking facilities to sports grounds. Presence from freeway and Dublin Boulevard. Compatibility with architectural character of Civic Center. Indoor Facilities: Appropriate location for community theater and Satellite Senior Center. Both facilities ' TANDAKDS © will share common use areas to minimize duplication of services. Special Features: Forecourt to theater, courtyard for senior's use. Parking: Shared use with Civic Center /sports ground parking lot. Each facilities uses parking lot during different times of the day or night. Lot to accommodate demand during high use periods. Lighting: Strong lighting concept is important to establish facility presence and orient users to the site. Provide lighting at the park entry and parking lots to promote safe night use of the facility. DUBLIN PARKS 54 FIG. 12 CIVIC PARK PROTOTYPE 1 i 8� 1 DUBLIN PARKS 55 1 Main Auto Entry 2 Civic Center 3 Plaza 4 Satellite Senior Center 5 Theater /Shop 6 Clock Tower 7 Sculpture 8 Water Feature 9 Snack Bar& Restrooms 10 Play Area 11 Proposed Baseball Field 12 Existing Soccer Field 13 Existing Baseball Field 14 7oggingTrail 15 Parking STANDARDS Neighborhood Park Standards The neighborhood park can be the visual and social center for the local community, In addition to meeting the local residents' recreational needs, the neighborhood park is also a "village green ". These parks should be designed to reflect the unique character of each neighborhood. Neighborhood parks are developed to provide space for improvement in relaxation, play and informal recreation activities in a specific neighborhood or cluster of residential units. The park improvements are oriented toward the individual recreational needs ofthe neighborhood in which it is located. Facilities should be designed to include practice fields and not for ones competitive use, which traditionally bring more traffic into a neighborhood. Development Criteria: 1.00 acre minimum per 1,000 person, 5 to 7 acres minimum. Service Area: Service area defined by major arterials or topography. Adjacent to neighborhood boundaries or open space area, visible from neighborhood TANDARDS © entry. Site Characteristics: Major percentage of the site should be level to accommodate active recreation uses. Natural or visual qualities to enhance the character. Access/Location: Minimum of 2 public street frontages. On collector or residential streets; no major arterials. Park Design: Central green/social center for neighborhood. Reflect character of setting - natural features or architectural style of homes. Play Area: Tot lot for children 2 -4 years. Apparatus play area adjacent to tot lot. Parents seating area. Potential Sports Facilities: Turf fields graded and maintained for practice softball/baseball (minimum 250' outfield) and soccer (minimum 180'). Tennis courts. Volleyball courts. Outdoor basketball courts. Picnic Facilities: Tables and secluded space for informal family picnics up to 6 -8 people. Barbecue facilities in family -sized picnic areas. Natural Areas: Open space meadow for informal sports, games and passive activities. Parking: Off - street parking for 10 -20 cars where minimum street frontages are not provided. Lockable parking for 6 -10 bicycles. Lighting: Provide lighting for security purposes not for night -use activities. Avoid penetration of unwanted light into adjacent neighborhood. DUBLIN PARKS 56 1-1 l fl 1 it 11 1 C� 1 FIG. 13 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK PROTOTYPE MAINTENANCE ACCESS LINK TO OPEN SPACE OR SCHOOL BASKETBALL VOLLEYBALL PARKING (20 CARS) DROP OFF till DUBLIN PARKS 57 W - STREET TREES --TOT LOT PARENTS' iSEATING PLAY AREA -PARK SIGNAGE STANDARDS Neighborhood Square Standards Neighborhood Squares provide specialized facilities that serve a concentrated or limited population or special interest group such as young children or senior citizens. The-Neighborhood Square is a scaled -down version of the Neighborhood Park, with an average size of 3 acres and located in high density residential urban areas where a green pocket is the central focus of the neighborhood. Site Characteristics: 3 acres. Predominately level site. Access/Location: Prominent location preferably at cross street. Within neighborhoods and in close proximity to apartment complexes, townhouse development or housing for the elderly. Linked with trails and pedestrian walkways. Park Design: Each park should have unique characteristics such as public art, fountain, sculpture, formal gardens, etc. to create a focal point for high density areas. TAAfDAPDS Develop plaza areas for gathering and neighborhood social events. © Play Area: Small scale, high quality play structures. Parents seating area. Sports Facilities: As appropriate to user groups in adjacent homes; provide tennis court, volleyball court, or basketball court. Picnic Facilities: Tables and benches with limited open space for individual use. Seatwalls for informal picnicking. Natural Areas: Views and vistas are desirable. Restrooms: Not provided. Parking: Street parking. Lighting: As necessary for security only. DUBLIN PARKS 58 FIG. 14 NEIGHBORHOOD SQUARE PROTOTYPE FOUNTAIN SCULPTURE —•- PLAY AREA ---- 1/2 COURT BASKETBALL — •A• a . ry s • r r r � WE /,.•� M MAIN STREET DUBLIN PARKS 59 I TENNIS COURT GAZEBO FORMAL -- GARDEN SHADE TREES _ftfil PLAZA STANDARDS to Historical Park Standards A facility which preserves the remnants of the agrarian heritage of Dublin. There are potentially two types of Historical Parks. "A facility on the cemetery site using the old Murray School and St. Raymond's Church would reflect the historic "townlook ". Antique and craft shops or abed and breakfast might benefit from being adjacent to this type of facility. A separate facility incorporating an historic farmstead and focusing on the rural historic aspects might be better associated with an open space area in Eastern Dublin. It could also function as a trail head or ranger headquarters. Service Area: Within the City of Dublin. Site Characteristics: Historical significance. Interesting natural or visual characteristics such as existing trees, creeks, vistas. Access/Location: Fifteen minute driving time radius. TANDARDS Restrooms: Potential. © Special Features: Historic gardens, potentially a facility for receptions or educational programs. Ranching tool, barns and outbuildings as appropriate. Site elements and materials reflect historical period. Parking: Parking lot to accommodate demand during high use times (35 -50 stalls). Lighting: Strong lighting concept is important to establish facility presence and orient users to the site. Provide lighting at the park entry and parking lots to promote safe night use of the facility for events. DUBLIN PARKS 60 Community Center Standards A multi -use facility that provides educational, cultural, recreational and social opportunities for the entire ' community. The community center provides a social hub for the community it serves. The facility should be a vital building which provides a good mix of rooms, in a variety of sizes, to meet the needs of various community organizations and activities. In addition to meeting a wide range ofprogram needs, the type and mix of spaces should also consider the revenue generation potential. Community Centers can generate ' substantial amounts ofrevenue to meet the City's cost recovery objectives. The Center should serve as a focal point and be a source of pride for the community. ' Size: 28,000 Square Feet Development Criteria: 15,000 square feet per 25,000 persons. Acreage: 2 -3 Acres. Service Area: Centralized to major population centers. Site Characteristics: Predominantly level. ' Interesting natural or visual characteristics such as existing trees, creek, vistas. Access/Location; Located on a major arterial or collector road with high visibility. Twenty minute driving time. Pedestrian access via trails and bikeways. Facility Design: Memorable public destination point which would be a source of pride for the City. Destination that will serve the diverse needs of the entire City. Facilities that maximize the recreational and leisure experience of all citizens. Provide an inventory of versatile facilities that respond to the changing demographics of the community. Indoor Facilities: Lobby Public Assembly Space Caterer's Kitchen Multi -Use Room(s) Classroom/Meeting Room Arts and Crafts Room Tot Activity Room Pre School Room Administrative Space Storage li Special Features: Outdoor patios Outdoor amphitheater Incorporate into City or Community Park ' Parking: Major parking lot to accommodate demand during high use periods (100 spaces). Lighting: Strong lighting concept is important to establish facility presence and orient users to the ' site. Provide lighting at the Center entry and parking lots to promote safe night use. ' DUBLIN PARKS 61 n INDOORFACILITIES GUIDELINES -COMMUNITY CENTER Space Sq. Ft. Comments Assembly Facility 5,000 Multi- purpose space for banquets, dances, meetings, weddings, and other large community events. Commercial Kitchen 800 Lobby and Reception 1,500 Art display and social space. Multi -Use Room 2,700 Multi- purpose space for meetings and social gatherings. Banquet seating for 200. Could be divided into 2 or 3 smaller rooms. rANDARDS Teen Lounge 750 Room dedicated to teens. Informal seating, kitchenette, big screen © TV. Teen Game Room 1,000 Separate area for foosball, pool, ping pong and other games. Conference Room 600 Tot Activity Room 900 Activity space for short term babysitting and tot programs. Includes children's bathroom. Classroom/Meeting Rooms (2) 1,200 Office Area 1,000 Space for coordinators and part-time staff. Pre School: Program 1,200 Restrooms 150 Kitchen 200 Office 120 Storage 200 Arts and Crafts Studio 1,200 Storage 1,500 Net Assignable S.F. 20,020 Total Gross S.F. 28,000 DUBLIN PARKS 62 Recreation Center Standards The Recreation. Center is envisioned as a dynamic, multi -use facility that provides structured programs, instruction and drop -in recreational opportunities to the entire community. It will provide residents of all ages with access to indoor recreation opportunities. These dynamic and versatile buildings will be tailored to the needs of youth, families and adult team activities. It will not be not designed to serve as a spectator facility for competitive sports but rather to provide spaces where residents of all ages and abilities can participate in heathful activities. Siting the Recreation Center at the sports park will provide an active park with something for everyone. Size: 35,000 Square Feet. Development Criteria: 15,000 square feet per 30,000 persons. Acreage: 3.0 Acres. Service Area: Centralized within the entire City of Dublin. Site Characteristics: Predominantly level. Access/Location: Located on a major arterial or collector road with high visibility Twenty minute driving time radius. Facility Design: Memorable landmark public destination point which would be a source of pride for the City. Destination that will serve the diverse needs of the entire City. Facilities that maximize the recreational and leisure experience of all citizens. Provide an inventory of versatile facilities that respond to the changing demographics of the community. Indoor Facilities: Aerobics Room Dance Room Multi -Use Room Gymnasium Gymnasium Storage Locker Rooms Administrative Space Activity Lobby Teen Center Tot Activity Room Special Features: outdoor sand volleyball court(s). Sited at future City Park or future Sports Park location. Parking: Parking lot to accommodate demand during high use periods (100 stalls). Lighting: A strong lighting concept is important and can establish facility presence and orient users to the site. Provide lighting at the Center entry and parking lots to promote safe night use. DUBLIN PARKS 63 STANDARDS INDOOR FACILITIES GUIDELINES - RECREATION CENTER Space Sq. Ft. Comments Aerobics / Dance 2,000 Includes storage. Fitness Center 2,000 Circuit training machines and cardiovascular equipment. Cardiovascular Fitness 1,000 Exercycles, stairclimbers, rowing machines. Gymnasium and Storage 16,000 One (1) basketball feature court; Three (3) basketball cross courts; Four (4) volleyball courts; Six (6) badminton courts. Multi -Use Room 1,600 'TANDARDS © Locker Rooms 3,600 Office Area 1,200 Activity Lobby 1,800 Access control location. Passive area for Reception Counter socializing, displays and disseminating information. Babysitting/ Tot Activity Room 900 Short-term babysitting while parent uses the facility. Net Assignable S.F. 30,100 Total Gross S.F. 35,000 DUBLIN PARKS 64 Aquatic Center Standards The Aquatic Center can provide a dynamic, multi -use aquatic facility that provides programmed and drop - in recreationaf opportunities for the entire community. This pool would supplement the existing City pool and would also serve the needs ofyouth and adults who participate in age group swimming, The pool design can provide adequate facilities for synchronized swimming, water aerobics and other fitness programs, and the full range of instructional classes. The aquatic center can include water features such as slides and sprays as a means to increase family and youth participation and generate additional revenue. Pools: 25 Meter by 25 yard with a shallow water "L" and Tot Wading Pool. ' Development Criteria: One (1) pool per 20,000 residents. Acreage: 2.0 to 3.0 Acres. ' Service Area: Centralized within the newly developed areas of the City of Dublin. Site Characteristics: Predominantly level. Access/Location: Located on a major arterial or collector road with high visibility. Facility Design: Multi -use facility that will provide a wide variety of aquatic opportunities. Facility to accommodate competitive as well as instructional and recreational programs. Play features such as water sprays, play apparatus or slides to add an "attraction" aspect to the facility. Handicapped accessible. ' Indoor Facilities: Lobby /Access Control Locker Rooms Family Changing Rooms Pool Manager's Office Lifeguard Room First Aid Room Multi -Use Room ' Food Concession Mechanical/Storage Special Features: Outdoor sand volleyball court(s). Sited at City park location. Parking: Parking lot to accommodate demand during high use periods. 150 parking spaces. Lighting: A strong lighting concept is important and can establish facility presence and orient users to the site. 1 Provide lighting at the park entry and parking lots to promote safe night use of the areas. DUBLIN PARKS 65 STANDARDS Senior Center Standards As the population of Dublin continues to grow and age, there will be an increasing need for a specialized facility that serves the social, recreation and leisure needs of the senior community. Integrating the Senior Center into the City Park and Civic Park will provide opportunities for multi - generational interaction and will create a wonderful setting and convenient access to the amenities of the park. Size: 2 at 6,000 Square Feet each. Development Criteria: 6,250 square feet-per population of 25,000 persons. Acreage: 1 Acre. Service Area: Centralized within the entire City of Dublin. Site Characteristics: Predominantly level site. Interesting natural or visual characteristics such as existing trees, creek, vistas. TANDARDS © Access/Location: Located on a major arterial or collector road. Fifteen minute driving time radius. Located along public transit route. Facility Design: Destination that will serve the needs of the City's senior adults. Provide an inventory of facilities that respond to the more active lifestyle of the senior population. Indoor Facilities: Reception / Lobby Offices Conference Room Exercise Room Game / Crafts Room Billiards Room Health Center Assembly Hall Kitchen Arts and Crafts Room Reading Room Restrooms Special Features: Outdoor patios. Incorporated into joint use facilities. Design features for mobility impaired seniors. Parking: Parking lot to accommodate demand during high use periods (75 stalls). Parking must be proximate to the building with design consideration for person with limited mobility. Lighting: Strong lighting concept is important to establish facility presence and orient users to the site. Provide lighting at the Center entry and parking lots to promote safe night use of the areas. DUBLIN PARKS 66 Community Theater Standards The Community Theater can provide a multi -use facility that affords cultural, educational and social opportunities for the entire community. The theater can serve as a playhouse to local theater companies and provide instruction and performance opportunities for children's theater. In addition, it will provide performance space for dance, music players, and a wide variety of community sponsored events. The community theater can also provide meeting and lecture space. With a large, regional performing arts center in nearby Walnut Creek, it is recommended the size of the theater be scaled to local community use. An appropriate site forthe community theaterwould be at the Civic Center location. The centralized location, vehicular access, and opportunities for shared parking make this a desirable location. Size: 16,000 Square Feet. Development Criteria: One facility per community. Acreage: 1 Acre. sTANDARDs Service Area: Centralized to major population centers. Site Characteristics: Predominantly level. Interesting natural or visual characteristics such as existing trees, creek, vistas. Access/Location: Located on a major arterial or collector road with high visibility. Twenty minute driving time. Facility Design: Memorable public destination point which would be a source of pride for the City. Destination that will serve the diverse needs of the entire Community. Indoor Facilities: Lobby and Reception 150 - 200 Seat Raked Floor Theater Green Room Music Room Scenery Storage Kitchen Multi -Use Room Administrative Space Dressing Room Wardrobe Storage Special Features: Outdoor patios. Outdoor amphitheater. Incorporate into Civic Park. ' Parking: Lighting: Major parking lot to accommodate demand during high use periods (100 spaces). Strong lighting concept is important to establish facility presence and orient users to the site. Provide lighting at the Center entry and parking lots to promote safe night use. DUBLIN PARKS 67 Trails and Bikeway Standards There are three basic types of trail use that may be found in Dublin - hiking and jogging, bicycle, and equestrian. Hikers, joggers and strollers make up the majority oftrail users. This group naturally prefers to use trails that are safe, that provide good footing and that are routed through interesting landscape with attainable destination points and offer some amenities along the way such as benches and rest areas. Bicyclists prefer Class I trails which have smooth surfaces (preferably paved) and which are separated from other types oftraffic. Their second choice is the Class II trail which is part of the urban street or rural roadway with designated area for the bicyclist, and finally, the Class III trail which is simply a street or roadway that is signed or marked for bicycle use. Often traveling a distance of25 miles on an outing, the serious bicyclist prefers trails with sweeping curves, good visibility, and a minimum of cross streets. Equesttian trails are generally planned for the outlying areas of the City where there is more open space and natural landscape. Because of the limited available space in Dublin, equestrian trails are intended to connect STANDARDS with other planned trails in neighboring communities and park districts. © The types of trails that are indicated in this master plan include: Parkway: Paved path suitable for bicycles and pedestrians which is physically separated from the street and not a part of the road section. Bicycle Trails: Usually a paved lane, 8 to 10 feet wide, along the side of the road or street which are signed and designated for that purpose. Creekside Trails: Paved trails along creeks for pedestrian and potential bicycle use. Open Space Trails: Unpaved trails for equestrian and hiking use. GENERAL TRAIL DESIGN Trail design should include appropriate landscaping to provide a pleasant visual and physical environment, including protection from sun, wind, noise and traffic hazards. • Where feasible and desirable, trail projects should accommodate more than one type of trail use. • Design the trail to require as little maintenance as possible over time and to avoid steep inclines. • Preserve existing vegetation, removing only as much as necessary to accommodate the trail. Analyze existing topography and locate trails so that minimal grading is required. DUBLIN PARKS 68 1 n PARKWAY TRAIL DESIGN The parkway links Eastern Dublin with the remainder of the community. As an important community spine it should be visually distinct. It should accommodate both bicycle and pedestrian use, both separated from the street whenever possible. The design of the parkway should promote its use as an alternative to the automobile. Parkway should be well landscaped and lighted. Easement Width: Minimum 20 feet along major street or parkway (both sides). Pedestrian Path: Minimum 5 feet wide, concrete. Bicycle Path: Minimum 8 feet, maximum 12 feet wide; 12 feet where joint use with pedestrians. Asphalt or concrete. Rest Areas: Rest area should include a bench and drinking fountain. BIKEWAYS "Bikeway" is used as a general term to designate all facilities that provide bicycle travel in someway. There STANDARDS are three classifications of bikeways, all conforming to Caltrans classifications and design standards. • Class I Bikeway (Bike Path). Provides for bicycle travel on a right-of-way completely separated from any street or highway. • Class II Bikeway (Bike Lane). Provides a striped, signed lane for one -way bike travel on a street or roadway. • Class III Bikeway (Bike Route). Provides for shared use with pedestrian or motor vehicle traffic and may be signed but is not striped. CLASS • The minimum paved width for a two -way bike path should be eight feet with a two -foot wide, cleared shoulder on both sides. Ifheavy traffic or significant pedestrian traffic is expected, the width ofthe paved path should be increased to 12 feet or more. • The vertical clearance to obstructions across the clear width of path should be a minimum of 8 feet. • A yellow centerline stripe maybe used to separate the path into two lanes. This is particularly beneficial in areas of heavy use and on curves with restricted sight distance, or where the path is not lighted. • When crossing an arterial street, the crossing should occur at the pedestrian crossing where motorists can be expected to stop. Mid block crossings should only be used where a nearby intersection does not exist, should be adequately signed with warning signs and located to provide good site distance. Traffic signals, "Stop" or "Yield" signs for bicyclists should be installed. • For minimum speed design for bike paths, conform with Caltrans Highway Design Manual. Signage should conform to Caltrans design standards. DUBLIN PARKS .! CLASS II • Bike lanes for preferential use by bicycles should be established within the paved area of the roadway. • Bike lane stripes should be continuous to separate the bike lane from traffic and parking lanes. • Bike lanes should be one -way and a minimum of 5 feet wide. • Signage should conform to Caltrans standards. CLASS III • Drainage grates, manhole covers etc. on bikeways should be designed and installed in a manner that provides a safe surface for bicycle tires. They should be maintained flush with the surface ofthe adjacent paving. • Place "Bikeway" signs along the route to inform the car driver that bicyclists use the roadway. Fig. 15 Class I Bikeway Additional Additional Road Width Road Width Fig. 16 Class II Bikeway DUBLIN PARKS 70 BICYCLE PARKING Adequate and secure bicycle parking will encourage bicycling as an alternative to the automobile for commuting and utility trips. Parking will be particularly important when other bikeways such as the Iron Horse Trail increase bicycle use. Bicycle parking should be located in the downtown shopping district, at commuter park and ride lots, at public transit access points, and at centers of employment. Racks should be located in areas of high visibility to reduce the possibility of theft. CREEKSIDE TRAIL DESIGN Creekside trails are a desirable community amenity and are a scenic and educational resource. • Width of creek trails should be a function of amount of use and sensitivity of natural resource. However, a minimum 8' width is desirable. • Creek trail design and location should be coordinated with County Flood Control and Fish & Game Agencies. • Maintenance trails along creek banks can frequently serve as trails. The fatal design of the trail must accommodate appropriate maintenance. • Where possible, creek trails should be located at top ofbank. Because these areas are flat, grading is kept to a minimum and existing vegetation can be preserved. Erosion and bank stabilization problems are also minimized. Access to and from streets and access by disabled persons is generally easier when the trail is located at the top of bank. • Where creek trails must be located on slopes, a bench will have to be cut into the slope to provide a flat platform for the trail. The cut should be minimized to preserve as much native vegetation as possible. Generally, the trail should be located as high above the creek as possible. Ease of access to and from the street and by disabled persons should be considered when locating a trail on a slope. • Provide rest areas and overlooks with educational signage to enhance enjoyment of creek area. • Special wildlife habitat areas should be protected from access. Habitatrestoration and creek revegetation should occur in degraded creek areas. • Where creeks are deeply incised, railing or fencing may be necessary to prevent access to the creek. Fag. 17 Creekside Trail DUBLIN PARKS 71 STANDARDS OPEN SPACE TRAIL DESIGN Open space trails, at a minimum, maybe narrow corridors that provide critical linkage to important facilities. However, at best, trail corridors may incorporate many hundreds of acres of significant open space and provide the public with unique opportunities to enjoy the natural environment between developed areas. Frequently, trails in open space areas follow old jeep roads or fire roads. The ideal alignment will "fit" the trail to the ground and will afford users the best views from the trail. The alignment should follow the topography of the land. Long straight stretches should be avoided as well as excessive switch backs. The alignment should angle across the natural slope of the hillside. Alignment directly up or down slope affords little opportunity to drain water away and can cause severe erosion. • Avoid areas with high soil erosion, high fire hazard or unstable slopes. • Where possible, route trails away from residences in order to maintain privacy. rANDARDS © • Establish trail rights -of -way that are wide enough to accommodate the designated uses. For single or double -use trails that permit hiking and/or equestrian use, provide a minimum right-of-way width of 20 feet. Multiple -use trails that permit hiking, equestrian and bicycle use, provide a minimum right -of -way width of 30 to 40 feet. STAGING AREA AND TRAIL HEADS FOR HIKING & EQUESTRIAN TRAILS Regional staging areas are better located on arterial or collector roads in areas that are both convenient to the public and that are easily accessible for maintenance and operation purposes. They should not be located where they would intrude on nearby residents. Care should be taken to locate equestrian staging areas so that trail circulation is not forced to move through areas where equestrian use is incompatible. Regional staging areas should also accommodate horse trailers, drinking water, restrooms, telephone, hitching pots, and a rest area with tables. • Provide lights, gates and fencing, as well as fire hydrants and fire truck turnarounds that address specific needs of police and fire departments. • Identify and utilize existing parking lots on schools and park facilities, wherever possible, to avoid duplication of staging facilities. A trail head is smaller, often consisting of nothing more than a sign. It may also include a small rest area. Whether staging area or trail head, each should be improved to include: • Signs indicating by color and/or graphics trail type; trail name (if appropriate); distance to distinctive feature or trail junction; • Map (where appropriate) showing overall system; • Trash receptacle(s). HIKING TRAILS Hiking trails should bean optimum of3 -5 feet wide. Only very occasionally should itbe at the minimum width of 2 feet. An additional 18" should be added to the width at problem spots, such as steep side slopes or high erosion areas. DUBLIN PARKS 72 [l Fri 1 On major trails, a 5 percent grade should be considered an average maximum. Where necessary, 10 percent grades for short lengths and 20 percent grades for very short lengths are acceptable where stairs are impractical. Stairways can cause erosion and should be avoided. 14IKING/EQUESTRIAN TRAILS All shared hiking/equestrian trail treads should be a minimum 8 feet wide, or a minimum 12 feet wide when used jointly for fire maintenance. Along a precipice or hazardous area, the trail should provide opportunities to allow horses to pass without difficulty. Special trail sections such as culvert crossings or built -up sections across flat areas should have a usable tread at least 3 feet wide. At switch back landings, all graded trails should be 8 feet wide. Long stretches of a uniform grade should be avoided. The grade should vary to provide natural drainage and eliminate monotonous level stretches and long steady grades that are tiring to animal and rider. Grades should be lessened at approaches to switch backs, and the turns should be as nearly level as is practicable. Approaches to road crossings should be nearly level. As a general rule, the trail should not be steeper than 15 percent. The grade may exceed 15 percent for short distances if it does not impair serviceability, safety, preservation and trailside aesthetics. TRAILS AND BIKEWAYS SUMMARY Easement Width Minimum 25 feet along major street or parkway (both sides). Minimum 30 feet where private property abuts on both sides. Pedestrian Path Minimum 5 feet wide. Asphalt, concrete, decomposed granite, or groomed or prepared native soil. Bicycle Path Minimum 8 feet, maximum 12 feet wide; 12 feet where joint use with pedestrians. Asphalt or concrete. Trailheads, Rest Areas Trail head should include street access, parking for 4 to 5 cars minimum, bench, drinking fountain, portable restroom, bike rack for 4 - 6 bikes. Rest area should include a bench and drinking fountain. Regional staging areas should also accommodate horse trailers, drinking water, restrooms and telephone as well as providing lights, gates and fencing. Fire hydrants and fire truck turnarounds that address specific needs of police and fire departments should also be included. Trail Design Trail design should include appropriate landscaping to provide a pleasant visual and physical environment, including protection from sun, wind, noise and traffic hazards. DUBLIN PARKS 73 TANDARDS 2 ft. Minimum, Optimum 3to5 ft. (add 18 inches for difficult areas) Fig. 18 Hiking Trail Hiking / Equestrian Trail 8' ft. Minimum 12' minimum when used jointly with fire maintenance Fig. 19 Hiking/Equestrian Trail DUBLIN PARKS 74 1 1 1 � I � I l OVERVIEW The goals, guiding policies and action programs established in this Master Plan represent an ambi- tious plan. The plan, however, reflects the desire of the residents of Dublin to have and maintain a high quality of parks and recreation facilities. This desire for quality attracts people to live and work in Dublin, and provides a drive to enhance and preserve that essence as the community grows. Table 5 Implementation Priorities Implementation The goal of this chapter of the Master Plan is to identify the costs attendantto the land acquisition, development, operations and maintenance of the proposed parkland and facilities for the enhance- ment of natural resources. The successful imple- mentation of the Master Plan is contingent upon acquisition of land as well as funding for develop- ment, operations, and maintenance of the new facilities. An agressive campaign combining sources of funding will be required to maximize funds to fulfill the objectives of the Plan. Continue school facility improvements ✓ o Iw ✓ Monitor specific plan process to ensure park v z O d0 a a Continue school facility improvements ✓ ✓ ✓ Monitor specific plan process to ensure park land dedication and vehicles for funding park construction ✓ ✓ Explore opportunities for recreational facilities and landscape buffer zone with Camp Parks ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Implement trails along Iron Horse Trail, Alamo Creek and drainage channels ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Secure regional ridge trail and other trail corridors as opportunities exist ✓ ✓ ✓ Secure land for City Park ✓ ✓ ✓ Prepare Master Plan for City Park; implement as funds are available ✓ ✓ ✓ Implement new neighborhood parks concurrent with development ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Continue Heritage Center (Historic Park) improvements ✓ Implement master plan improvements at Dublin Sports Grounds ✓ Continue to monitor recreation demands of community to insure needs are met in a timely manner ✓ DUBLIN PARKS 75 ITI' wJTla� � ►}r ELEMENTATION Table 5 recommends specific immediate action to be taken to initiate implementation of the Master Plan. This will require funding for the necessary specific planning and the acquisition of parkland. The challenge for the City will be to continue to use available regulatory tools and to develop new and creative methods for financing the planned facilities. The experience of other communities shows that a combination of regulatory, public and private funding is likely to be the most suc- cessful approach. The Master Plan addresses park and facility needs to the year 2010. Financ- ing strategies, like the Master Plan, should remain flexible to respond to the changing statutory re- quirements and opportunities that will impact sources of funding over time. This should not, however, limit planning and development of strat- egies to finance these public projects. FUNDING MECHANISMS Current parks capital improvements slated for the City of Dublin include a total of over $1.75 million dollars allocated from General Fund mon- eys, In -Lieu Fees, Measure AA Funds and CDBG. Funds from these sources have been allocated for capital improvements for various park and recre- ation facility upgrades, renovations and develop- ments through the 1996 -97 fiscal year but are subject to change. In addition, there are parks projects totalling approximately $2.5 million dol- lars for which funding is not currently available. When considering the funding responsibilities for parkland acquisition, development and mainte- nance, a number of funding opportunities are available to the City of Dublin. There also exists a number of regulatory mechanisms that should be considered in the City's long range implementa- tion plans. The major funding sources and regu- latory mechanisms include: • Land Dedication • General Fund • In -Lieu Fees • User Fees • Grants • Cooperative Agreements • Bond and Tax Measures • Donations and Transfer of Ownership • Individuals, Business or Non -Profit Founda- tions • Innovative Land Acquisition & Development • Landscape and Lighting District • Special Assessment Districts • Mello Roos Districts • Open Space and Conservation Easements • Transfer of Development Rights • Restrictive Covenants • Performance and Speciality Zoning • Planned Unit Development Table 6 provides an overview of applicable regu- latory mechanisms and funding sources for park acquisition, development ofnew facilities includ- ing trails and bikeways, and the maintenance and operation of these improvements. Each type of financing structure has its own ad- vantages and disadvantages relative to the spe- cific type of project and available resources. A brief discussion of the various funding source follows. LAND DEDICATION NEW QUIMBY ACT The New Quimby Act was enacted by the State Legislature in 1965 and amended in 1982. The Act requires residential developers to provide land or in -lieu fees for park and recreation pur- poses at the time of development. ADVANTAGES: • New parks are provided for at the time of residential development. Land dedication and/or in -lieu fees can be combined dependent on subdivision and best interest of the community. DISADVANTAGES: • The Act makes no provision for operating and maintenance of facilities. DUBLIN PARKS 76 [I fJ C. �J —7 1 1-1 1 1 Table 6 Funding Sources and Regulatory Mechanisms PARKACQUISITION and DEVELOPMENT Coop. Other City Spomored City Sources Some= Sources AeguluoryMechmisms T11 71 City Park � A D A D A D D D D 0 A 0 b v v Community Park D A D A D A D D D D 0 A M M M M 0 a b � m �' A O Y7 D A D A D z y .b D D D 0 A M M M M eo F q ' A b > d D A D 13 r� Q D D 0 A + �✓ •c M D A • QI ^y G 0�4 93. PARKACQUISITION and DEVELOPMENT City Park D A D A D A D D D D 0 A M M M M Community Park D A D A D A D D D D 0 A M M M M Sports Park D A D A D A D D D D 0 A M M M M Neighborhood Parks D A D A D A D D D D 0 A M M M M Historical Park D A D A D A A D D DEVELOPMENT of FACILITIES Community Center A D A D A D D D D A D Recreation Center A D A D A D D D D A D Senior Center A D A D A D D A D A D Aquatics Center A D A D A D D A D A 0 Theater A D A A A D D A TRAILS and BIKEWAYS Trails/Bikeways D A D A A D D D A M M M M MAINTENANCE and OPERATIONS Park Maintenance o A 0 A 0 Contract Maintenance o A A M Appropriate Mechanism D Appropriate for Acquisition and Development 0 Appropriate for Maintenance and Operations A Appropriate for All Funding Needs DUBLIN PARKS 77 IMPLEMENTATION 1EMENTATION to IN -LIEU FEES An in -lieu banking program allows fees collected, in place of direct parkland dedication, to be saved and used to acquire parkland in areas of the City not necessarily adjacent to the proposed develop- ment. ADVANTAGES: • Allows smaller developments to contribute to the overall masterplannedparksystem. Avoids numerous small unrelated mini - parks. • Allows the City to select the most appropriate sites for community parks. DISADVANTAGES: • In -lieu fee levels need continual review to insure that the fees are adequate to actually purchase and develop parkland. • In collecting in -lieu fees rather than requiring parkland dedication, the parks are not devel- oped concurrent with development. Thus, recreation demand on existing facilities will initially be increased. Opportunities to develop park facilities in addition to acquiring parkland through the Planned Development Process will be lost. USER FEES User fees are commonly used methods of collect- ing revenues for public facilities. Common ex- amples are facility use fees, admissions, licenses and permits. ADVANTAGES: User fees generate monies needed to augment City budget allowance to run and expand programs. They can provide an additional source ofrevenue without burdeningthe City's General Fund. Fees can be used to offset the cost of maintenance and operations. DISADVANTAGES: • Fees are not always popular with the public, depending on other financing methods used. The public is less likely to support, for ex- ample, the passage of bonds if there will be significant fees for use of the facilities. GRANTS Grants, although not readily available, provide a flexible source ofrevenue from Federal and State funds. Possible sources include various State bond grants, Transportation grants, Boating and Waterways grants, California Department of Water Conservation fund grants, Department of Water Resources financing and grants, Environmental License Plate fund, CalifomiaArts Council grants and National Endowment for the Arts grants. ADVANTAGES: • Matching and challenge grants also available for funding purposes. DISADVANTAGES: • Some grants are limiting due to specific regu- lations, applications and restrictions. Uncertainty on an annual basis of funding allocations by the State and Federal govern- ment. • Limited grant funding available. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS Cooperative agreements are interagency agree- ments and joint powers agreements with other jurisdications and private conservation organiza- tions. Joint powers agreements between the City, Dublin Unified School District, U.S. military and Alameda County can maximize shared use of property, facilities, equipment and personnel. Cooperative agreements will be ofcritical impor- tance to Dublin to maximize land use and devel- opment around the Camp Park and County Cor- rectional Facility. SCHOOL /CITY COOPERATION School/City Cooperation involves cost sharing of construction and rehabilitation of schools and recreation facilities. Joint agreements often in- clude city lease options that complement school district objectives and needs. ADVANTAGES: • Combines two sources of revenue for an oth- erwise unaffordable facility. DUBLIN PARKS 78 1 1 F Irl DISADVANTAGES: • School sites may not be located where there is greater need for community park and recre- ation development. BONDS GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS General Obligation (GO) securities are backed by the full faith and credit of a public agency. Before they can be issued, the GO authorization must be approved by a two -thirds margin of voters. Gen- erally, an ad valorem tax is levied over the existing property tax base. The tax rate is adjusted annu- ally based upon changes in assessed valuations in order to produce the revenues necessary to service debt requirements. ADVANTAGES: • GO's are supported by voter approved ad valorem taxes and as such, usually command a good rating and favorable interest rate. DISADVANTAGES: • GO's obligate the municipality to guarantee the bonds in the event there are shortfalls in revenues to pay debt service. • Requires a two -thirds voter approval. CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION Certificates of Participation can be agreements with non - profit organizations or industrial or com- mercial businesses as well as with private parties. Certificates of Participation (COP'S) provide a long tern financing through a lease- purchase agreement that does not constitute indebtedness ofthe public agency under the state constitutional debt limitation and is not subject to some of the other statutory requirements applicable to bonds. The COP's allow market investors to purchase interests in a stream of payments from a public entity relating to the payments for the public facility. ADVANTAGES: • COP's are respected in the market and gener- ally command a rating one grade lower than General Obligation Bonds. DISADVANTAGES: • Lease payments by the public agency must be funded annually out of the City's budget. • Reduces the amount of funds that are avail- able for other projects and services. • May not be used for on -going maintenance and operating costs. LIMITED OBLIGATION BONDS LOB's may be used for acquisition or construc- tion ofpublic improvements. Limited Obligation Bonds are securities that are backed by the full faith and credit of a public agency. Before they can be issued, the GO authorization must be approved by a two -thirds margin of voters. ADVANrAGES: • Limited Obligation Bonds pledge only a por- tion of sales and use taxes to secure bonds. • No increase in taxes makes it favorable to voters. • The two -thirds voter approval required for LOB's may be more easily obtained than for GO's as they do not call for any increase in local taxes. DISADVANTAGES: • Requires a two -thirds voter approval. INDIVIDUAL, BUSINESS OR NON - PROFIT FOUNDATIONS SPONSORSHIP Sponsorship is developed in conjunction with business, industry, civic associations and citizens. This type of sponsorship often takes the form of Adapt -a -Park or Adopt -a -Pool, whereby dona- tions of money, time and/or resources are made for part or all of a park or other recreation facili- ties. Museum facilities and programs frequently benefit from sponsorships. Sponsorship can be used for acquisition, development and mainte- nance with actual work performed by citizens. ' DUBLIN PARKS 79 "LEMENTAMN a ADVANTAGES: PRIVATIZATION • Citizen andbusiness involvementcreates pride Privatization is normally defined as the actual and support in what is created and maintained. selling off of formerly public enterprises to the private sector to operate on a profit - making basis. • Relieves demand on General Fund monies or This may include the construction and operation other City resources. of a facility or simply the purchase of existing assets. Privatization usually occurs when assets DISADVANTAGES: are affordable and can be financed and operated with a reasonable return on investment. Golf • Requires significant staffeffortto coordinate. courses, marinas, zoos and theaters are a few examples of joint ventures and privatization of • Maintenance can be inconsistent and raises parks and recreation. some liability issues for the City. ADVANTAGES: • Funding patterns are not certain. • Na voter approval required - ptrmurnnoN DONATIONS © • Lower operating cost to the City. There are numerous fundraising possibilities avail- able for community facilities. It is important to Cash generated from the sale of facilities. identify key individuals, corporations or organi- zations in the community, capable of a major gift DISADVANTAGEs: and those areas where their interest lies. An -ang- . Loss of day -to -day control of facility. ing with foundations, corporations or major do- nors to match funds also provides a positive Limited market for facilities sale or subcon- incentive in public fundraising. tract agreements. ADVANTAGES: • If arrangement creates a "public for profit" • Fundraising has the potential to raise large arrangement any municipal bonds issued for sums of capital thus off setting need for addi- project become taxable. tional taxes, bonds, etc. INNOVATIVE LAND ACQUISITION AND • Monies collected through fundraising are of- DEVELOPMENT ten tax deductible. Planned Development rezoning and development • Fundraising often increases public support agreement process may be used as an opportunity and involvement in the project by including to negotiate potential acquisition, development vested public interest in the process. and maintenance financing for park facilities. DISADVANTAGES: A creek restoration plan might also include a segment of the trail system. The sales office for a • Successful fundraising requires an extensively residential development might be ultimately con - planned public information campaign. This verted to a Satellite facility in a park. Neighbor- effort mustbe maintained intensively through- hood park construction could occur concurrent out the process to encourage large donations with development to facilitate sales. Business and public support. park developments would be encouraged to finan- cially recognize their responsibility to participate • A successful approach requires large gibs in the City's recreation system and overall image. committed at project conception as a predic- tor of fundraising success. Dependent upon ADVANTAGES: local and national economic conditions, this Allows the City to acquire developed parks can be difficult. rather than undeveloped parkland as demand occurs. DUBLIN PARKS 80 1 u 1 1 • Can be a cost effective way to develop park systems. • Allows incremental acquisition of trail corri- dors and open space units. DISADVANTAGEs: • Requires extensive City involvement and co- ordination throughout the development pro- cess. • May require additional policy adoption to insure consistent and defensible application of requirements on development proposals. LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT AND RELATED ACTS LANDSCAPE LIGHTING ACT The Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 estab- lished a special assessment facility. The assess- ments, which may be levied on both residential and commercial properties maybe determined by an outside consultant. There are two criteria used in analyzing the amounts to be assessed each parcel or property: (1) the benefit must be clearly identified; and, (2) the benefit mustbe considered specific and direct. The Act has been specifically amended to provide for the funding of parks and recreation type projects, (see Streets & Highway Code Section 22525.5). Other Benefit Assess- ment District Acts include the Improvement Act of 1911 and the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913. The Improvement Bond Act of 1915 autho- rizes the issuance of bonds. ADVANTAGES: No required registered voter election. The statute does require that the public entity de- termine the assessment for each parcel or property and to prepare a report demonstrat- ing that there is a proportionate benefit to each parcel and that the assessment is fair and equitable. The City Council may confirm the assessment unless there is a 50% or more property owner protest. If there are high value to lien ratios, the security for the bonds should provide attrac- tive interest rates. • Special Assessments require novoterapproval, except in some instances with special assess- ments for fire services. DISADVANTAGEs: • Unlike Mello -Roos District, there must be a determination of specific public benefit analy- sis prepared and confirmed prior to any as- sessments being levied. STREET LIGHTING ACTS There are three major laws that authorize the use of assessments to pay for street lighting systems. The Street Lighting Act of 1919, the Municipal Lighting Maintenance District Act of 1927 and the Street Lighting Act of 1931. The 1919 Act allows installation of new lighting systems if the lights are to be owned by a public utility. The other acts only authorize operation and mainte- nance. ADVANTAGES: • All allow for monies to be distributed for public facilities lighting. DISADVANTAGES: • Tenn limit on 1931 Act of five years. • Term limit of 1919 Act as determined by local government. TREE PLANTING ACT OF 1931 This act enables cities to install, maintain and remove trees, shrubs and other ornamental vege- tation within a city's parks and along its streets. Payment for the work is allowed through special assessments. Maintenance includes "clipping, spraying, fertilizing, irrigation, propping, disease treatment and other similar acts while promoting the life growth, health and beauty" oftrees, shrubs or other ornamental vegetation. An assessment under this act must be limited to five years. ADVANTAGES: • Includes maintenance costs. DISADVANTAGES: • Term limit of five years on assessment. DUBLIN PARKS 81 NPLEMENIAnON ILEMENTATION OTHER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DIS- TRICTS AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT MELLO -ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT BONDS The Mello -Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982 established another method whereby government entities can initiate the formation of separate districts to finance certain public facili- ties. A Mello -Roos District may be formed par- tially or totally within the boundaries of a munici- pality and funds are produced by collecting an annual special tax within the district. The special tax to be levied is determined based upon debt service and any bonds that may be needed for maintenance and operation. The special tax is not considered an ad valorem tax and therefore will not change due to adjustments in property valua- tions. Numerous public facilities may be financed in this manner providing that sufficient non-com - mitted potential tax revenues are expected to be available to service the debt requirements. ADVANTAGES: • The successful creation of a Community Fa- cilities District allows substantial funds to be generated that can be spread uniformly on a minimal per parcel basis. Mello -Roos requires no test of benefit, and can be used for any type of capital facility. • Authorizes financing for the on -going opera- tion costs of police, fire, park, recreation and flood control services. • The tax is a deductible expense by property owners from income for federal income tax purposes. DISADVANTAGES: The drawback to Mello -Roos financing lies in the fact that since there are more than twelve registered voters, a registered voter election must be held, and two -thirds of those voting must approve the special tax. Essentially a minority of those voting could override the majority of the voters approval of the project. Though not always politically popular, this method can be used if the recreation facility continues to have strong public support. MARKS -ROOS BONDS Mark Roos bonds are essentially a bond pool made up of the other bonds that a city has issued or plans to issue. They were created in 1985 to save cities some of the admistrative costs of tracking the disbursements from bond sales pro- ceeds and repayments from individual bond is- sues, and to hedge against future interest rate increases. The funds from the bond sales must be disbursed (lent to developers to create infrastruc- ture) within three years of the issue date and are repayable within a 30 -year term. ADvANTAGES: • Provides flexibility regarding structure, tim- ing and method of sale. BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT The Benefit Assessment Act finances projects plus parks, libraries, fire and police stations, schools, traffic signals and other public facilities. ADVANTAGES: • Allows for broad uses with no voter approval required. The Facilities Benefit Assessment District funding mechanism has withstood a court challenge. DiSADVANTAGEs: • "Pay -as- you -go" financing is not always de- sirable as it may limit long -term planning. • No bonds are issued with this financing op- tion. COMMUNITY REHABILITATION DISTRICT The Community Rehabilitation District Act (SB 1322, government Code Section 53370) provides monies to rehabilitate capital improvements in- cluding public buildings, libraries, parks and rec- reational facilities. DUBLIN PARKS 82 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 u 1 ADVANTAGEs: Bonds may be issued with a majority voters' approval. DISADVANTAGES: • No new taxing authority. GEOLOGIC HAZARD ABATEMENT DISTRICT Geologic Hazard Abatement District (GRAD) is an assessment district, formed for the purpose of prevention, mitigation, abatement, or control of a geologic hazard, including but not limited to the acquisition ofproperty, construction, orthe main- tenance, repair or operation ofany improvements, or the issuance and servicing of bonds issued to finance improvements. A GHAD is comprised of an area within a local agency which is specially benefitted by, and is subject to a special assess- ment to pay for the cost of improvements. OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION EASEMENTS The Open Space Easement Act of 1974 made available a voluntary program through which lo- cal governments can obtain the conservation value of property which it does not actually own. The open space easement is a restriction which runs with the land and restricts the potential use of land for the purpose of preserving its natural or scenic character. The benefit to the landowner who either grants or sells such an easement is a reduc- tion in property tax assessments and an income tax deduction. Open space easements include con- servation, scenic or trail corridors easements. ADVANTAGES: • Protects open space areas without necessitat- ing full -fee purchase. DISADVANTAGES: • Care must be taken in determing appropriate easement. Uses of open space are restricted to the type of easement. Thus, a scenic easement will not allow a public trail. TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS Transferable development rights can be utilized by the City to allow the development rights of a parcel located in an area of significant resource value to be transferred to another location with less resource value. The transfer of development rights would allow a developer to build on the development parcel athigher densitiesthan would otherwise be allowed under zoning and would preserve the parcel with resource value. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS A Restrictive Covenant is a mechanism whereby landowners enter into an agreement which re- stricts the use of their land to a specific, however it doesn't require 2 parties - only requires owner of land to place a restriction on it. The intention of a restrictive covenant is the preservation of land in its natural state for the protection of significant wildlife habitat, a viewshed or for other resource value. The agreement for such covenants can be proffered by the City of Dublin or through a conservation organization. PERFORMANCE/SPECIALTY ZONING This regulatory mechanism provides specific cri- teria to be met, including clustering of structures to protect open space or preservation of corridors for trail or park uses. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Planned Unit Development is a conventional tool used to encourage more creative site designs for commercial or residential units to allow preserva- tion of open space. SUMMARY Consideration shouldbe givento financingprojects by using a combination of various statutes and financing structures. Financing methods requir- ing voter approval must be planned far in advance to ensure sufficient time to mount a public infor- mation and voter campaign for successful passage of funding options. DUBLIN PARKS 83 IMPLEMENTATION COST OF DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATIONS CONSTRUCTION COSTS The actual cost to construct the facilities identi- fied in the Master Plan will be contingent upon a number of factors. Among these are: Site Conditions: Until a final site is selected, the actual cost to develop the site will not be known. Subsoil conditions can significantly impact con- struction costs for park land development and building construction. Design Criteria and Specialized Materials: The facilities development plan calls for the construc- tion of quality parks and buildings. Experience has shown that the investment in high quality materials and systems has significant lifecycle cost benefit. By using materials and systems that extend serviceability and reduce maintenance over the life of a facility, the result can be significant savings in maintenance costs. .Land Acquisition: The cost of land acquisition has not been included in the cost estimates that follow. The required acreage has, however, been provided so as those costs are known, they can be used to update the plan. Furnishings and Equipment: The total project cost will be impacted by the actual furnishings and equipment selected. Again, lifecycle consider- ations will be an important criteria in making the final selections. Date of Construction: The actual date of con- struction of the parks and community facilities will have a significant impact on project costs. The construction cost estimates are based on current dollars and must be adjusted for inflation. Development costs for the Phase 1 projects are identified in Table 7 below. At a Master Plan level, the budgets represent a "magnitude ofcost" and should be refined as the City moves forward with a specific project. A budget figure, ex- pressed as a range, has been included for annual operating costs and potential revenue. The ex- pense figures provided do not include the cost of financing capital construction. OPERATING COSTS The cost for maintaining both park land and community buildings represents a significant on- going financial commitment. The public's de- mand for these facilities leads to intensive use which in turn, impacts maintenance costs. Many factors will influence operating costs, including programs, environmental conditions, hours ofuse, utility costs, and source of labor, to name a few. Again, the range of cost presented reflects an average based on cost currently incurred by the City and comparable facilities. Table 7 Capital Costs and Operation Revenue (Figures provided in 1994 dollars) Description Project Cost Operating Cost Potential Revenue City Park $7,379,0001 $350,000- $425,000 Community Center $4,554,000 $250,000- $325,000 $275,000 - $350,000 Senior Center $1,485,000 $105,000 $20,000450,000 Recreation Center $6,676,000 $350,000- $425,000 $400,0004500,000 Aquatic Complex $1,457,000 $145,0004160,000 $110,000 - $250,0002 TOTALS $21,551,000 1 Community Park costs do not include the lighting of playfields. This cost could range from $80,000 to $700,000 depending on how many fields are to be lighted. Iflighting is desired, it could be done in asubsequent phase. 2 Income will vary widely based on the amenities designed into the pool. DUBLIN PARKS 84 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 POTENTIAL REVENUE Many factors will influence the actual amount of revenue generated by the facilities. Included among these factors are the number of fee based programs and services offered, pricing, market- ing efforts, cost recovery objectives, prioritization of use and rate of community growth. The rev- enue figures provided are based on similar facili- ties in comparable communities. Table 8 City Park Construction Costs (cost provided in 1994 dollars) Outdoor Facilities 4 little league fields (four plex) 6 acres x $110,000 $660,000 1 Babe Ruth field 3 acres x $110,000 $330,000 2 soccer fields (regulation) 3 acres each x $200,000 each $400,000 3 softball fields 2.5 acres each x $110,000 $2751000 4 tennis courts $45,000 each with lights $180,000 2 basketball courts 7,700 SF each x $3.50 /SF $53,900 5 volleyball courts 4,000 SF each x $5.00 SF sand (2 courts) $40,000 ' Contingency'(10%) $120,964 Total Outdoor Facility Cost $7,378,852 ' Structures Community Center $4,553,969 Senior Center $1,485,473 Aquatic Center $1,456,928 Total Cost, Structures $14,172,457 (see the Appendix for detailed cost breakdowns) Total City Park Cost $14,875,222 1 ' DUBLIN PARKS 85 MWLEMENTATION 6,000 SF each x $1.50 SF grass (3 courts) $27,000 Parkland (20 acres) $125,000 /acre ' (range of $100,000 - $150,000) $2,500,000 Play areas 4,200 SF each x 2 x $20 /SF $168,000 Picnic area (upgraded) 6,000 SF x $17 1SF $102,000 Maintenance Facility $500,000 Parking (200 spaces) $262,500 Total Construction Construction Contingency (10 1/6) $5,498,400 $549,840 Fees, Testing, Permits (20 9/6) $1,209,648 ' Contingency'(10%) $120,964 Total Outdoor Facility Cost $7,378,852 ' Structures Community Center $4,553,969 Senior Center $1,485,473 Aquatic Center $1,456,928 Total Cost, Structures $14,172,457 (see the Appendix for detailed cost breakdowns) Total City Park Cost $14,875,222 1 ' DUBLIN PARKS 85 MWLEMENTATION